HomeMy WebLinkAbout75-130CJL:nr
RESOLUTION NO. 75- 130
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SANTA ANA, REVERSING THE ACTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION ON VARIANCE APPLICATION
75-35, DENYING SAID VARIANCE APPLICATION, AND
APPROVING APPEAL NO. 351 FILED THEREON BY
ROBERT J. MOORE
WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly held before the
City Council of the City of Santa Ana On September 2: 1975 ,
on Appeal No. 351, filed by Robert J. Moore in opposition to
the Planning Commission's approval of Variance Application
75-35;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based on such
public hearing and the oral and documentary evidence submitted
therein, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana does hereby
reverse the action of the Planning Commission approving Variance
Application 75-35, and does hereby deny said Variance Application,
and does hereby grant said Appeal No. 351 filed thereon in opposi-
tion to the Planning Commission's action.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby
adopts the attached findings of fact supporting denial of
Variance Application 75-35.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Santa Ana at its re§ular meeting held on the 2nd
day of September , 1975.
ATTEST:
CLEP~K OF THE COUNCIL
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.:
CITY OF SANTA ANA )
I, FLORENCE I. MALONE, do hereby certify that I am the
Clerk of the Council of the City of Santa Ana; that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced to said Council at its re§ular
meeting held on the 2nd day of September , 1975, and was
at said meeting passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEN : Evans, 0rtiz, Bricken, Garthe,
Brandt
NOES: COUNCILMEN
Yamamoto, Ward
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN None
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~CO~W,~TORNEY
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA FINDINGS OF FACT
SUPPORTING DENIAL OF VA 75-35
APPELLANT: Robert J. Moore, 1905 W.
APPLICANT: William R. Zschernig
ADDRESS & ZONING: 210 S. Broadway
AP 008-173-08
15th Street, Santa Aha, Ca.
P District
SDM 13-5-10
VA PURPOSE: To allow a lock and key shop in the P District.
STAFF RECO~/~ENDATION: Approval
COMMISSION ACTION AND VOTE: Approved, July 15, 1975.
AYES: Commissioners Gosse, Gr£set, Ankrum, O'Dell
NOES: Commissioners Yates, Winters
ABSENT~ Commissioner Acosta
DETAILS OF PROPOSAL:
1. Description of Proposal:
The applicant proposes to operate a lock and key shop in an
existing building. The leasable square footage for this
use is 11' X 21' (231 square feet). A portion of the
building is presently being utilized as a beauty shop.
The two-story building also has two apartments on the second
floor. The retail sales of locks and keys requires an
approved variance.
NOTE:
Based upon floor area for existing and proposed uses,
parking spaces required would require 8 open spaces
and 2 covered spaces (for residential use). Ten
open spaces exist on site at present.
2. Area Description:
A. Property:
45' x 142', or approximately 6,390 square
feet of land area, located approximately
100 feet southerly of Walnut Street on
Broadway.
B. Surrounding Development:
north:
east:
south:
west:
single family home
single family and professional office
doctor's office
single family
C. Street System: Broadway is a planned arterial street.
D. Comparable Applications or Circumstances:
VA 75-18, approved on 6/6/75.
Retail use of an older professional/commercial building.
E. Surrounding Zoning:. See attached SDM.
F. Present Use:
A beauty salon, vacant office and two residential units.
The building was converted to two office/commercial areas
on the front portion and two residential units in May, 1956.
3. General Plan Compatibility:
The General Plan designates the area as a multi-use corridor.
4. General Findings:
There are no special circumstances applicable to the
subject property which would cause the strict appli-
cation of the zoning ordinance to deprive the subject
property of privileges not otherwise at variance with
the intent and purposes of the Santa Ana Municipal
Code Zoning Chapter 41; and
(a)
The granting of the variance is not necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment for one or more substantial
property rights; and
(b)
(c) The granting of the variance will be detrimental to
the public welfare or injurous to surrounding property.
5. Specific Findings:
a®
ce
COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA PROCEDURES - NEGATIVE DECLARATION
VA 75-35 Page 2