HomeMy WebLinkAbout74-120RESOLUTION 74- 120
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING AN APPLICATION
FORGRANT FOR ORANGE COUNTY NARCOTICS INDEX,
FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE OFFICE OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE PLANNING AND AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF
POLICE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO EXECUTE ALL
DOCUMENTS PERTINENT THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana desires to undertake a
certain project designated Orange County Narcotics Index to
be funded for the second year in part from funds made available
through the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968,
PL 90--355, as amended PL 91-644, (hereafter referred to as the
Safe Streets Act) administered by the Orange County Criminal
Justice Council (hereafter referred to as OCCJC).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA ANA that the Chief of Police, Raymond C. D~vis
of the Santa ~_na Police Department, was authorized on its behalf,
to submit the attached Application for Grant for Law Enforcement
Purposes to OCCJC and is authorized to execute on behalf of the
City of Santa Ana the attached Grant Award Contract for law en-
forcement purposes including any extensions or amendments there-
of.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant agrees to provide
all matching funds required for said project (including any ex-
tension or amendment thereof) under the Safe Streets Act and
the rules and regulations of OCCJC and the Law Enforcement Assis-
tance Administration and that cash will be appropriated as re-
quired thereby.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that grant funds received hereunder
shall not be used to supplant on-going law enforcement expendi-
tures.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City
of Santa Ana at its regular meeting held on the 5th
day of August , 1974.
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF SANTA ANA
SS
I, FLORENCE I. MALONE, do hereby certify that I am the
Clerk of the Council of the City of Santa Ana; that the fore-
going Resolution was introduced to said Council at its
regular meeting held on the 5th day of August ,
1974, and was at said meeting passed and adopted by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES,
NOES,
ABSENT,
COUNCILMEN: Yamamoto, Ward, Markel, Patterson,
Griset
COUNCILMEN: None
COUNCILMEN: Garthe, Evans
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
.,., CAUFOS NIA COUNCIL ON C IMINAL JUST',CS.
Application for a grant under Section 301
I. Title:
3. T_ivpe of Application
(b) of the O~nibus Crime Control and Safe
Streets Act of 1968 (PL-90-351), as amended
by PL-Pl-64~.
ORANGE COUNTY DiARCOTIC INDEX
Year: 1st ..... 2nd X 3rd
[--] Original (hate)
~ Revision (Date) ~ , 9-20-73 ,,
4. Grant Duration:
'12 Months
5. tenpth of Project: 36 Months
Support Dollars Percent
.6. Federal $36,ooo 90%1 ..
7. State Buy-In i~3 - 5Z-
8. Local Hard Match - ..5-~333 5%
g. Other Hatch & In-Kind --
Total Project Cost $106,666 100%
1 .- C~tegor~: Lasz En£ar ~e~.e~t _
Part B Part C Part E
Pre-Ag'ream. ant Eff'~cLive
Date
Grant Extension Approved
To
.~, Reflio~:
. 12.~ Applicant:
Santa An~ ~otice Department
24. CivicLcenter Plaza
Santa Aha, California. 92701
(71~) 834-4211
]3. ~ro~,ect Dire/tort
Raymond C.3 Davis, Chief of Police
City of Santa Aha
24 Civic Center Plaza-.
Santa Aha, CA 9270~ (714) 834-4131
14. Financia~icer: --
Lawrence M, Shaffer, Director of
: Finance ~ ....
i City of Santa Aha ~ . '
~-' 2'0 Civic Center
. Santa' Ana,. CA 92701
-(714) 834-4940
l~." 9fficial Au~ho;i~'ed.30.Sis~' A~plication:
RAY}~0ND C. DAVIS, Chie~ of Police
City of Santa Ana
' 24 Civic Cen~er Plaza
San~a~..~..k-~ 92'701 (714> 834--413.1
.. ' x; , - o.--,..-..
~ Pr~t Sq~-~rM- Thi~.a~l,i~t. io~.i~ for second yea= func!in-~ ~ c,o~tfm:~e t!~z: --
mst~oordinat, or.~s OffiCe within the exist'~= Orange Cou~_y Drug & ,~r_o
/a~Force-. The Task Force i[~clud'es all 23 >[unicipaI 6 County' Law Enforcement
O.C~ /Airport_ Secu~.it~_&.the 0.C~ Prohztion Department.
~ { Th~ Coo=dingtor~m~Offiqe provides essential time!y~ expeditious & conti~zugl]
zv~ .-able suppor~ to tk~ Task For6a' members & interfaces with other la~ emfo~ceaer
a~nn~as in~ thm. area of na='cotic oriented intelligence collection, analyzation
Hist-cibution. The office also handles procurement & utilization of up-to-data
w~re, planning for system improvemeat, personnel training & measnrement of the
effectiveness. Data obtained, where ~pplicable, is placed into the DALE computer
sy~;tem & retrievals possible by specified members of the Task Force.
