Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 17 - Appropriation Adjustments for Bristol Improvement Project Phase 4Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 17 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report March 4, 2025 TOPIC: Bristol Street Improvements Project - Phase 4 AGENDA TITLE Appropriation Adjustments, Construction Contract to Sully -Miller Contracting Company, and Construction Management Agreement to Cannon Corporation for Bristol Street Improvements (Phase 4) from Warner Avenue to St. Andrew Place Project (Nos. 11- 6741, 19-6499) RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve four appropriation adjustments recognizing: • $770,440 in the New Transportation System Improvement Area E, Prior Year Carry Forward revenue account to New Transportation System Improvement Area E, Improvements other than Building expenditure account. • $33,747 in the New Transportation System Improvement Area E, Prior Year Carry Forward revenue account to New Transportation System Improvement Area E, Improvements other than Building expenditure. • $1,196,886 in the Residential Street Improvement, Prior Year Carry forward Revenue account to Residential Street Improvement, Improvements other than building expenditure account. • $25,198 in Local Drainage Area IV, Prior Year Carry Forward revenue account to Public Works Storm Drain Construction, Improvements other than building expenditure account. (Requires five affirmative votes.) 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Capital Improvement Program to allocate an additional $10,283,196 in construction funds to complete the Bristol Street Improvements & Widening: Phase 4 — Warner Avenue to St. Andrew Project (Nos. 11-6741 & 19-6499). 3. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated completion cost of $26,994,144, which includes $22,354,493 for the construction contract, $2,803,930 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and a 10% ($2,235,449) project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work due to the complexity and extensive scope of this project. Bristol Street Improvements Project - Phase 4 March 4, 2025 Page 2 4. Reject Bid Protest received by Nationwide Contracting Services and award a construction contract to Sully -Miller Contracting Company, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $22,354,493, subject to change orders as approved by the City, for construction of the Bristol Street Improvements from Warner Avenue to St. Andrew Place and Bristol Street (Phase 4) Water Main Improvements Project (Nos. 11-16741 & 19-6499)and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. 5. Approve an agreement with Cannon Corporation for Construction Management and Inspection services for the Bristol Street Improvements Projects, in an amount not to exceed $1,998,642 for a term beginning March 4, 2025, and expiring March 3, 2027, with an option for one, one-year extension. (Agreement No. A-2025-XXX) 6. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. EIR 89-01 was filed for the Bristol Street Improvements Projects. GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes DISCUSSION Background In 1991, the City Council adopted the 3.9-mile Bristol Street Environmental Impact Report and Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan (amended March 2018). The plans incorporate Complete Streets standards, including wider sidewalks and landscaped buffers for pedestrians and bike lanes (Exhibit 1). These improvements will result in greater safety and mobility for all users, improve traffic flow, and enhance streetscape aesthetics. Bristol Street is classified as a north -south major Arterial per the City's General Plan Circulation Element and the County of Orange's Master Plan of Arterial Highway. In anticipation of population growth, traffic congestion, and safety concerns, the City and Orange County Transportation Agency (OCTA) have identified Bristol Street corridor for major improvements to provide adequate vehicular capacity and multimodal improvements. Bristol Street improvements is a long-term project being completed in 5 major phases as funding becomes available. The initial phases (1 and 2) were completed in 2002, which included improvements from St. Andrew Place to McFadden Avenue and from Elm Street to Memory Lane. Since then, enhancements have been made at key intersections, such as Bristol Street and Warner Avenue, Bristol Street and 171h Street, as well as segments between McFadden Avenue and Civic Center Drive, and from Washington Avenue to 18th Street. Additionally, on September 17, 2024, City Council approved the construction contract award of Bristol Improvements Phase 3, from Civic Bristol Street Improvements Project - Phase 4 March 4, 2025 Page 3 Center Drive to Washington Avenue, which is currently under construction. The remaining segment of Bristol Street improvements from 18t" Street to Elm Street (Phase 5) will need to be prioritized for funding allocation comes available. Bristol Improvements Phase 4 The proposed Phase 4 construction contract will improve Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to St. Andrew Place (Exhibit 2). Improvements include roadway widening from two to three lanes in each direction with bus islands to accommodate future bicycle lanes as further explained below, wider sidewalks, parkways, and a raised landscape median. Other major infrastructure improvements include replacing the water main line, undergrounding overhead utilities, and installing a new storm drain system. The project will also include sound walls adjacent to residential parcels. Once completed, these improvements will enhance vehicle capacity, the ride quality, and visual appearance of the Bristol Street corridor. The City was conditionally awarded federal funding from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to construct Class IV protected bicycle lanes on Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Edinger Avenue in June 2019. As required, the City applied to Caltrans for authorization to proceed to construction and bundle the protected bicycle lane improvements into a single Phase 4 construction contract as was done with the Phase 3 improvements. Caltrans informed staff that additional (new) reviews of documents related to right of way certification would be required. Staff has all required documentation but the Caltrans review and approval process may take between 6-12 months. In order to avoid any further delays in starting construction of Phase 4, staff separated the protected bicycle improvements from this construction contract. The protected bicycle improvements will be a separate future construction contract for City Council consideration, and constructed concurrently and in coordination with this construction contract once Caltrans authorizes construction funding. The Bristol Phase 4 contract includes many items of work which take significant time to construct including underground utilities whereas the bicycle improvements are constructed near the end of the project. Staff will be in routine communication with Caltrans to emphasize the importance of a timely review and authorization to proceed to construction of the bicycle lane work. To ensure timely delivery and oversight of this major construction project, staff recommends hiring a third party construction management company as has been done to assist in the oversight of other major construction projects. On December 19, 2024, the Public Works Agency (PWA) released Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 24-139, by which it sought the services of a qualified consulting firm to lead efforts to provide construction management and inspection services. The consultant shall provide general construction management services to support construction efforts and assist in the overall delivery of the project, including preconstruction tasks, managing construction, and ensuring the work is completed in accordance with the contract documents, project Bristol Street Improvements Project - Phase 4 March 4, 2025 Page 4 closeout, and commissioning phase. The consultant team will report directly to the City's project manager. Public Outreach and Contractor Participation To provide an opportunity for local vendors to submit bids, the City notified a total of 117 regional vendors via PlanetBids, many of which are Santa Ana based. Furthermore, staff specifically reached out to Santa Ana vendors to encourage their participation in bids. A total of six bids were received. No bids were received from Santa Ana contractors. As legally required, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register newspaper on November 22, 2024. The project was also advertised in PlanetBids from November 20, 2024 to December 19, 2024. Bids were received electronically via PlanetBids on December 19, 2024. One bid protest was received by the third -lowest bidder, Nationwide Contracting Services, Inc., against the second lowest bidder, Los Angeles Engineering, and the lowest bidder, Sully -Miller Contracting, regarding their responsiveness to the bid proposal requirements. Upon review, City staff determined the protest content invalid and rejected the bid protest on January 14, 2025. Staff deemed the protest immaterial and recommends awarding the project to the lowest responsible bidder, Sully -Miller Contracting Company. Bid Results Summary RANK BIDDER'S NAME LOCATION BASE BID 1 Sully -Miller Contracting Company Brea, CA $22,354,493 2 Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. Covina, CA $25,689,000 3 Nationwide Contracting Services, Inc. Huntington Beach, CA $26,144,807 4 OHLA USA, Inc. Irvine, CA $27,159,820 5 All American Asphalt Corona, CA $27,999,987 6 Excel Paving Company Long Beach, CA $31,428,645 A total of six bids were received and all were deemed responsive. Sully -Miller Contracting Company submitted the lowest responsive base bid in the amount of $22,354,493 (Exhibit 3). As specified in the bid documents, the lowest bid shall be determined on the basis of the Base Bid. Based on the bid analysis and a contractor's reference check, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Sully -Miller Contracting Company (Exhibit 4). The RFP for Construction Management services was advertised on the City's online procurement management and publication system, with Proposals due on January 16, 2025. Five proposals were received and evaluated by a selection committee. Based on Bristol Street Improvements Project - Phase 4 March 4, 2025 Page 5 criteria outlined in the RFP, the following summarizes the top three responding firms and their ranking. Firm City Rank Cannon Corporation San Luis Obispo, CA 1 Butier Engineering Tustin, CA 2 Willdan Anaheim, CA 3 Staff recommends awarding an agreement for construction management and inspection services to Cannon Corporation (Cannon) based upon the scope of work and selection criteria outlined in RFP 24-139 (Exhibit 5). Their proposal demonstrated the firm has the necessary capacity and expertise to complete the required services. The firm's rates are reasonable and within industry standard, the team qualifications are appropriate for this project, and the proposal was determined to provide the best value for the City. Project Delivery To deliver a complete project, in addition to the construction contract, the estimated total project delivery cost includes a budget allocation for construction administration, inspection, and testing. Construction administration and inspection may be performed by either Staff or consultants and includes construction management, inspection of the Contractor's work to ensure contract compliance, workmanship and quality, materials testing, and implementation of the labor requirements. Any of the allocated construction administration funds not spent are considered project savings and are returned to the respective fund balance upon close out of the project. In addition to the Construction Contract Bid Amount, Staff requests that City Council allocate and authorize a project contingency budget equal to 10% of the Contract Bid Amount. The recommended contingency budget will allow Staff to execute contract change orders in the event unexpected conditions arise or if additional work is required to effectively deliver and complete the project. As indicated in the Cost Analysis (Exhibit 6) and as summarized in the table below, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $26,994,144. Project Item Total Construction Contract Bid Amount $22,354,493 Construction Management and Inspection: Cannon (Includes Materials Testing and Inspection) $1,998,642 Construction Administration $405,560 Project Contingencies 10% of Bid $2,235,449 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST $26,994,144 Bristol Street Improvements Project - Phase 4 March 4, 2025 Page 6 The City had been awarded an OCTA M2 grant of $7,501,206 for street improvement related expenditures. The City is responsible for funding the balance of street improvements plus the costs of underground utility improvements. Construction costs have rapidly escalated in the past four (4) years. According to the California Department of General Services, California Construction Cost Index (CCCI), the average cost of construction has increased by 34.4% in the past four (4) years (since 2021), over double the rate for the previous five-year period (2016-2020). Staff applied for additional construction funds and, on April 10, 2023, OCTA replaced the previous award amount and awarded the City a total of $11,910,061. In addition to this grant, the City will fund the balance of improvements from gas tax revenues, General Fund, water capital, developer impact fees, and proceeds from sale of remnant Bristol properties. Project Schedule and Contract Time The completion date is November 30, 2026, with an option to extend to address any unforeseeable conditions such as rain, natural disasters, or other delays beyond the control of the City and of the Contractor. The contract time for this project is 368 working days, as specified in the bid documents. Working days are counted in accordance with the City's Standard Specifications, which exclude weekends, City -observed holidays, and inclement weather days that prevent work. The projected project schedule is provided below. Milestone Estimated Date Notes Administrative Startup March 2025 Contract execution, bonds, insurance, traffic control plans Material Procurement March 2025, concurrent with construction Staff review and approval of material submittals Contractor Mobilization April 2025 Start of construction activities Project Completion November 2026 Based on 368 working days Project Phasing As stipulated under the contract, the Contractor will be constructing this project in the following phases to minimize duplication and impacts to completed components of the project: 1. Phase I — Soundwalls, Temporary Street Lighting, and Potholing Soundwall construction will be the first item of work along with temporary street lighting on the east side of Bristol Street between Warner Avenue and St. Andrew Place. Contractor will perform exploratory potholing as required for utilities. 2. Phase II — Underaround Utilitv Construction In this phase, the Contractor will construct underground electric and communications ducts and structures for the undergrounding of existing pole Bristol Street Improvements Project - Phase 4 March 4, 2025 Page 7 mounted utilities. Work includes coordination with utility companies to facilitate underground relocations and pole removals. 3. Phase III — Water, Sewer, Storm Drain, and Street Improvements Contractor to construct water, sewer, and storm drain improvements prior to any street improvements and work only on one side of the street at a time to minimize traffic disruptions. 4. Phase IV — Future Protected Bike Lane Proiect Coordination As previously discussed, a future protected bike lane project will be awarded during the construction of this project. The Contractor is required to coordinate construction activities to deliver a seamless complete project. Final paving shall not occur until the protected bike lanes are in place. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. EIR No. 89-01 was filed for the Bristol Street Improvements Project (Exhibit 7) in 1991. The proposed project continues to meet the parameters of the CEQA Guidelines and EIR No. 89-01. On April 7, 2015, the Santa Ana City Council adopted a resolution approving an addendum to the Final Environmental Impact/Statement for the segment of Bristol Street between Warner Avenue and St. Andrew Place. FISCAL IMPACT As indicated in the Cost Analysis, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $26,994,144. All funds are available for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2024-25. Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the current fiscal year will be presented to the City Council for approval to carry forward to Fiscal Year 2025-2026 (Exhibit 8). The proposed contract authorizes staff a maximum of 10% in contingencies for construction contract change orders. Should additional contingency be necessary due to unforeseeable conditions, staff will return to City Council for authorization and appropriation. With the approval of the requested appropriation adjustments, a portion of the accumulated fund balances will be appropriated for spending in the following accounts: • New Transportation System Improvements Area E, Improvements Other Than Buildings expenditure account (No. 03417660-66220), • New Transportation System Improvements Area F, Improvements Other Than Buildings expenditure account (No. 03517660-66220), • Residential Street Improvement, Improvements Other Than Buildings expenditure account (No. 05817660-66220), and • Public Works -Storm Drain Construction, Improvements Other Than Buildings expenditure account (No. 22417660-66220). Bristol Street Improvements Project - Phase 4 March 4, 2025 Page 8 The spendable portion of the fund balance for the following funds on June 30, 2025 is estimated to be: • $770,440 for the New Transportation System Improvements Area E fund; • $33,747 for the New Transportation System Improvements Area F fund; • $3,904,391 for the Residential Street Improvement Fund; and • $257,198 for the Local Drainage Area IV Fund Which is sufficient to allow for the recommended appropriations of $770,440, $33,747, $1,196,886, and $257,198, respectively. Approval of the requests to reallocate funds will provide a total of $7,625,197 in unspent funds from Property Sale proceeds and Project Nos. 18-6901, 20-6954, 20-6955, 20- 6961, 20-6971, and 22-6470. The following table summarizes the funds budgeted for expenditure to deliver the construction of this project. Accounting Fiscal Unit — Fund Accounting Unit, Amount Year Account No. Description Account Description Project No. CURRENT BUDGET 01117017- PWA — Service 2024-25 66220 General Fund Enhancement, $680,000 (11-6741) Improvements Other Than Buildings 03217662- Measure M Measure M2 Local 2024-25 66220 Street Fairshare St, $11,380 (11-6741) Construction Improvements Other Than Buildings 03217663- Measure M Measure M2 2024-25 66220 Street Competitive Street, $11,910,023 (11-6741) Construction Improvements Other Than Buildings 03517660- New Transportation New Transportation System Improvements $638,361 2024-25 66220 System Area F, Improvements (11-6741) Improvements Other Than Buildings Area F 05917661- OCTA Bristol St 2024-25 66220 Select Street Corridor Imps, $178,516 (11-6741) Construction Improvements Other Than Buildings Bristol Street Improvements Project - Phase 4 March 4, 2025 Page 9 Accounting Fiscal Unit — Fund Accounting Unit, Amount Year Account No. Description Account Description Project No.) 05917663- Select Street HUTA 2103 Gas Tax, $632,183 2024-25 66220 Construction Improvements Other 11-6741) Than Buildings 06617647- Acquisition and Water Utility Capital 2024-25 66301 Construction Projects, Water Capital $2,568,996 19-6499 Project 22417660- Public Works -Storm 2024-25 66220 Local Drainage Drain Construction, $491,217 (11-6741) Area IV Improvements Other Than Buildings Total $17,110,676 APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS 03417660- New Transportation New Transportation 2024-25 66220 (11- System System Improvements $770,440 6741) Improvements Area E, Improvements Area E Other Than Buildings 03517660- New Transportation New Transportation 2024-25 66220 System System Improvements $33,747 (11-6741) Improvements Area F, Improvements Area F Other Than Buildings 22417660- Public Works -Storm 2024-25 66220 Local Drainage Drain Construction, $257,198 (11-6741) Area IV Improvements Other Than Buildings 05817660- Residential Residential Street 2024-25 66220 Street Improvement, Imp $1,196,886 (11-6741) Improvement Improvements Other Than Buildings Total $2,258,271 REALLOCATIONS 03217662- Measure M Measure M2 Local 2024-25 66220 Street Fairshare St, $1,287,170 (From 18-6901 Construction Improvements Other to 11-6741) Than Buildings 03217662- Measure M Measure M2 Local 2024-25 66220 Street Fairshare St, $313,260 (From 20-6971 Construction Improvements Other to 11-6741) Than Buildings 2024-25 05917661- Select Street OCTA Bristol St $2,884,900 66220 Construction Corridor Imps, Bristol Street Improvements Project - Phase 4 March 4, 2025 Page 10 Accounting Fiscal Unit — Fund Accounting Unit, Amount Year Account No. Description Account Description Project No.) (Property Sale Improvements Other Proceeds to Than Buildings 11-6741) 05917665- HUTA Gas Tax — 2024-25 66220 Select Street RMRA, Improvements $500,000 (From 18-6901 Construction Other Than Buildings to 11-6741) 05917665- HUTA Gas Tax — 2024-25 66220 Select Street RMRA, Improvements $1,031,880 (From 20-6961 Construction Other Than Buildings to 11-6741) 05917665- HUTA Gas Tax — 2024-25 66220 Select Street RMRA, Improvements $804,828 (From 20-6954 Construction Other Than Buildings to 11-6741) 05917665- HUTA Gas Tax — 2024-25 66220 Select Street RMRA, Improvements $198,405 (From 20-6955 Construction Other Than Buildings to 11-6741) 06617647- Water Utility Capital 2024-25 66301 (From 66301 (to Acquisition and Projects, Water Capital $604,754 19- Construction Project 6499) Total $7,625,197 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST $26,994,144 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Project Specific Plan 2. Location Map and Proposed Conditions 3. Bid Proposal 4. Construction Contract 5. Agreement for Construction Management & Inspection Services 6. Cost Analysis 7. Environmental Determination 8. Capital Improvement Project Worksheet Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director — Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nunez, City Manager 2018 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan City of Santa Ana Adopted May 5,1991 Amended March 2018 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Preface 1.2 The Specific Plan 1.3 Specific Plan Amendment 1.4 Organization of the Plan CHAPTER 2 PLANNING CONTEXT 2.1 Background and Need for Plan CHAPTER 3 PLANNING AREA DESCRIPTION 3.1 Location 3.2 Planning Area Character CHAPTER 4 PLANNING GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 4.1 Land Use 4.2 Urban Design 4.3 Circulation 1 1 1 2 2 5 5 9 9 11 15 15 17 17 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 CHAPTER 5 THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 19 5.1 Plan Overview 19 5.2 Urban Design Concept 38 5.3 Circulation and Parking 60 CHAPTER 6 DESIGN GUIDELINES 6.1 Site Development 6.2 Architecture 6.3 Landscape Architecture 6.4 Circulation CHAPTER 7 IMPLEMENTATION ELEMENT 62 62 66 70 70 82 Page I i Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 List of Tables and Figures Page I ii Table 5-1 Parcel Inventory ............................................. 30 Table 6-1 Parcel Standards ............................................. 71 Table 6-2 Recommended Plants ..................................... 79 Figure 3-1 Regional Location .......................................... 10 Figure 3-2 Project Study Area ......................................... 10 Figure 5-1 Land Use ........................................................ 20 Figure 5-2 Street Prospect .............................................. 37 Figure 5-3 Commercial Nodes ........................................ 39 Figure 5-4 Site Development .......................................... 41 Figure 5-5 Parkway Concept ........................................... 52 Figure 5-6 Street Section ................................................ 53 Figure 5-7 Median and Edge Treatment ......................... 54 Figure 5-8 Commercial Prototype ................................... 55 Figure 5-9 Park Prototype .............................................. 56 Figure 5-10 Park Development with Optional Gravel Paving ............................................. 57 Figure 5-11 Corner Prototype ......................................... 58 Figure 5-12 Light Standards ............................................ 58 Figure 5-13 Wall............................................................. 59 Figure 5-14 Cul-de-Sac Treatment .................................. 61 Figure 5-15 Wall Section @ Cul -de-Sac.......................... 61 Figure 6-1 Parking Frontage ........................................... 63 Figure 6-2 Access Drive .................................................. 65 Figure 6-3 Building Massing ........................................... 67 Figure 6-4 Fagade Treatment Options ............................ 67 Figure 6-5 Store Front Signage....................................... 68 Figure 6-6 Roof Options ................................................. 69 Figure 6-7 Planter Types ................................................. 69 Figure 6-8 Parcel Type A ................................................. 72 Figure 6-9 Parcel Type B................................................. 73 Figure 6-10 Parcel Type C............................................... 74 Figure 6-11 Parcel Type D............................................... 75 Figure 6-12 Parcel Type E............................................... 76 Figure 6-13 Parcel Type F............................................... 77 Figure 6-14 Parcel Type G.............................................. 78 Figure 7-1 Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project .......................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Preface The Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan Amendment provides the framework for future development of a 3.9-mile section of the Bristol Street Corridor in the central portion of the City of Santa Ana. The Plan, which has been developed in accordance with existing environmental conditions, City planning policies, and input from City staff and decision -makers, provides a comprehensive land use program and urban design guide for the area along with goals and policies to guide the future public and private actions relating to the area's development. In addition, the plan includes a strategy for its implementation and mechanisms to insure that development proposed by area landowners will be coordinated and occur in an orderly, planned manner, 1.2 The Specific Plan In 1991, the City of Santa Ana determined that a specific plan was the appropriate planning mechanism to guide long-range development of the Bristol Street Corridor. A specific plan is a planning and regulatory tool made available to local governments by the State of California. By law, specific plans are intended to implement a city or county's general plan through the development of policies, programs, and regulations which provide an intermediate level of detail between the general plan and individual development projects. As vehicles for the implementation of the goals and policies of a community's general plan, State law requires that specific plans can only be adopted or amended if they are consistent with the jurisdiction's adopted general plan. Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 The authority to prepare and adopt specific plans and the requirements for its contents are set forth in the California Government Code (Planning and Zoning Law), Title VII, Chapter 3, Article 8, Sections 65450 through 65457. The law requires that a specific plan include text and diagrams specifying: • The distribution, location, and intensity of land uses, including open space, within the plan area; • The distribution, location, and capacity of infrastructure, including transportation, water, storm drainage, solid waste, and energy systems; • Design standards and criteria for development and use of natural resources; and • An implementation program, including capital improvement plans, regulation and financing strategies. This Specific Plan provides the framework for the future use and form for development along the Bristol Street Corridor through to ultimate build out of the area. The adopted plan provides a public planning document that will act as an extension of the General Plan, and be used as both a policy and a regulatory document, When private development proposals for the planning area are brought before the City, the Planning staff will use the Specific Plan as a guide for project review. Projects will be evaluated on their consistency with the intent of plan policies and conformance with development standards and design guidelines. For projects with the Bristol Street planning area, policies and standards in the Specific Plan will take precedence over more general Page I 1 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 policies and standards applied throughout the rest of the city. In situations where policies or standards relating to a particular subject have not been provided in the Specific Plan, the existing policies and standards of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance will continue to apply. The adoption of the Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan constitutes a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As such, the Plan is subject to environmental review in accordance with CEQA statues. The Specific Plan was originally developed to conform to and implement the policies and improvements identified in the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Plan adopted by the City of Santa Ana on December 4, 1989. In conjunction with the Redevelopment Plan, the City prepared an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) (Bristol Street Widening Environmental Impact Statement, FHWA-CA-EIS-89-01-D, Willdan Associates) to analyze the effects and propose necessary mitigation for the prior Redevelopment Plan's principal action which is the widening of Bristol Street. The Specific Plan has therefore been developed to also be consistent with and sensitive to environmental conditions identified in the EIS, and to implement City -adopted mitigation measures. In addition, environmental review and assessment of the Specific Plan was addressed through preparation of an environmental Initial Study Checklist which found that the City's Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 88-1, Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project (State Clearinghouse No. Page 12 87101404), was adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for the Specific Plan. To keep the Specific Plan as concise as possible, much of the environmental background data has not been included in this plan document. For additional information relating to the environmental foundation of the plan, one should refer to the Bristol Street Widening EIS and EIR 88-1 which can be obtained from the City Planning Division. Although the environmental documentation has been included in a separate document, it is important to note that environmental factors have been an integral component of the planning process from the very beginning to ensure sensitivity to critical environmental concerns. 1.3 Specific Plan Amendment The Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan land use plan was amended (Bristol from Washington Street to 17th Street) and (Bristol from Civic Center to 17th Street and Warner Avenue to St. Andrew Place) to accommodate remnant parcels of land acquired by the City as a result of the widening of Bristol Street. The amendment identifies zoning designations for parcels within the corridor based on new street right-of-way designs and compatibility with existing land uses. An addendum to EIR 88-1 has also been prepared to address the minor land use revisions of the Specific Plan amendment. The addendum has identified that environmental impacts are less than significant, and that the general findings and conclusions of the previous EIR are still applicable. 1.4 Organization of the Plan The Specific Plan is organized to provide a step-by-step understanding of the Plan's components and the rationale behind its policy recommendations, design concepts, and implementation measures. The first three chapters are primarily descriptive, describing the plan, its purpose, the planning context, planning goals, and an outline of the principal planning concepts. The development standards, design guidelines, and implementation measures which will regulate future development are presented in subsequent chapters. The policies, standards, guidelines, and implementation measures in the plan are organized to correspond to categories established by City and State General Plan guidelines (i.e. Land Use, Circulation, Urban Design, and Implementation). Chapters in the Specific Plan include: 1. Introduction — establishes the broad purpose of the Specific Plan, describes the legislative authority under which specific plans exist, outlines the organization of the Plan. 2. Planning Context— summarizes the general conditions and sequence of events leading up to the Plan's preparation. 3. Planning Area Description—describesthelocationand general character of the planning area, and identifies key factors that influenced the Plan's form and policies. 4. Specific Plan Goals —states the fundamental intention identified for the Bristol Street Corridor. 5. Development Plan — sets forth the rationale and conceptual framework underlying the Plan's physical form, land use program, development standards and design guidelines, and infrastructure improvements. 6. Planning Standards and Design Guidelines — sets forth development and design concepts and translates them into standards and guidelines guiding the development of streets, yards, open space, grading, siting, landscaping, buildings, and other physical features. 7. Implementation Program — describes policies, regulations, and ordinances that must be adopted or amended to implement the plan and identifies development approval procedures, capital improvements, and development phasing recommendations. Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Page 13 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 This page intentionally left blank. Page 14 Chapter 2 Planning Context 2.1 Background and Need for Plan Former Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Plan On December 4, 1989 the City of Santa Ana adopted a redevelopment plan for the area referred to as the Bristol Corridor. The project area included parcels on either side of Bristol Street extending from Central Avenue on the south to the northernmost edge of the Bristol Marketplace on the north (i.e. just south of 21st Street). Along Bristol Street, the average width of the development area was approximately 750 feet. At First Street and 17th Street, the development area extended east and west along both sides of these two cross streets. The Bristol Street Corridor is a major north -south corridor through the City of Santa Ana. The street, which is designated as a Major Arterial Highway in the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH), serves as a vital north -south transportation link which has regional as well as local significance. The roadway also serves as the designated truck route through the central section of Santa Ana. Consistent with the high levels of traffic that move through the area, land use patterns along the Corridor reflect the importance of the area within the City's overall urban fabric, The City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element shows the corridor having four major commercial nodes distributed along the length of the corridor; South Bristol Center, North Bristol Center, College Center, and an extension of the Civic Center District. These commercial areas are intended as mixed use development areas whose primary function is to provide retail Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 services in support of surrounding neighborhoods but which also provide recreational, cultural and educational facilities and activities, employment. Residential neighborhoods fill the areas that separate the four District Centers. Historically, the need for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Plan arose out of the fact that the area was not physically or economically meeting its designated potential as either a major transportation or commercial corridor, Overall, the Corridor suffered from negative physical and visual characteristics typically associated with strip development. Large sections of the Corridor were depressed or economically failing. As development occurred over the years, the land use pattern became increasingly haphazard as residential lots fronting the Corridor have been converted to various commercial and office type uses. Development standards along the Corridor varied widely, compounding the perception of disorder. Prior to the 1990s, many of the older development areas were in poor physical condition, and the economic incentive was absent to renovate and upgrade these properties. At that time, Bristol Street itself no longer had adequate capacity to accommodate the traffic volumes. During peak -hour periods the Corridor suffered from significant congestion with many segments and intersections operating at levels of service which were below acceptable urban standards. This congestion not only causes annoying delays for traffic, but also resulted in an increased occurrence of traffic accidents and injuries. Page 15 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 The Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Plan was approved, in 1989, as a mechanism for alleviating existing problems through a process of development, rehabilitation, and revitalization. While it did not provide a detailed plan for how this would be accomplished, it created a framework within which specific projects and improvements can begin to take place. The general direction established for the development of the Bristol Corridor area was first set forth in the former Redevelopment Plan goals and objectives, which can be summarized as follows: • Reduce and prevent blight conditions; • Widen and improve Bristol Street; • Promote new and continuing private sector investment; • Establish a higher quality urban design character; • Retain and expand as many existing businesses as possible; • Provide for increased revenues to the City; • Preserve the existing employment base and create new job opportunities; • Replan, redesign, and redevelop areas which are stagnant or underutilized; • Eliminate or ameliorate environmental deficiencies; • Expand the community's supply of housing, including low - and moderate -income units; • Reduce City costs for providing services to the area; and • Protect existing neighborhoods and housing from adverse impacts associated with new development. Page 16 Intersection of Bristol Street and Santa Ana Boulevard looking south, before street widening, November 2010. Bristol Street Widening Project As can be seen in the prior list of development goals and objectives, the only specific project proposed by the former redevelopment plan was the widening of Bristol Street. The widening of the roadway to accommodate existing and projected traffic levels represented the keystone to the whole development process, without which the successful revitalization of the corridor would be highly unlikely. For this reason the City of Santa Ana undertook a study, in 1989, to determine the most appropriate means of expanding the capacity of the Bristol Street Corridor to accommodate both existing and projected traffic levels. At that time, Bristol Street was a four -lane, undivided arterial between Warner Avenue and Memory Lane. To the north and south of this section, the roadway was already six lanes. This narrower section of the roadway was responsible for much of the capacity limitations d� r 1 Intersection of Bristol Street and Fifth Street looking north, before street widening. November 2010. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was prepared in conjunction with the Bristol Street Widening study to evaluate the potential impacts associated with such a project. Four possible alternatives were evaluated in the Draft EIS and public hearings held on the environmental document. Based on the findings of the EIS and the public comment on the project, the City Council selected a preferred alternative which incorporated a combination of the characteristics of each of the preliminary alternatives. The preferred alternative was formulated with careful consideration given to the social, environmental, and fiscal costs of the final solution. Given the narrow existing right -of - Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 way between Warner Avenue and Memory Lane at the time, r Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan acquiring additional needed right-of-way and the related I impacts of such land acquisition (i.e., residential and business displacement) was a major issue addressed in the EIS. Public comments on the project generally supported the need for the widening, provided that affected property owners would be adequately compensated for the economic costs resulting from the project. In addition, a major concern was that the widening should not adversely affect the several major community facilities currently located along this segment of the corridor: Mater Dei High School, Santa Ana College, Santiago Elementary School, and the John Garthe Reservoir. As adopted in 1991, the preferred alternative called for the widening of a 3,9-mile section of Bristol Street between Warner Avenue and Memory Lane from four lanes to six lanes. In order to avoid impacts on major community facilities, the widened roadway would have a meandering centerline shift. While right-of-way along most of the corridor would be acquired equally from both sides of the roadway, in areas adjacent to the major public facilities, all the right-of-way would be acquired from the side opposite the facility. Further widening would be provided at key intersections to accommodate additional right and left turn lanes and bus turnouts. To accommodate the proposed right-of-way widths, a section as much as 20- to 60-feet deep would need to be acquired from the frontage of existing developed parcels. The widened street section itself would provide for three travel lanes in each direction with a 14-foot wide, raised center median that could be fully or partially landscaped (Figure 5-6), Construction on Bristol Street during street widening project in, November 2010. The findings of the EIS indicated that the street widening project would have a number of beneficial effects on the Bristol Street Corridor including improved drainage, air quality, aesthetics, circulation, and noise attenuation. Adverse impacts related to the street widening included the potential displacement of existing residential and business uses, and potential short-term construction impacts relating to circulation, noise, dust, and utility relocation. The Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan was originally prepared as a direct consequence of the policies, goals, objectives, and improvements approved and adopted as part of the former Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Plan and the Bristol Street Widening Project. Its function is twofold. First, the Plan is a tool for implementing mitigation measures to reduce identified impacts. Specifically, the Plan identifies which existing uses can be retained, where displaced uses can be relocated within the planning area, how to reuse irregular and substandard parcels created by the right-of-way acquisition, and how to best address environmental constraints such as noise. Secondly, the Specific Plan is a mechanism for addressing in a more detailed fashion, the goals and objectives in the City's General Plan. The Bristol Street Widening Project, because with the right-of-way acquisition, creates an excellent opportunity to move forward while achieving other development objectives. Specifically, the Plan continues to reexamine stagnant, underutilized, or disturbed parcels; reduce blighted conditions by identifying structures which need to be removed; mitigate environmental impacts and compatibility conflicts with adjacent residential neighborhoods; and provide landscape and urban design guidelines which will upgrade the overall character of the corridor. These improvements have attracted new private sector investment to the area and improved the business Page 17 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 climate along the corridor, which have a positive effect on the area's property values and revenue -generating potential. Completed portion of Bristol Street, February, 2011. Page 18 Chapter 3 Planning Area 3.1 Location Description Bristol Street is located in the City of Santa Ana. The street is a north -south transportation corridor which runs the length of the city bisecting it into two areas of approximately equal size. Bristol Street, which is aligned parallel to and one mile west of the Main Street corridor, Santa Ana's principal north -south urban spine, extends north to provide connections to the Garden Grove, Santa Ana, and Orange Freeways, and to the south to provide connections with the San Diego and Costa Mesa/Newport Freeways. Figure 3-1 shows the location of the planning area within the citywide context. The planning area extends along both sides of Bristol Street in the area between Warner Avenue and Santiago Creek, a section of approximately 3.9 miles in length. Within this section, several major east -west streets intersect Bristol Street, including, from north to south, 17th Street, First Street, McFadden Avenue, Edinger Avenue, and Warner Avenue. The depth of the planning area from the roadway varies throughout the length of the Corridor. Property located within the planning area corresponds to those parcels identified by the former City Redevelopment Agency as being subject to eminent domain procedures as a result of right-of-way acquisition requirements of the Bristol Street Widening Project. Figure 3-2 shows the boundaries of the entire planning area. While Santiago Creek acts as a defined visual entry into the corridor from the north, there is no equivalent sense of entry from the south. The intersection of Bristol Street and Warner Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Avenue, while being the project boundary as far as the Specific Plan is concerned, is not distinguished from those further to the south. For this reason, it is recommended that the standards and guidelines developed for this Specific Plan also be applied south of WarnerAvenue to Sunflower Street, which is the city boundary Commercial center on Bristol Street and Third Street, after completion of street widening, February 2011. Page 19 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 This page intentionally left blank. Location Page 110 W La Veta Ave 22 W Meru n m '4 W Sant Clara Ave N G cc m � N Z LL c W lith Street z Santa Ana z (Allege Washmglon Ave WCivic center Dr W 5th St c W Santa Ana 6Ntl W 1st st W Willits St W 6ishap St W McFadden Ave ve Figure 3-2 Ill ct Study Area W StAndrew PI - W Glenwood PI r W Warner Ave m` N 3.2 Planning Area Character Development and Land Use Character Bristol Street is a straight and practically flat (average slope of 0.4 percent) urban corridor with a north -south alignment consistent with the grid pattern street system that predominates in Santa Ana. The roadway extends through a completely urbanized area which includes a mixture of commercial, residential, and public facility uses. Historically, the area was characterized by a haphazard mixture of buildings of different types and uses, physical condition, and age. The contrast between old and new was quite pronounced and contributed to a disjointed, generally unappealing character. Historically, the development character along the corridor changed in a piecemeal fashion over the years as traffic volumes on Bristol Street increased and uses along the corridor became more auto -oriented. Most of the planning area was initially developed with residential uses, and then as the community grew and development patterns changed, strip commercial and other uses began to incrementally displace the residential uses. The displacement started at the intersections and extended toward mid -block, In several locations within the area, single family residences that front on Bristol Street were converted to commercial and office uses with little or no change to the structure's exterior other than signage. In other areas, single- family homes continue to front onto the Corridor. Commercial center on Bristol Street and Santa Ana Blvd before street widening, February 2011 Within the area, there was a perceptible transition in the age of development from north to south, with age increasing as one moves south along the corridor. With the increase in age also came a corresponding deterioration in the physical condition of the properties and a decline in the general level of maintenance. Newer development within the area was scattered throughout the Corridor. However, most of it was located at the intersections with major cross streets. In addition to the discrepancies in the character and age of the structures along the Corridor, the area was also characterized by features that are fairly typical of strip development areas and which detract from the area's visual character. These features included an uncoordinated clutter of billboards and signs, overhead power lines, and inconsistent public improvement standards. In general, signage along Bristol Street was of a very low quality and indicated the presence of businesses with little or no resources, ability, interest, or need Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 to upgrade sign quality or character. Temporary signs added to the overall low quality of signage along portions of Bristol Street. Medical building on Bristol Street and Santa Ana Blvd before street widening, February 2011. The level of amenity provided along the corridor was generally low, with only a minimal area devoted to landscaping, street furniture, or other improvements that would contribute to the visual character of the street. Without exception, existing commercial parking lots, which comprised a significant portion of the Bristol Street frontage, were almost completely unlandscaped. Businesses in the planning area were, and continue to be, predominantly local -serving in character. Many people have been observed walking from adjacent residential areas to nearby shopping areas such as the supermarkets on the southwest corner of Bristol Street and McFadden Avenue. The majority of the commercial uses along the corridor were Page 111 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 located in strip malls and only a handful of commercial businesses were located in freestanding structures (frequently in converted residences). Among the service type businesses, there are a number of small personal and professional services businesses offering medical, dental, personal care, financial, and day-care services. The major exception to the pattern of small commercial centers and individual uses is Bristol Marketplace, an approximately 38-acre commercial and shopping center located at the northwest corner of Bristol Street and 17th Street, The concentrations of commercial uses that occur along the Bristol Street Corridor are located in the following areas: Southwest corner of Edinger Avenue and Bristol Street; Northwest corner of Edinger Avenue and Bristol Street. Bristol Street, between McFadden Avenue and Brook Street; Southeast corner of Bristol Street and Civic Center Drive; Southeast corner of Bristol Street and Washington Avenue; Southwest corner of Bristol Street and Washington Avenue; Northwest and Northeast corner of Bristol Street and 17th Street; Southwest corner of Bristol Street and McFadden Ave Bristol Street, between 3rd Street to 5th Street Bristol Street, between 7th Street and 9th Street Page 112 • Bristol Street, between Warner Ave and St. Gertrude Street The newer strip malls can be distinguished from the older strip malls in their enhanced architectural style versus a plain rectangular shaped architectural style that characterizes the older strip malls, specifically those located on North Bristol Street. In addition to housing and commercial uses, there are a number of community and educational facilities which are not in, but adjacent to, the planning area. Eight schools are located along the Bristol Street Corridor: • Jose Andres Sepulveda Elementary School (1818 South Bristol Street); • Mater Del High School (1202 West Edinger Avenue). • Santa Ana College Digital Media Center (1300 South Bristol Street); • Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary School (1001 South Graham Lane); • Carver Elementary School (1401 West Santa Ana Blvd); • Santa Ana College (1530 West 17th Street); • Gonzalo and Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate School (2000 North Bristol Street); • Santiago Elementary School (2212 North Baker Street); Mater Del High School on the Bristol Street and Edinger Avenue, February 2011. In addition to the schools, there are also two-day care centers/preschools along the Corridor: • Love 2 Learn Preschool (1200 West 17th Street) • Santa Ana Campus Early Childhood Education Center (1720 West 17th Street) Five churches are located in the planning area; • Non Sectarian Church of God (1239 West 5th Street); • Johnson Chapel of the African Methodist Episcopal (AME) Church (1306 West 2nd Street); • Bread of Life (429 South Bristol Street); and • Deje de Sufrir Universal Church (1622 South Bristol Street). • The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints (2500 North Bristol) Santa Ana College Digital Media Center, February 2011. Johnson Chapel AME on Bristol and First Street, February 2011. Finally, at the north end of the planning area adjacent to Santiago Creek and the east side of Bristol Street, is a city - owned reservoir. The city owned water reservoir on Bristol Street near Seventeenth Street, February, 2011. Socio-Economic Character As indicated by the physical character of the street, the planning area is a low to moderate income area. The City's 2014 Housing Element indicated that approximately 54 percent of the households in the City have annual incomes of less than 80 percent of the county median income. The City's 2015 Housing Element also indicates the City has 11,370 extremely, which is considered low income households. In 1990 the population was approximately Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 293,742 and it rose to 340,338 citywide in 2009 —a 16 percent increase in population — making Santa Ana the most populous city in Orange County according to the 2009 U.S. Census population estimates. In 2010, the US Census estimated the citywide median income was $54,421 which is slightly lower than the $57,384 median income for the Anaheim -Santa Ana - Garden Grove Metropolitan Statistical Area. Although the spread may not appear to be significant, the slight differentiation of Santa Ana's average household income from the larger Metropolitan Statistical Area average may be attributed to the higher density per square mile in Santa Ana. Santa Ana's household size is 4.4 (according to the2014 Housing Element) and is the 10`h highest average household size in the nation. The average is even higher in the census tracts adjacent to the Bristol Street Corridor, which has a 4.69 average household size. A more accurate assessment of the poverty level in Santa Ana can be better reflected in the per -capita income, which averages $16,521, whereas the average per -capita income for the Anaheim -Santa Ana -Garden Grove Metropolitan Statistical Area is approximately $20,002. The average per - capita income for Orange County is $33,901. The population in the planning area vicinity is characterized by a large percentage of ethnic minorities, particularly Hispanic residents, which make up approximately 46 percent; White residents make up 24 percent, while the other 24 percent is made up of people reporting to be of one other race. These Page 113 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 numbers are based on the census tracts adjacent to the project area. Housing in the planning area is predominantly single family with more than 87 percent of the units being detached single family homes. The remaining housing consists of duplex units. Altogether 105 housing units have been identified in the planning area. Of these, 92 are single-family units and 13 are duplex units. The housing located south of First Street tends to be more uniformly single family in character, while most of the duplex units are located north of Vt Street, with a large concentration located between 215Y Street and Santa Clara Avenue on the west side of Bristol Street. The majority of neighborhoods adjoining the planning area is well -maintained and exhibit signs of relative stability. Those residential areas exhibiting the greatest signs of neglect and deterioration are on the east side of Bristol Street between Cubbon Street and Richland Avenue and 3rd and 6th Streets. In the better maintained areas along the Corridor, the residential neighborhoods contain distinctive streetscape elements that contribute to the character of the area, including individualized wrought iron and masonry fences around front yards, entry gates, porches, trees, lawns, and mature, coordinated street -tree plantings. There are approximately 118 businesses in the planning area, most of which are small, community serving businesses, ranging from Laundromats, party rental stores, and local retail selling apparel, auto accessories and cell phones. The larger employers include large grocery and general merchandise Page 114 stores, which include Northgate Super Market, Smart and Final, and Food 4 Less, and Target — all who employ a range of approximately 50 to 100 employees. These establishments typically hire a majority of their workers locally. In addition, the number of local eating establishments, primarily restaurant chains which employ anywhere from 15 to 20 employees, and the assumption that other local business employ an average 4 people each, the employee base is approximately 762 employees in the planning area. Reflecting the local nature of much of the commercial and service uses in the area, a large percentage of these employees are of Hispanic descent. Precise figures on the composition of the work force are not available. However, statistics for the census tracts surrounding the planning area indicate that roughly 56 percent of the labor force is employed in blue collarjobs and the other43 percent in white collarjobs. The female population in the census tracts surrounding the planning area is largely employed in the white collar sector, at 57 percent, whereas males in the same census tract area are largely employed in the blue collar sector at 65 percent. Unemployment figures for the area are also unavailable, but based on the census tracts adjacent to the corridor, the unemployment figures are 6 percent unemployment for the male population and 9 percent unemployment for the female population. The aggregate unemployment for the tracts adjacent to the corridor is 7.5 percent based on 2005-2009 Census estimates. This is substantially lower than the Los Angeles -Long Beach -Santa Ana Metropolitan area unemployment rate, which, according to the U.S, Department of Labor Statistics was 11.7 percent in 2010. However, the unemployment rate figures for Santa Ana better reflect the planning area unemployment rate prior to the 2008 recession and not current levels of unemployment, which are not available for the planning area. Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 4.1 Land Use Objectives: Chapter 4 Planning Goals and Goal: • Relocate the mini -mall and strip commercial land uses that Objectives Utilize the development of the Bristol Street Corridor as an are typical for high volume arterials from their mid -block opportunity to upgrade the development character of the area locations to new development on existing shopping center and to enhance the viability of those commercial enterprises sites or in new commercial buildings near the intersections which remain. with major cross streets. • Encourage commercial activity along the corridor as a Rationale: means of generating revenues for the City through fees There are a number of existing neighborhood shopping and sales tax revenues. centers and several adjacent blocks of street oriented • Retain as many existing businesses as possible and commercial development along the Bristol Street Corridor encourage their rehabilitation and possible expansion, which have the potential for continued operation. Many of Businesses which serve and benefit local residents and the existing businesses appear to be marginal in their provide high levels of employment will receive highest operation, but provide important services to the local priority for retention and rehabilitation. Parcels which are residents and would benefit from improved conditions along stagnant and underutilized will be re -planned. the corridor which would make it more attractive. Other uses • Assemble parcels where necessary to provide adequate detract from the character of the corridor and are less replacement area for remaining businesses that have lost dependent on their particular location. Widening of the important space or facilities to the road widening. Corridor has affected many business operations with the • Replace residential uses fronting Bristol Street with others Corridor either by removing parking or structures. The Specific compatible to the commercial character of the corridor. Plan represents the opportunity to encourage and enhance • Develop frontage parcels not to be of a type to detract continued operation of those businesses which will contribute from the overall image and character of Bristol Street. most to the design and land use character chosen for the Goal: corridor. Protect and enhance adjacent residential areas and community facilities along the Bristol Street Corridor by reducing the potential for adverse impacts related to traffic or other uses within the corridor. Page 115 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Rationale: High traffic volumes on Bristol Street and the related noise and air quality conditions have already negatively impacted some residential neighborhoods adjacent to the corridor. In addition, the haphazard mix of uses and the absence of consistent development standards in existing development detracts from the overall character of the local community. New development and use of the frontage parcels on Bristol Street will reduce existing adverse conditions without imposing additional impacts on adjacent areas that would further erode the building fabric and quality of street life for the neighborhoods. Page 116 Objectives: • Convert shallow frontage parcels adjacent to residential areas, schools, or churches into landscape buffer areas. • Require visual screening and noise buffers between the Bristol Street Corridor and adjacent residential and community facility uses. • Establish standards for the type and placement of lighting within the corridor that will minimize light and glare nuisances in adjacent residential uses. • Establish land -uses and development standards and guidelines that will consider security and privacy concerns of uses adjacent to the corridor, • Develop guidelines for processing and approving new uses in the planning area in the transition period between adoption of the Specific Plan and its implementation. • Adjacent to residential areas, land uses should be restricted to community facilities, neighborhood -serving commercial and professional office uses; general retail and other traffic -generating uses should be restricted to frontage parcels and/or to corners on major cross streets. 4.2 Urban Design Goal: Create a distinctive visual image for the Bristol Street Corridor which enhances its use as an urban corridor and as a center for community -serving commercial uses. Rationale: The widening of Bristol Street to a six -lane arterial with an extended median to control left turn movements will be a physical expression of its importance to the city as a major connector. The widening also provides the opportunity to establish a unified and safe streetscape that can enhance neighborhood character and contribute to community pride by bringing more consistency to the land use character of the corridor and removing certain deteriorated and visually unattractive uses. Despite the projected increase in traffic on the upgraded roadway, a unified design treatment within the corridor, including landscaping, pavement treatments, street furniture, and open space can also make Bristol Street more accommodating to the pedestrian, and not just as a cross- town corridor. Objective: • Establish a unifying landscape image for the street using the full range of available elements, including plant materials, hardscape (i.e. pavement), lighting, signage and street furniture. • Develop a landscape treatment that mitigates the increased area devoted to paved roadway and provides an attractive and effective buffer to the adjacent residential neighborhoods. • Create a landscape plan for the corridor that is sensitive to the consumption of water and long-term maintenance costs. • Demonstrate principles of 'green' streets through the implementation of various stormwater facility strategies, such as inlets to vegetated swales, within parkways. • Establish site development criteria that will contribute to a safe, attractive, and better defined street edge, and which are responsive to the overall land use and design concept for the corridor. • Establish design guidelines for the architecture and signage. • Reduce visual clutter within the corridor by placing all overhead utility lines underground. • Create open space areas which are attractive to the local residents, responsive to their needs, and which will encourage pedestrian activity. 4.3 Circulation Goal: Facilitate the safe and efficient movement of multimodal traffic on Bristol Street. Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Rationale: Bristol Street is being widened to allow it to function as a high volume arterial. Development and use of frontage parcels are not to create access conditions which will conflict with the efficient flow of traffic along the Bristol Street corridor. Objectives: • Limit left turns to or from Bristol Street to major intersections only. • Minimize the number of right -turn -in, right -turn -out conditions along the Bristol Street frontage. • Utilize side streets and alleys for access to Bristol Street frontage between major cross streets. • Reduce visual clutter along the street frontage to provide safer driving conditions. • Provide facilities that will encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation along the corridor. Page 117 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 This page intentionally left blank. Page 118 Chapter 5 The Development Plan 5.1 Plan Overview The plan for Bristol Street facilitates optimum use of the assembled parcels for development while mitigating adverse circulation and environmental impacts resulting from the street widening project. The principal criteria used in determining the land's optimum use were parcel configuration and surrounding land uses. In general, where the assembled land did not provide adequate width or depth for standard commercial, office or residential prototypes, the use was adjudicated to open space, or park. Conversely, where the parcel dimensions were adequate for development, commercial uses were considered in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with sensitivity to the scale and character of the adjacent neighborhoods. Because the corridor exhibits the variety of land uses, development intensities, building prototypes, multiple neighborhood characters and will be divided into commercial and open space zones, a principal purpose of the plan is to treat the street as a binding agent that can unify the corridor into a coherent whole. Attention has therefore been focused on the street's landscape treatment, particularly on the selection and rhythm of trees which can impart a strong, unifying image. Proposed Land Uses In general, the distribution of land uses responds to the City's General Plan intent to concentrate commercial uses at major intersections, leaving the section of the Corridor between Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 these nodes for less intensive uses like office, residential or open space. There are four proposed land uses: Commercial, corresponding to the City's C-5 (Arterial Commercial Zoning District); Office, or P (Professional Zoning District); Residential, or R-1 (Single -Family Residential Zoning District), R-2 (Two - Family Residential Zoning District), & R-3 (Multiple -Family Residential Zoning District); and Park, or 0 (Open Space Zoning District). One overlay use is proposed: a C-5 overlay on select park areas. The commercial overlay zone is proposed as a means to permit certain commercial uses on parcels with configurations that are considered marginal for parking and/or building footprints. While on these parcels, a park use is considered most appropriate, commercial development should be permitted as long as they meet zoning regulations and Specific Plan guidelines. Figure 5-1 shows the proposed land uses for the planning area. Use Distribution Table 5-1 Parcel Inventory, summarizes the net change in use from what is existing to what is proposed. The specific use by parcel was determined following a series of consultations with the City Planning and Public Works Divisions. Page 119 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5.1 Land Use n z m .i1 n m m z C m n 31 z m D C m z c Fri Page 120 VACANTTO p °��4 q r49q 4° ♦q �`0 q`4 q �4 ° y O ��,4 q° 9 ° ° q G9tl� q° q9 ° ?° °9 q9 �9tl° � © I -- -- q 4 -,°° q, 4a Dail . COMMERCIAL BE RESIDENTIAL °qq°qa° PARKWITH BE COMMERCIAL OPTION FEET 0 60 100 Zao Figure 5-1 Land Use P m Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 o_ Z 0 m n m Z C m - m E Z 0 m �1 D < m Z C m - COMMERCIAL gip. Qp'O PARK N ® OFFICE PARKWTH ^FEET COMMERCIAL OPTION o so too soo as'�'ta RESIDENTIAL �r, r m Page 121 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-1 Land Use HESPERIAN STREET Page 122 Q � _ — m r m s o n 15 s A s m mC "� m kr{; 16 MAGNOLIA AVENUE l J HESPERIAN STREET 17 9 - COMMERCIAL �i��, RESIDENTIAL u t" F RYZI� MAGNOLIA AVENUE I 1 19-1 WE 0. M-11 PARK WTH COMMERCIAL OPTION =ram FEET 0 50 100 200 Figure 5-1 Land Use n 0 m z n m z C m a 0 0 m z n C m z C m Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 27 27a` N A m ti I I f - COMMERCIAL •gip n0'0 PARK 0.00 . \\\\ , 060� • KWTH �• �. �i��, RESIDENTIAL u t" F RYZI� Page 123 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-1 Land Use m Page 124 lL I LL i iI 1 11 IESPERIAN STREET IL N°P eaP°Po°aa n o �P'P ana a�Pa�POn POn Pa°P QO PPo nPa P C� Pa a n P PO aP nP o P o P nP nn a n P ano° °P na o°PP Pon no co P a a a c P n n P P i m N z m ti I I I I I 37 l (RFP) VACANT Ir•1 '.ftwol i a°. ]V.. C�V 4° D Ana ®R', D��P °4 na f•_ a 9 av � n V v. P� v v n.. a a V av P nP°a P 4 P - COMMERCIAL 21 .',' RESIDENTIAL a°Pa PP �_a 0 (A 1 A m rn PARK WITH FEET COMMERCIAL OPTION o sa +W 200 Figure 5-1 Land Use X m m 1 ao 0no 0o0 no 0 40a o � rn I A a rn I I I 0 V1 m m m ti z z a a z a m O C r m t a 0 !Pi �In Y4' `� a z a ca + o m rn a 42a . COMMERCIAL I m RESIDENTIAL VACANT TO BE SOLD - ADJACENT OWNER 46 0� ti a ti p 4 0 OOQ 9�V PARK WITH COMMERCIAL OPTION Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 n m z m 0 m n m z m m 0 m a E$� N FEET 0 60 100 270 Page 125 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-1 Land Use Z r m z m 0 m S C n m z 71 0 m m Page 126 VACANT TO - COMMERCIAL •gip n0'0 PARK 0.00 . \\\\ , 060� • KWTH �• �. �i��, RESIDENTIAL u t" F RYZI� n W x z 0 O z n m z C m n W x z 0 0 z n m z C m Figure 5-1 Land Use SANTA ANA COLLEGE N 1 2 CA 1 m m m 1 LOUISE STREET Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 - COMMERCIAL pp �0'0 PARK Q .pn . � N ® OFFICE PARKWITH �^FEET 0 in COMMERCIAL OPTION �� mRESIDENTIAL Page 127 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-1 Land Use .Z1 m m Page 128 HESPERIAH STREET m P Z 163 P P `m p', 0 p',0 p' ® 0 0 p',0', 0 0 p' 0' 0 p' 0 p' 0 p' 0' c • r.0 n� n ,,0 nQl"q S'�O n� n .,0 • o—" - 9p.0 n0 Opn _n� i�0 0 m0 m 00. nQ��� O .�0_m _[3d I N 60- - 60b y y m GREENBRIER STREET m - COMMERCIAL �i��, RESIDENTIAL u t" F RYZI� 1 19-1 WE 0. M-11 PARK WTH COMMERCIAL OPTION =ram FEET 0 50 100 200 N z s" 7 z c m Figure 5-1 Land Use LLi HESPERIAN STREET 66 j66 " J 0 0� �) O pN.•o� on' O•nO�n'..O.,O•mV_tn'..tl .O_n'_•'„O•.�•n��� - COMMERCIAL as'�'ta RESIDENTIAL ,?�p',M, r", r Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 s — ' HESPERIAN STREET m Oon pp101, , PARKIMTH COMMERCIAL OPTION 3 m 3 0 r D Z m K m 0 j r a z m I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I Er N FEET 0 50 100 200 Page 129 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Table 5-1 Parcel Inventory LEGEND Zoning Use C = Commercial CH = Church 0 = Open Space COM = Commercial P = Professional GS = Gas Station R = Residential OFF = Office PK = Park RES = Residential Page 130 PARCELBLOCKINVENTORY EXISTING(2018) PROPOSED Area Parcel (sf) Zoning Use Zoning Use 1 41,207 R-1/C-5 C/0 PK/COM Vacant 2 45,305 0 Vacant C/0 PK/COM 3 7,730 0 RES 0 PK 4 12,935 0 RES R RES 5 13,047 0 RES R RES 6 6,828 R-1 Vacant R RES 6a 7,071 0 RES 0 PK Vacant 7 5,106 0 RES 0 PK 7a 5,331 0 RES 0 PK 8 12,068 0 RES R RES 9 12,072 0 RES R RES 10 6,519 0 PK 0 PK 11 6,074 0 RES 0 PK 11a 5,015 0 RES 0 PK Table 5-1 Parcel Inventory LEGEND Zoning Use C = Commercial CH = Church 0 = Open Space COM = Commercial P = Professional GS = Gas Station R = Residential OFF = Office PK = Park RES = Residential Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 PARCELBLOCKINVENTORY EXISTING(2018) PROPOSED Area Parcel (sf) Zoning Use Zoning Use 12 2,278 0 PK 0 PK 13 84,151 0 Parking 0 PK 14 87,970 C-5 COM C COM Vacant 15 6,666 R-1 RES R RES 16 6,336 0 PK 0 PK 17 3,423 0 PK 0 PK 18 61,387 P OFF P OFF 19 46,674 0 PK 0 PK 19a 33,681 0 PK 0 PK 20 16,698 C-5 COM C COM 21 44,821 P Vacant P OFF 22 29,205 C-5 COM C COM RES 22a 14,679 C-5 RES R RES 23 11,186 C-5 COM C/0 PK/COM Page 131 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Table 5-1 Parcel Inventory LEGEND Zoning Use C = Commercial CH = Church 0 = Open Space COM = Commercial P = Professional GS = Gas Station R = Residential OFF = Office PK = Park RES = Residential Page 132 PARCELBLOCKINVENTORY EXISTING(2018) PROPOSED Area Parcel (sf) Zoning Use Zoning Use 24 65,708 C-5 COM C COM RES 25 7,339 0 PK 0 PK 25a 5,3810 R-1 VAC R RES 25b 18,500 0 PK/VAC R RES 26 43,535 0 Vacant 0 PK 27 6,273 0 PK 0 PK 27a 5,604 0 PK 0 PK RES 28 16,603 P RES R RES 29 5,882 0 PK 0 PK 29a 4,682 0 PK 0 PK 29b 5,848 0 PK 0 PK 30 5,607 0 PK 0 PK 30a 2,643 0 OFF 0 PK PK 31 15,856 R-1 COM P OFF 32 48,522 0 Vacant 0 PK Table 5-1 Parcel Inventory LEGEND Zoning Use C = Commercial CH = Church 0 = Open Space COM = Commercial P = Professional GS = Gas Station R = Residential OFF = Office PK = Park RES = Residential Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 PARCELBLOCKINVENTORY EXISTING(2018) PROPOSED Area Parcel (sf) Zoning Use Zoning Use 33 1,891 0 PK 0 PK 33a 5,364 0 PK 0 PK 33b 3,899 0 PK 0 PK 33c 3,802 0 PK 0 PK 33d 9,490 0 PK 0 PK 34 13,024 R-1 COM C COM 34a 4,357 R-1 Vacant R RES 35 13,188 R-1 Vacant R RES 36 6,761 R-1 Vacant R RES 37 59,235 P OFF P OFF Vacant 38 34,866 C-5 COM C COM 39 20,520 C-5 COM C PK/COM 40 8,763 0 PK 0 PK 40a 6,283 0 RES R RES 40b 6,351 0 RES R RES 0 PK 41 8,641 0 CH C/0 PK/COM Page 133 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Table 5-1 Parcel Inventory LEGEND Zoning Use C = Commercial CH = Church 0 = Open Space COM = Commercial P = Professional GS = Gas Station R = Residential OFF = Office PK = Park RES = Residential Page 134 PARCELBLOCKINVENTORY EXISTING(2018) PROPOSED Area Parcel (sf) Zoning Use Zoning Use 41a 5,422 0 Vacant C/0 PK/COM 42 27,544 Redev. RES C COM Vacant 42a 19,208 Redev. RES R RES 43 7,424 C-55 COM C/P COM 44 36,982 Redev. COM C COM RES 45 9,004 C-5 Vacant C/0 PK/COM 46 31,192 C-5 COM C COM RES Vacant 47 9,134 Cond, Use COM C COM 48 5,750 R-1 Vacant C COM 49 3,303 0 PK 0 PK 50 15,153 C-5 COM C COM 51 15,462 C-5/0 Vacant R RES 51a 6,313 C-5/0 Vacant R RES 51b 11,045 C-5/0 Vacant R RES Table 5-1 Parcel Inventory LEGEND Zoning Use C = Commercial CH = Church 0 = Open Space COM = Commercial P = Professional GS = Gas Station R = Residential OFF = Office PK = Park RES = Residential Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 PARCELBLOCKINVENTORY EXISTING(2018) PROPOSED Area Parcel (sf) Zoning Use Zoning Use 52 42,323 C-5 COM C COM GS 53 134,525 0 COM C/0 PK/COM OFF RES 54 24,490 C-5 Vacant C COM 55 11,754 R-1 RES R RES Vacant 55a 14,290 R-1 RES R RES 55b 11,942 0 RES R RES 56 3,906 0 PK 0 PK 56a 6,314 0 RES 0 PK 56b 6,611 0 RES R-1 PK 57 27,864 C-5 COM C COM RES 58 198,666 C-5 & P COM C COM OFF RES Vacant Page 135 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Table 5-1 Parcel Inventory LEGEND Zoning Use C = Commercial CH = Church 0 = Open Space COM = Commercial P = Professional GS = Gas Station R = Residential OFF = Office PK = Park RES = Residential Page 136 PARCELBLOCKINVENTORY EXISTING(2018) PROPOSED Area Parcel (sf) Zoning Use Zoning Use 59 4,543 0 RES 0 PK 60 8,393 0 RES 0 PK 60a 42,368 0 RES 0 PK 60b 8,297 0 RES R RES 61 9.584 0 COM R RES 62 8,157 0 RES R RES 63 67,813 0 RES 0 PK 64 7,816 0 RES R RES 65 21,207 0 RES R RES 66 23,402 0 RES 0 PK 66a 16,290 0 PK 0 PK Figure 5-2 Street Prospect Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Page 137 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 5.2Urban Design Concept Overall Concept The widened Bristol Street consists of commercial nodes at major intersections linked by tree -lined, landscaped areas serving as a buffer to the adjacent residential neighborhoods (Figure 5-2). While small office and commercial development may occasionally interrupt the open space buffer, the continuity of the landscape at the street edge will not be broken, giving the street the appearance of a continuous linear parkway. Bristol Street will thus function as a limited access commercial parkway, This concept allows several benefits: it serves to enhance the appearance of the Corridor as a major commercial spine connecting the Santa Ana and San Diego freeways; it adds value to the surrounding neighborhoods by creating a park- like buffer; and it mitigates, through an urban reforestation program, adverse visual and environmental impacts stemming from the street widening. Page 138 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-3 Commercial Nodes W La Veta Ave 22 WMam n m 4 W Santa Clara Ave c m �e N m` o vJ LL W 17th Ste z Santa A z College Washington Ave W Civic Center Dr �5aota W 5th St W Santa Ana Blvd Wis" WWillits St WBishop St W McFadden W Wilshire Ave W EdingerA W St Andrew PI ---•-- — WGlenwood Pl OCommunity merAve Activity Node 0 Neighborhood a Activity Node Page 139 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Nodes, Links, and Destination Points The design concept calls for the Plan to define and differentiate areas along the corridor in order to mitigate its haphazard, disordered appearance. By dividing the planning area into a series of distinct nodes, links, and destination points, the Plan will retain the corridor's variety of uses while adding definition and order to the overall development pattern. Identifiable nodes within the planning area generally correspond to concentrations of commercial development and occur at the major east -west cross streets. The nodes can be divided into two broad categories relating to size and market area served. The smaller, more local -serving areas are designated as Neighborhood Activity (NA) nodes. The main community -serving area is designated as the Community Activity (CA) node (Figure 5-3). The Community Activity Node is located in the area from First Street north to Civic Center Drive. This area is envisioned as a strong "town center" with intense commercial development that stretches east -west as well as north -south and is characterized by a commercial pedestrian promenade along either side of Bristol Street, Four Neighborhood Activity Nodes have been identified in the area. The two larger nodes are located at the Warner Avenue/Bristol Street intersection and at the 17th Street/Bristol Street intersection. Two smaller nodes are located at the Edinger Avenue and McFadden Avenue intersections with Bristol Street. The Warner Avenue node Page 140 consists of existing commercial development on three corners, with the fourth corner designated for park with commercial as an option. The 17th Street node consists of the Bristol Marketplace, Santa Ana College, and existing commercial uses opposite the Bristol Marketplace. Redeveloped commercial is proposed along Bristol opposite the college. Whereas the two larger nodes tend to anchor either end of the planning area, the two smaller nodes at McFadden and Edinger Avenue are located in the middle of the corridor closer together. At Edinger Avenue, existing commercial and Mater Dei High School occupy the southern quadrants of the intersection, while redeveloped commercial uses are designated for the west side of Bristol Street north of Edinger Avenue, and park area is designated along the east side of Bristol Street. At McFadden Avenue, existing commercial development will continue to occupy the southwest quadrant while new development will occur on the two east -side quadrants. The northwest quadrant of this intersection is designated for park or school use with an option for commercial use. Links refer to the connections between nodes or major activity centers. The plan concept is for commercial activity nodes to be separated by street sections characterized by less active, non -retail uses and by more intensive landscape treatments. The links in the Plan generally belong in one of two categories, "landscaped parkway" or "landscaped professional." The landscaped parkway links are those street sections where all or most of the acquired land along the Bristol Street frontage will be developed as landscaped open space. The following links represent this characteristic: Warner Avenue to Edinger Avenue, Cubbon Street to Myrtle Street, Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue, and 171h Street to the Santiago Creek. The landscaped professional links are those Corridor sections where non -retail uses are designated along the Corridor. These areas will have special landscape requirements, however, to ensure a consistent green spine between nodes. In some cases, the professional links will only have new development on one side of the corridor with parkway on the other. The landscaped professional links include the sections of Bristol Street between McFadden Avenue & Edinger Avenue and McFadden Avenue & 1" Street. Figure 5-4 shows a conceptual layout of structures, parking, sidewalks, and sound walls along the length of the Bristol Street planning area. Figure 5-4 Site Development BRI STOL STREET W M z W W z ` W 2 W W Q w W L-j LLI a ��Q MAGNOLIA AVENUE t7 N H N Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 NORTH Not To Scale Page 141 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-4 Site Development } — I MATER DEI w 4 �+ HIGH 5CHOOL CL a OUi 9! a L C❑ Page 142 � _ : a ica, }_ w x LLJ LLJ a t NORTH Not To Seale Figure 5-4 Site Development - .