HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem No. 2 Public Comment_Yundt
October 10, 2022
Via E-mail
Bao Pham, Chair
Miguel Calderon, Vice Chair
Eric M. Alderete, Commissioner
Thomas Morrisey, Commissioner
Isuri S. Ramos, Commissioner
Mark McLoughlin, Commissioner
Alan Woo, Commissioner
Planning Commission
City of Santa Ana
22 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
PBAecomments@santa-ana.org
Ali Pezeshkpour, Principal Planner
Planning and Building Agency
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20
Santa Ana, CA 92701
apezeshkpour@santa-ana.org
Re: Opposition Comment on the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section
15183 Exemption for the Garry Avenue Business Park Project (Amendment
Application No. 2022-01; Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14); Planning
Commission Agenda Item 2
Dear Chair Pham, Vice Chair Calderon, Honorable City Planning Commissioners, and Mr.
Pezeshkpour:
I am writing on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility
(“SAFER”) regarding the Garry Avenue Business Park Project (Amendment Application No.
202201; Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14), including all actions related or referring to the
proposed construction of a 91,500 square foot industrial building, located at 1700, 1720, and
1740 East Garry Avenue in the City of Santa Ana (“Project”), which is being heard by the
Planning Commission on October 10, 2022 as Agenda Item 2. The City of Santa Ana Planning
Division staff have incorrectly determined that the Project is exempt from further environmental
review pursuant to Section 15183 of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”)
Guidelines.
After reviewing the Community Plan Exemption Checklist (“Exemption Checklist”)
prepared for the Project, as well as the 2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Update
Environmental Impact Report (“GPU EIR”) upon which the Exemption Checklist relies, we
conclude that the City’s consistency determination fails to provide evidence that the Project does
not require further analysis and mitigation under CEQA. In particular, the consistency
Comment on Garry Avenue Business Park Project
Planning Commission Agenda Item 2 (Amendment Application No. 2022 -01; Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14)
October 10, 2022
Page 2 of 7
determination fails to provide evidence to support the Exemption Checklist’s findings that the
Project will not involve environmental effects that:
(1) Are peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project would be
located,
(2) Were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the zoning action,
general plan or community plan with which the project is consistent,
(3) Are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts which
were not discussed in the prior EIR prepared for the general plan, community
plan or zoning action, or
(4) Are previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial
new information which was not known at the time the EIR was certified, are
determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the prior
EIR.
As evidenced by the expert comments submitted by environmental consulting firm
Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (“SWAPE”), additional environmental review is required
because: (1) there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its
site, and (2) the Project would result in any new significant effects not discussed in the GPU
EIR. SWAPE’s comment and curriculum vitae are attached as Exhibit A hereto and are
incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Since the Project is not exempt from CEQA, an initial study must be prepared to
determine the appropriate level of CEQA review required.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project proposes to demolish 105,558-square-feet (“SF”) of office space and
construct 81,500-SF of warehousing and distribution space, 10,000-SF of office space, and 145
parking spaces on the 5.2-acre site in the City of Santa Ana, California.
LEGAL STANDARD
The EIR is the very heart of CEQA. (Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of
Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1214 [“Bakersfield Citizens”]; Pocket Protectors v.
City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 927 [“Pocket Protectors”].) The EIR is an
“environmental ‘alarm bell’ whose purpose is to alert the public and its responsible officials to
environmental changes before they have reached the ecological points of no return.” (Bakersfield
Citizens, 124 Cal.App.4th at 1220.) The EIR also functions as a “document of accountability,”
intended to “demonstrate to an apprehensive citizenry that the agency has, in fact, analyzed and
considered the ecological implications of its action.” (Laurel Heights Improvements Assn. v.
Regents of Univ. of Cal. (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 392.) The EIR process “protects not only the
environment but also informed self-government.” (Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 927.)
An EIR is required if “there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before
Comment on Garry Avenue Business Park Project
Planning Commission Agenda Item 2 (Amendment Application No. 2022 -01; Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14)
October 10, 2022
Page 3 of 7
the lead agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment.” (PRC §
21080(d); see also, Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 927.) In very limited circumstances,
an agency may avoid preparing an EIR by issuing a negative declaration, a written statement
briefly indicating that a project will have no significant impact thus requiring no EIR (14 CCR §
15371), only if there is not even a “fair argument” that the project will have a significant
environmental effect. (PRC §§ 21100, 21064.) Since “[t]he adoption of a negative declaration . .
. has a terminal effect on the environmental review process,” by allowing the agency “to
dispense with the duty [to prepare an EIR],” negative declarations are allowed only in cases
where “the proposed project will not affect the environment at all.” (Citizens of Lake Murray v.
San Diego (1989) 129 Cal.App.3d 436, 440.)
To achieve its objectives of environmental protection, CEQA has a three-tiered structure.
(14 CCR § 15002(k); Committee to Save the Hollywoodland Specific Plan v. City of Los Angeles
(2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 1168, 1185-86 [“Hollywoodland”].) First, if a project falls into an
exempt category, or it can be seen with certainty that the activity in question will not have a
significant effect on the environment, no further agency evaluation is required. Id. Second, if
there is a possibility the project will have a significant effect on the environment, the agency
must perform an initial threshold study. (Id.; 14 CCR § 15063(a).) If the study indicates that
there is no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant
effect on the environment the agency may issue a negative declaration. (Id.; 14 CCR §§
15063(b)(2), 15070.) Finally, if the project will have a significant effect on the environment, an
environmental impact report (“EIR”) is required. (Id.) Here, since the City exempted the Project
from CEQA entirely, the first step of the CEQA process applies.
CEQA identifies certain classes of projects which are exempt from the provisions of
CEQA. These are called categorical exemptions. (14 CCR §§ 15300, 15354.) “Exemptions to
CEQA are narrowly construed and ‘[e]xemption categories are not to be expanded beyond the
reasonable scope of their statutory language.’ (Citations).” (Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish &
Game Com. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105, 125.) The determination as to the appropriate scope of a
categorical exemption is a question of law subject to independent, or de novo, review. (San
Lorenzo Valley Community Advocates for Responsible Education v. San Lorenzo Valley Unified
School Dist., (2006) 139 Cal. App. 4th 1356, 1375 (“[Q]uestions of interpretation or application
of the requirements of CEQA are matters of law. (Citations.) Thus, for example, interpreting the
scope of a CEQA exemption presents ‘a question of law, subject to de novo review by this
court.’ (Citations).”).)
In addition, there are several exceptions to CEQA’s categorical exemptions. (See, 14
CCR § 15300.2.) At least one exception is relevant here:
Significant Effects. A project may never be exempted from CEQA if there is a
“fair argument” that the project may have significant environmental impacts due
to “unusual circumstances.” 14 CCR § 15300.2(c). The Supreme Court has held
that since the agency may only exempt activities that do not have a significant
effect on the environment, a fair argument that a project will have significant
Comment on Garry Avenue Business Park Project
Planning Commission Agenda Item 2 (Amendment Application No. 2022 -01; Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14)
October 10, 2022
Page 4 of 7
effects precludes an exemption. (Wildlife Alive v. Chickering (1976) 18 Cal.3d
190, 204.)
Here, the City has issued a notice of exemption alleging that the proposed Project is
exempt from CEQA review under Section 15183. However, as discussed below, this exemption
is improper, and instead, a full CEQA analysis, such as an EIR, must be prepared for this Project.