Tb~z immediate: goals of the project are: 1) Reduce the trafficking and ava~
~bility of illegal nnrcotics & restricted dangerons dr.ugs; 2) Develop an operati(
a! i~arcot-ics Intel.]ii~ence !~utwork in conjunction with ])Al,E; 3) Increase g}:e quali;
c.f arrears & improve arrests/conviction ratio; 4.) Increa~e coordlnatlon & cooper-
?.u~on within the individual agencies; 5) Cooperqte with health care delivery sar--
vices in the area of drug abu~;e prevention & treatment resources; 6) Participate
z co~aprehensive uniform, narcotic enforce~m~t training program; 7) Impact on
:-.~lated to thc sale E usc of narcotics & res[ricted daugerons drui~;; 8)
',:itc prcc[p:[tating c:lo~;cs le;idlng to th(~ Jaitial contact & subaequeet arre:;~: (sf Llt~
.'iolator; 9) Collection of t, aselJne data related to tha~;e
The ~larcotic Iurelli~]~nce ]]adex Jt~ located ~a the S'a~tta Aha Poilce
,~:<I J.c; responsLble to th~ 't';~sk Force.
CCCJ Form 502 (R,,w. 6//95
NOTICE OF INTENT
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUM~tER {SOft. NO)
01
02
03
04
Santa Aha Po) ce Department
Orange County Harcotic Index
2q Civic Center Plaza
[] STATE CLEARINGHOUSE [] METROPOLITAN CLEARI~IGHOU.~,E
Donald D. Foreman J Coordinator
Santa Ana
icouNYY (6~-7s
Oranqe
05
06
07
08
09
11
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
Provides essential timely, expeditlous and continually
awailable support to Task Force members. [.mphasls on the
"~lectlon, analyzation, malntenance~ dissemination and
retrteYa! of narcotic intelligence submitted by,membeff
agencies. Establishes and presents ~rainlng program.
0N THESE 6 LINES CAPSULIZE THE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION, YOU ARE
CLEARINGHOUSE FOR THEIR SUB-
Supplements field investigations with equipment & financial ass~istance.
Santa Ana J Orange ' -
EEDERAL FUNDS J .ATC.,.~ FUNOS 'j(G"-~el OTHE'" JiS?-$.~
JLF,~& - ImaroviBg ~d StrengthenSnq T,m,, ~nFnrcom~n* J 16.502
~.S. Deponent of .Tnst~ce ~ . . .. I,~X . .
TYPE OF ACTION:
SCH*NO. FROM PR£. yR. 7%1 072,'t~
(23-30)
PROJECT:
ACKNOWLeDGEMEnT
Pr~e~ Notlfi~on and Rwiew System
Offi~ ofthe Governor
Orange County Narcotic Index
State Clearinghouse Number (SCH) 7 310 2 2/J 3
The above State Clearinghouse Number must be used on future correspondence with this
offic~ and must be brought to the at/enrico of the agency taklng action on your project.
Date Received:
The State review of your project will require.___]3_0.._.da,/s, This c~rd DOES NOT verify
. compllan~ with preapplicatlon end/or environmental document review requirements. A
letter containing the State's comments or a letter confirming that no comments were
~janerated will be for~varded es soon after the review is completed as possible. ·
If submittal is under preapplication review requirements, you may not submit the final
application until the letter iS receiv%'~1
F~r Clearinghouse by
o~,~ ~ DUPLICATE
3
CiTY OF SANTA ANA
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF POLICE
:24 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA- SANTA ANA · CALIFORNIA
Sep.te~-~b~r 20, 1973
ENVIRON,'.IE~FFAL IMPACT STATE~.iE~F
~/EGATIVE I,qPA~T STATEME~ff
TO: All lJ~te6ted Gove~J~ Agen~es and Publia Groups
GENTLE,qE~I:
O~,~IGE COU~TY ~ARCOTIC.I,~DEX
The ass~6s~,e)~ process did not indiaate a sig~ficaJ~t env/~m~me)~a~ impact
from tJte ~roposed a6tion. Co~v~que~ly, an eaviro~e~ i~pact
will not be ~rep~red.
An ~nv~to;~me)~tal ~.~pact appro~sa~, wr,,~dt summarize6 the as6~sme);~ and the
rea~o~ w,tty a sta~nent is not required, ~ oa fi~e a~ 2.be above o~(~ice
and iod/1 be. available for public sc~w~iny upon request.
S~tc~ely,
Rayr~)o,d C. Day6*
CI~¢~ of
ROD/aa
4
A. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIA)(CE WITH E.E.O. GUIDELINES
I, Raymond C. Davis (person filing the application) certify that the
City of Santa ;ma (agency) has formulated an equal employment
opportunity prog'ram in accordance with 28 CFR 42.301, et. seq. Subpart E,
and that it is on file in the Office of Personnel .... (name).
28 Civic Center Drive .. (address) Santa Ana
(Tit]e) AffirmitiveAction Pro,ram, for review or audit by officials of the
0ffice of Criminal Justice Planning or the law Enforcement Assistance
Administration as required, by re]event laws and regulations.
B. CERTIFICA!E OF INTENTION TO COMPLY WITH E.E.O. GUIDELINES
I, .... ,... (person filing the~appli~at, ion.).
certify; (1) that the (criminal justice agency)
has formulated an equal employment opportunity (EEO) Progr'am substantially in
accord with 28 CFR 42.301 et seq.; Subpart E, (2) that , ....
