Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2024-020 - Pavement Managment Plan for Measure M2 Program
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA CONCERNING THE STATUS AND UPDATE OF THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE MEASURE M2 PROGRAM BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The City of Santa Ana is required to meet eligibility requirements and submit eligibility verification packages to the Orange County Transportation Authority ("OCTA") in order to remain eligible to receive Measure M2 funds. B. On a biennial basis, the City of Santa Ana is required to adopt and update a Pavement Management Plan ("PMP"), using the required format, regarding the status of road pavement conditions and implementation of the PMP. C. The City of Santa Ana is required to provide a plan that manages the preservation, rehabilitation, and maintenance of paved roads by analyzing pavement life cycles, assessing overall system performance costs, and determining alternative strategies and costs necessary to improve paved roads. Section 2. The City Council hereby declares that the PMP is in conformance with the PMP Submittal Template provided in the Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines. Section 3. The City of Santa Ana hereby adopts a PMP and has provided an updated PMP report, using the required format, to OCTA. Section 4. The City Council authorizes the Executive Director of the Public Works Agency, the City Engineer, or his or her designee to sign the PMP certification form. Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this 4t" day of June, 2024. Resolution 2024-020 Page 1 of 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: 'XCiwtal A Kyle Nellesen gvl.*, Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers ABSENT: Councilmembers Amezcua, Bacerra, Hernandez, Lopez, Penaloza, Phan, Vazquez (7) None (0) None (0) None (0) CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, JENNIFER L. HALL, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2024-020 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on June 4, 2024. Date: ('a, �-�- Resolution 2024-020 Page 2 of 2 X, IN, 4e. Xt SANTA ANA 6d w TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS..............................................................................................................i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................ E-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................1-1 2.0 METHODOLOGY...............................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Inventory......................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Planning.......................................................................................................................2-2 2.3 Data Collection.............................................................................................................2-2 2.4 Data Entry....................................................................................................................2-2 2.5 Analysis........................................................................................................................2-2 3.0 PAVEMENT NETWORK....................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Functional Classifications.............................................................................................3-2 3.2 Pavement Condition Index...........................................................................................3-4 3.3 Existing Pavement Condition........................................................................................3-5 4.0 MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION STRATEGIES..................................................4-1 4.1 Treatment Types and Associated Costs.......................................................................4-1 4.2 Funding........................................................................................................................4-5 4.3 Budget Alternatives.....................................................................................................4-6 4.3.1 Existing Funding..................................................................................................4-7 4.3.2 Alternative Funding Levels Required To Maintain Existing PCI ..........................4-10 4.3.3 Alternative Funding Levels Required To Improve PCI........................................4-13 APPENDIX A: ENTIRE PAVEMENT NETWORK PCI REPORT APPENDIX B: ARTERIAL STREETS 7-YEAR M&R PLAN APPENDIX C: LOCAL STREETS 7-YEAR M&R PLAN APPENDIX D: OCTA PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE REPORT 2024 - Pavement Management Plan Certification - Quality Assurance / Quality Control Plan - Executive Summary City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program Table Of Contents FIGURES Figure E-1: PCI Distribution for 2020, 2022 and 2024............................................................. E-1 Figure 2-1: Sample Pavement Deterioration Curve..................................................................2-3 Figure 3-1: Entire Pavement Network Summary......................................................................3-1 Figure3-2: Arterial Street.........................................................................................................3-2 Figure3-3: Local Street............................................................................................................3-3 Figure 3-4: Current PCI Distribution (Entire Pavement Network)..............................................3-5 Figure 3-5: Current PCI Distribution (Arterial Network).............................................................3-6 Figure 3-6: Current PCI Distribution (Local Network)................................................................3-7 TABLES Table E-1: Funding Alternatives Summary.............................................................................. E-4 Table 3-1: Current Entire Pavement Network Summary...........................................................3-1 Table 3-2: Pavement Condition Index and Treatment Type.....................................................3-4 Table 3-3: PCI Distribution Comparison (2020, 2022 vs. 2024)................................................3-5 Table 3-4: PCI Distribution.......................................................................................................3-8 Table 4-1: Cost by Condition (Arterial Network).......................................................................4-3 Table 4-2: Cost by Condition (Local Network)..........................................................................4-3 Table 4-3: Existing Funding (Entire Pavement Network)..........................................................4-8 Table 4-4: Existing Funding (Arterial Network).........................................................................4-8 Table 4-5: Existing Funding (Local Network)............................................................................4-9 Table 4-6: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Maintain Existing PCI (Entire Pavement Network)...................................................................................4-11 Table 4-7: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Maintain Existing PCI (Arterial Network)..................................................................................................4-11 Table 4-8: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Maintain Existing PCI (Local Network)....................................................................................................4-12 Table 4-9: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Improve PCI (Entire Pavement Network)...................................................................................4-14 Table 4-10: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Improve PCI (Arterial Network)..................................................................................................4-14 Table 4-11: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Improve PCI (Local Network)....................................................................................................4-15 City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program ii ACRONYMS AC Asphalt Concrete ASTM American Society of Testing Materials AV Avenue BLVD Boulevard CDBG Community Development Block Grant CIP Capital Improvement Program CIR Circle CIR Cold In -Place Recycling City City of Santa Ana COMM Common CT Court CTB Cement Treated Base DR Drive EB East Bound FDR Full Depth Reconstruction FWY Freeway FY Fiscal Year GIS Geographical Information System GN Glen GPCE General Plan Circulation Element HUTA Highway Users Tax Account LN Lane M&R Maintenance and Rehabilitation MPAH Master Plan of Arterial Highways NB North Bound OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority PCC Portland Cement Concrete PCI Pavement Condition Index PCIaW Average Area -Weighted Pavement Condition Index PDC Pavement Deterioration Curve PL Place PMP Pavement Management Program RD Road RR Railroad RSRP Residential Street Repair Program SB South Bound SF Square Feet ST Street WB West Bound WY Way City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Santa Ana (City) Public Works Agency utilizes StreetSaver and geographical information system (GIS) to develop the Pavement Management Program (PMP) to provide an accurate inventory of the current and projected pavement condition of all public roadways and to implement a seven-year roadway maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) program to maximize the return from available existing funding for street pavement. The PMP's ultimate goal is to effectively strategize short and long-term usages of current and future limited funding to restore and maintain the entire street pavement network at "Good" condition or better. The City currently manages 454 miles of streets for a total of approximately 93.4 million square feet (SF) of paved surfaces. To be consistent with the City General Plan Circulation Element Master Plan of Streets and Highways and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH), the entire street pavement network is organized into two networks (arterial and local) depending on its functional classifications (i.e. major, primary, secondary, and collector arterial streets; residential and non-residential local streets). There are 129.3 miles (28% of entire pavement network) in the arterial network and 324.6 miles (72% of entire pavement network) in the local network. To assist planning maintenance needs, the streets are also arranged into over 4,174 sections and classified by surface types — Asphalt Concrete (AC) or Portland Cement Concrete (PCC). Figure E-1: PCI Distribution for 2020, 2022 and 2024 City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program E-1-1 Executive Summary Pavement condition inspections are performed biennially for both the arterial and local networks. Figure E-1 shows a comparison of the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) distribution between the 2020, 2022 and 2024 inspections. The PCI is a numerical value ranging from 0 for deteriorated pavement with virtually no remaining life to 100 for new or recently rehabilitated pavement. Generally, the PCI value is expressed as an area -weighted PCI (PCIaW) to provide a more representative value. A PCI value is computed for each street section based on the pavement distresses found within that section during an inspection. Inspections provide the data utilized in analysis and surface treatment recommendations for each street section; however, the PCI values shall be utilized for planning purposes in determining the surface treatment types and are not intended to replace sound engineering judgment. In general, the City's strategies involve the utilization of surface seals, such as crack sealing or slurry sealing for preventive maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) of streets in "Good" condition and major M&R plans typically consist of overlays, such as thin overlays, for "Fair" condition streets; resurfacing, such as structural overlays or cold -in -place recycling (CIR), for "Poor" condition streets; and reconstruction, such as cement -treated base (CTB) or full depth reconstruction (FDR), for "Very Poor" condition streets. A fully integrated PMP has had a positive effect on improving the City's entire pavement network by developing efficient M&R strategies and analyzing the effect of various funding alternatives on the pavement conditions. The strategies include forecasting optimal time for M&R needs, providing cost-effective alternatives for halting the deterioration of existing pavement, improving the overall condition of the entire pavement network, and reducing the backlog of M&R work over the next seven years. To carry forward one of the City's main objectives in providing a safe, reliable, efficient, and comfortable driving environment, this PMP report analyzes various M&R strategies, the effect of the City's existing Capital Improvement Program (CIP) funding on the street pavement system, and projected funding to both maintain and improve existing PCIaW over a seven-year plan. With existing funding of just under $139 million for the entire pavement network over the seven- year period from Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/25 through FY 2030/31, the entire pavement network existing PCIaW of 76.3 is projected to decrease by one (1) percent to 75.2 at the end of the seven- year cycle under existing funding levels. Individually, the arterial and local networks are projected to experience a negative result in existing PCIaW, three (3) percent arterial decrease and one (1) percent local decrease. Furthermore, the backlog for the entire pavement network is projected to increase by 58 percent from $285.2 million in the first year to $453.4 million in the seventh year. If the existing PCIaW of 76.3 were to be maintained at the end of the seven-year cycle, a total of $1.7 million in additional funds calculated at about $237,000 annually would be required; thus providing for a total alternative funding level of just over $140.4 million through FY 2030/31. The additional funding would be applied to both the arterial and local networks at 62 percent ($12.5 million) and 38 percent ($7.5 million), respectively. Furthermore, with this additional funding, the backlog for the entire pavement network is projected to increase by 56 percent from $285.2 million in the first year to $446.1 million in the seventh year. If the existing PCIaW were to be improved by two (2) points to 78.3 at the end of the seven-year cycle, a total of $3.6 million in additional funds calculated at about $508,400 annually would be City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program E-1-2 Executive Summary required; thus providing for a total alternative funding level of over $142.3 million through FY 2030/31. The additional funding would be applied to both the arterial and local networks at 63 percent ($12.8 million) and 37 percent ($7.6 million), respectively. Furthermore, with this additional funding, the backlog for the entire pavement network is projected to increase by 54 percent from $285.2 million in the first year to $440.3 million in the seventh year. Overall, the conclusion drawn from this PMP report is that the backlog for the entire pavement network is evenly distributed across both the arterial and the local network. Additionally, existing funding levels in the City CIP will not keep pace with rehabilitation needs over the next seven years. Since preserving street condition and performance should be a priority to provide motorists with safety assurances, the City's goal over the next seven years is to acquire sufficient pavement M&R funding to sustain the entire street pavement network at "Good" condition or better. By achieving this goal, the City will remain eligible for the reduced local match requirements for the renewed Measure M2 Competitive grant until FY 2030/31. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program E-1-3 Executive Summary Table E-1: Funding Alternatives Summary Existing Funding Alternative Funding Alternative Funding Maintain Existing PCI Im rove Projected PCI Entire Arterial Local Entire Arterial Local Entire Arterial Local Pavement Network Network Network Pavement Network Network Network Pavement Network Network Network 2024 PCIaw with 76 73 78 76 73 78 76 73 78 Existing Fundin 2031 PCIaw with 75 70 77 M Existing Fundin z I 2031 PCIaw with 3 76 72 78 78 75 80 Alternative Fundin FY 2024/25 Backlog4 $285,218 $116,940 $168,279 $285,218 $116,940 $168,279 $285,218 $116,940 $168,279 FY 2030/31 Backlog4 $453,424 $185,903 $267,521 $446,110 $182,905 $263,205 $440,253 $180,504 $259,749 7-yr Preventive M&R a $20,776 $2,476 $18,300 $20,776 $2,476 $18,300 $20,776 $2,476 $18,300 Existin Fundin 7-yr Major M&R s $117,994 $84,468 $33,504 $117,994 $84,468 $33,504 $117,994 $84,468 $33,504 Existin Fundin 7-yrTotal ' $138,770 $86,945 $51,804 $138,770 $86,945 $51,804 $138,770 $86,945 $51,804 ExistingFundin 7-yr Major M&R 8 Additional Funding $1,659 $1,250 $409 $3,558 $1,422 $2,136 7-yr Total 9 $140,429 $88,195 $53,678 $142,329 $88,366 $55,362 Alternative Fundin Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000. 1. 2024 PCI w Existing Funding: PCI yielded as a result of M&R work (existing PCI). 2. 2031 PCI w/ Existing Funding: PCI yielded at the end of the 7-year plan as a result of M&R work using existing funding. 3. 2031 PCI w/ Alternative Funding: PCI yielded @ the end of the 7-year plan as a result of M&R work using alternative funding. 4. Backlog: Total estimated M&R work left unfunded during the listed fiscal year. 5. 7-yr Preventive M&R Existing Funding: Existing funding for preventive M&R work from FY 2024/25 to FY 2030/31. 6. 7-yr Major M&R Existing Funding: Existing funding for major M&R work from FY 2024/25 to FY 2030/31. 7. 7-yr Total Existing Funding: Sum of existing funding from FY 2024/25 to FY 2030/31. 8. 7-yr Major M&R Additional Funding: Additional funding needed for major M&R work to reach the listed goal from FY 2024/25 to FY 2030/31. 9. 7-yr Total Alternative Funding: Sum of existing & additional funding needed required to reach the listed goal from FY 2024/25 to FY 2030/31. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program E-1-4 1.0 INTRODUCTION Since public streets are utilized for moving people and freight and they are vital to the City of Santa Ana (City) economy, preserving their condition and performance should be a priority. The City Public Works Agency has developed the Pavement Management Program (PMP) to monitor and maintain the City street system utilizing StreetSaver and geographic information system (GIS). The City's PMP has been developed to assist City personnel generate a solid and reliable Capital Improvement Program (CIP) based on the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the streets to sustain a desirable level of pavement performance on a network scale. The PMP's ultimate goal is to effectively strategize short and long-term usages of current and future limited funding to restore and maintain the entire pavement network at "Good" condition or better. Additionally, StreetSaver was selected as the pavement management software to be utilized by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and all member agencies in Orange County; therefore, with the City of Santa Ana's ongoing management of StreetSaver, the City's PMP is in compliance with this OCTA requirement. The purpose of the PMP is to: • Provide an accurate current inventory and pavement conditions of all public roadways; • Predict future pavement condition with and without work; • Develop a roadway maintenance program; • Prioritize and recommend the most cost-effective roadway repairs; • Implement a 7-year roadway maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) program; • Maximize the return from available funding for street pavement. Pavement is a dynamic structure where deterioration is constantly occurring. Therefore, as part of the development of the PMP, a survey of the City street pavement condition must be conducted on a regular basis to identify the type of severity and quantity of pavement distresses (refer to Section 2.0 Methodology and Appendix D: Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan). The pavement management database needs to be updated frequently to reflect the changes in pavement conditions and pavement maintenance histories. Upon completion of the survey and database updates, StreetSaver generates a new PCI value, which assists in the selection of the most cost-effective roadway M&R strategy. The PCI value, which was developed by US Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory and adopted as standard procedure by the American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, has been utilized by numerous municipalities nationwide. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 1-1-1 2.0 METHODOLOGY 2.1 INVENTORY All streets within the City are categorized as either arterial or local streets and are grouped as such into their respective networks; collectively they comprise the entire pavement network. Within each network, the streets are ranked based on their functional classifications (refer to Section 3.0 Pavement Network) and are assigned a letter that corresponds with the rank. In the case of the arterial network, the letter `B' is assigned to major arterial streets, the letter `P' is assigned to primary arterial streets, the letter `S' is assigned to secondary arterial streets, and the letter 'C' is assigned to collector arterial streets. In the case of the local network, the letters 'E' and 'I' are assigned to residential and non-residential streets, respectively. Each street, or branch, is divided into segments, or sections, at intersecting streets and railroads. For example, Main Street from First Street to Second Street and Grand Avenue from Railroad to Chestnut Avenue. Additionally, a section break is introduced where a change in pavement surface is encountered mid -block. For example, if the pavement surface were to change from Asphalt Concrete (AC) to Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) at any point along Main Street from First Street to Second Street, then the resulting sections would be Main Street from First Street to AC- PCC Transition and Main Street from AC-PCC Transition to Second Street; where one section has an AC surface and the other has a PCC surface. In an effort to help identify and sort the streets efficiently, identifying numbers are assigned to each branch and section. A Branch ID is a six -digit number assigned to each branch and is numbered increasingly with numbered streets listed first followed by the remainder of the streets listed in alphabetical order. A Section ID is a four -digit number assigned to each section and is numbered increasingly based on geography from west to east and from south to north. For example, the westernmost or southernmost section of a branch would have a Section ID with the lowest number and the easternmost or northernmost section of a branch would have a Section ID with the highest number. Furthermore, the four -digit Section ID number may be followed by a letter such as N, S, E, or W that denotes the direction of travel (north, south, east, and west, respectively) along a street. This letter is used to differentiate between the two halves of a street when it is divided as such. For example, Section ID 110ON and Section ID 1100S would denote the northbound and southbound sides of a section, respectively. Additionally, other sort features are available to assist in further grouping segments with similar characteristics. For example, to identify streets within pre -defined geographical areas, each section is labeled with a number that corresponds to either a neighborhood or a non -neighborhood area. A neighborhood area, which is typically comprised of churches, schools, and residential properties, is defined as the boundary established through a collaboration of the City's Community Development Agency (CDA) and local residents based on both geographic and social components. Currently, there are 64 neighborhoods established in the City, which meet with CDA staff regularly to develop strategies to shape it for the better and sustain it for the long term. A non -neighborhood area refers to the zone located outside of the established neighborhood boundaries comprising of mostly commercial and industrial uses. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 2-2-1 2.0 Methodology 2.2 PLANNING Preparation prior to performing pavement surveys involves three major components: inspector training, survey type selection, and identifying sample units. • Inspector Training - In order to be familiar with the inspection guidelines, inspectors are prompted to read the StreetSaver Asphalt & Concrete Distress Manuals, complete the web -based Pavement Management software training and learn the data input application for the StreetSaver program prior to inspecting. Additionally, the inspection routes are planned in a time -efficient manner to efficiently capture the pavement data. • Survey Types - There are two types of surveys allowable: "windshield" and "walking" surveys. A windshield survey consists of examining the pavement from a vehicle moving at no more than 10 miles per hour (MPH), while a walking survey allows an inspector to examine from the pavement surface itself. Although, for safety reasons, walking surveys on arterial roadways may be performed from a safe place adjacent to the pavement such as a sidewalk, center median, or shoulder. • Sample Units - Random areas, known as sample units, within a street section are inspected as a representative of the whole segment. A sample unit for an asphalt street section contains a total area of 2500 square feet (SF) ±1000 SF, and a sample unit for a PCC street section contains a total number of 20 slabs ±8 slabs. 2.3 DATA COLLECTION The pavement distresses found within a sample unit are identified by type, classified by severity, measured/counted, and recorded as they are encountered in the field. A number of sample units are randomly selected for re -inspection to assure consistent and accurate results among inspectors. Refer to Appendix D: Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan for further details on quality control/quality assurance. 2.4 DATA ENTRY The collected pavement distress data is input into StreetSaver, creating an inspection record for each sample unit. 2.5 ANALYSIS Based on the latest inspection data and several other factors, including surface type, functional classifications, last construction date, and PCI, pavement deterioration curves (PDCs) or pavement condition prediction models are generated separately for the local and arterial networks. These curves are imperative for a complete PMP to predict future pavement performance and determine maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) requirements. Figure 2-1 shows a sample PDC with the appropriate M&R. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 2-2-2 2.0 Methodology Figure 2-1: Sample Pavement Deterioration Curve 100 Very Good Do Nothing I85 —— — — — — ———————— — — — — —-—————— — — — — — —— Good Surface Seal a75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — • — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 Fair Overlay 60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 Poor Resurfacing c40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — a E a a Very Poor Reconstruction 0 Pavement Life (yrs) To develop an accurate PDC, "suspicious" data / anomalies outside of the maximum and minimum envelopes generated from StreetSaver are filtered out. For example, data with PCI increase significantly with age (recording error) or lack of past inspection data must be removed because pavements are load carrying structures, which degrade over time due to the combined action of environmental and traffic. This data filtering processing is critical because pavements with unusual performance would have substantial impact on the PDC behavior and the pavement life cycle consequently. The final PDCs illustrate that the rate of deterioration is fairly slow in the early years of the pavement's design life. During the first 65 percent to 75 percent of a pavement's design life, which varies based on functional classifications and surface type, a pavement deteriorates approximately 40 percent of its quality, i.e. from a PCI of 100 ("Very Good" condition) to a PCI of 60 ("Fair" condition). However, the rate of deterioration starts to increase rapidly with age after a pavement reaches this point in its life cycle. Typically, a pavement can deteriorate 40 percent in its quality (PCI quickly drops from 60 ("Fair" condition) to 20 ("Very Poor" condition)) in the next 15 percent to 25 percent of its design life. Although the local and arterial networks have different design life spans, both PDCs share similar characteristics because the pavement will crack and these cracks will propagate out and become severe with continued traffic loadings and weathering without any M&R treatment. Therefore, a PCI of 60 is assigned as the critical PCI for both the arterial and local networks. The critical PCI is defined as the PCI value after which a pavement section is expected to deteriorate rapidly with age or where the rate of PCI loss increases significantly with time. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 2-2-3 3.0 PAVEMENT NETWORK Currently, the City's entire street pavement network has approximately 454 miles consisting of approximately 93.4 million square feet of paved surfaces. To assist planning maintenance needs, the entire pavement network is organized into two networks (arterial and local) depending on their importance in the whole roadway system. The arterial and local networks include 129.3 miles (28 percent) and 324.6 miles (72 percent), respectively. To be consistent with the City General Plan Circulation Element Master Plan of Streets and Highways and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH), the streets in each network are ranked based on their functional classes; the arterial network is comprised of Major, Primary, Secondary arterial streets and Collector Streets, and the local network is comprised of Residential and Non -Residential streets. Additionally, these streets are classified by surface types —Asphalt Concrete (AC) or Portland Cement Concrete (PCC); and they are divided into 4,174 sections (refer to section 2.0 Methodology) for ease of tracking their pavement conditions, pavement history and M&R requirements. Table 3-1 and Figure 3-1 summarize the current City pavement networks information. Table 3-1: Entire Pavement Network Summary Je#work SurfaceType s Area (SF) Mileage Arter-al ...............................................................................a.......................................:....................................... AC 33.130.507 125.5 Arter-al ....................................... PCC ;....................................... €........................................ 484.500 ....................................... 3.8 Loca ...............................................................................a.......................................:....................................... AC 55.177.836 30.1 Loca PCC 4.590.069 24.5 Entire Pavement Network 93,382,912 453.4 Figure 3-1: Entire Pavement Network Summary Pavement Area Distribution (BF) by Street Classification Local AC; 55,177,936; 5 Local PCC; 4,590,069; 5% ■ Art erialAC ■Arterial PCC ■LoralAC ■LoraIPCC Arterial AC; ;J3D,507; 35% rial PCC; 5W; 1% City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 3-3-1 3.0 Pavement Network 3.1 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS One of the critical factors affecting the roadbeds and pavement deterioration rate is the quantity and associated vehicle weight of traffic utilizing the streets. The volume and type of vehicular usage for the abovementioned arterial network's four functional classifications are: • Major Arterial — Generally consists of a six -travel lane, divided roadway connecting various parts within the City of Santa Ana and adjacent cities. A major arterial is designed to accommodate between 30,000 and 50,600 vehicle trips daily. This facility type comprises approximately 58 centerline miles or 55.2 percent of City arterial network. • Primary Arterial — Generally consists of a four -lane, divided roadway serving as a major access route to regional destinations (such as downtown and similar major focal points within the City). A primary arterial is designed to accommodate between 20,000 and 30,000 vehicle trips daily. This facility type comprises approximately 9 centerline miles or 8.6 percent of City arterial network. • Secondary Arterial — Generally consists of a four -lane, undivided roadway serving intra- city mobility. A secondary arterial is designed to accommodate between 10,000 and 20,000 vehicle trips daily. This facility type comprises approximately 35 centerline miles or 33.3 percent of City arterial network. • Collector Street — Generally consists of a two-lane, undivided roadway. A collector street is designed to accommodate between 7,500 and 10,000 vehicle trips daily. This facility type comprises approximately 3 centerline miles or 2.9 percent of City arterial network. Figure 3-2: Arterial Street The local network is comprised of two functional classifications as described below: City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 3-3-2 3.0 Pavement Network • Non -Residential Street — Generally a low -speed two-lane, undivided roadway with parking allowed on both sides of the street. Businesses are located on both sides of the street. A non-residential street is designed to accommodate less than 6,000 vehicle trips daily. This facility type comprises approximately 32 centerline miles or 10 percent of City local network. • Residential Street — Generally a low -speed and low -volume two-lane, undivided roadway providing access to individual properties in a neighborhood. A residential street is designed to accommodate less than 6,000 vehicle trips daily. This facility type comprises approximately 285 centerline miles or 90 percent of City local network. Figure 3-3: Local Street City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 3-3-3 3.0 Pavement Network 3.2 PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX The City utilizes PCI output from StreetSaver as the rating mechanism to describe the City street pavement condition. This numerical index ranges from PCI of "0" for a failed and/or badly deteriorated pavement with virtually no remaining life to PCI of "100" for a pavement in perfect condition. A street section with proper engineering design and construction begins its life cycle as a new or recently rehabilitated street with a PCI of "100". As the condition of the street surface begins to deteriorate, the PCI decrease reflects the surface deterioration based on the signs of distress noted during the field surveys (refer to Section 2.0 Methodology and Appendix D: Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan). Although the surface treatment recommendation for each street section utilizes the PCI value as the basis, the PCI values shall be used for planning purposes only and are not intended to replace sound engineering judgment. An engineering review of the pavement condition shall take place prior to any actual construction work at a particular street section because the review may indicate that a particular pavement section needs attention earlier than the other street sections in its localized area. In general for planning and budgeting purposes, the correlation among the PCI, pavement quality and signs of distresses are summarized in Table 3-2: Table 3-2: Pavement Condition Index and Treatment Type Pavement Quality PCI Pavement Description The pavement is new or almost new with very little or no roughness Very Good 86-100 and surface distress (except utility patches if any), including minimal hairline cracks and/or weathering. The pavement structure is sound and no oxidation occurs. The pavement has minor roughness and little to slight surface Good 75-85 distresses (except utility patches if any), including slight cracking, slight to moderate weathering. The pavement structure is sound and no oxidation occurs. The pavement may have noticeable roughness and slight to Fair 60-74 moderate distresses are surfacing, including severe weathering, non -load -related cracking, depressions, and material loss. The pavement structure is becoming deficient minimal base failure). The pavement has noticeable roughness (significant surface distortion) and moderate to severe surface distresses, including Poor 41-59 severe weathering, load -related cracking (such as alligator cracking), depressions, material loss. The pavement structure is deficient (up to one-third base failure). The pavement has severe surface distresses, including large Very Poor 0-40 quantities of distortion and major and unsafe cracking (alligator cracking). The pavement structure is inadequate (over one-third failure). City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 3-3-4 3.0 Pavement Network 3.3 EXISTING PAVEMENT CONDITION Based on the inspections and data processing procedures mentioned in Section 2.0 Methodology, the majority of the local street's pavements (46 percent) currently have a PCI of at least 86 or in "Very Good" condition; this indicates that the City's local network continues to demonstrate high conditional values. Furthermore, the arterial network shows a slight improvement from 2022, these results show a slight increase in the entire network since the City's 2022 update due to sustaining of condition in the local network (refer to Table 3-3 for PCI distribution in 2020, 2022 compared to 2024). .................-2020 2022 2024 2020 2022 2024 2020 2022 2024 22.5% 26.2% 52.1% 54.5% .........................................................................,...........................................................................................................................................................;....................................... .. ... ... ....... . . Good 861CC 42-576 46.1% 40.9% 26.7% 45-89i Poor 41-59 1C.2'% 11.1'% 1D.9% 16.7% 22.9% 2D.D% 6-3% 6.9% TVA .........................................:..........................................................................................................._................................... .... ........................... .... ......... .... .... ... ....... .... .... .......... .... .... ... ....... ..... .... ............ Ver,`Poor C-4C I 7.1% 5.5% 5.2% ....}.... .....7.4%... ..._..... .....3.3%.... ....¢.... .....3.3%... .......... .....7.D%.... .....6.3%... ..... 