Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCORRESPONDENCE - 85A Orozco, Norma From:Rosalia Colorado <myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com> Sent:Saturday, July 04, 2020 2:11 PM To:Penaloza, David Subject:Wearing a mask should be a choice; protect your constituents Re: Wearing a mask should be a choice; protect your constituents Dear Council Member Penaloza, I am writing to urge you to do your part to make sure that mask-wearing is voluntary, not mandatory. Many jurisdictions are basing their face mask policies on guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The CDC has flip-flopped its position on face coverings several times since March but is now recommending that everyone wear a mask in public. This recommendation is not supported by strong empirical evidence. Though there is science to support mask-wearing, there’s also a preponderance of science showing that masks can cause considerable harm and are ineffective in preventing the spread of coronavirus. There is also no science supporting the use of masks by healthy individuals. So emergency orders that are being issued to help protect public health are actually hurting individuals’ physical and emotional well being — and violating their basic human rights, constitutional rights and religious rights. Evidence that masks reduce the transmission of viral respiratory infections within community settings is equivocal at best. A recent meta-analysis (bit.ly/2VHaubd) that included nearly a dozen randomized, controlled trials and 10 observational studies found that there was no clear clinical or laboratory-confirmed evidence that masks prevent infection. Even the U.S. Surgeon General has noted that masks “are not effective in preventing the general public from catching the coronavirus.” (bit.ly/31Dgdm5) In terms of harm, studies show that wearing a face covering reduces blood and tissue oxygenation — which can be deadly — while increasing carbon dioxide levels. The use of masks can also increase the risk of infection and the spread of viral illness (particularly cloth masks), hinder detoxification that occurs through exhalation, impair the immune system, and cause a wide range other physical and psychological issues. (bit.ly/31Epv1e). Moreover, some masks have been found to contain known carcinogens, which put people at risk from inhaling toxic chemicals and having them come into contact with their skin. There is no science to support the use of masks by healthy individuals, and the World Health Organization backed this up when it said, “WHO stands by recommendations to not wear masks if you are not sick or caring for someone who is sick.” Forcing healthy individuals to wear face coverings is a completely unnecessary intervention that dehumanizes their interactions with others. More important, it eliminates their right to make informed decisions about what risks and precautions they are willing to take. It is unethical and unconstitutional to subject healthy, law-abiding citizens to measures that can result in physical and emotional harm and that impinge on their ability to move freely throughout society. For those with deeply held religious beliefs, mask mandates violate their ability to abide by natural law and follow their convictions to walk in faith, not fear. As such, the decision to wear a mask is a highly personal one and should not be universally mandated; measures that are meant to protect the community as a whole are not effective if they hurt individuals in that community. 