.. (identification of the specific data elements which art
presently unobtainable) are absolutely unavailable at this time; ('3) that the
... (criminal
~ust~ce agency) has established
a program to collect the necessary data and will prepare the EEO Program in its
entirety, as required by 28 CFR 42.301, within
(time frame within which EEO Program will be completed which in no event may
exceed one year from the date the data collection program is begun); and (4)
that suc~ data collection.program is on file in the Office of
(name) (address). -
.(title) for review or audit by officials of the Office of
Criminal Justice Planning or the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration~ as
required by relevant laws and regulations.
Szonature RAYMOND C. DAVIS
Date
......... ~ETAI[~ PR0~CT BU6GET '-
(a)
(b)
(c)
BUDGET CATEGORY
21. Personal Services
A. Salaries
One Intel~igenceAnalyst
@ $17,400.00
One Steno-Clerk II
@ $8,240
One Clerk Typist II
@ $8,789
Benefits
(As per' above positions
refer Page 6a)
1~. IAL
TOTAL
$17,400.'
8,240.
8,789.
6,467.
'FEDERAL
FUHDS
tlARD MATCH
STATE
t
LO~AL
I
BUY- !,q
HARD I~IATCH
$12,067.
8,24Q.
8,789
6,467
$5,533.
-/.
· , ~Z : DOc QO OOE~ ~ ,,6~,,I,~7 GtX,,09 'sxoop
'OOS '005 00'00S$ ~ ~EUfl
$. 'O09~Z
S 'os
$ 'OOS'~
$ 'O00'S
$ 'ooz
'009'~
'osf
'OOS'£
'O00'S
'00~
ao^!o~o~! o!p~H aoi~:.~aoS (I) '9
'009'[$ O
o!pr~[ oo!IOd aITqoK (I) 'S
O0'OSI$ ~ zo~eociS 9
ot~oqdo~!l< ~o^ooaapufl IUpads (I) '~
'005'~$ 8 ££61-016I
· ~o '005'Z$ ~ s~Iun
aOU~lI!O~uns 9 a3ua~IIIalUI 6~S (Z) 'Z
· '?~ O0'OOZ$ 0 "
pz?o aI!J '~ooI I2pads/~t
~uumdtnb]
]VIOL
/"- -lV30] 31VIS Sd}{~q ]VIOl
(I,NO3) 139EflH 133C0~d QHllVIHO
DETAILED PROOECT .... ~
BU~o~, (CON'T)
FEDERAL HARD tiATCH
FUNDS STATE t. OCAL
'BUY-IN HARD HATCH
25.
BUDGET CATEGORY TOTAL
Supplies and Operating Expenses
Office Expenses
(a) Supplies: Est. $60 per month x
12 months = $?20.
Postage: Est.'S200
(b) Duplicating: Est. 4~'~ersheet X
- 12 months x 1200 sheets pe~ month
: $576
Of£ice Comunicarions
(a) 4 Telephones at $25 per n~onth.x
-12' months - $500
Co) Long ~istance at. $75 per monih
rest. x' 12 month = $900 '
Vehicle ~hintenance Est. at $350
vehicle x 6. vehicles = $2,100.
(a) Gasoline - 1000 g~l.@ 44.4¢ per
gal..= $444.
4. Confldsntial F~xpeqditures
(a) I>~r~hase of evidence ~nd
informant services.
(b).Investigati~e needs & travel'
7.20.
200'.
576.
500.
· 900.
2,~00.
444.
59,800.
6,980.
$ 720.
$ 200.
576.
300.
900.
$' 2,1001 -
$ 444.
$39'800.
1,647..
.$ 5,333."
TOTAL 020 , ,687.
COST tOO 666 :,~9(,]000.
O:L'T~G~; COb.%'fY PO.*u~M ION - 1,395,163'
CITY
Brea
Buena Park
Costa
Cypress
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
Garden Grove
Huntington Beach
ir~ine
Laguna Beach
La Habra
· La Palina
Los
Nm~or t Beach
Ormnge
Placentia
S,xn Clemente
S~n Jum~ Capistrano
Santa
Seal Beach
Stilton
'lhstin
Villa Park
l;'estminster
Yorba Lhada
Unincorporated
13.2%
1.5%
4.65
5.5%
2.5%
3.3%
6.4%
8.8%
9.8%
1.6%
1.1%
3.2%
0.8%
0.9%
3.9%
5.9%
1.9%
1.3%
0.4%
2.0%
1.6
1.8%
0.3%
4.5%
1.1%
12.3
693.27
80.00
245.32
295.32
133.33
175.99
341.3!
469.30
S22.63
85.33
58.66
170.66
42.66
48.00
207.99
· 314~ 65
101.33
69.33
2?. ~3
106.66
85.53
95.99
16.00
239.99
58.66
655.96
TOTAL 100% $5,535.00
su;o.,,~ t. ~,:1 by
~his chart represents the -" : ' *~
p,_oport~ona~ AI~ C.~,-I match monies to be '"'-'"~
~h of the member a~encies. Thc Santa An~ Police Department match is waived by the '
~ ~r~ because the Narcotic Index is to 'b~ house:l and or, cratedv,'".t~.n~n that aqency's
~ ility.
figure does not include the population of the City of S:.mta ;ma (169,970).