59% Table 3-3: PCI Distribution Comparison (2020, 2022 vs. 2024) With the proper maintenance and rehabilitation application of the local and arterial streets, the majority of the entire pavement network is currently in "Very Good" condition (41 percent) with a PCI of at least 86, which is similar to the results from the previous update in 2022. Figure 3-4 summarizes the current PCI distribution for the entire pavement network. Figure 3-4: Current PCI Distribution (Entire Pavement Network) Fair, 15A%— Current PCI Distribution (Entire Network) Very Poor, 5.2% Poor, 10.9% Good, 27 6%_," ■ Very Good . Good ■ Fair . Poor . Very Poor -y Cood, 40.9% City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 3-3-5 3.0 Pavement Network As shown in Table 3-3, the majority of arterial streets' pavements are currently either in "Fair" (27.0 percent), "Good" (23.5 percent), or "Very Good" (26.2 percent) conditions. These results, which show a condition stabilization (no significant increase or decrease) in the top three condition categories of "Fair", "Good", and "Very Good" from 2022 to the current year (77 percent for all three categories), indicate that the City has been performing proper and timely maintenance and rehabilitation strategies for the arterial streets to maintain the percentage of streets in the top three condition categories (refer to Table 3-3 for the comparison). The sustaining in arterial street pavement conditions can be attributed to local funding and various funding sources from Orange County Transportation Authority, County of Orange, State of California, and other various agencies that the City has received in past years. Figure 3-5 shows the current PCI distribution of the arterial network. Figure 3-5: Current PCI Distribution (Arterial Network) Po Fair, 271 Current PCI Distribution (Arterial Network) Very Poor, ?, 3% Very Good. 25.2% . Very Good ■ Good ■ Fair ■ Poor ■ Very Poor 235% City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 3-3-6 3.0 Pavement Network The sustainment in the condition of the local pavement network in recent years resulted largely from the annual Local Street Preventative Maintenance Program, which commenced in 2014. Figure 3-6 shows the current PCI distribution of the local network. Figure 3-6: Current PCI Distribution (Local Network) Current PCI Distribution (Local Network) PGor, 7,1% Fair, 50.7X Goad, 243Y. _ Very Poor, 5.9% - Very Good - Good - Fair - Poor - Very Poor Very Good, 45.3% City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 3-3-7 3.0 Pavement Network Table 3-4 shows the breakdown of PCI distribution of the entire pavement network, and the arterial and local pavement networks individually, based on area and section mileage. Table 3-4: PCI Distribution Miles Area �So Miles Area �Sn Miles Area (SPA ood ........................................ 7Poor (86-1cc) ....... ...... ...... ....... ...... 34.1 .... ...... ....... ...... ..................... 7:693:402 ... ......... ............ ................... ............................................ 149.9 27,155,532 :.............. ............ .................. ............................................ 183.9 34:848:934 :.............. ............ .................. d ........................ (75-85) i...........................................................................................>...........................................................................r 30.7 8.471,159 96.6 17,489.737 127.3 25,960,896 (60-74) 36.d 9.651,897 35.0 6.623.946 71.0 16,275,843 r (41-59) ............................................................................................>....................................... 24.6 6.819,981 23.1 4,611.046 47.7 I 11,431,027 ........................................................ Very Poor (0-44) 3.9 ........ 978.569 ................. ... ...... ....a............. 20.1 .......................................... 3.887.644 ........ ................................................... .... ....... ....a 24.0 4,866.212 The pavement condition is generally measured by a weighted index (typically by area), referred to as Average Area -Weighted Pavement Condition Index (PCIaw), which is determined as follows: Where, X' 1(PCIi x Ai) PCIaw — Z,n_1 Ai PCIaw = Average area -weighted PCI PCIi = PCI of pavement section number i Ai = Area of section number i n = Total number of pavement sections Based on the formula above, the City's current entire pavement network is in "Good" condition with a PCIaw of 76.3. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 3-3-8 4.0 MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION STRATEGIES With 454 miles and 4,174 street sections, the City develops a comprehensive, fully -integrated PMP utilizing the inventory data along with the inspection information, M&R options and their associated costs, and predictions about future pavement condition from StreetSaver to determine optimal time for maintenance and rehabilitation needs. Due to limited available fiscal resources, the City needs to perform cost-effective M&R strategies to maintain the pavement networks. Additionally, pavement preservation, which is an important aspect of the PMP considering the limited funding, will be included in the overall decision -making process. 4.1 TREATMENT TYPES AND ASSOCIATED COSTS The pavement preservation and M&R considerations utilized by the City are categorized into localized, global and major M&R. Localized M&R can be applied as a stop -gap measure or a preventive measure, including routine maintenance such as crack -filling and pothole repairs. Global M&R, which is cost effective when applied as a preventive measure, are methods applied to the entire pavement sections to slow the rate of deterioration and improve current PCI, including applying slurry seal to the existing pavement surface. Major M&R, which is often economically applicable to deteriorated pavements, pavements deteriorating at a rapid rate, and pavements subjected to a change in traffic loading, refer to methods correcting or improving structural and functional requirements, including cold -milling and overlay, cold -in -place recycling, cement treated base, and/or full depth reconstruction. The City currently utilizes the following M&R treatment methods: • Crack Seal — Crack Seal is applicable for newer pavements with cracks beginning to form. Since water is the most destructive element to a roadway pavement, this treatment utilizes asphalt materials bonding to the crack walls to restrict water penetration into the underlying base and sub -base layers to reduce further pavement deterioration. This preventive M&R treatment, which will extend the pavement life by three to five years, saves money by delaying the expense of major reconstructive pavement work. • Slurry Seal — Slurry Seal, which applies to pavement with minimal surface distress, such as minor/low severity cracks, provides a new wearing surface to extend the pavement life. This treatment is a mix blend of high -quality crushed aggregates (sand -like), asphalt emulsion, water and mineral fillers, spreading over the entire pavement surface. The layer of slurry seal (ranging from 1/8" to 3/8" thick) prevents further oxidization and water from further deteriorating the asphalt concrete surface and subgrade, corrects raveling, and improves skid resistance. • Thin Overlay — Thin Overlay is a maintenance overlay applicable to pavement with moderate cracking where preventive M&R is no longer effective. This treatment involves partially milling or grinding the edge of shoulder (typically 6 feet), sealing the cracks to retard reflective cracking, and placing a thin layer of hot -mixed asphalt concrete (up to two inches for streets in both arterial and local networks) over the existing pavement surface. The thin layer of AC improves the skid resistance and roadway's performance, and corrects the crown and drainage features. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 4-4-1 4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies • Structural Overlay — Structural Overlays, which applies to moderate to severe pavement cracking with little or no deficiency in the foundation layers, entails cold -milling / grinding the surface to a depth of up to three inches for arterial streets and two inches for local streets, removing localized failed areas, and placing a thick layer of hot -mixed AC (typically four to five inches for arterial streets and three to four inches for local streets). The new AC pavement section smooth the ride performance, improves skid resistance, correct the crown and drainage features, increases pavement structural capacity. • Cold -In -Place Recycling (CIR) — CIR, which applies to moderate to severe pavement cracking with little or no deficiency in the pavement structure, is a process rehabilitating pavement by recycling it in place. The top layer of pavement is removed with a milling (grinding) machine to a specified depth (typically three to four inches). The removed material is then crushed, sorted and mixed with a specially formulated asphalt emulsion. This emulsion mixes with the milled pavement and acts as a binder to form the new CIR pavement. This new mixture is placed on the roadway by a paver and compacted as a new and more durable asphalt base course. Finally, a thin overlay of conventional asphalt pavement is placed over the CIR to seal it and provide a new wear to improve ride performance and drainage features and increase pavement structural capacity. • Cement -Treated Base (CTB) — CTB is applicable when the distress evidence at the surface indicates failure in the pavement structure or subgrade (the roadway completely failed with crumbling surface pavement), which is not correctable by less extensive construction. Due to its long curing time, this treatment method typically should be applied to low -moderate traffic areas and/or moderate traffic areas with more than one lane per direction with a low volume of large vehicles. CTB involves grinding the existing roadway surface and base into pieces to a prescribed depth (typically 14 to 20 inches for arterial streets and 8 to 11 inches for local streets), which are mixed with cement and water to be used as a base course. A thin overlay of conventional asphalt pavement is then placed over the CTB base to provide a new wear for improving ride performance and drainage features and increase pavement structural capacity. • Full Depth Reconstruction (FDR) — FDR is applicable when the distress evidence at the surface indicates failure in the pavement structure or subgrade (the roadway completely failed with crumbling surface pavement), which is not correctable by less extensive construction. This treatment involves removal of existing layers of asphalt AC, PCC, and/or base to a prescribed depth recommended by geotechnical engineering pavement analysis and placement of conventional flexible pavement section. In general, local residential and non-residential streets are removed to depths of six inches and eight inches, respectively; a depth of 10 inches are removed on secondary arterial and collector streets; a depth of 12 inches are removed on primary arterial streets; and a depth of 16 inches are removed on major arterial streets. The actual depth depends on anticipated traffic loading, soil conditions, and roadway functional classifications. This treatment is by far the most expensive form of M&R strategies to increase pavement structural capacity. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 4-4-2 4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies Table 4-1: Cost by Condition (Arterial Network) Condition (PCI) Functional Classification Surface Cost $/SF 75 - 85 Secondary / Collector Primary Major AC $2.95 60 - 74 Secondary / Collector AC $6.39 41 - 59 Secondary / Collector AC $12.28 Primary AC $13.70 Major AC $15.11 41-59 Secondary / Collector PCC $26.46 0-40 Secondary / Collector AC $42.20 Primary AC $50.46 Major AC $66.96 Secondary / Collector PCC $26.46 Table 4-2: Cost by Condition (Local Network) Condition PCI Functional Classification Surface Cost ($/SF) 75 - 85 Residential Non -Residential AC $1.93 60 - 74 Residential Non -Residential AC $4.79 Residential AC $9.81 41 - 59 Non -Residential AC $9.81 Residential AC $21.82 Non -Residential AC $21.82 0-40 Residential/Non-Res PCC $23.79 Residential Non -Residential PCC $23.79 City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 4-4-3 4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies It is imperative for the City to receive the proper amount and type of funding to perform the M&R strategies as a plan to preserve the roadway pavement system in good condition. The plan is to apply a slurry seal coat to new or recently rehabilitated streets at regular intervals, usually seven to ten years. After a couple slurry seal coats, maintenance (thin) overlay or structural overlay shall be utilized to address structural issues. Every street will fail eventually or reach a point where it is more cost-effective to reconstruct than to repair. The roadway functional classification (refer to Section 3.0 Pavement Network) and the original design life of a particular street section will determine the intervals and treatment types. Additionally, streets with higher speeds, traffic volumes, and/or loads, will demand a larger pavement section. To account for the differences in pavement section across the spectrum of streets within the entire pavement network, the streets are grouped into M&R families according to their functional classification and/or surface type and a cost by condition is applied. The cost by condition for the arterial and local networks is shown in Table 4-1 and Table 4-2, respectively. These unit costs per SF include the soft costs of design, inspection, and construction engineering and are compiled utilizing current projects as a basis for costs. As the pavement ages, the PMP is designed to predict the roadway pavement's PCI based on the deterioration curves (refer to Section 2.0 Methodology). Additionally, the PMP, which is a tool to assist the City in making decisions when planning pavement M&R, involves scheduling pavement maintenance and rehabilitation before pavements deteriorate to a condition where reconstruction is the only solution. Based on Figure 2-1 in Section 2.0 Methodology showing how pavement generally deteriorates and the relative M&R cost (refer to Table 4-1 and Table 4-2) at various times throughout the pavement life, the critical PCI is established at 60. The critical PCI is defined as the PCI value after which the pavement section is expected to deteriorate rapidly with age, or the rate of PCI loss increases significantly with time, and the unit cost of repair greatly increases; therefore, the threshold for M&R decisions are considered at the critical PCI value since the cost of maintaining the pavement above the critical PCI value before the deterioration occurs is much less compared to maintaining pavements after substantial deterioration has occurred. Planned M&R strategies, essentially preventing pavements from reaching deteriorated conditions, helps the City stretch and maximize the use of City budgets and prolong the life of the pavements. StreetSaver utilizes the inventory database combined with the inspection information, M&R options along with their associated costs, and the deterioration curves predicting future pavement condition to calculate the chosen budget activity to reflect the best pavement management practices and costs. The City's PMP goal is to maintain a pavement system network with an optimal PCI of 75 ("Good" Condition) or better. The City's pavement system currently has 68 percent of the pavement sections in "Good" or "Very Good" condition (refer to Section 3.0 Pavement Network). The PMP will recommend priority list of maintenance treatments annually to bring all City streets to at least "Good" condition. The preventive M&R treatments, which are inexpensive treatments to extend pavement life cycle, have minimal costs since they are applied prior to pavement deterioration to "Poor" and "Very Poor" conditions. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 4-4-4 4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies 4.2 FUNDING The City has estimated total funding amounts of $86.9 million and $51.6 million for the pavement expenditures of the arterial and local networks, respectively, for the next seven years (refer to City CIP on a separate document for further details). Generally, the future revenues for City street preventive and major M&R programs are from the following funding sources: • Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) — The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 returns income tax funds to cities and counties to develop viable urban communities, primarily for the benefit of low and moderate income people. This U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development program gives priority to activities that help to eliminate blight, with emphasis on residential areas. CDBG projects are carried out by several operating departments with the City and by sub -agents. Public hearings are held to plan projects for each fiscal fear. The selected projects are recommended by citizens, commissioners, and staff. • Gas Tax — Gas Tax funds are derived from the Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax (or Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA)). Motorists pay a tax for fuel consumption. It is apportioned to cities according to population and can only be utilized in the maintenance and construction of the street system. • Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA— Streets and Highways Code Sec 2030 et sec.) includes funds from the following taxes enacted by Senate Bill 1 Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017: the 12 cent gasoline excise tax, 20 cent diesel fuel excise tax, transportation improvement fees. These new gas tax funding sources contribute funding on an annual basis. • Local Street Bond Fund — In 2007, the City issued a $60 million bond as a certificate of participation (COP) against Gas Tax revenue to create the Residential Street Repair Program to repair and rehabilitate neighborhood streets Citywide. • Measure M2 — On November 7, 2006, voters approved the renewal of the Measure M half -cent sales tax (Measure M2), extending the program over a 30-year period beginning in 2011. In addition to the original three program components, this generation of the Measure M Transportation Plan expands the program to include Environmental Cleanup and Taxpayer Safeguards and Audits. To receive revenues from the one -half -cent sales tax, cities and the County of Orange must coordinate their land use and transportation decisions, establish cooperative transportation planning programs with neighboring jurisdictions, develop Growth Management programs, and guarantee that transportation funds are used for transportation purposes only. • Measure M2 — Competitive — The competitive portion of the Measure M2 consists of the following programs: Regional Capacity Program (RCP), Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (TSSP), and several transit programs. • Measure M2 — Fairshare — This local fair share program returns a portion of the Measure M2 Streets and Roads revenues to the cities and the County of Orange once specific program requirements are met. Disbursement amounts are based on a formula that accounts for population, street mileage, and sales tax collected. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 4-4-5 4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies • Refuse Collection — Funds received in the course of business for the public collection and disposal of refuse. The City adopted a Vehicle Impact Fee program to provide funding for necessary improvements to the City's streets to offset the wear and tear impact of heavy vehicle travel. 4.3 BUDGET ALTERNATIVES Having determined the needs of the City local and arterial networks and the City fiscal -year budget for the next seven years, the City utilizes StreetSaver to evaluate impacts of various budget alternatives — existing budget in City CIP, budget to maintain the current PClaw over a seven year plan, and budget to improve the current PClaw by one point or better over a seven-year plan. StreetSaver has the capability of forecasting the effects of different budget alternatives on PCI and deferred maintenance (backlog). By examining the effects of these indicators, these "what - if" analyses clearly identify the advantages and disadvantages of different funding levels and preventive and major M&R strategies. The following guide is provided for interpreting the individual output in Budget Analysis tables below. • PCI w/o Existing Funding — PCI yielded as a result of no preventive or major M&R work during the listed fiscal year. This value is provided for comparison purposes and is intended to be used as the baseline PCI. • PCI w/ Existing Funding — PCI yielded as a result of preventive and major M&R work with existing funding during the listed fiscal year. • PCI w/ Alternative Funding — PCI yielded as a result of preventive and major M&R work with existing plus additional funding during the listed fiscal year. • Preventive M&R Existing Funding — Existing funding for preventive M&R work during the listed fiscal year. • Major M&R Existing Funding — Existing funding for major M&R work during the listed fiscal year. • Major M&R Additional Funding — Additional funding for major M&R work required to reach the listed goal during the listed fiscal year. • Total Existing Funding — Sum of existing funding during the listed fiscal year. • Total Alternative Funding — Sum of existing funding plus additional funding required to reach the listed goal during the listed fiscal year. • Backlog — Total estimated M&R work left unfunded during the listed fiscal year. