HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 20 - Authorize Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 20
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
February 2, 2021
TOPIC: Authorize Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.
AGENDA TITLE:
Approve agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. for design services of the
Standard Avenue Protected Bike Lane Project in an amount not to exceed $820,702.30
for a three-year term (Project No. 20-6965) (Non-General Fund)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.
to provide professional engineering services for the Standard Avenue Protected Bike
Lane Project, in the amount of $746,093.00, with a 10 percent contingency of $74,609.30,
for a total amount not to exceed $820,702.30, for a three-year term beginning February
2, 2021 and expiring February 1, 2024, with the option for two (2), one-year extensions,
subject non-substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney.
DISCUSSION
On August 27, 2020, the Public Works Agency released Request for Proposals (RFP) No.
20-113, by which it sought a qualified firm to provide design engineering for the Standard
Avenue Protected Bike Lane Project (Exhibit 1). The scope of work includes preparation
of the plans, specifications, and estimate package including, but not limited to, a street
improvement plan, construction details, traffic signal modification, channelization plan,
and landscape and irrigation plan. These services will help ensure the safety of bicyclists
in the public right-of-way.
The RFP was advertised on the City’s online procurement management and publication
system, with Proposals due on September 24, 2020. Six proposals were received and
evaluated by a selection committee. Based on criteria outlined in the RFP, the following
summarizes the responsive firms and their ranking:
Firm City Rank
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.Irvine, CA 1
Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc.Orange, CA 2
Authorize Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.
February 2, 2021
Page 2
3
9
7
Firm City Rank
Stantec Irvine, CA 3
Tetra Tech Irvine, CA 4
IBI Group Irvine, CA 5
KPFF Consulting Engineers Irvine, CA 6
In accordance with the qualifications-based selection process, the fee schedules were
opened after the proposal evaluations were completed. Staff recommends awarding an
agreement (Exhibit 2) to Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. to provide engineering services
based upon the scope of work and selection criteria outlined in RFP 20-113. Their
proposal demonstrated the firm has the necessary capacity and expertise to complete the
required services on an expedited grant-funding deadline. The firm’s rates are reasonable
and within industry standard, the team qualifications are appropriate for this project, and
the proposal was determined to provide the best value for the City.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funds are budgeted and available for expenditure in the current Fiscal Year 2020-21
Capital Improvement Program (Project No. 20-6965). The table below indicates the
estimated expenditures by fiscal year. Any remaining balances not expended at the end
of the agreement term will be carried forward for expenditure into future fiscal years in the
event the optional extension periods are exercised.
Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit - Account
No.
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit -
Account No.
Description
Amount
Agreement Term
2020-21
(Feb-
June)
14817614-
66220
(20-6965)
Traffic System
Management
Grant
Active Transportation
Program
Augmentation,
Improvements Other
Than Building
$149,219.00
2021-22
(July-
June)
14817614-
66220
(20-6965)
Traffic System
Management
Grant
Active Transportation
Program
Augmentation,
Improvements Other
Than Building
$298,437.00
2022-23
(July-
June)
14817614-
66220
(20-6965)
Traffic System
Management
Grant
Active Transportation
Program
Augmentation,
Improvements Other
Than Building
$298,437.00
Authorize Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.
February 2, 2021
Page 3
3
9
7
Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit - Account
No.
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit -
Account No.
Description
Amount
2023-24
(July-
Feb)
14817614-
66220
(20-6965)
Traffic System
Management
Grant
Active Transportation
Program
Augmentation,
Improvements Other
Than Building
$74,609.30
TOTAL:$820,702.30
EXHIBIT(S)
1. Location Map
2. Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.
Submitted By:
Nabil Saba, Executive Dir Public Works
Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager
NORTH Euclid Street 1st Street
17th Street
PWA
SANTA ANA
PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
22
55
405
Edinger Ave. Main St. Raitt Newhope Standard Avenue Protected Bike Lane
and Protected Intersection Project
Segerstrom Ave.
MacArthur Blvd.
Warner
Ave. Grand Ave. Harbor Blvd. Bristol St. Flower St. Tustin Ave. Dyer Rd.
5
Alton Ave. Sullivan Willits Fairview Civic Ctr. Standard McFadden Ave. Broadway Kent
Chestnut
Hazard Jackson Fifth Santa Ana Blvd. Mabury Bishop Lyon St. Raitt Adams
PROJECT
Attachment C - Project Location Map
Exhibit 2
AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES FOR
THE STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE PROJECT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 2nd day of February, 2021 by and between
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. (“Consultant”), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and
municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of
California (“City”).
RECITALS
A.
B.
C.
On August 27, 2020, the City issued Request for Proposal No. 20-113, by which it
sought a qualified consultant to provide engineering consulting services for the
Standard Avenue Protected Bike Lane and Protected Intersection project.
Consultant submitted a responsive proposal that was selected by the City.
Consultant represents that it is able and willing to provide the services described in
the scope of work that was included in RFP No. 20-113.
In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is
knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this
Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably
be expected from a professional contracting firm in the field.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the
terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:
1.SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall perform the services described in the scope of work that was included in
RFP No. 20-113 and that is attached as Exhibit A, and as further delineated in Consultant’s
proposal, which is attached as Exhibit B and incorporated in full.
2.COMPENSATION
a. City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services
under this Agreement, the rates and charges identified in Exhibit C. The total sum
to be expended under the term of this Agreement, including any extension periods,
shall not exceed $820,702.30. The sum is comprised of (1) the base amount of
$746,093 and (2) a 10% contingency in the amount of $74,609.30 for additional
services at the City’s sole discretion.
b.Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of
proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures.
Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of
performance set forth in the Recitals and Scope of Work, which may reasonably be
expected by City.
Page 1 of 8
3.TERM
This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and terminate on February
1, 2024, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 17, below. The term of this
Agreement may be extended for two 1-year periods upon a writing executed by the City Manager
and City Attorney.
4.PREVAILING WAGES
Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq.,
and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq.,
(“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the
performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the services
being performed are part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by
the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to
fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the
City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or
liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.
5.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an
independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall
it be construed to create an employer-employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to
allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant
performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be
provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and
regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social
security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be
responsible for all applicable withholding taxes.
6.OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS
This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use,
modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property
embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of
authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical
drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or
caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Consultant
shall require all subconsultants to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and
perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subconsultant prepares under this Agreement.
Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all
Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to
Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in
any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within
the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk.
Page 2 of 8
7.INSURANCE
Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain
and shall require its subconsultants, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below:
a.Commercial General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial
general liability insurance naming the City, its officers, employees, agents,
volunteers and representatives as additional insured(s) and shall include, but not
be limited to protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury,
including death resulting therefrom and damage to property, resulting from any
act or occurrence arising out of Consultant’s operations in the performance of this
Agreement, including, without limitation, acts involving vehicles. The amounts
of insurance shall be not less than the following: single limit coverage applying to
bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and property
damage, in the total amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence, with $2,000,000 in the
aggregate. Such insurance shall (a) name the City, its officers, employees, agents,
volunteers and representatives as additional insured(s); (b) be primary with
respect to insurance or self-insurance programs maintained by the City; and (c)
contain standard separation of insureds provisions.
b.
c.
Business automobile liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined single
limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall include
coverage for owned, hired and non-owned automobiles.
Worker’s Compensation Insurance. In accordance with the California Labor Code,
Consultant, if Consultant has any employees, is required to be insured against
liability for worker’s compensation or to undertake self-insurance. Prior to
commencing the performance of the work under this Agreement, Consultant agrees
to obtain and maintain any employer’s liability insurance with limits not less than
$1,000,000 per accident.
d.
e.
If Consultant is or employs a licensed professional such as an architect or engineer:
Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit
of not less than $1,000,000 per claim with $2,000,000 in the aggregate.
The following requirements apply to the insurance to be provided by Consultant
pursuant to this section:
(i)Consultant shall maintain all insurance required above in full force and
effect for the entire period covered by this Agreement.
(ii)Certificates of insurance shall be furnished to the City upon execution of
this Agreement and shall be approved by the City.
(iii) Certificates and policies shall state that the policies shall not be cancelled
or reduced in coverage or changed in any other material aspect, by
Consultant, without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City.
(iv)Consultant shall supply City with a fully executed additional insured
endorsement.
Page 3 of 8
f.If Consultant fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this
section or fails or refuses to furnish the City with required proof that insurance has
been procured and is in force and paid for, the City shall have the right, at the City’s
election, to forthwith terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not affect
Consultant’s right to be paid for its time and materials expended prior to notification
of termination. Consultant waives the right to receive compensation and agrees to
indemnify the City for any work performed prior to approval of insurance by the
City.
8.INDEMNIFICATION
With respect to its operations, other than the performance of professional services,
Consultant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend City, with counsel selected in
reasonable consultation with City, the City Indemnitees, from and against any third party damages,
liabilities, judgments, settlements, costs, claims, demands, actions, suits, losses, and expenses
(including reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees, legal costs and expenses recoverable under
applicable law) arising out of the death or bodily injury to any person or destruction or damage to
any property, to the extent caused by Consultant’s negligent acts, errors or omissions or willful
misconduct in the performance of services under this Agreement and anyone for whom Consultant
is legally liable. With respect to the performance of professional services, Consultant agrees to
indemnity and hold harmless (but not defend) City, and its officers, officials, employees, and
volunteers (collectively, the “City Indemnitees”), from and against liability for damages to the
extent caused by Consultant’s, recklessness, negligent acts, errors or omissions, or willful
misconduct in the performance of services under this Agreement, except such loss or damage
caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Consultant has no obligation to pay
for any of City Indemnitees defense related cost prior to a final determination of liability, or to pay
any amount that exceeds Consultant’s finally determined percentage of liability based upon the
comparative fault of Consultant, except as provided in Civil Code Section 2782.8(a) and (e).
9.INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION
Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents,
representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, and attorney’s fees,
for infringement of any United States’ letters patent, trademark, or copyright contained in the work
product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement.
10.RECORDS
Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed
under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements
charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by
law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and
invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the City to
examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created
pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all
Page 4 of 8
work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three
(3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement.
11.CONFIDENTIALITY
If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such
information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that
it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and
further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like
importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. “Confidential Information” shall include all
nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also
information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential
information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered
by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any
information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the
Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant
without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e)
is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the
City.
12.CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE
Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not have interests, direct or
indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this
Agreement.
13.NOTICE
Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement
shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by
first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in
the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons:
To City:Clerk of the City Council
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988
Fax 714- 647-6956
Executive Director
Public Works Agency
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Page 5 of 8
To Consultant: Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.
2121 Alton Parkway, Suite 210
Irvine, CA 92606
Attn: Darin Johnson or Paul Martin
A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter,
any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail,
communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been
deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and
addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have
been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the
transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these
timeframes, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded.
14.EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT
This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and
Consultant regarding the subject matter herein, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral
or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and
any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be
modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of
Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other
instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not
bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no
representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any
party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein.
15.ASSIGNMENT
Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant,
Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior
written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without
the City’s prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall
be construed to limit the City’s ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this
Agreement performed by City personnel or by other Consultants retained by City.
16.WAIVER
No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or
granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by
the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or
remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not
similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies.
Page 6 of 8
17.TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of
termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant
compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of
termination, subject to the following conditions:
a.As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to
deliver to the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case
such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and
Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems
appropriate.
b.Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of
performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement.
18.NON-DISCRIMINATION
Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, relation, sex, marital
status, sexual orientation, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited
by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or
other employment related activities or in connection with any activities under this Agreement.
Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable
federal, state and local laws and regulations.
19.JURISDICTION-VENUE
This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity,
interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be
determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that
Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or
arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement.
20.PROFESSIONAL LICENSES
Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses,
permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder
and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of
Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and
in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and
exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement.
21.MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
a.Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the
power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of
Page 7 of 8
EXHIBIT A
Appendix
ATTACHMENT 1
SCOPE OF WORK
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
STANDARD AVE. PROTECTED BIKE LANE AND PROTECTED INTERSECTION
PROJECT
RFP NO.: 20-113
INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Santa Ana (City) desires to enter into an Agreement with a qualified professional
engineering consulting firm for the preparation PS&E package for Standard Avenue Protected
Bike Lane and Protected Intersection Project.
The proposed project will implement a Class 2 buffered bike lane along Standard Avenue from
Warner Avenue to Edinger Avenue, a Class 4 protected bike lane from Edinger Avenue to
Chestnut Avenue, and a Class 3 bicycle boulevard from Chestnut Avenue to 3rd Street. The
project also includes a fully protected intersection at Standard and Mcfadden as well as partial
protection/bulbouts at other various intersections. Signalized bicycle crossings will include
separate bicycle phasing and signal heads.
New Traffic Signal:
1. Standard at Bishop New Signal
Traffic Signal Modifications at the following locations:
1. Standard at Edinger Modification
2. Standard at Hobart Modification
3. Standard at McFadden Modification
4. Standard at Warner Bike Detection
5. Standard at St Gertrude Bike Detection
6. Standard at Chestnut Bike Detection
7. Standard at First Bike Detection
Hybrid Beacon:
1. Standard at Wakeham or Wisteria
Pedestrian improvements along the corridor include high-visibility crosswalks and bulb outs at
all crossings. The existing conditions along Standard Avenue includes 4-lane configuration
segments (two northbound lanes and two southbound lanes) and 5-lane configuration segments
(two northbound lanes, two southbound lanes, and a center two-way left turn lane). The majority
of the corridor will be reconfigured with a road diet down to a 3-lane configuration (one
northbound lane, one southbound lane, and a center two-way left turn lane) with bike lanes (as
described above) in each direction. Existing uses along the project corridor includes single
family and multi-family residences, schools, parks, and commercial shopping. Further by
connecting to an existing bicycle network this project will provide connections to Downtown
Santa Ana, Santa Ana College, Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, and the Orange
County Civic Center. The Project also includes street resurfacing, water quality improvements,
City of Santa Ana RFP 20-113
Page A1-1
and improvements at the intersections including, but not limited to: pavement, curb extensions,
sidewalk, drainage and utility adjustments/relocations, signage, striping, and landscaping and
irrigation where feasible. All improvements will be constructed in the Public Right of Way. See
ATTACHMENT 4 for conceptual plans.
The Project is funded through the Active Transportation Program (ATP Program).
City of Santa Ana RFP 20-113
Page A1-2
CONSULTANT SERVICES
A. PROJECT COORDINATION. The Consultant shall be fully responsible for the overall
management and coordination for the project, which may include, but is not limited to project
development team meetings, liaison with affected agencies, and utility companies. Prepare
progress report and schedule, securing permits for all field studies and any other required
permits from other agencies.
B. RECORDS RESEARCH. Research all information pertinent to the project including, but
not limited to existing field condition, as-built plans and record drawings, right-of-way data
and all future improvement plans adjacent to or affecting the project site. The selected
Consultant shall identify all existing and proposed facilities within the projects limits and
potential conflicts.
C. SURVEY. On-the-ground field topographical survey work is required for the Consultant
(and/or the Consultant’s Subconsultant) using prevailing wages to identify existing horizontal
and vertical features that are needed for the project. It is the Consultant’s responsibility to
provide only the survey necessary for the design of the protected bike lanes on Standard
Avenue from Warner to 3rd Street . Consultant shall identify in the proposal a detail list of
features the survey would include. Design level survey and base mapping of the project site
shall be prepared in US Customary English units by a California licensed Land Surveyor in
accordance with the City guidelines and in Microstation V8i Computer Aided design and
Drafting (CADD) format. The horizontal datum shall be NAD 83 and the vertical datum shall
be NAVD 88.
D. WATER QUALITY. The Consultant shall coordinate with the City for the Low Impact
Development (LID) requirements on the project and to prepare a Water Quality Management
Plan (WQMP) for the project. Consultant shall provide BMPs with appropriate size based on
treatment and peak flow rates, freight to job site and one year of maintenance to include units
and cost in the engineer’s cost estimate.
The selection of Best Management Practices (BMPs) will always be subject to site specific
conditions and the Consultant will be required to perform the research into the site specific
conditions (e.g. prior contamination, depth to groundwater, soil conditions, interfering
utilities, etc.) that could preclude infiltration. The Consultant shall also perform the required
soils and/or infiltration testing per the Technical Guidance Documents, as necessary to
design the infiltration system assuming it is the selected LID approach.
Please find information and links to relevant documents and regulations at the following site:
http://ocwatersheds.com/documents/wqmp.
E. PUBLIC OUTREACH. The Consultant shall be available for a minimum of 2 public
outreach meetings to present the project to the community. The Constant shall be responsible
for leading the meeting as well preparing the presentation and any visual aids necessary to
deliver a clear message.
F. UTILITY COORDINATION. The Consultant shall be responsible for all utility
coordination efforts. Including but not limited to coordination with Edison for any electrical
service connections necessary for the project.
City of Santa Ana RFP 20-113
Page A1-3
G. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES (PS&E)
1. Development of Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E):
a) All reports, plans, specifications and quantity calculations shall conform to criteria,
policies, procedures and standards of the City. The Consultant shall use the
boilerplate for cut sheets, specifications and estimates provided by the City.
b) The plan development shall include four (4) milestone deliverables—30%, 60%,
95% (pre-final) and 100% (final). All plan sheets shall be prepared at 20 scale
unless noted otherwise. The necessary plans for each PS&E package shall include,
but not be limited to:
1. Title Sheet (City boiler template)
2. Typical Cross Sections
3. Street Improvement Plan (Layout, Profile)
4. Construction Details
5. Traffic Signal Modification
6. Channelization Plan (40 Scale)
7. Landscape & Irrigation Plan
c) All calculations for the design and quantities shall be submitted as part of the PS&E
submittal requirements. Quantities for all contract pay items shall be substantiated
by calculations. Quantity calculations shall be neat and orderly and shall show all
sketches, diagrams, and dimensions necessary to allow them to be independently
used by field inspectors during construction. All quantity calculations shall be
independently checked and substantiated with independent calculations.
d) Electronic files for all CADD (in Microstation V8i), reports, and calculations shall
be submitted at the end of the contract or when requested by the City.
e) All electronic software developed, databases generated, spreadsheets and
intellectual properties developed during the life of the Agreement shall become the
properties of the City.
2. Deliverable PS&E package:
a) 30% PS&E
The package shall include the concept layout of the protected bike lanes, bulb
outs/curb extensions, utility and drainage relocations, limits of pavement
improvements, aesthetic features including planting (California native or drought
tolerant plants), type of irrigation, if any, and cost estimates. The Grant only allows
5% of the total construction cost for landscaping and irrigation cost.
b) 60%, 90%, 100% PS&E
1) The Consultant shall submit the following documents for review and
approval:
City of Santa Ana RFP 20-113
Page A1-4
Each milestone submittal shall include the electronic files of the following
documents: Plans, Standard Special Provisions (SSP), preliminary quantities
and estimates, pay item list, design calculations and all reports supporting the
design (i.e. geotechnical report, hydraulic report).
2) The City reviews and comments on the PS&E package within four (4) weeks
of receipt of the complete milestone PS&E package.
3) Constructability review meeting shall take place at 60% or 90% and shall
include Consultant and City engineering staff.
c) Final PS&E for Approval and Bidding
The Consultant shall submit one set of PDF of the following documents for
construction Bid purpose:
Signed final design plans
Signed final specifications
Final cost estimate and final quantity calculations
Final design calculations
3. Construction Bidding Phase:
Bidding procedures will be the responsibility of the City. While the PS&E construction
package is advertising for bids, all questions concerning the intent shall be referred to the
City for resolution. In the event that any item requiring interpretation in the drawings or
specifications is discovered during the bidding period, said items shall be analyzed by the
Consultant for decision by the City.