Source: State Depart!~ent of Finance ~ur/ On, n~.,~ County Planning
BUDGET NARRATIVE
A. Personnel Services: $40,896
Salaries: Based upon existing wage scales prevailing in the County
of Orange.
a)
Project Director: T~he project director is responsible for policy
making, as it relates to direction m~d control of the Orange
County Narcotics Index and oversees the entire project operation.
b)
Project Coordinator: The project coordinator is responsible to
the Project Director, ~o represents the Chiefs of Police and the
Sheriff of Orange County, for directing the first-line bperation
of ~m Narcotics Index. It is his duties to establish proce&~res
for the receipt, dissemination and security of narcotic index
information. To i~lement a defendant/informant file with work
records. I~ schedules Task Force meetings and agendas as ~11 as
attends meetings of agencies involved in joint investigations of
.Task Force subjects and works with the operational c~ander in
coordinating Task Force efforts. Tim project coordinator maintains
personal liaison with mm~er agencies, Task Force members, and the
District Attorney's Office. He establishes training sessions for
Task Force members in areas of concern and mutual interest. He
maintains statistical information on the results of the Task Force
operations for dissemination and report to the Project Director
and the Chiefs of Police and the Sheriff of Orange County.
C) Narcotic Index Analyst: The Narcotic Index Analyst is, directly
responsible to the Project Coordinator. He evaluates and analyzes
narcotic intelligence information collected by the Orange County
Drug and Narcotic Task Force member agencies. Ne determines the
credibility, reliability m~d pertinence of infomation and- into'-
grates this information to disclose patterns, trends, and/or
evidence of organized narcotic activity. The Narcotic Index
;d]alyst also prepares reports to s~mm~arJ, ze the findings and con-
clusions based on the interpretation of the info,rotation. }lo is
called upon to instruct representatives of member agencies in the
. . analytical and r~lated functions of the Narcotic Index and the
resources available to identify and co~abat organized narcotic
activity. '11~e Analyst 5s required to participate in the meetings
of the Task Force in order to disseminate the results of the
analysis of the submitted infm~ation. Ilo assists in the planning
ami direction of the Narcotic Index and acts for the Project
Coordinator in his absence.
d) Index Stenographer: The stenographer handles ~11 related clerical
matters, including the bandling of the Index correspondence, pro-
cessing requests for in£oz~ation, processing incoming infmn~ation,
maintaining w~rious files and directori6s, hm~dles incoming phone
calls and other related duties as they may be assigned. 'l'h<.~
stenographer records the minut6s' of thc Task Force Executive
Colmnittec for distribution to m~mbcr agencies.
e)
Index Clerk: ~e clerk is assigned to clerical and filing matters.
The clerk is called upon to do indexing and processing as a cleri-
cal support to tbe stenographer and analyst positions.
£)
Index F~ecutive Comittee: The Index Cor. unittee meets once a month,
or more frequently if needed, to give assistance to the Project
Coordinator ~ld represent the Or~ulge County Narcotics Task Force
to the Narcotic Index Staff. The F~xecutive Committee consists of
seven (7) officers from representative departonents of the Narcotic
Task Force mid assists in determining the priorities of the Index.
bnployee Benefits: Employee benefits are based upon existing standard
salary overrides currently in effect within the City of Santa Aha and
used in the computation of the. annual budget, as accepted and approved
by that City's City Council. (See Chart Page 6a).
a)
Vacation: Computed at weekly salary thnes three (3) weeks. Current
City of Santa Ana benefits are fifteen (15) working days vacation.
Note: Analyst to receive one week pay in lieu of one week vacation.
b)
Holiday and Sick Leave: These benefits are included within salary.
Current City of Santa Ana benefits are nine (9) holidays and ~elve
(12) sick leave days per year. There is a I80 day limi$ accrual on
sick leave and no accrual on holidays.
B. Professional Services: No expenses in this category.
C. Travel (Transportation and Subsistance) - $2,600.
D. Equipment -
Travel Expenses - $2,600: Included within the travel fund are expenses
for transportatidn to and from Narcotics Seminars and Conventions, also
expenses incurred in atten~in~ local 'liaison meetings. It h~s been the
experience of the Or~u]ge County Narcotics Index that a .good rapport
must be maintained among narcotics officers throughout the State. This
rapport is also essential in the exchange of intelligence information.
q]le narcotic user knows no jurisdictional boundaries and therefore th~
most effective means of apprehending the offender is by complete juris-
dictional cooperation of the n~'ircotic officers. By attending Narcotics
Seminars mid Conference SchooIB ahd 'Intel] igence ]n~etings, person-to-
person contact with fellow narcotics officers has proven this type of
jurisdictional c6operation to be an extremely valuable aid in the
forcea~cnt of 'the narcotic laws. Funds allocated for travel will be used
for the seven member Index F~xecutive Co~r~ittee.
$11,150.
The purchasing of equipment will utilize the existin~ procedure of the Santa
Ana Police Department. A request for' equip)~ent will be made to the purch~s-
iug agent who will in tu~ request a mini~m~ of 3 bids from vendors and the
low bid will be accepted, except for very minor i{etl~s, where a direct buy
procedure is utilized, and those items covered u~d~r contracts already ].et
trader approved competitive bid prozeduros.
Filing Cabinet - $200: One metal four-drm~r, S x 8 card file, 18" x
S2"x 36" w/special lock at $200. This request is'based on increased
imput of data into the Index by .member agencies~ The addition of one
filing cabinet will provide the needed expansiml room.