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 4-4-6 4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies 4.3.1 EXISTING FUNDING This alternative represents the impacts of the City's current CIP budget on the entire pavement network, and the arterial and local pavement networks independently, for the next seven years. Currently, there are approximately $86.9 million and $51.3 million for the pavement expenditures in the arterial and local networks, respectively, for the next seven years. The City's main objective is keeping street sections from falling into the reconstruction category ("Very Poor" condition), at which point typically costs three to four times more per SF than resurfacing. Therefore, the selection of streets for M&R treatments during each fiscal year involves StreetSaver output, engineering judgment and experience, and available budget. With a limited existing budget over the next seven years from FY 2024/25 to FY 2030/31, the entire pavement network will sustain within the "Good" condition by slightly deteriorating from a PCl, , of 76.3 to a PCI,w of 75.2. Not only does the pavement condition deteriorate, but the entire pavement network's backlog will increase by 59 percent by FY 2030/31 as shown in Table 4-3. This information indicates that the City is facing the challenge of securing adequate, sustainable funding for the M&R program to keep up with the increasing rate of deteriorating streets. Although the arterial and local networks, independently, will reduce the PCI,w by at least one point during each of the next seven FYs with the existing budgeted funding as compared to the baseline alternative (without any funding), the pavement will deteriorate in a similar fashion to the entire pavement network. Furthermore, the local and arterial networks will remain in "Good" condition. Additionally, the current level of funding is insufficient to stabilize the backlog since the unfunded deferred M&R projects will increase by 25 percent for the arterial network, increase by 34 percent for the local network by FY 2030/31 and 59% for the entire network. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 4-4-7 4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies Table 4-3: Existing Funding (Entire Pavement Network) Fiscal Year PCI.W w/o Existing Funding PCI.W w/ Existing Funding Preventive M&R Existing Funding Major M&R Existing Funding Total Existing Funding Backlog Present 76 76 - - - $285,218 2024/25 75 79 $1,762 $18,446 $20,208 $267,345 2025/26 74 80 $4,269 $15,492 $19,760 $295,440 2026/27 74 78 $4,126 $15,634 $19,760 $322,919 2027/28 72 77 $3,505 $16,255 $19,760 $350,112 2028/29 71 77 $2,722 $17,039 $19,760 $377,325 2029/30 69 76 $4,099 $15,662 $19,760 $416,225 2030/31 67 75 $2,935 $19,467 $19,760 $453,425 TOTAL $20,776 $117,994 $138,770 Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000. Table 4-4: Existing Funding (Arterial Network) Fiscal Year PCI.W w/o Existing Funding PCI.W w/ Existing Funding Preventive M&R Existing Funding Major M&R Existing Funding Total Existing Funding Backlog Present 73 73 2024/25 72 73 $219 $12,473 $12,693 $109,612 2025/26 71 74 $684 $11,747 $12,431 $121,131 2026/27 71 74 $1,121 $11,299 $12,420 $132,397 2027/28 69 74 $47 $12,333 $12,377 $143,546 2028/29 68 74 $39 $12,341 $12,380 $154,703 2029/30 66 74 $368 $11,942 $12,311 $170,652 2030/31 64 75 $0 $12,333 $12,333 $185,904 TOTAL $2,476 $84,468 $86,945 Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 4-4-8 4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies Table 4-5: Existing Funding (Local Network) Fiscal Year PCI.W w/o Existing Funding PCI.W w/ Existing Funding Preventive M&R Existing Funding Major M&R Existing Funding Total Existing Funding Backlog Present 78 78 - - - 2024/25 77 81 $1,543 $5,945 $7,488 $157,734 2025/26 76 82 $3,585 $3,737 $7,322 $174,310 2026/27 75 80 $3,005 $4,342 $7,347 $190,521 2027/28 73 79 $3,461 $3,913 $7,374 $206,566 2028/29 72 78 $2,683 $4,699 $7,382 $222,621 2029/30 70 78 $3,730 $3,733 $7,463 $245,573 2030/31 68 77 $293 $7,134 $7,428 $267,521 TOTAL $18,300 $33,504 $51,804 Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 4-4-9 4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies 4.3.2 ALTERNATIVE FUNDING LEVELS REQUIRED To MAINTAIN EXISTING PCI With existing funding of just under $139 million for the entire pavement network over the seven- year period from FY 2024/25 through FY 2030/31, additional funding is required to maintain the existing PCIaW of 76.3. This alternative provides an available prioritized list of streets with recommended M&R treatment to allow the City to hand select if unforeseen funds become available at some point in the future. As illustrated in Table 4-6, a total of $1.7 million in additional funds calculated at about $237,000 annually would be needed; thus, providing for a total alternative funding level of just over $140.4 million over the seven-year period. Furthermore, with this additional funding, the backlog for FY 2024/25 of $285.2 million would be increased by about 56 percent to $446.1 million for FY 2030/31. Demonstrated in Table 4-7 and Table 4-8, 44 percent ($1.7 million) of the additional funding ($756,000) would be applied to the arterial network and 56 percent ($944,000) would be applied to the local network. As a result, the existing PCIaW would be maintained at 76.0; 72 and 78 for the arterial and local networks, respectively. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 4-4-10 4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies Table 4-6: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Maintain Existing PCI (Entire Pavement Network) Fiscal Year PCIaW w/o Existing Funding PCIaW w/ Alternative Funding Preventive M&R Existing Funding Major M&R Existing Funding Additional Funding Total Alternative Funding Backlog Present 76 76 - - - - $285,218 2024/25 75 77 $1,762 $18,446 -$333 $19,875 $272,310 2025/26 74 78 $4,269 $15,492 -$772 $18,989 $298,192 2026/27 74 78 $4,126 $15,634 -$244 $19,515 $326,443 2027/28 72 77 $3,505 $16,255 -$116 $19,644 $355,314 2028/29 71 77 $2,722 $17,039 $478 $20,239 $375,447 2029/30 69 77 $4,099 $15,662 $883 $20,644 $412,880 2030/31 67 76 $2,935 $19,467 $1,763 $21,523 $446,110 TOTAL $20,776 $117,994 $1,659 $140,429 Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000. Table 4-7: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Maintain Existing PCI (Arterial Network) Fiscal Year PCI. w/o Existing Funding PCIaW w/ Alternative Funding Preventive M&R Existing Funding Major M&R Existing Funding Additional Funding Total Alternative Funding Backlog Present 73 73 - - - - 2024/25 72 74 $219 $12,473 $0 $12,692 $119,512 2025/26 71 74 $684 $11,747 $0 $12,431 $110,845 2026/27 71 73 $1,121 $11,299 $0 $12,420 $124,646 2027/28 69 73 $47 $12,333 $0 $12,377 $139,410 2028/29 68 73 $39 $12,341 $192 $12,572 $147,778 2029/30 66 72 $368 $11,942 $354 $12,665 $170,215 2030/31 64 72 $0 $12,333 $705 $13,038 $182,404 TOTAL $2,476 $84,469 $1,251 $88,195 Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 4-4-11 4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies Table 4-8: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Maintain Existing PCI (Local Network) Fiscal Year PCIa,, w/o Existing Funding PClaw w/ Alternative Funding Preventive M&R Existing Funding Major M&R Existing Funding Additional Funding Total Alternative Funding Backlog Present 78 78 2024/25 77 79 $1,543 $5,945 $0 $7,488 $152,798 2025/26 76 79 $3,585 $3,737 $0 $7,322 $187,347 2026/27 75 80 $3,005 $4,342 $0 $7,347 $201,797 2027/28 73 79 $3,461 $3,913 $0 $7,374 $215,904 2028/29 72 79 $2,683 $4,699 $287 $7,669 $227,669 2029/30 70 79 $3,730 $3,733 $530 $7,993 $242,665 2030/31 68 78 $293 $7,134 $1,057 $8,485 $263,706 TOTAL $18,300 $33,504 $409 $53,678 Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 4-4-12 4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies 4.3.3 ALTERNATIVE FUNDING LEVELS REQUIRED TO IMPROVE PCI With existing funding of just under $139 million for the entire pavement network over the seven- year period from FY 2024/25 through FY 2030/31, additional funding is required to improve the existing PCIaW for FY 2024/25 of 76.0 by one point or better. As illustrated in Table 4-9, a total of $3.6 million in additional funds calculated at about $508,400 annually would be needed; thus providing for a total alternative funding level of over $142.3 million over the seven-year period. Furthermore, with this additional funding, the backlog for FY 2024/25 of $285.2 million would increase about 54 percent to $440.3 million for FY 2030/31. Demonstrated in Table 4-10 and Table 4-11, 39 percent ($3.6 million) of the additional funding ($1.4 million) would be applied to the arterial network and 61 percent ($2.2 million) would be applied to the local network. As a result, the existing PCIaW would be improved to 75.0 and 80.0 for the arterial and local networks, respectively. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 4-4-13 4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies Table 4-9: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Improve PCI (Entire Pavement Network) Fiscal Year PCIaW w/o Existing Funding PCIaW w/ Alternative Funding Preventive M&R Existing Funding Major M&R Existing Funding Additional Funding Total Alternative Funding Backlog Present 76 76 - - - 2024/25 75 79 $1,762 $18,446 $0 $20,208 $267,345 2025/26 74 80 $4,269 $15,492 $0 $19,760 $295,440 2026/27 74 79 $4,126 $15,634 $453 $20,213 $320,811 2027/28 72 79 $3,505 $16,255 $1,073 $20,834 $348,661 2028/29 71 78 $2,722 $17,039 $573 $20,333 $371,787 2029/30 69 78 $4,099 $15,662 $655 $20,415 $409,555 2030/31 67 78 $2,935 $19,467 $804 $20,565 $440,253 TOTAL $20,776 $117,994 $3,558 $142.329 Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000. Table 4-10: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Improve PCI (Arterial Network) Fiscal Year PCIaW w/o Existing Funding PCIaW w/ Alternative Funding Preventive M&R Existing Funding Major M&R Existing Funding Additional Funding Total Alternative Funding Backlog Present 73 73 2024/25 72 73 $219 $12,473 $0 $12,693 $109,612 2025/26 71 74 $684 $11,747 $0 $12,431 $121,131 2026/27 71 74 $1,121 $11,299 $181 $12,601 $131,533 2027/28 69 74 $47 $12,333 $429 $12,806 $142,951 2028/29 68 74 $39 $12,341 $229 $12,609 $152,433 2029/30 66 74 $368 $11,942 $262 $12,573 $167,918 2030/31 64 75 $0 $12,333 $320 $12,653 $180,504 TOTAL $2,476 $84.469 $1,422 $88.366 JE Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 4-4-14 4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies Table 4-11: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Improve PCI (Local Network) Fiscal Year PCIaW w/o Existing Funding PCI.W w/ Alternative Funding Preventive M&R Existing Funding Major M&R Existing Funding Additional Funding Total Alternative Funding Backlog Present 78 78 - - - - - 2024/25 77 81 $1,543 $5,945 $0 $7,488 $157,734 2025/26 76 82 $3,585 $3,737 $0 $7,322 $174,310 2026/27 75 83 $3,005 $4,342 $272 $7,800 $189,279 2027/28 73 82 $3,461 $3,913 $644 $8,447 $205,710 2028/29 72 81 $2,683 $4,699 $344 $7,955 $219,355 2029/30 70 81 $3,730 $3,733 $393 $8,118 $241,637 2030/31 68 80 $293 $7,134 $483 $8,232 $259,749 TOTAL $18,300 $33,504 $2,136 $55,362 Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000. City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 4-4-15 APPENDIX A: ENTIRE PAVEMENT NETWORK PCI REPORT City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII5treets Sorted by F.- Class, Name Order (A-Z) __-Name C..Cn -_-_ ,Cl Q hb.,h..d, yaw ___-_--- wmm Load PCr F.. m,o e, PCr Oche, ��®gym©a ��Mw M-mr,"'m ® gym®mo l��®���Ma rmygm, Own M-� Own M-�Mffrm M-7-mm����oa mmrm mmm���� wmmmm�mmmmrm �,��oa WnTr WnTr�����m©a WnTr ®O®gym©a ��� gym©a �m �mamo ��0�®m©a Nmr.m.��®�oa WnTr M,�M®gym©a®�mo�o wwm,�M WnTr M,�MWMMTF���m©a sm7f M,�Mw M-mmm,�� ��Mmmwmmm�®gym©a EM,M,��MTMMMM ��m©a Emmy��00m Page 1 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Class, Name Order (A-Z) C—ID ® oa .Cl— e�anno,no— aw �m .,- oad tea PCr Owe, � �a��moma I FMT mmmmm�mmamm�mm���oa �m a �m��ommo , ffmw. eee ®mmwvmr=�m��o , ffmmm rMyr M,moa ��©a mmwv��mv��moa �a��mamo AMMI mmmrm�mm©a ���oa Umm ���= ���M.TMT, �������oa prT. mmm�0�moa Emm.r.2��MTM ��� ��00my..M.T. �,MrwMT mmm�m®moo �m��m®ma mrmmm� �a��omma Page 2 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) .Cl nno,no— aw wmm —d va E...— va Oche, �����®moo • �a®�ma�a Or"M MINEWIT�����©a ��m©a mmmmm�mmmgm���moa my"Or's MOKUTT"Wr���moa mmmmm�mmmwm���m©a mmmmm�mmmgmm=���oa Mrm= mmm ���Mrm= mmm ��m��oa mFFwrrm�mmF"rrlT��®moo ��moa Page 3 045 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Class, Name Order (A-Z) �moa®000 .Cl e�ando.nooa. aw wmm oad va E...— va Owe. MUTT ��M��oa �m�mama mmmm Mill ORTM, lvmmrrmmmmm;wrsrrmlm����©a ORTMEMMOMMm®gym©a Page 4 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Class, Name Order (A-Z) ������m©o m-aO .Cl ewndo,nooa, aw �m��mom� wmm oad va E.—. va Owe, ��m©o ,. M ORION ON : ; Page 5 of 4S City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Class, Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl— nno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, a NAM, N�����m©o Page 6 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl ewnno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, ��m©a®��oo�o ml®�rrml mmm���oa �� Mr �m©a®��momo Or.7m, lv��m©o Or.7m, lv�����©o �����©a Or.7m, lv����©o ma��mo�o ��mwrm �mmmro Or.7m, lvm���©o ��Mmmwm �,,Mw ���M,M, ���®�©o � �Mm � � ���©o ���M,MR � Fmml wmrr. M.�Mff M.M. Page 8 of 4S City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl ewnno.nooa. aw wmm oad va Owe. . TOP N r HIM������©a mm��mo�o NMI Page 11 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) �����m©o m-aO .aa„ ewndo,nooa, aw m®���000 wmm oad va E.—. va Owe, , wrm, M,��©a®��mo�o rorr I M=Tl m I Page 12 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) C—ID :aa„ ewndo,nooa, aw wmm oad PCr E.—. PCr Owe, IT, .. Mwm Opur Opur wrm,������©o ���Mvff,rrlwmr ���oo Page 13 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) .Cl ewnno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, , ���©o Mrm- mm®gym®mo Page 14 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) C—ID .Cl a hb.,nooa, aw wmm oad PCr Owe, �������©a • • ........ .. �a��m®tea �������©a •. :......... .: �®��m®mom Page 15 ot45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) ���Mmm C—ID I .aa„ ewnno,nooa, aw m® wmm mo oad PCr Owe, o Nor, M,���m©a Nor, M,�� m®�oo�o Nor, M,��FVXTMM EN11511115 ROM Nor, M,�Nor, ���©a®��mo�o M,��FVXTMM �a mmnmm� mmmm,w ... PIE,... wr-m- V���©a®�mo�o wr-m- V����©a®�mom� Mm 111 MWTF ��M�m©o m®�moma ��MWMT, Mr.��®�oa �m��mmmo Page 17 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl ewnno,nooa, aw wmm oad Owe, �Mr M.M.-��m©o ��m©o MOW PHROMIT"IMINININ mmm �© •: �a���000 � MMMI ���®gym©a • : • ....... . ; �a��mo�o Mmmm,�� mmoo mm��mo�o a ® mama MOM MMrr m©a m®��m®moo WFTWM������©o Page 19 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) MOM m-aO © o .Cl., ewnno.nooa. aw wmm ®mo oad va Owe. WPM rmm,WPM rmm=rlWPM M,��rmm7ffrl •. .... 00mom MOM MOM�����m©o PMMMT, mmmmm�m���©a®�mo�o Page 20 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl e hb.,nooa, aw wmm —d va Owe, �rra-Wwn-r I I�©o wmll,rm���®gym©o wmrrm��rmnrl��m©o mm��m�ma Page 21 ot4S City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl., ewnno.nooa. aw wmm oad va Owe. �o WFW RE R Wor,�®��©oRE m ®��mo�® �� wmrm,����©o®��mo�o VWWM wurr wurr a ®®®moo®moo VrOWTIr Mrr-r Mrr-r Mmffr Page 22 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) ���MnT m-aO .Cl ewnno,nooa, aw wmm mo oad Owe, o ... mmo MHMIMM �a wr.m.�����©a®�mo�o NOT,�����©o wr.m.����©a wr.m ���®��©aW PH � wr-m-���®®m©a ma�o NOT,��®®m©o NOT,�����m©o �mo�o ffmlm NOT lv���©a®��mo�o arm. ll����©o NOT lv����©a ���FTMVVWFM���©o®��mom� �m®mom Wvmm— Ormr,�����m©o Page 23 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl ewnno.nooa. aw wmm oad Owe. OrmIr OrmIr MIN .1 On Page 24 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl— nno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, Nam. V��� Wmm wm � ����©a •: �m��mm�� Warr wmr ml������oa •: �m��m�®a w"��m©o �a�o�mo ����m©a wm-r ml��Rmm a Rmm Rmm Rmm Page 25 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .aa„ ewnno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, Muir Null FT Num, lv����©a Num, V� Num, V����©a Num, V� I' Num,���®gym©o �mo�o Page 27 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) C—ID .Cl ewnn-ooa. I.,th wmm oad Owe, MTMT ®m©a �a��momm rw ��� • ���©a ® �mm®o WMTTZ� EM.T. ml��Fr"T WOM, V�����m©o MOM V�� MOM V�� MOM V�� MOM V�� MON MOM V�� Orr.w. M,������©o ®ate®oom® Page 28 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .aa„ ewnno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, gym®mo FTMW NOW�����m©o Ell, IMININ MOMm���m©a fiffilffill MINI Page 29 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) �� C—ID � .aa„ a hb.,nooa, aw wmm mo oad va Owe, o ,..... mm�o®mo TO I TO ,..... ma��om�o TO I TO Page 31 ot4S City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl ewnno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, mm��m®moo MINI! fffiffiffill Page 32 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .aa„ ewnno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, NOWN 1-fiffilffill fill" mom WON a ® memo ������©o MMTMT Or" lv��©a®��mo�m Or"V Or"V Or"V .: Page 33 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) C—ID .Cl ewndo,nooa, aw wmm oad va E.—. Owe, M% mm �mo�o rmq rmq �����m©o ®m®gym®mo rmra ���� ra rmq �mo�o IN11511115 MOM wmr,v ��m©o Noll, 01 IN11511115 MOMwmmv �mmmmm MOWma��m®mo Page 34 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) C—ID .Cl a hb.,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, or ��m©a �m�oomo Orrm, mmwrmm���m©o Page 3S ot4S City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl e hb.,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, ���©a®���000 WVTMM��©o®���000 �� �� ����m©a NUT, M,� WVTT w"r, M,� NEW, M,� F-MTr ���� FTm©o ma��mm�o MTr Orrm, ml���MTr Orrm, ml�����m©o ma���000 ���� MTr a maw �000 F-MTr F-MTr mm��oamo F-MTr mmmm,��Fffm,m��©o Page 36 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) C—ID .Cl., ewnno.nooa. I.,th wmm oad va Owe. ��m©a®�oamo ��m©allo 11, 11 l a, 11 l No 1, a, I ma��m®mo ME m �m�mm�o Nmr,�����m©o a mm��m®moo VTmr VTmr VTmr VTmr Page 38 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) C—ID .Cl— nno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, VMmrl a ®®®gym®mom FMTMT Warr Mmmm ����©a ��FMTMT FMTMT Fr, ORM ORM WN MMW Page 39 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl e hb-h—, aw wmm oad Owe. WrIM WrIM WrIM�����m©o mono .... mmmo �mumm wMmu mmm�� mmm mmm mmm mmm mmm mmm mmm mmm mmm �m a mm mom® mmm mmm m© ® mom® mffm WME, M,����©o®®�oom� mffm WME, M,� � ma��m®moo mffm EMIT M,� Page 40 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl— nno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Oth- ONO .. FTMMI ®m®gym®moo WMMNM�����m©o mmm WMMNM��®�©o WMMNM�����m©o mm��mm�a WMMNM�����m©o �m mmm � mm��mmoa mr?" M,����©a®��mom� WMT, M,����©o®��mo�o mr?" M,� WMT, M,� WMT, M,� �� WMT, M,���m©o mr?" M,� WMT, M,���m©o ��m©a®��mmma 0 0 0 m WIT :'n T.r.. Page 41 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) .Cl nno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, ®�©o ®mom®mmma Page 43 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) . Cl., ndo.nooa. aw wmm oad va E.