HomeMy WebLinkAboutMETROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (4)/q- -. j '3 t" 5- - (-) o I
Ps
THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT
OF SO UTHFRN CALIFORNIA
C AO&
Office of the Board of Directors
Date: April 17, 2012
To: Presiding Officer of the Governing Body
of the Member Public Agency
Frorn: Board Executive Secretary
Subject: Resolutions 9141 and 9142
At its rneeting of April 10, 2012, the Board of Directors adopted Resolutions 9141. and
9142 fixing and adopting a readiness -to -serve charge, and a capacity charge, respectively,
for calendar year 2013.
Enclosed are certified copies Of.ReSOIL[tions 9141 and 9142.
Dawn Chin
Enclosures
s:\,,vlisliared\jiibra,,,s\9141-421tr
700 N. Alameda Street, Los Angeles, California 90012 9 Mailing Address: Box 54153, Los Angeles, California 90054-0153 9 Telephone (213) 217-6000
THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT
OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION 9141
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
FIXING AND ADOPTING
A READINESS -TO -SERVE CHARGE FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2013
WHEREAS, at its meeting on October 16, 2001, the Board of Directors ("Board") of
The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California ("Metropolitan") approved a rate structure proposal
described in Board Letter 9-6 dated October 16, 2001, including a readiness -to -serve charge; and
WHEREAS, providing firm revenue sources is a goal of such rate structure; and
WHEREAS, the amount of revenue to be raised by the readiness -to -serve charge shall be as
determined by the Board and allocation of the readiness -to -serve charge among member public agencies shall be
in accordance withh the method establishedby the Board; and
WHEREAS, the readiness -to -serve charge is a charge imposed by Metropolitan upon its member
agencies, and is not a fee or charge imposed upon real property or upon persons as an incident of property
ownership; and
WHEREAS, Metropolitan has legal authority to impose such readiness -to -serve charge as a water
rate pursuant to Section 1.34 of the Metropolitan Water District -Act (the "Act"), and as an availability of service
charge pursuant to Section 134.5 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, under authority of Sections 133 and 134 of the Act, the Board has the authority to
fix the rate or rates for water as will result in revenue which, together with other revemies, will pay Metropolitan's
operating expenses and provide for payment of other costs, including payment of the interest and principal of
Metropolitan's non -tax funded bonded debt; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 8329, adopted by the Board on July 9, 1991, proceeds of the
readiness -to -serve charge and other revenues from the sale or availability of water are pledged to the payment of
Metropolitan's outstanding revenue bonds issued and revenue bonds to be issued pursuant to Resolution 8329;
and
WHEREAS, under authority of Section 134.5 of the Act, a. readiness -to -serve charge imposed as
an availability of service charge may be collected from the member public agencies within Metropolitan, or may
be imposed as a standby charge against individual parcels within Metropolitan's service area; and
WHERE, AS, under such authority, the water standby charge may be imposed on each acre of laid
or each parcel of land less than an acre within Metropolitan to which water is made available for any purpose by
Metropolitan, whether the water is actually used or not; and
Section 3. That such readiness -to -serve charge for January 1, 2013 through and including
December 31, 2013 shall be the water rate as specified in Section 5, which shall be charged on a historic basis for
each acre-foot of water, excluding water used for purposes of replenishing local storage and agriculture as defined
by the Administrative Code, included in Metropolitan's average water deliveries to its member agencies for the
applicable ten-year period identified in Section 5 below. The aggregate readiness -to -serve charge for the period
from January 1., 2013 through and including December 31, 2013 shall. be as specified in Section 5.
Section 4. That in the alternative, and without duplication, the readiness -to -serve charge shall be
an availability of service charge pursuant to Section 134.5 of the Act.
Section 5, That the readiness -to -serve charge for January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013
shall be allocated among the member public agencies in proportion to the average of deliveries through
Metropolitan's system (in acre-feet) to each member public agency during the ten. -year period ending June 30,
2011. Metropolitan sales of reclaimed water under the Local Projects Program, groundwater under the
Groundwater Recovery Program, and deliveries under the Replenishment and Interim Agricultural Water- Service
Prograins. are not included in the readiness -to -serve charge water sales calculation. The allocation of the
readiness -to -serve charge among member agencies is based on sales data recorded by Metropolitan and shall be
conclusive in the absence of manifest error.
The ainount of the readiness -to -serve charge to be imposed on each member public agency
effective January 1, 2013, is as follows:
Table 1
.totals may not foot due to rounding
Table 3
Option 3: Calendar Year 2013 Readiness -To -Serve Charge
totals may not foot due to rounding
Section 6. That the allocation of the readiness -to -serve charge among member agencies set forth
in Section 5 above is consistent with the per -acre-foot water rates imposed pursuant to Section 3 above.
Section 7. That water conveyed through Metropolitan's system for the purposes of water
transfers, exchanges or other similar arrangements shall be included in the calculation of a member agency's
rolling ten-year average firm demands used to allocate the readincss-to-serve charge.
Section S. That the readiness -to -serve charge and the amount applicable to each member public
agency, the method of its calculation, and the specific data used in its determination are as specified in the
General Manager's recommendation on rates and charges to be effective January 1, 201.3, which forms the basis
of the readiness -to -serve charge, and the corresponding cost of service report. Such recommendation and cost of
service report are on file and available for review by interested parties at Metropolitan's headquarters.
obligation shall pay such readiness -to -serve charge obligation in full, as if continuation of such water standby
charges had never been sought.
Section 15, That the General Manager and the General Counsel are hereby authorized to do all
things necessary and desirable to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution, including, without limitation, the
commencement or defense of litigation.
Section 16 That this Board finds that the readiness -to -serve charge and other charges provided in
this Resolution are not defined as a Project under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") since they
involve continuing administrative activities, such as general policy and procedure malting (Section 15378(b)(2) of
the State CEQA Guidelines). In addition, the proposed actions are not subject to CEQA because they involve the
creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities, which do not involve any
commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the
environment (Section 15378(b)(4) of the State-CEQA Guidelines).
Section 17. That if any provision of this Resolution or the application to any member agency,
property or person whatsoever is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of
this Resolution which can be given effect without the invalid portion or application, and to that end the provisions
of this Resolution arc severable.
Section 18. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to tape all necessary
action to satisfy relevant statutes requiring notice by mailing or by publication.
Section 19. That the Board Executive Secretary is hereby directed to transmit a certified copy of
this Resolution to the presiding officer of the governing body of each member public agency.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a Resolution adopted
by the Board. of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, at its meeting held on
April 10, 2012.
Board Executive Secretary
The Metropolitan Water District
of Southern California
7
TIDE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER'S REPORT
PROGRAM TO LEVY READINESS -TO -SERVE CHARGE,
INCLUDING LOCAL OPTION FOR STANDBY CHARGE,
DURING FISCAL YEAR 2012/13
March 2012
BACKGROUND
The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California is a public agency with a primary purpose to provide
imported water supply for domestic and municipal uses at wholesale rates to its member public agencies. More
than 18 miIlion people reside within Metropolitan's service area., which covers over 5,000 square miles and.
includes portions of the six counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego and Ventura.
Metropolitan currently provides over 50 percent of the water used within its service area.
REPORT PURPOSES
As part of its role as an imported water supplier, Metropolitan builds capital facilities and implements water
management programs that ensure reliable high quality water supplies throughout its service area. The purpose of
this report is to: (1) identify and describe those facilities and programs that will be financed in part by
Metropolitan's readiness -to -serve (RTS) charge in fiscal year 2012/13, and (2) describe the method. and basis for
levying Metropolitan's standby charge for those agencies electing to collect a portion of their RTS obligation
through Metropolitan's standby charge. Because the standby charge is levied and collected on a fiscal year
basis the calculations in this report also are for the fiscal year, even though the RTS charge is imposed on a
calendar year basis. The RTS charge for calendar year 2012 was adopted by Metropolitan's Board on April 13,
201.0 and the RTS charge for 2013 will be considered by the Board on March 13, 2012.