1 Mandatory medicine and mandated interventions such as social distancing and mask-wearing have no place in a free society; citizens want to maintain the right to make responsible decisions about what is best for themselves and their children based on their own unique circumstances. I urge you to do the right thing, stand for choice and protect all individuals by encouraging — not mandating — the use of face masks in the community. This policy can be bolstered by asking at-risk populations and those who are sick to self-quarantine, with society taking the best care of them possible. Thank you for your continued leadership during these unprecedented times and for upholding the health and the rights of your constituents. Praying for you all! Sincerely, Rosalia Colorado rosienowh@icloud.com 1001 w. Stevens ave. Unit 230 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com 2 Orozco, Norma From:Ramiro Hernandez <myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com> Sent:Saturday, July 04, 2020 2:08 PM To:Penaloza, David Subject:Please ensure masks are a choice in our communities Re: Please ensure masks are a choice in our communities Dear Council Member Penaloza, I am writing to urge you to do your part to make sure that mask-wearing is voluntary, not mandatory in our communities. Many jurisdictions are basing their face mask policies on guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The CDC has flip-flopped its position on face coverings several times since March but is now recommending that everyone wear a mask in public. This recommendation is not supported by strong empirical evidence. Though there is science to support mask-wearing, there’s also a preponderance of science showing that masks can cause considerable harm and are ineffective in preventing the spread of coronavirus. There is also no science supporting the use of masks by healthy individuals. So emergency orders that are being issued to help protect public health are actually hurting individuals’ physical and emotional well being — and violating their basic human rights, constitutional rights and religious rights. Evidence that masks reduce the transmission of viral respiratory infections within community settings is equivocal at best. A recent meta-analysis (bit.ly/2VHaubd) that included nearly a dozen randomized, controlled trials and 10 observational studies found that there was no clear clinical or laboratory-confirmed evidence that masks prevent infection. Even the U.S. Surgeon General has noted that masks “are not effective in preventing the general public from catching the coronavirus.” (bit.ly/31Dgdm5) In terms of harm, studies show that wearing a face covering reduces blood and tissue oxygenation — which can be deadly — while increasing carbon dioxide levels. The use of masks can also increase the risk of infection and the spread