Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout76-049REL:nr 5-6-76 RESOLUTION NO. 76-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, AFFIRMING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 76-8, APPROVING SAID CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION AND DENYING APPEAL NO. 362 FILED THEREON BY IRA F. MCDANIEL WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly held before the City Council of the City of Santa Aha on May 3, 1976, on Appeal No. 362 filed by Ira F. McDaniel in opposition to the Planning Commission's approval of Conditional Use Permit Application No. 76-8. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based on such public hearing and the oral and documentary evidence submitted therein, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana does hereby affirm the action of the Planning Commission approving Condi- tional Use Permit Application No. 76-8 and does hereby approve said Conditional Use Permit Application No. 76-8 and does here- by deny Appeal No. 362 filed thereon in opposition to the Planning Commission's action. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby adopts as its finding of fact for approval of Conditional Use Permit Application No. 76-8, those "Finding of Fact, Conditional Use Permit 76-8" prepared and submitted by the Planning Commis- sion, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though fully set forth. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana at its re§ula~ meeting held on the l'Tth day of Hay , 1976. ATTEST: CLERK OF THC COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 76-49 PAGE TWO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF SANTA ANA ) I, FLORENCE I. MALONE, do hereby certify that I am the Clerk of the Council of the City of Santa Ana; that the fore- going Resolution was introduced to said Council at its regular meeting held on the 1?th day of May , 1976, and was at said meeting pa~d adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES, COUNCILMEN: Ward, Brandt, Bricken, Ortiz, Yamamoto, Garthe NOES, COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT, COUNCILMEN: Evans APPROVED AS TO FORM: KEITH CITY ATTO~ FINDING OF FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 76-8 REPORT DATE Staff: 4/1/76 Commission: 4/12/76 APPLICANT: James A. and Florence B. Lukens ADDRESS & ZONING: 1601S. Raitt Street, Tract 9046 AP 408-291-1 R 1-PD District SDM 23-5-10 CUP PURPOSE: To construct a standard single family development in the R 1-PD District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval COMMISSION ACTION & VOTE: Approved 4/12/76 AYES: 'NOES: ABSENT: Commissioners Griset, O'Dell, Ankrum, Acosta, Gosse, Winters Commissioners None Commissioner Yates REASON FOR ACTION: That the granting of this conditional use permit with all attached conditions will not be detrimental to the public welfare or surrounding property and further it will not adversely effect the General Plan of the City. DETAILS OF PROPOSAL: 1. Description of Proposal: The applicant proposes to construct detached single family residences on 6,000 sq.ft, lots that all have frontage on a public street {standard single family residence tract). Total lots involved in the project are 85. The unit sizes are proposed to range between 1300 sq.ft, and 1750 sq.ft. 2. Area Description: Property: A rectangular Shaped parcel with 658 feet of frontage on Raitt Street, a depth of 1,123 feet and a total area of approximately 16.96 acres. B. Surrounding Development: North: East: South: West: Salvation Army Headquarters, drive-in dairy, commercial stores single family residences single family residences Junior High School across Raitt Street C. Street System: Raitt Street is designated as a planned arterial highway. D~ Comparable Applications or Circumstances: None in the immediate area. CUP 76-8 Page 1. CUP 76°8 James A. and Florence B. Lukens e e e E. Surrounding Zoning: See attached SDM. F. Present Use: vacant property ~en,~ral plan Compatibility: The General Plan designates this area for low density residential. Reasons for Staff Recommendation: A. The proposal meet~ the intent and purpose of the R 1 Single Family ' Residential District. B. The proposal will not be detrimental to the General Plan or detri- mental to existing and proposed 'uses in the area. If the Commission approves the application, the following standard require- merits must be met: A. Planning: 2, 3, 14 B. Public Works: File a tract map with the City and comply with all Council approved conditions. NOTE: Tentative Tract Map No. 9046 is in process. The following requirements must also be met: A. The entire subdivision shall have a 6-foot high decorative concrete block wall, measured from highest finished grade. B. That the Raitt Street entrance way into the subdivision be decorative in design gnd meet with the approval of the Planning Director. C. Architectural elevations shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. D. That each lot within the subdivision contain a minimum of twenty-four (24) inch box tree to be placed in the front yard setback area. E. Plot plan shall meet with the approval of the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. Police Department: F. All exterior doors are to be solid core in design. G. Those doors which have'glass within 40 inches of the locking device shall be equipped with a double cylinder deadbolt lock with a minimum one inch throw. All exterior doors with glass 40 inches or more from the locking device may be equipped with a single or double cylinder deadbolt lock with a minimum of one inch throw. I. Glas~ sliding doors are to be so secured that they cannot be merely lifted out of the track. J. Sliding Windows are to be so constructed to restrict them from being moved and prevent being lifted out of the track. CUP 76-8 Page 2. CUP 76-8 James A. and Florence B. Lukens All exterior doors of the residence shall be equipped with a lighting device Which would illuminate the door 'and doorway and capable of illuminating the door and doorway with the equivalent of a 60 watt incandescent light bulb. L. Overhead garage doors are to be secured with two hasps placed on the exterior side of the door on opposing edges. Garage side doors shall be solid core in construction and be equipped with a deadbolt locking device with a minimum one inch throw. If said door has glass within 40 inches of the locking device, it shall be equipped with a double cylinder deadbolt lock with a minimum of a one inch throw. COMPLIANCE WITH C.E.Q.A. PROCEDURES: Negative Declaration jr EVERETT WINTERS, CHAIRMAN SANTA ANA PLANNING COMMISSION CUP 76-8 Page 3.