Cabinet: One metal convertible cabinet with sliding doors, 60" x
19 3/4" x 29" at $200. This request is based on the need for addition-
al storage space of st~plies. The top of the cabinet will be used as
a %~rk area for the Analyst.
Vehicles: The projectproposes the purchase of one vehicle - $3,500.
a) One B1 Camino pick-up,.VS, automatic (70-73) with air Conditioning
$3,s00.
The cost of this vehicle represents .retail price. The vehicles
purchased by departments are normally 4-door sedans, plain, and to
the drug world, readily recognizable as undercover police vehicles.
The vehicle p~opOsed for this project, represents a drastic change
in the image directed at preventing dc-tection as a police vehicle,
and %~ill supplement the Orange County Narcotic Task Force operation
by providing an additional snrv¢ill~ce vehicle for the gatheri~
of Narcotic Intelligence information. The vehicle chosen represents
(generally) the type of vehicle used by a large portion of today's
society% and its styling with minor modifications provides addi-
tional means of avoiding detection so necessary in the collection
of intelligence information. This vehicle may fnrther be disguised
bY placing it~l~s in its bed .to con~letely dissociate it from the
police atmosphere. (i.e., swimming pool cleaning materials, lm~n
maintenance equipment, motortycle, etc.) Such a vehicle would give
narcotic officers a valuable and versatile tool in entering various
geographical areas of Orange County.
b)
Intelligence/Surveillance Units - ~.;o (2) 'at $2500 = $5000. This
complete ~mit allo~,~s for recording, monitoring and co~.munication
between officers s~.~,ultaneously. For ob~ous reasons, tn~s t~pe
of equipment is an essential part of [m operation of this type.
This complete ~mit allo~'s for the mmximum amount of protection one
can provide to an under~over agent' While he is operating within
group of narcotic suspects. The surveillance officers will be
able to monitor the conversations of the underco~3er agent and the
suspects and thus insure the safety of the agent in this t>"pe
si'tuation. These units will augment' the existing hardware of the
Index.
In order to provide adequate con~nunications between surveillance
officers, a mobile radio will be necessary for the above mentioned
vehicle. The current cost of mobile radios by Orange County is
$1600 each.
d) A 'special micropho]!e mid speaker will be installed in the vehicle
at a total cost of $1S0.
e) In order to insure the utmost in semmity during a narcotics trans-
action, it is believed that a $crmublor radio receiver adapter should
be installed in the undercover vehicle. It.is the experience of the
Orange County Narcotics Task Force, that persons involved in major
operations of drug trafficking, are aware of the police frequencies
· and monitor such frequencies for their security of operations.
~e total cost of this Scrambler will be $500.00.
Supplies - $52,020.
1. Office Expenses - $1~496.
a}
~e estimated supplies expense to sufficiently supply an office of
four persons 'for a month is $60 or $720 per year. This is to include
envelopes, file folders, pens, pencils, desk trays, tablets, scratch
pads, waste baskets, etc.. Prices are based on the City of Santa Ana
purchasing figures.
h)
Duplicating expenses will be paid to the Santa Ana Police Department
in the amount of $S76 per year. This will allow the Narcotic Index
Office unl~nited use of the Police Deparmaent duplicating services
and supplies.
c)
Postage expense is estimated to be $200 per year and will be neces-
sary to cover the ~ailing of data to agencies concerned.
Office Communications - $1,200.
The use of four telephone lines are necessary for the operation of the
Narcotics Index Office, at a monthly cost of $25 a month for the four
phone lines, or $300 a year. In addition, it is estimated' that neces-
sary long distance phone charges will exist in the mmount of $75 per
month or $900 per year. The total office con~lunications expense is
estimated to be $1,200 for the year,- · .. .
Vehicle ~.~intenance- $2,544. .' ....
The Index vehicles are utilized by' the member agencies of ~h~ Oi'ange
County Narcotic /ask Force, and as done with their cxistipg vehicleS,
they are refueled by the ~'.~
u.,~],o , ~.~ncy. }~intenance, however, is con-
trolled by the Narcotics Index Coordinator ond it is cstim, atcd that
'~' ,,~100 per
this will amount to $350 per vehicle p~r yea~' and totaling
year for the six vehicles.
a) Although member agencys fuel the Index vehicles while using them on
investigations there are occasions when the vehicles are returned
with less than a full tank. To assure that all Index vehicles are
ready for £n,~edi. ate use and completely fueled $444 should be authori-
ed :for gasolin~~. for the vehicles. 1,000 gals. 8 44.4¢ (Santa Aha
City price) per gallon = $444.
4. Confidential Expenditures Expense.- $46,780.
a) I~rchase of Evidence & Informant Sezvices - $39,800.
b)
The Task Force officers are allocated monies for the purpose of
purchasing evidence. Funds for the purchase of .evidence is an
absolute necessity in the enforcement of the narcotic laws of
this state. The Courts of California have clearly stated that
a minim~n of three {3) purchases must be made from an individual
to reasonably indicate this person is a dealer of narcotics. Ail
monies used for this purpose are accounted for by the present
L.E.A.A. procedure,
The Task Force officers are allocated monies to purchase infor-
mation from informants pertaining to Task Force investigations
and the gatherialg of intelligence data. All monies used for the
purchase of ~nformatioh are accounted for by the present L.B.A.A.
procedures.