4. Construction Support Phase:
a) This task shall be included as optional in the fee proposal.
b) Consultant shall furnish, at the consultant’s sole cost and expense, all necessary
revised documents and drawings due to errors and omissions of the Consultant.
c) Consultant shall review and approve all submittals and shop plan drawings required
to support the construction contract. Consultant shall complete shop drawings
reviews within two (2) weeks of receipt. Contract Change Order reviews shall be
completed within two (2) working days of receipt.
d) Consultant shall be available as requested by the City to resolve discrepancies in the
contract documents. Consultant shall bring to the attention of the City any defects
or deficiencies in the work by the construction contractor which the Consultant may
observe. Consultant shall have no authority to issue instruction on behalf of the
City, or to deputize another to do so.
e) The Consultant shall prepare and deliver to the City the final as-built plans
incorporating field marked prints supplied by the City. Upon completion of
construction, the City will submit field-marked prints to Consultant. Consultant
City of Santa Ana RFP 20-113
Page A1-5
shall incorporate all changes to the plans electronically with all necessary revision
notations and submit to the City.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. The Consultant has total responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the plans and
related designs, specifications and estimates prepared and shall check all such materials
accordingly. The plans will be reviewed by the City for conformity with the requirements of
the Agreement. Reviews by the city do NOT include detailed review or checking of design
or the accuracy with which such designs are depicted on the plans. The responsibility for
accuracy and completeness of such items remains solely that of Consultant.
2. Consultant or its subconsultants shall not incorporate in the design any materials or
equipment of single or sole source origin without written approval of the City.
3. The plans, specifications, estimates, calculations, and other documents furnished under the
Agreement shall be of a quality acceptable to the City and State. The criteria for acceptance
shall be a product of neat appearance, well organized, technically and grammatically correct,
checked, dated, and having the maker and checker identified. The minimum standard of
appearance, organization and content of the drawings shall be that of similar types produced
by the City Boiler Plate. The Consultant shall modify its work as necessary to meet the level
of acceptability defined by the criteria above.
4. The Consultant shall have a quality control plan in effect during the entire time work is being
performed under the Agreement. The Quality control plan shall establish a process whereby
plans are independently checked, corrected and back checked, and all job related
correspondence and memoranda dated and received by affected persons and then bound in
appropriate job files. Plan check shall also be provided by the City of Santa Ana’s Design,
Traffic, Construction Engineering Division, and the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA).
Reviews by the City respective Divisions and OCFA shall be coordinated by the City
5. Manuals/Standards
Where applicable, engineering design of all PROJECT improvements shall be compatible
and in accordance with the following:
(1) City of Santa Ana Standard Plans
(2) Standard Special Provisions for Public Works Construction
It will be the responsibility of the Consultant to verify that it has received the latest version or
update of these documents.
6. Street improvement plans shall adhere to City of Santa Ana Standard Plans and the Standard
Special Provisions for Public Works Construction. Plans shall be computer drafted in
Microstation V8i format and shall adhere to the current City of Santa Ana Public Works
Agency Interagency CAD standards.
7. The Consultant’s work will be subject to inspections by representatives of the City.
8. Project progress
1. Meetings - Progress Review Meetings shall be held as deemed appropriate by the City.
City of Santa Ana RFP 20-113
Page A1-6
2. Progress Reporting - Progress Reports shall be submitted at monthly intervals, indicating
progress achieved during the reporting period in relation to the progress scheduled.
3. Project Schedule - The Consultant shall prepare the project schedule in Microsoft Project
format. The project schedule should break the tasks and subtasks. Any major change to
the project schedule must be approved by the City.
PAYMENT AND INVOICING:
Selected Consultant shall invoice the City based on time and material according to the City’s
standard invoice template. Tasks and hours shall be clearly identified and all rates must match
those included in the approved agreement. City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the invoice
amount from each payment until the completed Project has been accepted by the City.
City Responsibilities:
The City will provide information in its possession relevant to the preparation of the
required information in the RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and the
documentation specifically in referred to herein.
Furnish scope of work and provide general direction as needed for the assigned project
All plan check coordination within the City
Advertise, award, and administer of construction contract
Electronic files (sample plans & specifications, City of Santa Ana’s CADD Standards)
Electronic files for title sheets and sheet borders
Facilitate meeting space and coordination and City facilities
Consultant Responsibilities:
Consultant shall provide all required insurance as outlined in Attachment 2 of this RFP.
City of Santa Ana RFP 20-113
Page A1-7
EXHIBIT B
STANDARD AVENUE
PROTECTED BIKE LANES:
3RD TO WARNER
RFP NO. 20-113
City of Santa Ana
September 24, 2020
September 24, 2020
Attn: Sean Thomas, PE
City of Santa Ana I Public Works Agency; M-36
20 Civic Center Plaza; Ross Annex I Santa Ana, CA 92701
Dear Mr. Thomas,
The City of Santa Ana (City) continues to advance active transportation projects to better serve the community
and improve traffic safety. Developed collaboratively with the community and formalized in the Central Santa
Ana Complete Streets (CSACS) Plan, the Standard Avenue Bikeway Project will continue the commitment
to addressing community need with a high-quality public realm improvement. The project design will include
separated bikeways, a protected intersection, improved pedestrian crossings of Standard Avenue, buffered bike
lanes, and a bicycle boulevard. Collectively the project will serve bicyclists and pedestrians to better travel along
Standard Avenue and cross the roadway to travel within the City.
For the past 93 years, Mark Thomas has been providing engineering solutions that meet agency and community
needs. We have earned the reputation as award-winning industry experts in the planning and design of
bikeways, complete streets, and multi-modal connectivity. We offer the City the following benefits:
Passionate Project Manager. Our team will be led by Paul Martin, PE, TE, LCI, as project manager. Paul
lives nearby in Tustin and attended community meetings during the preparation of the CSACS Plan. He has a
long history of working directly with the Santa Ana community residents and City staff in the office, on bicycle,
or during school walk audits. Paul recently served as the Active Transportation Coordinator for the Orange
County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and often served as a liaison to address issues between the City and
OCTA. Leveraging his local understanding, strategic approach, and extensive experience on similar active
transportation projects, Paul will serve the City well for this ambitious project.
Active Transportation Design Expertise. Mark Thomas specializes in the planning and design of active
transportation infrastructure. This includes protected/separated bikeways, protected intersections, buffered
bike lanes, bicycle boulevards, pedestrian crossings, and traffic signal features to serve both bicyclists and
pedestrians. We are currently working on similar projects such as the Mendez Historic Freedom Trail & Green
Street and Garden Grove Boulevard Class IV bikeway projects in Westminster, Covell/J Street protected
intersection in Davis, Class IV bikeways and protected intersections on Charleston Road in Mountain View, and
the OC Loop Segment D in Brea and Placentia. Our experience will be leveraged to benefit the City’s project.
Dedicated Project Team. Paul will be supported by in-house experts and subconsultants who have the
expertise and availability to successfully complete this project. Subconsultants knowledgeable with the
community will support Mark Thomas to provide successful public outreach and excellent design solutions. We
have included Arrellano & Associates to lead the public engagement, KTUA for landscape design and water
infiltration opportunities, and Fehr & Peers for traffic engineering and the protected intersection design. KTUA
was involved in the preparation of the CSACS Plan, of which Standard Avenue is identified as a corridor for
improvement, which later empowered the City to secure Active Transportation Program (ATP) funding for design
and construction. This is a well-qualified team that has a history of delivering successful projects for the City.
We acknowledge receipt of all addenda and Q&A, and have reviewed the sample contract agreement; we have
provided our comments and suggested edits on the following page. If you have any questions about our
proposal, please contact Paul Martin at (949) 697-7840 or via email at pmartin@markthomas.com. We are
looking forward to working with you on this project.
Sincerely,
MARK THOMAS
Darin Johnson, PE
Principal in Charge
(949) 477-9000
2121 ALTON PARKWAY, SUITE 210
IRVINE, CA 92606 MARKTHOMAS.COM
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
CONTRACT AGREEMENT STATEMENT
Mark Thomas has reviewed the City’s sample contract agreement contained in the RFP as Attachment 2.
We respectfully request the following exceptions and modifications. Our request for modifications to contract
language is outlined below in red:
• Section 7 – Insurance
e(iii) – Carriers cannot provide prior notice when covered is reduced or changed.
• Section 8 – Indemnification
We request that the current indemnification language in the City’s sample contract agreement be replaced
with our split indemnification language below:
With respect to its operations, other than the performance of professional services, Consultant agrees to
indemnify, hold harmless and defend City, with counsel selected in reasonable consultation with City, the City
Indemnitees, from and against any third party damages, liabilities, judgments, settlements, costs, claims,
demands, actions, suits, losses, and expenses (including reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees, legal
costs and expenses recoverable under applicable law) arising out of the death or bodily injury to any person
or destruction or damage to any property, to the extent caused by Consultant’s negligent acts, errors or
omissions or willful misconduct in the performance of services under this Agreement and anyone for whom
Consultant is legally liable.
With respect to the performance of professional services, Consultant agrees to indemnity and hold
harmless (but not defend) City, and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers (collectively,
the “City Indemnitees”), from and against liability for damages to the extent caused by Consultant’s,
recklessness, negligent acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct in the performance of services
under this Agreement, except such loss or damage caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the
City. Consultant has no obligation to pay for any of City Indemnitees defense related cost prior to a final
determination of liability, or to pay any amount that exceeds Consultant’s finally determined percentage of
liability based upon the comparative fault of Consultant, except as provided in Civil Code Section 2782.8(a)
and (e).
• Section 16 – Termination
We request that the first sentence of this section is revised to reflect the following:
This Agreement may be terminated by the City, or Consultant, upon thirty (30) days written notice of
termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant
compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject
to the following conditions.
NOTE: ONLY THE CHANGES TO
SECTION 8 WERE ACCEPTED BY CITY
2
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
FIRM AND TEAM EXPERIENCE
FIRM PROFILE MARK THOMAS AT A
GLANCE
• Founded in 1927
• California Corporation
• 93 years in business
• 260+ employees
Mark Thomas provides civil and structures engineering, surveying,
construction management, landscape architecture, and urban design
services to public agencies throughout California. Providing excellent
client service and delivering projects to meet our clients’ goals is our
highest priority. Mark Thomas is committed to providing the City with
exceptional service, a responsive project manager, and a project team
that will be available and easily accessible throughout the duration of
your project.
• 12 offices in California
- Irvine
- Carmel
Roadway Planning and Design Expertise - Cupertino
Mark Thomas is a recognized industry leader in the planning, design,
and delivery of local roadway improvements including bicycle and
pedestrian mobility improvements. Our projects have involved vehicle/
bicycle separation projects, active transportation facilities, intersection
modifications, highway/railway at-grade crossing improvements, and
highway and interchange improvement projects throughout the State.
- Fresno
- Lakewood
- Oakland
- Rancho Cucamonga
- Sacramento
- San Carlos
- San JoseWe have extensive working knowledge of design manuals and
guidelines for the implementation of roadway, active transportation, and
drainage improvement projects throughout the State. This experience
includes innovative designs to improve safety and connectivity for all
travel modes.
- Walnut Creek
KEY AREAS OF
EXPERTISE:
• Active transportation
planning and designActive Transportation and Complete Streets • Bicycle and pedestrian
safety improvementsWhile our experience covers a wide array of transportation projects,
one of our key focus areas is the planning and design of active
transportation, complete streets, and bicycle and pedestrian
improvements and enhancements based on National Association of City
Transportation Officials (NACTO), Caltrans Highway Design Manual
(HDM), Caltrans Design Information Bulletin (DIB) 89 Class IV Bikeway
Guidance, and other Complete Street guidelines. We have in-depth
knowledge of design details and state-of-the-practice design solutions.
• Protected intersections
PS&E for roadway and
street improvements
• Roadway widenings,
road diets and roadway
reconstructions
We are actively working with bicycle/pedestrian-focused communities,
including the cities of Davis, Sacramento, Palo Alto, San Jose, Mountain
View, Newport Beach, and South Gate, and leverage this experience
Statewide. We recently worked with the community and agency staff to
develop updated street standards for the City of Davis, a bicycle friendly
community, which focused on narrow vehicle lanes and bicycle facilities.
Additionally, we recently completed the design of road diets and buffered
bike lanes for the City of Garden Grove and we are also designing
two Class IV protected bikeways on Hoover Street and Garden Grove
Boulevard for the City of Westminster.
• Complete streets design
• Pavement rehabilitation
and reconstructions
• Traffic handling
• Drainage & LID facilities
• Utility improvements/
agency coordination
• Funding assistance
• State and federal
policies & proceduresOur proven track record on project delivery and blend of technical
expertise in roadway and bicycle/pedestrian projects will help make
the Standard Avenue Protected Bike Lanes Project a success.
3
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
Organizational Stability and Strength
Mark Thomas provides clients with an assurance of stability that few other firms can offer, even during
changing economic times. As a privately owned, California Corporation, we are positioned to ride out the
financial downturns that impact larger, publicly-traded companies in our industry. Mark Thomas is rated
financially strong by Dun & Bradstreet and has never borrowed or used our line of credit to maintain
company operations. Our firm has never experienced receivership or other financial difficulties since its
founding. In 2019, our revenue exceeded $63 million and we currently enjoy a gross backlog of $65 million.
The bottom line benefit – a reliable firm with committed staff that will see through the City’s project
through to completion.
SUBCONSULTANTS
Mark Thomas has rounded out our internal team with quality subconsultants with whom we have
previously worked on similar projects, and who focus on active transportation and intersection
improvements projects. We have included Fehr & Peers for traffic signal & design, Arrellano Associates
for public outreach, and KTUA for landscape and irrigation. Brief firm bios are provided below.
Fehr & Peers I Traffic Signals & Protected Intersection Design
Fehr & Peers has specialized in providing transportation planning
and engineering design services to public agencies since 1985
and provides the unique combination of a nationally renowned bicycle and pedestrian practice with
local expertise for this project. They offer broad experience in multimodal operations and simulation,
bicycle and pedestrian planning, and complete streets design projects similar to the City’s project.
They previously worked with multiple cities and public agencies to develop concepts and renderings
for similar projects, and they are currently working with us on the Mendez Historic Trail & Green Street
Bikeway Project and Garden Grove Boulevard Complete Streets Project in Westminster, Central City
Bikeways in Sacramento, and the Limonite Gap Closure (Class I bikeway) in Eastvale.
Arrellano Associates (AA) I Public Outreach
AA specializes in communications and public outreach, community and
government relations, and strategic planning and marketing programs. AA
is well qualified to provide the City of Santa Ana with outreach services that
exceed the minimum requirement. The AA team has the necessary and relevant project experience,
range of technical communication tools, and firm reputations for successfully servicing projects.
Specifically, AA has current and previous project experience with the City of Santa Ana on a variety
of projects and this long-standing relationship history will be vital to implementation of a successful
outreach program.
KTUA (SBE) I Landscape Planning and Irrigation
As planners and landscape architects, KTUA is focused on the principles
of healthy placemaking – a collaborative process for reshaping the public
realm of our neighborhoods, communities and regions. Well designed
streets, parks, open spaces, public places and buildings facilitate human connectivity and improve
people’s mental, physical and social health. In their vision and our actions, KTUA collaborates with our
community leaders, public agencies, private developers, allied professionals, neighbors and families
to develop implementable plans that address social, physical, environmental and economic goals that
shape healthy places. KTUA has extensive experience in Orange County planning and implementing
active transportation facilities, including the Central Santa Ana Complete Streets (CSACS) Plan.
4
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
FIRM ORGANIZATION CHART
We have selected a team of highly qualified individuals that have experience delivering roadway and street
improvement projects for public agencies. The organization chart below depicts the Mark Thomas team, key
staff and associated discipline, support staff, and lines of communication. Paul Martin, PE, TE, LCI is our
proposed project manager. Paul is well known throughout Orange County for his commitment to working with
community members of local agencies.
We are committed to providing the City with ample resources to successfully deliver your projects. All of our
designated key personnel will be available and dedicated to the City for the duration of your project. No staff
designated as “key” in our proposal will be removed or replaced without prior written concurrence of the City.
PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE
Darin Johnson, PEPROJECT MANAGER
Paul Martin, PE, TE, LCIQA/QC
Vincent Guardian, PE Key Staff
PROJECT TEAM
CIVIL/ROADWAY
Aaron Silva, PE
Ravi Shah, PE, QSD
Alan Su, PE
DRAINAGE/WATER QUALITY UTILITIES COORINATION SURVEY
Steve Heise, PLS
Byron Cazar
Flora Diaz, PE, QSD
Chuck Karunathilake
Trisha Keith, PE
Adrian Cortez, EIT
GEOTECHNICAL
INVESTIGATIONS
(Optional)
TRAFFIC/SIGNAL
DESIGN
Claude Strayer, PE
Kendra Rowley, PE
Fehr & Peers
PUBLIC OUTREACH
Maria Yáñez-Forgash
Yvette Ximenez
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURE
Jacob Leon
Group Delta Arrellano Joe Punsalan
KTUA
KEY STAFF AVAILABILITY
Below is a table identifying the staff members assigned to this project, and their percentage of availability.
Resumes for key staff are included in the Appendix.
Team Member
Paul Martin, PE
Aaron Silva, PE
Ravi Shah, PE, QSD
Claude Strayer, PE
Jacob Leon
Firm Role Availability
70%Mark Thomas
Mark Thomas
Mark Thomas
Fehr & Peers
KTUA
Project Manager
Civil/Roadway Lead
Civil/Roadway
65%
50%
Traffic/Signal Design Lead
Landscape/Irrigation Lead
60%
55%
5
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
UNDERSTANDING OF NEED
Project Understanding
The Mark Thomas team have been involved in the Standard Avenue project concept since the CSACS
public engagement workshops and events. As a member of and supporter to the City, our Project Manager,
Paul Martin has been involved in stakeholder events and supported the City in grant pursuits to secure the
funding for this and many other projects in the City. Our team is excited to be involved in the design of this
important backbone corridor to traverse two miles of the City, establishing a high-quality facility for north-
south travel.
The Standard Avenue corridor will implement different bikeway solutions along three distinct segments of the
corridor. The planned bikeway per segment is the best fit based upon existing conditions.
• Warner Avenue to Edinger Avenue: The southern segment of the project consists of single family
homes on the west side and light industrial/warehousing businesses on the east. Commercial shopping
centers are located at Edinger Avenue intersection. There are multiple driveways serving the residences
and businesses. Parallel parking is maintained along the west side of the roadway. This segment of the
corridor will implement buffered bike lanes and implement a road diet, reducing the northbound lanes from
two to one.
• Edinger Avenue to Chesnut Avenue: The center segment of the project primarily consists of
single family homes on the west and multi-family residences on the east. Commercial land uses
are concentrated at the intersections with Edinger Avenue and McFadden Avenue. There are three
elementary schools and a community center as well. The project will implement Class IV protected
bikeways as well as a road diet, reducing lanes from four to three. A protected intersection will also be
added at McFadden Avenue.
• Chesnut Avenue to 3rd Street: The northern segment consists of a variety of land uses including single
family residential, industrial, and commercial. The roadway corridor is narrow in this segment. As a result,
the project will install a Class III bike boulevard.
The City was successful in securing ATP Cycle 4 funds for project delivery, and has already completed
environmental clearance. As stated in the RFP and Q&A, PS&E is scheduled to be complete by May 2021.
This aligns with requesting construction funds at the July 2021 CTC meeting. We seek to continue the public
engagement and improve awareness and education related to the new facility and protection intersection.
Our review of the project has yielded a list of key issues that will need to be addressed and we have the
project team to deliver results. The varied set of challenges include bikeway, stormwater, transit, and
landscaping design challenges. Key issues are not always technical in nature but can be missed by a design
team that simply applies standards without realizing the local context.
We realize the implementation of the bikeways along Standard Avenue will need to consider non-technical
issues such as minimizing parking impacts, incorporation of public art, working with local schools and
student travel needs, and easy to miss issues such as semi-permanent food trucks along Standard Avenue.
The Mark Thomas team is ready to continue the relationship with City staff
and the community to create a project that will improve the quality of life for
residents and businesses. The following pages identify the project constraints
as well as the key issues and our approach to address these issues.