Metropolitan levies the RTS charge on its member agencies to recover a portion of the debt service on bonds
issued to finance capital facilities needed to meet existing demands on Metropolitan's system. The standby
charge is levied on parcels of land within certain of Metropolitan's member agencies as a method of collecting
part or all of such member agency's RTS charge obligation. The RTS charge will partially pay for the facilities
and programs described in this report. The standby charge, if levied, will be utilized solely for capital payments
and debt service on the capital facilities identified in this report.
METROPOLITAN'S RESPONSE TO INCREASING WATER DEMANDS
To respond to increasing demands for water, Metropolitan and its member agencies collectively examined the
available local and imported resource options in order to develop a. least -cost plan that meets the reliability and
quality needs of the region.. The product of this intensive effort was an Integrated Resources Plan (IRP) for
achieving a reliable and affordable water supply for Southern California. The major objective of the IRP was to
develop a comprehensive water resources plan that ensures (1) reliability, (2) affordability, (3) water duality,
(4) diversity of supply, and (5) adaptability for the region, while recognizing the environmental, institutional, and
political constraints to resource development. As these constraints change over time, the IRP is periodically
revisited and updated by Metropolitan and the member agencies to reflect current conditions. To meet the water
supply needs of existing and future customers within its service area, Metropolitan continues to identify and
develop additional water supplies to maintain the reliability of the imported water supply and delivery systern.
These efforts include the construction of capital facilities and implementation of demand management programs.
summary of the estimated benefits of the demand management programs as measured by Metropolitan's
anticipated expenditures for these programs in fiscal year 2012/13 is shown in Table 1.
Local Resources Program
In 1998, Metropolitan's Board adopted the Local Resources Program (LRP) with the goal of developing local
water resources in a cost-efficient manner. Financial incentives of up to $250 per acre-foot are provided to
member agency -sponsored projects that best help the region achieve its local resource production goals of
restoring degraded groundwater resources for potable use and developing recycled supplies. in both instances, the
programs provide new water supplies, which help defer the need for additional regional conveyance, distribution
and storage facilities.
Combined production from participating recycling and groundwater recovery projects is expected to yield
approximately 220,000 acre-feet of water for fiscal year 2012/13 with financial incentive payments of about
$33 million. Regional recycling, recovered groundwater, and desalinated seawater production are projected to be
about 658,000 acre-feet per year, by year 2025. An estimate of potential benefits as measured by Metropolitan's
estimated incentive payments for recycling and groundwater recovery projects is shown in Table 2.
Water Conservation
Metropolitan actively promotes water conservation programs within its service area as a cost-effective strategy for
ensuring the long -terra reliability of supplies and as a means of reducing the need to expand system conveyance,
distribution and treatment capacity. Through the Conservation Credits Program, Metropolitan reimburses local
agencies for a share of their costs of implementing conservation. projects. Since fiscal year 1990/91, Metropolitan
has spent over $309 million in financial incentives to support local conservation projects.
In 1991, Metropolitan agreed. to implement conservation "Best Management Practices" (BMPs). By signing the
California Urban Water Conservation Council's Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Urban Water
Conservation (amended March 10, 2004), Metropolitan committed to implement proven and reliable water
conserving technologies and practices within its jurisdiction. Based on Metropolitan's IRP, the Conservation
Credits Program, in conjunction with plumbing codes and other conservation efforts, has saved over
1,569,000 acre-feet since inception through fiscal year 2010/11. In order to comply with the Governor's mandate
of reducing demand by 20 percent by the year 2020, Metropolitan is working on increasing its conservation
efforts in the next ten years to meet that request. Conservation is a critical element of Metropolitan's demand
management program, effectively increasing the reliability of existing water supplies by lessening the need to
import additional water while at the same time deferring the need to expand system capacity. An estimate of the
potential benefits of water conservation projects as measured by Metropolitan's incentive payments is given in
Table 2.
LONG-RANGE FINANCIAL PLANNING
Metropolitan's major capital facilities are financed largely from the proceeds of revenue bond issues, which are
repaid over future years. The principal source of revenue for repayment of these bonds is water sales, which is
currently Metropolitan's largest source of revenue. In addition, ad valorem property taxes provide an additional
limited revenue source, which is used to pay pre-1978 voter -approved indebtedness.
Since the passage of Article XIHA of the California Constitution, Metropolitan has necessarily relied more on
water sales revenue than on ad valorem property taxes for the payment of debt. Water sales have become the.
dominant source of revenue, not only for operation and maintenance of the vast network of facilities supplying
water to Southern California, but also for replacement and improvement of capital facilities.
10
imposition or reimposition, as applicable, of annexation standby charges for fiscal year 2012/13. Table 6 lists
parcels annexed, or to be annexed, to Metropolitan and to electing member agencies during ICY 2012/13, such
parcels being subject to the annexation standby charge upon annexation. Parcels annexed prior to FY 2012/13 are
subject to annexation standby charges as described in the Engineer's Report for the fiscal year of their annexation.
These parcels and parcels that are subject to the pre-1997 standby charges are identified in a listing filed. with the
Executive Secretary.
The estimated potential benefits of Metropolitan's water supply program, which could be paid by a standby
charge, exceed $322 million for fiscal year 2012/13, as shown in Table 1. An average total standby charge of
about $74.4 per acre of land or per parcel of less than one acre would be necessary to pay for the total potential
program benefits. Benefits in this amount will accrue to each acre of property andparcel within Metropolitan, as
these properties are eligible to use water from. the Metropolitan system. Because only properties located within
Metropolitan's boundaries may receive water supplies from Metropolitan (except for certain contractual deliveries
as permitted under Section 131 of the Metropolitan Water District Act), any benefit received by the public at large
or by properties outside of the proposed area to be annexed is merely incidental.
Table 5 shows that the distribution of standby charge revenues from the various member agencies would provide
net revenue flow of approximately $43.5 million for fiscal year 2012/13. This total amount is less than the
estimated benefits shown in Table 1. Metropolitan will use other revenue sources, such as water sales revenues,
readiness -to -serve charge revenues (except to the extent collected through standby charges, as described above),
interest income, and revenue from sales of hydroelectric power, to pay for the remaining program benefits. Thus,
the benefits of Metropolitan's investments in water conveyance, storage, distribution, and demand management
programs far exceed the recommended standby charge.
Equity
The RTS charge is a firm revenue source. The revenues to be collected through this charge will not vary with
sales in the current year. This charge is levied on Metropolitan's member agencies and is not a fee or charge upon
real property or upon persons as an incident of property ownership. It ensures that agencies that only occasionally
purchase water from Metropolitan but receive the reliability benefits of MetropoIitan's system pay a greater share
of the costs to provide that reliability. Within member agencies that elect to pay the RTS charge through
Metropolitan's standby charges, the standby charge results in lower water rates than would otherwise be
necessmy due to the amount of revenue collected from lands which benefit from the availability of Metropolitan's
water supply. With the standby charge, these properties are now contributing a more appropriate share of the cost
of importing water to Southern California.
Metropolitan's water supply program increases the availability and reliable delivery of water throughout
Metropolitan's service area. Increased water supplies benefit existing consumers and land uses through direct
deliveries to consumers and properties, and through the replenishment of groundwater basins and reservoir
storage as reserves against shortages due to droughts, natural emergencies, or scheduled facility shutdowns for
maintenance. The benefits of reliable water supplies from the SWP, CRA, DVL, and system improvements
accrue to more than 250 cities and communities within Metropolitan's six -county service area. Metropolitan's
regional water system is iilterconnectcd, so water supplies from the SWP and CRA can be used throughout most
of the service area and therefore benefit water users and properties system -wide.
