The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem 01 - City of Santa Ana Draft Maps FEBRUARY 16, 2022City of Santa Ana Draft Maps FEBRUARY 16, zozz Agenda What we will cover • Traditional Redistricting Principles • Census Data • Public Submissions • Community of Interest Testimony • Current Lines • Draft Maps • Next Steps WIN 1� iAN17�5 �..Ai Traditional Redistricting Principles Complying with the Fair Maps Act The Fair Maps Act passed by the Legislature mandates a set of criteria we must follow when drawing ward plans. • Relatively equal size - people, not citizens • Contiguous —wards should not hop/jump • Maintain "communities of interest" • Follow city and census designated place boundaries • Keep wards compact — appearance/function r� 1 rNO From COI to Maps With the Fair Maps Act requiring cities to include the public input in the redistricting process, we move redistricting out into the public, with maps driven by Community of Interest testimony. Input from community drives process with multiple ways for the public to engage. Rules for process emphasize the importance of traditional criteria and minimizing divisions of neighborhoods. Releasing maps for feedback — today we will see plans to spark more public engagement. rESM, , I,, �e -2-Ski �a3 '9tkM Voting Age Population ICVAP) o®Aeoisraicnn[ s ®exeoisrt ®®Pta*xrE ®®A ®®P Public Submissions Gardenl The City of Santa Ana City Council obtained public map submissions • Use of the online mapping tool DistrictR to solicit input. • Hosted 6 Community Workshops + additiona community presentations • Online training of DistrictR at each Community Workshop. u'491� Populat,on bats Lay( Population Balance u . ia]V D—W Census 51 51 51 �stln 57 UNASSIGNED POPULATION: MAX. POPULATION D[VIAli- Highlight Unassigned, Public Submissions We have converted all DistrictR submissions, received by February 7t", to our "Atlas" format which includes: • Cover page with full districting plan overview. • Data table with population, deviation, ethnic population, Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP)Ethnicity and breakdowns for each ward (numbered 1-6 for a complete plan) • Individual ward maps with street -details and data tables and charts. Ma del *IFNF-., Public Submissions In addition to PDF maps of all submissions, there are also web maps provided. These allow the user to zoom in to street level for a closer inspection of where ward lines are placed. NN��5ag� A� � 1�� i .��E mIN d ORANGE GARDEN GROVE..,.. 2020 Census 1 2 5 4 5 6 Population 51,983 SO,462 57,056 50,404 SZ698 50,1TI Deviation -136 - 657 4,9M -k;7k5 579 -2,009 Deviation % -03% -3.2% 9.5% -33% 1.1% -3.9% Oeh er 4,344 4,604 12 J29 3,509 3,675 4,079 Other % 8,4% -9.1% 213% 7.0% 7.0% 8.1% Latino 28,431 40,029 39,056 43,924 45,507 42,900 Latino % 547% 79.3% 684% 87.1% 86.096 85.6% Asian 10,813 5,264 5,213 2; Y k8 4161 2,749 Asian % 362% 10.4% 9.1% 5.4% 6.0% 55% _ c _, 395 56S 6'!8 255 SSS 383 3 L:' X 0.8% 1.1% 12% 0.5% 1.1% 0.8% Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) _ 3 4 S 6 24,738 33,290 26,660 23,076 23,497 Other CVAP 1, :U 3,860 12,062 3,801 2,952 3,450 Other CVAP % 135% 15.6% 36.2% 143% 12.8% 14.7% Latina CVAP 13,761 16,481 16,681 20,85/ 17,450 17,'755 Latina CVAP % 44.4% 66.6% 50.1% 76.2% 75.5% 75.6% Asian CVAP 12,845 3,842 3,658 1,760 2.424 2,IS1 Asian CVAP % 41.4% 15.5% 11,C% 66% 10.5% 92% Black CVAP 224 SSS 889 262 270 145 Black CVAP % C.7% 2.2% 2.7% 1.0% 12% 0.6% a�• 2020 Census 1 3 5 6 SI,985 50,462 S2,G98 SU,I Il Usher 4,344 3,675 4,079 Other % 8.1% Latino Total Deviation of 13.4% 42,900 Latino % a5.6% Asian 18,813 —_ _,_ _ _„ _ 3,161 2,749 Asian % 36.2% 10.4% 6.6% 55% _L_, 395 56S .,;L... _,_ SSS 383 3 L-, X. 0.8% 1.1% ._.. 0. s':. 1.1% 0.8% Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) _ 4 S 6 24,738 26,660 23.076 23.497 Other CVAP 1, iU 3.860 12.062 3,801 2.952 3.450 Other CVAP % 135% 15.6% 36.2% _ 12.8% 14.7% Latino CVAP 13,761 16.481 16,681 -0.8 :' 17,450 17,'753 Latino LVAP% 44.4% 66.6% 50.1% 782% 75.5% 75.6% Asian CVAP 12,845 3,842 3,658 1,760 2.424 2,IS1 Asian CVAP % 41.4% 15.5% 11,C% 6.6% 10S% 92% Black CVAP 224 SSS 889 262 770 145 Black CVAP % C.7% 2.2% 2.7% 1.0h 12% 0.6% Draft Plans A. A21 Councilmembers were provided a packet with two consultant created plans based on traditional redistricting criteria, COI testimony and amendments from the council. These maps were posted to the city's website for the public prior to Draft Map hearing. • Wards are letters, not numbers. This is a temporary structure for identifying seats as the final draft plan is required to be numbered based on a formula in the charter. • Each draft has been created with a less than 10% total deviation. F �riko-i �' 1471Ai �p a � Ana 9i Wa i W �s� Wan Wat G Wattl F c.U— Voting Aga POP.w Draft Plans F, J, J2, K SARC1. SARC2 Councilmembers were provided a packet with six plans based on public DistrictR submissions; the plans were10, reviewed to ensure they follow traditional redistricting criteria. These maps were posted to the City's website for the public prior to Draft Map hearing. • Wards are letters, not numbers. This is a temporary structure for identifying seats as the final draft plan is required to be numbered based on a formula in the charter. • Each draft has been created with a less than 10% total deviation. Ni°5g' W ®®REDISTRICTING City of Santa nna ®®REDISTRICTING City of Santa All ®®REDISTRICTING City of Santa Ana �0 PARTNERS 1111110MM® ,�..... CIZI V.tinyl ORANGE GARDEN GROVE, ru-04" re"'AMI, lrn 1,14 U Plan A Plan meets traditional redistricting criteria and also achieves the following: 0 Deviation of % 8.5 • Creates four wards that are 50%+ Latino Citizen Voting Age Population in "B", "D"I "Ell & 11P • Creates an Asian influence ward in Ward A at 42.4% ORANGE GARDEN G Plan A Plan meets traditional redistricting criteria and also achieves the following: • Uses existing lines as base • Adjusts for population growth Follows major streets GARDEN GROVE UAR-w-, - ORANGE PI-)n A2 Plan meets traditional redistricting criteria and also achieves the following: • Deviation of 7.4% • Creates four wards that are 50%+ Latino Citizen Voting Age Population in „B „D „E„ & „F„ • Creates an Asian plurality ward in Ward A at 42.9 GARDEN G PI-)n A2 Plan meets traditional redistricting criteria and also achieves the following: • Uses Draft Plan A as base • Adjusts for population growth • Follows major streets GARDEN GROVE --- OEM 1. I - -i F Plan meets traditional redistricting criteria and also achieves the following: Deviation of 4.7% • Based on public submission ID86566 • Creates five wards that are 50%+ Latino Citizen Voting Age & I 11CII "Y' "El/ Population in "B" I I 11P • Creates an Asian plurality ward in Ward A at 43.5% GARDEN G o�oR� ORANGE PI -in F Plan meets traditional redistricting criteria and also achieves the following: • Follows Neighborhood lines • Keeps Northern Communities whole: West Floral Park, Floral Park, Fisher Park, Morrison Eldridge Park, and Park Santiago • Keeps Southern Communities whole: Sandpointe, Republic Homes, Metro Classic, Thornton Park and South Coast GARDEN GROVE --- I Ian J Plan meets traditional redistricting criteria and also achieves the following: -- - Deviation of 1.5% • Based on public submission ID102694 0 Creates five wards that are 50%+ Latino Citizen Voting Age Population in "B", 11C11 I "D111 "El/ & 11P 0 Creates an Asian plurality ward in Ward A at 43.6% GARDEN G 4, tz." Ian J Plan meets traditional redistricting criteria and also achieves the following: • Keeps Northern Communities whole: West Floral Park, Floral Park, Fisher Park, Morrison Eldridge Park, and Park Santiago • Keeps Southern Communities whole: Sandpointe, Republic Homes, Metro Classic, Thornton Park and South Coast .an J2 Plan meets traditional redistricting criteria and also achieves the following: • Deviation of 3.5% • Creates five wards that are 50%+ Latino Citizen Voting Age Population in "B", "C", "D", "E" & „ P • Creates an Asian plurality ward in Ward A at 44.5% J X w 0 0 N n C- n MI&I� ny, ` ` .an J2 Plan meets traditional redistricting criteria and also achieves the following: • Keeps Northern Communities whole: West Floral Park, Floral Park, Fisher Park, Morrison and Eldridge Park • Keeps Southern Communities whole: Sandpointe, Republic Homes, Metro Classic, Thornton Park and South Coast ORANGE GARDEN GROVE--,, . ..... ..... Nel C— gg nmkoo�°5g' wN, f''-�n K Plan meets traditional redistricting criteria and also achieves the following: 0 Deviation of 6.2% • Creates four wards that are 50%+ Latino Citizen Voting Age Population in "B", 11CII I "D111 "El/ 11P • Creates an Asian plurality ward in Ward A at 43.5% GARDEN G Plan meets traditional redistricting criteria and also achieves the following: • Keeps Northern Communities whole: West Floral Park, Floral Park, Fisher Park, Morrison and Eldridge Park • Keeps Southern Communities whole: Sandpointe, Republic Homes, Metro Classic, Thornton Park and South Coast w ..m.A.. ORA"GE�E.� Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition 1 GARDEN GROVE-,-111- I -I ..��.�.. ��..