—. va Owe. ���©o gym®®mom®o Page 44 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) ,aa„ nno,nooa, aw wmm —d Owe, Page 45 of 45 APPENDIX B: ARTERIAL STREETS 7-YEAR M&R PLAN City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program CN /SanraAna, to A)-WICollxtw )-Yea) Maintenan9e/FehaGlitotion Plan-FY2¢29-3] S—d by FY, roo. Cass, N-0,-(A ) /Collectors (MPAN) APPENDIX C: LOCAL STREETS 7-YEAR M&R PLAN City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program APPENDIX D: OCTA PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE REPORT - 2024 City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program DRAI-i REPORT UPDATED CITYWIDE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN Measure M2 2024-2031 Submitted to: City of Santa Ana, CA May 27, 2024 I� FRA53Rl1C�F1RE 6#lDl1P, IHC May 27, 2024 Mr. David Ramirez CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Subject: City of Santa Ana — OCTA Pavement Management Compliance Report 2024 Dear David: As part of the 2024 Update of the Pavement Management Plan (PMP) for the City of Santa Ana, eucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. is pleased to submit the PMP reporting required by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). This data/report will be submitted to OCTA as part of the City's required biennial PMP prior to June 30, 2024. The information contained in this report was used to develop the recommended improvement program for the pavement network. The report covers the following categories: • Pavement Management Plan Certification • Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan • Pavement Management Data Files (Included within the online Santa Ana StreetSaver batch file) • Pavement Management Plan that includes the following: • Average Pavement Conditions For Each Segment in the Network (PCI Report) The Pavement Condition Index report shows the present condition of each street in the pavement network (MPAH and Locals). In addition, the report shows the basic geometry of each street segment. • Seven-year Projected PCI Under Existing Funding Levels This report identifies the projected PCI's based on the local agencies current funding programs. This report details the PCI projects for the entire network, MPAH roadways and Local streets. • Seven-year Plan for Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Forecasted Maintenance Report) The Forecasted Maintenance Report projects the street maintenance activities required for the next seven years, broken down to show maintenance levels for all streets. This includes all scheduled projects provided by the City for fiscal years 2024 through 2031. • Alternative Funding Levels OCTA has requested two reports indicating the necessary funding to maintain the City's current weighted average PCI as well as the necessary funding to improve the weighted average PCI by one PCI point over the next seven years. • Backlog by Fiscal Year (re: unfunded restoration, rehabilitation and reconstruction) • Percentage of total network in each of the five condition categories based on centerline mileage • Local Match Reduction Reporting In order to be eligible for Local Match Reduction of 10%, the following must be submitted: o Measurable improvement of paved road conditions during the previous reporting period defined as an overall weighted (by area) average system improvement of one PCI point. o No reduction in the overall weighted (by area) average PCI in the MPAH or local street categories -or— o Have road pavement conditions, for the overall network, during the previous reporting period within the highest twenty (20%) of the scale for road pavement conditions in conformance with OCTA Ordinance No. 3, defined as a PCI of 75 or higher, otherwise defined as in "good condition". These reports will be submitted to the City of Santa Ana as part of the biennial Pavement Management Plan that is due prior to June 30, 2024. These reports will be packaged in a way that it will be easy for staff to review. All comments received from the City have been incorporated in the reports that follow. All of the City's issues and needs that were brought to our attention are included in the report. It has been a pleasure working with you and the City on updating your Pavement Management Plan. We look forward to the continued success of this project and future teamwork with City staff. Sincerely, Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. A � � Peter J. Bucknam Project Manager Infrastructure Management — GIS Services A BUCKNAM 35485eandr OceaseCA920 AW INFRASTRUCTUREGROUP, INC T ( wwbuckna}-narrrinc.co 9 nc�com City of Santa Ana, CA Page i 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - May 27, 2024 AGENCY SUBMITTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Pavement Management Plan Certification.............................................................................. 2 II. Executive Summary................................................................................................................. 3 III. Background......................................................................................................................4 IV. Current Pavement Conditions (PCI)......................................................................................... 7 V. Projected Pavement Conditions (PCI) — Current Budget......................................................... 8 VI. Alternative Funding Levels.......................................................................................................9 a. Maintain Existing Average Network PCI................................................................ 9 b. Improve Average Network PCI............................................................................... 9 VII. Current and Projected Backlog by Year of Pavement Maintenance Needs ............................ 9 VIII. Centerline Mileage................................................................................................................. 10 IX. Percentage of Network in Each of Five Condition Categories Based on Centerline mileage 10 X. Reduction in M2 Local Match................................................................................................ 11 XI. Appendix A — Seven -Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Current or Expected Funding Level.............................................................................. 12 XII. Appendix B —Complete Street Listing Current Conditions.................................................... 13 XIII. Appendix C —GIS Digital Data................................................................................................ 14 XIV. Appendix D — Quality Assurance / Quality Control Plan........................................................15 • Introduction......................................................................................................... 15 • Objectives............................................................................................................15 • Structure of QA/QC Plan......................................................................................15 • Condition Survey Procedures...............................................................................16 • Accuracy Required for Data Collection................................................................ 17 • Random and Systematic Re-Inspections..............................................................17 • PCI Comparison with Past Surveys.......................................................................18 • Inspector Qualifications and Experience.............................................................18 • Safety Procedures................................................................................................18 XV. Appendix E — Pavement Management Data Files............................................................. 19 XVI. Appendix F — GIS Maps — Current Conditions................................................................... 20 City of Santa Ana, CA Page 1 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — May 27, 2024 CITY OF SANTA ANA PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN - part of - COUNTYWIDE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN GUIDELINES (OCTA Guideline — March 2024) Prepared by: Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. Submitted to OCTA: June 30, 2024 City of Santa Ana, CA Page 2 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — May 27, 2024 I. Pavement Management Plan Certification The City of Santa Ana, CA certifies that is has a Pavement Management Plan in conformance with the criteria stated in the Orange County Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 3. This ordinance requires that a Pavement Management Plan be in place and maintained to qualify for allocation of revenues generated from renewed Measure M (M2). The plan was developed by Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. using StreetSaver, a pavement management system conforming to American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard D6433, and contains, at a minimum, the following elements: • Inventory of MPAH and Local routes reviewed and updated biennially. The last update of the inventory was completed on April, 2024 for the Arterial (MPAH) and April, 2024 for the Local streets; • Assessment of the pavement condition for all routes in the system, updated biennially. The last field review of the pavement condition was completed in April, 2024; • Percentage of all section of pavement needing: o Preventive Maintenance = 28.0%; o Rehabilitation = 26.1%; o Reconstruction = 5.3% • Budget needs for preventive maintenance, rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of deficient sections of pavement for: o Current biennial period $39,968,540; o following biennial period $41,047,100; • Funds budgeted or available for Preventive Maintenance, Rehabilitation and/or Reconstruction. o Current biennial period $39,968,540; o following biennial period $39,520,540; • Backlog by year of unfunded rehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction needs (see page 9); • The Pavement Management Plan is consistent with countywide pavement condition assessment standards as described in the OCTA Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines adopted by the OCTA Board of Directors. *An electronic copy of the Pavement Management Plan (with MicroPAVER or StreetSaver compatible files) has been or will be submitted with the certification statement. A copy of this certification is being provided to the Orange County Transportation Authority. Submitted by: Name (Print) Signed Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer Title Jurisdiction Date of Santa Ana City of Santa Ana, CA Page 3 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - May 27, 2024 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2024 UPDATE OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (PMP) As the City of Santa Ana's infrastructure continues to mature Public Works priorities such as street maintenance and redevelopment are key projects to City staff. With the City mostly built -out, wear and tear on the infrastructure will occur at an ever-increasing rate. Pavement aging through annual weathering, dynamic topology, and increased usage, compounded with the increased cost of performing maintenance and rehabilitation, add to the yearly operational budget of the pavement network. System sustainability can only be achieved through proactive scheduling and the implementation of cost-efficient pavement applications. In the upcoming years, as the City continues to build upon this study through future inspections and maintenance work history, Santa Ana pavement data will continue to provide reliable data to enhance the PMP through detailed Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Measure M2 funding analysis, City specific budgetary reporting and level of service reporting. Additionally, the City is considering a strong local overlay program for sections that are older than 20 years. The Santa Ana PMP has been developed to assist City personnel by providing current data on the City's street network and to develop cost-effective maintenance strategies to maintain a desirable level of pavement performance on a network scale, while optimizing the expenditure of limited fiscal resources. The project consisted of analyzing the City's 2022 dataset for quality and usability. In doing this, we were tasked to generate an updated Capital Improvement Program report that identified recommendations and deficiencies in the current operating and maintenance efforts put forth by the City. We surveyed all designated arterial, collector (MPAH) as well as all local / alley streets this past spring to assist the City in being compliant with OCTA — Measure M2 March 2024 guidelines. Additionally, we updated the City's unique Pavement Management — GIS layer that will continue to assist the City in analyzing pavement conditions and other attribute information through the use of MyRoads° and ESRI ArcMap. Bucknam Infrastructure Group reviewed the City's previous maintenance efforts and the current 2024-25 proposed street improvements for pertinent pavement information in order to generate a CIP report that identified recommendations and opportunities for improvement in the current operating and maintenance efforts put forth by the City. The result of these work efforts is this report. City of Santa Ana, CA Page 4 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — May 27, 2024 III. BACKGROUND (CITY OF SANTA ANA) In late 1990, voters throughout Orange County approved a %-cent sales tax for transportation improvements known as OC Measure M2. Funding for streets and roads are included within the sales tax and are distributed to local agencies through both formula and a competitive method. In late 2006, the renewal of OC Measure M2 was approved by voters that would continue the %-cent sales tax for thirty additional years, starting in 2011. The primary of goal of this report is to comply with established guidelines from OCTA to ensure that field data collection and reporting efforts performed by outside consultants or local agency staff are consistent. This is required in order that funding allocations can be reviewed and based on agency comparable pavement conditions. Specifically, our findings and recommendations provide Public Works administrators, managers and field personnel with: * PMP report consistent with OCTA OC Measure M2 guidelines * the present condition status of the pavement network (arterial, collector, residential and industrial streets), as a whole and of any grouping or individual component within the City; * a ranked list of all streets, or segments of streets, by condition within the network; * rehabilitation/maintenance needs of each street segment by year, * an optimized priority maintenance and rehabilitation program based on cost/benefit analysis and various levels of funding; * optimum annual pavement expenditure levels for pavement maintenance for the next seven (7) years; * prediction of the life -cycle performance of the City's pavement network and each individual street section; and * pavement condition data and analysis presented in GIS through MyRoads° and ESRI ArcMap Pavement is a dynamic structure where deterioration is constantly occurring; thus the pavement management system needs to be updated on a regular basis to reflect these changes in pavement conditions, pavement maintenance histories, and maintenance strategies based upon budgetary constraints. This report reflects our findings and recommendations for the PMP and the current state of the City's pavement network. Furthermore, we have recommended detailed funding and maintenance strategies for the arterial/collector and residential networks for next seven (7) years. Currently, based upon the City's maintenance practices and their associated unit costs, the total replacement value of the Santa Ana pavement network is $3,252,388,600. This value clearly indicates that the City's pavement network is the most valuable and essential asset to Santa Ana. The City's use of slurry seal, AC Overlay and R&R practices are typically applied every seven years depending on the street conditions. These frequencies are typical but the City may see increases in deterioration rates due to environmental, load and high average daily traffic (ADT) volumes. For example, high ADT volumes along one of Santa Ana's arterial streets will increase deterioration rates for a previously applied AC Overlay compared to a small local street. These deterioration rates are monitored through frequent inspections and functional class deterioration analysis within the City's PMP database. City of Santa Ana, CA Page 5 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - May 27, 2024 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Through our assessment of historical maintenance performed within the City and through our discussions with City staff the conditional data found across the network clearly shows that the City has applied strong, preventative maintenance strategies over the past decade. Pavement management involves frequent preventative maintenance; as pavement deteriorates through heavy traffic impacts, weathering and time, preventative maintenances (such as slurry seal, stop gap, etc.) have limited benefits. Our study has shown that key overlay projects will be needed over the next seven years to maintain the network's high level of condition. Currently, the City's two major streets networks (Arterial & Local) hold very high weighted PCI values; it is our recommendation that a proactive, common sense overlay program and a continued slurry seal program be scheduled over the next several fiscal years. This will ensure that the citywide weighted PCI will sustain itself and allow for routine slurry seal maintenance to continue. We have found and recommend the following detailed items which should be reviewed and considered for a proactive approach to the future management of the PMP: ARTERIAL / COLLECTOR (MPAH) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The actual workload requirements identified indicate that the Arterial (MPAH) street network is currently in "fair' condition. To maintain this condition, it is critical that preventive maintenance and overlay activities are funded at the levels identified on page 9 to maintain a "fair" network weighted average PCI value. Our MPAH findings for conditional data and recommendations for revenue expenditures are shown below: • The MPAH network has a weighted PCI of 72.7 • The MPAH network consists of 129.3 miles and 33,615,007 SF of pavement; • Currently, 12% of the MPAH network (15.8 miles) qualify for slurry seal/stop gap maintenance; 22% of the MPAH network (28.4 miles) qualify for rehabilitation/reconstruction maintenance; • MPAH maintenance projects should focus on the increasing the current PCI above a weighted average of 80 by FY 2031; • Develop a proactive fiscal and planned approach to identify MPAH overlay projects based on the deterioration modeling within StreetSaver; o Appropriate the MPAH CIP revenues at an average of $12,420,700/yr level for the seven- year term to generate the beneficial results identified on page 9; and o The Santa Ana "Increase PCI" budget (page 9) will increase the MPAH weighted PCI of 72.7 to 75.0 after seven years, additionally, the citywide deferred backlog increases from a level of $285.2 million to $440.3 million after seven years; and • Perform pavement inspections on the MPAH network every two years to continue the City's City of Santa Ana, CA Page 6 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - May 27, 2024 solid planning model within StreetSaver to track PCI deterioration; also follows new OCTA guidelines for Measure M2. LOCAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The actual workload requirements identified indicate that the Local street network is currently in "good" condition. To maintain this condition, it is critical that preventive maintenance and overlay activities are funded at the levels identified on page 9 to maintain a "good" network weighted average PCI value. Our Local network findings for conditional data and recommendations for revenue expenditures are shown below: • The Local network has a weighted PCI of 78.3; • The Local network consists of 324.6 miles and 59,767,905 SF of pavement; • Currently, 13% of the Local network (41.8 miles) qualifies for slurry seal/stop gap maintenance; 5% of the Local network (16.4 miles) qualify for rehabilitation/reconstruction maintenance; • Local maintenance projects should focus on the increasing the current PCI above a weighted average of 80 by FY 2031; • Develop a proactive fiscal and planned approach to identify arterial overlay projects based on the deterioration modeling within StreetSaver; o Appropriate the Local CIP revenues at an average of $7,800,000/yr level for the seven- year term to generate the beneficial results identified on page 9; and o The Santa Ana "Increase PCI" budget (page 9) will increase the Local weighted PCI of 78.3 to 80.5 after seven years, additionally, the citywide deferred backlog increases from a level of $285.2 million to $440.3 million after seven years; and • Perform pavement inspections on the Local network every two years to continue the City's solid planning model within StreetSaver to track PCI deterioration; also follows new OCTA guidelines for Measure M2. • Increase the amount of Local funding to allow for overlays of sections that are older than 20 years City of Santa Ana, CA Page 7 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — May 27, 2024 IV. CURRENT PAVEMENT CONDITIONS (PCI) a5.0 80.0 78.3 76.3.. 