Additional Metropolitan deliveries required in the corning fiscal year due to the demands of properly development
will be reduced by the implementation of demand management projects, including water conservation, water
recycling, and groundwater recovery projects. As with the SWP, CRA and DVL and the conveyance and
distribution facilities, demand management programs increase the future reliability of water supplies. In addition,
demand management programs provide system -wide benefits by effectively decreasing the demand for imported
water, which helps to defer construction of additional system conveyance and distribution capacity. However, the
12
TABLE 1
ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF BENEFITS OF WATER SUPPLY
PAYABLE BY STANDBY CHARGE
I Water
Net Capital Payments to State Water Project (less portion paid by property taxes)
Non Tax Supported Debt Service Costs for System Storage'
Non Tax Supported Debt Service Casts for Conveyance and Distribution System 2
Sub -Total Capital Payments
less Estimated Standby Charge Revenues
Remaining capital payments
Demand Management Programs: Water Recycling,
Groundwater Recovery, and Water Conservation Projects
Sub -Total Capital Financing and Demand Management Programs
Costs nd Paid by Standby Charge Revenues
Estimated Potential
Program Benefits for Dollars Per Parcel
PY2012113 of 1 Acre or Less
52,504,650
$12.11
92,515,692
$21.33
$124,620,270
$28.74
$269,640,612
$62.1a
$ (43,547,586)
($10.04)
$226,093.026 $52.14
$53,202,188 $12.27
$279,295,214 $64,41
Total Benefits. Capital Financing and Demand Management Programs $322,842,800 $74,45
Notes:
[11 System storage includes Diamond Vatoy Lake, Lake Mathews, Lake Skinner and several other smaller surface reservoirs which provide storage
for operational purposes.
[2] Conveyance and Distribution facilities include the Colorado River Aqueduct and the pipelines, laterals, beders and canals that distribute water
throughout the service area.
Totals may not foot due to rounding
14
TABLE 2 (Continued)
WATER RECYCLING, GROUNDWATER RECOVERY
AND CONSERVATION PROJECTS
FY 2012/13
Project Name Payment
Water Recycling Projects (continued)
Long Beach Reclamation Expansion Phase I
Long Beach Reclamation Project
Los Angeles Taylor Yard Water Recycling Project
Moulton Niguel Phase 4 Reclamation System Expansion
Moulton Niguel Reclamation Project
North City Water Reclamation Project
Oceanside Water Reclamation Project
Olivenhain Recycled Project - SE Quadrant
Otay Recycled Water System
Padre Dam Reclaimed Water System Phase 1
Ramona/Santa Maria Water Reclamation Project
Rancho California Reclamation Expansion
Rancho Santa Fe Reclaimed Water System
RDDMWD Recycled Water Program
San Clemente Water Reclamation Project
San Efijo Water Reclamation System
San Pasqual Reclamation Project
San Vicente Recycled Water Project
Santa Margarita Reclamation Expansion Project
Sepulveda Basin Water Reclamation Project
Sepulveda Basin Water Recycling Project Phase IV
Shadowridge Reclaimed Water System
Trabuco Canyon Reclamation Expansion Project
West Basin Water Reclamation Program
16
TABLE 3
CONVEYANCE AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BENEFITS
(Description
PUMPING PLANTS - 230 KV & 69 KV DISCONNECTS REPLACEMEN T
ESS STRUCTURE, TRANSITION STRUCTURE AND MANHOLE COVER REPLACEM ENT
PUMPING PLANTS - BRI DGE CRANES
PUMPING PLANTS - TRANSFORMER BANK BRIDGE
EN MCCOLLOCH PIPELINE- RIGHT OF WAY
EN MCCOLLOCH PIPELINE- UPDATE IMODIFY ALL BOYLE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
EDUCT & PUMPI NG PLANT ISOLATION f ACCESS FIXTURES -STUDY
EDUCT & PUMPI NG PLANT ISOLATION GATES
DWHEAD EAST TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION
DWHEAD TDS REDUCTI ON
DWHEAD TUNNELS CLAIMS COST
DWHEAD TUNNELS CONNEC TCR ROAD
DWHEAD TUNNELS CONSTRUC TION
DWHEAD TUNNELS ENGI NEERI NG
ARROWHEAD TUNNELS RE-DESI GN
ARROWHEAD WEST TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION
AULD VALLEY CONTROL STRUCTURE AREA FACI LITIES UPGRADE STUDY
AUXILIARY POWER SYSTEM REHABS LITATION 1 UPGRADES STUDY
BACHELOR MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATION SITE ACQUISITION
BACHELOR MOUNTAIN TELECOM SITE IMPROVEMENTS
BANK TRANSFOR MERS REPLACEM ENT STUDY
BLACK METAL MOU NTAIN - COMMUNICATIONS FACI LITY UPGRADE
BOX SPRINGS FEEDER REHAB PHASE 111
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
CABA70N RADIAL GATE FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
CATHODIC PROTECTION STUDY - DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
CCRP - BLOW -OFF VALVES PHASE 4 PROJECT
CCRP - CONTINGENCY
CCRP - EMERGENCY REPAIR
CCRP - HEAD GATE OPERATORS & Cl RCUIT BREAKERS REHAB.
CCRP - PART 1 & 2
CCRP - SAND TRAP CLEANING EQUIPMENT &TRAVELING CRANE STUDY
CCRP - TRANSI TION & MAN -WAY ACCESS COVER REPLACEM ENT - STUDY & DESIGN
CCRP - TUNNELS STUDY
CEPSRP-230 KV SYSTEM SYNCHRONIZERS
CEPSRP-ALL PUMPING PLANTS -CONTI NGENCY & OTHER CREDITS
CEPSRP - ALL PUMPING PLANTS - REPLACE 6.9 KV TRANSFO RMER BUSH INGS
CEPSRP - ALL PUMPING PLANTS - REPLACE 230KV , 69 KV & 6.9 KV LIGHTENING ARRESTERS
CEPSRP - ALL PUMPING PLANTS- REPLACE 230KV TRANSFORMER PROTECTION
CEPSRP- SWITCHYARDS & HEAD GATES REHABILITATION
CEPSRP-ALL PUMPING PLANTS- IRON MOUNTAIN -230KV BREAKER SWITCH, INST.