� Plan meets traditional redistricting criteria and also achieves the following: E • Deviation of 2.3% • Creates four wards that are 50%+ Latino Citizen Voting Age F A Population in "B", "D", "E" & "F" • Creates an Asian plurality ward in Ward A at 42.8% MM6r R E D I S T R I C T I N G P A R T N E R S GARDEN G o�oR� ORANGE Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition 1 Plan meets traditional redistricting criteria and also achieves the following: • Keeps Northern Communities whole: West Floral Park, Floral Park, Fisher Park, Morrison Eldridge Park, and Park Santiago • Keeps Southern Communities whole: Sandpointe, Republic Homes, Metro Classic, Thornton Park and South Coast GARDEN GPOVE� MAO i R E D I S T R I C T I N G P A R T N E R S 10,721ij 11,101��'11111� 1� ORANGE Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition 2 Plan meets traditional redistricting criteria and also achieves the following: • Deviation of 1.7% • Creates four wards that are 50%+ Latino Citizen Voting Age Population in "B", "D111 "Ely & "F" • Creates an Asian plurality ward in Ward A at 42.8% GARDEN G o�oR� ORANGE Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition 2 Plan meets traditional redistricting criteria and also achieves the following: • Keeps Northern Communities whole: West Floral Park, Floral Park, Fisher Park, Morrison Eldridge Park, and Park Santiago • Metro Classic, Republic Homes and Thornton Park in DB • Sandpointe, South Coast and Rosewood Baker in DD Amendments to Plans Changes to plans may need balancing and understanding of tradeoffs. Three types of changes. 1) Keeps within deviation and doesn't necessitate other changes. 2) Identifying a change and a possible tradeoff with that same ward — a "one to one swap" 3) Identify a change and a set of wards that involves multiple wards — a "rotation" Amendments to Plans If there are proposed changes we can look at those individually and provide input on if they can be achieved easily or require more adjustments. What's Next • Official council drafts will be made public in advance of a citywide public draft feedback hearing. • All council draft plans will go to a final plan selection hearing. • Final Plan selection hearing will consider only draft plans that have been made public for seven days. • Numbering of wards is done at the end of the process R E D I S T R I C T I N G p O R T N E R S GARDEN GROVE Ml w A ORANGE Tustin (10 C J N i i V Q c • a 0 GARDEN G 2020 Census A U C 11 F Population 51,970 54.838 51,067 50,459 52,413 50.90-6 Devla ton 28 2,896 -87b t,483 47-1 -t.036 Deviation % 0.1% 5.646 -1.7% -2,9% 0.9% -20% Ocher 4,350 5.461 -11,976 3,517 S,fi.51 3,327 Other % 8.4% 10.0% 235% 7.0% 7.0% 6S% Latino 28.418 43.009 3S,724 43,961 45,053 44,903 Latino % 54.7% 78.4% 66.0% 87.1% 86.0% 882% Asian 18,808 S,Y 14 4,Y 19 2.728 3.154 2.361 Asian f 36,2% 10.4% 92% SA% 6:0% ;4" 3 c-K 394 6S4 648 2SS SSS 315 Black F U.81! 1.2% 1.3% 0.5% 1.1% 0.6% Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) I oral CVAP 31,U24 26,862 Other CVAP 4,333 5,289 Other CVAP % 14.0% 19.7% Latino CVAP 13,278 17,060 Latino CVAP % 428% 63.5% Asian CVAP IS, I6Y S.9S4 Asian CVAP% 42.4% 14.7% Black CVAP 246 559 Black CVAP % 0.8% 2.1% c o L 29.470 26,238 20,470 20.288 11280 S,9'Y4 2,999 2,728 38.3% 151% 14.7% 13.4% 14.219 19,755 14,978 IS,S'IS 48.2% 75.3% 73.2% 768% 3,48 2.061 2,247 1,826 11.0% 7.9% 11.0% 9.0% 722 449 248 IS9 15% 1.7% 1.2% 0.8% Ward A 2020 Census SANTA ANA 54% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Votina Aae Population -------------------------- lII 13% Other% Latino% Fountain Valley •.anon n.«n�. nin.n n.o J Mo�nnn�. ei�.... 51,970 28 0.1% 4,350 8.4% 28,418 54.7% 18,808 36.2% 394 0.8% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 30,998 4,173 13.5% 13,757 44.4% 12,845 41.4% 223 0.7% 41% Asian % 09(o Bl% Ward B 2020 Census NORTH ISLAND .... nun I'll All 4 Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black % 54,838 Z896 5.6% 5,461 10.0% 43,009 78.4% 5,714 10.4% 654 1.2% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 27298 4,716 17.3% 17,886 65.5% 4,101 15.0% 595 2.2% � m � Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Votinci Acie Population 65% Other Latino% Asian% Black I'll All 4 Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black % 54,838 Z896 5.6% 5,461 10.0% 43,009 78.4% 5,714 10.4% 654 1.2% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 27298 4,716 17.3% 17,886 65.5% 4,101 15.0% 595 2.2% � m � Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Votinci Acie Population 65% Other Latino% Asian% Black Ward C SANTA ANA 2020 Census ORANGE E 66% 23% 9% -_I 1% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Aae Population Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black % 51,067 -875 -1.7% 11,976 23.5% 33,724 66.0% 4,719 9.2% 648 1.3% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 31,119 11,773 37.8% 15,092 485% 3,387 10.9% 867 2.8% 48% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Ward D 2020 Census SGARDENS I Wezt Wa,ner A, Z a Warner Avenge Ma<q�r el, Ma c Ar[hu, elvd 87% 0% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population Edinger Avent n.