The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About75B - BOWERS MUSEUM-2032 N Main REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION .CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MAY 17, 2004 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2004-02 FOR THE BOWERS MUSEUM EXPANSION ~ ~ CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED D As Recommended D As Amended D Ordinance on 1'1 Reading D Ordinance on 2" Reading D Implementing Resolution D Set Public Hearing For tI QdJa-- CITY MANAGER CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Moni toring Program, Environmental Review No.2 0 04 -12 and consider public comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration. 4IÞ,2. Adopt a resolution approving General Plan PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Amendment No. 2004-02. On April 26, 2004, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2004-02 and approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004-12 and the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Bowers Museum expansion project by a vote of 7:0 (Exhibit A). FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. St¿tÆ¿fJ~ Executive Director Planning & Building Agency BSP:rb bsp\staff reports\gpao4-02.cc . 758-1 Koo- 5/10/04 RESOLUTION NO. 2004-038 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) TO DISTRICT CENTER (DC) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2032 NORTH MAIN STREET (GPA 2004-02) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. B. General Plan Amendment No. 2004-02 has been filed with the City of Santa Ana to amend the General Plan Land Use Designation from General Commercial (GC) to District Center (DC) for the property located at 2032 North Main Street to allow for the expansion of the Bowers Museum. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed public hearing on April 26, 2004, on General Plan Amendment No. 2004- 02 and determined by a unanimous vote to recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2004- 02. The Council finds that General Plan Amendment No. 2004-02 is consistent with the General Plan, including but not limited to its policies and goals of: 1. Promote the balance of land uses to address basic community needs. Land Use Element Goal 1.0. C. D. Encourage the development of commercial and nonprofit recreational facilities and services. Land Use Element Policy 1.7. Protect and enhance developments sites and districts which are unique community assets that enhance the quality of life. Land Use Element Goal 4.0. Improve the physical appearance of the City through development of districts that project a sense of place, positive community image, and quality environment. Urban Design Element Goal 1.0 The Mitigated Negative Declaration as approved does not include the parking structure identified therein. The City Council has determined that any impact to parking because of the future expansion will be addressed 2. 3. 4. 758-2 Resolution No. 2004-XXX Page 1 of3 . . . when the expansion project comes forward for subsequent approvals. At that time, mitigation measures will be in place to reduce the project's parking impacts. Mitigation options that could be considered to address parking impacts include additional surface parking and/or parking structures; satellite parking with shuttle; promotion of alternative transportation; adjustment of event schedules. All references to a five- story parking structure or the parking demands in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are hereby removed. Section 2. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the initial study and the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared with respect to this Project. The City Council has, as a result of its consideration and the evidence presented at the hearings on this matter, determined that, as required pursuant to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, Environmental Review No. 2004-12, adequately addresses the expected environmental impacts of this Project. On the basis of this review, the City Council finds that there is no evidence from which it can be fairly argued that the Project will have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The City Council hereby certifies and approves the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program and directs that the Notice of Determination be prepared and filed with the County Clerk of the County of Orange in the manner required by law. Pursuant to Title XIV, Califomia Code of Regulations ("CCR") § 735.5(c)(1), the City Council has determined that, after considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have the potential for any adverse effect on wildlife resources or the ecological habitat upon which wildlife reso!,Jrces depend. The proposed project exists in an urban environment characterized by paved concrete, roadways, surrounding buildings and human activity. Therefore, pursuant to Fish and Game Code § 711.2 and Title XIV, CCR § 735.5(a)(3), the payment of Fish and Game Department filing fees is not required in conjunction with this project. Section 3. The City Council hereby, approves General Plan Amendment No. 2004-02 to change the land use designation for the property located at 2032 North Main Street from General Commercial (GC) to District Center (DC). Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately after its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of May, 2004 Miguel A. Pulido 'Mayor 758-3 Resolution No. 2004-XXX Page 2 of 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Kylee O. Otto Deputy City Attomey AYES: Council members NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2004-038 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Cou ncil City of Santa Ana 758-4 Resolution No. 2004-XXX Page 3 of 3 REQUEST FOR Planning Commission Action ~LANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 26, 2004 (~ft! ~~~ }~~~ V "'\J PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY' TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2004-02 FOR THE BOWERS MUSEUM EXPANSION APPROVED 0 As Recommended 0 As Amended 0 Set Public Hearing For DENIED 0 Applicant's Request 0 Staff Recommendation CONTINUED TO Prepared by Bob St. Paul 4~.~' Executi Director ~1'OOi"9 M'009" RECOMMENDED ACTION Recommend that the City Council: 1. . Approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, Environmental Review No. 2004-12. 2. Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2004-02. DISCUSSION Request of Applicant The Bowers Museum is requesting approval of a general plan amendment to change the land use designation of the site to District Center (DC) and allow for future expansion to the Bowers Museum. Property Description The Bowers Museum is located at 2032 North Main Street, which is the northwest corner of Main and Twentieth Streets. The site is approximately 108,519 square feet (2.49 acres) in size and currently contains approximately 61,000 square foot building that was originally constructed in 1932. In 1992, a 52,000 square foot expansion was completed on the site which added a restaurant, gallery space, a gift shop, and a conference room to the facility. Due to the historical and cultural significance of the Bowers Museum, the property was listed on 411fhe Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties in October of 2000. The museum currently contains a landscaped courtyard that is surrounded by a 2,500 square foot restaurant and outdoor patio with seating for 160 patrons, several exhibit galleries, a 2,100 square foot multi-purpose room EXHIBIT A 758-5 General Plan Amendment April 26, 2004 Page 2 No. 2004-02 and a gift shop. Surrounding land uses include commercial to the north, south and east, and a mixture of commercial and residential to the west (Exhibits 1 and 2) . Project Description The Bowers Museum is in the process of securing a $4 million dollar grant from the State of California to facilitate various improvements to the museum. The request to change the existing land use designation from General Commercial (GC) to District Center (DC) will assist in obtaining the State grant. If secured, the funding is anticipated to be used to construct a future addition to the museum. In conjunction with the funding proposal, a conceptual plan for a 54,000 square foot, two- story addition has been submitted for review. Since Bowers is still in the process of reviewing various expansion alternatives, a final plan has not been submitted for formal City review. Once these final plans have been developed, they will be submitted to the Planning Commission for further review (Exhibits 3, 4 and 5) . Analysis of the Issues The Bowers Museum proposes to change the General Plan land use designation from General Commercial (GC) to District Center (DC) for the existing museum site. Approval of this amendment will create general plan consistency within the area and will facilitate the future expansion to the museum. District Centers were created to serve as the City's major retail, office, residential and cultural activity areas and serve as anchors to commercial corridors to accommodate the most intense development in the City. The proposed District Center (DC) land use designation is consistent with land use designations currently found in the area and is the most appropriate designation for the potential use of the museum. The Urban Design Element of the General plan recognizes the Bowers Museum as a node, which promotes culture, entertainment, and business activity at this location. Further, the node designation implements the City's vision,of becoming the dynamic urban center of Orange County. The proposed general plan amendment promote unity of design, purpose and the museum district area. for the Bowers Museum site will aesthetics, further distinguishing 758-6 8eneral Plan Amendment pril 26, 2004 Page 3 No. 2004-02 The approval of the general plan amendment will promote a balance of land uses to address basic community needs as identified in the General Plan. Further, this amendment will promote more consistent land use polices for this portion of the Main Street corridor in that the Bowers Museum is the only remaining property without the District Center designation. Approval of the amendment will also allow the future expansion of the Bowers Museum and will enhance an existing land use that provides community and regional economic and cultural benefits. Further, the project will enhance a dynamic urban space that fosters cultural, entertainment, and business activities within the City as encouraged in the Urban Design Element of the General Plan. Based upon the above analysis, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment No. 2004-02. The attached mitigated negative declaration has been prepared for the approval of the general plan amendment and to facilitate the proposed museum expansion. The environmental document has been revised to _incorporate a mitigation measure to clarify that any use on the city- ~wned surface parking lot site will require further environmental document analyzing the use's impact on the surrounding homes and businesses. The mitigation measure clarifies that the future use will be subject to pubic hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. CEQA Compliance In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, Environmental Review No. 2004-12 has been prepared for this project (Exhibits 6, 7 and 8) . ~~~. Bob St. Paul Associate Planner v~ BSP:JM bsp\staff reports\gpa04-02.042604.pc . 758-7 ~~- R1 R1 , ¡ R1 ^' i A1 . [jj V '''' ~y, A1 R1 , R1 R1 i R1 R1 ~. . R1 0 R1 ] ~: ( R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 ( R1 R1 ! R1 R1 R1 , R1 ( R1 R1 ( R2 w R1 0 ~ :'7 ¡, w R1 j R1 - -' , R1 R1 R1 R1 ' R1 R1 , ¡ R1 ¡ R1 i . R1 R1 ' R1 ". , t R1 "n R1-B R2 ."' A1 A1 A2' R2 . R; ...,..,..'''' C4 1 : ~R2-t.. ; 8D-73 C1 w, " C1 ~ C1 R3- > HDII A1 GENERALAGRIGULTURAL .B PARKING MODIFICATION C.SM COMMERCIAL SOUTH MAIN C1 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL C1.MD COMM. COMMERCIAL/MUSEUM DISTRICT C2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL C3 CENTRAL BUSINESS C3-A CENTRAL BUSINESS-ARTIST VILLAGE C4 PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER C5 ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL CR GC "' "2 "0 0 P PCD PRD COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL GOVERNMENT CENTER LIGHT INDUSTRIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL MILITARY OPERATIONS OPEN SPACE PROFESSIONAL PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT RI R2 R3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE MULTIPLE DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SUBURBAN APARTMENTS RESIDENTIAL ESTATE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIFIC PlAN R4 RE SD SP A GPA 04-2 BOWERS MUSEUM EXPANSION 2032 NORTH MAIN STREET fA ØíV' - - = 500 FEET 1" = 1000 FEET p L A N N N G A N D B U I EXHIBIT 1 758-8 L D N G A G E N c y . '" '" ~ " ~ "' 0 ~ ø: III ~ " . . A P LAN N I ~ ~ ~ < " '" " '" '" '" '" " " '" " " ~ " < - .iJt'¡)¡,'~:<;'li{:.;C;:;Ç."f""'r,,~;i;;¡;1'>tf''i,d'!' .. , ., ..n --". - -. .. " , , COMMf./ó" ' P. R .cr J E C T .. i> " ¡--~ '\";/ " ~ ~ ., S I T E ' .. I : ~ s; ! : ~ " i : ' ':,1 " TWENTIETH RESID NTI L I þOM ERCIAL R IE ~ I E N T I A L I NINTEENTH ST. TfÐI[J ~ < - <> '" R~ '" '" '" " <> / ¡.: (/ ~ .