The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About75D - MERGER S.A. REDEVELOPMENT REQUEST FOR AGENCYI COUNCIL ACTION ~ ~ CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONL V: MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2004 TITLE: APPROVED JOJ:NT PUBLJ:C HEARJ:NG - ADOPTJ:ON OF AlŒNDMENTS FOR THE MERGER OF THE SANTA ANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS 0 As Recommended 0 As Amended 0 Ordinance on 1 st Reading 0 Ordinance on 2nd Reading 0 Implementing Resolution 0 Set Public Hearing For .~ t.[j][° .f CIT~ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION CITY COUNCJ:L ACTJ:ON 1. Adopt a resolution approving the Negative Declaration, Environmental Review No. 2004-34. 2 . Adopt a resolution finding that the proposed redevelopment plan- merger Amendments conform to the City of Santa Ana General Plan. 3 . Adopt ordinances approving and adopting the Amendments to the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Areas for the merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Project Areas. COMMUNJ:TY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTJ:ON' 2 . 1. Adopt a resolution approving and adopting the Negative Declaration, Environmental Review No. 2004-34. Adopt a resolution approving the proposed Amendments and recommending that the City Council approve the proposed Amendments and adopt the ordinances for the merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Project Areas. 75D-1 JT Public Hearing -- Adoption of Amendments of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Project Areas September 7, 2004 Page 2 PLAHNJ:NG COMNJ:SSJ:ON ACTJ:ON 1. Approve and adopt the Negative Declaration, Environmental Review No. 2004-34. 2 . Adopt a resolution finding that the proposed redevelopment plan merger amendments conform to the Santa Ana General Plan. 3 . Approve the Redevelopment Plan Amendments. 4 . Find that the Redevelopment Plan Amendments are in conformity with the City's General Plan. By a vote of 7:0 at its Regular Meeting of June 14, 2004. COMMUNJ:'l'Y REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSJ:NG COMMJ:SSJ:ON RBCOMMENDATJ:ON 1. Recommended that the City Council adopt ordinances approving and adopting the Amendments to the Central Ci ty, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Areas. 2. Recommended that the Community Redevelopment Agency: a) Adopt a resolution approving and adopting the Negative Declaration, Environmental Review No. 2004-34. b) Adopt a resolution recommending that Amendments for the Project Areas. approving the proposed Amendments and the Ci ty Council adopt the proposed Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment By a vote of 7: 0: 1 (Turner Abstained) at its Regular Meeting of August 17, 2004. DJ:SCUSSJ:ON The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana currently has six redevelopment proj ect areas: Central Ci ty, Inter-City Commuter 75D-2 JT Public Hearing -- Adoption of Amendments of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Project Areas September 7, 2004 Page 3 Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor. Each of the Project Areas has existing plans addressing the revitalization of the blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. Community Redevelopment Law provides for a redevelopment agency to merge the project areas in order to combine the tax increment revenues from all the proj ect areas and allocate the revenue among the entire merged proj ect area that will best facilitate the implementation of the redevelopment plans for each project area. The proposed plan Amendments (Exhibit 1) are considered technical amendments that will not add territory to the Project Areas, increase the tax increment limit, affect the plan termination date, or change the eminent domain authority. When merging project areas, the Community Redevelopment Law allows an agency to amend existing redevelopment plans wi thout requiring the documentation of significant blight or remaining blight findings within the project areas. As part of the process to amend the redevelopment plans, the Community Redevelopment Law provides that the City Council and Community Redevelopment Agency hold a joint public meeting to receive testimony on the proposed Amendments. On July 19, 2004, the City Council and Community Redevelopment Agency adopted resolutions receiving and approving the Report to Council (Exhibit 2) and setting the time and place for the j oint public hearing. The time and place of the public hearing has been noticed in accordance with the Law for five consecutive Mondays in the Orange County Register beginning August 2, 2004 (Exhibit 3) . Addi tionally, a community information meeting was held on August 10, 2004, to discuss the proposed Amendments. The Supplement to the Report to Council includes a summary of the presentation and public input. The Supplement also includes the summary of consultations with affected taxing agencies and an explanation that the Amendment numbering has been increased by one for each Redevelopment proj ect to reflect the May 17, 2004, passage of an Ordinance extending the duration of each project area by one year as permitted in response to the State mandated contribution to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) (Exhibit 4). Notification of the joint public hearing and community information meeting was sent to all property owners and occupants within the six Project Areas by First Class mail on July 30, 2004 (Exhibit 5). Also, 75D-3 JT Public Hearing -- Adoption of Amendments of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Project Areas September 7, 2004 Page 4 notice of the joint public hearing was sent to the affected taxing agencies via Certified Mail on July 30, 2004 (Exhibit 6). Finally, notice was sent Certified Mail to the Department of Housing and Community Development on July 30, 2004, of the City's intent to merge the redevelopment project areas (Exhibit 7). The joint public hearing on the proposed Amendments for the merger of the project areas is scheduled for September 7, 2004, at 6:00 p.m. ENV'J:RONMENTAL :IMPACT The Negative Declaration 2004-034 is intended to inform public decision makers, other responsible and trustee agencies, and the general public of the potential effects of the proposed project (Exhibit 8). The negative declaration determined that there would be no significant impacts associated with approval of the proposed project (Amendments). On April 6, 2004, the public review period for the Draft Declaration was closed. No comments were received on the Draft Declaration. At this time, staff is recommending approval of the Declaration. Negative Negative Negative FJ:SCAL DlPACT There is no fiscal impact III (.(J1JL associated with this action. patricia C. Whitaker Executive Director Community Development Agency sd: !~zfIJ' Executive Director Planning and Building Agency PCW/NTE/mlr H:Actions\2004CC\JT CC-CRA PH AdoptiOnAmendmtsforMergerSARedevProjAreas-9-7-04 75D-4 SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the Central City Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 2.1973 by Ordinance No. NS-1173. The Project Area is comprised of approximately 694 acres locateçt in the central and northern portions of the City. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on June 2,1975 by Ordinance No. NS-1258, on December 1,1986 by Ordinance No. NS-1877, on October 3,1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2234, on May 6. 1996 by Ordinance No. NS-2290, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. NS-2396 and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a seventh amendment ("Seventh Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits in effect and stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part IX to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: IX. MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Seventh Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects. the Central City Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". EXHIBIT 1 PA0408008.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002108/16/04 75D-5 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 6,1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1636. The Project Area contains approximately 536 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2234, on May 6, 1996 by Ordinance No. NS-2289, on August 2,1999 by Ordinance No. NS- 2396, and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a fifth amendment ("Fifth Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Conidor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: X. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Fifth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". EXHIBIT 1 PA0408008.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002108/16104 75D-6 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE NORTH HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the North Harbor Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 6,1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1637. The Project Area contains approximately 428 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2234, on May 6, 1996 by Ordinance No. NS-2291, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. NS-2396, on January 20, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2641, and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a sixth amendment . .("Sixth Amendmenf) to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: x. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Sixth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the North Harbor Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". EXHIBIT 1 PA0408oo8.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002108116104 ' 75D-7 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTH HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the South Harbor Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 6, 1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1638. The Project Area contains approximately 1,050 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on August 3, 1992 by Ordinance No. NS-2167, on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2234, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. NS-2396, on January 20, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2641, and on May 17, . 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a sixth amendment ("Sixth Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: X. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Sixth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the South Harbor Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station' Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". EXHIBIT 1 PA0408008.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002/08/16/04 . 75D-8 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTH MAIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the South Main Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 6, 1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1639. The Project Area contains approximately 1,500 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2234, on July 17, 1995 by Ordinance No. NS-2256, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. NS-2396, on January 20. 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2641, and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a sixth amendment ("Sixth Amendmenr) to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project. Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: X. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Sixth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the South Main Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". EXHIBIT 1 PA0408008.SNA.CK:gbd , ' 19090.003.002108/16104 75D-9 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on December 4, 1989 by Ordinance No. NS-2039. The Project Area contains approximately 781 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been previously amended on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2231 and Ordinance No. NS-2234, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. NS-2396, and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a fifth amendment ("Fifth Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and the South Main Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: x. (§1000) MERGER . Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Fifth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and the South Main Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". EXHIBIT 1 PA0408oo8.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002108/16/04 75D-10 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL for the MERGER of the SANTA ANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Prepared for: THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the CITY OF SANTA ANA Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. JUNE 2004 EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 of 190 75D-11 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL for the MERGER of the SANTA ANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Prepared for: THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the CITY OF SANTA ANA JUNE 2004 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 500 South Grand Avenue, Suite 1480 Los Angeles, California 90071 1660 Hotel Circle North, Suite 716 San Diego, California 92108 Golden Gateway Commons 55 Pacific Avenue Mall San Francisco, California 94111 Page 2 of 190 75D-12 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. I NTRODUCTI ON................................................................................................................ 1 A. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE AND CONTENTS........................................ 1 B. BACKGROUND .""'''.''''''''.'''''''''.''''.'' ....... ........................................ .... ............... ....... 3 C. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES............ ...... ...... ........................ ........... ...............................8 D. AGENCY ACCOMPLISHMENTS..... ...... ............ ...................... "'"..'''.''''.''''' ...... ........ 10 II. REASONS FOR AMENDING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLANS..................................... 12 III. PROPOSED PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS ..................................................................13 A. REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS .................................................. ................. ..... ...... 14 1. Economic/Community Development......... .................................................................. 14 2. Public Facility Development ....................................................................... ................ 14 3. Infrastructure Improvements....................................................................................... 14 4. Housing Program....................................................................................................... 14 IV. PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING, ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY, AND REASONS FOR INCLUDING DIVISION OF TAXES PURSUANT TO SECTION 33670....................16 ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COSTS .................................................................... 16 FINANCING METHODS AVAILABLE TO THE AGENCY ...........................................19 PROPOSED FINANCING METHOD, ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY, AND REASONS FOR INCLUDING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING .....................................................21 V . IMPLEMENTATION PLAN .... ..... .............. ...... ........ ................. .......... ........... .... ........... .... 32 VI. METHOD OR PLAN FOR RELOCATION ........................................................................33 A. AGENCY DISPLACEMENT......... ............... ................... ....... .......................... ............33 B. RELOCATION IN THE EVENT OF AGENCY DISPLACEMENT.................................34 C. RULES AND REGULATIONS.... ....... "".' ........ .... .................. ......................................34 D. AGENCY DETERMINATIONS AND ASSURANCES ..................................................34 E. RELOCATION ASSISTANCE ADVISORY PROGRAM AND ASSURANCE OF COMPARABLE REPLACEMENT HOUSING ........ .... ....................................... ...... .... 36 F . ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION...... ............. ........ ."'"'''''''''''''.''.''' ............. ........36 1. Responsible Entity...................................................................................................... 36 2. Functions..... ........................................ ....................................................................... 37 3. Information Program....................................................................................... ...... ......38 4. Relocation Record...................................................................................................... 39 5. Relocation Resources Survey ................................................ ....................................39 6. Relocation Payments................................................................................................. 39 a ) Temporary Moves................................................................................................... 39 b) Last Resort Housing......... ...... ........ ...... ...... .................,..... ..,...... ....... ......................39 c) Eviction Policy......................................................................................................... 40 d) Grievance Procedures...... ...... ....... ...... ...... ..... ...... ........ .......................................... .40 e) Relocation Appeals Board....................................................................................... 40 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Page 3 of 190 Page i A. B. C. PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004/06126104 75D-13 VII. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING COMMISSION .....................................41 VIII. COMMUN ITY CONSULTATIONS.. ...... ...... ........................... .... ........... ............ ...... .........46 IX. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE NEGATIVE DECLARATION ...................................47 X. NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT REPORT AS WARRANTED BY THE PROPOSED AM EN DM ENTS ............................................................................................................... 48 IMPACT ON RESIDENTS IN THE PROJECT AREAS AND SURROUNDING AREAS. .... ..... .... ..... ...... ..... ....... ...... ....... ........ .... ...... ..... ........ ... ... ... ..... ...... .... ...... ........48 1. Relocation.................................................................................................................. 48 2. Traffic Circulation....................................................................................................... 49 3. Environmental Quality....................... ......................................................................... 50 4. Community Facilities and Services .............................................................................50 5. School Population and Quality of Education............................................................... 51 6. Property Assessment and Taxes................................................................................ 51 B. RELOCATION AND LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING.............................51 1. Housing Units to be Destroyed or Removed............................................................... 51 2. Projected Residential Displacement................. ..........................................................52 3. Number and Location of Replacement Housing Units................................................ 52 4. Number and Location of Low and Moderate Income Housing Units Planned Other than Replacement Housing .................. .....................................,................. ...... ......53 5. Financing Method for Replacement Housing Requirements ....... ................................53 6. Timetable for Provision of Relocation Housing ........................................................... 53 c. OTHER MATTERS AFFECTING THE PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT ......... .... "".'" ............... ."..' ................... ........... ............... ......... .........53 XI. SUMMARY OF CONSULTATIONS WITH AFFECTED TAXING AGENCIES..................55 A. A. B. THE REPORT OF THE COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER AND ANALYSIS THEREOF ....55 SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION WITH AFFECTED TAXING ENTITIES ..................55 Page 4 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page ii PA0403012.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090 .003.004106128104 75D-14 FIGURES 1. Santa Ana Redevelopment Project Area Boundaries ............................................,..............4 TABLES Table 1: Organization of the Report to the City Council........................................................... 2 Table 2: Time and Financial Limits.......................................................................................... 5 Table 3: Summary of Objectives............................................................................................. 9 Table 4: Financial Feasibility Cash Flow - Merged Project Area............................................. 22 Table 5: Revenue and Expenditure Detail- Merged Project Area ..........................................23 Table 6: Existing Debt Service and Other Senior Obligations.................................................. 24 Table 7: Tax Increment Revenue Projection - Merged Project Area ....................................... 25 Table 7a: Tax Increment Revenue Projection - Central City Project....................................... 26 Table 7b: Tax Increment Revenue Projection - Inter City Project ........................................... 27 Table 7c: Tax Increment Revenue Projection - North Harbor Project Area............................. 28 Table 7d: Tax Increment Revenue Projection - South Harbor Project ................................... 29 Table 7e: Tax Increment Revenue Projection - South Main Project........................................ 30 Table 7f: Tax Increment Revenue Projection - Bristol Corridor Project.................................. 31 APPENDIX APPENDIX A - FIVE-YEAR AB 1290 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN APPENDIX B - PLANNING COMMISSION'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPENDIX C - CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION REGARDING NO PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE APPENDIX D - NEGATIVE DECLARATION APPENDIX E - AGENCY RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE AMENDMENTS AND TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENTS TO ALL AFFECTED TAXING ENTITIES APPENDIX F - AGENCY RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY REPORT Page 5 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Pageiii PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128/04 75D-15 I. INTRODUCTION A. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE AND CONTENTS This Report to the City Council ("Report") for the proposed adoption of the merger amendments ("Amendments" or "Merger") to the existing Redevelopment Plans ("Redevelopment Plans" or "Plans") for the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter- City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Project Areas" or "Projects") has been prepared by the Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") to fulfill the requirements of Sections 33486, 33457.1, 33354.6 and 33352 of the Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq., the "CRL"). As discussed in the following section, the purpose of the proposed Amendments is to merge the Project Areas ("Merged Project Area") for more efficient administration of the Agency's redevelopment program and to contribute to revitalization of the Project Areas through increased economic vitality of such areas and through increased and improved housing opportunities in or near such areas. Section 33354.6(a) of the CRL requires that when an agency proposes to amend a redevelopment project that utilizes tax increment to add territory to a project area; to increase either the limitation on the number of dollars (tax increment limit) to be allocated to the redevelopment agency or the time limit on establishing loans, advances, and indebtedness (debt establishment); to lengthen the period during which the Plan is effective (plan effectiveness); to merge projects, or to add significant additional capital improvement projects; an agency shall follow the same procedures it would for the adoption of a redevelopment plan. Section 33486 of the CRL provides that a merger may proceed by amendment of each redevelopment plan as provided in Article 12 (commencing with CRL Section 33450). Section 33457.1 of the CRL provides that "[t]o the extent warranted by a proposed amendment to a redevelopment plan, (1) the ordinance adopting an amendment to the redevelopment plan shall contain the findings required by Section 33367... "Therefore, because the Agency is proposing to merge projects, which is a technical amendment, the Agency will follow applicable provisions, to the extent warranted, of CRL Sections 33320.1, et seq. and 33450, et seq., specifically, pursuant to Section 33457.1. This Report to the City Council is one of the legally required documents leading to the adoption of the proposed Amendments. Its purpose is to provide the information, documentation, and evidence required by CRL Section 33352 to accompany the proposed Amendments when these are submitted by the Agency to the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") for review. Such information, documentation, and evidence is provided to assist the City Council in its consideration of the proposed Page 6 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 1 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106/28104 75D-16 Amendments and in making the various findings associated with the adoption of the proposed Amendments. This Report is divided into sections that generally correspond to the subdivisions contained in the CRL Section 33352 (subject to CRL Section 33457.1), which specify the required contents of the Report to the City Council pertaining to the proposed Amendments as described below in Table 1. CRL Section 33352 (a) 33352 (b) 33352 (c) 33352 (d) 33352 (e) 33352 (f) 33352 (g) 33352 (h) 33352 (i) Table 1: Organization of the Report to the City Council The reasons for the Amendments, a description of the specific projects proposed by the Agency, a description of how these projects will improve or alleviate the conditions described in subdivision (b). (The Agency is not adding new projects or programs by these Amendments) A description of the remaining blighting conditions in the Project Area specified in Section 33031. (Not required for an amendment to merge project areas) An Implementation Plan. (The Amendments will not alter the existing Implementation Plan) An explanation of why the elimination of blight and the redevelopment of the Merged Project Area cannot reasonably be expected to be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone or by the legislative body's use of financing alternatives other than tax increment financing. (Not required for an amendment to merge project areas) The proposed method of financing the redevelopment of the Merged Project Area including an assessment of economic feasibility of the proposed Amendments and reasons for continuing to include tax increment financing. A method or plan for the relocation of families and persons to be temporarily or permanently displaced from housing facilities in the Merged Project Area. Analysis of the Preliminary Plan. (Not required for an amendment to merge project areas) The report and recommendations of the Planning Commission. The summary referred to in Section 33387. (consultations with the property owners, residents, businesses and community organizations) ReDort Section Section II Not Applicable Section V Not Applicable Section IV Section VI Not Applicable Section VII Section VIII Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Page 7 0 f 190 Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090 .003.004/06128104 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 2 75D-17 CRL Section 33352 0) 33352 (k) 33352 (I) The report required by Section 65402 of the Government Code. (Report on the conformity of the Amendments with the City's General Plan) The report required by Section 21151 of the Public Resources Code. (Environmental Compliance - Negative Declaration) The report of the County Fiscal Officer per Section 33328 of the CRL (base year report). (Not required for an amendment to merge project areas) 33352 (m) Neighborhood Impact Report. 33352 (n) An analysis by the Agency of the report submitted by the County as required by Section 33328 (base year report), which shall include a summary of the consultation of the Agency, with each of the affected taxing entities. (Only consultations with taxing agencies are applicable and are included in the Report to the City Council) B. BACKGROUND ReDort Section Section VII Section IX Not Applicable Section X Section XI The Agency is in charge of implementing redevelopment within the City of Santa Ana. As previously stated, the Agency is proposing to merge all six (6) of the City's redevelopment project areas (Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project). In total, the Merged Project Area will contain approximately 4,989 acres, which comprises approximately 29 percent of the total acres located in the City. Figure 1 shows the boundaries of the Project Areas, which are located throughout the City primarily along major commercial corridors. Table 2 provides a summary of each of the Project Areas including the current time and financial limits as described in the Redevelopment Plans, as amended. The following is an overview of the Redevelopment Projects: Central City Redevelopment Project Central City Redevelopment Project was adopted on July 2, 1973, by Ordinance No. NS- 1173. The Central City Redevelopment Plan was first amended on June 2, 1975, by Ordinance No. N5-1258 to restate the plan and amend certain provisions, including adding territory to the existing project area, simplifying land use standards, and establishing a plan effectiveness limit of 30 years (later extended to 40 years). The second amendment adopted by Ordinance No. N5-1877 on December 1,1986, in accordance with 58 690 established a tax increment limit ($3,000,000,000), established .. Page 8 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 3 75D-18 rf ~ Ir. - I "~:::"'c:L~c.~~~ AVE.. t. 0 ~~ I ....' ~i I tiiì - ~-_._~- .-.:::Ø'1. rJ- -_J '~Ir" ._..._....~-_._] ill I ì~ . I I I i- II .I ii I; I' -- ~.~~-' ~~'~ . """~::-~:,::::- -..--' II -'l! f FIGURE 1 -;:- Redevelopment Project Areas J:::::::::I CENTRAL CITY ~ NORTH HARBOR ~ INTERCITY - SOUTH MAIN - SOUTH HARBOR" BRISTOL Page 9 of 190 75D-19 TABLE:.2 ~ ~I~E. A~D fIN~.CIAL. LlMIT~ - Sant~_Ana :Co.mmunity l?evelopm~rit_Agency I PROJECT ADOPTION DATE 1 Community Redevelopment Law Requirements for Pre- 1994 Redevelopment Plans adopted Central City Adopted 7/2/73 by Ordinance No. NS-1173 Amended 6/2/75 by Ordinance No. NS-1258 Amended 12/1/86 by Ordinance No. NS-1877 Amended 10/3/94 by Ordinance No. NS-2234 Amended 5/6/96 by Ordinance No. NS-2290 Amended 8/2/99 by Ordinance No. NS-2396 Inter-City Adopted 7/6182 by Ordinance No. NS-1636 'l:J I Amended 10/3/94 by Ordinance No. NS-2234 ~ Amended 5/6/96 by Ordinance No. NS-2289 ~ended 8/2/99 by Ordinance No. NS-2396 ~orth Harbor Ddopted 7/6182 by Ordinance NO.NS-1637 0 I Amended 10/3194 by Ordinance No. NS-2234 1\).mended 5/6/96 by Ordinance No. NS-2291 tØmended 8/2/99 by Ordinance No. NS-2396 0 . Amended 1120/04 by Ordinance No. NS-2641 South Harbor Adopted 7/6182 by Ordinance No. NS-1638 Amended 8/3/92 by Ordinance No. NS-2167 Amended 10/3/94 by Ordinance No. NS-2234 Amended 8/2/99 by Ordinance No. NS-2396 Amended 1/20/04 by Ordinance No. NS-2641 South Main ¡Adopted 7/6182 by Ordinance No. NS-1639 Amended 10/3/94 by Ordinance NS-2234 Amended 7/17/95 by Ordinance NS-2256 Amended 8/2/99 by Ordinance NS-2396 Amended 1/20/04 by Ordinance No. NS-2641 Bristol Corridor ¡ Adopted 12/4/89 by Ordinance NS-2039 lAmended 10/3/94 by Ordinance No. NS-2231 Amended 10/3/94 by Ordinance No. NS-2234 Amended 8/2/99 by Ordinance No. NS-2396 DEBT ESTABLISHMENT 20 years from adoption or 1/1/04 whichever is later plus 10 years with amendment (may repeal limit by ordinance) Expired Expired 7/6/22 7/6122 7/6122 12/4/09 " PLAN EFFECTIVENESS 40 years from adoption or 1/1/09 whichever is later + 10 year with significant remaining blight (AB1290) + 1-year for ERAF payment (SB1045) 7/2/14 7/6123 7/6/23 7/6/23 7/6123 12/4/30 ,. DEBT REPAYMENT (RECEIPT OF T.I.) 10 years after Plan effectiveness + 10 year with significant remaining blight (AB1290) + 1- year for ERAF payment (SB1045) 7/2124 7/6133 7/6/33 7/6/33 7/6/33 12/4/40 .. --- TAX INCREMENT Limit required no maximum $3,000,000,000 S80,600,OOO $259,500,00 w/bonds $32,100,000 $103,375,000 w/bonds . .-.. .. BOND DEBT " -, .. .. EMINENT DOMAIN Limi~ required no 112 y~ars maximum maximum None (not required for plans adopted before 10/1/76) $80,600,000 $32,100,000 $2,600,000,000 I $1,000,000,000 $2,000,000,000 I $600,000,000 $335,000,000 $105,100,000 5/612008 5/612008 5/612008 8/3/2004 7/17/2007 Expired 1 The amendments to each of the redevelopment projects have been listed in order by the date of adoption, and, therefore, do not necessarily correspond with the amendment reference numbers (i.e. First Amendment) described in the ordinances, a time limit on incurring debt (July 2, 2008) and established a limit on initiating eminent domain proceedings by 12 years (December 1, 1986). The third amendment adopted by Ordinance No. NS-2234 on October 3, 1994, amended the plan to reduce the time limit on incurring debt (January 1, 2004) and establishes a limit for the receipt of tax increment/repayment of debt (July 2, 2018). The fourth amendment adopted on May 6, 1996, by Ordinance No. NS-2290 extended the Agency's eminent domain authority within the project area by 12 years until May 6,2008. The fifth amendment to the redevelopment plan adopted by Ordinance No. NS-2396 on August 2, 1999, extended plan effectiveness limit by ten years (July 2, 2013) and the limit on receipt of tax increment/repayment of debt by five years (July 2, 2023) to the maximum permitted by Assembly Bill 1290 ("AB 1290") as permitted by Assembly Bill 1342 ("AB 1342"). The proposed Merger amendment will be the sixth amendment to the Central City Redevelopment Plan. Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project The Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project was adopted on July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1636. On October 3, 1994, in accordance with AB 1290, the Inter- City Commuter Station Redevelopment Plan was first amended by Ordinance No. NS- 2234 to establish certain time limits including a time limit on incurring debt of January 1, 2004; a time limit on plan effectiveness of July 6, 2012, and limit on receipt of tax increment/repayment of debt of July 6, 2022. [The same limits were established for South Main, South Harbor and North Harbor Redevelopment Plans]. The second amendment adopted on May 6, 1996 by Ordinance No. NS-2289 extended the Agency's eminent domain authority within the project area by 12 years until May 6, 2008. On August 2, 1999, the third amendment adopted by Ordinance No. NS-2396 extended the time limit on plan effectiveness by 10 years to July 6, 2022, and the limit on receipt of tax increment by 10 years to July 6, 2032, to coincide with the maximum time limits prescribed by AB 1290 as amended by a summary ordinance in accordance with AB 1342. The proposed Merger will be the fourth amendment to the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Plan. North Harbor Redevelopment Project The North Harbor Redevelopment Project was adopted on July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1637. On October 3, 1994, in accordance with AB 1290, the North Harbor Redevelopment Plan was first amended by Ordinance No. NS-2234 to establish certain time limits including a time limit on incurring debt of January 1, 2004; a time limit on plan effectiveness of July 6, 2012, and limit on receipt of tax increment/repayment of debt of July 6,2022. The second amendment adopted on May 6,1996, by Ordinance No. NS- 2291 extended the Agency's eminent domain authority within the project area by 12 years until May 6, 2008. On August 2, 1999, the third amendment adopted by Ordinance No. NS-2396 extended the time limit on plan effectiveness by 10 years to July 6, 2022, and the limit on receipt of tax by 10 years to July 6, 2032, to coincide with the Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Page 11 of 190 Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 6 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106/28104 75D-21 maximum time limits prescribed by AS 1290 as amended by a summary ordinance in accordance with AS 1342. The fourth amendment adopted on January 20, 2004, by Ordinance No. NS-2641 extended the time limit to incur debt to coincide with the plan effectiveness date of July 6,2022. The proposed Merger will be the fifth amendment to the North Harbor Redevelopment Plan. South Harbor Redevelopment Project The South Harbor Redevelopment Project was adopted on July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1638. On August 3, 1992, by Ordinance No. NS-2167, the South Harbor Redevelopment Plan was amended to: 1) extend the Agency's eminent domain authority within the project area by 12 years until August 3, 2004; 2) modify certain land use provisions; 3) increase the tax increment limit to $2,600,000,000; 4) increase the bonded indebtedness limit to $1,000,000,000; 5) increase the time limit to incur debt from 25 to 30 years until August 3,2022; and 6) increase the plan effectiveness of the South Harbor Redevelopment Plan from 30 to 40 years until August 3, 2032. On October 3, 1994, the plan was amended a second time by Ordinance No. NS-2234 to reduce certain time limits in accordance with AS 1290, including the time limit on incurring debt (January 1,2004), the time limit on plan effectiveness (July 6,2012), and the time limit on receipt of tax increment/repayment of debt (July 6, 2022). On August 2, 1999, the third amendment adopted by Ordinance No. NS-2396 extended the time limit on plan effectiveness by 10 years to July 6, 2022, and the limit on receipt of tax increment by 10 years to July 6, 2032, to coincide with the maximum time limits prescribed by AS 1290 as amended by a summary ordinance in accordance with AS 1342. The fourth amendment adopted on January 20, 2004, by Ordinance No. NS-2641 extended the time limit for incurring debt to coincide with the plan effectiveness limit of July 6, 2022. The proposed Merger will be the fifth amendment to the South Harbor Redevelopment Plan. South Main Redevelopment Project The South Main Redevelopment Project was adopted on July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1639. On October 3, 1994, in accordance with AS 1290, the South Main Redevelopment Plan was amended by Ordinance No. NS-2234 to establish certain time limits including a time limit on incurring debt of January 1, 2004; a time limit on plan effectiveness of July 6, 2012; and a limit on receipt of tax increment/repayment of debt of July 6, 2022. On July 17,1995, the redevelopment plan was amended a second time by Ordinance No. NS-2256 to increase the tax increment ($2,000,000,000) and bond debt ($600,000,000) limits, establish eminent domain authority for 12 years (July 17, 2007), and add projects to the redevelopment plans capital improvements list. The third amendment adopted on August 2, 1999, by Ordinance No. NS-2396 extended the time limit on plan effectiveness by 10 years to July 6, 2022, and the limit on receipt of tax by 10 years to July 6, 2032, to coincide with the maximum time limits prescribed by AS 1290 as amended by a summary ordinance in accordance with AS 1342. The fourth Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Page 12 of 190 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Page 7 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-22 Provide or replace public streets, alleys, parks, sidewalks, sewers, storm drains, traffic signals, lighting systems, and other public facilities and improvements as necessary. Page 13 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090 .003.004106128104 amendment adopted on January 20, 2004, by Ordinance No. NS-2641 extended the time limit to incur debt to coincide with the plan effectiveness limit of July 6, 2022. The proposed Merger will be the fifth amendment to the South Main Redevelopment Plan. Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Plan The Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project was adopted on December 4, 1989, by Ordinance No. NS-2039. The Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Plan was amended on October 3, 1994, by Ordinance No. NS-2231 to exempt certain properties from eminent domain. On October 3, 1994, in accordance with AB 1290, the plan was amended a second time by Ordinance No. NS-2234 to establish certain time limits including a time limit on incurring debt of December 4, 2009; a time limit on plan effectiveness of December 4, 2024, and limit on receipt of tax increment/repayment of debt of December 4, 2034. On August 2, 1999, the third amendment adopted by Ordinance No. NS-2396 extended the time limit on plan effectiveness by 5 years to December 4, 2029, and the limit on receipt of tax by 5 years to December 4, 2039, to coincide with the maximum time limits prescribed by AB 1290 as amended by a summary ordinance in accordance with AB 1342. The proposed Merger will be the fourth amendment to the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Plan. C. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The Agency's Five-Year (2000-2005) Implementation Plan outlines various Redevelopment Plan goals and objectives for each of the Project Areas. In general, the goals and objectives are summarized below, and are outlined for each of the Project Areas on Table 3. 1. Eliminate physical blight. 2. Create new employment opportunities. 3. Encourage uniform and consistent land use patterns. 4. Encourage private commercial/industrial rehabilitation, development, and capital investment. 5. Implement the City's General Plan. 6. Encourage highest and best use of available land consistent with the General Plan. 7. Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 8 75D-23 TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OBJECTIVES REDEVELOPMENT PLAN MERGER AMENDMENTS SANTA ANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Project Areas Objective Central Inter-City N. Harbor S. Harbor South Main Bristol Eliminate physical blight X X X X X X Restore the economic/social health of the downtown area X Stimulate development and revitalization of downtown area X Strenghten vehicular access between downtown/retail ctrs. X Implementing street beautification/enhancement programs X X X X Preserve the aesthetic and cultural qualities of the City X Assist in the re-establlshment of businesses X Improve the City's tax base and employment opportunities X X X X X X Preserve the retail vitality of the community X Make the area a source of pride to residents/workers X X X X X X Encourage uniformed/consistent land use pattems X X X X Encourage private commercial/industrial development X X X X X Implement the General Plan X X X X X X Encourage highest and best use consistent w/ Gen.Plan X X X X Improve traffic circulation to/from Amtrak Station X Remove obsolete and substandard structures X Improve land use potential X Assemble sites for commercial/industrial developments X Rehabilitate un-reinforced masonry structures X Improve infrastructure/public facilities improvements X X X X X X Improve market potential along Harbor Blvd. X X Develop vacanUunderutilized land X X X X Improve traffic flow along South Main Street X Increase availability of off-street parking X Expand housing including for low/moderate income X X X X X X Reduce City's annual cost in providing local services X Protect the housing stock/neighborhood integrity X X X X X X Increase sales, business license, and other fees X X X X X X Provide for participation of property owners in rehabilitation X X X X X X activities Page 14 of 190 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:CCDCISanta Ana-Summary of Objectives\4127/2004110:55 AM; ema 75D-24 8. Develop vacant or underutilized industrial land. 9. Provide for increased sales, business license, and other fees, taxes, and revenues to the City of Santa Ana. 10. Expand the community's supply of housing, including opportunities for low and moderate income housing. D. AGENCY ACCOMPLISHMENTS Redevelopment in Santa Ana began with the adoption of the Central City Redevelopment Project in 1973. The project was adopted in response to deteriorating conditions in the downtown. The decline of the downtown began in the 1960's when growth in the Orange County suburbs resulted in Santa Ana's decline as the central marketplace for Orange County. Revitalization objectives included creating convenient parking, rehabilitating and retrofitting historic structures, and providing infill development that would support a mix of office, retail and residential uses. In the past 20 years, the Agency has built six public parking structures, the Fiesta Marketplace, new commercial office buildings and 600 senior units. Downtown is also the site of the new Ronald Reagan Federal Building and Courthouse. The following is a list of projects completed by the Agency within the proposed Merged Project Area: Central City Redevelopment Project: . Olson Live-Work lofts (86 total for-sale units) Festival Hall Renovation Facade Rebate Program (Historic Rehab) Bowers Museum of Cultural Art Expansion Discovery Science Center Orange County Center of Contemporary Art (OCCCA) California State University, Fullerton Grand Central Art Center Memphis Restaurant Second Street Promenade improvements (benches, trash cans, tree lighting, bollards) Town Square Condominium Housing Project Fourth Street Streetscape Improvements St. Joseph Ballet Rosswood Villas-senior housing Bowers Kidseum Main Place Mall Santa Ana Towers-senior housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . North Harbor Redevelopment Project . Riverview West Shopping Center (including Wal-Mart) Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Page 15 0 f 190 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Page 10 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090 .003.004/06128104 75D-25 South Harbor Redevelopment Project . Waxie (Janitorial Supplies Company) Street Improvements . South Main Redevelopment Project . Auto Mall Doubletree Hotel Commercial Rebate Program Street Improvements . . . Inter-City Redevelopment Project . Regional Transportation Center Street Improvements . Bristol Redevelopment Project . Digital Media Center Street Improvements . To facilitate rehabilitation of the older commercial buildings many of which are essential to the historic character of the downtown and to promote new commercial development the Agency has in the past teamed with the Santa Ana Economic Development Corporation (which has evolved into the Southland Economic Development Corporation) to providing funding for the Commercial Rehabilitation Loan Program and the Storefront Improvement Program. Through the loan programs, the Agency has estimated funding 157 new construction projects and 142 rehabilitation projects. The Agency also administers the States' Enterprise Zone program that assists businesses in securing sales, use and hiring tax credits. Through the Enterprise Zone, 18,000 jobs have been "vouchered" for Santa Ana businesses. The Agency has also funded the reuse of vacant and underutilized historic structures to benefit the City's Arts Corridor which extends from the Artists Village in the downtown to Discovery Science Center on north Main at the 1-5 Freeway. The Agency helped to fund the renovation and expansion of the Bowers Museum and Cultural Art and acquired the facility for the Kidseum. Among other cultural sport activities, the Agency assisted in the acquisition of a site for the new home of the St. Joseph Ballet, a non-profit organization designed to help under privileged youth. Redevelopment has contributed substantially to improving the infrastructure within the Project Areas. Redevelopment funded the Salgado Community Center and numerous street improvements throughout the neighborhoods. Page 16 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 11 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004/06128/04 75D-26 II. REASONS FOR AMENDING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLANS The Agency is proposing to amend the Redevelopment Plans to merge the existing Project Areas. Section 33485 et seq. of the CRL allows for merger of redevelopment project areas as a matter of public policy if they will result in substantial benefit to the public, and if they contribute to the revitalization of the Project Areas through the increased economic vitality of such areas and through increased and improved housing opportunities in or near such areas. The CRL also provides that redevelopment project areas, under the jurisdiction of a redevelopment agency, may be merged without regard to contiguity of the areas, by the amendment of each affected redevelopment plan. Furthermore, taxes attributable to each project area merged that are allocated to the redevelopment agency may be allocated to the entire merged project area for the purpose of paying the principal of, and interest on, indebtedness incurred by the redevelopment agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the merged redevelopment project. The proposed Merger of the Project Areas is a technical amendment that will allow the Agency to combine revenues from the six separate Project Areas. The Merger will also allow the Agency to prioritize spending of available tax increment revenue in order to maximize efficiency in the implementation of the Agency's redevelopment program. The Agency's redevelopment program will continue to be those activities identified in its five-year Implementation Plan (currently 2000-2005). The proposed Merger will have a substantial benefit to the public by allowing the Agency to efficiently implement its redevelopment program, which is targeted at revitalizing blighted areas and increasing the economic vitality of such areas. In addition, the Agency will continue to implement its affordable housing program, which currently exceeds the CRL's requirements for affordable housing unit production. The proposed Merger will not allow the Agency to collect any additional tax increment beyond the limits identified in the Redevelopment Plans. No increase in any financial limit or extension of any time limit is proposed as part of the Amendments. Page 17 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 12 PA0403012.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106/28104 75D-27 III. PROPOSED PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS In the past, the Agency has implemented separate programs in each of the six redevelopment Project Areas. The Agency's existing Five-Year Implementation Plan includes all of the six Project Areas within this single document and outlines the project and programs for each of the six Project Areas. With the proposed Merger, the Agency intends to consolidate the individual projects and programs for each of the six Project Areas into one set of projects and programs for the Merged Project Area that will be funded from the combined tax increment from the Merged Project Area. The Agency is not adding any new projects and programs and the existing Five-Year Implementation Plan will continue to be the implementation plan for the Merged Project Area. How and which programs are implemented within the Merged Project Area depends on the needs and objectives of the Merged Project Area and will be determined by the Agency consistent with the Five-Year Implementation Plan. Due to the lengthy timeframe for implementing the Redevelopment Plans, the redevelopment program needs to be flexible and provide the capability to respond to.changes and private sector interest in the Merged Project Area. The strategy to attain the goals and objectives is to use public investment to attract and stimulate private investment. The Agency uses legal agreements to form public-private partnerships leading to development of industrial sites, commercial centers, office buildings, and housing. The following description of proposed projects and programs is presented for the Merged Project Area. As stated above, the Agency will continue to address the needs within the Merged Project Area as described in the Five-Year Implementation Plan. However, the Agency will approach community redevelopment from the perspective of how best to achieve the redevelopment objectives from a citywide basis. Based upon the Agency's Five-Year Implementation Plan (January 1, 2000-December 31, 2005), the proposed redevelopment program for the Merged Project Area includes four (4) programs, as follows: 1) Economic/Community Development; 2) Public Facility Improvements; 3) Infrastructure Improvements; and 4) Housing. Within Section IV of this Report (financial feasibility analysis), the above listed programs are identified within the cash flow analysis as discretionary funds since exact future allocation of Agency revenues for each of the redevelopment programs beyond the current Five-Year Implementation Plan period cannot be determined. The Agency will allocate the necessary funds for each program as needed over the remaining life of the Redevelopment Plans to address each Project Area's conditions, which will include responding to private sector interests. The programs are designed to address the most significant blighting conditions in the proposed Merged Project Area. It is believed that as the most significant blighting conditions are reduced that further private sector investment will occur in the proposed Merged Project Area leading to further removal of blight. Therefore, the Agency's program of redevelopment will serve as a catalyst to remove blighting conditions and spur the preservation, improvement, creation and maintenance of affordable housing. Page 18 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 13 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-28 A. REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS 1. Economic/Community Development Economic/Community Development program will consist of the Agency enhancing the Merged Project Area by assisting in the commercial and industrial rehabilitation/ development through business retention/attraction, rehabilitation loans and site assemblage. The Agency's efforts in this program will provide new and expanded opportunities to existing businesses as well as encourage the revitalization of the proposed Merged Project Area through new commercial and industrial developmenU rehabilitation. Rehabilitation loans provided by the Agency could also assist in the preservation of historic structures through rehabilitation, relocation and reuse. The Agency will primarily assist private developers in the developmenU redevelopment of vacant, underutilized and blighted properties and will include, as necessary, the development of parking structures to create additional off-street parking. 2. Public Facility Development Public facility-based projects focus on the need for new or improved public facilities such as parks, community centers, and cultural centers and facilities. The Agency may participate financially in providing upgraded or new park facilities that are of benefit to the Merged Project Area by providing adequate recreational facilities in the proposed Merged Project Area. The Agency proposes to provide assistance in the development of art and cultural facilities including adequate parking facilities and assistance in the overall attraction of artists and art galleries to the Artists Village. 3. Infrastructure Improvements Infrastructure improvements include projects that will assist with the future development of the Merged Project Area including, but not limited to, the following: 1) transportation and circulation improvements which may entail street widening, construction of street medians, land configuration, street maintenance, and improved traffic signalization; 2) sewer improvements to alleviate infrastructure inadequacies, meet flow requirements and ensure public safety; 3) storm drain improvements including capacity for existing and new development to ensure proper drainage and on-going street improvements of Merged Project Area streets; and 4) public infrastructure improvements including sidewalks, curbs and gutters, streetscape improvements, public transit improvements, create pedestrian links and develop enhanced parkways and sidewalks, and provide access to the disabled. 4. Housing Program As required by State law, not less than 20 percent of tax increment funds allocated to the Agency pursuant to CRL Section 33670 must be deposited into the Housing Fund to be used to assist in increasing, improving and preserving the City's supply of low and Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Page 19 0 f 190 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Page 14 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106/28104 75D-29 moderate income housing available at affordable housing cost. For the Bristol Corridor Project, as part of a settlement agreement, the Agency agreed to set-aside 30 percent of the tax increment allocated to the Agency for affordable housing. The Inter-City and North Harbor Projects also contribute 30 percent of the tax increment allocated to the Agency for affordable housing while the South Harbor Project contributes 60 percent. The Agency's affordable housing requirements will be met through the rehabilitation/development of affordable housing within the Merged Project Area and Citywide as allowed by the adopted resolutions for all Project Areas to allow expenditures from the Housing Fund to be used outside of Project Areas' boundaries. Therefore, money could be spent anywhere in the City depending on the need. The Agency will evaluate projects outside of the Merged Project Area to determine the overall merits and benefits to the Agency and City as a whole. The Agency in its current Five-Year (2000-2005) Implementation Plan have outlined six (6) primary programs related to affordable housing: 1) Multi-Family Residential Rehabilitation Programs; 2) Single-family Residential Rehabilitation Programs; 3) Housing Mortgage Assistance/First Time Home Buyer Program; 4) New Residential Construction and substantial Rehabilitation Programs; 5) Mobile Home Parks Program; and 6) Assistance for the Preservation of Affordable Units. The Multi-Family Residential Rehabilitation Programs involves alleviating blighting conditions at overcrowded, small apartment complexes by working within focused neighborhoods to provide the necessary financing to improve the conditions of these properties. The Single-Family Residential Rehabilitation Programs are administered through the City's Community Development Agency and include funding by HOME, CBDG, and the Agency's housing set-aside funds. This program is available to very low-, low and moderate income families, with the majority of the funds going to households in the very low- and low range. The Agency's set-aside funds provide approximately 20 loans annually in the amount of $20,000 to $30,000. The City will be implementing a mortgage assistance program for first time homebuyers. As part of the New Residential Construction and Substantial Rehabilitation Programs, the Agency will participate with the private sector for-profit and nonprofit housing developers to develop and substantially rehabilitate a mix of ownership and rental housing opportunities throughout the City. The City has a total of 29 mobile home parks, which serve a substantial number of very low- and low income seniors and families. The City provides Agency loans between $5,000 - $7,500 to cover the cost of rehabilitation to mobile home units for eligible very low-, low and moderate income persons. This program will be funded through HOME funds and Agency funds. In addition, the Agency provides loans up to $20,000 for replacement mobile homes. The Agency, in cooperation with the Housing Authority, will continue to work with owners of affordable housing projects, which have expiring affordable housing covenants. Page 20 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 15 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-30 IV. PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING, ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY, AND REASONS FOR INCLUDING DIVISION OF TAXES PURSUANT TO SECTION 33670 Section 33352( e) of the CRL provide that the Report for the merger contain an assessment of the proposed method of financing the Merged Project Area, including an assessment of economic feasibility and the reasons for including a provision for the division of taxes pursuant to CRL Section 33670. Economic feasibility, for purposes of this analysis, is defined to be a comparative analysis of anticipated costs for implementation of the Merged Project Area and the resulting revenues expected to be generated. Economic feasibility is determined through a summarized feasibility cash flow analysis of the Project Fund for the Merged Project Area as summarized on the Table 4 cash flow. A. ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COSTS A determination of economic feasibility requires an identification of the future resources to finance future costs associated with redevelopment of the Merged Project Area and the elimination of remaining blighting conditions. Redevelopment could require significant participation from the Agency in activities to promote and achieve the desired goals and objectives of the respective Redevelopment Plans and to address blighting conditions. The redevelopment program described in this section outlines a set of activities to be implemented by the Agency for the purpose of facilitating private reinvestment in the Merged Project Area and eliminating physical and economic blighting influences, and increasing, improving and preserving the community's supply of low and moderate income housing. The estimated costs of potential future redevelopment programs over the term of the cash flow projection are as follows: Agency Bond Debt Service Transfers In (Credit) Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (presumed) Administration Contractual Obligations Budgeted Projects Affordable Housing Future Loan Repayments Future Discretionary Uses Total Estimated Expenditures $231,702,000 (19,804,000) 48,040,000 106,763,000 254,318,000 2,456,000 579,692,000 70,458,000 184.270.000 $1,457,895,000 Page 21 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 16 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106/28104 75D-31 1. Aaencv Bond Debt Service The Agency will continue to make principal and interest payments on the 1989 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds (Central City, Inter City and South Harbor Project Areas) and the 2003 Tax Allocation Bonds (South Main Project Area). While the Agency may elect to incur additional bonded indebtedness in the future, for purposes of this financial feasibility analysis no additional future bond issues are assumed in the feasibility projection. 2. Transfers In (Credit) The Santa Ana Financing Authority issued 1998 Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series A, B, C and D for the purpose of using the net proceeds to purchase the Agency's 1989 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series A, B, C and E referenced above. This enabled the Agency to realize significant savings in annual debt service payments by utilizing the leverage of pooling funds permitted by Marks Roos bonds. The rebate of the net savings is annually reflected in the Transfers In line item of the cash flow projection. 3. Educational Revenue Auamentation Fund Chapter 260, Statutes of 2003, (SB 1045) requires redevelopment agencies to shift $135 million in property tax revenues to K-12 schools and community colleges during the 2003-04 fiscal year. The shift of tax increment revenues will be placed into the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF). SB 1045 provides that one-half of the ERAF obligation of the Agency is calculated based on the gross tax increment apportioned to the Agency and the other one-half of the ERAF obligation is calculated based on net tax increment revenues retained by the Agency (net of any pass-through payments to other taxing entities), as such tax increment revenues are reported in the Community Redevelopment Agencies Annual Report of the California State Controller for FY 2001-02. The Agency allocated an ERAF payment to the County Auditor-Controller totaling approximately $1,831,000 on May 10, 2004. It is uncertain at the present time as to whether or not future ERAF payments will be required by the State. It is also not known whether the ERAF amounts will increase in future years. Therefore, for purposes of the feasibility projection, it is assumed that commencing in FY 2004-05, ERAF payments will continue to be required by the respective Project Areas in subsequent fiscal years and reflect the current year requirement. Page 22 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 17 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-32 4. Administration The projected cost to administer the redevelopment program over the life of the Merged Project Area is based on the Agency's estimate of $4,362,000 for both FY 2004-05 and FY 2005-06. Subsequent year administrative costs are projected to increase by an assumed 3% cost of living factor over the term of the projection. The administrative expenditures are assumed to continue over the effective life of the respective Project Areas. 5. Contractual Obliqations The Agency annually budgets for various existing contractual obligations unique to specific project areas as well as those of the Agency as a whole. The pre-existing contractual obligations identified in the Agency's FY 2004-05 and FY 2005-06 budget projection are detailed on Table 5. These annual obligations include trustee fees, economic development obligations, debt service on certificates of participation, debt repayments related to site-specific projects and to the City General Fund. The 20% commercial corridor settlement set-aside from the South Main tax increment revenue is also incorporated here. The contractual obligations are assumed to continue over the effective life of the respective Project Areas. 6. Budaeted Proiects Existing budgeted capital improvement projects identified in the Agency's FY 2004-05 and FY 2005-06 budget projection reflects various anticipated capital improvements in the South Main commercial corridor of the South Main Project Area. Specific subsequent year project costs were not identified by Agency staff and are not assumed in the cash flow projection. 7. Affordable Housinq The Agency is annually required to deposit 20 percent of gross tax increment revenues into the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund for the purposes of increasing, improving and preserving the community's supply of low and moderate income housing. Specific housing projects, programs and activities have not been delineated in this projection, but assume that as housing set aside funds become available they are used by the Agency to fund such expenditures. The set aside requirements of the respective Project Areas are as follows: Central City I nter City North Harbor South Harbor South Main Bristol Corridor 0% 30% 30% 60% 20% 30% Page 23 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 18 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-33 8. Future Loan ReDavments The Table 4 cash flow projects potential cash deficits, such that short-term loans may be required. The deficits are primarily the result of anticipated ongoing ERAF payments to the State to address State budget deficits, in which the Agency is assumed to borrow the required ERAF payment from the Housing Fund. Non-ERAF deficits are assumed to be funded from other Agency financing sources as necessary over the term of the projection. The projection assumes that such loans can be advanced to the Agency to meet any future cash deficits, with the loan principal and interest (assumed at 6%) to be paid on a pay-as- you-go basis in subsequent fiscal years. These short-term loans may be funded from any allowable source noted below. 9. Future Discretionarv Proiects To the extent future tax increment revenues continue to be allocated to the Agency and exceed debt service, contractual obligations, administrative costs, budgeted capital improvement projects, ERAF requirements by the State and short term loan repayments, the financial feasibility analysis assumes that the Agency will exercise its discretion in funding other future projects, programs or activities of benefit to the Merged Project Area, including the repayment of any outstanding indebtedness of the Agency. The anticipated projects, programs or activities that the Agency may undertake as future resources become available have been presented in this Report. B. FINANCING METHODS AVAILABLE TO THE AGENCY The Agency has the legal authority and flexibility to implement the revitalization of the Merged Project Area utilizing any or all of the following sources: (1) city; (2) state; (3) federal government; (4) tax increment funds in accordance with provisions of the existing CRL; (5) new tax allocation bonds; (6) interest income; (7) loans from private financial institutions; (8) lease or sale of Agency-owned property; (9) donations; (10) developer payments; and (11) any other legally available public or private sources. Current provisions of the CRL provide authority to the Agency to create indebtedness, issue bonds, borrow funds or obtain advances in implementing and carrying out the specific intents of a redevelopment plan. The Agency is authorized to fund the principal and interest on the indebtedness, bond issues, borrowed funds or advances from tax increment revenue and any other funds available to the Agency. To the extent that it is able to do so, the City may also supply additional assistance through City loans or grants for various public facilities or other project costs. The Table 4 feasibility cash flow reflects net tax increment revenues of approximately $845,082,000 over the term of the cash flow. In addition, nearly $579,692,000 would be deposited into the Agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. Other funds may be available to the Agency, as assumed on the Table 4 feasibility cash flow, including Page 24 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Page 19 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106/28104 75D-34 repayments of monies lent by the Agency and loans from other allowable financing sources noted above. Net Tax Increment Housing Set Aside Miscellaneous Revenue Loans Total Resources $845,082,000 579,692,000 872,000 32.275.000 $1,457,921,000 1. Tax Increment Revenues Table 6 presents the combined summary of tax increment revenues that have been projected for the Merged Project Area. The projections of the incremental taxable values and resulting tax increment revenues for each of the respective redevelopment project areas are shown in Table 7, Table 7a, Table 7b, Table 7c, Table 7d, Table 7e, and Table 7f. Reported assessed values for each project area provide the basis for the respective tax increment projections (values as reported by the Orange County Auditor-Controller for FY 2003-04). Future, tax increment revenues are based upon assumed increases in the annual incremental assessed valuation resulting from a real property 4% annual inflationary increase allowable under Article XIIIA of the California Constitution. The gross tax increment revenues projected for the Merged Project Area over the term of the feasibility cash flow projection amounts to $1,961,741,000, of which $579,692,000 would be deposited into the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, $39,235,000 would be paid in County administrative charges, $447,173,000 would be paid to affected taxing agencies under current tax sharing agreements and $50,560,000 would be paid under statutory pass through formulas to other taxing agencies triggered as a result of the elimination of the debt incurrence time limits (per 58 211) of the South Main, North Harbor and South Harbor Project Areas. Net tax increment revenues amount to $845,082,000. 2. Housina Set Aside The Agency is annually required to deposit 20 percent of gross tax increment revenues generated by the Merged Project Area into the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund for the purposes of increasing, improving and preserving the community's supply of low and moderate income housing. Specific housing-related projects, programs and activities are not delineated in by the Agency to fund such expenditures. The feasibility cash flow, but assume that as housing set aside funds become available they are used. 3. Miscellaneous Revenues Existing miscellaneous revenues identified in the Agency's FY 2004-05 and FY 2005-06 budget projection reflects loan repayments anticipated in the Central City, South Harbor and South Main Project Areas. Page 25 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 20 PA0403012.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090 .003.004106128/04 75D-35 4. Loans The cash flow projects potential cash deficits, as discussed above. The deficits are primarily the result of assumed on-going ERAF payments to the State as a result of State budget deficits. The cash flow assumes that short-term loans can be advanced to the Agency, as necessary, to meet any future year deficits. The projection assumes that the Agency may borrow from the Housing Fund in order to meet the ERAF payments. Non- ERAF deficits are assumed to be funded from other Agency financing sources. Loan principal and interest (assumed at 6%) to be paid, on a pay-as-you-go basis, within the subsequent fiscal years. The short-term loans may be funded from any allowable source outlined above. C. PROPOSED FINANCING METHOD, ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY, AND REASONS FOR INCLUDING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING The anticipated costs to implement a program of revitalization in the Merged Project Area will require significant participation from the Agency as it implements activities that promote and achieve the stated goals and objectives of the Amended Plan. Economic feasibility of the Merged Project Area has been determined based upon a comparative cash flow analysis of the anticipated costs for implementation of the proposed redevelopment program to the resulting projected resources expected to be generated over the life of the Merged Project Area. The financial feasibility cash flow summarized on Table 4 was created to represent one scenario of economic feasibility and similar to Tables 5 through 7F are based upon information provided to KMA in February 2004. At the discretion of the Agency, other funding sources discussed above may also represent viable funding alternatives for economic feasibility of the Amended Plan. Although the Agency may consider other funding sources permitted in the Amended Plan, not all of the funding sources may be available or be feasible for the Agency to use in financing the anticipated costs and revenue shortfalls. In the event that neither the City nor the private market acting alone could fully bear the costs associated with revitalization of the Merged Project Area, the implementation of a redevelopment program utilizing tax increment revenues must be considered as a viable financing tool. Page 26 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 21 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106/28104 75D-36 Table 4 Financial Feasibility Cashflow Proposed Project Area Merger Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency (OOO's Omitted) Central City Plan T enninalion 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 I 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Resources: 1 Net Tax Increment (Table 7) 23,738 23,012 22,652 23,566 24,516 25,502 26,513 27,563 28,653 29,784 30,940 31,744 32,974 2 Housing Revenue (Table 7) 10,443 10,951 11,478 12,025 12,592 13,181 13,791 14,424 15,082 15,763 16,471 17,205 17,967 3 Miscellaneous Revenue (Table 5) 800 16 16 16 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Resources 34,980 33,978 34,145 35,607 37,116 38,690 40,312 41,987 43,734 45,547 47,410 48,949 50,940 Expenditures: 5 Agency Bond Debt Service (Table 6) 13,715 13,714 13,726 13,738 13,735 13,744 13,761 13,766 13,775 13,793 13,794 13,808 13,810 6 Transfers In (1998 vs 1989 DS credit) (1,211) (1,193) (1,216) (1,217) (1,216) (1,227) (1,236) (1,230) (1,240) (1,245) (1,252) (1,251) (1,264) 7 ERAF (Table 5) 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 8 Administration (Table 5) 4,362 4,362 4,493 4,628 4,767 4,910 5,057 5,209 5,365 5,526 5,692 5,863 6,038 ~ Contractual Obligations (Table 5) 9,305 9,080 9,607 8,968 8,864 9,149 9,366 9,695 9,862 10,069 10,504 9,317 8,342 ;;?