The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem 22 - Redistricting Ward BoundariesClerk of the Council Office www.santa-ana.org/cc Item # 22 or City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report October 19, 2021 TOPIC: Revised Resolution of Intention and First Public Hearing: Redistricting Ward Boundaries AGENDA TITLE: Adopt Resolution of Intention Revising Public Hearing Dates and Times and Hold First Public Hearing Regarding Redistricting Ward Boundaries RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Adopt a resolution declaring the City's intention to consider changes to boundary lines of Wards and revising the time and place of said hearings to be held on October 19 at 7:00 p.m., November 2 at 7:00 p.m., November 15 at 5:00 p.m., and December 6, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. 2. Open and close the first public hearing seeking input regarding possible changes to the wards boundaries before proposed ward map(s) are drawn. DISCUSSION Pursuant to Santa Ana Charter Section 101.4, on September 21, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution of Intention No. 2021-053, setting fourth public hearing dates to consider changes to boundary lines of wards, and fixing the date, time and place of said hearings thereon. Due to conflicts beyond staff's control, an updated Resolution of Intention will need to be adopted to update the public hearing dates and times. Pursuant to California Election Code, the process must be completed and the adoption of the new ward boundary map must occur by April 17, 2022, which will be utilized in the November 2022 General Municipal Election. To assist in the redistricting process, demographic and outreach consultants have been secured. The City is working with demographer Paul Mitchell, Redistricting Partners, who also assisted the City during the re -boundary process and first ward -based election in 2020. Revised Resolution of Intention and First Public Hearing: Redistricting Ward Boundaries October 19, 2021 Page 2 Assembly Bill 849 — The Fair Maps Act The Fair Maps Act, effective January 1, 2020, creates a standardized redistricting criteria aimed to keep communities together and to prohibit partisan gerrymandering. It also contains expanded community outreach and public hearing requirements and timelines. In the re -drawing of ward boundaries, the City Council must ensure compliance with state and federally mandated criteria by adopting boundaries that contain a nearly equal population, based upon total population of residents of the City as determined by the most recent census, adjusted by California to count state prisoners at their "last known home address" rather than at the prison. The City Council must also adopt maps that comply with the Federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Wards must not be adopted for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against a political party, and are not designed with race as the predominate factor. Additionally, the Fair Maps Act now requires the City Council to adopt ward boundaries using specific criteria as set forth in the following order of priority: 1. To the extent practicable, City Council wards shall be geographically contiguous. areas that meet only at the points of adjoining corners are not contiguous. Areas that are separated by water and not connected by a bridge are not contiguous. 2. To the extent practicable, the geographic integrity of any local neighborhood or local community of interest shall be respected in a manner that minimizes its division. A "community of interest" is a population that shares common social or economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation. Communities of interest do not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates. 3. City Council ward boundaries should be easily identifiable and understandable by residents. To the extent practicable, City Council wards shall be bounded by natural and artificial barriers, by streets, or by the boundaries of the city. 4. To the extent practicable, and where it does not conflict with the preceding criteria in this subdivision, City Council wards shall be drawn to encourage geographical compactness in a manner that nearby areas of population are not bypassed in favor of more distant populations. Procedural Requirements for Redistricting State law authorizes the City Council to draw its own map. This can include a process of draft map submissions from the public and demographer for City Council review and consideration. In addition, the Fair Maps Act provides specific procedural requirements the City Council must meet before adopting a