75.0 72.7 70.0 55.0 60.0 W. PCI 2024 Santa Ana Historical PCI (2014 - 20 4) 91.7 79.0 79 76,0 705 75.0 70 79.7 W. PCI 2022 W. PCI 2020 W. PCI 2016 —a—MPAH —9--Local Citywide 83.0 -4- 81.6 79A W. PCI 2014 VeryGaad ......................................................... (86-100) €................................................ ;........................................... 34.1 149.9 ;........................................... 193.9 ;............................................ 40.5% ............................................ Goad ......................................................... (75-85) ¢................................................ E............................................ 30.7 96.6 E............................................E 127.3 ............................................ 28.0% E............................................. Fair .................. ..':... (60-74) ...... 36.0 ...... 35.0 71.0 15.6% Poor �.41-59]........... 24.6.............:.1............ 47.7............ 10.596.............. .........................................................a................................................;............................................;............................................;........................................................................................ Very Faar i0 40] 3.9 20.1 24_0 5.3% City of Santa Ana, CA 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - May 27, 2024 V. PROJECTED PAVEMENT CONDITIONS (PCI) - CURRENT BUDGET Page 8 Today 7fi 3 72.7 2024-25 ........................................... ....................................................................... $20,209,270 ................................................................ 79 73 ................................................................ 91 ................................................................ 2025-26 .............................. .............. ....................................................................... 519,760,270 ................................................................. 80 74 ................................................................. 82 ................................................................. 2026-2-7 ........................................... $19,760,270 . ................................................................ 78 73 ................................................................ so ................................................................ 2027-28 ............................................ ....................................................................... $19,760,270 ................................................................. 77 72 ................................................................. 79 ................................ 2029-29 ........................................... $19,760,270 77 72 ................................................................ 79 ................................................................ 2029--30 ............................................ ....................................................................... $19,760,270 ................................................................. 76 71 ................................................................. 79 ................................................................. 2030-31 S19.76C.27C 75 70 77 Projected PC] based on Current Budget (Fly 2024-2031) $Z5,000,000 so 79 7� Z76 3 $10AW000 79 $5,000,000 Today 2024-2-5 2025-25 2026-27 2027-29 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 � Current Funding --q—NetworkPICI 91.0 80.0 79.0 78.0 77.0 76.0 75.0 74.0 73.0 72.0 City of Santa Ana, CA Page 9 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — May 27, 2024 V1. ALTERNATIVE FUNDING LEVELS Maintain Existing Average Network PCI Today 76.3 72.7 79.3 2024-25 ........................................... ...................................................................... $19,875,400 ................................................................. 77 73 ................................................................ 79 ................................................................ 2025-25 ............................................ ....................................................................... $18,988,700 ................................................................. 79 74 ................................................................. 79 ................................................................. 2026-27 ........................................... ...................................................................... $19,515,300 ................................................................. 78 74 ................................................................ 8() ................................................................ 2027-29 ............................................ ....................................................................... $19.644,000 ................................................................. 77 73 ................................................................. 79 ............................................................ 2028-29 ........................................... ...................................................................... $2C.239,700 ................................................................. 77 73 ................................................................ 79 ................................................................ 2029-30 ............................................ ....................................................................... $2C.643.500 ................................................................. 77 72 ................................................................. 79 ................................................................ 2030-31 52'-.523.CCC 76 72 78 Improve Average Network PCI Today 76.3 72.7 783 2024-25 ........................................... ...................................................................... $20,209,270 ................................................................ 79 73 ................................................................ 91 ................................................................ 2025-26 ............................................ ....................................................................... $19,760,270 ................................................................. so 74 ................................................................. 82 ................................................................. 2026-27 ........................................... ...................................................................... $20,213,400 ................................................................ 79 74 ................................................................ 93 ................................................................ 2027 29 .............................. .............. ....................................................................... $20,833,700 ................................................................. 79 74 ................................................................. 82 ................................................................. 2029-29 ........................................... $20,333,000 79 ............... 74 ................................................................ 81 ................................................................ 2029-30 ........ .............. .............................. $20,415,500 .................................................. 79 74 ................................................................. 81 ................................................................. I 2030-31 00................................................ $20.564-.300 79 75 &0 VII. CURRENT AND PROJECTED BACKLOG BY YEAR OF PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE NEEDS Current S285,218AW $295,218A00 $295,218AW 2024-25 ............................................ ....................................................................... $267,345,400 $272,310,100 ................................................................. $267,345,400 ................................................................. 2025-26 ........................................... .................................. $295,4 ................. $299,191,800 ................................................................ $295,440,300 2026-2-7 ........................................... ....................................................................... $322,919,500 $326,442,500 ................................................................. $320,911,400 ................................................................. 2027-28 ........................................... $350,111 600 ................ $355,313,500 ................................................................ $349,661,200 2028-29 ........................................... ....................................................................... $377,324,500 $375,446,800 ................................................................. $371,797,300 ................................................................. 2024-30 ........................................... $416,22 ................. $412,880,000 ................................................................ $409,554,900 t'll""I'll""I'll,'ll""I'll"l"..Ie:7,1� 2030-31 $453,424,EM $446,110.200 $440,252,500 City of Santa Ana, CA Page 10 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — May 27, 2024 VIII. CENTERLINE MILEAGE IX. PERCENTAGE OF NETWORK IN EACH OF FIVE CONDITION CATEGORIES BASED ON CENTERLINE MILES Percent Area of Area of Percent Centerline Condition PCI Range Newark Total Pavement Pavement 5F CenteEline Mi. of Mi I ealle of ' 82% 7,693,402 7.6% 34.1 Very Gaud (g5-100j ................MPAH ..................................29.1% .......................27,15 .............. Logy a.I 5,532..........................33.096................................149.8 6.896 30.7 Good (75-85) s..... ........ ...MPAH.... ........ ........ ....... ..... ...�.:1%....... ..... .......... .... .8,471,15+3 ....................................................................................................................... Local 1&7% 17,4813,737 21,3% 96.6 3%.........................9,651,897.............................}....................................3�'.�................. Fair (60-74j ................MPAH................................10 .... Loyal 7.1% 6,623,946 7.7% 35.0 ''s 3%...........................6,819,981..............................:¢...................................24.6................. Poor (41-59� ................MPAH..................................7 .... Laval 4.9% 4,611,046 5_1% 23.1 MPAHVery Poor (0-40) ..................... ........ ...... ..................1.096.............................978,568...............................0:996........ ........ ...... ........ ..... .�:`�................... LOCal 42% 3.887.644 4.4% 20.1 43,382,912 5><53.9 City of Santa Ana, CA Page 11 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — May 27, 2024 X. REDUCTION IN M2 LOCAL MATCH A local agency match reduction of 10% of the eligible cost for projects submitted for consideration of funding through the M2 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs (CTFP) call for projects is available if the local agency either: a. Shows measurable improvement of paved road conditions during the previous reporting period defined as an overall weighted (by area) average system improvement of one Pavement Condition Index (PCI) point with no reduction in the overall weighted (by area) average PCI in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) or local categories: or b. Have road pavement conditions during the previous reporting period, within the highest 20% of the scale for road pavement conditions in conformance with OCTA Ordinance No. 3, defined as a PCI of 75 or higher, otherwise defined as in "good condition". Road conditions found through our 2024 PMP management study shows that the City is eligible for Local Match Reduction based on the current network weighted PCI of 76.3. Additionally, the City of Santa Ana has demonstrated with the enclosed budget projection (page 8) that the City's weighted average PCI (by area) remains above a PCI of 75 after the seven-year program. City of Santa Ana, CA Page 12 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — May 27, 2024 XI. APPENDIX A — SEVEN YEAR ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION PLAN BASED ON CURRENT OR EXPECTED FUNDING LEVEL City of—Aw c Foreeast_inte ',/Rehnhilit ll(FMR)Rlpw -FYIOU-31 S—d by fv, roo. Cass, N-0,- (A-1) City of Santa Ana, CA Page 13 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - May 27, 2024 XII. APPENDIX B -COMPLETE LISTING OF CURRENT STREET CONDITIONS City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII5treets Sorted by F.- Class, Name Order (A-Z) __-Name C..Cn -_-_ ,Cl Q hb.,h..d, yaw ___-_--- wmm Load PCr F.. m,o e, PCr Oche, ��®gym©a ��Mw M-mr,"'m ® gym®mo l��®���Ma rmygm, Own M-� Own M-�Mffrm M-7-mm����oa mmrm mmm���� wmmmm�mmmmrm �,��oa WnTr WnTr�����m©a WnTr ®O®gym©a ��� gym©a �m �mamo ��0�®m©a Nmr.m.��®�oa WnTr M,�M®gym©a®�mo�o wwm,�M WnTr M,�MWMMTF���m©a sm7f M,�Mw M-mmm,�� ��Mmmwmmm�®gym©a EM,M,��MTMMMM ��m©a Emmy��00m Page 1 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Class, Name Order (A-Z) C—ID ® oa .Cl— e�anno,no— aw �m .,- oad tea PCr Owe, � �a��moma I FMT mmmmm�mmamm�mm���oa �m a �m��ommo , ffmw. eee ®mmwvmr=�m��o , ffmmm rMyr M,moa ��©a mmwv��mv��moa �a��mamo AMMI mmmrm�mm©a ���oa Umm ���= ���M.TMT, �������oa prT. mmm�0�moa Emm.r.2��MTM ��� ��00my..M.T. �,MrwMT mmm�m®moo �m��m®ma mrmmm� �a��omma Page 2 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) .Cl nno,no— aw wmm —d va E...— va Oche, �����®moo • �a®�ma�a Or"M MINEWIT�����©a ��m©a mmmmm�mmmgm���moa my"Or's MOKUTT"Wr���moa mmmmm�mmmwm���m©a mmmmm�mmmgmm=���oa Mrm= mmm ���Mrm= mmm ��m��oa mFFwrrm�mmF"rrlT��®moo ��moa Page 3 045 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Class, Name Order (A-Z) �moa®000 .Cl e�ando.nooa. aw wmm oad va E...— va Owe. MUTT ��M��oa �m�mama mmmm Mill ORTM, lvmmrrmmmmm;wrsrrmlm����©a ORTMEMMOMMm®gym©a Page 4 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Class, Name Order (A-Z) ������m©o m-aO .Cl ewndo,nooa, aw �m��mom� wmm oad va E.—. va Owe, ��m©o ,. M ORION ON : ; Page 5 of 4S City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Class, Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl— nno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, a NAM, N�����m©o Page 6 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl ewnno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, ��m©a®��oo�o ml®�rrml mmm���oa �� Mr �m©a®��momo Or.7m, lv��m©o Or.7m, lv�����©o �����©a Or.7m, lv����©o ma��mo�o ��mwrm �mmmro Or.7m, lvm���©o ��Mmmwm �,,Mw ���M,M, ���®�©o � �Mm � � ���©o ���M,MR � Fmml wmrr. M.�Mff M.M. Page 8 of 4S City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl ewnno.nooa. aw wmm oad va Owe. . TOP N r HIM������©a mm��mo�o NMI Page 11 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) �����m©o m-aO .aa„ ewndo,nooa, aw m®���000 wmm oad va E.—. va Owe, , wrm, M,��©a®��mo�o rorr I M=Tl m I Page 12 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) C—ID :aa„ ewndo,nooa, aw wmm oad PCr E.—. PCr Owe, IT, .. Mwm Opur Opur wrm,������©o ���Mvff,rrlwmr ���oo Page 13 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) .Cl ewnno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, , ���©o Mrm- mm®gym®mo Page 14 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) C—ID .Cl a hb.,nooa, aw wmm oad PCr Owe, �������©a • • ........ .. �a��m®tea �������©a •. :......... .: �®��m®mom Page 15 ot45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) ���Mmm C—ID I .aa„ ewnno,nooa, aw m® wmm mo oad PCr Owe, o Nor, M,���m©a Nor, M,�� m®�oo�o Nor, M,��FVXTMM EN11511115 ROM Nor, M,�Nor, ���©a®��mo�o M,��FVXTMM �a mmnmm� mmmm,w ... PIE,... wr-m- V���©a®�mo�o wr-m- V����©a®�mom� Mm 111 MWTF ��M�m©o m®�moma ��MWMT, Mr.��®�oa �m��mmmo Page 17 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl ewnno,nooa, aw wmm oad Owe, �Mr M.M.-��m©o ��m©o MOW PHROMIT"IMINININ mmm �© •: �a���000 � MMMI ���®gym©a • : • ....... . ; �a��mo�o Mmmm,�� mmoo mm��mo�o a ® mama MOM MMrr m©a m®��m®moo WFTWM������©o Page 19 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) MOM m-aO © o .Cl., ewnno.nooa. aw wmm ®mo oad va Owe. WPM rmm,WPM rmm=rlWPM M,��rmm7ffrl •. .... 00mom MOM MOM�����m©o PMMMT, mmmmm�m���©a®�mo�o Page 20 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl e hb.,nooa, aw wmm —d va Owe, �rra-Wwn-r I I�©o wmll,rm���®gym©o wmrrm��rmnrl��m©o mm��m�ma Page 21 ot4S City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl., ewnno.nooa. aw wmm oad va Owe. �o WFW RE R Wor,�®��©oRE m ®��mo�® �� wmrm,����©o®��mo�o VWWM wurr wurr a ®®®moo®moo VrOWTIr Mrr-r Mrr-r Mmffr Page 22 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) ���MnT m-aO .Cl ewnno,nooa, aw wmm mo oad Owe, o ... mmo MHMIMM �a wr.m.�����©a®�mo�o NOT,�����©o wr.m.����©a wr.m ���®��©aW PH � wr-m-���®®m©a ma�o NOT,��®®m©o NOT,�����m©o �mo�o ffmlm NOT lv���©a®��mo�o arm. ll����©o NOT lv����©a ���FTMVVWFM���©o®��mom� �m®mom Wvmm- Ormr,�����m©o Page 23 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl ewnno.nooa. aw wmm oad Owe. OrmIr OrmIr MIN .1 On Page 24 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl— nno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, Nam. V��� Wmm wm � ����©a •: �m��mm�� Warr wmr ml������oa •: �m��m�®a w"��m©o �a�o�mo ����m©a wm-r ml��Rmm a Rmm Rmm Rmm Page 25 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .aa„ ewnno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, Muir Null FT Num, lv����©a Num, V� Num, V����©a Num, V� I' Num,���®gym©o �mo�o Page 27 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) C—ID .Cl ewnn-ooa. I.,th wmm oad Owe, MTMT ®m©a �a��momm rw ��� • ���©a ® �mm®o WMTTZ� EM.T. ml��Fr"T WOM, V�����m©o MOM V�� MOM V�� MOM V�� MOM V�� MON MOM V�� Orr.w. M,������©o ®ate®oom® Page 28 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .aa„ ewnno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, gym®mo FTMW NOW�����m©o Ell, IMININ MOMm���m©a fiffilffill MINI Page 29 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) �� C—ID � .aa„ a hb.,nooa, aw wmm mo oad va Owe, o ,..... mm�o®mo TO I TO ,..... ma��om�o TO I TO Page 31 ot4S City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl ewnno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, mm��m®moo MINI! fffiffiffill Page 32 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .aa„ ewnno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, NOWN 1-fiffilffill fill" mom WON a ® memo ������©o MMTMT Or" lv��©a®��mo�m Or"V Or"V Or"V .: Page 33 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) C—ID .Cl ewndo,nooa, aw wmm oad va E.