COLORADO RIVER AQUEDUCT - PUMPI NG
CONTROL SYSTEM DRAWING UPGRADE STUDY (PHASE 1) - STUDY
COPPER BASIN AND GENE DAM OUTLET WORKS REHABI LITATION (STUDY & DESIGN)
COPPER BASIN INTERIM CHLORINATION SYSTEM
COPPER BASIN OUTLET GATES RELIABILITY
COPPER BASIN POWER & PHONE LI NES REPLACEMENT
CORROSION CONTROL OZONE MATERIAL TEST FACILITY
COST OF LAND AND RI GHT OF WAY
CRA - ACCESS STRUC TURF, TRANSITION STRUCTURE AND MAN HOLE COVER REPLACEM ENT
CRA-AQUEDUCT AND PUMPING PLANT ISOLATION GATES
18
TABLE S
CONVEYANCE AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BENEFITS
(Description
CRA CONVEYANCE RELIABILITY PROGRAM PART 1 & PART 2
CRA DESERTAIRFIELDS IMPROVEMENT
CRA DISCHARGE CONTAINMENT PROGRAM - CONTINGENCY
CRA DISCHARGE CONTAINMENT PROGRAM - GENE & IRON DRAIN SYSTEMS
CRA DISCHARGE CONTAINMENT PROGRAM - INVESTIGATION
CRA DISCHARGE CONTAINMENT PROGRAM - OIL & CHEMICAL UNLOAD] NG PAD CONTAINMENT
CRA ELECTRI CAL 1 POWER SYSTEM RELIABILITY PROGRAM (CEPSRP)
CRA ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS
CRA GENE STORAGE WAREHOUSE REPLACEMENT
CRA HINDS PUMPING PLANT - WASH AREA UPGRADE
CRA INTAKE PPLANT- POWER & COMMUNICATION LINE REPLACEMENT
CRA IRON GARAGE HEAVY EQUIPMENT SERVI CE PIT REPLACEMENT
CRA IRON HOUSING REPLACEMENT
GRA MAIN PUMP STUDY
CRA MILE 12 POWER LINE & FLOW MONITORING EQUIP. STUDY
CRA PUM P PLANT FLOW METER UPG RADE
CRA PUMP PLANT SUMP PIPING REPLACEMENT STUDY
CRA PUMPING PLANT RELIABILITY PROGRAM - HIGH PRESSUR E COMPRESSOR REPLACEM ENT
CRA PUMPING PLANT RELIABILITY PROGRAM - SUCTION & DISCHARGE LINES EXPANSION JOINT STUDY
CRA PUMPING PLANTS SWITCH HOUSE FAULT CURRENT PROTECTI ON
CRA PUMPING PLANTS VULNERABI LITY ASSESSM ENT
CRA PUMPING WELL CONVERSION
ORA QUAGGA MUSSEL BARRI ERS
CRA RELIABILITY PROGRAM - DISCHARGE VALVE L UBRICATORS
CRA RELIABILITY PROGRAM - MOTOR BREAKER FAULTY CURR ENT STUDY (5 PLANTS)
CRA RELIABILITY PROGRAM PHASE 8 (AQUED LOT PHASE 6 REHAB.) - SPEC 1588
CRA SEISMIC EVALUATION -SWITCH HOUSE AND PUMP ANCH ORAGE
CRA SERVI CE CONNECTI ON DWCV-2T VALVES REPLACEMENT AND STRUCTURE CO NSTRUCTION
CRA SERVICE CONNECTION DWCV-4 VALVES REPLACEMENT
GRA SIPHON REHAB
CRA SI PHONS, TRANSITIONS, CANALS, AND TUNN ELS REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENTS
DAM SLUICEWAYS AND OUTLETS REHABI LITATION
DANBY TOWER HOOTER REPLACEMENT
DESERT FACI LITIES FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS UPGRADE
DESERT LAND ACQU ISITIONS
DESERT PUM P PLANT 01 L CONTAINMENT
DESERT ROADWAY IMPROVEM ENT
DESERT SEPTI G SYSTEM
DESERT SEWER SYSTEM REHABILITATION
DESERT WATER TANK ACCESS- FIR E WATER, CIRCULATING WATER, DOMESTIC WATER- STUDY
DIEMER FILTRATION PLANT - METROPOLITAN/SCE HELI PAD LAND SITE
DISCHARGE LINE ISOLATION BULKHEAD CO UPLINGS
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FACILITIES- REHABILITATION PROGRAM
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FACILITIES REHABILITATION PROGRAM - MAINTENANCE & STORAGE SHO P (PC-1)
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM RELIABILITY PROGRAM - PHASE 2
DVL TO SKINNER TRANSMISSION LINE STUDY
E. THORNTO N IBBETSO N GUEST QUARTERS
EAGLE AND HI NDS EQUIPMENT WASH AREA UPGRADE
EAGLE. KITCHEN UPGRADE
SYSTEM
20
TABLE 3
CONVEYANCE AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BENEFITS
Option
INTAKE PUMPI NG PLANT SCADA SYSTEM
IRON MOUNTAIN PUMPING PLANT
IRON MOUNTAIN PUMPING PLANTSCADASYSTEM
LAKE MATHEWS FOREBAY & HEADWORK FACILITY & EQUIPMENT
LAKE MATHEWS FOREBAY WALKWAY REPAIRS
LAKE MATHEWS ICS
LAKE MATHEWS INTERIM CHLORINATION SYSTEM
LAKE SKIN NER - OUTLET CONDUIT FLOWMETER ] NSTALLATION
LAKE SKINNER BYPASS PIPELINE NO. 2 CATHODIC PROTECTION
LAKE SKIN NER OUTLET CONDU IT
LAVERNE FACILITIES- EMERGENCY GENERATOR
LAVERNE FACI LITIES - MATERIAL TESTING
MAGAZINE CANYON OIL & WATER SEPARATOR
MAGAZINE CANYON OILIWATER SEPARATOR
MAPES LAND ACQ UISTION
MILE 12 POWER LINE & FLOW MONITORING EQUIPMENT STUDY
MILLS FILTRATION PLANT- MODULE NO, 1 FILTER BE.D
MILLS PLANT SUPPLY PUMP STATION STUDY
MOTOR BREAKER FAULTY (5 PPLANTS)
NEWHALL TUNNEL - REPAI R STEEL LINER
NEWHALL TUNNEL- UPGRADE LINER SYSTEM
OC 44 SERVICE CONNECTIONS & EOC#2 METER ACCESS ROAD REPAIR
OC 88 PUMP PLANT FIR E PROTECTION STUDY
OLINDA PCS FACILITY REHABILITATION AND UPGRADE
OLINDA PRESSUR E CONTROL STRUCTURE FACI LITY REHABILITATION AND UPGRADE
ORANGE COUNTY 44SERVICE CONNECTIONS & EOC#2 METER ACCESS ROAD REPAIR
ORANGE COUNTY 88 PUMP PLANT FIR E PROTECTION STUDY
OWNER CONTROLLED INSURANCE PROGRAM
PALO VERDE VALLEY LAND PURCHASE - 16,00D ACRES
PALOS VERDES FEEDER REH ABILITATION OF DOMINGUEZ CHAN NEL
PALOS VERDES RESER VOIR SPILLWAY MODIFICATION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
PUDDI NGSTONE RADIAL GATE REHAB[ LITATION
PURCHASE OF LAND AND RIGHT OF WAY
QUAGGA MUSSEL STUDY
REPAIR UPPER FEEDER LEAK] NG EXPANDSION JOINT
REPAIRS TO TUNNELS
RIALTO FEEDER REPAI R OF ANOMALOUS PIPE SECT[ ON
RIVERSIDE BADLANDS TUNNEL CC NSTRUCTI ON
RIVERSIDE BRANCH - ALESSANDR O BLVD. LEFT LAND TURN LANE
RIVERSIDE BRANC H - CONSTRUCTION OF CONTROL PANEL DI SPLAY WALL
RIVERSIDE NORTH PIPELINE DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
RIVERSIDE SOUTH PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION
SAN DIEGO PIPELINE REPAIR AT STATION 1258+57
SAN FERNAND0 TUNNEL STATION 778+80 VALVE REPLACEMENT
SAN GABR IEL TOWER SEISMIC ASSESSMENT
SAN GABRIEL TOWER SLI DE GATE REHABI LITATION
SAN JACI NTO TUNNEL, WEST PORTAL
SAN JOAQUIN RESERVOIR - NEW DESIGN
SAN JOAQUIN RESERVOIR IMPROVEMENT- FLOATING COVER