- East Warner All DYER East pynl 0 Bd 0� eta �b> ' .r ll,ute `oe0 G Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black % 50,459 -1,483 -2.9% 3517 7.0% 43,961 87.1% 2,728 5.4% 253 05% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 26679 3,802 14.3% 20,849 78.1% 1,766 6.6% 262 1.0% 14% JM- Mj� 1% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Ward E 2020 Census 86% 7% 6% Other % Latino % Asian % Black% Citizen voting Age Population Othar % Latino % Asian % RI.,k a Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black% 52,413 471 0.9% 3,651 7.0% 45,053 86.0% 3,154 6.0% 555 13% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 22,893 2,916 127% 17,289 75-5% 2,412 10-5% 276 1.2% Ward F 2020 Census SANTA ANA 0% euowwec Other% Latino % Asian % Black% Citizen Voting Age Population % J, 50,906 -1,036 -20% 3,327 6,5% 44,903 88.2% 2,361 4.6% 315 0.6% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 22,659 2,834 12-5% 17,798 78.5% 1,908 8.4% 119 0.5% Other % Latino % Asian % Black% 5A ORANGE GARDEN GROVE -, ..-,.-.- ...... .... Tustin D GARDEN G U) N C J c- C- m n ORANGE 2020 Census A B C D E F Population 49,763 53,110 53,213 53,594 50,906 Deviation -2,179 1,168 -875 1.271 1.652 -1,036 Deviation % -4.2% 2.2% 2.4% 3.2% -2.0% Other 4,307 5,419 11,976 4,053 3,200 3,327 1 Other % 8.7% 10.2% 23.5% 7.6% 6.0% 6.5% Latino 26,584 41,568 33,724 45,656 46,633 44,903 Latino% 53.4% 78.3% 66.0% 85.8% 87.0% 88.2% Asian 18,488 5,473 4,719 3,164 3,279 2.361 Asian % 37.2% 10.3% 9.2% 5.9% 6.1% 4.6% Black 384 650 648 340 482 315 Black % 0.8% 1.2% 1.3% 0.6% 0.9% 0.6% Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) A B C D E F Total CVAP 30,076 26,197 29,470 26,977 21,345 20,288 Other CVAP 4.394 5,169 11,280 4.097 2.935 2,728 Other CVAP % 14.6% 19.7% 38.3% 15.2% 13.7% 13.4% Latino CVAP 12550 16,695 14,219 20,185 15,639 15,575 Latino CVAP % 41.7% 63.7% 48.2% 74.8% 73.3% 76.8% Asian CVAP 12,915 3,774 3,248 2,240 2500 1,826 Asian CVAP % 42.9% 14.4% 11.0% 8.3% 11.7% 9.0% Black CVAP 216 559 722 456 271 159 Black CVAP % 0.7% 2.1% 2.5% 1.7% 1.3% 0.8% District A SANTA ANA Fountain Valley 49,763 -2,179 -4.2% 4,307 8.7% 26,584 53.4% 18,488 37.2% 384 0.8% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 30,076 4,394 14.6% 12,550 41.7% 12,915 42.9% 216 0.7% 2020 Census 53% Other % Latino % "an % Black % Citizen Voting Age Population 41% 42% Other % Latino% Asian % Black % District B NOI i a � 53,110 1,168 22% 5,419 10.2% 41,568 78.3% 5,473 10.3% 650 1.2% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 26,197 5,169 19.7% 16,695 63.7% 3,774 14.4% 559 23% 2020 Census 1 1 Other% Latino% Ad- % Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 63% 2% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% District C ORANGE 2020 Census <=„r 66% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 48% Other % Tu Population Deviation Deviation% Other Other% Latino Latino% Asian Asian% Black Black% 51,067 -875 -1.7% 11,976 23.5% 33,724 66.0% 4,719 9.2% 648 1.3% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 29,470 11,280 38.3% 14,219 48.2% 3,248 11.0% 722 25% Latino% Asian% Black% A&I District D Wes, War, East Warner 1 rner Ave n ovEa 4as ? Eas ,a s M 4 /5` hem .e/otl MacArthur ..M„<Ar ' 53,213 1,271 2.4% 4,053 7.6% 45 656 85.8% 3,164 5.9% 340 0.6% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 26,977 4,097 15.2% 20,185 74.8% 2,240 83% 456 1.7% 2020 Census 85% - 0% Other % latino % Asian % Black % Citizen Voting Age Population 5 Other % Latino % Asian % Black % 4 District E Population Deviation Deviation% Other Other% Latino Latino% Asian Asian% Black Black% 53594 1,652 32% 3,200 6.0% 46,633 87.0% 3,279 6.1% 482 0.9% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 21,345 2,935 13.7% 15,639 733% 2,500 11.7% 271 13% 2020 Census 87% - 0% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 73% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% kNIFIM District F SANTA ANA Tustin ...... ....... 