final map of ward boundaries for the redistricting process. The City must hold at least four public hearings that enable community members to provide input regarding the composition of the City Council wards. These hearings shall consist of: • At least one public hearing before the City Council draws draft map(s). • At least two public hearings after the City Council has drawn draft map(s). Revised Resolution of Intention and First Public Hearing: Redistricting Ward Boundaries October 19, 2021 Page 3 • At least one public hearing or public workshop shall be held on a Saturday, on a Sunday, or after 6 p.m. on a weekday Monday through Friday. The Fair Maps Act also outlines requirements to increase accessibility and participation at the public hearings. A public hearing must be held at its noticed time if it is consolidated with another regular or special meeting, must be held in an accessible facility, and translation services must be provided for "applicable languages" if it is requested at least 72 hours before a public hearing. The California Secretary of State, per the Fair Maps Act, is required to list the applicable languages for all cities. The California Secretary of State listed Spanish and Vietnamese as the "applicable languages" for the City of Santa Ana. The City of Santa Ana will provide Spanish and Vietnamese translation services at all public hearings, as well as at any community redistricting workshops, and translation services in other languages, upon request to the Clerk of the Council's Office at least 72 hours prior to the meeting in order to make the reasonable arrangements. Timeline and Next Steps A timeline of scheduled events is listed below as a reference to engage the community and solicit public input in the redrawing of the City's ward boundaries. This public hearing is for the City Council and the public to receive a report on the redistricting process and the criteria for redistricting boundary lines; and to provide initial input on the ward boundaries. In efforts to fully engage the community, during the next few months, the Clerk of the Council's Office is prepared to conduct in -person and virtual community meetings throughout the City, solicit input, educate the community on the redistricting process, and provide training on how to use the mapping tools once the redistricting data is released. • Public Input Workshops: Saturday, September 25, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. - Delhi Center, 505 E. Central Ave. Thursday, October 7, 2021, at 6:00 p.m. - Pentecostal Church of God, 1025 W. Memory Lane Saturday, October 9, 2021, at 10.00 a.m. -Southwest Senior Center, 2201 W McFadden Ave Saturday, October 23, 2021, at 1.00 p.m. - Salgado Recreation Center, 706 N. Newhope St. Friday, October 29, 2021, at 6.00 p.m. - El Salvador Community Center, 1825 W Civic Center Dr. Saturday, October 30, 2021, at 10.00 a.m. - Memorial Community Center, 2102 S Flower St. • October 19, 2021: The City will hold its first public hearing at 7:00 p.m. before maps are drawn. Revised Resolution of Intention and First Public Hearing: Redistricting Ward Boundaries October 19, 2021 Page 4 November 2, 2021: The City will hold its second public hearing at 7:00 p.m. to present 2020 Census findings to the City Council during a regular meeting, including redistricting process updates. • November 15, 2021: The City will hold its third public hearing at 5:00 p.m. to present staff recommended initial draft map (or maps) and accompanying technical report to City Council during a special meeting, along with public comment and submitted proposed maps analysis, and conduct the first public hearing on the draft map. • December 6, 2021: The City will hold the fourth public hearing at 5.00 p.m. on the draft map. • December 21, 2021: Present staff recommended final map for approval. Adoption of final map and first reading of ordinance by the City Council. • January 18, 2022: Adoption of final map and second reading of ordinance by the City Council. Public Outreach and Communication The Clerk of the Council's Office is committed to taking steps to have a robust and diverse community participation in the process for redrawing ward maps for future City Council elections. The goals in the outreach plan are to educate residents about the redistricting requirements, ensure participation from a wide range of residents, and build community awareness and understanding of the process. During this process, staff seeks public input regarding what communities of interest exist, how to re -draw the ward maps to maintain existing communities, along with suggestions and preferences. The Clerk of the