Investigative Needs & Travel - $6,980.
Various areas within the County of Orange are tourist'attractions;
there are an oven~helming number of motels and hotels located in
all parts of the County, me, ky of which are u.ti]~i%ed by traffickers
to consl~mate their transactions. Therefore, it is a necessity
.that law enforcement also be able t~o rent this type accon~nod~ation
in order to surveill the trafficker and Obtain ti~e necessary evi-
'donee in order to sustain a successful conviction. It ~is also
important in so,ne ci%cu~n~stances that Task Force officers be able
on short notice to rent a vehicle with which to perfo~n a surveil~
lance on tailing of a suspect(s). These vehicles will be rented
from available con,mercial sources, within tho County when needed.
Those persons with experience in the field of buying narcotics
and dnkgs can substantiate the fact that on many occasions the
trafficker does not always possess the drugs or narcotics in his
residence or within his vehicle, but must, as a security precau-
tion to his business, secrete the contraband in another residence
rented only for that purpos, e. On many occasions the drugs or
narcotics to.be sold can actually be located outside the ~fnysical
boundaries that determine the jur~sdictim~ of one agency from
~other. Thi~ type activity therefore, requires traveling some
distances within ~ county or in other cases, outside of the county
in order to bring the purchase of the dru~s or narcotics, arrest
of the suspects, and successful prosecutim~ to an end. Through
jurisdictional cooperation, which already exists in the County of
Orange, Some of this problem is cirmm~vented. However with the
approval of this grant, funds will be available to travel into
other jurisdictions and conduct the necessary surveillances a~]d
provide the proper security measures to tmdercover officers while
they arc traveling to make large purchases of dn~gs or narcotics.
1 '~'~ 2n d ~r¢ rd
95 , 999
4th 5th fi'th
7th 8th
9 th
lO~h
llth
100%
9O%
85,333
74,666
64,000
53,333
60~
4
2
'2 i' 21,333
I
1 i' 10,667
I,-0-
30%
2O%
10%
30. Ot,,er~S..O__~_t_~_~S.. of Fundinfi
AGENCY REQUESTEi)
REQUESTED
$
STATUS OF
32. Problem Statement
Per ~he Region T CCCJ~ 1973 Regional Plan~ Orange County has the
most severe drug abuse problems of any County in the State. In
th~s County, drug oriented problems relate to approximately 40~ '
of ali. major crimes committed. For this reason this category of
5rug abuse has been assigned the top priority in Region:T (Orange
County's CCCJ des!gnat$on) problem planning and priority. A
comprehensive fully-integrated effort is necessary in order to
solve this very serious problem. The severity of the drug abuse
problem in Orange County is indJcate~ below: (1979 statistics
nor available at time proposal prepared.)
1) Orange County's 23 polic~ agencies ma~e a total of 14,351
narcotics arrests in 1971~ an increase of 782 over the
previous year. This represents an increase of 3~, compared
with a Statewide ~ecrease of 6.3~ (figure 3).
in 1970~ 53~ of al!. adult felony eases arrested in the County
were for narcotics misuse.
3)
4)'
Arrests constitute only a small portion of the total drug
abuse D~oble .... Sur'~rejs s,o,,; that of the county's f~)~roxi-
~ ~ , ~ -~ ~' .... ~- ~t least 85,000 now in
m~tel'y 250~000 .~e~on(k,r~ ,~ tud..n~s,
shcool h~xe ~r_ed illegel drugs at leas~ once~ and a~ least
1~5~000 m~y be cla~.s~f~ea as. curre%t .users.
Over 27~ of total drug arrests in'valve persons under 1.8
years of age. More than 400 secondary school, students were
ex~elled during thc 1970-71 school year for. drug abuse
offenses (Figure 2_'). Th~s ~s of even greater significence
when Jt is noted, fiz'st~ that only a small fracCioa (].0~)
of those :invo!ved.w:ith di'u~s are identJ.:~ie{~. Combining the
above percentages indicates that the 400 students expel!cd for
c]rug offenses constitutes only 9~ of the to~al est~r.,sted
m~mber of users.' This'figure is calculated ss 447~4~, which
is in remarkable agreement with the figure of 45,000 pre-.
se:~ted Jn (3) above .as that indicated by independent surveys.
5) Mo}~e th,':~n 1~2C. 0 patients f~*op Oran[~e Courd:y a.re admitted
annually to Hetropolit~n Sta'te l[os!x~tal for wi-hhdraws!
detoxification 'treatment. This number, of coui, se~ repre--
sents on].y a fraction of the 8ddic'f; population.
for exavp]e~ ~ndica'[e there are ~'t ler~st 5~[)Oq hero~n ,'~dd. icts
in the County.
6) Nstim~tes place the to~a]_ cost of etlf'orcement of law
to ~.[(cAoJ and d~i'USC l~n ()l'{)N[~c County 8~, ) "~ '
the ::;t:-~t~:n:~::~. in LS(R" (F]sur'es ]., 3, 5 e 6).
1]
Juvenile drug arrests are also .increasing, though not as
rapidly as in pas~ years (Figure 2). Unfortunately, actual
drug abuse among juveniles is apparently continuing to soar.