---::- < < - - <> ~ '" ~ '" '" " - '" " <> '" ST. z <i ::E ~ < - <> '" '" " <> '" A G A #ý' ENe Y ~ " '" " '" '" GPA 04-2 BOWERS MUSEUM EXPANSION 2032 NORTH MAIN STREET N G AND B U EXHIBIT 2 758-9 I L 0 N G I '/", /"///7T'!'.7ï'7T. ;' . -. ---- .-- . ;' ;' ~ ~ ~. .1. . , I , ,~. ! C ,I ";;:" i ¡ }'L ! i ~.r : I nil , I , I , ",I ~i <><, ~I zl - , -<I :¿, I , I , 1 , I , I , I , I , I , I , li¡' ; n ~ Q n 111 a¡1 I GPA 04-2 V!Øl"1U . . . ~ ---~-'~-----_._'-' 0 --- " ¡,- r "f 'V. .. t '., =l z 0 ~ I- :;¡ ~ «~ uJ VI L.U >~ :;¡ :2 w~ ~ uJ ...J" VI C w~ eo:: uJ 3 (/)1- 0 rJJ ex:> « w GPA 04-2 758~"'BIT 4 r I l~- 'I ~ , I ! ¡ , , ! :...:J ¡O D ¡¡j t- o w <n G 0 .rM~2 - ~ ".- """'".~ -- ¡ ! ~ , ¡ ----~I i t- o iw '<n i , , , i z 0 f- 0 0 -< l:) z ~ ::¡J: ~~ ~ f-! ~'" Q¡ ~ 0 f ti. '" < ~ ~ z! :;¡ ¿ ::> w '" ::> ¿ '" '" w ~ 0 cc () . . . MITIGATION MEASURE Prior to the issuance of building permits, the final design of any use on the surface parking lot site shall be subject subsequent environmental reviews and be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. Building plans for the proposed project shall reflect a 30- foot setback between the parking structure and the existing single-family residence to the west. Prior to issuance of demolition and or grading permits a landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department. The landscape plan shall reflect BOWERS MUSEUM EXPANSION ER 2004-12 TIMING Prior to Building Permits Prior to Building Permits Prior to demolition or Grading Permits RESPONSIBLE AGENCY Building/Planning Agency Building/Planning Agency Building/Planning Agency EXHIBIT 6 75B~1313 VERIFICATION that 25-foot high canopy trees are provided in the landscape area between the parking structure and the single family home and that the western elevation of the parking structure is provided with landscaped vines. school buses, transit bus or other commercial motor vehicles shall be required to manually turn off the bus or vehicle engine upon arriving at the parking structure and shall not restart no more than 30 seconds before departing. Signs shall posted parking structure informing drivers of idling restrictions. Ongoing in be Ongoing the bus the Prior issuance certificate to of of Prior to Certificate of Building/Planning Agency Building/Planning Agency Building/Planning Agency Page 2 of 13 758-14 . occupancy permits, a staging area for passenger queuing shall be established. 8 During construction, the contractor would be required to comply SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403 to suppress dust generated by construction operations. To ensure compliance with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403, grading plans and demolition plans for the proposed project shall reflect the following notes: . 1.AII material excavated or graded will be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering with complete coverage shall occur at least twice daily, once in the late morning and once Occupancy During Construction Building/Planning Agency Page 3 of 13 758-15 after work is done for the day. 2.AII clearing and earthwork activities shall cease during period of high winds (winds greater than 25 mph averaged over one hour) or during Stage 1 or Stage 2 smog episodes. 3.Streets surrounding the project site should be cleaned at the end of each day of construction. 4.AII material transported off site shall either be sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. 5.The amount of area disturbed by clearing and earthwork activities shall be minimized at all times. 6.Equipment engines shall be maintained in ..f',jiIije 4 of 13 7:>Þ-16 . good condition and in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. To the extent feasible, gasoline powered equipment shall be used for onsite and offsite construction activities. . Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall submit for review and approval a surface drainage/grading plan/erosion control plan, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, showing the direction and means of flow to adjacent streets. The plan is to include existing and proposed elevations at and adjacent to all property lines. Drainage routed to the street must be directed beneath the sidewalk and . Prior to grading Permits Public Works Agency Page 5 of 13 758-17 through the curb. Prior issuance demolition permits, an asbestos and lead paint survey shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Santa Ana Environmental Coordinator for review. All handling and removal of asbestos containing building materials and lead paint shall be performed by, a certified California State licensed contractor that has been certified under the California Occupational Safety Health Administration. and Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall provide proof of coverage under NPDES General to Prior to of issuance of demolition permits During Construction Prior to grading permits Building/Planning Agency Building/Planning Public Works Agency 75~:'få3 . . . construction Activity Storm Water Permit, which includes a copy of the project permit number and two copies of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall prepare an NPDES post- construction storm water management plan per Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) that includes all structural and non-structural Best Management Practices for the project. Submi t and have approved surface drainage/utility plan to include all structural Best management Practices. Provide two copies of the Water Quality Management Plan Prior to Grading Permits Public Works Agency a Page 7 of 13 758-19 (WQMP) that includes a description of all-applicable Structural and Non-Structural Best Management Practices, which would apply to this project. Prior to issuance of grading permits the project applicant shall receive approval of NPDES Permit for