(ì Budgeted Projects (Table 5) 1,228 1,228 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \QO Affordable Housing 10,443 10,951 11,478 12,025 12,592 13,181 13,791 14,424 15,082 15,763 16,471 17,205 17,967 (J) Total Expenditures 39,673 39,972 39,919 39,972 40,572 41,588 42,570 43,694 44,675 45,737 47,039 46,773 46,725 tvl ~ Additional Resources: ~~ Loan from Housing Fund (ERAF) 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,707 941 190 0 0 0 14 Loan from Other Sources 2,862 4,163 3,943 2,535 1,625 1,067 428 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 15 Total Additional Resources 4,693 5,994 5,774 4,365 3,456 2,898 2,258 1,707 941 190 0 0 0 0 Additional Expenditures: 16 Hsg Loan Repaid (50% pay-as-you-go Net TI) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 186 1,088 2,108 17 Other Loans Repaid (50% pay-as-you-go Net TI) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 544 1,054 18 Discretionary Agency Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 544 1,053 19 Total Additional Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 371 2,176 4,215 20 Ending Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Sta Ana Merger 02-23-04: Cash: Sn/2004: GSH: Page 1 of 3 Table 4 Financial Feasibility Cashflow Proposed Project Area Merger Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency (OOO's Omitted) N Harbor, S Harbor, S Main Inter City Plan T ennination & Central City Plan TI Receipt Brislcl Corr Plan T 8fTI'Iinalion 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Resources: 1 Net Tax Increment (Table 7) 34,251 35,577 36,955 38,382 39,865 41 ,406 26,893 27,915 28,780 27,721 28,418 29,522 30,668 2 Housing Revenue (Table 7) 18,757 19,578 20,429 21,313 22,230 23,181 24,169 25,195 26,259 25,907 26,813 27,932 29,093 3 Miscellaneous Revenue (Table 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Resources 53,008 55,154 57,383 59,694 62,094 64,587 51,061 53,110 55,039 53,627 55,231 57,453 59,760 Expenditures: 5 Agency Bond Debt Service (Table 6) 13,817 13,816 10,929 1,290 1,291 1,294 1,295 1,294 1,297 1,297 1,300 1,301 1,300 6 Transfers In (1998 vs 1989 DS credit) (1,268) (1,257) (1,281) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 ERAF (Table 5) 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,427 1,427 1 ,427 1,427 1,427 1,427 1,427 8 Administration (Table 5) 6,220 6,406 6,598 6,796 7,000 7,210 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 I"( 9 Contractual Obligations (Table 5) 8,590 8,846 9,112 9,352 9,638 9,934 7,231 7,526 7,833 8,151 8,482 8,825 9,181 PJ-"" Budgeted Projects (Table 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~(.h Affordable Housing 18,757 19,578 20,429 21,313 22,230 23,181 24,169 25,195 26,259 25,907 26,813 27,932 29,093 ~~ Total Expenditures 47,946 49,220 47,618 40,582 41,989 43,451 34,156 35,477 36,851 36,819 38,060 39,524 41,041 CDI . 0 W Additional Resources: 0 0 H1cø Loan from Housing Fund (ERAF) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I--' 14 Loan from Other Sources 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \.0 15 Total Additional Resources 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Expenditures: 16 Hsg Loan Repaid (50% pay-as-you-go Net TI) 2,531 2,967 4.882 9,556 7,115 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 17 Other Loans Repaid (50% pay-as-you-go Net TI) 1.265 1,484 2,441 4,778 6,495 10,568 8,452 2,851 0 0 0 0 0 18 Discretionary Agency Expenditures 1,265 1,483 2,441 4,778 6,494 10,568 8,452 14,781 18,187 16,808 17.171 17,929 18,718 19 Total Additional Expenditures 5.061 5,934 9,764 19,112 20,104 21,136 16,904 17,632 18,187 16,808 17,171 17,929 18,718 20 Ending Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Sta Ana Merger 02-23-04: Cash: 5n12004: GSH: Page 2 of 3 Table 4 Financial Feasibility Cashflow Proposed Project Area Merger Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency (OOO's Omitted) N Harbor, S Harbor, S Main, Inter City TlReceipt Bristol COlT TI Receipt 2030-31 2031-32 2032-33 2033-34 2034-35 2035-36 2036-37 2037-38 2038-39 TOTAL Resources: 1 Net Tax Increment (Table 7) 31,858 33,094 349 357 365 374 383 392 402 0 845,082 2 Housing Revenue (Table 7) 30,299 31,550 3,155 3,313 3,476 3,646 3,822 4,006 4,197 0 579,692 3 Miscellaneous Revenue (Table 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 872 4 Total Resources 62,156 64,644 3,504 3,669 3,840 4,019 4,205 4,398 4,599 0 1,425,630 Expenditures: 5 Agency Bond Debt Service (Table 6) 1,301 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 231,702 6 Transfers In (1998 vs 1989 DS credit) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (19,804) 7 ERAF (Table 5) 1 ,427 1 ,427 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 0 48,040 8 Administration (Table 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106,763 t¡j Contractual Obligations (Table 5) 9,551 9,936 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 254,318 ~~ 9 c.n CD 10 Budgeted Projects (Table 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,456 11 . Affordable Housing 30,299 31,550 3,155 3,313 3,476 3,646 3,822 4,006 4,197 0 579,692 C N 12 Total Expenditures 42,578 42,912 3,215 3,373 3,536 3,706 3,882 4,066 4,257 0 1,203,166 \.0 I 0 W HI Additional Resources: CD I-' 13 Loan from Housing Fund (ERAF) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,652 \.0 14 Loan from Other Sources 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,623 0 15 Total Additional Resources 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32,275 Additional Expenditures: 16 Hsg Loan Repaid (50% pay-as-you-go Net TI) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,433 17 Other Loans Repaid (50% pay-as-you-go Net TI) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,025 18 Discretionary Agency Expenditures 19,578 21,731 288 296 304 313 322 332 342 0 184,270 19 Total Additional Expenditures 19,578 21,731 288 296 304 313 322 332 342 0 254,728 20 Ending Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Sta Ana Merger 02-23-04: Cash: 5fl/2004: GSH: Page 3 of 3 Table 5 Revenue & Expenditure Detail Proposed Project Area Merger Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency (OOO's Omitted) Central City Plan Termination RP Description 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 I 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 Miscellaneous Resources: CC loan Repayment - Comml Rehabs 10 10 10 10 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SH loan Repayment - Comml Rehabs 8 6 6 6 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SM loan Repayment - Auto Mall Saab 782 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Misc Resources 800 16 16 16 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Assumed ERAF CC Central City ERAF 404 404 404 404 404 404 404 404 404 404 404 404 404 404 404 IC Inter City ERAF 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 I"d NH North Harbor ERAF 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 p¡ ~H South Harbor ERAF 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 j.nM South Main ERAF 741 741 741 741 741 741 741 741 741 741 741 741 741 741 741 COC Bristol Corridor ERAF 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 0 I Total ERAF Agency-Wide 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 ~ tP Administration at 3% COLA 623 623 641 660 680 701 722 743 766 789 812 837 862 888 914 0 NH Admin Redevelopment SH Admin Redevelopment 25 25 26 27 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 SH Admin Services 647 647 666 686 707 728 750 772 795 819 844 869 895 922 950 8M Admin Redevelopment 736 736 758 781 804 828 853 879 905 932 960 989 1,019 1,049 1,081 SM Admin Economic Development 1,167 1,167 1,202 1,238 1,275 1,313 1,352 1,393 1,435 1,478 1,522 1,568 1,615 1,663 1,713 8M Admin Non-Divisional 232 232 239 246 254 261 269 277 285 294 303 312 321 331 341 SM Admin Services 913 913 941 969 998 1,028 1,059 1,091 1,123 1,157 1,192 1,227 1,264 1,302 1,341 BC Admin Redevelopment 20 20 21 21 22 23 23 24 25 25 26 27 28 29 29 Total Administrative Services 4,362 4,362 4,493 4,628 4,767 4,910 5,057 5,209 5,365 5,526 5,692 5,863 6,038 6,220 6,406 Source: Baseline estimates provided by Agency staff Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Sta Ana Merger 02-23-04: Exp: 5/7/2004: GSH: Page 1 of 4 Table 5 Revenue & Expenditure Detail Proposed Project Area Merger Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency (OOO's Omitted) N Harbor, S Harbor, S Main N Harbor, S Harbor, Inter City Plan Termination 5 Main, Inter City & Central City Plan TI Receipt Brislo1 Corr Plan Termination TI Receipt RP Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 I 2032-33 Miscellaneous Resources: CC Loan Repayment - Comml Rehabs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SH Loan Repayment - Comml Rehabs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SM Loan Repayment - Auto Mall Saab 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Mise Resources 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Assumed ERAF CC Central City ERAF 404 404 404 404 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IC Inter City ERAF 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 0 ~ NH North Harbor ERAF 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 0 SH South Harbor ERAF 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 0 c.n> SM South Main ERAF 741 741 741 741 741 741 741 741 741 741 741 741 741 0 ~ BC Bristol Corridor ERAF 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Total ERAF Agency-Wide 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,831 1,427 1 ,427 1 ,427 1 ,427 1,427 1 ,427 1,427 1 ,427 1,427 60 ~ Administration at 3% COLA ....... NH Admin Redevelopment 942 970 999 1,029 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 SH Admin Redevelopment 38 39 40 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SH Admin Services 978 1,008 1,038 1,069 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SM Admin Redevelopment 1,113 1,146 1,181 1,216 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SM Admin Economic Development 1,765 1,818 1,872 1,928 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SM Admin Non-Divisional 351 362 372 384 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SM Admin Services 1,382 1 ,423 1,466 1,510 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BC Admin Redevelopment 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 0 0 0 Total Administrative Services 6,598 6,796 7,000 7,210 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 0 0 0 Source: Baseline estimates provided by Agency staff Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Sta Ana Merger 02-23-04: Exp: 51712004: GSH: Page 2 of 4 Table 5 Revenue & Expenditure Detail Proposed Project Area Merger Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency (OOO's Omitted) Central City Plan Termination RP Description 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 I 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 Contractual ObliGations CC Loan Repayment - SA Venture 800 816 832 849 866 883 901 919 937 956 975 995 1,015 1,035 1,056 CC Trustee Fees 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 CC Pacific Symphony 145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC Cal State Fullerton Subsidy 80 80 80 80 80 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC DSC Lease Payment 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 CC Orange County High School for the Arts 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC Sycamore Garage 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 CC 2002 $2.8M COP (Phillips-Hutton) 368 369 367 367 369 367 368 369 184 0 0 0 0 0 0 tcJ IC Trustee Fees 89A & 98C 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 ~ ~ Trustee Fees 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 CD CJ!Ii FHP Lease 200 200 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w~ Trustee Fees 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 N ISM Doubletree Agency Assistance Amount 375 400 712 733 503 519 534 550 567 584 601 619 0 0 0 ~ GF Repay - CC Parking Garage DS 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 GF Repay - DT Prop Mgmt/Maint 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 ~ SM GF Repay - Senior Parking 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 0 SM GF Repay - 2003 COPs (DT Pkg) 1,867 1,900 1,950 1,317 1,261 1.346 1,434 1,547 1,676 1,835 2,029 595 0 0 0 SM Commercial Corridor 20% Set-Aside 3,289 3,434 3,585 3,742 3,904 4,073 4,248 4,430 4,618 4,814 5,017 5,228 5,447 5,674 5,910 Total Contractual Obligations 9,305 9,080 9,607 8,968 8,864 9,149 9,366 9,695 9,862 10,069 10,504 9,317 8,342 8,590 8,846 Budaeted Proiects: SM Comm Corr S Main St Imps 828 828 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SM Comm Corr First & Main 400 400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Budgeted Projects 1,228 1,228 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Source: Baseline estimates provided by Agency staff Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Sta Ana Merger 02-23-04: Exp: 51712004: GSH: Page 3 of 4 Table 5 Revenue & Expenditure Detail Proposed Project Area Merger Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency (000'5 Omitted) N Harbor, S Harbor, S Main N Harbor, S Harbor, Inter City Plan Tenninaöon S Main. Inter City & Central City Plan TI Receipt Bristol Corr Plan T erminalion TI Receipt RP Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 2032-33 Contractual Obllaatlons CC Loan Repayment - SA Venture 1,077 1,098 1,120 1,143 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC Trustee Fees 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC Pacific Symphony 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC Cal State Fullerton Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC DSC Lease Payment 135 135 135 135 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC Orange County High School for the Arts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC Sycamore Garage 180 180 180 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC 2002 $2.8M COP (Phillips-Hutton) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '"d IC Trustee Fees 89A & 98C 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) ~ SH Trustee Fees 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SH FHP Lease 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SM Trustee Fees 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ SM Doubletree Agency Assistance Amount 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SM GF Repay - CC Parking Garage DS 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W SM GF Repay - OT Prop MgmtlMaint 300 300 300 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1..0 SM GF Repay - Senior Parking 30 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SM GF Repay - 2003 COPs (DT Pkg) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SM Commercial Corridor 20% Set-Aside 6,155 6,409 6,673 6,947 7,231 7,526 7,833 8,151 8,482 8,825 9,181 9,551 9,936 0 Total Contractual Obligations 9,112 9,352 9,638 9,934 7,231 7,526 7,833 8,151 8,482 8,825 9,181 9,551 9,936 0 Budaeted Prolects: SM Comm Corr S Main St Imps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SM Comm Corr First & Main 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Budgeted Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Source: Baseline esümates provided by Agency staff Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Sta Ana Merger 02-23-04: Exp: 5m2004: GSH: Page 4 of 4 Table 6 Existing Debt Service & Other Senior Obligations Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency (OOO's Omitted) I Central City Redevelopment Project Fin Authority Fin Authority Fin Authority Agency Agency 1998 Ser A 1998 Ser B 1998 Ser D 1989 Ser B 1989 Ser E Refunding Tax Allocation Refunding Financing Tax Allocation Main Place Agency Rev Bds Bonds Rev Bds Authority Refunding T A Refund Debt Svc FY Acct6948 Acct6948 Fd 402-933 Obligation Fd 517 Fd 518 Obligations 2004-05 4,162,140 925,325 1 ,545,455 6,632,920 5,771,119 1,750,733 7,521,851 2005-06 4,168,995 928,159 1 ,552,708 6,649,862 5,768,781 1,754,659 7,523,440 2006-07 4,161 ,525 924,841 1,557,481 6,643,846 5,770,566 1,759,824 7,530,389 2007-08 4,153,450 925,369 1,559,721 6,638,540 5,770,550 1,761,314 7,531,864 2008-09 4,154,825 924,616 1,564,045 6,643,486 5,767,997 1 ,763,945 7.531,942 2009-10 4,145,865 922,581 1,565,224 6,633,670 5,766,984 1,767,350 7,534,334 2010-11 4,140,953 924,138 1,568,041 6,633,132 5,769,413 1,770.945 7,540,358 2011-12 4,143,875 924,156 1,572,375 6,640,406 5,768,850 1,774.345 7,543,195 2012-13 4,139,750 922,638 1,582,723 6,645,110 5,770,663 1,782,195 7,552,858 2013-14 4,138,625 919,581 1 ,584,248 6,642,454 5,768,538 1,784,125 7,552,663 2014-15 4,130,250 919,859 1,592,098 6,642,207 5,770,975 1,789,765 7,560,740 2015-16 4,129,250 918,344 1,600,860 6,648,454 5,771,288 1,793,560 7,564,848 2016-17 4,125,125 915,034 1 ,604,940 6,645,099 5,767,975 1,799,953 7,567,928 2017-18 4,122,500 914,803 1,609,060 6,646,363 5,768,194 1,803,395 7,571,589 2018-19 4,116,000 917,394 1,618,420 6,651,814 5,757,656 1,808,325 7,565,981 2019-20 4,110,250 912,806 1,685,920 6,708,976 5,768,325 1,871,785 7,640,110 2020-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2021-22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022-23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2023-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2024-25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025-26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026-27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2027-28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2028-29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2029-30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2030-31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2031-32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 66,243,378 14,739,644 25,363,317 106,346,338 92,297,872 28,536,217 120,834,089 Source: Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency Page 34 of 190 Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Sta Ana Merger 02-23-04: DebtSvc: 5/7/2004:1~t)a.:~~ 2 Table 6 Existing Debt Service & Other Senior Obligations Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency (OOO's Omitted) I Inter City Convnuter Station South Harbor I Fairview South Main Fin Authority Agency Fin Authority Agency 1998 Ser C 1989 Ser A 1998 Ser A 1989 Ser C Agency Agency Total Tax Allocation Tax Allocation Refunding Tax Allocation Ser2003A Ser2003B South Bonds Refunding Rev Bds Refunding New Money New Money Main St FY Acct6948 Fd 527 Acct6948 Bonds TAB TAB Obligations 2004-05 667,613 739,888 1,012,030 1,261,781 1,282,448 2,909,475 4,191,923 2005-06 668,240 741,763 1,014,390 1,260,606 1,276,448 2,911,475 4,187,923 2006-07 662,800 742,188 1,011,913 1,262,075 1,279,248 2,912,475 4,191,723 2007-08 666,300 741,163 1,011,825 1,261,006 1,279,448 2,924,475 4,203,923 2008-09 663,748 738,688 1,009,200 1,262,219 1,278,198 2,923,925 4,202,123 2009-1 0 664,945 739,581 1,009,084 1,260,531 1,279,173 2,930,400 4,209,573 2010-11 664,728 738,663 1,006,296 1,260,763 1,283,423 2,938,000 4,221,423 2011-12 663,055 740,750 1,008,000 1,257,731 1,280,710 2,943,500 4,224,210 2012-13 660,105 740,663 1,009,125 1,261,075 1,281,810 2,939,000 4,220,810 2013-14 660,480 743,219 1,008,500 1,260,431 1,286,510 2,949,750 4,236,260 2014-15 659,020 738,419 1,006,125 1,260,619 1,284,730 2,949,750 4,234,480 2015-16 661,020 741,081 1,006,875 1,261,275 1,286,605 2,954,250 4,240,855 2016-17 656,480 740,844 1 ,005,625 1,262,038 1,286,905 2,952,750 4,239,655 2017-18 655,400 742,525 1,002,375 1,257,725 1,284,905 2,960,250 4,245,155 2018-19 657,500 740,944 1,002,000 1,261,025 1,286,905 2,961,000 4,247,905 2019-20 652,780 740,919 999,375 1,261,175 1 ,286,975 0 1,286,975 2020-21 0 0 0 0 1,290,055 0 1,290,055 2021-22 0 0 0 0 1,290,870 0 1,290,870 2022-23 0 0 0 0 1,294,350 0 1,294,350 2023-24 0 0 0 0 1,295,200 0 1,295,200 2024-25 0 0 0 0 1,294,250 0 1,294,250 2025-26 0 0 0 0 1,296,500 0 1,296,500 2026-27 0 0 0 0 1,296,725 0 1,296,725 2027-28 0 0 0 0 1,299,925 0 1.299,925 2028-29 0 0 0 0 1,300,875 0 1,300,875 2029-30 0 0 0 0 1,299,575 0 1,299,575 2030-31 0 0 0 0 1,301,025 0 1,301,025 2031-32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 10,584,213 11,851,294 16,122,738 20,172,075 34,783,788 44,060,475 78,844,263 Source: Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency Page 35 of 190 Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Sta Ana Merger 02-23-04: DebtSvc: 5nI2004:1~:[1~~g2 Table 7 Tax Increment Revenue Summary Proposed Project Area Merger Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency (OOO's Omitted) 2 3 4 5 6 7 Statutory Total Tax Net TI After Pass Thru Net TI After Increment County Existing Housing & SMain Triggered Revenue Housing Admin Fee Pass Existing N Harbor Statutory FY at 1% Set Aside -2% Throughs Pass Thrus S Harbor Pass Thru (10,443) (782) (4,054) 23,813 (75) 23,738 (10,951) (819) (5,997) 23,165 (153) 23,012 (11,478) (857) (7,621) 22,885 (234) 22,652 (12,025) (896) (8,019) 23,884 (317) 23,566 (12,592) (938) (8,431) 24,920 (404) 24,516 (13,181 ) (980) (8,859) 25,997 (495) 25,502 (13,791) (1,025) (9,303) 27,114 (601) 26,513 (14,424) (1,071) (9,764) 28,275 (712) 27,563 (15,082) (1,118) (10,242) 29,480 (827) 28,653 (15,763) (1 ,168) (10,738) 30,731 (947) 29,784 (16,471) (1 ,219) (11,253) 32,030 (1,091) 30,940 (17,205) (1,273) (12,184) 32,984 (1,240) 31,744 (17,967) (1,328) (12,755) 34,369 (1,395) 32,974 (18,757) (1,386) (13,348) 35,807 (1 ,556) 34,251 (19,578) (1,446) (13,964) 37,300 (1,723) 35,577 (20,429) (1,508) (14,603) 38,851 (1,897) 36,955 (21,313) (1,572) (15,266) 40,462 (2,080) 38,382 (22,230) (1,639) (15,955) 42,136 (2,270) 39,865 (23,181) (1,709) (16,670) 43,874 (2,468) 41,406 (24,169) (1,452) (17,412) 29,566 (2,673) 26,893 (25,195) (1,514) (18,182) 30,802 (2,886) 27,915 (26,259) (1,578) (19,180) 31,888 (3,108) 28,780 (25,907) (1,548) (19,826) 30,102 (2,381) 27,721 (26,813) (1,601) (20,665) 30,964 (2,546) 28,418 (27,932) (1,668) (21,560) 32,239 (2,718) 29,522 (29,093) (1,738) (22,489) 33,563 (2,896) 30,668 (30,299) (1,810) (23,454) 34,938 (3,081) 31,858 (31,550) (1,885) (24,455) 36,367 (3,273) 33,094 (3,155) (210) (6,277) 875 (527) 349 (3,313) (221 ) (6,588) 920 (564) 357 (3,476) (232) (6,912) 967 (602) 365 (3,646) (243) (7,248) 1,016 (642) 374 (3,822) (255) (7,598) 1,066 (683) 383 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 2032-33 2033-34 2034-35 2035-36 2036-37 2037 39,091 40,931 42,841 44,824 46,881 49,017 51,233 53,534 55,922 58,401 60,974 63,646 66,419 69,298 72,287 75,391 78,613 81,959 85,433 72,599 75,693 78,905 77,383 80,044 83,399 86,883 90,501 94,257 10,518 11,042 11 ,587 12,153 12,741 5 -38 13,3 3 (4,006) (267) (7,961) 1,119 (726) 392 2038-39 13,989 (4,197) (280) (8,339) 1,174 (771) 402 2039-40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 1,961,741 (579,692) (39,235) (447,173) 895,642 (50,560) 845,082 Page 36 of 190 Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Sta Ana Merger 02-23-04: Sum: 517/2004: G' m~46 Appendix Table 7-A Tax Increment Revenue Projection Central City Redevelopment Project Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency (OOO's Omitted) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total Tax Less Existing Net TI After Total Increment Increment Housing County Pass Housing & Project Over Base Revenue Set Aside Admin Fee Throughs Existing FY Value (1) $112,114 at 1 % (5) 0% -2% Agreements Pass Thrus (2) 2004-05 835,501 723.386 7,807 0 (156) 0 7,651 2005-06 867,034 754,920 8,123 0 (162) 0 7.960 2006-07 899,792 787.677 8,450 0 (169) 0 8.281 2007-08 933.821 821,707 8.790 0 (176) 0 8,615 2008-09 969,172 857.058 9,144 0 (183) 0 8,961 2009-10 1,005.897 893,783 9,511 0 (190) 0 9.321 2010-11 1.044,050 931,936 9,893 0 (198) 0 9.695 2011-12 1.083,688 971.573 10,289 0 (206) 0 10,083 2012-13 1,124,868 1,012,754 10,701 0 (214) 0 10,487 (3) 2013-14 1,167,653 1,055.539 11.129 0 (223) 0 10,906 2014-15 1,212,105 1,099,990 11,573 0 (231) 0 11,342 2015-16 1,258,289 1,146,175 12,035 0 (241) 0 11 ,794 2016-17 1.306,275 1.194,161 12,515 0 (250) 0 12,265 2017-18 1.356,134 1,244,020 13.014 0 (260) 0 12,753 2018-19 1,407,939 1.295,825 13,532 0 (271) 0 13,261 2019-20 1 ,461,768 1,349,654 14,070 0 (281) 0 13,788 2020-21 1,517,700 1,405,586 14,629 0 (293) 0 14,337 2021-22 1,575.818 1,463,704 15,210 0 (304) 0 14,906 2022-23 1.636,209 1,524,095 15,814 0 (316) 0 15,498 (4) 2023-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 216,229 0 (4,325) 0 211,904 Note: Commencing in FY 2004-05, secured values increase by 4% per year and unsecured values by 2% per YI (1) Project value as reported by the Orange County Auditor Controller. (2) Debt incurrence limit of January 1, 2004 (FY 2003-04) (3) Plan effectiveness limit of July 2,2013 (FY 2013-14) (4) Debt repayment limit of July 2,2023 (FY 2023-24) and tax increment allocations cease after such date. (5) Includes Unitary tax revenue, estimated County administrative fees and any forfeitures caused by tax increment being reached. Page 37 of 190 Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Sta Ana Merger 02-23-04: CC: 4/27/2004: GSH: Pf51D~4 7 Appendix Table 7-B Tax Increment Revenue Projection Inter City Commuter Station Project Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency (000'5 Omitted) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total Tax Less Existing Net TI After Total Increment Increment Housing County Pass Housing & Project Over Base Revenue Set Aside Admin Fee Through Existing FY Value (1) $91,286 at 1% (5) -30% -2% Agreements Pass Thrus (2) 2004-05 291 ,920 200,634 2,043 (613) (41) (67) 1,322 2005-06 302,839 211,553 2,152 (646) (43) (71) 1,392 2006-07 314,180 222,894 2,265 (680) (45) (75) 1,466 2007 -08 325,959 234,673 2,383 (715) (48) (78) 1,542 2008-09 338,194 246,908 2,505 (752) (50) (83) 1,621 2009-10 350,901 259,616 2,632 (790) (53) (87) 1,703 2010-11 364,101 272,815 2,764 (829) (55) (91) 1,789 2011-12 377,812 286,526 2,902 (870) (58) (96) 1,877 2012-13 392,054 300,768 3,044 (913) (61) (100) 1,970 2013-14 406,849 315,563 3,192 (958) (64) (105) 2,065 2014-15 422,218 330,932 3,346 (1,004) (67) (110) 2,165 2015-16 438,183 346,897 3,505 (1,052) (70) (115) 2,268 2016-17 454,768 363,482 3,671 (1,101) (73) (121) 2,375 2017-18 471,998 380,712 3,843 (1,153) (77) (127) 2,487 2018-19 489,898 398,612 4,022 (1,207) (80) (132) 2,603 2019-20 508,495 417,209 4,208 (1,263) (84) (139) 2,723 2020-21 527,815 436,529 4,402 (1,320) (88) (145) 2,848 2021-22 547,888 456,602 4,602 (1,381) (92) (152) 2,978 (3) 2022-23 568,742 477,457 4,811 (1,443) (96) (158) 3,113 2023-24 590,410 499,124 5,028 (1,508) (101) (166) 3,253 2024-25 612,923 521,637 5,253 (1,576) (105) (173) 3,399 2025-26 636,314 545,028 5,487 (1,646) (110) (181) 3,550 2026-27 660,619 569,333 5,730 (1,719) (115) (189) 3,707 2027 -28 685,872 594,586 5,982 (1,795) (120) (197) 3,871 2028-29 712,113 620,827 6,245 (1,873) (125) (206) 4,041 2029-30 739,379 648,093 6,517 (1,955) (130) (215) 4,217 2030-31 767,711 676,425 6,801 (2,040) (136) (224) 4,400 2031-32 797,152 705,866 7,095 (2,128) (142) (234) 4,591 (4) 2032-33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 116,428 (34,929) (2,329) (3,835) 75,336 Note: Commencing In FY 2004-05, secured values Increase by 4% per year and unsecured values by 2% per year. (1) Projecl value as reported by the Orange COunty Aud~or Controller. (2) Debt Incurrence limit of January 3, 2004 (FY 2003-(4) (3) Plan effectiveness limit ot July 6, 2022 (FY 2022-23) (4) Debt repayment limit of July 6, 2032 (FY 2032-33) and tax increment allocations cease after such date. (5) Includes Unitary tax revenue, estimated County administrative fees and any forfeitures caused by tax Increment receipts limit being reached. Page 38 of 190 Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Sta Ana Merger 02-23-04: IC: 4/27/2004: GSH: '51ð~48 Appendix Table 7-C Tax Increment Revenue Projection North Harbor Boulevard Project Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency (000'5 Omitted) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 SB211 Total Tax Less Existing Net TI After Triggered Net TI After Total Increment Increment Housing County Pass Housing & Statutory Statutory Project Over Base Revenue Set Aside Admin Fee Throughs Existing Pass Thru Pass Thru FY Value (1) $53,289 at 1% (5) -30% -2% Agreements Pass Thrus Payments Trigger (2) 2004-05 258,130 204,841 2,064 (619) (41) (82) 1,322 (18) 1,303 2005-06 268,038 214,749 2,163 (649) (43) (86) 1,385 (37) 1,348 2006-07 278,335 225,045 2,266 (680) (45) (90) 1,451 (57) 1,394 2007-08 289,034 235,745 2,373 (712) (47) (94) 1,520 (78) 1 ,442 2008-09 300,153 246,864 2,484 (745) (50) (98) 1,591 (99) 1,492 2009-10 311,708 258,419 2,600 (780) (52) (103) 1,665 (121) 1,543 2010-11 323,716 270,427 2,720 (816) (54) (108) 1,742 (144) 1,597 2011-12 336,195 282,906 2,844 (853) (57) (113) 1,822 (168) 1,653 2012-13 349,164 295,875 2,974 (892) (59) (118) 1,905 (193) 1,711 2013-14 362,642 309,353 3,109 (933) (62) (123) 1,991 (219) 1,772 2014-15 376,650 323,360 3,249 (975) (65) (129) 2,081 (264) 1,817 2015-16 391,208 337,918 3,395 (1,018) (68) (134) 2,174 (310) 1,864 2016-17 406,338 353,048 3,546 (1,064) (71) (140) 2,271 (358) 1,913 2017-18 422,062 368,773 3,703 (1,111) (74) (147) 2,371 (408) 1,963 2018-19 438,406 385,116 3,867 (1,160) (77) (153) 2,476 (460) 2,016 2019-20 455,392 402,102 4,036 (1,211) (81) (160) 2,585 (514) 2,071 2020-21 473,046 419,757 4,213 (1,264) (84) (167) 2,698 (570) 2,128 2021-22 491,396 438,106 4,396 (1,319) (88) (174) 2,815 (629) 2,187 (3) 2022-23 510,468 457,179 4,587 (1,376) (92) (182) 2,938 (689) 2,248 2023-24 530,291 477,002 4,785 (1,436) (96) (190) 3,065 (752) 2,312 2024-25 550,896 497,606 4,991 (1,497) (100) (198) 3,197 (818) 2,379 2025-26 572,312 519,022 5,206 (1,562) (104) (206) 3,334 (886) 2,448 2026-27 594,572 541,283 571 (171) (11) (23) 366 0 366 2027-28 617,711 564,421 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2028-29 641,762 588,472 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2029-30 666,762 613,472 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2030-31 692,748 639,459 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2031-32 719,761 666,471 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (4) 2032-33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 76,143 (22,843) (1,523) (3,016) 48,761 (7,796) 40,965 Nole: Commencing in FY 2004-05, secured values Increase by 4% per year and unsecured values by 2% per year. (1) Project value as reported by the Orange County Auditor Controller. (2) Debt Incurrence limit repealed by adoption of Summary Ordinance under SB 211. (3) Plan effectiveness limit of July 6, 2022 (FY 2022-23) (4) Debt repaymenl limit of July 6, 2032 (FY 2032-33) and tax increment allocalions cease after such date. (5) Includes Unitary tax revenue, estimated County administrative fees and any forfeitures caused by tax Increment receipts limit being reached. Page 39 of 190 Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Sta Ana Merger 02-23-04: NH: 4/27/2004: GSH: '151ð~49 Appendix Table 7.D Tax Increment Revenue Projection South Harbor Blvdl Fairview Project Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency (OOO's Omitted) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 SB211 Total Tax Less Existing Net TI After Triggered Net TI After Total Increment Increment Housing County Pass Housing & Statutory Statutory Project Over Base Revenue Set Aside Admin Fee Throughs Existing Pass Thru Pass Thru FY Value (1) $330,958 at 1% (5) -60% -2% Agreements Pass Thrus Payments Trigger (2) 2004-05 1,222,183 891,225 9,006 (5,404) (180) (1,383) 2,039 (21) 2,019 2005-06 1,263,327 932,368 9,418 (5,651) (188) (2.786) 793 (42) 751 2006-07 1,305,961 975,003 9,844 (5,906) (197) (2.912) 829 (64) 765 2007-08 1,350,143 1,019,185 10.286 (6,172) (206) (3,043) 866 (87) 779 2008-09 1.395,932 1,064,974 10,744 (6,446) (215) (3,178) 904 (110) 794 2009-10 1,443,387 1,112,429 11,218 (6,731) (224) (3,319) 944 (135) 810 2010-11 1.492.573 1,161,615 11,710 (7,026) (234) (3,464) 986 (160) 826 2011-12 1,543,556 1,212,598 12,220 (7.332) (244) (3,615) 1,029 (186) 842 2012-13 1,596,403 1,265,445 12,748 (7,649) (255) (3,771) 1.073 (214) 859 2013-14 1,651.187 1,320,229 13,296 (7,978) (266) (3,933) 1,119 (242) 877 2014-15 1,707,980 1,377.022 13,864 (8,319) (277) (4,101) 1,167 (272) 895 2015-16 1,766,860 1,435,902 14.453 (8,672) (289) (4.275) 1,217 (303) 913 2016-17 1.827,907 1,496,949 15,064 (9,038) (301) (4.456) 1,268 (336) 932 2017-18 1,891,202 1,560,244 15,696 (9,418) (314) (4,643) 1,321 (369) 952 2018-19 1,956,833 1.625.875 16,353 (9,812) (327) (4,837) 1,377 (404) 972 2019-20 2,024.889 1,693,931 17,033 (10,220) (341) (5,039) 1,434 (440) 994 2020-21 2,095,463 1,764,505 17,739 (10,643) (355) (5,247) 1,493 (478) 1,015 2021-22 2,168,652 1,837,694 18,471 (11,083) (369) (5,464) 1,555 (517) 1,038 (3) 2022-23 2,244,555 1,913,597 19,230 (11,538) (385) (5,689) 1,619 (557) 1,062 2023-24 2,323,278 1,992,320 20,017 (12,010) (400) (5,921) 1,685 (599) 1,086 2024-25 2,404,928 2,073,970 20,834 (12,500) (417) (6,163) 1,754 (642) 1.112 2025-26 2,489,619 2,158,661 21,681 (13,008) (434) (6,413) 1,825 (687) 1,138 2026-27 2,577,467 2,246,509 22,559 (13,535) (451) (6,673) 1,899 (734) 1,165 2027-28 2,668,595 2,337,637 23,470 (14,082) (469) (6,943) 1,976 (782) 1,194 2028-29 2,763,128 2,432,170 24,416 (14,649) (488) (7,223) 2,055 (832) 1,223 2029-30 2,861 ,198 2,530,240 25,396 (15,238) (508) (7.513) 2.138 (884) 1,254 2030-31 2,962,942 2.631,984 26,414 (15,848) (528) (7,814) 2,224 (938) 1,285 2031-32 3,068,502 2,737,544 27,469 (16,482) (549) (8,126) 2,313 (994) 1,318 (4) 2032-33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 470,651 (282,391) (9,413) (137,945) 40.903 (12,030) 28.872 Note: Commencing in FY 1004-05, secured values Increase by 4% per year and unsecured values by 2% per year. (1) Project value as reported by the Orange County Auditor Controller. (2) Debt incurrence limit repealed by adoption of Summary Ordinance under S8 211. (3) Plan effectiveness limit of July 6, 2022 (FY 2022-23) (4) Debt repayment limit of July 6, 2032 (FY 2032-33) and tax increment aliocattons cease after such date. (5) Includes Unitary tax revenue, estimated County administrative fees and any forfeitures caused by tax Increment receipts limit being reached. Page 40 of 190 Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Sta Ana Merger 02-23-04: SH: 4/27/2004: GSH: 'S Ö ~5 0 Appendix Table 7-E Tax Increment Revenue Projection South Main Street Project Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency (OOO's Omitted) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 S8211 Total Tax Less Existing Net TI After Triggered Net TI After Total Increment Increment Housing County Pass Housing & Statutory Statutory Project Over Base Revenue Set Aside Admin Fee Throughs Existing Pass Thru Pass Thru FY Value (1) $418,485 at 1 % (5) -20% -2% Agreements Pass Thrus Payments Trigger (2) 2004-05 2,036,376 1,617,891 16,443 (3,289) (329) (1,483) 11,343 (36) 11,307 2005-06 2,109,131 1,690,646 17,171 (3,434) (343) (1,910) 11,484 (74) 11,410 2006-07 2,184,623 1,766,138 17,926 (3,585) (359) (3,289) 10,693 (113) 10,580 2007-08 2,262,957 1,844,472 18,709 (3,742) (374) (3,433) 11,160 (153) 11,007 2008-09 2,344,243 1,925,758 19,522 (3,904) (390) (3,582) 11,645 (195) 11,450 2009-10 2,428,596 2,010,111 20,366 (4,073) (407) (3,737) 12,148 (238) 11,910 2010-11 2,516,135 2,097,650 21,241 (4,248) (425) (3,897) 12,670 (284) 12,387 2011-12 2,606,984 2,188,499 22,149 (4,430) (443) (4,064) 13,212 (330) 12,882 2012-13 2,701,270 2,282,785 23,092 (4,618) (462) (4,237) 13,775 (379) 13,396 2013-14 2,799,128 2,380,643 24,071 (4,814) (481) (4,417) 14,359 (429) 13,929 2014-15 2,900,696 2,482,211 25,087 (5,017) (502) (4,603) 14,964 (483) 14,481 2015-16 3,006,119 2,587,634 26,141 (5,228) (523) (5,192) 15,198 (539) 14,658 2016-17 3,115,547 2,697,062 27,235 (5,447) (545) (5,410) 15,834 (597) 15,237 2017-18 3,229,136 2,810,651 28,371 (5,674) (567) (5,635) 16,494 (657) 15,837 2018-19 3,347,048 2,928,563 29,550 (5,910) (591) (5,869) 17,180 (720) 16,460 2019-20 3,469,451 3,050,966 30,774 (6,155) (615) (6,113) 17,891 (785) 17,106 2020-21 3,596,520 3,178,035 32,045 (6,409) (641) (6,365) 18,630 (852) 17,778 2021-22 3,728,439 3,309,954 33,364 (6,673) (667) (6,627) 19,397 (922) 18,475 (3) 2022-23 3,865,395 3,446,910 34,734 (6,947) (695) (6,899) 20,193 (995) 19,198 2023-24 4,007,585 3,589,100 36,155 (7,231) (723) (7,181) 21,020 (1,070) 19,950 2024-25 4,155,215 3,736,730 37,632 (7,526) (753) (7,475) 21,878 (1,148) 20,730 2025-26 4,308,497 3,890,012 39,165 (7,833) (783) (7,977) 22,572 (1,230) 21,342 2026-27 4,467,651 4,049,166 40,756 (8,151) (815) (8,301) 23,489 (1,314) 22,175 2027-28 4,632,908 4,214,423 42,409 (8,482) (848) (8,638) 24,441 (1,402) 23,040 2028-29 4,804,506 4,386,021 44,125 (8,825) (882) (8,987) 25,430 (1,492) 23,938 2029-30 4,982,693 4,564,208 45,907 (9,181) (918) (9,350) 26,457 (1,587) 24,870 2030-31 5,167,729 4,749,244 47,757 (9,551) (955) (9,727) 27,524 (1,685) 25,839 2031-32 5,359,880 4,941,395 49,678 (9,936) (994) (10,118) 28,631 (1,787) 26,844 (4) 2032-33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 851,573 (170,315) (17,031) (164,515) 499,712 (21,497) 478,215 Note: Commencing in FY 2004-05, secured values Increase by 4% per year and unsecured values by 2% per year. (1) Project value as reported by the Orange County Auditor Conlroller. (2) Debt incurrence limit repealed by adoption of Summary Ordinance under 58 211. (3) Plan effectiveness limit of July 6, 2022 (FY 2022-23) (4) Debt repaymenl limit of July 6, 2032 (FY 2032-33) and tax Increment allocations cease after such date. (5) Includes Unitary tax revenue, estimated County administrative fees and any forfeitures caused by tax Increment receipts limit being reached. Page 41 of 190 Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Sta Ana Merger 02-23-04: SM: 4/27/2004: GSH: 1! t5 251 Appendix Table 7-F Tax Increment Revenue Projection Bristol Corridor Commuter Station Project Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency (OOO's Omitted) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 58211 Total Tax Existing Net TI After Triggered Net TI After Total Increment Increment Housing County Pass Housing & Statutory Statutory Project Over Base Revenue Set Aside Admin Fee Throughs Existing Pass Thru Pass Thru FY Value (1) $291,192 at 1 % (5) -30% -2% Agreements Pass Thrus Payments Trigger 2004-05 463,766 172,574 1,728 (518) (35) (1,039) 136 0 136 2005-06 481,555 190,363 1,906 (572) (38) (1,145) 150 0 150 2006-07 500,041 208,849 2,090 (627) (42) (1,256) 166 0 166 2007-08 519,251 228,059 2,282 (685) (46) (1,371) 181 0 181 2008-09 539,213 248,021 2,482 (745) (50) (1,490) 198 0 198 (2) 2009-10 559,957 268,765 2,690 (807) (54) (1,614) 215 0 215 2010-11 581,515 290,323 2,905 (872) (58) (1,743) 233 (13) 220 2011-12 603,918 312,726 3,129 (939) (63) (1,877) 251 (27) 224 2012-13 627,201 336,009 3,362 (1,009) (67) (2,016) 271 (41) 230 2013-14 651,397 360,205 3,604 (1,081) (72) (2,160) 291 (56) 235 2014-15 676,543 385,351 3,855 (1,157) (77) (2,310) 312 (71) 240 2015-16 702,676 411,484 4,117 (1,235) (82) (2,466) 333 (87) 246 2016-17 729,837 438,645 4,388 (1,316) (88) (2,628) 356 (104) 252 2017-18 758,065 466,873 4,671 (1,401) (93) (2,796) 380 (121) 259 2018-19 787,402 496,210 4,964 (1,489) (99) (2,971) 404 (139) 265 2019-20 817,894 526,702 5,269 (1,581) (105) (3,153) 430 (157) 272 2020-21 849,585 558,393 5,586 (1,676) (112) (3,342) 456 (180) 277 2021-22 882,523 591,332 5,915 (1,775) (118) (3,538) 484 (203) 281 2022-23 916,758 625,566 6,258 (1,877) (125) (3,742) 513 (227) 286 2023-24 952,341 661 149 6613 1984 132 3954 543 252 291 2024-25 989,326 698,134 6,983 2025-26 1,027,768 736,576 7,368 2026-27 1,067,725 776,533 7,767 2027-28 1 ,109,257 818,065 8,183 2028-29 1,152,426 861,234 8,614 (3) 2029-30 1,197,299 906,107 9,063 2030-31 1,243,942 952,750 9,529 2031-32 1,292,426 1,001,234 10,014 2032-33 1,342,823 1,051,631 10,518 2033-34 1,395,211 1,104,019 11,042 2034-35 1,449,667 1,158,475 11,587 2035-36 1,506,275 1,215,083 12,153 2036-37 1,565,119 1,273,927 12,741 2037-38 1,626,289 1,335,097 13,353 2038-39 1,689,877 1,398,685 13,989 (4) 2039-40 0 0 0 Totals 230,717 (, ) (2,095) (2,210) (2,330) (2,455) (2,584) (2,719) (2,859) (3,004) (3,155) (3,313) (3,476) (3,646) (3,822) (4,006) (4,197) 0 (69,215) ( ) (140) (147) (155) (164) (172) (181 ) (191 ) (200) (210) (221 ) (232) (243) (255) (267) (280) 0 (4,614) (, ) (4,174) (4,403) (4,641) (4,888) (5,145) (5,412) (5,689) (5,977) (6,277) (6,588) (6,912) (7,248) (7,598) (7,961) (8,339) 0 (137,862) 574 607 641 676 713 751 791 832 875 920 967 1,016 1,066 1,119 1,174 0 19,025 ( ) (278) (305) (333) (362) (393) (424) (457) (491) (527) (564) (602) (642) (683) (726) (771 ) 0 (9,236) 296 302 308 314 320 327 334 341 349 357 365 374 383 392 402 0 9,789 Note: Commencing in FY 2004-05, secured values increase by 4% per year and unsecured values by 2% per year. (1) Project value as reported by the Orange County Auditor Controller. (2) Debt incurrence limit of December 4,2009 (FY 2009-10) (3) Plan effectiveness limit of December 4, 2029 (FY 2029-30) (4) Debt repayment limit of December 4,2039 (FY2039-40) and tax increment allocations cease after such date. (5) Includes Unitary tax revenue, estimated County administrative fees and any forfeitures caused by tax increment receipts limit being reached. Page 42 of 190 Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Sta Ana Merger 02-23-04: BC: 4/27/2004: GSH: ,~ [j:5 2 v. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Per Section 33352(c) of the CRL, the Implementation Plan prepared as part of the Report to the City Council must describe the specific goals and objectives of the Agency, specific projects proposed by the Agency, including a program of actions and expenditures proposed to be made within the first five years of the adoption of the Redevelopment Plans, a description of how these projects will improve or alleviate the blighting conditions in the Project Area, and show how the requirements for low and moderate income housing in the community will be met. The initial (combined) Five Year AS 1290 Implementation Plan for the Project Areas was originally adopted in 1994, for the five-year period from December 1994 through 1999. In 1999, the Agency adopted the Second Five Year AS 1290 Implementation Plan for the Project Areas for the five-year period between December 1999 - December 2004. This second Five-Year Implementation Plan is the current Implementation Plan for 2000-2005 and is included within this Report as Appendix A. The purposes of the proposed Amendments are to merge the Project Areas to combine tax increment revenues for more effective administration of the Agency's redevelopment program and contribute to revitalization of the Project Areas through increased economic vitality, and increased and improved housing opportunities. The specific goals and objectives, projects and programs, and proposed expenditures contained in the current Implementation Plan (Appendix A) will not change as a result of the adoption of the proposed Amendments. The Agency intends to continue to implement the same projects and programs identified in the current Implementation Plan. Furthermore, the identified expenditures for the Project Areas will not change. Therefore, the current Implementation Plan will not be amended as a result of the Merger. To the degree that increment is received beyond what has been allocated for the repayment of existing debt, the Agency will allocate those revenues within the Merged Project Area that will best eliminate blight, increase economic vitality and promote affordable housing. Page 43 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 32 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-53 VI. METHOD OR PLAN FOR RELOCATION Section 33352(f) of the CRL requires that the Agency's Report to the City Council contain a "Method or Plan" for "the relocation of families and persons to be temporarily or permanently displaced from housing facilities in the project area, which...shall include the provision required by Section 33411.1." Additionally, Section 33411 of the CRL requires the Agency prepare a feasible "method or plan" for relocation of non-profit local community institutions to be temporarily or permanently displaced from facilities actually used for institutional purposes in the Project Areas. Section 33411.1 requires the legislative body to insure that ".. .such method or plan of the Agency...shall provide that no persons or families of low and moderate income shall be displaced unless and until there is a suitable housing unit available and ready for occupancy by such displaced person or family at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. Such housing units shall be suitable to the needs of such displaced persons or families and must be decent, safe, sanitary, and otherwise standard dwelling. The Agency shall not displace such person or family until such housing units are available and ready for occupancy." The Reports to the City Council initially prepared at the time of adoption of the Project Areas were required to contain a Method or Plan for Relocation for each of the Project Areas. This Plan or Method of Relocation restates the Agency's Plan or Method of Relocation for the proposed Merged Project Area. However, this Method or Plan for relocation is not intended to be a "Relocation Plan" within the meaning of Section 6038 of the "Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Guidelines" promulgated by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (California Code of Regulations, Division 1 of Title 25, commonly called the "State Guidelines"). As described below, a Section 6038 Relocation Plan is not prepared until the Agency initiates negotiations for the acquisition of real property and prior to proceeding with any phase of a public improvement or facility project or other implementation activity that would result in any displacement other than an insignificant amount of non- residential displacement. A. AGENCY DISPLACEMENT As noted in the Report, the Agency anticipates that its programs of land assembly and upgrading and installation of public improvements and facilities needed within the proposed Merged Project Area will provide an incentive for existing owners and the private sector to develop or redevelop vacant, underutilized and blighted properties and to achieve the goals and objectives for the redevelopment of the proposed Merged Project Area. To the extent that the Agency, directly or through agreements with owners, developers or others, cause occupants to be displaced, the Agency will be responsible for providing relocation benefits. The Agency is not responsible for any displacement that may occur as a result of private development activities not directly assisted by the Agency under a disposition and development agreement, participation agreement, or other similar agreement. Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Page 44 of 190 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Page 33 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-54 B. RELOCATION IN THE EVENT OF AGENCY DISPLACEMENT Displacement of businesses or tenants is a possibility under Agency programs and activities over the remaining life of the Redevelopment Plans. Should such displacement occur, the Agency will provide persons, families, business owners and tenants displaced by Agency activities with monetary and advisory relocation assistance consistent with the California Relocation Assistance Law (State Government Code, Section 7260 et seq.), the State Guidelines adopted and promulgated pursuant thereto, the Federal Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. Section 4601 et. seq.), appropriate Federal Guidelines, and the provisions of the Redevelopment Plans. The Agency will pay all relocation payments required by State and Federal law. The following portions of this Method or Plan for Relocation outline the general relocation rules and procedures that must be adhered to by the Agency in activities requiring the relocation of persons and businesses. Also identified below are the Agency determinations and assurances that must be made prior to undertaking relocation activities. The Agency's functions in providing relocation assistance and benefits are also summarized. C. RULES AND REGULATIONS In connection with the preparation of a Relocation Plan adopted pursuant to Section 6038 of the State Guidelines, the Agency has adopted rules and regulations that: (1) implement the requirements of California Relocation Assistance Law (Government Code, Chapter 16 of Division 7 of Title 1, commencing with Section 7260) (the "Act"); (2) are in accordance with the provisions of the State Guidelines; (3) meet the requirements of the California Community Redevelopment Law and the provisions of the Redevelopment Plans, and (4) are appropriate to the particular activities of the Agency and not inconsistent with the Act or the State Guidelines. D. AGENCY DETERMINATIONS AND ASSURANCES 1. The Agency may not proceed with any phase of a project or other activity that will result in the displacement of any person or business until it makes the following determinations: a. Fair and reasonable relocation payments will be provided to eligible persons as required by State and Federal law, the State Guidelines, Federal Guidelines, and Agency rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. Page 45 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 34 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-55 2. 3. 4. b. A relocation assistance advisory program offering the services described in the State Guidelines will be established. c. Eligible persons will be adequately informed of the assistance, benefits, policies, practices and procedures, including grievance procedures, provided for in the State Guidelines. d. Based upon recent survey and analysis of both the housing needs of persons who will be displaced and available replacement housing, and considering competing demands for that housing, comparable replacement dwellings will be available, or provided, if necessary, within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement sufficient in number, size and cost for the eligible persons who require them. e. Adequate provisions have been made to provide orderly, timely and efficient relocation of eligible persons to comparable replacement housing available without regard to race, color, religion, sex, marital status, or national origin with minimum hardship to those affected. f. A Relocation Plan meeting the requirements of State law and the State Guidelines has been prepared. No person shall be displaced until the Agency has fulfilled the obligations imposed by State and Federal law, the California Community Redevelopment Law, the Redevelopment Plan, the State Guidelines and the Agency rules and regulations. No persons or families of low and moderate income shall be displaced unless and until there is a suitable housing unit available and ready for occupancy by such displaced person or family at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. Such housing units shall be suitable to the needs of such displaced persons or families and must be decent, safe, sanitary and an otherwise standard dwelling. The Agency shall not displace such persons or families until such housing units are available and ready for occupancy. If any portion of the proposed Merged Project Area is developed by the Agency with low or moderate income housing units, the Agency shall require by contract or other appropriate means that such housing be made available for rent or purchase to the persons and families of low and moderate income displaced by Agency activities. Such persons and families shall be given priority in renting or buying such housing; provided, however, that failure to give such priority shall not affect the validity of title to real property. Page 46 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004/06128104 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 35 75D-56 The Agency is responsible for providing relocation payments and assistance to site occupants (persons, families, business owners and tenants) displaced by the Agency Page 47 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects PA0403012.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 5. If suitable housing units are not sufficiently available in the community for low and moderate income persons and families to be displaced by the Agency from the proposed Merged Project Area, the City Council shall assure that sufficient land is made available for suitable housing for rental or purchase by low and moderate income persons and families. If suitable housing units are not sufficiently available in the proposed Merged Project Area for use by such persons and families of low and moderate income displaced by Agency activities within the proposed Merged Project Area, the Agency may, to the extent of that deficiency, direct or cause the development, rehabilitation, or construction of housing units within the City. 6. Permanent housing facilities shall be made available within four years from the time occupants are displaced by the Agency, and pending the development of such facilities, they will be available to such displaced occupants adequate temporary housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the City at the time of their displacement. E. RELOCATION ASSISTANCE ADVISORY PROGRAM AND ASSURANCE OF COMPARABLE REPLACEMENT HOUSING The Agency shall implement a relocation assistance advisory program, which satisfies the requirements of the State law and Article 2 of the State Guidelines and the Civil Rights Act. Such program shall be administered so as to provide advisory services which offer maximum assistance to minimize the hardship of displacement and to ensure that (a) all persons and families displaced from their dwellings are relocated into housing meeting the criteria for comparable replacement housing contained in the State Guidelines, and (b) all persons displaced from their places of business are assisted in reestablishing with a minimum of delay and loss of earnings. No eligible person shall be required to move from his/her dwelling unit unless an adequate replacement dwelling unit is available to such person. The following outlines the general functions of the Agency in providing relocation assistance advisory services. Nothing in this section is intended to permit the Agency to displace persons other than in a manner prescribed by law, the State Guidelines and the adopted Agency rules and regulations prescribing the Agency's relocation responsibil ¡ties. F. ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION 1. Responsible Entity Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 36 75D-57 from the proposed Merged Project Area, and the Agency will meet its relocation responsibilities through the use of its staff and consultants, supplemented by assistance from local realtors and civic organizations. 2. Functions The Agency's staff and/or consultants will perform the following functions: 1. 2. Prepare a Relocation Plan as soon as possible following the initiation of negotiations for acquisition of real property by the Agency and prior to proceeding with any phase of a public improvement or facility project or other implementation activity that will result in any displacement other than an insignificant amount of non-residential displacement. Such Relocation Plan shall conform to the requirements of the Section 6038 of the State Guidelines. The Agency shall interview all eligible persons, business concerns, including non-profit organizations, to obtain information upon which to plan for housing and other accommodations, as well as to provide counseling and assistance needs. Provide such measures, facilities or services as needed in order to: a. Fully inform persons eligible for a parcel of land as to the availability of relocation benefits and assistance and the eligibility requirements therefor, as well as the procedures for obtaining such benefits and assistance, in accordance with the requirements of Section 6046 of the State Guidelines. b. Determine the extent of the need of each such eligible person for relocation assistance in accordance with the requirements of Section 6048 of the State and Federal Guidelines. c. Assure eligible persons that within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement there will be available comparable replacement housing meeting the criteria described in Section 6008(c) of the State Guidelines, sufficient in number and kind for and available to such eligible persons. d. Provide current and continuing information on the availability, prices and rentals of comparable sales and rental housing, and of comparable commercial properties and locations, and as to security deposits, closing costs, typical down payments, interest rates, and terms for residential property in the area. e. Assist each eligible person to complete applications for payments and benefits. Page 48 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects PA0403012.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106/28/04 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 37 75D-58 3. f. Assist each eligible, displaced person to obtain and move to a comparable replacement dwelling. g. Assist each eligible person displaced from his/her business in obtaining and becoming established in a suitable replacement location. h. Provide any services required to insure that the relocation process does not result in different or separate treatment on account of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, marital status or other arbitrary circumstances. i. Supply to such eligible persons information concerning Federal and State housing programs, disaster loan and other programs administered by the Small Business Administration, and other Federal or State programs offering assistance to displaced persons. j. Provide other advisory assistance to eligible persons in order to minimize their hardships. Such assistance may include counseling and referrals with regard to housing, financing, employment, training, health and welfare, as well as other assistance. k. Inform all persons who are expected to be displaced about the eviction policies to be pursued in carrying out the Projects, which policies shall be in accordance with the provisions of Section 6058 of the State Guidelines. I. Notify each individual tenant and owner-occupant to be displaced with at least 90 days written advance notice prior to requiring any such person to move from a dwelling or to move a business. m. Coordinate the Agency's relocation assistance program with the project work necessitating the displacement and with other planned or proposed activities of other public entities in the community or other nearby areas which may affect the implementation of its relocation assistance program. Information Program The Agency shall establish and maintain an information program that provides for the following: Within 15 days following the initiation of negotiations and not less than 90 days in advance of displacement, except for those situations described in subsection 6042(e) of the State Guidelines, the Agency shall prepare and distribute informational materials (in the language most easily understood by the recipients) to persons eligible for Agency relocation benefits and assistance. Page 49 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Page 38 a. PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-59 b. Conducting personal interviews and maintaining personal contacts with occupants of the property to the maximum extent practicable. c. Utilizing meetings, newsletters and other mechanisms, including local media available to all persons, for keeping occupants of the property informed on a continuing basis. d. Providing each person written notification as soon as his/her eligibility status has been determined. e. Explaining to persons interviewed the purpose of relocation needs survey, the nature of relocation payments and assistance to be made available, and encouraging them to visit the relocation office for information and assistance. 4. Relocation Record The Agency shall prepare and maintain an accurate relocation record for each person to be displaced as required by the State of California. 5. Relocation Resources Survey The Agency shall conduct a survey of available relocation resources in accordance with Section 6052 of the State Guidelines. 6. Relocation Payments The Agency shall make relocation payments to or on behalf of eligible displaced persons in accordance with and to the extent required by State and Federal law, Article 3 of the State Guidelines and appropriate Federal Guidelines. a) Temporary Moves Temporary moves would be required only if adequate resources for permanent relocation sites are not available. Staff shall make every effort to assist the site occupant in obtaining permanent relocation resources prior to initiation of a temporary move, and then only after it is determined that Agency activities in the proposed Merged Project Area will be seriously impeded if such move is not performed. b) Last Resort Housing The Agency shall follow State law and the criteria and procedures set forth in Article 4 of the State Guidelines for assuring that if the Agency action results, or will result in displacement, and comparable replacement housing will not be available as needed, the Page 50 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Page 39 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-60 Agency shall use its funds or other authorized funding for the Projects to provide such housing. c) Eviction Policy Eviction for cause is permissible only as a last resort and must conform to State and local law. If a person is evicted for cause on or after the effective date of a notice of displacement issued, displaced persons retain the right to the relocation payments and other assistance for which they may be eligible. d) Grievance Procedures The Agency may adopt grievance procedures to implement the provisions of the State law and Article 5 of the State Guidelines. The purpose of the grievance procedures is to provide Agency requirements for processing appeals from Agency determinations as to the eligibility for, and the amount of a relocation payment, and for processing appeals from persons aggrieved by the Agency's failure to refer them to comparable permanent or adequate temporary replacement housing. Potential displacees will be informed by the Agency of their right to appeal regarding relocation payment claims or other decisions made affecting their relocation. e) Relocation Appeals Board The City Council of the City of Santa Ana will function as the Relocation Appeals Board. The Appeals Board shall, after a public hearing, transmit its findings and recommendations to the Agency. Page 51 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 40 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090 .003.004106/28104 75D-61 VII. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING COMMISSION Plannina Commission Section 33352(h) of the CRL requires that the Agency's Report to the City Council contain the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission on the proposed Amendment. Section 33352 (j) of the CRL requires that the Agency's Report to the City Council contain the report required by Section 65402 of the Government Code. Section 65402(c) states among other things, that no real property should be acquired by dedication or otherwise for public purposes, no real property shall be disposed of, no street shall be vacated or abandoned and no public building or structure shall be constructed or authorized until such activities have been submitted to and reported upon by the local planning agency as to conformity with the jurisdiction's adopted general plan. On May 24, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana received the proposed Amendments. The Planning Commission has 30 days within receiving the Amendments to make and file its report and recommendations with the Agency. On June 14,2004, the Planning Commission adopted their report regarding the consistency of the proposed Amendments with the City's General Plan and recommended that the Agency and City Council adopt the proposed Amendments. The Planning Commission's report regarding the consistency of the proposed Amendments with the General Plan, and the recommendations on the proposed Amendments are included within this Report as Appendix B. Communitv RedeveloDment and Housina Commission As part of its duties, the Community Redevelopment and Housing Commission provides recommendations to the Agency Board on the adoption of redevelopment plans and plan amendments. The Commission has been involved with the Amendments' adoption process including reviewing the Preliminary Report and the draft Amendments on March 2, 2004 and recommending that the Agency Board approve these documents. On June 15,2004, the Commission having reviewed the Report to the City Council recommended approval of this Report in draft form including the Initial Study/Negative Declaration, receipt of the Amendments and consenting to the joint public hearing. The specific recommended actions were: 1. That the City Council adopt a resolution receiving the Report to the City Council including the Initial Study/Negative Declaration; receive the Amendments merging the six Redevelopment Projects; and set the date and time for a joint public hearing with the Community Redevelopment Agency with respect to the proposed plan amendments for the merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Project Areas and the Initial Study/Negative Declaration prepared in connection therewith. Page 52 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 41 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-62 2. That the Community Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution approving the Report to the City Council which incorporates the Initial Study/Negative Declaration prepared for the Amendments merging the six Redevelopment Projects; receive the Amendments and consent to a joint public hearing with the City Council with respect to the proposed Amendments to merge the Santa Ana Redevelopment Project Areas; and approve the Initial Study/Negative Declaration prepared in connection therewith. Commission members had questions and recommendations related to project implementation and the proposed Merger. The following are the issues and recommendations of the Commission and Agency staff and consultant's responses. In some instances further information is provided to clarify or expand upon the issues raised by the Commission. Commission Issues and Recommendations 1. Comment: Will the joint public hearing notice be mailed to just property owners in the Project Areas or will all property owners in the City be notified? Response: As discussed in Section VIII of this Report, the Agency will hold a joint public hearing on the proposed Amendments tentatively scheduled for September 7, 2004. In accordance with CRL Sections 33349 and 33452, the Agency will send by first class mail a notice containing the date, time and location of the joint public hearing at least 30 days prior to the joint public hearing to each property owner. Residents and business owners within the Project Areas will also receive the notice (addressed to "occupant"). The CRL only requires that joint public hearing notice be sent to those individuals that are located within the boundaries of the Project Areas. However, the joint public hearing notice will be published in the newspaper of general circulation (Orange County Register or the Orange County Recorder) at least four (4) consecutive weeks prior to the joint public hearing. Therefore, all interested persons will be invited to the joint public hearing. Although not required by the CRL, on July 20, 2004 the Agency will hold a community information meeting to discuss the Merger, which will include an overview of redevelopment activities that have been accomplished and those planned for the Project Areas. Notice of the community information meeting will be included with the notice of the joint public hearing. 2. Comment: wm the joint public hearing notice be available in other languages? Response: The joint public hearing notice will be in English. However, the joint public hearing notice will contain a statement in Spanish and Vietnamese with a telephone number where individuals may call to have the notice translated. Page 53 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 42 PA0403012.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106/28104 75D-63 3. 4. Comment: Can the joint public hearing notice be published in a non-English newspaper? Response: As suggested by the Commission, the joint public hearing notice will be translated into Spanish and Vietnamese. Based upon a conversation with the City Clerk's office, the Spanish and Vietnamese-speaking newspaper with the greatest outreach to individuals in Santa Ana will be used. Agency staff will coordinate publishing of the joint public hearing notice in the newspapers. Comment: Regarding Agency accomplishments listed on pages 10-11 of this Report, what housing projects have been completed using the 20 percent housing set-aside funds within the Project Areas? Response: The list of accomplishments discussed in Section I D. provides an overview of some of the accomplishments that have occurred over the past 30 years. This list is not all inclusive of every project or program completed by the Agency. The following is a list of additional Agency assisted residential projects and activities anticipated for completion in the near future: Accomplishments . 518-unit Cornerstone Village Project - This project was awarded the NAHRO National Award of Merit. Affordable housing projects. Fund Replacement Coach/Manufactured Housing Unit program. Received NAHRO Award of Merit for the Emmanuel House Project. Funded the 21-unit Casa Alegre HOPW A project in Anaheim. Facilitated the development of two low and moderate income housing projects (Borchard Street and Bush Street) to meet replacement housing obligations. . . . . . Proposed Activities Support the Santiago Villas Project, which includes: acquisition, rehabilitation, and conversion of a motel to 83 senior residential housing units. Initiate the "Paint It Now" program to paint 100 affordable homes within a specific target area. Complete construction of the San Miguel residence, which is a Mercy Housing expansion project. Construct the Birch Street Project that includes four single family homes in the Heninger Park neighborhood. Issue a Request for Proposal for the construction of seven units with unique historic sensitivity at McFadden/Orange. Page 54 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 . . . . . Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 43 75D-64 It should be noted that the proposed Merger does not affect the housing obligations and would not reduce the overall commitment to the Project Areas. The Agency is legally required to set-aside 20 percent of the gross tax increment that is generated within the Project Areas (excluding Central City Project which is a pre-1976 redevelopment plan and by law is exempt for the housing set-aside requirements). However, the Agency exceeds the 20 percent set-aside for four of the five remaining Project Areas including 60 percent for the South Harbor Project and 30 percent for the Inter-City, North Harbor and Bristol Corridor Projects. Agency staff will be preparing a new five-year Implementation Plan for 2005-2009 that will be adopted by the end of this year. This 2005-2009 Implementation Plan will outline the goals, projects and programs, and expenditures for the next five-year period, which is likely to include some of the contemplated housing projects listed above. In addition, the housing component of the Implementation Plan will contain a history of the residential units that were developed, substantially rehabilitated and price restricted within the Project Areas to determine that all very low-, low and moderate income housing requirements have been met. The upcoming 2005-2009 Implementation Plan is anticipated to provide a more extensive list of Agency accomplishments related to affordable and market rate housing within the Project Areas. 5. Comment: Could the merger divert necessary tax increment revenues from a specific Project Area that may already have minimal tax increment revenues generated to implement projects and programs? Response: The merging of redevelopment project areas is to share tax increment revenues among the project areas. For project areas that receive more tax increment than is currently needed to implement projects and programs, this tax increment can assist the "poorer project areas" that do not have sufficient tax increment revenues to fund the desired projects and pay existing obligations. The benefit of merging the Project Areas is to allow the Agency to prioritize projects where needs are the greatest. Currently, most of the tax increment revenues from the Project Areas are committed to existing debt and obligations and, therefore, cannot be used to implement new projects and programs. The decision on how the discretionary increment will be allocated amongst the Project Areas will be decided and identified in the upcoming 2005-2009 Implementation Plan to the degree possible and will be addressed annually in the City/Agency's budgeting process. 6. Comment: How does the proposed Merger relate to the Five-Year Implementation Plan? Response: The proposed Merger will not affect or change the existing Implementation Plan. The upcoming 2005-2009 Implementation Plan will be prepared and adopted in a separate process. It is anticipated that Agency staff will prepare a draft of the 2005-2009 Implementation Plan for presentation to the community in the fall of this year. Subsequently, the 2005-2009 Implementation Plan will be submitted to the Commission Page 55 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 44 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106/28104 75D-65 for review and recommendation on adoption prior to an Agency public hearing on the Implementation Plan and approval. 