SAN JOAQUIN RESERVOIR IMPROVEMENTS
22
TABLE 3
CONVEYANCE AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BENEFITS
rlptlon
42" CONICAL PLUG VALVE REPLACEM ENT
ACCUSONIC FLOWMETER UPGRADE
ALAMEDA CORRIDOR PIPELINE
ALL FACILITIES - WATER DISCHARGE ELIMINATION
ALL FACILITIES INSPECTION AND REPLACHMENT OF CRI TICAL VACUUM VALVES
ALL PUMPING PLANTS- INSTALL HY POCHLORINATION STATIONS
ALLEN MCCOLLOCH PIPELINE INTERCONNECTIONS
ALLEN MCCOLLOCH PIPELINE LOCAL CONTRO L MODIFICATIONS
ALLEN MCCOLLOCH PIPELINE REPAIR
ALLEN MCCOLLOCH PIPELINE REPAIR - CARBON FIBER LINING REPAIR
ALLEN MCCOLLOCH PIPELINE REPAIR -SERVICE CONNECTIONS UPGRADES
ALLEN MCCOLLOCH PIPELI NE REPAIR -STATIC N 276+63
ALLEN MCCOLLOCH PIPELINE REPAIR - SURGE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM AT OC86A
ALLEN MCCOLLOCH PIPELINE REPAIR -VALVE ACTUATOR REPLACEMENTS
ALLEN MCCOLLOCH PIPELINE REPAIR SERVICE CONNECTIONS SIMPLIFICATION
ALLEN MCCOLLOCH PIPELINE STRUCTURE- ROOF SLAB REPAIRS
ALLEN-MCCOLLOCH CORROSIONANTERFERENCE M ITIGATION, STATION 719+34 TO 1178+02
ALLEN-MCCOLLOCH PIPELINE
ALLEN-MCCOLLOCH PIPELI NE VALVE AND SERVI CE CON NECTION VAULT REPAI RS
AMP -SERVICE CONNECTIONS UPGRADES
AMP -VALVE ACTUATOR REPLACEMENTS
AMP COMPLETION RESOLUTION RIGHT OF WAY ISSUES
AMR - RTU UPGRADE - PHASE 2
ANODE WELL REPLACEMENT FOR O RANGE COUNTY AND RIALTO FEEDERS
ASPHALT REPAI RS TO PERIMETER OF SEPULVEDA PCS
ASSESS THE COND ITION OF METROPOLITAN'S PRESTRESSED CO NCRETE CYLINDER PI PE
ASSESS THE CONDITIONS OF MET'S
AULD VALL EY CONTROL STRUCTURE AREA FACI LITIES
AUTOMATED RESERVOI R WATER QUALITY MONITORING
AUTOMATIC METER READI NG SYSTEM - RTU UPGRADE PHASE 2
AUTOMATIC METER READING SYSTEM UPGRADE
AUTOMATION COMMUNICATION UPGRADE
AUTOMATION DOCUMENTATION SURVEY FIA
BAR 97- ENHANCED AREA VEHI CLE TESTING
BATTERY MONITORING SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATIC METER READI NG SYSTEM
BLACK METAL MOU NTAIN ELECTRICAL TRANSFORM ER
BOX SPRINGS FEEDER BROKEN BACK R EPAIR
BOX SPRINGS FEEDER BROKEN SACK R EPAIR PHASE I
BOX SPRINGS FEEDER REPAIR- PHASE I I
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
C&D CRANE INSTALLATION AT OC-66 PUMPING PLANT
CALABASAS FEEDER CARBO N FIBER/BROKEN BACK REPAI R
CALABASAS FEEDER I NTERFERENCE MITIGATION
CAPITAL PROGRAM FOR PROJECTS COSTI NG LESS THAN $250,000 FOR FY 2010111
CAPITAL PROJECTS COSTING LESS THAN $250,000 FOR FY20OB-09
CASA LOMAAND SAN DI EGO CANAL LINING STUDY - PART 2
CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM UPGRADES
CCP-PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTION
CDSRP -DISCHARGE ELIMINATION
CDSRP - ENTRAINED AIR IN UPPER FEEDER PIPELINE STUDY
CDSRP -SEPULVEDA FEEDER REPAI RS
CDSRP - SEPULVEDA TANKS RECC ATING
24
TABLE 3
CONVEYANCE AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BENEFITS
IDescriptlon
DANBY TOWER FOUNDATION INVESTI GATION AND SHO RT TERM MITIGATION
DEODERA PCS PAVEMEN T UPGRADE & BETTERMENT
DESERT BRANC H PUMP PLANT AUX ILIARY (STATION SERVICE)
DESERT BRANC H, PURCHASE & I NSTALL 5 PORT VIDEO CONFERENCING
DESERT FACILITIES DOMESTIC WATER GAC SYSTEM INSTALLATION
DESERT HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSMISSION TOWERS - REPLACE CO PPER GROUND WIRES ON
DETAIL SEISMIC EVALUATION OF WATER STORAGE TANK
DFP - ELIMINATE BACKUP GENERATO R TIE -BUS & I NSTALL MANUAL TRANSFER SW ITCH FOR CHLORINE SCRUBBER
DIEMER AREA & PLANT- REPLACEMEN T OF AREA CONTROL SYSTEMS
DIEMER FILTRATION PLANT -AIR COMPRESSORS REPLACEMEN T
DIEMER FILTRATION PLANT - ASPHALT
DIEMER FILTRATION PLANT -ASPHALT ROAD REPAIRS
DIEMER FILTRATION PLANT - EMERGENCY POWER FEED
DIEMER FILTRATION PLANT - NORTH STORM DRAIN REPLACEMENT
DIEMER FILTRATION PLANT - ON-LINE TURBIDITY
DIEMER FILTRATION PLANT - SLOPE REPAI R
DIEMER FILTRATION PLANT -SLUDGE DEWATERINGIDISPOSAL STUDY
DIEMER FILTRATION PLANT -SLUDGE LINE & STORM
DIEMER FILTRATION PLANT - USED WASHWATER RETUR N PUMP CHECK VALVES UPG RARE
DIEMER FILTRATION PLANT - WASTE WATER DISCHARGE SYSTEM
DISCHARGE ELIMINATION
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM- STANDPIPE STRENGTHENING PROGRAM
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM -STATIONARY CORROSION REFERENCE
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CONTROL & EQUIP UPGRADE- ENHANCED DI STRIB. SYSTEM AUTOMATION PHASE I
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM EQUIPMENT&INSTRUMENTATION UPGRADES
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM REHABILITATION PROGRAM -ASSESS THE STATE OF MW D'S DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM REPLACEM ENT OF AREA CONTRO L SYSTEMS - WILLOWGLEN RTUS ADMI NISTRATION
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM REPLACEM ENT OF AREA CONTRO L SYSTEMS (DSRACS)
DISTRICT WIDE - ENHANCED VAPOR REC OVERY PHASE 2 GASOLI NE DISPENSING
DSRACS - OPERATIONS CONTRO L CENTER - CONTRACT Al 396
DSRACS - SKI NNER AREA
DSRACS -SOFTWARE DEVELOPM ENT COST
DSRACS- WEYMOUTH
DVL & CONTROL SYSTEM REPLACEMENT INVESTIGATION & PREPARATION FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGN
EAGLE EQUI PMENT WASH AREA UPGRADE
EAGLE ROC K -ASPHALT REHABILITATION
EAGLE ROCK - FIRE PROTECTION AT THE WESTERN AREA OF THE EAGLE ROC K CONTROL CENTER PERI METER GROU NOS
EAGLE ROCK LATERAL INTERCONNECTION REPAIR
EAGLE ROCK MAIN BUILDING ROOF REPLACEMENT- STUDY
EAGLE ROCK OCC - REHAB CO NTROL ROOM
EAGLE ROCK OPERATIONS CONTROL CENTER
EAGLE ROCK RESIDENCE CONVERSION
EAGLE ROCK TOWER SLIDEGATE REHABILITATION
EAST INFLUENT CHANNEL REPAIR PROJECT
EAST ORANGE COUNTY FEEDER #2 REPAIR