the State regional Water Quality Control Board for proposed onsite dewatering operations. Building plans for the proposed project shall reflect that all restaurant uses be fitted with a grease interceptor to the size and capacity as designated by the Building Safety Division of the City of Santa Ana to mitigate impacts on the local sanitary sewer Prior to Grading Permits Prior to Building Permits Public Works Building/Planning Agency 75'n~~Ö . system regional quality. grease interceptor shall regularly maintained so as to remain fully functional. and water Such be The proposed project would be subject to City of Santa Ana Federal Clean Water Protection Enterprise Fees. Prior to Building Permits Public Works Agency Prior to Prior to Public Works issuance of a Grading AgenCY . grading permit, Permits the project applicant shall submit a final surface water runoff evaluation for review and approval showing existing and proposed facilities and methods of draining the site without exceeding the capacity of any street or adjacent storm drain facility. Prior to the Prior to Public Works . issuance of Building Agency building permits Permits the project 75ë~213 applicant shall be responsible for the construction of onsite storm drain systems. The first floor where the bus parking stalls would be located shall have a solid masonry wall enclosure without openings along the entirety of the west side of the parking structure. Mechanical equipment used in the new or renovated structures shall be acoustically engineered, incorporating mufflers, enclosures, and parapets to minimize noise impacts. The Bowers museum shall provide signage within the parking structure that would prohibit car alarms that are overly sensitive or Prior to Building Permits Prior to Building Permits Prior to Certificate of Occupancy Building/Planning Agency Building/Planning Building/Planning Agency Pa~1O of 13 75tS-22 . . . faulty. A neighborhood liaison from the Museum shall be available to respond to any complaints regarding noise from the parking structure. Demolition Plans, Grading Plans and Building Plans for the proposed project shall note that construction activities on the project site shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. No construction equipment on the project site shall operate including warming up until after 7:00 a.m. All construction equipment shall be properly maintained and tuned to Prior to Demolition and grading permits Building/Planning Agency During Building/Planning Construction Agency During Building/Planning Construction Agency 7ga:~~3 minimize noise emissions, All equipment shall be fi tted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers no less efficient than those originally installed, Stockpiling and vehicle staging areas shall be located away from existing residential uses. The name and telephone number of a contact person shall be posted on-site, and Construction shall be subject to any and all provisions set forth by the City of Santa Ana Planning Department. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall submit evidence to the City of Prior to Building Permits Building/Planning Agency 75B~2f43 . . . Santa Ana Building and Planning Department that appropriate school impact fees have been paid. Restripe Street provide northbound southbound travel lanes along Main Street between 20th Street and Buffalo Avenue/I-5 SB On-Ramp by removing on- street parking. Main to 3 and 2 Convert existing undivided configuration along Main Street between 20th Street and Buffalo Avenue/I-5SB On- Ramp to a divided configuration. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy Prior to Certificate of Occupancy Public Works Agency Building/Planning Agency Page 13 of 13 758-25 STATE OF CALIFORNIA BtISINRSS TRANSPORT AnON AND HOt ISING AGENCY ARNOLD SCHW ARZENEGGER (jovernor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION District 12 3337 Michelson Drive, Suite 380 Irvine, CA 92612-8894 949-724-2000 RECEIVED APR 0 2 2004 SANTA ANA PlANNING DEPT. ~ Flex your power! Be energy efficient! March 30, 2004 Mr. Dan Bolt, Environmental Coordinator City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza PO Box 1988, M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92702 File: IGRlCEQA SCH#: None Log #: 1377 Interstate 5 Subject: Bowers Museum Expansion Initial StudylMitigated Negative Declaration Dear Mr. Bolt, Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Initial StudylMitigated Negative Declaration (ISIMND) for the Bowers Museum Expansion Project dated March 2004. This project, located in the city of Santa Ana, proposes a 53,950 square foot, two-story expansion to the existing museum and the construction of a five-level parking structure with approximately 15,000 square feet of retail space on the ground floor. The nearest State transportation facility is Interstate 5. Caltrans District 12 status is a reviewing agency on this project and we have the following comments from our Traffic Operations Branch: 1. The minimum level of service (LOS) acceptable for State transportation facilities is "D". Any intersections with LOS "E" or "F" (on State right-of-way) will create a significant impact; 2. The signalized intersection on State right-of-way (ROW) needs to be analyzed using the Highway Capacity Methodology (HCM) software; 3. Please include the intersection at the northbound (NB) off-ramp and Main Street as part of the traffic analysis; 4. Please also include traffic coming from NB Interstate 5 as part ofthe distribution; "Callrans improves mobility across California" EXHIBIT 8 Page 1 of 17 758-26 . Mr. Dan Bott City of Santa Ana March 29, 2004 Page 2 5. In general, it is recommended that the project's construction not be scheduled during the busy summer/tourist season, and that the rainy season (October 1 "-April 30th) be considered and provisions be made so there is little interference of construction traffic with the nonnal commuter traffic flow on the highway. Peak commute hours include: . 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.; . 11 :00 a.m. to 1 :00 p.m.; and, . 