DISCUSSION
I. THE PROJECT WILL HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS PECULIAR TO THE
PROJECT THAT WERE NOT ANALYZED AS SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS IN
THE GENERAL PLAN EIR AND THESE IMPACTS REQUIRE FURTHER
ANALYSIS UNDER CEQA
Section 15183 of the California Environmental Quality Act allows a project to avoid
environmental review if it is “consistent with the development density established by existing
zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified . . . except as
might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which
are peculiar to the project or its site.” (14 CCR § 15183 (emphasis added).) The intention of
this section is to “streamline[]” CEQA review for projects and avoid the preparation of repetitive
documents. Even when a project is “consistent with the development density established by
existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified,”,
environmental review is still required for various types of impacts, including those “peculiar to
the project or parcel on which the project would be located,” those which “were not analyzed as
significant effects in a prior EIR,” “are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative
impacts which were not discussed in the prior EIR,” or “[a]re previously identified significant
effects which, as a result of substantial new information which was not known at the time the
EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the
prior EIR.” (14 CCR sec. 15183.)
Section 1518(f) of the CEQA Guidelines states that a Project’s environmental effects are
not peculiar to a project if “uniformly applied development policies or standards have been
previously adopted” which serve to mitigate environmental impacts, “unless substantial new
information shows that the policies or standards will not substantially mitigate the
environmental effect.” (Emphasis added). Therefore, the standard set forth by CEQA for this
analysis is substantial evidence.
Here, there is substantial evidence demonstrating that the Project will have project-
specific significant impacts that were not addressed in the General Plan EIR, and therefore must
be addressed through CEQA review now.
II. THE PROJECT WILL HAVE PROJECT-SPECIFIC SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
WHICH WERE NOT ADDRESSED IN THE PREVIOUS GENERAL PLAN
UPDATE EIR.
Comment on Garry Avenue Business Park Project
Planning Commission Agenda Item 2 (Amendment Application No. 2022 -01; Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14)
October 10, 2022
Page 5 of 7
First of all, the Project’s potential air quality impacts were not addressed in the previous
General Plan EIR, because the air quality impacts of the Project as proposed could not have been
foreseen at the time the General Plan was prepared. Emissions for the proposed Project must be
modeled using a program such as CalEEMod, and project-specific input parameters must be
measured against applicable thresholds. Further, a screening-level HRA must be prepared to
determine the risk posed to nearby residential receptors, as well as propose mitigation as
necessary. If the Project’s criteria air pollutant and/or toxic air contaminant emissions exceed the
relevant South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (“SCAQMD”) thresholds, the Project’s
greenhouse gas emissions must also be modeled using a program such as CalEEMod and
mitigation must be implemented if necessary. As discussed below, these considerations all
represent potential project-specific significant effects that were not addressed in the previous
General Plan EIR, and therefore, the City must review these impacts under CEQA.
A. The Project Could Have Significant Air Quality Impacts, Requiring Additional
CEQA Analysis Under Section 15183.
In support of the Exemption, the City claims that the Project is not required to submit an
HRA, as Mitigation Measure AQ-3 (“MM-AQ-3”) included in the GPU EIR is not applicable to
the Project. (See, Exhibit A, pp. 1-2.) However, as SWAPE notes, “regardless of the [Exemption
Checklist] claims, the State of California Department of Justice recommends that all warehouse
projects prepare a quantitative HRA pursuant to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard
Assessment (“OEHHA”), the organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting
HRAs in California, as well as local air district guidelines.”
OEHHA released its most recent guidance document in 2015 describing which types of
projects warrant preparation of an HRA. (See, e.g., “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance
Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at:
http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/hotspots2015.html.) OEHHA recommends that projects lasting
at least 2 months be evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors, a time period which
this Project easily exceeds. (Exhibit A, p. 2.) Because “the Project’s anticipated construction
duration exceeds the 2-month and 6-month requirements set forth by OEHHA, construction of
the Project meets the threshold warranting a quantified HRA under OEHHA guidance and
should be evaluated for the entire 12-month construction period.” (Id.) The OEHHA document
also recommends that if a project is expected to last over 6 months, the exposure should be
evaluated throughout the project using a 30-year exposure duration to estimate individual cancer
risks. (Id.) Based on its extensive experience, SWAPE reasonably assumes that the Project will
last at least 30 years, and therefore recommends that health risk impacts from project-generated
Diesel Particulate Matter (“DPM”) emissions be evaluated. (Id.)
An initial study and mitigated negative declaration or environmental impact report is
needed to adequately address the air quality impacts of the proposed Project, and to mitigate
those impacts accordingly.
B. The Project Will Have a Significant Health Impact as a Result of Diesel
Particulate Emissions into the Air.
Comment on Garry Avenue Business Park Project
Planning Commission Agenda Item 2 (Amendment Application No. 2022 -01; Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14)
October 10, 2022
Page 6 of 7
SWAPE analyzed the Project’s emissions of Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) into the air,
and the resulting impact on human health. To do so, SWAPE prepared a screening-level Health
Risk Assessment (“HRA”) to evaluate potential impacts from the construction and operation of
the Project. (Exhibit A, pp. 3-7.) SWAPE prepared a screening-level HRA to evaluate potential
health risk impacts posed to residential sensitive receptors as a result of the Project’s
construction-related and operational TAC emissions. SWAPE used AERSCREEN, the leading
screening-level air quality dispersion model. SWAPE applied a sensitive receptor distance of 200
meters and analyzed impacts to individuals at different stages of life based on OEHHA and
SCAQMD guidance utilizing age sensitivity factors.
SWAPE found that the excess cancer risks at a sensitive receptor located approximately
200 meters away over the course of Project construction and operation, while utilizing the
recommended age sensitivity factors, are approximately 71.6 in one million for infants, 103 in
one million for children, and 11.5 in one million for adults. (Id., p. 6.) Moreover, the excess
cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (i.e. 30 years) for Project operation and
construction is approximately 188 in one million. (Id.) The cancer risks to infants, children,
adults, and lifetime residents appreciably exceed SCAQMD’s threshold of 10 in one million,
thus indicating a significant air quality impact.
Because the Project will have numerous significant air quality impacts peculiar to this
project, and not analyzed in the GP EIR, additional CEQA review is required.
C. The Project Will Have Significant Greenhouse Gas Impacts Requiring
Additional CEQA Analysis Under 15183 Exemption.
SWAPE analyzed Project’s potential greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions and found that
the Project and GPU EIR failed to adequately analyze the Project’s greenhouse gas impacts,
which SWAPE found to be potentially significant. (See, Exhibit A, pp. 8-10.)
First, the Exemption Checklist’s greenhouse gas impact analysis and subsequent less-
than-significant impact conclusion are based on an outdated quantitative analysis GHG
threshold. (See, id., pp. 8-9.) According to SWAPE, the Exemption Checklist incorrectly
“estimates that the Project would generate net annual [GHG] emissions of 1,668 metric tons of
carbon dioxide equivalents per year (“MT CO2e/year”), which would not exceed the SCAQMD
threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year.” (Id., p. 8.) SWAPE explains that this is incorrect because
“the guidance that provided the 3,000 MT CO2e/year threshold, the SCAQMD’s 2008 Interim
CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans report, was
developed when the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, commonly known as “AB 32”, was
the governing statute for GHG reductions in California. AB 32 requires California to reduce
GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.” (Id.) In addition, the Association of Environmental
Professionals (AEP) guidance states:
Comment on Garry Avenue Business Park Project
Planning Commission Agenda Item 2 (Amendment Application No. 2022 -01; Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14)
October 10, 2022
Page 7 of 7
[F]or evaluating projects with a post 2020 horizon, the threshold will need to be
revised based on a new gap analysis that would examine 17 development and
reduction potentials out to the next GHG reduction milestone.
(Id., pp. 8-9 [citations omitted].) Because it is currently October 2022, thresholds for 2020 are
not applicable to the proposed Project and should be revised to reflect the current GHG
reduction target. (Id., p. 9.) As a result, the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT
CO2e/year is outdated and inapplicable to the proposed Project, and the [Exemption
Checklist’s] less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. (Exhibit A,
p. 9.) Instead, SWAPE recommends “that the Project apply the SCAQMD 2035 service
population efficiency target of 3.0 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per service
population per year (“MT CO2e/SP/year”), which was calculated by applying a 40% reduction
to the 2020 targets.” (Id.)