7. Comment: Prioritize the development and improvement of parks and other public facilities as stated in the goals and objectives of the Implementation Plan. Response: The potential for parks and other public facilities could be addressed in the Agency's goals and objectives for the 2005-2009 Implementation Plan. The following is list of Agency assisted public improvements and activities anticipated for the near future: Completed . Phase I of street improvements on South Main Street. Fourth Street sidewalk and landscape improvements between Broadway and Main Street as part of visual branding of Downtown. . Planned . Continue South Main Street improvements including new sidewalks and street trees. 8. Comment: A draft of the Report was received and reviewed; will Commission members get to review the final version of the Report? Response: The draft Report received by the Commission was approximately 99 percent complete. There were three items that Agency staff had to verify, of which, the verification was complete with no or very minimal changes to the text. Furthermore, at the time of distribution, the Planning Commission had not taken action regarding their report and recommendation on the proposed Amendments, which actually took place on June 14, 2004 the day before the Commission meeting. The Planning Commission found the proposed Amendments in conformance with the General Plan and recommended Agency City Council adoption. Because the Agency Board approves and adopts the Report to City Council, the Report remains a draft until approved. This allows the incorporation of comments and information from the Planning Commission, Community Redevelopment and Housing Commission, Agency staff and other City organizations, committees and commissions as necessary. Page 56 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 45 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-66 VIII. COMMUNITY CONSULTATIONS Section 33352(i) of the CRL requires that the Agency's Report to the City Council contain the summary referred to in Section 33387. Section 33387 of the CRL refers to the consultations with the PAC, if any. There is no existing PAC for any of the existing Project Areas. On March 15,2004, the City Council by Resolution No. 2004-017, found and determined that the proposed Amendments do not include a provision to grant additional authority to acquire by eminent domain or add territory to the existing Project Areas; therefore, a Project Area Committee was not required to be formed in connection with the proposed Amendments (Appendix C). In lieu of a PAC, the Agency will consult with and obtained the advice of property owners, business owners, tenants, community organizations, and other interested parties at a community information meeting to be held on August 10, 2004 at 6:00 p. m. Notice of this meeting will be mailed to all of the occupants and property owners within the Project Areas in conjunction with the notice on the joint public hearing on the Amendments adoption. The notice of the community information meeting and joint public hearing on the Amendments will also be published on August 2 and 9, 2004, in the Orange County Register or other newspaper of general circulation. Copies of the meeting notice and a summary of the meeting will be included within a supplement to this Report prior to the adoption of the proposed Amendments. It is anticipated that the community information meeting will consist of a presentation including an overview of redevelopment in Santa Ana, and the purposes of the proposed Amendments, followed by a comment, question and answer session. Copies of the Owner Participation Rules, Existing Plans, proposed Amendments and map of the Project Areas will be available for review. The Agency and the City Council will also consult and obtain the advice of property owners and occupants on the adoption of the Amendments at a joint public hearing scheduled for September 7,2004. Per CRL Section 33349, the Agency will send a first class mailing containing the required notice of joint public hearing to the last known assessee (the "property owner") of each parcel of land and to all tenants and business owners within the Project Areas. This notice (referenced above) will explain the purpose of the joint public hearing and contain other pertinent information such as the meeting date, time and location. The notice of joint public hearing will also be published in a newspaper of record (Orange County Register) for five (5) consecutive weeks, in compliance with the CRL. The days of publication are scheduled for August 2, 9 (which as noted above will include notice at a community information meeting), 16, 23 and 30, 2004. Page 57 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 46 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106/28/04 75D-67 IX. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE NEGATIVE DECLARATION Section 33352 (k) of the CRL requires that the Agency's Report to the City Council contain the report required by Section 21151 of the Public Resources Code (environmental compliance document). However, since the proposed Amendments are technical in nature and only consist of merging the existing Project Areas, it was determined that a Negative Declaration could be prepared to meet the environmental compliance portion of the Amendments adoption process. The Negative Declaration and related Initial Study prepared for the proposed Amendment are included within this Report as Appendix D. The Negative Declaration identified the following issues as having no impacts as a result of the implementation of the proposed Amendments; therefore, no mitigation measures are necessary: . Agricultural Resources Mineral Resources Biological Resources Land Use and Planning . . . The Negative Declaration identified the following issues as having less than significant impact as a result of the implementation of the proposed Amendments; therefore, no mitigation measures are necessary: . Cultural Resources . Aesthetics . Noise . Public Services and Facilities . Utilities and Service Systems . Geology and Soils . Hazards and Hazardous Materials . Recreation . Air Quality . Hydrology and Water Quality . Population and Housing . Transportation I Traffic On March 16, 2004, the Draft Negative Declaration was circulated to the responsible entities for a 20-day review period beginning on March 18, 2004, and ending on April 6, 2004. A Notice of Intent (NO I) to adopt a Negative Declaration was published in the Orange County Register on March 18,2004 (see Appendix D). The Agency did not receive any comments on the Draft Negative Declaration. The Agency proposes to approve the Negative Declaration at the Joint Public Hearing on the Merger, tentatively scheduled for September 7,2004. Page 58 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 47 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128/04 75D-68 x. NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT REPORT AS WARRANTED BY THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Section 33352(m) of the CRL requires that the Agency's Report to the City Council contain a neighborhood impact report if the redevelopment project contains low or moderate income housing. The purpose of the neighborhood impact report is to describe in detail the impact of the proposed actions upon the residents of the project area and surrounding areas in terms of relocation, traffic circulation, environmental quality, availability of community facilities and services, effect on school population and quality of education, property assessments and taxes, and other matters affecting the physical and social quality of the neighborhood. The neighborhood impact report is also to include: (a) the number of dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate income expected to be destroyed or removed from the low and moderate income housing market as part of the redevelopment project; (b) the number of persons and families (households) of low or moderate income expected to be displaced by the project; (c) the general location of housing to be rehabilitated, developed, or constructed pursuant to Section 33413 of the CRL; (d) the number of dwelling units housing persons and families of low and moderate income planned for construction or rehabilitation, other than replacement housing; (e) the projected means of financing the proposed dwelling units for housing persons and families of low and moderate income planned for construction or rehabilitation, and (f) a projected timetable for meeting the relocation, rehabilitation and replacement housing objectives. Neighborhood impact reports for each of the constituent Project Areas that comprise the Merged Project Area were a required component of the Reports to the City Council prepared for each of the Redevelopment Plans when they were initially adopted and are incorporated herein by reference. The following sections update, as warranted by the proposed Amendments, the neighborhood impact report for the Merged Project Area. A. IMPACT ON RESIDENTS IN THE PROJECT AREAS AND SURROUNDING AREAS 1. Relocation As previously stated, the primary purpose of the proposed Amendment is to merge the Project Areas by combining tax increment revenues from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues throughout the entire Merged Project Area. The proposed Merged Project Area contains residential dwelling units, a portion of which are assumed to be occupied by low or moderate income persons or families. Any non-voluntary or voluntary displacement which occurs as a result of Agency redevelopment activities will be mitigated by relocation assistance including financial payments, advisory assistance, and replacement housing plan provisions of state law relating to Agency assisted developments. These provisions are further described in the Agency's Method or Plan for Relocation, which is included in Section VI of this Report. Page 59 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 48 PA0403012.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-69 It is anticipated that existing non-residential, underutilized and vacant parcels will be selected as first development sites. However, from time to time throughout the remaining life of the Redevelopment Plans, residential displacement and relocation may occur in conjunction with eminent domain proceedings (as this authority exists in each of the Redevelopment Plans except in the Bristol Corridor Project) and voluntarily negotiated acquisitions. Displacement and relocation resulting from redevelopment activity are generally dependent upon the following factors: . Market demand for various types of development; . Availability of funds to finance redevelopment activities; and . Agency's ability to meet applicable relocation and housing replacement requirements under the CRL for low and moderate income families. Residents will not be displaced unless and until there are suitable relocation facilities available for occupancy at rents or costs comparable to those paid at the time of displacement. The Agency will assist residents in finding housing, that is decent, safe and sanitary and within their financial means, in reasonably convenient locations and otherwise suitable to their needs. As previously stated, any displacement which occurs as a result of Agency redevelopment activities will be mitigated by relocation assistance including financial payments, advisory assistance, and replacement housing plan provisions of State law relating to Agency assisted developments. Additionally, it is possible that implementation of the proposed Amendments may require the temporary or permanent displacement and relocation of non-residential occupants within the proposed Merged Project Area. In every case, the Agency will diligently use its best efforts to attempt to find relocation sites meeting the required needs of the individual business displaced by the Agency activity as required by law. Furthermore, the Agency will work with property owners to provide every opportunity for them to participate in the rehabilitation or redevelopment of their own properties and/or other properties in the Merged Project Area. The Agency will additionally offer re-entry opportunities where feasible to existing business owners and tenants on a preference basis. 2. Traffic Circulation The proposed Amendments to merge the Project Areas are considered technical amendments to the existing Redevelopment Plans and, therefore, no additional environmental impacts to traffic circulation are anticipated. As described in the Negative Declaration (Appendix D), the adoption of the Amendments would not have a direct impact on traffic volumes, roadway configurations, emergency access or level of services established in the County of Orange Congestion Management Plan or alternative nodes of transportation. Future redevelopment activities implemented within the proposed Merged Project Area could potentially result in adverse traffic impacts. Page 60 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 49 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106/28104 75D-70 However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the proposed Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potential traffic impacts. Where needed, mitigation measures, such as traffic improvements and traffic impact fees would be required to avoid or minimize potential traffic impacts. 3. Environmental Quality The environmental impacts of the proposed Merger were analyzed in the Negative Declaration referenced in Section IX of this Report. The Negative Declaration analyzed impacts on the following: aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic, and utilities and service systems, agriculture resources, land use and planning, and mineral resources. However, it was determined that of all the issues above would have either a less than significant impact or no environmental impacts as a result of the proposed Amendments. The Negative Declaration is included within this Report as Appendix D. 4. Community Facilities and Services The Negative Declaration also analyzed impacts on community services. Impacts to fire protection, police protection, and schools were considered. No significant or potentially significant impacts were found or stated for any of the community services or public utilities analyzed in the Negative Declaration. The proposed Amendments are intended to assist in funding the upgrading and installation of public improvements and facilities, which would include improvements to traffic, water, sewer, and drainage systems. Police/fire personnel, schools, libraries and parks provide a wide range of services that are affected by population increases. The proposed Amendments would assist in the elimination of barriers to General Plan growth, thus potentially increasing the Merged Project Area's population over existing conditions. However, based on the findings of the Negative Declaration, community services will not be impacted by physical environmental effects created by the Amendments. Approval of the proposed Amendments would not directly generate additional demands for Police Department and Fire Department services over current levels of demand. However, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could generate additional demands for Police Department and Fire Department services. Both the Police Department and the Fire Department will be given the opportunity to review and comment on the design of any proposed redevelopment project within the proposed Merged Project Area that could affect public or fire safety. In addition, efforts to eliminate blight in the Merged Project Area and public facilities and service programs may have a beneficial impact on police service levels. Page 61 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 50 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-71 5. School Population and Quality of Education Public education services within the proposed Merged Project Area are provided by the Santa Ana Unified School District, Orange Unified School District, Garden Grove Unified School District, Tustin Unified School District, Rancho Santiago Community College District, Coast Community College District, South Orange County Community College District and the Orange County Department of Education. Approval of the proposed Amendments would not directly generate additional demands for school facilities/services over current levels of demand. Future redevelopment activities implemented within the proposed Merged Project Area, could generate additional demands for school facilities/services. However, through the City's development review process future redevelopment activities implemented within the proposed Merged Project Area would be evaluated to ensure that adequate school facilities are available. 6. Property Assessment and Taxes The proposed Amendments will not cause the property taxes paid by owners to increase. In general, taxable valuations of property within and adjoining the proposed Merged Project Area should increase as development of that property occurs. New development within the proposed Merged Project Area will be assessed at market value, as determined by the assessor. Regardless of whether property is in the proposed Merged Project Area or not, the assessor may increase property valuations for existing properties at the maximum rate of two percent per year allowed under Proposition 13. In cases where property changes hands, the assessor will reassess the added value to property and improvements due to any new development or rehabilitation which occurs. B. RELOCATION AND LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING 1. Housing Units to be Destroyed or Removed Implementation of the proposed Amendments will not directly include Agency acquisition of property within the proposed Merged Project Area as provided for by the Redevelopment Plans including the use of eminent domain. However, eminent domain authority still exists within the Project Areas, except for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Area and in August of 2004, in the South Harbor Redevelopment Project Area, and therefore the Agency over the life of these Redevelopment Plans could still acquire and remove low and moderate income housing units. At this time, the Agency does not have any specific plans for the acquisition of any uses and in particular low and moderate income housing by eminent domain. However, the Agency is currently acquiring and demolishing some housing units through voluntary sale, which will go towards implementing and eventually meeting its replacement housing obligations. Page 62 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 51 PA0403012.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-72 Should Agency acquisition by means including eminent domain result in the removal of dwelling units occupied by person or families of low and moderate incomes, the Agency will be required to construct, develop or rehabilitate, or cause the construction, development or rehabilitation of, low and moderate income dwelling units equal in number to those destroyed or removed. These "replacement housing units" must be constructed within four years of their destruction or removal, and must be available at affordable housing cost to, and occupied by, persons in the same or a lower income category (very low-, low or moderate) as the persons displaced from those destroyed or removed units. The units must remain affordable for the longest feasible time, but not less than 55-years for rental units and 45-years for owner-occupied units as set forth in the CRL Section 33334.3. 2. Projected Residential Displacement As mentioned above, the Agency does not have any approved specific plans at this time that would involve the removal of low and moderate income housing units or displacement of low and moderate income residents. Should such displacement be contemplated, the Agency will conduct individual household surveys to determine the exact number, type and location of comparable replacement housing units and the required number of referrals thereto prior to displacement of any person of low or moderate income. Section VI (Method and Plan for Relocation) of this Report provides an overview of the relocation process that must be undertaken by the Agency prior to displacing any person(s) or family(ies). 3. Number and Location of Replacement Housing Units The specific number and type of replacement housing units required pursuant to CRL Section 33413 has not been determined. Should housing units be destroyed or removed from the low and moderate income housing market by the Agency, suitable replacement housing locations are available within the Project Areas or other areas of the City as identified in the City's General Plan as residential infi" areas. The City Council and the Agency will make findings as may be necessary to provide such replacement housing. When the Agency acquires property, enters into a disposition and development agreement, participation agreement or other agreement, or undertakes any other activities requiring or causing the destruction or removal of housing units from the low and moderate income housing market, the Agency will provide replacement housing required pursuant to Section 33413 of the CRL and replacement housing plan pursuant to Section 33413.5. Page 63 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 52 PA0403012.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-73 4. Number and Location of Low and Moderate Income Housing Units Planned Other than Replacement Housing The proposed Amendments will not alter the housing projections contained within the current Implementation Plan (Appendix A). The Agency plans to assist in the construction, rehabilitation and preservation of low and moderate income housing in the proposed Merged Project Area under its housing programs. These housing programs are described in the current Implementation Plan for the Project Areas. The current Implementation Plan estimated that 554 housing units will be developed in the proposed Merged Project Area between 2003 and 2009 with approximately 50 units made affordable to low and moderate income families and persons, and 34 housing units for very low-income families or persons. 5. Financing Method for Replacement Housing Requirements Although the primary purpose of the proposed Amendments is to merge the financial provisions of the Project Area, the financing methods for replacement housing will not change. The Agency will employ, as necessary, the method outlined in this Report to meet replacement housing requirements and other obligations under the Community Redevelopment Law. As discussed in this Report, not less than 20 percent of all taxes which may be allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 of Article 4 of the CRL shall be used by the Agency for purposes of increasing, improving, preserving the supply of low and moderate income housing available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low or moderate income and very low income households. This source of funding is expected to be utilized for replacement housing should the Agency be required to create such housing. 6. Timetable for Provision of Relocation Housing If replacement housing is to be provided pursuant to Section 33413 of the CRL, the Agency shall take necessary steps to cause the construction, rehabilitation or development of such housing in accordance with the time limits prescribed by law. The relocation plan(s) prepared by the Agency for a particular development activity shall contain schedules to insure comparable replacement housing is available in accordance with the requirements of the CRL and the State Relocation Guidelines. C. OTHER MATTERS AFFECTING THE PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT Implementation of the proposed Amendments is necessary to continue implementing the Agency's redevelopment program. By assisting in the implementation of the Agency's activities, the Amendments will provide the Agency the flexibility to help to alleviate blight and will encourage economic growth and development within the proposed Merged Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Page 64 of 190 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Page 53 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106/28104 75D-74 Project Area, making the proposed Merged Project Area a more attractive area, which in turn should stimulate reinvestment. Page 65 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 54 PA0403012.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-75 XI. SUMMARY OF CONSULTATIONS WITH AFFECTED TAXING AGENCIES Pursuant to Section 33352(n) of the CRL, the Report to the City Council must include an analysis of the Fiscal Officer's Report and must include a summary of consultations of the Agency, or attempts to consult by the Agency, with each of the affected taxing agencies. If any of the affected taxing agencies have expressed written objections or concerns with the proposed Amendments as part of these consultations, the Agency shall include a response to these concerns, additional information, if any, and, at the discretion of the Agency, proposed or adopted mitigation measures. A. THE REPORT OF THE COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER AND ANALYSIS THEREOF The CRL provides that when a project area which proposes to use tax increment revenue is initially adopted or when it is being amended to add territory to the project, the county officials charged with the responsibility of allocating taxes to redevelopment agencies shall prepare and deliver a report containing information on the allocation of tax revenue in the project area (or amendment area) to taxing agencies and the redevelopment agencies. The proposed Amendments do not include adding territory to the Project Areas. Therefore, a fiscal officer's report prepared by the Orange County Auditor-Controller's Office is not required as part of the adoption process for the proposed Amendments. B. SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION WITH AFFECTED TAXING ENTITIES Section 33328 of the CRL requires the Agency, prior to the publication of a notice of the joint public hearing on the proposed Amendments, to consult with each affected taxing agency with respect to the Amendments' impact on the allocation of tax increment revenues. On March 2, 2004, the Community Redevelopment and Housing Commission recommended that the Agency approve the Preliminary Report and receive the proposed Amendments. Subsequently, on March 15, 2004, the Agency, by Resolution No. 2004-04, accepted the draft Amendments and authorized transmittal of the draft Amendments to the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana and all affected taxing entities (see Appendix E). Also, on March 15, the Agency, by Resolution No. 2004-03 approved the Preliminary Report and authorized transmittal of the Preliminary Report to all affected taxing entities (Appendix F). Agency staff, on March 16, 2004, sent the proposed Amendments and Preliminary Report and related cover letter to all affected taxing entities as part of the consultation process for the proposed Amendments (see Appendix E for example letter, the proposed Amendments, and the mailing list). The letter urged all affected taxing entities to contact the Agency regarding questions concerning the proposed Amendments. To date, the Agency has not received any inquires or comments from the affected taxing entities on the proposed Amendments. Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Page 66 of 190 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Page 55 PA0403012.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.004106128104 75D-76 Finally, in accordance with CRL Section 33349(d), on July 29, 2004, the Agency will send to all of the affected taxing entities a notice of joint public hearing, which is scheduled for September 7,2004. Page 67 of 190 Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 56 PA0403012.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.004/06128104 75D-77 APPENDIX A FIVE-YEAR AB 1290 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 68 of 190 75D-78 ¡ ¡-. I ' 1 I i~ A City of Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency féar Implementation PÚln January 1,2000 - Decemb~r 31, 2005 Amended February 2003 Page 69 of 190 75D-79 III. IV. VI. VII. VIII. I. II. v. Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 1 CITY OF SANTA ANA COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FY 1999/2000 - FY 2004/2005 TNTD()nIICTTnN .... ... ... ......".. .... I""" ... II ....... ..... II II..' ... ...........1... II' ... I"""" II' ....1 II 3 DRn11=rr 4DI=4 nVI=DVTI=W I""."""""""" I""'" ... .... II I"" ... ....1. ... I"'." .... ...... .... 4 DDn18=rT 4111=.& CnAI ~ ANn nA11=rTT\II=S ..................................................... 5 5 7 ..... I..".'.' ... I' ......... ..... II" I""""" ... .... II' ...... .... ..... ..... 9 .'."..'.'.'1 ............ ...... ....... II..... ... .... II "'1"'" II .... ..... II 13 South Main Project Area II II' ...... ... II'" ... II""""" 11"1""'" II 11'11"""".'....""'.". a...... 15 Bristol Corridor Project Area ..................................... ...... ......... ................... 17 A. B. C. D. E. F. Cen'tral City Project Area.. ....... .......... ...... ,... ~ I' ... I"" .... ... ... ...... "".'.'" .... ... '...... Inter-City Project Area ..... ................. ... .... .... ,... ... ............ ... ..... ...... ...... ...... ... North Harbor Project Area South Harbor Project Area PDn11=rT 4DI=4 DI=\II=NIII=.'I=XÞI=Nnm IDI= ÞI AN ......................................... 19 A. B. C. D. E. F. Cenual City' Project Area ...... ....... .., ...... 11.1 .... I ........ II I'.'" ........ ...... ... ..,.. ..... I ,.. 21 Inter-City Project Area ......... ....... ....... ..... ............. ................. ....................... 22 North Harbor Project Area..... ................... ........ ............. ........ ........ ....... ........ 23 South Harbor Project Area ......... ...... ........ ............ ...... ............. ...... ....... ........ 24 SoU't:l1 Main Project Area...... ... ................... ,........... I.'.....' I 1.,..' I "'" ,. ,. "., . ,. ... ". 25 Bristol Corridor Project Area I' ".".,, "~".' ....... ".. ,., ....... ............ a.. ,.... ....... ...... " 27 RI Tt::NT M4TDTY I""'."'.. ........... ............ ....... ...... ......... ................. ".,.,...." ".,." I 28 A. Mabix of Expenditure Categories Associated with the Goals, Objectives and Expenditures and the Relationship to Blight Eradication......................... 29 T..6. Y TNrDFMFNT ~FT -4~'nF~. ............. ....... .... ....,..... ... ... ........ ... ... ......... ...,. ... 30 A. Housing Set-Aside Fund Revenue/Expenditure Plan...................................... 31 TMDII=MI=NT4TTnN nl= AI=I=nDn4RII= J.lnll~TNG DDnGD4M~..................... A. Multifamily Residential Rehabilitation Programs............................................ B. Single Family Residential Rehabilitation Programs........................................ C. Housing Mortgage Assistance/Rrst Time Home Buyer Programs................... D. New Residential Construction and Substantial Rehabilitation Programs.......... E. Mobile Home Parks ... ........ ............. ................. ..... ..... ............ ..................... F. Assistance For Preservation of Affordable Units............................................ G. 32 33 33 33 33 34 34 Capital Projects............. ",." """,", """.,..."""..,."",.,.,."",..".".,..,.",., . ........ 34 I-InIISTNt:: D~DI arJ:MI=NT DI aN ............. ... .., .............. ........ .... ..... ""'" .... ... ..... 37 A. B. Introduction.. ........ ............ ...... ...... .... .,...... ............. "..",,. ......... ,. .......... ........ 37 Health and Safety' Code Sections Addressing Replacement and Inclusionary Housing Plans & Requirements ......................................,... ........ 37 Page 70 of 190 75D-80 Five-Year Implementatlon Plan Amended February 2003 Page 2 I TST OF fX~TB'[TS 1. Activities in Project Areas (1976-2002)................................................... 43 2. Anticipated Agency Activities (2003-2009) ............................................. 47 3. Production Requirements (1976-2002)... ............... ................ ................ 49 4. Anticipated Production Requirements (2003-2009) ................................. 51 5. Production Units Inside Project Areas (1976-2002) ................................ 53 6. Anticipated Production Units Inside Project Areas (2003-2009) .............. 57 7. Production Outside Project Areas (1976-2002) ....................................... 59 8. Anticipated Production Units Outside Project Areas (2003-2009) ........... 61 '- Page 71 of 190 75D-81 I ": FIVe-Year Implementatron Plan Amended February 2003 Page 3 I. TNTRnnllt'T1'nN On October 6, 1993, Governor Pete Wilson signed Assembly Bill 1290 (Isenberg). AS 1290, enacted as Chapter 942, took effect January 1, 1994 and was sponsored by the California Redevelopment Association (CRA). Entitled the Community Redevelopment law Reform Act of 1993, the bill included the most sweeping changes in the Community Redevelopment Law Reform Act in years. The changes affected both existing project areas and new plan adoptions, and included modifications to the definition of blight, the end of fiscal review committees, time limits on all project areas, the repeal of authority to receive sales tax revenues, and a strong penalty provision for agencies which do not spend their housing funds. The bill also included specific authority for commercial rehabilitation loans and assistance to manufacturing facilities, and provided options for agencies in meeting their inclusionary housing requirement. One of the provisions of the bill is the requirement that each agency adopt a five- year implementation plan, which provides documentation for the link between the elimination of blight and the proposed actions of the redevelopment agency. For redevelopment plans adopted on or after January 1, 1994, AS 1290 requires agencies to include an implementation plan in the report submitted by the agency to the legislative body prior to adoption of the redevelopment plan (Section 33352; SEC 12). Each agency that has adopted a redevelopment plan prior to December 31, 1993 was required to adopt, after a public hearing, an implementation plan on or before December 31, 1994 (Section 33490(a); SEC 30). This implementation plan is the second five year plan completed by the agency and must be adopted before December 31, 1999. In addition, a public hearing on the implementation plan is required to be held at least once during the fIVe-year period. Amendments to the plan may be made at this time, or any time after a noticed public hearing. The implementation plan must describe specific goals, objectives, and programs of the agency, including programs, potential projects, and estimated expenditures to be made over the next fIVe years of the plan, and a description of how these goals, objectives, programs, and expenditures will assist in the alleviation of blight The implementation plan required of agencies with existing project areas must also describe how the agency will implement the requirement to increase, improve, and preserve low- and moderate-income housing and the inclusionary and replacement housing requirements. This section of the plan must contain an annual housing program and specific plans for the estimated expenditure of' monies from the Housing Fund. If the implementation plan contains a project that wiU result in the destruction of low- or moderate-income housing, the implementation plan must identify proposed locations suitable for the replacement dwelling units. The implementation plan also has implications for the disposition of agency property and for the agency's funding of public improvements. When the agency conveys property acquired in whole or in part with tax increment, AB 1290 requires that the 33433 Report contain an explanation of why the sale or lease of the property will '5D~82 190 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 4 assist in the alleviation of blighting conditions together with supporting evidence. In addition, prior to the agency's paying for the cost of a public improvement or facility, AB 1290 requires the agency to find that the payment of funds for the cost of the improvements will assist in the alleviation of blighting conditions, or provide affordable housing, and Is consistent with this Implementation Plan. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency has prepared the following five- year implementation plan. As provided by Section 33490( c) of the Health and Safety Code, this implementation plan addresses the Inter-aty, South Main, North Harbor, South Harbor, Bristol Corridor, and Central City project areas. II. ÞRn1Frr 4DF4 nVFRVTFW The original Redevelopment Plan for the City of Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Project Area was adopted by the City Council pursuant to Ordinance No. 1173 on July 2, 1973 and amended on: June 2, 1975 by Ordinance No. 1258, October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. 2234 and August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. 2396. This project area now consists of approximately 694 acres in the central and northern parts of the city. This original area is referred to as the Central City Project Area, which encompasses the Downtown. The Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project Area was adopted on July 6, 1982 by Ordinance No. N5-1636 and amended on: June 6, 1996 by Ordinance No. N5-2289 and NS-2290, October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. 2234 and August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. 2396. The project area contains approximately 536 acres. The North Harbor Redevelopment Project Area was adopted on July 6, 1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1637 and amended on: June 6, 1996 by Ordinance No. N5-2291, October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. 2234, and August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. 2396. The project area contains approximately 428 acres. The South Harbor Redevelopment Project Area was adopted on July 6, 1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1638 and amended on: July 21, 1992 by Ordinance No. NS-2167, August 3, 1992 by Ordinance No. NS-2167, October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. 2234 and August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. 2396. The project area contains approximately 1,050 acres. The South Main Redevelopment Project Area was adopted on July 6, 1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1639 and amended on: July 17, 1995 by Ordinance No. NS-2256, October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. 2234 and August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. 2396. The project area contains approximately 1,500 acres. The Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Area was adopted on December 4, 1989 by Ordinance No. NS-2039 and amended on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. NS- 2231. The project area contains approximately 781 acres. 75b7-383 190 I I I III. ( FIVe-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 5 PDn11=" 4D8=& Goal ~ aNn nR11=rnvF~ A. Central City Redevelopment Plan Goals and Objectives (entr;:!1 ('it)' R~ev~l()pl11ent PI;:!n r.:n;:!lc: 1. Restore the economic and social health of the downtown area:; 2. Make. the area a source of pride to persons residing and working in Santa Ana, or visiting the city. 3. Stimulate development and revitalization of the Downtown core and northern core so that the two areas are complementary, rather than contradictory and competitive. Strengthen vehicular access between the northern retail center and the .,j Downtown, and implement a program of improved traffic circulation and freeway access between north and central Santa Ana in order that service to both areas is available to all persons in and surrounding the project area. 5. Encourage the revitalization of the shopping areas by implementing street beautification and enhancement programs. 4. '-. 6. Guide development toward an urban environment while preserving the aesthetic and cultural qualities of the city. 7. Assist in the reestablishment of businesses within the project areà:/ 8. Stimulate and attract private investment, thereby improving the citYs'~ economic health, employment opportunities, and the tax base. 9. Preserve the retail vitality of the community by participating in a plan to' increase the existing shopping area known as Main Place. r~nt,.;:!1 fity Projprt A,.~;:t Ot'1jPrtiv~c:/Pnt~nti;:!J Prnjects 1. Midtown: a) Support the development of multistory parking structures to create additional' off-street parking. b) Develop community shopping and entertainment opportunities. c) Provide opportunities for new office and commercial development. Page 74 of 190 75D-84 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 6 d) Encourage rehabilitation, relocation, and reuse of historic structures. e) As funds are available, provide rehabilitation loans to property owners. f) Provide streetscape amenities. 2. Downtown: a) Provide for new commercial or residential development opportunities. b) Provide for rehabilitation and reuse of historic structures. c) Develop and implement a plan for replacement of street furniture in the Downtown and complete Downtown theme streetscape program. d) Provide rehabilitation loans to property owners. e) Continue to provide on-street and off-street parking. f) Continue to develop and market the Artists Village as an enterta inment and cultural venue. g) Provide new live/work space in the Artists VilJage. h) Encourage attraction of artists, art galleries and retail and restaurants which support the Artists Village. 3. Museum District: a) Assist in development of new or existing art and cultural facilities. b) Provide off-street parking to serve the Museum District. c) Provide for new commercial development opportunities. . 4. North Main area: a) Continue to provide support to the Main Place retail establishment. b) Develop public infrastructure that will assist with the development of the Main Place area. c) Continue to enhance street and landscaping improvements. Page 75 of 190 75D-85 I : Rve-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 7 B. Inter-City Project Area Goals and Objectives Intpr-(jty Ped~v~lopm~nt PI~n Gn~l~ 1. Elimination of physical blight. 2. Creation of new employment opportunities. 3. Encouragement of uniform and consistent land-use patterns. 4. Encouragement of private commercial/industrial rehabilitation, development, and capital investment. 5. Implementation of the General Plan. 6. Encouragement of highest and best use of available land consistent with the General Plan. 7. Improvement of traffic circulation to and from proposed new Amtrak station. 8. Removal of obsolete and substandard structures. 9. Improvement of land-use potential. 10. Assemblage of sites for new commercial/industrial development. 11. Rehabilitation of un-reinforced masonry structures to meet Seismic Code requirements. 12. Provision or replacement of public streets, alleys, parks, sidewalks, sewers, storm drains, traffic signals, lighting systems, and other facilities and improvements as necessary. Tnt~r-Ci~ 5f:r;:t~y PI~n The emphasis of these goals is to focus on retaining and strengthening these assets by mitigating adverse constraints, and by utilizing existing and creating new opportunities to improve the area. These goals are as follows: a) Development of complementary uses by promoting land-use compatibility and the recycling of vacant, underutilized or deteriorated properties. b) Encourage the retention, stabilization, and/or rehabilitation of viable ~~86 190 FIVe-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 8 uses. Continue to implement the City's Business Retention Program and Unkages Program to assist businesses and residents. c) Enhance the aesthetic character of the area by enforcing gqvernment codes to control the illegal use of property, sign code violations, etc. Promote highly visible public improvements, such as landscaped medians, to upgrade the appearance of the area. Develop design guidelines for the major commercial corridors that will set quality standards for development. . d) Improve the public infrastructure to complement future development needs, and improve the appearance of neighborhoods and arterials corridors. e) Continue the neighborhood improvement/community outreach efforts to maintain effective communication with residents in the area. Continue programs, such as rehabilitation loans and graffiti abatement, to improve the quality of life in the neighborhoods. f) Encourage the recycling of targeted development sites to appropriate uses based on land-use and economic considerations. T'1tpr..{"jty prajPct Arp;:¡ ()hjPrtiv~/Pntpnti;::¡1 Prnjects 1. Prepare a reuse plan for parcels impacted by the Santiago/Standard realignment. 2. Develop and implement a master plan for affordable and market rate housing along Santa Ana Boulevard. 3. Assist with the sale and development of the County/Carrrans parcels at the Interstate 5 and Santa Ana Boulevard. 4. Continue to address deferred maintenance and capital improvement for the Depot. Page 77 of 190 75D-87 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 9 c. North Harbor Project Area Goals and Objectives Nnrth H~rhn... R~rf,:1v~lorrn€'nt P'~n Gœls 1. Elimination of physical blight. 2. Creation of new employment opportunities. 3. Encouragement of uniform and consistent land-use patterns. 4. Encouragement of private commercial/industrial rehabilitation, development and capital investment. 5. Implementation of the General Plan. 6. Encouragement of highest and best use of availabJe land consistent with the General Plan. 7. Improvement of market potential through creation of a uniform commercial character along Harbor Boulevard. 8. Development of vacant or underutilized industrial land. 9. Provision or replacement of public streets, alleys, parks, sidewalks, sewers, storm drains, traffic signals, lighting systems and other facilities and improvements as necessary. North H~rhnr C:m:.t~ PI~n 1. Enforce the North Harbor Boulevard Specific Plan, which provides land use and development standards for the Project Area. 2. Retain and upgrade the area's commercial character while improving and expanding its role as a significant regional commercial district. a. Create a cohesive mix of commercial land uses. b. Assist in the economic and land-use activities that have been identified by the North Harbor Boulevard Specific Plan into distinct activity zones with a strong sense of identity. c. Limit residential development to the existing cluster of residential areas. d. Encourage high-quality design values, especially at main entries and major intersections of the planning area. 75D28tJ 190 FIVe-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 10 e. Provide a balance of shopping and employment opportunities for local and regional residents. f. Establish strategies for achieving lot consolidation. g. Ensure .consistent application of development standards and elimination of activities that are incompatible with improving the area's image. h. Fund and support community service programs and assertive policing to alleviate crime and social problems along the Harbor Boulevard corridor. 3. Enhance and support the residential neighborhoods surrounding Harbor Boulevard. a. Reduce potential land use conflicts between residential and commercial activities, and incompatible com merda I land uses, by implementing design and development standards which improve the area and mitigate impacts to each use. b. Provide and maintain a variety of neighborhood-serving activities along Harbor Boulevard and Rrst Street. c. Improve intra-neighborhood circulation through enhanced collector streets and pedestrian travel routes, land use planning and improved traffic flow on Harbor Boulevard. d. Whenever possible and/or necessary, retain, expand and/or redesignate open space areas. e. Use landscaping, entry monuments and other design features to define residential neighborhood and enhance identity. g. Support and assist neighborhood organizations to encourage neighborhood pride, revitalization and communication among residents, businesses and Oty staff. . h. Fund and support residential rehabilitation loan programs, policing and code enforcement efforts and public improvements to alleviate crime and social problems, and improve the quality of life in neighborhoods. 4. Improve vehicular and pedestrian circulation in and around the Harbor Boulevard area. a. Complete widening of all streets to their maximum widths. P1SD-ifg19O FIVe-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 11 b. Reduce traffic congestion through median construction, lane configuration, signalization, and other traffic control techniques. c. Create pedestrian links and develop enhanced parkways/sidewalks. d. Improve vehicular approaches to Harbor Boulevard along McFadden Avenue, Rrst Street, Hazard Avenue, Rfth Street, and Wesbninster Avenue. e. Provide improved service and access for the disabled. f. Enhance public transit systems by providing turnouts at designated bus stops, bus shelters, and disabled access. g. Reduce the number of driveways along Harbor Boulevard, and encourage larger lot development, including promoting integrated development. 5. Achieve an aesthetic visual consistency throughout the Harbor Boulevard area while improving and upgrading the visual image of the adjacent areas. a. Implement consistent development standards and land-use patterns. b. Implement and maintain a systematic landscaping pattern and standards for public and private land. c. Implement design and architectural standards for new and rehabilitated structures. d. Place emphasis on improving the appearance of all arterial streets through an aggressive streetscape improvement program. e. Create a visually active environment with the use of mimetic architecture and innovative signage. f. Coordinate visual improvement strategies and implementation with adjacent jurisdictions and other agencies, where necessary. 6. Enhance the economic viability of the Harbor Boulevard area. a. Assist local businesses and property owners through available financing and other means to upgrade their properties or expand their businesses. Page 80 of 190 75D-90 FIVe-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 12 b. Work to retain existing and emerging businesses that are consistent with the Specific Plan, wherever and whenever possible, through redevelopment or rehabilitation efforts. c. Recruit and actively encourage new businesses into the area that will meet the standards of the Specific Plan. d. Encourage the relocation and elimination of inappropriate activities. e. Encourage the formation of a business improvement association to promote the area, help educate other businesses¡ and instill high professional and maintenance standards. 7. Create a secure atmosphere within which business and residential communities can thrive. a. Encourage land uses and design features that are not prone to attracting criminal activity. b. Continue to reduce the levels of criminal activity through active and visible policing efforts. c. Attract more desirable and viable uses to the area that serve to enhance its customer base. d. Encourage safe pedestrian circulation through adequate lighting standards, appropriate setbacks¡ improved visibility, well-designed landscaping¡ and convenient links to neighborhood shopping centers. e. Encourage high maintenance standards to upgrade the overall appearance of the area and increase public pride. f. Create an interagency task force to coordina.te policing¡ land-use regulation, housing, and community service activities. North H~rbor Pmj~ct Arpa Objeçtiv~5/Pntpnti;t1 Projects 1. Complete medians in the First Street to regulate traffic and improve the appearance of the First Street Corridor. 2. Encourage the redevelopment of the City entry point at Harbor Boulevard and Westminster Avenue. 3. Improve the identity of the Harbor Boulevard area by creating a marketing and image strategy to i~rove commercial activity. Page fá5Ð-91 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 13 D. South Harbor Project Area Goals and Objectives ~,8th l1~rhor RPdøv~l()prn~nt P'~r'l Gn(JJe; 1. Elimination of physical blight. 2. Creation of new employment opportunities. 3. Encouragement of uniform and consistent land-use patterns. 4. Encouragement of private commercial/industrial rehabilitation, development and capital investment. . 5. Implementation of the General Plan. 6. Encouragement of highest and best use of available land consistent with the General Plan. 7. Improvement of market potential through aeation of a uniform commercial character along Harbor Boulevard. 8. Development of vacant or underutilized industrial land. 9. Provision or replacement of public streets, alleys, parks, sidewalks, sewers, storm drains, traffic signals, lighting systems and other public facilities and improvements as necessary. Sol rtn H~rhnr ~~t~y PIt'f1 1. Develop facilities that would make South Harbor a more attractive location for businesses, by providing employees with conveniently located services and amenities. a. Medical offices and an emergency center b. Restaurants c. Child care centers d. Recreational facilities Page 82 of 190 75D-92 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 14 2. Develop public improvements that will contribute to the upscale corporate park image, and continued desirability of the South Harbor project area as a business location. a. Median improvements along Fairview Street, Warner Avenue and Segerstrom Avenue, and Harbor Boulevard. b. Identify means for inaeased traffic control and improved traffic patterns as new development occurs and traffic volumes increase. c. Improved and continued street and landscape maintenance. 3. Enforce design standards for all new development and rehabilitation for the project area. This goal is to ensure that the project area continues to develop as a viable employment center and desirable location for business, and that new development projects meet with the approval of the existing businesses. Sollth I-I;:trhor projert Arl3:::1 ()bjP(iiv~/Pnh:::.nti~1 prnjects 1. Encourage the development of vacant sites within the project area as opportunities arise. 2. Encourage the redevelopment of underutilized property into more effident and beneficial businesses. 3. Assist in marketing and promotion of the South Harbor industrial area as a premier location to retain existing businesses and attract new businesses. 4. Add street medians in areas lacking medians and require for traffic control and aesthetic improvements. Page 83 of 190 75D-93 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 15 E. South Main Project Area Goals and Objectives <::01 Ith M~i" Rørløvølormønt PI~n (';O~lc: ~nrl ()bj€rtiv~c; 1. Elimination of physical blight. 2. Creation of new employment opportunities. 3. Encouragement of uniform and consistent land-use patterns. 4. Encouragement of private commercial/industrial rehabilitation, development, and. capital investment. 5. Implementation of the General Plan. 6. Encouragement of highest and best use of available land consistent with the General Plan. 7. Improvement of traffic flow along South Main Street commerdal corridor. 8. Improvement of market potential through creation of a uniform commercial character. 9. Increase in availability of off-street parking. 10. . Development of vacant or underutilized industrlalland. 11. Provision or replacement of public streets, alleys, parks, sidewalks, sewers, storm drains, traffic signals, lighting systems, and other facilities and improvements as necessary. Sol ,th M~in <;trateav PI~" 1. In general, the plan directs development that will retain a majority of businesses, supplement existing commercial and industrial uses with complementary uses, provide local residential commercial conveniences, rehabilitate viable businesses, and enhance the aesthetic character of the area. 2. Develop public infrastructure that will assist with the future development of the project area. . a. Sewer improvements to alleviate infrastructure inadequacies, meet flow requirements and ensure public safety. Page 84 of 190 75D-94 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 16 b. Adequate storm drains for proper maintenance of streets, capacity for existing and new development, and proper drainage. c. Street construction, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, landscaping and median improvements, traffic circulation systems improvements, streetscape improvements, and park improvements. Improved and continued street and landscape maintenance. d. Bridge Construction improvements. e. Community development programs to eradicate remaining blighting conditions by providing commercial/industrial rehabilitation funds. 3. Create design guidelines to address building design, materials, color palette, landscaping, walls and fences, loading docks, lighting, parking, and signage. ~I 8th M::.in Prnjert Ar~~ Objectfves/Pntt:llnti::.1 Projects 1. Continue efforts to identify public improvements needed in the project area and coordinate with the South Santa Ana Merchants Association. 2. Facilitate plans for hotel/entertainment development at MacArthur Place with Mola Development. 3. Implement a rebate program for South Main Street. 4. Identify public improvements desired for the Sandpoint Neighborhood. 5. Indentify redevelopment opportunities as it relates to the Centerline Project along South Main Street. 6. Encourage development of under utilized sites and assist in the review of plans with other agencies. Page 85 of 190 75D-95 FIVe-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 17 F. Bristol Corridor Project Area Goals and Objectives Rri~1 Red~v~lnrmp.nt pl~1" ~n;:alc; 1. The reduction and prevention of blight, or the prevention of the relocation of blight (within or outside the redevelopment project boundaries), and the conservation, rehabilitation, and redevelopment of the project area in accord with the Gen~ral Plan, Specific Plans, the Redevelopment Plan, and local codes and ordinances. 'J 2. The widening and improvement of Bristol Street in accordance with the Orange County Regional Highway Plan and the Orculation Element of the Santa Ana General Plan. 3. The promotion of new and continuing private sector investment within the . project area to prevent the loss of and to facilitate the capture of commercial sales activity. 4. The achievement of an environment reflecting a high level of concern for architectural, landscape, and urban design and land-use principles appropriate for attainment of the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. The retention and expansion of as many existing businesses as possible by means of redevelopment and rehabilitation activities, and by encouraging and assisting the cooperation and participation of owners, businesses, and public agencies in the revitalization of the project area. 5. The provision for increased sales, business license, and other fees, taxes, and revenues to the City of Santa Ana. s The creation and development of local job opportunities and the ...j . preservation of the area's existing employment base. 8. The replanning, redesign and development of areas which are stagnant or' improperly utilized. Any General Plan and/or land-use changes made by the City within the project area shall be brought to the Project Area Committee for its comment. 6. 7. 9. The elimination or ameliorization of certain environmental deficiencies, including substandard vehicular circulation systems; inadequate water, sewer, and storm drainage systems; insufficient off-street parking; and other similar public improvement, facilities, and utiJities deficiencies adversely affecting the project area. 10. The expansion of the community's supply of housing (inside or outside the project area), including opportunities for low- and moderate-income households. Page 86 of 190 75D-96 FIVe-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 18 11. The mandatory reduction of the City's annual costs of the provision of local services to and within the project area. 12. The housing stock and neighborhood integrity shall be protected from. adverse consequences associated with new development and/or redevelopment. 13. The actions taken as part of the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Area shall not displace existing social blight to another part of the city. Rric::tnl PrnjPCt Ar~;:a nhj~iv~c:/Pnt~nti;:a1 prnjects 1. Assist with the coordination of the Mater Dei Expansion. 2. Provide community meetings for widening plan construction schedule. 3. Implement a public relations program for Bristol Street Widening. 4. Identify surplus property on Bristol and prepare a marketing strategy. Page 87 of 190 75D-97 IV. DRn1FrT ADF.4 RI=VI=NIIF I FYDFNnm IRF PI AN . FIVe-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 19 This section includes the fIVe-year revenue/expenditure plan for the six project areas. The plan details currently estimated Agency revenues, estimated obligations, and potential projects through Fiscal Year 2003-2004. Page 88 of 190 75D-98 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 20 II ~ Page 89 of 190 75D-99 .1 ' Five-Year Implementation Plan Updated February 2003 Page 21 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIVE YEAR ESTIMATED REVENUE/EXPENDITURE PLAN YEARS 2000 THROUGH 2005 2000.2001 2001-2002 2002.2003 2003.2004 2004.2005 CENTRAL CITY Revenues Tax Increment 5,800,000 5,657,000 5,741,855 5,827,985 5,915,405 Miscellaneous Revenues 1,034,605 1,350,765 1,367,370 1,384,185 1,404,675 Fund Transfers/Loans 3,375,000 3,684,135 3,674,120 3,615,810 3,297,455 10,209,605 10,691,900 10,783,345 10,827,980 10,617,535 Expenditures Obligations-Debt Service Debt Service - Parking 1,187,525 1 ,204,265 1,219,185 1,242,225 1,267,785 Debt Service - 1989 B 2,263,570 0 0 0 0 Debt Service - 1989 E 1,046,025 0 0 0 0 Debt Service - 1998 A 1,601,230 4,175,985 4,165,220 4,171,485 4,167,140 Debt Service - 1998 B 369,515 836,205 910,125 °905,905 905,625 Debt Service - 1998 0 504,795 1,528,460 1,535,010 1,539,120 1,545,865 Loan Repayment - JMB 894,000 636,540 659,640 685,615 710,740 Trustee Fee - B/E 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 Trustee - Parking 7,945 7,945 7,945 7,945 7,945 Discovery Science Note 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 0 Obligations - Other Pacific Symphony 135,000 141,750 148,840 156,280 164,095 Civic Center Garages 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 DSC Lease Payment 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 Ca.ltrans Lease Payment 20,000 20,000 20,000 3,000 0 CSUF Lease Subsidy 110,000 58,000. 21,500 7,000 0 Administration Administrative Services 80,000 82,400 84,870 87,415 90,040 Projects Property Mgm't & Maintenance 345,000 355,350 366,010 376,990 388,300 10,209,605 10,691,900 10,783,345 10,827,980 10,617,535 CENTRAL CITY SUMMARY Revenues 10,209,605 10,691,900 10,783,345 10,827,980 10,617,535 Expenditures _(10,209,605)-110,691,900)-110, 783,345U1 0,827,980)_( 10,617 ,535t BALANCE ° 0 0 0 0 Page 90 of 190 75D-100 Five-Year Implementation Plan Updated February 2003 Page 22 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIVE YEAR ESTIMATED REVENUE/EXPENDITURE PLAN YEARS 2000 THROUGH 2005 2000.2001 2001..2002 2002.2003 2003.2004 2004-2005 INTERCITY PROJECT AREA Revenues Tax Increment 1,170,000 1,205,100 1,223,180 1,241,525 1,260,150 Miscellaneous Revenues 105,220 100,000 103,000 106,090 109,275 Fund Transfers/Loans 387,890 327,445 307,270 293,630 271,435 1,663,110 1,632,545 1,633,450 1,641,245 1,640,860 Expenditures Obligations-Debt Service Debt Service - RTC 842,660 834,835 835,535 838,920 839,795 Debt Service - 1989 A 459,500 0 0 ° ° Debt Service. 1998 C 213,550 666,710 665,585 668,635 665,985 Trustee Fee - A & C 12,000 5,000 5,150 5,305 5,465 Trustee Fee - RTC 5,400 6,000 6,180 6,365 6,555 Obligations - Other Pass- Throughs 60,000 50,000 51,000 52,020 53,060 Administration Redevelopment 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Projects RTC Improvements 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1,663,110 1,632,545 1,633,450 1.641,245 1,640,860 INTER CITY SUMMARY Revenues 1,663,110 1,632,545 1,633,450 1,641,245 1,640,860 Expenditures (1.663.110) (1 .632.545) (1 .633.450) (1.641.245) (1.640.860) BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 Page 91 of 190 75D-101 FNe- Year Implementation Plan Updated February 2003 Page 23 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY FIVE YEAR ESTIMATED REVENUE/EXPENDITURE PLAN YEARS 2000 THROUGH 2005 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003..2004 2004-2005 NORTH HARBOR PROJECT AREA Revenues Tax Increment 1,540,000 1,570,800 1,602,215 1,634,260 1,666,945 . Miscellaneous Revenues 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,QOO 20,400 1,560,000 1,590,800 1,622,215 1,654,260 1,687,345 Expenditures Obligations - Other Pass- Throughs 65,000 60,000 61,200 62,425 63,675 Loan Repayments Loan Repayment - ec 1,330,000 852,865 898,745 943,205 997,235 Loan Repayment - Ie 145,000 327,445 307,270 293,630 271,435 Administration Redevelopment 20,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Projects Street Improvements 0 320,490 325,000 325,000 325,000 1,560,000 1,590,800 1,622,215 1,654,260 1,687,345 NORTH HARBOR SUMMARY Revenues 1,560,000 1,590,800 1,622,215 1,654,260 1,687,345 Expenditures (1.560.000) (1.590.800) (1.622.215) (1.654.260) (1.687.345) BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 Page 92 of 190 75D-102 Five-Year Implementation Plan Updated February 2003 Page 24 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIVE YEAR ESTIMATED REVENUE/EXPENDITURE PLAN YEARS 2000 THROUGH 2005 2000.2001 2001-2002 2002..2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 SOUTH HARBOR PROJECT AREA Revenues Tax Increment 5,090,000 5,800,000 5,974,000 6,153,220 6,337,820 Miscellaneous Revenues 100,045 147,045 149,985 152,990 156,045 5,190,045 5,947,045 6,123,985 6,306,210 6,493,865 Expenditures Obligations - Debt Service Debt Service - 1989 C 771,030 0 0 ° 0 Debt Service - 1998 A 626,730 1,008,445 1,016,335 1,018,275 1,013,905 Trustee Fees 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 Obligations - Other Housing Set-Aside 3,090,395 2,900,000 2,987,000 3,076,610 3,168,910 Pass- Throughs 220,000 275,880 284,155 292,680 301,460 Loan Repayment - CC 0 1,273,720 1,199,450 1,077,380 684,735 Loan Repayment - IC 242,890 ° 0 0 0 FHP Lease 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Administration Redevelopment 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Projects Street Improvements 0 250,000 398,045 602,265 1,085,855 5,190,045 5,947,045 6,123,985 6,306,210 6,493,865 SOUTH HARBOR SUMMARY Revenues 5,190,045 5,947,045 6,123,985 6,306,210 6,493,865 expenditures C5.190.045) 15.947.045) (6.123.985) (6.306.210) (6.493.865) BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 Page 93 of 190 75D-103 ~ .n Ave-Year Implementation Plan Updated February 2003 Page 25 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIVE YEAR ESTIMATED REVENUE/EXPENDITURE PLAN YEARS 2000 THROUGH 2005 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 SOUTH MAIN PROJECT AREA South Maln-20% Commercial Corridor Revenues Tax Increment 1,750,000 1,837,500 1,911,000 1,968,330 2,027,380 1,750,000 1,837,500 1,911,000 1,968,330 2,027,380 Expenditures Obligations - Debt Service Debt Service - Series D 1,126,000 1,136,280 1,136,930 1,135,985 1,137,225 Trustee Fee 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Obligations - Other Parking Lots 45,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 Commercial Rebates 100,000 0 0 0 0 Pass-Throughs (SAUSD) 475,000 275,000 286,000 294,580 303,415 Projects Street Improvements 0 70,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Sewer/Storm Drains ° 301,220 233,070 282.765 331,740 1,750,000 1,837,500 1,911,000 1,968,330 2,027,380 SOUTH MAIN 20% SET ASIDE SUMMARY Revenues 1,750,000 1,837,500 1,911,000 1,968,330 2,027,380 Expenditures (1.750.000) (1.837.500) (1.911.000) (1,968.330) (2.027 .380) BALANCE ° 0 0 0 0 . Page 94 of 190 75D-104 Five-Year Implementation Plan Updated February 2003 Page 26 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIVE YEAR ESTIMATED REVENUE/EXPENDITURE PLAN YEARS 2000 THROUGH 2005 2000-2001 2001.2002 2002.2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 SOUTH MAIN PROJECT AREA Revenues Tax Increment 7.000,000 7,800.000 8.034.000 8,275,020 8.523,270 Miscellaneous Revenues 350,000 175,000 178.500 182,075 185,715 7,350,000 7,975,000 8,212,500 8,457,095 8,708,985 EXPENDITURES Obligations - Debt Service Debt Service;. Series D 1,944,190 1,934.745 1 ,935,855 1,934,245 1,936,355 Trustee Fee 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Obligations - Other Housing Set-Aside 1,528,605 2,030.915 2,074.350 2,115,150 2,156,935 Pass- Throughs 320,000 326,340 336,130 346,215 356,600 lIT Cannon Reimbursement 180,000 200,000 200,000 0 0 SAUSD Pass-through 485,000 275,000 283,250 291,750 300.500 Loan Repayments Loan Repayment - CC 400,000 0 0 0 0 Administration Redevelopment/Downtown 707,500 728,725 750,585 773,100 796,295 Economic Development 664,275 684,205 704,730 725,870 747,645 Administrative Services 898,000 924,940 952,690 981.270 1,010,710 Projects Street Improvements 0 866,130 970,910 1,285,495 1,399,945 Auto Mall 218,430 0 0 0 0 7,350,000 7,975,000 8,212,500 8,457,095 8,708,985 SOUTH MAIN GENERAL USE SUMMARY Revenues 7,350,000 7,975,000 8,212,500 8,457,095 8,708,985 Expenditures (7.350.000) (7.975.000) (8.212.500) l8.457.095) (8.708.985) BALANCE 0 0 0 0 ° Page 95 of 190 75D-105 Five-Year Implementation Plan Updated February 2003 Page 27 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIVE YEAR ESTIMATED REVENUE/EXPENDITURE PLAN YEARS 2000 THROUGH 2005 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 BRISTOL CORRIDOR PROJECT AREA Revenues Tax Increment 630,000 661,500 694,575 729,305 765,770 Miscellaneous Revenues 10,000 13,700 14,385 15,105 15,860 640,000 675,200 708,960 744,410 781,630 Expenditures Obligations - Other Pass-Through 185,000 307,650 323,035 339,185 356,145 Loan Repayment - CC 61,120 357,550 375,925 395,225 415,485 Loan Repayment - IC 383,880 0 0 0 0 Administration Redevelopment $10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 640,000 675,200 708,960 744,410 781,630 BRISTOL CORRIDOR SUMMARY - Revenues 640,000 675,200 708,960 744,410 781,630 Expenditures (640.000) (675.200) (708.960) (744.410) (781 .630) BALANCE 0 -0 0 0 0 Page 96 of 190 75D-106 v. Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 28 RI Tt=NT M.4TDTY Potential Agency expenditure categories associated with goals, strategies, and objectives and the relationship to blight is addressed and listed in the following matrix. Page 97 of 190 75D-107 Five-Year Implementation -Plan Amended February 2003 ~ Page 29 5~ )()O( )O()()( >0<)( î 0.. ¡:; j i ~~ ~g ffi~ ' )()()()()()( )(x ! I i ~w j f I ~t- . I j If ax It ~(! b Ii: :¡ )( )( )( )()()()()()()( 10m I J I t ~ f5 f ( ~ ~ ~ )( t I' i U1 . Z fIJ ,f j fit ~ I. ~ :s § fin f J I K! 0 ~ ~ ä i t J,lt 't1 j fß ~ IfIll !,' : .~ 1) .)( !UlJlid I ~ f IIfi11f1} ~ ~ IIf 1,lflhlf¡ ì :;) ~ I~ i llill_¡ I IIIII~II j I ~ .~ I Ili~! i . '1 It )( iunUh J Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 30 VI. T.4Y TNCRFMFNT ~FT-.4~TnFC: In addition to passing through a portion of tax increment monies to special districts, the five newer project areas are required to contribute a portion of each year's tax increment revenue to low- and moderate-income housing as follows: Inter-City-- 30%, North Harbor--300ÆJ, South Harbor--60%, South Mainø-20°Æ», and Bristol--300/0. In late 1985, the State legislature adopted AS 265 (Chapter 1135 of the Statutes of 1985) which extended the 20% housing set-aside requirement to redevelopment project areas adopted prior to 1977, beginning with the tax increment generated in Fiscal Year 1985/86. This provision would apply to the Central City Project Area, except that the legislation allowed an exemption if a substantial effort to meet the low- and moderate-income housing needs is made by other sources. As the annual housing set-aside appropriated from the fIVe other project areas exceeds 200/0 of the tax increment generated by the six project areas, the Agency qualifies under this exception. Legislation adopted in 1991 adding Section 33334.3(i) of the Health and Safety Code now authorizes the Agency to continue to meet the set-aside requirements of Community Redevelopment law by annually allocating more than 20% of the tax increment revenue received by all six project areas to the housing set-aside funds. The Agency will continue to do this using the percentage allocation formula stated above. In the South Main Project Area, an additional 20% of tax increment revenues is set aside for capital improvements and commercial rehabilitation along the South Main corridor between First Street and Warner Avenue. . The following table summarizes the Agency's anticipated revenue and expenditure plan for the five-year period of 2000-2005. Page 99 of 190 75D-109 Five-Year Implementation Plan Updated February 2003 Page 31 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIVE YEAR ESTIMATED REVENUE/EXPENDITURE PLAN YEARS 2000 THROUGH 2005 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 HOUSING SET.ASIDE FUND Revenues Tax Increment Loan RepaymentslTllnterest $4,619,000 $4,930,915 $5,064,350. $5,191,760 $5,325,845 $700,000 $700,000 $700,000 $700,000 $700,000 $5,319,000 $5,630,915 $5,764,350 $5,891,760 $6,025,845 Expenditures . Administration 2,970,960 3,060,089 3,151,891 3,246,448 3,343,842 Loans 783,040 985,826 1,047,459 1,080,312 1,117,003 Debt Service 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 Projects Replacement Housing Health & Safety $700,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $700,000 $420,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 5,319,000 5,630,915 5,764,350 5,891,.760 6,025,845 HOUSING SET-ASIDE FUND Revenues $5,319,000 $5,630,915 $5,764,350 $5,891,760 $6,025,845 Expenditures $5,319,000 $5,630,915 $5,764,350 $5,891,760 $6,025,845 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Page 100 of 190 75D-110 Ave-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 32 VII. TMDII=MI=NT4TTnN nl= 41=I=()Rn4RII= ...nll~'Nt: DDn(;R4M~ Pursuant to Section 33490 of the Health and Safety Code, each agency that has adoptecl a redevelopment plan prior to December 31, 1993 shall adopt, after a public hearing, an implementation plan that shalf contain the specific goals and objectives of the agency for the project area; the specific programs, including potential projects and estimated expenditures proposed to be made during the next five years; and an explanation of how the goals and objectives, programs, and expenditures will eliminate blight within the project area and implement the requirements of Sections 33334.2, 33334.4, 33334.6, and 33413. In addition to the above programs, the implementation plan must describe how the requirements of Sections 33334.2, 33334.6, and 33413 will be implemented. These sections of the Health and Safety Code refer to the agency's responsibility to increase, improve and preselVe the community's supply of low- and moderate-income housing at an affordable cost as defined in Section 50093, and very- low-income housing as defined in Section 50105. The Agency has been responsible for stimulating the provision of high quality affordable housing, both for sale and rental. The following provides a brief overview of such projects. 'ID The Agency fadlitated and subsidized the development of in-fill new construction units that resulted in the construction of 1 three- and 3 four- bedroom single family homes by the Southland Economic Devefopment Corporation. These for saJe housing units are for low income households. 