EASTERN AND DESERT REGIONS PLUMBING RETROFIT
E-DISCOVERY STORAGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPGRADE
ELECTRONIC SYSTEM LOG (ESL)
ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - PHASE 2
ENHANCED DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AUTOMATION PHASE
ENHANCED DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AUTOMATION PHASE II
EQUIPMENT UPGRAD E AT THE NORTH PORTAL OF THE HOLLYWOOD TUNNEL
26
TABLE 3
CONVEYANCE AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BENEFITS
ription
JENSEN FILTRATI ON PLANT- FIRE SYSTEM FOR NAOCI SYSTEM
JENSEN FILTRATION PLANT- FIRE WATER LOOP PRESSU RE UPGRADE
JENSEN FILTRATI ON PLANT - IC C ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
JENSEN FILTRATI ON PLANT- INSTALL INFLUENT SCUP PER GATES
JENSEN FILTRATION PLANT -MODIFICATIONS AT WASHWATER INTERCONNECTION
JENSEN FILTRATION PLANT - PRESSUREI NDICATION AT COO LING WATER PUMPS
JENSEN FILTRATI ON PLANT -RELOCATE AMMONIA
JENSEN FILTRATI ON PLANT -REPLACE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING
JENSEN FILTRATI ON PLANT - ROAD RECO NSTRUCTION
JENSEN FILTRATI ON PLANT- SANDBLASTING BOOTH PURCHASE & INSTALLATION
JENSEN FILTRATION PLANT- TRAVELING BRIDGE RETROFIT MODULE 2 & 3
JENSEN FILTRATI ON PLANT- WTP PROTECTION BCLLARDS
LA VERNE FACILITIES- BRI DGEPORT E-2-PATH
LA VERNE FACI LITIES - ENERGY CONSERVATI ON ECM 1 - 10
LA VERNE FACILITIES- EXPANSION OF THE SANITARY SEWER
LA VERNE FACI LITIES - HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAG E
LA VERNE FACILITIES- MAIN TRANSFORM ERS REPLACEM ENT
LA VERNE FACILITIES - MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORY
LA VERNE FACI LITIES - REPLACEMENT OF FLOCCULATOR STUB SHAFT - BASI NS 1 & 2
LA VERNE MACH INE SHOP - AIR CONDITIONING UNIT REPLACEMENT
LA VERNE MACH ]ME SHOP - REPAIR HORIZONTAL BORING MILL
LA 35 DISCHARGE STRUCTURE REPAI RS
LAKE MATHEWS - CONSTRUCTION OF BACKUP COM PATER FACI LITIES
LAKE MATHEWS - DIVERSION TUNNEL WALKWAY REPAIR
LAKE MATHEWS - FACILITY WIDE EMERGENCY WARNING AND PAGING SYSTEM
LAKE MATHEWS - FOREBAY MCC ROOF IMPROVEMENT
LAKE MATHEWS - MAIN DAM TOE SEEPAGE COLLECTI ON
LAKE MATHEWS - MULTI PLE SPECIES MANAGER'S OFFI CE & RESI DENCE
LAKE MATHEWS - RENOVATION OF BLDGS. 8 & 15. GENERAL ASSEMBLY & ADMIN. BLDG. OFFICE AREAS
LAKE MATHEWS - RETROFIT LOWER ENTRANCE GATE SWING ARM
LAKE MATHEWS FOREBAY MCC ROOF IMPROVEMENT
LAKE MATHEWS MAIN DAM TOE SEEPAGE CO LLECTICN
LAKE MATHEWS RETROFIT LOWER ENTRANCE GATE SW ING ARM
LAKE PERRIS BYPASS PIPELINE EXPLORATION
LAKE PERRI S EMERGENCY STANDBY GENERATOR AND TRANSFER SW ITCH REPLACEMENT
LAKE SKINNER - AERATOR AI R COMPRESSOR REPLACEMENT
LAKE SKINNER - OUTLET TOWER VALVE REHABI LITATiON
LAKE SKINNER -REPLACEMENT AERATOR RING
LAKE SKINNER AERATOR AI R COMPRESSOR REPLACEMENT
LAKE SKINNER EAST BYPASS SCREENING STRUCTURES
LAKE SKINNER WEST BYPASS SCREENING STRUCTURE
LAKEVIEW PIPELINE- REPLACE VACUUMIAIR RELEASE
LAKEVIEW PIPELINE CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM
LOWER FEEDER - CATHODI C PROTECTION
LOWER FEEDER WR 33 - AREA REPAI R AND REMEDIATION
MAGAZINE CANYON CANOPY
MAGAZINE CANYON -ISOLATION GATE JACKING FRAME
MARES LAND ACQUISTION
MICROWAVE COMMUNICATION SITES BUILDING UPGRADE
MIDDLE CROSS FEEDER CATHODI C PROTECTION
MIDDLE FEEDER - CATHO DIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS
MIDDLE FEEDER - NORTH CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM
28
TABLE 3
CONVEYANCE AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BENEFITS
ription
S VALLEY PIPELINE - NORTH REAC H
PERRIS VALLEY PIPELINE - RESERVED FOR STAG E II DESIGN ! BUI LID
PERRIS VALLEY PIPELINE- SOUTH REACH
PERRIS VALLEY PIPELINE- STUDY
PERRIS VALLEY PIPELINE- TIE-IN (WMWO)
PERRIS VALLEY PIPELINE - VALVES
PERRIS VALLEY PIPELINE DESIGN -BUILD (EMWD)
PERRIS VALLEY PIPELINE NORTH REACH
PERRIS VALLEY PIPELINE SOUTH REAC H
PERRIS VALLEY PIPELI NE TIE-IN (WMWD)
PERRIS VALLEY PIPELINE VALVES
PLACENTIA RAILROAD LOWERING PROJECT
PLACERITA CREEK PERI METER FENCI NG
PLANT INFLUENT REDU NDANT FLOW METERING AND SPLITTING
PRESTRESSED CO NCRETE CYLINDER PIPE . PHASE 2
PRESTRESSED CO NCRETE CYLINDER PIPE -PHASE 3
PUDDINGSTONE SPILLWAY CROSS CONNECTION
RED MOUNTAIN HEP FLOOD DAMAGE
RED MTN COMM. TOWER & METER STRUCTURE
RELOCATION OF ORANGE COUNTY Ff~FDER
RELOCATION OF PORTION OF ORANGE COUNTY FEEDER (MWD'S SHARE)
REMAINING PORTIONS
REPAIRS TO THE LA-35 DISCHARGE STRUCTURE
REPLACE 2 FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM
REPLACE COM MUNICATION LINE TO THE SAN GABRIEL CONTROL. TOWER
REPLACE COPPER GROUNDWIRES ON DESERT HI GH VOLTAGE TRANSMISSION TOWERS
REPLACE VALVE POSITION INDICATORS
RIALTO FEEDER BROKEN BACK REPAIR
RIALTO FEEDER VALVE STRUCTURE
TO FEEDER, REPAI RS AT SELECT LOCATIONS, STUDY
TO PIPELINE -CONSTRUCTION PHASE 1
RIALTO PIPELINE -CONSTRUCTION PHASE 2
RIALTO PIPELINE IMPROVEMENTS
RIALTO PIPELINE IMPROVEMENTS -CONSTRUCTION
RIALTO PIPELINE IMPROVEMENTS -CONSTRUCTION PHASE IN
RIALTO PIPELINE IMPROVEMENTS - DESIGN PHASE 2
RIALTO PIPELINE IMPROVEMENTS - DESIGN PHASE 3
RIALTO PIPELINE IMPROVEMENTS - FINAL DESIGN
RIALTO PIPELINE IMPROVEMENTS -VALVE PROCUREMENT
RIALTO PIPELINE IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1 FINAL DESIGN
RIALTO PIPELINE REPAIRS AT STATION 3198+44
ROBERT B. DIEMER FILTRATION PLANT- LAND ACQUISITION
ROOF REPLACEMENT AT SOTO ST. FACi LITY
DIEGO CANAL- EAST & WEST BYPASS SCREENING STRUCTURES STUDY
DIEGO CANAL- ELECTRICAL VAULT & CONDUCTOR REPLACEMENT
DIEGO CANAL- FENCING