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. We appreciate your cooperation in doing your share in ensuring that the traffic circulation on the local and state highway is not degraded during and after project construction. Please continue to keep us infonned of any future developments, which could potentially impact the transportation facilities. If you have any questions or need to contact us, please do not hesitate to call Becky Shumway at (949) 440-4461. Sincerely, ~OBER F. JOSEPH ~ - Chief 0 Advanced Planni District 12' cc: Terri Pencovic, Caltrans HQ IGR/Community Planning Gail Farber, District 12 Deputy Director of Planning . "Ca/trafU improves mobility across California" Page 2 of 17 758-27 II P&D Consultants Plannersl Engineers 999 TOWN AND COUNTRY ROAD, 4TH FLOOR ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92868 (714) 835-4447 PHONE (714) 2S:H)102 FAX www.pdoonsultants.can MEMORANDUM TO: Dan Bott, Environmental Coordinator City of Santa Ana FROM: Chris Pruitt, P&D Consultants, Inc. DATE: April 27, 2004 SUBJECT: RESPONSES TO COMMENTS FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DATED MARCH 30, 2004). BOWERS MUSEUM EXPANSION Dear Mr. Bott, P & D Consultant has reviewed the comment letter fnom Caltrans regarding the subject pnoject. Our responses are summarized in the body of this memorandum. COMMENTS and RESPONSES Comment 1 - The minimum level of service (LOS) acceptable for State transportation facilities is "D". Any intersection with LOS "E" or "F" (on State right-of-way) will create a significant impact; Response: As discussed in the Section 2.8 Regulatory Framework in the Traffic Impact Study Report, the City of Santa Ana has established LOS D or better as the acceptable LOS for intersections in the City except in Major Development Areas, where LOS E is considered acceptable. The two ramp intersections (1-5 SB on-ramp at Main St./Buffalo Ave and 1-5 SB off-ramp at Main St./Santa Clara Ave.) are located in the Major Development Area. Comment 2 - The signalized intersection on State right-of-way needs to be analyzed using the Highway Capacity Methodology (HCM) software; Page 3 of 17 758-28 . Bowers Museum Expansion Responses to Comments 4/27104 Response: Attachment A of this memorandum includes an analysis completed in accordance with the analysis procedures of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) for the intersections included in the study area that are related to Caltrans facilities. As shown in Table 1 (LOS Summary) in Attachment A, both intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service under future conditions with and without the subject project based on the 2000 HCM analysis procedures. It should be noted, the Level of Service (LOS) E is acceptable for intersections in Major Development Areas. Table 2 of Attachment A summarizes a comparison of the LOS analysis results based on the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology and HCM methodology. As shown, there are three cases in which the HCM methodology results are different from the ICU methodology. However, the results are actually very close. For the intersection #4 under the existing conditions, the ICU result (0.699, B) is at very high range of LOS B criteria, but the HCM result (26.4, C) is at low range of LOS C. Refer to Table 3 for the LOS criteria used for both the ICU and HCM Methodologies. For the intersection #4 under the condition of 2005 without project, the ICU result (0.903, E) is at very low range of LOS E criteria, but the HCM result (51.3, D) is at high range of LOS D criteria. Similarly, for the intersection #5 under the existing conditions, the ICU result (0.590, A) is at very high range of LOS A criteria, but HCM result (15.7 B) is at low range of LOS B criteria. . Detailed LOS worksheets for the HCM analysis are included in Attachment B. The HCM methodology and ICU methodology resulted in different LOS results for three cases because the intersections were operating near the thresholds of changing from one LOS to another. However, the differences in LOS will not change the analysis results because they are all at acceptable level of service. It should be noted, the ICU and HCM methodologies use different measures of effectiveness for signalized intersections. The ICU is primarily based on volume-to-capacity ratios and the HCM is based on a measure of delay. Typically, a comparison of the two different methodologies will provide similar LOS results. Comment 3 - Please included the intersection at the northbound (NB) off-ramp and Main Street as part of the traffic analysis; Response: As shown in Figure 2.6-2 of the Traffic Impact Study Report, at intersection #5, 21 project vehicles go north and 23 project vehicles go south. A total of 44 vehicles will be generated north of intersection #5. Therefore, intersections to the north of intersection #5 (including the intersection of Main St. and 1-5 NB off-ramp) were not included because they were below the 51 trip threshold. Definition of the study area is further discussed in Section 1.3 of the Traffic Study. . P&D Consultants, Inc. An.AECOM Company Page 4 of 17 Page 2 of 5 758-29 Bowers Museum Expansion Responses to Comments 4f27/04 Comment 4 - Please also include traffic coming from NB Interstate 5 as part of the distribution; Response: As shown in Figure 2.5-1 of the traffic Study, traffic coming from 1-5 NB has already been included in the study. Some project traffic will use Broadway, some use Main SI. and a small percentage will use 17"' street to access the project site. Comment 5 - In general, it is recommended that the project's construction not be scheduled during the busy summer/tourist season, and that the rainy season (October 1.' - April 30"') be considered and provisions be made so there is little interference of construction traffic with the normal commuter traffic flow on the highway. Peak commute hours include: . 6:00am to 9:00 am; . 11 :OOam to 1 :00 pm; and . 3:00pm to 6:00 pm. Response: Comments noted. CLOSING P&D Consultants is pleased to provide this response letter. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please give me a call at (714) 835-4447. Respectfully submitted, Chris Pruitt P&D Consultants, Inc. P&D Consultants. Inc. An AECOM Company Page 5 of 17 Page 3 of 5 758-30 Bowers Museum Expansion Responses to Comments 4/27104 . Attachment A Table 1 Intersection Level of Service Analysis Summary (2000 Hiohwav Caoacitv Manual Methodoloo\ ,) Index Intersection Traffic condition Delav LOS #4 Main Street at Buffalo Ave.ll- ExlstjnQ 26.4 C . 