'OJ The Agency has subsidized the development of a 21 bed community residence for persons diagnosed with HIV/Aids. This development is a collaborative' effort between the Agency, Mercy Charities, and HomeAid, a nonprofit associated with the Orange County Building Industry Association. m The Agency is culTently working with owners of multi-family units on Minnie Street to enter into an OWners Participation Agreement as well as Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) to assist in the revitalization of the area. The plan is to re-design the facades and courtyards of approximately 48 buildings. In addition, loans will be available for the rehabilitation of the units. m The Agency has participated in the Family Fund Loan Loss Reserve administered by a non-profit, Santa Ana Neighborhood Housing Services. Approximately 13 families have purchased homes through the Family Fund Program. m With the use of Agency funds, Orange Housing Development Corporation rehabilitated an 84 unit apartment complex housing very low- and fow-income households. Page 101 of 190 75D-111 1 . ; 1 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 33 The following is a list of those programs which the Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency expects to either continue or to begin within the next fIVe years, the estimated number of affordable housing units assodated with each, their targeted income levels, and the type of assistance provided. Other projects under these programs may be considered and developed in lieu of, or in addition to, those shown. A. Multifamily Residential Rehabilitation Programs Over the past several decades, older, small apartment complexes located throughout the city have suffered significant deterioration from overcrowding, with as many as 15 people in a two-bedroom unit. The overcrowded conditions have resulted in accelerated w~r and tear, and deferred maintenance on the interior and exterior of the units. In addition, there have been serious impacts on the surrounding neighborhoods, including trash storage, parking, traffic, and crime. The apartments are predominately occupied by very-low-income persons and families. The lack of on-site professional management has fueled the continued downward spiral of housing conditions and quality of life for tenants. The Agency is working within focused neighborhoods to provide the necessary financing to improve the conditions of these properties. B. Single Family Residential Rehabilitation Programs The City's Community Development Agency administers programs funded by HOME, CDBG, and Redevelopment Agency Housing Set-Aside funds. The program is available citywide to very low-, low- and moderate-income families, with the majority of funds going to households in the low- to very-low-income range. Annually, the Agency Set-Aside funds provide 25-30 loans in an amount of $20,000 to $30,000. . C. Housing Mortgage Assistance/First Time Home Buyer Programs The Agency has operated a Mortgage Assistance Program. Currently, the program is being reviewed and will be restructured. The City also participates in the Mortgage Credit Certificate Program that annually assists approximately 20 households. The Agency has provided funds for the Family Fund Loan Loss Reserve administered by Santa Ana Neighborhood Housing Services~ D. . New Residential Construction and SUbstantial Rehabilitation Programs The Agency partidpates with private sector for-profit and nonprofit housing developers to develop and substantially rehabilitate a mix of ownership and rentàl housing opportunities throughout the city. Page 102 of 190 75D-112 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 34 E. Mobile Home Parks Santa Ana has 29 mobile home parks. These parks serve a substantial number of low- and very-low-income seniors and families. The current escalation of mobile home park rents has made the economic environment for these very-low-income families and seniors untenable, with many losing their coaches for nonpayment of rent The City provides up to a $5,000 loan to cover the cost of rehabilitation to mobile home units for eligible very-Iow-, low- and moderate-income persons. Currently, this program is being funded through HOME funds. F. Assistance For Preservation of Affordable Units The Agency in cooperation with the Housing Authority, will continue to work with owners of affordable housing projects which have expiring affordable housing covenants. G. Capital Projects Funds are provided to support the elimination of health and safety items. The Minnie Street capital improvement project will be incorporated into an overall revitalization program resulting in an improved residential environment and rehabilitation of 527 very low- and low-income units. In addition to these projects, the City of Santa Ana received in 1998 an Empowerment Zone designation and federal Empowerment Zone funding. The Agency will be providing funding in support of the nine Housing Strategies. Agency funds are also used to meet match requirements for the federal HOME Program. This amOunt is equal to 12°k of HOME funds expended. These funds are expended for Housing related activities for very low- and low-income households. The following tables list each potential project, the number of units to be provided and the income level addressed. Page 103 of 190 75D-113 :zooo.ZOO5 LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING RIND FIVE-YEAR ANTICIPATED PROGRAM GOALS BY INCOME LEVEL PROGRAMS AFFORDABILITY 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 TOTAL MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL VERY LOW 0 0 0 8 8 16 REHABIUTAll0N LOW 0 0 0 17 17 34 MODERATE 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL ~~0TIJ;[Fit:::.-j'::l::.,S;~~:HH;2:-~U 0 0 0 25 25 50 SINGlE FAMILY REHABILITATION I VERY lOWI 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 SO (.rig 20 20 20 20 20 100 01-' RESIDENllAL NEW 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 ~,¡:,. CON5fRUCT10N/ 0 0 0 17 17 34 ~o 0 0 0 33 33 66 H1 0 0 0 50 SO 100 oÞ.l-' ~ IREPL6.ŒMENT HOUSING Va:KY LUWI 0 I 16 I 0 I n I 0- ------n 0 10 0 0 0 26 :!I ARST TIME HOMEBUYER T VERY lowl , ASSISTANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 -< 6 12 12 12 12 54 »(1) 3~ 14 23 23 23 23 106 (1)- 20 35 35 35 35 160 5.3 E.~ ~~ C"::J 261" "tIQJa QJ -<! 0 '2 N ~ 0- WOOl U1tAJ::J 2000-2005 AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FIVE-YEAR PROGRAMS AND PROJECT GOALS 'l::J PJ ~ --4 ~ 10 ~ ~ ~ PROGRAMS a. PROJECTS ACTIVITY STATUS 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 TOTAL MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION Multi-family rehab Implemented 0 0 0 25 25 SO SINGLE FAMILY REHABIUTATION Single family rehab Implemented 20 20 20 20 20 100 RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCI10N/ SUBSTANTIAL REHABIUTATION SANTA ANA BLVD. New construction Planning 0 0 0 50 50 100 BIRCH STREET New construction Planning 4 0 0 0 0 4 MOBILE HOME LOANS AND GRANTS Single family rehab Implemented 20 20 20 20 20 100 FIRST TIME HOMEBUYER LOANS Housing Assistance Planning 20 35 35 35 35 160 REPLACEMENT HOUSING New consb'ucI:Ion and ACQuisition/Rehab Implemented 2 2 0 0 0 4 Concorde New construction Planning 0 1 0 0 0 1 Adams New construction Planning 0 1 0 0 0 1 Birch Street New construction Planning 0 16 0 0 0 16 CAPITAL PROJECTS Price Restricted Pre-Planning 527 0 0 0 527 ~ CD I ~ >01 ~~ ::s- 0.3 ~¡ ër~ 0":3 261' "QI!:!: CÞ-<o U) :3 CÞ"'-o 0- wOCÞ mw::s Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 37 VIII. HOUSING REPLACEMENT PLAN A. INTRODUCTION The California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq., states that one of the fundamental purposes of redevelopment is to increase and improve the community's supply of low-and moderate-income housing. This is accomplished in part through three different but interrelated requirements imposed on the Agency by California law. These three requirements provide for the production, improvement and preservation of housing for low-and moderate-income persons, and include: m Twenty percent of tax increment revenue must be expended to increase, improve and preserve the supply of low-and moderate-income housing in the community (H &S 33334.2). 'OJ The Agency must replace low-and moderate-income housing which is removed as a result of a redevelopment project (the replacement rule, H&S 33413 [a]). B. m A fixed percentage of all housing constructed in a redevelopment project area must be affordable to low-and moderate-income persons and families (the inclusionary rule, (H&S 33413 [bD. HEALTH "AND SAFETY CODE SECTIONS ADDRESSING REPLACEMENT AND INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PLANS AND REQUIREMENTS i. H&S Section 33413 (a) - The Replacement Rule Section 33413 (a) of the Health and Safety Code requires that whenever dwelling units housing persons and families of low-or moderate-income are destroyed or removed from the low-and moderate-income housing market as part of a redevelopment project subject to a written agreement with the agency, the agency shall, within four years of the removal of the dwelling units, cause to be developed an equal number of replacement dwelling units. For affordable units removed prior to September 1, 1989, replacement units must be available at an affordable housing cost to persons and families of low-and moderate-income, without regard to the specific income of the person or family originally occupying the removed dwelling unit. However, for units removed after September 1, 1989 California law requires that 75 percent of the replacement units be affordable to the same income groups that occupied the units removed. Page 106 of 190 75D-116 Ave-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 38 The following table identifies the number and income level of occupants in housing units lost due to Agency projects. V~ry I ow I o"Ver Mocl~r;:tte Iota! Pre-1976 Projects 0 0 0 0 1986-1989 0 0 0 0 1990-1993 0 0 0 0 1994-1999 20 ~ ~ 28 Total: 20 4 4 28 Proposed loss 2000-2004 12 35 0 47 The proposed housing loss for the years of 2000 through 2004 are anticipated to occur due to the following Agency project: m Santa Ana Boulevard Project Pursuant to H&S Section 33490 (a) (3), proposed replacement dwelling units must be identified for those housing units identified as potentially being removed due to an Agency project. The replacement units for the above mentioned projects will be: m Within the boundaries of the Santa Ana Boulevard Project (Santa Ana Boulevard and Civic Center Drive) m District Centers m McFadden remnant parcels ii. H&S Section 33413 (b) (1) and (2) - The Inclusionary Rule Section 33413 (b) (1) of the Health and Safety Code requires that at least 30 percent of all dwelling units actually developed by a redevelopment agency shall be available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low-or moderate-income, and not less than 50 percent of the units shalf be available at affordable housing to very- low-income households. Section 33413 (b) (2) requires that at least 15 percent of all dwelling units developed within a project area by public or private entities or persons other than the redevelopment agency, but including those developed pursuant to a written agreement with the agency, shall be available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low-or 76D~1717t 190 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 39 moderate-income, and not less than 40 percent of the affordable units shall be available at affordable housing cost to very-low-income households. To illustrate the inclusionary rule in terms of numbers, of every 100 dwelling units developed or rehabilitated by entities other than the Agency, 15 shall be affordable, with 9 affordable to persons of low-or moderate-income, and 6 available to persons of very-Iow- income. For each project area which subdivision (b) of Section 33413 applies, the Agency is required by H & S 33490 (a) (2) (B) (i) to estimate the number of new, substantially rehabilitated or price-restricted developed to date (detailed in Exhibit 1) and during the next five years (detailed in Exhibit 2). The following is the number by activity anticipated to occur within all project areas. NEW SUBSTANTIAL REHAB PRICE RESTRICTED 1976-2002 874 8 0 882 2003-2009 554 0 0 554 1976-2009 1428 8 0 1436 The following table represents the total incurred inclusionary obligation based on 33413 (b) (1) and (2) to date (detailed in Exhibit 3) and during the next five years (detailed in Exhibit 4). Very-Low Income Low Income Moderate Income TOTAL: 1976-2002 53 79 0 132 2003-2009 44 57 0 101 1976-2009 97 136 0 233 Pursuant to Section 33490 (a) (2) (B) eiii), the following number of housing units for all project areas were provided to date (detailed in Exhibit 5) and during the next 5 years (detailed in Exhibit 6) in order to meet the requirements of paragraph (1) and (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 33413. Very-Low Income Low Income Moderate Income TOTAL: 1976-2002 103 440 0 543 Page 108 of 190 75D-118 2003-2009 102 6 0 108 1976-2009 205 446 0 651 FIve-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 40 Production Outside Project Areas to date (detailed in Exhibit 7) and during the next five years (detailed in Exhibit 8) based on Section 33413(b)(2)(A)(ii) (2 for 1 Calculation): Very-Low Income Low Income Moderate Income. TOTAL: 1976-2002 132 155 0 287 2003-2009 2 3 0 5 1976-2009 135 158 0 292 Summary of Production to date and during the next five years: 1976-2002 Very-Low Income Low Income Inclusionary Obligation 53 79 Production Units 235 605 Production Exceeded Obligation 182 526 Total 132 605 708 2003-2009 Very-Low Income 44 103 182 241 Total 101 111 708 718 Inclusionary Obligation Production Units (2003-2009) Excess Units from 1976-2002 Production Exceeded Obligation Low Income 57 8 526 477 iii. Terms of Affordability Health and Safety Code Section 33413 (c) requires that replacement and inclusionary units shall remain available at affordable housing cost to the income levels indicated for the longest feasible time, but not less than the period of land-use controls of the redevelopment plan. Health and Safety Code Section 33334.3 (f)(l)(A) and (B) states that when housing units are developed or assisted with money from the Agency's 20 percent affordable housing set-aside fund, the Agency shaH require that those housing units shall remain affordable for the longest feasible time, but for not less than 15 years for rental units or 10 years for owner-occupied units. Effective January 1, 2002, Health and Safety Code Section 33413(c) requires that dwelling units rehabilitated, developed, q>nstructed or price restricted remain available at affordable housing cost to the income levels indicated for the longest feasible time, but not less than 55 years for rental units and 45 years for homeownership units. Page 109 of 190 75D-119 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 41 In order to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (1) and subparagraphs (A) and (B) the Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency and the City of Santa Ana will ensure all future projects comply with these requirements. iv. It is the goal of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency and the City of Santa Ana that very-low-income, lower-income, and moderate-income units developed anywhere within the city pursuant to any of these sections shall remain affordable for the longest feasible time, up to and including the life of the land-use controls of the plan. ProportionaUty Health and Safety Code Section 33334.4(a) requires each agency to expend, over the duration of the redevelopment implementation plan, the moneys in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund to assist housing for persons of low and very low income in at least the same proportion as the total number of housing units needed for those income groups as those needs have been detel111inecl for the community pursuant to Section 66584 of the Government Code. Additionally, each agency shall expend, over the duration of the redevelopment implementation plan, the moneys in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund to assist housing that is available to families with children in at least the same proportion as the population under age 65 years bears to the total population of the community. In order to satisfy the requirements of Section 33334.4(a), the Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency and the City of Santa Ana will ensure all future projects comply with these requirements. Page 110 of 190 75D-120 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 42 m ~don~ Page 111 of 190 75D-121 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 43 EXHIBIT 1 ACTIVITIES IN PROJECT AREAS (1976-2002) PROJECT AREA NEW SUBSTANTIAL TOTAL' REHAB OF UNITS INTER CITY 94 0 94 NORTH HARBOR 462 0 462 SOUTH HARBOR 0 0 0 SOUTH MAIN 293 6 299 BRISTOL 25 2 27 TOTAL 874 8 882 .. ~ SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS IDENTIFIED I .2 Total units developed subsequent to plan adoption. 94 # OF UNITS f# OF UNITS ADDRESS NEW SUBSTANTIAL WITH COVENANTS WITH COVENANTS TOTAl. f# REHAB OF UNITS VERY LOW LOW 400 S. Elk 52 0 0 0 52 600 E. Well/natan 42 0 0 0 42 Total Units 94 0 0 0 94 . Total units developed subsequent to plan adoption - 462 f# OF UNITS i# OF UNITS ADDRESS NEW SUBSTANTIAL WITH COVENANTS WITH COVENANTS TOTAl. f# REHAB OF UNITS VERY LOW LOW 1314 N. Harbor 100 0 0 0 100 1500 N. Harbor 130 0 0 0 130 3200 W. Fifth 232 0 46 0 232 TOTAL UNITS 462 0 46 0 462 7~tI122 . Page 112 of 190 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 44 EXHIBIT 1 CONTINUED II . ~ I SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS IDENTIFIED Total units developed subsequent to plan adoption - 0 # OF UNITS # OF UNITS SUBSTANTIAL WITH WITH TOTAL # ADDRESS NEW REHAB COVENANTS COVENANTS OF UNITS VERY LOW LOW None 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 0 0 0 0 .0 ~ROJEC~PTION JULY 1982 I Total units developed subsequent to plan adoption. 299 # OF UNITS # OF UNITS SUBSTANTIAL WITH WITH TOTAl.. # ADDRESS NEW REHAB COVENANTS COVENANTS OF UNITS VERY LOW LOW 124-126 E. Flora 2 0 0 0 2 2140 S. Marn 38 0 0 0 38 607 S. MaIn 0 6 0 0 6 1-15 MacArthur Crescent 253 0 0 0 253 TOTAL UNITS 293 6 0 0 299 Page 113 of 190 16 I§). 11 23 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 45 EXHIBIT 1 CONTINUED I ~ AREA-PLAN ADOPTIO~9 I I SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS IDENTIFIED Total units developed subsequent to plan adoption - 27 # OF UNITS # OF UNITS SUBSTANTIAL WITH WITH TOTAL f# ADDRESS NEW REHAB COVENANTS COVENANTS OF UNITS VERY LOW LOW 1060 W. Third 6 0 0 6 6 1102 W. Second 3 0 0 3 3 1130 W. Third 0 2 0 1 2 1122 1/2 W. Third 1 0 0 0 1 1210 W. Third 2 0 0 0 2 1218 W. Third 1 0 0 0 1 1506 W. Second 1 0 0 0 1 714 N. Baker 2 0 0 0 2 718 N. Baker 2 0 0 0 2 1219 W. Second 1 0 0 0 1 1221 & 1223 W. Second 2 0 0 0 2 1224 W. Second 1 0 0 0 1 1131 W. Third 1 0 0 0 1 1227 W. Second 1 0 0 0 1 1309 Borchard 1 0 1 0 1 TOTAL UNITS 25 2 1 10 27 Page 114 of 190 7~1"124 ~ r~ Page 115 of 190 75D-125 Ffve-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 46 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 47 EXHIBIT 2 ANTICIPATED AGENCY ACTIVITIES 2003-2009 TOTAL ~ I SUBSTANT1AL REHAB æ OF UNITS 554 q I SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS IDENTIFIED I Agency Activities-H & S Section 33413(b)(1) 30% Obligation Project Area Project NEW SUBSTANTIAL TOTAL' REHAB OF UNITS Central City 217.219 Bush 2 0 2 Central City 415-417 Bush 2 0 2 Central City Santa Ana Blvd. 100 0 100 Outside McFadden 7 0 7 TOTAL AGENCY DEVELOPED 111 0 111 Non-Agency Activities-H & S Section 33413(b)(2){A)(i) 15% Obligation Project Area Project NEW SUBSTANTIAL TOTAL' REHAB OF UNITS South Main Main/MacArthur 93 0 93 Townhomes South Main MacArthur Place 350 0 350 TOTAL NON AGENCY DEVELOPED 443 0 443 Page 116 of 190 7 S<l!JU1f2 6 tD ~n~ Page 117 of 190 75D-127 Ave-Year ImplementatIon Plan Amended February 2003 Page 48 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 49 EXHIBIT 3 PRODUCTION REQUIREMENTS (1976-2002) TOTAL ACTIVITIES N PROJECT AREAS (1916-2002) PROJECT AREA NEW SUBSTANTIAL TOTAL' REHAB OF UNITS INTER CITY 94 0 94 NORTH HARBOR 462 0 462 SOUTH HARBOR 0 0 0 SOUTH MAIN 293 6 299 BRISTOL 25 2 27 TOTAL 874 8 882 INCLUSIONARY OBLIGATION SECTION 33413(b)(2)(A)(i) TOTAL NON-AGENCY DEVELOPED OR 882 SUBSTANTIALLY REHAB UNITS IN PROJECT AREAS 15% INCLUSIONARY OBLIGATION 132 LOW INCOME UNITS (60% OF OBLIGATION) 79 VERY LOW INCOME UNITS (40% OF OBLIGATION) 53 Page 118 of 190 FH-r.428 ~ r~ Page 119 of 190 75D-129 Five-Year Implementatlon Plan Amended February 2003 Page 50 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 51 EXHIBIT 4 ANTICIPATED PRODUCTION REQUIREMENTS (2003-2009) AGENCY DEVELOPED NON AGENCY DEVELOPED TOTAL TOTAL DEVELOPED 111 443 554 OBLIGATION 34 1 672 101 VERY LOW 17 3 24 4 44 LOW 17 3 40 4 57 1 At least 30 % of all new and substantially rehabilitated dwelling units developed by an agency shall be available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low and moderate income and shall be occupied by these persons and families. 2 At least 15 % of all new and substantially rehabilitated dwelling units developed within a project area shall be available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low and moderate income and shall be occupied by these persons and families. 3 Not less than 50% of the dwellings required to be available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low and moderate income and shall be occupied by very low income households. 4 Not less than 40% of the dwellings required to be available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low and moderate income and shall be occupied by very low income households and shan be occupies by these persons and families. Page 120 of 190 7sïr~B1T30 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 52 Jl\ Page 121 of 190 75D-131 Five-Year Implemantation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 53 EXHIBIT 5 PRODUCTION UNITS INSIDE PROJECT AREAS (1976-2002) , OF UNITS , OF UNITS PROJECT AREA WITH COVENANTS WITH COVENANTS VERY LOW LOW INTER CITY 0 0 NORTH HARBOR. 46 0 SOUTH HARBOR 0 0 SOUTH MAIN 0 0 BRISTOL 1 10 CENTRAL CITY 56 440 TOTAL 103 450 ~ . Pursuant to Section 33413(b)(2)(A){i): Units with Very Low Income Covenants II ~ SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS IDENTIFIED 46 * OF UNITS . OF UNITS TOTAl.. 'II WITH ADDRESS COVENANTS WITH COVENANTS OF UNITS Vr:FN LOW LOW 3200 W. Fifth 46 0 232 . Pursuant to Section 33413(b)(2)(A)(i): UnIts with Very Low Income Covenants: t 1 Units with Low Income Covenants 10 tI OF UNITS , OF UNITS TOTAL tI WITH ADDRESS COVENANTS WITH COVENANTS OF UNITS VERY LOW LOW 1060 W. Third 0 6 6 1102 W. Second 0 3 3 1130 W. Third 0 1 2 1309 Borchard 1 0 1 7 ~'5J2 Page 122 of 190 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 54 EXHIBIT 5 CONTINUED SUM AR OF BUILDI GS IDENTIFIED -- CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA. PLAN ADOPTION PRE.1976 PURSUANT TO H & S SECTION 33413Ib}(2)(A}{i) Units with Very Low Covenants: 56 UnIts with Low Covenants 440 # OF UNITS # OF UNITS TOTAl # WITH WITH ADDRESS COVENANTS COVENANTS OF UNITS VERY LOW LOW 100 N Ross 0 199 199 401 W. First 0 199 199 300 E. Santa Ana 0 41 84 301 S. Cypress 0 1 1 600 W. Third A-110 1 0 1 600 W. Third A-115 1 0 1 600 W. Third A-116 1 0 1 600 W. Third A-117 1 0 1 600 W. Third A-120 1 0 1 600 w. Third A-204 1 0 1 600 W. Third A-206 1 0 1 600 W. Third A-207 1 0 1 600 W. Third A-208 1 0 1 600 W. Third A-215 1 0 1 600 W. Third A-3D7 1 0 1 600 W. Third A-309 1 0 1 600 W. Third A-312 1 0 1 600 W. Third 8-107 1 0 1 600 W. Third 8-112 1 0 1 600 W. Third 8-118 1 0 1 600 W. Third 8-205 1 0 1 600 W. Third 6-303 1 0 1 600 W. Third 8-310 1 0 1 600 W. Third B-310 1 0 1 600 W. Third C-301 1 0 1 600 W. Third C-305 1 0 1 601 W First F102 1 0 1 1 Page 123 of 190 ~~33 i Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 55 ~ EXHIBIT 5 CONTINUED SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS IDENTIFIED ~ CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA - ConUnued ADDRESS # OF UNITS .. OF UNITS WITH COVENANTS WITH COVENANTS TOTAL # OF UNITS VERY lOW LOW 601 W First F-202 601 W First F-205 611 W First E-105 621 W. First D-104 700 W. Third A-10B 700 W. Third A-110 700 W. Third A-113 700 W. Third A-202 700 W. Third A-204 700 W. Third A-20B 700 W. Third A-211 700 W. Third A-217 700 W. Third A-220 700 W. Third A-304 700 W. Third A-305 700 W. Third A-31B 700 W. Third A-322 700 W. Third 8102 700 W. Third 8-108 700 W. Third 8-115 700 W. Third 8-117 700 W. Third 8-204 700 W. Third 8-209 700 W. Third 8-217 700 W. Third 8-307 700 W. Third C-102 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 700 W. Third C-103 1 0 1 700 W. Third C-105 1 0 1 700 W. Third C-106 1 0 1 701 W. First D-201 1 0 1 711 W. First E-101 1 0 1 721 W. First F-102 1 0 1 721 W. First F-203 1 0 1 56 440 0 EXHI81T 5 pag15D~134 ~ r~ Page 125 of 190 75D-135 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 56 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 57 EXHIBIT 6 ANTICIPATED PRODUCTION UNITS IN.SIDE PROJECT AREAS (2003-2009) , Of UNrTS tI OF UNITS PROJECT AREA WITH COVENANTS WITH COVENANTS VERY LOW LOW INTER CITY 0 0 NORTH HARBOR 0 0 SOUTH HARBOR 0 0 SOUTH MAIN 0 0 BRISTOL 0 0 CENTRAL CITY 102 6 TOTAL 102 6 I SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS IDENTIFIED I ~EA. PLAN ADOPTION PRE-1916 Pursuant to Section 33413Ib)12UA)lI): Units with Very Low Income Covenants 102 Units with Low Income Covenants 6 . OF UNITS , OF UNITS PROJECT AREA PROJECT WITH COVENANTS WITH COVENANTS TOT~L. OF UNITS VERY LOW LOW Central City Artist Villaae 0 6 86 Central City 1414-1428 Birch 4 0 4 Central City 217.219 Bush 1 0 4 415-411 Bush Central Cltv Santa Ana Blvd 97 0 97 TOTAL 102 6 191 Page 126 of 190 EXHIBIT 6 75D-136 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 58 ~ r~ Page 127 of 190 75D-137 \ P Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 59 EXHIBIT 7 PRODUCTION UNITS OUTSIDE PROJECT AREAS (1976- 2002) I SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS IDENTIFIED I PURSUANT TO H & S SECTION 33413(b)(2)(A)(jj} Units with Very Low Covenants: 264 Units with Low Covenants 311 , OF UNITS t# OF UNITS WITH WITH TOTAl. # ADDRESS COVENANTS COVENANTS OF UNITS VERY LOW LOW 201 N. Raitt 2 0 3 300-304 N. Jackson 0 4 7 638-642 E. Adams 0 1 3 200 S.. Sycamore 0 15 58 4501 W. Sunswept 0 1 1 4501 W. FIi ht 0 1 1 2309 Monica 0 1 1 1025 Surgeon 4 0 4 1001 Stevens #176 0 1 1 1001 Stevens #266 0 1 1 1001 Stevens #404 0 1 1 1001 Stevens #406 0 1 1 1001 Stevens #172 0 1 1 1 001 Stevens #192 0 1 1 1001 W. MacArthur #82 0 1 1 201 W Carriage 1 0 1 300 W. Carria e 1 0 1 430 W. Carriage 1 0 1 1725 W. Third 1 0 1 2760 E. Segerstrom 1 0 1 405-411 Raitt 12 0 12 3524 W. Washington 0 8 8 1705 S. Spruce 1 0 1 Cornerstone Village 240 273 513 TOTAL 264 311 624 2 FOR 1 CALCULA rlON 132 155.5 Page 128 of 190 7MJ!1f38 FIve-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 60 ~ ~a60~ Page 129 of 190 75D-139 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 61 EXHIBIT 8 ANTICIPATED PRODUCTION OUTSIDE PROJECT AREAS (2003-2009) I SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS IDENTIFIED I PURSUANT TO H & S SECTION 33413lbU2UA)(If) Units with Very Low Covenants: 3 Units with Low Covenants 5 . 01' UNIT' . OF UNITS Project Area ,,",J~ WITH COVENANTS WITH COVENANTS TOTAL' OF UNITS VERY LOW LOW Outside Concorde 0 1 1 Outside Adams 0 1 1 Outside McFadden 0 1 7 Outside Martha Lane 0 1 1 Outside Valencia 0 1 1 Outside French Street 3 0 3 TOTAL 3 5 14 2 FOR 1 CALCULATION 1.5 2.5 Page 130 of 190 75'D!!140 ~ ~r.tlon~ Page 131 of 190 75D-141 Five-Year Implementation Plan Amended February 2003 Page 62 APPENDIX B PLANNING COMMISSION'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Page 132 of 190 75D-142 FROM :CITY OF SANTA ANA CDA FAX NO. :714 647-6736 Jun. 17 2004 01:01PM P2 ò' REQUEST FOR Planning Commission Action A PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY LANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: JUNE 14, 2004 TITLE: AMBNDHBNTS TO THE CITY'S RBDEVELOPDN'I' PROJECT AREA PLANS APPROVED 0 As Recommended [J As Amended [:] Set Public Hearing For DENIED [J Applicant's Request. [J Staff Recommendation' CONTINUED TO Prepared by John Reekstin ~~¿~~IÆdDr ~nlngManager Recommend that the City Council: 1. Approve and adopt the Negative Declaration, Environmental Review No. 2004-34. ,,,,,,-,,, :2 . Adopt a resolution finding tha.t the proposed redevelopment plan merger amendments conform to the Santa Ana General Plan. 3 . Approve the Redevelopment Plan Amendment. 4. Find that the Redevelopment Pla.n Amendment ia in conformity with the City's General Plan. DJ:SCt1SSJ:ON The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana. currently haa aix redevelopment project areas: Central City, Inter City Commuter Station North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main and Bristol Corridor. Each of the proj ect areas has existing plans addressing the revitalization of the blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. Exieting community Redevelopment Law provides for a redevelopment agency to m~rge the proj ect areas in order to combine the tax increment revenues from all the project areas and allocate the revenue among the entire project area that will best facilitate the implementation of the redevelopment plans for each project area. ',--,/ Page 133 of 190 f.~"" I 75D-143 FROM :CITY OF SANTA ANA CDA FAX NO. :714 647-6736 Jun. 17 2004 01:01PM P3 ~endments to City Redevelopment Project Area Plans \.......¿une 14, 2 0 04 Page 2 ADalys1s of the Isøues The proposed plan amendments (Exhibit 1) are considered technical amendments, which will not add territory to the project area, increase the tax increment limit, or affect the plan t@rmination date. Community Redevelopment Law allows an agency to amend existing redevelopment plans wi thout requiring the documenting of significant blight or remaining blight findings within the project areas. As part of the process to amend the redevelopment plans, the Community Redevelopment Law requires that specific information regarding the proposed amendment be provided to the affected taxing entities and to the Planning Commission prior to the a.doption of the proposed amendments. In order to meet this requirement I the Preliminary Report {Exhibit 2} and proposed amendments are provided. Additionally, State Law requires Planning Commission review of all new ~edevelopmertt plans and amendments to existing plans to determine \--.,,:>nsiatency with the City's General Plan. Since this action does not involve any changes to land uses or land use plans, and the existing plans were determined to be consistent when they were adopted, staff has determined that the proposed action is in conformanoe with ,the General Plan. It is anticipated that the final review and adoption of the environmental document and proposed plan amendments will be considered for ,approval by the City Council and Agency after a public hearing in the summer of 2004. The Draft Negative Declaration is intended to inform public decision makers, other responsible and trustee agencies, and the general public of the potential effects of the proposed project. Page 134 of 190 ',--,,' 75D-144 FROM :eITY OF SANTA ANA eDA FAX NO. :714 647-6736 Jun. 17 2004 01:02PM P4 , ~èndments to City Redevelopment Project Area Plans \"d1ine 14, 2004 Page 3 ClOA Analysis The Draft Negative Declaration was released for its 20-day public oomment review period that closed on April 6, 2004 with no comments being received. In addition, the Negative Declaration determined that there would be no significant impacts associated with the approval of the proposed project (Exhibit 3). Jo P. Reekstin E ecutive Director Community Redevelopment Agency .1'~~ J'M " :Draft )leg Dee! 04-:a.pC! "---., , Page 135 of 190 ,~." 75D-145 APPENDIX C CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION REGARDING NO PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE Page 136 of 190 75D-146 8 . 8 02l5l041es RESOLUTION NO. 2004-017 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE NEED NOT BE FORMED.IN RELATION TO THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE EXISTING SANTA ANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA. AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. On July 2, 1973, by Ordinance No. 1173. the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") approved and adopted a redevelopment plan for the Central City Redevelopment Project ('ICentral City Project"); and B. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1636, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project ('"Inter- City Project"); and C. On July 6, 1982. by Ordinance No. NS-1637, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the North Harbor Redevelopment Project ("North Harbor Project"); and . D. On July 6, 1982. by Ordinance No. NS-1638, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the South Harbor Redevelopment Project ("South Harbor Project"); and E. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1639, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the South Main Redevelopment Project f'South Main Project"); and F. On December 4, 1989, by Ordinance No. NS-2039, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Bristol Corridor Projecr); and G. The "Existing Plans" consist of the Redevelopment Plans, as amended, prepared for the Central City Project; Inter-City Project, North Harbor Project, South Harbor Project, South Main Project. and the Bristol Corridor Project and the territory included within the Existing Plans is referred to as the IIProject Areas"; and Page 137 of 190 Resolution No. 2004-017 Page 1of4 ~ H. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is vested with the responsibility to carry out the Existing Plans, I. The Agency desires to amend each of the Existing Plans ("Amendments") to merge the Project Areas in order to combine the tax increment revenues from the Project Areas and reallocate the revenues to and among the entire merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increase and improve housing opportunities; and J. California Health and Safety Code section 33385 (Community Redevelopment Law - "CRL") requires that a Project Area Committee (PAC) be formed if: (1) A substantial number of low income persons or moderate income persons, or both, reside within the project area, and the redevelopment plan as adopted will contain authority for the agency to acquire, by eminent domain, property on which any persons reside; (2) The redevelopment plan as adopted contains one or more public projects that will displace a substantial number of low income persons or moderate income persons, or both; and K. California Health and Safety Code Section 33385.3 requires, in part: (a) If a project area committee does not exist, and the agency proposes to amend a redevelopment plan, the agency shall establish a project area committee pursuant to Section 33385 if the proposed amendment to a redevelopment plan would do either of the following: Grant the authority to the agency to acquire by eminent domain property on which persons reside in a project area in which a substantial number of low and moderate-income persons reside. Add territory in which a substantial number of low and moderate- income persons reside and grant the authority to the agency to acquire by eminent domain property on which persons reside in the added territory. L. The Bristol Corridor Project does not currently contain the authority to use eminent domain as that authority has expired; and (1 ) (2) M. The Agency currently has eminent domain authority within the Central City Project, Inter-City Project, North Harbor Project, South Harbor and South Main Project which Will not be impacted by the proposed Amendments; and N. The proposed Amendments do not grant additional eminent domain authority within the Project Areas or add territory to the Project Areas. Resolution No. 2004-017 Page 2 of4 Page 138 of 190 15D-148 8 Section 2. In recognition of the Agencÿs existing authority to use eminent domain /n portions of the Project Areas as described in the Existing Plans, the City Council hereby finds and determines that, because the proposed Amendments are a merger for economic reasons only and will not grant additional eminent domain authority or add territory to the Project Areas, a Project Area Committee need not be formed in connection with the proposed Amendments. Section 3. As a means of complying with other requirements of CRL Sections 33385 and 33385.3, the City Council directs that Agency staff meet with residents, property owners, business owners, and existing civic and business organizations within the Project Areas, as appropriate, to discuss the Amendments and to receive input from res/dents, property owners, businesses and members of those organizations. Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this 15th day of March, 2004. . APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. FJetcher, City Attorney BY:ffi, - t. .2J:¡;;~ Lisa E. Storck Assistant City Attomey AYES: CounciJmembers: Alvarez. Blst. ChristY. Franklin. Garcia. Pulido. Solorio (7) NOES: CounciImembers: None (0) ABSENT: Cou ncilmembers: None (0) 8 ABSTAIN: Councllmembers: None (0) Page 139 of 190 Resolution No. 2004-017 Page 3 of 4 75D-149 - CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2004-017 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on March 15. 2004. Date: 3ß1jo't Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Page 140 of 190 Resolution No. 2004-017 Page 4 of 4 -....-. 75D-150 . ---...~. . APPENDIX D NEGATIVE DECLARATION Page 141 of 190 75D-151 AFFIDA VIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) ) ss. ) County of Orange I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal ,cler~ of The Orange County Regis'ter, a newspaper of general circuhttion , published in the city of Santa Ana, County of Orange, and which newspaper has been adjudged to be a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under the date of November 19, 1905~ Case No. A-21046, that the notice, of which the annexed is a true printed copy~ has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit; March 18,2004 "I certify (or declare) under the. penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct"; Executed at California, on Santa Ana, Orange County, ~w' 2004, Æ/] //~ ' , , ..ir /' ¡í? Signature II The Orange County Register 625 N. Grand Ave. Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714) 796-7000 ext. 2209 PROOF OF PUBLICATION This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp ¡;:ì ECE f\/ED f~~kfl 2 ~~ ¿¡lO~+ SW'JT!! AHA PI f,f\I;..!!i\Jr; Or:::rrt - "~'-';""'\.."i ~¡¡-.. . NOTICE OF INTENT ~ TO ADpPT A NEGAnVE DECLARAnON ~,This is to in. fa. rm the general public that the City of Sanla ~¡.na.' pr!?poses 10 adopf a Negative Declaration for the follow- Proo~ . ¡r:.{~ project: . , ' - ~J-t nu.: Redevelopment Project Areas Merger - ~~tJ,~J.ct Descrtp~onl The proposed pro¡èci in~lvøst '~~'.'.Arnendme!'1fs to eX/,sling redevelopment plans to merge the .",,,,,.Cenlral City, Inter-G/tv' Commuter 'Station, North Harbor >',rN: ~ H~or¡ ~h Main and Bristol Corridor Redevelo ' ," ;."fllent..Project NeSS Into a one Redevelopment Project Arêt - ,<:11:1& proposed merger of the six existing rea~v~oPment r', , ,; : Is'a technical amend~nt' to. the redevelopment Jf8~ ""." Woul~ allow the Community ,Redevelopment Þ,genc::y' ?~('!Agerycy .)10 more effectively aáminlster Its redevelopment ; I~.;¿=-m by altowlng th~ Agency to combine taJdncremènt ' I.. d UctivitieBl! ~m the existing redevelopment project areas 10 'I :.o4!..n ,- s anywhere In the merged project area. The I I ,'!rerglng of the exÌ$!li~g project areas does change the boun- ¡ , " anes of the ex!sting n;dev~lopment project lIfeas or I , ch~e the financial and time limit provisIons staled In the' eXistmg ~edevelopmenl Plans for each 01 the Redevelop- ..'ment project ereas. :;C' ~~Ject Lo~tlon: Cenlral City Redevelopment Proiect ",ea, Inter-Gity Commuter Station Redevelopment Pro'ect Area, North Harbor Redevelopment Project Area South 8ar- ' ,": b.or Redt;WI°,e.ment Project Area, South Main'Redevelo ::%:~Oject rea and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment prJj: ,".-- . ::~,P;OJ8Ct Number: ER 2004-34 ,; !~pûbllc Review Period: 3/18/2004 to 4/612004 :) Ûj,I,:" . ___~.arlng ~et.: 6/21f04 , ' '.:,,';~..'¡ng Loc.Uon: City?f Santa Ana Council Chambers . 'r, ,:' , 22 Civic Center Plaza ,-' '."'. . Sanla Ana. CA 92702 -" fThe Negative Declaration 81'Id Initial Study as well as all ref- , et:enceá documents Will be available for public review at the _CIty?'. Santa Ana Planning and BuDding Agency lòcaleq at ", 20, CMC Center Plaza, Santa, Ana, California. Please submit ", any comments on the NegatIVe Declaralion 10 the City on or ..: befc;>re Sf2/2004, Plea.se direct your comments to: Dan Sott - EnVlronmenlal Coordmator. City of Santa Ana POBox , 1988. M-20. Ssnta Ans. CA. 92702, ' .. - ,Jf yc;>u have any questions or would like sny addltio.nal infor- ~ ,'Pabon, please conlacl John Reekstin at (714) 647-5360. ,> 'PUblish: Urange Counly Regisler March 18 2004 R624/6116816 Page 142 of 190 75D-152 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Brett E. Franklin COUNCllMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bist Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher ClERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy PLANNING & BUILDING AGENCY 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-20) . P.O. BOX 1988 . Santa Ana, California 92702 www.santa-ana.org NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION This is to inform the. general public that the City of Santa Ana proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration for the following project: Project Title: Redevelopment Project Areas Merger Project Description: The proposed project involves amendments to existing redevelopment plans to merge the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Areas into a one Redevelopment Project Area. The proposed merger of the six existing redevelopment projects is a technical amendment to the redevelopment plans that would allow the Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency" )to more effectively administer its redevelopment program by allowing the Agency to combine tax increment revenues from the existing redevelopment project areas to fund activities anywhere in the merged project area. The merging of the existing project areas does change the boundaries of the existing redevelopment project areas or change the financial and time limit provisions stated in the existing Redevelopment Plans for each of the Redevelopment project areas. Project Location: Central City Redevelopment Project Area, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project Area, North Harbor Redevelopment Project Area, South Harbor Redevelopment Project Area, South Main Redevelopment Project Area and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Area Project Number: ER 2004-34 Public Review Period: 3/18/2004 to 4/612004 Hearing Date: 6/21/04 City of Santa Ana Council Chambers 22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92702 Thê Negative Declaration and Initial Study as well as all referenced documents will be available for public review at the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency located at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, Califomia. Please submit any comments on the Negative Declaration to the City on or before 51212004. Please direct your comments to: Dan Bott, Environmental Coordinator, City of Santa Ana, P.O. Box 1988, M- ~-,- 20, Santa Ana, CA, 92702. Hearing Location: If you have any questions or would like any additional information, please contact John Reekstin at (714) 647-5360. Page 143 of 190 75D-153 cs. 1J06.2 MA YOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO rEM Brett E. Franklin COUNCILMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa B ist Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio 1m ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCil Patricia E. Healy PLANNING & BUILDING AGENCY 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-20) P.O. BOX 1988 . Santa Ana, California 92702 www.santa-ana.org I" l1~'~),~~":1;lf~¥I"~ca J)j ~~lt~~~J../J~iá,\m.~;~{~X~~' Pursuant to the Procedures of the City of Santa Ana for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Environmental Evaluator has completed an Initial Study for the project described below: Project Number: ER 2004-34 Applicant: City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA Project Location I Address: Central City Redevelopment Project Area, Inter": City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project Area, North Harbor Redevelopment Project Area, South Harbor Redevelopment Project Area, South Main Redevelopment Project Area and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Area Project Title / Description: Redevelopment Project Area Merger/ The proposed project involves amendments to existing redevelopment plans to merge the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Areas. And does hereby find: That the proposed project cannot, or will not, have a significant effect on the environment. Negative Dedaration status is therefore granted for this project. No mitigation measures are required for the proposed project. ~~ Env onmenta' Coordinator Date: 2/ s/zorY{ Signature: This determination is not final until adopted by the decision-making body or administrative official, and a Notice of Determination is filed. Page 144 of 190 75D-154 CS. 606-2 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AREAS MERGER INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION ER 2004-34 PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project involves amendments to existing redevelopment plans to merge (the "Merger") the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Areas (the ~Merged Project Arean) . BACKGROUND Section 33485 et seq. of the Community Redevelopment Law (CRL) allows for the merger of redevelopment project areas as a matter of public policy if they would result in substantial benefit to the public, and if they contribute to the revitalization of blighted areas through the increased economic vitality of such areas and through increased and improved housing opportunities in or near such areas. The CRL also provides that redevelopment project areas, under the jurisdiction of a redevelopment agency, may be merged without regard to contiguity of the areas, by an amendment of each affected redevelopment plan. Further, with certain exceptions, taxes attributed to each project area merged that are allocated to the redevelopment agency may be allocated to the entire merged project area for the purpose of paying the principal of, and interest on, indebtedness incurred by the redevelopment agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the merged redevelopment project. SETTING Presently, there are six Redevelopment Project Areas within the City of Santa Ana. Exhibit 1 depicts the Redevelopment Project Areas the City is proposing to merge. The Central City Redevelopment Project Area consists of 964 acres and is located in the central and northern parts of the City. The Central City Redevelopment Project Area was adopted by, the City on July 2, 1973. The Central City Project Area encompasses the historic downtown area including retail, office and government uses. The proposed Merger would be the Sixth Amendment to the Central City Redevelopment Project. Page 145 of 190 1 75D-155 The Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project contains 536 acres of land and was adopted by the City Council on July 6, 1982. Major roadways traversing the project area inqlude Interstate 5 Freeway, Grand Avenue, 1st street and 4th Street. The project area includes older industrial uses that were originally developed in the area to take advantage of the rail access. However, residential uses are scattered throughout the area and there is a node of commercial uses located at the intersection of 17th Street and Grand Avenue. The proposed Merger would be the Fourth Amendment to the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project. The North Harbor Redevelopment Project was adopted by the City on July 6, 1982 and contains approximately 428 acres of land. The North Harbor Redevelopment Project Area is generally located along Harbor Boulevard from Westminster Avenue to Kent Avenue and along 5th Street, 1st Street and Mcfadden Avenue from Harbor Boulevard to the Santa Ana River. The project area includes a mix of older residential and strip commercial uses fronting along Harbor Boulevard with newer commercial uses developed along Fairview Street near the civic center. The proposed Merger would be the Fifth Amendment to the North Harbor Redevelopment Project. The South Harbor Redevelopment Project Area encompasses approximately 1,050 acres primarily along Harbor Boulevard from Warner Avenue to MacArthur Boulevard and along the west side of Fairview Street from Edinger Avenue to Sunflower Avenue. The South Harbor Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the City on July 6, 1982. The South Harbor Project Area is primarily developed with light industrial land uses. The proposed Merger would be the Fifth Amendment to the South Harbor Redevelopment Project. The South Main Redevelopment Project was approved July 6, 1982. The project area encompasses approximately 1,500 acres and is located along Main Street from 1st Street to Sunflower Avenue and the area west of the 55 Freeway along McFadden Street, Edinger Avenue, Warner Avenue, Dyer Road and MacArthur Boulevard. The project area includes older strip commercial uses interspersed with residential units radiating out from the downtown along Main Street and newer manufacturing and light industrial uses along the southeastern boundary of the City. The proposed Merger Page 146 of 190 2 75D-156 would be the Fifth Amendment to the South Main Redevelopment Plan. The Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project was adopted by the City on Dec~mber 4, 1989. The Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Area encompasses approximately 781 acres and is primarily located along Bristol Street from 17th Street to Central Avenue and the area east of Fairview Street along 17th Street and 1st Street. The project area consists primarily of older strip commercial uses. The proposed Merger would be the Fourth Amendment to the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Merger is a technical amendment that would allow the City's Community Redevelopment Agency (the UAgency") to more efficiently administer its redevelopment program. The proposed Merger would allow the Agency to combine tax increment revenues from the existing Redevelopment Project Areas to fund redevelopment activities anywhere in the Merged Project Area. The Agency is not proposing to change the projects and programs identified in the current Implementation Plan. The Agency's proposed activities would continue to be same activities identified in the current five-year Implementation Plan. Additionally, the Agency would continue to implement its affordable housing program, which exceeds the CRL requirement for expenditure of 20% of the gross tax increment on affordable housing. The proposed Merger would not allow the Agency to collect any additional tax increment beyond the current limits identified in the six existing Redevelopment Plans or change any other provisions of the Redevelopment Plans. RESPONSES TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following is an analysis of potential environmental impacts associated with the approval of the proposed Merger, based upon the City of Santa Ana's Environmental Check List. The analysis focuses on potential impacts directly associated with approval of the proposed Merger and defers impacts associated with future redevelopment activities within the Merged Project Area to subsequent City reviews. Based on the significance of the impacts associated with the future redevelopment activities, the Page 147 of 190 3 75D-157 appropriate level of environmental documentation would be prepared. I. AESTHETICS (A.B.C.D) Less Than Significant Impact, Approval of the proposed Merger would not directly result in adverse impacts to any scenic vista or aesthetic resource, in that the project does not involve any activities that would result in adverse aesthetic impacts. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could'potentially result in adverse impacts to aesthetic resources. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potential impacts to aesthetic resources and where needed mitigation measures would be required to avoid or minimize potential aesthetic impacts. II. AGRICULTURE (A.B.C) No Impact According to the California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program there are no prime or unique farmlands within the proposed Merged Project Area. Therefore, approval and implementation of the proposed Merger would not result in adverse impacts to any agriculture resources. III. AIR QUALITY (A) Less Than Significant Impact The City of Santa Ana is included within the South Coast Air Quality Management District and subject to the requirements of the Clean Air Act at both the Federal and State level. The South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) is the primary planning document to monitor if air quality standards and objectives are being achieved in the South Coast Air Basin. The air quality objectives in the AQMP are based upon growth projections provided in local general plans and regional planning programs. A project could be in conflict with the AQMP if it results in population and growth impacts beyond those identified in local general plans and regional planning programs. Page 148 of 190 4 75D-158 Approval of the proposed Merger would not directly result in any activities that would be in conflict with the AQMP. However, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could be in conflict with the AQMP. However, throug~ the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities implem~nted within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for consistency with the AQMP. (B.C.D.E) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not directly result in any short-term construction related or long-term operational air quality impacts or odor impacts. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could potentially result in short-term and long-term air quality impacts and odor impacts. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potential short- term and long-term air quality impacts and odor impacts and where needed mitigation measures would be identified to avoid or minimize air quality and odor impacts. III. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (A.B.C.D) No Impact According to the California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Data Base, the Merged Project Area would not contain any biological resources. Therefore, approval and implementation of the proposed Merger would not have any directòr indirect impacts on biological resources. IV. CULTURAL RESOURCES (A.B.C.D) Less Than Significant Impact According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, the City of Santa Ana has a variety of known cultural resources. Additionally, the City has high probability for the discovery of unknown resources. Approval of the proposed Merger would not result in any direct impacts to known or unknown cultural resources, in that the project does not involve any activities that would impact known or unknown cultural resources. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could Page 149 of 190 5 75D-159 involve long-term operations and/or construction- . operations that could potentially result in adverse impacts to known and/or unknown cultural resources. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment a~tivities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potential impacts to cultural resources and where needed mitigation measures would be required to avoid or minimize pot~ntial impacts to cultural resources. IV. GEOLOGY/SOILS (A-l, A-4) No Impact According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR there are no active earthquake faults, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Zones, or landslides in Santa Ana. Therefore, approval and implementation of the proposed Merger would not be subject to potential ground rupture impacts or landslide impacts. (A-2) Less Than Significant Impact According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, there are several active faults within fifty miles of the City. In the event a moderate earthquake occurs along one of these active faults, the City of Santa Ana could experience moderate seismic shaking impacts. Approval of the proposed Merger would not directly increase the potential for seismic impacts. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could be subject to potential seismic shaking impacts. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potential seismic impacts. Mitigation measures, such as preparation of geotechnical studies and compliance with Seismic Safety Standards of the Uniform Building code would be required to avoid or minimize potential seismic shaking impacts. (A-3) Less Than Significant Impact According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, the Merged Project Area is located in areas that range from a very low potential to a very high potential for liquefaction impacts. Approval of the proposed Merger would not directly increase the risk for potential liquefaction Page 150 of 190 6 75D-160 impacts. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could be subject to potential liquefaction impacts. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities impl~mented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potential liquefaction impacts. Where needed, mitigation measures, such as preparation of geotechnical studies and compliance with Seismic Safety Standards of the Uniform Building code would be required to avoid or minimize potential liquefaction impacts. (B) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not result in or directly increase the potential for soil erosion or sedimentation impacts in that the project would not involve any construction activities. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could involve earthwork activity that could result in potential erosion and sedimentation impacts to onsite and offsite drainage facilities. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potential soil erosion and sedimentation impacts. Where needed, mitigation measures, such as preparation of erosion control plans and the incorporation of best management practices would be required to avoid or minimize potential soil erosion and sedimentation impacts. (C) No Impact According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, there are no unique geologic features within the proposed Merged Project Area. Therefore, approval and implementation of the proposed Merger would not result in the loss of any unique geologic features. (D.E) Less Than Significant Impact According to the General plan Land Use Element EIR, the proposed Merged Project Area contains a variety of soil types and associated geotechnical .constraints. Approval of the proposed Merger would not result in geologic safety impacts, in that the proposed project does not involve any development activities. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could be subject to geotechnical constraints. However, through Page 151 of 190 7 75D-161 the City's Development Review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potential geotechnical constraints and where needed geotechnical design recommendations would be incorporated in~o the projects to ensure geotechnical stability. v. HAZARDS/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (A.B.C) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not directly result in the creation of any significant hazardous material safety impacts to the public. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could involve the short-term and long-term and handling and storage of incidental amounts of hazardous materials. However, the handling and storage of hazardous materials would be subject to the local, state and federal regulations regarding the handling, storage and transportation of hazardous materials. Compliance with local, state and federal regulations would reduce potential hazardous material impacts to a level considered less than significant. Additionally, future redevelopment activities could involve the demolition and removal of existing buildings. Some of these buildings may contain asbestos containing building materials and lead paint thus posing a risk to public safety if not handled properly. However, through the City's development review process, site assessments would be prepared to determine the presence of any hazardous substances. The handling and disposal of these substances would be subject to local, state and federal regulations. (D) Less Than Significant Impact According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, the proposed Merged Project Area is not located within any aircraft accident potential zones or clear zones. However, some of the Redevelopment Project Areas are within FAA Notification Areas, requiring compliance with the John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan. Approval of the proposed Merger would not increase the potential for safety hazards for people residing in or working within the Merged Project Area. Though, redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could involve activities Page 152 of 190 8 75D-162 requiring FAA Notification and compliance with the" John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated fo~ consistency with the John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use plan. VI . HYDROLOGY /WATER QUALITY (A) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not directly result in any adverse water quality impacts, in that the project does not involve any activities that would result in adverse water quality impacts. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could potentially result in long-term and/or short-term adverse water quality impacts. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potential water quality impacts. Where needed, mitigation measures, such as water quality plans, compliance with the City's NPDES requirements and implementation of Best Management Practices would be required to avoid or minimize potential water quality impacts. (B) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not impact underground water supplies, in that the project would"not involve any activities that would impact underground water supplies. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could potentially involve dewatering operations, which could impact underground water supplies. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potential impacts to underground water supplies. Mitigation measures, such as preparation of water quality plans, compliance with the City's NPDES requirements and implementation of Best Management Practices would be required to avoid or minimize impacts to underground water supplies. Page 153 of 190 9 75D-163 (C.D) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not directly alter existing drainage patterns or directly increase rates of surface water runoff. Though, future redevelopment activities implémented within the Merged Project Area could alter existing patterns of drainage and/or increase existing rates of surface water runoff. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potential drainage impacts. Where needed, mitigation measures, such as preparation of urban runoff studies, drainage improvements and payment of drainage impact fees, would be required to avoid or minimize potential drainage impacts. (E.F.G) Less Than Significant Impact According to the Flood Rate Insurance Maps for the City, some portions of North Harbor, South Harbor and Bristol Street Redevelopment Project Areas are within the IOO-year Flood Zone. Approval of the proposed Merger would not increase the risk for IOO-year flood hazards. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could be subject to IOO-year flood hazards. However, through the City's development review process future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for IOO-year flood hazards and where needed, mitigation measures would be identified to avoid or minimize potential IOO-year flood hazards. VII. LAND USE/PLANNING (A) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not physically divide any established communities or neighborhoods. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could potentially divide an established community or neighborhood. However, through the City's development review process future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potential land use impacts to existing communities and neighborhoods and where needed mitigation measures would be identified to avoid or minimize potential land use impacts. Page 154 of 190 10 75D-164 (B) No Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not be in conflict with Community Redevelopment Law, adopted redevelopment plans or other relevant planning programs or policies in the City. Futuré redevelopment activities proposed within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for consistency with applicable redevelopment plans and other relevant planning programs and policies. (C) No Impact According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, there are no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans established within the City of Santa Ana. Therefore, approval and implementation of the proposed Merger would not be in conflict with any habitat conservation or natural community conservation plan. VIII. MINERAL RESOURCES (A) No Impact The City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR identifies that there are no areas in Santa Ana that contain significant Mineral Aggregate Resource Areas. Therefore, approval and implementation of the proposed Merger would not result in adverse impacts to any mineral resources. IX. NOISE (A.B.C.D) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not directly result in any short-term or long-term noise impacts or excessive groundborne vibration impacts. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could potentially result in or be subject to adverse noise impacts. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potenti~l noise impacts. Where needed, mitigation measures, such as preparation of noise reports, incorporation of sound attenuation measures and compliance with the City's Noise Ordinance would be required to avoid or minimize potential noise impacts. Page 155 of 190 11 75D-165 (E) No Impact The City of Santa Ana is located just southeast of John Wayne Airport. According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, there are no Redevelopment Project Areas that are impactéd with aircraft noise ~evels in excess of City or County standards. Therefore, approval and implementation of the proposed Merger would not expose people within the City to excessive aircraft noise impacts. X. POPULATION/HOUSING (A.B.C) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not directly induce substantial growth in the City or would not displace existing residential uses or population. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could potentially induce population growth within the project area beyond local and regional projections or could displace existing residential uses. However, through the City's Development review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potential growth inducing impacts and the displacement of residential uses and population and where needed mitigation measures would be identified to avoid or minimize potential housing and population impacts. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES (A) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not directly generate additional demands for public services over current levels of demand. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could generate additional demands for public services. However, through the City's development review process future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated to ensure that adequate public facilities are available. Page 156 of 190 12 75D-166 XI. RECREATION (A.B) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not directly increase the demand for recreational facilities over current levels of demand. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area,could potentially increase the demand for recreational facilities over current levels of demand. However, through the City's development review process future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated to ensure that adequate recreational facilities are available. XII. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC (A.B.D.E.G) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not have a direct impact on traffic volumes, roadway configurations, emergency access or level of services 'established in the County of Orange Congestion Management Plan or alternative modes of transportation. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could potentially result in adverse traffic impacts. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potential traffic impacts. Where needed, mitigation measures, such as traffic improvements and traffic impact fees would be required to avoid or minimize potential traffic impacts. (C) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not have any adverse impacts air traffic patterns. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could potentially interfere with air traffic patterns. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated to ensure there would be no conflicts with air traffic patterns. Page 157 of 190 13 75D-167 (F) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not have a direct impact on parking facilities, in that the proposed project would not involve any activities that would generate additional parking demands. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Mergèd Project Area could potentially result in adverse parking impa~ts. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated to ensure that adequate parking facilities are provided. XIII. UTILITIES/SERVICE SYSTEMS (A.B.C.D.E.F.G) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not directly generate additional demands for utility service systems over current levels of demand provided. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could potentially result in increased demands for utility systems. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated to ensure that adequate utility systems are provided. XIV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (A) Less Than Significant Impact The proposed Merger would not have a direct impact on any plant or wildlife species, in that in accordance with the California Department Fish and Game Natural Diversity Data Base there are no sensitive plant species or wildlife species within the proposed Merged Project Area. The proposed Merged Project Area could potentially contain significant cultural resources. Future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could potentially result in impacts to cultural resources. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities would be evaluated for potential impacts to cultural resources. Where needed mitigation measures would be identified to avoid or minimize potential impacts to cultural resources. Page 158 of 190 14 75D-168 (B) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not directly result in any significant cumulative impacts. Though, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area coúld potentially result in adverse cumulative impacts. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated to 'determine cumulative impacts and if needed to identify needed mitigation measures to avoid or minimize potential cumulative impacts. (C) Less Than Significant Impact Approval of the proposed Merger would not directly cause any substantial adverse effects on human beings. However, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could potentially result in adverse impacts to human beings. However, through the City's development review process, future redevelopment activities implemented within the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potential adverse impacts on human beings. Where needed, mitigation measures would be required to avoid or minimize potential impacts to human beings. XVIII. DETERMINATION Based upon the evidence in light of the whole record documented in the above evaluation and cited references, I find that the proposed project would not have a significant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. XVIV. REFERENCES City of Santa Ana General Plan September 1982 Environmental Impact report for the General Plan Land Use Element, August 1997 City of Santa Ana Zoning Ordinance, December 1998 California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program Page 159 of 190 15 75D-169 South Coast Air Quality Management District Air Quality Management plan California Depa~tment of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Data Base Flood Rate Insurance Maps John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan XX. PRE PARERS Dan Bott, Environmental Coordinator City of Santa Ana Page 160 of 190 16 75D-170 DITThfA Environmental' Checklist For CEQA Compliance PLANNING DIVISION I. Project Title: Redevelopment Project Areas Merger II. Project Numbers: ER 2004-34 III. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Santa Ana Planning Division P.O. Box 1988 (M-20) Santa Ana, CA 92702 IV. Environmental Coordinator and Phone Number: Dan Bott (714) 667-2719 Locanon: Central City Redevelopment Project Area, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project Area, North Harbor Redevelopment Project Area, South Harbor Redevelopment Project Area, South Main Redevelopment Project Area and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Area V. VI. Environmental Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that: A. ~e proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. B. 0 Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions to the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. C. 0 The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. D. 0 Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR (EIR No. - ) pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the project, nothing further is required. E. 0 Pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, an EIR (EIR No. - ) has been prepared earlier and only minor technical changes or additions are necessary to make the previous EIR adequate and these changes do not raise important new issues about the significant effects on the environment. An ADDENDUM to the EJR . shall be prepared. F. 0 Pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, an EIR (EIR No. - ) has been prepared earlier; however, subsequent proposed changes in the project and/or new information of substantial importance will cause one or more significant effects no previously discussed. A SUBSEQUENT EIR shall be prepared. ~~ Signature Printed 120, 1\ Þ 0 It- ~š-/~ Dat Page 161 of 190 md\msword\envcheck.doc\ 1.15.99 75D-171 Page 1 of 1 aIT~fA Envi ro n me ntalC heckl ist For CEQA Compliance Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: I. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impacf' answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). II. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. III. "Potentially Significant Impacf' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. IV. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact". The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact I. Aesthetics - Would the project: A Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? D 0 ßr 0 B. Damage scenic resources, including but not limited D 0 ft( 0 to, trees, rock outpourings and historic buildings within a state highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character M or quality of the site and its surroundings? 