6
STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNERPROPOSALCity of Santa Ana
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING - SOUTH SEGMENT
HICKORY ST
Delhi
Park Integrate public art andHALLADAY ST infiltration at new curbCollaborate withFuture separatedbikeway on Warner Ave extensions and mediansOCTA for design ofHALLADAY ST CEDAR STtransit stop at CEDAR STEDAR ST
buered bike lane Redesign buspad where busstop is osetfrom curb face
MadisonElementarySchool
EVERGREEN ST Madison Park
STANDARD AVE
Evaluate curb extensions Consider “loadingzone” design toserve food trucks
Manage bikeway to continue serving heavyconflicts at driveways trucking and EMS vehiclesand cross streets
Commercial/Industrial useswith truck access needsSANTA FE ST John F. KennedyHATHAWAY ST Elementary SchoolL E G E N D Evaluate opportunities fornew on-street parking Design curb extensionsto shorten crossingCLASS II Buꢀered Bike Lanes
CLASS IV Bikeway distance at school
Paul Martin Flora Diaz Maria Yanez-Forgosh Joe PunsalanProject Manager Drainage Expert Public Engagement Expert
Maria will build upon her history
working in Santa Ana to engage
the public directly to solicit input
while increasing awareness and
project understanding.
Graphics Expert
Paul will collaborate with the City,
community members, OCTA, and
the project team to proactively
address challenges and develop
solutions in the best interest of
the City.
Flora will evaluate the drainage
along the corridor to ensure the
project does not aggravate storm
water flooding and identify
potential solutions to managing
rain events.
Joe will provide renderings and
graphics to help with the public
engagement and awareness of
new bikeway treatments oriented
towards the local residents.
7
STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNERPROPOSALCity of Santa Ana
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING - NORTH SEGMENT
Multiple cross Maintain on-streetparking where possiblealong future corridor
Include wayfinding signshere and along corridor tolink with key destinationsstreets bisectingseparated bikeway
ꢇꢈꢃoꢉoꢄꢃ
ꢊooꢋꢃꢌꢃꢁt
ꢅꢁꢃꢆꢃntaꢄyꢀaꢁꢂꢃꢄ
ꢅꢁꢃꢆꢃntaꢄy Roosevelt-WalkerCommunity Center
Advance preliminaryconcept for protectedintersection Integration with future New Pedestrian HybridBeacon at Wisteria Plor Wakeham Ave
Integrate curb extensionscity-developed park and infiltration with lowmaintenance landscaping
Commercial/Industrial usesL E G E N D with truck access needs
CLASS IV Bikeway
CLASS III Bike Boulevard
Aaron Silva Claud StrayerTraꢀc Engineering Expert Jacob LeonBikeway Design Expert Landscape Design ExpertAaron will ensure bikeway designs
serve trucking activity, emergency
vehicles and transit needs, while
addressing conflict points such as
school zones and high pedestrian
cross-flows.
Claude will develop lighting plans,
trac signal modifications and
improved crossing treatments
using City standards and managing
potential costs to fit within the
project budget.
Jacob will design landscape
improvements, low impact
development treatments, and
potential art and landscaping in
new medians and hardscape for
better linkage to community.
8
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
Key Issues
Bikeway Design
Coordination of the bikeway project with the adjacent residential, commercial, and industrial uses will be
important to address driveways and access issues for a safe and comfortable bikeway facility serving a
broad range of users. Additionally, the project can link to the 3rd Street connector to Downtown, the Bishop-
Willits Bike Boulevard, and future bikeways on Edinger Avenue, McFadden Avenue, St. Andrew Place, St.
Gertrude Place, and Warner Avenue.
The protected intersection design will establish the design for future integration with the McFadden Avenue
cycletrack and needs to account for large vehicle turns serving heavy trucking and emergency vehicles. Our
project team has begun evaluating the truck turning radius and is ready to work with the City to consider
mountable truck apron that still protects vulnerable users traveling through the intersection. Mark Thomas
has extensive experience designing Class IV protected bikeways, Class II buffered bike lanes, and Class
III shared facilities. We have designed protected bikeways for the cities of Westminster, Sacramento, and
Mountain View. We have a detailed understanding of the nuances of the design to provide for a safe and
comfortable bicycle route.
Large Vehicle Accommodation
The project design will need to account for large vehicles that serve industrial uses south of Edinger Avenue
with careful consideration of the visibility of cyclists at turning locations and driveways. Enhancements to
shorten pedestrian crossing distances and curb modifications will need to be reviewed to serve truck turning
radius by heavy trucking as well as emergency vehicles employed by the Orange County Fire Authority.
Curb Extensions
While portions of the project are focused on striping a bikeway and design of the separated bikeway, we will
seek to incorporate curb extensions or bulb outs to shorten pedestrian crossings. The design will need to
carefully balance the stormwater flow and ensure we do not create a low point that creates ponding and long-
term maintenance issues.
Stormwater Management
Much of the corridor is very flat and storm event flooding along the project corridor and McFadden Avenue
will need to be considered to avoid aggravating the condition. Our project team will seek solutions that can
minimize the impacts of ponding and flooding while looking to incorporate infiltration through LID where
acceptable to the City. Our team is well-practiced at working with regulatory agencies to address water
quality requirements and securing needed permits. We are currently with the City of Westminster to install
LIDs along Hoover Street as part of the Mendez Historic Trail & Green Street Project Bikeway. The design
incorporates curb cuts and appropriate landscaping in bioswales to reduce stormwater flows to the storm
drain system.
9
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
Mark Thomas has the experience and expertise to effectively design and implement protected intersections.
After review of the previously prepared Concept Plans, we’ve identified several opportunities to improve the
intersection of Standard and McFadden Avenue to safely serve vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists of all
ages and abilities.
10
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
Pedestrian Crossings
The project plans to signalize the Standard Avenue/Bishop Street intersection better serving pedestrian traffic
including youth to Walker Elementary School. Additional pedestrian improvements include a Pedestrian
Hybrid Beacon at Wakeham Avenue or Wisteria Place, and discussion with City staff to determine if striping
additional crosswalks is desired. The Safe Mobility Santa Ana Plan (2016) prepared a comparison of
segment demand and infrastructure supply analysis that identified high demand with high supply need on
Standard Avenue between McFadden Avenue and Edinger Avenue. Mark Thomas team visits to the area
show a high degree of pedestrian crossing area here as well as north of McFadden Avenue. We will work
with the City to identify potential additional pedestrian crossing improvements and costs.
Bike Signals
The project includes a mix of bikeway types about Edinger Avenue with buffered bike lanes southerly
and a separated bikeway northerly. Typically a separated bikeway would include dedicated bicycle signal
phasing and employ no turn on red signage, but this treatment would not be included in a buffered bike lane
configuration where the right-turn traffic would cross the bikeway at the green conflict zone striping. We
recognize the City seeks to provide a high quality bikeway corridor to serve the existing and future bikeway
traffic and will work with the City to evaluate available project budget to include bike phasing and provide a
consistent and intuitive signal phasing treatment along the corridor. For our protected bikeway along Hoover
Street in Westerminster, we modified the existing signals to include bicycle phases and no turn on red blank-
out signs for turning vehicles.
Land Use Access
The project will provide a 2-mile north-south corridor as identified in the CSACS Plan. However, the design
should incorporate access to land uses along the roadway and be sensitive to needs of localized uses such
as school drop-off activity at Madison Elementary or peak demands at Madison Park. Please see the graphic
below for initial design considerations near Walker Elementary School. Additional land use concerns may
arise at Walker Elementary and the future park at the northeast corner of the Standard Avenue/McFadden
Avenue intersection.
11
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
School Youth Travel
Students crossing the corridor travel to many local schools, including Roosevelt, Walker, and Madison
Elementary, Lathrop Intermediate and Villa Fundamental, and Century High School. The project will consider
serving north-south bicycle travel as well as student travel crossing Standard Avenue for reduced exposure
at intersections.
Transit Integration
The proposed project will require collaboration with OCTA to develop bus stops that serve the agency needs
and integrate well with bicyclist and pedestrian travel patterns. OCTA Fixed Route 55 will require continued
bus stops along the buffered bike lane and the separated bikeway. We will utilize lessons learned in Santa
Ana from other current and planned floating transit islands in the City. The boarding/alighting area required
by OCTA is an 8-feet x 40-feet envelope. While likely not applicable for Standard Avenue, OCTA seeks
bigger boarding areas if there are overlapping bus routes, layover areas, or 60-feet long buses utilized on the
route. Additional transit considerations include accommodating bus turns in the design at St. Gertrude Place
and Chestnut Avenue. We are currently implementing transit islands along the Garden Grove Boulevard
protected bikeway in Westminster.
The project design includes a road buffet (or road diet) along Standard Avenue, so buses stopped at transit
islands will temporarily stop through traffic in the single travel lane. Our team anticipates centerline hardening
or median treatments may be needed to manage illegal passing of the bus in the two-way left-turn lane.
ITS elements may also be considered to modify signal timing if a bus is stopped and blocking traffic using a
detector loop.
Parking Supply
Parking continues to be a premium community concern in the City of Santa Ana where a high density of
people live and work. The design will need to minimize potential parking loss and provide increased parking
opportunities where possible.
However, the addition of parking may have reduced yield than envisioned in the concept plans due to
setback requirements from driveways, alleys, fire hydrants, and other utilities. Lastly, the project will need to
evaluate preferential parking supply such as loading zone (one location observed north of Chestnut Avenue),
accessible parking, and other time restricted parking.
12
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
Food Trucks Accommodation
Current food truck activity for food and grocery sales exists along Standard Avenue north of McFadden
Avenue. While the food trucks may not be formally permitted by the City, they are a part of the community
and inclusion in the design project may be prudent to continue serving the community needs. Based on
discussions with City staff, a loading zone design for the bikeway can be incorporated and grade changes,
striping, and signing features can be utilized to slow bicyclists at likely conflict zones.
Public Art
This project has the opportunity to gain ownership
from the community through incorporation of public
art. Throughout the project, our team will consider
opportunities to include public art such as additional
murals, mosaics, pavers, and other mediums to better
link directly with the cultural groups and community
members that live and work along Standard Avenue.
Public outreach will be utilized to identify opportunities
for public art and solicit stakeholders preferences.
While the project may not be able to fund new art, the
engagement can be utilized to pursue future funding
from public or private sources. Mark Thomas is well-
practiced as is the City at pursuing grants and we
can work with the City to identify sources that can
supplement the ATP funding.
Public Engagement
Santa Ana has led the path for public engagement to identify infrastructure projects throughout Orange
County and the State of California. Grant funding secured by the City is founded on strong outreach that
shows funding agencies the viability of projects and support from local stakeholders. Our team wants to
continue the dialogue with the community via two workshops led in Spanish with English translation (if
needed). Additionally, we propose two short-duration pop-up events hosted at Madison Park, the Roosevelt-
Walker Community Center, the Delhi Center, or other location that is respected as a welcoming and safe
place for local stakeholders. Public engagement can solicit input on the project, but also improve awareness
and education on how to use the new bikeways and protected intersection, or cross as a pedestrian.
Paul Martin, our proposed project manager, KTUA, and Arrellano Associates have all participated in
community engagement in the City, including KTUA and Paul’s involvement in the CSACS Plan. Our team
also includes Spanish speakers. This experience will allow our team to quickly establish trust with the
community and community effectively with residents in their primary language.
Landscaping
The project includes curb extensions and new medians for the separated bikeway providing new
opportunities for enhanced landscaping. We recognize the addition of landscaping would increase
maintenance costs for the City, so we can explore low maintenance plant palettes that might be acceptable
to the City. Public art such as pavers and mosaic-type treatments might be utilized in lieu of new landscaping
where the City prefers not to incorporate new irrigation and landscaping maintenance needs.
Mark Thomas and KTUA have experience implementing low maintenance landscaping in the urban street
environment. These projects include the Mendez Historic Trail & Green Street Bikeway in Westminster, Long
Beach Boulevard Green Street in South Gate, and Amorlite Complete Street in San Marcos.
13
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
Project Management Approach
ATP Funding Requirements
The project’s ATP funds require approvals from Caltrans and the CTC. Chapter 22 of the Caltrans LAPG
outlines the specific allocation requirements for the AT P. The request for funding allocation will be submitted
to Caltrans Local Assistance and will include the following: Exhibit 22-A “Award Information for ATP Projects”,
Exhibit 22-6 “Project Programming Request”, Exhibit 22-N “Funding Allocation Checklist”, Exhibit 22-O
“Allocation Request”, and Right of Way Certification. Utility Certification packages for affected utilities will be
included with the Right of Way Certification. Once through Caltrans, the project goes to the CTC for approval,
which takes two months to be placed on the agenda. Our project schedule has been developed to include
CTC allocation at Construction phases.
Maintaining Project Schedule
Based on the information provided in the RFP and the addenda, PS&E needs to be complete by May
2021. This is an aggressive schedule driven by the project’s ATP programming. Construction phase
funding is programmed for Fiscal Year 2021/2022. By completing design by May 2021, the City can
request construction funding from the CTC at the July 2021 Commission meeting, meeting programming
requirements. To meet this schedule, the City needs a team with the expertise to deliver this project from
preliminary concepts to an implementable design. Our team is equipped with an efficient project approach,
specific complete street knowledge, available and dedicated resources, and experience needed to make this
project successful and deliver the City’s and community’s goals for the corridors.
We have developed a Critical Path Method (CPM) schedule for the project as included in this proposal. Once
the schedule is approved by the City, Paul Martin will distribute to the Project Development Team and update
the project schedule monthly (or more often as needed). He will proactively manage the schedule, constantly
tracking critical path items and mitigating schedule deviations.
Ensuring Quality Construction Documents
Mark Thomas has a proven approach to quality, budget and schedule control. Beyond developing a highly
skilled team of designers, there are key elements to our approach that will be critical to delivering this project
on a fast-track schedule.
• Initial Scoping: Immediately following the kick-off meeting, Mark Thomas recommends holding a meeting
with key stakeholders including internal City Departments focused on defining the project scope and
getting buy-in on key project elements. This will help mitigate the potential for redesign and schedule
delays as the project moves forward.
• Early Concept Approval: We will develop a 30% concept plan that will highlight the unique geometric
elements along the corridor, specifically at key intersections. This will allow us to gain consensus to
minimize rework. We recommend that the key stakeholders include City public works staff, maintenance,
Fire and Police.
• Plans in Hands Site Review: Prior to the 60% Design Submittal, we will perform a “plans in hands” field
walk along the corridor. The site walk will include the project team and City staff to field verify project
elements. This process can help catch small conflicts early, before they develop into larger problems
during construction. Developing a complete set of design plans for the contractor to accurately bid and
build the project will minimize contract change orders and schedule delays.
14
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Mark Thomas has planned and designed a wide variety of State and federally funded capital improvement
projects for public agencies. Projects have included complete streets design, active transportation facilities,
roadway widenings and reconstruction, pavement rehabilitation, multimodal enhancements, signing and
striping, drainage facilities, utility coordination and relocation, and ADA improvements.
The following representative projects demonstrate our experience, competency and capability in
successfully delivering transportation improvement projects to public agencies throughout the state.
MENDEZ HISTORIC TRAIL & GREEN STREET BIKEWAY
Westminster
CLIENT
City of Westminster
The Mendez Historic Trail runs along Hoover Street and was redefined
from an auto-centric 5-lane roadway to a bicycle and pedestrian friendly
street. Paul Martin, while working for OCTA, worked with the City of
Westminster to identify potential active transportation solutions for the
Mendez Historic Trail Green & Street Bikeway and secure $2.3M from
the California Natural Resource Agency’s Urban Greening Program.
REFERENCE
Adolfo Ozaeta
City of Westminster
aozaeta@westminster-ca.gov
Mark Thomas is currently providing the City of Westminster with
engineering design services for a range of local roadway improvements
to complete this project that will develop layered transportation
networks, reduce vehicle travel lanes and create a two-mile long Class
IV bikeway along the western limits of the corridor. A raised median will
be incorporated to provide separation between vehicles and bicycles,
and serve as a stormwater treatment for roadway runoff. Project
improvements also include traffic signal modifications, pedestrian
lighting, correction of deficient driveways, ADA upgrades, pavement
rehabilitation and overlay, and curb ramps.
PERIOD OF
PERFORMANCE
2019 - Ongoing
KEY FEATURES
• Class IV Protected Bikeway
Design
• Traffic Signal Modifications
• LID Implementation
• Railroad/CPUC Coordination
• Public Engagement
We are also coordinating with railroad authorities and preparing GO-
88B applications for signalized at-grade rail crossings at Bolsa Avenue,
Hazard Avenue, Westminster Boulevard, Trask Avenue, and Garden
Grove Boulevard.
The project is on schedule
and within budget.
15
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
THE OC LOOP
Orange County
CLIENT
County of Orange, Cities of
La Habra and Brea
While working for OCTA, Paul Martin led the strategy and communications
to advance the OC Loop Project. The OC Loop is a vision for 66 miles of
seamless connections and an opportunity for people to bike, walk, and
connect to some of California’s most scenic beaches and inland reaches.REFERENCE
Michael Plotnik
City of La Habra
(562) 383-4162
Paul introduced the project concept at approximately ten City Councils
and led coordination with agency staff to help close gaps through funding
pursuits and strategic public engagement. A Southern California Association
of Governments (SCAG) Go Human funded demonstration event illustrated
a gap closure linking the project to the Santa Ana River in Yorba Linda. He
collaborated with two cities, UPRR, and CPUC to negotiate land acquisition
from UPRR for a 4.1 mile long rails-with-trails portion.
mplotnik@lahabraca.gov
Michael Ho
City of Brea
(714) 990-7657
michaelh@cityofbrea.net
Brad FowlerMark Thomas is providing PS&E for the design of Carbon Canyon
Channel Bikeway (OC Loop Segment D). This project will connect the La
Floresta Development trail at Imperial Highway (SR-90) to the El Cajon
trail at Bastanchury Road. The project includes a 12’-15’ wide bikeway,
undercrossings at Golden Avenue and Bastanchury Road, constructing
permanent retaining walls, drainage conveyance, lighting, landscape,
irrigation, ADA access, bicycle/pedestrian signals and beacons, street
crossings, pervious pavement and localized stormwater best management
practices (BMP’s).
Orange County
(714) 245-4503
Brad.Fowler2@ocpw.ocgov.
com
PERIOD OF
PERFORMANCE
2014 - 2020
KEY FEATURES
• Active Transportation
PlanningAdditionally, Mark Thomas also provided grant application services
pursuing statewide Active Transportation Program funding for construction
funding including 25% design plans addressing the Coyote Creek gap
segments (Segments O, P, Q). Successful OC Loop efforts have secured
over $20 million to close gaps since project initiation in 2012.
• Trail Design
•Public Engagement
• Drainage/Stormwater
Management
• Landscape and Irrigation
• Street Crossings and
Pedestrian Signals
16
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
CENTRAL CITY MOBILITY IMPROVEMENTS
Sacramento
Mark Thomas is preparing the PS&E for the Central City Mobility Project
in the City of Sacramento. The project will reduce vehicle travel lanes on
5th Street and I Street to create two-way travel lanes for vehicles and
bicycles with the installation of bike lanes. It also includes roadway space
reassignments on 9th Street from L to R Street, 10th Street from Q Street
to Broadway, P and Q Street from 15th to 21st Street, and 19th and 21st
from I Street to T Street to add to the parking protected bikeway network
throughout the grid. It will also include 13 signal modifications, pavement
microseal and spot digouts, ADA upgrades, modifications to the US 50/5th
Street Interchange to convert to two-way traffic, and modifications to the I
Street/UPRR at-grade crossing.
CLIENT
City of Sacramento
REFERENCE
Elizabeth Weeks
(916) 808-7035
eweeks@cityofsacramento.
org
PERIOD OF
PERFORMANCE
2018-Ongoing
KEY FEATURESThe project is funded through Senate Bill 1 Local Partnership Program
(LPP) funds. As a result, the project has been under an aggressive project
development schedule. PS&E was completed for 70 city blocks (5.5 miles)
within 18 months. This includes extensive coordination with UPRR for at-
grade crossing approvals, Caltrans approvals for work at the US-50/5th
Street interchange, City Parking Department for changes in parking, and
Sacramento Regional Transit District for bus stop relocations.