•'�..W.�.a�..�a� � ��T . � iJr �� kr1Y �4 � ,# ._/FT �F � }�_��JR '� T!` Nt.���- �j.:.'7 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 i w MARTIN LUTHER KING LU SCHODL LU n' - BRISTDL STREET uJ ;j' z w a - NORTH Not To Scale R w a m Page 143 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-4 Site Development MARTIN LUTHER KING SCH0GL R w x m Page 144 HESPERIAN STREETDIP 4 BRISTOL STREET HESKRET w 011 9. 1 X NORTH Not To Scale n w J 2 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-4 Site Development LU C1;LU - w 4l' i sir' j Qz �, r „ - — _ WSTOL STREET 42 a n � o1 NORTH Not To Scale Page 145 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-4 Site Development Z!w r'P' R w C s Page 146 > f� S ' 1 BRiSTOL STREET 1 R Uj 53 l I a I j i 0 a ._ — — —.L LOUISE STREET T--T—FT T—T I 1 1+11 NORTH Not To Seale Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-4 Site Development R w w a BRISTOL STREET R w a O i L6 L _J RANCHO SANTIAGO jc:2 COMMUNITY COLLEGE moo �v,......,,,., - ou::rca � NORTH Not To Scale —f--16 Page 147 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-4 Site Development ' HESPERIAN STREET T- -r�FT GREENBRIER STREET Page 148 1r,�i I I F��- NORTH L Not To Seale l The Streetscape Transforming Bristol Street from a strip -commercial thoroughfare into a verdant parkway brings to mind the great European boulevards and their alleys and trees framing along stretches of road. Using the "boulevard" as a streetscape prototype on Bristol Street satisfies a key purpose of the plan: to use the street as a strong, unifying element that gives motorists a sense of continuity and visual clarity from beginning to end. However, the open areas of the street behind its edge must act as a buffer to adjacent residential areas and provide a needed landscape amenity to pedestrians, For these reasons, the streetscape must also function like a park, allowingfor a greater diversity of trees and a more varied ground treatment that encourages strolling, gathering, or stopping. The street must also accommodate commercial uses at intersections and along several intersections of the corridor between them. Therefore, special design considerations are proposed for these areas so that they can properly function as retail or office sites without disruptingthe continuity of the streetscape. In combination, the street edge, the park areas and the commercial sites, yield the concept of a "commercial parkway". Such streetscapes are rare in this region and nonexistent in Santa Ana, Figure 5-5 and Figure 5-6 depict the three basic zones of the parkway concept: the median and street edge zone, the commercial zone, and the park zone. Median and Edge Zone The street median and the buffer strips within the public right- of-way are the primary and essential footholds in which to plant trees that can impart a strong, unifying quality to the landscape (Figure 5-7). For the median the proposed trees are Canary Island Date Palms (Phoenix Canariensis), planted 35 to 45 feet on center to establish a dramatic sight -line from one end of the corridor to the other. Should these palms not be available in the required sized and quantity at the time of installation of the median, the Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera) should be used as a substitute. Whichever tree is first planted, it should remain as the sole median tree. A minimum palm size of 20 feet brown -trunk height is recommended. To frame the street in a boulevard fashion, a double, mixed row of London Plan tree (Platanus acerifolia) and Jacaranda (Jacaranda acutifolia) is proposed. The Jacarandas — also noted as the official tree for the City of Santa Ana — would be planted only in the interior or second row of the alley to add variety and color to the street edge. They should be planted in irregular spacing, at a 1:5 ratio (one Jacaranda for every five Sycamores), Medians should be designed with maintenance - access points at turn pockets. Median noses should be paved with stamped concrete paving or other decorative paving. Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Commercial Area Zone Commercial development sites (which include all Neighborhood Activity Nodes) require visibility both for considerations of safety and advertisement. Palm trees are an appropriate plant for these sites, as they provide visual interest and shade without obstructing the view of storefronts and signage. They would also reinforce the nodal structure of the corridor, calling attention to the major commercial intersections (Figure 5-8). Palms other than those used in the median should be considered for these sites. Palms shall be 20 feet brown -trunk minimum. At intersections, the sidewalks coming from the park areas should be expanded to function more like plazas, with emphasis on ornamental paving, site furnishings and planters. Some of the plazas will also function as transit stops, allowing for people to comfortably gather and wait for buses. Page 149 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Park Area Zone These areas, which account for about one-third of the land in the corridor, should be heavily planted with trees to maximize their visual appeal and environmental value (Figure 5-9 & Figure 5-10). To address the anticipated pedestrian use of the park zone, a greater variety of species, planted in more irregular patterns is proposed behind the street -edge zone. The increase in species diversity and its informal placement also serves to visually "mesh" the parkway vegetation into the canopy of the adjacent residential areas. The ground plane should be kept free of visual obstructions, with emphasis on turf, ground cover, or optional decomposed granite coverage. Figure 5-10 depicts the criteria for using decomposed granite as an alternative to turf or ground cover planting. Trees should be drip or flood -irrigated wherever possible while sod and ground cover areas should be spray irrigated using low gallonage, vandal resistant nozzles. Within the park zone, the Community Activity Node stretching from 15` Street to Civic Center Drive should receive special treatment. Because the adjacent areas are mostly commercial in character and/or are targeted for commercial redevelopment there is a lesser need to create a "buffer" landscape. Increased pedestrian activity should also be expected. Therefore, more of the park area should be paved in this section of the corridor, with regular tree planting appearing to be "cutout" from a paved matrix, rather than the other way around. Page 150 Within this node, the street intersections should be distinctive features of the streetscape. At each intersections corner, groves of palm trees, raised ornamental planters, shelters, special paving and other visually strong and unique features should be considered (Figure 5-11). Sidewalks and Buffer Treatment At the street edge is proposed either a 25-foot public buffer containing a 10-foot sidewalk or a 14-foot public buffer containing an 8-foot sidewalk (Figure 5-7). The initial Specific Plan Street Alignment (SPSA) called for the sidewalk to be immediately adjacent to the street curb. Following further study it was determined that the sidewalk should be placed behind the remaining 15-foot or 6-foot buffer corresponding to the 25-foot and 14-foot public buffers, respectively. This decision allowed the sidewalk to be placed between two rows of trees thus acquiring the most amenable of all possible alignments. Because the second or inner row of trees falls on private property, the design guidelines calls for continuous parking frontage whereby the trees could be planted on regularly spaced planting islands. The spacing of the trees, therefore, is subject to the rhythm of the parking space. One tree every three spaces (9 feet per space) yields a spacing of 36 feet, which is adequate. The two rows should be planted in a staggered fashion to maximize canopy cover over the sidewalk. Slight adjustments in the placement of the trees should be exercised in order to accommodate underground utilities and new street lighting. Flexibility on the exact dimension of the buffer alignment of the sidewalk will also be necessary. At Mater Dei High School, for example, there is no room for the buffer strip. In this instance the sidewalk will have to be placed adjacent to the curb line and, if feasible, trees planted on school property to preserve street -tree continuity. Similar variations may be required on other existing developments according to land availability. In such instances trees should be planted not more than 36 feet on center, in tree wells if necessary. Lighting Standard street lighting will be provided as part of the street widening project. However, given the extent of area proposed for pedestrian use, supplementary lighting to achieve a 1- footcandle illumination level will be necessary. Along sidewalk, plaza areas and gathering areas along the parkway, pedestrian -scaled fixtures should be provided, They should be placed in continuous rows and matched in style throughout the Corridor, both in private and public zones. Figure 5-12 illustrates the type of fixture proposed. These fixtures should be spaced no more than five times their height (measured to the light source) along the park zones and half as far in the commercial zones, or as otherwise determined by an engineer. Walls The Environmental Impact Statement requires the placement of sound absorbing walls that are at least six -feet high on the rear edge of the parcels abutting residential areas. The layout guidelines for the walls as described in the Bristol Street Widening Project should be maintained, with additional considerations as follows: • The walls should be divided in three sections: straight runs, ornamental runs, and end runs. The purpose is to adjust the design of the walls according to their proximity to pedestrian activity, which increases towards the side streets. c The "straight runs" occupy the mid -sections of the wall between street intersections. These runs should be plain and simple, constructed of a single material and without excessive ornamentation. The walls should be planted with vines to eliminate the opportunity for graffiti and to soften the wall and add to 'green environment'. o The "ornamental runs" extend 100 feet from a side street right-of-way, and, owing to their proximity to pedestrian activity, should offer more visual interest. Espalier vines, colorful tiles, decorative caps and piers should be considered as integral elements of the wall. o The "end run" corresponds to the terminal sections of the wall as they meet side streets. These sections should be "opened -up" or perforated, allowing for wrought iron or other see -through ornamentation, including shrubbery, to soften their appearance as they meet the side streets. The length of the "end runs" should match adjacent building setbacks or be about 20 feet in length, whichever is greater. The wall ends should also act as "gateways" into the residential areas. Pylons, posts, trellises or other similar features should be considered, possibly incorporating neighborhood identification signs and logos. The "end runs" should be designed in pairs -two per side -street - with each pair assuming a distinctive character Figure 5-13 depicts the above concepts. Figure 5-14 and Figure 5-15 depict the treatment at the end of cul-de-sac streets. Architectural Character The commercial sites within the corridor are for the most part small in area and therefore will be occupied by moderately sized retail or office buildings. Following the land use concept, these buildings will be spaced along the corridor rather than grouped to form long, "hard" edges; they will appear more like "structures in a park" than as a continuous urban frontage, For this reason, the buildings should be designed so that all of their visible sides display a reasonable architectural interest and fagade articulation. Exposed, blank walls should be avoided. The emphasis should be on breaking the regularity of buildings, on treating them like ornaments in the landscape, with as much fagade interest and articulation as possible within the limits of feasibility. On long buildings (over 50 feet in length), roof lines should be continuous but interrupted, either by breaks in the roof lines or by wall extensions or parapets; smaller buildings should be treated like pavilions, with continuous parapet ornamentation or sloped roofs on all side. In all cases, buildings should blend with the landscape Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 and the surrounding homes and businesses. Colors should be soft and muted rather than bright and contrasting. An emphasis on high quality design, materials and architecture is recommended, with additional guidance available through use of the City of Santa Ana's Design Guidelines and Development Standards. However, in as much as the Specific Plan dictates a specific approach to the corridor's architecture, it must not preclude variety and/or refinements to the design intent. In this vein, the design guidelines are purposefully wide in scope, focusing not on the detail of the buildings but rather on the broad issues of scale, massing and facade articulation. They thus guard against possible gross misinterpretation of the stated aesthetic objectives while leaving ample room for creative and ingenious solutions. Page 151 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-5 Parkway Concept Date Palms � „ A, Commercial Zone --- Park Zone Page 152 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-6 Street Section SOUND MEDIAN STREET PARK SOUND EXISTING WALL ZONE EDGE ZONE WALL HOMES ZONE 15, 25, VARIES t. a i. Bristol Street from Saint Andrew Place to Civic Center Drive ae P , SOUND MEDIAN STREET PARK SOUND EXISTING WALL ZONE EDGE ZONE WALL HOMES ZONE 14 14' VARIES Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place Bristol Street from Civic Center Drive to Santiago Creek Page 153 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-7 Median and Edge Treatment Bristol Street from Saint Andrew Place to Civic Center Drive Page 154 MEDIAN BRISTOL STREET LANDSCAPE SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE PRIVATE PARKING BUFFER BUFFER Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place Bristol Street from Civic Center Drive to Santiago Creek Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-8 Commercial Prototype SOUND WALL DRNAM ENTAL PATTERNED PAVING SOUND WALL ORNAMENTAL PARKJHG PARKING PATTERNED PAVING DPEN WALL SECTION PLANTING ISLAND 'OPEN' WALL SECTION EACH 3 SPACES Bf 15T L STREET BRISTOL STREET PLANTING ISLAND f RAISED PLANTERS 'EACH 3 SPACES WIPALMS IS'LANDSCAPE SETBACK RAISED ALMS LATER 10' SIDEWALK 8' SIDEWALK —15' LANDSCAPED BUFFER 6' LANDSCAPE BUFFER Bristol Street from Saint Andrew Place to Civic Center Drive Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place Bristol Street from Civic Center Drive to Santiago Creek Page 155 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-9 Park Prototype TURFIGROUNDCOVER DECOMPOSED GRANITE �GPTIDNAL) INFORNIALTREE PLANTING ..5�' AD 10' SIDEWALK i 15' LANDSCAPED BUFFER H SDUNDWALL 6'-�' HEIGHT OPEN' WALL SECTION ACCENTTREES & GROUNDCDVER DOUBLE ROW OF STREET TREES iff 34'40' SPACING -� BRISTOL STREET Bristol Street from Saint Andrew Place to Civic Center Drive Page 156 TURF / GROUND COVER DECOMPOSED GRANITE (OPTIONAL) INFORMALTREE PLANTING BRISTOL STREET B' SIDEWALK J 6' LANDSCAPE BUFFER Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place Bristol Street from Civic Center Drive to Santiago Creek SOUND WALL 6'-8' HEIGHT 'OPEN' WALL SECTION ACCENT TREES & GROUNDCOVER DOUBLE ROWS OF STREET TREES 34'-40' SPACING Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-10 Park Development with Optional Gravel Paving DECOMPOSED GRANITE ON FRONT HALF (25% MAX. COVERAGE) SODiGRDUNDCOVERISHRUBS ON REAR HALF Bristol Street from Saint Andrew Place to Civic Center Drive Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place Bristol Street from Civic Center Drive to Santiago Creek $' SIDEWALK V LANDSCAPE BUFFER DECOMPOSED GRANITE ON FRONT HALF (25% MAX. COVERAGE) SOD/ GROUNDCOVER/ SHRUBS ON REAR HALF Page 157 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 5-11 Corner Prototype DATE PALM: 2Y IN 10, SLR. MIN, R SIDEWALK PAVING DECORATIVE Pi Page 158 Figure 5-12 Light Standards 12' STANDARD EDISON LIGHT POLE MOUNTED SIGH MIN.16' HEIGHT SINGLE GLOBE ALONG PUBLIC SIDEWALK MULTIPLE GLOBES IN COMMERCIALAREAS — VAN DA L RE SI STA NT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM GLOBE PRECAST CONCRETE POLE WALL MOUNTED I LIGHT FIXTURE MIN. 1U' HEIGHT (CENTER OF GLOBE) Figure 5-13 Wall SPLIT FACE BLOCK VINES F ORNAMENTAL RUN }1-144" LOW PLANTER 1 5 f ' r r•i! i i PROPERTY LANE Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Page 159 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 5.3 Circulation and Parking As part of the original Specific Plan and related environmental documentation, a Traffic Study was prepared for the Corridor detailing the existing conditions, comparisons with the General Plan in terms of traffic generation, potential impacts to the surrounding street network and standards for property access. As previously identified, this amendment provides changes in land use designations to allow for additional residential development as well as opportunities for commercial uses on selected parcels. An updated Traffic Study was prepared to analyze impacts associated with the changes and identified that the total number of trips would be a relatively small percentage of the overall original project, and no significant traffic impacts would be experienced as a result of the land use changes. The original analysis and proposed mitigation measures still apply. Daily Trip Generation Following a calculation of the proposed land uses and development intensity, the Specific Plan area will generate 7,000 daily trips. This volume represents 42 percent of the 1990 General Plan trip generation estimates. Page 160 Impact to Surround Areas The construction of a median on Bristol Street plus the closing of several side streets and their reconfiguration into cul-de- sacs is likely to divert and increase traffic along some adjacent neighborhood streets. This impact is mitigated by two factors: The maximum distance increase resulting from a street closure is 1,850 feet, which is considered modest; and the overall reduction in volume as stated above plus the proposed traffic control measures will ease current circulation conflicts affecting the adjacent streets. Intersection Enhancement Based on the projected traffic generations and movement patterns, no new improvements at any of the corridor's intersections are required beyond those prescribed by the General Plan. Public Transit Bristol Street is identified as a public transit corridor. Following consultations with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), the following bus turnouts have been incorporated in the Specific Plan. The plan proposes that expanded plaza areas be developed at each turnout to enhance the space for gathering and waiting. Bus Stop Turnouts: North Bound (NB) South Bound (SB) • Warner Avenue Farside NB/SB • St. Gertrude Place Farside NB only • St. Andrew Place Farside SB only • Edinger Avenue Farside NB/SB • Wilshire Street Farside NB only • McFadden Avenue Farside NB/SB • Bishop/Willits Streets Farside NB/SB • 111 Street Farside NB/SB • Santa Ana Boulevard Farside NB/SB • Civic Center Drive Farside NB/SB • Washington Avenue Mid -block SB, Farside NB • 17th Street Farside NB/SB • Santa Clara Avenue Farside NB/SB Figure 5-14 Cul-de-Sac Treatment STREET TREES 6' SOUND MILL, STEPPED DOWN 6 MLL END WIINTEGRATED TRELLIS & VINES Figure 5-15 Wall Section @ Cul-de-Sac Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Page 161 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Chapter 6 Page 162 Design Guidelines This section of the Specific Plan outlines specific design controls governing the implementation of the private improvements in the Bristol Street Corridor. The controls represent minimum design criteria designed to guide development towards the goals and objectives of the Specific Plan. Guidelines or standards not specifically addressed in this section indicate concurrence with the city of Santa Ana Zoning Code and Design Development Standards, to which all development in the Corridor should adhere. 6.1 Site Development Objective: The sitting of new buildings and parking as shown on the Development Plan (Chapter 5) should provide optimum continuity of the parkway landscape through private development parcels. Table 6-1 in conjunction with the attached parcel standards summarizes the site development guidelines applicable to each commercial parcel. 6.1.1 Parking Frontages The site layout and design of new developments shall emphasize placement of parking towards the rear of the site behind the building and siting the building closer to Bristol Street. Where parking is provided along the Bristol Street frontage, a continuous strip of parking stalls shall be provided abutting the public sidewalk and perpendicular to it (Figure 6-1). The public sidewalk shall be continuous at driveway ramp locations and shall have special paving at parking entrances along Bristol Street (Figure 6-2). When the building is situated closer to Bristol Street the commercial landscape standards shall apply. A 5-foot (for Bristol Street from Saint Andrew Place to Civic Center Drive) or 15-foot (for Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place and Civic Center Drive to Santiago Creek) continuous and curbed planting strip shall separate the parking from the sidewalk. The planter curb may be used as a wheel stop, with two -feet of the planter area counted as part of the parking stall dimension. The planting strip shall be planted with shrub material suitable to provide a 30-inch high continuous hedge. A planting island shall be provided after every three stalls along the strip. The dimension of the planting islands shall be equal to the minimum dimension of a parking stall as dictated by the City's Parking Ordinance. Each planting island shall receive a street tree of the specie recommended in the plant list. Trees shall be planted to form a line along the parking frontage. Figure 6-1 Parking Frontage — 5TREETTREE; CALIFORNIA OAK OR HOLLY OAK —PARKING STALLS MUST FRONT ON BRISTDL STREET PARKING ISLAND EVERY THIRD SPACE 10' PUBLE 'SIDEWALK Sr MIN. SIDEWALK ALL PARKING SIDES Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place Bristol Street from Civic Center Drive to Santiago Creek 8' SIDEWALK - V LANDSCAPE BUFFER Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 15' LANDSCAPE SETBACK STREET TREES: CALIFORNIA OAK OR HOLLY OAK PARKING STALLS MUST FRONT ON BRISTOL STREET PARKING ISLAND EVERY THIRD SPACE 5' MIN. SIDEWALK @ ALL PARKING SIDES Page 163 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 6.1.2 Building Siting Buildings shall be sited as close to Bristol Street as possible. Buildings shall be placed not farther than 5-feet from the rear property line where buildings do not exceed one story. Two or more story structures shall be set back additionally at the rate of 1-foot of height for each foot of additional distance from side or rear property lines. The space between rear building walls and the property line or sound -abating wall shall be paved and the access to this space secured by means of a lockable, solid fence not less than 6- feet high. A 5-foot minimum distance shall be maintained between building lines, driveway curbs and parking areas. 6.1.3 Building Form Side street elevations shall be as narrow as possible given reasonable footprint configurations. Conversely, buildings shall present maximum frontage towards Bristol Street. Building corners facing an intersection shall be chamfered; the chamfered face shall not be less than 15 feet (Figure 6-3). Raised architectural elements, e.g. roof and parapet extensions, are encouraged at street corners. The height of such extensions shall follow the building height guidelines per the following subsection. Page 164 6.1.4 Building Height Adjacent to residential areas buildings shall not exceed 22.5 feet in height from grade to the top of the roof or parapet wall (Figure 6-5). Building heights may be increased one -foot for each additional foot of rear and side setback provided. Roof or parapet wall extensions at the intersection -facing corner of a building are permitted to a height of 35-feet provided such extensions do not exceed 500 square feet in project floor area or 25-feet along a side. 6.1.5 Screens Architectural screens shall be constructed to obscure trash enclosures, mechanical, electrical equipment or other utilitarian equipment as required by the Municipal Code. 6.1.6 Signage Signage shall be subject to Municipal Code standards. Signage shall not be constructed in the landscaping between curb and sidewalk. Signs should be compatible to the architectural character of the proposed development. The location of the sign shall not hinder street or driveway visibility. 6.1.7 Lighting Pedestrian scale, pole -mounted fixtures shall be provided as necessary to achieve a 2-footcandle minimum level of illumination in all commercial site areas (Figure 5-12). All lighting shall be high -pressure -sodium. The fixture type shall match the pedestrian type fixtures proposed for the public space. Placement of the fixtures shall be consistent with and responsive to the spacing and location of street trees and other landscape elements. Building -mounted lights shall be compatible with the proposed exterior fixtures. Figure 6-2 Access Drive SCREEN HEDGE Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Page 165 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 6.2 Architecture Objective: Develop a unified architectural character that enhances the identity of the surrounding communities while not detracting from the street's park -like setting. 6.2.1 Facades Long, uninterrupted fa4ades shall be avoided: building facades should be "broken", or segmented in 20 to 30 feet sections, A "section" is defined as a plane separated horizontally not less than 3 feet from an adjacent parallel plane, and/or vertically not less than five feet from an adjacent parallel plane (Figure 6-4). Per subsection 6.1.5, terminating a facade with a special architecture feature is required. 6.2.2 Storefront Signage Each Commercial store or business may have one sign placed on the building's Bristol Street or side street facade (where a single store faces both streets, two signs shall be permitted). The sign shall be restricted to the name and/or logo of the store of business and shall consist solely of the type -face necessary to spell said name and/or logo. The type -face shall not exceed 24 inches in height nor project more than 8 inches from the building face. Product representative graphics are encouraged (Figure 6-5). The sign or collection of signs shall not visually dominate nor overwhelm the building's fa4ade. A 1.5-foot minimum Page 166 distance shall be maintained from the edge of the type -face to any wall edge or corner. Issues not addressed in this section shall refer to the municipal code. 6.2.3 Rooflines Sloping roofs shall be pitched upwards from exterior walls at not less than a 2:1 ratio and not more than a 1:5:1 ratio (Figure 6-6). 6.2.4 Projections Roof projections are encouraged as long as they do not have cantilevered appearance: they must terminate in a colonnade, open wall or other similar architectural device, The use of colonnades is highly encouraged. 6.2.5 Awnings The use of canvas or metal awnings is encouraged. Awnings shall not extend more than 6 feet from the face of buildings (Figure 6-6). 6.2.6 Materials Exterior wall materials shall be predominantly concrete, concrete block, or painted stucco. Wood, metal, brick or synthetic veneers may be used as secondary materials, The use of decorative finishes, like ceramic tile or glass block is encouraged provided they do not dominate the architecture. Sloped roofs shall be clad in ceramic, terracotta, or cement tiles. Asphalt tiles shall be avoided. Glass shall be tinted or clear. Reflective or "mirror" glass is not permitted. 6.2.7 Colors Color shall be used as an integral part of the architecture, not as ornament or decoration, except as part of decorative or ornamental features like awnings, metal trim, doorframes, etc, Hues shall be in the pastel range, muted in tone rather than bright. Variations in color within a building are encouraged, provided the transitions in color occur at breaks in building surfaces. Figure 6-3 Building Massing 15'CHAMFEREDCORNER; SIDE YARD TO MAY RP IINRFR Qnnp MATCH ADJACENT r iECURE SOUND _HTENSION { b IV C 7 Figure 6-4 Fayade Treatment Options EXTENDED PA RAPET AWNING RECESSED STOREFRONT S' MAX. 8" MIN. 17 CORNER SECTION Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 RAISED FEATURE FACING INTERSECTION CHAMFERED CORNER Page 167 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 6-5 Store Front Signage BUSINESS LOGO OR PRODUCT REPRESENTATIONAL GRAPHIC 22.51 MAX. I � HEGHT not MAX. HEIGHT STREET CORNER 11.5' CLEARANCE WINDOW SIGN AREA -� - NOT MORE THAN 14 OF TOTAL WINDOW PANEL Page 168 251 MAX, WIDTH Figure 6-6 Roof Options 22,5' MAX 1.5' MAX AWNING r +. ml I - - Wit; W MAX. Z I r77— f � 4 MAX, I SETBACK LINE Figure 6-7 Planter Types FORMED —1 CONCR�T CURBED PLANTER SEAT HIGH PLANTER Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 EE -E 20.1 Page 169 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 6.3 Landscape Architecture Objective: Improve the visual appearance of the corridor, improve its environmental quality; enhance the identity of the surrounding communities. 6.3.1 Grading For visual security reasons, mounds or sloped areas higher than 2 feet from existing grade shall be avoided. 6.3.2 Plant Material Table 6-2 describes the recommended plant material. Trees on median and sidewalks should be in root barriers. 6.3.3 Soft Area Treatment Non -paved or "soft" areas shall be surfaced with turf, groundcover or shrub planting. 6.3.4 Parking Area Treatment One Canopy Shade Tree shall be provided for each 6 required parking spaces. Each tree shall be planted in raised, curbed planters not less than 150 square feet in area for shade trees, 44 feet in area for palm trees. Trees/palms shall be located in such manner as to provide regular coverage across the parking area. Page 170 6.3.5 Paving Paving areas wider than 4 feet or larger in area than 100 square feet shall be paved with one or more of the following: concrete unit pavers; embossed, integral -color concrete; natural stone. Special paving shall be used in driveway entrances adjacent to the public sidewalk. 6.3.6 Planters The use of planters in plaza or pedestrian gathering areas is encouraged (Figure 6-7). For the planters to have a significant visual impact, the total surface area covered by planter should not be less than 20 percent of any given paved or plaza area, 6.3.7 Furnishings Drinking fountains, waste receptacles, newspaper stands, flagpoles, etc., shall be provided, Benches, chairs or other seating features shall be movable and suitable for overnight, secured storage. Seating may also be provided in the form of planter walls, retaining walls or other such elements that do not encourage loitering. Five bicycle parking posts shall be provided for each 50 feet of commercial frontage. Posts may be combined in racks or be single standing. Racks or posts shall be galvanized steel. 6.3.8 Irrigation Spray irrigation shall be restricted to turf and ground cover areas. Sprinklers shall be vandal -resistant, pop-up in type. Trees and vines shall be drip or flood irrigated. 6.4 Circulation Objective: Provide adequate areas for safe, efficient movement of all modes. 6.4.1 Service Access The site design for commercial areas shall permit adequate access and movement of service vehicles, including waste, service and fire -emergency vehicles, When parked, these vehicles shall not hinder the operation of parking areas (except during off -hours) nor shall encroach upon public or other private property. Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Table 6-1 Parcel Standards PARCEL STANDARDS Parcel Recommended Site Layout Block Parcel Type Remarks 1 A/G Commercial Option 14 N/A Maintain Existing building lines, setbacks, and access alignment. 18 B 20 C 21 D 22 N/A Access from side streets only. 23 N/A Maintain Existing building lines, setbacks, and access alignment. 24 N/A Maintain Existing building lines, setbacks, and access alignment. 34 C 37 E 38 F 42 C Access from side streets only. 44 C Access from side streets only. 46 C Access from side streets only. 47 & 48 C Access from side streets only. 50 C Link driveway and parking to existing development. 52 C 53 C Commercial Option 54 C 57 C Building placed behind side street driveway. Maintain 5-foot rear and side setbacks. 58 C 58a G Page 171 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 6-8 Parcel Type A .SIDE YARD TO MATCH RESIDENT fAL FRONT YARD SETBACK (15' MIN.) SHADE TREE PLANING ON }. MDSTLY PAVED AREA I i FRONT YARD 20' MIN. IT @ BUS TURN -OUT); PALM TREE OR SHADE TREE PLANTING SITE AC C ESS 5' FROM REAR PROPERTY LINE i SOUND WALL WITH 20' OPEN WALL SECTION (M SIDE STREETS Bristol Street from Saint Andrew Place to Civic Center Drive Page 172 SITE ACCESS NO' MIN. FROM SIDE STREET 28' WIDTH i i _:??. j PARKING d ISLAND AFTER EACH THIRD SPACE; 5' SETBACK G REAR AND SIDE YARD FRONT YARD 20' MIN. (3' @ BUS TURN -OUT); PALM TREE OR SHADE TREE PLANTING SIDE YARD A: TO MATCH RFSI DENTIAL FRONT .v YARD SETBACK (15' MIN.) SHADETREE PLANTINGON MOSTLY PAVED t AREA 4I p, SITE ACCESS 5' FROM REAR PROPERTY LINE SITE ACCESS FROM SIDE STREET 28' WIDTH BRISTOL STREET ,. ".,,. �w —, CA 6111L MAUL Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place Bristol Street from Civic Center Drive to Santiago Creek PARKING ISLAND AFTER EACH THIRD SPACE; IS' SETBACK @ FRONT AND SIDE YARD SOUNDWALL WITH 20' OPEN WALL SECTION @ SIDE STREETS Figure 6-9 Parcel Type B SIDE YARD REAR YARD MIN, 20' SETBACK MIN, 20' SETBACK 10' SIDEWA LK 6 FRONT OF BUILDING SIDEWALK AUNDWALLWITH 2Y )PEN WALL SECTION � SIDE STREETS SITE ACCESS FROM REAR PROPERTY LINE 28' WIDTH FRONT YARD I PARKING BUILDING SHALL NOT ISLANDAFTEREACH THIRD SPACE; PROJECT FORWARD OF 5'SETBACK@REARANDSIDEYARD ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY Bristol Street from Saint Andrew Place to Civic Center Drive Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Page 173 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 6-10 Parcel Type C FRONT YARD BFMIN (2V @ BUS TURNOUT); PALM TREE PLANING ON PAVED PLAZA AREA SIDEYARD TO MATCH RESIDENTIAL 1 FRONT YARD SETBACK (15' MIFI•) 5HADETREEPLANTING ON MOSTLY PAVED AREA REAR YARD 5'SETBACK .SOU NDWALL WITH 20' OPEN WALL SECTION (MSIDE STREETS Bristol Street from Saint Andrew Place to Civic Center Drive Page 174 SITE ACCESS 300' MIN. FROM SIDE STREET '28' WIDTH Y SIDE YARD TO MATCH RESIDENTIAL FRONT _ -- YARD SETBACK(15' MIN.( SHADE TREE PLANTING ON PARKING MOSTLY PAVED AREA ISLANOAFTER EACH THIRD SPACE, 5' 5ETBAC K 0 REA R A N D SIDE YARD FRONT YARD 33' MIN. (21' @ BUS TURN -OUT); PALM TREE PLANTING ON PAVED PLAZA AREA REAR YARD 5'SETBACK SOUNDWALL WITH 20' OPEN WALL SECTION @ SIDE STREETS BRISTOL STREET Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place Bristol Street from Civic Center Drive to Santiago Creek SITE ACCESS 300' MIN. fROM SIDE STREET 28' WIDTH PARKING ISLAND AFTER EACH THIRD SPACE; 15' SETBACK @ FRONT AND SIDE YARD Figure 6-11 Parcel Type D SITE ACCESS 28' MIN. WIDTH SOU NDWALL WITH 20' OPE,N WALL �'- SECTION 9 31DE STREETS IPARKING I S LAN D AFT ER EAC H THI RD SPAC E; 5' SETBACK 0 REAR AND SIDE YARD Bristol Street from Saint Andrew Place to Civic Center Drive REAR YA RD 20' PAIN. SETBACK SIDE YARD 5' MIN, SETBACK FRONT YARD 3T MIN. SETBACK SHADETREE PLANTING ON MOSTLY PAVED AREA BUILDIN SHALL NOT PROJECT FORWARD OFADJACENT COMMERCIAL BUILDING Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Page 175 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 6-12 Parcel Type E -SIDE YARD 26' MIN, INSIDE RADIUS 40' MIN. OUTSIDE RADIUS iFRDNT YARD 63' MIN. STREET TREE PLANTI N G 5' FROM REAR PROPERTY LINE 45MIN. WIDTH REAR YARD 5' SETBACK MIN, PLAZA AREA Bristol Street from Saint Andrew Place to Civic Center Drive Page 176 ,SFf E ACC ESS ,W' MfN, FROM ,0E STREET Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 6-13 Parcel Type F 51 DE YARD W MIN. SETBACK _ SOUNDWALLWITH 24' OPEN WALL SECTION 11516E STREET S -_-___ALLEY, 5' SETBACK __ _ .._ LANDSCAPED CUL-DE-SAC SITE ACC E 5S'l 5' FRDM REAR 1 SIDE YARD PROPERTY LINE 28' MIN. WIDTH r. , . - . MIN,15' SETBACK (PARKING ISLAND AFTER EACH ` THIRD SPACE ti FRONT YARD I SITE ACCESS - - 62' MIN. SETBACK: —} X-) MIN. FROM .STREET TREE PLANTING SIDE STREETS Bristol Street from Saint Andrew Place to Civic Center Drive Page 177 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Figure 6-14 Parcel Type G SITE ACCESS LINE UP WITH REAR 28 ACCESSIWIDTH BRISTOL STREET FRONT YARD 29' MIN. SETBACK SIDEYARD 30'MIN. SETBACK SETBACK PARKING I I H. ,�'R. ,,,_.--i SIDEYARD ISLAND@ 3 SPACESEACH 1S' SETBACK @ SIDEYARD i Z5Fvr9rh 30' MIN. SETBACK 15'SETBACK @ REAR YARD YARD PREFERABLY TREATED AS PIAZA AREA SOUNDWALL WITH ✓ y!'!' !a` 20' OPEN WALL SECTION ": @END ,,w,...,.. .�...^ o-. - ...-..... :�.-.�.._. SITE ACCESS REAR YARD 300' MIN. FROM TO MATCH RESIDENTIAL SIDE STREET FRONT YARD SETBACK 28' W IDTH SO' MIN. SIDEWALK Bristol Street from Saint Andrew Place to Civic Center Drive Page 178 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Table 6-2 Recommended Plants Median & Street Edge Commercial Botanical Name Common Name Remarks Zone Zone Park Zone Palms Phoenix Canariensis Phoenix doctilyfera Trachycarpus fortunei Canopy Shade Trees Brochychiton populneum Eucalyptus nicholii Ginkgo biloba 'Fairmount' Pinus canariensis Pistachia chinensis Platanus acerifolia 'Bloodgood' Tristania conferta Quercus agrifolia Flowering and Accent Trees Stenocarpus sinuatus Eriobotrya deflexa Eucalyotus sideroxylon 'Rosea' Jacaranda mimosifolia Koelreuteria paniculata Tabebuia avellanedae 'Paulensis' Tipuana tipu Cupressa sempervirens Canary Island Date Palm Plant in rows, 30' o.c. ✓ Plant in clusters,15'-25' o.c. ✓ Date Palm Plant in rows, 30' o.c. ✓ Plant in clusters,15'-25' o.c. ✓ Windmill Palm Plant in clusters,15'-25' o.c. ✓ ✓ Bottle Tree ✓ ✓ Nichol's Willow -Leafed Peppermint ✓ ✓ Maidenhair Tree ✓ ✓ Canary Island Pine ✓ ✓ Chinese Pistache ✓ ✓ London Plane Tree Plant 34'-36' o.c. ✓ Brisbane Box ✓ ✓ Evergreen Oak ✓ ,/ Firewheel Tree ✓ Bronze Loquat ✓ Red Ironbark ✓ ✓ Jacaranda Plant 34'-36' o.c. ✓ ✓ ✓ Goldenrain Tree ✓ ✓ Ipe Tree ✓ ✓ Tipu Tree ✓ ✓ Italian Cypress ✓ ✓ Page 179 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Table 6-2 Recommended Plants Botanical Name NOTE: All trees shall be a minimum of 24"-box. Low Mounding Shrubs and Grasses Myrsine africana Westringia rosemariniformis Coleonema diosma Cotoneaster microphyllus Escallonio 'Compakto' Grevillea 'Noellil' Pennisetum setaceum 'Cupreum' Rosmarinus officinialis'Collingwood Ingram' Santolina chomoecyparissus Xylosma 'Compocta' Teucrium Cistus purpureus Muhlenbergia Nossella Cistus crispotus Salvia chamaedryoides Lovadula Festuca Helictotrichon Corex Vines Bougainvillea ssp. Distictus buccinotorio Lonicero sempervirens Solandra maxima Page 180 Median & Street Edge Commercial Common Name Remarks Zone Zone Park Zone Shrub masses, triangular spacing African Boxwood T-0" o.c. ✓ ✓ Australian Rosemary 2'-6' o.c. ✓ ✓ Breath of Heaven T-0" o.c. ✓ ✓ Rockspray Cotoneaster T-0" o.c, ✓ ✓ No Common Name T-0" o.c, ✓ ✓ Hummingbird Bush T-0" o.c. ✓ ✓ Fountain Grass 2'-6' o.c. ✓ ✓ Rosemary T-0" o.c. ✓ ✓ Lavender Cotton 2'-6' o.c. ✓ ✓ No Common Name T-0" o.c. ✓ ✓ Germander Orchid Rockrose Muhly Grass Needlegrass Warley Rose Germander Sage Lavender Fescue Blue Oat Grass Sedge Grass Bougainvillea ✓ ✓ Blood -red Trumpet Vine ✓ ✓ Trumpet Honeysuckle ✓ ✓ Cup -of -Gold Vine ✓ ✓ Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Table 6-2 Recommended Plants Median & Street Edge Commercial Botanical Name Common Name Remarks Zone Zone Park Zone Sollya heterophylla Australian Bluebell Creeper ✓ ✓ Hibertia scandens Guinea Gold Vine ✓ ✓ Clematis armandii Evergreen Clematis ✓ ✓ Hardenbergia comptoniana Lilac Vine ✓ ✓ Ground Covers Ground cover masses, triangular spacing Convolvulus mauritanicus Ground Morning Glory 12" o.c. ✓ ✓ ✓ Drosanthemum floribundum Rosea Iceplant 12" o.c. ✓ ✓ ✓ Gazania rigens Trailing Gazania 12" o.c. ✓ ✓ ✓ Hypericum calycinum Creeping St. Johnswort 12" o.c. ✓ ✓ ✓ Lantana montevidensis Trailing Lantana 12" o.c. ✓ ✓ ✓ Pelargonium peltotum Ivy Geranium 12" o.c. ✓ ✓ ✓ Turf Drought Resistance Fescue Hydroseed or Sod ✓ ✓ ✓ Page 181 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Chapter 7 Page 182 IMPLEMENTATION ELEMENT The Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan sets forth a variety of land use controls in the form of policies, objectives, development standards and regulations, and design guidelines whose function is to ensure the orderly development of the planning area. This section of the Plan describes anticipated administrative, development review, and regulatory approaches that would be followed to effectively implement this Specific Plan and identifies project capital improvements and implementation responsibilities. In addition to the Specific Plan, the planning area is also subject to regulation under the Bristol Street Corridor Redevelopment Plan (). The two plans have distinct and complementary roles in the implementation process. While the Specific Plan sets forth guidelines which regulate land use, development, and design in the planning area, the Redevelopment Plan authorizes the City to acquire right-of- way necessary to make improvements to Bristol Street, acquire and assemble land parcels for development of open space, and provide development funding to finance capital improvements. The objectives of the two plans are highly integrated. Successful implementation of the Specific Plan is therefore dependent upon close coordination with implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. 