0 0 0 D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views ~ in the area? 0 0 0 Page 162 of 190 md\msword\envcheck.doc\ 1.15.99 Page 1 of 10 75D-172 aŒ~fA Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Issues & Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation . Incorporated No Impact Less Than Significant Impact II. Agricultural Resources - In determining whether impacts to. agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the Califomia Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agricultural farmland. Would the project: Air Quality - Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management õr III. pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: ~ Violate any stationary source air quality standard or 0 0 jxf 0 contribute to an existing or proposed air quality violation? Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase 0 0 ]x[ 0 of any criteria polfutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emission which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant 0 0 ~ 0 concentrations? Page 163 of 190 A. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program in the California Resources Agency, Department of Conservation, maintains detailed maps of these and other categories of farmland.) B. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Contract? C. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? A. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? . B. C. D. md\msword\envcheck.doc\ 1.15.99 75D-173 0 % 0 0 0 # ø 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 Page 2 of 10 œTClSANTA ANA Environmental.Checklist For CEQA Compliance Issues & Supporting Information Sources E. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? IV. Biological Resources - Would the project: A. Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services? B. Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? C. Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling hydrological interruption, or other means? D. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance? v. Cultural Resources - Would the project: A. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? B. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to define Section 15064.5? C. Directly or indirectly disturb or destroy a unique paleontogical resource or site? Page 164 of 190 md\msword\envcheck.doc\ 1.15.99 75D-174 Potentially Significant Impact 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation . Incorporated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Less Than Significant Impact Þf 0 0 0 0 x Þ( ~ No Impact 0 ~ M ~ ~ 0 0 0 Page 3 of 10 crn~fA Envi ron mentalCheckl ist For CEQA Compliance Issues & Supporting Information Sources D. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI. Geology and Soils - Would the project: A. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1. Rupture of an known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? 3. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? 4. Landslides? B. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c. Would the project result in the loss of a unique geologic feature? D. Is the project located on strata or soil that is unstable or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? E. Where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater, is the soil capable of supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems? Page 165 of 190 md\msword\envcheck.doc\ 1.15.99 75D-175 Potentially Significant Impact 0 0 0 D 0 D 0 0 0 0 Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation . Incorporated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Less Than Significant Impact f¥ 0 0 ß )( 0 j( 0 ~ ~ No Impact 0 0 ~ 0 D ~- 0 x 0 0 Page 4 of 10 ~~fA Environmental.Checklist For CECA Compliance Issues & Supporting Information Sources VII. Hazardous and Hazardous Materials - Would the project: A. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? B. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substance or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? C. Be located on a site which is located on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 659662.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? D. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles where of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality - Would the project: A. Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? B. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there wou1d be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Page 166 of 190 md\msword\envcheck.doc\ 1.15.99 75D-176 Potentially Significant Impact 0 0 0 0 0 0 Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation . Incorporated 0 0 0 0 0 0 Less Than Significant Impact ~ ~ ÞZ ~ x ft{ No Impact 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 5 of 10 aIT~fA Environmental.Checklist For CEQA Compliance Issues & Supporting Information Sources c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would resutt in flooding on or off- site? D. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted run-off? E. Place housing within a 1 DO-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? F. Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? G. Place housing within a 1 DO-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? IX. Land Use and Planning- Would the project: A. B. Physically divide an established community? Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? --~ Mineral Resources - Would the project: A. Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan. specific plan, or other land use plan? Potentially Significant Impact 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 md\msword\envcheck.doc\ 1.15.99 Page 167 of 190 75D-177 Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation . Incorporated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 less Than Significant Impact 'fl ~ K ~ ~ k 0 0 0 No Impact D D D 0 D 0 )( ~ 9f Page 6 of 10 ~~fA Environmental.Checklist For CEQA Compliance Issues & Supporting Information Sources XI. Noise - Would the project result in: A Exposure of persons to or generation of noise . levels in excess of standards. established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? B. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? D. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without projec~? For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? E. XII. Population and Housing - Would the project: A. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and business) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? B. c. Displace substantial numbers of people, . necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Page 168 of 190 mcl\msword\envcheck.doc\ 1.15.99 75D-178 Potentially Significant Impact 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation . Incorporated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Less Than Significant Impact l~ þ ß( ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ No Impact 0 0 0 0 If- 0 0 D Page 7 of 10 an~AfA Environmental.Checklist For CEQA Compliance Issues & Supporting Information Sources XIII. Public Services A. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service rations, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public service: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? XIV. Recreation A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. B. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? xv. Transportation I Traffic A. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e. result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ration on roads, or congestion at intersections?) Potentially Significant Impact 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 md\msword\envcheck.doc\ 1.15.99 Page 169 of 190 75D-179 Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation . Incorporated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Less Than Significant Impact A 0 0 0 0 0 jK{ r:( ~ No Impact 0 0 0 0 D- O 0 0 0=- Page 8 of 10 ~~fA Environmental.Checklist For CEQA Compliance Issues & Supporting Information Sources B. Exceed; either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? D. Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? E. Result in inadequate emergency access? F. G. Result in inadequate parking capacity? Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. Utilities and Service Systems A Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? B. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? D. Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources or are new or expanded entitlements needed? E. Result in the determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Potentially Significant Impact 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 md\msword\envcheck.doc\ 1.15.99 Page 170 of 190 75D-180 Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation . Incorporated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Less Than Significant Impact K ,J{ 9( ~ frl % Œ{ ~ M ~ No Impact 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 Page 9 of 10 anfA Environmental.Checklist For CEQA Compliance Issues & Supporting Information Sources F. Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's sold waste disposal needs? G. Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVII. Mandatory Findings of Significance A. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? B. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects). c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Significant Impact 0 0 0 0 0 Page 171 of 190 md\msword\envcheck.doc\ 1.15.99 75D-181 Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated 0 0 0 0 0 Less Than Significant Impact x ~ frJ: ~ ~ No Impact 0 0 0 0 0 Page 10 of 10 APPENDIX E AGENCY RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE AMENDMENTS AND TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENTS TO ALL AFFECTED TAXING ENTITIES Page 172 of 190 75D-182 . . 48 3/4/04 LES RESOLUTION NO. CRA 2004-04 RESOLUTION OF THE SANTA ANA COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECEIVING AND FILING THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER- CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS AND REFERRING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FOR ITS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. On July 2, 1973, by Ordinance No. 1173, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") approved and adopted a redevelopment plan for the CentraJ City Redevelopment Project (.Central City Project"); and B. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1636, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project ("Inter.. City Project"); and C. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1637, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the North Harbor Redevelopment Project ("North Harbor Project"); and . D. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1638, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the South Harbor Redevelopment Project ("South Harbor Project"); and E. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1639, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the South Main Redevelopment Project ("South Main Project"); and - F. On December 4, 1989, by Ordinance No. NS-2039, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Br;stol Corridor Projecf'); and G. The "Existing Plans" consist of the Redevelopment Plans, as amended. prepared for the Central City Project, Inter-City Project, North Harbor Project, South Page 173 of 190 Resolution No. CRA 2004-04 - Page 1 of4 75D-183 Harbor Project, South Main Project, and the Bristol Corridor Project and the territory included within the Existing Plans is referred to as the "Project Areas"; and H. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is vested with the responsibility to carry out the Existing Plans; and I. The Agency desires to amend each of the Existing Plans ("Amendments") to merge the Project Areas in order to combine the tax increment revenues from the Project Areas and reallocate the revenues to and among the entire merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through economic vitality and increase and improve housIng opportunities; and J. Sections 33346, 33356 and 33453 of the Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) provide that, prior to a jojnt public hearing on a proposed amendment to a redevelopment plan, the redevelopment agency shall submit the proposed changes to the planning commission; and K. The Agency has prepared and completed in draft form the Amendments to the Existing Plans which are attached hereto as Exhibits A - F and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. The proposed Amendments to the Existing Plans in draft form attached hereto as Exhibits A - F, are hereby received and filed by the Agency. and the Agency is authorized to transmit a copy of the Amendments to affected taxing entities as part of the Agency's ongoing effort to consult with those entities about the proposed Amendments. Section 3. The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby authorized and directed to transmit a copy of the Amendments to the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana for its report and recommendation. ADOPTED this 15th day of March, 2004. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, Agency Counsel By: bL<- ¿ ~ Lisa E. Storck Assistant Counsel Page 174 of 190 Resolution No. CRA2004-04 Page 2 of 4 75D-184 '..---" .. . AYES: Boardmembers: Alvarez. Bist. Christy. Franklin. Garcia. Pulido. Solorio (7) NOES: ABSTAIN: Boardmembers: None (0) Boardmembers: None (0) NOT PRESENT: Boardmembers: None (0) CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Recording Secretary for the Community Redevelopment Agency. do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. CRA 2004-04 to be the original resolution adopted by the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana on March 15. 2004. . Date: ~~ 1J'l /IJ~ / " Secretary, Community Redevel City of Santa Ana . . Page 175 of 190 Resolution No. CRA 2004-04 Page 3 of 4 75D-185 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO rEM Brett E. Franklin COUNCIL MEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Usa Bist Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 ~ CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCil Patricia E. Healy March 15,2004 James D. Ruth County Executive Officer . County of Orange 10 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana CA 92701 SUBJECT: ' Amendments to the Redevelopment Plans Merging the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects Dear Mr. Ruth: The Santa Ana Conununity Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of merging ("Merger" or "Amendments") the financial provisions of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects ("Project Areas" or "Projects"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial' or time limits of the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. Each of the project areas will continue to meet its existing obligations. The merger wil1 allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues among the Project Areas that will best facilitate the elimination of blighting conditions and increase and improve housing opportunities. On March 15, 2004, the Agency, by resolution, authorized Agency staff to transmit a copy of the proposed Amendments to all affected taxing entities as an information item for the purpose of facilitating consultations pursuant to Section 33328 of the Community Redevelopment Law (CRL). Enclosed are copies of the draft Amendments, which add a section to each of the Redevelopment Plans regarding merging the Project Areas. Furthermore, in accordance with CRL Section 33344.5, the Agency has also prepared and approved a Preliminary Report on the proposed AmendmentS, which is also enclosed. The Agency, over the next few months, will continue to transmit information to all affected taxing entities regarding the adoption of t~e proposed Amendments as required by the CRL. . Page 176 of 190 75D-186 cs. 19(, ~ Amendments to the Redevelopment Plans Merging the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Conidor Redevelopment Projects March 15, 2004 Page 2 If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments or would like to schedule a consultation meeting, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 667-2244. Sincerely, . SANTA ANA COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ,~~ Executi ve Director JPR/CK/NTE/mlr /Enclosures Page 177 of 190 75D-187 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the Central City Redevelopment .Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 2, 1973 by Ordinance No. 1173. The Project Area is comprised of approximately 694 acres located in the central and northern portions of the City. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on June 2, 1975 by Ordinance No. 1258, on December 1, 1986 by Ordinance No. NS-1877, on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. 2234, on May 6, 1996 by Ordinance No. NS-2290, and on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. 2396. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a sixth amendment ("Sixth Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits in effect and stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part IX to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: IX. MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Sixth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the Central City Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". Page 178 of 190 PA0401011.SNACK:gbd 19090.003.002102123/04 75D-188 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 6.1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1636. The Project Area contains approximately 536 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. 2234, on May 6, 1996 by Ordinance No. NS- 2289, and on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. 2396. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a fourth amendment ("Fourth Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: X. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". Page 179 of 190 PA0401011.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002102123/04 75D-189 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE NORTH HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the North Harbor Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 6,1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1637. The Project Area contains approximately 428 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. 2234, on May 6, 1996 by Ordinance No. NS-2291, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. 2396, and on January 20, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2641. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a fifth amendment ("Fifth Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: X. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Fifth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the North Harbor Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". Page 180 of 190 PA0401011.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002102123/04 75D-190 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTH HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the South Harbor Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 6, 1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1638. The Project Area contains approximately 1,050 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on August 3, 1992 by Ordinance No. NS-2167, on October 3,1994 by Ordinance No. 2234, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. 2396, and on January 20, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2641. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a fifth amendment ("Fifth Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: x. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Fifth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the South Harbor Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". Page 181 of 190 PA0401011.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002102123/04 75D-191 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTH MAIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the South Main Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 6, 1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1639. The Project Area contains approximately 1 ,500 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. 2234, on July 17, 1995 by Ordinance No. NS-2256, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. 2396, and on January 20, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2641. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a fifth amendment ("Fifth Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: x. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Fifth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the South Main Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". Page 182 of 190 PA0401011.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002/02/23/04 75D-192 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on December 4, 1989 by Ordinance No. NS-2039. The Project Area contains approximately 781 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been previously amended on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. 2231 and Ordinance No. NS-2234, and on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. NS-2396. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a fourth amendment ("Fourth Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and the South Main Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: X. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and the South Main Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". Page 183 of 190 PA0401011.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002102123/04 75D-193 Amendment to Merge the Central City, Intercity, North Harbor Blvd., South Harbor Blvd., South Main St., and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Areas Mailing List of the Affected Taxing Entities Fiscal Year 2003-04 A. TAXING ENTITIES Orange County James D. Ruth, Interim County Executive Officer 10 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714) 834-2345 Orange County Cemetery District Sam Randall, General Manager 25751 Trabuco Road Lake Forest, CA 92630 (949) 951-9102 Orange County Department of Education William M. Habermehl, Superintendent 200 Kalmus Drive P.O. Box 9050 Costa Mesa, CA 92628 (714) 966-4000 Orange County Flood Control District C/O PFRD Financial Operations Steve Danley P.O. Box 4048 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Orange County Harbor District C/O PFRD Financial Operations Steve Danley P.O. Box 4048 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Orange County Sanitation District Gary Streed, Director of Finance P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 (714) 593-7550 Page 184 of 190 Filename: Santa Ana Taxing Entity List.062804; 6/28/2004; cb 75D-194 Page 1 of Orange County Transportation Authority Jim Kenan, Director of Finance & Administration P.O. Box 14184 Orange, CA 92863 (714) 560-5678 Orange County Vector Control District Dana K. Ohanesian, Administration & Finance Manager P.O. Box 87 Santa Ana, CA 92702 (714) 971-2421 Orange County Water District Virginia Grebbien, General Manager P.O. Box 8300 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714) 378-3200 Orange Unified School District Robert L. French, Ed.D., Superintendent P.O. Box 11022 Orange, CA 92856 (714) 628-4040 Rancho Santiago Community College District Dr. Edward Hernandez, Chancellor 2323 N. Broadway St., #404-1 Santa Ana, CA 92706 (714) 480-7340 Coast Community College District Mr. Chandu Brahmbhatt, Vice Chancellor 1370 Adams Ave. Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714) 438-4736 East Orange County Water District Mr. William H. Redcay, General Manager 185 North McPherson Road Orange, CA 92869 (714) 538-5815 Page 185 of 190 Filename: Santa Ana Taxing Entity List.062804; 6I2~~ 0 -1 95 Page 2 of Garden Grove Unified School District Laura Schwalm, Ph.D., Superintendent 10331 Stanford Ave. Garden Grove, CA 92840 (714) 663-6000 City of Santa Ana Mr. David N. Ream, City Manager 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92702 (714) 647-5200 Santa Ana Unified School District Mr. Rob Richardson, President 1601 East Chestnut Ave. Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714) 558-5501 South Orange County Community College District Mr. Micael Merrifield, President 28000 Marguerite Parkway Mission Viejo, CA 92692 (949) 451-4384 Tustin Unified School District Ann Albertson, President 300 South C Street Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 730-7301 Page 186 of 190 Filename: Santa Ana Taxing Entity List.062804: 6/28/2004; cb 75D-196 Page 3 of APPENDIX F AGENCY RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY REPORT Page 187 of 190 75D-197 8 8 8 3/4/04 les RESOLUTION NO. CRA 2004-03 RESOl..UTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS AND AUTHORIZING TRANSMITTAL OF SAID REPORT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. On July 2, 1973, by Ordinance No. 1173, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") approved and adopted a redevelopment plan for the Central City Redevelopment Project ("Central City Project"); and B. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1636, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project C'lnter- City Project"); and C. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1637, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the North Harbor Redevelopment Project ("North Harbor Project"); and . D. On JuJy 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1638, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the South Harbor Redevelopment Project ("South Harbor Project"); and E. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1639, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the South Main Redevelopment Project ("South Main Projecf'); and F. On December 4, 1989, by Ordinance No. NS-2039, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Bristol Corridor Project"); and G. The "Existing Plans" consist of the Redevelopment Plans, as amended, prepared for the Central City Project. Inter-City Project, North Harbor Project, South Page 188 of 190 Resolution No. CRA 2004-03 Page 1 of 3 75D-198 Harbor Project, South Main Project, and the Bristol Corridor Project and the territory included within the Existing Plans is referred to as the "Project Areas"; and H. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is vested with the responsibIlity to carry out the ExIsting Plans; and I. The Agency desires to amend each of the Existing Plans C-Amendments") to merge the Project Areas in order to combine the tax increment revenues from the Project Areas and reallocate the revenues to and among the entire merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through economic vital ity and increase and improve housing opportunities: and J. Pursuant to sections 33344.5 and 33344.6 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, the Agency has prepared a preliminary report for transmittal to the affected taxing agencies (the "Preliminary Report") on the proposed Amendments; and K. State law requires the Agency to consult with affected taxing entities about the proposed Amendments. Section 2. The Preliminary Report for the proposed Amendments. in the form currently on file with the Agency Secretary, is hereby approved. Section 3. The Executive Director ;s hereby authorized and directed to transmit a copy of the Preliminary Report for the proposed Amendments to all affected taxing entities. ADOPTED this 15th day of March, 2004. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, Agency Counsel By: ~~'- L .~ Lisa E. Storck Assistant Counsel Page 189 of 190 Resolution No. CRA 2004-03 Page 2 of 3 7.5D-1-9.9 8 8 8 AYES; NOES: ABSTAIN; Board members: Alvarez. Bist. Christy. Franklin. Garcia. Pulido. Solorio (7) Boardmembers: None (0) Boardmembers: None CO) NOT PRESENT: Boardmembers: None (0) CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY " PATRICIA E. HEALY, Recording Secretary for the Community Redevelopment Agency, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. CRA 2004-03 to be the original resolution adopted by the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana on March 15. 2004. ,13 /11/ór Date: ecretary, Community RedeveJopme gency City of Santa Ana Page 190 of 190 Resolution No. CRA 2004-03 Page 3 of 3 7...5D..2OD - - IIOTICS.. ...........--.... ......118 ------ ...... T~L. .....-. .... ......~.._- 1:1_' ~~ ""-''''''IMII ........... ....-..a: II; I RIIIR....-..--.r ..... . ............. th8t tile ca, CDuncI 01.,.. :l 01 SInta ~ C8IIIDrnia ("CIW CuuIIciI") If'd .... Senlalroa Camníuñitv ~ . ~ rAaincw"l ,. hold. ~ pu(Iø ~~20Ø4'1. .. . lit lie hOur or. Po m. or -iOOri theM- "'.IÞen-.ÇII'IbIt ... Cøund~~~ee... 8M- fa Ana,.CdDInia. ~ to ComInII!IIr ~ law 8IId ~Codit"'" 33IlOl). '*'" far.. ~ 01 CCI~"'" Md On""~"" --..,¡;;:;: "-"'II:; =~ . ConMMr~:"I=A8a!¡.~~~?3 ::".,¡:.~"':'m-_~P"::iF=_..:cI~ buNi.8dM OIbof1h8 ."ttrf'8c:::fJttra otk8aAn& 1b8 :UpCIIe 01 /hi ~_.d.._. "10 æ ~ P-.Joiect Ate8 bor ~ tMlrIcI8mert ---=æ ExI8dng PI MIls WII1I111oC81111ha... nuM /he 8rIIInt Ala The ~_6 . nee . the f'rojKt~ not .. 1tIt ~. IIIM:t '"' of 1M pIOpIrI\N in ØIe = ~ ~~AIea---th8J ,..PtçfectMilli8mølri8dæ1h8 ~. posjþ 01118 ~.., 01111 ~ A;.a would _lor of .ø.àlll '\ Ind 1r8nciIIO,,--1II....... b8iIIIa to" ~......... wit ~ 118 c:onIinuIB I8IIiIIIIiíIiÐn of .~ .... IhIauDb inct8AId 8CCIrIOII1ID YtIIIy of IUCh PIÐiKt ~ IfId ~ IAcN8i8d 8fId ~houIIna ~ in or,.., ad1 .... . Tb8 = AiR8lIdI8111 .. nee IIÌIdIII'Id ~ of tfie 1l8í18 or fnInd8Ilmb of the IIII!!dng A8ck "j PIIN or add IMIorY to .. ~ PIoIct Ñ8II. The putp08e 01 JDtIt PuI:IIIo ~ 1110 CØIIIIdIr: f. 1Jie píjIpoeId Awllìd.....1D die ~ AiW8~1I8I11 PIIn8 for t~ ~~.:ø'~~ø::~. SoIAhM8ln.IfId z. TII8 ~ to the ÇItf. CoUndI. CI'I_~ Amendme...s. ~ 1he ftIPOIt MOCW...-.cww. øltJIe.C1tV'8 P.f8nr*Ig. ~ 1M .18Ig/1IIoItIoW Inij)Ict I8ØQIt. 811d.~. of corIIUIIIIcri willi ~ owner.. ~ M/new OWI'*$ arid IIIected tailing -- on"'lIRIÞOMCi 111181; wd $.'" M:Ience ind fIIIIIInony & ind.1IgIInIIt tile 8dopdøn ollie proposed Am8nd- menta. . /lithe 8bcwe It8I8d :z. hour end pIIC8 ønf. 8fId aI perscns ~ ~ obi8cIIDnI to the ~ Amer.41 ., ...... beIart .. Þtt¡¡¡IIèy 81d 118 aay CoiinGIf'ind.ìI1øw CIUI8 WIJW!he ØI'OPI*Id A.._4._. IIIauId not be IIppi1MId McI ~ At." lime not ..... hn Ole 1IOIIf i1bwIid ... fOr '-ina. '!!f P8!!fOI'I ~ to 1he ~ AmelIG."'11II¥1iIe in ~ with IheClllk øltTIe Cõuncla....... õthla or r. Obfeo. Š. r 01 ~~I d8Øm 80 bell8ll'd at... ~ wII be IIbdIId 8n 10 be heMS. . Councf'"IhIIt heir end coneIder 10 8IId CIIher iboLc lie p,opceed~"'ICIn"'. øwuantlD "C8IfømIa~ RecrMJ. ~.a - AUiO -.R ....... fie AaInw w8 hold a~""¡'" fion rn8IIIfng on AuauIt 1O~Ø41.~~ ..1h8 SMtaAna PaIœ ~ ~ ID- CIIIId . erfQllc CiInIer ~".,.. ~ ID dIcII88 the ~ or 1he pR)- e Amt,,di,,",,* Ind ...., 8I8cII of 1he 8døption of the propoød IÕ-.Ib,. 1M PIDØQ88d AmII~-.4!a. lilt ~I A8ÞoIt 10 .. cay CcMd.1he 81111tk1g. ,.. ~ !111ft b.. ~ ~.",.,.Iind cøw ~ doc:uInIfW8 .. an .. SS~~~""L~iiiS:5 ~ fie Poøosed hrie..œ.-. .... CII/I.,rS8nla Ana ~ ~ ~AgiM. ICy . (n4) 847-5380 ~ Ihe hoIn 018 a.m. end 5 p.rn.. Monc:IIr¥ 1hIouQh E. Hally. a.t 01 the CøI8d ~ ~ ~ ReaiI8t PubIcIIIIan DII88s: ~ 2. -, 18, 23. ao. 2004 ...... ........ .. ........ III ~u..u - ~ II . ~... ....-. ......... 181M -. II -.. d........ - "!!.f'8!!18 .... . ~.........-..... ~ ] l , ......... 1M""""""'''' . w :t CU..}~......,......... ...... ............. -....... EXHIBIT 3 75D-201 " ::z:..' .;:::'~ I I \ ! t I i I . j i ~ . '-~" .. - - .- . . .' . ... . . ......~~~~Mø -- _",__-'~Il .... _...... .,--'f Á.;J' -........ - -: ,..~!t ... PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2016,SCIC.P.) La Opini6n ,.... -,.. -.-... ~ :Illy "-_. 70C S. :'C..I 8: . 1..01 Angelll. CA 80017 TII 'I.S; 588'2280 . 1"'.'.:2~:t: 8i)fM!?8IJ -- ..'.11/' oam STATE OF CALIFORNIA I B~ B citizen of Thl United States and B reBid..,! of the C:'Iunty aforesaid: I 11m OV8r the ag. of eighteen YAII". end not. pany :0 :)r inter..t.d in the above-OMltlO manur. I Un" the pri"!clpal c;.rk of the prlntor of I 8 Opin'ón II "':øwBpaper of g81"'8ral circJlatio:'l, p~¡nre:i and pUblished daily in the City Of loB An.elea. COLln~ cf Les Ar:se'., en:i 'A"hicr: nøwosper hAil be..., Bdjl.dged a nøwSDlper of generai c¡.cul.tlc~ trJ the Sl.perlc. COl." of thl Cour.t'¡ of Los Angel... Stat. o~ Califom a, undo. ~hc data ct. Ju:y 2B. 1989, case NUT.cør: asc 176: that the "o~lce. of which tt-e an~8J(ec! i. . printed copy. has be.n publil¡hed :n 8(lch regular and net ¡" any sU¡:::)lomon( Il10roo: or: tho following da:es. to-wit: -Þ-.. l \~. ~4 2ö ----- .. .. ... all In the year 20 oL\- I certify (or declare) under penalty of perJury that the foregOing 18 true and correct. Da~at Los Ange~"fornI81 thlt..... day of .20~ "':t 'Q~~ MN (17 QonIrOJ.., Aw. 0MI4 " -." I , .. IICßIIIICAaOr... U:INC~ PI1IL1CA CONoIIiII1A G- . ' .. ,.'. ,...,~..,...... PLAN 1II1IIIIP.8A/11AC1ðr4 : : ',.. 1IMU8~PlltJrItnllÐ8I11i1I18oUWC1OND!cINIPALc.'rY I unaan CD8IIU I1II1IJI¡ NORn! IWIICIR.IOImt HAõIIOR,lO'v'l'IIIAI" , IIIi' ~, :'.~' " ,TOL~,a:!J'IAIDI"""P.C1CEI!ITEIm9.~. I : . ,. .", ,=. . :,.1 I ;' " ;, 1.;NCmFICA POR UTI 11lIIIO - II ..,.I"':..'."'J rI8 '1 ;"...-~ .t I -,., . 88Na ~ C' "IrrII..o\P........,..u dI .. C.-, Y" 1':111-'Il1011 aI oIewrÞI¡- rlr.l~' ~I :.;~~, , ,:-.'C1r,IP'¡: .:IIu'- Ii&.. A.'II ;-...,...¡ 'WIll" "'11 a:.l::-t"C:I ~ ;:jor:1 t:;:. 1:"'11' ~:III . .' :':r , ': IIIiIIIMDII d8 ~JIM, 111111 e r:... :I :1' ~. T:H':'I'r ~.;ecr. :I 'M .1 ......, '" I ca.....¡ ': j.. ' '.QIj ~-II...1InIt ~. ,I .-:',¡r,I:!, ~::o.. = C- "'.118"'1 "'~'I, ::a",".., -"11'1:"1 Ii !"" III'., CI 'l1li.'\18.. UC!-3'". ~ iii 1"'.n"PAr:dlu lie c..-c... '::~e~o CI SI .c., 51;"."::" ,,:'~, a.c.~ :l:lC1.' ,M_: :Ie". :1IIi0lt,¡¡ ¡¡a :IOIIIIdI..r I "w,ot.I,1':Ir, ! ..-...~ c,'u '~:": I WoIINIII/I'tFI....IlIIIInCII ~'Io'rIIIIOI: ¡"'i-n..w. ;:lI:h' . Q ""')8\;'"11 " ~. '!:-'III,......,.r.r r.1 ClIft 0!1/0 .... c.~ CIII"ftIIIr ........ ....!).":!' "lr:IGI, l:1li.:'" .; , . ',IoIii!Ior..ac.81 ".. J.=- ConId&::, ~Ani8I.II:G¡ec::lI"''':'',,! :.."1IIW8II :,... ,"" :18 P-",..& =-ut... cao:'" ..1uIInI1. II 'II1II8 11.1 I~I -r. . -, ï ;......... ...~- .....~ iICfÑI :18 III ~paI- 81:l1li. _lor."'. 'III I 1II'iI III- AIHI. ~III''''''Y.II'''''I''.'''''I OIIG,r"cIII " .1 ~.~,~"",.#r~~,IIIIaU:"r.l'lllr.ll"." I Ie .,.; ," '. ., I II' "," E!.~ III"I~. pI'II:'-"""''': ,II"'" =- jJ ~'8d:: I .: : '~",ait.irI...IMII'i'JIMIiiIIn'~"""'18 ~.::... C"'. .. dill. ....., , ;' :ii"'~ 1:.':-- ~ cII:Ild'W ..-. pllllIICII" A:w.. i'Ia¥IIX:I .... do.... II. ;. ;~ i.M 1i:Ir..- 'lll1IIII'IIa.'*' _Adaa dllI~ft WIPOGC .. irlPIIP'nu' :, ;' ~_rv. IIIIIMII4'- "1"111 ......l1li ~ .)filii !I, ,rll".. I ~fIrIr2~ ".. ~ ~ II'. ArIa. :II ~ :1-........-.II1II.8. Ii' ~":1'11'- :IIIrqIII :1111 . ,',*,,\.'P16' III u ArIII CII ,~ ."1 ll1I !"II:ailr:e at\coll'ã41 'I Icr. 'lito ;: . :t'8I!Iit-, ,.. ..",:no 'Ww:IIIIID" :1" :lll1IIIIaIO .-W' :I'. 81 ":::11Il1o CIII:'GD I ",. ~- '...".en '........ ~'I1IIiO-! CIGI''!IIudI :a. -... c_~ -........ . ,:. "JI'III'Im eII.'¥IIIIIIIIIIIIIII'O'"IIGIII8I1:I' .w.1II"m,IIiID, I ~..... at ~r."II, "', ' '''''.IC:T~,*,-",';a'''''''... = ,,-1II."'.-.L8I ¡¡r~-II'OII"'- " .,'It, II:IQIIØ.'I nI'I,'":I :II.""":II~ C l'I'IY.Ir.)I CI (I' I""" a . ~: ,FlJI!o~IIIf!8:""';. ~ 1I"'.øto ~,"!'I. 1II.At_. !I!"3'jt;lO '......... '" ,",., I ~:. ,,; ~ : ~ IIIIIÕIID ~.;. ...... ~ ~'-Ir"~ I' ~:18'.' i , ~' ;':' I.. ..,,:...o:_:ll:X:~ .inI"IrIII~. J"....'":W"nc~- I I~' "_nnIII ;II" oCI ,,~. III ~ .......,.:=IðrI ::. :.:.r ~.. 0," I .. . '-..c,:,/ Cor-""'lhllDr~ :I.:.~. 'II""", ;!oIr.~ ~"!II:. IIr.'" , ':~'.'; .:."'" ,....r. Cd"'''', i""- ell :;I.~,., ': EII'nrr.... ~r" ! ,¡ ..' ". ",:, ''< ... hlnpwt:18: :10' 18 4¡t-- I . ,"" t.' " . :", . æ. ~ 111.8 ""- I II Ay;.'!II:"'er:D III.. C v::a::l1C!lr81U .""i(' .' ,~,I!-.--II'I::IIIII8.IO:='-'YI"CD II"'~'"", II' .tC(-IIICI .,' f..,. . ,.,: ,'~'!!8 I CuP"¿" ~I ""-:'IcI* 0:.. ('~,II:ooJ ,J - '='''1, :: .' ' , ':f>.,~.., ; '''',~,Îl1"\DI:IIC .. 8Õ VIII.'IaI:'Ø ,... -"I" :.. I. :ftI'U " '-'..;":... ~~:" : '/'_'~""".IIoDII ",,:11"411. ct...rø dl "IgCIII;. r !'.. ": ~ " '.':~ ~~~u laÞnlllll!""'",,_"N'I.M''W, ":~"'" .,~ ;'~,~.(..:1.,:it~~.~:~,. '..'. ....' -. , ! .~- '.. 'J", "'f.I\C'~/\UICII)_a,aUr'''_, ."..I.-'DØC:~ I ' ,.,' ":iI!:~:" .";,'..:;~...~ . . ! . :.~~.~/.,..:~~,~\-;;:,:... ,,~.,. ;.".: . I ''''.''''''B. §-=~:Q.:'lIIi"!IIIC" ;.1.:;1 :~llm.l..& ,II. Þ~lIW . II':¡{ I AgIfIGI8 Y II ,.,..~eru: :18 . Î 'CIIIiIII,':' , ',: iii ".IIII!r-:IIir"'!l'DllUlllUI'D:IIIhI'''.. ~ .,. -':1!I**Y~ .1-=1.01' I"IDI"IIII''¡;, ''''.'» ,.' ; I ¡; .. I"'''''' ftIØerJ. , .18 ,.,.. 'I M:ñf.IaIIIC"")I'IOI'8 '1:'" cIIItI'u ""r II'CII :'l1li'."'''' 11.- ,: ....... PC. 'IIIIID ... allllïr8aiGr :II.. Gli;1G'0IW811 "In':IaPoI.'":¡ \181 IIfor.l:"\' . 0....... I8IICIIII ~ vr;w...!illlllIIIII'" - a'CIIIlI' 1.'..:Ior=-.. . ;:u....' .. ; . - . ØIIIIIII't8d d8'- cllll. . 11M"'" 18 . Qt~õI8d 1111 Y !ØI.- .. 1ICIIIdc'" ! : , UIIU8 -,:ftOHaI'~I8" II ~a pmUIIIl w':/uI . . I .a -It' .tI I :. : ~~ 111"1 t.cIr!riI8a 118 ::.IIIIr.'a., ! ' ': ~:, :D1..i:~:6i1'iÌléÌÎi'íëÅ1A)I- po"em1ilølChlulÌ"*"AgIiñIù IOIWnIH IN;',i:.; ,~., , ::~'.,ïiltilnÌl!klli"Í8:~ 1110 ~IOO~4I2004"a.. e p.1n. 8ft 1~,h1a':, ,:':: ,'::- ':DoirÜiIIIIII.IåI!llli*."'~',~",ØCMD,CenI8r.PllZa. SIm8:An8;:,:: :.;, ~?¥ ' ~~:..~~:JI~dl1ìt !lJ\'ll1Ír\CIIII'prøpulltal y otm Ø:lðA1IIIo.:':: .< ~:m~~8ç:~~~~~... <.~; 'í.êIrDI_"*'*:JIII1InI!IIII1IiI*i 'tlllIIdWD Y 1I1JCII'III..p... "!nIpICXllOn pðbbda ;:0,'?" ,~ciåp.i~IIIIOrIrIb'iIoul8rdl'aftaInI (811JT1-1 ø.ri\.cJi 111111.. ",",mea) """ . . ,:?;~t\~:::5~===æ;~.:æ.;-~' ,,' ,~~ : ,,00I'IiiI~,,~ ÑI8 .II.W4,~.:aeo e/ItI'I ¡. ~ LI1I, Y 8 p.n'I holU. dlllunee I ' j~~,:'lí~~!iU!0\~~!;;~"::.(/;:: I' ., . 'I. ::l. . ; , EXH'8IT'" 3 .,....' ." ~..' ":" '''.''... ,. ,-, 75~-.202 ..n', '" " , -..--. i;i){l..:. ;:::':::-.j; , - ...."'~.!~~.~ -- ......- -- --- .....- ..- -....-..--.- -- ------ -.._- -~...-- ~ ..~~-~ .. ~.T THU SA - s6 6814 - 3 tháng 8,.2004 (18 tháng Sáu näm Giáp Thån) TUESDAY, ALÌGtJ$:r;~i . ., . .. Dill ~ IÍ ~ iii IdI .. .. kit -- If cic . ÍI _iii k( .elllil"'" if ... 8ft ... till ..... JIll, IIIIf.CIIJ C....r SIaIIII ... IIiI ~ 1111 ..... -, Ii de"" .. iii WI ..... .... ... 1IIsIII, SII8 l1li, - ....., lili'iii .... . THEO ÐÂY, CHÛNG TOI XIN THONG BÁo ràng HOi Ððng Thành PM Santa Ana, California (sau day goi tãt là MHOi Ððng Thành Ph6") và CO Quan TAi Thitt GOng Ððng Santa Ana (Santa Ana Commmity Redevelopment Agern:y) (sau dAy 001 tãt Ià "CO Quan") së tð ehílc mOt ~ d""u tr4n cOng khai klft h(Ip vào Iúc 6 gið ehidu ngày 7 thång Chfn, 2004, hate sau d6 ngay khi c6 thl dilu tr4n xem xét ~ VU, ~i City CoII\ciI Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, ehitu theo lu&t TAl Thift GOng Ð6ng cùa tilu bang California (California CommunllY Redevelopment Law) (80 lI4t sac Khòe và An Toàn, Mvc 33000 và tilfp theo) dl xem xét phê eht4n và thOng qua dl ån SlIa 961 Kif Hoeeh TAi Thitt (sau day OQi tãt Ià "Ð4 Án SlIa Ðði") dè h(Jp nMt cáe DtJ ÁJ;1 TnIIg TAm Thành PM, T~m lw Hành LiAn ThànhPìi6, cáe DtJ Án TAl Thitt ÐIñng Hinh Lang Bristol, ScUh Main, South Harbor, North Harbor, (sau day goi tãt Ià "Cåe Khu VI,Ie D\W Án Hitn Tei"). Ranh Q.iði cùa Cåe Khu VI,Ie D\W Án Hitn Tei dtJ;Jc minh hQa trAn bin dð dfnh kèm vði thðng báo này. Quý Vi c6 thl Ify và xem xét tài litu phåp Iý mð tã 'If ranh giðl cùa CAe Khu VI,Ie DtJ Án Hitn Tel tei VAn Phðng Thll Ký HOI Ððng Thành pM Santa Ana. Myc dfch cùa Ð4 Án SlIa Ð6i làh(lp nMt Cåe Khu VI,Ie DtJ Án Hitn Tei blng cáeh klft h(Ip phan thu vI tho( bA't dOng sån tit Cåe Khu VIJC DII Án Hitn Tel và phln b6 các khain phln thu này trAn 10àn Khu VI,Ie D\W Án Ðd;IC ti(Jp NMl Ð4 Án SlIa Ðði së khðng thay lidi nhiJng cJd ån thilft kif hitn tei; së khðng nði rOng nhOng khu 'Ne thiEt kif hitn Iii, và wng së khOng ånh htiJng dlfn nhOng bA't dOng sãn trong khu VIC thiEt kif này. Muc dfch ehrnh cùa em ån H(Jp Nhít Cåe Khu we DtJ An Ià !let hitu qui trong hoet dOng tàl ehfnh và hành ehfnh nhAm mang lei IØI fch dång kl cho cOng ehúng v1 vite Høp Nhtt sð ~o didu kltnthutn !ØI dlliên We tái thiEt cáe khu ¥\Ie bi suy tàn nhð tlng etbng khði ph\IC nln kinh tIf cùa Cåe Khu VI,Ie DII An dó vi tlng thêm cáe 00 hOi 'If gia ell trong cáe khu V\IC này hate cáe khu VIC g4n kl. ÐI An SlIa adi së khðng gia hen thAm cáe giðl IIfn 'If tài ehfnh và thði gian cùa cáe Oil An TAi Thilft hitn ~i ~e mð rOng thAm dlt dai eho Cåe Khu VIJC DUO An Hitn Tel. ' Mvc dfch cùa Me Ðilu Tlfn GOng Khal KEt HQp Ià dl xem xét: 1. 91! An SlIa Ðòi dð'i vði Cåe Kif ~ch TAi Thilft hien tei cho cáe DII An T""g Tam Thành PM, Trem lW Hành liên Thành Ph6, cáe DUO An Tåi Thilft Ðlñng Hành Lang Bristol, Scùh Main, South Harbor, North Harbor, theo nhll dt trlnh cùa CO Quan 2. ~ çio cùa caQuan eho HOI Ððng Thành pM vI! ÐI! Án SÌla Ðòi, bao gðm bãn báo cáo và cáe dl! nghi cùa Uy Ban HOI)eh Ðinh Thành PM, báo cáo ånh htiJng tðI khu dan ell, và mOt bån tóm ~ 'If các cuOc hQi Ý VI Ð4 Án Sila ó6i vði cáe ehù nhln bA't dOng sãn, cáe ell dAn, chCI 00 slJ thlÜlg m~i, và các cá nhAnJtð ehae flOp thulf bi ånh htiJng; và 3. Toàn bO blng ehímg vi ehímg thlle ùng hO và phån dð'i 'lite thðng qua ÐI An SlIa adi. Vio ngày, gið, và dia cJilm nói trAn, bA't IcY và tát cã nhOng ngtØ phån ct6i ÐI An SlIa adi c6 till tlIi trlnh dien vði CO Quan và HOi Ððng Thành PM và cho bilft Iý do tei sao khðng nên phA ehulln và thðng ~ ÐI Än SiIa Ð6i. 84't cO ICJc nåo, tntJc gið didu tJin di dinh lJ trên, nhOng n- phin d6i Ð'An SlIa Ð6i c6 thI g(Ii thll phån dðI cho Thll Ký HOi f)ðng. 84't IcY cá nhln hote t6 eht1c nào mta1n dtJ;Jc phit bilu ~i cuOc difu tr4n së cJd;IC teo 00 hOl phát bilu. HOi Ððng Thành Ph6 së nghe và xem xét cáe Ý kilfn phån dð'i và chímg tht,Ic kháe vi! Ð4 An SlIa Mi, ehitutheo lI4t Tál Thitt GOng Ððng cùa tilu bang CalifonJia. ¡ JHEO ÐÂY, CHÛNGTOI cONG THÒNG BÁo ¡ RÂNG CO Quan sð US ehíic mOt Ct()e hQp ano ! ca'p tin tííc cho tOng dðng vào IOe 6 gilJ chilu ¡ ngày 10 thang TAm, 2004, tei Santa Ana PoIice- ¡ Commmity Room 60 Civic Center Plaza, Santa ¡ Ana, California, êil bàn bee vI! Iß\IC dfeh cùa ÐI : Án Si'ta Ð61 và cáe ånh htiJng c6liAn quan khác ¡ cùa quylft dinh thOng qua ÐI Än SlIa Mi. I Ð4 An SlIa Ð6i båo cåo cùa 00 ~ cho HOI . Ððng Thành Ph6, Kif HOI)ch TAl Thitt Cåe Khu ¡ We Oil Án Hltn Tel và cáe tàl lItu thfch h(Ip ¡ khåe dang - IW ~I Vln Phðng ThaI Ký HOi i Ððng Thành PM Santa Ana. 20 CivIc Center ¡ Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92701. GOng ! chOng c6 till tðI xem và sao cht)p cáe tài lItu ¡ này trong gið làm 'lite !Hnh ttdJng (tit 8 gið :g~tðI~ilJb=~~:ae~':: :X~ ~ Ðði, xin gol CO Qllln TAi Thilft GOng Ððng Santa Ana (Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency) ~i s6 (714) 647-5360, tit 8 gilJ sáng tði 5 gllJ ehil!u, thíl Håi tði thíI Sãu I i I L.. -- CIIr" __1311......,. --- --- -- ....-..........--..........-....-.". .'"._n..._u''''''-''''''' Patricia E. Healy . Thll Ký HOi Ððng Thành pt¡6 'I ..._--_._.__....._----..,,~- EXHIBIT 3 75D-203 SUPPLEMENT TO THE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE MERGER OF THE SANTA ANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS PREPARED FOR: THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the CITY OF SANTA ANA PREPARED BY: KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. AUGUST 2004 EXHIBIT 4 75D-204 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.. ....... ............... .... ................ ..... ..... ... ............. .......... ........ ....... ........................... 1 A. REASONS FOR THE PREPARATION OF A SUPPLEMENT TO THE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL.. ....... ..... ................................ ................... ................. ............ ........ 1 ORGANIZATION OF THE SUPPLEMENT ..................... ............................................... 2 B. VII. COMMUNITY CONSULT A TIONS...................................................................................... 3 XI. SUMMARY OF CONSULTATIONS WITH AFFECTED TAXING AGENCIES ................13 A. THE REPORT OF THE COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER AND ANALYSIS THEREOF ....13 B. SUMMARY OF CONSULTATIONS WITH AFFECTED TAXING ENTITIES............... 13 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - Revised Amendments to the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects Attachment B - City Council and Agency Resolutions Consenting to a Joint Public Hearing Attachment C - Joint Public Hearing Notice and Related Cover Letter sent to Property Owners and Occupants. Attachment D - Letter Transmitted to the State of California - Department of Housing and Community Development Attachment E - Joint Public Hearing Notice and Related Cover Letter sent to all Affected Taxing Entities Supplement to the Report to the City Council for ttlXBI:8IT 4 Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. pagei PA04080tO.SNTA:CK:lp 19090.003.007.œt26104 75D-205 INTRODUCTION A. REASONS FOR THE PREPARATION OF A SUPPLEMENT TO THE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL As required by Section 33352 of the California Community Redevelopment Law (CRL), the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana ("Agency") prepared a Report to the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("Report") for the proposed adoption of the merger amendments ("Amendments" or "Merger") to the existing Redevelopment Plans ("Redevelopment Plans" or "Plans") for the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects ("Project Areas" or "Merged Project Area"). On June 15, 2004, the Redevelopment Commission recommended the Agency adopt the Report to the City Council noting their questions and concerns. The Agency Board adopted the Report to the City Council on July 19, 2004 and authorized transmittal of the Report to the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council"), and recommends the City Council consent to a joint public hearing of the Agency and Council and set the hearing date. The City Council received the Report on July 19, 2004, and consented to set the hearing date for September 7, 2004. The City Council will consider the information within the Report as part of the adoption of the proposed Amendments. The City Council is scheduled to approve and adopt the proposed Amendments by ordinance on September 20, 2004, or at the following meeting on October 5, 2004. Since the completion and distribution of the Report to the City Council, certain actions or events occurred that supplement the information contained within the Report. At the time the Agency Board received and adopted the Report, the Community Information Meeting on the Merger with property owners, residents and business owners had not taken place yet. A summary of the Community Information Meeting is now included within this Supplement to the Report to the City Council ("Supplement"). Also, the Agency received one telephone inquiry from the Orange County Flood Control District regarding the Merger. A summary of this discussion is included in the Supplement. In addition, for information purposes, the Agency Board/City Council resolutions consenting to holding a joint public hearing are also included in this Supplement as well as the joint public hearing notice and related letters that were sent to property owners, occupants and all affected taxing entities. Furthermore, the Supplement contains the letter notifying the State of California - Department of Housing and Community Development that the Agency intends to merge the Project Areas. Supplement to the Report to the City Council for the Merger ofthe Santa Ana Redevelopment ProjectsEXBIBIT 4 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 1 PA0408010.SNTA:CKIp 19090.003.007~ 75D-206 Finally as a technical correction, subsequent to the preparation of the draft Amendments, the City Council on May 17, 2004, by Ordinance No. NS-2652, amended the six existing Redevelopment Plans to extend the time limits for plan effectiveness and receipt of tax increment by one additional year as allowed under Senate Bill 1045 (ERAF payment relief). These SB 1045 amendments are currently not described or acknowledged within the background section of the proposed Amendments. Therefore, for consistency purposes and acknowledgement of the recent SB 1045 amendments, the proposed Amendments have been revised to update the amendment number to reflect the adoption of the 58 1045 ordinance. For example, the merger amendment for Bristol Corridor previously referred to as the Fourth Amendment is now the Fifth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project. The extension of the proposed Amendments in accordance with SB 1045 is only for one year for the purpose of repaying the Agency's ERAF payment and does not significantly change the conclusions of the financial feasibility analysis contained within the Report. The revised and updated Amendments are included within this Supplement as Attachment A. B. ORGANIZATION OF THE SUPPLEMENT The part and section numbers contained in this Supplement correspond to the part and section numbers used in the Report on the proposed Amendments. The following pages contain the whole section of each section within the Report that was updated with additional information. This Supplement addresses the following section within the Report: 1. Community Consultations (Section VIII) - incorporates revisions to this section including a summary of the joint public hearing noticing and mailing, the Community Information Meeting, the Agency and City Council resolutions consenting to holding a Joint Public Hearing, and the transmittal of the letter to the Department of Housing and Community Development. 2. Summary of Consultations with Affected Taxing Agencies (Section XI) - incorporates revisions to sub-section B. (Summary of Consultations with Affected Taxing Agencies) to include any discussions with affected taxing entities and note the required transmittal of the joint public hearing notice. 3. Although not a separate section, this Supplement includes the revised Amendments as an attachment with the corrected Amendment numbering. Supplement to the Report to the City Council for the Merger ofthe Santa Ana Redevelopment ProjectsZXBIBIT 4 Keyser Marston Associates. Inc. Page 2 PA0408010.SNT A:CK:1p 19090.003.007108126104 75D-207 VII. COMMUNITY CONSULTATIONS Section 33352(i) of the CRL requires that the Agency's Report to the City Council contain the summary referred to in Section 33387. Section 33387 of the CRL refers to the consultations with the PAC, if any. There is no existing PAC for any of the existing Project Areas. On March 15,2004, the City Council by Resolution No. 2004-017, found and determined that the proposed Amendments do not include a provision to grant additional authority to acquire by eminent domain or add territory to the existing Project Areas; therefore, a Project Area Committee was not required to be formed in connection with the proposed Amendments (Appendix C of the Report). On July 19, 2004, the Agency Board by CRA Resolution No. 2004-010, and the City Council by Resolution No. 2004-055, consented to holding the Joint Public Hearing on the Merger for September 7,2004 (Attachment B of this Supplement). Per CRL Section 33349, the Agency sent a first class mailing containing the required notice of joint public hearing to the last known assessee (the "property owner") of each parcel of land and to all tenants and business owners within the Project Areas. This notice explains the purpose of the joint public hearing and contains other pertinent information such as the meeting date, time and location. The joint public hearing notice also included a Spanish and Vietnamese reference to call the Agency for interpretation. Furthermore, the notice included an invitation to attend a community information meeting to discuss the proposed Merger. A copy of the joint public hearing and community information meeting notice is included within this Supplement as Attachment C. The notice of joint public hearing was published in the Orange County Register for five (5) consecutive weeks in compliance with the CRL. The joint public hearing notice was also published twice in Spanish and Vietnamese speaking newspapers. The dates the joint public hearing notice was published consist of August 2, 9 (which as noted above included the notice of the community information meeting), 16,23 and 30,2004. Notices in the La Opinion and Nguoi Viet were published on August 3 and 3D, 2004. In addition to the transmittal of the joint public hearing notice, CRL Section 33488 requires the Agency to notify the State of California - Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) of its intention to merge the Project Areas at least 30 days prior to the adoption of the Merger. The Agency transmitted a letter to the HCD on July 30, 2004, for receipt on August 2, 2004 (see Attachment D ofthis Supplement). The adoption of the ordinances merging the Project Areas is scheduled to occur no sooner than September 20, 2004. Supplement to the Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment ProjeåsEXHIBIT 4 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 3 PA0408010.SNTA:CK:1p 19090.003.007108J26104 75D-208 I. Summary of Questions Received regarding the Notice of the Community Meeting and Joint Public Hearing and responses thereto. The following are questions received by Agency staff from callers regarding the notice of the community meeting and joint public hearing. City staff received between 60 and 80 telephone calls. The notices were mailed on or about July 30, 2004 and the questions were received up until the community meeting. held on August 10, 2004. Additional questions raised at the community meeting are discussed in the following section. Included with the list of questions is the answer to the question asked. This is a generalized summary of the questions asked and responses provided. 1. Will "problems" at my apartment complex be resolved? The Merger is a financing tool and will not result in any direct program changes or changes in Agency activities. If there are problems with health and safety issues at an apartment complex the tenants should notify the City for a code enforcement inspection. The owners of the apartment building may be eligible for low-income loans to make repairs through the Agency. 2. What's happening at Washington and 10 Streets - Plaza Broadway? One Broadway Plaza is a 37 -story building that is being privately financed and built. This is not a redevelopment project. There is no redevelopment or other City financing in this project. 3. Is there a new park being built? No new park is planned as part of the Merger action. 4. Are you removing our mobile home park (329 S. Harbor)? The Agency does not have any plans to close or relocate any mobile home parks. 5. Are any homes being tom down? The Agency only has residential eminent domain authority in the Central City Project Area. If the Agency were to acquire to demolish a house in any other Project Area, it would have to be voluntary with the consent of the owner. No homes will be tom down as a result of the Merger. Supplement to the Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects¡:XH:IBJ:T 4 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 4 PA0408010.SNTA:CK:1p 19090.003.007108J26J04 75D-209 6. Will we be paying more taxes? Redevelopment is a reallocation of tax dollars. A property owner pays the same amount of property taxes whether he/she is in a project area or not. Instead of the property taxes being distributed to the various taxing agencies the Agency retains a greater percentage of the increase in taxes from new construction, rehabilitation and property sales (assuming the property sold for a high price than the subsequent purchase price) for use in improving properties in the redevelopment project areas. 7. Will my apartment be torn down? Who will pay for my house? No apartments are being torn down as a result of the Merger. If an apartment or home was acquired by the Agency, the Agency in accordance with Redevelopment Law, would have to provide relocation benefrts assistance in locating the residents to a comparable apartment or house and paying moving expenses, regardless if the Agency acquired the property through voluntary negotiation or through eminent domain. 8. Which park is being torn down? No park is proposed to be torn down. 9. Will there be a street widening where I live? There are two street widenings underway along the Bristol Corridor and Grand Avenue from McFadden to the 1-5 Freeway. These are City projects and are not funded or constructed with redevelopment assistance. 10. Is this related to housing? A major priority of the Agency is to provide housing. The Merger will make administration of the Agency housing program easier, particularly for market rate housing by combining the tax increment and allocating the revenues where the needs and opportunities are the greatest. The Merger will not reduce or increase the Agency's affordable housing obligations. 11. What's happening on Main and McFadden? Approximately two years ago the City realigned McFadden so that it would connect directly with Main Street. There are some vacant remnant parcels that resulted from the street improvements. It is anticipated that the vacant site will be developed with between six and eight affordably restricted single-family dwellings. Supplement to the Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projed!£XHIBIT 4 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 5 PA0408010.SNT A:CK:1p 1Ø090.003.007.œJ26J04 75D-210 12. What projects are you working on? There are projects that are being undertaken within the various project areas by the private sector. The Agency's assistance in new development has primarily been in the completion of the downtown lofts. 13. Does a property owner haye obligations when he sells? The property would go through the same process in selling land in a redevelopment project area that he/she would go through in any sales transaction. 14. How does this Merger affect my property? In most cases, properties will not be affected as the Agency's assistance to private properties is typically initiated at the owner's request. However,some properties will benefit indirectly from infrastructure improvements or development of public facilities within proximity of a property. 15. Does this have anything to do with the train? The City originally began the widening of Bristol, which included the section between McFadden and Edinger. After this section was completed the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCT A) announced plans to run light rail connecting the existing train station in Santa Ana to the Orange County Airport. OCT A is continuing to implement their rail plan, which now includes an extension to the Santa Ana College. However, redevelopment, and the Merger specifically, have nothing to do with the proposed rail lines. 16. Is the Agency going to take property through eminent domain? As stated before the Agency has limited eminent domain authority. If the Agency were to acquire property through eminent domain it would have to following a separate noticing and hearing procedures. In addition, if acquisition were to be proposed the Agency would have to prepare a relocation plan for the existing owners or tenants, which includes identifying potential relocation sites and providing relocation financial assistance. 17. Will taxes be increased? Taxes are exactly the same if you are inside or outside of a Project Area. There is not an additional or special redevelopment tax. Supplement to the Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects EXHIBIT 4 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 6 PA0408010.SNTA:CK:1p 19090.003.007108l26I04 75D-211 18. Does the Merger have anything to do with the light rail? See response to No.15. 19. Wanted to know if it would impact any current projects in the area. By law the Agency must pay the debt on the funding of existing projects before it can consider allocating money from one project area to another. Therefore, no existing projects can be jeopardized or eliminated as a result of the Merger. 20. Is the Agency going to tear down any buildings? Please see response to No. 16. II. Summary of Questions and Responses received at the Community Information Meeting. The following is a generalized summary of the questions raised and the responses provided at the community information meeting held at 6:00 p.m. on August 10, 2004, regarding the proposed Merger. Notice of the meeting was available in Spanish and Vietnamese. Translation was also available at the meeting. Approximately 125 persons attended the meeting held at the Police Community Center. The community information meeting consisted of a power point presentation, including an overview of redevelopment in Santa Ana, and the purposes of the proposed Amendments, followed by a comment, question and answer session. Copies of the proposed Amendments, map of the Project Areas, and Agency newsletter were availa~le as handouts. The Existing Plans and the Report to the City Council were also made available for review. In addition to the redevelopment consultant, several staff persons were on hand to answer questions. 1. Can eminent domain or anything change from the beginning to the end of a project? Certain redevelopment plans limits can be amended if the Agency can make the necessary findings but the Agency must go through the plan amendment process before any changes could be made. Changes cannot be. made to the Plans without public notification and a hearing. 2. What is the reason for a redevelopment plan or project? California Community Redevelopment Law provides financial assistance to qualifying areas (redevelopment project areas) to improve and revitalize the areas. The Redevelopment Plan is the document that identifies the agency's authorities and responsibilities in implementing the redevelopment plan. Supplement to the Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment ProjectSEXBJ:BJ:T 4 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 7 PAO«>8010.SNT A:CK:1p 19090.003.007iD8J21W4 75D-212 3. Why have they shaded the areas (refers to the project area boundaries) when things have changed considerably? Should the shading be changed? Shouldn't areas be unshaded because of redevelopment? If revitalized, why are they still showing on the map? If I tore my building down and built a new one, would my taxes increase? The shaded areas indicate the boundaries of the Project Areas. The boundaries of the Project Areas are determined at the time of project adoption (unless otherwise amended to add or delete territory). The Project Areas have been in existence from between 15 and 30 years. It is expected that there would be considerable improvement and that properties that are no longer blighted are included in the Project Areas. Because redevelopment is financed from tax increment generated largely from new development (may also be generated from significant rehabilitations and property sales) the improved properties provide the funding to revitalize other properties. If you deleted properties as they were improved there would be no way to finance redevelopment of the balance of the project area. If a building is tore down and a new building is constructed the owner's property tax would increase. However, this is true whether the property is in a redevelopment project or not. The property is not further taxed by its inclusion in a redevelopment project. Redevelopment is a reallocation of property tax and is not a new tax or an increase in property taxes. 4. How do I get more information about redevelopment? I did not know I was in a redevelopment area. Several Agency staff people were identified at the meeting. It was suggested that persons having specific questions about their property or needing a more detailed explanation of redevelopment meet with one of the staff persons following the presentation. Agency staff and the consultant remained after the presentation and the conclusion of public comments to answer individual questions that persons did not what to raise in the group forum or for which they wanted additional information. 5. What does expiration date mean? Each redevelopment plan has a duration or expiration date. Plans adopted before January 1994 have a 40-year life (or January 1, 2009 whichever is later) with the possibility of a 10-year extension if certain findings can be made and following the plan amendment process, which includes a public hearing. Supplement to the Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects EXHIBIT 4 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 8 PA0408010.SNTA:CK:lp 19090.003.007.œ12M14 75D-213 6. What areas are determined to have the greatest need? All of the Project Areas have needs. How the Agency addresses those needs in the near term is defined in the Agency's Five-Year Implementation Plan. Also, Agency funding and projects are determined annually as part of the City's budgeting process. 7. Explain the 5-year plan. The Agency adopts an Implementation Plan every five years for the upcoming five-year period. The Implementation Plan identifies the Agency's near-term goals, objectives, projects, programs and expenditures. It is during the public review and hearing process in which the Agency's activities are identified. 8. Six areas have been defined with projects to be redeveloped, so at the public hearing would all of us be given a.list of projects? And, do we get to vote on which projects get approved? The Public Hearing is only for the Merger, or in other words the ability t~ combine tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate revenues anywhere within the Merged Project Area. The Merger does change the projects that the Agency is currently proposing to undertake. There is not a list of projects that are proposed to be undertaken other than what is identified in the Implementation Plan, which is programmatic in nature. The Agency will be conducting a community outreach effort to prioritize projects as part of the City's application for Federal grants. This process, which begins this year, will also be utilized to help define the projects and programs to be incorporated in the upcoming five-year Implementation Plan. There is not a vote on the proposed projects but the Implementation Plan will be adopted at the close of a public hearing which will be posted and noticed provided in the newspaper three weeks in advance of the hearing. 9. Can anyone project borrow from another project? Is there a cap? When projects are merged the increment is combined. The Agency does not have to pay back increment generated from one project that is spent in another. In other words, tax increment can be spent anywhere within the Merged Project Area without borrowing the money. There is not a cap on the amount of money that be utilized from one project area or allocated to another project area. However, any existing debt or obligations in anyone-project area must be met before money from that project area can be spent in another. It does not mean that all the debt must be repaid but that on-going obligations (debt payments) are made before money from a project area can be allocated to another. Supplement to the Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment ProjectSZXBIBIT 4 Keyser Marston.Associates, Inc. Page 9 PA0408010.SNT A:CK:1p 19090.003.007108126o()4 75D-214 10. When money is spent for redevelopment, is money spent in these areas or where? Money generated in a redevelopment project area must be spent in that redevelopment project area. When projects are merged any money generated within the merged project area can be spent anywhere within the merged project area. However, money from the redevelopment project areas cannot be spent outside the redevelopment project areas. The money is to be spent on revitalization of the project areas. There are some instances in which affordable housing money can be spent citywide but that is the exception. 11. When you say housing redevelopment, what does it mean? The Agency can spend money on both market rate and affordable housing. However, a specified amount must be spent on affordable housing. This restricted affordable housing fund can be used for the preservation (e.g. rent subsides to maintain affordability), rehabilitation and development of affordable housing. Any type of housing can be developed or rehabilitated including single family, apartments and condominiums. 12. Does a conditional use permit affect my building? If I put money into my building, I don't want you to come and take it away from me. There is not special or additional permitting process for properties included in the redevelopment project areas. The purpose of redevelopment is to encourage and assist owners in investing in their property. The Agency's objective is to assist in the rehabilitation and redevelopment of properties that are deteriorated, obsolete and underutilized. The Agency is not interested in purchasing rehabilitated properties because they already meet the redevelopment objectives. In the unlikely event that the Agency would acquire a rehabilitated or redevelopment property because it was a necessary and essential parcel needed for some larger redevelopment goal the Agency would have to pay fair market value. for the property as improved. Eminent domain provisions are not changed or affected by the Merger. 13. Will projects be dropped out at the end of its life? Yes. Although the Project Areas will be merged they will retain there separate duration dates. For example the oldest redevelopment project, the Central City Redevelopment Project, is set to expire on July 2,2014. After that date the Agency cannot initiate any new redevelopment efforts in that project area and has 10 years (until 2024) to collect tax increment and repay any remaining débt from that project area. After the Central City Project Area is terminated the other remaining project areas within the Merged Project Area will continue to implement until their respective termination dates. Supplement to the Report to the City Council for the Merger ofthe Santa Ana Redevelopment ProjectsEXBIBIT 4 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 10 PA0408010.SNTA:CK:1p 19090.oo3.oo7108J2&'04 75D-215 14. 'Why does the Agency have a need to merge? Is it because some project areas are over performing and others are under performing? If so, is it because blight in those over performing areas has been taken care of? Would you be pulling funds from over performing areas to give to under performing areas? Merging the project areas will make redevelopment of the projects more efficient. The Merger will allow the Agency to address blight elimination where the needs are the greatest and consider what is best for eliminating blighting and increasing the economic vitality for redevelopment citywide rather than by the individual Project Areas. Some of the Project Areas generate more tax increment than others. (South Main Street generates the greatest amount and Bristol Corridor generated the smallest amount). The Merger will allow the Agency to move money from Project Areas which have potentially more increment than required to address the remaining and share the increment with Project Areas with less tax increment and substantial remaining blighting conditions. This does not mean that the Agency will divert all of the tax increment from the higher tax increment generating areas to spend on those will the least tax increment. The Agency's objective to address all of the blighting conditions in all of the Project Areas. It is just as important to complete redevelopment in South Main, as it is Bristol Corridor. Furthermore, redevelopment law prohibits the Agency from allocating the tax increment from one project area to another until the debt obligations of the donor project is met. 15. We have owned a business for 27 years, will this help us improve our business? The Merger will not likely have any effect on your business. The Merger is simply a method for combining tax increment from all of the Project Areas to allocate where needs are the greatest. Much of the Agency's assistance is in response from developers or at the owner's request. There may be the potential for Agency assistance in expanding or improving your business such as low interest loans for façade rehabilitation or assisting in the acquisition and site preparing of adjoining property to allow your business to expand. However, these activities are typically done at the initiation of owners or developers. 16. Concerned with widening of the streets and taking of businesses. The concern of street widening was specific to Bristol Corridor, which is undergoing a street widening. The street widening project is a City project and not a redevelopment project. The distinction is that the City is funding and constructing the improvements, the project is not being funded with redevelopment dollars. Persons who were concerned with the Bristol Corridor widening were directed to speak with a public works staff person after the meeting. Supplement to the Report to the City Council for the Merger ofthe Santa Ana Redevelopment ProjectSSXHrBJ:T 4 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 11 PA0408010.SNTA:CK:1p 19090.003.007108l26I04 75D-216 17. What happens when a redevelopment project expires? Does all redevelopment have to take place in the years before it expires? When a redevelopment plan expires (reaches its duration date) projects that are underway will be completed but the Agency will not be able to initiate new projects (the possible exception would be to complete any affordable housing obligations). The Agency has 10 years following the expiration of a redevelopment plan to collect tax increment and repay previously established debt. 18. Explain Implementation Plan Every five years a redevelopment agency must adopt an Implementation Plan, which describes the agency's goals, objectives, proposed projects and programs and expenditures. Additionally, the Implementation Plan describes the relationship between the proposed projects and programs, expenditures and attaining the goals and objectives as identified in the Implementation Plan. (The Plan must also describe how the Agency intends on fulfilling its affordable housing obligations). The Implementation Plan is important because it identifies the Agency's intended near term activities in the project area(s). The Implementation Plan is adopted following a hearing by the Agency and notice of the hearing will be posted in the projects areas and published for three weeks in the newspaper (noticing ends 10 days prior to the hearing). Community meetings are underway as part of the Federal grant application process to gather input from the community on what they would like to see as priorities for Agency activities in the Project Areas. People were encouraged to meet with the staff person in charge with the community effort outreach. 19. Is the Bristol widening totally different from what we are talking about tonight? As mentioned above, the Bristol widening is a City project rather than a redevelopment project. The proposed Merger simply allows the Agency to combined revenues and allocate the revenues within the Merged Project Area as needed. The Merger does not redefine or define a set of projects to be implemented. It was suggested that persons interested in specific projects or what is going on in their redevelopment area meet with the various staff persons available after the meeting charged with managing the Project Areas. 