50,906 -1,036 -2.0% 3,327 6.5% 44,903 88.2% 2,361 4.6% 315 0.6% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 20,288 2,728 13.4% 15,575 76.8% 1,826 9.0% 159 0.8% 2020 Census 88% Other % Latino % Asian % Black % Citizen Voting Age Population —7 0% Other % Latino% Asian % Black % Lr) 0 00 n Z=l LL C: m P-M ORANGE GARDEN GPOVE- T.,O, F .:IIINE 2020 Census A B C D E F Population 52,194 52,513 - 53,333 51,250 50,885 51,478 Deviation 252 571 1.391 -692 -1,057 -464 Deviation % 0.5% 1.1%� 2.7% -1.3% -2.0% -0.9% Other 4,426 8,495 12,018 1,497 3,611 2,235 1 Other % 8.5% 16.2% 22.5% 2.9% 7.1% 4.3% Latino 28,188 36,741 37.093 46,182 44,182 46,682 Latino % 54.0% 70.0% 69.5% 90.1% 86.8% 90.7% Asian 19,162 6,613 3,596 3,176 2,542 2.395 Asian % 36.7% 12.6% 6.7% 6.2% 5.0% 4.7% Black 418 664 626 395 550 166 Black % 0.8% 1.3% 1.2% 0.8% 1.1% 0.3% Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) A B C D E F Total CVAP 31,340 31,254 29,495 19,761 18,651 23,850 Other CVAP 4.384 8,313 11,454 944 3,134 2,374 Other CVAP % 14.0% 26.6% 38.8% 4.8% 16.8% 10.0% Latino CVAP 13,073 17,957 14,933 16,021 13,701 19,177 Latino CVAP % 41.7% 57.5% 50.6% 81.1% 73.5% 80.4% Asian CVAP 13,645 4,374 2,425 2,388 1,521 2,150 Asian CVAP % 43.5% 14.0% 8.2% 12.1% 8.2% 9.0% Black CVAP 239 609 684 408 295 150 Black CVAP % 0.8% 1.9% 2.3% 2.1% 1.6% 0.6% District A GARDEN GPOIIE,.,.,---,, A_. SANTAANA7 A Fountain Valley o°ba 52,194 252 0.5% 4,426 8-5% 28,188 54.0% 19,162 36.7% 418 0.8% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 31,340 4,384 14.0% 13,073 41.7% 13,645 435% 239 0.8% 2020 Census 54% 8% 0% .the, % Iatln. % Asian 91 Mack 41% 43% 0% Other % Latino % Asian % Black % District B 2020 Census 70% 16% . _ 12% 1% SANTA ANA Other% Latino% Asian% Black% ° Citizen Voting Age Population 57% I e cNs c Y LL IRVINE 5—Dlequ—Y San y BUSINESS COMPLEX P°e 52,513 571 1.1% 8,495 16.2% 36,741 70.0% 6,613 12.6% 664 1.3% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 31,254 8,313 26.6% 17,957 575% 4,374 14.0% 609 1.9% Other% Latino% - 1% Asian % Black % omp District C _.,NTA ANA` T.-,, PACIFIC PAFN 3 F 53,333 1,391 2.7% 12,018 22S% 37,093 69.5% 3,596 6.7% 626 1.2% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 29,495 11,454 38.8% 14,933 50.6% 2,425 82% 684 23% 2020 Census 69% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Other % 50% ■ Latino % Asian % Black % 41 District D 2020 Census 90% Other % Latino % Asian % Black % Citizen Voting Age Population 81% E WILSHIRE SQUARE A NORTH I' ANA SANTA cAR.E.S 51,250 -692 -1.3% 1,497 2.9% 46,182 90.1% 3376 6.2% 395 0.8% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 19,761 944 4.8% 16,021 81.1% 2,388 121% 408 2.1% Other % Latino% Asian % Black % 4m District E 2 sauwueE 50,885 -1,057 -2.0% 3,611 7.1% 44,182 86.8% 2,542 5.0% 550 13% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 18,651 3,134 16.8% 13,701 735% 1,521 8.2% 295 1.6% 2020 Census 86% 7% Other % Latino % Asian % Black % Citizen Voting Age Population 73% Other % Latino% Asian % Black % District F 2020 Census 90% M=AL WE--- -7 1— 51,478 -464 -0.9% 2,235 43% 46,682 90.7% 2,395 4.7% 166 0.3% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 23,850 2,374 10.0% 19,177 80.4% 2,150 9.0% 150 0.6% 4% 4% 0% Other % Latino % Black % 80% ■ 10% 9% 0% Other % Latino % Amain % Black % GARDEN GROVE,,,,,,,-,. C- -M n 4f ORANGE 2020 Census A B C D E F Population 52,003 52,452 52,490 52,064 51,803 50,841 Deviation 61 510 548 122 -139 -1,101 Deviation % 0.1% 1.0% 1.1% 0.2% -0.3% -2.1% Other 3,718 9,255 11597 1,976 3,043 2,693 Other % 7.1% 17.6% 22.1% 3.8% 5.9% 5.3% Latino 29,071 34.838 36,702 46.519 45,773 46.165 Latino % 55.9% 66.4% 69.9% 89.3% 88.4% 90.8% Asian 18,864 7,629 3,565 3,133 2.561 1,732 Asian % 36.3% 14.5% 6.8% 6.0% 4.9% 3.4% Black 350 730 626 436 426 251 Black % 0.7% 1.4% 1.2% 0.8% 0.8% 0.5% Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) _ A B C D E F Total CVAP 30,082 32,937 28,522 22,518 20,940 19,354 Other CVAP 3,534 8,982 11,186 1,919 2,702 2,279 Other CVAP % 11.7% 27.3% 39.2% 8.5% 12.9% 11.8% Latino CVAP 12,986 18,005 14,392 17,948 16,316 15,215 Latino CVAP % 43.2% 54.7% 50.5% 79.7% 77.9% 78.6% Asian CVAP 13,376 5,266 2,230 2,192 1,760 1,679 Asian CVAP % 44.5% 16.0% 7.8% 9.7% 8.4% 8.7% Black CVAP 185 684 714 459 161 181 Black CVAP % 0.6% 2.1% 2.5% 2.0% 0.8% 0.9% District A GARDEN GROVEaa,mm,c.m.ama m FJi n Gmsdmn G`oJ Trash Avenue Trask A-- SAN ^� W Ed-,r A- - IN Ed., NORTH ISLAND m 52,003 61 0.1% 3,718 7.1% 29,071 55.9% 18,864 36.3% 350 0.7% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 30,082 3,534 11.7% 12,986 43.2% 13,376 445% 185 0.6% 2020 Census — L 7% J �._= 0% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 43% 44% Other% Latino% !I Asian% Black% District B Sa��Coast D� ; �a90 F� LL 'NILSHIRE SQUARE San Dlego Fwy San Diogo F E M�In Stre, 52,452 510 1.0% 9,255 17.6% 34,838 66.4% 7,629 14.5% 730 1.4% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % ASian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 32,937 8,982 27.3% 18,005 54.7% 5,266 16.0% 684 23% 2020 Census 66% 1% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 54% Other % Latino % Asian % Black % M& District C K SANTA ANAs PACIFIC PAPK I 2020 Census 69% 22% m Other% Iatino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 50% E 1'!tl 39% Tustin Other 96 ly 4na F 52,490 548 1.1% 11597 223% 36,702 69.9% 3565 6.8% 626 1.2% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 