5 SB on-ramp 2005 without proiect 51.3 D' 2005 with project 54.5 E 2025 without project 38.4 D 2025 with oroiect 43.3 D #5 Main Street at Santa Clara ExlstinQ 15.7 B Ave.ll-5 ramps 2005 without proiect 24.6 C 2005 with orolect 26.4 C 2025 without oroiect 37.5 D 2025 with oroject 40.3 D 8 om Danson etween an met 0 ooav ICU HCM Intersectlo methodoloav Methodoloav Index n Traffic condition ICU LOS Delav (Sec.) LOS #4 Main Street ExjstinQ 0.699 B 26.4 C at Buffalo 2005 without proiect 0.903 E 51.3 D Ave.ll-5 SB 2005 with oroiect 0.917 E 58.2 E on-ramp 2025 without oroiect 0.824 D 38.4 D 2025 with oroiect 0.840 D 43.3 D #5 Msln Street ExistlnQ 0.590 A 15.7 B at Santa 2005 without proiect 0.770 C 24.6 C Clara Ave.ll- 2005 with project 0.800 C 26.4 C 5 ramps 2025 without oroiect 0.860 D 37.5 D 2025 with proiect 0.900 D 40.3 D C b Table 2 ICU d HCM h d I Table 3 level of Service Criteria . LOS ICU methodology HCM methodology nCU) (Delav) A 0.00 - 0.60 <-10 B 0.61 - 0.70 > 10 - 20 C 0.71 - 0.80 >20-35 D 0.81 - 0.90 >35-55 E 0.91 - 1.00 >55-80 F > 1.00 >80 P&D Consultants, Inc. An AECOM Company Page 6 of 17 Page 4 of 5 758-31 Bowers Museum Expansion Responses to Comments 4/27104 Attachment B Intersection Level of Service Analysis Worksheet (HCM methodology) Page 7 of 17 P&D Consultants, Inc. An AECOM Company Page 5 of 5 758-32 Short Report Page 1 of 1 I SHORT REPORT cera. Infomatlon Site Infonnatlon alyst . Intersection #4 Agency or Co. Area Type' All other areas Date Performed 04/26/2004 urisdiction ~ime Period 5:00 pm Analysis Year Existing Condition Volume and Timln" Innut EB we NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 0 ""ane group ..TR TR L T 1\70Jume (YDh\ .252 212 43 1272 31 785 1004 % Heawveh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 iÄctuated (PIAl P P P P P P P ~tartU[) lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Exl eff. "reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 lb.rrivailVDe 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 .3.0 3.0 PedlBikelRTOR Volume 0 8 0 0 2 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 IParkirg/Gr1IdeIParking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr lBus stops(hr 0 0 0 0 .t Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 asin" EB Only 02 03 04 SB OnlY Thru & RT 07 06 rnr' G= 17.7 G= G= G= G = 28.0 G = 33.3 G.= G= Imlng Y= 4 Y y= y= Y= 4 y", 4 Y= y= Duration of Analysis (hrs -0.25 Cvcle Lenath C = 91.0 ane GrouD CaDaçjt> Control Delav. and LOS Detennlnatlon EB we NB SB ~dj. flow r1Ite 555 1445 872 1116 "ane group cap. 664 1855 1056 3649 ~/c ratio 0.84 0.78 0.83 0.31 [Green ratio 0.19 0.37 0.31 0.72 Unif. delay d1 35.3 25.6 29.2 4.6 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 11.9 3.3 7.4 0.2 PF factor 1000 1.000 1.000 1.000 !control delay 47.1 28.9 36.6 4.9 !Lane group LOS D C D A IApprch. delay 47.1 28.9 18.8 Approach LOS D C B Intersec. delay 26.4 I ntersection LOS C 8S1OOO1>< Copyright 02000 University of Florida, AU Right:5 Reserved VcrsioIl4.1d Page 6 of 17 758-33 ;hort Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT R~PORT General Information ite Informlltlon Analyst Intersection #4 Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas þate Perfonmed 04/26/2004 Jurisdiction irime Period 5:00 pm Analysis Year 2005 without project Volume and Tlmlna Input EB we NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 0 Lane group eTR TR L T Volume (voh\ 303 222 57 1944 30 920 1432 % Heaw veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Actuated (PIA) P P P P P P P Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Exl eft. green .2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 "'-rrivai type 3 3 3 3 ¡Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 PedlBikelRTOR Volume 0 9 0 0 2 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N. N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr 3us stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Jnit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 >hasiM EB Only 02 03 04 sa On~ Thru & RT 07 08 r;ming G = 20.0 G= G= G= G = 31.0 G = 44.0 G= G= y= 4 y= y- y= y= 4 . y= 4 y= y= Duration of AnalYsis Ihrs =0.25 Cvcle Lenath C = 107.0 ane GrOUD CaDacitv. Control Delav. and LOS Determination EB we NB SB ..dj. flow rate 837 2191 1022 1591 _ane group cap. 836 2087 995 754 Ic ratio 1.00 1.05 . 1.03 0.42. Green ratio 0.19 0.41 0.29 0.74 Unif. delay d1 43.5 31.5 38.0 5.3 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 36.1 34.3 35.7 0.4 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 79.8 85.8 73.7 5.7 Lane group LOS E E IE A Apprch. delay 79.8 85.8 32.3 Approach LOS E E C ntersec. delay 51.3 Intersection LOS D /fCS2000TM. Copyright C 2000 University otf'lorida, An Right5 RC$m'ed Page 9 of 17 758-34 Version4.1d . Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT .rallnformation Site Information . alyst ntersection #4 ~ency or Co. ..rea Type All other areas Date Performed 04/2612004 urisdiction Time Period 5:00 pm I\nalysls Year 2005 with project Volume and Timino Inout EB we NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 0 Lane group /-TR TR L T Volume (vDhJ 303 240 57 1999 48 920 1475 % HeaVY veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Actuated (PIA) P P P P P P P ~tartup lost time 2.0 . 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eft. areen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival tvDe 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0. Ped/BikelRTOR Volume 0 9 0 0 3 "ana Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Þarking/GradelParking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Þarking/hr . ~s stopslhr 0 0 0 0 Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 sing EB Only 02 03 04 , SB OnlY Thru & RT 07 08 iming G = 20.0 G= G= G= G = 31.0 G = 44.0 G= G= y= 4 y= y= y= Y= 4 Y = 4 y= y= Duration of Analvsls Chrs =0.25 ::vcle Lenoth C = 107.0 Lane Group CaDaci~', Control Delav. and LOS Detennination EB we NB SB ..dj. flow rate 657 2271 1022 1639 Lane group cap. 637 20B4 995 3754 Ie ratio 1.03 1.09 1.03 0.44 3ree n ratio 0.19 0.41 0.29 0.74 Jnif. delay d1 43.5 31.5 38.0 5.4 )elay lactor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 ncrem. delay d2 44.0 49.0 35.7 0.4 "F factor 1.000 . 1.000 1.000 1.000 ::ontrol delay 87.5 BO.5 73.7 5.B ane group LOS F F E A ..pprch. delay 87.5 80.5 .31.8 "pproaeh LOS F F C ntersec. delay 58.2 I ntersection LOS E 00'" Copyright C 2000 University of Florid~ All Righa Reserved Version 4.1d Page 10 of 17 -~._----- - 758-35 Short Report GØnerallnfonnatlon ~nalyst '\gency or Co. Date Performed 04/26/2004 ime Period 5:00 pm Volume and TlmliiOli1Dut SHORT REPORT Site Information' ..ntersection Alea Type ~,:~sdictlon Nlalysis Year #4 All other areas Page 1 of 1 2025 without project Num. of Lanes ane group ,/olume (vohl % Heaw veh PHF actuated/PiAl StartiIDlost time Ex!. eft. areen !