HomeMy WebLinkAbout77-015RESOLUTION NO. 77-15
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SANTA ANA ENDORSING THE PRIORITY PLAN FOR
EXPENDITURES FOR JURISDICTIONS WITHIN THE
COUNTY OF ORANGE FROM THE NEJEDL~'--HART STATE,
URBANt AND COASTAL PARK BOND ACT OF 1976
WHEREAS, S.B. 3121 approved by the Governor of the
State of California on June 24, 1976, created the Nejedly-
Hart State, Urban, and Coastal Park Bond Act of 1976; and
WHEREAS, the voters of the State of California on
November 2, 1976, adopted the Nejedly-Hart State, Urban,
and Coastal Park Bond Act of 1976, and authorized the issuance
of bonds in the amount of $280~Million to provide funds to ac-
quire, develop, and restore real property for state and local
park, beach, recreational and historical purposes; and
WHEREAS, approximately $6.9 Million of these funds
will be available for use by Orange County and its cities and
districts for the acquisition and development of high priority
projects; and
WHEREAS, Section 5096.127 of the Public Resources Code
requires that each county of the State submit a priority plan
of expenditures to the State Department of Parks and Recreation
prior to June 30, 1978; and
WHEREAS, the plan must be approved by at least 50
percent of the cities and districts within the County represent-
ing at least 50 percent of the population of the cities and
districts, and by the Count Board of Supervisors; and
WHEREAS, similar provisions were required for State
Beach, Park, Historical and Recreational Facilities Bond Act
of 1974, and after numerous meetings more than 50 percent of
the jurisdictions representing more than 50 percent of the
population agreed that the expenditure plan should provide
approximately 29 percent of the available to Orange County in
recognition of its regional park responsibility as well as its
local park responsibility and the remaining 71 percent to be
made availabe to cities and districts on an equal per capita
basis except that no jurisdiction would receive less than
$19,000.00; and
WHEREAS, the Orange County Division, League of Califor-
nia Cities, Ad Hoc Task Force ~or Prop. #2 met January 14,
1977 and adopted the attached priority plan for expenditures
by unanimous vote;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA: that said Council hereby approves the
priority plan for expenditures for Orange County as identified
above. Said plan is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
RESOLUTION NO. 77-15
PAGE TWO
ADOPTED, this 7th
by the following vote;
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
day of February , 1977,
Evans, Bricken, 0rtiz, Yamamoto,
Garthe, Ward
None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Brandt
ATTEST:
FLORL"NCE I. MALON~ ~~~L__
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KEITH L. GOW, CITY ATTORNEY
Proposed Priority Plan of Expenditures
1976 State Bond Act
Based upon the 1976 Special Census, the estimated $6.9 million of 1976
State Bond Act monies have been allocated using the ratio of city popu-
lation to County population after allocating $2 million to the County
Regional Park Program.
City ,Population Allocation
Anaheim
Brea
Buena Park
Costa Mesa
Cypress Park and Recreation District
Fountain Valley
Fullerton '-
Garden'Grove
Huntington Beach
Irvine
Laguna Beach
La Habra
La Palma
Los AlamlCos
Rewport-Beach
Orange ,~.~.~.z ·
Placentla .
San Clemente
San Juan Capistrano
Santa Aha
Seal Beach
Stanton
Tustin
Villa Park
Westminster
¥orba.Linda
196,382 $ 562,624
21,920 62,799
61,656 176,640
76,404 218,892
46,112 132,108
52,814 151,308
94,475 270,664
118,179 338,575
151,500' 434,936
35,393 101,398
16,422 47,048
43,208 123,788
14,744 42,241
10,903 31,~36
63,101 180,780
82,661 236,818
31,281 89,618
22,100* 63,315
13,658 39,129
179,499 514~252
27,671 7'9,275
23,150' 66,323
29,799* 85,372
6,841 19,613
67,437 ' 193,202
23,266 66,65~
Sub-total-Incorporated Area .
1,510,581
$4,327,709
Sub-total-Unincorporated Area 211,513
Total' Estimated County Population 1,722,094
605,970
$4,933,679
*City did not participate in the 1976 Special Census, consequently have supplied
a 1976 estimated population based on a census performed in 1973 or 1974.
The above dollar figures may cha~ge slightly when the state provides the exact
amount of the allocation to the county. The percentage distribution would re-
main unchanged.
LML:rm3Ola(l)