• Pavement Rehabilitation
• Drainage Design
• ADA Upgrades
•Public Engagement
Mark Thomas has also conduct community engagement meetings to inform the public of the proposed
improvements. Due to the downtown location, a community workshop was held at City Hall. The project was
presented to the community at the workshop and input was sought. This input was incorporated into the
design to enhance the project.
LEGEND
CURRENT BIKEWAY PROJECTS
CURRENT 2-WAY CONVERSIONS
EXISTING BIKEWAYSC ST
INTERSTATE
5 BROADWAY COMPLETE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
MIDTOWN UNDERCROSSING IMPROVEMENTSBUSINESS
LOOP80
I ST 2-WAY
CONVERSION BIKEWAY
ENHANCEMENTSC ST
IMPROVED STREET
CROSSINGH ST LANE REDUCTION
PEDESTRIAN
ENHANCEMENTS
N ST Several undercrossings lack on-street delineation for bicycles, however additional space
within the roadway is available. Undercrossing will be evaluated to include Class II or
Buered Class II bike lanes.
1
Connector street improvements include updated signing and striping, improved
crosswalks, accessibility improvements, and potential signal improvements to improve
operations for all users.
2
Several locations will close gaps creating a connected bicycle and pedestrian network,
improving access to residences, business centers, and regional transportation.3
Improvements for undercrossing with access to the State facilities need to balance the
needs of non-motorized modes of travel as well as vehicle operations. Special
consideration was given to the 5th Street undercrossing to improve trac signal
equipment and timing to optimize operations and safety of bicycles and pedestrians.
43
4 EXAMPLE UNDERCROSSING IMPROVEMENTS
50 IMPROVED PEDESTRIANCROSSINGS NEW SOUTHBOUNDTRAVEL LANE
11’2 8’6.5’11’11’6.5’8’
1 SIDEWALK SIDEWALKX ST
T ST
V ST
NEW
BIKE LANES 5TH STREET UNDERCROSSING AT US-50
17
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
LIMONITE GAP CLOSURE
Eastvale
Mark Thomas is providing roadway design, bicycle and pedestrian facilities,
and bridge design for both the roadway and a separate multi-use trail
spanning the Cucamonga Creek Channel throughout the Cities of Chino
and Eastvale. The project includes coordination with the US Army Corps
of engineers to secure MS 408 approvals and the development of a CEQA
compliant environmental document for all project improvements. Limonite
Avenue is a critical multimodal transportation corridor that runs east-west,
providing the connection to I-15 for the northern portion of the City.
CLIENT
City of Eastvale
REFERENCE
Bryan Jones
(951) 703-4411
bjones@eastvaleca.gov
PERIOD OF
PERFORMANCE
2019-OngoingOriginal project concepts included a 6-lane arterial facility, however after
performing 2040 projections and traffic modeling, we were able to confirm
a 4-lane facility was sufficient, saving the City millions of dollars in bridge
construction costs.Additionally, we were able to identify a multi-lane
roundabout in lieu of a conventional signal was more feasible and safer and
was incorporated into the final alternative. These efforts result in savings of
over $5 million in construction costs from the original concept identified in
the City’s General Plan.
KEY FEATURES
• Bicycle Facilities
•Roadway design
• Pedestrian mobility
improvements
• Pavement rehabilitation
• Aesthetic design
• Drainage design
The installation of bicycle and pedestrian facilities are an important element
of the project. The corridor is planned as a Class IV bikeway in the City’s
Bicycle Master Plan. We analyzed Class IV bikeways as well as Class I
paths. Class I paths were selected as it combined bicycle and pedestrian
modes, increased separation of trucks and vehicles, and reduced costs. In
addition to the Class I paths along the Limonite Avenue corridor, the project also includes the addition of a
pedestrian bridge over Cucamonga Creek Channel south of the roadway within an SCE corridor.
18
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
ADDITIONAL PROJECT EXPERIENCE
In addition to our highlighted projects, Mark Thomas has delivered a number of bike/pedestrian projects in
recent years, from advance planning studies and preliminary designs through construction. These projects all
include bike/ped improvements, safety enhancements, traffic signals and lighting and roadway rehabilitation.
A selection of these projects are shown in the table below.
PROJECT AGENCY
Garden Grove Boulevard Complete Streets
Firestone Boulevard Widening and Bike Lanes
Broadway Complete Streets
City of Westminster
City of Norwalk
City of Sacramento
UC DavisWest Village Connectivity Improvements
North/South Bike Network Gap Closure/Connectivity
Bayside Drive Multimodal Improvements
Bicycle Corridor Improvement Project
Peters Canyon Bikeway
City of Eastvale
City of Newport Beach
City of Garden Grove
County of Orange
City of South Gate
City of Mountain View
City of South Gate
City of Palo Alto
Long Beach Boulevard Green Street
Charleston Road Complete Streets
Chakemco Street Improvements
Charleston-Arastradero Complete Streets
Cities of San Mateo, Palo
Alto and San CarlosEl Camino Real (SR-82) Grand Boulevard Initiative
West Capitol Avenue Complete Streets City of West Sacramento
19
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
REFERENCES
We are proud of our track record of successfully completing projects and meeting the project goals and
needs of our clients. Below is a list of our references for projects similar to the City’s project. We are
confident you will find that our references will attest to our exceptional performance.
Adolfo Ozaeta, PE
City Traffic Engineer
City of Garden Grove
8200 Westminster Boulevard
Westminster, CA 92683
(714) 548-3462
Mendez Historic Trail & Green Street Bikeway Improvements
PS&E for the complete streets project that will reduce vehicle travel lanes on
Hoover Street to create a 2-mile long Class IV bikeway along the roadway. A
raised planted median will provide separation between vehicles and bicycles and
serve as a stormwater treatment for roadway runoff. The improvements will also
include pavement rehabilitation, correcting deficient driveways and curb ramps,
pedestrian level lighting and traffic signal modifications.aozaeta@westminster-ca.gov
Bryan Jones, PE
City Manager
City of Eastvale
Limonite Gap Closure
PA&ED and PS&E for the complete street extension of Limonite Avenue over
Cucamonga Creek Channel. The project evaluated bicycle infrastructure options,
12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910 ultimately implementing a Class I path. The project includes design of a Class
Eastvale, CA 91752
(951) 703-4411
bjones@eastvaleca.gov
I path to the south of the roadway alignment to extend the trail within the SCE
right of way. Improvements also include bridge design, environmental permitting,
traffic signals, roundabout design, landscape & irrigation, and bridge aesthetics.
Alana Cheng, Community
Development Senior Analyst
City of Garden Grove
11222 Acacia Parkway
Garden Grove, CA 92842
(714) 741-5121
Bicycle Corridor Improvements Program
Engineering design services for local roadway improvements as part of the BCIP
which will double the number of Class II and Class III bicycle lanes along five
corridors in the City. The project will rebalance the existing roadways to provide
space for bicycle facilities and includes road diets, buffered bikes, Class II and
Class III bicycle facilities, and wayfinding signage.
alanac@ggcity.org
Elizabeth Weeks Central City Mobility Improvements
Associate Engineer
City of Sacramento
915 I Street, 2nd Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 808-7035
PS&E for the project that will reduce vehicle travel lanes to create two-way
travel lanes for vehicles and bicycles with the installation of bike lanes. The
project includes roadway space reassignments at multiple locations to add to the
parking protected bikeway network throughout the grid. The project also includes
signal modifications, pavement microseal and spot digouts, ADA upgrades,
modifications to the US 50/5th Street Interchange to convert to two-way traffic,
and modifications to the I Street/UPRR at-grade crossing.
eweeks@cityofsacramento.org
Brad Fowler
Project Manager
County of Orange
300 North Flower Street
Santa Ana, CA 92703
(714) 245-4503
Carbon Canyon Channel Class 1 Bikeway (OC Loop Segment D)
PS&E for the design of this project that will connect the existing trail at Imperial
Highway and La Floresta to the existing portion of El Cajon trail at Bastanchury
Road. The project includes a 12’-14’-wide bikeway, retaining walls, drainage,
landscape, irrigation, hardscape, ADA access, bicycle/ pedestrian signals
and beacons, street crossings, maintenance road access, signage, pervious
pavement and localized stormwater best management practices (BMP’s).Brad.Fowler2@ocpw.ocgov.com
20
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Mark Thomas will follow the scope of work below to deliver the Standard Avenue Protected Bikeways project
for the City of Santa Ana (City). This scope of work will provide services for the final contract documents
(plans, specifications, and estimates). All reports, studies, renderings, exhibits, plans, specifications and
calculations developed by Mark Thomas will comply with the City’s standards. Upon selection, Mark Thomas
will submit the full detailed scope for inclusion in the contract.
TASK 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION
Task 1.1. Project Kickoff Meeting
The project kickoff meeting is an important first step to assemble key agency stakeholders, and to better
establish a dialogue between the City and the Consultant Project Team. The kickoff meeting allows more
conversational discussion about major project issues and concerns. Discussion will include background
such as consistency with the Central Santa Ana Complete Streets Plan and the Safe Mobility Santa Ana
Plan and other planning efforts. We seek to hear more from City staff to understand the grant funding
available and items that are required, desired, and optional for inclusion in the design. The Mark Thomas
Team will listen to the dialogue to determine how best to serve the City.
Mark Thomas will organize and facilitate a project kickoff meeting with City staff and identified key
stakeholders. Topics will include the following:
• Review of project background, funding, and grant requirements
• Review of project scope, goals and objectives, and schedule
• Review public outreach approach and expectations
• Define and clarify roles and responsibilities
Mark Thomas will develop the meeting agenda and content in advance and will work with the City Project
Manager to identify invitations in advance. Where possible, the meeting notes will be drafted during
the meeting with action items identified in real-time. This allows the meeting minutes to be developed
collaboratively and avoids a delay in delivering the minutes and actions. Real-time note taking can avoid
conflicting perspectives on discussion points and clearly define the action items.
TASK 1.1 DELIVERABLES:
• Meeting distribution list, invitations, agenda, and meeting notes.
Task 1.2. Project Development Team Meetings
Project management to ensure communication, expectations and deliverables are proceeding as scheduled
is important to project success. We propose to host monthly project development team (PDT) status
meetings via a Mark Thomas provided videoconference link. The video conference is recommended to
allow for a screenshare opportunity where meeting notes are recorded in real-time to document discussion
and establish action items with clarity. This approach ensures regular and consistent communication on
upcoming tasks, identifying potential risks and challenges to success. Participation in the monthly PDT
meetings is anticipated to include the City Project Manager and the Mark Thomas Project Manager and
Deputy Project Manager, with additional City of Santa Ana staff determine during the kick-off meeting. Real-
time recording of notes eliminates a time delay often seen between hosted meetings and meeting notes,
providing a clear set of actions for efficient completion.
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
Where needed, meetings can occur every 2-weeks. While the frequency of the meetings may seem high,
these meetings provide a defined time to collectively discuss project items with key staff. A similar approach
will be utilized by Mark Thomas with project subconsultants to achieve similar positive outcomes for internal
communication and management.
TASK 1.2 DELIVERALBES:
• Project Development Team Meetings, agenda and notes in real-time (monthly meetings)
Task 1.3. Agency Stakeholder Engagement
The Mark Thomas Team plans to engage directly with key agency representatives such as OCTA for transit
needs, wet/dry utilities, and the regional water quality board to position for permitting and approvals as
needed. Up to four meetings are planned in-person with various agency stakeholders to address project
design issues and address permitting requirements.
TASK 1.3 DELIVERABLES:
• Agency Stakeholder Meeting Agenda and Meeting Notes (up to four meetings)
Task 1.4. Progress Invoicing and Schedule
Success for the City will be accomplished through delivery of the final design plans bid package according
to an agreed upon schedule. At project start, we will develop a work breakdown schedule that establishes a
completion date acceptable to the City. The schedule will be reviewed regularly for tracking and consistency
during the PDT meetings. The schedule defines expectations and allows regular review to ensure critical
milestones are satisfied. It has been our experience that a realistic schedule allows for the greatest flexibility
to meet project challenges by empowering the team to appropriately allocate resources and adjust staffing
levels.
In addition to the schedule, we will provide monthly invoicing with a progress report identifying status on
major tasks and anticipated challenges. The progress report and invoice will be sent to the City on a
monthly basis and will address the key items needed by the City for reimbursement by the grant funding.
TASK 1.4 DELIVERABLES:
• Project Schedule
• Project Status Report and Invoice (Monthly)
Task 1.5. Quality Control
The Mark Thomas Quality Control plan consists of established procedures for performing the work, including
methods for design calculations, establishing appropriate levels of design development for intermediate
submittals, identification of regularly scheduled plan reviews, design checklists, and methods of project
documentation. Specific methods for QA/QC will include:
• The Mark Thomas Quality Assurance Manager will perform an independent review of the project plans,
estimates, and reports at each submittal for consistency, constructability, and accuracy.
• Design Technicians will use a “review stamp” for each round of changes which will track who commented
on the plans, who checked the drafting, and when the final product was reviewed again by the design
engineer.
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
Mark Thomas will implement and maintain these quality control procedures during the preparation of plans
and documents throughout the project.
TASK 1.5 DELIVERABLES:
• Quality Control Check List at Milestone Submittals
TASK 2. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
Task 2.1. Utility Mapping/Data Gathering
Mark Thomas will perform research at the City, County, State, utility companies and other agencies to obtain
as-builts and record maps of the project limits. This includes preparation and mailing of the Utility “A” letter
upon City approval. Mark Thomas will obtain mapping from utility companies and develop a base map. A
Utility Matrix will be created to track discussions and data received from utility agencies.
Mark Thomas, with City staff, will perform a walking audit prior to concept development and 30% plans to
identify anticipated Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) upgrades at intersections and driveways along the
corridor, define locations for bus stops, and identify potential impacts to parking. This effort will define the
limits of ADA improvements to be included in the final design plans.
TASK 2.1 DELIVERABLES:
• Utility “A” Letter
• Utility base mapping
• Walking Audit
Task 2.2. Topographic Surveys and Base Mapping
Control Survey Network
All Mark Thomas survey work for this project will use horizontal control based on the current Orange County
horizontal control datum which is the CCS83, zone VI, 1991.35 and 2007.00 epoch adjustment. The Orange
County network consists of approximately 2700 stations located on a ½ mile grid throughout the developed
areas within the county. The majority of these stations have recorded cadastral references and all of them
along with OCRTN, can be used to comply with the Ordinance 3809 Basis of Bearings requirement.
Mark Thomas will establish the Horizontal and Vertical control network consisting of 22 aerial control ground
targets required to control the aerial photogrammetry and LiDAR data acquisition. During the establishment
of the Control Network, Mark Thomas will locate survey monuments in project area. Additional Survey work
required to satisfy Monument Preservation is not included in this proposal or scope, only initial monument
location. Supplemental base mapping and design surveys will be acquired through detailed field topography
in areas designated by the Engineering Team. Record Data will be used to establish the Right Way along
the project area and note any areas of possible encroachments that could impact the project schedule. If
any such areas are found, additional boundary survey work may be required (additional Boundary Survey
work is not a part of this scope or fee proposal).
Photogrammetric Mapping
Aerotech Mapping will provide photogrammetric mapping for the 2.2-mile segment on Standard Avenue.
The photography will consist of 2 flight lines and 29 exposures utilizing 3.5cm digital imagery. Accuracies of
plus or minus 0.23’ can be expected as it relates to the topographical information generated from the Digital
Terrain Modeling (DTM) information. Accuracies of plus or minus 0.153’ can be expected as it relates to the
DTM information itself.
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
Task 2.3. 30% Design Concept Plans & Estimates
We will analyze the project conditions and goals based on cost, pedestrian and bicyclist accessibility, safety,
and right of way and utility impacts to obtain City consensus. This analysis will also include review of design
features (such as lane widths, bikeway widths, potential buffers, mid-block crossing treatments, curbs,
gutters, turn pockets, and intersection modifications) that could potentially be refined to avoid significant
impacts (such as a right of way acquisition). This will allow the City and Mark Thomas to “screen” potential
design options and incorporate feasible improvements into the 30% Plans.
We will prepare 30% concept plans and estimates for the proposed project corridor. Plan sheets will be
prepared in AutoCAD at 1”=40’ scale. This task includes preliminary cost estimates of major construction
related items including signals and electrical components and project contingencies.
KTUA will provide design review for the 30% plans to provide water infiltration, landscaping, aesthetic and
placemaking elements for Standard Avenue. Selected designs can be developed as three dimensional (3D)
renderings for team use and public outreach.
Fehr & Peers will participate in the preparation of conceptual designs and will provide a review of all design
plans leading up to the 30% plan submittal. These reviews will consider best practices and conformance
with relevant design standards and guidance (CAMUTCD, CA HDM, AASHTO, NACTO, FHWA, etc.), traffic
operations, and context sensitive design solutions.
Fehr & Peers will participate in the review of conceptual intersection designs and signal modifications/
phasing for the 30% submittal. These reviews will consider best practices and conformance with relevant
design standards and guidance (CAMUTCD, CA HDM, AASHTO, NACTO, FHWA, etc.), traffic operations,
and context sensitive design solutions.
TASK 2.3 DELIVERABLES:
• 30% Plans and Estimate
Task 2.4. Drainage Analysis
Mark Thomas will prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the proposed roadway in
accordance with the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (Order No. R8-2009-0030/NPDES
No. CAS618030). MT will incorporate Low Impact Development Best Management Practices to the
maximum extent practicable, for example the use of similar existing infiltration facilities used elsewhere in
the City to maintain the aesthetics of recently constructed improvements within the project limits and where
feasible per site specific conditions. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) document
“Managing Wet Weather with Green Infrastructure: Green Streets” will be used to satisfy the compliance
requirements for this priority project.
TASK 2.4 DELIVERABLES:
• Draft and Final Water Quality Management Plans
• Inclusion of chosen BMP’s within the Construction documents.
Task 2.5 Geotechnical Investigation (Optional)
If required, Group Delta will perform subsurface investigations and prepare a Geotechnical Design Report
(GDR) with final pavement design recommendations.
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
TASK 3. PUBLIC & STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH
Public Engagement Plan and Stakeholder Database
Community outreach and engagement are essential to ensure the successful delivery of this project. We will
develop a Public Engagement Plan (PEP) with review and approval by the City. The PEP will outline specific
tasks, the purpose of these tasks in relation to the project, a schedule of public outreach activities, due dates
and deliverables associated with each task. Once approved, the PEP will serve as a blueprint for outreach,
but will remain flexible to address our current dynamic environment resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.
As part of the PEP and outreach supporting services, we will develop a stakeholder database that will
be used to communicate with stakeholders for the duration of the project. To maximize efficiency, we will
utilize existing City’s list(s) to establish and expand upon the stakeholder database. The database will be
augmented with key stakeholder groups including neighborhood associations, City residents, property
owners, business owners, community groups/organizations and other interested parties. We will maintain
the database throughout administration of the project.
Community Meetings and Materials
As requested by the City, we plan to host two community meetings, which will be scheduled at key project
milestones. The purpose of these meetings is to discuss the project aspects, narrate benefits and changes,
solicit input on concepts with options, and educate the public on how to use the facilities. The meetings
will be hosted at a trusted community facility (Roosevelt-Walker Community Center, Madison Elementary
School, Kennedy Elementary School, Delhi Center, or other welcoming location). Our team is prepared to
lead the meetings in the preferred language of community members in attendance (likely Spanish).
In advance of meetings, a notification and promotion plan will be prepared. The notification plan will identify
the appropriate timing, meeting format, venues, data gathering tools, materials, and needed logistics. We
will prepare meeting presentation materials such as a project fact sheet, meeting notices, and graphics/
boards. All materials will be developed in collaboration with the City and comments received during the
meetings will be documented via meeting outreach summaries.