of viral illness (particularly cloth masks), hinder detoxification that occurs through exhalation, impair the immune system, and cause a wide range other physical and psychological issues. (bit.ly/31Epv1e). Moreover, some masks have been found to contain known carcinogens, which put people at risk from inhaling toxic chemicals and having them come into contact with their skin. There is no science to support the use of masks by healthy individuals, and the World Health Organization backed this up when it said, “WHO stands by recommendations to not wear masks if you are not sick or caring for someone who is sick.” Forcing healthy individuals to wear face coverings is a completely unnecessary intervention that dehumanizes their interactions with others. More important, it eliminates their right to make informed decisions about what risks and precautions they are willing to take. It is unethical and unconstitutional to subject healthy, law-abiding citizens to measures that can result in physical and emotional harm and that impinge on their ability to move freely throughout society. For those with deeply held religious beliefs, mask mandates violate their ability to abide by natural law and follow their convictions to walk in faith, not fear. As such, the decision to wear a mask is a highly personal one and should not be universally mandated; measures that are meant to protect the community as a whole are not effective if they hurt individuals in that community. 1 Mandatory medicine and mandated interventions such as social distancing and mask-wearing have no place in a free society; citizens want to maintain the right to make responsible decisions about what is best for themselves and their children based on their own unique circumstances. I urge you to do the right thing, stand for choice and protect all individuals by encouraging — not mandating — the use of face masks in the community. This policy can be bolstered by asking at-risk populations and those who are sick to self-quarantine, with society taking the best care of them possible. Thank you for your continued leadership during these unprecedented times and for upholding the health and the rights of your constituents. Sincerely, Ramiro Hernandez yoda8911@icloud.com 1001 w Stevens ave #230 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com 2 Orozco, Norma From:Momica Beilhart <myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com> Sent:Saturday, July 04, 2020 6:22 AM To:Penaloza, David Subject:Please ensure masks are a choice in our communities Re: Please ensure masks are a choice in our communities Dear Council Member Penaloza, I am writing to urge you to do your part to make sure that mask-wearing is voluntary, not mandatory in our communities. Many jurisdictions are basing their face mask policies on guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The CDC has flip-flopped its position on face coverings several times since March but is now recommending that everyone wear a mask in public. This recommendation is not supported by strong empirical evidence. Though there is science to support mask-wearing, there’s also a preponderance of science showing that masks can cause