7.1 Development Review and Regulation Specific Plan Adoption Following public review and certification by the City of a Negative Declaration on the Specific Plan, and adoption of the Plan by the Planning Commission and City Council, the Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan shall be incorporated as part of the City of Santa Ana's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Policies and standards presented in the Specific Plan will take precedence over more general policies and standards applied throughout the rest of the city. In situations where policies or standards relating to a particular subject have not been provided in the Specific Plan, the existing policies and standards of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance will continue to apply, A. Revisions to the Santa Ana General Plan The Santa Ana General Plan currently designates the planning area for a combination of Low Density Residential, General Business District, Mixed Use District, and Open Space, With approval of the Plan, the City would also adopt the Bristol Street Specific Plan as an amendment to the City of Santa Ana General Plan. The City will then revise its General Plan Land Use Map to be consistent with the distribution of land use categories presented in the Specific Plan Land Use Map (See Figure 5-1). For the most part, the same land use designations currently found in the planning area will continue to be used, although there will be a significant shift in the allocation of land area awayfrom General Business District and Low Density Residential designations to Open Space. B. Revisions to Existing Zoning The zoning provisions in the Specific Plan add to or supplement those that already exist in the City's Zoning Ordinance. Existing zoning categories will continue to be used in the planning area (i.e., no new zoning categories will need to be created), however, the redistribution of land uses will require that the majority of the existing parcels be rezoned in order to initiate implementation of the plan and bring the properties into compliance with the General Plan land use designations. Ninety percent of 374 parcels in the planning area will need to be rezoned. In order to facilitate implementation of the plan and avoid confusion to area landowners, it is recommended that all, or at least major portions, of the planning area be rezoned at the time of the Specific Plan's adoption. Existing uses which are made nonconforming by this action could continue until proposed capital improvements actually begin, but the zone change would provide clear direction for landowners and the City regarding the ultimate land use direction for the area. The procedure followed bythe Cityto rezone the planning area will be to create and adopt a single Specific Plan District (SP) designation for the area (except for isolated single family residential lots not fronting on Bristol Street), The City Zoning maps would then be revised to show the area with an SP designation and refer interested parties to the Specific Plan itself for the underlying zoning on any one parcel. C. Assemblage of Parcels A primary factor affecting the implementation of the Specific Plan will be the City's acquisition of the properties necessary to implement the Bristol Street Widening project. The City will be acquiring parcels incrementally as funds become available. Acquisition will be phased to be consistent with the phasing of proposed capital improvements. Ninety percent of the 374 parcels in the planning area will need to be rezoned. In order to facilitate implementation of the plan and avoid confusion to area landowners, it is recommended that all, or at least major portions, of the planning area be rezoned at the time of the Specific Plan's adoption, Existing uses which are made nonconforming by this action could continue until proposed capital improvements actually begin or until property owners elect to redevelop those properties where commercial uses are planned to continue. In either case, the zone change would provide clear direction for landowners and the City regarding the ultimate land use direction for the area. The procedure followed bytheCityto rezone the planning area will be to create and adopt a single Specific Plan District (SP) designation for the area (except for isolated single family residential lots not fronting on Bristol Street). The City Zoning maps would then be revised to show the area with an SP designation and refer interested parties to the Specific Plan itself for the underlying zoning on any one parcel. Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 Page 183 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan March 2018 F Page 184 �i t� Faisv�w srsr. . I _ V-11 I In J wl"':Fmt� F T IU4--ATE�4_6�HHFFLOWE H ❑❑❑❑ Fie ❑❑��1—JLII��C awar nnnnr—i+---Ir�F1nnrIM'mm�� b Acknowledgements City of Santa Ana City Council Miguel Pulido, Mayor Michelle Martinez, Mayor Pro Tern City Staff Raul Godinez II, City Manager David Benavides Robert Zur Schmide, Interim Executive Director Community Development Agency Candida Neal Vincent Sarmiento Interim Executive Director Planning and Building Agency Jose Solorio Vince Fregoso, Acting Planning Manager Sal Tinajero William Galvez, Interim Executive Director Juan Villegas Public Works Agency Planning Commission Mark McLoughlin, Chair Cynthia Contreras -Leo, Vice Chair Eric Alderete Phil Bacerra Beatriz Mendoza Kenneth Nguyen Lynnette Verino WA: II 31WA PL- LOCATION MAP,,S (NOT TO SCALE) �N ORAtVo SANTA ANA 32 �i Project No. 11-6741 & 19-6499: PWA Q111 SA �J Bristol Street Improvements — Phase 4 PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY (Warner Ave. to Saint Andrew PI.) II EXISTING CONDITIONS _. I 1 I 1 1�71 I 12' 12' 12' 11' 11' 12' 12' Sidewalk Drive lane Drive lane Center turn lane Drive lane Drive lane Sidewalk PROPOSED CONDITIONS * �� � � -`► � � _ i � � III IIII II 1 i I illl i 1 III Illli IIIIIII 6' 6' 4' 2' 11' 10' 10, 1' 14' 1' 10' 19 11' 2' 4' T Raised Raised Buffer Buffer SANTA ANA PROJECT 11-6741 CITY COUNCIL BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS PH. 4 P W A AGENDA DATE: FROM WARNER AVENUE TO March 4, 2025 SAINT ANDREW PLACE PUBLIC VUBKS AGENCY CITY OF SANTA ANA ADDENDUM No. ONE Project 11-6741 PROPOSAL Project 19-6499 PROJECT NO.: 11-6741 - BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE PROJECT NO.: 19-6499 - BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS BID PROPOSAL TO: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FROM: Sully -Miller Contracting Company REQUIREMENT: The undersigned bidder declares that they have carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that they have examined the Contract Documents in its entirety and hereby proposes to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with said plans (if any) and the specifications for the unit price(s) or lump sum(s) set forth in the following schedule: Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 1 Unclassified Excavation* 22,740 CY $ $ 72.00 1,637,280.00 2 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $ $ 925000.00 925000.00 3 Asphalt Concrete Pavement (AC)* 18,676 TN $ $ 140.00 2,614,640.00 4 Cold Mill (3") 10,741 SF $ $ 6.00 64,446.00 5 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) 3,922 TN $ $ 134.00 525,548.00 6 Crushed Aggregate Base —Class II (CAB)* 1,500 CY $ $ 125.00 187,500.00 7 PCC Sidewalk (T=4") 56,120 SF $ $ 6.50 364,780.00 8 PCC Driveway Approach (Commercial = 8") 3,680 SF $ $ 12.50 46,000.00 9 PCC Driveway Approach (Residential = 6") 1,955 SF $ $ 18.75 36,656.25 10 PCC Curb Ramp 3,680 SF $ $ 22.00 80,96.00 11 PCC Curb and Gutter (Type A-2-8) 5,290 LF $ $ 36.00 190,440.00 P-1 of P-23 CITY OF SANTA ANA ADDENDUM No. ONE Project 11-6741 PROPOSAL Project 19-6499 PROJECT NO.: 11-6741 - BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE PROJECT NO.: 19-6499 - BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 12 PCC Curb and Gutter (Type A-2-6) 1,035 LF $ $ 47.50 49,162.50 13 PCC Curb (Type B-1) 4,945 LF $ $ 33.00 163,185.00 14 PCC Median Curb (4") 460 LF $ $ 32.00 14, 720.00 15 Colored Concrete for Median Turn Pocket — 2,875 SF $ $ Brick Red, Topcast Exposed Aggregate Finish (T=4") 13.50 38,812.50 16 Colored Concrete — Brick Red, Topcast 3,740 SF $ $ Exposed Aggregate Finish (T=6") 23.0 86,020.00 17 Concrete Bus Pad 8,970 SF $ $ 14.00 125,580.00 18 Concrete Bus Pad — with Dowels 552 SF $ $ 36.00 19,872.00 19 PCC Protected Bike Lane (6") 805 LF $ $ 32.00 25,760.00 20 Adjust Manhole Frame and Cover to Finished 17 EA $ $ Grade 2,100.00 35,700.00 21 Furnish and Install New Water Valve Frame 7 EA $ $ and Cover 2,800.00 19,600.00 22 Furnish and Install Survey Monument to 1 EA $ $ Finished Grade 2,200.00 2,200.00 23 Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover per OC San 2 EA $ $ Std. 4,300.00 8,600.00 24 Traffic Signal Modification at Bristol St and 1 LS $ $ Wainer Ave 154, 000.00 154, 000.00 25 Traffic Signal Modification at Bristol St and 1 LS $ $ Glenwood Pl. 418,000.00 418,000.00 26 Traffic Signal Modification at Bristol St and 1 LS $ $ St. Andrew Pl. 167, 000.0167,000.00 27 Install 2" PVC Conduit per Plan 250 LF $ $ 100.00 25,000.00 28 Install 3" PVC Conduit per Plan 3,000 LF $ $ 65.00 195,000.00 P-2 of P-23 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 11-6741 - BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE PROJECT NO.: 19-6499 - BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 29 Install 4" PVC Conduit per Plan 440 LF $ $ 100.00 44,000.00 30 Install No. 6 Pull Box 20 EA $ $ 2,500.00 50,000.00 31 Install No. 6E Pull Box 8 EA $ $ 2,500.00 20,000.00 32 Install SCE Pull Box 1 EA $ $ 5,000.00 5,000.00 33 Install Traffic Signal Loop Detector (Type E 12 EA $ $ Loop) 1,000.00 12,000.00 34 Install CCTV & IP Communication System 1 LS $ $ 35,000.00 35,000.00 35 Install 144 Strand SMFO Cable 3,700 LF $ $ 10.00 37,000.00 36 Install 12 Strand SMFO Cable 200 LF $ $ 10.00 2,000.00 37 Fusion Splice 1 Strand of Single Mode Fiber 156 EA $ $ (SMFO) 100.00 15,600.00 38 Install Fiber Optic Splice Closure 1 EA $ $ 5,000.00 5,000.00 39 Pothole Traffic Signal Pole Location for 12 EA $ $ Utility Conflicts 3,000.00 36,000.00 40 Temporary Overhead Wiring at Traffic 1 LS $ $ Signals 45,000.00 45,000.00 41 Street Lighting Installation 1 LS $ $ 747,000.00 747,000.00 42 8" PVC Class 305 (DR 14) C900 Pipe 1,300 LF $ $ 350.00 455,000.00 43 12" PVC Class 305 (DR 14) C900 Pipe 2,700 LF $ $ 435.00 1,174,500.00 44 1" Copper Water Service 14 EA $ $ 7,000.00 98,000.00 45 2" Copper Water Service 1 EA $ $ 21,000.00 21,000.00 P-3 of P-23 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 11-6741 - BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE PROJECT NO.: 19-6499 - BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 46 6" Fire Service 1 EA $ $ 48,000.00 48,000.00 47 Fire Hydrant 11 EA $ $ 24,000.00 264,000.00 48 8" Resilient Wedge Gate Valve 12 EA $ $ 4,500.00 54,000.00 49 12" Resilient Wedge Gate Valve 7 EA $ $ 6,700.00 46,900.00 50 Steel Casing 150 LF $ $ 310.00 46,500.00 51 Abandon Existing Water Service 30 EA $ $ 310.00 9,300.00 52 Abandon Existing Fire Service 1 EA $ $ 2,500.00 2,500.00 53 Abandon Existing Sewer Lateral 34 EA $ $ 2,600.00 88,400.00 54 CCTV Inspection of Existing Sewer Main 6,000 LF $ $ 5.00 30,000.00 55 CCTV Inspection of Existing Sewer Laterals 40 EA $ $ 1,300.00 52,000.00 56 Vertical Offset Type I (As -Needed)* 4 EA $ $ 7,700.00 30,800.00 57 Vertical Offset Type 2 3 EA $ $ 18,400.00 55,200.00 58 Additional Potholing (As -Needed)* 13 EA $ $ 2,300.00 29,900.00 59 8' High Sound Wall (including footing) 2,750 LF $ $ 438.00 1,204,500.00 60 Ornamental Wall (including footing) 500 LF $ $ 1,000.00 500,000.00 61 2222 S. Bristol St. - Wall Reconstruction 1 LS $ $ 7,500.00 7,500 62 1306 W. Saint Anne Pl. -Wall 1 LS $ $ Reconstruction 7,500.00 7,500.00 P-4 of P-23 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 11-6741 - BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE PROJECT NO.: 19-6499 - BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 63 Trench Shoring & Plating 1 LS $ $ 1,150,000.00 1,150,000.00 64 18" RCP SD (2500-D) per City Standard Plan 310 LF $ $ 1150 700.00 217,000.00 65 24" RCP SD (2500-D) per City Standard 40 LF $ $ Plan 1150 1,000.00 40,000.00 66 30" RCP SD (2500-D) per City Standard Plan 60 LF $ $ 1150 1,000.00 60,000.00 67 48" RCP SD (1750-D) per City Standard Plan 2,520 LF $ $ 1150 925.00 2,331,000.00 68 Reinforced Concrete Collar (D=18") per City 3 EA $ $ Standard Plan 320 1,300.00 3,900.00 69 Reinforced Concrete Collar (D=24") per City 1 EA $ $ Standard Plan 320 1,300.00 1,300.00 70 Junction Chamber Type 'B' per City Standard 12 EA $ $ Plan 307 20,000.00 240,000.00 71 Catch Basin Type 'B'(W=7') including Local 9 EA $ $ Depression per City Standard Plan 302 and 305 16,000.00 144,000.00 72 Catch Basin Type `B' (W=2F) including 2 EA $ $ Local Depression per City Standard Plan 303 and 305 28,000.00 56,000.00 73 Concrete Pipe Support per SPPWC Standard 2 EA $ $ Plan 224-2 (Case I - 36" MWD) 4,000.00 8,000.00 74 Wrap Proposed 18" Diameter Pipe with 24 200 LF $ $ Mil Polyethylene Liner 200.00 40,000.00 75 Abandon Existing 24" Storm Drain and 90 LF $ $ Backfill per STD 1212 62.00 5,580.00 76 Remove Existing 21" Storm Drain Line 20 LF $ $ 300.00 6,000.00 77 Remove Existing Manhole Structure and 2 EA $ $ Junction Box - Backfill per STD. 1150 10,000.00 20,000.00 78 Remove Existing 21'x3' Catch Basin 1 EA $ $ 11,200.00 11,200.00 79 Remove Existing 9'x4' Catch Basin 1 EA $ $ 6,500.00 6,500.00 80 Transition Structure 2 EA $ $ 44,000.00 88,000.00 P-5 of P-23 CITY OF SANTA ANA ADDENDUM No. ONE Project 11-6741 PROPOSAL Project 19-6499 PROJECT NO.: 11-6741 - BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE PROJECT NO.: 19-6499 - BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 81 Install French Drain 94 LF $ $ 270.00 25,380.00 82 Construct Parkway Culvert Type "A" per 20 LF $ $ City Standard Plan 318 Case II 600.00 12,000.00 83 Construct Parkway Culvert Type "B" per 120 LF $ $ City Standard Plan 319 Case II 100.00 12,000.00 84 Curb Inlet 30 EA $ $ 1,200.00 36,000.00 85 Retaining Curb 79 LF $ $ 75.00 5,925.00 86 Signing and Striping 1 LS $ $ 68,500.00 68,500.00 87 Landscaping 1 LS $ $ 445,000.00 445,000.00 88 Irrigation 1 LS $ $ 410,000.00 410,000.00 89 24" Box - Coast Live Oak 69 EA $ $ 775.00 53,475.00 90 25' BTH - Date Palm 34 EA $ $ 4,400.00 149,600.00 91 Re -configure Existing Irrigation at 2222 S. 1 LS $ $ Bristol Street 6,700.00 6,700.00 92 Re -configure Existing Irrigation at 2200 S. 1 LS $ $ Bristol Street 8,800.00 8,800.00 93 1-Year Landscaping & Irrigation 1 LS $ $ Maintenance Period 31,000.00 31,000.00 94 Furnish and Install Bus Shelter Unit (12' AD 4 EA $ $ Sunset Shelter) 37,000.00 148,000.00 95 Bus Island Railing 470 LF $ $ 291.00 136,770.00 96 Filterra Offline (FT0612) - 12'x6' by Contech 5 EA $ $ or Approved Equal 84,000.00 420,000.00 97 Filterra Offline (FT0806) - 8'x6' by Contech 2 EA $ $ or Approved Equal 56,000.00 112,000.00 98 Utility Undergrounding 1 LS $ $ 2,007,000.00 2,007,000.00 99 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan 1 LS $ $ (SWPPP) - Risk Level 2 250,000.00 250,000.00 100 Project Advertisement Sign 2 EA $ $ 4,500.00 9,000.00 P-6 of P-23 CITY OF SANTA ANA ADDENDUM No. ONE Project 11-6741 PROPOSAL Project 19-6499 PROJECT NO.: 11-6741 - BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE PROJECT NO.: 19-6499 - BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 101 Construction Permit 1 LS $45,300 $ 45,300.00 102 Re -configure Existing Fire Protection I LS g $ Baclflow Assembly at 2222 S. Bristol Street* 33,000.00 33,000.00 TOTAL BASE BID S 22,354,492.25 The lowest responsible bidder shall be selected based on the total base bid. The City reserves the right to award the Base Bid, and any, all, or none of the add -alternate bid items (if any). * The quantity for this bid item is shown for bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the "25%" limit as stated in Section 7-3.5 of the Standard Specifications. The actual amount for this item will be dictated by the actual quantity used, and the Agency reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantity of this item accordingly. t This bid item is considered a Specialty Item per Section 3-2 of the Standard Specifications. TIME FOR COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The undersigned bidder hereby proposes to complete the Work for the total base bid amount shown above, within number 368) working days after the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. Upon issuance of the Notice to Proceed, Contractor shall immediately place order for long -lead time items. The liquidated damages amount, in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be $11,420 per calendar day. Name of Firm Sully -Miller Cor)tracting Company Signature of BIDDER Title Assistant Secretary Jeff Galterio (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) 0 CC Y UFI P-7 of P-23 Docusign Envelope ID: 91 F206F5-424B-431 A-B7E6-95AB3921 ADA6 EXHIBIT 4 3 CITY OF SANTA ANA CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AGREEMENT PROJECT 11-6741 & 19-6499 BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE AND BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS This CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT is made and entered into this 0, day of March, 2025 by and between the City of Santa Ana, California, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter "CITY"), and Sully -Miller Contracting Company (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR"). WITNESSETH: The CITY and the CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all the work and furnish all the materials at its own cost and expense necessary to construct and complete in a good and workmanlike manner and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the CITY, the Bristol Street Improvements From Warner Avenue To Saint Andrew Place And Bristol Street (Phase 4) Water Main Improvements Project (hereinafter referred to as the "WORK OF IMPROVEMENT") identified in and in accordance with the Contract Documents prepared by the City's Public Works Agency and approved by the City Council. 2. The complete Construction Contract consists of the "Contract Documents" as defined by the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and which include the following: • Notice Inviting Bids • Information to Bidders • Bid Proposal • Bid Bond • Contract Form • Contract Bonds • General Provisions • Special Provisions • Technical Provisions and Project Plans • Community Workforce Agreement • Appendices In case of conflict between the Contract Documents, the precedence of documents shall be as established in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT the sum total amount not to exceed Twenty -Two Million Three Hundred Fifty -Four Thousand Four Hundred Ninety -Two Dollars and Twenty -Five Cents ($22,354,492.25), as set forth and identified in the BID PROPOSAL, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A". The BID PROPOSAL contains a schedule of unit price(s) or lump sum(s) based on approximate quantities only, and the City does not expressly or by implication agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any rev. 08/01/2023 Page 1 of 3 Docusign Envelope ID: 91F206F5-424B-431A-B7E6-95AB3921ADA6 class or portion of the work or to omit portions of the work as may be deemed necessary or advisable. 4. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT within the time specified in the Time for Completion of Improvements section of the BID PROPOSAL (Exhibit "A") including commencing construction within the timeframe therein specified after issuance of a Notice to Proceed. 5. The CONTRACTOR will pay, and will require all subcontractors to pay, all employees on the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT a salary or wage at least equal to the prevailing salary or wage established for such work as set forth in the wage determinations for this work in accordance with applicable State and Federal law. 6. If applicable, the CONTRACTOR shall adhere to the CITY'S Community Workforce Agreement (CWA), a pre -hire collective bargaining agreement, which establishes the labor relations policies and procedures for CONTRACTOR to follow in the crafts persons employed to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT as more fully described in the CWA. The CWA may be found on the City's website at: http://www.santa-ana.org_/pwa/documents/CWA.pdf 7. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish two bonds to be approved by the CITY, one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price, to guarantee the faithful performance of the work (Performance Bond), and one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price to guarantee payment of all claims for labor and materials furnished (Payment Bond). This Contract shall not become effective until such bonds are supplied to and approved by the CITY. 8. CONTRACTOR shall, prior to the release of the performance and payment bonds or the retention payment, furnish a warranty performance and payment bond (Warranty Bond). Said Warranty Bond shall also be required as a condition of project acceptance. For projects up to Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or Twenty Percent (20%) of the final contract price. For projects above Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) or Ten Percent (10%) of the final contract price. 9. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish Certificates of Liability Insurance and Worker's Compensation Insurance as outlined in the General Provisions, to be approved by the CITY. 10. INDEMNIFICATION. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONTRACTOR and its Subcontractors hereby agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, employees, representatives and volunteers (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Indemnitees"), through legal counsel acceptable to CITY, from and against any liability, claims, actions, costs, damages or losses, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for injury, including death to any person or damage to any property, arising directly or indirectly from, or in any manner relating to, any of the following: (i) Performance or nonperformance of the Work of Improvement by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier; Page 2 of 3 Docusign Envelope ID: 91F206F5-424B-431A-B7E6-95AB3921ADA6 (ii) Performance or nonperformance by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, of any of the obligations under the Contract Documents; (iii) The construction activities of CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, either on the project site or on other properties; (iv) The payment or nonpayment by CONTRACTOR of any of its Subcontractors of any lower tier, for Work of Improvement performed on or off the project site; and (v) Any personal injury, property damage or economic loss to third persons related to and arising from the performance or nonperformance by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, of the Work of Improvement. (vi) The indemnity obligations of Subcontractors provided by this Section shall be included in all subcontract documents issued by CONTRACTOR. Nothing in the Contract Documents shall be construed to give rise to any implied right of indemnity in favor of CONTRACTOR against CITY or any other Indemnitee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Construction Contract on the day and year first above written. ATTEST: JENNIFER L. HALL City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: e Nellesen Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Digitally signed by Nabil Saa N a b i I C J a Nh a Date: 2025.02.13 14:54:14-08'00' NABIL SABA, PE Executive Director Public Works Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA ALVARO NUNEZ City Manager CONTRACTOR: Sully -Miller Contracting Company DocuSigned by: Mg?'J'e 'Galterio TITLE: Assistant Secretary Page 3 of 3 Docusign Envelope ID: 91F206F5-424B-431A-B7E6-95AB3921ADA6 CERTIFICATE OF INCUMBENCY AND RESOLUTION I, Anthony L. Martino, II, do hereby certify that I am the Secretary of Sully -Miller Contracting Company, a Delaware corporation, and that as such I have access to and custody of the corporate records and minute books of said corporation. And I do hereby further certify that the following persons are duly elected officers of said corporation. TITLE Chairman Of The Board President Vice President, CFO, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary Vice President and Assistant Secretary Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary NAME Marcus Leavitt William Joseph Thomas Boyd Jae Won Scott Bottomley Anthony L. Martino, II Jeff Galterio Mark Pachura I further certify that the following is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of said Company at a meeting held on December 14, 2023, and that this resolution has not been in any way rescinded, annulled, or revoked but the same is still in full force and effect: BID TENDERS: GENERAL RESOLVED, that any officer of the Corporation be and they hereby are authorized in the name and on behalf of the Corporation, under its corporate seal or otherwise (i) to prepare proposals and bids for the supplying of construction materials and the performance by itself or in joint venture, of work of whatsoever nature in connection with the construction or paving of highways, roads and airports and in connection with earthworks and civil engineering projects of all kinds, together with all work incidental thereto, (ii) to execute and submit any and all such proposals and bids to any governmental authority, instrumentality, or agency of the United States, its several states, territories and possessions, including without limitation, any municipality or other political or corporate subdivision thereof, and to any corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, or other business entity, (iii) in connection with any such submission, to deliver bid deposits or bonds as may be required and (iv) to execute and deliver definitive agreements binding the Corporation to perform work in accordance with any proposals and bids authorized hereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal this 8th day of April 2024. By: v (SEAL) Antho . Martino, II Secretary Sully -Miller Contracting Company 135 S. State College Blvd., Ste. 400 Brea, CA 92821 Docusign Envelope ID: 91F206F5-424B-431A-B7E6-95AB3921ADA6 EXHIBIT A CITY OF SANTA ANA ADDENDUM No. ONE Project 11-6741 PROPOSAL Project 19-6499 PROJECT NO.: 11-6741 - BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE PROJECT NO.: 19-6499 - BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS IaIo70Z$]Z�T.Y_\!1 TO: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FROM: Sully -Miller Contracting Company I a 1 LGIIJI-s Ifri�►�iil The undersigned bidder declares that they have carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that they have examined the Contract Documents in its entirety and hereby proposes to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with said plans (if any) and the specifications for the unit price(s) or lump sum(s) set forth in the following schedule: Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 1 Unclassified Excavation* 22,740 CY $ $ 72.00 1,637,280.00 2 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $ $ 925000.00 925000.00 3 Asphalt Concrete Pavement (AC)* 18,676 TN $ $ 140.00 2,614,640.00 4 Cold Mill (Y) 10,741 SF $ $ 6.00 64,446.00 5 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) 3,922 TN $ $ 134.00 525,548.00 6 Crushed Aggregate Base — Class II (CAB)* 1,500 CY $ $ 125.00 187,500.00 7 PCC Sidewalk (T=4") 56,120 SF $ $ 6.50 364,780.00 8 PCC Driveway Approach (Commercial = 8") 3,680 SF $ $ 12.50 46,000.00 9 PCC Driveway Approach (Residential = 6") 1,955 SF $ $ 18.75 36,656.25 10 PCC Curb Ramp 3,680 SF $ $ 22.00 80, 96.00 11 PCC Curb and Gutter (Type A-2-8) 5,290 LF $ $ 36.00 190,440.00 P-1 of P-23 Docusign Envelope ID: 91F206F5-424B-431A-B7E6-95AB3921ADA6 ADDENDUM No. ONE CITY OF SANTA ANA Project 11-6741 PROPOSAL Project 19-6499 PROJECT NO.: I 1-6741 - BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE PROJECT NO.: 19-6499 - BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 12 PCC Curb and Gutter (Type A-2-6) 1,035 LF $ $ 47.50 49,162.50 13 PCC Curb (Type B-1) 4,945 LF $ $ 33.00 163,185.00 14 PCC Median Curb (4") 460 LF $ $ 32.00 14, 720.00 15 Colored Concrete for Median Turn Pocket — 2,875 SF $ $ Brick Red, Topcast Exposed Aggregate Finish (T=4") 13.50 38,812.50 16 Colored Concrete — Brick Red, Topcast 3,740 SF $ $ Exposed Aggregate Finish (T=6") 23.0 86,020.00 17 Concrete Bus Pad 8,970 SF $ $ 14.00 125, 580.00 18 Concrete Bus Pad — with Dowels 552 SF $ $ 36.00 19,872.00 19 PCC Protected Bike Lane (6") 805 LF $ $ 32.00 25,760.00 20 Adjust Manhole Frame and Cover to Finished 17 EA $ $ Grade 2,100.00 35,700.00 21 Furnish and Install New Water Valve Frame 7 EA $ $ and Cover 2,800.00 19,600.00 22 Furnish and Install Survey Monument to 1 EA $ $ Finished Grade 2,200.00 2,200.00 23 Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover per OC San 2 EA $ $ Std. 4,300.00 8,600.00 24 Traffic Signal Modification at Bristol St and 1 LS $ $ Wainer Ave 154, 000.00 154, 000.00 25 Traffic Signal Modification at Bristol St and 1 LS $ $ Glenwood Pl. 418,000.00 418,000.00 26 Traffic Signal Modification at Bristol St and 1 LS $ $ St. Andrew Pl. 167,000.0 167,000.00 27 Install 2" PVC Conduit per Plan 250 LF $ $ 100.00 25,000.00 28 Install 3" PVC Conduit per Plan 3,000 LF $ $ 65.00 195,000.00 P-2 of P-23 Docusign Envelope ID: 91F206F5-424B-431A-B7E6-95AB3921ADA6 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 11-6741 - BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE PROJECT NO.: 19-6499 - BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 29 Install 4" PVC Conduit per Plan 440 LF $ $ 100.00 44,000.00 30 Install No. 6 Pull Box 20 EA $ $ 2,500.00 50,000.00 31 Install No. 6E Pull Box 8 EA $ $ 2,500.00 20,000.00 32 Install SCE Pull Box 1 EA $ $ 5,000.00 5,000.00 33 Install Traffic Signal Loop Detector (Type E 12 EA $ $ Loop) 1,000.00 12,000.00 34 Install CCTV & IP Communication System 1 LS $ $ 35,000.00 35,000.00 35 Install 144 Strand SMFO Cable 3,700 LF $ $ 10.00 37,000.00 36 Install 12 Strand SMFO Cable 200 LF $ $ 10.00 2,000.00 37 Fusion Splice 1 Strand of Single Mode Fiber 156 EA $ $ (SMFO) 100.00 15,600.00 38 Install Fiber Optic Splice Closure 1 EA $ $ 5,000.00 5,000.00 39 Pothole Traffic Signal Pole Location for 12 EA $ $ Utility Conflicts 3,000.00 36,000.00 40 Temporary Overhead Wiring at Traffic 1 LS $ $ Signals 45,000.00 45,000.00 41 Street Lighting Installation 1 LS $ $ 747,000.00 747,000.00 42 8" PVC Class 305 (DR 14) C900 Pipe 1,300 LF $ $ 350.00 455,000.00 43 12" PVC Class 305 (DR 14) C900 Pipe 2,700 LF $ $ 435.00 1,174,500.00 44 1" Copper Water Service 14 EA $ $ 7,000.00 98,000.00 45 2" Copper Water Service 1 EA $ $ 21,000.00 21,000.00 P-3 of P-23 Docusign Envelope ID: 91F206F5-424B-431A-B7E6-95AB3921ADA6 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 11-6741 - BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE PROJECT NO.: 19-6499 - BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 46 6" Fire Service 1 EA $ $ 48,000.00 48,000.00 47 Fire Hydrant 11 EA $ $ 24,000.00 264,000.00 48 8" Resilient Wedge Gate Valve 12 EA $ $ 4,500.00 54,000.00 49 12" Resilient Wedge Gate Valve 7 EA $ $ 6,700.00 46,900.00 50 Steel Casing 150 LF $ $ 310.00 46,500.00 51 Abandon Existing Water Service 30 EA $ $ 310.00 9,300.00 52 Abandon Existing Fire Service 1 EA $ $ 2,500.00 2,500.00 53 Abandon Existing Sewer Lateral 34 EA $ $ 2,600.00 88,400.00 54 CCTV Inspection of Existing Sewer Main 6,000 LF $ $ 5.00 30,000.00 55 CCTV Inspection of Existing Sewer Laterals 40 EA $ $ 1,300.00 52,000.00 56 Vertical Offset Type I (As -Needed)* 4 EA $ $ 7,700.00 30,800.00 57 Vertical Offset Type 2 3 EA $ $ 18,400.00 55,200.00 58 Additional Potholing (As -Needed)* 13 EA $ $ 2,300.00 29,900.00 59 8' High Sound Wall (including footing) 2,750 LF $ $ 438.00 1,204,500.00 60 Ornamental Wall (including footing) 500 LF $ $ 1,000.00 500,000.00 61 2222 S. Bristol St. - Wall Reconstruction 1 LS $ $ 7,500.00 7,500 62 1306 W. Saint Anne Pl. -Wall 1 LS $ $ Reconstruction 7,500.00 7,500.00 P-4 of P-23 Docusign Envelope ID: 91F206F5-424B-431A-B7E6-95AB3921ADA6 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 11-6741 - BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE PROJECT NO.: 19-6499 - BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 63 Trench Shoring & Plating 1 LS $ $ 1,150,000.00 1,150,000.00 64 18" RCP SD (2500-D) per City Standard Plan 310 LF $ $ 1150 700.00 217,000.00 65 24" RCP SD (2500-D) per City Standard 40 LF $ $ Plan 1150 1,000.00 40,000.00 66 30" RCP SD (2500-D) per City Standard Plan 60 LF $ $ 1150 1,000.00 60,000.00 67 48" RCP SD (1750-D) per City Standard Plan 2,520 LF $ $ 1150 925.00 2,331,000.00 68 Reinforced Concrete Collar (D=18") per City 3 EA $ $ Standard Plan 320 1,300.00 3,900.00 69 Reinforced Concrete Collar (D=24") per City 1 EA $ $ Standard Plan 320 1,300.00 1,300.00 70 Junction Chamber Type 'B' per City Standard 12 EA $ $ Plan 307 20,000.00 240,000.00 71 Catch Basin Type 'B'(W=7') including Local 9 EA $ $ Depression per City Standard Plan 302 and 305 16,000.00 144,000.00 72 Catch Basin Type `B' (W=2F) including 2 EA $ $ Local Depression per City Standard Plan 303 and 305 28,000.00 56,000.00 73 Concrete Pipe Support per SPPWC Standard 2 EA $ $ Plan 224-2 (Case I - 36" MWD) 4,000.00 8,000.00 74 Wrap Proposed 18" Diameter Pipe with 24 200 LF $ $ Mil Polyethylene Liner 200.00 40,000.00 75 Abandon Existing 24" Storm Drain and 90 LF $ $ Backfill per STD 1212 62.00 5,580.00 76 Remove Existing 21" Storm Drain Line 20 LF $ $ 300.00 6,000.00 77 Remove Existing Manhole Structure and 2 EA $ $ Junction Box - Backfill per STD. 1150 10,000.00 20,000.00 78 Remove Existing 21'x3' Catch Basin 1 EA $ $ 11,200.00 11,200.00 79 Remove Existing 9'x4' Catch Basin 1 EA $ $ 6,500.00 6,500.00 80 Transition Structure 2 EA $ $ 44,000.00 88,000.00 P-5 of P-23 Docusign Envelope ID: 91F206F5-424B-431A-B7E6-95AB3921ADA6 CITY OF SANTA ANA ADDENDUM No. ONE Project 11-6741 PROPOSAL Project 19-6499 PROJECT NO.: I 1-6741 - BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE PROJECT NO.: 19-6499 - BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 81 Install French Drain 94 LF $ $ 270.00 25,380.00 82 Construct Parkway Culvert Type "A" per 20 LF $ $ City Standard Plan 318 Case II 600.00 12,000.00 83 Construct Parkway Culvert Type "B" per 120 LF $ $ City Standard Plan 319 Case II 100.00 12,000.00 84 Curb Inlet 30 EA $ $ 1,200.00 36,000.00 85 Retaining Curb 79 LF $ $ 75.00 5,925.00 86 Signing and Striping 1 LS $ $ 68,500.00 68,500.00 87 Landscaping 1 LS $ $ 445,000.00 445,000.00 88 Irrigation 1 LS $ $ 410,000.00 410,000.00 89 24" Box - Coast Live Oak 69 EA $ $ 775.00 53,475.00 90 25' BTH - Date Palm 34 EA $ $ 4,400.00 149,600.00 91 Re -configure Existing Irrigation at 2222 S. I LS $ $ Bristol Street 6,700.00 6,700.00 92 Re -configure Existing Irrigation at 2200 S. I LS $ $ Bristol Street 8,800.00 8,800.00 93 1-Year Landscaping & Irrigation I LS $ $ Maintenance Period 31,000.00 31,000.00 94 Furnish and Install Bus Shelter Unit (12' AD 4 EA $ $ Sunset Shelter) 37,000.00 148,000.00 95 Bus Island Railing 470 LF $ $ 291.00 136, 770.00 96 Filterra Offline (FT0612) - 12'x6' by Contech 5 EA $ $ or Approved Equal 84,000.00 420,000.00 97 Filterra Offline (FT0806) - 8'x6' by Contech 2 EA $ $ or Approved Equal 56,000.00 112,000.00 98 Utility Undergrounding 1 LS $ $ 2,007,000.00 2,007,000.00 99 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan I LS $ $ (SWPPP) - Risk Level 2 250,000.00 250,000.00 100 Project Advertisement Sign 2 EA $ $ 4,500.00 9,000.00 P-6 of P-23 Docusign Envelope ID: 91F206F5-424B-431A-B7E6-95AB3921ADA6 CITY OF SANTA ANA ADDENDUM No. ONE Project 11-6741 PROPOSAL Project 19-6499 PROJECT NO.: 11-6741 - BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE PROJECT NO.: 19-6499 - BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 101 Construction Permit 1 LS $45,300 $ 45,300.00 102 Re -configure Existing Fire Protection 1 LS $ $ Baclflow Assembly at 2222 S. Bristol Street* 33,000.00 33,000.00 TOTAL BASE BID S 22,354,492.25 The lowest responsible bidder shall be selected based on the total base bid. The City reserves the right to award the Base Bid, and any, all, or none of the add -alternate bid items (if any). * The quantity for this bid item is shown for bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the "25%" limit as stated in Section 7-3.5 of the Standard Specifications. The actual amount for this item will be dictated by the actual quantity used, and the Agency reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantity of this item accordingly. t This bid item is considered a Specialty Item per Section 3-2 of the Standard Specifications. TIME FOR COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The undersigned bidder hereby proposes to complete the Work for the total base bid amount shown above, within number (368) working days after the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. Upon issuance of the Notice to Proceed, Contractor shall immediately place order for long -lead time items. The liquidated damages amount, in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be $11,420 per calendar day. Name of Firm Sully -Miller Corjtracting Company Signature of BIDDER Title Assistant Secretary Jeff Galterio (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) �n 0 P-7 of P-23 Docusign Envelope ID: 91 F206F5-424B-431 A-B7E6-95AB3921 ADA6 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 11-6741 - BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE PROJECT NO.: 19-6499 - BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS BIDDER'S STATEMENT BIDDER understands and agrees that this Bid Proposal, Contract Documents and subsequent Construction Contract Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement between BIDDER and the AGENCY only after it has been accepted by the City Council, endorsed by the Clerk of the Council with her signature and official seal noting hereon the action of approval of the Council, signed by the Public Works Agency Executive Director or his/her duly authorized agent, and signed by the City Attorney, denoting his approval of the form of this document, and its execution, and when it or an exact copy of it has been either delivered to BIDDER or deposited with the United States Postal Sei vice properly addressed to the BIDDER with the correct postage affixed thereto. BIDDER further agrees that upon delivery (as defined above) of the accepted agreement he/she will furnish AGENCY all required bonds and certificate of liability insurance within ten (10) business days or the funds, check, draft, or BIDDERS bond substituted in lieu thereof accompanying this proposal shall become the property of the AGENCY and shall be considered as payment of damages due to the delay and other causes suffered by AGENCY because of the failure to furnish the necessary bonds and because it is distinctly agreed that the proof of damages actually suffered is difficult to ascertain; otherwise said funds, check, drafts, or BIDDER'S bond substituted in lieu thereof shall be returned to the undersigned. BIDDER understands that a bid is required for the entire work, the estimated quantities set forth in the bid schedule are solely for the purpose of comparing bids, and that final compensation under the contract will be based upon the actual quantities of work satisfactorily completed. The BIDDER also certifies that the bid is a balanced bid. In accordance with Section 7028.15 of the California Business and Professions Code, the undersigned certifies under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. NameofFirm Sully -Miller Contracting Company Signature of BIDDER Jeff Galterio Title Assistant Secretary **Please See Attached Certificate of Incumbency and Resolution** (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) P-8 of P-23 EXHIBIT 5 EXHIBIT 4 AGREEMENT WITH CANNON CORPORATION TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 4th day of March, 2025 by and between Cannon Corporation ("Consultant"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City„). RECITALS A. On December 19, 2024, City released a Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 24-139, by which it sought qualified consultants having special skill and knowledge in the field of construction management and inspection services for the Public City's Works Agency. B. Consultant submitted a responsive proposal which was selected by City. Consultant represents that it is able and willing to provide the services described in the scope of work included in RFP No. 24-139. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional contracting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant shall perform the tasks and obligations including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and adequately complete the services described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 2. COMPENSATION a. City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services under this Agreement, the rates and charges identified in Exhibit B. The total sum to be expended under the term of this Agreement, including any extension, shall not exceed $1,998,642. b. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. City and Consultant agree that all payments due and owing under this Agreement shall be made through Automated Clearing House (ACH) transfers. Consultant agrees to execute the City's standard ACH Vendor Payment Authorization and 1 provide required documentation. Upon verification of the data provided, the City will be authorized to deposit payments directly into Consultant's account(s) with financial institutions. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals which may reasonably be expected by City. 3. TERM This Agreement shall commence on March 4, 2025 and terminate on March 3, 2027, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 17, below. The term of this Agreement may be extended for an additional one (1) year term period upon a writing executed by the City Manager and City Attorney. 4. PREVAILING WAGES Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and 2 perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 7. INSURANCE Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and shall require any subcontractors to obtain and maintain insurance as described below for the entire Term of this Agreement against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with services, products and materials supplied to City. Total cost of such insurance shall be borne by Consultant. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE • Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence and $4,000,000 aggregate. Required policy limits can be met with primary and umbrella/excess insurance policies. • Automobile Liability (AL): Insurance Services Office Form CA 00 01 covering Code 1 (any auto), with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limits. In the event Consultant does not maintain commercial automobile liability insurance, City will accept evidence of personal automobile insurance. • Workers' Compensation (W/C): as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident, per employee, per policy for bodily injury or disease. Coverage is not required if Consultant has no employees and signs request to waive such insurance. • Professional Liability Insurance: with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, and $2,000,000 aggregate. If Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums requirements shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City. Other Insurance Provisions The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1. City, its City Council, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to 3 be covered as additional insureds, under Consultant's CGL, Professional Liability, and Automobile Liability policies, with respect to any liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, equipment, and personnel furnished in connection with such work or operations. 2. Consultant's Insurance company(ies) agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its City Council, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers for losses paid under the terms of any policy which arise from work performed by Consultant under this Agreement. 3. For any claims related to this contract, Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary and any insurance maintained by City, its City Council, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers shall not contribute with it. 4. A severability of interest provision must apply for all the additional insureds, ensuring that Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer's limits of liability. 5. Insurance policies required herein shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, suspended, voided, reduced in coverage or in limits, non -renewed by the carrier, or materially changed except after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to City. Ten (10) days prior written notice shall be provided to City for policy cancellation or non -renewal due to non-payment of premium. 6. Certificate Holder on each Evidence of Insurance certificate shall be: City of Santa Ana, Attention: Danny Mai, 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-36, Santa Ana, CA 92701. The name and location of project must be included in the Description of Operations section of each certificate. Self -Insured Retentions Self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. City may require the Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the State of California with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than ANII, unless otherwise acceptable to City. Verification of Coverage Consultant shall furnish City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive Consultant's obligation to provide them. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. Special Risks or Circumstances City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 4 8. INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Consultant or its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on their behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. 9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, and attorney's fees, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 10. RECORDS Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. 11. CONFIDENTIALITY 5 If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City. 12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement. 13. NON-DISCRIMINATION Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, relation, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or in connection with any activities under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 14. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant regarding the subject matter herein, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein. 15. ASSIGNMENT C Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other contractors retained by City. 16. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 17. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. 18. JURISDICTION -VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 19. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 20. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: City Clerk City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 With courtesy copies to: Executive Director, Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 To Consultant: Cannon Corporation 16842 Von Karman Ave., Suite 150 Irvine, CA 92606 Attn: Patrick Riddell, PE, CPII, QSD A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these timeframes, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 21. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: Jennifer L. Hall City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: le Nellesen Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Digitally signed by Nabil NabilC Saba J a a Date: 2025.02.12 13:53:46 -08,00, Nabil Saba, P.E. Executive Director Public Works Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA Alvaro Nunez City Manager CANNON CORPORATION By: Pat Riddell Title: Director, Construction Management Division EXHIBIT A 10 CITY OF SANTA ANA EXHIBIT SCOPE OF SERVICES INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND The City of Santa Ana is soliciting proposals to engage a professional consultant to perform construction management and inspection services. The consultant shall provide at least three individuals to act as Construction Manager (CM, the "owner's representative"), Inspector, and a Contract Administrator (CA), and serve as an extension of City staff to assist in the overall delivery of this project which includes performing independent review of plans, specifications, and estimate, pre -construction tasks, managing construction and ensuring that the work is completed in accordance with any applicable funding requirements, contract documents, and project closeout, and warranty phase. The consultant team will report directly to the City's Construction Manager or his authorized representative. City staff may assist in managing construction and will oversee the work of the Construction Manager, Inspector, and Contract Administrator. In 1990, the approved project of the Widening of Bristol Street, from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane Project, was subsequently divided into several phases. This project focuses on the 0.52-mile segment of Bristol Street between Warner Avenue and Saint Andrew Place in the City of Santa Ana. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental evaluation conducted in 2013, the project area is located within a fully developed, urban setting within the City's limits. Land use within the area consists of a mix of general commercial/retail development, professional offices, and single-family residential units. Bristol Street is classified as a north -south Major Arterial per the City General Plan Circulation purpose of the project is to (1) provide sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate current and future traffic demand, (2) improve the performance and safety of the roadway, (3) reduce current and projected future delays experienced at major intersections by designing intersections to function at acceptable Levels of Service (LOS), and (4) provide a roadway design conducive to the provisions of the current GPCE and the MPAH designation of Major Arterial (i.e. public transportation requirements, cross section and curb - to -curb pavement width). As a result, Right -of -Way Acquisitions for approximately 43 residential and commercially used parcels were completed to accommodate the new land use and construction of this project. Site Improvements may include, but is not limited to: • New street pavement and cul-de-sacs • Sound wall • Gutter, curb, cross gutters, and sidewalks • Traffic signal improvements • Traffic striping • Storm drain • Landscape and Irrigation • Street lighting • Water main improvements • Abandon Sewer laterals and CCTV Inspection of Sewer (9) CITY OF SANTA ANA Electrical joint trench Underground utility work Note: Minor changes to plans and the preparation of the specifications may occur during the RFP process without notice to the prospective proposer, however, selected firm will have access to the latest documents once the RFP has been awarded. Consultant Responsibilities The Consultant's responsibilities shall include the following project tasks: The required services by the Construction Manager (who will be performing plan checking services), the Inspector, and the Contract Administrator may include the following: 1. The CM shall be a registered engineer in the State of California or a Certified Construction Manager (CCM) and shall represent the City Construction Manager in the field. The CM shall possess a minimum of (5) years' experience in construction management. The Inspector and the Contracts Administrator should have relevant experience in construction management and certifications that affirm the experience. 2. The CM team shall be responsible for review of completeness and quantity of all required shop drawings, product data, samples, requests for information (RFI), and other submittals ("Submittals"). Shall coordinate with design consultant to review before transmitting their assessment of each Submittal to City staffing for final approval, and shall establish and implement procedures for expediting the processing and approval of Submittals. 3. Lead pre -construction meeting and schedule and conduct weekly construction and progress meetings to discuss such matters as procedures, progress, problems and scheduling. Will prepare and promptly distribute minutes. 4. Attend and co -lead up to three (3) Construction Update meetings with the community, including a pre -construction meeting. Primary purpose of these meetings are to provide pertinent updates to the community and answer any questions relating to the construction project. 5. Shall be responsible for ensuring that all building permits, special permits, if required are obtained, and that all applicable fees have been paid, and shall obtain approvals from authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. 6. Shall review construction schedule, including activity sequences and duration, schedule of submittals and schedule of delivery for products with long lead-time. Update the project schedule as required showing current conditions and revisions required by actual progress. 7. Shall conduct comprehensive evaluation of change order requests, provide independent estimates, render recommendations and assist in claim resolution. Shall regularly monitor and report on the status of the Project Construction Budget on a monthly basis, indicating actual costs for completed activities and work in progress, and indicating estimates for uncompleted work. Report should identify variances between actual and budgeted or estimated costs, and shall advise the City whenever it appears (9) CITY OF SANTA ANA that the Actual Construction Cost has exceeded, or will exceed, the Project Construction Budget for the entire Project or any Project Component. 8. Monitor the contractor's safety program. Take necessary steps to ensure the jobsite conditions are in compliance with OSHA regulations. 9. Maintain cost accounting records on authorized work performed under unit costs and additional work performed on the basis of actual costs of labor and materials, or other work requiring accounting records. 10. May develop and implement procedures for the review and processing of applications by contractor for progress and final payments. CM is responsible to review and approve monthly progress payments, and make recommendations for certification to the City for payment. 11. Act as an advisor to the city throughout construction and commission of the project. Determine that the work of contractor is being performed in accordance with the contract documents. Make recommendations to the City regarding special inspection or testing of work not in compliance with the provisions of the contract documents. Subject to review by the City, reject work which does not conform to the requirements of contract documents. 12. The individuals, Construction Manager, Inspector and Contract Administrator, shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures employed by the contractor in the performance of the contract, and shall not be responsible for the failure of the contractor to carry out work in accordance with the contract documents. However, any errors, omissions, or discrepancies found in the Contract Documents shall be called to the attention of the City's Construction Manager and clarified prior to construction starts. 13. Consult with the City when the contractor requests interpretations of the meaning and intent of the drawings and specifications, and assist in achieving the resolution of problems, which may arise. 14. Record the progress of the project. Submit written daily and progress reports to the City. Keep daily logs containing a record of weather, contractor's work on the site, number of workers and equipment, work accomplished, problems encountered, and other relevant data. Make the log available to the City. Prepare and send Weekly Statement of Working Days to the contractor. Monitor contractor's compliance with labor code requirements. 15. Maintain, at the job site, records of contract documents including drawings, addenda, change orders, and other modifications of plans and specifications marked to show all changes made during construction. Maintain as -built records of underground utilities, including locations and depths of trenches. At the completion of the project, deliver to the City all contract documents including as- built records. 16. Evaluate the completion of the work of the contractor and make recommendations to the City when work: is ready for final inspection. Assist the City in conducting final inspections. 17. Facilitate and coordinate inspection by representatives of other agencies. 18. Assist City with project budget tracking by funding source to ensure progress payment applications are applied appropriately to correct funding sources. (9) CITY OF SANTA ANA 19. Assist City with submission of narrative and financial reports on the progress and activities of the project to grant agencies 20. Shall monitor and enforce prevailing wage forms and requirements for conformance to the prevailing wage rates on a weekly basis. Shall verify that all Trade personnel listed in the daily log are also listed in the certified payroll and shall conduct weekly employee interviews, one for each trade, and submit verification with the monthly progress payments. 21. Shall coordinate and assist the City's Community Work Force Agreement (CWA) Consultant to monitor and enforce the CWA forms and requirements to ensure compliance. Verification should be provided with the monthly progress payments. 22. The CM shall be responsible for all project closeout items, such as: As -Built plans and related documentation, punch list completion, commissioning, warranty requests during the one-year period. Shall schedule and oversee the warranty repair. Should include site visits as requested by the City to look at defects or imperfection to determine if it is a warranty issue. 23. The CM shall also provide material testing and inspection to provide quality assurance services for the project. Expected testing and inspection for construction activities may involve grading, soils, base material, concrete, masonry, asphalt concrete, structural elements, and other quality assurance services as required. All frequency of services shall be in accordance with the City of Santa Ana Quality Assurance Program provided in Attachment K. The city reserves the right to add or reduce some of the above tasks and duties as it sees fit. The consultant, serving as staff extension, shall remain sufficiently flexible to meet the needs of the City and of the project. PAYMENT AND INVOICING: Selected Consultant shall invoice the City based on time and material according to the City's standard invoice template. Tasks and hours shall be clearly identified and all rates must match those included in the approved agreement. PAYMENT AND INVOICING: This agreement will be utilizing Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program (CTFP) and local funds. Proposer shall comply with all requirements as they pertain to use of these funds. FEE PROPOSAL: In addition to Section V.G.2 (Response to RFP: Cost Proposal) fee schedule shall be structured to correspond to the above mentioned tasks as follows: Task: Construction Management and Inspection Services - Subtasks Total Fee: Fee schedule for each task should include an hourly breakdown that corresponds to the task total. CITY OF SANTA ANA CITY RESPONSIBILITIES: The City will provide information in its possession relevant to the preparation of the required information in the RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and the documentation specifically in referred to herein. • Provide general direction as needed for the assigned project • Advertise, award, and execution of construction contract • Electronic files (sample plans & specifications, City of Santa Ana's CADD Standards) • Electronic files for title sheets and sheet borders • Facilitate meeting space and coordination and City facilities • Facilitate City Permits CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES: Consultant shall provide all required insurance as outlined in Exhibit II of this RFP. EXHIBIT B II }\}\\\\\\ \\\\\ IIJ ©-m ;§@ ,z/ ,- ° ■!!!/2M22 Fr i Us o \ )\])± ! \ . \ -!(|,) -!®|! .2 « - } OE LBO :-\]k )4MW ~ =!2v'. g)!!)).=!i z- . \}\\}:\}\\\\}\}:\\\\\\\}}} �\\j\\ O q e c� N ei � N 00 AR O cn N U Ln n c — m E Y O W L O V) v U V) O U a) Q N C c n3 a--) C v E v C� G O U L Ln N O U v o O O O O O N cc <D O v o 0 N O p O N CO N O N O O O ap O O N I W I� CD r N N v 47 cD v 0 O (O O) N O h O in 't C' —I p p V N v M N fA 64 N fA N r (D v W )O N w v M M )O 10 M V tC LO '6 cD M tc M O' V3 OO fA fA 64 N EA l0 l0 EA fA fA EA fA fA 6s E9 1D o N M V M 5q T Q) 14 E U W V7 O N N O O v N N V <o y N H O r O O O v N O N N N O obi tl) d 0OD N O Q V Q y W y `D atmm U N r aoo M a w o O co coC O m r V O� 1 N llJ - 0V �0 m d to to c v 'N nD m m W 16 O N co N N V O N M O O co O N (b M f2 oo oD m O N C M M M M D N N co O tD�c0Doc0DoI v o 6 D v � co ap 0D N a olo � 'D m ao ov°DODo co m m rn v co �vOD� oo o w ID v 0 0 n n N lo N n O N O V N M 0OD O O 11 O - N mN)oo N N fA fA O ti fA fA M fR NmN)o0 N N fA fA O fA fA N fA NO) N N fA EA N O n fA fA O M fA W W a a0_``- W c cc U W W aaaLLz W m U W W D_aaLLL W m V 3 o — o o 0 d o o m � d � o m — � N cLi o m i a o o ayi u :a o o o :o 0 o aa)) u c c E c E m Yi d m Yi ETcYi EL m ca i6 t m is m 41 y a 0 U d O U W a 0 U is N O O Q L �COa L`°COC C, COC 75 c_ C E °) C N `o O c_ C E o C N o O c_ C E C N O (6 jp a o c U jp a o c U �a m o c U o =2 o = o = o a� c� c` j a c` j a OO c j m O O y 0) — 0 O y O p y 0) n a)c c a)U V c dL) c c c d m V c m c d m V c m C c O) m V C m C m C C C m C C C m C C C O U w Q) w a) L LI Lu a ' U N U N U o_ 3 dv ' d.2 ` a 3v U y O U y O U y U a. c c c c o O U O U C U 9 y 2 o co c a E h 0 V 2 C O n O U N c j U C7 Q K Lj O O a) y a L) a 0 x 0 10 U) 47 N (� O N 0O a -o M U m t0 � >. 2 m 3 c O N O O N m � r 3 w Z y O 00 m '- N 6 C N w U U O a1 C_ J Y O y C C — m L O O t U c 3 aci � O a O y m N O c m a s c a 3 a 01 .O O O O y O 0 O C C E : U m U y L c L T? m y c m o) o) c 0 m a) U E' O oo E C a C a) a) a O U O O O G p 2C� y J a) y y yE2 m 0 T L a) J0� a o o a m (0m E E E o � '- a a a 0 y J J L N CO N v a1 y 0 N J o N li Q Q M 2 2 EXHIBIT 6 COST ANALYSIS CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT NOS. 11-6741, 19-6499: BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SAINT ANDREW PLACE AND BRISTOL STREET (PHASE 4) WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Construction Contract $ 22,354,492.25 Construction Management and Inspection: Cannon $ 2,398,370.00 Contract Administration $ 405,560.00 Contingencies $ 2,235,449.23 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 27,393,871.48 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 7, 2015 TITLE; PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION TO ADOPT AN ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BETWEEN WARNER AVENUE AND SAINT ANDREW PLACE (STRATEGIC PLAN NO. S, 1, G) CITY MANAG RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: ►F.&ISZ19]T1-1 ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on V" Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For - CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Adopt a resolution approving an Addendum to the final Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report pertaining to the Bristol Street Improvement Project between Warner Avenue and Saint Andrew Place. DISCUSSION Bristol Street is a major north -south transportation facility which is designated as a major arterial highway in the City's Circulation Element of the General Plan. Improvement of the 3.9-mile Bristol Street segment from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane has been a long-term priority project that is being constructed in several phases. Improvements include widening the street from two to three lanes in each direction, raised landscape medians, bike lanes, and sidewalks. In 1990, the City Council authorized embarking on these proposed improvements with the approval of the Bristol Street Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) (EIS No. 89-01). A copy of the FEIS/EIR is attached (Exhibit 1) and is also available for review in the Clerk of the Council office. Since the adoption of the 1990 FEIS/EIR, there have been no substantial changes in the project scope. Minor design modifications for improvements between Warner Avenue and Saint Andrew Place (Exhibit 2) were considered, including addressing climate change issues. These modifications are identified in the Addendum to the FEIS/EIR (Exhibit 3) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The design modifications to the project segment include the following: 75C-1 Resolution Adopting an Addendum to the FEIR/FEIS for the Bristol Street Improvements (Warner to Saint Andrew) April 7, 2015 Page 2 of 2 • The right-of-way (ROW) width would be increased from 120 feet to 128 feet. • The 15-foot-wide parkway would be reduced to 6 feet in width. • The 10-foot-wide sidewalk would be reduced to 8 feet in width. • The Bristol Street centerline between Saint Anne Place and Saint Andrew Place would be shifted an additional four feet to the west. The Bristol Street centerline would remain unmodified north of Saint Andrew Place. The resolution approving the Addendum to the expenditure of federal grant funding for right-of-way Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the requirements. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT FEIS/EIR (Exhibit 4) is needed to allow acquisition and construction of the project, resolution in accordance with the CEQA Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #6 Community Facilities & Infrastructure, Objective #1 (establish and maintain a Community Investment Plan for all City assets), Strategy G (develop and implement the City's Capital Improvement Program in coordination with the Community Investment and Deferred Maintenance Plans for Bristol Street widening). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Pursuant to Section 15164(d) of the Californi consider adopting a resolution approving the Statement/Environmental Impact Report. FISCAL IMPACT a Environmental Quality Act, City Council shall Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. i-rea Tousavipour Exec Ave Director Public Works Agency FM/EWG/ML Exhibit: 1. Bristol Street FEISIEIR (attached CD) 2. Location Map 3. Addendum to the FEIS/EIR 4. Resolution 75^-2 Exhibit 1 Located on the city's website: http://santaana.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewer.php?view id=2&event id=350 A. Bristol Street Improvements and Widening Environmental Impact Study — Environmental Impact Review B. Bristol Street Improvements and Widening Technical Studies C. Bristol Street Improvements and Widening Traffic Study D. Bristol Street Improvements and Widening Historical Property Survey Report E. Bristol Street Improvements and Widening Relocation Impact Study 75C-3 75C-4 _J .-- ST AINDREW PL 7 r- CARLTON PL CARLTON PL P 7 I I I I I I �A- GLENWOOD PL GLENWOOD PL II CAMDEN P I I� CAMDEN PL �+ jw I I j ST ANNE PL I I7 '-' L- ST ANNE PL I � I ' ST GERTRUDE PL I - ST GERTRUDE PL 7.-� I WARNER AV (DEU-0 RD) .-) r-,- ® PROJECT AREA EXHIBIT 2 RESOLUTION TO ADOPT ADDENDUM TO FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT A ARIA STATEMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CITY COUNCIL REPORT FOR THE BRISTOL STREET N A AGENDA DATE: IMPROVEMENTS AND WIDENING PROJECT APRIL �' 2015 BETWEEN WARNER AVENUE AND ]RKS AGENCY SAINT ANDREW PLACE. (SCALE - NTS1 75Ci-5 75c-6 August 2014 CITY OF SANTA ANA Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) Environmental Impact Report Addendum PROJECT NUMBER: i33667 PROJLc°CT CONTACT Court Morgan EMAIL: court. morgan@powereng, com PHONE: 949-436-3453 ENGINEERS Exhibit 3 I 5V-/ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Werner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) Environmental Impact Report Addendum PREPARED FOR. CITY OF SANTA ANA PREPARE® BY.- COURT MORGAN 714-507-2764 COUR T. MORGAN@PO WERENG. COM 75^-v ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE OF AN ADDENDUM............................................................................................................. 2 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION........................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.1 Existing Land Uses...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 PROJECT BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................. 10 1.3.1 Approved 1990 Final EIR/EIS...................................................................................................................10 1.3.2 Adopted Transportation Improvement Program........................................................................................10 1 A PROJECT DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................................... 11 1.4.1 Bristol Street Widening Phase IV Project Area..........................................................................................11 1.4.2 Property Acquisition........................................................................ 1.4.3 Changes as Compared to the Approved Project.........................................................................................15 1.4.4 Construction Timeframe............................................................................................................................16 1.5 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS...............................................................................................................16 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST................................................................................................19 2.1 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................. 19 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES.......................................................................................21 3.1 AESTHETICS.....................................................................................................................................21 3.2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES........................................................................................................... 22 3.3 AIR QUALITY ................................................................................................................................... 23 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES................................................................................................................ 32 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES................................................................................................................... 33 3.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS...................................................................................................................... 34 3.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS........................................................................................................ 36 3.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS....................................................................................... 37 3.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY............................................................................................... 39 3.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING.............................................................................................................. 43 3.11 MINERAL RESOURCES ..................... ................................................................................................ 43 3.12 NOISE...............................................................................................................................................44 3.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING............................................................................................................ 49 3.14 PUBLIC SERVICES............................................................................................................................ 50 3.15 RECREATION................................................................................................................................... 51 3.16 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC............................................................................................................ 51 3.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS.................................................................................................. 53 3.18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE...................................................................................... 54 ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 1 33867YU i 75C-9 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) 4.0 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................................56 FIGURES FIGURE 1 REGIONAL LOCATION.................................................................................................................... 7 FIGURE 2 PROJECT LOCATION....................................................................................................................... 8 FIGURE 3 EXISTING LAND USES FROM 1990 FINAL EIS/EIR........................................................................ 9 FIGURE 4 PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS........................................................................................................... 14 FIGURE 5 PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT...................................................................................................... 17 FIGURE 6 PROPOSED LANE GEOMETRICS - 1990 FINAL EIS/EIR............................................................... 18 FIGURE 7A NOISE MONITORING AND MODELING LOCATIONS.................................................................. 46 FIGURE 7B NOISE MONITORING AND MODELING LOCATIONS.................................................................. 47 TABLES TABLE 1 EXISTING LAND USES....................................................................................................................4 TABLE 2 PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS........................................................................................................... 12 TABLE 3 PROJECT RELATED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS.......................................................................... 25 TABLE 4 YEAR 2015 WITH AND WITHOUT PROJECT AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS .................................... 27 TABLE 5 YEAR 2035 WITH AND WITHOUT PROJECT AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS .................................... 28 TABLE 6 LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS ANALYSIS FOR CONSTRUCT ION ACTIVITIES .............. 30 TABLE 7 CO HOTSPOT ANALYSIS (PPM).................................................................................................... 31 TABLE 8 LOCAL SCHOOLS WITHIN THE PHASE IV PROJECT AREA............................................................ 38 APPENDICES APPENDIX A ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-10 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Addendum has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended, to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the proposed changes to the widening of Bristol Street, from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane as proposed in the Project Final Environmental Impact Statement I Environmental Impact Report (FEISIEIR) approved in 1990 (FHWA-CA-EIS-89-01- F; SCH No. 87071509). This Addendum focuses on the segment of Bristol Street between Warner Avenue and Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV, or Project) and is limited to the proposed improvements to this segment. This Addendum provides an assessment of potential environmental impacts associated with minor design modifications and the issue of climate change which was not addressed in the previously prepared and certified FEISIEIR. Design modifications to the Project, since approval of the 1990 FEISIEIR, that are addressed in this Addendum include the following: • The proposed Project increases the total right-of-way width from 120 feet to 128 feet. The proposed Project right-of-way cross-section would maintain a curb -to -curb width of 100 feet, would accommodate a 7-foot wide bike lane on each side of the roadway, and would not affect the number or width of vehicular travel lanes as compared to the right-of-way cross-section addressed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. However, the proposed Project right-of-way cross section, as compared to the right - of --way cross section addressed in the 1990 FEISIEIR, would reduce the width of the sidewalks from 10 to 8 feet and also accommodate a 6-foot wide parkway on each side of Bristol Street to separate pedestrian and vehicular travel; a parkway was not included as part of the roadway cross section addressed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Acquisition of property resulting from the proposed Project right- of-way is accounted for in this analysis. • The centerline alignment has been shifted to the west starting at St. Gertrude instead of starting at Glenwood Place with the addition of 4-feet to the original 20-foot shift. The street centerline then shifted back 4-feet to the east at St. Andrew in order to match the existing centerline north of St. Andrew. By shifting the centerline at St. Gertrude, the Phase IV Project saved eight parcels from full take by reducing these parcels to partial acquisitions. • A bus turnout would be located at the Warner Avenue. • Change right-of-way requirement from full take to partial tape of the following single-family residential parcels: 015-215-10 (150 square feet), 015-215-11 (50 square feet), 015-214-10 (50 square feet), 015-234-10 (50 square feet), 015-233-11 (50 square feet), 015-233-10 (50 square feet), 015-232-11 (50 square feet), and (015-232-10 (50 square feet). • Change right-of-way requirement from full take to partial take of Parcel 408-336-17 (3,466 square feet). • Land use for the current Project has been changed compared to the 1990 FEIS. The following parcels have been changed from Park to Park with Commercial Option; 015-194-38 and 015-194- 39. • Preceding project phase inclusive of the following parcel which is no longer included in the Phase IV Project right-of-way requirements: 015-194-40. It should be noted that the 1990 FEIS and 2013 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Reevaluation (URS Corporation) provided comprehensive noise barriers at all easterly parcel boundaries currently fronting the east side of Bristol Street between Warner Avenue and Saint Andrew Place and comprehensive noise barriers at all westerly parcel boundaries currently fronting the west side of Bristol Street between ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-11 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) West Saint Gertrude Place and Saint Andrew Place. Using the California Department of Transportation's (Caltrans) May 2011 Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, the following noise barriers (NB) were determined to be reasonable: NB-4, NB-5, NB-6, NB-7, NB-8, NB-9, NB-10, and NB-11. 'These noise barriers are generally equivalent to the recommended noise barriers shown in the 1990 FEIS and 2013 Reevaluation. However, barriers NB-6, NB-7, NB-8, and NB-9 would need to be shifted to the west of the receivers (parcels) that are no longer being acquired. The modifications and other refinements to the project would not create any additional impacts than what was identified in the 2013 NEPA Reevaluation; thus, there would be no changes or additions to the avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures. Furthennore, as climate change is a relatively new area of discussion, the topic was not discussed in the Air Quality section of the previously approved FEISIEIR. As such, this Addendum analyzes the effects of climate change associated with the construction and operation of the Project. This Addendum to the previously certified 1990 Final EIS/EIR has been prepared because project -related modifications to the Bristol Street alignment do not trigger the need for further environmental analysis in a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR under the requirements of CEQA or CEQA Guidelines (refer to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15164 and 15167). 