Graphics and Renderings
The Mark Thomas team will prepare necessary conceptual renderings to effectively convey the proposed
project features at the two community workshops. Graphics will include renderings, a detailed map, and/or
cross-section diagrams.
Due to KTUA’s involvement in the Central Santa Ana Complete Streets project, a concept for the protected
intersection at Standard Avenue and McFadden Avenue has already been created and can be refined for
similar cross-sections along the corridor. Given our team experience in the City, we can efficiently create
high quality 3D schematic renderings for remaining project segments to illustrate proposed changes to
the community. Graphics can be used in conjunction with photography and videos to create photorealistic
content. If needed for the final product, KTUA can develop visual simulations, or photo simulations, that
involve the use of various software packages to overlay a 3D model of a proposed design over a high quality
photograph of the location.
Public Noticing
Our team proposes a variety of notification methods to inform and encourage participation from stakeholders
including residents, property owners, community groups, schools, faith-based organizations local
businesses, and more. The final selection of these methods will be identified in the PEP and can include:
• Bilingual noticing (English and Spanish).
• Direct mail notices to stakeholders in the project database.
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
• Door-to-door flyer distribution (using subconsultant services) to residents, businesses, and other
occupants within in close proximity to the project area.
• E-blasts including meeting announcements, reminders, ‘Thank You’ messages with links to materials
• Social media campaign that includes boosts, targeted advertisements via Facebook, Instagram and/or
Twitter.
• Extended outreach via neighborhood associations, schools, community centers, shopping centers and
other key stakeholders – coordinate dissemination of project information/tools, including online postings,
newsletters and public counter information.
• Project Banners that can be placed on highly trafficked intersections/destinations that promote the
meetings (Madison Park, Roosevelt-Walker Community Center, Kennedy Elementary School, Delhi
Center, etc.).
Pop-up events (Optional Task)
Our team understands the importance of reaching community members where they are. As such, our team
proposes hosting up to two “pop-up” events at local parks and gathering spaces along the project corridor.
These events provide an informal setting to engage community members directly on project components.
Items that might be discussed include:
• Discussing design options and requesting public input on a preferred concept
• Input about the integration of public art into the project and opportunity areas
• Educating the public about the bikeway facilities and best use
• Educating the public about the protected intersection concept
• Reviewing project benefits for both bicyclists and pedestrians
Distribution of bicycle lights and/or helmets (would need to be separately funded) could be made available.
We have strong relationships with local community-based organizations that may have distribution events
that could be collaborated with the project. The team will reach out to Santa Ana Active Streets and Latino
Health Access about collaborative opportunities.
Public Engagement Summary Report
At the conclusion of the project, we will prepare a report documenting the full public involvement and
communication process. This report will summarize the outreach process, including notification methods,
online engagement tools and results. Additionally, an appendix including the project database, meeting
notices, meeting summaries, sign-in sheets will be included.
TASK 3 DELIVERABLES:
• Community Meetings, Public Workshops, Stakeholder Outreach (two meetings)
• Graphics/Renderings
• Public Notices
• Public Engagement Summary Report
TASK 4. FINAL UTILITY COORDINATION
Final utility coordination will build upon utility mapping performed in Task 2.1 and will include the required
utility documents per Chapter 14 of the Caltrans LAPM. Typically, this includes the Report of Investigation,
Notice to Owner, and Utility Agreement. Mark Thomas will take the lead on verifying the information provided
by the utility owners in the claim letter including overall costs, liability splits, easement documentation, and
depreciation and salvage credits.
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
Mark Thomas will work with the City and Caltrans to finalize utility agreements and certifications to comply
with federal requirements. The utility portion of the Right of Way certification form (Exhibit 13-B) will be
provided. Mark Thomas will build on the coordination performed in Task 2.1, which includes Utility “B” and
“C” Letters.
TASK 4 DELIVERABLES:
• Utility “B” and “C” Letters
• Utility Conflict Mapping
• Right of Way Certification
TASK 5. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES
Mark Thomas will prepare final plans, specifications, and estimates for the project.
Task 5.1. Roadway 60% Plans
Based on City comments, the Mark Thomas team will revise the 30% plans and prepare draft construction
documents Standard Avenue using City, NACTO and Caltrans guidelines. The 60% PS&E package will be
submitted to the City for review. The plans will include the following sheets: Title Sheet, Project Control,
Typical Cross Sections, Layouts, Construction Details, Drainage and Utility Plans, Signing and Striping. As
identified in the Request for Proposals, City review of submitted plans will be completed within four weeks.
Task 5.2. Roadway 90% Plans
Based on City comments on 60% plans, the Mark Thomas team will develop the 90% design plans.
Comments from the City on the 60% set will be addressed with a response matrix for City review. Design
details will be checked and updated within the plans.
Task 5.3. Roadway 100% Plans
Following City comments on the 90% PS&E submittal, the Mark Thomas team will prepare 100% submittal
plans. Mark Thomas will prepare the contract documents using the City’s standard boilerplate and a
combination of City and Caltrans specifications.
Task 5.4. Traffic Signal and Lighting Plans
The Mark Thomas team will prepare plans, specifications and a cost estimate (PS&E) for the modification of
the existing traffic signals located along Standard Avenue. This includes up to five (5) sheets to include:
1. Standard Avenue & Edinger Avenue – Traffic signal modification
2. Standard Avenue & Hobart Street – Traffic signal modification
3. Standard Avenue & McFadden Avenue – Traffic signal modification
4. Standard Avenue & Bishop Street – New signal design
5. Standard Avenue & Wisteria Place or Wakeham Avenue – 1 Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB) Signal
For signals requiring loop detector adjustments only, we will incorporate the changes into the civil design
drawings. Locations anticipated to require this minimal approach are:
6. Standard Avenue & Warner Avenue – Loop detection modifications only
7. Standard Avenue & St. Gertrude Place – Loop detection modifications only
8. Standard Avenue & Chestnut Avenue – Loop detection modifications only
9. Standard Avenue & First Street – Loop detection modifications only
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
We will prepare the traffic signal sheets for locations 1-5 using the topographic survey files, civil
improvement files (where applicable), and the as-built plans. Bicycle signal heads and separate phasing are
anticipated, in accordance with FHWA Interim Approval 16 (IA-16). Pedestrian improvements will include
adjusted push button locations (where needed) based on new curb bulbouts. The traffic signal modification
design will include existing equipment to remain, existing equipment to be removed, new equipment to be
installed, and the associated notes, details and schedules.
The traffic signal modification plans will be prepared in AutoCAD at 1”=20’ scale and will be designed in
conformance with CAMUTCD and City requirements. This scope assumes one sheet will be prepared
perunidentified intersection. The construction cost estimate will be developed based on recent bid
information (if available) for similar projects. We will coordinate with Southern California Edison (SCE) to
establish new service for the new signal at Bishop Street and the PHB (location to be determined). Existing
service is anticipated to be utilized at locations that are modified only.
Traffic signal and lighting plans will be prepared and submitted to the City with civil design plans at the
typical milestones (30%, 60%, 90% and 100%).
Task 5.4.1. Landscape Plans
We feel the landscape design and water treatment plans are highly dependent upon each other to manage
water runoff and address aesthetics along the corridor. Therefore, we will prepare a landscape construction
documents with specifications for City review. All work will be coordinated with the design team and
prepared using AutoCAD. The documents included are:
• Irrigation Plan, Legend and Details
• Planting Plan, Legend and Details
• Special Provision Specifications
• Planting and Irrigation Cost Estimates
Irrigation Plans, Legend and Details
This plan will diagrammatically lay out landscape irrigation piping, valves, control equipment, sprinkler heads
and related irrigation equipment for the irrigation of planting areas, at 1”=20’ scale, specifically calling out
all pipe and equipment sizing and types; and will include legend and details required to install the irrigation
system. A Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet shall be provided inclusive of the Hydrozone information
table and Water budget calculations (MAWA, ETWU) as required by City.
Planting Plans, Legend and Details
This plan will graphically locate and identify planting materials at 1”=20’ scale, including specific quantities,
sizes and varieties, and will include details and a planting legend to install the plant materials. The palette
will include California native or adaptive, drought tolerant plant materials.
Task 5.5. Special Provisions
Mark Thomas will develop the project technical special provisions using City of Santa Ana and Caltrans
Standard Specifications. The special provisions will be prepared using Microsoft Word. Special provisions
will be submitted at the 90% and final submittals. The City’s Front-End boilerplate contract language will be
incorporated into the specifications at the 100% submittal.
Task 5.6. Engineer’s Estimate
Mark Thomas will develop quantities and prepare construction cost estimates using the project geometrics
and surfaces developed from survey information. Cost estimates will be calculated at the 60%, 90%, and
final 100% submittals.
PROPOSAL STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNER
City of Santa Ana
Construction costs will be developed using current bid results from similar projects, Caltrans data base
information and from Caltrans latest Construction Cost Manual. All estimates will be done in Caltrans BEES
format using Microsoft Excel.
TASK 5 DELIVERABLES:
• 60%, 90%, 100% PS&E (Plans and response matrix)
TASK 6. BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
Task 6.1. Bidding Assistance
We will provide assistance to the City during the bidding process of the project. The work may include
answering bid inquiries from prospective bidders, attending pre-bid meetings, and preparing addenda to
the PS&E documents during the advertisement period. Mark Thomas has provided a not-to-exceed budget
amount to be used on a time and materials basis as requested by the City. Any time spent beyond this
budget will require a contract amendment.
Task 6.2. Construction support (Optional)
We will provide assistance to the City during construction of the project. The work may include responding
to Requests for Information (RFIs) by the contractor, providing consultation and interpretation of the
contract documents, preparing Contract Change Orders (CCOs), reviewing shop drawings, and attending
construction meetings and field visits. Mark Thomas has provided a not-to-exceed budget amount to be
used on a time and materials basis as requested by the City. Any time spent beyond this budget will require
a contract amendment.
Assumptions
• No traffic control will be required on local streets.
• A Record of Survey is not included in this scope of work but may be required by law. If a Record of
Survey is required a fee will be negotiated.
• Monument Preservation is not included
• The City will be responsible for all fees related to securing a venue for the community workshop, including
obtaining insurance certificates.
STANDARD AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANES
3RD TO WARNERPROPOSALCity of Santa Ana
SCHEDULE
CITY OF SANTA ANA
APPENDIX
•
•
Resumes
Non-Collusion Certifications
RESUMES
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Standard Avenue Protected Bike Lanes: 3rd to Warner
RESUME
PAUL MARTIN, PE, TE, LCI
Paul Martin has more than 21 years of experience as a transportation manager
and traffic engineer. He has a strong engineering and planning background
that is focused on improving public travel and safety. Paul’s expertise
includes active transportation, community engagement, traffic engineering,
and strategic funding programs. As the first countywide Active Transportation
Coordinator, Paul secured over $6 million in ten distinct grants to address
infrastructure and non-infrastructure needs.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
THE OC LOOP - PROMOTION STRATEGY, ORANGE COUNTY
Program manager responsible for leading communications and funding
strategy for the 66-mile OC Loop to close the gap on the remaining 30-percent
of unbuilt portions. Led presentations introducing project and soliciting input to
over ten City Councils and coordinate a demonstration event of a gap closure
linking with the Santa Ana River in Yorba Linda. Collaborated with two cities,
railroad owner, and California Public Utilities Commission to negotiate land
acquisition for 4.1 mile long rails-with-trails portion. Over $20 million has been
secured to close gaps along the OC Loop since 2012.
PROJECT ROLE
Project Manager
AVAILABILITY
70%
EDUCATION
BS in Civil
Engineering,
University of
California, Irvine,
1999 OC LOOP SEGMENTS O, P, Q, ORANGE COUNTY
Project manager responsible for assisting with the preparation of ATP Cycle 4
and Cycle 5 ATP grant applications for construction of the OC Loop Segment
O and Segments O, P, Q of this regional trail system. Segments OPQ define
a 2.7-mile off-street multi-use path along the Coyote Creek flood channel.
The project includes two bridges over the channel, three roadway/highway
undercrossings, three railroad undercrossings, and three roadway at-grade
crossings.
REGISTRATION
CA C65868
CA TR2315
LCI 4936
AWARDS/
RECOGNITION
2019 Public Sector
Professional of the
Year - Association of
Pedestrian & Bicycle
Professionals
MENDEZ HISTORIC FREEDOM TRAIL, WESTMINSTER
Project manager responsible for initiating concept for roadway reallocation
to provide the first cycletrack in the City of Westminster. Supported City
engagement with the CPUC related to adjacent active rail corridor. Positioned
the City to seek regional Go Human event funding illustrating pop-up cycletrack
in 2016 which later led to securing $2.4 million in funding to implement the
Mendez Historic Freedom Trail. The trail will provide an outdoor education
opportunity related to the historic Mendez school desegregation case while
also serving to manage stormwater runoff and provide a high quality bikeway
for students and community members
2017 Change Maker
of the Year -
Alliance for a Healthy
Orange County
RAIL TO RIVER FEASIBILITY STUDY, LA METRO
Project manager responsible for evaluating the feasibility of creating an active
transportation corridor along the underutilized 10-mile long railroad right-of-way
through disadvantaged communities along Slauson Avenue south of downtown
Los Angeles. Robust community input was facilitated to establish community
interest and linkage with future potential benefits. The new pedestrian and
bicycle transportation corridor will link to multiple Metro and municipal bus lines
along Slauson Avenue, connect to three major north-south Metro transit lines,
as well as the Los Angeles River.
RESUME
PAUL MARTIN, CONT’D
COUNTYWIDE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (OC ACTIVE), ORANGE COUNTY
Project manager responsible for securing an Active Transportation Program 2015 grant to prepare the first
countywide Active Transportation Plan covering both bicycle and pedestrian topics. Branded OC Active,
the study updated the prior bicycle master plan and created data analysis to create pedestrian heat maps
showing the highest need areas in all 35 jurisdictions. Creative outreach included engagement with schools
for a chalk-based art contest related to walking and biking and pop-up events at over 70 unique community
events countywide.
TRANSPORTATION MANAGER/TRAFFIC ENGINEER, PLACENTIA
Transportation manager and traffic engineer for the City of Placentia responsible for leading solutions to all
transportation planning, operations, and maintenance needs within a City serving 50,000 residents. Paul
leveraged technical skills to communicate directly with residents, business owners, City Council, and local
commissions. He proactively pursued funding to address high levels of need while incorporating active
transportation enhancements into annual Capital Improvement Projects.
SYSTEMIC SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PROGRAM, ORANGE COUNTY
Project manager responsible for securing and leading a Caltrans Systemic Safety Analysis Report
Program Grant to evaluate bicycle and pedestrian collision history for all cities and the unincorporated
communities within Orange County. The analysis identified trends in crashes by roadway and intersection
types and informed the development of a list of potential engineering solutions by facility. A comprehensive
countermeasure toolbox was developed documenting crash reduction factors and eligibility for funding
through Federal and State safety programs.
GO HUMAN ENCOURAGEMENT EVENTS, ORANGE COUNTY
Project manager responsible for the promotion of the Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG) program to host non-infrastructure encouragement activities at seven jurisdictions throughout county.
Each event demonstrated a proposed capital infrastructure improvement through use of temporary materials
and equipment. The events showcased engineering concepts long before preparation of full design plans
and garnered community and elected officials support for implementation.
PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN, ORANGE COUNTY
Project manager responsible for the development of the Pedestrian Action Plan for the Orange County
Transportation Authority. The 9-point plan established a baseline of efforts to improve pedestrian safety
countywide addressing education, enforcement, and engineering solutions. The action plan was created
following tragic death of three young students on Halloween and empowered the regional agency to guide
future endeavors more broadly to address active transportation rather than solely focus on topics related to
people bicycling.
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL ACTION PLAN, ORANGE COUNTY
Project manager responsible for securing over $800,000 in funding for countywide Safe Routes to School
Action Plan to collaborative work with stakeholders countywide for multi-disciplinary actions to improve
conditions for youth walking and biking to school. The action plan is being developed to evaluate and
identify a leadership system to leverage existing strengths and expand to additional communities,
schools, and school districts. The funding was also secured to provide non-infrastructure education and
encouragement activities at 25 disadvantaged community schools countywide utilizing State of California
Active Transportation Program funding. Both projects were led jointly in partnership with the Orange County
Health Care Agency.
RESUME
AARON SILVA, PE
Aaron has more than 13 years of experience in design and delivery of municipal
and transportation projects. He is knowledgeable in both local agency and
Caltrans design standards and has successfully delivered projects with sensitive
and significant public outreach efforts. He is a recognized expert in the design of
bike and pedestrian facilities, helping design and implement state of the practice
solutions to improve active transportation safety throughout California.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
MENDEZ HISTORIC TRAIL/GREEN STREET BIKEWAY, WESTMINSTER
Project manager and bike/ped expert for this historic trail and Green Street
bikeway project that will reduce vehicle travel lanes and create a two-mile long
Class IV bikeway along the western limits of the corridor. A raised median will
be incorporated to provide separation between vehicles and bicycles, and serve
as a stormwater treatment for roadway runoff. Additional project improvements
include pedestrian level lighting, correction of deficient driveways, ADA
upgrades, pavement rehab, asphalt overlay, and curb ramps.
PROJECT ROLE
Civil/Roadway Lead
AVAILABILITY
65%
EDUCATION
BS in Civil
Engineering,
California State
University,
GARDEN GROVE COMPLETE STREETS, WESTMINSTER
Project manager for this ATP-funded bikeway project that will repurpose Garden
Grove Boulevard to include one lane in each direction, a two-way-left-turn
lane, and a Class IV protected bikeway with landscape median. The project
also provides a road diet at Edwards Street/Trask Avenue and adds buffered
bike lanes. The project requires a Caltrans encroachment permit and approval
from UPRR. Additional project improvements include pedestrian level lighting,
correction of deficient driveways, pavement rehabilitation, and curb ramps.
Sacramento
REGISTRATION
CA C75938
YEARS OF
EXPERIENCE
13 CENTRAL CITY MOBILITY IMPROVEMENTS, SACRAMENTO
Project Manager responsible for managing the preliminary engineering, design
concept plans, and PS&E to the City of Sacramento to implement the second
phase of the Central City Specific plan which includes two-way conversions
on 5th Street and I Street to improve circulation for vehicles and bicyclists.
Additionally, parking protected bikeways on 9th, 10th, 19th, 21st, P, and Q
Streets will create a facility for all ages and abilities.
ADDITIONAL
PROJECTS
• Street Design
Standards, Davis
• Active
Transportation
Improvements,
Eastvale
WEST VILLAGE CONNECTIVITY, DAVIS
Project manager responsible for preparation of preliminary and final design
documents for several critical transportation improvement projects in the
West Village area of the UC Davis campus. Projects include widening the
multi-use path and adding lighting along the south side of Russell Boulevard,
modifying the bike path and extending connections from the West Village to the
pedestrian overcrossing at Acer Street, widening the pedestrian pathway from
the pedestrian overcrossing to Orchard Park Drive, constructing a traffic circle at
Orchard Park Circle and Orchard Park Drive and altering the existing two lane
vehicle roundabout at the West Village to a single lane roundabout.
• SR-120/
Union Road
Interchange
DDI and Class
I Ribbon Path,
Manteca
• I-80/Richards
Boulevard
Interchange and
Class I Ribbon
Path, Davis
WEST CAPITOL AVENUE REHABILITATION, SACRAMENTO
Project manager for this project that will provide a safe pedestrian environment
through this major east-west arterial in Sacramento, which connects industrial,
commercial, and residential land uses along the corridor. Mark Thomas is
providing new bikeways and bike paths, pavement rehabilitation and improved
safety and mobility for bicycles/pedestrians along the corridor.
RESUME
RAVI SHAH, PE
Ravi Shah has more than 13 years of experience providing project
management expertise in the design of highway and local infrastructure
improvements, including the design of Caltrans highway and roadway projects,
such as reconstructions and widenings, new bridges, bridge replacements, and
bicycle/pedestrian facilities. He has also led a number of on-call engineering
services contract for different local agencies. Through his experience
managing numerous simultaneous projects, he has developed skills in leading
teams and building consensus. Ravi is well versed at managing fast-paced,
multi-agency/discipline projects.