To more accurately determine the Project’s GHG emissions, SWAPE prepared an
updated air model using the project-specific information provided by the Exemption Checklist.
(See, id., pp. 9-10.) SWAPE’s updated analysis demonstrates that the Project would emit
approximately 14.6 MT CO2e/SP/year. (Id.) Therefore, the Project’s service population
efficiency value exceeds the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year,
indicating a potentially significant GHG impact not previously identified or addressed by the
Exemption Checklist or GPU EIR. Thus, SWAPE’s model demonstrates that the Project would
result in a significant GHG impact, which precludes reliance on the CEQA Section 15183
exemption.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, SAFER requests that the Planning Commission deny the
applications for the Project and, instead, direct city staff to prepare the necessary environmental
documents under CEQA. The City should prepare an initial study followed by an EIR or
negative declaration in accordance with CEQA prior to consideration of approvals for the
Project.
Sincerely,
Victoria Yundt
LOZEAU | DRURY LLP
EXHIBIT A
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
mhagemann@swape.com
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
prosenfeld@swape.com
September 23, 2022
Victoria Yundt
Lozeau | Drury LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150
Oakland, CA 94618
Subject: Comments on the 1700 Garry Avenue Project
Dear Ms. Yundt,
We have reviewed the August 2022 Planning Commission Staff Report (“Staff Report”) for the 1700 E
Garry Avenue Project (“Project”) located in the City of Santa Ana (“City”). The Project proposes to
demolish 105,558-square-feet (“SF”) of office space and construct 81,500-SF of warehousing and
distribution space, 10,000-SF of office space, and 145 parking spaces on the 5.2-acre site.
Our review concludes that the Staff Report fails to adequately evaluate the Project’s health risk and
greenhouse gas impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and
operation of the proposed Project are underestimated and inadequately addressed. An Environmental
Impact Report (“EIR”) should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential health risk
and greenhouse gas impacts that the Project may have on the environment.
Air Quality Diesel Particulate Matter Emissions Inadequately Evaluated
Regarding the preparation of a health risk analysis (“HRA”), the General Plan Update Final Recirculated
Program Environmental Impact Report (“GPU EIR”) incorporates Mitigation Measure (“MM”) AQ-3. The
Environmental Analysis (“EA”), provided as Exhibit 10 to the Staff Report, elaborates on MM AQ-3,
stating:
“AQ-3 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, project applicants for new
industrial or warehousing development projects that 1) have the potential to generate 100 or
more diesel truck trips per day or have 40 or more trucks with operating diesel- powered
transport refrigeration units, and 2) are within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g.,
2
residential, schools, hospitals, or nursing homes), as measured from the property line of the
project to the property line of the nearest sensitive use, shall submit a health risk assessment
(HRA) to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval…
Proposed Project Applicability: Mitigation Measure AQ-3 is not applicable to the proposed
Project because it would only generate 44 truck trips per day, as detailed in Section 5.17,
Transportation” (p. 2-81).
As demonstrated above, the EA claims the Project is not required to submit an HRA, as MM-AQ-3 is not
applicable to the proposed Project. However, regardless of the EA’s claims, the State of California
Department of Justice recommends that all warehouse projects prepare a quantitative HRA pursuant to
the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”), the organization responsible for
providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California, as well as local air district guidelines.1 OEHHA
released its most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk
Assessments in February 2015. This guidance document describes the types of projects that warrant the
preparation of an HRA. Specifically, OEHHA recommends that all short-term projects lasting at least 2
months assess cancer risks.2 Furthermore, according to OEHHA:
“Exposure from projects lasting more than 6 months should be evaluated for the duration of the
project. In all cases, for assessing risk to residential receptors, the exposure should be assumed
to start in the third trimester to allow for the use of the ASFs (OEHHA, 2009).”3
Thus, as the Project’s anticipated construction duration exceeds the 2-month and 6-month
requirements set forth by OEHHA, construction of the Project meets the threshold warranting a
quantified HRA under OEHHA guidance and should be evaluated for the entire 12-month construction
period (p. 2-53). Furthermore, OEHHA recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years should be
used to estimate the individual cancer risk at the maximally exposed individual resident (“MEIR”).4 While
the Project documents fail to provide the expected lifetime of the proposed Project, we can reasonably
assume that the Project would operate for at least 30 years, if not more. Therefore, operation of the
Project also exceeds the 2-month and 6-month requirements set forth by OEHHA and should be
evaluated for the entire 30-year residential exposure duration, as indicated by OEHHA guidance. These
recommendations reflect the most recent state health risk policies, and as such, an EIR should be
prepared to include an analysis of health risk impacts posed to nearby sensitive receptors from Project-
generated DPM emissions.
1 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental
Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice, available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/environment/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 6.
2 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February
2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-18.
3 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February
2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-18.
4 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February
2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 2-4.
3
Screening-Level Analysis Demonstrates Potentially Significant Health Risk Impact
In order to conduct our screening-level risk assessment we relied upon AERSCREEN, which is a screening
level air quality dispersion model.5 As discussed above, the model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is
included in the OEHHA and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated (“CAPCOA”) guidance
as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening assessments (“HRSAs”).6, 7 A
Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable
downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an
unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling
approach is required prior to approval of the Project.
We prepared a preliminary HRA of the Project’s construction and operational health risk impact to
residential sensitive receptors using the annual PM10 exhaust estimates from the EA’s CalEEMod output
files, provided within the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment (“GHG Assessment”) as Appendix F to
the EA. Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA, we assumed residential exposure begins
during the third trimester stage of life.8 The EA’s CalEEMod model indicates that construction activities
will generate approximately 125 pounds of DPM over the 363-day construction period.9 The AERSCREEN
model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations
from point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability in equipment usage and
truck trips over Project construction, we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following
equation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 �𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠�= 124.6 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐸𝐸363 𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑𝐸𝐸 × 453.6 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐸𝐸 × 1 𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑24 ℎ𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔𝐸𝐸 × 1 ℎ𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔3,600 𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸 =𝟎𝟎.𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒈𝒈/𝒔𝒔
Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission rate of 0.00180 grams per second (“g/s”).
Subtracting the 363-day construction period from the total residential duration of 30 years, we assumed
that after Project construction, the sensitive receptor would be exposed to the Project’s operational
DPM for an additional 29.01 years. The EA’s operational CalEEMod emissions indicate that operational
activities will generate approximately 340 pounds of DPM per year throughout operation. Applying the
same equation used to estimate the construction DPM rate, we estimated the following emission rate
for Project operation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 �𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠�= 340.0 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐸𝐸 365 𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑𝐸𝐸 × 453.6 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐸𝐸 × 1 𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑24 ℎ𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔𝐸𝐸 × 1 ℎ𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔3,600 𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸=𝟎𝟎.𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒈𝒈/𝒔𝒔
5 “AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model,” U.S. EPA, April 2011, available at:
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/clarification/20110411_AERSCREEN_Release_Memo.pdf
6 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February
2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf.
7 “Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects.” CAPCOA, July 2009, available at:
http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA_HRA_LU_Guidelines_8-6-09.pdf.
8 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February
2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-18.
9 See Attachment A for health risk calculations.
4
Using this equation, we estimated an operational emission rate of 0.00489 g/s. Construction and
operation were simulated as a 5.13-acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN, with approximate
dimensions of 204- by 102-meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the
height of stacks of operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical
dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release.