DIEGO CANAL- INSTALL ACOUSTIC FLOW METER
DI EGO CANAL- PIEZOMETER
DIEGO CANAL - REPLACE SODIUM BISULFATE TANK
DIEGO CANAL - SEEPAGE STUDY
30
TABLE 3
CONVEYANCE AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BENEFITS
ription
Distribution Facilities (continued)_
SAN DIMAS HEP BATTERY BANK AND GENERATOR BREAKER
SAN DIMAS PCS - UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SOURCE SYSTEMS INSTALLATION
SAN FRANCI SQUITO PIPELINE BLOW OFF STRUCTURE, STA 287+70, ACCESS ROAD CONSTRUCTION
SAN GABRIEL TOWER SLI DE GATE REHABI LITATION
SAN JACINTO #1 AND #2 CASA LOMA FAULT CROSSING STRUCTURE UPGRADE
SAN JOAQUIN RELIEF STRUCTURE FOR EASTERN O RANGE COUNTY FEEDER #2
SAN JOAQUIN RELIEF STRUCTURE FOR EASTR OC FDR #2
SAN JOAQUIN RESERVOIR, INSTALLBULKHEAD
SANTA ANA RIVER BRIDGE SEISMIC RETROFIT
SANTA MONICA FEEDER RELOCATI ON
SANTA MONICA FEEDER STAT ION 495+10 REHABILITATION
SANTIAGO LATERAL REPLACE MOTO R - OPERATED VALVE
SANTIAGO LATERAL STA 216+40 BUTTERFLY VALVE REPLACEM ENT
SANTIAGO TOWER ACCESS ROAD IMPROVEMENT
SCADA SYSTEM HARDWARE UPGRADE
SCADA SYSTEM NT SOFTWARE UPGRADE
SCADA SYSTEM SUPPORT PROGRAMS
SDAND CASA LOMA CANALS LINING
SD CANAL EAST & W EST BYPASS SCREEN ING STRUCTURES STUDY
SD CANAL REPLACE SODI UM BISULFITE TANK
SD PIPELINE 3 CULVERT ROAD REHAB
SD PIPELINE 3,4, AND 5 PROTECTIVE COVER
SD PIPELINE EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION
SD PIPELINE 5 EXPLORATOTY EXCAVATION
SD PIPELINES 3 AND 5 REMOTE CONTROL BY PASS STRUCTURE G ATES AND ISOLATION VALVES
SECOND LOWER & SEPULVEDA FEEDERS SCI DRAIN STATIONS
SECOND LOWER CROSS FEEDER - VALVE PROCUR EMENT
SECOND LOWER CROSS FEEDER CO NSTRUCTION
SECOND LOWER CROSS FFEDFR FI NAL DESIGN
SECOND LOWER FEEDER- INSTALL LINER
SECOND LOWER FEEDER CURRENT MITIGATION REFURBISHMENT
ND LOWER FEEDER PCCP REPAI RS
PRESSURE REPLACE VALVE PCSI TION INDICATORS
PULVEDA FEEDER CO RROSIONIINTERFEREN CE MITIGATION, STATION 950+00 TO 1170+00
PULVEDA FEEDER REPAI RS AT 3 SITES
PULVEDA FEEDER STATI ON 2002+02 TO 2273+28 STRAY CURRENT INTERFERENCE M ITIGATION
PULVEDA FEEDER STRAY CURRENT MITIGATION REFURBISHMENT
PULVEDA PCS - PERI METER ASPHALT REPAI RS
RVICE CONNECTION LV-01 UPGRADES
MULATION AND MODELI NG APPLICATION FOR REAL Tl ME OPERATIONS SMART OPS
(INNER BRANCH -AIR INJECTION MODIFICATIONS TO RED MOUNTAIN POWER PLANT
(INNER BRAN CH - CASA LOMA CANAL
SKINNER BRANCH - CASA LOMA SIPHON BARREL ONE
SKINNER BRANCH - CATWALK FOR TRAVELI NG MAINTENANCE BRI DGE FOR
SKINNER BRAN CH - FABRICATE & REPLACE THE STEMS, NUTS & KEY S
SKINNER BRAN CH - REPAIR MODULE 1 AND 2 FLOCC ULATCRS BRI DGES
SKINNER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM - CONTRACT # 1396
SKINNER FILTRATION PLANT- CHLORINE MASS FLOW METERS
SKINNER FILTRATION PLANT- EFFLUENT WATER QUALITY BLDG
SKINNER FILTRATION PLANT -ELEVATED SLAB IN SERVICE BLDG 1
32
TABLE 3
CONVEYANCE AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BENEFITS
Description
TER PLANNING APPLICATION
TER QUALITY- REMOTE MONITORING
TER QUALITY LABORATORY BUILDING EXPANSION
TER QUALITY MONITORING AND EVENT DETECTI ON SYSTEM
TER TREATMENT PROC ESS OPTIMIZATION
ST COAST FEEDER - CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS
ST VALLEY AREA STUDY
ST VALLEY FEEDER NO. 1 ACCESS ROAD S AND STRUCTURES I MPROVEMENTS
ST VALLEY FEEDER NO. 1 VALVE STRUCTURE MODIFICATIONS
STERN REGION PLUMBING RETROF7
YMOUTH DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM - REPLACEMEN T OF AREA CONTROL SYSTEMS - CONTRACT #1396
YMOUTH FILTRATION PLANT- 140" EFFLUENT CONDUIT ROOF REPAIR
YMOUTH FILTRATI ON PLANT (W FP) - AREA CO NTROL SYSTEM REPLACEMENT
P - ASPHALT REHASI LITATION
P- BASIN SLUDGE PUMP FLUSHING
P - COMPRESSED AIR SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT
P - DOMESTIC WATER PUMP UPG RADE
P - DRY POLYMER
P - EFFLUENT CHLORI NE INJECTION
P - LAND ACQUISITION
P - PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY
REPAIR TO BLDG # 1
REPLACE ACTUATO RSIOPERATORSI MOTORS FOR EFFLUENT VALVE CONVERSION FILTER BEDS 1-24
WFP - WASHWATER RECLAMATION (WWRP)
YORBA LINDA FDR STA 924+11 PORTAL ACCESS
YORBA LINDA FEEDER -STA924+11 PORTAL ACCESS
YORBA LINDA FEEDER BYPASS
Sub -total Distribution facilities beneflfs
Total Conveyance and Distribution facllfles benefits
53,792,470
124,620,270
34
Totals may not foot due to rounding
36
TABLES
FISCAL YEAR 2012113
ESTIMATED STANDBY CHARGE REVENUE
Total
Number
Gross
Parcel
Of Parcels
Revenues
Member Agencles
Charge
Or Acres
(Dollars)
Anaheim
$ 8.55
68,942
$ 589,454
.Beverly Hills
Burbank
14.20
29,144
413,842
Calleguas MWD
9.58
260,512
2,495,708
Central Basin MWD
10.44
340,385
3,553,623
Compton
8.92
18,128
161,701
Eastern MWD
6.94
405,546
2,814,487
Foothill MWD
10.28
30,402
312,530
Fullerton
10.71
34,493
369,416
Glendale
12.23
44,843
548,426
Inland Empire Utilities Agency
7.59
252,852
1,919,146
Las Virgenes MWD
8.03
57,658
462,993
Long Beach
12.16
92,006
1,118,795
Los Angeles
_
_
_
Municipal Water District of Orange County z
10.09
714,540
7,340,407
Pasadena
11.73
38,860
455,823
San Diego County Water Authority
11.51
1,102,179
12,686,086
San Fernando
7.87
5,120
40,293
San Marino
8.24
4,973
40,977
Santa Ana
7.88
54,102
426,325
Santa Monica
_
_
_
Three Valleys MWD
12.21
161,406
1,848,673
Torrance
12.23
40,537
495,766
Upper San Gabriel Valley MWD
9.27
211,473
1,960,365
West Basin MWD
-
-
_
Western MWD
9.23
378,414
3,492,761
MWD Total
4,336,515
$ 43,547,586
(1) Estimates per FY2011/12 applied amounts
(2) Adjusted for inclusion of Coastal MWD
Note: Totals may not foot due to rounding.