PROJECT ROLE
Civil/Roadway REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
EDUCATION
BS in Civil
Engineering,
CARBON CANYON CHANNEL CLASS I BIKEWAY (OC LOOP
SEGMENT D), ORANGE COUNTY
Project manager responsible for final design of the Carbon Canyon Channel
Bikeway project. The project includes a 12’-14’ wide bikeway, undercrossing
at Golden Avenue, a 133’ long 12’x12.5’ box culvert at Bastanchury Road,
constructing permanent retaining walls, drainage conveyance, lighting, fencing,
landscape, irrigation, hardscape, ADA access, bicycle/ pedestrian signals
and beacons, street crossings, maintenance road access, signage, pervious
pavement and localized stormwater best management practices (BMP’s).
California Polytechnic
State University,
Pomona, 2008
REGISTRATION
CA C79183
QSD/P 25656
YEARS OF
EXPERIENCE
13
OC LOOP SEGMENTS OPQ, 25% DESIGN ATP APPLICATION,
ORANGE COUNTY
Project engineer responsible for providing on-call road and bridge engineering
services. Services include roadway geometrics, signing and striping,drainage
design, bridge type selection, PS&E documents, and the development of
reports and grant applications. Projects include the Silverado Canyon Road
Bridge Replacement project and the OC Loop Segments O, P, Q projects.
ADDITIONAL
PROJECTS
• Modjeska
Grade Road
Improvements,
Orange County BAYSIDE DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, NEWPORT BEACH
Roadway/drainage design engineer for this roadway improvement project
in Newport Beach. Mark Thomas is providing engineering, geometric
and transportation design services to improve pedestrian safety, bicycle
connectivity, and overall vehicular and multimodal operations. Key services
include Caltrans approval and permitting, pavement rehabilitation, complete
streets/urban design, and bike/ped improvements.
• John Wayne
Airport
Maintenance and
Remediation,
Orange County
• I-710 Utilities
Relocation, Los
Angeles County
• SR-58 (Rosedale
Highway)
ON-CALL ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS - BIKE LANE PROJECTS, SAN
JOSE
Project engineer responsible for civil design on-call services to support the City
of San Jose in developing improvements to their roadways. Task orders have
included developing striping plans for more than 30 miles of City roadways to
add bike facilities.
Widening and
Improvements,
Bakersfield
Claude Strayer, PEAssociate
ABOUT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Mr. Strayer is an associate with 9 years of experience and
has a range of transportation experience with the design
of traffic signals, bicycle facilities, signing and striping
plans, safe routes to school improvements, pedestrian
facilities, wayfinding and the public involvement process.
He has led teams of designers on a variety of other
transportation engineering projects such as temporary
traffic control, roadway and sidewalk design, and
lighting. He also has experience performing traffic
analysis as well as studies with respect to parking,
circulation and school zone safety.
Honolulu Complete Streets Planning & Design
Fehr & Peers conducted multimodal transportation analysis, complete
streets planning, and design plan development for 15.6 miles of bikeway
facilities throughout Honolulu's Primary Urban Center (PUC). This project
was envisioned as a critical first phase of the expansion of a low traffic
stress bicycle and pedestrian network, and a trophy project for Honolulu's
leadership in innovative bikeway planning and design. A key component
of our work focused on the design, which Mr. Strayer is contributing to, of
Complete Streets that provided improved and balanced bike, pedestrian,
transit, and vehicular mobility and access while supporting the civic life of
streets and an economically and environmentally sustainable context. Mr.
Strayer was the project manager of the design phase which included final
(PS&E) design of signing and striping, bicycle facilities, and traffic signal
modifications.
EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, MA (2011)
Minor, Mathematics, Northeastern University, MA (2011)
North Park Mid City Bikeway, San Diego, CA
Fehr & Peers completed the planning, specifications and estimates
(PS&E) for 11 traffic signal modifications along the Meade, Georgia, and
Landis bikeways in the North Park-Mid City area of San Diego, as well as
the wayfinding design for the Meade and Landis bikeways. The signal
modifications included the preparation of 100% plans that addressed the
planned removal of separate left-turn lanes at numerous intersections,
the installation of curb extensions/bendouts, and modifications to signal
phasing. Mr. Strayer was a design engineer on the team working to
review and design traffic signal modification plans. The wayfinding plans
included PS&E for confirmation and destination signage based on
guidelines previously prepared for SANDAG by Fehr & Peers.
REGISTRATIONS
Civil Engineer, CA #86774
Civil Engineer, AZ #68882
Civil Engineer, HI #17856
AFFILIATIONS
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Member
ITE Pedestrian & Bicycle Standing Committee, Vice Chair Hoover Street Bikeway, Westminster, CA
Fehr & Peers is currently involved in the design of a two-way, class IV bicycle
facility for the City of Westminster. Mr. Strayer is the Project Manager and is
responsible for the design of traffic signal modifications and street lighting
associated with the new bikeway. The new class IV bikeway takes away one
travel lane, shifts traffic and includes new bicycle traffic signals, bicycle
detection as well as other traffic signal upgrades for motor vehicles.
.FEHR & PEERS
18
KTUA Key Personnel | Jacob Leon | Project Planner | Outreach Facilitator
Jacob is responsible for network and facility design, public outreach, technical drafting and
3D modeling. He is an integral member of KTUA’s tactical urbanism team, raising public
awareness of the benefits of thoughtful urban design, safe pedestrian and bicycle accessi-
bility, and green infrastructure. His strong background in 3D modeling and graphic design
allows him to produce effective digital and print media to communicate design concepts.
His mobility planning projects include active transportation plans, complete streets plans,
and bicycle and pedestrian master plans. These projects entail network and facility design,
public outreach, technical drafting and 3D modeling.
City of Santa Ana Complete Streets Plan
Assisted the project team in branding the project by creating fun, attractive and unique
logos and support graphics for flyers, postcards, and digital media. Assisted the team
with all community outreach coordination, workshop support and Spanish translation.
Assisted in developing pilot projects with a Complete Streets approach which empha-
sizes safe access for pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders of all ages and abil-
ities. 3D models and support graphics were created to help communicate the designs.
Assisted in developing a project film that showcases the project process from the initial
three-day workshop to the development of the top ten pilot projects.
EDUCATIONꢀBachelor of Landscape Architecture,
Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, 2013
REGISTRATIONCity of Grand Terrace Barton Road Thematic Streetscape Plan ꢀ2014, LEED Green Associate
Assistant project manager responsible for developing the community engagement pro-
cess, thematic conceptual designs, and 3D modeling exhibits. Responsible for day-to-day
communication with the City, scheduling community engagement events, and provid-
ing Spanish interpretation at those events. Jacob will assist with the development of a
Green Street Toolbox that will support the City’s vision for a more sustainable future.
AFFILIATIONS ꢀAmerican Society of Landscape
Architects ꢀAssociation of Pedestrian and Bicycle
Professionals
City of Vista Emerald Drive and Townsite Complete Streets AWARDSSenior planner/outreach facilitator. Assisted with the development of complete street
and traffic calming concepts to improve multi-modal access throughout the project
corridors. Assisted in planning necessary exhibits for community workshops as well as
attended all community workshops. Provided Spanish interpretation and translation.
ꢀ2020 APA Inland Empire, Compre-
hensive Plan- Large Jurisdiction,
Prado Regional Park Master Plan ꢀ2020 APA San Diego Transportation
Planning Award of Merit, City of
National City INTRA-Connect Plan ꢀ2020 ASLA San Diego Award of Mer-
it, San Jacinto Trails Master Plan ꢀ2019 APA California, Comprehensive
Plan Small Jurisdiction; 2019 APA
Inland Empire Comprehensive Plan
Small Jurisdiction, San Jacinto Trails
Master Plan, Award of Excellence ꢀ2019 APA Central Coast; 2018 AP-
WA-California Central Coast Project
of the Year, Special Studies Under
$2M Category; Goleta BMP Award of
Excellence
City of Atascadero El Camino Real Downtown Traffic Calming and Corridor Plan
Senior planner/outreach facilitator. Assisted with the development of complete street,
traffic calming, and placemaking concepts to improve multi-modal access throughout
the project corridor. Assisted in planning necessary exhibits for community workshops.
City of National City SMART Foundation
Assisted the project manager in the preparation of documents needed for city-wide walk
audits and community workshops such as maps, posters, and surveys. Spanish transla-
tion and assistance for all written products and during workshops was also provided.
All information gathered was transferred to GIS for future analysis. Helped develop pilot
projects throughout the study area with an emphasis on art and with a Complete Streets
approach which emphasizes safe access for pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit
riders of all ages and abilities. 3D models and graphics were created to help communi-
cate the designs.
ꢀ2019 APA Central Coast-Paso Robles
BMP Award of Merit ꢀ2019 APA San Diego Achievement
Award, Transportation Planning, City
of Vista Townsite Dr. Corridor Study ꢀ2019 SCAG Sustainability Award for
Active, Healthy and Safe Communi-
ties; and 2019 APA OC Transportation
Planning Merit Award: City of Santa
Ana - Central Complete Streets Plan
City of San Diego City Heights Urban Greening Plan
Assisted the project manager in developing materials for community workshops