An urban meteorological setting was selected with model-default inputs for wind speed and direction
distribution. The population of Santa Ana was obtained from U.S. 2020 Census data.10
The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single-hour DPM concentrations
from the Project Site. The U.S. EPA suggests that the annualized average concentration of an air
pollutant be estimated by multiplying the single-hour concentration by 10% in screening procedures.11
According to the Air Quality Assessment (“AQA”), provided as Appendix A to the EA, the nearest
sensitive receptor is located 700 feet, or 213 meters, from the Project site (p. 9). Thus, the single-hour
concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction is approximately 1.049 µg/m3 DPM at
approximately 200 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an
annualized average concentration of 0.1049 µg/m3 for Project construction at the MEIR. For Project
operation, the single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN is 2.849 µg/m3 DPM at approximately
200 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average
concentration of 0.2849 µg/m3 for Project operation at the MEIR.
We calculated the excess cancer risk to the MEIR using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by
OEHHA, as recommended by SCAQMD.12 Specifically, guidance from OEHHA and the California Air
Resources Board (“CARB”) recommends the use of a standard point estimate approach, including high-
point estimate (i.e. 95th percentile) breathing rates and age sensitivity factors (“ASF”) in order to
account for the increased sensitivity to carcinogens during early-in-life exposure and accurately assess
risk for susceptible subpopulations such as children. The residential exposure parameters, such as the
daily breathing rates (“BR/BW”), exposure duration (“ED”), age sensitivity factors (“ASF”), fraction of
time at home (“FAH”), and exposure frequency (“EF”) utilized for the various age groups in our
screening-level HRA are as follows:
10 “Santa Anna.” U.S. Census Bureau, 2020, available at: https://datacommons.org/place/geoId/0669000.
11 “Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised.” U.S. EPA, October
1992, available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/EPA-454R-92-019_OCR.pdf.
12 “AB 2588 and Rule 1402 Supplemental Guidelines.” SCAQMD, October 2020, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk-assessment/ab-2588-supplemental-
guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=19, p. 2.
5
Exposure Assumptions for Residential Individual Cancer Risk
Age Group
Breathing
Rate
(L/kg-day)13
Age
Sensitivity
Factor 14
Exposure
Duration
(years)
Fraction of
Time at
Home15
Exposure
Frequency
(days/year)16
Exposure
Time
(hours/day)
3rd Trimester 361 10 0.25 1 350 24
Infant (0 - 2) 1090 10 2 1 350 24
Child (2 - 16) 572 3 14 1 350 24
Adult (16 - 30) 261 1 14 0.73 350 24
For the inhalation pathway, the procedure requires the incorporation of several discrete variates to
effectively quantify do se for each age group. Once determined, contaminant dose is multiplied by the
cancer potency factor (“CPF”) in units of inverse dose expressed in milligrams per kilogram per day
(mg/kg/day-1) to derive the cancer risk estimate. Therefore, to assess exposures, we utilized the
following dose algorithm: 𝐷𝐷𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴,𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝 𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑝𝑝= 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝× 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 × �𝐵𝐵𝑅𝑅𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵� × 𝐴𝐴 × 𝐶𝐶𝐸𝐸
where:
DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg/day), per age group
Cair = concentration of contaminant in air (μg/m3)
EF = exposure frequency (number of days/365 days)
BR/BW = daily breathing rate normalized to body weight (L/kg/day)
A = inhalation absorption factor (default = 1)
CF = conversion factor (1x10-6, μg to mg, L to m3)
To calculate the overall cancer risk, we used the following equation for each appropriate age group: 𝐶𝐶𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑔𝑔 𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴= 𝐷𝐷𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 × 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐸𝐸 × 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐸𝐸 × 𝐸𝐸𝐴𝐴𝐹𝐹 × 𝐸𝐸𝐷𝐷𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴
13 “Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics ‘Hot Spots’ Information and
Assessment Act.” SCAQMD, October 2020, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk-
assessment/ab-2588-supplemental-guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=19, p. 19; see also “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance
Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf.
14 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February
2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-5 Table 8.3.
15 “Risk Assessment Procedures.” SCAQMD, August 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/rule-book/Proposed-Rules/1401/riskassessmentprocedures_2017_080717.pdf, p. 7.
16 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February
2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 5-24.
6
where:
DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg/day), per age group
CPF = cancer potency factor, chemical-specific (mg/kg/day)-1
ASF = age sensitivity factor, per age group
FAH = fraction of time at home, per age group (for residential receptors only)
ED = exposure duration (years)
AT = averaging time period over which exposure duration is averaged (always 70 years)
Consistent with the 363-day construction schedule, the annualized average concentration for
construction was used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy (0.25 years), and the first 0.74 years of
the infantile stage of life (0 – 2 years). The annualized average concentration for operation was used for
the remainder of the 30-year exposure period, which makes up the latter 1.26 years of the infantile
stage of life, as well as the entire child (2 – 16) and adult (16 – 30 years) stages of life. The results of our
calculations are shown in the table below.
The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor
Age Group Emissions Source Duration (years) Concentration
(ug/m3) Cancer Risk
3rd Trimester Construction 0.25 0.1049 1.43E-06
Construction 0.74 0.1049 1.28E-05
Operation 1.26 0.2849 5.87E-05
Infant (0 - 2) Total 2 7.16E-05
Child (2 - 16) Operation 14 0.2849 1.03E-04
Adult (16 - 30) Operation 14 0.2849 1.15E-05
Lifetime 30 1.88E-04
As demonstrated in the table above, the excess cancer risks for the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, infants,
children, and adults at the MEIR located approximately 200 meters away, over the course of Project
construction and operation, are approximately 1.43, 71.6, 103, and 11.5 in one million, respectively. The
excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) is approximately 188 in one million.
The infant, child, adult, and lifetime cancer risks exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus
resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the EA.
Our analysis represents a screening-level HRA, which is known to be conservative and tends to err on
the side of health protection. The purpose of the screening-level HRA is to demonstrate the potential
link between Project-generated emissions and adverse health risk impacts. According to the U.S. EPA:
7
“EPA’s Exposure Assessment Guidelines recommend completing exposure assessments
iteratively using a tiered approach to ‘strike a balance between the costs of adding detail and
refinement to an assessment and the benefits associated with that additional refinement’ (U.S.
EPA, 1992).
In other words, an assessment using basic tools (e.g., simple exposure calculations, default
values, rules of thumb, conservative assumptions) can be conducted as the first phase (or tier)
of the overall assessment (i.e., a screening-level assessment).
The exposure assessor or risk manager can then determine whether the results of the screening-
level assessment warrant further evaluation through refinements of the input data and
exposure assumptions or by using more advanced models.”
As demonstrated above, screening-level analyses warrant further evaluation in a refined modeling
approach. Thus, as our screening-level HRA demonstrates that construction and operation of the Project
could result in a potentially significant health risk impact, an EIR should be prepared to include a refined
health risk analysis which adequately and accurately evaluates health risk impacts associated with both
Project construction and operation.
Greenhouse Gas Failure to Adequately Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Impacts
The Project claims an exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to
Guidelines Section 15183. Specifically, the Staff Report states:
“Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the
project is exempt from further review pursuant to 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines. This type of
exemption analysis evaluates whether the potential environmental impacts of the proposed
demolition of three office buildings, which total 105,558 square feet, and construction of a new
91,500 square foot light industrial warehousing building that would accommodate two tenants
are addressed in the City of Santa Ana General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program
Environmental Impact Report (GPU EIR).
As set forth in California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21083.3 and State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15183, projects that are “consistent with the development density
established by the existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was
certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to
examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project
or its site” (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(a) and PRC Section 21083.3(b)). The State
CEQA Guidelines further state that “[i]f an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the project,
has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by
the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards […] then an additional
EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that impact” (State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15183(c))” (p. 2-6 – 2-7).
8
As demonstrated above, a Project is ineligible for an exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15183 if
“there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.” The City
determined that the Project would not result in any new significant effects not discussed in the GPU EIR.