considerable harm and are ineffective in preventing the spread of coronavirus. There is also no science supporting the use of masks by healthy individuals. So emergency orders that are being issued to help protect public health are actually hurting individuals’ physical and emotional well being — and violating their basic human rights, constitutional rights and religious rights. Evidence that masks reduce the transmission of viral respiratory infections within community settings is equivocal at best. A recent meta-analysis (bit.ly/2VHaubd) that included nearly a dozen randomized, controlled trials and 10 observational studies found that there was no clear clinical or laboratory-confirmed evidence that masks prevent infection. Even the U.S. Surgeon General has noted that masks “are not effective in preventing the general public from catching the coronavirus.” (bit.ly/31Dgdm5) In terms of harm, studies show that wearing a face covering reduces blood and tissue oxygenation — which can be deadly — while increasing carbon dioxide levels. The use of masks can also increase the risk of infection and the spread of viral illness (particularly cloth masks), hinder detoxification that occurs through exhalation, impair the immune system, and cause a wide range other physical and psychological issues. (bit.ly/31Epv1e). Moreover, some masks have been found to contain known carcinogens, which put people at risk from inhaling toxic chemicals and having them come into contact with their skin. There is no science to support the use of masks by healthy individuals, and the World Health Organization backed this up when it said, “WHO stands by recommendations to not wear masks if you are not sick or caring for someone who is sick.” Forcing healthy individuals to wear face coverings is a completely unnecessary intervention that dehumanizes their interactions with others. More important, it eliminates their right to make informed decisions about what risks and precautions they are willing to take. It is unethical and unconstitutional to subject healthy, law-abiding citizens to measures that can result in physical and emotional harm and that impinge on their ability to move freely throughout society. For those with deeply held religious beliefs, mask mandates violate their ability to abide by natural law and follow their convictions to walk in faith, not fear. As such, the decision to wear a mask is a highly personal one and should not be universally mandated; measures that are meant to protect the community as a whole are not effective if they hurt individuals in that community. 1 Mandatory medicine and mandated interventions such as social distancing and mask-wearing have no place in a free society; citizens want to maintain the right to make responsible decisions about what is best for themselves and their children based on their own unique circumstances. I urge you to do the right thing, stand for choice and protect all individuals by encouraging — not mandating — the use of face masks in the community. This policy can be bolstered by asking at-risk populations and those who are sick to self-quarantine, with society taking the best care of them possible. Thank