such as charts, maps, and surveys. Data from community surveys was digitized and
transferred to GIS for future analysis. Spanish translation and assistance for all written
products and during workshops was also provided. Helped develop pilot projects
throughout the study area with an emphasis on storm water Best Management Prac-
tices (BMPs) and urban forestry. 3D models and graphics were created to help commu-
nicate the designs.SPECIAL SKILLS ꢀSpanish Fluency
NON-COLLUSION
CERTIFICATIONS
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Standard Avenue Protected Bike Lanes: 3rd to Warner
Appendix
ATTACHMENT 3-2: NON-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
CERTIFICATIONS
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢄꢂꢈꢉꢊꢋꢂꢃꢄꢌꢅꢉꢊꢈꢊꢄꢌꢍꢉꢃꢈꢂꢅꢉꢊꢎꢊꢂꢇꢏꢃꢐꢑꢃꢇꢊꢒꢍꢊꢍꢒꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢇꢔꢐꢕꢊꢉꢉꢊꢍꢒꢃꢉꢁꢊꢇꢃꢐꢊꢓꢃꢆꢅꢃꢄꢅꢆꢄꢆꢇꢌꢖꢏꢃꢉꢆꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢐꢂꢇꢉꢃꢆꢎꢃ
ꢁꢊꢇꢃꢆꢅꢃꢁꢂꢅꢃꢗꢍꢆꢘꢖꢂꢓꢒꢂꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢐꢂꢖꢊꢂꢎꢏꢃꢉꢁꢌꢉꢙꢃ
ꢚꢛ ꢜꢆꢃꢎꢂꢓꢂꢅꢌꢖꢃꢌꢄꢄꢅꢆꢄꢅꢊꢌꢉꢂꢓꢃꢎꢔꢍꢓꢇꢃꢁꢌꢋꢂꢃꢐꢂꢂꢍꢃꢄꢌꢊꢓꢃꢆꢅꢃꢘꢊꢖꢖꢃꢐꢂꢃꢄꢌꢊꢓꢏꢃꢐꢑꢃꢆꢅꢃꢆꢍꢃꢐꢂꢁꢌꢖꢎꢃꢆꢎꢃꢉꢁꢂ
ꢔꢍꢓꢂꢅꢇꢊꢒꢍꢂꢓꢏꢃꢉꢆꢃꢌꢍꢑꢃꢄꢂꢅꢇꢆꢍꢃꢎꢆꢅꢃꢊꢍꢎꢖꢔꢂꢍꢈꢊꢍꢒꢃꢆꢅꢃꢌꢉꢉꢂꢕꢄꢉꢊꢍꢒꢃꢉꢆꢃꢊꢍꢎꢖꢔꢂꢍꢈꢂꢃꢌꢍꢃꢆꢎꢎꢊꢈꢂꢅꢃꢆꢅꢃꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢂꢂ
ꢆꢎꢃꢌꢍꢑꢃꢎꢂꢓꢂꢅꢌꢖꢃꢌꢒꢂꢍꢈꢑꢏꢃꢌꢃꢝꢂꢕꢐꢂꢅꢃꢆꢎꢃꢞꢆꢍꢒꢅꢂꢇꢇꢏꢃꢌꢍꢃꢆꢎꢎꢊꢈꢂꢅꢃꢆꢅꢃꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢂꢂꢃꢆꢎꢃꢞꢆꢍꢒꢅꢂꢇꢇꢏꢃꢆꢅꢃꢌꢍ
ꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢂꢂꢃꢆꢎꢃꢌꢃꢝꢂꢕꢐꢂꢅꢃꢆꢎꢃꢞꢆꢍꢒꢅꢂꢇꢇꢃꢊꢍꢃꢈꢆꢍꢍꢂꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢘꢊꢉꢁꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢌꢘꢌꢅꢓꢊꢍꢒꢃꢆꢎꢃꢌꢍꢑꢃꢎꢂꢓꢂꢅꢌꢖꢃꢈꢆꢍꢉꢅꢌꢈꢉꢏ
ꢉꢁꢂꢃꢕꢌꢗꢊꢍꢒꢃꢆꢎꢃꢌꢍꢑꢃꢎꢂꢓꢂꢅꢌꢖꢃꢒꢅꢌꢍꢉꢏꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢕꢌꢗꢊꢍꢒꢃꢆꢎꢃꢌꢍꢑꢃꢎꢂꢓꢂꢅꢌꢖꢃꢖꢆꢌꢍꢏꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢂꢍꢉꢂꢅꢊꢍꢒꢃꢊꢍꢉꢆꢃꢆꢎꢃꢌꢍꢑ
ꢈꢆꢆꢄꢂꢅꢌꢉꢊꢋꢂꢃꢌꢒꢅꢂꢂꢕꢂꢍꢉꢏꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢂꢟꢉꢂꢍꢇꢊꢆꢍꢏꢃꢈꢆꢍꢉꢊꢍꢔꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢏꢃꢅꢂꢍꢂꢘꢌꢖꢏꢃꢌꢕꢂꢍꢓꢕꢂꢍꢉꢏꢃꢆꢅ
ꢕꢆꢓꢊꢎꢊꢈꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢆꢎꢃꢌꢍꢑꢃꢎꢂꢓꢂꢅꢌꢖꢃꢈꢆꢍꢉꢅꢌꢈꢉꢏꢃꢒꢅꢌꢍꢉꢏꢃꢖꢆꢌꢍꢏꢃꢆꢅꢃꢈꢆꢆꢄꢂꢅꢌꢉꢊꢋꢂꢃꢌꢒꢅꢂꢂꢕꢂꢍꢉꢛ
ꢠꢛ ꢡꢎꢃꢌꢍꢑꢃꢎꢔꢍꢓꢇꢃꢆꢉꢁꢂꢅꢃꢉꢁꢌꢍꢃꢎꢂꢓꢂꢅꢌꢖꢃꢌꢄꢄꢅꢆꢄꢅꢊꢌꢉꢂꢓꢃꢎꢔꢍꢓꢇꢃꢁꢌꢋꢂꢃꢐꢂꢂꢍꢃꢄꢌꢊꢓꢃꢆꢅꢃꢘꢊꢖꢖꢃꢐꢂꢃꢄꢌꢊꢓꢃꢉꢆꢃꢌꢍꢑ
ꢄꢂꢅꢇꢆꢍꢃꢎꢆꢅꢃꢊꢍꢎꢖꢔꢂꢍꢈꢊꢍꢒꢃꢆꢅꢃꢌꢉꢉꢂꢕꢄꢉꢊꢍꢒꢃꢉꢆꢃꢊꢍꢎꢖꢔꢂꢍꢈꢂꢃꢌꢍꢑꢃꢆꢎꢎꢊꢈꢂꢅꢃꢆꢅꢃꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢂꢂꢃꢆꢎꢃꢌꢍꢑꢃꢎꢂꢓꢂꢅꢌꢖ
ꢌꢒꢂꢍꢈꢑꢏꢃꢌꢃꢝꢂꢕꢐꢂꢅꢃꢆꢎꢃꢞꢆꢍꢒꢅꢂꢇꢇꢏꢃꢌꢍꢃꢆꢎꢎꢊꢈꢂꢅꢃꢆꢅꢃꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢂꢂꢃꢆꢎꢃꢞꢆꢍꢒꢅꢂꢇꢇꢏꢃꢆꢅꢃꢌꢍꢃꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢂꢂꢃꢆꢎꢃꢌ
ꢝꢂꢕꢐꢂꢅꢃꢆꢎꢃꢞꢆꢍꢒꢅꢂꢇꢇꢃꢊꢍꢃꢈꢆꢍꢍꢂꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢘꢊꢉꢁꢃꢉꢁꢊꢇꢃꢎꢂꢓꢂꢅꢌꢖꢃꢈꢆꢍꢉꢅꢌꢈꢉꢏꢃꢒꢅꢌꢍꢉꢃꢖꢆꢌꢍꢏꢃꢖꢆꢌꢍꢃꢆꢅ
ꢈꢆꢆꢄꢂꢅꢌꢉꢊꢋꢂꢃꢌꢒꢅꢂꢂꢕꢂꢍꢉꢏꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢔꢍꢓꢂꢅꢇꢊꢒꢍꢂꢓꢃꢇꢁꢌꢖꢖꢃꢈꢆꢕꢄꢖꢂꢉꢂꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢇꢔꢐꢕꢊꢉꢃꢌꢃꢢꢣꢊꢇꢈꢖꢆꢇꢔꢅꢂꢃꢆꢎ
ꢤꢆꢐꢐꢑꢊꢍꢒꢃꢥꢈꢉꢊꢋꢊꢉꢊꢂꢇꢦꢛ
ꢀꢁꢊꢇꢃꢈꢂꢅꢉꢊꢎꢊꢈꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢊꢇꢃꢌꢃꢕꢌꢉꢂꢅꢊꢌꢖꢃꢅꢂꢄꢅꢂꢇꢂꢍꢉꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢆꢎꢃꢎꢌꢈꢉꢃꢔꢄꢆꢍꢃꢘꢁꢊꢈꢁꢃꢅꢂꢖꢊꢌꢍꢈꢂꢃꢘꢌꢇꢃꢄꢖꢌꢈꢂꢓꢃꢘꢁꢂꢍꢃꢉꢁꢊꢇꢃꢉꢅꢌꢍꢇꢌꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃ
ꢘꢌꢇꢃꢕꢌꢓꢂꢃꢆꢅꢃꢂꢍꢉꢂꢅꢂꢓꢃꢊꢍꢉꢆꢛꢃꢧꢔꢐꢕꢊꢇꢇꢊꢆꢍꢃꢆꢎꢃꢉꢁꢊꢇꢃꢈꢂꢅꢉꢊꢎꢊꢈꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢊꢇꢃꢌꢃꢄꢅꢂꢅꢂꢨꢔꢊꢇꢊꢉꢂꢃꢎꢆꢅꢃꢕꢌꢗꢊꢍꢒꢃꢆꢅꢃꢂꢍꢉꢂꢅꢊꢍꢒꢃꢊꢍꢉꢆꢃꢉꢁꢊꢇꢃ
ꢉꢅꢌꢍꢇꢌꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢊꢕꢄꢆꢇꢂꢓꢃꢐꢑꢃꢧꢂꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢚꢩꢪꢠꢏꢃꢀꢊꢉꢖꢂꢃꢩꢚꢏꢃ ꢫꢛꢃꢧꢛꢃꢞꢆꢓꢂꢛꢃꢥꢍꢑꢃꢄꢂꢅꢇꢆꢍꢃꢘꢁꢆꢃꢎꢌꢊꢖꢇꢃꢉꢆꢃꢎꢊꢖꢂꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢅꢂꢨꢔꢊꢅꢂꢓꢃ
ꢈꢂꢅꢉꢊꢎꢊꢈꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢇꢁꢌꢖꢖꢃꢐꢂꢃꢇꢔꢐꢬꢂꢈꢉꢃꢉꢆꢃꢌꢃꢈꢊꢋꢊꢖꢃꢄꢂꢍꢌꢖꢉꢑꢃꢆꢎꢃꢍꢆꢉꢃꢖꢂꢇꢇꢃꢉꢁꢌꢍꢃꢭꢚꢮꢏꢮꢮꢮꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢍꢆꢉꢃꢕꢆꢅꢂꢃꢉꢁꢌꢍꢃꢭꢚꢮꢮꢏꢮꢮꢮꢃꢎꢆꢅꢃꢂꢌꢈꢁꢃ
ꢇꢔꢈꢁꢃꢎꢌꢊꢖꢔꢅꢂꢛꢃ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢄꢂꢈꢉꢊꢋꢂꢃꢄꢌꢅꢉꢊꢈꢊꢄꢌꢍꢉꢃꢌꢖꢇꢆꢃꢌꢒꢅꢂꢂꢇꢃꢐꢑꢃꢇꢔꢐꢕꢊꢉꢉꢊꢍꢒꢃꢁꢊꢇꢃꢆꢅꢃꢁꢂꢅꢃꢐꢊꢓꢃꢆꢅꢃꢄꢅꢆꢄꢆꢇꢌꢖꢃꢉꢁꢌꢉꢃꢁꢂꢃꢆꢅꢃꢇꢁꢂꢃꢇꢁꢌꢖꢖꢃꢅꢂꢨꢔꢊꢅꢂꢃ
ꢉꢁꢌꢉꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢖꢌꢍꢒꢔꢌꢒꢂꢃꢆꢎꢃꢉꢁꢊꢇꢃꢈꢂꢅꢉꢊꢎꢊꢈꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢐꢂꢃꢊꢍꢈꢖꢔꢓꢂꢓꢃꢊꢍꢃꢌꢖꢖꢃꢖꢆꢘꢂꢅꢃꢉꢊꢂꢅꢃꢇꢔꢐꢈꢆꢍꢉꢅꢌꢈꢉꢇꢏꢃꢘꢁꢊꢈꢁꢃꢂꢟꢈꢂꢂꢓꢃꢭꢚꢮꢮꢏꢮꢮꢮꢃ
ꢌꢍꢓꢃꢉꢁꢌꢉꢃꢌꢖꢖꢃꢇꢔꢈꢁꢃꢇꢔꢐꢃꢅꢂꢈꢊꢄꢊꢂꢍꢉꢇꢃꢇꢁꢌꢖꢖꢃꢈꢂꢅꢉꢊꢎꢑꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢓꢊꢇꢈꢖꢆꢇꢂꢃꢌꢈꢈꢆꢅꢓꢊꢍꢒꢖꢑꢛꢃ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢈꢁꢉꢯꢊꢅꢕꢙꢃ
Darin Johnsonꢧꢊꢒꢍꢂꢓꢀꢁꢂꢃꢀꢄꢅꢆꢂꢇꢈꢃꢀꢉꢁꢊꢈꢙꢃ
ꢀꢁꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢈꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢂꢅꢆꢇꢀꢊꢉꢖꢂꢙꢃ
ꢣꢌꢉꢂꢙꢃꢊꢋꢌꢊꢍꢌꢎꢊꢎꢊ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢄꢇꢈꢉꢂꢈꢄꢊꢉꢈꢄꢋꢌꢍꢄꢎꢏꢐꢑꢑꢒꢄ
ꢍꢈꢓꢔꢄꢊꢒꢐꢎꢄ
Appendix
ATTACHMENT 3-3: NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION
CERTIFICATIONS
ꢀꢁꢂꢃ ꢔꢍꢓꢂꢅꢇꢊꢒꢍꢂꢓꢃ ꢈꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉꢃ ꢆꢅꢃ ꢈꢆꢅꢄꢆꢅꢌꢉꢂꢃ ꢆꢎꢎꢊꢈꢂꢅꢏꢃꢓꢔꢅꢊꢍꢒꢃ ꢉꢁꢂꢃ ꢄꢂꢅꢎꢆꢅꢕꢌꢍꢈꢂꢃ ꢆꢎꢃ ꢉꢁꢊꢇꢃ ꢈꢆꢍꢉꢅꢌꢈꢉꢏꢃꢈꢂꢅꢉꢊꢎꢊꢂꢇꢃ ꢌꢇꢃ
ꢎꢆꢖꢖꢆꢘꢇꢙꢃ
ꢚꢛ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢞꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉꢃꢇꢁꢌꢖꢖꢃꢍꢆꢉꢃꢓꢊꢇꢈꢅꢊꢕꢊꢍꢌꢉꢂꢃꢌꢒꢌꢊꢍꢇꢉꢃꢌꢍꢑꢃꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢂꢂꢃꢆꢅꢃꢌꢄꢄꢖꢊꢈꢌꢍꢉꢃꢎꢆꢅꢃꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢕꢂꢍꢉꢃꢐꢂꢈꢌꢔꢇꢂꢃꢆꢎ
ꢅꢌꢈꢂꢏꢃꢈꢆꢖꢆꢅꢏꢃꢅꢂꢖꢊꢒꢊꢆꢍꢏꢃꢇꢂꢟꢏꢃꢆꢅꢃꢍꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢌꢖꢃꢆꢅꢊꢒꢊꢍꢛꢃꢃ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢞꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉꢃꢇꢁꢌꢖꢖꢃꢉꢌꢗꢂꢃꢌꢎꢎꢊꢅꢕꢌꢉꢊꢋꢂꢃꢌꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢉꢆꢃꢂꢍꢇꢔꢅꢂ
ꢉꢁꢌꢉꢃꢌꢄꢄꢖꢊꢈꢌꢍꢉꢇꢃꢌꢅꢂꢃꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢂꢓꢏꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢉꢁꢌꢉꢃꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢂꢂꢇꢃꢌꢅꢂꢃꢉꢅꢂꢌꢉꢂꢓꢃꢓꢔꢅꢊꢍꢒꢃꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢕꢂꢍꢉꢃꢘꢊꢉꢁꢆꢔꢉꢏꢃꢅꢂꢒꢌꢅꢓꢃꢉꢆ
ꢉꢁꢂꢊꢅꢃꢅꢌꢈꢂꢏꢃꢈꢆꢖꢆꢅꢏꢃꢅꢂꢖꢊꢒꢊꢆꢍꢏꢃꢇꢂꢟꢏꢃꢆꢅꢃꢍꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢌꢖꢃꢆꢅꢊꢒꢊꢍꢛꢃꢃꢧꢔꢈꢁꢃꢌꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢇꢁꢌꢖꢖꢃꢊꢍꢈꢖꢔꢓꢂꢏꢃꢐꢔꢉꢃꢍꢆꢉꢃꢐꢂꢃꢖꢊꢕꢊꢉꢂꢓꢃꢉꢆꢏꢃꢉꢁꢂ
ꢎꢆꢖꢖꢆꢘꢊꢍꢒꢙꢃꢃ ꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢕꢂꢍꢉꢏꢃꢔꢄꢒꢅꢌꢓꢊꢍꢒꢏꢃꢓꢂꢕꢆꢉꢊꢆꢍꢏꢃꢆꢅꢃꢉꢅꢌꢍꢇꢎꢂꢅꢰꢃꢅꢂꢈꢅꢔꢊꢉꢕꢂꢍꢉꢃꢆꢅꢃꢅꢂꢈꢅꢔꢊꢉꢕꢂꢍꢉꢃꢌꢓꢋꢂꢅꢉꢊꢇꢊꢍꢒꢰ
ꢖꢌꢑꢆꢎꢎꢃꢆꢅꢃꢉꢂꢅꢕꢊꢍꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢰꢃꢅꢌꢉꢂꢇꢃꢆꢎꢃꢄꢌꢑꢃꢆꢅꢃꢆꢉꢁꢂꢅꢃꢎꢆꢅꢕꢇꢃꢆꢎꢃꢈꢆꢕꢄꢂꢍꢇꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢰꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢇꢂꢖꢂꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢎꢆꢅꢃꢉꢅꢌꢊꢍꢊꢍꢒꢏꢃꢊꢍꢈꢖꢔꢓꢊꢍꢒ
ꢌꢄꢄꢅꢂꢍꢉꢊꢈꢂꢇꢁꢊꢄꢛꢃꢃꢃ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢞꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉꢃꢌꢒꢅꢂꢂꢇꢃꢉꢆꢃꢄꢆꢇꢉꢃꢊꢍꢃꢈꢆꢍꢇꢄꢊꢈꢔꢆꢔꢇꢃꢄꢖꢌꢈꢂꢇꢏꢃꢌꢋꢌꢊꢖꢌꢐꢖꢂꢃꢉꢆꢃꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢂꢂꢇꢃꢌꢍꢓ
ꢌꢄꢄꢖꢊꢈꢌꢍꢉꢇꢃꢎꢆꢅꢃꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢕꢂꢍꢉꢏꢃꢍꢆꢉꢊꢈꢂꢇꢃꢉꢆꢃꢐꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢋꢊꢓꢂꢓꢃꢇꢂꢉꢉꢊꢍꢒꢃꢎꢆꢅꢉꢁꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢋꢊꢇꢊꢆꢍꢇꢃꢆꢎꢃꢉꢁꢊꢇꢃꢍꢆꢍꢓꢊꢇꢈꢅꢊꢕꢊꢍꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍ
ꢈꢖꢌꢔꢇꢂꢛ
ꢠꢛ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢞꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉꢃꢇꢁꢌꢖꢖꢏꢃꢊꢍꢃꢌꢖꢖꢃꢇꢆꢖꢊꢈꢊꢉꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢇꢃꢆꢅꢃꢌꢓꢋꢂꢅꢉꢊꢇꢂꢕꢂꢍꢉꢇꢃꢎꢆꢅꢃꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢂꢂꢇꢃꢄꢖꢌꢈꢂꢓꢃꢐꢑꢃꢆꢅꢃꢆꢍꢃꢐꢂꢁꢌꢖꢎꢃꢆꢎ
ꢉꢁꢂꢃꢞꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉꢏꢃꢇꢉꢌꢉꢂꢃꢉꢁꢌꢉꢃꢌꢖꢖꢃꢨꢔꢌꢖꢊꢎꢊꢂꢓꢃꢌꢄꢄꢖꢊꢈꢌꢍꢉꢇꢃꢘꢊꢖꢖꢃꢅꢂꢈꢂꢊꢋꢂꢃꢈꢆꢍꢇꢊꢓꢂꢅꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢎꢆꢅꢃꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢕꢂꢍꢉꢃꢘꢊꢉꢁꢆꢔꢉ
ꢅꢂꢒꢌꢅꢓꢃꢉꢆꢃꢅꢌꢈꢂꢏꢃꢈꢆꢖꢆꢅꢏꢃꢅꢂꢖꢊꢒꢊꢆꢍꢏꢃꢇꢂꢟꢏꢃꢆꢅꢃꢍꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢌꢖꢃꢆꢅꢊꢒꢊꢍꢛ
ꢩꢛ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢞꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉꢃꢇꢁꢌꢖꢖꢃꢇꢂꢍꢓꢃꢉꢆꢃꢂꢌꢈꢁꢃꢖꢌꢐꢆꢅꢃꢔꢍꢊꢆꢍꢃꢆꢅꢃꢅꢂꢄꢅꢂꢇꢂꢍꢉꢌꢉꢊꢋꢂꢃꢆꢎꢃꢘꢆꢅꢗꢂꢅꢇꢃꢘꢊꢉꢁꢃꢘꢁꢊꢈꢁꢃꢁꢂꢱꢇꢁꢂꢃꢁꢌꢇꢃꢌ
ꢈꢆꢖꢖꢂꢈꢉꢊꢋꢂꢃꢐꢌꢅꢒꢌꢊꢍꢊꢍꢒꢃꢌꢒꢅꢂꢂꢕꢂꢍꢉꢃꢆꢅꢃꢆꢉꢁꢂꢅꢃꢈꢆꢍꢉꢅꢌꢈꢉꢃꢆꢅꢃꢔꢍꢓꢂꢅꢇꢉꢌꢍꢓꢊꢍꢒꢏꢃꢌꢃꢍꢆꢉꢊꢈꢂꢃꢉꢆꢃꢐꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢋꢊꢓꢂꢓꢃꢌꢓꢋꢊꢇꢊꢍꢒ
ꢉꢁꢂꢃꢇꢌꢊꢓꢃꢖꢌꢐꢆꢅꢃꢔꢍꢊꢆꢍꢃꢆꢅꢃꢘꢆꢅꢗꢂꢅꢇꢲꢃꢅꢂꢄꢅꢂꢇꢂꢍꢉꢌꢉꢊꢋꢂꢇꢃꢆꢎꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢞꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉꢲꢇꢃꢈꢆꢕꢕꢊꢉꢕꢂꢍꢉꢇꢃꢔꢍꢓꢂꢅꢃꢉꢁꢊꢇꢃꢇꢂꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢏ
ꢌꢍꢓꢃꢇꢁꢌꢖꢖꢃꢄꢆꢇꢉꢃꢈꢆꢄꢊꢂꢇꢃꢆꢎꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢍꢆꢉꢊꢈꢂꢃꢊꢍꢃꢈꢆꢍꢇꢄꢊꢈꢔꢆꢔꢇꢃꢄꢖꢌꢈꢂꢇꢃꢌꢋꢌꢊꢖꢌꢐꢖꢂꢃꢉꢆꢃꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢂꢂꢇꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢌꢄꢄꢖꢊꢈꢌꢍꢉꢇꢃꢎꢆꢅ
ꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢕꢂꢍꢉꢛ
ꢳꢛ ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢞꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉꢃꢇꢁꢌꢖꢖꢃꢈꢆꢕꢄꢖꢑꢃꢘꢊꢉꢁꢃꢌꢖꢖꢃꢄꢅꢆꢋꢊꢇꢊꢆꢍꢇꢃꢆꢎꢃꢴꢟꢂꢈꢔꢉꢊꢋꢂꢃꢵꢅꢓꢂꢅꢃꢚꢚꢠꢳꢶꢃꢆꢎꢃꢧꢂꢄꢉꢂꢕꢐꢂꢅꢃꢠꢳꢏꢃꢚꢷꢶꢪꢏ
ꢌꢍꢓꢃꢆꢎꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢅꢔꢖꢂꢇꢏꢃꢅꢂꢒꢔꢖꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢇꢏꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢅꢂꢖꢂꢋꢌꢍꢉꢃꢆꢅꢓꢂꢅꢇꢃꢆꢎꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢧꢂꢈꢅꢂꢉꢌꢅꢑꢃꢆꢎꢃꢤꢌꢐꢆꢅꢛ
ꢪꢛ ꢀꢁꢂꢃ ꢞꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉꢃ ꢇꢁꢌꢖꢖꢃ ꢎꢔꢅꢍꢊꢇꢁꢃ ꢌꢖꢖꢃ ꢊꢍꢎꢆꢅꢕꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃ ꢌꢍꢓꢃ ꢅꢂꢄꢆꢅꢉꢇꢃ ꢅꢂꢨꢔꢊꢅꢂꢓꢃ ꢐꢑꢃ ꢴꢟꢂꢈꢔꢉꢊꢋꢂꢃ ꢵꢅꢓꢂꢅꢃ ꢚꢚꢠꢳꢶꢃ ꢆꢎ
ꢧꢂꢄꢉꢂꢕꢐꢂꢅꢃ ꢠꢳꢏꢃ ꢚꢷꢶꢪꢏꢃ ꢌꢍꢓꢃ ꢐꢑꢃ ꢅꢔꢖꢂꢇꢏꢃ ꢅꢂꢒꢔꢖꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢇꢏꢃ ꢌꢍꢓꢃ ꢆꢅꢓꢂꢅꢇꢃ ꢆꢎꢃ ꢉꢁꢂꢃ ꢧꢂꢈꢅꢂꢉꢌꢅꢑꢃꢆꢎꢃ ꢤꢌꢐꢆꢅꢏꢃ ꢆꢅꢃ ꢄꢔꢅꢇꢔꢌꢍꢉ
ꢉꢁꢂꢅꢂꢉꢆꢏꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢘꢊꢖꢖꢃꢄꢂꢅꢕꢊꢉꢃꢌꢈꢈꢂꢇꢇꢃꢉꢆꢃꢁꢊꢇꢱꢁꢂꢅꢃꢐꢆꢆꢗꢇꢏꢃꢅꢂꢈꢆꢅꢓꢇꢏꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢌꢈꢈꢆꢔꢍꢉꢇꢃꢐꢑꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢌꢓꢕꢊꢍꢊꢇꢉꢂꢅꢊꢍꢒꢃꢌꢒꢂꢍꢈꢑ
ꢌꢍꢓꢃ ꢉꢁꢂꢃ ꢧꢂꢈꢅꢂꢉꢌꢅꢑꢃ ꢆꢎꢃ ꢤꢌꢐꢆꢅꢃ ꢎꢆꢅꢃ ꢄꢔꢅꢄꢆꢇꢂꢇꢃ ꢆꢎꢃ ꢊꢍꢋꢂꢇꢉꢊꢒꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢏꢃ ꢉꢆꢃ ꢌꢇꢈꢂꢅꢉꢌꢊꢍꢃ ꢈꢆꢕꢄꢖꢊꢌꢍꢈꢂꢃ ꢘꢊꢉꢁꢃ ꢇꢔꢈꢁꢃ ꢅꢔꢖꢂꢇꢏ
ꢅꢂꢒꢔꢖꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢇꢏꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢆꢅꢓꢂꢅꢇꢛ
ꢶꢛ ꢡꢍꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢂꢋꢂꢍꢉꢃꢆꢎꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢞꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉꢲꢇꢃꢍꢆꢍꢸꢈꢆꢕꢄꢖꢊꢌꢍꢈꢂꢃꢘꢊꢉꢁꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢍꢆꢍꢓꢊꢇꢈꢅꢊꢕꢊꢍꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢈꢖꢌꢔꢇꢂꢇꢃꢆꢎꢃꢉꢁꢊꢇꢃꢈꢆꢍꢉꢅꢌꢈꢉ