Furthermore, the EA concludes the Project would have a less-than-significant greenhouse gas (“GHG”)
impact (p. 2-99 – 2-100). However, these claims are incorrect and subsequent environmental review is
required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15183, as the Project’s GHG analysis is insufficient for the
following two reasons:
(1) The EA’s GHG analysis relies upon an outdated quantitative GHG threshold; and
(2) The EA’s GHG analysis fails to identify a potentially significant GHG impact.
1) Incorrect Reliance on an Outdated Quantitative GHG Threshold
The EA estimates that the Project would generate net annual greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions of
1,668 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year (“MT CO2e/year”), which would not exceed the
SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year (see excerpt below) (p. 2-99, Table GHG-2).
However, the guidance that provided the 3,000 MT CO2e/year threshold, the SCAQMD’s 2008 Interim
CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans report, was developed when
the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, commonly known as “AB 32”, was the governing statute for
GHG reductions in California. AB 32 requires California to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by
2020.17 Furthermore, AEP guidance states:
17 “Health & Safety Code 38550.” California State Legislature, January 2007, available at:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC§ionNum=38550.
9
“[F]or evaluating projects with a post 2020 horizon, the threshold will need to be revised based
on a new gap analysis that would examine 17 development and reduction potentials out to the
next GHG reduction milestone.”18
As it is currently September 2022, thresholds for 2020 are not applicable to the proposed Project and
should be revised to reflect the current GHG reduction target. As such, the SCAQMD bright-line
threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year is outdated and inapplicable to the proposed Project, and the EA’s
less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. Instead, we recommend that the
Project apply the SCAQMD 2035 service population efficiency target of 3.0 metric tons of carbon dioxide
equivalents per service population per year (“MT CO2e/SP/year”), which was calculated by applying a
40% reduction to the 2020 targets.19
2) Failure to Identify a Potentially Significant GHG Impact
In an effort to quantitatively evaluate the Project’s GHG emissions, we compared the Project’s GHG
emissions, as estimated by the EA, to the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year. When
applying this threshold, the Project’s air model indicates a potentially significant GHG impact.
As previously stated, the EA estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of
1,668 MT CO2e/year (p. 2-99, Table GHG-2). According to CAPCOA’s CEQA & Climate Change report, a
service population (“SP”) is defined as “the sum of the number of residents and the number of jobs
supported by the project.”20 The EA indicates that the Project would generate approximately 114 jobs
(p. 2-124). As the proposed Project does not include any residential land uses, we estimate a SP of 114
people. When dividing the Project’s net annual GHG emissions, as estimated by the EA, by a SP of 114
people, we find that the Project would emit approximately 14.6 MT CO2e/SP/year (see table below).21
EA Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Annual Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 1,668
Service Population 114
Service Population Efficiency (MT CO2e/SP/year) 14.6
SCAQMD 2035 Target 3.0
Exceeds? Yes
18 “Beyond Newhall and 2020: A Field Guide to New CEQA Greenhouse Gas Thresholds and Climate Action Plan
Targets for California.” Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP), October 2016, available at:
https://califaep.org/docs/AEP-2016_Final_White_Paper.pdf, p. 39.
19 “Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #15.” SCAQMD, September
2010, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-
significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf, p. 2.
20 “CEQA & Climate Change.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), January 2008,
available at: http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA-White-Paper.pdf, p. 71-72.
21 Calculated: (1,668 MT CO2e/year) / (114 service population) = (14.6 MT CO2e/SP/year).
10
As demonstrated above, the Project’s service population efficiency value, as estimated by the EA’s
provided net annual GHG emission estimates and SP, exceeds the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0
MT CO2e/SP/year, indicating a potentially significant impact not previously identified or addressed by
the EA. As a result, the EA’s less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. Thus,
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15183, an EIR should be prepared, including an updated GHG analysis
and incorporating additional mitigation measures to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions to less-than-
significant levels.
Mitigation Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions
Our analysis demonstrates that the Project would result in potentially significant health risk and GHG
impacts that should be mitigated further. In an effort to reduce the Project’s emissions, we identified
several mitigation measures that are applicable to the proposed Project. Feasible mitigation measures
can be found in the Department of Justice Warehouse Project Best Practices document.22 Therefore, to
reduce the Project’s emissions, consideration of the following measures should be made:
• Requiring off-road construction equipment to be zero-emission, where available, and all diesel-
fueled off-road construction equipment, to be equipped with CARB Tier IV-compliant engines or
better, and including this requirement in applicable bid documents, purchase orders, and
contracts, with successful contractors demonstrating the ability to supply the compliant
construction equipment for use prior to any ground-disturbing and construction activities.
• Prohibiting off-road diesel-powered equipment from being in the “on” position for more than 10
hours per day.
• Requiring on-road heavy-duty haul trucks to be model year 2010 or newer if diesel-fueled.
• Providing electrical hook ups to the power grid, rather than use of diesel-fueled generators, for
electric construction tools, such as saws, drills and compressors, and using electric tools
whenever feasible.
• Limiting the amount of daily grading disturbance area.
• Prohibiting grading on days with an Air Quality Index forecast of greater than 100 for
particulates or ozone for the project area.
• Forbidding idling of heavy equipment for more than two minutes.
• Keeping onsite and furnishing to the lead agency or other regulators upon request, all
equipment maintenance records and data sheets, including design specifications and emission
control tier classifications.
• Conducting an on-site inspection to verify compliance with construction mitigation and to
identify other opportunities to further reduce construction impacts.
• Using paints, architectural coatings, and industrial maintenance coatings that have volatile
organic compound levels of less than 10 g/L.
22 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental
Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice, available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/environment/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 6 – 9.
11
• Providing information on transit and ridesharing programs and services to construction
employees.
• Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations for
construction employees.
• Requiring that all facility-owned and operated fleet equipment with a gross vehicle weight rating
greater than 14,000 pounds accessing the site meet or exceed 2010 model-year emissions
equivalent engine standards as currently defined in California Code of Regulations Title 13,
Division 3, Chapter 1, Article 4.5, Section 2025. Facility operators shall maintain records on-site
demonstrating compliance with this requirement and shall make records available for inspection
by the local jurisdiction, air district, and state upon request.
• Requiring all heavy-duty vehicles entering or operated on the project site to be zero-emission
beginning in 2030.
• Requiring on-site equipment, such as forklifts and yard trucks, to be electric with the necessary
electrical charging stations provided.
• Requiring tenants to use zero-emission light- and medium-duty vehicles as part of business
operations.
• Forbidding trucks from idling for more than two minutes and requiring operators to turn off
engines when not in use.
• Posting both interior- and exterior-facing signs, including signs directed at all dock and delivery
areas, identifying idling restrictions and contact information to report violations to CARB, the air
district, and the building manager.
• Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, air
filtration systems at sensitive receptors within a certain radius of facility for the life of the
project.
• Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, an air
monitoring station proximate to sensitive receptors and the facility for the life of the project,
and making the resulting data publicly available in real time. While air monitoring does not
mitigate the air quality or greenhouse gas impacts of a facility, it nonetheless benefits the
affected community by providing information that can be used to improve air quality or avoid
exposure to unhealthy air.
• Constructing electric truck charging stations proportional to the number of dock doors at the
project.
• Constructing electric plugs for electric transport refrigeration units at every dock door, if the
warehouse use could include refrigeration.
• Constructing electric light-duty vehicle charging stations proportional to the number of parking
spaces at the project.
• Installing solar photovoltaic systems on the project site of a specified electrical generation
capacity, such as equal to the building’s projected energy needs.
• Requiring all stand-by emergency generators to be powered by a non-diesel fuel.
• Requiring facility operators to train managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load
management to eliminate unnecessary queuing and idling of trucks.
12
• Requiring operators to establish and promote a rideshare program that discourages single-
occupancy vehicle trips and provides financial incentives for alternate modes of transportation,
including carpooling, public transit, and biking.