28522 11,186 39.2% 14,392 505% 2,230 7.8% 714 25% Lai Asian% Black% 41 District D ws u 2020 Census 89% a s x F 3% 6% 0% Other % Latino % Asian % Black % Citizen Voting Age Population =r 52,064 122 0.2% 1,976 3.8% 46519 89.3% 3,133 6.0% 436 0.8% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 22,518 1,919 85% 17,948 79.7% 2,192 9.7% 459 2.0% 8% 2% Other % Latino % Asian % Black % District E J, 2020 Census 88% FRENCI _ 0% vae Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 12% 8% _� i � 0% other% Latino% Asian% Black% 51,803 -139 -0.3% 3,043 5.9% 45,773 88.4% 2561 4.9% 426 0.8% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 20,940 2,702 12.9% 16,316 77.9% 1,760 8.4% 161 0.8% P% District F SANTAANA£ AEcl— � Mao,so�aaax 2020 Census 90% 3% 0% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population nA.,c 78% 11% 8% - 0% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% 50,841 -1,101 -21% 2,693 5.3% 46,165 90.8% 1,732 3.4% 251 05% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 19,354 2,279 11.8% 15,215 78.6% 1,679 8.7% 181 0.9% FBI ORANGE DELHI GARDEN G 2020 Census A B C D E F Population 51,570 51,714 51,904 F 52,146 52,748 51571 Deviation -372 -228 -38 204 806 -371 Deviation % -0.7% -0.4% -0.1% 0.4% 1.6% -0.7% Other 4,341 7,971 11,975 2,023 3,430 2,542 Other % 8.4% 15.4% 233% ' 3.9% 6.5% 4.9% Latino 28,074 36,686 34536 47,444 45.271 47,057 Latino% 54.4% 70.9% 66.5% 91.0% 85.8% 91.2% Asian 18,749 6,431 4,742 2,299 3,495 1,768 Asian % 36.4% 12.4% 9.1% 4.4% 6.6% 3.4% Black 406 626 651 380 552 204 Black % 0.8% 1.2% 1.3% 0.7% 1.0% 0.4% Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) A B C D E F Total CVAP 30504 31,096 29,999 21,378 21,649 19,726 Other CVAP 4,361 7,850 11.429 1,795 2,701 2.467 Other CVAP % 14.3% 25.2% 38.1% 8.4% 12.5% 12.5% Latino CVAP 12,821 18,365 14587 17,478 16,067 15544 Latino CVAP % 42.0% 59.1% 48.6% 81.8% 74.2% 78.8% Asian CVAP 13,059 4,286 3,253 1,746 2,616 1,541 Asian CVAP % 42.8% 13.8% 10.8% 8.2% 12.1% 7.8% Black CVAP 262 594 730 358 266 174 Black CVAP % 0.9% 1.9% 2.4% 1.7% 1.2% 0.9% District A All Fountain V,11,y 0 SANTA ANA 51570 -M -0.7% 4,341 8.4% 28,074 54.4% 18,749 36.4% 406 0.8% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % ASian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 30,504 4,361 14.3% 12,821 42.0% 13,059 42.8% 262 0.9% 2020 Census 54% Other 96 Latino % "an % Black % Citizen Voting Age Population 42% 42% Other % Latino% Asian % Black % District B 2020 Census 70% ...... . Other % Latino % "an % Black % Citizen Voting Age Population 51,714 -228 -0.4% 7,971 15.4% 36,686 70.9% 6,431 12.4% 626 1.2% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 31,096 7,850 25.2% 18,365 59.1% 4,286 13.8% 594 1.9% Other % Latino% Asian % Black % U1 District C Tu anra 4"aF 3 51,904 -38 -0.1% 11,975 23.1% 34,536 66.5% 4,742 9.1% 651 1.3% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 29,999 11,429 38.1% 14,587 48.6% 3,253 10.8% 730 2.4% 2020 Census 66% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 48% Other % Latino% Asian% Black% A&% District D �F twoe..s� Ewona c MAOISON PARR m A r " 52,146 204 0.4% Z023 3.9% 47,444 91.0% 2,299 4.4% 380 0.7% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 21,378 1,795 8.4% 17,478 81.8% 1,746 82% 358 1.7% 2020 Census 91% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 81% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% District E EDNA BARN m _ Al TRIANGL 2020 Census 85% FRET Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 12% 12% - 1% m.c.ve.... Other% Latino% Asian% Black% p . WIU AR E SQUARE 52,748 806 1.6% 3,430 6.5% 45,271 85.8% 3,495 6.6% 552 1.0% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 21,649 2,701 125% 16,067 74.2% 2,616 121% 266 1.2% District F SANTA ANA Tustin 1111 STII anent anaH IICKSON PARK anak IA"TIAIA 2020 Census 91% 0% Other % Latint, % "an % Black % Citizen Voting Age Population 78% o 0 A- 12% 7% 0% Other % Latimo% Asian % Black % TUITIN Lc.ACI 51,571 -371 -0.7% Z542 4.9% 47,057 91.2% 1,768 3.4% 204 0.4% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 19,726 2,467 125% 15544 78.8% 1541 7.8% 174 0.9% ORANGE stim ORANGE GARDEN G 2020 Census A B C D E F Population 51,570 52,437 51,904 F 51,806 52,352 51,584 Deviation -372 495 -38 -136 410 -358 Deviation % -0.7% 1.0% -0.1% -0.3% 0.8% -0.7% Other 4,341 4,770 11,975 5,060 3,589 2,547 Other % 8.4% 9.1% 233% ' 9.8% 6.9% 4.9% Latino 28,074 41.907 34536 42,903 44.588 47,060 Latino% 54.4% 79.9% 66.5% 82.8% 85.2% 91.2% Asian 18,749 5,200 4,742 3,410 3,610 1,773 Asian % 36.4% 9.9% 9.1% 6.6% 6.9% 3.4% Black 406 560 651 433 565 204 Black % 0.8% 1.1% 1.3% 0.8% 1.1% 0.4% Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) A B C