you for your continued leadership during these unprecedented times and for upholding the health and the rights of your constituents. Sincerely, Momica Beilhart monicabeilhart@yahoo.com 1592 SE Skyline Dr Santa Ana, CA 92705 Constituent Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact info@oneclickpolitics.com 2 Orozco, Norma From:elizondo.maria1153@gmail.com Sent:Monday, July 06, 2020 10:34 PM To:eComment Subject:CITY COUNSEL MEETING 7/7/2020 Dear City Council, I am writing in regards to several Agenda Items for your meeting on 7/7/2020. 23A. Construction Contract for All American Asphalt – I understand that this work may have been done, but what kind of inspection of work is being done for these repairs. Myself and my family have driven on many streets that were “supposedly” repaired, but they are actually done very poorly and need more work. In particular is the area of Raitt and th 5 Street. The road was repaved, however it still has the same holes and very uneven pavement that makes driving in that area hazardous and taxes your vehicles wear and tear. Please ensure that if you are approving companies to do work, that it is thoroughly inspected and that the city has the right of refusal to pay unless it is fixed to the council / citizens satisfaction. If the repair was done to your home driveway, you know that you would be un-satisfied with the work and want it fixed. Treat of city streets like it your street and the money is coming out of your pocket. 25G. Amendment to Police Officers Association – Please do not give the police officers of our city a pay raise at this time. The extension needs to be a length of at least 2-3 years so that the police department can be thoroughly investigated for the issues that have been raised in recent weeks. We do need our officers, but we cannot in good conscience provide them a pay raise when many of them do not perform their duties in a proper fashion, to include harassment of citizens, police brutality, corruption, and a basic lack of human decency for all citizens of our city. 85A and 85B. Please pass this order as the wearing of face masks and having hand sanitizer available due to the COVID- 19 pandemic is a must for the citizens of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, and our country as a whole. As we all have seen, the positive test rates have increased since the Governor started to open things back up. All business should adopt the policy of “NO MASK, NO SERVICE” and not allow people without a mask in their premises. I have seen too many people just walking around like they are invinsible and will not get the disease. It is starting to reach people of all ages as the new reports show that the average age of those contracting the virus is decreasing. We must realize that we are not just taking these precautions for ourselves, but for our fellow man. 85C. Please approve this action to have the Staff report on how to curb / stop the street racing in South Santa Ana. Too many nights we can hear the cars screatching down the streets at all hours and have the sound turn into a crash. Our family has lost friends to these actions and they are senseless deaths that could be avoided. While