1.1 Purpose of an Addendum Under CEQA, when an EIR has been certified for a project, no Subsequent EIR may be required for that project unless the lead agency determines, based upon substantial evidence, that one or more specified circumstances has occurred. Only if one or more of the following circumstances arises is a Subsequent EIR required: 1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revision of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revision of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following: A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162[a]) A Supplement to an EIR (or Supplemental EIR), which is narrower in scope than a Subsequent EIR, may be prepared if any of the above criteria apply, but "[o]nly minor changes or additions would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation" (CEQA Guidelines Section 15163[a]). In the absence of the need to prepare either a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR, an Addendum may be prepared. Section 15164 states: ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-12 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) (a) The lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. (b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. (c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration. (d) The decision making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project. (e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15164) This Addendum to the previously certified Final EIS/EIR for the Approved Project has been prepared because the evaluation of the proposed modifications does not result in any of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent or Supplemental EIS/EIR. As shown in this Addendum, although the proposed modifications would result in development that differs from that in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR, they do not trigger the need for preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR under the criteria listed in Sections 15162(a) and 15163(a). Sections 2 and 3 of this Addendum demonstrate that no substantial changes are proposed in the approved project or have occurred in the area of the Bristol Street Widening Phase IV project located between Warner Avenue and St. Andrew Place that will require major revisions to the previously certified 1990 Final EIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Specifically, the proposed modifications do not result in new or substantially greater significant impacts because the scale and nature of the development proposed are sufficiently similar to that analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR that the impacts of the proposed modifications are within the levels and types of environmental impacts disclosed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Additionally, no substantial changes in circumstances under Section 15162(a)(2) have occurred since the certification of the 1990 Final EIS/EIR for the approved project that would implicate new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, since the background environmental conditions have not significantly changed since that time. The City of Santa Ana has received no information indicating there has been a substantial change in any circumstances that would result in a new or substantially greater significant impact. Furthermore, no new information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time of the 1990 Final EIS/EIR preparation, has been revealed that shows new or substantially greater significant impacts will result (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3)). In addition, there are no new or different Mitigation Measures or Alternatives that would substantially reduce one or more significant impacts of the approved project but that are not adopted. The proposed modifications do not identify or require adoption of any further Mitigation Measures or Alternatives beyond those provided in the certified 1990 Final EIS/EIR for the approved project, since additional Mitigation Measures are either not necessary or not feasible, and the Alternatives analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR represent a reasonable range as requested by CEQA (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3)). The Addendum relies on the certified 1990 Final EIS/EIR and the related administrative record, in addition to the additional documentation included to support the Addendum, including the appendices. The Addendum is to be included or attached to the 1990 Final EIS/EIR and is not to be considered as an independent or separate document. As this Addendum does not identify new or substantially greater significant impacts, circulation for public review and comment is not necessary pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(c). However, the City ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-13 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) Council will consider and adopt or reject this Addendum at a public meeting prior to the approval of the proposed Bristol Street Widening Phase IV project (refer to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(d)). The findings of the City Council in its resolution of adoption of this Addendum, if adopted, will reflect this Addendum which provides the basis and substantial evidence for the decision not to prepare a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR (refer to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(e)). 1.2 Project Location The project site is located on a segment of Bristol Street between Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place in the City of Santa Ana. The City of Santa Ana, located within the County of Orange, is surrounded by the Cities of Tustin, Orange, Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley, and Garden Grove. The proposed project site is located approximately 1.5 miles north of the San Diego Freeway (1-405) and approximately three miles south of State Route 22 (SR-22). Refer to Figure I and Figure 2 for the regional map and project location map with proposed roadway alignment and widening. 1.1.1 Existing Land Uses The project area and surrounding vicinity is located within a fully urbanized area of the City. The existing land uses along the project corridor consist of commercial and single-family residential developments. There are no outdoor activities associated with the commercial developments in the project area. The existing single-family residences consist of single -story homes of varying sizes, and include outdoor areas of frequent human use (i.e., rear and side yards). According to the current City of Santa Ana General Plan, land use designation for the affected parcels fronting Bristol Street within the vicinity of the Bristol Street Widening Phase IV project area and existing land uses are summarized in the Table 1 Existing Land Uses. The majority of surrounding areas beyond the project site are similar to the development typology along Bristol Street Widening Phase IV which includes single family residences, multi -family residences and various commercial and retail facilities. Figure 3 (Existing Land Uses from the 1990 Final EISIEIR]), illustrates the existing land uses identified for Bristol Street Widening Phase IV as part of the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. It should be noted that while the Phase IV project area stretches along Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place, Bristol Street at Edinger Avenue is also included as part of the project study area however, Bristol Street from Saint Andrew to Edinger has already been widened and is not a part of Phase IV. The locations of the full or partial acquisitions are shown on Figure 4. TABLE 1 EXISTING LAND USES Af?:N ADpI�ESS GENERALP.LAN ZONING EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATION 015-191-11 1235 W Saint OS SP1 Single Family Residential Gertrude PI 015-194-17 2101 S Bristol St OS SP1 Commercial (Mortgage Office) 015-194-20 2115 S Bristol St OS SP1 Commercial (Lawnmower! Equipment Repair 015-194-21 2119 S Bristol St OS SP1 Parking 015 194-22 2123 5 Bristol St OS SP1 Commercial (Palm/Tarot Reading in Single Family Residential) 015-194-23 2201 S Bristol St OS SP1 Single Family Residential 015-194-24 2205 S Bristol St OS SP1 Single Family Residential ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-14 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . 015-194-25 2209 S Bristol St Os SPI Commercial (Dentist) 015-194-28 2223 S Bristol St P/C Spi Commercial (Real Estate Office) 015-194-29 2227 S Bristol St P/C Spi Commercial (Costume Rental) 015-194-36 2231 S Bristol St PIC Spi Commercial (Dentist) 015-194-38 2215 S Bristol St PIC Spi Commercial (Ambulance Services) 015-194-39 2219 S Bristol St P/C Spi Commercial (Ambulance Services) 015-194-41 2109 S Bristol St Os Spi Commercial (Dentist) 015-214-10 1241 Camden PI 0S Spi Single Family Residential 016-215-10 1241 Saint Anne P1 OS SPI Single Family Residential 015-215-11 1242 Camden PI Os Spi Single Family Residential 015-216-01 1242 Saint Anne PI 08 SPI Single Family Residential 015-232-10 1242 W Saint Andre Pi Os Spi Single Family Residential 015-232-11 1241 Carlton PI Os Spi Single Family Residential 015-233-10 1242 Carlton PI OS Spi Single Family Residential 015-233-11 1241 W Glenwood F OS SPI Single Family Residential 015-234-10 1242 W Glenwood F OS Spi Single Family Residential 408-332-01 1p302 W IS Saint Andre ] Os SIDI Single Family Residential 408-332-17 1305 VV Carlton P1 LR7 R2 Single Family Residential 408-332-18 1301 W Carlton PI OS Spi Single Family Residential 408-333-01 1302 W Carlton PI OS SPI Single Family Residential 408-333-02 1306 VV Carlton PI LR7 R2 Single Family Residential 408-333-18 1301 W Glenwood F OS Spi Single Family Residential 408-334-01 2034 S Bristol St 0S Spi Single Family Residential 408-334-17 1305 W Camden PI LR7 R2 Single Family Residential 408-334-18 1301 W Camden PI OS Spi Single Family Residential 408-335-01 1302 W Camden PI OS Spi Single Family Residential 408-335-02 1306 W Camden PI LR7 R2 Single Family Residential 408-335-17 1305 W Saint Anne LR7 R2 Single Family Residential 408-335-18 1301 W Saint Anne OS Spi Single Family Residential ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-1 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) �' i"2 �. 'C h_ } �, �'' x5k t- L K c1 °�"'-' � l� ^,', x75. � ? � '+v— it t fr 3'Y °5x'"r yy� fill •�.� F.pF < 408-336-01 1302 W Saint Anne OS SP1 Single Family Residential 408-336-02 1306 W Saint Anne LR7 R2 Single Family Residential 408-336-17 2040 S Bristol St LR7/OS R21SP1 Vacant 408-471-01 2102 S Bristol St GC C21SP1 Commercial (Restaurant) 408-471-05 2222 S Bristol St GC C21SP1 Commercial (Strip Mall) 408-471-06 2240 S Bristol St GC C21SP1 Commercial (Florist) 408471-17 2130 S Bristol St GC C21SP1 Commercial (Shopping Plaza) Notes: General Plan Designations: GC = General Commercial, LR7 = Low Density Residential, OS = Open Space, P/C = Park with Commercial Zoning Designations: SP1 = Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan, R1 = Single Family Residential, R2 = Two -Family Residential, C2 = General Commercial Parcel 015-194-40 located at 2235 S Bristol St was not included in this list as it was acquired by the City of Santa Ana as park of a separate preceding project. ANA 305-194 (PER02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-16 FIGURE 1 REGIONAL LOCATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) ANA 305-194 (PER 02) GSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-17 LEGEND PROJECT LOCATION PACIFIC OCEAN N Miles 0 5 1C 95 ;` Pern r RIVERSIDE CO Hem = 0A.4Murrieta T� YFellbraok . tJ i FN `SAN DIEGO ZW 7� a� OC28 Id_ (s (!arlSb4d ,� Escondl o � 1 FIGURE 1 REGIONAL LOCATION BRISTOL STREET WIDENING PROJECT WARNER AVENUE TO ST ANDREW PLACE (PHASE IV) 75C-18 FIGURE 2 PROJECT LOCATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-19 SOURCE', ARCGIS ONLINE, NATCEO WORLD MAP, ACCESSED 812012014. 75C-20 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) FIGURE 3 EXISTING LAND USES FROM 1990 FINAL EISIEIR ANA 305-194 (PLR 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-21 w ti a LU LU a ��a MAW zn W Q f j w�-z� J UJ M o y V' Lr) LL. _ Z CDww� 3 A via V" 1-^ Obi w J Q LU w RAW Ovas 03 E IL VAV W210 Nl403 'a %:'�u ,sly i+' ' 9M18y°y 5i. `S��� •'-rc � +� �' w' Al9�iQYV 'i# rn rn U. M[ LLp LU g! F- J 'Id N011tlVQ z U d4 z o Qco .} w ` z UJQ 7/ OQQA4NRi'0 D V � .,zq az W U. 4d (i a 1►o cc 0C� ILw N iM9 a Q G L� I- p � U wZ 1r Z w z� Oz �w z Y{LLJ Mw z o G 7 l as z Lu J LIA 4 9Ar YmN81YM z UJo o aC v� m 75C-22 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) 1.3 Project Background 1.3.1 Approved 1990 Final EIRIEIS The City of Santa Ana General Plan has designated Bristol Street as a Major Arterial Highway traveling in a north -south direction. As a result of significant growth and traffic congestion on Bristol Avenue, the City, in the late 1980s, proposed to widen Bristol Street from a four -lane roadway to a six -lane arterial in accordance with adopted County of Orange and City of Santa Ana standards for a Major Arterial Highway. A joint EIS/EIR was prepared and approved by the City of Santa Ana and Caltrans for the widening of Bristol Street in 1990. The 1990 project entailed a 3.9-mile segment of Bristol Street from Warner Avenue on the south to Memory Lane on the north. Due to significant costs associated with construction and availability of funding, the project was divided into several construction phases; Phase 1 from Warner Avenue north to First Street, Phase 2 consisting of the widening and reconstruction of the bridge which crosses Santiago Creels (northerly limits of the street widening project), and Phase 3 between First Street and Memory Lane. The 1990 Final EIS/EIR document (SCH No. 87071509) was approved on November 19, 1990. The 1990 Final EIS/EIR and associated technical studies, incorporated herein by reference, documented the environmental impacts of widening Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane in the City of Santa Ana. As stated in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR, the purpose and goals of the Bristol Street Widening project were to: 1) Provide sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate current and future traffic demand. 2) Improve the performance and safety of the roadway for the benefit of the motoring public. 3) To reduce current and projected future delays experienced at major intersections and to design intersections to function at acceptable Levels of Service (LOS). 4) To design the roadway in manner conducive to the provision of public transportation, namely bus service provided by the Orange County Transit District (OCTD). 1.3.2 Adopted Transportation Improvement Program The Approved Project is included as project number ORA125 in the regional emissions analysis conducted by Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for the conforming 2013 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) adopted by SCAG on September 19, 2012 and approved by FHWA on December 14, 2012. As provided in the FTIP, the Approved Project description reads as follows: BRISTOL ST (WARNER TO MEMORY LANE) WIDEN FROM 4 TO 6 LANES (IMPV AT BRISTOL/WARNER (ADD NBIEBISB THR U LNS; WB RT TRN LN) AND BRISTOL/FIRST (ADD NBISB THR U LNS; SB LFTIRTITRN LNS The Phase IV project is a component of the Approved Project. The Phase IV Project's design concept and scope have not changed significantly from what was analyzed in the RTIP and FTIP. This analysis found that the plan and, therefore, the individual projects contained in the plan, are conforming projects, and would have air quality impacts consistent with those identified in the state implementation plans (SIPS) for achieving the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). FHWA determined the RTIP to conform to the SIP. The Phase IV Project's open to the public year is consistent with (within the same regional emission analysis period as) the construction completion date identified in the FTIP and/or RTP. The FTIP gives priority to eligible Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) identified in the SIP and provides sufficient funds to provide for their implementation. FHWA determined the TIP to conform to the SIP on December 2010. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 10 75C-23 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT RE°PORTADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) The Phase IV Project is also included in the 2013 TIP adopted by SLAG on September 6, 2012 and approved by FHWA on December 14, 2012. 1.4 Project Description 14.9 Bristol Street Widening Phase 1V Project Area Phase IV of the Bristol Street Widening Project involves the widening of Bristol Street (between Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place) from 4 lanes to 6 lanes with a 150-foot-wide right-o.f-way cross section including a 14-foot wide raised landscaped median; three 12-foot-wide through travel lanes in each direction; a 7-foot wide Class II bike lane on each side of the roadway; a 15-foot wide parkway, and 10-foot sidewalk with curb ramps for wheelchair access pursuant to American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) requirements on both sides of the roadway. As Bristol Street approaches the intersections between Warner Avenue and Saint Andrew Place, and between Warner Avenue and Glenwood Place, the landscaped center median would taper to accommodate right -turn pockets and left -turn lanes in each direction. The landscaped center median would then continue north of the Glenwood Place intersection to match the existing raised center median approximately 380 feet south of Edinger Avenue. The addition of the landscaped center median would improve safety by preventing left -turn access to/from Saint Gertrude Place, Saint Anne Place, Camden Place, and Carlton Place to the newly widened Bristol Street. (Note: the intersection of Bristol Street and Saint Andrew Place would be converted to a right -turn only intersection in both directions.) Additionally, cul-de-sacs would be included on the west side of Bristol Street at Saint Anne Place, Camden Place, and Carlton Place to improve safety by preventing access to/from these streets to the newly widened Bristol Street. The location of the Phase IV Project is shown in Figure 1 and in Figure 2. Street signs and utilities including electric power lines, telephone poles, and street lighting would be relocated to new locations within the project area along Bristol Street. Street furniture, including the benches and bus shelters, will be provided at bus stop locations. During the one-year construction (approximately mid-2016 to mid-2017), one lane in each direction would remain open and existing driveway accesses along Bristol Street would be retained at all times. Maximum excavation depth would be three feet for roadway excavation and 10 feet for utility/drainage excavation. Construction equipment would be those consistent with other similar roadway widening projects and likely would include excavators, loaders, backhoes, dump trucks, graders, pavers and rollers, and other construction trucks. 1.4.2 Property Acquisition To accommodate the street widening proposed by the Bristol Street Widening project, a combination of full and partial acquisition of right of way is required from a total of 43 residential and commercial parcels fronting Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place (refer to Figure 4 [Property Acquisitions] for the locations of affected properties). Table 2 includes a listing of properties affected and the disposition of acquisition requirements. ANA 305.194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 11 75C-24 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) TABLE 2 PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS ? r`'. � �'yx� -.,xI..s _f.—� Y.-..��:L� T1 1„ _} ,n.. .e.a �' c+k'S' �4 r.3'${¢z.y-5 :Ef�F ✓� t f 3 ` ..�u''�w,s .�.... ..,..:. i-...�4_sl>f.v.. 'n 4lb..a.�t5 :'1''k i �+�ja3t3t 4G�Y'vx j 0 -". f f-'h.=..:.i i ;r:...:�'A.+G4z,FSk'.TyS •ST{-Z�2n.: s. u2�...(r':_ � �. '�+. 5 � � i a: � <: ;v�P :r,'w .E'Y�= 015-191-11 --- 1235 W. Saint Gertrude Place Single -Family Residential Full 6,493 015-194-17 --- 2101 S. Bristol Street Mortgage Full 5,389 015-194-20 --- 2115 S. Bristol Street Lawnmower/Equipment Repair Full 5,881 015-194-21 --- 2119 S, Bristol Street Parking Full 6,000 015-194-22 - 2123 S Bristol Street Palm/Tarot Reading in Single- Family Residential Full 6,720 015-194-23 --- 2201 S, Bristol Street Single -Family Residential Full 6,720 015-194-24 --- 2205 S, Bristol Street Single -Family Residential Full 6,600 015-194-25 --- 2209 S. Bristol Street Dental Office Full 5,880 015-194-28 --- 2223 S. Bristol Street Real Estate Office Full 6,120 015-194-29 --- 2227 S. Bristol Street Costume Rental Full 6,120 015-194-36 --- 2231 S. Bristol Street Dental Office Full 5,940 015-194-38 --- 2215 S. Bristol Street Ambulance Services Full 5,760 015-194-39 --- 2219 S, Bristol Street Ambulance Services Full 5,640 015-194-41 --- 2109 S. Bristol Street Dental Office Full 11,402 015-214-10 RD 1241 Camden Place Single -Family Residential Partial 53 015-215-10 RD 1241 Saint Anne Place Single -Family Residential Partial 209 015-215-11 RD 1242 Camden Place Single -Family Residential Partial 48 015-216-01 --- 1242 Saint Anne Place Single -Family Residential Full 6,556 015-232-10 RD 1242 W. Saint Andrew Place Single -Family Residential Partial 50 015-232-11 RD 1241 Carlton Place Single -Family Residential Partial 52 015-233-10 RD 1242 Carlton Place Single -Family Residential Partial 46 015-233-11 RD 1241 W. Glenwood Place Single -Family Residential Partial 51 015-234-10 RD 1242 W. Glenwood Place Single -Family Residential Partial 50 408-332-01 --- 1302 W, Saint Andrew Place Single -Family Residential Full 8,262 408-332-17 --- 1305 W. Carlton Place Single -Family Residential Partial 450 408-332-18 --- 1301 W. Carlton Place Single -Family Residential Full 8,286 408-333-01 --- 1302 W. Carlton Place Single -Family Residential Full 8,286 408-333-02 --- 1306 W. Carlton Place Single -Family Residential Partial 450 ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 12 75C'25 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) 408-333-18 --- n_ 1301 W, Glenwood Place F�3,r9 Single -Family Residential Full 8,262 408-334-01 --- 2034 S. Bristol Street Single -Family Residential Full 7,531 408-334-17 --- 1305 W. Camden Place Single -Family Residential Partial 150 408-334-18 --- 1301 W. Camden Place Single -Family Residential Full 7,012 408-335-01 --- 1302 W, Camden Place Single -Family Residential Full 7,009 408-335-02 --- 1306 W, Camden Place Single -Family Residential Partial 150 408-335-17 --- 1305 W. Saint Anne Place Single -Family Residential Partial 150 408-335-18 --- 1301 W. Saint Anne Place Single -Family Residential Full 7,012 408-336-01 - 1302 W. Saint Anne Place Single -Family Residential Full 7,012 408-336-02 --- 1306 W. Saint Anne Place Single -Family Residential Partial 150 408-336-17 RD 2040 S. Bristol Street Vacant Partial 3,466 408-471-01 --- 2102 S. Bristol Street Restaurant Full 11,079 408-471-05 --- 2222 S. Bristol Street Strip Mall Partial 1,415 408-471-06 --- 2240 S. Bristol Street Florist Full 21,169 408-471-17 --- 2130 S. Bristol Street Shopping Plaza Partial 17,076 Source: POWER Engineers, 2014. NOTES RD: Change in parcel boundaries or parcel impact subsequent to the 1990 FEIS and 2013 Reevaluation. No Change. The acquisition of property, as described herein, would comply with policies pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as implemented by the City of Santa Ana. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 13 75C-26 FIGURE 4 PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133861 YU 75C-27 IV A, .5 ;4 pr. TI ti '� 51! r ' -T= �. ' 14 �" YYY"`'�--�c A tl i 1 I.1V In S+ IM j tut 11 11 � 1 �,yV i EF IsE4r #'Ei� d G A AJ� I I .,„g� -.� a'� �k.."=5'--• UZI 1 [ 1 1; 1. tt ti PM SSW 76. _fieTJ _ Or r tl .�.. _ .::���'._.��iA�'1v.5 �...i;C' _, �. _ —�.. __ ... .. k�`�iM .. �yr!Irdfnr.•r 1-€.rcv`�r�..`— ... _�"t'"nr'c-....,:+. �°. _ -_..-.._a'"o_. i i ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) 1.4.3 Changes as Compared to the Approved Project It should be noted that project phasing has been revised from the original three phases identified in the1990 Final EISIEIR. Construction phasing of the entire project segment has been further subdivided as follows: • St. Andrew Place to McFadden Avenue (Constructed in 2002) • Elrn Street to Memory Lane (Constructed in 2003) • Pine Street to 3r4 Street (Constructed in 2009) • Phase I: McFadden Avenue to Pine Street (Constructed in 2011)' • Phase II: 3`d Street to Civic Center Drive (Construction to be completed in 2014) • Phase IIIA: Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue • Phase IIIB: Washington Avenue to 17t" Street • Phase IV: Warner Avenue to St. Andrew Place • Phase V: 17t" Street to Elra Street The proposed street widening design configuration for the current Phase IV segment differs from the original configuration of the 1990 Final EISIEIR, as follows: • The proposed Project increases the total right-of-way width from 120 feet to 128 feet. The proposed Project right-of-way cross-section would maintain a curb -to -curb width of 100 feet, would accommodate a 7-foot wide bike lane on each side of the roadway, and would not affect the number or width of vehicular travel lanes as compared to the right-of-way cross-section addressed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. However, the proposed Project right-of-way cross section, as compared to the right- of-way cross section addressed in the 1990 FEISIEIR, would reduce the width of the sidewalks from 10 to 8 feet and also accommodate a 6-foot wide parkway on each side of Bristol Street to separate pedestrian and vehicular travel; a parkway was not included as part of the roadway cross section addressed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Acquisition of property resulting from the proposed Project right- of-way is accounted for in this analysis. • The centerline alignment has been shifted to the west starting at St. Gertrude instead of starting at Glenwood Place with the addition of 4-feet to the original 20-foot shift. The street centerline then shifted back 4-feet to the east at St. Andrew in order to match the existing centerline north of St. Andrew. By shifting the centerline at St. Gertrude, the Phase IV Project saved eight parcels from full take by reducing these parcels to partial acquisitions. • A bus turnout would be located at the Warner Avenue. • Change right-of-way requirement from full take to partial take of the following single-family residential parcels: 015-215-10 (150 square feet), 015-215-11 (50 square feet), 015-214-10 (50 square feet), 015=234-10 (50 square feet), 015-233-11 (50 square feet), 015-233-10 (50 square feet), 015-232-11 (50 square feet), and (015-232-10 (50 square feet). 1 Phase numbers were assigned to the Bristol Street Widening Project subsequent to cancelation of the CenterLine Light Rail Transit Project and associated reallocation of funding from that canceled project to the Bristol Street Widening Project. ANA 305494 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 15 75C-29 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) • Change right-of-way requirement from full take to partial take of Parcel 408-336-17 (3,466 square feet).Land use for the current Project has been changed compared to the 1990 FEIS. The following parcels have been changed from Park to Park with Commercial Option: 015-194-38 and 015-194- 39. • Preceding project phase inclusive of the following parcel which is no longer included in the Phase IV Project right-of-way requirements: 015-194-40. It should be noted that the 1990 FEIS and 2013 NEPA Reevaluation (URS Corporation) provided comprehensive noise barriers at all easterly parcel boundaries currently fronting the east side of Bristol Street between Warner Avenue and Saint Andrew Place and comprehensive noise barriers at all westerly parcel boundaries currently fronting the west side of Bristol Street between West Saint Gertrude Place and Saint Andrew Place. Using the California Department of Transportation's (Caltrans) May 2011 Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, the following noise barriers were determined to be reasonable: NB-4, NB-5, NB-6, NB-7, NB-8, NB-9, NB-10, and NB-11. These noise barriers are generally equivalent to the recommended noise barriers shown in the 1990 FEIS and 2013 NEPA Reevaluation. However, barriers NB-6, NB-7, NB-8, and NB-9 would need to be shifted to the west of the receivers (parcels) that are no longer being acquired. The modifications and other refinements to the project would not create any additional impacts than what was identified in the 2013 NEPA Reevaluation; thus, there would be no changes or additions to the avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures. The proposed Phase IV Project lane configurations are shown in Figure 5, whereas the lane configurations from the original approved 1990 Final EISIEIR are shown in Figure 6. An assessment of construction and Project related GHG emissions was also not addressed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR, and as a result is addressed in this Addendum. 1.4.4 Construction Timeframe Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would occur following acquisition of the required parcels. Construction of the Project is anticipated to begin in mid-2016 and be completed within approximately one year (mid-2017). 1.5 Discretionary Actions The Addendum document inust be adopted by the City of Santa Ana City Council as to its adequacy in complying with the requirements of CEQA and the previously approved 1990 Final EISIEIR, The City Council will consider the information contained in the Addendum and the 1990 Final EISIEIR in :making a decision to approve or deny the proposed project. No discretionary actions with regards to National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), or changes are proposed pursuant to NEPA. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133967 1 U 16 75C-30 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) FIGURE 5 PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-31 Jr 719-- tNsjj t! P; alii +may Lei .�s n gggggg I FT. I j1 i - '� rF f77, ar—. s �iJ 11 rr CYI II,IJJVi III I m 51 rt sas + _{ ra .04 fps-:§#fffn OR€t;r.;rl - ° r x ;E• ;a+ } r!f;,r • :.#t "'�� +t4 d 'Tyap it 7YaI d��r-a4',� it nl" IV 11 ittA 4 , fr: 1 { [f $ f �>a.��..,,„..�, � �e I• J. � I � d7i1 - a i�.. �F:' � j }' f � 5 o- I ., {{ 1�3�S:.. y?Y'f. M nY Iloi CJJ�Yt 1 dil � + � �' r Y� }a�°''.� �.: �g_�tr{ z h� 'kr•,3 : �1 � � I� �§ -ten �`��` d �a - t Isi 661�f.-h�r er fir,, nj5 *�; F. ; } f � ��, rl�k ara■ 4 — I � �� rt � r�}il�J�'rr # I JY I � k -1 - - `f!'` 777 p 11 � � I , w Flop, 111666 iF rjl�. i� ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Wamer Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) FIGURE 6 PROPOSED LANE GEOMETRICS -1990 FINAL EIS/EIR ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133967 YU 75C-33 le v v. �s 1' t v V �il r { • 1 F iotl t dr.w...... " a'1fi1 N art" ' H"*d SOURCE: FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTIENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, PROPOSED WIDENING OF BRISTOLSTREET FROM WHILSHIREAVENUETO WARNER AVENUE IN THE CITY OF SANTAANA, WILLDAN ASSOCIATES. 1990 FIGURE 6 PROPOSED LANE GEOMETRICS (1990 FEISIEIR) BRISTOL STREET WIDENING PROJECT WARNER AVENUE TO ST. ANDREW PLACE (PRASE IV) 75C-34 ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2.1 Background Project Title: Bristol Street Widening Phase IV Project, Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-36 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Contact Person and Phone Number: Kenny Nguyen, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Santa Ana (714) 647-5632 Project Location: Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place in the City of Santa Ana. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-36 Santa Ana, CA 92702 General Plan Designation: General Commercial (GC), Low Density Residential (LR-7), Open Space (OS), Park with Commercial (P/C) Zoning: Specific Plan (SPl), General Commercial (C-2), Single Family Residential (R1), Two Family Residential (R2) Description of Project: The City of Santa Ana is proposing to widen the Bristol Street between Warner Avenue and Saint Andrew Place as part of the previously approved Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane Project, for which an EIS/EIR was certified in 1990. The Build Alternative involves the widening of Bristol Street (between Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place) from 4 lanes to 6 lanes with a 150-foot wide right-of-way cross section including a 14-foot wide raised landscaped median; 3 12-foot wide through travel lanes in each direction; a 7-foot wide Class II bike lane on each side of the roadway; a 15-foot wide parkway, and 10-foot sidewalk with curb ramps for wheelchair access pursuant to ADA requirements on both sides of the roadway. As Bristol Street approaches the intersections between Warner Avenue and Saint Andrew Place, and between Warner Avenue and Glenwood Place, the landscaped center median would taper to accommodate right -turn pockets and left -turn lanes in each direction. The landscaped center median would then continue north of the Glenwood Place intersection to snatch the existing raised center median approximately 380 feet south of Edinger Avenue. The addition of the landscaped center median would improve safety by preventing left -turn access to/from Saint Gertrude Place, Saint Anne Place, Camden Place, and Carlton Place to the newly widened Bristol Street. (Note: the intersection of Bristol Street and Saint Andrew Place would be converted to a right -turn only intersection in both directions.) Additionally, cul-de-sacs would be included on the west side of Bristol Street at Saint Anne Place, Camden Place, and Carlton Place to improve safety by preventing access to/from these streets to the newly widened Bristol Street. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 19 75C-35 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) The widening would require full and partial takes of several parcels fronting Bristol Street as detailed in Table 2 (Property Acquisitions). Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is Iocated within a fully developed urban area within the City of Santa Ana. Areas surrounding the project site consist of various urban uses such as commercial and retail facilities, and single and multi -family residences. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required (e.g., permits, financing, or participation agreement): City of Santa Ana ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-36 20 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPOR T ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES This section describes the effects of the proposed modifications to the Bristol Street Widening Phase IV project compared to those identified in the previously approved 1990 Final EISIEIR document, and to existing conditions and any changes in regulatory setting since the previously approved 1990 Final EISIEIR. Furthermore, this section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The issue areas evaluated in this document include the following, pursuant to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, and have been modified to evaluate the proposed project changes for which a Final EISIEIR has been previously approved (in 1990) to assist in the determination of the need for a supplemental EISIEIR or an Addendum. The modified Initial Study checklist is found in Appendix A. Aesthetics • Agricultural and Forestry Resources • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality • Land Use Mineral Resources Noise • Population and Housing • Public Services • Recreation • Transportation/Traffic • Utilities/Service Systems • Mandatory Findings of Significance A summary of impacts of the previously approved project and the mitigation measures imposed is provided along an analysis of the potential impacts resulting from the proposed project and whether those impacts substantially exceeds those discussed in the previously approved 1990 Final EISIEIR. 3.1 Aesthetics This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, subsections A, Landform Modification, G, Urban Landscaping, J, Light and Glare, and K, Aesthetic Considerations of the previously approved 1990 Final EISIEIR. (a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? The proposed project would not result in any significant modifications or changes from the previously approved 1990 Final EIS/EIR. The Bristol Street Widening Phase IV intersections are located within a highly developed urban area of the City. No scenic vistas are located within the project area. No impact to scenic vistas would result from the proposed project. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? There are no state designated scenic highways within the project area. The project is located within a highly developed and urbanized area of the City. No scenic highways are located within close proximity, nor is the project area visible from any scenic highways. No impacts are anticipated in this regard. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 21 75C-37 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) (c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? The proposed project involves a total of 43 parcels of which 35 would result in the full take and eight would result in partial take. Field observations indicated that the potentially affected properties (residential and non- residential) do not have unique characteristics related to their age or condition that would be difficult to replace, or possess attributes that are unique. The proposed project would result in a reduced number of acquired units in comparison to the 1990 Final EISIEIR and would not result in substantial changes in visual character as analyzed in the previously approved 1990 Final EISIEIR. Implementation of mitigation measures as included in the previously approved 1990 Final EISIEIR would ensure that impacts are reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures No additional new mitigation measures are required. (d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Sight and glare are currently generated from existing vehicular uses within the Phase IV project area, commercial and retail businesses, signage, street lighting, and parking lot lighting. The proposed project does not involve the construction of any structures other than relocation of street lighting fixtures. Therefore, no new sources of light or glare are anticipated with implementation of the proposed project. The proposed project would not generate additional daytime or nighttime illumination beyond that currently experienced within the area. Implementation of the proposed project would not create more significant light and glare impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No additional new mitigation measures are required. 3.2 Agricultural Resources The previously approved 1990 Final EISIEIR did not include evaluation for agricultural resources, as no agricultural resources are located within the area of analysis. (a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? The project site is located within a fully developed, urban area of the City of Santa Ana. No Prime, Unique, or Farmland or Statewide Importance is located in the vicinity of the project site. No impacts would result from the proposed project. The proposed project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No additional new mitigation measures are required. (b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? The project site is located within a fully developed, urban area of the City of Santa Ana. The project area is designated as General Commercial, Park with Commercial, Open Space, and Low Density Residential by the City of Santa Ana General Plan with a combination of Specific Plan (SP1), General Commercial (C), Two Family Residential (R2), and Single Family Residential (RI) zoning designations. No agricultural uses exist on site or in the vicinity, and the project would not conflict with a Williamson. Act contract. The proposed project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final FIS/EIR. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 22 75C-38 ENVlRONMENTAi IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) Mitigation Measures No additional new mitigation measures are required. (e) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning, of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? The project site is located within a fully developed, urban area of the City of Santa Ana. No timberland or forest resources exist on site or in the vicinity. The project area is either designated as General Commercial, Park with Commercial, Open Space, or Low Density Residential by the City of Santa Ana General Plan with a combination of Specific Plan (SP1), General Commercial (C2), Two Family Residential (R2), and Single Family Residential (RI) zoning designations. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No additional new mitigation measures are required. (d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? The project site is located within a fully developed, urban area of the City of Santa Ana. No forest land is located on site or in the vicinity. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No additional new mitigation measures are required. (e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to nonagricultural use or conversion of forest land to non - forest use The project site is fully developed with no agricultural uses within or in the vicinity. No impact would result from the proposed project. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No additional new mitigation measures are required. 3.3 Air Quality This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, subsections H, Air Quality and V. Construction Impacts of the previously approved 1990 Final EISIEIR. (a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? The Bristol Street Widening Phase IV project is a component of the Proposed Widening of Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane, which was approved in 1990. The Bristol Street Widening Phase IV Project is included as project number ORA125 in the regional emissions analysis conducted by SCAG for the conforming 2013 FTIP adopted by SCAG on September 19, 2012 and approved by FHWA on December 14, 2012. As provided in the FTIP, the Approved Project description reads as follows: ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133967 YU 23 75C-39 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) BRISTOL ST (WARNER TO MEMORY LANE) WIDEN FROM 4 TO 6 LANES (IMPV AT BRISTOL/WARNER (ADD NBIEBISB TFIRU LNS, WB RT TRN LN) AND BRISTOL/FIRST (ADD NBISB THRULNS,- SB LFTIRT/TRNLNS The Phase IV Project's design concept and scope have not changed significantly from what was analyzed in the RTIP and FTIP. This analysis found that the plan and, therefore, the individual projects contained in the plan, are conforming projects, and would have air quality impacts consistent with those identified in the state implementation plans (SIPS) for achieving the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). FHWA determined the RTIP to conform to the SIP. The Phase IV Project's open to the public year is consistent with (within the same regional emission analysis period as) the construction completion date identified in the FTIP and/or RTP. The FTIP gives priority to eligible TCMs identified in the SIP and provides sufficient funds to provide for their implementation. FHWA determined the TIP to conform to the SIP on December 2010. The Phase IV Project is also included in the 2013 TIP adopted by SCAG on September 6, 2012 and approved by FHWA on December 14, 2012. The Proposed Widening of Bristol Street, from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane project has been included in the federal TIP since 1992. The federal TIP gives priority to eligible TCMs identified in the SIP and provides sufficient funds to provide for their implementation. FHWA determined the TIP to conform to the SIP on April 2, 2009. No significant impacts would occur. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Furthermore, the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) is designated by the state and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as nonattaimnent for ozone (03 ), and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5 ). The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) developed regional emissions thresholds to determine whether or not a project would contribute to air pollutant violations. If a project exceeds the regional air pollutant thresholds, then the project would substantially contribute to air quality violations in the SCAB. In addition, a project would also contribute to air pollutant violations if localized emissions result in an exceedance of the ambient air quality standards (AAQS). Short-term emissions generated during project -related construction activities would not exceed the SCAQMD regional emissions thresholds for any of the criteria pollutants and also would not substantially elevate localized concentrations of these pollutants. Consequently, the project would be consistent with the AQMP. Long -teen emissions generated by the project would not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for regional emissions and would. therefore also not contribute to an increase in frequency or severity of air quality violations. The proposed project would be consistent with the Major Arterial designation of the City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element and the County of Orange's Master Plan of Arterial Highways. Additionally, the project would improve traffic flow and result in a reduction in air pollutant emissions. Mitigation Measures No additional new mitigation measures are required. (b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Short-tenn emissions were modeled for the construction phase of the proposed street widening project. Construction activities associated with the project would include demolition of pavement and buildings, fine grading, trenching, paving, and development of ancillary structures. During construction activities, emissions from heavy equipment exhaust, delivery trucks, and fugitive dust would be generated for a short duration. To ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 24 75C-40 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) accurately determine the significance of air quality impacts from construction activities, construction emissions are quantified and compared to the significance thresholds set by the SCAQMD. Project -specific data, such as construction timelines and dimensions of the project site, along with general operating guidelines, were used as inputs to the SCAQMD's California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Model (version 2011.1.1) to quantify construction emissions. As shown in Table 3, emissions calculated by this model were compared to the SCAQMD's regional significance thresholds. As shown in Table 3, emissions attributable to construction of the proposed project were found to be below the significance thresholds adopted by the SCAQMD for all the analyzed air pollutants. Because emissions were found to be below the SCAQMD's significance thresholds, project related construction emissions are not considered by the SCAQMD to result in a significant impact. In addition, mitigation measures included in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR would further reduce construction -related air quality impacts. TABLE 3 PROJECT RELATED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS C121T1=RlA FOLLIJTAM(S �L�B� lf}AY� j vOC NOx CO ' SO2 PM10 PM2s5 Demolition 8 64 43 <1 12 3 Trenching 4 33 19 <1 2 2 Grading 7 52 31 <1 5 4 Paving 3 15 11 <1 1 1 Maximum 8 64 43 <1 12 3 SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Source: URS Corporation, January 2011 An assessment of regional emissions associated with the operations phase of the proposed project was also conducted which compared emissions with and without the proposed project. Air pollutant emissions generated by roadway vehicles are quantified based on emissions rates that vary based on vehicle speed. Because the Proposed Project would increase the roadway capacity along Bristol Street, traffic congestion would be alleviated and average vehicle speeds would increase along improved roadway segments. Table 4 shows the emissions that would occur with and without the proposed Project based on the average vehicle speeds. As shown in Table 4, air pollutant emissions would be less under the With Project Alternative as opposed to the No Project Alternative due to the lower emission rates associated with higher average vehicle speeds. The SCAQMD has established significance thresholds to determine whether the operations phase of projects would result in significant impacts to regional air quality. The proposed project would result in air pollutant emissions which are below these significance thresholds and would result in a beneficial impact in emissions due to improvements in operational phase efficiencies along project roadway segments for the 2015 project opening year. Emissions occurring during the 2035 design year were also quantified based on the LOS, average vehicle speed and emission rates that would occur with and without the proposed project. As shown in Table 5, air polhrtant emissions occurring under the With Project Alternative would be less than under the No Project Alternative due to lower emission rates associated with higher average speeds. Consequently, the Proposed Project for the 2035 ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 25 75C-41 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) project design year would likewise result in emissions which are below the SCAQMD's significance thresholds and would result in a beneficial impact relative to GHG emissions due to improvements in operational phase efficiencies along project roadway segments. Mitigation Measures No additional new mitigation measures are required. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-42 26 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) TABLE 4 YEAR 2016 WITH AND WITHOUT PROJECT AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS KI" Year2015'No Project Bristol Street Between Glen wooc 15 76 5 13 0 2 1 Place and Warner Avenue Bristol Street Between St Andrew 15 23 2 4 0 1 0 Place and Glenwood Place Bristol Street Between Edinger 15 56 4 9 0 1 1 Avenue and St Andrew Place Total 155 11 26 0 4 3 Year 2015 With Project Bristol Street Between Glenwood 32 54 2 10 0 1 1 Place and Warner Avenue Bristol Street Between St Andrew 32 16 1 3 0 0 0 Place and Glenwood Place Bristol Street Between Edinger Avenue and St Andrew Place 32 40 2 7 0 1 1 Total 110 5 20 0 2 2 - Difference between No?roject and. With Project Emissions Bristol Street Between Glenwood -22 -3 -3 0 -1 -1 Place and Warner Avenue Bristol Street Between St Andrew -7 -1 -1 0 0 0 Place and Glenwood Place Bristol Street Between Edinger Avenue and St Andrew Place -16 -2 -2 0 -1 -1 Total -45 -6 -6 0 -2 -1 SCAQMD Significance 550 55 55 150 150 55 Thresholds Exceeds Thresholds No No No No No No Notes; mph = miles per hour Source: URS Corporation, January 2013. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133967 YU 27 75C-43 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) TABLE 5 YEAR 2035 WITH AND WITHOUT PROJECT AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS . A SikD'.Y7\ I .,'d.9 ,'' �*plr.1��'77y( ".'ei?.: OR 4j .'d` --i�.s++?Tu ar,Lf F• ''€ _'i.;_u-3.. ... Year,2035 No Project Bristol Street Between Glenwood 13 41 3 7 <1 3 2 Place and Warner Avenue Bristol Street Between St Andrew 13 12 1 2 <1 1 1 Place and Glenwood Place Bristol Street Between Edinger 13 30 2 5 <1 2 1 Avenue and St Andrew Place Total 83 6 13 <1 5 4 Year 2.035 With Project Bristol Street Between Glenwood 25 32 2 5 <1 2 1 Place and Warner Avenue Bristol Street Between St Andrew 25 10 0 1 <1 0 0 Place and Glenwood Place Bristol Street Between Edinger 25 24 1 4 <1 1 1 Avenue and St Andrew Place Total 65 3 10 0 3 2 Difference between No Project and With Project Emissions Bristol Street Between Glenwood -g -2 -2 <1 -1 -1 Place and Warner Avenue Bristol Street Between St Andrew -3 0 -1 <1 0 0 Place and Glenwood Place Bristol Street Between Edinger -7 -1 -1 <1 -1 -1 Avenue and St Andrew Place Total -18 -3 -4 <1 -2 -2 SCAQMD Significance 550 55 55 150 150 55 Thresholds Exceeds Thresholds No No No No No No Notes: mph = miles per hour Source: 11RS Corporation, January 2013 ANA 303-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133967 YU 75C-44 28 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) (e) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air duality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? The SCAB is designated by the EPA and the State as being nonattainment for 03 , PM10 , and PM2.5 . In accordance with SCAQMD methodology, any project that does not exceed or can be mitigated to less than the daily threshold values does not add significantly to a cumulative impact. Since the proposed project would not exceed the SCAQMD's significance thresholds for construction activities or the operations phase, the SCAQMD does not consider emissions from the project to add significantly to any cumulative impact. Furthermore, it should be noted that the proposed project would increase the capacity at three out of the four study intersections (Bristol Street at Edinger Avenue has already been widened) during both AM and PM peak hours. Increases in roadway capacity would result in improvement in the LOS along Bristol Street. The improvement in LOS would result in increases in average vehicle speed and reductions in the amount of delay vehicles experience at intersections thereby resulting in both lower emissions and lower emissions rates associated with higher vehicle speeds. As such, the project would continue to result in a beneficial impact. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No additional new mitigation measures are required. (d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? A project could have the potential to expose sensitive receptors to elevated pollutant concentrations if it would cause or contribute substantially to elevated pollutant concentration levels or place the project in an area with elevated pollutant concentrations. An evaluation of air pollutant emissions as it affects local sensitive receptors has been conducted for both the construction and operations phases of the project. Localized Construction Impacts Localized air pollutant emissions are evaluated relative to the exposure of local sensitive uses to air pollutant concentrations generated by the proposed Project. These are pollutant concentrations which can be directly correlated to the health -based ambient air quality standards. This differs from regional emissions which were discussed previously in that regional emissions are used to assess how much air pollution is generated within an air basin and does not have a direct correlation with health effects. Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) have been developed by the SCAQMD for NOx , CO, PM10 , and PM2.5 . The LSTs determine whether project- related emissions would substantially contribute to or exceed the ambient air quality standards and expose sensitive receptors to excessive concentrations of air pollutants. The LSTs differ based on distance such that a greater allowance in air pollutant emissions is allowed for construction activities occurring further from a sensitive use and a lesser allowance in emissions is given for construction activities occurring closer to sensitive uses. Only short -teen emissions occurring at the project site for the Project's constriction phase were included to determine if sensitive receptors local to the project site would adversely affected. Emissions generated by construction activities disperse rapidly with distance from the construction site. Individual construction phases were compared against the SCAQMD's LST significance criteria. As shown in Table 6, project emissions would not exceed the LST screening level criteria for CO, NO2 , PM10 , or PM2.5 . Because emissions associated with this alternative would be less than the LST, onsite construction emissions would not be expected to exceed the federal or California AAQS at the nearest sensitive receptors. As such, no significant air quality impacts related to localized air pollutants would occur from the construction phase. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133967 YU 29 75C-45 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPA C T REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Wamer Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) TABLE 6 LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS ANALYSIS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES D$II�ltITIN PIAk P NOx CO Pmia P. Mz.3 Demolition 61 40 4 3 Grading 52 30 5 4 Trenching 33 19 2 2 Paving 15 11 1 1 SCAQMD Threshold 183 1,253 13 7 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Source: URS Corporation, January 2013. Intersection Hot -Spots While the proposed Project would not result in any direct sources of localized emissions due to the roadway street lighting being powered by electricity, changes in LOS or traffic volumes due to the project may cause indirect sources of localized emissions. While emissions of motor vehicles have improved due to more stringent vehicle emissions standards and the use of cleaner burning fuels, they continue to be the primary source of local emissions within the study area. Localized areas where ambient concentrations exceed national and/or state standards for CO are known as hotspots. The SCAQMD defines typical sensitive receptors as residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, athletic facilities, long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, and retirement homes. Because CO is produced in greatest quantities from vehicle combustion and does not readily disperse into the atmosphere, adherence to AAQS is typically demonstrated through an analysis of localized CO concentrations. Areas of vehicle congestion have the potential to create pockets of CO called "hot spots." These pockets have the potential to exceed the state one -hour standard of 20 ppin or the eight -hour standard of 9.0 ppm. Note that the federal levels are based on one- and eight -hour standards of 35 and 9 ppm, respectively. Thus, an exceedance condition would occur based on the state standards before the federal standards. The following intersections were modeled for CO hotspots: • Bristol Street and Warner Avenue • Bristol Street and Glenwood Place • Bristol Street and St. Andrew Place • Bristol Street and W. Edinger Avenue As shown in Table 7, both the 1-hour and 8-hour CO concentrations at the intersections that were affected by the proposed project would be substantially below the California and federal ambient air quality standards for CO, potential CO impacts related to the project alternatives are below AAQS and would not result in a significant air quality impact from CO hotspots. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 30 75C-46 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) TABLE 7 CO HOTSPOT ANALYSIS (PPM) �,';._;.%,.'`- Bristol Street.and Warner Avenue Northeast Receptor 6.8 20 4.6 9.0 No No Southeast Receptor 6.9 20 4.7 9.0 No No Southwest Receptor 6.9 20 4.7 9.0 No No Northwest Receptor 6.9 20 4.7 9.0 No No Bristol Street and Glenwogd Place Northeast Receptor 6.5 20 4.4 9.0 No No Southeast Receptor 6.5 20 4.4 9.0 No No Southwest Receptor 6.6 20 4.5 9,0 No No Northwest Receptor 6.6 20 4.5 9.0 No No Bristol Street and St. Andrew Place Northeast Receptor 6A 20 4.3 9.0 No No Southeast Receptor 6.4 20 4.3 9.0 No No Southwest Receptor 6.5 20 4.4 9.0 No No Northwest Receptor 6.5 20 4.4 9.0 No No Bristol street and St. Andrew Plat, Northeast Receptor 7.1 20 4.s 9.0 No No Southeast Receptor 7.1 20 4.8 9.0 No No Southwest Receptor 7.2 20 4.9 9.0 No No Northwest Receptor 7.1 20 4,8 9.0 No No Source: URS Corporation, January 2012. As discussed previously, the proposed project would not result in air pollutant concentrations that exceed the SCAQMD's Localized Significance Thresholds for construction activities. In addition, the operations phase of the project would not result in CO hotspots. As such, the construction and operations phases of the project would not result in significant impacts to air quality which would expose sensitive receptors to substantial air pollutant concentrations. Mitigation Measures No additional new mitigation measures are required. (e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Construction activities associated with the proposed Project may generate detectable odors from heavy- duty construction equipment and exhaust. Odors associated with diesel and gasoline fumes are transitory in nature and would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. The impacts from these odors would be short-term, would cease upon project completion and are not anticipated to be significant. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No additional new mitigation measures are required. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2044) 133867 YU 31 75C-47 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) 3.4 Biological Resources This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, subsection E, Streambed Modification, of the previously approved 1990 Final EIS/EIR. (a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? The project site is located within a fully developed urban area within the City of Santa Ana. No special natural habitat exists on or in the vicinity of the proposed project. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Refer to response in 3.4 (a), above. No riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities are identified in the project area or vicinity. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Refer to response in 3.4 (a), above. No federally protected wetlands are identified in the project area or vicinity. The proposed project is located within a fully developed urban area of the City. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? The proposed project would not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites, as none are located within the project area. The proposed project is located within a fully developed urban area of the City. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (c) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 32 75C-48 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) preservation policy or ordinance? The proposed project may involve the removal of existing landscaping, including trees. Any removal or planting of trees is required to comply with the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code, Article VII, Regulation of the Planting, Maintenance, and Removal of Trees. Furthermore, the proposed project would not conflict with the City's tree ordinance. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? The proposed project site is not a part of any habitat conservation plan. The project site is developed with urban uses and no natural conservation plans are adopted for the area. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. 3.5 Cultural Resources This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, subsection T, Cultural Resources, of the previously approved 1990 Final FIS/FIR. (a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? The proposed project would not involve changes that were not addressed in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Based on aerial photographs and a windshield survey, the structures do not appear to be of historical significance due to unique architecture and are not anticipated to cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. Land uses within the Phase IV project area affected parcels include single family residential, parking lots, strip malls, shopping plazas, and various office uses. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? Due to the limited area of disturbance, within an existing developed and urban area, and limited depth of proposed excavations, the potential to uncover archaeological resources is considered low. However, implementation of mitigation measures as included in the previously approved 1990 Final EISIEIR would reduce impacts to archaeological resources yet uncovered or undiscovered. The proposed project would not result in archaeological impacts greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 33 75C-49 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) As shown in Chapter Vf, Resources Element, of the County of Orange General Plan, the project site is not located in an area of paleontological sensitivity. Also, the proposed project would involve only shallow excavation. Furthermore, since the project area is already developed, the potential for discovering paleontological resources during construction is low. Soils occurring in the project area are mostly Quaternary Alluvium. Typically, these deposits are less than 10,000 years old, and not likely to contain important fossils. No greater impacts to paleontological resources than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EISIEIR would result from project implementation. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? The project site is located within a fully developed urban area of the City. No formal cemeteries are located within the project area or vicinity. However, in the event that human remains are uncovered during grading or excavation, contractors are required to comply with the procedures and requirements set forth in the California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Section 2098.98. The County Coroner and, in the event that the remains are Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission would be notified and, in turn, would notify those persons believed to be most likely descended from the deceased for appropriate disposition of the remains. The proposed project would not result in human remains impact greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. 3.6 Geology and Soils This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, subsections A, Landform Modification, B. Seismic Hazards, C. Erosion Impacts, and F. Water Quality, of the previously approved 1990 FinalEIS/EIR. (a) i Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. The City of Santa Ana is not included in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map. The project site is not underlain by an active fault and the closest fault, the Newport -Inglewood Fault, is approximately eight miles to the west. The proposed widening would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (a) ii Strong seismic ground shaking? The Newport -Inglewood Fault is the closest fault to the project site and is the most likely source of ground shaking impacts. The proposed project is an intersection widening project and would not expose people or structures to adverse ground shaking impact. The proposed widening would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 34 75C-50 ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (a) iii Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? The project site is not identified by the 1990 EIS/EIR as having a high liquefaction potential but is near areas classified as high to medium liquefaction potential. In addition, the project would be constructed to achieve the standards outlined in the California Building Code to reduce impacts in this regard. Consequently, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to potential liquefaction impact. The proposed widening would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (a) iv Landslides? The proposed project site is generally flat and does not contain any significant slopes. The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Exposure of barren rock and soil surfaces during construction would result in soil erosion. However, considering the slight gradient, anticipated erosion impact is minimal. Furthermore, the project would be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting regulation, including the development and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction activities. The SWPPP requires construction contractors to implement best management practices (BMPs) to reduce sediment from impacting the stormwater system. The increased erosion impact due to the intersection widening would not be substantially greater than previously analyzed. (c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? The 1990 EIS/EIR indicated that there are no instances of undisturbed, natural soils. The project site is underlain by well -drained alluvial fan or flood plains and is not included in the areas of high subsidence or high liquefaction hazard (but located south of an area identified as high to medium subsidence for liquefaction). The project area is fully developed with urban uses within the City. The proposed project will be constructed in accordance with the standards of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The proposed project would not create greater impact than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? ANA 305.194 (PS1t 02) GSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 XU 35 75C-51 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) The proposed project would not include the construction of any structures other than relocation of existing utilities. The proposed project would not create substantial risks to life or property and the proposed project would not create greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (e) Rave soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? The proposed project would not generate any sewage or wastewater and would not require installation of any septic tanks or alternative wastewater systems. No impacts are anticipated in this regard. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. 3.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, subsection H, Air Quality, and V. Construction Impacts of the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. (a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? The 1990 Final EIS/EIR did not evaluate global climate change or greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts. Construction activities would consume fuel and result in the generation of GHG emissions. Construction of the project is anticipated to begin in the early 2015 and be complete later that year. Construction- related GHG emissions would cease upon completion of the project. Due to the length of construction activities, GHG emissions associated with construction activities are anticipated to be minimal. Because construction emissions are not substantial and would cease after completion of construction, GHG emissions would not be significant. Furthermore, the project proposes intersection widening of Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place, therefore only carbon dioxide (CO2 ) emissions from mobile -sources are evaluated. Similar to the other criteria pollutants, the highest emissions would occur between 0 to 10 mph and 50 mph and above. Because the project would improve traffic flow within the Phase IV project area, the project would result in reduced CO2 emissions. Consequently, GHG emissions associated with the project would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? The proposed project would not conflict with applicable plans, policy or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHG. The proposed project would result in improved traffic flow, reduced vehicle idling times and congestion. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in new impacts to GHG. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 36 75C-52 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) 3.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, subsections V, Construction Impacts, X, Hazardous Materials, of the 1990 Final EISIEIR. (a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? The proposed project would result in demolition of structures. Compliance with the standard protocol surveys and abating procedures would be required prior to any demolition activities that would potentially disturb existing building materials. Furthermore, specific requirements limiting asbestos emissions from building demolition activities are set forth in SCAQMD Rule t403 (Asbestos Emission From Demolition/Renovation Activities). The existing structures to be demolished and roadway paintings and markers are also required to be surveyed for lead -based paint prior to demolition, in compliance with the applicable local, state, and federal regulations administered through the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health. Compliance with existing regulations would ensure that impacts are not greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required (b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Refer to response in 3.8 (a), above. Compliance with existing regulations and mitigation measures from the 1990 Final EIS/EIR would ensure that impacts are not greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (e) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? There are two schools that lie within one -quarter mile of the project site. Table 8 provides a summary of schools within the Bristol Street Widening Phase 1V project area. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 37 75C-53 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) TABLE 8 LOCAL SCHOOLS WITHIN THE PHASE IV PROJECT AREA r Jose Andres Sepulveda 1801 S Poplar Street, Santa Ana, CA West of Bristol Street at Saint 0.11 miles Elementary School 92704 Andrew Place intersection 1202 West Edinger Avenue, Santa Ana, Northeast of Bristol Street at Saint Mater Dei High School 0.25 miles CA 92707 Andrew Place intersection Hazardous materials can be classified into four basic categories: toxins, flammables, irritants, and explosives. Toxins include a broad range of industrial chemicals and agricultural pesticides that may cause serious illness or death to humans. Irritants can cause inflaznmation or destruction of living tissue with effects ranging from mild to severe, depending on the degree of exposure and material involved. Flammables pose the threat of combustion at low ignition temperatures and rapid burning characteristics. Explosives can produce rapid chemical reactions causing damage from blast and flash fire. Because of their widespread use, it was assumed that each type of hazardous material was transported through, used, or stored to some degree, within the project area. Storage and use of hazardous materials was, and still is, generally limited to the industrial area to the west although hazardous materials are used or stored along Bristol Street at businesses such as gas stations, auto service shops, metal polishing and plating operations, and medical clinics. Both Mater Dei High School and Jose Andres Sepulveda Elementary School were identified and evaluated for potential impact in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. It is not anticipated that the project would increase risk of upset beyond previous conditions. Therefore, health risks associated with project construction activities would be less than significant and impacts are not greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? The proposed project site involves the widening of an existing intersection. The project area is developed with commercial and retail uses. Compliance with existing regulations and mitigation measures from the 1990 Final EIS/EIR would ensure that impacts are not greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? The project site is not within an airport land use plan. The closest airport to the site is John Wayne — Orange County Airport, miles southeast of the project site. The proposed widening would not introduce any new risks or increase risks associated with the project. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 38 75C-54 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? The project site is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip and would not create any safety hazard. The proposed project would not create additional significant impact. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? The disruption of traffic and restricted access along Bristol Street between Warner Avenue and Saint Andrew Place during construction would affect the mobility of emergency vehicles. However, provisions would be made for interim access and traffic control plans would be prepared prior to each step in the construction process. Advance warning and information signs would be used to reduce the confusion motorists may experience during the construction process. It is expected that Bristol Street would remain open during construction. Although the proposed project may interfere with an emergency evacuation plan, it would be short term during construction, and the mobility would improve once the project is completed. Compliance with mitigation measures from the 1990 Final EISIEIR would ensure that impacts arc not greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? The proposed project site is developed with various urban uses within the City. There are no wildlands in the project vicinity and no new significant impacts would result with project implementation. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. 3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality This section corresponds with Section 1V, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, subsections C, Erosion Impacts, D, Floodplain/Floodway Encroachment, and F, Water Quality of the 1990 Final EISIEIR. (a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? As part of Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, the EPA has established regulations under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program to control direct stormwater discharges. The proposed project would be required to comply with the NPDES program for the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB). ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 39 75C-55 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase 1V) Construction Activities Grading and excavation and use of hazardous materials during construction would create potential sources of polluted discharge. The construction contractor is required to conforin to the requirements of the Statewide NPDES Stonn Water Permit. Pursuant to the CWA, in 2001, the State Water Quality Control Board (SWRCB) issued a statewide general NPDES Permit for stormwater discharges from construction sites (NPDES No. CAS000002). Under this Statewide General Construction Activity permit, discharges of stormwater from construction sites with a disturbed area of one or more acres are required to either obtain individual NPDES permits for stormwater discharges or to be covered by the General Permit. In addition, best management practices (BMPs) specified in the Caltrans Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) are also applicable. The construction contractor is required to conform to the requirements of the General NPDES Permit for Construction Activities and any subsequent General Permit in effect at the time of project construction. As part of the statewide NPDES permit, the construction contractor would be required to implement BMPs into their construction operations to reduce potential water quality impacts to the maximum extent practicable through preparation of a SWPPP. The General Permit contains requirements that BMPs must meet, including: Erosion Control Erosion control, also called stabilization, is the protection of the soil surface so that soil particles do not become detached by water or wind; and trapping soil particles that do become detached and are moved by water or wind. Non-Stormwater Management Non-stormwater management is the reduction or avoidance of discharges other than stormwater, such as from cleaning of vehicles and equipment, and spills of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes. Non- stonnwater management includes requirements for the use and storage of hazardous substances so as to avoid spills and minimizes pollution by cleaning spills that do occur. The SWPPP contains BMPs chosen for a project based on the specific activities that would be conducted as part of that project, and the amounts of stormwater and non-stormwater runoff that are anticipated. The 1990 Final EISIEIR included a mitigation measure to control stormwater runoff associated with construction activities. Impacts would be less than significant and would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Moreover, the project would comply with the updated NPDES requirements, as described above. Operational Phase Operation of the proposed intersection has the potential to degrade water quality as a result of vehicular travel, including increases in such pollutants as oil, gasoline, grease, lead, and dust. Discharge from the proposed project to stormwater facilities would consist of non -point sources. Stormwater quality is generally affected by the length of time since the last rainfall, rainfall intensity, urban uses of the area, and the quantity of transported sediments. Typical urban water quality pollutants usually result from motor vehicle operations, oil and grease residue. The majority of pollutant loads are usually washed away during the first flush of the storm occurring after the dry season period. Due to the nature of the proposed project, generally occurring within an existing developed area, project impacts are not considered adverse. Consequently, impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 40 75C'56 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase 1V) (b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? The project site is already developed and is not a groundwater recharging area. The proposed Bristol Street Widening Phase IV project would not result in increased water consumption and would not deplete groundwater supplies. No impact to groundwater supplies would result from the proposed project. No mitigation measures are necessary. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? The project site is already developed and the existing drainage pattern would not be changed due to the implementation of Bristol Street Widening Phase IV project. The storm drain improvements would be limited to relocation and/or construction of catch basins as necessary. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite due to drainage alteration. No mitigation measures are necessary. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off -site? The project site is already developed and the existing drainage pattern would not be changed due to the Bristol Street Widening Phase IV. The storm drain improvements would be limited to construction of properly designed curb and gutter as necessary. The proposed project would not result in substantial reduction in impervious ground surfaces. The proposed project would not increase the rate or amount of surface runoff to create on- or offsite flooding. Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? The project site is already developed and the existing drainage pattern would not be changed due to the Bristol Street Widening Phase IV project. The storm drain improvements would be limited to construction of catch basins as necessary. The proposed project would not result in substantial increase in impervious ground surfaces. The proposed project would not increase the rate or amount of surface runoff to create on - or offsite flooding. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) GSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 41 75C-57 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? The project site is currently developed and the proposed project would not result in substantial changes to the volume or nature of the urban runoff. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. The proposed project would be required to adhere to water quality regulatory requirements, as described above. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? The proposed widening would not place any housing within a 100-year flooding zone as mapped by the FIRM. No impact would result from the proposed project. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? The Bristol Street Widening Phase IV project would not place any structures within a 100-year flood hazard zone. No impact would result from the proposed project. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? The proposed street widening does not involve development of any above -grade structures except for the relocation of utility poles. Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant flooding risk any greater than what is already existing onsite. No impact would result from the proposed project. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. 0) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? The project site is approximately 10 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean. The likelihood of tsunami impacting a site more than five miles inland is minimal. The project site and its vicinity are built out with urban uses and there is no unusual slope or geologic feature in the area. The potential for seiche, tsunami, or mudflow impacting the project site is less than significant. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 42 15C-5S ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. 3.10 Land Use and planning This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, subsection A, Landforrn Modification, of the 1990 Final EISIEIR. (a) Physically divide an established community? The project area is developed with various urban uses and the proposed widening would not divide an established community. Although there would be partial and full takes, the project would not create a physical barrier to separate a community. The proposed project would not introduce any significant land use impacts than previously analyzed. No significant impact would result from the project implementation. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? The proposed project would not result in changes to the land use designation of the acquired parcels. The proposed project is in compliance with the existing designation and would not create a new conflict. No significant impact is anticipated. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? The project site is not a part of any habitat conservation plan. The project site is already fully developed and the proposed widening would not conflict with any habitat conservation plan or natural community. No impact is anticipated. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. 3.11 Mineral Resources This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, subsection W, Consumption of Renewable and Non -Renewable Resources of the 1990 Final EISIEIR. (a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? The project site is currently developed and does not contain any areas for the extraction of mineral resources. The proposed project would not involve excavation that would likely identify previously ANA 305-194 (PER 02) GSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 43 75C-59 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) unidentified mineral resources. No impact to mineral resources would result from the proposed project. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally --important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? The project site is currently developed and is not delineated as a mineral resources recovery site by the City of Santa Ana General Plan. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact on the mineral resources and no mitigation measures are necessary. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. 3.12 Noise This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsection I, Noise, and V, Construction Impacts of the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. (a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? The proposed project involves widening of Bristol Street between Warner Avenue and Saint Andrew Place. The land uses in between Warner Avenue and St. Gertrude Place, and adjacent to the project, are commercial (Category C) on the west side of Bristol Street, and a mix of residential and commercial land uses on the cast side of Bristol Street. The land uses on both sides of Bristol Street between St. Gertrude and St. Andrew Place are residential. Mater Dei High School is located along the east side of Bristol Street north of St. Andrew Place. Jose Andres Sepulveda Elementary School is west of Bristol Street in this same area. The future noise modeling results of the 1990 Final EIS/EIR indicated that future noise levels would be no more than one dBA higher with the project as compared to levels without project improvements (noise level changes of less than 3 dBA are normally inaudible to the human car). The 1990 Final EIS/EIR (and 2013 NEPA Reevaluation) provided comprehensive noise barriers at all easterly parcel boundaries currently fronting the east side of Bristol Street between Warner Avenue and Saint Andrew Place and comprehensive noise barriers at all westerly parcel boundaries currently fronting the west side of Bristol Street between West Saint Gertrude Place and Saint Andrew Place. The following noise barriers were determined to be reasonable: NB-4, NB-5, NB-6, NB-7, NB-8, NB-9, NB-10, and NB-11. These noise barriers are generally equivalent to the recommended noise barriers shown in the 1990 FEIS and 2013 Reevaluation. However, barriers NB-6, NB-7, NB-8, and NB-9 would need to be shifted to the west of the receivers (parcels) that are no longer being acquired in whole such that these barriers are now proposed at the westerly parcel boundaries that front the east side of Bristol Street between Saint Anne Place and Saint Andrew Place (refer to Figure 7a and Figure 7b). Furthermore, the reasonable noise barriers would be constructed at a height of 8 feet, as opposed to 6 feet as identified in the 1990 FEIS and 2013 NEPA Reevaluation. The modifications and other refinements to the project would not create any additional impacts than what was identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. With implementation of the mitigation measures from the 1990 Final EIS/EIR, noise impacts would be similar to that identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 44 75C'6O ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street lfdening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 45 75C-61 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase 1V) FIGURE 7A NOISE MONITORING AND MODELING LOCATIONS ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 46 75C'62 M 22 m ST ANNE> PLACE � -c r,�Slf all '.' ST'iGERTRfJCE'PLACa�E ':::. +" y YW 17. I'm 19t rreg . S7}ANNE! PLACE I 7 `31, 1 5+ I IRA -' ST GERTRUDPLACE - i E i h 11 k° r 1$� 1, M 29 a 1 i IN 5 j* �X 0 a 1 Zal- M�39 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) FIGURE 7B NOISE MONITORING AND MODELING LOCATIONS ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 Y-U 47 75C-64 z L � Ix: Ify�j 0,ZA m4 fi bw 76i0N PL'AC� _.fir o r ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) (b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Refer to response in 3.12 (a.) above. Project construction will involve typical groundborne noise and vibration. However, the majority of construction activities will consist of standard procedures, and will be relatively limited for any particular area. Construction activities would comply with the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code, which limits construction noise to the least noise sensitive portions of the day. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR with implementation of mitigation measures as included in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Refer to response in 3.12 (a.) above. During construction of the proposed project, the noise associated with construction may intermittently dominate the noise environment in the immediate area of construction. Typical construction equipment for roadway construction is expected to generate noise levels ranging from 74 to 89 decibels (0) at a distance of 50 feet. However, no additional adverse noise impacts from construction are anticipated as construction would comply with the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code, which limits construction noise to the least noise sensitive portions of the day. Construction equipment would be properly fitted and maintained according to the manufacturer's specifications, furthermore, construction noise would be short-term, temporary and cease upon completion of the proposed project. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR with implementation of mitigation measures, as identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Refer to responses 3.12 (c), above, for discussion regarding temporary noise impacts associated with construction. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working hi the project area to excessive noise levels? The project site is not located within an airport land use plan. The nearest airport is the John Wayne Airport approximately 3.5 miles southeast of the southernmost Phase IV project intersection. No impacts would occur. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST2014) 133867 YU 48 75C-66 ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) Refer to response 3.12 (e.), above. The proposed project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. 3.13 Population and Housing This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, subsections L, Population, M, Housing Displacement, N, Business Displacement, O, Impacts on Neighborhood Character and Minority Groups, and R, Effect on Assessed Property Values, of the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. No take of residential parcels is proposed as part of this project. (a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure? Bristol Street and Warner Avenue are currently heavily traveled roadways and the City of Santa Ana is fully built out. The proposed project is designed to accommodate the existing and future traffic volume and would not create significant numbers of new trips. The proposed widening would not result in additional impact. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The proposed project's Build Alternative is anticipated to result in full or partial acquisitions of approximately 43 parcels along the project study area. The acquired parcels are defined as distinct locations where residential and non-residential displacement could occur along the project alignment. The project is anticipated to result in the acquisition of 27 single-family residential units. This compares to a total of 28 single-family residential units (6 partial and 22 full acquisitions) as identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Of the 27 residential units that would be displaced as part of the proposed Project, 14 parcels would be considered partial acquisitions and 13 parcels would be considered full acquisitions. Since comparable relocation properties appear to be available in the metropolitan Santa Ana area in sufficient quantity, the need for replacement housing would not be triggered due to project implementation. The number of displacees resulting from the Proposed project are anticipated to be less than identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR due to the reduction in number of full acquisition of single-family residential units. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The proposed project requires the acquisition of 27 single-family units could possibly result in displacing approximately 82 residents (URS Corporation, November 2011). The construction of replacement housing elsewhere would not be necessary because comparable relocation properties appear to be available in the metropolitan Santa Ana area in sufficient quantity. The project involves the widening Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place in an urbanized, residential/commercial area of the City of Santa Ana. The required relocations would not disproportionately affect any specific group or groups of ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 49 75C'67 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) individuals. Before any displacement occurs, residential and non-residential displacees will be presented with a list of comparable replacement properties that are available within the last six months for rent, lease, or purchase regardless of race, color, religion, sex or national origin, and would be consistent with the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1968. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. 3.14 Public Services This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, subsections P, hnpacts on Community Facilities, and V, Construction Impacts of the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. (a) Fire Protection? The proposed project is an intersection widening project and no increase in demand for fire protection services would occur with implementation of the proposed project. Furthermore, the proposed project would result in positive impacts as a result of greater congestion relief and increased mobility in the vicinity for motor vehicles including emergency vehicles. Immpacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (b) Police Protection? Refer to response for Section 3.14 (a), above. The proposed project would reduce congestion and traffic idling times, and therefore, increase mobility of emergency vehicles, including police vehicles. The proposed project would not result in the need or increase the demand for police services in the area. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (c) Schools? No schools would be impacted by the proposed project and no school services would be affected by the proposed project. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (d) Parks? The proposed project is a road widening project and no park site would be acquired as part of the project. No park services would be increased or impacted by the proposed project and no impact would result from the proposed project. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (e) Other public facilities? ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 50 15C-6S ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) The proposed project is an intersection widening project and would not generate demands for public facilities, Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required, 3.15 Recreation This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, subsection P, Impact on Recreational Facilities, of the 1990 Final EISIEIR. (a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? The proposed project is not a growth -inducing project and would not create demand for recreation services. Physical deterioration of recreational facilities would not result from the proposed intersection widening and no impact would result from the project implementation. No mitigation measures are required with regards to recreational resources. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The proposed intersection widening would not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities and no adverse physical impact would be generated. No mitigation measures are required. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. 3.16 Transportation/Traffic This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, subsections U, Impacts to Transportation Facilities, and V, Construction Impacts of the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. (a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taping into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit. The Bristol Street Widening Phase IV project is consistent with the applicable plans, ordinances and policies establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system as described in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. The widening of Bristol Street was designated in the Orange County Master Plan, and was recommended in the Bristol Street Corridor Study — Final Report by Mohle, Grover & Associates in 1983. It was also recommended in the Arterial Highway Element — Santa Ana Element — Santa Ana Transportation Corridor State 11 Alternative Analysis prepared by Parsons Brincicerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc., in 1983. The proposed widening is also in agreement with the recommendation found in the Intercity Liaison Committee — Five -Year Transportation Study Update to 1990 prepared by Basmaeiyan-Darnell, Inc., in ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 Y U 51 75C-69 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FREPORTADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) 1985. Furthermore, the proposed project would result in an improvement to the Bristol Street at Warner Avenue, Glenwood Place, and Saint Andrew Place intersections. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? The proposed project would result in an improvement to Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place. Once the project has been implemented, all roadway segments would operate at LOS D or better. The proposed project would not cause the County congestion agency's LOS standards to be exceeded. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? The closest airport to the site is John Wayne — Orange County Airport, located approximately 3.5 miles southeast of the project site. The proposed project would have no impact on air traffic patterns. The proposed project would not introduce any new risks or increase risks. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? The proposed project would improve the traffic flow along Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place and would not create any sharp curves or other incompatible uses. The proposed project would not create any significant hazards beyond what was previously analyzed. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (e) Result in inadequate emergency access? The proposed project would improve traffic flow along Bristol Street in the long-term. However, during the construction phase, the disruption of traffic and restricted access along Bristol Street could temporarily affect the mobility of emergency vehicles. Provisions would be made for interim access, and traffic control plans would be prepared prior to construction. Additionally, advance warning and infonuation signs would be used to reduce the confusion motorists may experience during the construction process. Bristol Street would remain open during construction. Although the proposed project may interfere with emergency access in the short-term, it would improve emergency access once the project is completed. The proposed project would not result in a more significant impact to emergency access than previously analyzed, and with the implementation of mitigation measures as prescribed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 52 75r-70 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? The proposed project supports the use of public transportation and it would not conflict with any alternative transportation plan and would increase safety. The proposed project would not result in impacts greater than as described in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. 3.17 Utilities and Service Systems This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, subsections S, Effect on Utilities, and V, Construction Impacts of the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. (a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? The proposed project would not generate any sewer demand and would not change the sewer quality. No impacts are anticipated in this regard. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? The proposed road widening project would not generate the need for water and wastewater services from the City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency and the Orange County Sanitation District, respectively. The existing sewer and water lines beneath Bristol Street would not be relocated. The proposed project would not create any new significant environmental impact. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? The project site is already fully developed and the proposed project would not change the runoff volume significantly. Instead, the proposed project would improve existing drainage flow by constructing properly designed curb and gutter along the edges of Bristol Street. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in any new significant environmental impact. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISII?1R. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required, ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133967 YU 53 75C-71 ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) (d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? The proposed project would not result in any increase in water consumption. Landscape improvements, if applicable, would not require any new or expanded water entitlements. The proposed project would not create any new significant environmental impact. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? The proposed roadway widening project would not generate any sewer demands. No new significant impact is anticipated. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (1) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the projects solid waste disposal needs? The proposed project would generate construction waste on a short-term basis. The City has two haulers, Waste Management and Ware Disposal, which provide recycling services for construction and demolition projects. Construction waste that cannot be recycled would be taken to available landfills. The predominant receiving landfill for the City is the Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill at 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road in Irvine. The landfill, which is owned and operated by the Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department, opened in 1990 and is scheduled to operate until approximately 2022. The facility has adequate landfill capacity to serve the proposed project and no new significant environmental impact would result from the project implementation. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. (g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? The proposed project would comply with all applicable federal, state, and Iocal statutes and regulations related to solid waste. The proposed project would comply with the City's established reduction, reuse, and recycling programs. No new significant solid waste impact would result from the proposed project. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Mitigation Measures No new additional mitigation measures are required. 3.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance Based on this Addendum, the Bristol Street Widening Phase IV project has not substantially changed in regard to the setting, design, impacts, and mitigation measures as described in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. New ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867'YU 54 75C'72 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Wamer Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) circumstances or new information, including any new or revised environmental laws, regulations, or policies have not modified the impacts of the proposed project. (a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? The proposed project would not result in greater impacts as compared with the 1990 Final EIS/EIR and does not have the potential to degrade the environment, reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, threaten plant or animal communities, reduce or restrict endangered plant or animal species or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. (b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Due to the relatively limited nature of the proposed project and in consideration of mitigation measures addressed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR, the project would not involve impacts that are cumulatively considerable. (c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Construction -related activities are anticipated to have some minor, temporary impacts, which can be mitigated with implementation of measures included in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. Furthermore, potential long- term impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels through implementation of required mitigation measures. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133967 YU 55 75C-73 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT" REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) 4.0 REFERENCES Air Quality Conformity Analysis — Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV), URS Corporation. January 2013. City of Santa Ana General Plan, Adopted September 1982 (with updates and reformatting through January 2010). City of Santa Ana Website: www.ci.santa-ana.ca.us.Community Impact Assessment --- Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV), URS Corporation. October 2010, Relocation Impact Statement — Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV), URS Corporation. November 2011, Final Environmental Impact Statement, Proposed Widening of Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane, in the City of Santa Ana, Wildan Associates. 1990. Noise Study Report — Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place, URS Corporation, November 2012. Southern California Association of Governments, Orange County RTIP, Project Listing Report. 2008, www.seag.ca.gov. Traffic Impact Analysis -- Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place, URS Corporation, October 2010. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-74 56 APPENDIX A MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C'75 Appendix A Modified Initial Study Checklist The following Modified Initial Study (MIS) Checklist is based on the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Initial Study Checklist. It is modified to evaluate the proposed project changes for which environmental impact reports/statements have previously been completed to assist in the determination of the need for supplemental environmental documents, in this case, a Supplemental EIS/1IR or an Addendum under Public Resources Code 21166 and Guideline Sections 15162, 15163, and 15164. For purposes of this study, references to "the proposal" in the left hand column questions refer to the proposed project changes. The first four columns to the right of the MIS questions identify whether the proposed project changes would result in new impacts and if so whether these impacts would be less than significant, less than significant after mitigation, or significant. The fifth cohunn asks whether or not the impacts associated with project changes, if any, were sufficiently disclosed in the previous environmental documents (Not Addressed). Finally, the last column indicates whether or not a Supplemental EIS/EIR is needed. A Supplemental EIS/EIR would be needed if there were new significant iuimitigated or substantially more severe impacts which would result from the project changes and which were not sufficiently disclosed in the previous environmental documents. Discussion in support of the conclusions indicated on the checklist is provided in Chapter 3. ANA 345-194 (PER 42) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133967 YU 75r-76 MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST New Impacts bf Project Changes Previous:FEIR and FEI.$ NoLess Impact p Than Significant Less I man Significant otentia yy Significant Impacts Disclosed? uppp ement. al EIRIEIS Impact After Impact Required? Mitigation _ 1. AESTHETICS: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect X YES NO on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and X NIA NO historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site X YES NO and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which X YES NO would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Z AGRICULTURAL. RESOURCES, Would the project a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on X NIA NO the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act X N/A NO contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning, of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code X NIA NO section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non - X NIA NO forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result X NIA NO in conversion of Farmland, to non- agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C'77 New Impacts of Project Changes Previous FOR and FEIS No Impact P ess an Significant es5. an Significant" Potentialy Significant. m acts Disclosed? Supplement afEIRIEIS Impact After impactRequired? . Mitigation 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct X YES NO implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or X YES NO contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criterla pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an X YES NO applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to X YES NO substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of X YES NO people? 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES, Would the project: a) Have a substantlal adverse effect, elther directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or X YES NO regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, X YES NO policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited X YES NO to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? ANA 305.194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-7S New Impacts of Project Changes. Previous FOR and FEIS No Impact Less an Significant Less an Significant otentia y Significant Imppacts Disc]osed? uppp ement al EIRIEfS Impact. After Impact Required? Mitigation d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or X YES NO with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological X YES NO resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 5,CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a X YES NO historical resource as defined in § 15064,5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an X YES NO archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064,5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or X YES NO site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of X NA NO formal cemeteries? 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project' a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- PrVo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the X YES NO State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Dlvision of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-79 Appendix A New Impacts of Project•Changes PrevtousFOR and FEIS. No Impact ess' an Signiiicant Less an Significant otentia 5ignifican Impacts Disclosed? up 'Tent . pp al EIRIEIS Impact After Impact Required? Mitigation. ` .. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X YES NO iii) Seismic -related ground failure, X YES NO including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? X YES NO b) Result in substantial soil erosion X YES NO or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- X YES NO or off -site landsfide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), X YES NO creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste X NA NO water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or X NO NO indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Confliotwith an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the X NO NO purpose of reducing tho emissions of greenhouse gases? &. HAZARDS. Would the project involve: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through X YES NO the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU Q 75C-SO Appendix A New Impacts of Project Changes . Previous FEW and FEIS No, Impact Less an Significant Less an significant otentia y Significant Imppacts bisclosed?.. uppp ement al EIRlEIS Impact .After Impact Required? Mitigation: b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and X YES NO accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or X NIA NO waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 X YES NO and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within X NIA NO two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project X N/A NO result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted X YES NO emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to X NIA NO urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY a) Violate any water quality X YES NO standards or waste discharge requirements? ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-S 1 New Impacts of Project Changes Previous FEIR and FEIS No Impact p ess- an Significant Less an Significant otentia y Significant Im acts Disclosed? up p. ement 6I.EIRIEIS Impact After .. ImpactRequired? Mitigation b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local X YES NO groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of X YES NO the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result it substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Su bsiantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or X YES NO substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water X YES NO drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade X YES NO water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or X YES NO Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood X YES NO hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding X YES NO as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133S67 YU Q 75C-S2 Appendix A New Impacts: of. Project. Changes Previous FEIR and FEIS No Impack Less an Significant Less an Significant Potentially. Significant Impacts Disclosed? uppp ement al E.IR/EIS . Impact After Impact.. Required.? Mitigation j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or X NIA NO mudflow? 10. LAND USE.ANp PLANNING. Would the project, a) Physically divide an established X NIA NO community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local X YES NO coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservatlon plan or natural X NIA NO community conservation plan? 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would X YES NO be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local X YES NO general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local X YES NO general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X YES NO groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase In ambient noise levels in the project X YES NO vicinity above levels existing without the project? ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133967 YU 75C-S3 New Impacts of Project Changes previous FEIR and FEIS No Impact Less : an Significant Less an Signifcant Potentially Significant. Im .acts Disc osed? uppp ement al EIRIEIS impact After Impact Required? Mitigation . d) A substartial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise X YES NO levels In the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public X N/A NO use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project X NIA NO expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING.. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes X YES NO and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the X YES NO construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X YES NO construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical irnpacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental fa Ilities, need for new or physically altered.govern mental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other eriofmance ob'ectives for any of the a) Fire protection? X YES NO b) Pailce protection? X YES NO c) Schools? X YES NO ANA 305-194 (PEA 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-S4 Appendix A Neva Impacts of Project Changes Previous FOR and FEIS No Impact Less Than Significant ess an Significant otentfa y Significant Impacts Disclgsed7 Supplement al EIRlEIS -Impact, After impact Required.? ,. Mitigation d) Parks? X YES NO e) Other public facilities? X YES NO 15. RECREATI0N a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational X YES NO facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of X YES NO recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? 16. TRANSPORTATI0NITRAFFIO. Would the prpject: . a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including X YES NO mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand X YES NO measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase X NO NO in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e,g., sharp X YES NO curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e,g„ farm equipment)? ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C—Q5 New Impacts of.Projeet Changes Previous FEIR and FEIS No Impact p Less .Than Significant Less Than Significant . PotentiallV Significant Impacts Disclosed? sup pp ement aI EiWEIS Impact After Impact. Required? Mitigation e) Result in Inadequate emergency X YES NO access? f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian X YES NO facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilitles? 17, UTILITIES AND .SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the t: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable X YES NO Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of now water or wastewater treatment facilities or X YES NO expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause sign lficantenvironmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of X YES NO existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, X YES NO or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that It has adequate capacity to serve the X YES NO projects projected demand In addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to X YES NO accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Compiy with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related X YES NO to solid waste? ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU Q 75C-86 Appendix A New Impacts of Project Changes Previous FEIR and FEIS No Impact ess Irian Significant Less I han Significant otenUa ,1y Significant Impacts Disclosed? uppp ement al EIRlEIS Impact After Impact Required? Mitigation 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wlidffe population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to X YES NO eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a X YES N project are considerable when 0 viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will X YES NO cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or Note: N/A = Not applicable 19. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EI R, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addrossed Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU Q 75C-S7 75c-ss ROH -- 04/07/15 RESOLUTION NO.2015-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 89-01 FOR THE BRISTOL STREET WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN WARNER AVENUE AND SAINT ANDREW PLACE (PHASE 1V) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows; A. On November 19, 1990, the City Council approved the Final Environmental Impact Statement / Environmental Impact Report (EIS 89-01) for the widening of a 3.9-mile segment of Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane, hereinafter referred to as the "Project°. B. City Council has been asked to approve the commencement of Phase IV of the Project, widening Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Saint Andrew Place. Phase IV includes minor design modifications to the Project approved in EIS 89-01. C. On April 7, 2015, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana considered the request for approval of the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Study I Environmental Impact Report (EIS 89-01). Section_2. The City Council previously approved and adopted Final Environmental Impact Study I Environmental Impact Report (EIS 89-01). In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), an Addendum to EIS 89-01 was prepared for Phase IV of the Bristol Street Widening Project, A true and correct copy of the Addendum is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. The City Council reviewed the information contained in the Addendum, which includes reference materials, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference, and as a result of its consideration and the evidence presented at the hearings on this matter, determined that, as required pursuant to CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, the Addendum adequately addresses the expected environmental impacts of this Project. Based upon the studies, the City Council determines that there are no new significant impacts or any increases in the severity of the impacts previously identified in the original FEISIEIR. Resolution No, 2015- Page 1 of 3 75C-S9 Section 3. The City Council hereby certifies and approves the Addendum to EIR 89-01, and directs that any necessary Notice of Determination be prepared and filed with the County Clerk of the County of Orange in the matter required by Law. Section 4. These decisions are based upon the Request for Council Action dated April 7, 2015, and exhibits attached thereto; the public comments; and, the Final Environmental Impact Study / Environmental Impact Report (EIS 89-01), all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. This decision rendered by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana is final and is subject to judicial review pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6. ADOPTED this day of April, 2015. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia F�arvalhp, City Attorney M Ryan Hbd, Ass t City l ttorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers Resolution No. 2015- Page 2 of 3 75C-90 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, MARIA D. HUIZAR, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No, 2015 XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2015- Page 3 of 3 75C-91 75C-92 EXHIBITA Please note that Exhibit A referenced in the resolution is Exhibit 3 of the 75C Staff Report. 75C-93 75C-94 PROJECT TITLE: Bristol St Impr & Widening: Ph 4 - Warner - St Andrew PROJECT CATEGORY: Street Improvements Street/Bridge Improvements & Widening LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT 8 CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 24/25CIP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET IIA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Bristol Street Improvements project was planned and designed to incorporate complete street concepts with storm water quality features. The improvements include widening of the street from four lanes to six lanes, with bus turnouts, raised median, bike lanes, enhanced storm drain system, and sound walls. The project also brings native and organic landscaping that beautifies a fully developed urban area. A� PROJECT COSTS Construction Contingency Engineering Other FY 24/25 22,354,493 2,235,449 405,560 2,398,370 TOTAL 27,393,872 SOURCE OF FUNDS DAF: DA-IV GAS TAX GENERALFUND M2 LOCAL FAIRSHARE MEASURE M2 COMPETITIVE ' + OCTA BRISTOL ST CORRIDOR FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 748,415 632,183 680,000 1,611,810 11,910,023 3,063,416 RESIDENTIAL STREET IMPROV 1,596,614 RMRA SB1 2,535,113 TSIA AREA E 770,440 TSIA AREA F 672,108 WATER CAPITAL 3,173,750 TOTAL 27,393,872 - AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE: Public Works CIP Engineering Jason Gabriel, Principal Civil Engineer 4-Mar-2025