Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout67-025RESOLUTION 67-25 OF TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ENDORSING THE PROPOSED $46.4 MILLION FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CON- SERVATION BOND ISSUE PROGPJ%M OF ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Chief Engineer of the Orange County Flood Control District has prepared an Engineer's Report for the con- struction of numerous flood control and water conservation projects throughout Orange County with an estimated cost of such projects; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Board of Supervisors, acting as Board of Directors for the Flood Control District, has adopted said report and proposes to place the matter before the voters of this County for the issuance of flood control bonds to cover the cost of such projects; and WHEREAS, the previous flood control district bond issue authorized in June, 1956, in the amount of $42,620,000 has played a vital role in the explosive growth and expansion of Orange County; and WHERF2%S, it is anticipated that the new proposed bond issue will have a similar effect in the future and will be necessary for the continued growth and development in the County; and WHEREAS, the citizens of the City of Santa Ana will derive both direct and indirect benefits from the proposed flood control projects; and WHEREAS, the proposed flood control bond issue above mentioned will not increase the District tax rate; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the City Council of the City of Santa Aha does hereby endorse said bond issue proposal and strongly recommends the support of the issue by the voters of Orange County. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana at its regular meeting held on the 20th day of February, 1967. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF OP~NGE ) ss CITY OF SANTA ANA ) I, DORIS M. BROWN, do hereby certify that I am the Clerk of the Council of the City of Santa Aha; that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced to said Council at its regular meeting held on the 20th day of February, 1967, and was at said meeting regularly passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES, COUNCILMEN: Gilmore, Brooks, Burk, Herrin, Markel, McMichael, Harvey NOES, COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT, COUNCILMEN: None CLERK OF THE COUNCIL