Council's Office is using the following community outreach plan: • Public messaging via social media, City's website, press releases, newsletters, and other public communications, in English, Spanish, and Vietnamese • Dedicated webpage for redistricting updates and information: www.santa- ana.org/redistricting • Press releases sent to various outlets and groups • Collateral material available at city facilities and other City meetings/events • Marketing video in English, Spanish, and Vietnamese • Advertisements on City's local public network channel and YouTube ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Revised Resolution of Intention and First Public Hearing: Redistricting Ward Boundaries October 19, 2021 Page 5 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Resolution 2. Presentation Submitted By: Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, AMENDING AND RESTATING RESOLUTION NO. 2021-053 AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO CONSIDER CHANGES TO BOUNDARY LINES OF WARDS, AND FIXING THE DATE, TIME AND PLACE OF SAID HEARINGS THEREON WHEREAS, In 2020 the federal decennial census was conducted and census data was recently released by the federal government. WHEREAS, pursuant to California Elections Code Section 21621, after the federal decennial census, the City Council shall adopt boundaries of all Council wards. WHEREAS, Santa Ana Charter Section 101.4 requires that, before making any change, modification or realignment of ward boundaries, the City Council shall pass a resolution declaring its intention to make such change. WHEREAS, The City Council will set Public Hearing dates and locations in which any person having an interest in, objection to, or suggestion regarding the making of changes in ward boundary lines may appear before the City Council and be heard thereon. WHEREAS, Santa Ana Charter Section 101.4 provides that the City Council shall direct the Clerk of the Council to give notice of said hearings by publishing this Resolution once a week for two weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. WHEREAS, on September 21, 2021, the Santa Ana City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-053 declaring the City Council's intention to consider changes to boundary lines of wards, and fixing the date, time, and place of said hearings thereon. WHEREAS, a public input workshop was held on Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. at Delhi Center located at 505 E. Central Avenue. WHEREAS, on October 5, 2021, the Santa Ana City Council determined that the first Public Hearing would be held on October 19, 2021 instead of October 5, 2021. WHEREAS, a public input workshop was held on Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6.00 p.m. at Pentecostal Church of God located at 1025 W. Memory Lane. WHEREAS, a public interest workshop was held on Saturday, October 9, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. at the Southwest Senior Center located at 2201 West McFadden Avenue. Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 1 of 3 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby declares its intention to consider making changes, modifications or realignment of ward boundaries. SECTION 2. Public Hearing dates to consider making changes to current ward boundary lines are hereby scheduled for: October 19, 2021 at 7:00 p.m., November 2, 2021 at 7:00 p.m., November 15, 2021 at 5:00 p.m., and December 6, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. The first two (2) Public Hearings will seek input regarding possible changes to the ward boundaries before any proposed ward map(s) are drawn. The next two (2) Public Hearings will seek input regarding the content of the draft map(s). The City Council will consider the introduction and first reading of an Ordinance establishing the new ward boundaries on December 21, 2021. On January 18, 2022, the City Council will consider final adoption of an Ordinance establishing the new ward boundaries. SECTION 3. Additional public input workshop dates have been scheduled for: Saturday October 23, 2021, 1 p.m. — Salgado Recreation Center, 706 N. Newhope St, Friday October 29, 2021, 6 p.m - El Salvador Community Center, 1825 W. Civic Center Dr, and Saturday October 30, 2021, 10 a.m. — Memorial Community Center, 2102 S. Flower St. [•9x��[�]►[��i1�:Z�7 . • � . �� - �.�1irRi�:Z�7[1[i[7i�\[.