this may seem to be a difficult task, it is a task that must be tackled head on and with great persistence. We are losing too many young lives of our city who could have gone on to live successful and fruitful lives. We need the police to be more proactive in stopping these incidents from happening. Please have a report ready to be discussed and ask the public for their thoughts as well as their lives have been directly touched by street racing. Lastly, I did not see an agenda item where the council is reducing the budget for assisting persons who are potentially being deported or held by ICE. Please excuse me I missing this in the agenda. Cutting this funding is a travesty. There are way too many people in our city who need this assistance as it is vital to them and their family to be treated fairly and with respect in being in our city and country. Please increase the funding back to prior levels or to an increased level so that the Immigrant Defenders Law Center can do more good for our citizens. Lupe Elizondo 1 Orozco, Norma From:Jarvis Jennings <jarvisjay2@twc.com> Sent:Monday, July 06, 2020 10:35 PM To:eComment Subject:7/7/2020 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA ITEMS Importance:High Dear City Council, I am writing in regards to several Agenda Items for your meeting on 7/7/2020. 23A. Construction Contract for All American Asphalt – I understand that this work may have been done, but what kind of inspection of work is being done for these repairs. Myself and my family have driven on many streets that were “supposedly” repaired, but they are actually done very poorly and need more work. In particular is the area of Raitt and th 5 Street. The road was repaved, however it still has the same holes and very uneven pavement that makes driving in that area hazardous and taxes your vehicles wear and tear. Please ensure that if you are approving companies to do work, that it is thoroughly inspected and that the city has the right of refusal to pay unless it is fixed to the council / citizens satisfaction. If the repair was done to your home driveway, you know that you would be un-satisfied with the work and want it fixed. Treat of city streets like it your street and the money is coming out of your pocket. 25G. Amendment to Police Officers Association – Please do not give the police officers of our city a pay raise at this time. The extension needs to be a length of at least 2-3 years so that the police department can be thoroughly investigated for the issues that have been raised in recent weeks. We do need our officers, but we cannot in good conscience provide them a pay raise when many of them do not perform their duties in a proper fashion, to include harassment of citizens, police brutality, corruption, and a basic lack of human decency for all citizens of our city. 85A and 85B. Please pass this order as the wearing of face masks and having hand sanitizer available due to the COVID- 19 pandemic is a must for the citizens of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, and our country as a whole. As we all have seen, the positive test rates have increased since the Governor started to open things back up. All