County education specialist state that ¥~ithin the public school
system~ of 521 schools with 450,000 students there is s high
rate of involvement in drugs. They estimate that 50~ to
bf all high school students have experimented with mariju~na~
with 90~ becoming users. Involvement in j~nior high school
in between 7[~ to !4~ with 6[~ to 10~ using frequently. Usage
· n elementary schools ~s esozma~ed at ~/a to 7~, .~mth ~/~ be- . .
coming users, During the 1970-71 school year, 400 high
school students were expelled for ~]~ug abuse offenses.. This
figure is highly significant~ since only'.l/3 of th~ h~gh
schools expel for these offenses and only 10[~ of the .school.
age users ~re iSentified. It appears that arrests may have
hit a "ceiling"~ or a 'maximum number of arrests possible
using current law enforcement resources, w~ile ~ctual drug
abuse continues to increase.
The problem of drug abuse results ir~ many eases with victims
suffering monetary loss. Drug abuse contributes to the cost
spiral in three ways: (1) the human cost of people (e~pecially
juveniles) victimized by drugs~ (2) dollar cost of arrests,
trials, etc.; (3) burglaries and thefts by drmg abusers. Il-1
1970, Orange County was the only major county in the 'State
where the felony 5rug arrest rate was higher 'than the non-drug
arrest rate. The felony 5rug arrest rate was the highest of
the major countles and far exceeded the State-wi~e rate, The
rate of abuse wes 5~J7.3 per 100,000 populatJ, on~ or,3~. Although
the percentage increase is not as great as in. previous yaar. s.,
~]r~g arrests are still on the rise.'
The Orange County Drug and Narcotic Task Force was fount]ed in
November, 1970. The narcotic details' of 22 municipal po!i. ce
departme~bs in.Orange County are members a'~ well as the She~iff's
Department, and the State Bu'reau.df Narcotic Enforcement
Department of Justice), Other members include the
Orange County Harbor Patrol, Orange County Airport Security
and the Orange Ccm~ty Probation Department.. Close liaison ls
mainta~[ru~d by the Task ]?oreo Coordinator with all o[' Chase
agencies as well as law enforcement agencies throughout the
Southern Cali['ornia area. Through the elimination of dupli-
ca'tion of effort and the pro~oting of C~ood w]l! among thc
narcotic officers from each of these agencies~ the Task Fo.ree
has made remark~b!e progress toward the ulti~,ate goal of
moving the narco'[-~c trafficker from the commun]'ty.
J[n January, ]..072, the Coordinator of the. Tas!~ Force init:tn ted
a recorc] Xaep~ng r~ysl;,em _i[.atcd. zing ih~: results of the Ta~;k Foreo
:invest:i.gatJours. Tho oml)h~J:; by 'J?~al~ ]?orca ::~amb:l, rs was
op destroyinf~ o~-~;m:~zed g'coup~: (ton~:piri~:{?, to v:]o]~te 'thc s
n:,reob:~c :L~wr~. Whil. e worhir~L; on Ta~l,c Force
their o~.;n jurJsdJ¢:L~on:: regarclj~k~ ],c)c:~]l narcob.;r: t~rob].et,:a.
assist them in this area~ the Task Force coordinator (an OraNge
County District Attorney's Invettigator assigned full time to
this function) is available day or night to provide a~vicc and
assistance. Two deputy district attorney's assigned 'to 'the
Task Force are also available day or night for search warrant
preparation and legal advice. During 1972~ the Task Force
imitiated 8 conspiracy investigations~ made 1~9 arrests, and
seized over $223,900.00 worth of illicit dr~gs a~d narcotics.
Ail. of the Police Chiefs were contacted wi't~in 'the cOunty~
as was the Sheriff, and each gave his permission, in writing~
for officers in another jurisdiction to conduct investigations
in his'~ity as long as pri.~r notification was received.
10,000
9,000
8,000
7,gO0
6;000
5',000 'OTAL
4,000
3~000
2,000'_
1,O00
ORAN6E COUNTY
ADULT DRUG ARRESTS
(~cs)
TOTAL
TOTAL
].2
I'OTAL
1970
1971
4
JU, Elik-',: DRUG /;P,[~S'rs - ORAhG[: CO~- ,, Y *
Ovcr 400 high
scl:'ool studenls..
were expelled
from
County high
SChOOlS during
1970-71 for
~rug abuse
oJJens.s.
{Significance:
onJr 1/3 of Ihe
high schools
expel on~ only
identi{ied!)
ABUSE 3818'*
'1469
DRUGS
966
896
Dangerous Drugs
881 **
Other 761'*
39 OPIAt'ES 4! 63
..... : .............. ~ ..................................... : ...... ~ .......... Opiates 50'*
1Y68 i96~) 1970 1971
JUVENILE AND ADLILT U l,: :. A¢,,,=S"
(I'oTAL FELONY ARB ':I°oDmI,,::AI/OR'' '~- ' )
CLASSIFIED BY TYPE
1968.-19~1
t"--'-'-----"------------~ JUVENILES ......
