HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence #16 Middleton, Samuel
From: Nathaniel Greensides <mynci90@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2022 3:38 PM
To: eComment; Hernandez, Johnathan; Sarmiento, Vicente
Subject: Property Acquisition for New Willard Park (Item 16, City Council Meeting Dec 6)
Hello,
I write in opposition to this item.
A park is definitely needed in Willard and the other surrounding neighborhoods. Yet I question that this
particular housing unit should be destroyed to expand the park when the current lots should suffice.
Furthermore, the currently vacant properties used to have housing which was razed before the City acquired the
lots. I was saddened to walk by one day and see the house boarded up for destruction when only a few weeks
prior, a senor and a few others sat on the porch(see photo of Google street view from 2019 below for
reference). Willard has historically received what I would consider an unjust reduction (destruction) of detached
single family homes due to government re-development during the construction of Civic Center starting in the
late 1970s. While I am aware that this property acquisition would not constitute eminent domain as the
landowner has listed it for sale on and off since December 2021, I take serious issue with the notion that yet
more housing should be destroyed in Willard. As the staff report notes,there are currently two families who live
on the property as renters. I actually toured the property at one point myself in 2020 when it was listed for sale
prior to the current owner "Gamsey Corp" (a business entity formed in Delaware because it affords additional
levels of property/investment ownership obfuscation to the detriment of local communities here in California
than what is required and disclosed under California state law)purchasing it. It appears that the current owner
has repeatedly tested how much profit could be made by constantly listing and removing the property for sale
(as offered by the listing history on Zillow.com). It is saddening that once again residents of this particular
corner of Willard will be subjected to further displacement because of this particular landlord's desire to profit
above all else. Additionally, it is saddening that the City instead of spending over $750,000 on making the
currently owned space as best as it can be to serve residents of Willard is proposing to spend over $750,000 on
procuring a property at top dollar rates from an absentee corporate landlord on top of the funds that will be
necessary for relocation of the tenants currently residing in the property. It is evident that the current owner is
aware of the shortage of housing units and is attempting to capitalize on it as much as possible to the detriment
of local community on top of our tax payers all while this proposal from local government seemingly does not
attempt to creatively meet park space goals and ensuring stable housing supply for current residents.
There also exists the possibility of shared public-private park space which would be a much more suitable
alternative to completely destroying more housing units in Willard for continued government re-development if
this property acquisition is to proceed.
2019 This property (right across the street from the property that the City aims to purchase) was razed and now
sits vacant:
i
u
l
l� � " " ��✓�%ai�� oar
11/0��/�
a l,� �,i//i/,�1%�%//,/�%i %�i ��;,,.: %�!J�q %%��� ✓/�!��,%%�` �f�/%i,^/ J��i/�,//� i wok �/i i
„.;
1947: the corner of Willard with proposed new park in red. Note how much housing existed in 1947:
F
i
r
a
uv v
i
� u
2022 Google Maps aerial showing just how much housing has been destroyed because of government re-
development in Willard since 1947:
2
• ""�',� ai rr -�.��j� i g ,. .,, G�7�1M � '�" ' � fill i '>G'
iti�u lilu u�l:,� �� r
� .�,
IIII I� t i
��
s J �-
n . .
r, �
n
iU��� - �� � •. �_� ..
i .. � � �i
e ,, ., ,. S / l� r
,, „�, W'�xwr
r s
;,, / .. � � a ro '
� W 4 4 ''fs
,a %� �" ,, � i �.,,,
N - ' g� n � lA J yN„�V
� Y
1 �ii
SIN I � //
� � It�� y�; `%, ;P
� �� N�� -
�, //�fir,
'�„'
a
,� n� .p
c ,�Y 1
�� ,,� ,,,% I .�a i�
c � r�,�. �, � � ,,, �,
i/ � ° ��
i
r
// o �."
�� �
,wawa "6/
,,, - )�II �, ��,
,.
i , '/
o s i � �r
ii u � �
t;
I�ri��rrraw�w, a,� j � �„ ,-, , r,�'f, r w�-,, I:-�,
r � �
�� li
� �i
i i /�o a �'
i �
H� � �
�.� ��� � �� � 9 lip! % n
�,
i�
� � l„r
i � � �/ aV�' i ;� � � �,
s
��
I y.., a r
i � ti /
t
' w�i r � � �s � � ,i "/f.��aww 2Wa�
., a N,. ( /i// � � ' i � t
m���� .. e o ,�. ,,.. �., ., ,r., �. �,„
3
Zillow listing as of December 2, 2022:
iHow ,av<<I
m $699,900 la
4Lid 36a 126Ds ft
S"'
841 N Garnsey St Santa Ana CA 92701
Est.payiment S3996/irro oet lu awualilied
LLlt1�SgYdLL\" 1 yqy�' u J
me a vallue Find n r Imry NeanOyim hoes Local 6 i
e
j
I
Prlice history
Date Event Price
rri
10/28/2022 Pending sale $699,900 $5551sgft
Report
9114Y2022 Listed for sale $699,900 $5551sgit
NOR
G I �1
6128Y20 22 Listing removed $769,g9Q 5615/sa}fh
Report
5114Y2022 Lisked Ear sale $789609Q $615/sa ft
I
I YI
E
`ReLiart
1
1211512021 Lstoing removed $649,999 %5161sry?4
;Repor[
12M2021 Listed for sale $649,499 $5161sgf4
e49�I t M Repor[
2125Y2020 Skald $434,09Q 53441s¢ft
y
el""t i Report
i I
111 V2020 P nd ng sale $560,000 $444lsgit
Repprr,.
1110Y2020 Listed for sale $5606000 $4441sa}ft
N33,31ki
RepM
118/2020 Scald $420,000 $333lsgft
4 (15,255)
11A25/2019 Perrin sale 445000 $393Js ft
4