• Meeting CalGreen Tier 2 green building standards, including all provisions related to designated
parking for clean air vehicles, electric vehicle charging, and bicycle parking.
• Achieving certification of compliance with LEED green building standards.
• Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations.
• Posting signs at every truck exit driveway providing directional information to the truck route.
• Improving and maintaining vegetation and tree canopy for residents in and around the project
area.
• Requiring that every tenant train its staff in charge of keeping vehicle records in diesel
technologies and compliance with CARB regulations, by attending CARB-approved courses. Also
require facility operators to maintain records on-site demonstrating compliance and make
records available for inspection by the local jurisdiction, air district, and state upon request.
• Requiring tenants to enroll in the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s SmartWay
program, and requiring tenants to use carriers that are SmartWay carriers.
• Providing tenants with information on incentive programs, such as the Carl Moyer Program and
Voucher Incentive Program, to upgrade their fleets.
These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into
the proposed Project, which subsequently, reduce emissions released during Project construction and
operation. An EIR should be prepared to include all feasible mitigation measures, as well as include
updated health risk and GHG analyses to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are
implemented to reduce emissions to below thresholds. The EIR should also demonstrate a commitment
to the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the Project’s
significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible.
Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become
available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional
information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of
care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants
practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is
made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing
results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was
reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or
otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by
third parties.
Sincerely,
13
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
Attachment A: Health Risk Calculations
Attachment B: AERSCREEN Output Files
Attachment C: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment D: Paul Rosenfeld CV
Annual Emissions (tons/year)0.0792 Annual Emissions (tons/year)0.17
Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.433972603 Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.931506849
Construction Duration (days)184 Total DPM (lbs)340
Total DPM (lbs)79.8509589 Emission Rate (g/s)0.004890411
Total DPM (g)36220.39496 Release Height (meters)3
Start Date 7/1/2021 Total Acreage 5.13
End Date 1/1/2022 Max Horizontal (meters)203.77
Construction Days 184 Min Horizontal (meters)101.88
Initial Vertical Dimension (meters)1.5
Annual Emissions (tons/year)0.0456 Setting Urban
Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.249863014 Population 309,441
Construction Duration (days)179
Total DPM (lbs)44.72547945
Total DPM (g)20287.47748
Start Date 1/1/2022
End Date 6/29/2022
Construction Days 179
Total DPM (lbs)124.5764384
Total DPM (g)56507.87244
Emission Rate (g/s)0.001801725
Release Height (meters)3
Total Acreage 5.13
Max Horizontal (meters)203.77
Min Horizontal (meters)101.88
Initial Vertical Dimension (meters)1.5
Setting Urban
Population 309,441
Start Date 7/1/2021
End Date 6/29/2022
Total Construction Days 363
Total Years of Construction 0.99
Total Years of Operation 29.01
2022
Operation
2021
Total
Emission Rate
Construction
Appendix A
Start date and time 09/20/22 13:21:17
AERSCREEN 21112
Gary Avenue Business Park, Construction
Gary Avenue Business Park, Construction
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DATA ENTRY VALIDATION ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
METRIC ENGLISH
** AREADATA ** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Emission Rate: 0.180E‐02 g/s 0.143E‐01 lb/hr
Area Height:3.00 meters 9.84 feet
Area Source Length: 203.77 meters 668.54 feet
Area Source Width: 101.88 meters 334.25 feet
Vertical Dimension: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet
Model Mode:URBAN
Population:309441
Dist to Ambient Air:1.0 meters 3. feet
** BUILDING DATA **
Appendix B
No Building Downwash Parameters
** TERRAIN DATA **
No Terrain Elevations
Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet
Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet
No flagpole receptors
No discrete receptors used
** FUMIGATION DATA **
No fumigation requested
** METEOROLOGY DATA **
Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K ‐9.7 / 98.3 Deg F
Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s
Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters
Dominant Surface Profile: Urban
Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture
Surface friction velocity (u*): not adjusted
DEBUG OPTION ON
AERSCREEN output file:
2022.09.20_AERSCREEN_GaryAveBusinessPark_Construction.out
*** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin
No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run
**************************************************
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET
Obtaining surface characteristics...
Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture
Season Albedo Bo zo
Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000
Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000
Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000
Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000
Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl
Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe
FLOWSECTOR started 09/20/22 13:25:18
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Winter
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Spring
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Summer
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Autumn
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
FLOWSECTOR ended 09/20/22 13:25:28
REFINE started 09/20/22 13:25:28
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
REFINE ended 09/20/22 13:25:29
**********************************************
AERSCREEN Finished Successfully
With no errors or warnings
Check log file for details
***********************************************
Ending date and time 09/20/22 13:25:30
Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date
H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M‐O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT
REF TA HT
0.21811E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23810E+01 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25483E+01 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26879E+01 75.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28382E+01 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
* 0.28493E+01 103.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21693E+01 125.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15454E+01 150.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12544E+01 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10495E+01 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.89655E+00 225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.77806E+00 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.68454E+00 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.60894E+00 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.54643E+00 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.49474E+00 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.45072E+00 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.41319E+00 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38070E+00 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.35233E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.32761E+00 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.30590E+00 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28629E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26873E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25302E+00 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23890E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22613E+00 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21443E+00 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20373E+00 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19395E+00 700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18497E+00 725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17666E+00 750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16897E+00 775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16186E+00 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15526E+00 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14912E+00 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14333E+00 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13793E+00 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13288E+00 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12815E+00 950.01 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12370E+00 975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11952E+00 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11558E+00 1025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11186E+00 1050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10835E+00 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10503E+00 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10189E+00 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.98893E‐01 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.96044E‐01 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.93336E‐01 1200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.90760E‐01 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.88304E‐01 1250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.85947E‐01 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.83698E‐01 1300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.81549E‐01 1325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.79495E‐01 1350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.77530E‐01 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.75650E‐01 1400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.73850E‐01 1425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.72121E‐01 1450.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.70460E‐01 1475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.68866E‐01 1500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.67333E‐01 1525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.65860E‐01 1550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.64441E‐01 1575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.63076E‐01 1600.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.61759E‐01 1625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.60491E‐01 1650.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.59267E‐01 1675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.58086E‐01 1700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.56945E‐01 1725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.55843E‐01 1750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.54775E‐01 1775.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.53743E‐01 1800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.52746E‐01 1825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.51781E‐01 1850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.50847E‐01 1875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.50272E‐01 1900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.49380E‐01 1925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.48514E‐01 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.47675E‐01 1975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.46860E‐01 2000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.46069E‐01 2025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.45301E‐01 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.44555E‐01 2075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.43830E‐01 2100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.43125E‐01 2125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.42440E‐01 2150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.41773E‐01 2175.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.41124E‐01 2200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.40493E‐01 2225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.39878E‐01 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.39279E‐01 2275.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38695E‐01 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38126E‐01 2325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.37572E‐01 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.37031E‐01 2375.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36504E‐01 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.35990E‐01 2425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.35488E‐01 2450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34998E‐01 2475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34519E‐01 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34052E‐01 2525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.33596E‐01 2550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.33150E‐01 2575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.32714E‐01 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.32289E‐01 2625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.31872E‐01 2650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.31465E‐01 2675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.31067E‐01 2700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.30677E‐01 2725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.30296E‐01 2750.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.29923E‐01 2775.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.29558E‐01 2800.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.29200E‐01 2825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28850E‐01 2850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28508E‐01 2875.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28172E‐01 2900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.27842E‐01 2925.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.27520E‐01 2950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.27204E‐01 2975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26894E‐01 3000.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26590E‐01 3025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26292E‐01 3050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26000E‐01 3074.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25714E‐01 3100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25432E‐01 3125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25157E‐01 3150.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24886E‐01 3175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24620E‐01 3200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24359E‐01 3225.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24103E‐01 3250.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23852E‐01 3275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23605E‐01 3300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23362E‐01 3325.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23124E‐01 3350.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22890E‐01 3375.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22660E‐01 3400.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22434E‐01 3425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22212E‐01 3450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21993E‐01 3475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21778E‐01 3500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21567E‐01 3525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21360E‐01 3550.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21156E‐01 3575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20955E‐01 3600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20757E‐01 3625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20563E‐01 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20372E‐01 3675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20184E‐01 3700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19999E‐01 3725.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19816E‐01 3750.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19637E‐01 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19460E‐01 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19287E‐01 3825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19116E‐01 3849.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18947E‐01 3875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18781E‐01 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18617E‐01 3925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18457E‐01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18298E‐01 3975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18142E‐01 4000.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17988E‐01 4025.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17836E‐01 4050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17686E‐01 4075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17539E‐01 4100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17394E‐01 4125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17250E‐01 4150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17109E‐01 4175.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16970E‐01 4200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16833E‐01 4225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16697E‐01 4250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16564E‐01 4275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16432E‐01 4300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16303E‐01 4325.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16175E‐01 4350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16048E‐01 4375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15924E‐01 4400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15801E‐01 4425.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15679E‐01 4450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15560E‐01 4475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15442E‐01 4500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15325E‐01 4525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15210E‐01 4550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15096E‐01 4575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14984E‐01 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14873E‐01 4625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14764E‐01 4650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14656E‐01 4675.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14550E‐01 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14445E‐01 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14341E‐01 4750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14238E‐01 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14137E‐01 4800.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14037E‐01 4825.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13938E‐01 4850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13840E‐01 4875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13744E‐01 4900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13648E‐01 4925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13554E‐01 4950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13461E‐01 4975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13369E‐01 5000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