20. Where can I find out more about eminent domain? The limitations on eminent domain authority were reviewed. Before, the Agency can pursue eminent domain owners of the property must be notified and a hearing before the City Council is held regarding the condemnation. Supplement to the Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment ProjectsEXBiBiT 4 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 12 PA0408010.SNTA:CK:1p 19090.003.007108l26I04 75D-217 XI. SUMMARY OF CONSULTATIONS WITH AFFECTED TAXING AGENCIES Pursuant to Section 33352(n) of the CRL, the Report to the City Council must include an analysis of the Fiscal Officer's Report and must include a summary of consultations of the Agency, or attempts to consult by the Agency, with each of the affected taxing agencies. If any of the affected taxing agencies have expressed written objections or concerns with the proposed Amendments as part of these consultations, the Agency shall include a response to these concerns, additional information, if any, and, at the discretion of the Agency, proposed or adopted mitigation measures. A. THE REPORT OF THE COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER AND ANALYSIS THEREOF The CRL provides that when a project area which proposes to use tax increment revenue is initially adopted or when it is being amended to add territory to the project, the county officials charged with the responsibility of allocating taxes to redevelopment agencies shall prepare and deliver a report containing information on the allocation of tax revenue in the project area (or amendment area) to taxing agencies and the redevelopment agencies. The proposed Amendments do not include adding territory to the Project Areas. Therefore, a fiscal officer's report prepared by the Orange County Auditor-Controller's Office is not required as part of the adoption process for the proposed Amendments. B. SUMMARY OF CONSULTATIONS WITH AFFECTED TAXING ENTITIES Section 33328 of the CRL requires the Agency, prior to the publication of a notice of the joint public hearing on the proposed Amendments, to consult with each affected taxing agency with respect to the Amendments' impact on the allocation of tax increment revenues. On March 2, 2004, the Community Redevelopment and Housing Commission recommended that the Agency approve the Preliminary Report and receive the proposed Amendments. Subsequently, on March 15,2004, the Agency, by Resolution No. 2004-04, accepted the draft Amendments and authorized transmittal of the draft Amendments to the Planning Commission ofthe City of Santa Ana and all affected taxing entities (see Appendix E of the Report). Also, on March 15, the Agency, by Resolution No. 2004-03 approved the Preliminary Report and authorized transmittal of the Preliminary Report to all affected taxing entities (Appendix F of the Report). Agency staff, on March 16,2004, sent the proposed Amendments and Preliminary Report and related cover letter to all affected taxing entities as part of the consultation process for the proposed Amendments (see Appendix E of the Report for a sample letter, the draft Amendments, and the mailing list). Supplement to the Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Proje~XHIBIT 4 Keyser Marston Associates. Inc. Page 13 PA0408010.SNTA:CK:1p 19090.003.007108/26/04 75D-218 The letter urged all affected taxing entities to contact the Agency regarding questions concerning the proposed Amendments. To date, the Agency has only received contact from one of the affected taxing entities regarding the proposed Amendments. The Orange County Flood Control District contacted Agency staff by telephone in July of 2004 to get background information on the proposed Amendments and confirm that the proposed Amendments did not impact the existing pass-through agreements. There were no follow-up conversations with the District's representative. Finally, in accordance with CRL Section 33349(d), on July 30,2004, the Agency sent to all of the affected taxing entities a notice of joint public hearing, which is scheduled for September 7, 2004 (Attachment E of this Supplement). Supplement to the Report to the City Council for the Merger of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Projed!£XHJ:BJ:T 4 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 14 PA0408010.SNT ACK:1p 19090.003.007 J08I26I04 75D-219 ATTACHMENT A REVISED AMENDMENTS TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS EXHIBIT 4 75D-220 EXH:IBJ:T 4 75D-221 SEVENTH Al8ENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the Central City Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 2, 1973 by Ordinance No. NS-1173. The Project Area is comprised of approximately 694 acres located in the central and northern portions of the City. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on June 2,1975 by Ordinance No. NS-1258, on December 1, 1986 by Ordinance No. NS-1877, on October 3. 1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2234, on May 6, 1996 by Ordinance No. NS-2290, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. NS-2396 and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a seventh amendment ("Seventh Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project. North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project. South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits in effect and stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part IX to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: IX. MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Seventh Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the Central City Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project. South Harbor Redevelopment Project. South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". EXHIBIT 4 PA0408008.SNACK:gbd 19090.003.002/08116104 75D-222 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 6, 1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1636. The Project Area contains approximately 536 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2234, on May 6, 1996 by Ordinance No. NS-2289, on August 2,1999 by Ordinance No. NS- 2396, and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a fifth amendment ("Fifth Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: X. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Fifth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". EXHIBIT 4 PA0408008.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002J08l16104 75D-223 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE NORTH HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the North Harbor Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 6, 1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1637. The Project Area contains approximately 428 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2234, on May 6, 1996 by Ordinance No. NS-2291, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. NS-2396, on January 20, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2641 , and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a sixth amendment ("Sixth Amendmenr) to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: X. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Sixth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the North Harbor Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". . EXHIBIT 4 PA0408008.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002/08116104 75D-224 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTH HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the South Harbor Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 6, 1982 by Ordinance No. N8-1638. The Project Area contains approximately 1,050 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on August 3, 1992 by Ordinance No. NS-2167, on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2234, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. N8-2396, on January 20,2004 by Ordinance No. N8-2641 , and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a sixth amendment ("Sixth Amendmenr) to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: X. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Sixth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the South Harbor Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". EXBJ:BIT 4 PA0408oo8.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002108/16104 75D-225 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTH MAIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the South Main Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 6, 1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1639. The Project Area contains approximately 1,500 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2234, on July 17, 1995 by Ordinance No. NS-2256, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. NS-2396, on January 20, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2641, and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a sixth amendment ("Sixth Amendmenf) to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: X. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Sixth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the South Main Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". EXBJ:BIT 4 PA0408008.SNACK:gbd 19090.003.002/08116104 75D-226 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on December 4, 1989 by Ordinance No. NS-2039. The Project Area contains approximately 781 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been previously amended on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2231 and Ordinance No. NS-2234, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. NS-2396, and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a fifth amendment ("Fifth Amendmenr) to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and the South Main Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include anew Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: X. (§ 1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Fifth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and the South Main Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". EXHIBIT 4 PA0408008.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002/08116104 75D-227 ATTACHMENT B CITY COUNCIL AND AGENCY RESOLUTIONS CONSENTING TO A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING EXHIBIT 4 75D-228 EXHIBIT 4 75D-229 8 8 8 6I25104LES RESOLUTION NO. 2004-055 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA RECEIVING THE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PREPARED FOR THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR. SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND CONSENTING TO HOLDING A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WITH THE SANTA ANA COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is a community redevelopment agency organized and existing under the California Community Redevelopment Law. Health and Safety Code Section 33000, at. seq., ("CRLft) and has been authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency - pursuant to action of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council"). B. On July 2, 1973, by Ordinance No. 1173, the City Council approved and adopted a redevelopment pran for the Central. City Redevelopment Project ("Central City Projecf'). C. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1636, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project ("Inter-City Project"). D. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1637, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the North Harbor Redevelopment Project ("North Harbor Project"). E. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1638, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the South Harbor Redevelopment Project ("South Harbor Project"). F. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1639, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the South Main Redevelopment Project ("'South Main Project"). G. On December 4, 1989, by Ordinance No. NS-2039, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Bristol Corridor Project"). EXHIBIT 4 Resolution No. 2004-055 Page 1 of4 7.au.3Q H. The "Existing Plans" consist of the Redevelopment Plans, as amended, prepared for the Central City Project, Inter-City Project, North Harbor Project, South Harbor Project, South Main Project, and the Bristol Corridor Project and the territory included within the Existing Plans is referred to as the 8Project Areas.. I. The Agency is vested with the responsibility to carry out the Existing Plans. J. The Agency desires to amend each of the Existing Plans (8Amendments") to merge the Project Areas in order to combine the tax increment revenues from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the entire merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through economic vitalitY and increase and improve housing opportunities. K. The Agency has submitted the proposed Amendments to the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana for its report and recommendations, and the Planning Commission on June 14, 2004, reviewed the proposed Amendments and determined the proposed Amendments are consistent with the City's General Plan and recommended approval of the proposed Amendments. L The Agency has caused to be prepared a Report to the City Council on the proposed Amendments pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33352. M. Pursuant to the provisions of the CRL Sections 33452, 33454, 33457.1, 33458 and 33486 there is a need for a joint public hearing of the City Council and the Agency in order to receive testimony from any and all interested persons, including property owners, business owners, tenants, community organizations, and any other interested groups and/or citizens, with respect to the proposed Amendments and related items. N. The Agency has prepared the required Notice of Joint Public Hearing and related attachments for transmittal. pursuant to CRL Sections 33452 and 33486. Section 2. The City Council hereby receives the Agency's Report to the City Council prepared pursuant to CRL Section 33352 and the proposed Amendments prepared for the Existing Plans. Section 3. The City Council approves the convening of a joint public hearing with the Agency on September 7, 2004, at 6 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible, in the City of Santa Ana City Council Chambers, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92702, for the purpose of receiving testimony and considering the proposed Amendments and other related matters. Section 4. The City Council hereby approves the Notice of Joint Public Hearing and related attachments substantially in the form attached to this resolution. EXHIBIT 4 Resolution No. 2004-055 Page 2 of4 75D-231 8 . 8 Section 5. Agency staff is hereby directed to work with the City Clerk and Agency advisors in the mailing of a copy of the aforesaid notice and related materials, pursuant to Sections 33486 and 33452 of the CRL, to the last known assessee of each parcel of land within the Existing Project Areas as shown on the last equalized assessment rolls of Orange County and the State of California. The notice shall be sent to all property and business owners, tenants and residents within the Existing Project Areas, and to all affected taxing entities, which receive a portion of the ad valorem taxes levied on properties within the Existing Project Areas. Section 6. Agency staff is hereby directed to work with the City Clerk and Agency advisors in the publishing of the aforesaid notice, including a map and a reference to the availability of the legal description for the Existing Project Areas (as recorded with the Orange County Recorder and available with the City Clerk), prior to the date of the joint public hearing in a newspaper of general circulation for period not less than once a week for four (4) consecutive weeks. The notice shall be published in the Orange County Register on August 2.9, 16,23 and 30, 2004, to satisfy this requirement. ADOPTED this 19th day of Julv, 2004. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney BY:~~ ¿.~ isa E. Storck Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers: Alvarez. Bist. ChristY. Franklin. Garcia. Pulido. Solorio (7) NOES: Councilmembers: None (0) None (0) ABSENT: Còuncilmembers: ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None (0) EXBJ:BIT 4 Resolution No. 2004-055 Page 3 of 4 7-5Q.2.3 2 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2004-055 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Jufv 19.2004. Date: 7 -~ 7- t!J Y ,... , Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2004-055 Page 4 of4 EXHIBIT 4 75D-233 8 . 8 RESOLUTION NO. CRA 2004-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE SANTA ANA COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND CONSENTING TO HOLDING A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WITH THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency (-Agency") is a community redevelopment agency organized and existing under the Callfomla Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000. st. seq., (.CRL II) and has been authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana (-CIty Councilll). B. On July 2, 1973, by Ordinance No. 1173, the City Council approved and adopted a redevelopment plan for the Central City Redevelopment Project (MCentral City Project"). C. On July 6. 1982. by Ordinance No. NS-1636, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project (lIfnter-City ProJectll). D. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. N8-1637. the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the North Harbor Redevelopment Project (IINorth Harbor Projecr). E. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. N8-1638, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the South Harbor Redevelopment Project (""South Harbor Projecf'). F. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1639, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the South Main Redevelopment Project (.South Main Projectll). G. On December 4, 1989, by Ordinance No. NS-2039, the City Council adopted a redevelopment pJan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project (-Bristol Corridor Projecr). EXHIBIT 4 Resolution No. CRA 2004-10 Page 1 of 4 H. The -Existing Plans" consist of the Redevelopment Plans, as amended, prepared for the Central City Project, Inter-City Project, North Harbor Project, South Harbor Project, South Main Project, and the Bristol Corridor Project and the territory included within the Existing Plans is referred to as the -Project Areas". I. The Agency is vested with the responsibility to carry out the Existing Plans. J. The Agency desires to amend each of the existing Plans (-Amendments") to merge the Project Areas In order to combine the tax Increment revenues from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the entire merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through economic vitality and increase and improve housing opportunities. K. The Agency has submitted the proposed Amendments to the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana for its report and recommendations, and the Planning Commission on June 14,2004, reviewed the proposed Amendments and determined the proposed Amendments are consistent with the City's General Plan and recommended approval of the proposed Amendments. L. The Agency has caused to be prepared a Report to the City Council on the proposed Amendments pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33352. M. The Report to the City Council has been submitted to the members of the Governing Board of the Agency. N. Pursuant to the provisions of the CRL Sections 33452, 33454, 33457.1, 33458 and 33486 there is a need for a joint public hearing of the City Council and the Agency in order to receive testimony from any and all interested persons, including property owners, business owners, tenants, community organizations, and any other interested groups and/or citizens, with respect to the proposed Amendments and related items. ' , ; o. The Agency has prepared the required Notice of Joint Public Hearing and related attachments for transmittal pursuant to CRl Sections 33452 and 33486. Section 2. The Agency approves and adopts the Report to the City Council prepared for the proposed Amendments. Section 3. The Agency approves the convening of a joint public hearing with the City Council on September 7; 2004, at 6 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible, In the City of Santa Ana City Council Chambers, 20 CIvic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92702, for the purpose of receiving testimony and considering the proposed Amendments and other related matters. Section 4. The Agency hereby approves the Notice of Joint Public Hearing and related attachments substantially in the fonn attached to this resolution. EXHIBIT 4 ResolutIon No. CRA 2004-10 Page 2 of4 75~5 ":) :J "J . . 8 Section 5. Agency staff is hereby directed to work with the City Clerk and Agency advisors in the mailing of a copy of the aforesaid notice and related materials attached herewith, pursuant to Sections 33452 and 33486 of the CRL. to the last known assessee of each parcel of land within the Existing Project Area! as shown on the last equalized assessment rolls of Orange County and the State of Califomia. The notice shall be sentto all property and business owners, tenants and residents within the Existing Project Areas, and to aU affected taxing entities, which receive a portion of the ad valorem taxes levied on properties within the Existing Project Areas. Section 6. Agency staff is hereby directed to work with the City Clerk and Agency advisors in the publishing of the aforesaid notice, including a map and a reference to the availability of the legal description for the E.xisting Project Areas (as recorded with the Orange County Recorder), prior to the date of the joint public hearing in a" newspaper of general circulation for period not less than o"ce a wee~ for four (4) consecutive weeks. The notice shall be published in the Orange County Register on August 2, 9, 16,23 and 30, 2004, to satisfy this requirement. ADOPTED this 19" day of ~, 2004. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, Agency Counsel By:~.. L ~ [ E. Storck Assistant Counsel AYES: Boardmembers: Alvarez Bist. ChristY. Franklin. Garcia. Pulido. .§Q.Iorlo m NOES: ABSTAIN: Boardmembers: None (0) Boardmembers: None (0) NOT PRESENT: Boardmembers: None (0) EXHIBIT 4 Resofution No. CRA2004-10 Page3of4 Ji.9-H6 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Recording Secretary for the Community Redevelopment Agency, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. ~to be the original resolution adopted by the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Anaon~. Date: ReeoIutIon No. CRA 2004-10 Page4of4 EXHIBIT 4 756=257 " 0 ) "--' .) ATTACHMENT C JOINT PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE AND RELATED COVER LETTER SENT TO PROPERTY OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS EXHIBIT 4 75D-238 EXHIBIT 4 75D-239 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Brett E. Franklin COUNCILMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bist Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PlAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ^ TTORNEY . Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCil Patricia E. Healy VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL July 29,2004 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING. PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOU~ MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Dear Property OWner, Resident or Business: A joint public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") and the Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency e Agency") on September 7, 2004, at 6 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the. matter may be heard, in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, for the purpose of considering the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendments ("Amendments") to merge the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Staüon, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects ("Project Areas"). Enclosed with this letter are the official notice of the joint public hearing and a map showing the boundaries of the Project Areas. The Agency's records indicate that the property, which you own, reside in, or conduct a business in, may bè located within the boundaries of the Project Areas as shown on the attached map. If you own, reside in, or conduct a business within the boundaries of the Project Areas, the California Community Redevelopment Law requires that we mail the enclosed notice to you in order to inform you of the joint public hearing. The purpose of the proposed Amendments is to merge the Project Areas to combine tax increment revenues for more effective administration of the Agency's redevelopment program and to contribute to revitalization of the Project Areas through increased economic vitality of such areas and through increased and improved housing opportunities in or near such areas. In order to address any questions or concerns before the joint public hearing on September 7,2004, the Agency will hold a community information meeting on August 10, 2004, at 6 p.m., in the Police Community Room, 60 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, to discuss the proposed Amendments. EXH:IBJ:T 4 75D-240 cs. ),. Notice of Joint Public Hearing Proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendments to Merge July 29, 2004 Page 2 Copies of the proposed Amendments to the existing Redevelopment Plans and other relevant documents are available for public inspection and copying during regular office hours (8 a.m. - 5 p.m., Monday through Friday) at the office of the Clerk of the Council of the City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92701. If you \VOU1d like additional information regarcling the proposed Amendments, please call the Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency at [114) 647-5360 between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Your attendance at both the community information meeting on August 10, 2004, and the joint public hearing on September 7, 2004, is welcomed. Sincerely, A A COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (£cfJiU atricia C. Whitaker Executive Director Attachments: Notice of Joint Public Hearing Project Areas Map This letter and attached notice are available in alternative languages (,Jpon request. For interpretation of this letter and the attached notice, please call (714) 647-5360. Esta carta y notificaci6n adjunta estån a su disposición en diferentes idiomas a petición. Para interpretación de esta carta y notificaci6n adjunta, per favor lIame al (714) 647-5360. Lá thll này và tò thông cáo dFnh kèm dã ðù~c dich ra các ngôn ngO khác và sé c6 . cho quý vi néu muón. Ðê hiêu rõ hdn vê lá thll này và tò thông cáo dFnh kèm, xin gQi só (714) 647-5360. EXBIBJ:T 4 75D-241 NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTERooCrrv COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Santa Ana, California ("City Council") and the Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") will hold a joint public hearing on September 7, 2004, at the hour of 6 p. m. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) for the purpose of considering the approval and adoption of the proposed Redevelopment Plan. Amendments ("Amendments") to merge the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects ("Existing Project Areas"). The boundaries of the Existing Project Areas are as illustrated on the map accompanying this notice. Copies of the legal descriptions of the boundaries of the Existing Project Areas are available and may be reviewed at the Office of the Clerk of the Council of the City of Santa Ana. The purpose of the proposed Amendments is to merge the Existing Project Areas by combining tax increment revenues from the Existing Project Areas and allocate the revenues throughout the entire Merged Project Area. The Amendments will not enlarge the Project Areas, nor will the Amendments affect any of the properties in the proposed Merged Project Area differently than if the Project Areas remained separate. The main purpose of the proposed Merger of the Project Areas would be for efficiency of administration and financing resulting in substantial benefit to the public because the Merger will facilitate the continued revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality of such Project Areas and through increased and improved housing opportunities in or near such areas. The proposed Amendments will not extend any of the time or financial limits of the existing Redevelopment Plans or add territory to the Existing Project Areas. The purpose of the Joint Public Hearing. is to consider: 1. The proposed Amendments to the existing Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects as submitted by the Agency; 2. The Agency's Report to the City Council on the proposed Amendments, including the report and recommendations of the City's Planning Commission, the neighborhood impact report, and a summary of consultations with property owners, residents, business owners and affected taxing entities on the proposed Amendments; and 3. EXHIBIT 4 All evidence and testimony for and against the adoption of the proposed Amendments. 75D-242 At the above stated day, hour and place any and all persons having any objections to the proposed Amendments may appear before the Agency and the City Council and show cause why the proposed Amendments should not be approved and adopted. At any time not later than the hour aforesaid set for hearing, any person objecting to the proposed Amendments may file in writing with the Clerk of the Council a statement of his or her objections. Any person or organization desiring to be heard at the hearing will be afforded an opportunity to be heard. The City Council shall hear and consider objections to and other testimony about the proposed Amendments pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law. NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that the Agency will hold a community information meeting on August 10, 2004, at 6 p.m., in the Santa Ana Police Community Room, located at 60 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, to discuss the purpose of the proposed Amendments and other related effects of the adoption of the proposed Amendments. The proposed Amendments, the Agency's Report to the City Council, the existing Redevelopment Plan for the Existing Project Areas and other pertinent documents are on file and available for public inspection and copying during regular office hours (8 a.m. - 5 p.m. Monday through Friday) at the Office of the Clerk of the CouncU of the City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92701. If you would like additional information regarding the proposed Amendments, please call the Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency at (714) 647-5360 between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Patricia E. Healy Clerk of the Council Publish: Orange County Register. Publication Dates: August 2, 2004 August9,2004 August 16,2004 August23,2004 August 30, 2004 This material is available in alternative formatsllanguages upon request. To order information in an alternative form~t, or to arrange for a sign language or oral interpreter for the meeting, please call the Community Redevelopment Agency at least five wol1dng days prior to the meeting at (714) 647-5360. Este material estå disponible en formatosndiomas alternativas a petici6n. Para pedir la información en un formato alternativo, or para recibir traduccl6n en lenguaje de seftas 0 intérprete oral para la junta, por favor lIame a la Agencia del Desarrollo Comunitario por 10 menos, cinco dias antes de la junta al (714) 647-5360. EXHIBIT 4 Thông cáo này dã dllqc dich ra các ngðn ngU khác và sé có cho quý vi néu mu6n. Ðê có nhUng tin tac này bàng ngôn ngU khác, hay s&p xép di có thông dlch viên cho ngôn ngU cùa quý vi hay ngôn ngU cll chI cho bu6i hQp này, xin gQI cho vin phòng Community Redevelopment Agency ft nhat nim ngày làm vl~c trllðc ngày hQp t'li s6 (714) 647-5360. 2 75D-243 ~ . Redeveloprœnt Prqject Areas 1:::::::::1 CENTRAl CITY ~ NæTH HARBæ ~ INTERCITY .. SOUTH MAIN .. SŒJTH HARBæ .. BRISTQ EXHIBIT 4 75D-244 EXHIBIT 4 75D-245 ATTACHMENT D LETTER TRANSMITTED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EXHIBJ:T 4 75D-246 EXHJ:BJ:T 4 75D-247 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM . Brett E. Franklin COUNCllMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bist Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio 1m ~~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PlAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy July 29, 2004 CERTlFŒD MUL Matthew O. Franklin, Director Department of Housing and Community Development State of California 1800 3rd Street, Suite 450 Sacramento, CA 95814 SUBJECT: Amendments to the Redevelopment Plans Merging the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects Dear Mr. Franklin: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merger" or "Amendments") of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, . and Bristol Conidor Redevelopment Projects (together, "Project Areas," Merged Project Area," or Projects''). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the -- financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger wilJ allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that wilJ best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Section 33488 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, the Department of Housing and Community Development - State of California is hereby notified that it is the Agency's intention to merge the Project Areas. The adoption of the ordinances merging the Project Areas is scheduled to occur no sooner than September 7, 2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposéd Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 647-5360. EXHIBIT 4 75D-248 Ci * EXHIBIT 4 75D-249 ATTACHMENT E JOINT PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE AND RELATED COVER LETTER SENT TO ALL AFFECTED TAXING ENTITIES BXHIBJ:T 4 75D-250 EXHIBJ:T 4 75D-251 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Breu E. Franklin CaJNCILMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bist Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~. CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PlAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29. 2004 Chandu arahmbhatt Vice Chancellor Coast Community College District 1370 Adams Avenue Costa Mesa CA 92626 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Dear Mr. Brahmbhatt: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merge"" or "Amendments") of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City. Inter- City Commuter Station. North Harbor, South Harbor. South Main. and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment -- Projects (together. "Project Areas." "Merged Project Area." or "Projects"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best faCIlitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community. Redevelopment law. attåched is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments. which is scheduled for September 7. 2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments. please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 647-5360. Sincerely. T ANA COMMUNITY REDEvELOPMENT AGENCY e.~ ia C. Whitaker Executive Director EXHIBIT 4 Attachment 75D-252 C~ )9fo EXHIBIT 4 75D-253 ---~._~----,.__._- - - ------_.~~-----~-~ NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ON THE , PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDO~' REDEVELOPMENT ÞROJECTS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Santa Ana, California ('"City Council") and. the Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency r Agency") will hold a joint public hearing on September 7, 2004, at the hour of 6 'p. m. o~ as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard,' in the City Council Chambers,' 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) for the purpose of considering the, approval and adoption of the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendments ("Amendments;,) to merge the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects ("Existing Project Areas"). The boundaries of the Existing Project Areas are as illustrated on the map accompanying this notice. Copies of the legal descriptions of the boundaries of the Existing Project Areas are available and may be reviewed at the Office of the Clerk of the Council of the City of Santa Ana. The purpose of the proposed Amendments is to merge the Existing Project Areas by combining tax increment revenues from the Existing Project Areas and all~te the revenues throughout the entire Merged Project Area. The Amendments will not enlarge the' Project Areas, nor will the Amendments affect any of the properties in the proposed Merged Project . Area differently than if the Project Areas remained separate. The main purpose of the proposed' Merger of the Project Areas would be for efficiency of administration and financing resulting in substantial benefit to the public because the Merger will facilitate the continued revitalizatiån of blighted areas through increased economic vitality of such Project Areas and through increased and improved housing opportunities in or near such areas. The proposed Amendments will not extend any of the. time or financial limits of the existing Redevelopment Plans or àdd tenitory to ~e Existing. Project Areas. The purpose of the Joint Public Hearing is to consider. 1. The proposed Amendments,to the existing Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects as submitted by the Agency; 2. The Agency's Report to the City Council on the proposed Amendments, including the report and recommendations of the, City's Planning Commission, the neighbòrhood impact report, and a summary of consultations with property owners, residents, business owners and affected taxing entities on the proposed Amendments; and EXHIBIT 4 75D-254 3. All evidence and testimony for and against the adoption of the proposed Amendments. At the above stated day, hour and place any and all persons having any objections to the proposed Amendments may appear before the Agency and the City Council and. show cause why the proposed Amendments should not be approved and adopted. At any time not later than the hour aforesaid set for hearing, any person objecting to the proposed Amen~ments may file in writing with the Clerk of the Council a statement of his or her objections. Any person or organization desiring to be heard at the hearing will be afforded an opportunity to be heard. The City Council shall hear and consider objections to and. other testimony about the propósed Amendments pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law. NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that the Agency will hold a community infoni1ðtion meeting on August 10, 2004, at 6 p.m., in the Santa Ana Police Community Room, located at 60 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, to discuss the purpose of the proposed Amendments and other related effects of the adoption of the proposed Amendments. The proposed Amendments, the Agency's Report to the City COuncil, the existing Redevelopment Plan for the Existing Project Areas and other pertinent documents are on file and available for public inspection and copying during regular officé hours (8 a.m. - 5 p.m. Monday through Friday) at the Office of the Clerk of the Council of the City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92701. If you would fake additional information r~arding the proposed Amendments, please call the Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency at (714) 647-5360 between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Þatrida E. Healy Clerk of the Coundl Publish: Orange County Register Publication Dates:. August 2, 2004 August 9, 2004 August 16t 2004 August 23. 2004 August 30. 2004 This material. Is available In alternative fonnats!languages upon request. To order information in an alternative format, or to arrange for a sign language or oral interpreter for the meeting, please call the Community Redevelopment Agency at least five working days prior to the meeting at (714) 647-5360. EXHIBIT 4 75D-255 .. MAlAlÞMIE. . ,.: ! ~ 0 '" ~ Z ~ ~edeveloprœ:nt .Prqject Areas I ~ ~ I CENTRAl CtTY .~ NCRTH HARBCR ~ INTERCITY SOOTH MAIN .. SOOTH HARBCR .. BRISTŒ. EXHIBIT 4 75D-256 EXHIBIT 4 75D-257 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Brett E. Franklin COUNCllMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Usa B ist Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia 'ose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PlAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CAliFORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCil Patricia E. Healy VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL July 29,2004 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Dear Property Owner, Resident or Business: A joint public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") and the Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") on September 7,2004, at 6 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, for the purpose of considering the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendments ("Amendments") to merge the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects ("Project Areas"). Enclosed with this letter are the official notice of the joint public hearing and ~ map showing the boundaries of the Project Areas. The Agency's records indicate that the property, which you own, reside in, or conduct a business in, may bè located within the boundaries of the Project Areas as shown on the attached map. If you own, reside in, or conduct a business within the boundaries of the Project Areas, the California Community Redevelopment Law requires that we mail the enclosed notice to you in order to inform you of the joint public hearing. The purpose of the proposed Amendments is to merge the Project Areas to combine tax increment revenues for more effective administration of the Agency's redevelopment program and to contribute to revitalization of the Project Areas through increased economic vitality of such areas and through increased and improved housing opportunities in or near such areas. In order to address any questions or concerns before the joint public hearing on September 7, 2004, the Agency will hold a community information meeting on August 10, 2004, at 6 p.m., in the Police Community Room, 60 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, to discuss the proposed Amendments. EXHIBIT 5 75D-258 C~ J% Notice of Joint Public Hearing Proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendments to Merge July 29,2004 Page 2 Copies of the proposed Amendments to the existing Redevelopment Plans and other relevant documents are available for public inspection and copying during regular office hours (8 a.m. - 5 p.m., Monday through Friday) at the office of the Clerk of the Council of the City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92701. If you would like additional information regarding the proposed Amendments, please call the Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency at (714) 647-5360 between the hours of 8 a.m.. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Your attendance at both the community information meeting on August 10, 2004, and the joint public hearing on September 7, 2004, is welcomed. Sincerely, SA A A COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (¿CUilt atricia C. Whitaker Executive Director Attachments: Notice of Joint Public Hearing Project Areas Map This letter and attached notice are available in alternative languages upon request. For interpretation of this letter and the attached notice, please call (714)647-5360. Esta carta y notificación adjunta están a su disposición en diferentes idiomas a petición. Para interpretación de esta carta y notificación adjunta, por favor lIame al (714) 647-5360. Lá thù này và tò thông cáo dfnh kèm dã dùcjc dich ra các ngôn ngO khác và së c6 . cho quý vi néu muón. Ðã hiãu rõ hdn vé lá thù này và tò thông cáo dính kèm, xin gQi só (714) 647-5360. EXHIBIT 5 75D-259 -~ NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Santa Ana, California ("City Council") and the Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") will hold a joint public hearing on September 7, 2004, at the hour of 6 p. m. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000et seq.) for the purpose of considering the approval and adoption of the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendments ("Amendments") to merge the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects ("Existing Project Areas"). The boundaries of the Existing Project Areas are as illustrated on the map accompanying this notice. Copies of the legal descriptions of the boundaries of the Existing Project Areas are available and may be reviewed at the Office of the Clerk of the Council of the City of Santa Ana. The purpose of the proposed Amendments is to merge the Existing Project Areas by combining tax increment revenues from the Existing Project Areas and allocate the revenues throughout the entire Merged Project Area. The Amendments will not enlarge the Project Areas, nor will the Amendments affect any of the properties in the proposed Merged Project Area differently than if the Project Areas remained separate. The main purpose of the proposed Merger of the Project Areas would be for efficiency of administration and financing resulting in substantial benefit to the public because the Merger will facilitate the continued revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality of such Project Areas and through increased and improved housing opportunities in or near such areas. The proposed Amendments will not extend any of the time or financial limits of the existing Redevelopment Plàns or add territory to the Existing Project Areas. The purpose of the Joint Public Hearing is to consider: 1. The proposed Amendments to the existing Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, tnter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects as submitted by the Agency; --.... 2. The Agency's Report to the City Council on the proposed Amendments, including the report and recommendations of the City's Planning Commission, the neighborhood. impact report, and a summary of consultations with property owners, residents, business owners and affected taxing entities on the proposed Amendments; and 3. All evidence and testimony for and against the adoption of the proposed Amendments. EXBJ:BIT 5 75D-260 At the above stated day, hour and place any and all persons having any objections to the proposed Amendments may appear before the Agency and the City Council and show cause why the proposed Amendments should not be approved and adopted. At any time not later than the hour aforesaid set for hearing, any person objecting to the proposed Amendments may file in writing with the Clerk of the Council a statement of his or her objections. Any person or organization desiring to be heard at the hearing will be afforded an opportunity to be heard. The City Council shall hear and consider objections to and other testimony about the proposed Amendments pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law. NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that the Agency will hold a community information meeting on August 10, 2004, at 6 p.m., in the Santa Ana Police Community Room, located at 60 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, to discuss the purpose of the proposed Amendments and other related effects of the adoption of the proposed Amendments. The proposed Amendments, the Agency's Report to the City Council, the existing Redevelopment Plan for the Existing Project Areas and other pertinent documents are on file and available for public inspection and copying during regular office hours (8 a.m. - 5 p.m. Monday through Friday) at the Office of the Clerk of the Council of the City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92701. If you would like additional information regarding the proposed Amendments, please call the Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency at (714) 647-5360 between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Patricia E. Healy Clerk of the Council Publish: Orange County Register Publication Dates: August 2, 2004 August9,2004 August 16, 2004 August 23, 2004 August 30, 2004 This material is available in alternative formats/languages upon request. To order information in an alternative format, or to arrange for a sign language or oral interpreter for the meeting, please can the Community Redevelopment Agency at least five working days prior to the meeting at (714) 647-5360. Este material está disponible en formatos/idiomas alternativas a petición. Para pedir la información en un formato aitemativo, or para recibir traducción en lenguaje de señas 0 intérprete oral para la junta, por favor lIame a la Agencia del Desarrollo Comunitario por 10 menos, cinco dias antes de la junta al (714) 647-5360. Thõng cáo này dã dll~c dich ra các ngôn ngil khác và së có cho quý vi néu muón. Ðé có nhung tin tûc này bång ngõn ngil khác, hay s'p xép dé có thông dich viên cho ngõn ngil cùa quý vi hay ngôn ngil câ chI cho bu6i hQp này, xin gQI cho vãn phòng Community Redevelopment Agency ít nhat nãm ngày làm vifc trllðc ngày hQp t~i só EXHIBIT 5 (714)647-5360. 75D~61 I FAlRHAVEN AVE- SANTA CLARA AVE. :=. ¡--- ! I HAZARD AVE. I ¡ ~I ~I QD g PJ w ~ z SUNflOWER AVE. 1- " EXHIBIT 5 Redevelopment Project Areas - CENTRAL CITY - NORTH HARBOR - INTERCITY - SOUTH MAIN - SOUTH HARBOR - BRISTOL MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MA YOR PRO TEM Brett E. Franklin COUNClLMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bist Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PlAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY A TTÕRNEY Joseph W. Fletcher ClERK Of THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29, 2004 Chandu Brahmbhatt Vice Chancellor Coast Community College District 1370 Adams Avenue Costa Mesa CA 92626 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENTPROUECTS Dear Mr. Brahmbhatt: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency (" Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merger" or IIAmendments") of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor. South Harbor, South Main. and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment._- Projects (together. "Project Areas," "Merged Project Area; or "Projects"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the finan€ial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate. the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, attached is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments, which is scheduled fòr September 7. 2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (J14) 64 7 -5360. Sincerely, T ANA COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY e.~ cia C. Whitaker Executive Director EXHIBIT 6 Attachment 75D-263 ß. )'Ho .,," ", " U.S. Postal Service,,- CERTIFIED MAIL.., RECEIPT (Domestíc Mail Only: No Insurapce Covwage Provided) .:r M IT' U1 to M t:I ru OFFICIA .'° ~,3ð ,75' Po8I8ge , ru CerIIIIed Fee t:I t:I ReIum A8!:fept Fee t:I (ÈII(1of8e,,1II1I FtequRd) t:I ReøIrIcted DeþeIy Fee M (Endorsement ReqU&ed) t:I M ToIaI Postage a Fees $ . iPS ~ Chandu Brahmbhatt, Vice Chancellor ~ 58 Coast Community College District OtP 1370 Adams Avenue ëiÿ, Costa Mesa CA 92626 PS Form :)i300. ,JlJfle 2C02 S::e R¡:'1J,::>"~e ;or ir,,;t¡UC1¡ons + . Complete items 1,2, and 3. Also complete. item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. . Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. . Attach this card to the back of the mail piece, or on the front If space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Chandu Brahmbhatt Vice Chancellor Coast Community College District 1370 Adams Avenue Costa Mesa CA 92626 2. Article Number (Copy from service label) I f, '~ f f OAQent D Addressee Dyes DNo 3. ServIce Ty (0 :; "Certified it 9, - .,,' / ait - 0 Regi~ered' " íii ReceIpt for Merchwtdise - D Insured Màil 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) DYes ", 7DD3 1010 0002 2018 5914 I 102595-00-M"0952 PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt EXBXBXT6 75D-264 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Brett E. Franklin CQlNClLMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bist Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia 'ose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher ClERK OF THE CŒJNClL Patricia E. Healy VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29, 2004 Steve Danley clo PFRD Financial Operations Orange County Flood Control District POBox 4048 Santa Ana CÀ 92702 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY,INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Dear Mr. Danley: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merger" or "Amendments'") of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment-~ Projects (together, "Project Areas," "Merged Project Area," or "Projects"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that wiD best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, attached is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments, which is scheduled for September 7,2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 647-5360. Sincerely, ( sA". T "'COMM~NrïfDeELOPMENTAGENCY ~t-\V~ Patricia C. Whitaker EXHIBIT 6 Executive Director Attachment 75D-265 C~ )'H> ~., ._" "...;" 3. Service Type 0" -"~ . . . ]I. Certified Mail ~~ ~ 0 Registered ~Retùii'rReééipt for ~ 0 Insured Mail D C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0- IT1 I:Q U"J I:Q M c::J ru PosI8ge $ ru CertifIed Fee c::J c::J . Return ~Fee c::J (EndonIemenI Rec¡uinId) c::J RestrIcted DelIvery Fee H (El1dorsement ReqUIred) c::J M Total Postage & Fees $ .h5 m-J5 IT1 -- . . c::J Steve Danley, c/o PFRD Financial Ops ~ §i Orange County Flood Control District ,xl POBox 4048 ëi) Santa Ana CA 92702 ------- --- PS Form 3800, June 2002 See '~l:...ei-s..: f:Jr :"sP\~ctions : . Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete ~ item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ~ . Print y~ name' and address on the reverse . so that we can return the card to you. : . Attach this card to the back of the mailplece, : or on the front if space permits. i 1. Article AddresSed to: Steve Danley c/o PFRD Financial Operations Orange County Flood Control District POBox 4048 Santa Ana CA 92702 . "\ 1:. B. Date of DelIvery { {' ,. ~. .. " -., - . PS Form 38ft, july1999 Domestic Return Receipt 7003 1010 0002 2018 5839 Dyes . 2. Article Number (Copy from service label) EXHIBIT 6 75D-266 102595-00-M-0952 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Bren E. Franklin COUNCllMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bist Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA CITY MANAGER David N: Ream CITY ATTORNEY Jo~ph W. Fletcher ClERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29, 2004 Steve Danley clo PFRD Financial Operations Orange County Harbor District POBox 4048 Santa Ana CA 92702 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Dear Mr. Danley: . The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merger" or "Amendments") of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and BristoJ Corridor Redevelopment .~ Projects (together, "Project Areas," "Merged Project Area," or "Projects"). The proposed Merger does not . change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, attached is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments, which is scheduled for September 7, 2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 647-5360. Sincerely, EVELOPMENTAGENCY EXHIBIT 6 Attachment 75D-267 o. ),.. ". ru c C ReI&m A4!!:IePt Fee C (Endorsement RecjuIred) ~~~ ~ Total Postage & Fees $ 4. fo5 ~ Be Steve Danley, c/o PFRD Financial Ops ~ 1JIi Orange County Harbor District 01' POBox 4048 ëi Santa Ana CA 92702 .JI :r Ie[) U') Ie[) M C ru Postage $ CertIfied Fee (Y)..- ;l5 ...-....----- ..------ PS F()r¡n 3500 -.J~:"C 2002 s,:;c GC'.\::-'~.i' iC: !:¡~)tr-,;ctlons .. Complete Items 1. 2. and 3. Also complete Item 4 If RestrIcted DelIvery Is desired. . Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can retum the card..to you. . Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: .c. '... Steve Danley c/o PFRD Financial Operations Orange County Harbor District POBox 4048 Santa Ana CA 92702 2. Article Number (Copy from service label) c.Signature X 3.. ServIce Type _,__.~r" Jt.CertifIed Mail [) Express Mal r [) ~istered )!t Return ReceIpt for Merohandise [) Insured Mail [) C.O.D. 4. Restricted DelIvery? (Extra Fee) [) Yes 7003 1010 0002 201ð 5ð4b 102595-0CH1-0952 PS Fonn 3811, July 1999 EXHXBJ:T 6 Domestic Return ReceIpt 75D-268 MA YOR Miguel A. Pulido MA YOR PRO TEM Bre" E. Franklin COUNClLMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bisl Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY A TIORNEY Joseph W. Flelcher ClERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALtFORNIA 92702 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29, 2004 Robert L. French, Ed.D. Superintendent Orange Unified School District POBox 11022 Orange CA 92856 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, tNTER..c1TY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN. AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENTPROUECTS Dear Mr. French: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merger" or "Amendments") of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City. Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main. and Bristol Corridor RedeveJopment,~~ Projects (together, .Project Areas," "Merged Project Area: or "Projects"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment Law. attached is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments, which is scheduled for September 7, 2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 64~-5360. Attachment 75D-269 c!>, ),.. r=I a- te 10 U.S. Postal Service" CERTIFIED MA1L, RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) , . .. PœIIIge $ ~ M b ru ru CeftIIIed Fee 0 I:] ReIum FIf!CIIpt Fee C (El1dor8emeI1t RecPred) 0 ReIIIrIcIød DeIveIy Fee r=I (Endorsement ReqiIInId) '0 M TotàIPosIage&'Fee8 $ ~ Robert L. French,Superintendent C Orange Unified School District ('- ~ POBox 11022 ë¡.;Ë Orange CA 92856 PS Form 38CO. jL.:ne 2002 S:.:':! ::::¡eo'.'e-.;;r:' for !Ps:rL,ctlons , , + .1 ~ ~ IÍ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete ~ item 4 if Restricted Deflvery ,is desired. ~ . Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. { . Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ; or on the front if space permits. " 1. Article Addressed to: ..¡ Robert L. French, Ed.D. Superintendent Orange Unified School District POBox 11022 Orange CA 92856 3. Service Type )0 Certified Mail 0 Express MaR ' , 0 Registered ;ØlRetum Receipt for MerchaiKrase 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. . 4. Restricted Delivery? (Exf1a Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number (Copy from service label) 7003, 1010 0002 2018 5ð91 PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 1025!J5-OO.M-0952 EXHIBIT 6 75D-270 MA YOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Brett E. Franklin COUNClLMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa B iSI Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY A TfORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29. 2004 Peter C. Gorman Superintendent Tustin Unified School District 300 South C Street Tustin CA 92780 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING . PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER..crrv COMMUTER STATION,NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAtN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS . Dear Mr. Gorman: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency (ICAgency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merger'" or ICAm~ments.) of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City. Inter- City Commuter Station. North Harbor. South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment.-. Projects (together, "Project Areas." "Merged Project Area," or "Projects"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment law. attached is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments, which is scheduled for September 7.2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 64 7 -5360. Sincerely, cia :L~¡¡rELOPME:::~: 6 Executive Director Attachment 75D-271 C~ 3910 U.S. Postal Service.. - . CERTIFIED MAIL: RECEIPl . (Domestíc MaU Only: No Insura.nce C, overage Provided) ...D I""' rr U"' ~ ...=I t:J ru ru t:J t:J Return Redøpt Fee t:J (Endorsem8I1I RøquIrecf) t:J RøsIrIcted DeIv8IY Fee M (EI.doIdement ReqWed) ~ TotàI Postage & Fees $ 4. '5 (T1 Peter C. Gorman, Superintendent g Tustin Unified School District I'- ~ 300 South C Street ëij Tustin CA 92780 .. . Po8ta08 $ CerIIIIed Fee --------- ----.....-.- '::"p h\c\,crsc tor Instructions: PS Form 3800. June 2002 .".' ~..~ + [. Complétè items 1. 2. and 3. Also complete ¡ item 4 if ReStricted Delivery is desired. . {. Print your rìame and address on the reverse ;. so that we can return the card to you. i. Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece. ; or on !rye front if space permits. . 1. Article Addressed to: . different from item 1? If YES, enter delivery address below: Peter C. Gonnan Superintendent Tustin Unified School District 300 South C Street Tustin CA 92780 . , { . l 3. Service Type k Certified Mail 0 Express Mail. . 0 Registered H RetUrn Receipt fOr Merchandise. ; 0 Insured Mail 0 C;O.D. . 4. Restricted Delivery? (&tra Fee) 0 Yes .2. Article Number (Copy from service 'abel) 7003 1010 0002 2018 5976 ;PS Form 3811, July 1999 DomestIc Return Receipt 102595-00-M..0952 ØBIBIT 6 75D-272 MA YOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PROTEM Brett E. Franklin CQUNCllMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bisl Alberta O. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PlAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY. MANAGER David N. Re~m CITY A TIORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher ClERK OF THE COUNCIL Palricia E. Healy VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29. 2004 Virginia Grebbien General Manager Orange County Water District POBox 8300 Fountain Valley CA 92708 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Dear Ms. Grebbien: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments . to effect the merger ("Merger" or "Amendments") of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City. Inter- City Commuter Station. North Harbor. South Harbor, South Main. and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment .'''''!!.. Projects (together, "Project Areas: "Merged Project Area: or "Projects"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, attached is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the City of Santa Ana . on the Amendments, which is scheduled for September 7, 2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 647-5360. ELOPMENT AGENCY EXHIBIT 6 Attachment 75D-273 n.n/> .:r 10 10 U1 10 M C ru .- ,- U.S. Postal Service~,. CERTIFIED MAIL-., RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only: No Insurance Coyerage ProvIded) . .. . . ... OFFICIAL . to ;1.30 /.75 Postage $ \ -. ru CerIiIIed Fee C C ReIum ReçIept Fee C (B4.-......,ent RequIred) .~~~~ C M ToIaI Post8ge & Fees $ 4.b m .. C Virginia Grebbien, G. M., OC Water DIst ~ §i POBox 8300 orf Fountain Valley CA 92708 ëiÿ. ---------- ----------- PS Fc.;r;11 .JGCQ. Jlirp 2002 ::;'-'::~ r::r:'..r;r-~C' ':)r in:;~r,,'c~'ons . _..~...-..........~--~--..__..._..~....... ¡ . Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete ; item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ; . Print your name and address on the reverse so that We can return the card tò you. . Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, .or on the front if space permits. 1. ArtIcle Addressed to: D. Is delivery address cfifferent from item 11 If YES, enter delivery address below: Virginia Grebbien General Manager Orange County Water District POBox 8300 Fountain Valley CA 92708 3. ServIce Type . )( Certified Mail D Express Mail D. Registered )Q Retum Receipt for ~. D Insured Mail D C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 2. Article Number (Copy from service label) 7003 1010 0002 2018 5884 102595-OO-M-0952 . PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic RetUrn Receipt EXHIBIT 6 75D-274 Dyes MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Breit E. Franklin COUNCllMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa B isl Alberta D. Chrisly Mike Gårcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PlAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER Dâvid N. R£Oam CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher ClERK OF THE COUNCil Patricia E. Healy VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29, 2004 William M. Habermehl Superintendent Orange County Department of Education 200 Kalmus Drive POBox 9050 Costa Mesa CA 92628 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENTPROUECTS Dear Mr. Habermehl: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger rMerger" or "Amendments") of the Redevelopment-Plans for the Central City, Inter- .--.. City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects (together, "Project Areas," "Merged Project Area," or "Projects"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, attached is a notice of a joint public, hearing of the Agency and the City - Council of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments, which is scheduled for September 7,2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwanfs at (714) -- 647-5360. Sincerely, 7CCZ!MUNmLOPMENT AGENCY ~ VtI EXHIBIT 6 Patricia C. Whitaker Executive Director Attachment 75D-275 C!Þ. ),. U.S. Postal Service,." CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only: No Insurance C:.Jvcrage Provided) ru ru ~ U1 J:(J M C ru Postage $ ru CeI1IIIed Fee C , C RøIum~Fee C (EJ1dorsemeI1t RecJ*8d) t:J Re8IrIcIed ~ Fee M (Eaodol....lllh4R8qú1red) C M 1btaI Postage & Fee8 $ 4. "5 \ . rr1 . I:] ( William M. Habermehl, Supenntendent ~ ~ Orange County Department of Education DlPOf. POBox 9050 ëiy,Si Costa Mesa CA 92628 PS FOrf'r'1 3300 jl..ne 2002 See Fe\.'~r.:;~ ~or Instructions ;+ . Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. ; . Print your name and address on the reverse ,so that we can return the card to you. ; . Attach this card to the back of the maílpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. ArtIcle Addressed to: ; . William M. Habermehl Superintendent Orange County Department of Education 200 Kalmus Drive : POBox 9050 Costa Mesa CA 92628 2. Article Number (Copy from service IabeJ) 0 Agent DAddressee: Dyes DNa 3. Service 11 J( Certified 0 Registered 0 Insured Mail Dyes 7003 1010 0002 2018 5822 102595-00-M-0952 ( PS Fonn 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt EXHIBIT 6 75D-276 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MA YOR PRO TEM Brett E. Franklin COUNCILMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez lisa B isr Alberta D. Chrisry Mike Garcia lose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA CITY MANAGER David N. Ream - CITY ATTORNEY loseph W. Flercher ClERK OF THE COUNCIL Parricia E. Healy 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29, 2004 Dr. Edward Hernandez Chancellor Rancho Santiago Community College. District 2323 North Broadway Street #404-1 Santa Ana CA 92706 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENTPROUECTS Dear Dr. Hernandez: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merger" or "Amendments'") of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South. Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor RedeveJopment_..,.~ Projects (together, "Project Areás,. "Merged Project Area,. or "Projects'"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow too Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, attached is a notice of a joint public OOaring of the Agency and the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments, which is scheduled for September 7,2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 647-5360. ELOPMENT AGENCY EXH:IB:IT 6 Attachment 75D-277 C~ J9è U.S. Postal Service,., CERTIFIED MAIL.., RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) l"- e 0- U1 IC[J M e ru ru CerIIIIed Fee e e AeIum ReçIept Fee e (El1dDI8ement Reqund) CJ Re8IrIcIIId D4WY Fee M (Elodo.lS8IIl8Il1 ReqüIred) C M Total Postage & Fees $ PoIt8ge . . '5 m.,.)5 IT1 CJ Edward Hernandez, Chancellor ~ ~ Rancho Santiago Community College Dist orPO 2323 North Broadway Street #404-1 ëiÿ,"~ Santa Ana CA 92706 PS Forn: JBG!] J~lne 2002 3r:¡~ RC'1..'~i'-;e fer Instr~jctlOíl5 + . CóFnplete Items 1, 2, and 3. AJ$O comþlete Itém 4 if F{estricted DelIVery is dëslred. . Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. . Attach this card to the back of the mallpiece, or on the front If space permits. : 1. ArtIcle Addressed to: ~ 0 Addressee D. Is deIvery address ärfferent from item 11 0 Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: e-No Edward Hernandez Chancellor' ~ n. Rancho Santiago Community College District 2323 North Broadway Street #404-1 Santa Ana CA 92706 3. ServIce Type J§ Certified Mail 0 Express Mail DReglstered . Return Réceipt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. - 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes - 2. Article Numt:fer '(Copy #om sè1Vicè label) : 7D03 1010 0002 2D18 5907 PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt . . ~. . 102S9S-OO-M-0952 EXBJ:BJ:T 6 75D-278 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido . MAYOR PRO TEM Brett E. franklin COUNCIlMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bist Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Flelcher ClERK OF THE COUNCIL Palricia E. Healy VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29, 2004 Jim Kenan Director of Finance & Administration Orange County Transportation Authority POBox 14184 Orange CA 92863 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENTPRCUECTS Dear Mr. Kenan: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merger" or "Amendments") of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor. South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment-_~ Projects (together. "Project Areas.. "Merged Project Area," or "Projects"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment law, attached is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments, which is scheduled for September 7, 2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments. please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 647-5360. Attachment 75D-279 ß. J'16 .- c ..ø 1:0 U1 I:(J i-=I CJ ru U.S. Postal Service-... - - - - CERTIFIED MAIL., RECEIPT .. (Dam estlc Mail Only;. No Insurance Covera e Prcvided 9 PostIIg8 $ I!;-- ~ OertiIIedFee t:J ReU'n C (Elldors.m8l~~ C ResIrIcI8d ~ Fee r-=I (Elldolæ.nent ReqUIred) C r-=I Total Postage & Fees $ . bS IT1 g . Jùn Kenan, Dir of Finance & Admin r- §i Orange County Transportation Authority ~~ POBox 14184 CII) Orange CA 92863 ..--.----- --~.-_..-.- P Form 3800- JUf'e 2002 ~ :'c.;(~ '~c','c~';t) fc~ i:~str:..;r.licns s ~ . -Complete items 1, 2, and 3. þJst) comptete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. . Print yQUr name and addreSS on the reverse so that we éan- return the card to you. . Attach this card to the baCk of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. ArtIcle þ,ddreSSed to: Jim Kenan Director of Finance & Administration Orange County Transportation Authority POBox 14184 - Orange CA 92863 0 Agent - 0 Ac\dIeSßeØ -,- D. Is deliverY addreSS dIffer9nt from Item 17 - 0 Yes If YES, enter delivery addresS beloW: 0 . No ...' 3. Service Type \ ~ CertifIed Mail 0 express Mail - ¡ 0 Registered ~ Return Receipt for Merchandise .~ 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes w 2. Article Numbér (Copy from service label) 7003 1010 0002 2018 5860 PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic RetUrn Receipt 102595-00-M-0952 J EXHIBIT 6 75D-280 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MA YOR PRO TEM Brett E. franklin COUNClLMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bist Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER David N.Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher. CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29,2004 Raghu Maghur Chancellor South Orange County Community College District 28000 Marguerite Parkway Mission Viejo CA 92692 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH. HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Dear Mr. Maghur: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments. to effect the merger ("Merger" or "Amendments.) of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment....~ Projects (together, "Project Areas," "Merged Project Area,. or "Projects.). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will atlow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, attached is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments, which is scheduled for September 7, 2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 647-5360. ANA COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY C~~ . Patricia C. Whitaker EXHIBIT 6 Executive Director Attachment 75D-281 cs. ),. u.s. Postal Service, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail O"ly,' No In5'Jíi3¡;Ce Coverage Provided) Raghu Maghur, Chancellor § South Orange County Com College District 01 28000 Marguerite Parkway ëi Mission Viejo CA 92692 [J"'" ..D [J"'" Lt) IC() r=I c:J nJ Postage s nJ CertiIIed Fee c:J r:::J ReUn ~ Fee c:J (Endorsement RequII:ed) c:J ~ De!v8Y Fee r=t I8ftt ReqúIred) c:J M ToIeI PosIage & Feea $ m c:J c:J I"- '( . ---------- 0___"_.".--- PS FOP11 3800 -June 2002 Sr:e RC'Jcrse for :nstrdct!OnS 'T , 8 Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restrictèd Delivery is desired. 8 Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. : 8 Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space pennits. 1. Article Addressed to: Raghu Maghur Chancellor South Orange County Community College District 28000 Marguerite Parkway . Mission Viejo CA 92692 2. Article Number (Copy from servfce label) D. Is deHvery different from item 1? If YES. enter delivery addr:ess below: 3. Service Type ,: )It CertIfied Mall 0 Express Mail . ~' 0 Registered JIIReturn Receipt for Merchandise :. 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. ' 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) OYés '. 7003 1010 0002 2018 5969 I I: 102595-00-M-()952 . ,..I' PS Form 3811, July 1999 DomestIc Return Receipt EXB:tB:tT 6 75D-282 MA YOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Brett E. Franklin COUNClLMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bist Alberta D. Chrisry Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PlAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATIORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29, 2004 AI Mijares, Ph.D. Superintendent Santa Ana.Unifted School District 1601 East Chestnut Avenue Santa Ana CA 92701 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENTPRCUECTS Dear Dr. Mijares: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency (" Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merger" or "Amendments") of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor. South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects (together, "Project Areas," "Merged Project Area," or "Projects"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment.Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment law, attached is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City CounciJ of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments. which is scheduled for September 7, 2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 647-5360. A C~MäEVELOPMENT AGENCY Patrici~ C. ~hitaker EXHIBIT 6 ExecuÍlve Director Attachment 75D-283 Ci },. ru U1 [J"'" U1 r:Q ñ C nJ U.S. Postal Servjce~, CERTIFIED MAIL., RECEIPT (Domest:c Maìf Oniy; No Insurance Coverage Provide(1) POIIIge $ nJ CertIfIed Fee C C ReJum~Fee C (EJldorsemer' Rec¡uhd) t:J ResIrIcted [)e!wIfy Fee .-::I ([íålla6nlld ReqUQd) CJ . ñ Total Pos1age & Fees $ m'.25 .5 \ . . gJ AI Mijares, Ph.D., Superintendent ~ §i Santa Ana Unified School District orl 1601 East Chestnut Avenue ëij Santa Ana CA 92701 ..- PS Form 3800. June 2002 See ~i"\.'(;rS0 fc:" 'q';¡~ljC~iOnS ., ; . Comp~e items 1. 2. and 3: Also complete , item 4 if R$Stricted Delivery is desired. ¡ . Piint your name and address on the reverse ; so that we Cé\n return the card to you. : . Attach this card to the back of the mallpiece, . or on the front If space ~its. .