HomeMy WebLinkAbout81-102REL: adg
6/3/81
RESOLUTION NO. 81-102
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA ANA MAKING ENVIRONMENTAL
FINDINGS NECESSARY FOR THE PROPOSED
DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND
HAROLD NEMETZ FOR THE SALE AND DEVELOP-
MENT OF THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN
THE SANTA ANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Santa Ana has prepared an Initial Study of the
environmental impact of the proposed Disposition and
Development Agreement between the Agency and Harold Nemetz;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Aha
has reviewed and considered the above said Initial Study and
the final Environmental Impact Report for the Santa Ana
Redevelopment Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Agency has found on the basis of the
Initial Study that the environmental impact of the proposed
Agreement is essentially the same as in the previous
Environmental Impact Report; and that there is no additional
information or data available requiring supplementation of
the previous Environmental Impact Report; and
WHEREAS, said Initial Study conforms to the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et se_~), the
"Guidelines for the Implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970," as amended, adopted by
the Secretary for Resources of the State of California, and
the procedures for implementation of the Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 adopted by Resolution No. 75-4 of the
Agency.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, AS FOLLOWS:
The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
1. Neither the approval nor the implementation
of the proposed Agreement will cause substantial changes in
the Redevelopment Project, or with respect to the
circumstances under which the Project is to be undertaken,
which will require major revisions in the Environmental
Impact Report previously adopted for the Project due to the
involvement of new environmental impacts not covered in said
previous Environmental Impact Report.
2. NO new information of substantial importance
to the project has become available which shows that the
project will have one or more significant effects not
discussed previously in the Environmental Impact Report; or
that significant effects previously examined will be more
severe than shown in the Environmental Impact Report; or
that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found
not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would
substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the
RESOLUTION NO. 81-102
PAGE TWO
project; or that mitigation measures or alternatives which
were not previously considered in the Environmental Impact
Report would substantially lessen one or more significant
effects on the environment.
3. The proposed action will have no significant
effect on the environment, except as identified and
considered in the previous Environmental Impact Report.
ADOPTED this l§~ day of
1980, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June ,
Acosta, Griset, tuxembourger,
McGuigan, Serrato
Markel
ABSENT: COUNC ILMEMBERS: Bricken
ATTEST
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
EDWARD J. COOPER '
CITY ATTORNEY