Start date and time 09/20/22 13:25:41
AERSCREEN 21112
Gary Avenue Business Park, Operation
Gary Avenue Business Park, Operation
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DATA ENTRY VALIDATION ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
METRIC ENGLISH
** AREADATA ** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Emission Rate: 0.489E‐02 g/s 0.388E‐01 lb/hr
Area Height: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet
Area Source Length: 203.77 meters 668.54 feet
Area Source Width: 101.88 meters 334.25 feet
Vertical Dimension: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet
Model Mode: URBAN
Population: 309441
Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet
** BUILDING DATA **
No Building Downwash Parameters
** TERRAIN DATA **
No Terrain Elevations
Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet
Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet
No flagpole receptors
No discrete receptors used
** FUMIGATION DATA **
No fumigation requested
** METEOROLOGY DATA **
Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K ‐9.7 / 98.3 Deg F
Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s
Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters
Dominant Surface Profile: Urban
Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture
Surface friction velocity (u*): not adjusted
DEBUG OPTION ON
AERSCREEN output file:
2022.09.20_AERSCREEN_GaryAveBusinessPark_Operation.out
*** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin
No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run
**************************************************
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET
Obtaining surface characteristics...
Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture
Season Albedo Bo zo
Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000
Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000
Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000
Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000
Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl
Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe
FLOWSECTOR started 09/20/22 13:32:12
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Winter
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Spring
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Summer
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Autumn
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
FLOWSECTOR ended 09/20/22 13:32:21
REFINE started 09/20/22 13:32:21
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
REFINE ended 09/20/22 13:32:23
**********************************************
AERSCREEN Finished Successfully
With no errors or warnings
Check log file for details
***********************************************
Ending date and time 09/20/22 13:32:24
Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date
H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M‐O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT
REF TA HT
0.59207E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.64635E+01 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.69177E+01 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.72965E+01 75.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.77045E+01 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
* 0.77347E+01 103.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.58887E+01 125.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.41951E+01 150.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34051E+01 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28489E+01 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24338E+01 225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21121E+01 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18583E+01 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16530E+01 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14834E+01 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13430E+01 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12235E+01 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11216E+01 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10335E+01 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.95643E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.88932E+00 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.83039E+00 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.77716E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.72950E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.68686E+00 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.64851E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.61386E+00 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.58210E+00 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.55305E+00 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.52649E+00 700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.50213E+00 725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.47956E+00 750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.45869E+00 775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.43938E+00 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.42147E+00 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.40480E+00 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38909E+00 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.37443E+00 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36071E+00 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34787E+00 950.01 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.33580E+00 975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.32444E+00 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.31375E+00 1025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.30366E+00 1050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.29414E+00 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28513E+00 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.27659E+00 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26846E+00 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26072E+00 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25337E+00 1200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24638E+00 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23971E+00 1250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23331E+00 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22721E+00 1300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22137E+00 1325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21580E+00 1350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21046E+00 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20536E+00 1400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20047E+00 1425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19578E+00 1450.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19127E+00 1475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18694E+00 1500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18278E+00 1525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17878E+00 1550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17493E+00 1575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17122E+00 1600.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16765E+00 1625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16421E+00 1650.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16089E+00 1675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15768E+00 1700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15458E+00 1725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15159E+00 1750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14869E+00 1775.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14589E+00 1800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14319E+00 1825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14057E+00 1850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13803E+00 1875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13647E+00 1900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13405E+00 1925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13170E+00 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12942E+00 1975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12721E+00 2000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12506E+00 2025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12297E+00 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12095E+00 2075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11898E+00 2100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11707E+00 2125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11521E+00 2150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11340E+00 2175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11164E+00 2200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10992E+00 2225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10825E+00 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10663E+00 2275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10504E+00 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10350E+00 2325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10199E+00 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10052E+00 2375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.99094E‐01 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.97698E‐01 2425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.96335E‐01 2450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.95005E‐01 2475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.93706E‐01 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.92438E‐01 2525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.91199E‐01 2550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.89989E‐01 2575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.88807E‐01 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.87651E‐01 2625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.86520E‐01 2650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.85415E‐01 2675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.84334E‐01 2700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.83277E‐01 2725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.82242E‐01 2750.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.81229E‐01 2775.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.80238E‐01 2800.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.79267E‐01 2825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.78317E‐01 2850.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.77386E‐01 2875.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.76475E‐01 2900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.75581E‐01 2925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.74706E‐01 2950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.73848E‐01 2975.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.73007E‐01 3000.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.72182E‐01 3025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.71373E‐01 3050.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.70580E‐01 3074.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.69802E‐01 3100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.69039E‐01 3125.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.68290E‐01 3150.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.67555E‐01 3174.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.66834E‐01 3199.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.66126E‐01 3225.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.65431E‐01 3250.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.64748E‐01 3275.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.64078E‐01 3300.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.63419E‐01 3325.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.62772E‐01 3350.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.62137E‐01 3375.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.61512E‐01 3400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.60899E‐01 3425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.60296E‐01 3450.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.59703E‐01 3475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.59120E‐01 3500.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.58547E‐01 3525.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.57983E‐01 3550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.57429E‐01 3575.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.56884E‐01 3600.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.56348E‐01 3625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.55820E‐01 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.55302E‐01 3675.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.54791E‐01 3700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.54288E‐01 3725.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.53794E‐01 3750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.53307E‐01 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.52827E‐01 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.52356E‐01 3825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.51891E‐01 3849.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.51433E‐01 3875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.50983E‐01 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.50539E‐01 3925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.50102E‐01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.49671E‐01 3975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.49247E‐01 4000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.48829E‐01 4025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.48417E‐01 4050.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.48011E‐01 4075.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.47611E‐01 4100.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.47217E‐01 4125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.46828E‐01 4150.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.46445E‐01 4175.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.46067E‐01 4200.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.45694E‐01 4225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.45327E‐01 4250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.44965E‐01 4275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.44608E‐01 4300.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.44255E‐01 4325.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.43908E‐01 4350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.43565E‐01 4375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.43226E‐01 4400.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.42893E‐01 4425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.42563E‐01 4450.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.42238E‐01 4475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.41918E‐01 4500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.41601E‐01 4525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.41289E‐01 4550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.40980E‐01 4575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.40676E‐01 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.40376E‐01 4625.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.40079E‐01 4650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.39786E‐01 4675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.39497E‐01 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.39211E‐01 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38929E‐01 4750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38651E‐01 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38376E‐01 4800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38104E‐01 4825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.37836E‐01 4850.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.37570E‐01 4875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.37308E‐01 4900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.37050E‐01 4924.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36794E‐01 4950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36541E‐01 4975.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36291E‐01 5000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
mhagemann@swape.com
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
CEQA Review
Education:
M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.