ꢆꢅꢃ ꢘꢊꢉꢁꢃ ꢌꢍꢑꢃ ꢆꢎꢃ ꢉꢁꢂꢃ ꢇꢌꢊꢓꢃ ꢅꢔꢖꢂꢇꢏꢃ ꢅꢂꢒꢔꢖꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢇꢏꢃ ꢆꢅꢃ ꢆꢅꢓꢂꢅꢇꢏꢃ ꢉꢁꢂꢃ ꢈꢆꢍꢉꢅꢌꢈꢉꢃ ꢕꢌꢑꢃ ꢐꢂꢃ ꢈꢌꢍꢈꢂꢖꢂꢓꢏꢃ ꢉꢂꢅꢕꢊꢍꢌꢉꢂꢓꢏꢃ ꢆꢅ
ꢇꢔꢇꢄꢂꢍꢓꢂꢓꢃꢊꢍꢃꢘꢁꢆꢖꢂꢃꢆꢅꢃꢊꢍꢃꢄꢌꢅꢉꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢞꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉꢃꢕꢌꢑꢃꢐꢂꢃꢓꢂꢈꢖꢌꢅꢂꢓꢃꢊꢍꢂꢖꢊꢒꢊꢐꢖꢂꢃꢎꢆꢅꢃꢎꢔꢅꢉꢁꢂꢅꢃꢹꢆꢋꢂꢅꢍꢕꢂꢍꢉ
ꢈꢆꢍꢉꢅꢌꢈꢉꢇꢃ ꢆꢅꢃ ꢎꢂꢓꢂꢅꢌꢖꢖꢑꢃꢌꢇꢇꢊꢇꢉꢂꢓꢃ ꢈꢆꢍꢇꢉꢅꢔꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃ ꢈꢆꢍꢉꢅꢌꢈꢉꢇꢃ ꢊꢍꢃ ꢌꢈꢈꢆꢅꢓꢌꢍꢈꢂꢃ ꢘꢊꢉꢁꢃ ꢄꢅꢆꢈꢂꢓꢔꢅꢂꢇꢃ ꢌꢔꢉꢁꢆꢅꢊꢺꢂꢓꢃ ꢊꢍ
ꢴꢟꢂꢈꢔꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢵꢅꢓꢂꢅꢃꢚꢚꢠꢳꢶꢃꢆꢎꢃꢧꢂꢄꢉꢂꢕꢐꢂꢅꢃꢠꢳꢏꢃꢚꢷꢶꢪꢏꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢇꢔꢈꢁꢃꢆꢉꢁꢂꢅꢃꢇꢌꢍꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢇꢃꢕꢌꢑꢃꢐꢂꢃꢊꢕꢄꢆꢇꢂꢓꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢅꢂꢕꢂꢓꢊꢂꢇ
ꢊꢍꢋꢆꢗꢂꢓꢃꢌꢇꢃꢄꢅꢆꢋꢊꢓꢂꢓꢃꢊꢍꢃꢴꢟꢂꢈꢔꢉꢊꢋꢂꢃꢵꢅꢓꢂꢅꢃꢚꢚꢠꢳꢶꢃꢆꢎꢃꢧꢂꢄꢉꢂꢕꢐꢂꢅꢃꢠꢳꢏꢃꢚꢷꢶꢪꢏꢃꢆꢅꢃꢐꢑꢃꢅꢔꢖꢂꢏꢃꢅꢂꢒꢔꢖꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢇꢏꢃꢆꢅꢃꢆꢅꢓꢂꢅ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢄꢇꢈꢉꢂꢈꢄꢊꢉꢈꢄꢋꢌꢍꢄꢎꢏꢐꢑꢑꢒꢄ
ꢍꢈꢓꢔꢄꢊꢒꢐꢒꢄ
ꢆꢎꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢧꢂꢈꢅꢂꢉꢌꢅꢑꢃꢆꢎꢃꢤꢌꢐꢆꢅꢏꢃꢆꢅꢃꢌꢇꢃꢆꢉꢁꢂꢅꢘꢊꢇꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢋꢊꢓꢂꢓꢃꢐꢑꢃꢖꢌꢘꢛꢃ
ꢻꢛ ꢀꢁꢂꢃ ꢞꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉꢃ ꢇꢁꢌꢖꢖꢃ ꢊꢍꢈꢖꢔꢓꢂꢃ ꢉꢁꢂꢃ ꢄꢆꢅꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃ ꢆꢎꢃ ꢉꢁꢂꢃ ꢇꢂꢍꢉꢂꢍꢈꢂꢃ ꢊꢕꢕꢂꢓꢊꢌꢉꢂꢖꢑꢃ ꢄꢅꢂꢈꢂꢓꢊꢍꢒꢃ ꢄꢌꢅꢌꢒꢅꢌꢄꢁꢃ ꢼꢚꢽ
ꢌꢍꢓꢃ ꢉꢁꢂꢃ ꢄꢅꢆꢋꢊꢇꢊꢆꢍꢇꢃ ꢆꢎꢃ ꢄꢌꢅꢌꢒꢅꢌꢄꢁꢇꢃ ꢼꢚꢽꢃ ꢉꢁꢅꢆꢔꢒꢁꢃ ꢼꢻꢽꢃ ꢊꢍꢃ ꢂꢋꢂꢅꢑꢃ ꢇꢔꢐꢈꢆꢍꢉꢅꢌꢈꢉꢃ ꢆꢅꢃ ꢄꢔꢅꢈꢁꢌꢇꢂꢃ ꢆꢅꢓꢂꢅꢃ ꢔꢍꢖꢂꢇꢇ
ꢂꢟꢂꢕꢄꢉꢂꢓꢃꢐꢑꢃꢅꢔꢖꢂꢇꢏꢃꢅꢂꢒꢔꢖꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢇꢏꢃꢆꢅꢃꢆꢅꢓꢂꢅꢇꢃꢆꢎꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢧꢂꢈꢅꢂꢉꢌꢅꢑꢃꢆꢎꢃꢤꢌꢐꢆꢅꢃꢊꢇꢇꢔꢂꢓꢃꢄꢔꢅꢇꢔꢌꢍꢉꢃꢉꢆꢃꢧꢂꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢠꢮꢳꢃꢆꢎ
ꢴꢟꢂꢈꢔꢉꢊꢋꢂꢃꢵꢅꢓꢂꢅꢃ ꢚꢚꢠꢳꢶꢃ ꢆꢎꢃ ꢧꢂꢄꢉꢂꢕꢐꢂꢅꢃ ꢠꢳꢏꢃ ꢚꢷꢶꢪꢏꢃ ꢇꢆꢃ ꢉꢁꢌꢉꢃ ꢇꢔꢈꢁꢃ ꢄꢅꢆꢋꢊꢇꢊꢆꢍꢇꢃ ꢘꢊꢖꢖꢃ ꢐꢂꢃ ꢐꢊꢍꢓꢊꢍꢒꢃ ꢔꢄꢆꢍꢃ ꢂꢌꢈꢁ
ꢇꢔꢐꢈꢆꢍꢉꢅꢌꢈꢉꢃꢆꢅꢃ ꢄꢔꢅꢈꢁꢌꢇꢂꢃ ꢆꢅꢓꢂꢅꢃ ꢌꢇꢃ ꢉꢁꢂꢃ ꢌꢓꢕꢊꢍꢊꢇꢉꢂꢅꢊꢍꢒꢃ ꢌꢒꢂꢍꢈꢑꢃ ꢕꢌꢑꢃ ꢓꢊꢅꢂꢈꢉꢃ ꢌꢇꢃ ꢕꢂꢌꢍꢇꢃ ꢆꢎꢃ ꢂꢍꢎꢆꢅꢈꢊꢍꢒꢃꢇꢔꢈꢁ
ꢄꢅꢆꢋꢊꢇꢊꢆꢍꢇꢏꢃꢊꢍꢈꢖꢔꢓꢊꢍꢒꢃꢇꢌꢍꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢇꢃꢎꢆꢅꢃꢍꢆꢍꢈꢆꢕꢄꢖꢊꢌꢍꢈꢂꢰꢃꢄꢅꢆꢋꢊꢓꢂꢓꢏꢃꢁꢆꢘꢂꢋꢂꢅꢏꢃꢉꢁꢌꢉꢃꢊꢍꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢂꢋꢂꢍꢉꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢞꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉ
ꢐꢂꢈꢆꢕꢂꢇꢃꢊꢍꢋꢆꢖꢋꢂꢓꢃꢊꢍꢏꢃꢆꢅꢃꢊꢇꢃꢉꢁꢅꢂꢌꢉꢂꢍꢂꢓꢃꢘꢊꢉꢁꢏꢃꢖꢊꢉꢊꢒꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢘꢊꢉꢁꢃꢌꢃꢇꢔꢐꢸꢈꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉꢃꢆꢅꢃꢋꢂꢍꢓꢆꢅꢃꢌꢇꢃꢌꢃꢅꢂꢇꢔꢖꢉꢃꢆꢎꢃꢇꢔꢈꢁ
ꢓꢊꢅꢂꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢐꢑꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢌꢓꢕꢊꢍꢊꢇꢉꢂꢅꢊꢍꢒꢃꢌꢒꢂꢍꢈꢑꢏꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢞꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉꢃꢕꢌꢑꢃꢅꢂꢨꢔꢂꢇꢉꢃꢉꢁꢌꢉꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢫꢍꢊꢉꢂꢓꢃꢧꢉꢌꢉꢂꢇꢃꢂꢍꢉꢂꢅꢃꢊꢍꢉꢆ
ꢇꢔꢈꢁꢃꢖꢊꢉꢊꢒꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢉꢆꢃꢄꢅꢆꢉꢂꢈꢉꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢊꢍꢉꢂꢅꢂꢇꢉꢇꢃꢆꢎꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢫꢍꢊꢉꢂꢓꢃꢧꢉꢌꢉꢂꢇꢛ
ꢾꢛ ꢿꢔꢅꢇꢔꢌꢍꢉꢃ ꢉꢆꢃ ꢞꢌꢖꢊꢎꢆꢅꢍꢊꢌꢃ ꢤꢌꢐꢆꢅꢃ ꢞꢆꢓꢂꢃ ꢧꢂꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃ ꢚꢻꢩꢪꢏꢃ ꢌꢇꢃ ꢌꢓꢓꢂꢓꢃ ꢐꢑꢃ ꢞꢁꢌꢄꢉꢂꢅꢃ ꢶꢳꢩꢃ ꢧꢉꢌꢉꢇꢛꢃ ꢚꢷꢩꢷꢏꢃ ꢌꢍꢓꢃ ꢌꢇ
ꢌꢕꢂꢍꢓꢂꢓꢏ
ꢜꢆꢃ ꢓꢊꢇꢈꢅꢊꢕꢊꢍꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃ ꢇꢁꢌꢖꢖꢃ ꢐꢂꢃ ꢕꢌꢓꢂꢃ ꢊꢍꢃ ꢉꢁꢂꢃ ꢂꢕꢄꢖꢆꢑꢕꢂꢍꢉꢃ ꢆꢎꢃ ꢄꢂꢅꢇꢆꢍꢇꢃ ꢔꢄꢆꢍꢃ ꢄꢔꢐꢖꢊꢈꢃ ꢘꢆꢅꢗꢇꢃ ꢐꢂꢈꢌꢔꢇꢂꢃ ꢆꢎꢃ ꢅꢌꢈꢂꢏꢃ
ꢅꢂꢖꢊꢒꢊꢆꢔꢇꢃꢈꢅꢂꢂꢓꢏꢃꢈꢆꢖꢆꢅꢏꢃꢍꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢌꢖꢃꢆꢅꢊꢒꢊꢍꢏꢃꢌꢍꢈꢂꢇꢉꢅꢑꢏꢃꢄꢁꢑꢇꢊꢈꢌꢖꢃꢁꢌꢍꢓꢊꢈꢌꢄꢇꢏꢃꢕꢂꢍꢉꢌꢖꢃꢈꢆꢍꢓꢊꢉꢊꢆꢍꢏꢃꢕꢌꢅꢊꢉꢌꢖꢃꢇꢉꢌꢉꢔꢇꢏꢃꢆꢅꢃꢇꢂꢟꢃ
ꢆꢎꢃꢇꢔꢈꢁꢃꢄꢂꢅꢇꢆꢍꢇꢏꢃꢂꢟꢈꢂꢄꢉꢃꢌꢇꢃꢄꢅꢆꢋꢊꢓꢂꢓꢃꢊꢍꢃꢧꢂꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢚꢳꢠꢮꢏꢃꢌꢍꢓꢃꢌꢍꢑꢃꢈꢆꢍꢇꢔꢖꢉꢌꢍꢉꢃꢆꢎꢃꢄꢔꢐꢖꢊꢈꢃꢘꢆꢅꢗꢇꢃꢋꢊꢆꢖꢌꢉꢊꢍꢒꢃꢉꢁꢊꢇꢃ
ꢧꢂꢈꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢊꢇꢃꢇꢔꢐꢬꢂꢈꢉꢃꢉꢆꢃꢌꢖꢖꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢄꢂꢍꢌꢖꢉꢊꢂꢇꢃꢊꢕꢄꢆꢇꢂꢓꢃꢎꢆꢅꢃꢌꢃꢋꢊꢆꢖꢌꢉꢊꢆꢍꢃꢆꢎꢃꢉꢁꢂꢃꢞꢁꢌꢄꢉꢂꢅꢛꢃ
Darin Johnsonꢧꢊꢒꢍꢂꢓꢙꢃ
ꢀꢊꢉꢖꢂꢙꢃ
ꢯꢊꢅꢕꢙꢃ
ꢣꢌꢉꢂꢙꢃ
ꢀꢁꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢈꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢂꢅꢆꢇ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇꢈꢁꢉ
ꢊꢋꢌꢊꢍꢌꢎꢊꢎꢊ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢄꢇꢈꢉꢂꢈꢄꢊꢉꢈꢄꢋꢌꢍꢄꢎꢏꢐꢑꢑꢒꢄ
ꢍꢈꢓꢔꢄꢊꢒꢐꢕꢄ
IRVINE
2121 Alton Parkway, Suite 210
Irvine, CA 92606
(949) 477-9000
EXHIBIT C
COST PROPOSAL FOR PROJECT SCOPE: Santa Ana - Standard Ave Protected Bikeways Project
Subconsultants
TOTAL COSTTotal
Hours
Total MT
Cost
$372
RH
$224
AS/PM
$184 $138 $120 $98 $56 $160 $146 $109 $278 $127 $116 $120 DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE DBE
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
PROJECT MANAGEMENT & COORDINATION
Project Kick-Off Meeting
Project Development Team Meetings
Agency Stakeholder Engagement
Progress Invoicing & Schedule
Quality Control
2
8
6
40
60
6
40
40
24
14 $2,916
$17,360
$18,960
$32,996
$22,080
$94,312
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$2,916
$20,713
$18,960
$32,996
$22,080
$97,665
24 104
100
168
120
506
3,353
-
-
-
100 12 24
120
120Subtotal Phase 1 10 206 110 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 24 0 $3,353 $0 $0 $0
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
Utility Mapping/Data Gathering
Topographic Survey & Base Mapping
30% Design Concept Plans & Estimate
Water Quality Management Plan
Geotechnical Investigation (Optional)
Subtotal Phase 2
8 16 60 60 2 8 8 16
40
178
164
216
108
10
$21,368
$27,340
$26,864
$11,920
$1,552
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$21,368
$27,340
$35,124
$11,920
$16,552
$112,304
24
26
0
40
48
0
60
68
0
24
4
2
48
24
8
80
40
40
16
24
24
3,000 5,260
-
-
-
-15,000
0
0
0
38 0
0
0
96 180 56 108 56
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 676 $89,044 $0 $3,000 $5,260 $15,000
3.0
3.1
PUBLIC & STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH
Public & Stakeholder Outreach
Subtotal Phase 3
36
36
36
36
16
16
80
80
168
168
$24,552
$24,552 $24,979
24,979 2,400
$2,400 $15,030
15,030 -
$0
$66,961
$66,96100
4.0
4.1
FINAL UTILITY COORDINATION
Final Utility Coordination
Subtotal Phase 4
8
8
40
40
40
40
88
88
$12,112
$12,112
-
$0
-
$0
-
$0
-
$0
$12,112
$12,1120000000
5.0
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS & ESTIMATE
Roadway 60% Plans
Roadway 90% Plans
Roadway 100% Plans
Traffic Signal & Lighting Plans
Landscape Plans
Special Provisions
Engineer's Estimate
Subtotal Phase 5
80
48
40
280
200
80
36
8
80
16
700
320
240
100
300
180
100
980
668
320
36
$124,360
$84,792
$41,800
$4,968
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$0
$124,360
$84,792
$41,800
$92,218
$16,164
$16,544
$16,064
$391,942
87,250
8 $1,104 -
-
-
15,060
16
4
188
16
80
756
112
160
2284
$16,544
$16,064
$289,632
-
-60
6000580 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $87,250 $15,060
6.0
6.1
6.2
BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
Bidding Assistance
Construction Support (Optional)
Subtotal Phase 6
4
8
12
40
60
100
44
108
152
$6,416
$14,872
$21,288
-
-
2,000
8,000
-
10,520
$302
-
-
$0
$8,416
$33,392
$41,808
40
4000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $10,000
TOTAL HOURS 10 488 120 1082 1056 636 168 26 48 68 56 12 24 80 3874
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
TOTAL COST
$14,451 $8,300 $550 $0 $0 $23,301
$3,720 $109,312 $22,080 $149,316 $126,720 $62,328 $9,408 $4,160 $7,008 $7,412 $15,568 $1,524 $2,784 $9,600 $545,391 $36,632 $103,200 $46,172 $15,000 $746,093
RATE SCHEDULE (V)
EXHIBIT A
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. Rate Schedule
Expires June 30, 2021*
HOURLY CHARGE RATE RANGES
Engineering Services
Intern
Survey Services
$43 ‐ $75
$69 ‐ $113
$86 ‐ $122
$103 ‐ $145
$111 ‐ $143
$130 ‐ $160
$145 ‐ $189
$145 ‐ $189
$171 ‐ $215
$171 ‐ $215
$196 ‐ $278
$196 ‐ $278
$253 ‐ $311
$253 ‐ $311
$283 ‐ $380
$357 ‐ $424
Survey Intern $43 ‐ $79
$71 ‐ $93Technician
Design Engineer I
Sr. Technician
Survey Technician
Sr. Survey Technician
Surveyor
$83 ‐ $148
$100 ‐ $123
$114 ‐ $163
$131 ‐ $157
$139 ‐ $170
$154 ‐ $182
$163 ‐ $207
$189 ‐ $252
$257 ‐ $327
$134 ‐ $152
$126 ‐ $131
$117 ‐ $122
$59 ‐ $129
$134 ‐ $152
$252 ‐ $305
$310 ‐ $427
Design Engineer II
Project Engineer
Sr. Project Engineer
Sr. Technical Engineer
Project Manager
Technical Lead
Sr. Project Manager
Sr. Technical Lead
Engineering Manager
Practice Area Leader
Sr. Engineering Manager
Principal
Sr. Surveyor
Lead Survey Technician
Project Surveyor
Sr. Project Surveyor
Survey Manager
Sr. Survey Manager
Survey Division Manager
** Single Chief
** Single Instrumentman
** Single Chainman
** Apprentice
** 1 Person Field Crew
** 2 Person Field Crew
** 3 Person Field CrewUrban Planning/Landscape Architecture Services
Intern $43 ‐ $75
$71 ‐ $141
$100 ‐ $179
$163 ‐ $192
$174 ‐ $226
$206 ‐ $252
$229 ‐ $267
Landscape Designer
Landscape Architect
LAUD Project Manager
Sr. LAUD Project Manager
LAUD Division Manager
Sr. LAUD Division Manager
Project Support/Coordination Services
Project Assistant $57 ‐ $88
Technical Writer $57 ‐ $91
$80 ‐ $110
$80 ‐ $113
$89 ‐ $116
$83 ‐ $132
$91 ‐ $126
$103 ‐ $141
$106 ‐ $148
$114 ‐ $154
$134 ‐ $157
Sr. Project Assistant
Project Coordinator
Graphic Designer
Sr. Technical Writer
Project Accountant
Sr. Project Coordinator
Sr. Graphic Designer
Sr. Project Accountant
Sr. Graphic Manager
District Management Services
** Inspector ‐ Apprentice
** Inspector
$57 ‐ $88
$86 ‐ $119
$109 ‐ $138
$126 ‐ $151
$137 ‐ $182
$196 ‐ $278
$243 ‐ $299
$272 ‐ $318
** Sr. Inspector
Assistant Sanitary Engineer
Associate Sanitary Engineer
Operations Manager
Deputy District Manager
District Manager‐Engineer
Construction Management Services
Office Technician $66
Office Engineer
** Asst. Resident Engineer
** Inspector ‐ CM
$129
$171
$171
$214
$224
$229
$268
$314
Grant Writing Services
Funding Specialist $130
$160
Project Manager ‐ CM
RE/Structural Representative
Sr. Project Manager ‐ CM
Division Manager ‐ CM
Sr. Division/Area Manager
Sr. Funding Specialist
Special Services
Expert Witness $420
$420Strategic Consulting
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
Reimbursables including, but not limited to:
Reproductions, Delivery and Filing Fees
Mileage
Cost Plus 5%
Per IRS Rate
Outside Consultant Fees
Survey Field Expenses
Cost Plus 5%
Cost Plus 5%
*Rates subject to escalation with new hourly rate schedule as of July 1, 2021
**These charge rates are subject to Prevailing Wage laws and Union contract.PAGE 1 OF 1