Dangerous Other ~rug
Year Total ha 1,,N, na 0piates .__D]z!'t~)' . Offenses
1971 3,785 2113 50 881 74i
1970 3,710 1951 63 880 896
1969 3,846 1469 41 1370 966
1968 2,790 1571 39 758 422
ADULT
1971 10,566 '5440 767 2998 1361
1970 9,859 5423 .569 2693 1174
1969 7,O10 3009 .477 2520 1004
1968 4,777 2791 550 tl08 528
TOTAL
1971 14,451 7553 817 3879 2102
!970 !~569 7374 632 3493 2070
1969 10,856 4478 518 3890 1970
1968 7,567 4362 389 186G 950
Analysis of the above further accentuates the
fact that drug abuse is on the rise'with marijuana
arrests up 73%, opiates up 110%, dangerous drugs
up 108%, and arrests for other miscellaneous drug
offenses up over i20% above the 1968 figures.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE
JUVEi' I _E Ai:DD ,UG ARRESTS
(TOTAl FELO;,",',..~'n..
CLASSIFIF~ ~Y ~'PE
1968-1971
Total _=_~_=l.~ari ~vana .... O_?_ia'ces Dan~_~ .. ~= Other Dru§
Dr~ sql__ OFfenses
1971 14,351 7553 817 3879 2102
1970 13,559 7374 632 3493 2070
/969 10,856 '4478 518 3890 1970
195B 7,567 4362 389 1865 950
FIGURE 5
CRI'HE & POPU:]ATION IR~R'EAsES IN F{~UR LARGEST CITIES
%naheim
;anta Aha
]arden Grove
{untington
Beach
Sourco : t3CS
Crime Population
1960 197]. Increase
1,354 5,976 529%
].,362 5,491 393%
815 3,276 575%
237 3.,024 1,978%
1960
104,].84
100,350
84,238
11,492
1971 Increase
175,136 68%
163,285 62%
].22,830 45%
126,456 1000%
FIGURE
Approaches
A. Considered ~nd rejected
l)
To divide the grant among all law enforcement agencies
in Orange County on a per capita basis. Rejected because
of lack of control on purposes for which the money would
be used and lack of impact on nsrcotic.problem to diffused
efforts.
2)
To divide the grant among the
impact area of Oranoe County.
reasons as approach number 1.
five agencies within the
Rejected for the same
To use the entire grant for a public education campaign
against drug abuse in Orange County. Rejected because,
while public education campaigns can be effective, they
are basically short term and '[he approach would do nothing
to alleviate 'the over-burdening of the criminal justice
system in Orange County.
To use the grant strictly to provide support services
for the law enforcement agencies in Orange County; Rejected
because although highly needed, the approach would do
nothing to impact the line functions of, the law enforce-
ment agencies and would provide only a partial solution
to the problem.
5)
To use the grant to create a "super Task Force" of desig-
nated officers.in Orange County that would have orisJ.nal
jurisdiction o~?r all or selected mr~jor narcotic invest:[-
gations. Rejected because of the le,gal~ political and
philosophical questions and restrictions involved. Also
rejected because it defea~s.'the existing r~pport already
established between Task Force members..
B. Proposed Approach
l)
To provide a centre! inc]e× for the submission~ analyzation.,
evaluation and dJ. ssJmin~-tion of narcot:lc intelligence
formation to rasP, bare of the Orange County Dr'ug E~n~J NaPcotJc
Task Force and Associates.
To develop an(] present instruction '1:o Task ~orce m
that :i'~ designed top~-o,'~.~ a~e~ +~h~,~ basic :~nz o.~' ~ -~- ..... ~'t.~o~'" lleCeSsary
to invcstigetc viola
~loh.~ o~. the state narcot:ic laws.
3)
4) To as:-::i~:i lo,::~1 ~}[:ler '::Jes throu:sh coo:qdJ, no:l;io:,l o[' ef£k z'l' to
obtafi]l the max:'[mu:;t ben::f:it from th',:: source3 dra',~n upon.
This approach would greatly assist the smaller agencies
which are uno~.~otafled to the point that they cannot
conCuct an ongoing narcotic investigation.
5) To provide a vehicle for inter-agency exchange of infor-
mation on major narcotic traffikers in Orange County and
provide cooperation between investigators on a "line-
function" level.
C. Approach Selection
1) Criteria for Selection
a) Must provide for strict control of project,
financiat~ technical an~ human resources.
ie - the
b) Must benefit all components of the criminal justice
system, ie - police, courts~ corrections and citizens.
c) Must impact the major facets of dr~g abuse in Orange
County, ie - apathy, manpower, ~no~ledge and information.
d) Must meet CCCJ law enforcement drug abuse project guide-
D. Agency Se].ection
l)
Criteria for Selection
The proposed approach requires oh,~t the proponent be a law
enforcement agency '.4ith certain cnar,~cter~ot_c~.
a) C~mtra~ location.
b) Personnel trained in major narcotic investigations.
c) Capability of ?!ousing the Orshge County Narcotic: Inde×.
Conformance to Select':.on
a )
Santa Aha Police I~epartment has a central location
insofar ns Coun<y: gecgr0phic distribution;
graph;ic distribution; ?.~rcot~c activity; and
iate access to County government agencJe:: anU faci!.-
.ities.
].dZg ..... l'larcotic lnvesClgaC:icn Ur~its ~n O:canc~e (]olln'ky
tra:lne':] Jnv:~st:i%~