B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.
Professional Certifications:
California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:
Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation,
stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and
Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional
Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with
EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major
military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic
characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE,
Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include
consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from
industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and
greenhouse gas emissions.
Positions Matt has held include:
•Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present);
•Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2104, 2017;
•Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003);
Attachment C
2
•Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004);
•Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989–
1998);
•Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000);
•Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 –
1998);
•Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995);
•Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
•Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).
Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:
With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
•Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports
and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard
to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions,
and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead
agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks
and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from
toxins and Valley Fever.
•Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial
facilities.
•Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA
compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination.
•Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns.
•Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications
for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission.
•Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S.
•Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in
Southern California drinking water wells.
•Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the
review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas
stations throughout California.
With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
•Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony
by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel.
•Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology
of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
•Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology
of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
•Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking
water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony
against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies.
•Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by
MTBE in California and New York.
3
•Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi.
•Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los
Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines.
•Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with
clients and regulators.
Executive Director:
As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange
County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of
wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange
County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection
of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the
development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the
discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including
Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business
institutions including the Orange County Business Council.
Hydrogeology:
As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to
characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point
Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army
Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
•Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of
monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and
groundwater.
•Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory
analysis at military bases.
•Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation
development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund
Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.
At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of
groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to
show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and
County of Maui.
As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the
Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included
the following:
•Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for
the protection of drinking water.
•Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities
through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted
4
public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned
about the impact of designation.
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments,
including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water
transfer.
Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance
with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste.
• Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed
the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.
EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.
With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to
prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the
Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants.
• Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and
Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico
and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA.
• Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a
national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while
serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal
watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐
wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks.
• Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water
Action Plan.
Policy:
Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 9.
Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the
potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking
water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing
to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in
Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff.
• Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in
negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific
5
principles into the policy‐making process.
•Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents.
Geology:
With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for
timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
•Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical
models to determine slope stability.
•Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource
protection.
•Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the
city of Medford, Oregon.
As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later
listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern
Oregon. Duties included the following:
•Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling.
•Conducted aquifer tests.
•Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.
Teaching:
From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university
levels:
•At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in
environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater
contamination.
•Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students.
•Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.
Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California
where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.
Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public
Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.
EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.
Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and
Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water
in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las
Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
6
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at
schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.
Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE
Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.
Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater
Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water
in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust,
Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water
in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy
of Sciences, Irvine, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a
tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a
meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water
Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.
Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited
presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of
the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a
meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address
Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental
Journalists.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater
(and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage
Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and
State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
7
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished
report.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.
Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage
Tanks. Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related
to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft
Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright
Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.
Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund
Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air
Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.
Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic
Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui,
October 1996.
Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu,
Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air
and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.
Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te r i z a t i o n and Cl ean up a t Closing Military Bases
in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.
Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater
Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of
Groundwater.
Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐
contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.
8
Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of
Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.
Other Experience:
Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations,
2009‐2011.
SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: prosenfeld@swape.com
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 10 October 2021
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling
Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist
Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.
M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.
B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment.
Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years’ experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for
evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and
transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.
Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks,
storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil
drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and
modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in
surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by
water systems and via vapor intrusion.
Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites
containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents,
pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote,
perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates
(MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from
various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the
evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist
at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert
witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an
expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad,
agricultural, and military sources.
Attachment D
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 10 October 2021
Professional History:
Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner
UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher)
UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor
UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator
UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate
Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist
National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor
Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager
Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager
Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor
King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist
Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist
Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist
Publications:
Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil
Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48
Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property
Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C.,
(2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated
Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.
Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best
Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and
Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.
Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.
Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and
Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal
of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best
Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best
Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living
near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air
Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 10 October 2021
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid
Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two
Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins
And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527-
000530.
Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near
a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.
Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for
Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.
Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater,
Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.
Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food,
Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science
and Technology. 49(9),171-178.
Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme
For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC)
2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities,
and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science
and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.
Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from
Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.
Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using
High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management
Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water
Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal
of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor
emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and
Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.
Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 10 October 2021
Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and
distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users
Network, 7(1).
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids
Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters
thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third
World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.
Presentations:
Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law
Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.
Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile
organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American
Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.
Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.;
Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.
Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.
Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse,
R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis,
Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS)
Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United
States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting , Lecture conducted
from Tuscon, AZ.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United
States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the
United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture
conducted from Tuscon, AZ.
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in
populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air
Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and
Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing
Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from
University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A
Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 10 October 2021
Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst
MA.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment
Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted
from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3-
Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture
conducted from San Diego, CA.
Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala,
Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And
Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on
Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia
Hotel in Oslo Norway.
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And
Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility . APHA 134 Annual Meeting &
Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.
Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel,
Philadelphia, PA.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human
Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton
Hotel, Irvine California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA
Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater
Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.
International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from
Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related
Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.
Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human
Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and
Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability
and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental
Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.
Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 10 October 2021
Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.
Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.
Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento,
California.
Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh
International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical
Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus
Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California
CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA
Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and
Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water
Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.
Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association . Lecture
conducted from Barcelona Spain.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a
Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from
Indianapolis, Maryland.
Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water
Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.
Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted
from Ocean Shores, California.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery
Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur
Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th
Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue
Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil
Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from
Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 10 October 2021
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from
Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur
Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th
Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue
Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three
Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim
California.
Teaching Experience:
UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science
100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on
the health effects of environmental contaminants.
National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New
Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage
tanks.
National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1,
2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.
California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San
Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.
UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation
Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.
University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry,
Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.
U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.
Academic Grants Awarded:
California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.
Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.
Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.
Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.
King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of
Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on
VOC emissions. 1998.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of
polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.
James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered
Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 10 October 2021
United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the
Tahoe National Forest. 1995.
Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts
in West Indies. 1993
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:
In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois
Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants
Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 5-14-2021
Trial, October 8-4-2021
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty, Plaintiff vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
d/b/a AMTRAK,
Case No.: No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition, 6-28-2021
In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois
Theresa Romcoe, Plaintiff vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA
Rail, Defendants
Case No.: No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition, 5-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa
Mary Tryon et al., Plaintiff vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.
Case Number CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition: 5-7-2021
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division
Robinson, Jeremy et al Plaintiffs, vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.
Case Number 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition: 3-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino
Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.
Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse
Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.
Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020
In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.
Case No.: 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition. 8-30-2019
In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey
Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.
Case No.: 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition. 6-7-2019
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 10 October 2021
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division
M/T Carla Maersk, Plaintiffs, vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido”
Defendant.
Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237
Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica
Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants
Case No.: No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition, 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica
The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants
Case No.: No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19
In United States District Court For The District of Colorado
Bells et al. Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants
Case No.: 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition, 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112th Judicial District
Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants
Cause No.: 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa
Simons et al., Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants
Cause No C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois
Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants
Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017
In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi
Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case: No 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition, 4-22-2020
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles
Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC
Case No.: LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division
Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants
Case Number: 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2017
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 10 October 2021
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish
Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants
Case No.: No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial, March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda
Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants
Case No.: RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants
Case No.: LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.
Civil Action N0. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant
Case No 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida
Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.
Case Number CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.
Case Number cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants
Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987)
Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division
James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.
Civil Action Number 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010, June 2011
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants
Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2010
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division
Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.
Case Number 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2009