business should adopt the policy of “NO MASK, NO SERVICE” and not allow people without a mask in their premises. I have seen too many people just walking around like they are invincible and will not get the disease. It is starting to reach people of all ages as the new reports show that the average age of those contracting the virus is decreasing. We must realize that we are not just taking these precautions for ourselves, but for our fellow man. 85C. Please approve this action to have the Staff report on how to curb / stop the street racing in South Santa Ana. Too many nights we can hear the cars screeching down the streets at all hours and have the sound turn into a crash. Our family has lost friends to these actions and they are senseless deaths that could be avoided. While this may seem to be a difficult task, it is a task that must be tackled head on and with great persistence. We are losing too many young lives of our city who could have gone on to live successful and fruitful lives. We need the police to be more proactive in stopping these incidents from happening. Please have a report ready to be discussed and ask the public for their thoughts as well as their lives have been directly touched by street racing. Lastly, I did not see an agenda item where the council is reducing the budget for assisting persons who are potentially being deported or held by ICE. Please excuse me I missing this in the agenda. Cutting this funding is a travesty. There are way too many people in our city who need this assistance as it is vital to them and their family to be treated fairly and with respect in being in our city and country. Please increase the funding back to prior levels or to an increased level so that the Immigrant Defenders Law Center can do more good for our citizens. 1 Jarvis Jennings 2 Orozco, Norma From:damansonfire <damansonfire@aol.com> Sent:Tuesday, July 07, 2020 4:24 AM To:eComment Subject:Masks Dear Council, Have all protesters use a mask and practice social distancing while protesting. Manuel Delgadillo Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone 1 3 ­³  !­ Ǿ #! ΘΑΖΏΓ ¨­¥®͔³§ ¨µ¨¤³¯§ ­ȁ¢®¬ *´«¸ ΖǾ ΑΏΑΏ $¤ ± (®­®± ¡«¤ - ¸®±  ­£ -¤¬¡¤±² ®¥ ³§¤ 3 ­³  !­  #¨³¸ #®´­¢¨«Ǿ )  ¬ ¶±¨³¨­¦ ¸®´ ³®£ ¸ ±¤¦ ±£¨­¦ ²¤µ¤± « ¨³¤¬² ³® ¡¤ £¨²¢´²²¤£ ³®­¨¦§³  ³ ³§¤ 3 ­³  !­  #¨³¸ #®´­¢¨« ¬¤¤³¨­¦ȁ )³¤¬ ΕΔ#Ȁ #§ ±³¤± !¬¤­£¬¤­³² 3¤¢³¨®­ ΓΏΐȁΏΐ 4¤±¬ ,¨¬¨³² 4§¤ ¢§ ±³¤± ²§®´«£ ¡¤  ¬¤­£¤£ ³® ±¤¬®µ¤ ³§¤ ¤¨¦§³ȃ¸¤ ± ¢®®«¨­¦ ¯¤±¨®£  ­£  ««®¶  ­ ¤«¤¢³¤£ ®¥¥¨¢¨ « ³® ²¤±µ¤ ­® ¬®±¤ ³§ ­   ³®³ « ®¥ ΑΏ ¸¤ ±² ®­ ³§¤ £ ¨²ȁ "¸  ««®¶¨­¦  ­ ¤¨¦§³ȃ¸¤ ± ¢®®«¨­¦ ®¥¥ ¯¤±¨®£  ¥³¤± ³§¤ ΑΏȃ¸¤ ± ³®³ «Ǿ ¶¤±¤ ¤­¢®´± ¦¨­¦ ¢ ±¤¤± ¯®«¨³¨¢¨ ­² ³® ¡¨£¤ ³§¤¨± ³¨¬¤Ǿ ¢®­³¨­´¤ ³® ± ¨²¤ ¬®­¤¸Ǿ  ­£ ¢®¬¤ ¡ ¢ª ³® ®¥¥¨¢¤ȁ 4§¤ ¢´±±¤­³ ³¤±¬ «¨¬¨³² £® ­®³§¨­¦ ¬®±¤ ³§ ­ ´¯§®«£   ²¸²³¤¬ ¨­ ¶§¨¢§ ¯®«¨³¨¢¨ ­²  ±¤ ±¤¶ ±£¤£ ¥®± ­®³§¨­¦ ¬®±¤ ³§ ­ ¡¤¨­¦  ±®´­£ ¥®±   «®­¦ ³¨¬¤Ǿ ¶§¤³§¤± ®± ­®³ ³§¤¸ ¶¤±¤ ¤¥¥¤¢³¨µ¤ ®± ±¤²¯®­²¨µ¤ ³® ³§¤ ¢®¬¬´­¨³¸ȁ 2¤²¨£¤­³²  ±¤ ³§ ­ª¥´« ¥®± ³§¤ ¯´¡«¨¢ ²¤±µ¨¢¤¢®´­¢¨« ¬¤¬¡¤±² § µ¤ ¯±®µ¨£¤£Ǿ ¡´³ ¶¤ ¬´²³ ¬ ª¤ ±®®¬ ¥®± ³§¤ ­¤·³ ¦¤­¤± ³¨®­ ®¥ «¤ £¤±²ȁ 2¤²¨£¤­³²£®­³ § µ¤ ³® ¡¤   ¢®´­¢¨« ¬¤¬¡¤± ³® ¡¤¯´¡«¨¢ ²¤±µ ­³²³§¤¸¢ ­ ²¤±µ¤ ®­ ¢¨³¸ ¢®¬¬¨²²¨®­²Ǿ «¤ £­¤¨¦§¡®±§®®£  ²²®¢¨ ³¨®­²Ǿ ¡¤   ¯ ±³ ®¥ #®¬¬ȃ,¨­ªǾ ®± ©®¨­ ¬¸±¨ £ ®³§¤± ¢®¬¬´­¨³¸ȃ®±¨¤­³¤£ ®±¦ ­¨¹ ³¨®­² ³§ ³ §¤«¯ ±¤²¨£¤­³² ¨­ 3 ­³  !