\.rrival N"e Unit Extension PedlBikeJRTOR Volume Lane Width Parking/GradeJParking Parking/hr Bus stcps/hr 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3. ° Phaslno EB Onl". 02 03 04 S8 On" Thru & RT 07 TIming ~: ;°.0 ~;~: ~; ~: ~0.0 ~; :5.0 ~: nuration of AnãiVsis (hrs = 0.25 ~Ie Lenoth C = Lane Groun Canacit Control Delav. and LOS Determination EB WB NB 645 2097 895 2134 0.72 . 0.¡¡8 0.28 0.42 34.7 30. B oæ aæ ao 1a8 1.000 1.000 39.7 46.4 D D 39.7 . 46.4 D D 38.4 Intersection LOS LT 0 EB TH 2 LT 0 NB TH 3 TR 1858 32 2 2 0.90 0.90 P P 2.0 2.0 3 3.0 WB TH ° RT 0 LT 0 RT 0 ...TR 168 83 376 222 0.90 0.110 0.110 P P P 2.0 2.0 3 3.0 0 47 0 0 2 12.0 . 0 N N 12.0 0 N N N N Mj. flow rate Lane group cap. Ie ra~o Green ratio Unif. delay d1 Delay factcr k Inerem. delay d2 PF factor Control delay ane group LOS Apprch. delay !o\pproach LOS ntersec. deiay HCS20fJOTM . Copyright 0 2()OO UtrivcuÏty of FlorilJa., All Rights Reserved Page 11 of18 758-36 RT 0 5B LT TH 2 3 L T 583 1466 2 2 0.90 0.90 P P 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3 3 3.0 3.0 RT 0 12.0 12.0 N 0 N 0 3.0 08 G- y= 107.0 SB 648. 1629 642 3279 1.01 0.50 0.19 0.64 43.5 9.9 0.50 0.50 37.9 0.5 1.000 1.000 81.4. 10.5 F 8 30.6 C D . Vcrsion4.1d. Short Report Page 1 of 1 ane group oluma V h % Has veh HF ctusted PIA tartu lost tme t. eff. reen rrival e nit Extension edlBikelRTOR Volume ana Width arkinglGradeIParking Parkinglhr Bus stopslhr nit Extension asin EB On G'" 30.0 y- 4 SHORT REPORT nerallnfcnnatlon ita Information Iyst #4 gency or Co. All other aroa$ ate Performed 04/2612004 ime Period 5:00 pm 2025 witl1 project Volume and TImln In ut EB WB NB S6 LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT urn. of Lanes 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 0 LTR TR L T 168 104 376 1920 53 583 1512 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P P P P P P P 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 . 2.0 2.0 2.0 3 3 3 3 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0 45 0 0 3 12.0 12.0 . 12.0 12.0 N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N irning . 02 G'" y- 0 3.0 03 G= y- 04 G= y- SBOn G = 20.0 y- 4 0 3.0 Thru & RT G= 45.0 y- 4 0 3.0 07 G= y= 0 3.0 08 G'" y- - - - - - - - Duration of Analvsis (hrs = 0.25 Cycle Ler'lath C = 107.0 Lane GroUD CaDaci1:\ Control Delav, and LOS Determination EB 1M3 NB SB Adj. flow rate 670 12189 648 1680 Lane group cap. 898 2131 642 279 "/c ratio 0.75 1.03 1.01 0.51 . Green ratio 0.28 0.42 0.19 0.64 Unlf. delay d 1 35.0 . 31.0 43.5 10.1 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 5.6 26.8 37.9 0.6 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ~ontrol delay 40.6 57.8 81.4 10.7 ane group LOS D . E F B ~pprch. delay 40.6 57.8 30.3 'pproach LOS D E C Intersec. delay 43.3 Intersection LOS D' _2000N copyright 0 2000 lTni~rsity oCFlorida. AIL Rights Reserved Yersion4.1d Page 12 of 17 758..37 Short Report Page 1 of 1 ~neralln'ormat;on SHORT REPORT !Site Information . Ma Iys1 Intersection #5 Agency or Co. I\reaType All ather areas Date Performed 0412612004 uMsdiction TIme PeMod 5:00 pm Analysis Vear ex/sling condition Volume and Timing InDut EB WB NB 5B . LT TH RT LT j}i RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 3 1 2 3 0 Loane group L LT R L T R L TR Volume (vph) 203 287 122 18 1044 545 131 1646 92 % Heaw veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Actuated (PIA) P P P P P P P P P Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ex!. eff. Q reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0. 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival tv ce 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/BikefRTOR Volume 0 95 0 0 139 0 5 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/GradefParklng N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parklng/hr Bus stopslhr 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 PhasinQ EB Onlv 02 03 04 . Excl. Left Thru & RT 07 08 friming G" 11.0 G= G= G= G= 3.8 G = 30.2 G= G= y= 4 y= V= V= y= 4 y= 4 y= y= . Duration of Analvsls (hrs = 0.25 t;ycle Lenath C - 57.0 Lane GroUD CaDaci tv, Control Delav. and LOS Determination E8 WB NB S8 ~j. now rate 226 319 30 20 1160 451 146 1926 Lane group cap. . 342 360 305 229 2694 839 229 2674 Icratio 0.66 0.89 0.10 0.09 0.43 0.54 0.64 0.72 3reen ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.07 0.53 0.53 0.07 0.53 Unif. delay d1 21.3 22.4 18.9 25.0 8.2 8.8 25.9 10.2 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50. 0.50 Incram. delay d2 9.6 25.9 0.6 0.8 0.5 2.6 12.8 1.7 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ~ntrol delay 30.9 48.2 19.6 25.7 8.7 11.3 38.7 11.9 Lane g roup LOS C D B C A B D B I\pprch. delay 39.9 9.6 13.8 I\pproach LOS D A B Intersec. delay 16.7 Intersection LOS B fiCS](j{)OTM Copyright «:;I 1000 University o(F1Qrida, All Ri¡hts Re$!rvW VC:r.lÎQn 4.1 d . Page 13 of 17 ---- -_...._--_._-_.~-,--" 758-38 Page 1 of 1 Short Report SHORT REPORT ite Infonnatlon Intersection rea Type urlsdlction alysis Year . enerallnformaUon alyst ency or Co. te Performed ime Period #5 All other /trees 04/2612004 5:00 pm 2005 without proj/tct Volume and Tlmln In ut we TH 0 58 TH 3 TR 275 130 2 2 0.90 0.90 P P 2.0 2.0 3 3.0 EB L T TH RT 1 1 1 L LT R 270 347 120 2 2 2 0.90 0.90 0.90 P P P 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 333 3.0 3.0 3.0 0 66 12.0 12.0 12.0 NON NB LT TH RT LT 2 3 1 2 L T R L 22 1511 792 125 2 2 2 2 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P P P P 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3 3 3 3 3.0 3.t) 3.0 3.0 0 62 0 1~0 120 120 120 120 NON N .0 LT 0 RT 0 RT 0 . 0 6 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 &0 30 30 ao 30 30 -naSlno nlY 02 03 04 Excl. Left Thru & RT <ïmlng ~~ ~9.9 ~~ ~:. ~~. ~: :.3 ~: ;5.2~: Juration of Analysis Ihrs = 0.25 . . ~e Lenoth C = ,-ane Group Capacit:v. Control Delav. and LOS Determination. . EB we NB 300 3B8 60 24 1679 390 410 348 125 3105 0.77 0.94 0.17 0.19 0.54 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.04 0.61 33.1 34.7 28.6 42.3 10.2 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 13.6 31.9 1.1 3.4 0.7 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 48.7 86.6 29.8 45.6 10.9 DEe D B U8 MO E B 24.6 Intersection LOS 0 3.0 07 0 3.0 8 os G= y= 90.4 SB 811 139 2666 967 125 3081 0.84 1.11 0.87 0.61 0.04 0.61 14.0 43.5 14.5 0.50 0.50 0.50 8.6 113.7 3.5 1.000 1.000 1.000 22.7 157.3 18.1 C F B 25.0 C C "'dj. now rate ana group cap. lc ratio Green ratio Unif. delay d1 Delay factor k Increm. delay d2 PF factor Control delay Lane group LOS ð,pprch. delay ð,pproach LOS ntersec. delay . . 