—. Owe, M% mm �mo�o rmq rmq �����m©o ®m®gym®mo rmra ���� ra rmq �mo�o IN11511115 MOM wmr,v ��m©o Noll, 01 IN11511115 MOMwmmv �mmmmm MOWma��m®mo Page 34 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) C—ID .Cl a hb.,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, or ��m©a �m�oomo Orrm, mmwrmm���m©o Page 3S ot4S City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl e hb.,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, ���©a®���000 WVTMM��©o®���000 �� �� ����m©a NUT, M,� WVTT w"r, M,� NEW, M,� F-MTr ���� FTm©o ma��mm�o MTr Orrm, ml���MTr Orrm, ml�����m©o ma���000 ���� MTr a maw �000 F-MTr F-MTr mm��oamo F-MTr mmmm,��Fffm,m��©o Page 36 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) C—ID .Cl., ewnno.nooa. I.,th wmm oad va Owe. ��m©a®�oamo ��m©allo 11, 11 l a, 11 l No 1, a, I ma��m®mo ME m �m�mm�o Nmr,�����m©o a mm��m®moo VTmr VTmr VTmr VTmr Page 38 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) C—ID .Cl— nno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, VMmrl a ®®®gym®mom FMTMT Warr Mmmm ����©a ��FMTMT FMTMT Fr, ORM ORM WN MMW Page 39 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl e hb-h—, aw wmm oad Owe. WrIM WrIM WrIM�����m©o mono .... mmmo �mumm wMmu mmm�� mmm mmm mmm mmm mmm mmm mmm mmm mmm �m a mm mom® mmm mmm m© ® mom® mffm WME, M,����©o®®�oom� mffm WME, M,� � ma��m®moo mffm EMIT M,� Page 40 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) m-aO .Cl— nno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Oth- ONO .. FTMMI ®m®gym®moo WMMNM�����m©o mmm WMMNM��®�©o WMMNM�����m©o mm��mm�a WMMNM�����m©o �m mmm � mm��mmoa mr?" M,����©a®��mom� WMT, M,����©o®��mo�o mr?" M,� WMT, M,� WMT, M,� �� WMT, M,���m©o mr?" M,� WMT, M,���m©o ��m©a®��mmma 0 0 0 m WIT :'n T.r.. Page 41 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) .Cl nno,nooa, aw wmm oad va Owe, ®�©o ®mom®mmma Page 43 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) . Cl., ndo.nooa. aw wmm oad va E.—. va Owe. ���©o gym®®mom®o Page 44 of 45 City of Santa Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by F.- Cl.., Name Order (A-Z) ,aa„ nno,nooa, aw wmm —d Owe, Page 45 of 45 CIty of Sant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order (0-100) Type cClass Neighborhoods Length Width -P. Da Load Othec a �����®moo �Mymm �� jj= Page 2 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type .Class L,.gth Width nsp.N -d Other �m��m®tea �m©a �����mMa �m��mamo Page 3 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type nc Cass Nelgbborbootlz engtb —tb nsp. Da oad Otbcr ® ®gym©a �m��mo�o ®m��mo�o ormyr wwmv����©o MrMMM���©o mm�m�mo mrrnr,v���©o Or=������©o ��=r"Mr. �,���©o Page 4 of C4 Cl" ' fSnt. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cCl— Area ID L,.gth Width nsp.O oad Other 711 ���©oPOOT, . .. r .... I. �������©o • • :: .. r ..... .: : �m��®moo llom��m©o®gym®�� M il�m�mmao llom m©o �m��mmma �m����©o NF= ��m©o ������m©o • :. ....... . r �m��m®tea Pee. a of as cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cClass Neighborhoods ngth Wldth nsp. Da oad Other ©o®m®mo ����m©o • mm��m�mo Page 10 of" Cl"' fSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type eCl— A ID Neighborhoods ength —th nsP. Da oad Other • •®gym®ma ��m©o •®��m�®a Page 11 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cCh, A ID Neighborhoods ength —th nsp. Da oad Other .. ��m©o �m��mmmo 12.1 ��m©o . ®®®gym®mom Page 12 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cCl— A ID N,.,hb.,h..d, ny,th —th nsp. Da oad Other �������©o : :. .......: . • �®��m®mom �����®�©o ,..... .. ,• �m��m®moo Page 13 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cCl— M Neighborhoods Llll,lh —th nsp. Da oad Other �������©o .. ... ...• �®��m®moo 10 Eli ®m��mo�o �������©o .. ... ...• ®®��m®moo Page 14 of C4 cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cCl— Neighborhoods Llll,lh —th nsp. Da oad Other �������©o • �®��m®mom m®��mmmo 11 MINN Ell B� Page 15 of" Cl"' fSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) — Type cCh, Neighbor.— ength Wldth nsp. Da oad Other �� �m©o �m��m�mo �������©o •. :. ........ .: �®��m®mom Page 18 of" Cl"' fSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cCh, ,.,hb.,h..d, ipth —th nsp. Da -d Other ��—�m©o ®m��m�mo ������m©o ,...:. :: ,• �®��m®moo �����m©o ,..... ...• �m��m®moo ';. ������©o :.. , ; ... :::• �®��m®moo lflm��MMTME Page 19 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type ..Cass Neighborhoods nyth Wldth nsp. Da -d Other �m©o OMM mm��moma Page 20 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cClass Neighborhoods Llll,lh Wldth nsP. Da oad Other ....®��mo�o WNW Page 21 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) — Type cCh, Neighborhoods igth —th nsP. Da oad Other �� �m©o �m��mo�o �������©o .. ... ...• �®��m®moo NF= � Ir Rim Page 22 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cClass Neighborhoods Llll,lh Wldth nsP. Da oad Other ��m©o MAROM �������©o ,..... ...• �®��m®moo �m��m®tea Page 23 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cCl— A ID Neighborhoods ngth Wldth nsp. Da oad Other 11 M MIN! � Mo g am Page 25 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cCl— A ID Neighborhoods ngth Width nsp.O -d Other ������m©o • .. r .... .: m®�®moms ����moo • �m��mo�o r. ..r Page 26 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cCl— A ID N,.,hb.,h..d, Llll,lh —th nsp. Da -d Other NO®®®gym®moo Page 3J of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cCl— Area lU Neighborhoods ngth Width nsp.O oad Other ����©o •. ®®�momo ..r Page 28 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) — Type cCh, ciy,hb.,h..dz l,,th Wldth nsP. Da oad Oche, �� �m©o �m��mo�o NO Page 30 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cCl— Neighborhoods Llll,lh Wldth nsp. Da oad Other MIN wOMM ug UMMMM I OMM Page 31 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cCl— A ID N,.,hb.,h..d, Llll,lh —th nsp. Da -d Other ,: �������©o • • :. ........ . • mm�®moo NOW Page 32 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type eCl— Neighborhoods ength Wldth nsp. Da -d Other ©o®mama REM Page 33 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cCl— Neighborhoods Llll,lh —th nsp. Da oad Other Page 34 of C4 cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cCl— Neighborhoods ngth Wldth nsp. Da oad Other Page 35 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cClass ciy,hb.,h..d, ny,th —th nsp. Da oad Other 11 oil 111,11, Ml Page 36 of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) — Type cCl— ciy,hb.,h..ds ny,th —th nsP. Da oad Other �� �m©o �®��momo Page 3] of" Cl" ' fSnt. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cClass Neighborhoods ength —th nsP. Da oad Other ON Page a of" cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type cCl— Neighborhoods Llll,lh —th ",Da oad Other WOM mm 0 M, TM, m���©o Mmzm�m�©o Mmm,m�mmormr� mmmm�m��©o mmrmm�mmrmmm���©o ww,m�m��©o wgmm�m�©o mrgmm�m��©o �m��mmma mmmm�m�©o mmmm�0��©o W=m�m�©o Em, mm�m��oo Em, mu�mmrmm � �M���oo mmrm,�m��©o ��m�©o mrwm�m���oo �m®gym®moo mmmm�mmoymrm= mmvm,�m�oom��m�mo mmm,m���©o Emm�m mmr,m�m��©o Page 41 of C4 cl"'ofSant. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-10)) 91420 9010 91420.9010 ALLEYN/OSUNFLOWERS/. STEVEN ALLEY E/O FLOWER W/O 1.11 ROSS ST AC/AC 2 0 13-SANDPOINTE Alleys 456 20 8,213 3/1/24 15 43 56 1 90220 9050 90220.9050 ALLEYE/O FAIRVIEW W/O MARINE- SAIMANDREW PL POMONA ST AC/AC 2 O 95-NON-NEIGHBORHOOD AREA95 All 886 20 11,316 5/8/24 15 40 59 1 91440 9010 91440.9030 ALLEYN/O WALNUT 1/01ST-91440 CDS WI. ALLEYEl. PACIFIC W/O ALLEYE/OPACIFICW/OBRISTOL AC/AC 2 0 36-CENTRAL CITY Alleys 453 20 8,613 5/16/24 SS 42 58 0 91080 9010 93080.9030 ALLEY N/O HALESWORTH S/.WASH RDSS ST BROADWAY AC/AC 2 O 34-WILIARD Alleys 856 20 1.409 5/18/24 15 57 29 14 90010 9010 90010.9010 ALLEYE/.ARIESW/OGREENVILLE-'. ALLEYN/. COLUMBINE S/. ALT.N ALTONAV AC/AC 2 O 95-NON-NEIGH BORHOOD AREA 95 Alleys 166 23 1581 3/31/22 16 29 J0 2 90220 9040 90220.9040 ALLEYE/.FAIRVIEWW/.MARINE- CASTOR ST SAINT ANDREW PL AC/AC 2 0 95-NON-NEIGHBORHOODAREA95 Alleys BES 20 11258 5/8/24 16 27 37 36 91300 9010 91300.9010 ALLEYN/OMYRTLE 1/0 CHESTNUT- CDSW/.ALLEYE/.CENTERW/OD ALLEYE/OCENTERW/ODAISY AC/AC 2 0 S]-CIA BONITA Alleys 205 20 3,760 5/16/24 16 32 68 0 91980 9010 91480.9030 ALLEYN/OWIUUrSS/OCAMILE-.1 MFfiST ALLEYE/. RAITT W/O NOTTINGHAM AC/AC 2 O 36-CENTRALCITY Alleys 364 20 6545 5/16/24 16 37 63 0 90300 9030 90300.9030 ALLEY El. HESPERIAN W/O ERISTO-WILLFfS ST MYRTLE ST AC/AC 2 0 36-CENTRAL CITY Alleys 664 20 11,465 5/21/24 16 98 48 5 91120 9010 91120.9010 ALLEY N/O HUNTER 1/0 BISHOP -91'. CEDARST STANDARD AV AC/AC 2 O 09-EASTSIDE Alleys 6]B 20 10,005 1/18/24 17 39 49 12 90920 9020 90920.9020 ALLEYN/OAUROMS/OORION-9IX MARINE ST GREENVILLE ST AC/AC 2 0 15-NON-NEIGH BORHOOD AREA 95 Alleys 899 20 16,189 5/15/24 17 43 SJ 0 90980 9010 90980.9010 ALLEY N/O COLUMBINE S/O ALTON- ALLEYE/O ARIES W/O GREENVILLE GREENVILLE ST AC/AC 2 O SS- NON -NEI GHBORHOODAREA95 Alleys 364 23 61099 5/15/24 SJ 31 69 0 90300 9040 90300.9090 ALLEY E/O HESPERIAN W/O BRISTO-MYRTLE ST FINEST AC/AC 2 O 36-CENTRALCII Alleys 660 20 11,123 5/21/24 17 99 32 19 91300 9040 91300.9090 ALLEY N/O MYRTLE S/O CH ESTNUT- STANDARD AV ALLEY E/O STANDARD W/O SANTAF AC/AC 2 O 09-EASTSIDE Alleys 401 20 6,596 5/23/24 17 4S 53 2 909J5 9020 904)5-9020 ALLEY E/O PONDEROSA W/O DEODA ALLEY N/O SANTA CLIRA 1/0 FRAN FRANZEN AV' AC/AC 2 O 9J-NON-NEIGHBORHOODAREA97 Alleys 160 20 2534 1/19/24 18 49 41 9 91050 9010 91050.9010 ALLEY N/O FRANZEN 1/0 JOANA-91 PONDEROSA ST DEODAR ST AC/AC 2 O 9J-NON-NEIGHBORHOODAREA17 Alleys J15 20 15,500 1/19/24 18 40 44 16 91290 9010 91290.9010 ALLEY N/O MCFADDEN 1/0 WAKEHA STANDARD AV ALLEYE/. STANDARD W/O MINNIE AC/AC 2 O 51-CORNERSTONE VILLAGE Alleys 23D 20 3,431 2/23/24 18 54 20 27 90200 9010 90200.9010 ALLEY E/O FAIRVIEW W/O EVERGIA WARNERAV ALLEY N/O WARNER 5/0 PENDIETOP AC/AC 2 O 18-CENTENNIALPARK Alleys 315 20 3,886 5A7/24 18 34 54 11 91450 9010 91450.9010 ALLEY N/O WARNER 1/0 PENDLET01 FAIRVIEW ST ALLEY E/O FAIRVIEW W/. EVERGIA AC/AC 2 O 18-CEMENNIAL PARK Alleys 493 20 51841 5A7/24 18 32 51 17 90530 9020 90530.9020 ALLEY E/O ROSS W/O DURANT-905: 15TH ST CDS N/O ISTH ST AC/AC 2 O 39-WILLIRD Alleys 281 20 4,247 5/18/24 18 33 51 16 91200 9010 91200.9030 ALLEY N/O MAD SON 1/0 BORCHARI STANDARD AV ALLEY E/O MINNIE W/O RR AC/AC 2 O 51-CORNERSTONE VILLAGE Alleys BUD 20 8,115 5/21/24 18 6D 28 12 91130 9010 91130.9030 ALLEY N/O JOANA S/O GROVEMONT ALLEY E/O TUSTIN W/O PONDEROSA ALLEY E/O PONDEROSA W/O DEODA AC/AC 2 O 97-NON-NEIGH BORHOOD AREA 97 Alleys 215 20 4,218 1/19/24 19 32 4S 23 90280 9010 90280.9030 ALLEY E/O HALIADAV W/O STANDAR BISHOP ST ALLEY N/O BISHOP 5/0 CAMILLE AC/AC 2 0 09-EASTSIDE Alleys 182 20 2.154 2/23/24 19 53 39 ] 903J0 9010 903]0.9030 ALLEY E/O MERIDAY W/O COLLEGE-MARTHA UN 1- ST AC/AC 2 O 21-ARTESIA PI.AR Alleys 528 20 9,923 4/10/24 19 42 31 20 90200 9040 90200.9090 ALLEY E/O FAIRVIEW W/O EVERGIA ANAHURST PL SAINT GERTRUDE PL AC 2 0 18-CENTENNIAL PARK Alleys 283 20 4,103 5/S7/24 19 29 58 12 91340 9110 91340.9130 ALLEY N/O PINE S/O WALNUT-9134 HALLIDAY ST CEDARST AC/AC 2 O 09-EASTSIDE Alleys 402 20 5,880 5A7/24 19 31 4S 24 90530 9010 90530.9030 ALLEY E/O ROSS W/O DURANT-905: CDS 1/015TH ST 15TH ST AC/AC 2 O 39-WILLIRD Alleys 230 20 SA42 5/18/24 19 33 67 0 90980 9010 90480.9030 ALLEY E/O POPLAR W/O BRISTOL-91 ALLEY N/O WHSHIRE 1/0 DAHL ALLEY N/O UNGAN 1/0 MCFADDEN AC/AC 2 0 20-MID-CITY Alleys EUG 20 16,1J0 5/21/24 19 52 16 31 91190 9030 91190.9030 ALLEY N/O LINGAN 1/0 MCFADDEN-PACIFIC AV ALLEY E/O POPLAR W/O BRISTOL AC/AC 2 O 20-MID-CITY Alleys 390 20 6,229 5/21/24 19 54 36 SO 91490 9010 91490.9010 ALLEY N/O WILSHIRE 1/0 DAHL-914 PACIFIC AV ALLEY E/O POPLAR W/O BRISTOL AC/AC 2 O 20-MID{ITY Alleys 390 20 6,947 5/21/24 19 56 21 23 90020 9010 90020.9010 ALLEY E/O BAKER W/O ROSEWOOD-SAN LORENZO AV HEMLOCK WY AC/AC 2 O R.SEWOODBAKER.WNERSASSOCIA Alleys 512 20 7,600 5/15/24 20 37 SJ 6 91460 9010 91460.9010 ALLEY N/O WARNER 1/0 SEACREST- RENE DR PACIFIC AV AC/AC 2 0 1S-BRISTOL/WARNER Alleys fi90 20 9,824 5A7/24 20 50 44 6 90580 9010 90580.9010 ALLEY E/O SPURGEON W/O FRENCH CDs 5/015TH ST 15TH ST AC/AC 1 O 25-FRENCH COURT Alleys 395 16 4,237 5/22/24 20 31 22 47 901J0 9010 901)0.9030 ALLEY E/O DURANT W/O BROADWA CDs 1/015TH ST 15TH ST AC/AC 2 O 34-WILLIRD Alleys 230 20 3,525 5/23/24 20 53 36 SO 90500 9020 90500.9020 ALLEY E/O RAITT W/O SPRUCE -905( ALLEY N/OPINE S/O WALNUT WALNUTST AC/AC 2 O 36-CENTMLCITY Alleys 1]6 20 L092 3/25/22 21 29 71 0 90840 9020 90840.9020 ALLEY N/O 2ND 1/03RD-90MO DAISY AV RAITi ST AC/AC 2 O 21-ARTESIA MILAN Alleys S1J 20 7,350 5/2/24 21 13 6D 28 91300 9020 91300.9020 ALLEY N/O MYRTLE 1/0 CH ESTNUT- ALLEY E/O CENTER W/O DAISY DAISVAV AC/AC 2 O SJ-CASA 00NITA Alleys 1,016 20 19.726 5/16/24 21 30 70 0 90560 9010 90560.9010 ALLEY E/O SHELTON W/O FLOWER-'. MYRTLE ST CHESTNUTAV AC/AC 1 O 91-PICO-LOWELL Alleys 334 SS 3,937 5/23/24 21 47 36 17 90820 9030 90820.9030 ALLEY N/O LIT 1/0 STH N-90820 BEWLEYST GUNTHER PL AC/AC 1 0 42-SANTA ANRA Alleys 330 15 3,905 5/14/24 22 28 72 0 905J0 9020 905]0.9020 ALLEY E/O SPRUCE W/O PACIFIC-90 RITA WY MCFADDENAV AC/AC 2 0 W-MID{ITY Alleys 582 20 7,853 5/21/24 22 58 20 22 90580 9020 90580.9020 ALLEY E/O SPURGEON W/O FRENCH 15TH ST 16TH ST AC/AC 1 O 25-FRENCH COURT Alleys 400 16 3,925 5/22/24 22 26 34 90 90910 9010 90910.9010 ALLEY N/O -1/0 CIVIC CENTER WESTERN AV CDs E/O WESTERN AV AC/AC 1 O 21-ARTESIA PH -AR Alleys 3)2 20 3,883 5/22/24 22 20 4S 35 91310 9010 91310.9010 ALLEY N/O NOBELS/O KELLER-1131 ALLEY E/O FLOWER W/O ROSS ROSS ST AC/AC 2 O 13-SANDPOINTE Alleys 456 20 6,839 3/1/24 23 54 43 3 90300 9050 90300.9050 ALLEY E/O HESPERIAN W/O BRISTO-215TST SANTACLIRA AV AC/AC 2 0 39-RIVERVIEW Alleys 1,275 20 20,221 4/4/24 23 47 34 18 91320 9020 91320.9020 ALLEY N/O ORLON S/OJUNIPER-913 MARINE ST GREENVILLE ST AC/AC 2 O 95-NON-NEIGHBORHOODAREA15 Alleys 899 20 14,671 5/SS/24 23 30 70 0 90490 9010 90490.9010 ALLEY E/O RAII W/O NOTTINGHAM WILLFfS ST ALLEY N/O WILUTS 5/0 CAMILE AC/AC 2 O 36-CENTRAL CITY Alleys 1]3 20 L675 5/16/24 23 28 72 0 90350 9060 90350.9060 ALLEY E/O MAIN W/OBUSH-90350 20TH ST CDS N/020TH ST AC/AC 1 O 24-SANTA ANA TRIANGLE Alleys 828 15 13,384 5/18/24 23 6D 13 27 914J0 9010 914]0.9030 ALLEY N/O WASHINGTON 1/011H SPURGEON ST FRENCH ST AC/AC 2 O 25-FRENCH COURT Alleys 401 20 SA41 5/23/24 23 26 35 39 90930 9010 90930.9030 ALLEY N/O BISHOP 1/0 CAMILLE - ID HAWIDAYST ALLEY E/O HALIADAY W/O STANDAR AC/AC 2 O 09-EASTSIDE Alleys 412 20 5,674 2/23/24 24 4S 54 1 90050 9030 90050.9030 ALLEY E/O BRISTOL W/O BAKER SIX ALLEY N/O HEMLOCK 1/0 CENTRAL N/O ALLEY N/O HEMLOCK 1/0 CENT AC/AC 2 O ROSEWOOD BAKER OWNERSASSOCIA Alleys 100 20 L592 5/15/24 24 43 50 ] 90050 9040 90050.9040 ALLEY E/O BRISTOL W/O BAKER-9IX ALLEY N/O HEMLOCK 1/0 CENTRAL CENTMLAV AC/AC 2 O ROSEWOOD BAKER OWNERS ASSOCIA Alleys 31] 20 4,534 5/15/24 24 52 34 13 90120 9020 90120.9020 ALLEY E/O CENTER W/O TOWNSEND MCFADDENAV MONTA VISTA AV AC/AC 2 0 90-BELLI VISTA Alleys 1,318 20 23,77l 5/16/24 24 96 54 0 90350 9050 90350.9050 ALLEY E/O MAIN W/OBUSH-90350 18TH ST 20TH ST AC/AC 1 O 24-SAMA ANA TRIANGLE Alleys 509 15 7,387 5/18/24 24 63 15 22 90450 9010 90450.9030 ALLEYE/OPACIFIC W/O BRISTOL-9( ALLEVN/OPINES/.WAWW WALNUTST AC/AC 2 O 36-CENTML CITY Alleys 1]1 20 2.144 3/25/22 25 44 50 5 91130 9030 91130.9030 ALLEY N/O JOANA 1/0 GROVEMONT DEODAR ST ALLEYE/. DEODAR W/O SR -SS FWY AC/AC 2 O 9J-NON-NEIGHB0RHOODAREA97 Alleys 17D 20 2.234 1/19/24 25 40 42 18 90810 9030 90810.9030 ALLEYN/015T5/0STH1-90810 GUMHER PL JACKSON ST AC/AC 2 0 42-SAMA ANRA Alleys 330 15 4,757 5/14/24 25 90 SO 0 90090 9030 90090.9030 ALLEY E/O 0USH W/O SPURGEON-916TH ST 1JTH ST AC/AC 1 O 25-FRENCH COURT Alleys 401 17 4,697 5/22/24 25 30 29 91 90630 9010 90630.9030 ALLEY E/O TODDY W/O NEWHOPE-!HAZARD AV HOLLYLINE AV AC/AC 2 0 26- RIVERVIEW WEST Alleys 512 20 7,736 3/22/24 26 28 64 8 90980 9020 90980.9020 ALLEY N/O COLUMBINE 1/0 ALTON-CDSW/O HALIADAVST HALIADAYST AC/AC 2 O 92-NON-NEIGHB0RHOODAREA92 Alleys 232 20 4,292 5/15/24 26 24 )6 0 905J0 9010 905]0.9030 ALLEY E/O SPRUCE W/O PACIFIC -90 DAHLLN RRAWY AC/AC 2 O 20- mil D-CITY Alleys 481 20 6381 5/21/24 26 44 28 29 91350 9010 91350.9010 ALLEYN/O POMONA S/O EDINGER-'.ALLEYE/O RR W/OGRAND GRANDAV AC/AC 2 O 98-NON-NEIGHBORHOODAREAIB Alleys 958 20 13,060 5/9/24 27 76 21 3 90]90 9010 90J90.9030 ALLEYN/015T5/01ND-90790 CLIRA ST ALLEY E/O I- W/O TOWNSEND AC/AC 2 O 21-ARTESIA PILIR Alleys 554 20 9,937 5/14/24 27 33 67 0 90090 9040 90090.9040 ALLEY E/O 0USH W/O SPURGEON-920TH ST CDS N/020TH ST AC/AC 2 O 24-SAMA ANA TRIANGLE Alleys 293 20 4,J04 5/18/24 2J 4J 35 18 91000 9020 93000.9020 ALLEY N/O DORMAN 1/0 SJT11-910 FAIRMONTST ALLEY E/O FAIRMONT W/O LINCOLN AC/AC 2 O 98-NON-NEIGHB0RHOODAREA98 Alleys 192 20 2.344 5/22/24 27 23 44 33 90230 9010 90230.9030 ALLEY E/O FLOWER W/O ROSS -902: ALLEY N/O SUNFLOWER 1/0 STEVEN ALLEY N/O STEVENS 1/0 NOBEL AC/AC 2 0 13-SANDPOINTE Alleys 310 20 3,526 3/1/24 28 49 4S J 90020 9020 90020.9020 ALLEY E/O BAKER W/O ROSEWOOD -HEMLOCK WY CENTRALAV AC/AC 2 O ROSEWOOD OAKER OWNERS ASSOCIA Alleys 1,020 20 18,429 5/15/24 28 67 19 14 90200 9030 90200.9030 ALLEY E/O FAIRVIEW W/O EVERGIA MAYWOOD AV ANAHURST PL AC/AC 2 0 18-CEMENNIAL PARK Alleys 269 20 3,790 5/S7/24 28 24 59 16 90500 9010 90500.9010 ALLEY E/O RAITT W/O SPRUCE SCSI P-ST ALLEY N/O PINE S/O WALNUT AC/AC 2 O 36-CENTRAL CITY Alleys 155 20 1,686 3/25/22 29 41 58 1 91090 9010 93090.9030 ALLEY N/O HAZARD 1/0 CELESTE-91 GATES ST CDSE/O GATES ST AC/AC 2 O 26-RIVERVIEW WEST Alleys 531 20 8,842 4/23/24 29 0 90 SO 90)80 9025 90J80.9025 ALLEYN/0-111101911-1-90780 AC-PCCTRANSITION CDSE/OBROADWAY AC/AC 1 O 91-NON-NEIGHBORHOODAREA91 Alleys 100 15 1,488 5/18/24 29 ]S 25 0 90090 9010 90090.9030 ALLEY E/O 0USH W/O SPURGEON-914TH ST 15TH ST AC/AC 1 O 25-FRENCH COURT Alleys 400 17 S,642 5/22/24 29 31 40 29 90990 9010 90990.9010 ALLEYN/O CUBBON S/O BROOK-90'. CDS W/O ALLEY E/00RIST.L W/O ALLEY E/O BRISTOL W/O BAKER AC/AC 1 O 41-PICO-LOWELL Alleys 205 20 11119 3/29/22 30 59 41 0 90680 9020 90660.9020 ALLEYE/.TUSTIN W/O PONDEROSA FRANZEN AV ALLEY N/O JOANA 5/0 GROVEMONT AC/AC 2 O 97-NON-NEIGHBORHOOD AREA 97 Alleys 4J8 20 6,686 1/19/24 30 44 40 16 91400 9010 91W0.9030 ALLEY N/O STEVENS 1/0 NOBEL-- ALLEY E/O FLOWER W/O ROSS ROSS ST AC/AC 2 O 13-SANDPOINTE Alleys 456 20 8,134 3/1/24 30 54 45 1 90290 9010 90290.9010 ALLEY E/O HARBOR W/O JACKSON-'.MCFADDENAV ALLEY N/O MCFADDEN 510 CAMILLE AC/AC 2 O 42-SANTA ANRA Alleys 651 20 11,358 4/5/24 30 53 45 2 90050 9060 90050.9060 ALLEY E/O BRISTOL W/O BAKER -9IX ALLEY N/O CUBSON 1/0 BROOK .ROOK ST AC 1 O 91-PICO-LOWELL Alleys 168 SS Zoo. 5/21/24 30 53 30 SJ 90960 9010 90460.9010 ALLEY E/O PACIFIC W/O POPLIR-90 DAHLW ONGAN LN AC/AC 2 0 W-MID-CITY Alleys 520 20 7,433 5/21/24 30 63 26 11 90600 9010 90600.9030 ALLEY E/O STANDARD W/O MINNIE- BORCHARD AV WIISHIRE AV AC/AC 2 0 51-CORNERSTONE VILLAGE Alleys S]2 20 8,315 5/21/24 30 49 36 15 90860 9020 90860.9020 ALLEY N/O 3RD 1104TH-90860 BROADWAY SYCAMORE ST AC/AC 2 0 63-DOWNTOWN Alleys 3. 