D E F Total CVAP 30,558 25,551 29,999 26,328 22,190 19,726 Other CVAP 4,367 4,561 11.429 4,959 2,821 2.467 Other CVAP % 14.3% 17.9% 38.1% 18.8% 12.7% 12.5% Latino CVAP 12,862 16,886 14587 18,624 16,360 15544 Latino CVAP % 42.1% 66.1% 48.6% 70.7% 73.7% 78.8% Asian CVAP 13,065 3,646 3,253 2,219 2,778 1,541 Asian CVAP % 42.8% 14.3% 10.8% 8.4% 12.5% 7.8% Black CVAP 265 458 730 527 231 174 Black CVAP % 0.9% 1.8% 2.4% 2.0% 1.0% 0.9% District A All Fountain V,11,y 0 SANTA ANA 51570 -M -0.7% 4,341 8.4% 28,074 54.4% 18,749 36.4% 406 0.8% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % ASian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 30,558 4,367 14.3% 12,862 423% 13,065 42.8% 265 0.9% 2020 Census 54% Other 96 Latino % "an % Black % Citizen Voting Age Population 42% 42% Other % Latino% Asian % Black % District B W E NORTH ISLAND y 2020 Census 79% QUA RE RE S SQUA �._� 1% - - Other% Latino% Asian% Black% MADISON RARK w Etl nye Avc i EEd Citizen Voting Age Population CEDAR EVERGREEN SANTAANA 66% MEMORIAL PARK W W., n er Ave Z DELHI EW.-Are ANA A 77QL ¢f 4r y`'ejvtl - MacArthur Blvd. 4�`> f m b a v �5c 52,437 495 1.0% 4,770 9.1% 41,907 79.9% 5,200 9.9% 560 13% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 25,551 4,561 17.9% 16,886 66.1% 3,646 143% 458 1.8% 1% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% District C Tu anra 4"aF 3 51,904 -38 -0.1% 11,975 23.1% 34,536 66.5% 4,742 9.1% 651 1.3% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 29,999 11,429 38.1% 14,587 48.6% 3,253 10.8% 730 2.4% 2020 Census 66% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 48% Other % Latino% Asian% Black% A&% District D i= RACIFIC BARN I" n SQLAR E SQUARE 1'P MADISON RARN ' CEDAR EE gor qve nii5o EVERGREEN 3q DELHI EWarnor qve. y w w,r i A G Pas° 1161 oven Fy M 3 t^ v - MacnnM1. G TUSTIN S i esh - � P Dr 51,806 -136 -0.3% 5,060 9.8% 42,903 82.8% 3,410 6.6% 433 0.8% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 26,328 4,959 18.8% 18,624 70.7% 2,219 8.4% 527 2.0% 2020 Census 82% 9% 6% - _- 0% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 70% - LY6 Other% Latino% Asian% Black% I District E Y ENCI Other% Latino% Asian% Black% 3 Citizen Voting Age Population 73% 12% 12% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% 52,352 410 0.8% 3589 6.9% 44,588 85.2% 31610 6.9% 565 13% 2020 Census 85% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 22,190 2,821 127% 16,360 73.7% 2,778 125% 231 1.0% wo District F SANTA ANA Tustin 1111 STII anent anaH IICKSON PARK aaak IA"TIAIA 2020 Census 91% 0% Other % Latint, % "an % Black % Citizen Voting Age Population 78% 12% 7% 0% Other % Latimo% Asian % Black % TUITIN Lc.ACI 51584 -358 -0.7% 2547 4.9% 47,060 91.2% 1,773 3.4% 204 0.4% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 19,726 2,467 125% 15544 78.8% 1541 7.8% 174 0.9% ORANGE Tustin 2020 Census A B C D E F Population 51,026 52,064 52,490 50,959 52,780 52,334 Deviation -916 122 548 -983 838 392 Deviation % -1.8% 0.2% 1.1% -1.9% 1.6% 0.8% Other 3,695 1,976 11597 8,459 3,066 3,489 Other % 7.2% 3.8% 22.1% 16.6% 5.8% 6.7% Latino 28,296 46,519 36,702 34,577 46.548 46,426 Latino% 55.5% 89.3% 69.9% 67.9% 88.2% 88.7% Asian 18,693 3,133 3,565 7,253 2,732 2,108 Asian % 36.6% 6.0% 6.8% 14.2% 5.2% 4.0% Black 342 436 626 670 434 311 Black % 0.7% 0.8% 1.2% 1.3% 0.8% 0.6% Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) A B C D E F Total CVAP 29,375 22,518 28,522 32,424 21,646 19,867 Other CVAP 3,534 1,919 11,186 8,806 2,702 2,455 Other CVAP % 12.0% 8.5% 39.2% 27.2% 12.5% 12.4% Latino CVAP 12591 17,948 14,392 17,755 16,711 15,464 Latino CVAP % 42.9% 79.7% 50.5% 54.8% 77.2% 77.8% Asian CVAP 13,064 2,192 2,230 5,187 2,072 1,758 Asian CVAP % 44.5% 9.7% 7.8% 16.0% 9.6% 8.8% Black CVAP 185 459 714 675 161 190 Black CVAP % 0.6% 2.0% 2.5% 2.1% 0.7% 1.0% District A GARDEN GROVEaarmm,c.m.ama mFJ n Gmsdmn G`oJ Trask Avenue Trask A-- SAN ^� W Ed-,r A- - IN Ed., NORTNISLAND . m 51,026 -916 -1.8% 3,695 7.2% 28,296 555% 18,693 36.6% 342 0.7% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 29,375 3,534 12.0% 12,591 429% 13,064 445% 185 0.6% 2020 Census — L 7% J �._= 0% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 42% 44% Other% Latino% !I Asian% Black% District B 52,064 122 0.2% 1,976 3.8% 46519 89.3% 3,133 6.0% 436 0.8% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 22,518 1,919 85% 17,948 79.7% 2,192 9.7% 459 2.0% 2020 Census 89% 3% % 0% Other % Latino % Asian % Black % Citizen Voting Age Population 8Am2% Other % Latino % Asian % Black % f' District C Ak, I 2020 Census 69% 22% IN Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 50% E 1'!tl 39% Tustin other % ly 4na F 52,490 548 1.1% 11597 223% 36,702 69.9% 3565 6.8% 626 1.2% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 28522 11,186 39.2% 14,392 505% 2,230 7.8% 714 25% Latino% Asian% Black% District D 2020 Census 67% s 4 Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 54% 50,959 -983 -1.9% 8,459 16.6% 34577 67.9% 7,253 14.2% 670 1.3% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 32,424 8,806 27.2% 17,755 54.8% 5,187 16.0% 675 23% Other % Latino % Asian % Black % md District E 2020 Census 88% FPENCI E 0% vae Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 27% � o% m,..