��IY�iQIF'�i3 adopted September 21, 2021. SECTION 5. The City Council directs the Clerk of Council to give notice of the public hearings and public input workshops by publishing this Resolution once a week for two (2) weeks in a newspaper of general circulation. SECTION 6. The City Council directs staff to work with the demographer and other appropriate consultants as needed, to provide a detailed analysis of the City's current demographics and any other information or data necessary to prepare ward re - boundary maps that divides the City into voting wards in a manner consistent with federal and state law, including, but not limited to the U.S. Constitution, the California Constitution, the federal Voting Rights Act, and the City Charter. SECTION 7. The City Council directs staff to establish a means of communication to answer questions from the public regarding hearings dates and to make every effort possible to translate material and notices in multiple languages, including Spanish, Vietnamese, Chinese and Korean. SECTION 8. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by a majority of the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 2 of 3 ADOPTED this day of , 2021. Vicente Sarmiento Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2021 -XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 3 of 3 o REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS City of Santa Ana Redistricting 4RALN-0.9 -COUNTY 4Cq -- 00VI Redistricting 101 October 19, 2021 THE ODLD EN Cliff' 4 FOUNDED a11¢9 iy':'• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS Redistricting Partners Redistricting Partners is a firm that focuses on redistricting, demographics and Voting Rights Act analysis. Our partnership with the City of Santa Ana includes: - Helping with outreach meetings - Generating draft maps based off public input and census data - Training staff and Council Members on the redistricting process and best practices - Analyzing qualitative and quantitative data for the City to use during the redistricting process iy':• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS Overview This presentation will cover a range of topics regarding the redistricting process, traditional redistricting principles, and the timeline. Including: - What is Redistricting? - State and Federal Voting Rights Act - Traditional Redistricting Principles - Timeline - Current Demographics iy!� REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS What is Redistricting? Redistricting is at its core the act of equalizing population among districts. This is important in order to meet two requirements - one constitutional, one from Supreme Court precedent: - Equal Representation (14 th Amendment) -how effective any resident can be at advocating for themselves or being represented within a jurisdiction. - One Person One Vote - equal ability to elect a candidate of choice. iy':• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS What is Redistricting? Redistricting has changed significantly over the years as federal and state laws, norms, best practices, and public opinion has transformed. In Public Opinion /Media: - 97% of Voters agree that "local government should be required to have transparent / open redistricting." - Media and Community Based Organizations have become much more adept at covering redistricting. iy':• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS What is the Voting Rights Act? The Voting Rights Act is a federal law that seeks to remedy racial disenfranchisement. It has two sections impacting redistricting: Section 2 — Majority Minority Districts Section 5 —Preclearance (inactive) The California Voting Rights Act prohibits the use of at - large election systems in local government if there is proof of racially polarized voting. It does not impact Santa Ana. iy':• REDISTRICTING (HO PARTNERS Traditional Redistricting Principles Preventing a Ward from becoming a Gerrymander There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts. • Relatively equal size - people, not citizens • Contiguous — wards should not hop/jump • Maintain "comm unities of interest" • Follow city and census designated place boundaries • Keep wards compact — appearance/function iy':'• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS Traditional Redistricting Principles Preventing a Ward from becoming a Gerrymander There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts. • Relatively equal size - people, not citizens • Contiguous — wards should not hop/jump • Maintain "comm unities of interest" • Follow city and census designated place boundaries • Keep wards compact — appearance/function iy':• REDISTRICTING (HO PARTNERS Equal Population Utilizing the U.S. Census Decennial File What is "equal" population has been a key subject in redistricting litigation. • Congress: 1 Person • Local Govt: 10% • Legislative/others: 1%-5% or other more restrictive by