HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-074 - Redevelopment Plan Merger Amendments Conform to the City of Santa Ana General Plan
9/1/04 LES
8
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-074
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SANTA ANA
FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN MERGER AMENDMENTS CONFORM TO THE CITY
OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN AND APPROVING THE
NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED WITH REGARD
TO THE MERGER OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
AREAS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and
declares as follows:
8
A. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is a
community redevelopment agency organized and existing under the California
Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et. seq.,
("CRL") and has been authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a
redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana
("City Council").
B. On July 2, 1973, by Ordinance No. 1173, the City Council of the City of Santa
Ana ("City Council") approved and adopted a redevelopment plan for the Central City
Redevelopment Project ("Central City Project").
C. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1636, the City Council adopted a
redevelopment plan for the Inter-City Commuter Station Redevelopment Project ("Inter-
City Project").
D. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1637, the City Council adopted a
redevelopment plan for the North Harbor Redevelopment Project ("North Harbor
Project").
E. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1638, the City Council adopted a
redevelopment plan for the South Harbor Redevelopment Project ("South Harbor
Project").
F. On July 6, 1982, by Ordinance No. NS-1639, the City Council adopted a
redevelopment plan for the South Main Redevelopment Project ("South Main Project").
8
G. On December 4, 1989, by Ordinance No. NS-2039, the City Council adopted
a redevelopment plan for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Project ("Bristol Corridor
Project").
Resolution No. 2004-074
Page 1 of 3
H. The "Existing Plans" consist of the Redevelopment Plans, as amended,
prepared for the Central City Project, Inter-City Project, North Harbor Project, South
Harbor Project, South Main Project, and the Bristol Corridor Project and the territory
included within the Existing Plans is referred to as the "Project Areas".
I. The Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is vested with
the responsibility to carry out the Existing Plans.
J. The Agency desires to amend each of the Existing Plans ("Amendments") to
merge the Project Areas in order to combine the tax increment revenues from the
Project Areas and reallocate the revenues to and among the entire merged Project
Area that will best facilitate the revitalization of blighted areas through economic vitality
and increase and improve housing opportunities.
K. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Redevelopment Law, the Agency
and the City Council have held a duly noticed joint public hearing on the proposed merger
of the project areas.
Section 2. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information
contained in the initial study and the negative declaration prepared with respect to this
Resolution. The City Council has, as a result of its consideration and the evidence
presented at the hearings on this matter, determined that, as required pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines, a
Negative Declaration adequately addresses the expected environmental impacts of this
Resolution. On the basis of this review, the City Council finds that there is no evidence
from which it can be fairly argued that the project will have a significant adverse effect on
the environment. The City Council hereby certifies and approves the negative declaration
and directs that the Notice of Determination be prepared and filed with the County Clerk
of the County of Orange in the manner required by law. Negative Declaration,
Environmental Review No., 2004-34 will be filed for this project.
Pursuant to Title XIV, California Code of Regulations ("CCR") § 735.5(c)(1), the
City Council has determined that, after considering the record as a whole, there is no
evidence that the proposed project will have the potential for any adverse effect on wildlife
resources or the ecological habitat upon which wildlife resources depend. The proposed
project exists in an urban environment characterized by paved concrete, roadways,
surrounding buildings and human activity. Therefore, pursuant to Fish and Game Code
§ 711.2 and Title XIV, CCR § 735.5(a)(3), the payment of Fish and Game Department
filing fees is not required in conjunction with this project.
Section 3. The City Council has reviewed the proposed redevelopment plan
and hereby finds and determines that said plans conform to the City of Santa Ana
General Plan because the merger the Council approves herein is a strictly financial
matter not affecting the land uses of properties in the City. In addition, the
Redevelopment Plans and their respective amendments have only been adopted after
each has been found by a prior City Council to be in conformance with the City's
General Plan and these prior findings are conclusive at this point in time.
Resolution No. 2004-074
Page 2 of 3
8
8
8
Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by
the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote
adopting this Resolution.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney
By: L!';(~' [ ~~
Lisa E. Storck
Assistant City Attorney
AYES:
Councilmembers: Alvarez, Sist, Christy, Franklin, Pulido, Solorio (6)
NOES:
Councilmembers: None (0)
ABSTAIN:
Councilmembers: None (0)
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: Garcia (1)
CERTIFICATION OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached
Resolution No. 2004-074 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the
City of Santa Ana on September 7,2004.
Date: /éJ# tt/~ Y
( / /
erk of the Council
City of Santa Ana
Resolution No. 2004-074
Page 3 of 3