8 HCS10aoTM CopyrightC 2000 UnÎ\lersity of Flo~ All Ri¡hts Re¡erved Vcrsi(n4.ld Page 14 of 17 758-39 Short Report Page 1 of 1 ê!:nerallnformatlon SHORT REPORT ~t. Information Analyst ~tersection #5 Agency or Co. rea Type All other areas Date Performed 04/26/2004 ~urisd ¡coon Time Period 5:00 pm f,nalysis Year 2005 with project Volume and TlminalnDut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 3 1 2 3 0 Lane group L LT R L T R L TR II/olume [vDh) 270 365 120 22 152g 829 125 ~18 130 % HeaYV veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90. 0.90 ""ctuated (PIA) P P P - P P P P P P tartuD lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 xt. eft. areen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival tvDe 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Jnit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 . PedlBikelRTOR Volume 0 64 0 0 57 0 6 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 .12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stopslhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasina EBOnlv 02 03 04 Excl. Left Thru & RT 07 08 ~iming G = 20.5 G= G- G= G= 3.3 G = 55.2 G= G= y= 4 y= ¥= y= y= 4 Y= 4 y= y= Duration of Analvsls Ihrs =0.25 Cvcle Lenoth C = 91.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delav. and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB ...dj. flow rate 300 406 62 24 1699 a5a 139 2714 Lane group cap. 399 420 357 124 3085 960 124 3061 Ic ratio 0.75 0.g7. 0.17 0.1g 0.55 0.89 1.12 0.89 3reen ratio 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.61 0.61 0.04 0.61 lJnif. delay d1 32.9 34.9 28.4 42.6 10.6 15.4 43.8 15.2 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 12.3 36.3 1.1 3.5 0.7 12.5 117.0 4.2 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 45.2 71.2 29.5 46.0 11.3 27.9' 160.9 19.5 ane group LOS D E C D B C F B Apprch. delay 57.7 17.1 26.4 Approach LOS E B C ntersec. delay 26.4 Intersection LOS C HCS1000TM Copyrisbt C 2()OO University of Florid.. All Ri¡hts Reserved Venion 4.1d Page 15 of 17 758-40 - Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT 8 3enerallnformatJon Site Information ",nalyst Intersection #5 "'ganey or Co. r..rea Type All other areas Date Performed 04/2612004 urisdiction ime Period 5:0Ó pm '\nalysis Year 2025 without project Volume and Timlnlllnput EB we N8 SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 3 1 2 3 0 . ~ane group L LT R L T R L TR Volume (vph) 387 442 114 11 1409 804 288 2161 153 % Heaw veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 HF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 7 N N N 0 3.0 a IrJQ noy x . e noy ru Timing G = 28.0 G= G= G= G= 8.0 G= 4.0 G = 50.0 G= y= 4 y- y= y= Y=4 y= 4 y= y= Duration of Analvsis Ihrs =0.25 Cycle Length C = 102.0 Lane GrouD CaDaci tv. Control Delay, and LOS Determination . EB we NB S8 if'.dj. flow rate 430 491 61 . 12 1566 836 320 563 Lane group cap. 486 511 435 269 2493 776 539 '864 "/c ratio 0.88 0.96 0.14 0.04 0.63 1.08 0.59 0.89 ¡Green ratio 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.08 0.49 0.49 0.16 0.57 Jnif. delay d1 35.5 36.5 27.9 43.5 19.2 26,0 40.0 19.3 Jelay factor It 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 ncrem. delay d2 20.4 31.2 0.7 0.3 1.2 55.2 4.8 4.9 ~F factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 55.9 67.7 28.6 43.8 20.4 81.2 44.7 24.2 Lane group LOS E E C D C F D C . Apprch. delay 60.1 41.5 26.5 Approach LOS E D C Intersec. delay 37.5 Intersection LOS D 8 HCSlOOOTM Copyright CJ 2000 Uaiveßity of F1o~ All Ri¡hts Reserved Vmioa4.1d Page 16 of 17 - 758-41 ctuated PIA tartu lost time xt. eff, reen rrival e Unit Extension PedIBike/RTOR Volume Lane Width Parking/Grade/Parking Paridng/hr Bus stops/hr - Unit Extension ,., Ph s'n EB 0 I p p P 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3 :3 3 3.0 3.0 3.0 0 59 12.0 12.0 12.0 NON P 2.0 2.0 3 3.0 0 12.0 12.0 N 0 P 2.0 2.0 3 3.0 0 3.0 EdLft 0 3.0 SBO I 0 3.0 02 0 3.0 03 04 p P 2.0' 2.0 2.0 2.0 3 3 3.0 3.0 52 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 N N 0 p P 2.0 2.0 3 3.0 000 3.0 3.0 3.0 Th &RT 08 Short Report Page' 1 of 1 [enerallnfonnatlon SHORT REPORT [Itie Information Analyst ~.rseclion #5 ~ency or Co. a Type All other areas !2,ate Performed 0412512004 Jurisdìction Ime Period 5:00 pm À~alysis Year 2025 with project Volume and Tlminnlonut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 3 1 2 3 0 Lane group L LT R. L T R L TR Volume (v-nhl 153 387 463 11 1430 845 288 2207 153 % Heavv-veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Actuated (P/AI P P P P P P P P P StartUD lost lime 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ex!. eft. "Teen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ~vafV"" 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 nil Extension ~ 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 68 0 0 66 0 7 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N N, N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasln" E80~ 02 03 04 Excl. Left 58 Onlv Thru & RT DB :"iming G = 28.0 G= G= G= G= 8.0 G= 4.0 G - 50.0 G= y= 4 Y= y= y= y= 4 Yo, 4 y= y" Duration of Analvsislhrs =0.25 CVcle Lenath C" 102.0 Lane GroUD CaDacitv, Control Delav. and LOS Determination EB we NB 58 ~dj. flow rate 170 430 439 12 1589 866 320 2614 Lane group cap. 486 511 435 269 2493 776 539 2865 "Ie ratio 0.35 0.84 1.01 0.04 0.64 1.12 0.69 0.91 ßreen ratio 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.08 0.49 0.49 0.16 0.57 Unif. delay d1 29.7 34.9 37.0 43.5 19.3 26.0 40.0 19.7 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 ncrem. delay d2 2.0 15.4 45.5 0.3 1.3 69.1 4.8 5.7 IPF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ¡;;onlrol delay 31.7 50.3 82.5 43.8 20,6 95.1 44.7 25.4 ,-ane group LOS C D F D C F D C IApprch. delay 60.8 . 46.8 27.5 IApproach LOS ' E D C Intersec. delay 40,3 IntersectiOn LOS D llCS1OO0T'M Copyright 0 2000 University of Florida. AU Right, IœJerved Version 4.1 d Page 17 of 17 758-42