choice. iy':'• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS Traditional Redistricting Principles Preventing a Ward from becoming a Gerrymander There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts. Relatively equal size - people, not citizens F Contiguous — wards should not hop/jump • Maintain "communities of interest" • Following city and census designated place boundaries • Keep wards compact — appearance/function iy':• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS Contiguity Two definitions for what is contiguous Contiguity should be thought of as "literal" and "functional." • An area that is one whole piece is "literally contiguous." • An area that represents how the population functions or how people are connected is "functionally contiguous." CONTIGUOUS 4 iy':'• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS Traditional Redistricting Principles Preventing a Ward from becoming a Gerrymander There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts. Relatively equal size - people, not citizens • Contiguous — wards should not hop/jump • Maintain "communities of interest" • Follow city and census designated place boundaries • Keep wards compact — appearance/function iy':• REDISTRICTING (HO PARTNERS Communities of Interest Bringing like people together for representation What are you looking for in trying to judge the applicability of a Community of Interest to the redistricting process? • Group with shared culture /characteristics • Geographic Nature /Density /Ability to be mapped 0 Relationship to Agency /Policies iy':'• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS Traditional Redistricting Principles Preventing a Ward from becoming a Gerrymander There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts. Relatively equal size - people, not citizens • Contiguous — wards should not hop/jump • Maintain "comm unities of interest" Follow city and census designated place boundaries • reep wards compact — appearance/function iy':• REDISTRICTING (HO PARTNERS Protecting Cities & Census Designated Places Bringing like people together for representation FAIR MAPS Act: To the extent practicable, the geographic integrity of a city or census designated place shall be respected in a manner that minimizes its division. iy':'• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS Traditional Redistricting Principles Preventing a Ward from becoming a Gerrymander There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts. • Relatively equal size - people, not citizens • Contiguous — wards should not hop/jump • Maintain "comm unities of interest" • Follow city and census designated place boundaries Keep wards compact —appearance/function iy':• REDISTRICTING (HO PARTNERS Compactness Determining what is "compact" California has a rather elegant/simple definition. • Not bypassing nearby populated areas in favor of more distant populated areas iy':• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS Additional Redistricting Rules Criteria required in Santa Ana Beyond Traditional Principles The FAIR MAPS Act adds more criteria to the process. • Not consider Incumbents or candidates. • Not draw wards to advantage or disadvantage a political party. • Hold minimum set of hearings, encourage public engagement. • Posting of all redistricting commission information on a website that is maintained for the next 10 years. iy':• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS The City of Santa Ana Redistricting Process Timeline October 19t" First Hearing presentation for the public November 2nd Second Hearing to gather input November 15t" Third Hearing on the draft maps December 6tn Fourth Hearing on the draft maps December 21St First reading Approval of Approval January 18, 2022 Final Approval of the Map iy':• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS The City of Santa Ana Redistricting Process Community Meetings Ward 6: September 25, 2021110:00 a.m. — Delhi Center, 505 E. Central Ave (already held) Ward 3: October 7, 2021) 6:00 p.m. — Pentecostal Church of God, 1025 W. Memory Lane (already held) Ward 2: October 9, 2021, 10:00 a.m. — Southwest Senior Center, 2201 W. McFadden Ave. (already held) Ward 1: October 23, 2021) 1:00 p.m. — Salgado Recreation Center, 706 N. Newhope St. Ward 5: October 29, 20211 6:00 p.m. — El Salvador Community Center, 1825 W. Civic Center Dr. Ward 4: October 30, 2021, 10:00 a.m. — Memorial Community Center, 2102 S. Flower St. ►RDEN GROVE "40p, -A\ UPANUE i Tustin iy':'• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS 2020 Census 1 2 3 4 S 6 Population 51,828 50,254 56,893 50,209 52,458 49,904 Deviation 96 1,670 4.969 1,71 S 534 -2,020 Deviation -0,2% -3.296 $496 -3-3% 1,0% Other 4.311 4,580 12.092 3,4483 3.635 4,053 Othef 96 8.396 9,1% 21,396 up.