38
THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT
OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION 9142
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
FIXING AND ADOPTING
A CAPACITY CHARGE
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2013
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors ("Board") of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California ("Metropolitan"), pursuant to Sections 133, 134 and 134.5 of the Metropolitan Water District Act (the
"Act"), is authorized to fix such rate or rates for water as will result in revenue which, together with revenue from
any water standby or availability of service charge or assessment, will pay the operating expenses of
Metropolitan, provide for repairs and maintenance, provide for payment of the purchase price or other charges for
property or services or other rights acquired by Metropolitan, and provide for the payment of the interest and
principal of its bonded debt; and
WHEREAS, the capacity charge is a fixed fee imposed (on a dollar per cubic -foot -per -second
basis) on member agencies on the amount of capacity used by such member agency and is designed to recover the
cost of providing peaking capacity within the distribution system; and
WHEREAS, on January 9, 2012, the General Manager presented to the Finance and
Insurance Committee of Metropolitan's Board his proposed biennial budget for fiscal years 2012/13 and 2013/l4,
determination of total revenues and of revenues to be derived from water sales and firm revenue sources required
during the fiscal years 2012/13 and 20 [3/14, and detailed reports for each fiscal year describing each of the
proposed rates and charges and the supporting cost of service process, dated December 2011, that (i) describe the
rate structure process and design, (ii) show the costs of major service functions that Metropolitan provides to its
member agencies, (iii) classify these service functions costs based on the use of the Metropolitan system to create
a logical nexus between the revenues required from each of the rates and charges, and (iv) set forth the rates and
charges necessary to defray such costs; and
WHEREAS, on March 2012, following discussions of proposed revenue requirements, budget and rates
by the Finance and Insurance Committee and the Board in meetings from January through February of 2012,
board workshops .regarding the proposed budget and future rates and charges held on January 24, February 13, as
well as a presentation at the February 28, 2012 meeting of the Executive Committee, and a public hearing at the
Finance and Insurance Committee meeting on March 12, 2012, Metropolitan's Board adopted water rates and
charges to be effective January 1, 2013 and January 1, 2014; and
Section 3. That such capacity charge effective January 1, 2013 shall be a water rate as specified
in Section G (set in dollars per cubic -feet -per -second of the peak day capacity) for capacity provided to a member
agency.
Section 4. That in the alternative, and without duplication, the capacity charge shall be all
availability of service charge pursuant to Section 134.5 of the Act.
Section 5. That the capacity charge specified in Table 1 does not exceed the reasonable and
necessary cost of providing the service for which the charge is made and is fairly apportioned to each member
agency in proportion to the peak day capacity utilized by each member agency. Accordingly, the Board finds and
determines that the capacity charge is a reasonable fee charged according to the bitrden on or benefit from the use
of capacity of Metropolitan's distribution system.
Section G. That the capacity charge shall be a fixed charge as shown in the following table and
collected from each member agency monthly, quarterly or semiannually as agreed to by Metropolitan and the
member agency.
Table 1. Option 1: Calendar Year 2013 Capacity Charge
Peak Day Demand cfs
(May 1 through September 30)
Rate (Mf$):
Calendar Year
$6,600
Calendar Year
2013 Capacity
AGENCY
2009
2010
2011
3-Year Peak
Charge
Anaheim
40.7
44.8
39.3
44.8
$296,680
Beverly Hills
31.0
31.2
31.5
31.5
$207,900
Burbank
21,E
22.3
21.4
22.3
$147,180
Calleguas
192.8
208.9
210.1
210.1
$1,386,660
Central Basin
94.7
74.2
79.2
94.7
$625,020
Compton
5.9
3.3
2.4
5.9
$38,940
Eastern
233.8
229.6
192.5
233.8
$1,543,080
Foothill
24.3
20.2
19.0
24.3
$160,380
Fullerton
37.4
32.2
27.4
37A
$245,840
Glendale
56.0
49.6
49.0
56.0
$369,600
Inland Empire
108.1
124,2
138.0
138.0
$910,800
Las Virgenes
42.7
43.9
43.4
43.9
$269,740
Long Beach
67.2
61.2
51.5
67.2
$443,520
Los Angeles
698.2
525.9
329.0
698.2
$4,608,120
MWDOC
489.5
425.5
382.7
489.5
$3,230,700
Pasadena
50.2
50.5
50.6
50,6
$333,960
San Diego
1,055.3
949.5
760.7
1.055.3
$6,964,980
San Fernando
-
4.1
1.6
4.1
$27,060
San Marino
3,5
4.2
1.3
4.2
$27,720
Santa Ana
16.4
20,0
20.0
20.0
$132,000
Santa Monica
25.0
24.3
21.1
26.0
$165,000
Three Valleys
132.7
139.4
122.7
139.4
$920,040
Torrance
39.3
42.8
35.5
42.8
$282,480
Upper San Gabriel
27.6
22.9
20.4
27.6
$182,160
West Basin
221.3
221.2
214.6
221.3
$1,460,580
Western
214.4
199.5
179.3
214.4
$1,415,040
Total
3,927.E
1 3,575.4
1 3,044.21
4,002.3
$26,415,180
Tolals may not root due to rounding
Table 3. Option 3; Calendar Year 2013 Capacity Charge
Peak Day Demand cts
(May 1 through September 30)
Rate ($Icfs):
Calendar Year
$6,500
Calendar Year
2013 Capacity
AGENCY
2009
2010
2011
3-Year Peak
Charge
Anaheim
407
44.8
39.3
44.8
$291,200
Beverly Hills
31.0
31.2
31.5
31.5
$204,750
Burbank
21.6
22.3
21.4
22.3
$144,950
Calleguas
192.8
208.9
210.1
210.1
$1,365,660
Central Basin
94.7
74.2
79.2
94.7
$615,550
Compton
6.9
3.3
2.4
5.9
$38,350
Eastern
233.8
229.6
192.5
233.8
$1,519,700
Foothill
24.3
20.2
19.0
24.3
$157,950
Fullerton
37.4
32.2
27.4
37A
$243,100
Glendale
56.0
49.6
49.0
56.0
$364,000
Inland Empire
106.1
124.2
138.0
138.0
$897,000
Las Virgenes
42.7
43.9
43A
43.9
$285,350
Long Beach
67.2
61.2
51.5
67.2
$436,800
Los Angeles
698.2
525.9
329.0
698.2
$4,638,300
MWDOC
489.5
425.5
382.7
489,5
$3,181.750
Pasadena
50.2
50.5
50.6
50.6
$328,900
San Diego
1'0553
949.5
760.7
1,055.3
$6,859,450
San Fernando
-
4.1
1.6
4.1
$26,650
San Marino
3.5
4.2
1.3
4.2
$27,300
Santa Ana
16.4
20.0
20.0
20.0
$130,000
Santa Monica
25.0
24.3
21.1
25.0
$162,500
Three VaUays
132.7
139A
122.7
139.4
$906,100
Torrance
39.3
42.8
35.5
42.8
$278,200
Upper San Gabriel
27.6
22.9
20.4
27.6
$179,400
West Basin
221.3
221.2
214.6
221.3
$1,438,450
Western
214.4
199.5 1
179.3
214.4
$1,393,600
Total
r 3,927,E 1
3,676.4 1
3,044.21
4,002.31
$26,014,950
Totals may not fool due to rounding
Section 7. That the capacity charge for each member public agency, the method of its
calculation, cost allocations and other data used in its determination are as specified in the General Manager's
recommendation on rates and charges to be effective January 1, 2013, and the corresponding cost of service
report. Such recommendation and cost of service report are on file and available for review by interested parties
at Metropolitan's headquarters.
Section S. That the General Manager and the General Counsel are hereby authorized to do all
things necessary and desirable to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution, including, without limitation, the
commencement or defense of litigation.
Section 9. That this Board finds that the proposed capacity charge is not defined as a Project
under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") since it involves continuing administrative activities,
such as general policy and procedure making (Section 15378(b)(2) of the State CEQA Guidelines), In addition,
the proposed action is not subject to CEQA because it involves the creation of government funding mechanisms