20 4,412 5/23/24 30 75 25 0 912J0 9020 912]0.9020 ALLEY N/O MCFADDEN 110 MONTA ALLEY E/O TOWNSEND W/O RAITT ALLEY E/O TOWNSEND W/O RAII AC/AC 2 0 40-BELLI VISTA Alleys 118 20 1,959 3/10/22 31 61 21 18 91300 9010 91100.9010 ALLEY N/O HEMLOCK 1/0 CENTRAL- ALLEY E/O BRISTOL W/O BAKER BAKER ST AC/AC 2 O ROSEWOOD BAKER OWNERSASSOCIA Alleys 130 20 1300 3/15/22 31 29 53 18 90220 9030 90220.9030 ALLEY E/O FAIRVIEW W/O MARINE - JUNIPERIT ALLEY N/O JUNIPER 5/O MACARTHU AC/AC 2 O 95-NON-NEIGHBORH ODD AREA 95 Alleys 152 20 2A05 3/31/22 31 62 38 1 90365 9010 90365-9030 ALLEY E/O MARINE W/O GREENVILL IUNIPERST ALLEY N/O JUNIPER 5/0 MACARTHU AC/AC 2 O 95-NON-NEIGHBORHOODAREA95 Alleys 160 20 2A41 3/31/22 31 44 24 31 91940 9020 91440.9020 ALLEY N/O WALNUT 1/01ST-114. ALLEY E/O BRISTOL W/O BAKER BAKERST AC/AC 2 O 91-PICO-LOWELL Alleys 586 20 11,642 4/1/22 31 51 92 ] 90J20 9010 90J20.9030 ALLEY E/O WRIGHT W/O MABURY EIJTH ST 18TH ST AC/AC 2 O 32-PORTOLI PARK Alleys 332 20 5,206 1/8/24 31 79 12 9 91150 9010 91150.9010 ALLEY N/O JUNIPER 1/0 MACARTH U ALLEY E/O FAIRVIEW W/O MARINE ALLEYE/. FAIRVIEW W/OGREENVI AC/AC 2 O 95-NON-NEIGHBORHOODAREA95 Alleys J95 20 17,396 5/15/24 31 22 78 0 90200 9020 90200.9020 ALLEY E/O FAIRVIEW W/O EVERGIAPENDLETON AV MAYWOOD AV AC/AC 2 0 18-CENTENNIAL PARK Alleys 2)3 20 3,332 5/S7/24 31 26 63 11 91000 9010 93000.9030 ALLEYN/O DORMAN S/O 1JTH-910 C. W/O FAIRMONT ST FAIRMONT ST AC/AC 2 O 98-NON-NEIGHBORHOOD AREA98 Alleys 596 20 M308 5/22/24 32 48 36 16 909J0 9030 904J0.9030 ALLEY E/O PARTON W/O VAN NE55-LIME ST WASHINGTON AV AC/AC 2 O 39-WILLIRD Alleys 310 20 4,521 5/23/24 32 40 50 SO 90110 9010 90110.9010 ALLEY E/O CEDAR W/O STANDARD-'.MCFADDENAV ALLEY N/O MCFADDEN 5/0 HARWO( AC/AC 2 O 09-EASTSIDE Alleys 155 20 1,618 1/21/22 33 53 47 0 90950 9010 90950.9010 ALLEY N/O CENTRAL 1/0 WARNER-! BIRCH ST BROADWAY AC/AC 2 O 99-NON-NEIGHBORHOODAREA19 Alleys 439 20 8,334 3/21/22 33 67 33 0 90300 90J0 90300.90]0 ALLEY E/O HESPERIAN W/O BRISTO-ELM ST CDS N/O ELM ST AC/AC 2 O 39-RIVERVIEW Alleys 363 20 7,052 4/4/24 33 52 41 1 90950 9020 90450.9020 ALLEY E/O PACIFIC W/O BRISTOL- 9(WALNUT ST ALLEY WALNUT S/01ST AC/AC 2 0 36-CENTRAL CITY Alleys 165 20 2.J53 5/16/24 34 0 100 0 90640 9040 90690.9040 ALLEY E/O TOWNSEND W/O RAITT -!ALLEYN/O MCFADDEN S/O MONTAI MONTA VISTAAV AC/AC 2 0 90-BELLI VISTA Alleys 913 20 16,869 5/16/24 34 38 62 0 90830 9010 90830.9030 ALLEY N/O 11T 1/0 PALM -90830 WRIGHTST LVON ST AC/AC 2 O 0)-SADDLEBACK VIEW Alleys 583 18 7,532 5/23/24 34 28 43 30 911J0 9010 911]0.9030 ALLEYN/OLILICS/OKENT-911]0 HARBOR BLVD CDs E/O HARBOR BLVD AC/AC 2 0 26-RIVERVIEW WEST Alleys 33D 20 4,518 5/23/24 35 58 41 1 90J80 9005 90J80.9005 ALLEY N/O 18TH 51019TH-90780 IEFFERSON PL AC -FCC TRANSRION AC/AC 2 O 02-FLORAL PARK Alleys 116 18 1,100 3/23/22 36 49 38 13 90100 9010 90100.9010 ALLEY E/O CEDAR W/O EVERGREEN -OCCIDEMAL ST EDINGERAV AC/AC 2 O 48-CEDAR EVERGREENCO-OP Alleys 1,119 20 W,435 3/14/24 36 63 33 4 90)fi0 9005 90J60.9005 ALLEY N/O 17TH 11019W 907fi0 MABURY ST SHERRY LN AC/AC 2 O 58-MEREDRH PARKWOOD Alleys 651 20 30,392 1/8/24 37 71 22 ] 90601 9010 90601-9030 ALLEY E/O STANDARD W/O MINNIE-MCFADDENAV ALLEY N/O MCFADDEN S/.WAKEHA AC/AC 2 O 51-CORNERSTONE VILLAGE Alleys 1,111 20 M.- 2/23/24 37 43 91 16 90050 9010 90050.9010 ALLEY E/O BRISTOL W/O BAKER SIX SAN LORENZO AV HEMLOCK WY AC/AC 2 O ROSEWOOD OAKER OWNERSASSOCIA Alleys .6 20 9,240 5/1S/24 37 55 28 16 90510 9010 90510.9010 ALLEY E/O ROSEWOOD W/O SHELTO SAN LORENZO AV HEMLOCK WY AC/AC 1 O 19-SUNWOOD CEMRAL Alleys 311 20 6,109 5/1S/24 37 50 37 14 90090 9020 90090.9020 ALLEYE/. BUSH W/O SPURGEON-91S THST 1-ST AC/AC 1 O 25-FRENCH COURT Alleys 400 17 5,371 5/22/24 37 35 44 21 Page 43 of" Cl" ' fSnt. Ana, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Fun. Ch., PCI Order )0-100) Type nc Cass Neighborhoods nyth —th nsp. Da -d Other �� ©o • ®mom®memo Ma7mr. �rra-rzari f -�oo Page"of" City of Santa Ana, CA Page 14 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — May 27, 2024 XIII. APPENDIX C —GIS DIGITAL DATA Introduction The OCTA GIS Section maintains a spatial inventory of transportation infrastructure which mostly consists of major arterial streets, roads, and highways. A key component of road information is pavement condition. Maintaining an inventory of pavement condition will enhance OCTA's GIS visualization and analysis capabilities and assist in understanding the transportation investment needs throughout the region. Therefore, a GIS dataset in digital format should be included in this report. Structure of GIS Data The GIS dataset must consist of linear geographic features that represent road/street segments. All segments that are part of the report should be included in the GIS dataset. The attribute information of each segment should generally follow the format of the Complete Listing of Current Street Conditions in Appendix B above. The GIS data requirements are discussed below. Most commercial and open -source GIS software provide industry - standard tools to manage GIS data to meet these requirements. GIS Dieital Data Format The GIS data must be submitted in either one of the following formats • Esri Shapefile, or • Esri File Geodatabase Metadata The GIS data are required to have associated metadata. The minimum metadata items required are: • Title of Dataset • Tags (A set of words that can be used by GIS to search for the resource. For example: "pavement", "transportation", "roads") • Summary (A brief purpose statement of the dataset) • Description (A brief narrative of the dataset's content) • Credits (A recognition of those who created or contributed to the resource) Spatial Geometry Type The spatial geometry of the segment features must be lines that represent the roadway centerline as accurately as possible. Protection The GIS data must have spatial reference information and have its coordinate system identified and embedded in or associated with the data file(s). All GIS data submitted to OCTA should be in the following projected coordinate system: • NAD 1983 State Plane California VI FIPS O406 (US Feet) - More information about this system can be found at: https://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/nad83-california-zone-6-ftus/ :, A City of Santa Ana, CA Page 15 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - May 27, 2024 GIS Feature Attributes The required segment attributes are: • Street name • Unique segment identifier (Segment ID from original source if available) • Name of intersecting road at the beginning of a segment • Name of intersecting road at the end of the segment • Current pavement condition index (PCI) • Current PCI inspection date • Length of road segment in feet • Width of road segment in feet • Paved area of road segment in square feet or square yards • Projected PCI at end of Seven -Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Additional attributes such as number of through travel lanes, direction of travel and pavement surface type may be provided. XIV. APPENDIX D - QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL PLAN Intrnrhir*inn When performing data collection in any field, the need for quality control is paramount as it is essential for accurate planning, analysis and design. This is particularly true for collecting pavement distress data for a pavement management program. The Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan establishes minimum quality standards for performance and procedures for update of the pavement management program. Objectives This document constitutes a formal QA/QC Plan for the City of Santa Ana. It was prepared in April, 2020 and last revised in March, 2024. Specifically, it is intended for the 2024 Pavement Management Plan Update. The focus is on the collection of network -level pavement distress data (defined by National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 401 Quality Management of Pavement Data Collection, as "Network -level data collection involves collection of large quantities of pavement condition data, which is often converted to individual condition indices or aggregated into composite condition indices". This document also addresses the QA/QC plan requirements of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)'s "Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines" (Section 2.4), adopted in May 2010. Structure of QA/QC Plan The following components are addressed in this QA/QC Plan: • Condition survey procedures used; City of Santa Ana, CA Page 16 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - May 27, 2024 • Accuracy required for data collection; • Inspector qualifications and experience; and • Safety. Condition Survey Procedures The governing document in performing condition surveys for the City of Santa Ana is ASTM D6433 "Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Surveys." Both asphalt concrete (AC) and Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements are included in this protocol. The following distresses are collected for each pavement type: 1. Alligator (fatigue) cracking ......................................................................................................................................:............................................................................................................... 1. Blow-up/Buckling 2. Bleeding ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... :2. Corner Breaks 3. Block Cracking ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... :3. Divided Slab 4. Bumps and sags ......................................................................................................................................:............................................................................................................... 4. Durability ("D") Cracking 5. Corrugation ......................................................................................................................................:............................................................................................................... 5. Faulting 6. Depression ......................................................................................................................................:............................................................................................................... 5. Joint Seal damage 7. Edge Cracking ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... :7. Lane/Shoulder Drop-off S. Joint Reflection Cracking ......................................................................................................................................:............................................................................................................... 8. Linear Cracking 9. Lane/Shoulder Drop-off ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... :9. Patching (large) and Utility Cuts 16. Longitudinal &Transverse Cracking ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16. Patching (small) 11. Patching and Utility Cut Patching, ......................................................................................................................................:............................................................................................................... 11. Polished Aggregate 12. Polished aggregate ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... :12. Popouts 13. Potholes ......................................................................................................................................:............................................................................................................... 13. Pumping 14. Railroad Crossing ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... :14. Punchout 15. Rutting ......................................................................................................................................:............................................................................................................... 15. Railroad Crossing 16. Shoving ......................................................................................................................................:............................................................................................................... 16. Scaling, map cracking and crazinf 17. Slippage Cracking ......................................................................................................................................:............................................................................................................... 17. Shrinkage Cracks 18. Swell ......................................................................................................................................:............................................................................................................... 18. Spalling (corner) 19. Weathering ......................................................................................................................................:............................................................................................................... 19. Spalling (joint) 20. Raveling As required by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), the City of Santa Ana must prepare and implement a quality assurance / quality control (QA/QC) plan regarding pavement management inspection as they pertain to StreetSaver. For the purposes of this report, Bucknam has demonstrated below how our project team implemented QA/QC procedures during the project. Our QA/QC plan focuses on the how each pavement inspection is performed, what distresses are collected and ensures that it complies with the OCTA guidelines defined within the "Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines (CPMPG)". As shown within the OCTA CPMPG, our staff followed and delivered on the requirements stated within Chapter 2, page 2-5 which require specific QA/QC data (Items A through G). Additionally, Chapter 3 requires numerous data/deliverables from local agencies for OC Measure M2 eligibility. All general PCI budgetary report submittals will follow the Chapter 3 guidelines. In conjunction with the outlined items within the CPMPG Section 2 we have City of Santa Ana, CA Page 17 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - May 27, 2024 summarized our QA/QC procedures below: Descriptions of condition survey - Our staff follows the required Condition Survey Protocols (CPMPG, Chapter 2); our staff assesses each pavement section for the minimum distresses outlined within Chapter 2, page 2-1. Additionally, based on the pavement conditions found, we collect all MicroPAVER/StreetSaver Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) distresses, if found within the sample sections; for example, if slippage cracking, potholes, etc. are found our survey technicians record the proper information. b. How data was collected - Our surveys follow the OCTA accepted walking requirements. All sections that our staff surveys are performed through the walking method, approximately 10% of all sections surveyed were complemented with windshield surveys based on unique conditions found. Our staff physically measures the width of every section as well as measure for any square footage adjustment that need to be added or taken away from a sections "true area" (i.e. cul-de- sac, bus pads, street width variances, etc.). Samples taken always include a minimum of 2,500 SF coverage unless specific section limits prohibit this. Arterial section samples utilize a 3,500 SF sample size due to the larger section area (this is within the ASTM D6433 sample size calculation. Field crews typically include one individual for residential pavement sections while Arterial (MPAH) routes utilize a two -person crew for safety, traffic control and increases quality control. Accuracy required for data collection - We use a statistical sampling approach for measuring the quality of our field technician's work. In this manner, 10 percent of the original surveys are re- surveyed by a different survey crew than the original, supervised by a field supervisor, and the results are compared to the original surveys. Our QC process involves checking the field crews' work in a "blind study" fashion. Quality control checks are performed at the end of each survey week. This ensures that all field personnel are properly collecting section samples, distress types and distress severities for all street segments. When QA/QC issues are found, our staff documents the issues within M i cro PAVE R's/St reetSave r's user interface. If distress types found are not within the 97% accuracy our QA/QC is expanded beyond our minimum 10% resurvey to 20% of the original survey Random and Systematic Re -Inspections —As described above our staff re -inspects, as a minimum, 10% of the original survey (OCTA only requires 5%). Per the agency's requests, our staff will submit PCI reports to the agency as project status reports for their review. Agencies will typically review specific pavement sections for PCI accuracy based on recent overlay or slurry seal maintenance; this serves as an initial accuracy check on our surveys (outside Bucknam QC efforts). Additionally, our staff performs "ride -a -long" surveys with local agency staff to build consensus on how our MicroPAVER/StreetSaver ACOE surveys are performed, recorded and reported on. Random re -inspections will include a representative selection across the following categories: • Functional classed (i.e. MPAH, locals); • Surface types (e.g. AC or PCC); • Pavement conditions (e.g. good, fair, poor); • Inspectors; • Geographical areas, if applicable. City of Santa Ana, CA Page 18 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - May 27, 2024 For systematic re -inspections, this could be due to noticed trends such as specific treatment types (e.g. open -graded mixed), a specific inspector or geographical area. In these cases Bucknam continues to utilize a 10% re -inspection policy. e. PCI Comparison with Past Surveys - if previous inspection data is available, new PCI's calculated through the most recent inspections will be compared to previous PCI's. If the variance in PCI is greater than +/- 10 PCI points, these sections will be flagged for further investigation and/or re - inspection (In the cases that a PCI increases or decreases by 10 points follows the established CPMPG guidelines; Appendix A, page A-18). f. Schedule of data submittal — Pending on the City's last major PMP submittal, Bucknam will assist the agency in submitting the following: ❖ Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) routes will be surveyed and reported on at least once every two years Local streets will be surveyed and reported on every six years Corresponding MPAH and local PCI reporting and budgetary reporting will be submitted every two years g. Experience of Inspectors — Bucknam staff have been trained on the use of StreetSaver and the segment calibration/verification and inspection practices. Mr. Peter Bucknam (Project Manager) has completed the MicroPAVER Certification of Professional Development courses. All Bucknam field technicians are trained using the ASTM D6433 survey methodologies and have passed OCTA's prequalification testing every year since 2010. Bucknam Infrastructure Group inspectors have attended formal training on pavement condition distress surveys. This training was conducted prior to performing any work using the ASTM D6433 protocols, consistent with OCTA's requirements. Shaun Russo Feb-23 OCTA ....................................................;..................................................................................;................................................. ,baron Cohodas Feb-24 OCTA h. Field data collection safety procedures — Bucknam field survey techniques utilize the following procedures: a. All vehicles are properly marked or flagged with appropriate sign markings indicating that a "PAVEMENT SURVEY IS IN PROGRESS"; b. All vehicles have the proper flashing amber light beacons placed on the top of the vehicle to allow for proper visibility and line -of -site warning; c. Large MPAH routes are surveyed using two field technicians to increase traffic control warning and safety; d. While parking or stopping along the survey route, vehicles legally park within the right- of-way or use a parking lot; e. All field technicians wear ANSI —105 Class 11 safety vests City of Santa Ana, CA Page 19 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - May 27, 2024 XV. APPENDIX E - PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT DATA FILES The City of Santa Ana StreetSaver database is available online through MTC StreetSaver's website; to log in and review PMP data OCTA will need to obtain permission from Santa Ana staff and MTC. Available PMP data and the associated reporting data includes: • Street names and limits for the City's public streets • Street identifiers (Branch ID, Section ID) • Direction • Begin and end of section • Length, width and true areas • Functional Classification (MPAH, Local) • Number of travel lanes • Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and date of inspection • Type of recommended treatment • Cost of recommended treatment City of Santa Ana, CA Page 20 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — May 27, 2024 XVI. APPENDIX F — GIS MAPS / CURRENT CONDITIONS