$% b.996 8-1% Latina 28.322 39.95E 38.929 43,761 45,131 42.735 Latino % S44% 793% 68.4% $7 a 86.0% 85-E °% Asian 18,808 5.263 5.211 2.718 3.157 2,743 Asian 96 3613 10-S% 9.296 SA% 6.096 5S% Black 387 553 661 247 535 373 S lack % 0_796 1.1% 1.295 O.S% 1.01A 0.7% Citizen Voting Age Population (CHAP) 1 2 S 4 S 6 Total CVAP 30,926 24,245 31372 26,067 20,799 21,520 Other CVAP 4.324 434E 11.5B7 3,931 3.074 3,39E Dt her CVAP % 14.0% 17.9% 36.9% 15.1% 14.8% 1518% Latino CVAP 131205 15.725 15,623 19,68S 1S,152 1S,B21 Latina CVAP 42-796 64.9% 49.8% 75596 72.8% 73s% Asian CVAP 13.157 3.699 3.428 2,005 2,321 2,063 Asian CVAP % 42596 153% 103% 7.7% T1,2A 9.6% B lack r-VAP 241 473 734 446 252 TM Black CVAP % 0-696 1.9% 2.1% 1.7% 1.2% 1.1% iy':'• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS District 1 5ANIA ANA F44nl Ple)'J�flry Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino `Jrs Asian Asian % Black Black % 51,820 -96 -0.2% 4,311 6.3% 28.322 54,65A 18,608 3G3% 387 0.7% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latina CVAP % Asian CVAP Asia CVAP % Brack CVAP Black CVAP % 2020 Census 54ch 8 INEIIIIII tithe- atlrro46 Aslan11 Bieck% Citizen Votina Aae PoDulatlon 42% 42% 1496 other% Litho% Aslan% 0% Black 96 30,925 4324 14-()% 13205 42.7% 13,157 42 5% 241 O_E 2% iy':• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS District 2 �1Vf�� SFI•� 1 f 41 Population Deviation Deviation % Other other % Lat6o Latino % Asian Aslan % Black Black 9b 50, 54 -1,670 -3.2% 41580 9.1% 39,858 79,3% 51263 10.5% 553 111% Totai CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Lati no CVAP Lati no CVAP % Asia n CVAP Asia n CVAP % Buck CVAP Nack CVAP 96 2020 Census 79% Otner4 Latho% Asian% 6iackw Citizen Noting Age Population 64% ■ m = = ' Other% Latino% Aslan% SlacK'A 24.245 4.348 17-9% 15,725 64.9% 3.699 15.3% 473 1-9% iy':'• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS District 3 NTA ANA Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black % 56,893 4,969 9.6% 12,092 21.3% 38,929 6&4% 5,211 9.2% w 1.2% Total CHAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 31,372 11,567 36.9% 15 623 49.6% 3,428 10.9% 734 23% 2020 Census 69% 21% } �_aUro1� Aalun Citizen Voting Age Population 49% 1096 LaUnoX Allan% alade% iy':'• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS District 2020 Census 87% Other% Latlno% Asian% Slack% Citizen Voting Age Population 75% 15% mm UyEa Ocne.1� Launo% Asian% Black% Population Deviation Deviation% other Other% Latfnv Latino% Asian Asian% Black Black96 50209 -1,715 -3.3% 3,483 6.9% 43,761 87.2% 2.718 5.4% 247 0.5% Tota I CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Lat i no CVAP Lati no CVAP % Asia n CVAP Asia n CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 26.067 3.931 15.1 % 19.685 7S_5% 2 005 7.7% 446 1.7% 'fie REDISTRICTING 410 PARTNERS District Population Deviation Deviation % Daher Other % Latino Labno % Asian Aslan % Black Black % 52.458 534 1.0% 3.635 6.9% 45.131 86.0% 3,157 &()% 5.35 1.0% Total CVAP Other CHAP Other CVAP % Latina CVAP Latina CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVA# Black CVAP % 20,799 3,074 14.876 15.152 72.8% 2.321 11.2% 252 1.2% 2020 Census 8 Other'? Latino% Asian% alaa% Citizen Voting Age Population Other % 72% Latho% Asian% slack% LW iy':• REDISTRICTING 00 PARTNERS District lumn 2020 Census 85% Other96 Latlno96 Aslan% Black's ■ti Citizen Voting Age Population 73% Other% Latlno'A AslanA6 Black% r Population Deviation Deviation % Daher Other% Latina Labno`xo- Asian Asian % Black Black 96 49.904 -2,020 -3.9% 4,053 8.1% 42.735 851.6% 2.743 5.5%} 373 0.7% TotaICVAP 01herCVAP Otheir CVAP% Lat i no CVAP Lati no CVAP % Asia nCVAP Asia nCVAP% &ackCVAP Black CVA?% 21.520 3,398 15-8% 15,821 73,59E 2.063 9.6% 238 1.1% .�1 IIWLd1 1 PAA JI Orozco, Norma From: Lydia Salvetta <Isalvetta3@icloud.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 2:18 PM To: eComment Subject: Item #24 on Agenda At 7pm My name is Lydia Salvetta, current president of republic homes neighborhood association. The South Side leaders have met with council member Phil Bacerra, Ward 4 several times and feel that we are communities of interest (Republic homes, Thornton park, south coast metro,sunwood central, metro classic, Sandpointe, Armstrong ranch etc. ) and would like the re -districting to go back to its original wards. Seems like ward 4 has had many changes in my tenure. We also have had meetings with South Co ast Alliance and councilmember Bacerra. Thank you in advance, for your time and consideration. Mrs. Salvetta. I Sent from my Whone