­ ȁ 3¤¢³¨®­ ΐΑΏΕȀ # ¬¯ ¨¦­ #®­³±¨¡´³¨®­ ,¨¬¨³ ³¨®­ # ­£¨£ ³¤² ¥®± ¤«¤¢³¤£ ®¥¥¨¢¤ ²§®´«£ ¡¤  ² ³± ­²¯ ±¤­³  ² ¯®²²¨¡«¤Ǿ ¡¤¢ ´²¤ µ®³¤±² § µ¤   ±¨¦§³ ³® ¶§® ¨² ¨­¥«´¤­¢¨­¦ ³§¤¨± ¤«¤¢³¨®­²ȁ 3¤¢³¨®­ ΐΑΏΕȁΏΐȀ 2¤°´¨±¤£ $¨²¢«®²´±¤² ) ¥´««¸ ²´¯¯®±³ ³§¨² ­¤¶ £¨²¢«®²´±¤ ¯±®µ¨²¨®­ȁ !² ²³ ³¤£  ¡®µ¤Ǿ ¶¤ ²§®´«£ ²³±¨µ¤ ¥®±  ² ¬´¢§ ³± ­²¯ ±¤­¢¸ ¨­ ®´± ¤«¤¢³¨®­²  ² ¯®²²¨¡«¤Ǿ ¡¤¢ ´²¤ µ®³¤±² § µ¤   ±¨¦§³ ³® ª­®¶ ¶§® ¨² £®­ ³¨­¦ ³® ¶§®¬ȁ &´±³§¤±Ǿ ®­¤  ££¨³¨®­ « ¢ ¬¯ ¨¦­ ¥¨«¨­¦ ¨² ­®³ £¨¥¥¨¢´«³ ³® £®Ǿ  ­£  ­¸ ²¤±¨®´² ¢ ­£¨£ ³¤ ¥®± ®¥¥¨¢¤ ¶¨«« ¡¤  ¡«¤ ³® ¥¨¦´±¤ ¨³ ®´³ȁ 4§¨² ¯±¤ȃ¤«¤¢³¨®­ ¥¨«¨­¦ §¤«¯² ¤­²´±¤ ³§ ³ ­® « ²³ȃ¬¨­´³¤ ¢®­³±¨¡´³¨®­²  ±¤ §¨££¤­Ǿ ®­«¸ ³® ¡¤ £¨²¢®µ¤±¤£  ¥³¤± ³§¤ ¤«¤¢³¨®­ § ² ¤­£¤£ȁ )³¤¬ ΕΔ$Ȁ "udget Ordinance ) £® ­®³ ²´¯¯®±³ ³§¤ ¡´£¦¤³  ² ¨³ ¨² ¢´±±¤­³«¸ ¢± ¥³¤£ȁ 4§¤ 5­¨µ¤±² « 2¤¯±¤²¤­³ ³¨®­ ¯±®¦± ¬ ¨­ 3 ­³  !­  ¨²   µ¨³ « ¯ ±³ ®¥ ¤­²´±¨­¦ ³§ ³ ®´± ´­£¤±±¤¯±¤²¤­³¤£ ±¤²¨£¤­³² ¥ ¢¨­¦ £¤¯®±³ ³¨®­ § µ¤ 3 ­³  !­ Ǿ #! ΘΑΖΏΓ ¨­¥®͔³§ ¨µ¨¤³¯§ ­ȁ¢®¬ «¤¦ « ±¤²®´±¢¤²ȁ 3 ­³  !­  ¨²   ¯±®´£ ² ­¢³´ ±¸ ¢¨³¸Ǿ ¡¤¢ ´²¤ ¶¤  ±¤ ¯±®´£ ®¥ ®´± ¨¬¬¨¦± ­³ §¤±¨³ ¦¤ȁ 4§¨² ¯±®¦± ¬ ­®³ ®­«¸ ´¯§®«£² ³§¤ µ «´¤² ¶¤ ¤²¯®´²¤Ǿ ¨³ ¬ ª¤²  ­ ¤­®±¬®´² £¨¥¥¤±¤­¢¤ ¨­ ³§¤ «¨µ¤² ®¥ ³§¤ ¢«¨¤­³²  ­£ ³§¤¨± ¥ ¬¨«¨¤²Ǿ  ­£ ¨³ §¤«¯² ³® ¯±®³¤¢³ ³§¤ ¥ ¡±¨¢ ®¥ ®´± ­¤¨¦§¡®±§®®£²  ­£ ¢®¬¬´­¨³¨¤²ȁ 7§¤­ ¡´£¦¤³²  ±¤ ³¨¦§³Ǿ ) ª­®¶ ¢´³² § µ¤ ³® ¡¤ ¬ £¤ȁ "´³ ͡ΑΏΏǾΏΏΏ ³® ² µ¤ «¨µ¤²  ­£ ¯±¤µ¤­³ ¥ ¬¨«¨¤² ¥±®¬ ¡¤¨­¦ ²¤¯ ± ³¤£ ¨² ­®³ ³®® §¨¦§   ¯±¨¢¤ȁ &´±³§¤±Ǿ ) £® ­®³ ²´¯¯®±³ ³§¤ ¢´±±¤­³ ¡´£¦¤³ ¡¤¢ ´²¤ ¶¤±¤ ¨­¢±¤ ²¨­¦ ¤·¯¤­£¨³´±¤² ¥®± ¯´¡«¨¢ ² ¥¤³¸ ¡¸ ³§¤ ¬¨««¨®­² ¶§¤­ ¶¤ £® ­®³ § µ¤ ³§¤ ¥´­£² ³® £® ²®ȁ )  ¬ ¦± ³¤¥´« ³§ ³ ®´± ®¥¥¨¢¤±²  ±¤ ¶¨««¨­¦ ³® £¤« ¸ ¯ ¸ ± ¨²¤² ¡¸ ²¨· ¬®­³§²Ǿ ¡´³ ³§¨² ¯ ­£¤¬¨¢  ­£ ³§¤ ±¤¢¤²²¨®­ ¶¨«« ­®³ ¡¤ ¤­£¨­¦  ­¸³¨¬¤ ²®®­Ǿ ¦¨µ¤­ ³§¤ ±¨²¨­¦ ³±¤­£² ¨­ #/6)$ ¨­¥¤¢³¨®­²  ­£ £¤ ³§²ȁ & ¬¨«¨¤²  ±¤ ²³±´¦¦«¨­¦ ³® ¬ ª¤ ¤­£² ¬¤¤³Ǿ  ­£ ³§¤ #¨³¸ ¨² ²³±´¦¦«¨­¦ ³® ¢®««¤¢³ ³§¤ -¤ ²´±¤ 8 ³ · £®«« ±² ¯±®©¤¢³¤£ ¨­ ΑΏΐΘȁ 3¨· ¬®­³§² ¥±®¬ ­®¶Ǿ ³§¤ #¨³¸ ¶¨«« § µ¤   ¡¨«« ¢®¬¤ £´¤ ¶¨³§®´³  ­¸ ¥´­£² ³® ¯ ¸ ¨³ȁ )³¤¬ ΗΔ!Ȁ & ¢¤ - sks ) ²¨­¢¤±¤«¸ §®¯¤ ³§¤ #¨³¸ ¶¨«« ¥´««¸ ²´¯¯®±³ ³§¤ '®µ¤±­®±² ¤·¤¢´³¨µ¤ ®±£¤± ±¤°´¨±¨­¦ ¥ ¢¤ ¢®µ¤±¨­¦² ¨­ ¯´¡«¨¢ȁ /± ­¦¤ #®´­³¸ § ² ²¤¤­   ¬ ±ª¤£ ¨­¢±¤ ²¤Ǿ ¤²¯¤¢¨ ««¸ §¤±¤ ¨­ 3 ­³  !­ ȁ #«¤ ±«¸Ǿ ¤­¢®´± ¦¨­¦  ­£  £µ¨²¨­¦ ¯¤®¯«¤ ³® ¶¤ ± ¥ ¢¤ ¢®µ¤±¨­¦² ¨­ ¯´¡«¨¢ § ² ­®³ ¡¤¤­ ¶®±ª¨­¦ȁ 4§¤ ¯ ­£¤¬¨¢ ¨² ­®³ ²«®¶¨­¦ £®¶­ ¨­ ³§¤ 5­¨³¤£ 3³ ³¤²ȁ 7¤ § µ¤ ­®³ ¥« ³³¤­¤£ ³§¤ ¢´±µ¤ȁ (®²¯¨³ «²  ±¤ ¥¨««¨­¦ ´¯  ¦ ¨­ȁ 4§¤±¤ ¨² ­® ±¤ ²®­ ¶§¸ ¶¤ ²§®´«£ ­®³ ¢®­³¨­´¤ ³® ²³ ¸  ² µ¨¦¨« ­³  ² ¯®²²¨¡«¤³® ¥¨¦§³ ³§¨² ¯ ­£¤¬¨¢ȁ # «« ¬¤ ²¤«¥¨²§Ǿ ¡´³ ) ¶ ­³ ³® ¡¤  ¡«¤ ³® ²¤¤  ­£ §´¦  ­£ ª¨²² ¬¸ ¬®¬Ǿ ¶§®²  «¬®²³ ΖΏȁ ) ¶ ­³ ³® ²¤¤ ¬¸ ¥±¨¤­£²Ǿ ²¨³ £®¶­  ³ ¬¸ ¥ µ®±¨³¤ ±¤²³ ´± ­³²Ǿ  ­£ ¦® ³® ³§¤ ¬®µ¨¤²ȁ ) ¶ ­³ 3 ­³  !­   ­£ ³§¤ ¢®´­³¸ ³® ¥´««¸ ®¯¤­  ¦ ¨­ȁ ) ¶ ­³ ³® £®  «« ³§¤ ³§¨­¦² ) ¢®´«£ £® ¡¤¥®±¤ ­£ )¬ ²´±¤ )¬ ­®³ ³§¤ ®­«¸ ®­¤ȁ "´³ ) ª­®¶ ³§¤ ®­«¸ ¶ ¸ ³§¨² ¶¨«« § ¯¯¤­ ¨² ¨¥ ¶¤  «« £® ®´± ¯ ±³ȁ )³¤¬ ΗΔ"Ȁ ( ­£ 3 ­¨³¨¹¤± ) ¥´««¸ ²´¯¯®±³ ³§¨² ¨³¤¬ȁ "´²¨­¤²²¤² ²§®´«£ £® ¤µ¤±¸³§¨­¦ ³§¤¸ ¢ ­ ³® ª¤¤¯ ³§¤¨± ¢´²³®¬¤±²  ­£ ¤¬¯«®¸¤¤² ² ¥¤  ² ³§¤ #/6)$ ¢ ²¤² ±¨²¤ ¨­ ³§¤ ¢®´­³¸  ­£ ¨­ 3 ­³  !­ ȁ 6¤±¸ 4±´«¸ 9®´±²Ǿ 4(!) 6)%4 0(!.