��•�A,�.�• other% Latino% Asian% Black% S .. se�AaE Population Deviation Deviation% Other Other% Latino Latino% Asian Asian% Black Black% 52,780 838 1.6% 3,066 5.8% 46548 88.2% 2,732 5.2% 434 0.8% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 21,646 2,702 12.5% 16,711 772% 2,072 9.6% 161 0.7% District F SANT ANA3 52,334 392 0.8% 3,489 6.7% 46,426 88.7% 2,108 4.0% 311 0.6% 2020 Census 88% Other % Latino % Asian % Black % Citizen Voting Age Population 7W_ 1% Other % Latln0% ASian% Black% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 19,867 2,455 12.4% 15,464 77.8% 1,758 8.8% 190 1.0% Tustin D.— T-- 1-11 2020 Census A B C D E F Population 52,194 52,437 53,333 ' 51,043 50,133 52,513 Deviation 252 495 1.391 -899 -1,809 571 Deviation % 0.5% 1.0% 2.7% -1.7% -3.5% 1.1% Other 4,426 1,790 12,018 1,951 3,602 8,495 Other % 8.5% 3.4% 22.5% 3.8% 7.2% 16.2% Latino 28,188 46,048 37,093 47,726 43,272 36,741 Latino% 54.0% 87.8% 69.5% 93.5% 86.3% 70.0% Asian 19,162 4,129 3,596 1,272 2.712 6.613 Asian % 36.7% 7.9% 6.7% 2.5% 5.4% 12.6% Black 418 470 626 94 547 664 Black % 0.8% 0.9% 1.2% 0.2% 1.1% 1.3% Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) A B C D E F Total CVAP 31,340 22,443 29,495 20,861 18,959 31,254 Other CVAP 4.384 1,457 11,454 1,871 3,125 8,313 Other CVAP % 14.0% 6.5% 38.8% 9.0% 16.5% 26.6% Latino CVAP 13,073 17,348 14,933 17,606 13,944 17,957 Latino CVAP % 41.7% 77.3% 50.6% 84.4% 73.5% 57.5% Asian CVAP 13,645 3,110 2,425 1,319 1,629 4,374 Asian CVAP % 43.5% 13.9% 8.2% 6.3% 8.6% 14.0% Black CVAP 239 528 684 64 261 609 Black CVAP % 0.8% 2.4% 2.3% 0.3% 1.4% 1.9% District A GAPDENGPOVE SANTAANA' Fountain Valley 52,194 252 0.5% 4,426 8-5% 28,188 54.0% 19,162 36.7% 418 0.8% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 31,340 4,384 14.0% 13,073 41.7% 13,645 435% 239 0.8% 2020 Census 54% Other % Latino % "an % Black % Citizen Voting Age Population 41% 43% Other % Latino% Asian % Black % District B 2020 Census 87% 0% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population € 7W Other% Latino% i 52,437 495 1.0% 1,790 3.4% 46,048 87.8% 4,129 7.9% 470 0.9% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 22,443 1,457 6.5% 17,348 773% 3,110 13.9% 528 2.4% - 2% Asian% Black% 52,437 495 1.0% 1,790 3.4% 46,048 87.8% 4,129 7.9% 470 0.9% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 22,443 1,457 6.5% 17,348 773% 3,110 13.9% 528 2.4% - 2% Asian% Black% District C _,,N Ir — N. Tustin PACIFIC PARK ra 4na F 3 E F 53,333 1,391 2.7% 12,018 22.5% 37,093 69.5% 31596 6.7% 626 1.2% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 29,495 11,454 38.8% 14,933 50.6% 2,425 82% 684 23% 2020 Census 69% 22% IN Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 50% Other % Latino% Asian% Black% 41 District D MCEaeeen neen�e `V VILLAGE N[ �eM�AOISON PARK � E E 9 nve E E g nve h CEDAR EVERGREEN Narn<' P ` e — ••.-»•.•. �.•..— E wane, n DELHI E wane, a.e 51,043 -899 -1.7% 1,951 3.8% 47,726 93.5% 1,272 2.5% 94 0.2% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % ASian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 20,861 1,871 9.0% 17,606 84.4% 1,319 63% 64 03% 2020 Census 'A Z)b 0% Other % 1atino % Asian % Black % Citizen Voting Age Population 84% Other % Latino % Asian % Black % 1-i District E f IONA PARK SANTA ANA TRIANGLE v n.r, Si Si PACIFIC PARK 2020 Census 86% UI SQVA 1% Other% Ustino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population MAI 73% SADDL VII LV( Other% Latino% Asian% Black% WILSHIRE SQUARE Population Deviation Deviation% Other Other% Latino Latino% Asian Asian% Black Black% 50,133 -1,809 -3.5% 3,602 7.2% 43,272 86.3% 2,712 5.4% 547 13% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 18,959 3,125 165% 13,944 735% 1,629 8.6% 261 1.4% District F OACIFIC DARN WILSH IRE SQUARE JID-PARK din a CEDAR P[ EVERGREEN sary ra arva canK DELHI L Warrr, r ave. 2020 Census 70% Other% Latino% Asian% Black% Citizen Voting Age Population 57-% Y f� Other % Latino % Asian % Black % c9 sc st Dr 3 �r� u 52,513 571 1.1% 8,495 16.2% 36,741 70.0% 6,613 12.6% 664 1.3% Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % ASian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 31,254 8,313 26.6% 17,957 575% 4,374 14.0% 609 1.9%