~.. 1. Article Addressed to: . . . Al Mijares~ Ph.D. Superintendent . Santa Ana Unified School District 1601 East Chestnut Avenue Santa Ana CA 92701 t 3. Service Type i I;J CertifIed Mail 0 Express Mail :l: 0 Registered J(Retum Receipt for Merd1andise : 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D.. .; . 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes : '.2. Article Number (Copy from service label) 7003 1010 0002 2018 5952 { ',;;. PS Form 3811, July 1999 DomestIc Retum Receipt 10259S-()().M.()952 f' EXHIBIT 6 75D-284 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MA YOR PRO TEM Breu E. Franklin COUNClLMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bisl Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK Of THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29, 2004 Dana K. Ohanesian Administration & Finance Manager Orange County Vector Control District POBox 87 Santa Ana CA 92702 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING . PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENTPROUECTS Dear Mr. Ohanesian: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") i.s in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merger" or "Amendments") of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South. Harbor, South Main, and aristol Corridor Redevelopment .~...~ Projects (together, .Project Areas," "Merged Project Area," or "Projects"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger wiHatlow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and im.proved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment law, attached is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments, which is scheduled for September 7, 2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 647-5360. . Sincerely, ~~~~~ElOPMENTAGENCY Patricia C. Whitaker EXHIBIT 6 Executive Director Attachment 75D-285 Ü),. r- r- 10 U") 10 ñ C ru U.S. Postal Servicec' CERTIFIED rV1AIL" RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only: No ¡nsur;:¡nc~ Coverage Provided) . . ~ CerlllledFee C RøIum~Fee C (EJ1dorsement Rec¡u/nId) C ResIrIcIed ~Fee ñ (Endorsement RecPred) C M Total Postage & Fees $ ~ 0 Dana K. Ohanesian, AdmirÏ'& Fin Mgr ~ "-}4 Orange County Vector Control District orPOBD POBox 87 ãrÿ7ši8i Santa Ana CA 92702 PosI8ge $ . .. ~ PS Form J8CO. .Jl"t",C 20C2 Sc;',~ ~~e'.12r::;e ~or 1:'.;;ti;_,ct;'J[-;S - . -.. -'''''~'-- .". r' . - .....,...--,"'......'... ~ :. Complete items 1. 2. and 3. Also complete : item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired: ; . Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can retum the card to you. . Attach this card to the back of the mallplece, , or on the front If space permits. 1. ArtIcle Addressed to: ~Ageñt 0 Mdressee item 110ft- . below: ~ No ~' Dana K. Ohanesian Administration & Finance Manager Orange County Vector Control District POBox 87 Santa Ana CA 92702 Certified Mail 0 Express Maif 0 Registered ~. 0 InsuredM 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) (Ii.uli n Dves , 2. Article Number (Copy from service label) 1003 1010 0002 2018 5877 PS Form 3811 , July 1999 , Domestic Retum Receipt 102595-00-M-0952 EXBJ:BIT 6 75D-286 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MA YOR PRO TEM Brett E. franklin COUNCILMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa B ist Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PlAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph w. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29, 2004 Sam Randall General Manager Orange County Cemetery District 25751 Trabuco Road Lake Forest CA 92630 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Dear Mr. Randall: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merger" or "Amendments") of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter- Cíty Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment-- Projects (together, "Project Areas," "Merged Project Area," or "Projects"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, attached is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the Cíty of Santa Ana on the Amendments, which is scheduled for September 7, 2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 647-5360. Sincerely, A c~;Œ.EVELOPMEm AGENCY Pa ricia C. Whitaker EXHIBIT 6 Executive Director Attachment 75D-287 C~. )9to U.S. Postal Service-." CERTIFIED MAIL.: RECEiPT (Domestic Mail Only: No fnsurance Coverage Provided) ..., M r:O ..., r:O M C ru .. .. ru t:J r:J ReIII'n Rec:Iept Fee r:J (ElldorseI1l8..& Required) r:J ResIrIc&ed [)e!veIy Fee r-=I (Endorsement ReqúIred) ~ Total Postage & Fees $ 4. h 5" rn ..~.. . ~ - S~ Randall, G. M., OC Cemetery District I"- ; 25751 Trabuco Road ë Lake Forest CA 92630 CertilledFee . .. . OF ------....---..- ---.....----- PS Form 3S00. JUW 2C,C2 SEt? RC\¡L'~'-;e 7(H í's~~uct;r;ns + ;. Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete ~ item 4 if: Restricted Delivery is desired. . ;. Print your name and address on the reverse : so that we can return the card to YOU. . '. Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, . or on the front if space permits. 1. Mlcle Addressed to: C. Sigflature X ~f'...L D. Is delivery address different from item 11 . If YES, enter delivery address below~ 0 Agent 0 Addressee D)t¡s , ONo Sam Randall General Manager Orange County Cemetery District 25751 Trabuco Road Lake Forest CA 92630 3. Service Type ;J!d..Certified Mail 0 Express MaR 0 Registered )1 Return Reçeipt for. Mørchahdise 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. ' 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes : 2. Article Number (Copy from service label) 7003 1010 0002 2018 5815 PS Form 3811, July 1999 DornEistic Return Receipt 102595-00-M-0952 ~ EXHIBIT 6 75D-288 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Brett E.Franklin COUNClLMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bist Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia lose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIfORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY A TIORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher ClERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29, 2004 William H. Redcay General Manager East Orange County Water District 185 North McPherson Road Orange CA 92869 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, tNTER-C1TY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENTPROUECTS Dear Mr. Redcay: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merger" or .Amendments") of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment - ..,..~ Projects (together, "Project Areas," "Merged Project Area," or "Projects"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment law, attached is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Councif of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments, which is scheduled for September 7,2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 647-5360. Attachment 75D-289 C~ J'" . . u.s. Postal Service~1 CERTiFIED MAIL. RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only: No ,'nsiJrance Coverage Provided) William H. Redcay, General Manager ä East Orange County Water District or 185 North McPherson Road ã Orange CA 92869 r:I ru n- Ul EO ñ 0 ru PoeI8ge $ ru CertilJedFee C C Retum~Fee C (Ellcbae...ent Aøquked) C n:= De!wlrYFee M (Ec 1604Reqiftd) 0 M Total Postage & Fees $ m c c I"- ..---.-.....- --..----- rs Form 3800. JUf'\e 2002 8,;0 fl,~,...;r~-,c for ,'r':-;lruct¡or.s "'- I .' Cömpletø.items 1, 2, and 3. AlSo complete ~ item 4if Restricted Delivery is desired. . ; .. Print your narné and address on the reverse ; so that we caØ return the card to you. i . Attach this ~- to the back of the maiJpieCe, . \ or on the miinf- if space permits. . 1. ArtIcle AddnIssed to: -~ . William H. Redcay General Manager East Orange County Water District 185 North McPherson Road Orange CA 92869 2. ArtIcle Number (Copy from S8f\IÍCe label) i". :-~ .~, ... -... 3. SeNIœ Type , " Certified Mall D Express Mail . 0 Regi$tered' JI Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) Dves 7003 1010 0002 2018 5'21 102~.00s2 ;' PS FonT1 381 '1. July 1999 . DomestiC Return Reœïpi EXHIBIT 6 75D-290 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MA YOR PRO TEM Brett E. Franklin COUNClLMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa B iSI Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY MANA"GER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher ClERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29, 2004 James D. Ruth County Executive Officer County of Orange 10 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana CA 92701 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENTPROUECTS Dear Mr. Ruth: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merger" or "Amendments") of the Redevelopmen. Plans for the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor. South Main. and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment -...~ Projects (together, "Project Areas," "Merged Project Area," or "Projects").. The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries. of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged . Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increaseçj economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, attached is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments, which is scheduled for September 7,2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 647-5360. \:QreIY, ~~~U~OPMENTAGENCY Patricia C. Whitaker EXHIBIT 6 Executive Director Attachment 75D-291 cs. J,. U,S. Postal Service" CERTIFIED MAIL., RECEIPT (DomestÎc Mail Only; No Insurance Covrxage Provided) to C to U1 . EO M C ru ,-u CerIIIIed Fee C C Retwn ~ Fee C ,(EJIdorsement RequIred) ~~~ ~ Total Postage & Fees $ , b5 rT1Sent g 0 James D. Ru~ Co of Orange Exec Offtc r- ~i 10 Civic Center Plaza ~'::!..~ Santa Ana CA 92701 ~SL;- .. Postage $ , ' PS Forrn Jane. June 2002 '-:C'P ~C". 0~-~~'! for ~':s:r,Jc':ons '+ . Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. . . . Print your name andadctress on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. . . Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. , 1. ArtIcle Addressed to: . Dat' of ! C. S~ ~ 1-1- A""I AgeOt , ' X ~v-{ ~ 0 Addressee D. Is delivery addreSS different from item 11 D Yes If YES, enter delivery addresS beIow-~ D No !So' James D. Ruth County Executive Officer County of Orange 10 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana CA 92701 3. ServiceType tit Certified Mail D Express Mail , '¡j R~isteíed .rJ Return Receipt for MerchandiSe Dlnsured Mail D C.O.D. 4. Restricted DerlVery? (Extra Fee) DYes' :::::,:-- _=~1D 0002 2016 '5,~~ EXHIBIT 6 75D-292 .-- MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Brell E. Franklin COUNClLMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bist Alberta O. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK Of THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29,2004 Laura Schwalm, Ph.D. Superintendent Garden Grove Unified School District 10331 Stanford Avenue Garden Grove CA 92840 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING . PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Dear Dr. Schwalm: The -Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency r Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("'Merger" or "Amendments") of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment .-... Projects (together, .project Areas," "Merged Project Area,. or "'Projects"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, attached is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments, which is scheduled for September 7, 2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 64 7-5360. Attachment 75D-293 C~ J94> IC() m IT" U'J IC() ,..::¡ . I:J ru U.S. Postal Service,.. CERTIFIED MAIL~... RECEIPT . (Domestic Maíí Only; No !nsurance Coverage Provided) Po8I8ge $ ru CerlllledFee I:J I:J Return ~ Fee I:J (Q IdorseIII8I'It Requked) I:J Restricted ~ Fee . ,..::¡ (Endol'8llll18111 ReqüIred) I:J ,..::¡ Total Postage & Fees $ 4." ~ Laura Schwalm, Ph.D., Superintendent ~ ~ Garden Grove Unified School District or 10331 Stanford Avenue ëi Garden Grove CA 92840 - rn~~? ----..............- ----.------ PS Form 3800. June 2002 SL'e' R"vc' oe for Instn;ctlons -='" - _.A__- i . Complete items 1, 2. and 3. Also complete ; . item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. ~ . Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. '> . Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. ArtIcle Addressed to: 0 Agent . . Addressee; Dves DNo Laura Schwalm, Ph.D. Superintendent . . Garden Grove Unified School Dlstnct 10331 Stanford Avenue Garden Grove CA. 92840 t è. . Service Type r --CertIfied Mall 0 Express Mail ~' D Registered IiI Return Receipt for MerchandIse t 0 Insured Mall. 0 C.O.D. . 1: 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) . 0 Ves .; 2. Article Number (Copy from service label) 7003 1010 0002 2018 5938 PS Form 3811, July 1999 . " 102595-00-M-09S2 ). . Domestic Return Receipt EXH:IB:IT 6 75D-294 ~, .... """~ MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Brett E. franklin COUNCILMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa B isl Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY.MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Flelcher CLERK OF THE COUNCil Patricia E. Heafy VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29, 2004 Gary Streed Director of Finance Orange County Sanitation District POBox 8127 Fountain Valley CA 92728 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENTPR~ECTS Dear Mr. Streed: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merger" or "Amendments") of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor RedevelOpment---- Projects (together, "Project Areas, If "Merged Project Area," or "Projects"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and anocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, attached is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments, which is scheduled for September 7. 2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 647-5360. A CO~w:.EVELOPMENT AGENCY 'cia C. Whitaker EXHIBIT 6 Executive Director Attachment 75D-295 (S. ),. U.S. Postal Service", CERTIFIED MA.IL R.ECEIPT (Domestic Maif Only: No Insuranée Coverage Provided} OFFICIA .100 :213 1,76 JT1 - c Gary Streed, Director of Finance ~ ¡fij Orange County Sanitation District Of' POBox 8127 ~ Fountain Valley CA 92728 " , JT1 IS} EO IS} EO ñ C nJ Postage $ . .. nJ CefIIfIød Fee t:J t:J Retum ~ Fee t:J (El1dOnIem8nI Reèjuhd) C ReøIrIcIed DeþeryFee ñ (Elldol1l8ment RecIi*ed) C ñ TotàI PosIage a'Fees $ .5 --- ..---..-.. ?S Form 38CO. JUl'e 2002 See Reverse for 1r~structlcns , . Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if RestrICted Dellveiy is desired. . . Prlnt.your name'and address on the reverse , so that. we can return the card to you. . .:. Attach this c8rd to the back of the mailpiece, , or on the front If space permits. , 1. Article AddresSed to: Gary Streed Director of Finance . Orange County Sanitation District POBox 8127 Fountain Valley CA 92728 2. Article Number (Copy from service label) > . ~ -:-' ~.~ "J., - . x D. Is delivery address different from item 11 If YES, enter delivery address below: 3. Service Type þ( CertifIed Mail 0 Express Mail 0 Registered J(Retum R~ for M$1;:handise 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) DYes 7003 1010 0002 2018 5853 102595-0()4.0952 PS Fonn 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt EXHIBIT 6 75D-296 MA YOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Breit E. Franklin COUNCllMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bisl Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA. P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy VIA CERTIFIED MAIL July 29. 2004 Dave N. Ream City Manager City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza M-31 Santa Ana CA 92702 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION,NORTH .HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Dear Mr. Ream: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merger" or "Amendments") of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central.City, Inter- City Commuter Station. North Harbor. South Harbor. South Main. and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment -....~ Projects (together. "Project Areas," "Merged Project Area," or "Projects"). The proposed Merger does not" change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the financial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will allow the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Sections 33349 and 33452 of the California Community Redevelopment Law. attached is a notice of a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on the Amendments, which is scheduled for September 7, 2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed Amendments. please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 647-5360. Sincerely. ~~GJ~EDEVElOPMENTAGENCY patnci~ c. ~hitaker EXHIBIT 6 Executrve DIrector Attachment 75D-297 U. 3910 75D-298 NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ON THE , PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MERGE THE CENTRAL CITY, INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION, NORTH HARBOR, SOUTH HARBOR, SOUTH MAIN, AND BRISTOL CORRIDOR' REDEVELOPMENT PROJEèTS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Santa Ana, California ("City Council") and. the Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ('"Agency") will hold a joint public hearing on September 7, 2004, at the hour of 6 'p. m. o~ as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, in the City Council Chambers,' 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) for the purpose of considering the approval and adoption of the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendments ("Amendments;') to merge the Central City. Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects ("Existing Project Areas"). The boundaries of the EXisting Project Areas are as illustrated on the map accompanying this notice. Copies of the legal descriptions of the boundaries of the Existing Project Areas are available and may be reviewed at the Office of the Clerk of the Council of the City of Santa Ana. The I?urpose of the proposed Amendments is to merge the Existing Project Areas by combining tax increment revenues from the Existing Project Areas and all~te the revenues throughout the entire Merged Project Area. The Amendments will not enlarge the Project Areas, nor will the Amendments affect any of the properties in the proposed Merged Project , Area differently than if the Project Areas remained separate. The main purpose of the proposed ' Merger of the Project Areas would be for efficiency of administration and financing resulting in substantial benefit to the public because the Merger will facilitate the continued revitalizatio"n of blighted areas through increased economic vitality of such Project Areas and through increased and improved housing opportunities in or near such areas. The proposed Amendments will not extend any of the. time or financial limits of the existing Redevelopment Plans or add tenitory to t~e Existing Project Areas. The purpose of the Joint Public Hearing is to consider: 1. The proposed Amendments,to the existing Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Conidor Redevelopment Projects as submitted by the Agency; 2. The Agencys Report to the City Council on the proposed Amendments, including the report and recommendations of the, City's Planning Commission, the neighborhood impact report, and a summary of consultations with property owners, residents, business owners and affected taxing entities on the proposed Amendments; and EXHIBIT 6 75D-299 3. All evidence and testimony for and against the adoption of the proposed Amendments. At the above stated day, hour and place any and all persons having any. objections to the proposed Amendments may appear before the Agency and the City Council and. show cause why the proposed Amendments should not be approved and adopted. At any time not later than the hour aforesaid set for hearing, any person objecting. to the proposed Amen~ments may file in writing with the Clerk of the Council a statement of his or her objections. Any person or organization desiring to be heard at the hearing will be afforded an opportunity to be heard. The City Council shall hear and consider objections to and other testimony about the propòsed Amendments pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law. NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that the Agency will hold a community information meeting on August 10, 2004, at 6 p.m., in the Santa Ana Police Community Rooril, located at 60 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana. California, to discuss the purpose of the proposed Amendments and other related effects of the adoption of the proposed Amendments. The proposed Amendments, the Agencys Report to the City Council, the existing Redevelopment Plan for the Existing Project Areas and other pertinent documents are on file and available for pUblic inspection and copying during regular offiCé hours (8 a.m. - 5 p.m. Monday through Friday) at the Office of the Clerk of the Council of the City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana. California 92701. If you would flke additional information regarding the proposed Amendments, please call the Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency at (714) 647-5360 between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Pabicia E. Healy Clerk of the Council Publish: Orange County Register Publication Dates: - August 2. 2004 August 9, 2004 August 16, 2004 August23,2004 August30,2004 This material Is available In alternative formats~languages upon request. To order information In an alternative format, or to arrange for a sign language or oral Interpreter for the meeting. please call the Community Redevelopment Agency at least five working days prior to the meeting at (714) 647-5360. EXHIBIT 6 75D-300 ::. HAZAlD AYE. ~ ~ <> <> 2 ... 0 % ~ Z ~ Redeveloprœnt Prqject Areas (:::::::::/ CENTRAL CITY ~ NœTH HARBœ ~ INTERCITY .. SOUTH MAIN .. SOUTH HARBœ .. BRISTQ -'I' " 75D-301 MA YOR Miguel A. Pulido MA YOR PRO TEM Brett E. Franklin COUNCILMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Lisa Bist Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio 1m ~i~ CITY OF SANTA ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PlAZA . P.O. BOX 1988 SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCil Patricia E. Healy July 29, 2004 CERTIFIED ~ Matthew O. Franklin, Director Department of Housing and Community Development State of California 1800 3M Street, Suite 450 Sacramento, CA 95814 SUBJECf: Amendments to the Redevelopment Plans Merging the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects Dear Mr. Franklin: The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is in the process of adopting amendments to effect the merger ("Merger" or "Amendments'') of the Redevelopment Plans for the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Statio~ North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, . and Bristol Conidor Redevelopment Projects (together, "Project Areas," Merged Project Area," or Projects"). The proposed Merger does not change or add to the boundaries of the Project Areas or change any the -- fmancial or time limits in effect and as stated in the Redevelopment Plans for the respective Projects. The Merger will al10w the Agency to combine the tax increment from the Project Areas and allocate the revenues to and among the Merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities. In accordance with Section 33488 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, the Department of Housing and Community Development - State of California is hereby notified that it is the Agency's intention to merge the Project Areas. The adoption of the ordinances merging the Project Areas is scheduJed to occur no sooner than September 7, 2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposèd Amendments, please contact Nancy Edwards at (714) 647-5360. 75D-302 O)~ U.S. Postal Sel"vice-., , CERTIFIED MAIL" RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Oniy: No Insurance C{)verage Pro\iided) ru D'"" f'- U1 ~ r=I 0 ru Postage $ ru Cer8edFee C t:I AeUn~Fee t:I (Et1lloRlment Rec¡und) t:I ResIrIcIed De!¥erY Fee i-=I (D1don;ement ReqUnd) '0 r-1 TOIaI PosIage & Fees $ ~o Matthew O. Franklin, Dir, Dept of ~ ~J Housinrf & Com Dev, State of CA ~~~ 1800 3 Street, Suite 450 Cily,SII Sacramento CA 95814 PS F~r~ JSco. JLre :C;C2 So.:; ~e'.'2~Sf? ~cr 1;'3~'-....c1!cr.s , . Complete items 1, 2. and 3. Also complete. . item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. !.' .' Pñnt your name ,and address on the reverse ; so that we can return the card to you. : . Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. : 1. MIele Addressed to: D. Is delivery address ' from item 11 If YES. enter delivery address below: ~. 0 Agent ~; 0 Addressee S' 0 Yes !~ DNo {~ .' "¡;¡.. f' Matthew O. Franklin, Director Dept.. of Housing & Com. Dev. State of California 1800 3rd Street, Suite 450 , Sacramento CA 95814 " " 3. Service 1ÿpe , , - Certified Mail 0 Express Mail , 0 Registered JII Return Receipt for MerchandIse , '0 Insu'ed Mail 0 C.O.D.' 4. Restricted Delivery? (Ext1a Fee) 0 Yes 2. . Article Number (Copy from service label) 7003 1010 0002 2018 57~2 !' ~ .. . . . , . [ PS Form 3811, July 1999 , Domestic ~ ReceIpt 102595-00-M-0952 EXHIBIT 7 75D-303 MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Brett E. Franklin COUNClLMEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Usa Bist Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio ~ ~ CITY OF SANTA ANA PLANNING & 8UILDlNG.AGENCY 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-20) P.O. BOX 1988 . Santa Ana, California 92702 CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ^ TTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy www.santa-ana.org NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION This is to infonn the general public that the City of Santa Ana proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration for the following project: Project Title: Redevelopment Project Areas Merger Project Description: The proposed project involves amendments to existing redevelopment plans to merge the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Areas into a one Redevelopment Project Area. The proposed merger of the six existing redevelopment projects is a technical amendment to the redevelopment plans that would allow the Community Redevelopment Agency (ftAgency" )to more effectively administer its redevelopment program by allowing the Agency to combine tax increment revenues from the existing redevelopment project areas to fund activities anywhere in the merged project area. The merging of the existing project areas does not change the boundaries of the existing redevelopment project areas or change the financial and time limit provisions stated in the existing Redevelopment Plans for each of the Redevelopment project areas. Project Location: Central City Redevelopment Project Area, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project Area, North Harbor Redevelopment Project Area, South Harbor Redevelopment project Area, South Main Redevelopment Project Area and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Area . Project Number: ER 2004-34 Public Review Period: 3/18/2004 to 4/612004 Hearing Date: 6/21/04 City of Santa Ana Council Chambers 22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana. CA 92702 The Negative Declaration and Initial Study as well as aU referenced documents will be available for public review at the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agenej located at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California. Please submit any comments on the Negative Declaration to the City on or before 51212004. Please direct your comments to: Dan Bott, Environmental Coordinator, City of Santa Ana, P.O. Box 1988, M- 20, Santa Ana, CA, 92702. Hearing Location: If you have any questions or would like any additional information. please contact John Reekstin at (714) 647-5360. EXHIBIT 8 . 75D-304 cs. 608-2 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding ER No.: 04 -34 Lead Agency: City of Santa Ana Name of Project Proponent: City of Santa Ana Address of Project Proponent: 20 civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA Project Title/Description: Redevelopment Project Areas Merger! The proposed project involves amendments to existing redevelopment plans to merge the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Areas into a one Redevelopment Project Area. The proposed merger of the six existing redevelopment projects is a technical amendment to the redevelopment plans that would allow the Community Redevelopment Agency ("AgencyU )to more effectively administer its redevelopment program by allowing the Agency to combine tax increment revenues from the existing redevelopment project areas to fund activities anywhere in the merged project area. The merging of the existing project areas does change the boundaries of the existing redevelopment project areas or change the financial and time limit provisions stated in the existing Redevelopment Plans for each of the Redevelopment project areas. ProjeclLocation: Central City Redevelopment Project Area, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project Area, North Harbor Redevelopment Project Area, South Harbor Redevelopment Project Area, South Main Redevelopment Project Area and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Area City: Santa Ana Findings of Exemption: County: Orange The City of Santa Ana, as the Lead Agency for the subject project, has conducted an initial study for the above referenced project and has determined there is no potential for adverse. effects on wildlife resources. The site exists in an urban environment characterized by paved concrete, roadways, surrounding buildings and human activity. There is no ecological habitat found on site or adjacent to the site which would support wildlife resources. Certification: I hereby certify that the lead agency has made the above findings of fact and that based upon the initial study and hearing record, the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. ~ Signature:.~ EXBJ:BJ:T 8 Title: Environmental Coordinator Date: May 21, 2004 75D-305 - NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO: 0 Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 I8J Orange County Clerk Recorder P.O. Box 238 Santa Ana, CA 92702-0238 Subject: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 or the Public Resources Code Project Title: Redevelopment Project Area Merger State Clearinghouse Number: ER Number: Lead Agency Contact Person: Dan Bott Area CodefTelephone Number: (714) 667-2719 Project Location: Central City Redevelopment Project Area, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project Area, North Harbor Redevelopment Project Area, South Harbor Redevelopment Project Area, South Main Redevelopment Project Area and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Area City, Santa Ana County, Orange Project Description: The proposed project involves amendments to existing redevelopment plans to merge the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project Areas into a one Redevelopment Project Area. FROM: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92702 The proposed merger of the six existing redevelopment projects is a technical amendment to the redevelopment plans that would allow the Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency" )to more effectively administer its redevelopment program by allowing the Agency to combine tax increment revenues from the existing redevelopment project areas to fund activities anywhere in the merged project area. The merging of the existing project areas does not change the boundaries of the existing redevelopment project areas or change the financial and time limit provisions stated in the existing Redevelopment Plans for each of the Redevelopment project areas. This is to advise that the City of Santa Ana (Lead Agency) has approved the above described project -e:pJuly 19,2004 and has made the following determination regarding the above described project: ~ The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 0 An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CECA. ~ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEOA. 0 Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval for this project. 0 A Statement of Ovenidlng Considerations was adopted for this project. 0 Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CECA. This is to certify that the final environmental document with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to ublic at City of Santa Ana Planning Division, 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 M-20, Santa, CA 927 . Signature County Clerk: Please post for 30 days in accordance with Section 21152(c) of the California Environmental Quality Act EXHIBIT 8 75D-306 9/1/04 LES RESOLUTION NO. 2004-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SANTA ANA FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN MERGER AMENDMENTS CONFORM TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN AND APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED WITH REGARD TO THE MERGER OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: . A. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is a community redevelopment agency organized and existing under the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et. seq., ("CRL") and has been authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council"). B. On July 2, 1973, by Ordinance No. 1173, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") approved and adopted a redevelopment plan for the Central City Redevelopment Project ("Central City Project"). C. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1636, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project ("Inter- City Project"). D. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1637, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the North Harbor Redevelopment Project ("North Harbor Project"). E. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1638, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the South Harbor Redevelopment Project ("South Harbor Project"). F. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1639, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the South Main Redevelopment Project ("South Main Project"). 1 75D-307 G. On December 4, 1989, by Ordinance No. NS-2039, the City Council adopted a redevelopment plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Bristol Corridor Project"). H. The "Existing Plans" consist of the Redevelopment Plans, as amended, prepared for the Central City Project, Inter-City Project, North Harbor Project, South Harbor Project, South Main Project, and the Bristol Corridor Project and the territory included within the Existing Plans is referred to as the "Project Areas". I. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is vested with the responsibility to carry out the Existing Plans. J. The Agency desires to amend each of the Existing Plans ("Amendments") to merge the Project Areas in order to combine the tax increment revenues from the Project Areas and reallocate the revenues to and among the entire merged Project Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through economic vitality and increase and improve housing opportunities. K. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Redevelopment Law, the Agency and the City Council have held a duly noticed joint public hearing on the proposed merger of the project areas. Section 2. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the initial study and the negative declaration prepared with respect to this Resolution. The City Council has, as a result of its consideration and the evidence presented at the hearings on this matter, determined that, as required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CECA") and the State CEQA Guidelines, a Negative Declaration adequately addresses the expected environmental impacts of this Resolution. On the basis of this review, the City Council finds that there is no evidence from which it can be fairly argued that the project will have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The City Council hereby certifies and approves the negative declaration and directs that the Notice of Determination be prepared and filed with the County Clerk of the County of Orange in the manner required by law. Negative Declaration, Environmental Review No., 2004-34 will be filed for this project. Pursuant to Title XIV, California Code of Regulations ("CCR") § 735.5(c)(1), the City Council has determined that, after considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have the potential for any adverse effect on wildlife resources or the ecological habitat upon which wildlife resources depend. The proposed project exists in an urban environment characterized by paved concrete, roadways, 2 75D-308 surrounding buildings and human activity. Therefore, pursuant to Fish and Game Code § 711.2 and Title XIV, CCR § 735.5(a)(3), the payment of Fish and Game Department filing fees is not required in conjunction with this project. Section 3. The City Council has reviewed the proposed redevelopment plan and hereby finds and determines that said plans conform to the City of Santa Ana General Plan because the merger the Council approves herein is a strictly financial matter not affecting the land uses of properties in the City. In addition, the Redevelopment Plans and their respective amendments have only been adopted after each has been found by a prior City Council to be in conformance with the City's General Plan and these prior findings are conclusive at this point in time. Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. 3 75D-309 ADOPTED this day of ,2004. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Lisa E. Storck Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: NOT PRESENT: Council members: CERTIFICATION OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. ?004-074 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of Council City of Santa Ana 4 75D-310 ORDINANCE NO. NS-2662 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") hereby, finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is a community redevelopment agency organized and existing under the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et. seq., ("CRL") and has been authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the City Council. B. On December 4, 1989, by Ordinance No. NS-2039, the City Council approved and adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Project Area") and subsequently amended the Redevelopment Plan ("Existing Plan") four (4) times to exempt certain properties from eminent domain, extend plan effectiveness, and establish financial and time limits in compliance with Assembly Bill 1290, Assembly Bill 1342, Senate Bill 1054, and other provisions of the CRL. C. The ordinances adopting the Existing Plan, as amended (collectively, the "Original Ordinances"), including the findings and determinations made by the City Council therein are made part hereof by this reference. D. The Agency is vested with the responsibility to carry out the Existing Plan. 7SD-311 E. As a part of this amendment proceeding, the Agency desires to amend the Existing Plan ("Amendment") to merge the Project Area with the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, and South Main Redevelopment Projects ("Merged Project Area") to allow the combining of tax increment revenues from each and all of these constituent project areas so that taxes attributable to each constituent project area which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to CRL Section 33670(b) are allocated to the entire Merged Project Area for the purpose of paying principal of, and interest on, indebtedness incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the Merged Project Area; except that any such taxes attributable to any constituent project area shall first be used to pay indebtedness in compliance with the terms of any bond resolution or other agreement pledging such taxes from the constituent project area, which resolution or other agreement was adopted or approved by the Agency prior to the merging of these projects; and except as otherwise noted above, tax increment revenue attributed to each constituent project may be used for any lawful purpose in any constituent project now within the Merged Project Area. F. Further, the Amendment (as well as the concurrent amendments to the other constituent project areas) creating the Merged Project Area will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities pursuant to CRL Article 16, Section 33485, et. seq. G. The City Council has received from the Agency the proposed Amendment, a copy of which is on file at the office of the Clerk of the Council, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, together with the Agency's Report to the City Council on the Amendment, including the reasons for the Amendment; proposed projects and programs; the proposed method of financing the redevelopment of the Merged Project Area which includes the Project Area; a method and plan for relocation; the report of the Planning Commission of the City with respect to the conformity of the Amendment with the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana ("General Plan"); a neighborhood impact report; a summary of consultations with 75D-312 Project Area property owners, businesses and community organizations; and a summary of consultations with affected taxing agencies. H. A project area committee was not required to be formed in connection with this Amendment because it does not affect the existing authority of the Agency to acquire, by eminent domain, ~ -'\ property on which a substantial number of low and moderate income persons reside and because this Amendment does not contain additional public projects and does not grant the Agency authority to fund or develop additional public projects that would displace a substantial number of low and moderate income persons. I. Although this Amendment, and each of the proposed plan amendments causing the merger, will be considered and adopted separately pursuant to the CRL to facilitate their consideration, this Amendment and each of the proposed plan amendments causing the merger have been aggregated and presented together in a single joint public hearing. J. The City Council and the Agency held a joint public hearing on September 7, 2004, on the adoption of the Amendment in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California. K. Notice of said joint public hearing was duly and regularly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, once a week for at least four successive weeks prior to the date of such joint public hearing, and a copy of said notice was mailed, by first class mail, to each last known assessee of each parcel and to all known residents and businesses located on each parcel in the Project Area not less than thirty days prior to the date of commencement of the joint public hearing. Affidavits of such publication and such mailing are on file with the Clerk of the Council and the Agency. L. Copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by certified mail with return receipt requested to the governing body of each affected taxing agency receiving taxes from property in the Project Area. 750-313 M. The Agency, in accordance with CRL Section 33488, has timely notified the State of California - Department of Housing and Community Development of its intent to merge the Project Area with the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor and South Main Redevelopment Projects. N. In conformity with the requirements of CRL Section 33490, the Agency has previously adopted and has in place an implementation plan for the Existing Plan and each of the constituent project areas ("Implementation Plan") that describes the redevelopment project areas, the specific goals and objectives for the project areas, and the specific programs, including potential projects and estimated expenditures proposed during the five (5) year term of such Implementation Plan, and further, the Implementation Plan includes an explanation of how the goals, objectives, programs, and expenditure will eliminate blight in the Project Area and implement the affordable housing requirement of the CRL. o. The Implementation Plan in place is current for the applicable five- year period, and does not require amendment in connection with this Amendment or other merger proceedings. P. These proceedings for the merger of all existing project areas have proceeded pursuant to and in conformity with CRL Section 33486 through the proposed amendment of each affected redevelopment plan for each constituent project area as provided in Article 12 of CRL Section 33450, et. seq. Q. Section 33457.1 of Article 12 provides that to the extent warranted by a proposed amendment to a redevelopment plan, the reports and information required by Sections 33352 and 33367 will be prepared. R. The Agency prepared and circulated a Negative Declaration on the proposed Amendment in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code § 21000 et. seq.), the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14, California Code of Regulations, § 15000 et. seq.), and environmental procedures adopted by the Agency pursuant thereto. 751:1-314 S. The City Council has considered the report and recommendation of the Planning Commission, the Negative Declaration, the Report to the City Council by the Agency, the Amendment to the Existing Plan, has provided an opportunity for all persons to be heard, and has received and considered all evidence and testimony presented for or against any and all aspects of the Amendment and has made written findings in response to each written objection of an affected property owner or taxing entity, if any, filed with the Clerk of the Council before or during such joint public hearing. T. All actions required by law have been taken by all appropriate public bodies. Section 2. Based on the evidence in the record, including, but not limited to, the Agency's Report to the City Council on the Amendment prepared in accordance with CRL Section 33352, and all documents referenced therein, and evidence and testimony received at the joint public hearing on adoption of the Amendment held on September 7, 2004, and the Original Ordinances, the City Council hereby makes the following findings and determinations as warranted by the Amendment: A. The implementation of the Amendment (and the other amendments causing the merger) will promote the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the City of Santa Ana and will effectuate the purposes and policies of the CRL. This finding is based on the fact that the Amendment is and will be of substantial benefit to the community and contribute. to the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality of such areas, and increased and improved housing opportunities, in particular the financial benefits and feasibility of the Merged Project Area that will accrue due to the merger. B. The carrying out of the Amendment would promote the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the City and would effectuate the purposes and policies of the CRL. This finding is based on the fact that redevelopment will benefit the Project Area and the Merged Project Area as a whole by correcting conditions of blight and by coordinating public and private actions to stimulate development and improve the economic and physical conditions of the Merged Project Area including the Project Area. 75D~315 C. The adoption and carrying out of the Amendment is economically sound and feasible. This finding is based on the fact that under the Existing Plan and the Amendment the Agency will continue to be authorized to seek and utilize a variety of potential financing resources, including property tax increment revenues; that the nature and timing of public redevelopment assistance within the Project Area will continue to depend upon the amount and availability of such financing resources, including tax increment generated by new investment in the Merged Project Area; that under the Existing Plan and the Amendment no public redevelopment activity can be undertaken unless the Agency can demonstrate that it has adequate revenue to finance the activity; and that the financing plan included within the Agency's Report to the City Council prepared for the Amendment demonstrates that sufficient financial resources will be available to carry out the implementation of the Existing Plan and will allow flexibility within the Merged Project Area in addressing the most pressing needs and respond to market forces more effectively. D. The Amendment is consistent with the General Plan, including, but not limited to, the Housing Element of the General Plan, which substantially complies with the requirements of Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code. This finding is based upon the General Plan and the findings of the Planning Commission that the Amendment conforms to the General Plan. E. Pursuant to CRL Section 33367(d)(6), the condemnation of real property, if provided for in the redevelopment plan, is necessary to the execution of the redevelopment plan and adequate provisions have been made for payment for property to be acquired as provided by law. F. The Agency has a feasible method and plan for the relocation of families and persons who might be displaced, temporarily or permanently, from housing facilities in the Merged Project Area by means other than the use of eminent domain. The Agency also has a feasible method and plan for relocation of businesses. This finding is based upon the fact that in conjunction with the adoption of the Original Ordinances, the Agency had prepared a method or 750-316 plan for relocation of families, persons and businesses that may be displaced by Agency projects. The relocation plans prepared for the Project Area, included within the Reports to the City Council prepared for the Existing Plan and Amendment, provides for relocation assistance within the Project Area according to law, and the fact that such assistance, including relocation payments, constitutes a feasible method for relocation. G. There are, or shall be provided, within the Merged Project Area or within other areas not generally less desirable with regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons who might be displaced from the Project Area, decent, safe and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of and available to such displaced families and persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment. This finding is based upon the provisions of the Existing Plan and Original Ordinances which require that families and persons shall not be displaced prior to the adoption of a relocation plan pursuant to CRL Sections 33411 and 33411.1, and that dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate-income shall not be removed or destroyed prior to the adoption of a replacement housing plan pursuant to CRL Sections 33334.5,33413 and 33413.5. Section 3. The City Council is satisfied that permanent housing facilities will be available within three years from the time residential occupants of the Project Area, if any, are displaced, and that pending the development of such facilities, there will be available to any such displaced residential occupants temporary housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the City at the time of their displacement. This finding is based upon the City Council's finding that no persons or families of low and moderate income shall be displaced from residences unless and until there are suitable housing units available and ready for occupancy by such displaced persons or families at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. Such housing units shall be suitable to the needs of such displaced persons or families and must be decent, safe, sanitary and otherwise standard dwellings. Section 4. Written objections to the Amendment filed with the Clerk of the Council before the hour set for the hearing on the Amendment and all written and oral objections presented to the City Council at the hearing having been considered and, in the case of written objections received from Project Area 75D-317 property owners, occupants and affected taxing agencies having been responded to in writing, all such objections are hereby overruled. Section 5. The Existing Plan, as adopted by the Original Ordinances, is hereby further amended as set forth in the Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A. As so amended, the Existing Plan is hereby incorporated herein by reference. The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby authorized to combine the Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A with the Existing Plan prepared for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, and when filed with the Clerk of the Council and the Secretary of the Agency, shall constitute the official Redevelopment Plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project. Section 6. In order to implement and facilitate the effectuation of the Amendment hereby approved, this City Council hereby: (a) pledges its cooperation in helping to carry out the Amendment, (b) authorizes and directs the various officials, departments, boards, and agencies of the City having administrative responsibilities in the Project Area likewise to cooperate to such end and to exercise their respective functions and powers in a manner consistent with redevelopment of the Project Area, (c) stands ready to consider and take appropriate action upon proposals and measures designed to effectuate the Amendment, and (d) declares its intention to undertake and complete any proceeding necessary to be carried out by the City under the provisions of the Amendment. Section 7. The Clerk of the Council is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Agency, whereupon the Agency is vested with the responsibility for carrying out the Amendment. Section 8. The Clerk of the Council is hereby directed to record with the County Recorder of the County of Orange a statement that proceedings for the redevelopment of the Project Area, pursuant to the Amendment, have been instituted under the CRL. Section 9. If any part of this Ordinance or the Amendment which it approves is held to be invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or of the Amendment, and this City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of the Ordinance or approved the remainder of the Amendment if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted. 7S[j-318 ADOPTED this day of ,2004 Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher City Attorney By: Lisa E. Storck Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS-2662 to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 750-319 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BRISTOL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on December 4, 1989 by Ordinance No. NS-2039. The Project Area contains approximately 781 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been previously amended on October 3,1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2231 and Ordinance No. NS-2234, on August 2,1999 by Ordinance No. NS-2396, and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a fifth amendment ("Fifth Amendmenf) to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and the South Main Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: x. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Fifth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station - Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and the South Main Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". EXHIBIT A PA0408008.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002108/16104 75D-320 ORDINANCE NO. NS-2663 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") hereby, finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is a community redevelopment agency organized and existing under the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et. seq., ("CRL") and has been' authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the City Council. B. On July 2, 1973, by Ordinance No. NS-1173, the City Council approved and adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the Central City Redevelopment Project ("Project Area") and subsequently amended the Redevelopment Plan ("Existing Plan") six (6) times to add territory, extend plan effectiveness and eminent domain authority, and establish tax increment and time limits in compliance with Senate Bill 690, Assembly Bill 1290, Assembly Bill 1342, Senate Bill 1045,and other provisions of the CRL. C. The ordinances adopting the Existing Plan, as amended (collectively, the "Original Ordinances"), including the findings and determinations made by the City Council therein are made part hereof by this reference. D. Existing Plan. The Agency is vested with the responsibility to carry out the E. As a part of this amendment proceeding, the Agency desires to amend the Existing Plan ("Amendment") to merge the Project Area with the Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects ("Merged Project Area") to allow the combining of tax increment revenues from each and all of these constituent PA0407013.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008/08/16104 1 75D-321 project areas so that taxes attributable to each constituent project area which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to CRL Section 33670(b) are allocated to the entire Merged Project Area for the purpose of paying principal of, and interest on, indebtedness incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the Merged Project Area; except that any such taxes attributable to any constituent project area shall first be used to pay indebtedness in compliance with the terms of any bond resolution or other agreement pledging such taxes from the constituent project area, which resolution or other agreement was adopted or approved by the Agency prior to the merging of these projects; and except as otherwise noted above, tax increment revenue attributed to each constituent project may be used for any lawful purpose in any constituent project now within the Merged Project Area. F. Further, the Amendment (as well as the concurrent amendments to the other constituent project areas) creating the Merged Project Area will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities pursuant to CRL Article 16, Section 33485, et seq. G. The City Cou ncil has received from the Agency the proposed Amendment, a copy of which is on file at the office of the Clerk of the Council, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, together with the Agency's Report to the City Council on the Amendment, including the reasons for the Amendment; proposed projects and programs; the proposed method of financing the redevelopment of the Merged Project Area which includes the Project Area; a method or plan for relocation; the report of the Planning Commission of the City with respect to the conformity of the Amendment with the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana ("General Plan"); a neighborhood impact report; a summary of consultations with Project Area property owners, businesses and community organizations; and a summary of consultations with affected taxing agencies. H. A project area committee was not required to be formed in connection with this Amendment because it does not affect the existing authority of the Agency to acquire, by eminent domain, property on which a substantial number of low and moderate income persons reside and because this Amendment does not contain additional public projects and does not grant the Agency authority to fund or develop additional public projects that would displace a substantial number of low and moderate income persons. PA0407013.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108116104 2 75D-322 I. Although this Amendment, and each of the proposed plan amendments causing the merger, will be considered and adopted separately pursuant to the CRL to facilitate their consideration this Amendment and each of the proposed plan amendments causing the merger have been aggregated and presented together in a single joint public hearing. J. The City Council and the Agency held a joint public hearing on September 7, 2004, on the adoption of the Amendment in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California. K. Notice of said joint public hearing was duly and regularly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, once a week for at least four successive weeks prior to the date of such joint public hearing, and a copy of said notice was mailed, by first class mail, to each last known assessee of each parcel and to all known residents and businesses located on each parcel in the Project Area not less than thirty days prior to the date of commencement of the joint public hearing and affidavits of such publication and such mailing are on file with the Clerk of the Council and the Agency. L. Copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by certified mail with return receipt requested to the governing body of each affected taxing agency receiving taxes from property in the Project Area. M. The Agency, in accordance with CRL Section 33488, has timely notified the State of California - Department of Housing and Community Development of its intent to merge the Project Area with the Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects. N. In conformity with the requirements of CRL Section 33490, the Agency has previously adopted and has in place an implementation plan for the Existing Plan and each of the constituent project areas ("Implementation Plan") that describes the redevelopment project areas, the specific goals and objectives for the project areas, and the specific programs, including potential projects and estimated expenditures proposed during the five (5) year term of such Implementation Plan, and further, the Implementation Plan includes an explanation of how the goals, objectives, programs, and expenditure will eliminate blight in the Project Area and implement the affordable housing requirement of the CRL. PA0407013.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108/16104 3 75D-323 O. The Implementation Plan in place is current for the applicable five-year period, and does not require amendment in connection with this Amendment or other merger proceedings. P. These proceedings for the merger of all existing project areas have proceeded pursuant to and in conformity with CRL Section 33486 through the proposed amendment of each affected redevelopment plan for each constituent project area as provided in Article 12 of CRL Section 33450, et seq. Q. Section 33457.1 of Article 12 provides that to the extent warranted by a proposed amendment to a redevelopment plan, the reports and information required by Sections 33352 and 33367 will be prepared. R. The Agency prepared and circulated a Negative Declaration on the proposed Amendment in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq.), the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14, California Code of Regulations, § 15000 et seq.), and environmental procedures adopted by the Agency pursuant thereto. S. The City Council has considered the report and recommendation of the Planning Commission, the Negative Declaration, the Report to the City Council of the Agency, the Amendment to the Existing Plan, has provided an opportunity for all persons to be heard, and has received and considered all evidence and testimony presented for or against any and all aspects of the Amendment and has made written findings in response to each written objection of an affected property owner or taxing entity, if any, filed with the Clerk of the Council before or during such joint public hearing. T. All actions required by law have been taken by all appropriate public bodies. SECTION 2. Based on the evidence in the record, including, but not limited to, the Agency's Report to the City Council on the Amendment prepared in accordance with CRL Section 33352, and all documents referenced therein, and evidence and testimony received at the joint public hearing on adoption of the Amendment held on September 7, 2004, and the Original Ordinances, the City Council hereby makes the following findings and determinations as warranted by the Amendment: 4 PA0407013.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108/16104 75D-324 A. The implementation of the Amendment (and the other amendments causing the merger) will promote the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the City of Santa Ana and will effectuate the purposes and policies of the CRL. This finding is based on the fact that the Amendment is and will be of substantial benefit to the community and contribute to the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality of such areas, and increased and improved housing opportunities, in particular the financial benefits and feasibility of the Merged Project Area that will accrue due to the merger. B. The carrying out of the Amendment would promote the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the City and would effectuate the purposes and policies of the CRL. This finding is based on the fact that redevelopment will benefit the Project Area and the Merged Project Area as a whole by correcting conditions of blight and by coordinating public and private actions to stimulate development and improve the economic and physical conditions of the Merged Project Area including the Project Area. C. The adoption and carrying out of the Amendment is economically sound and feasible. This finding is based on the fact that under the Existing Plan and the Amendment the Agency will continue to be authorized to seek and utilize a variety of potential financing resources, including property tax increment revenues; that the nature and timing of public redevelopment assistance within the Project Area will continue to depend upon the amount and availability of such financing resources! including tax increment generated by new investment in the Merged Project Area; that under the Existing Plan and the Amendment no public redevelopment activity can be undertaken unless the Agency can demonstrate that it has adequate revenue to finance the activity; and that the financing plan included within the Agency's Report to the City Council prepared for the Amendment demonstrates that sufficient financial resources will be available to carry out the implementation of the Existing Plan and will allow flexibility within the Merged Project Area in addressing the most pressing needs and respond to market forces more effectively. D. The Amendment is consistent with the General Plan, including, but not limited to, the Housing Element of the General Plan, which substantially complies with the requirements of Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code. This finding is based upon the General Plan and the findings of the Planning Commission that the Amendment conforms to the General Plan. 5 PA0407013.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108116104 75D-325 E. The condemnation of real property may be necessary for the overall execution of the Existing Plan. The Agency has eminent domain authority within the Project Area and adequate provisions have been made for payment for property that may be acquired as provided by law. This finding is based upon the facts set forth in the Existing Plan and the Agency's Report(s) to the City Council prepared for the Existing Plan, in particular that without eminent domain authority, the Agency's redevelopment efforts may be impaired. This finding is further based on the fact that in connection with the acquisition of property by the Agency, the Agency will comply with all applicable provisions of the California Eminent Domain Law (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq.), including provisions requiring the payment of just compensation. F. The Agency has a feasible method and plan for the relocation of families and persons who might be displaced, temporarily or permanently, from housing facilities in the Merged Project Area. The Agency also has a feasible method and plan for relocation of businesses. This finding is based upon the fact that in conjunction with the adoption of the Original Ordinances, the Agency had prepared a method or plan for relocation of families, persons and businesses that may be displaced by Agency projects. The relocation plans prepared for the Project Area, included within the Reports to the City Council prepared for the Existing Plan and Amendment, provides for relocation assistance within the Project Area according to law, and the fact that such assistance, including relocation payments, constitutes a feasible method for relocation. G. There are, or shall be provided, within the Merged Project Area or within other areas not generally less desirable with regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons who might be displaced from the Project Area, decent, safe and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of and available to such displaced families and persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment. This finding is based upon the provisions of the Existing Plan and Original Ordinances which require that families and persons shall not be displaced prior to the adoption of a relocation plan pursuant to CRL Sections 33411 and 33411.1, and that dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate-income shall not be removed or destroyed prior to the adoption of a replacement housing plan pursuant to CRL Sections 33334.5, 33413 and 33413.5. PA0407013.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108116104 6 75D-326 SECTION 3. The City Council is satisfied that permanent housing facilities will be available within three years from the time residential occupants of the Project Area, if any, are displaced, and that pending the development of such facilities, there will be available to any such displaced residential occupants temporary housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the City at the time of their displacement. This finding is based upon the City Council's finding that no persons or families of low and moderate income shall be displaced from residences unless and until there are suitable housing units available and ready for occupancy by such displaced persons or families at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. Such housing units shall be suitable to the needs of such displaced persons or families and must be decent, safe, sanitary and otherwise standard dwellings. SECTION 4. Written objections to the Amendment filed with the Clerk of the Council before the hour set for the hearing on the Amendment and all written and oral objections presented to the City Council at the hearing having been considered and, in the case of written objections received from Project Area property owners, occupants and affected taxing agencies having been responded to in writing, all such objections are hereby overruled. SECTION 5. The Existing Plan, as adopted by the Original Ordinances, is hereby further amended as set forth in the Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A. As so amended, the Existing Plan is hereby incorporated herein by reference. The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby authorized to combine the Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A with the Existing Plan prepared for the Central City Redevelopment Project, and when filed with the Clerk of the Council and the Secretary of the Agency, shall constitute the official Redevelopment Plan for the Central City Redevelopment Project. SECTION 6. In order to implement and facilitate the effectuation of the Amendment hereby approved, this City Council hereby: (a) pledges its cooperation in helping to carry out the Amendment, (b) authorizes and directs the various officials, departments, boards, and agencies of the City having administrative responsibilities in the Project Area likewise to cooperate to such end and to exercise their respective functions and powers in a manner consistent with redevelopment of the Project Area, (c) stands ready to consider and take appropriate action upon proposals and measures designed to effectuate the Amendment, and (d) declares its intention to undertake and complete any proceeding necessary to be carried out by the City under the provisions of the Amendment. 7 PA0407013.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.008/08116104 75D-327 SECTION 7. The Clerk of the Council is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Agency, whereupon the Agency is vested with the responsibility for carrying out the Amendment. SECTION 8. The Clerk of the Council is hereby directed to record with the County Recorder of the County of Orange a statement that proceedings for the redevelopment of the Project Area, pursuant to the Amendment, have been instituted under the CRL. SECTION 9. If any part of this Ordinance or the Amendment which it approves is held to be invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or of the Amendment, and this City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of the Ordinance or approved the remainder of the Amendment if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted. 8 PA0407013.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108116104 75D-328 ADOPTED this day of ,2004 Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher City Attorney By: Lisa E. Storck Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Council members CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS-2663 to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , 2004, and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 9 PA0407013.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108/16104 75D-329 SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the Central City Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 2, 1973 by Ordinance No. NS-1173. The Project Area is comprised of approximately 694 acres locateçj in the central and northern portions of the City. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on June 2,1975 by Ordinance No. NS-1258, on December 1, 1986 by Ordinance No. NS-1877, on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2234, on May 6, 1996 by Ordinance No. NS-2290, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. NS-2396 and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a seventh amendment ("Seventh Amendmenr) to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits in effect and stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended. for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part IX to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: IX. MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Seventh Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the ~edevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the Central City Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". . EXHIBIT A PA0408008.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002/08116104 75D-330 - ORDINANCE NO. NS-2664 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE INTER-CITY COMMUTER STATION REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") hereby, finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is a community redevelopment agency organized and existing under the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et. seq., ("CRL") and has been authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the City Council. B. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1636, the City Council approved and adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project ("Project Area") and subsequently amended the Redevelopment Plan ("Existing Plan") four (4) times to extend plan effectiveness and eminent domain authority, and establish tax increment and time limits in compliance with Assembly Bill 1290, Assembly Bill 1342, Senate Bill 1045, and other provisions of the CRL. C. The ordinances adopting the Existing Plan, as amended (collectively, the "Original Ordinances"), including the findings and determinations made by the City Council therein are made part hereof by this reference. D. Existing Plan. The Agency is vested with the responsibility to carry out the PA0407014:SNTA:CK:gbd 19090 .003.008108/16/04 75D-331 E. As a part of this amendment proceeding, the Agency desires to amend the Existing Plan ("Amendment") to merge the Project Area with the Central City, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects ("Merged Project Area") to allow the combining of tax increment revenues from each and all of these constituent project areas so that taxes attributable to each constituent project area which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to CRL Section 33670(b) are allocated to the entire Merged Project Area for the purpose of paying principal of, and interest on, indebtedness incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the Merged Project Area; except that any such taxes attributable to any constituent project area shall first be used to pay indebtedness in compliance with the terms of any bond resolution or other agreement pledging such taxes from the constituent project area, which resolution or other agreement was adopted or approved by the Agency prior to the merging of these projects; and except as otherwise noted above, tax increment revenue attributed to each constituent project may be used for any lawful purpose in any constituent project now within the Merged Project Area. F. Further, the Amendment (as well as the concurrent amendments to the other constituent project areas) creating the Merged Project Area will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities pursuant to CRL Article 16, Section 33485, et. seq. G. The City Council has received from the Agency the proposed Amendment, a copy of which is on file at the office of the Clerk of the Council, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, together with the Agency's Report to the City Council on the Amendment, including the reasons for the Amendment; proposed projects and programs; the proposed method of financing the redevelopment of the Merged Project Area which includes the Project Area; a method or plan for relocation; the report of the Planning Commission of the City with respect to the conformity of the Amendment with the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana ("General Plan"); a neighborhood impact report; a summary of consultations with Project Area property owners, businesses and community organizations; and a summary of consultations with affected taxing agencies. H. A project area committee was not required to be formed in connection with this Amendment because it does not affect the existing authority of the Agency to acquire, by eminent domain, property on which a substantial number of low and moderate income persons reside and because this 2 PA0407014:SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108116104 75D-332 Amendment does not contain additional public projects and does not grant the Agency authority to fund or develop additional public projects that would displace a substantial number of low and moderate income persons. I. Although this Amendment, and each of the proposed plan amendments causing the merger, will be considered and adopted separately pursuant to the CRL to facilitate their consideration, this Amendment and each of the proposed plan amendments causing the merger have been aggregated and presented together in a single joint public hearing. J. The City Council and the Agency held a joint public hearing on September 7, 2004, on the adoption of the Amendment in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California. K. Notice of said joint public hearing was duly and regularly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, once a week for at least four successive weeks prior to the date of such joint public hearing, and a copy of said notice was mailed, by first class mail, to each last known assessee of each parcel and to all known residents and businesses located on each parcel in the Project Area not less than thirty days prior to the date of commencement of the joint public hearing. Affidavits of such publication and such mailing are on file with the Clerk of the Council and the Age.ncy. L. Copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by certified mail with return receipt requested to the governing body of each affected taxing agency receiving taxes from property in the Project Area. M. The Agency, in accordance with CRL Section 33488, has timely notified the State of California - Department of Housing and Community Development of its intent to merge the Project Area with the Central City, North Harbor, South Harbor, South Main and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects. N. In conformity with the requirements of CRL Section 33490, the Agency has previously adopted and has in place an implementation plan for the Existing Plan and each of the constituent project areas ("Implementation Plan") that describes the redevelopment project areas, the specific goals and objectives for the project areas, and the specific programs, including potential projects and estimated expenditures proposed during the five (5) year term of such Implementation Plan, and further, the Implementation Plan includes an explanation of how the goals, objectives, programs, and expenditure will 3 PA0407014:SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108116104 75D-333 eliminate blight in the Project Area and implement the affordable housing requirement of the CRL. O. The Implementation Plan in place is current for the applicable five-year period, and does not require amendment in connection with this Amendment or other merger proceedings. P. These proceedings for the merger of all existing project areas have proceeded pursuant to and in conformity with CRL Section 33486 through the proposed amendment of each affected redevelopment plan for each constituent project area as provided in Article 12 of CRL Section 33450, et. seq. Q. Section 33457.1 of Article 12 provides that to the extent warranted by a proposed amendment to a redevelopment plan, the reports and information required by Sections 33352 and 33367 will be prepared. R. The Agency prepared and circulated a Negative Declaration on the proposed Amendment in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code § 21000 et. seq.), the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14, California Code of Regulations, § 15000 et. seq.), and environmental procedures adopted by the Agency pursuant thereto. S. The City Council has considered the report and recommendation of the Planning Commission, the Negative Declaration, the Report to the City Council of the Agency, the Amendment to the Existing Plan, has provided an opportunity for all persons to be heard, and has received and considered all evidence and testimony presented for or against any and all aspects of the Amendment and has made written findings in response to each written objection of an affected property owner or taxing entity, if any, filed with the Clerk of the Council before or during such joint public hearing. T. All actions required by law have been taken by all appropriate public bodies. SECTION 2. Based on the evidence in the record, including, but not limited to, the Agency's Report to the City Council on the Amendment prepared in accordance with CRL Section 33352, and all documents referenced therein, and evidence and testimony received at the joint public hearing on adoption of the Amendment held on September 7, 2004, and the Original Ordinances, the City 4 PA0407014:SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108116104 75D-334 Council hereby makes the following findings and determinations as warranted by the Amendment: A. The implementation of the Amendment (and the other amendments causing the merger) will promote the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the City of Santa Ana and will effectuate the purposes and policies of the CRL. This finding is based on the fact that the Amendment is and will be of substantial benefit to the community and contribute to the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality of such areas, and increased and improved housing opportunities, in particular the financial benefits and feasibility of the Merged Project Area that will accrue due to the merger. B. The carrying out of the Amendment would promote the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the City and would effectuate the purposes and policies of the CRL. This finding is based on the fact that redevelopment will benefit the Project Area and the Merged Project Area as a whole by correcting conditions of blight and by coordinating public and private actions to stimulate development and improve the economic and physical conditions of the Merged Project Area including the Project Area. C. The adoption and carrying out of the Amendment is economically sound and feasible. This finding is based on the fact that under the Existing Plan and the Amendment the Agency will continue to be authorized to seek and utilize a variety of potential financing resources, including property tax increment revenues; that the nature and timing of public redevelopment assistance within the Project Area will continue to depend upon the amount and availability of such financing resources, including tax increment generated by new investment in the Merged Project Area; that under the Existing Plan and the Amendment no public redevelopment activity can be undertaken unless the Agency can demonstrate that it has adequate revenue to finance the activity; and that the financing plan included within the Agency's Report to the City Council prepared for the Amendment demonstrates that sufficient financial resources will be available to carry out the implementation of the Existing Plan and will allow flexibility within the Merged Project Area in addressing the most pressing needs and respond to market forces more effectively. D. The Amendment is consistent with the General Plan, including, but not limited to, the Housing Element of the General Plan, which substantially complies with the requirements of Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code. 5 PA0407014:SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108/16104 75D-335 This finding is based upon the General Plan and the findings of the Plannin~ Commission that the Amendment conforms to the General Plan. E. The condemnation of real property may be necessary for the overall execution of the Existing Plan. The Agency has eminent domain authority within the Project Area and adequate provisions have been made for payment for property that may be acquired as provided by law. This finding is based upon the facts set forth in the Existing Plan, the subsequent settlement agreement related to restrictions on the use of eminent domain authority in the Project Area, and the Agency's Report(s) to the City Council prepared for the Existing Plan, in particular that without eminent domain authority, the Agency's redevelopment efforts may be impaired. This finding is further based on the fact that in connection with the acquisition of property by the Agency, the Agency will comply with all applicable provisions of the California Eminent Domain Law (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et. seq.), including provisions requiring the payment of just compensation. F. The Agency has a feasible method and plan for the relocation of families and persons who might be displaced, temporarily or permanently, from housing facilities in the Merged Project Area. The Agency also has a feasible method and plan for relocation of businesses. This finding is based upon the fact that in conjunction with the adoption of the Original Ordinances, the Agency had prepared a method or plan for relocation of families, persons and businesses that may be displaced by Agency projects. The relocation plans prepared for the Project Area, included within the Reports to the City Council prepared for the Existing Plan and Amendment, provides for relocation assistance within the Project Area according to law, and the fact that such assistance, including relocation payments, constitutes a feasible method for relocation. G. There are, or shall be provided, within the Merged Project Area or within other areas not generally less desirable with regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons who might be displaced from the Project Area, decent, safe and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of and available to such displaced families and persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment. This finding is based upon the provisions of the Existing Plan and Original Ordinances which require that families and persons shall not be displaced prior to the adoption of a relocation plan pursuant to CRL Sections 33411 and 33411.1, and that dwelling units PA0407014:SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008/08116104 6 . 75D-336 housing persons and families of low or moderate-income shall not be removed or destroyed prior to the adoption of a replacement housing plan pursuant to CRL Sections 33334.5, 33413 and 33413.5. SECTION 3. The City Council is satisfied that permanent housing facilities will be available within three years from the time residential occupants of the Project Area, if any, are displaced, and that pending the development of such facilities, there will be available to any such displaced residential occupants temporary housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the City at the time of their displacement. This finding is based upon the City Council's finding that no persons or families of low and moderate income shall be displaced from residences unless and until there are suitable housing units available and ready for occupancy by such displaced persons or families at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. Such housing units shall be suitable to the needs of such displaced persons or families and must be decent, safe, sanitary and otherwise standard dwellings. SECTION 4. Written objections to the Amendment filed with the Clerk of the Council before the hour set for the hearing on the Amendment and all written and oral objections presented to the City Council at the hearing having been considered and, in the case of written objections received from Project Area property owners, occupants and affected taxing agencies having been responded to in writing, all such objections are hereby overruled. SECTION 5. The Existing Plan, as adopted by the Original Ordinances, is hereby further amended as set forth in the Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A. As so amended, the Existing Plan is hereby incorporated herein by reference. The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby authorized to combine the Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A with the Existing Plan prepared for the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, and when filed with the Clerk of the Council and the Secretary of the Agency, shall constitute the official Redevelopment Plan for the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project. 7 PA0407014:SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108116104 75D-337 SECTION 6. In order to implement and facilitate the effectuation of the Amendment hereby approved, this City Council hereby: (a) pledges its cooperation in helping to carry out the Amendment, (b) authorizes and directs the various officials, departments, boards, and agencies of the City having administrative responsibilities in the Project Area likewise to cooperate to such end and to exercise their respective functions and powers in a manner consistent with redevelopment of the Project Area, (c) stands ready to consider and take appropriate action upon proposals and measures designed to effectuate the Amendment, and (d) declares its intention to undertake and complete any proceeding necessary to be carried out by the City under the provisions of the Amendment. SECTION 7. The Clerk of the Council is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Agency, whereupon the Agency is vested with the responsibility for carrying out the Amendment. SECTION 8. The Clerk of the Council is hereby directed to record with the County Recorder of the County of Orange a statement that proceedings for the redevelopment of the Project Area, pursuant to the Amendment, have been instituted under the CRL. SECTION 9. If any part of this Ordinance or the Amendment which it approves is held to be invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or of the Amendment, and this City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of the Ordinance or approved the remainder of the Amendment if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted. PA0407014:SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108/16104 8 75D-338 ADOPTED this day of ,2004 Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher City Attorney By: Lisa E. Storck Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS-2664 to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , 2004, and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana PA0407014:SNTA:CK:gbd 19090 .003.008108116104 9 75D-339 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE INTER-cITY COMMUTER STATION REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 6, 1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1636. The Project Area contains approximately 536 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2234, on May 6, 1996 by Ordinance No. NS-2289, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. NS- 2396, and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a fifth amendment ("Fifth Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: X. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Fifth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances becOme effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project will hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, North Harbor - Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". EXHIBIT A PA0408008.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002lO8l16J04 75D-340 ORDINANCE NO. NS- 2665 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE NORTH HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") hereby, finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is a community redevelopment agency organized and existing under the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et. seq., ("CRL") and has been authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the City Council. B. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1637, the City Council approved and adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the North Harbor Redevelopment Project ("Project Area") and subsequently amended the Redevelopment Plan ("Existing Plan") five (5) times to extend plan effectiveness and eminent domain authority, and establish tax increment and time limits in compliance with Assembly Bill 1290, Assembly Bill 1342, Senate Bill 1045, and other provisions of the CRL. C. The ordinances adopting the Existing Plan, as amended (collectively, the "Original Ordinances"), including the findings and determinations made by the City Council therein are made part hereof by this reference. D. Existing Plan. The Agency is vested with the responsibility to carry out the PA0407015.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108/16104 75D-341 E. As a part of this amendment proceeding, the Agency desires to amend the Existing Plan rAmendment") to merge the Project Area with the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, South Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects ("Merged Project Area") to allow the combining of tax increment revenues from each and all of these constituent project areas so that taxes attributable to each constituent project area which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to CRL Section 33670(b) are allocated to the entire Merged Project Area for the purpose of paying principal of, and interest on, indebtedness incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the Merged Project Area; except that any such taxes attributable to any constituent project area shall first be used to pay indebtedness in compliance with the terms of any bond resolution or other agreement pledging such taxes from the constituent project area, which resolution or other agreement was adopted or approved by the Agency prior to the merging of these projects; and except as otherwise noted above, tax increment revenue attributed to each constituent project may be used for any lawful purpose in any constituent project now within the Merged Project Area. F. Further, the Amendment (as well as the concurrent amendments to the other constituent project areas) creating the Merged Project Area will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities pursuant to CRL Article 16, Section 33485, et. seq. G. The City Council has received from the Agency the proposed Amendment, a copy of which is on file at the office of the Clerk of the Council, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, together with the Agency's Report to the City Council on the Amendment, including the reasons for the Amendment; proposed projects and programs; the proposed method of financing the redevelopment of the Merged Project Area which includes the Project Area; a method or plan of relocation; the report of the Planning Commission of the City with respect to the conformity of the Amendment with the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana ("General Plan"); a neighborhood impact report; a summary of consultations with Project Area property owners, businesses and community organizations; and a summary of consultations with affected taxing agencies. H. A project area committee was not required to be formed in connection with this Amendment because it does not affect the existing authority of the Agency to acquire, by eminent domain, property on which a substantial number of low and moderate income persons reside and because this Amendment does not contain additional public projects and does not grant the PA0407015.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108/16/04 2 75D-342 Agency authority to fund or develop additional public projects that would displace a substantial number of low and moderate income persons. I. Although this Amendment, and each of the proposed plan amendments causing the merger, will be considered and adopted separately pursuant to the CRL to facilitate their consideration, this Amendment and each of the proposed plan amendments causing the merger have been aggregated and presented together in a single joint public hearing. J. The City Council and the Agency held a joint public hearing on September 7, 2004, on the adoption of the Amendment in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California. K. Notice of said joint public hearing was duly and regularly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, once a week for at least four successive weeks prior to the date of such joint public hearing, and a copy of said notice was mailed, by first class mail, to each last known assessee of each parcel and to all known residents and businesses located on each parcel in the Project Area not less than thirty days prior to the date of commencement of the joint public hearing. Affidavits of such publication and such mailing are on file with the Clerk of the Council and the Agency. L. Copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by certified mail with return receipt requested to the governing body of each affected taxing agency receiving taxes from property in the Project Area. M. The Agency, in accordance with CRL Section 33488, has timely notified the State of California - Department of Housing and Community Development of its intent to merge the Project Area with the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, South Harbor, South Main and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects. N. In conformity with the requirements of CRL Section 33490, the Agency has previously adopted and has in place an implementation plan for the Existing Plan and each of the constituent project areas ("Implementation Plan") that describes the redevelopment project areas, the specific goals and objectives for the project areas, and the specific programs, including potential projects and estimated expenditures proposed during the five (5) year term of such Implementation Plan, and further, the Implementation Plan includes an explanation of how the goals, objectives, programs, and expenditure will PA0407015.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108/16104 3 75D-343 eliminate blight in the Project Area and implement the affordable housing requirement of the CRL. O. The Implementation Plan in place is current for the applicable five-year period, and does not require amendment in connection with this Amendment or other merger proceedings. P. These proceedings for the merger of all existing project areas have proceeded pursuant to and in conformity with CRL Section 33486 through the proposed amendment of each affected redevelopment plan for each constituent project area as provided in Article 12 of CRL Section 33450, et. seq. Q. Section 33457.1 of Article 12 provides that to the extent warranted by a proposed amendment to a redevelopment plan, the reports and information required by Sections 33352 and 33367 will be prepared. R. The Agency prepared and circulated a Negative Declaration on the proposed Amendment in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code § 21000 et. seq.), the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14, California Code of Regulations, § 15000 et. seq.), and environmental procedures adopted by the Agency pursuant thereto. S. The City Council has considered the report and recommendation of the Planning Commission, the Negative Declaration, the Report to the City Council of the Agency, the Amendment to the Existing Plan, has provided an opportunity for all persons to be heard, and has received and considered all evidence and testimony presented for or against any and all aspects of the Amendment and has made written findings in response to each written objection of an affected property owner or taxing entity, if any, filed with the Clerk of the Council before or during such joint public hearing. T. All actions required by law have been taken by all appropriate public bodies. SECTION 2. Based on the evidence in the record, including, but not limited to, the Agency's Report to the City Council on the Amendment prepared in accordance with CRL Section 33352, and all documents referenced therein, and evidence and testimony received at the joint public hearing on adoption of the Amendment held on September 7, 2004, and the Original Ordinances, the City 4 PA0407015.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108/16104 75D-344 Council hereby makes the following findings and determinations as warranted by the Amendment: A. The implementation of the Amendment (and the other amendments causing the merger) will promote the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the City of Santa Ana and will effectuate the purposes and policies of the CRL. This finding is based on the fact that the Amendment is and will be of substantial benefit to the community and contribute to the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality of such areas, and increased and improved housing opportunities, in particular the financial benefits and feasibility of the Merged Project Area that will accrue due to the merger. B. The carrying out of the Amendment would promote the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the City and would effectuate the purposes and policies of the CRL. This finding is based on the fact that redevelopment will benefit the Project Area and the Merged Project Area as a whole by correcting conditions of blight and by coordinating public and private actions to stimulate development and improve the economic and physical conditions of the Merged Project Area including the Project Area. C. The adoption and carrying out of the Amendment is economically sound and feasible. This finding is based on the fact that under the Existing Plan and the Amendment the Agency will continue to be authorized to seek and utilize a variety of potential financing resources, including property tax increment revenues; that the nature and timing of public redevelopment assistance within the Project Area will continue to depend upon the amount and availability of such financing resources, including tax increment generated by new investment in the Merged Project Area; that under the Existing Plan and the Amendment no public redevelopment activity can be undertaken unless the Agency can demonstrate that it has adequate revenue to finance the activity; and that the financing plan included within the Agency's Report to the City Council prepared for the Amendment demonstrates that sufficient financial resources will be available to carry out the implementation of the Existing Plan and will allow flexibility within the Merged Project Area in addressing the most pressing needs and respond to market forces more effectively. D. The Amendment is consistent with the General Plan, including, but not limited to, the Housing Element of the General Plan, which substantially complies with the requirements of Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code. PA0407015.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108116104 5 75D-345 This finding is based upon the General Plan and the findings of the Planning Commission that the Amendment conforms to the General Plan. E. The condemnation of real property may be necessary for the overall execution of the Existing Plan. The Agency has eminent domain authority within the. Project Area and adequate provisions have been made for payment for property that may be acquired as provided by law. This finding is based upon the facts set forth in the Existing Plan, the subsequent settlement agreement related to restrictions on the use of eminent domain authority in the Project Area, and the Agency's Report(s) to the City Council prepared for the Existing Plan, in particular that without eminent domain authority, the Agency's redevelopment efforts may be impaired. This finding is further based on the fact that in connection with the acquisition of property by the Agency, the Agency will comply with all applicable provisions of the California Eminent Domain Law (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et. seq.), including provisions requiring the payment of just compensation. F. The Agency has a feasible method and plan for the relocation of families and persons who might be displaced, temporarily or permanently, from housing facilities in the Merged Project Area. The Agency also has a feasible method and plan for relocation of businesses. This finding is based upon the fact that in conjunction with the adoption of the Original Ordinances, the Agency had prepared a method or plan for relocation of families, persons and businesses that may be displaced by Agency projects. The relocation plans prepared for the Project Area, included within the Reports to the City Council prepared for the Existing Plan and Amendment, provides for relocation assistance within the Project Area according to law, and the fact that such assistance, including relocation payments, constitutes a feasible method for relocation. G. There are, or shall be provided, within the Merged Project Area or within other areas not generally less desirable with regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons who might be displaced from the Project Area, decent, safe and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of and available to such displaced families and persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment. This finding is based upon the provisions of the Existing Plan and Original Ordinances which require that families and persons shall not be displaced prior to the adoption of a relocation plan pursuant to CRL Sections 33411 and 33411.1, and that dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate-income shall not be removed or PA0407015.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108116104 6 75D-346 destroyed prior to the adoption of a replacement housing plan pursuant to CRL Sections 33334.5,33413 and 33413.5. SECTION 3. The City Council is satisfied that permanent housing facilities will be available within three years from the time residential occupants of the Project Area, if any, are displaced, and that pending the development of such facilities, there will be available to any such displaced residential occupants temporary housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the City at the time of their displacement. This finding is based upon the City Council's finding that no persons or families of low and moderate income shall be displaced from residences unless and until there are suitable housing units available and ready for occupancy by such displaced persons or families at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. Such housing units shall be suitable to the needs of such displaced persons or families and must be decent, safe, sanitary and otherwise standard dwellings. SECTION 4. Written objections to the Amendment filed with the Clerk of the Council before the hour set for the hearing on the Amendment and all written and oral objections presented to the City Council at the hearing having been considered and, in the case of written objections received from Project Area property owners, occupants and affected taxing agencies having been responded to in writing, all such objections are hereby overruled. SECTION 5. The Existing Plan, as adopted by the Original Ordinances, is hereby further amended as set forth in the Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A. As so amended, the Existing Plan is hereby incorporated herein by reference. The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby authorized to combine the Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A with the Existing Plan prepared for the North Harbor Redevelopment Project, and when filed with the Clerk of the Council and the Secretary of the Agency, shall constitute the official Redevelopment Plan for the North Harbor Redevelopment Project. 7 PA0407015.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108116104 75D-347 SECTION 6. In order to implement and facilitate the effectuation of the Amendment hereby approved, this City Council hereby: (a) pledges its cooperation in helping to carry out the Amendment, (b) authorizes and directs the various officials, departments, boards, and agencies of the City having administrative responsibilities in the Project Area likewise to cooperate to such end and to exercise their respective functions and powers in a manner consistent with redevelopment of the Project Area, (c) stands ready to consider and take appropriate action upon proposals and measures designed to effectuate the Amendment, and (d) declares its intention to undertake and complete any proceeding necessary to be carried out by the City under the provisions of the Amendment. SECTION 7. The Clerk of the Council is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Agency, whereupon the Agency is vested with the responsibility for carrying out the Amendment. SECTION 8. The Clerk of the Council is hereby directed to record with the County Recorder of the County of Orange a statement that proceedings for the redevelopment of the Project Area, pursuant to the Amendment, have been instituted under the CRL. SECTION 9. If any part of this Ordinance or the Amendment which it approves is held to be invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or of the Amendment, and this City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of the Ordinance or approved the remainder of the Amendment if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted. PA0407015.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.00BJ08/16104 8 75D-348 ADOPTED this day of ,2004 Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher City Attorney By: Lisa E. Storck Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS-2665 to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ,2004, and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana PA0407015.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108116104 9 75D-349 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE NORTH HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the North Harbor Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 6, 1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1637. The Project Area contains approximately 428 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2234, on May 6, 1996 by Ordinance No. NS-2291, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. NS-2396, on January 20, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2641, and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a sixth amendment ("Sixth Arnendmenf) to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: X. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Sixth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the North Harbor Redevelopment Project will - hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". EXHIBIT A PA0408008.SNACK:gbd 19090.003.002108116104 75D-350 LES 8/23/04 ORDINANCE NO. NS- 2666 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTH HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") hereby, finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is a community redevelopment agency organized and existing under the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et. seq., ("CRL") and has been authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the City Council. B. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1638, the City Council approved and adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the South Harbor Redevelopment Project ("Project Area") and subsequently amended the Redevelopment Plan ("Existing Plan") five (5) times to extend plan effectiveness and eminent domain authority, and establish financial and time limits in compliance with Assembly Bill 1290, Assembly Bill 1342, Senate Bill 1045, and other provisions of the CRL. C. The ordinances adopting the Existing Plan, as amended (collectively, the "Original Ordinances"), including the findings and determinations made by the City Council therein are made part hereof by this reference. 75D-351 D. Existing Plan. LES 8/23/04 The Agency is vested with the responsibility to carry out the E. As a part of this amendment proceeding, the Agency desires to amend the Existing Plan ("Amendment") to merge the Project Area with the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects ("Merged Project Area") to allow the combining of tax increment revenues from each and all of these constituent project areas so that taxes attributable to each constituent project area which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to CRL Section 33670(b) are allocated to the entire Merged Project Area for the purpose of paying principal of, and interest on, indebtedness incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the Merged Project Area; except that any such taxes attributable to any constituent project area shall first be used to pay indebtedness in compliance with the terms of any bond resolution or other agreement pledging such taxes from the constituent project area, which resolution or other agreement was adopted or approved by the Agency prior to the merging of these projects; and except as otherwise noted above, tax increment revenue attributed to each constituent project may be used for any lawful purpose in any constituent project now within the Merged Project Area. F. Further, the Amendment (as well as the concurrent amendments to the other constituent project areas) creating the Merged Project Area will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities pursuant to CRL Article 16, Section 33485, et. seq. G. The City Council has received from the Agency the proposed Amendment, a copy of which is on file at the office of the Clerk of the Council, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, together with the Agency's Report to the City Council on the Amendment, including the reasons for the Amendment; proposed projects and programs; the proposed method of financing the redevelopment of the Merged Project Area which includes the Project Area; a method or plan for relocation; the report of the Planning Commission of the City with respect to the conformity of the Amendment with the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana ("General Plan"); a neighborhood impact report; a summary of 75D-352 LES 8/23/04 consultations with Project Area property owners, businesses and community organizations; and a summary of consultations with affected taxing agencies. H. A project area committee was not required to be formed in connection with this Amendment because it does not affect the existing authority of the Agency to acquire, by eminent domain, property on which a substantial number of low and moderate income persons reside and because this Amendment does not contain additional public projects and does not grant the Agency authority to fund or develop additional public projects that would displace a substantial number of low and moderate income persons. I. Although this Amendment, and each of the proposed plan amendments causing the merger, will be considered and adopted separately pursuant to the CRL to facilitate their consideration, this Amendment and each of the proposed plan amendments causing the merger have been aggregated and presented together in a single joint public hearing. J. The City Council and the Agency held a joint public hearing on September 7, 2004, on the adoption of the Amendment in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California. K. Notice of said joint public hearing was duly and regularly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, once a week for at least four successive weeks prior to the date of such joint public hearing, and a copy of said notice was mailed, by first class mail, to each last known assessee of each parcel and to all known residents and businesses located on each parcel in the Project Area not less than thirty days prior to the date of commencement of the joint public hearing. Affidavits of such publication and such mailing are on file with the Clerk of the Council and the Agency. L. Copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by certified mail with return receipt requested to the governing body of each affected taxing agency receiving taxes from property in the Project Area. M. The Agency, in accordance with CRL Section 33488, has timely notified the State of California - Department of Housing and Community Development of its intent to merge the Project Area with the Central City, Inter- 75D-353 LES 8/23/04 City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Main, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects. N. In conformity with the requirements of CRL Section 33490, the Agency has previously adopted and has in place an implementation plan for the Existing Plan and each of the constituent project areas ("Implementation Plan") that describes the redevelopment project areas, the specific goals and objectives for the project areas, and the specific programs, including potential projects and estimated expenditures proposed during the five (5) year term of such Implementation Plan, and further, the Implementation Plan includes an explanation of how the goals, objectives, programs, and expenditure will eliminate blight in the Project Area and implement the affordable housing requirement of the CRL. o. The Implementation Plan in place is current for the applicable five-year period, and does not require amendment in connection with this Amendment or other merger proceedings. P. These proceedings for the merger of all existing project areas have proceeded pursuant to and in conformity with CRL Section 33486 through the proposed amendment of each affected redevelopment plan for each constituent project area as provided in Article 12 of CRL Section 33450, et. seq. Q. Section 33457.1 of Article 12 provides that to the extent warranted by a proposed amendment to a redevelopment plan, the reports and information required by Sections 33352 and 33367 will be prepared. R. The Agency prepared and circulated a Negative Declaration on the proposed Amendment in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code § 21000 et. seq.), the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14, California Code of Regulations, § 15000 et. seq.), and environmental procedures adopted by the Agency pursuant thereto. S. The City Council has considered the report and recommendation of the Planning Commission, the Negative Declaration, the Report to the City Council of the Agency, the Amendment to the Existing Plan, 75D-354 LES 8/23/04 has provided an opportunity for all persons to be heard, and has received and considered all evidence and testimony presented for or against any and all aspects of the Amendment and has made written findings in response to each written objection of an affected property owner or taxing entity, if any, filed with the Clerk of the Council before or during such joint public hearing. T. All actions required by law have been taken by all appropriate public bodies. SECTION 2. Based on the evidence in the record, including, but not limited to, the Agency's Report to the City Council on the Amendment prepared in accordance with CRL Section 33352, and all documents referenced therein, and evidence and testimony received at the joint public hearing on adoption of the Amendment held on September 7, 2004, and the Original Ordinances, the City Council hereby makes the following findings and determinations as warranted by the Amendment: A. The implementation of the Amendment (and the other amendments causing the merger) will promote the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the City of Santa Ana and will effectuate the purposes and policies of the CRL. This finding is based on the fact that the Amendment is and will be of substantial benefit to the community and contribute to the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality of such areas, and increased and improved housing opportunities, in particular the financial benefits and feasibility of the Merged Project Area that will accrue due to the merger. B. The carrying out of the Amendment would promote the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the City and would effectuate the purposes and policies of the CRL. This finding is based on the fact that redevelopment will benefit the Project Area and the Merged Project Area as a whole by correcting conditions of blight and by coordinating public and private actions to stimulate development and improve the economic and physical conditions of the Merged Project Area including the Project Area. C. The adoption and carrying out of the Amendment is economically sound and feasible. This finding is based on the fact that under the Existing Plan and the Amendment the Agency will continue to be authorized to 75D-355 LES 8/23/04 seek and utilize a variety of potential financing resources, including property tax increment revenues; that the nature and timing of public redevelopment assistance within the Project Area will continue to depend upon the amount and availability of such financing resources, including tax increment generated by new investment in the Merged Project Area; that under the Existing Plan and the Amendment no public redevelopment activity can be undertaken unless the Agency can demonstrate that it has adequate revenue to finance the activity; and that the financing plan included within the Agency's Report to the City Council prepared for the Amendment demonstrates that sufficient financial resources will be available to carry out the implementation of the Existing Plan and will allow flexibility within the Merged Project Area in addressing the most pressing needs and respond to market forces more effectively. D. The Amendment is consistent with the General Plan, including, but not limited to, the Housing Element of the General Plan, which substantially complies with the requirements of Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code. This finding is based upon the General Plan and the findings of the Planning Commission that the Amendment conforms to the General Plan. E. Pursuant to CRL Section 33367(d)(6), the condemnation of real property, if provided for in the redevelopment plan, is necessary to the execution of the redevelopment plan and adequate provisions have been made for payment for property to be acquired as provided by law. F. The Agency has a feasible method and plan for the relocation of families and persons who might be displaced, temporarily or permanently, from housing facilities in the Merged Project Area by means other than the use of eminent domain. The Agency also has a feasible method and plan for relocation of businesses. This finding is based upon the fact that in conjunction with the adoption of the Original Ordinances, the Agency had prepared a method or plan for relocation of families, persons and businesses that may be displaced by Agency projects. The relocation plans prepared for the Project Area, included within the Reports to the City Council prepared for the Existing Plan and Amendment, provides for relocation assistance within the Project Area according to law, and the fact that such assistance, including relocation payments, constitutes a feasible method for relocation. 75D-356 LES 8/23/04 G. There are, or shall be provided, within the Merged Project Area or within other areas not generally less desirable with regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons who might be displaced from the Project Area, decent, safe and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of and available to such displaced families and persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment. This finding is based upon the provisions of the Existing Plan and Original Ordinances which require that families and persons shall not be displaced prior to the adoption of a relocation plan pursuant to CRL Sections 33411 and 33411.1, and that dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate-income shall not be removed or destroyed prior to the adoption of a replacement housing plan pursuant to CRL Sections 33334.5, 33413 and 33413.5. SECTION 3. The City Council is satisfied that permanent housing facilities will be available within three years from the time residential occupants of the Project Area, if any, are displaced, and that pending the development of such facilities, there will be available to any such displaced residential occupants temporary housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the City at the time of their displacement. This finding is based upon the City Council's finding that no persons or families of low and moderate income shall be displaced from residences unless and until there are suitable housing units available and ready for occupancy by such displaced persons or families at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. Such housing units shall be suitable to the needs of such displaced persons or families and must be decent, safe, sanitary and otherwise standard dwellings. SECTION 4. Written objections to the Amendment filed with the Clerk of the Council before the hour set for the hearing on the Amendment and all written and oral objections presented to the City Council at the hearing having been considered and, in the case of written objections received from Project Area property owners, occupants and affected taxing agencies having been responded to in writing, all such objections are hereby overruled. 75D-357 LES 8123/04 SECTION 5. The Existing Plan, as adopted by the Original Ordinances, is hereby further amended as set forth in the Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A. As so amended, the Existing Plan is hereby incorporated herein by reference. The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby authorized to combine the Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A with the Existing Plan prepared for the South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and when filed with the Clerk of the Council and the Secretary of the Agency, shall constitute the official Redevelopment Plan for the South Harbor Redevelopment Project. SECTION 6. In order to implement and facilitate the effectuation of the Amendment hereby approved, this City Council hereby: (a) pledges its cooperation in helping to carry out the Amendment, (b) authorizes and directs the various officials, departments, boards, and agencies of the City having administrative responsibilities in the Project Area likewise to cooperate to such end and to exercise their respective functions and powers in a manner consistent with redevelopment of the Project Area, (c) stands ready to consider and take appropriate action upon proposals and measures designed to effectuate the Amendment, and (d) declares its intention to undertake and complete any proceeding necessary to be carried out by the City under the provisions of the Amendment. . SECTION 7. The Clerk of the Council is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Agency, whereupon the Agency is vested with the responsibility for carrying out the Amendment. SECTION 8. The Clerk of the Council is hereby directed to record with the County Recorder of the County of Orange a statement that proceedings for the redevelopment of the Project Area, pursuant to the Amendment, have been instituted under the CRL. SECTION 9. If any part of this Ordinance or the Amendment which it approves is held to be invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or of the Amendment, and this City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of the Ordinance or approved the remainder of the Amendment if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted. 75D-358 LES 8/23/04 ADOPTED this day of ,2004 Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher City Attorney By: Lisa E. Storck Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Coun~iI, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS-2665 to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , 2004, and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 75D-359 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTH HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the South Harbor Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 6, 1982 by Ordinance No. N5-1638. The Project Area contains approximately 1,050 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on August 3, 1992 by Ordinance No. N5-2167, on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2234, on August 2,1999 by Ordinance No. NS-2396, on January 20,2004 by Ordinance No. N5-2641 , and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The San~ Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a sixth amendment ("Sixth Amendmenf') to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: X. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Sixth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the South Harbor Redevelopment Project will - hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Statign Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Main Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". EXHIBIT A PA0408008.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002/08/16104 75D-360 ORDINANCE NO. NS-2667 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTH MAIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") hereby, finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is a community redevelopment agency organized and existing under the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et. seq. ("CRL") and has been authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the City Council. B. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1639, the City Council approved and adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the South Main Redevelopment Project ("Project Area") and subsequently amended the Redevelopment Plan ("Existing Plan") five (5) times to extend plan effectiveness and eminent domain authority, and establish financial and time limits in compliance with Assembly Bill 1290, Assembly Bill 1342, Senate Bill 1045, and other provisions of the CRL. C. The ordinances adopting the Existing Plan, as amended (collectively, the "Original Ordinances"), including the findings and determinations made by the City Council therein are made part hereof by this reference. D. Existing Plan. The Agency is vested with the responsibility to carry out the PA0407017 .SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108/16104 75D-361 E. As a part of this amendment proceeding, the Agency desires to amend the Existing Plan ("Amendment") to merge the Project Area with the Central City, Inter-City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects ("Merged Project Area") to allow the combining of tax increment revenues from each and all of these constituent project areas so that taxes attributable to each constituent project area which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to CRL Section 33670(b) are allocated to the entire Merged Project Area for the purpose of paying principal of, and interest on, indebtedness incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the Merged Project Area; except that any such taxes attributable to any constituent project area shall first be used to pay indebtedness in compliance with the terms of any bond resolution or other agreement pledging such taxes from the constituent project area, which resolution or other agreement was adopted or approved by the Agency prior to the merging of these projects; and except as otherwise noted above, tax increment revenue attributed to each constituent project may be used for any lawful purpose in any constituent project now within the Merged Project Area. F. Further, the Amendment (as well as the concurrent amendments to the other constituent project areas) creating the Merged Project Area will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through economic vitality and increased and improved housing opportunities pursuant to CRL Article 16, Section 33485, et. seq. G. The City Council has received from the Agency the proposed Amendment, a copy of which is on file at the office of the Clerk of the Council, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, together with the Agency's Report to the City Council on the Amendment, including the reasons for the Amendment; proposed projects and programs; the proposed method of financing the redevelopment of the Merged Project Area which includes the Project Area; a method or plan for relocation; the report of the Planning Commission of the City with respect to the conformity of the Amendment with the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana ("General Plan"); a neighborhood impact report; a summary of consultations with Project Area property owners, businesses and community organizations; and a summary of consultations with affected taxing agencies. H. A project area committee was not required to be formed in connection with this Amendment because it does not affect the existing authority of the Agency to acquire, by eminent domain, property on which a substantial number of low and moderate income persons reside and because this Amendment does not contain additional public projects and does not grant the PA0407017 .SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108116104 2 75D-362 Agency authority to fund or develop additional public projects that would displace a substantial number of low and moderate income persons. I. Although this Amendment, and each of the proposed plan amendments causing the merger, will be considered and adopted separately pursuant to the CRL to facilitate their consideration, this Amendment and each of the proposed plan amendments causing the merger have been aggregated and presented together in a single joint public hearing. J. The City Council and the Agency held a joint public hearing on September 7, 2004, on the adoption of the Amendment in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California. K. Notice of said joint public hearing was duly and regularly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, once a week for at least four successive weeks prior to the date of such joint public hearing, and a copy of said notice was mailed, by first class mail, to each last known assessee of each parcel and to all known residents and businesses located on each parcel in the Project Area not less than thirty days prior to the date of commencement of the joint public hearing. Affidavits of such publication and such mailing are on file with the Clerk of the Council and the Agency. L. Copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by certified mail with return receipt requested to the governing body of each affected taxing agency receiving taxes from property in the Project Area. M. The Agency, in accordance with CRL Section 33488, has timely notified the State of California - Department of Housing and Community Development of its intent to merge the Project Area with the Central City, Inter- City Commuter Station, North Harbor, South Harbor, and Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Projects. N. In conformity with the requirements of CRL Section 33490, the Agency has previously adopted and has in place an implementation plan for the Existing Plan and each of the constituent project areas ("Implementation Plan") that describes the redevelopment project areas, the specific goals and objectives for the project areas, and the specific programs, including potential projects and estimated expenditures proposed during the five (5) year term of such Implementation Plan, and further, the Implementation Plan includes an explanation of how the goals, objectives, programs, and expenditure will 3 PA0407017.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108116104 75D-363 eliminate blight in the project area and implement the affordable housing requirement of the CRL. O. The Implementation Plan in place is current for the applicable five-year period, and does not require amendment in connection with this Amendment or other merger proceedings. P. These proceedings for the merger of all existing project areas have proceeded pursuant to and in conformity with CRL Section 33486 through the proposed amendment of each affected redevelopment plan for each constituent project area as provided in Article 12 of CRL Section 33450, et. seq. Q. Section 33457.1 of Article 12 provides that to the extent warranted by a proposed amendment to a redevelopment plan, the reports and information required by Sections 33352 and 33367 will be prepared. R. The Agency prepared and circulated a Negative Declaration on the proposed Amendment in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code § 21000 et. seq.), the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14, California Code of Regulations, § 15000 et. seq.), and environmental procedures adopted by the Agency pursuant thereto. S. The City Council has considered the report and recommendation of the Planning Commission, the Negative Declaration, the Report to the City Council of the Agency, the Amendment to the Existing Plan, has provided an opportunity for all persons to be heard, and has received and considered all evidence and testimony presented for or against any and all aspects of the Amendment and has made written findings in response to each written objection of an affected property owner or taxing entity, if any, filed with the Clerk of the Council before or during such joint public hearing. T. All actions required by law have been taken by all appropriate public bodies. SECTION 2. Based on the evidence in the record, including, but not limited to, the Agency's Report to the City Council on the Amendment prepared in accordance with CRL Section 33352, and all documents referenced therein, and evidence and testimony received at the joint public hearing on adoption of the Amendment held on September 7, 2004, and the Original Ordinances, the City 4 PA0407017.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108/16104 75D-364 Council hereby makes the following findings and determinations as warranted by the Amendment: A. The implementation of the Amendment (and the other amendments causing the merger) will promote the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the City of Santa Ana and will effectuate the purposes and policies of the CRL. This finding is based on the fact that the Amendment is and will be of substantial benefit to the community and contribute to the revitalization of blighted areas through increased economic vitality of such areas, and increased and improved housing opportunities, in particular the financial benefits and feasibility of the Merged Project Area that will accrue due to the merger. B. The carrying out of the Amendment would promote the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the City and would effectuate the purposes and policies of the CRL. This finding is based on the fact that redevelopment will benefit the Project Area and the Merged Project Area as a whole by correcting conditions of blight and by coordinating public and private actions to stimulate development and improve the economic and physical conditions of the Merged Project Area including the Project Area. C. The adoption and carrying out of the Amendment is economically sound and feasible. This finding is based on the fact that under the Existing Plan and the Amendment the Agency will continue to be authorized to seek and utilize a variety of potential financing resources, including property tax increment revenues; that the nature and timing of public redevelopment assistance within the Project Area will continue to depend upon the amount and availability of such financing resources, including tax increment generated by new investment in the Merged Project Area; that under the Existing Plan and the Amendment no public redevelopment activity can be undertaken unless the Agency can demonstrate that it has adequate revenue to finance the activity; and that the financing plan included within the Agency's Report to the City Council prepared for the Amendment demonstrates that sufficient financial resources will be available to carry out the implementation of the Existing Plan and will allow flexibility within the Merged Project Area in addressing the most pressing needs and respond to market forces more effectively. D. The Amendment is consistent with the General Plan, including, but not limited to, the Housing Element of the General Plan, which substantially complies with the requirements of Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code. PA0407017.SNT A:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108116/04 5 75D-365 This finding is based upon the General Plan and the findings of the Planning Commission that the Amendment conforms to the General Plan. E. The condemnation of real property may be necessary for the overall execution of the Existing Plan. The Agency has eminent domain authority within the Project Area and adequate provisions have been made for payment for property that may be acquired as provided by law. This finding is based upon the facts set forth in the Existing Plan, the subsequent settlement agreement related to restrictions on the use of eminent domain authority in the Project Area, and the Agency's Report(s) to the City Council prepared for the Existing Plan, in particular that without eminent domain authority, the Agency's redevelopment efforts may be impaired. This finding is further based on the fact that in connection with the acquisition of property by the Agency, the Agency will comply with all applicable provisions of the California Eminent Domain Law (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et. seq.), including provisions requiring the payment of just compensation. F. The Agency has a feasible method and plan for the relocation of families and persons who might be displaced, temporarily or permanently, from housing facilities in the Merged Project Area. The Agency also has a feasible method and plan for relocation of businesses. This finding is based upon the fact that in conjunction with the adoption of the Original Ordinances, the Agency had prepared a method or plan for relocation of families, persons and businesses that may be displaced by Agency projects. The relocation plans prepared for the Project Area, included within the Reports to the City Council prepared for the Existing Plan and Amendment, provides for relocation assistance within the Project Area according to law, and the fact that such assistance, including relocation payments, constitutes a feasible method for relocation. G. There are, or shall be provided, within the Merged Project Area or within other areas not generally less desirable with regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons who might be displaced from the Project Area, decent, safe and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of and available to such displaced families and persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment. This finding is based upon the provisions of the Existing Plan and Original Ordinances which require that families and persons shall not be displaced prior to the adoption of a relocation plan pursuant to CRL Sections 33411 and 33411.1, and that dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate-income shall not be removed or 6 PA0407017.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090.003.008108116104 75D-366 destroyed prior to the adoption of a replacement housing plan pursuant to CRL Sections 33334.5, 33413 and 33413.5. SECTION 3. The City Council is satisfied that permanent housing facilities will be available within three years from the time residential occupants of the Project Area, if any, are displaced, and that pending the development of such facilities, there will be available to any such displaced residential occupants temporary housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the City at the time of their displacement. This finding is based upon the City Council's finding that no persons or families of low and moderate income shall be displaced from residences unless and until there are suitable housing units available and ready for occupancy by such displaced persons or families at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. Such housing units shall be suitable to the needs of such displaced persons or families and must be decent, safe, sanitary and otherwise standard dwellings. SECTION 4. Written objections to the Amendment filed with the Clerk of the Council before the hour set for the hearing on the Amendment and all written and oral objections presented to the City Council at the hearing having been considered and, in the case of written objections received from Project Area property owners, occupants and affected taxing agencies having been responded to in writing, all such objections are hereby overruled. SECTION 5. The Existing Plan, as adopted by the Original Ordinances, is hereby further amended as set forth in the Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A. As so amended, the Existing Plan is hereby incorporated herein by reference. The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby authorized to combine the Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A with the Existing Plan prepared for the South Main Redevelopment Project, and when filed with the Clerk of the Council and the Secretary of the Agency, shall constitute the official Redevelopment Plan for the South Main Redevelopment Project. 7 PA0407017 .SNT A:CK:gbd 19090 .003.008108116104 75D-367 SECTION 6. In order to implement and facilitate the effectuation of the Amendment hereby approved, this City Council hereby: (a) pledges its cooperation in helping to carry out the Amendment, (b) authorizes and directs the various officials, departments, boards, and agencies of the City having administrative responsibilities in the Project Area likewise to cooperate to such end and to exercise their respective functions and powers in a manner consistent with redevelopment of the Project Area, (c) stands ready to consider and take appropriate action upon proposals and measures designed to effectuate the Amendment, and (d) declares its intention to undertake and complete any proceeding necessary to be carried out by the City under the provisions of the Amendment. SECTION 7. The Clerk of the Council is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Agency, whereupon the Agency is vested with the responsibility for carrying out the Amendment. SECTION 8. The Clerk of the Council is hereby directed to record with the County Recorder of the County of Orange a statement that proceedings for the redevelopment of the Project Area, pursuant to the Amendment, have been instituted under the CRL. SECTION 9. If any part of this Ordinance or the Amendment which it approves is held to be invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or of the Amendment, and this City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of the Ordinance or approved the remainder of the Amendment if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted. 8 PA0407017.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090 .003.008108/16104 75D-368 ADOPTED this day of ,2004 Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher City Attorney By: Lisa E. Storck Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Council members CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS-2667 to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , 2004, and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana PA0407017.SNTA:CK:gbd 19090 .003.008/08116104 9 75D-369 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTH MAIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the South Main Redevelopment Project ("Project" or "Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana ("City Council") on July 6, 1982 by Ordinance No. NS-1639. The Project Area contains approximately 1,500 acres. The Redevelopment Plan has been amended on October 3, 1994 by Ordinance No. NS-2234, on July 17, 1995 by Ordinance No. NS-2256, on August 2, 1999 by Ordinance No. NS-2396, on January 20, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2641, and on May 17, 2004 by Ordinance No. NS-2652. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is proposing a sixth amendment ("Sixth Amendmenf) to the Redevelopment Plan, the sole purpose of which is to merge the Project Area with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Merged Projects"). No amendment is proposed to the financial or time limits or the boundaries of the Project Area. The financial and time limits stated in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, for the Project Area shall remain in force and effect. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby further amended to include a new Part X to the Redevelopment Plan to read as follows: x. (§1000) MERGER Upon the effective date of the ordjnance adopting the Sixth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, and provided the ordinances become effective amending the Redevelopment Plans for the Merged Projects, the South Main Redevelopment Project will - hereby be merged with the Central City Redevelopment Project, Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project, North Harbor Redevelopment Project, South Harbor Redevelopment Project, and the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project, collectively referred to as the "Merged Redevelopment Projects". EXHIBIT A PA0408008.SNA.CK:gbd 19090.003.002108116104 75D-370 -