HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-021 CRA
EJC:adg
2/7/80
RESOLUTION NO. 80-21
.
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA MAKING
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS NECESSARY FOR THE
PROPOSED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOP-
MENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND
STEPHEN LAWRENCE PHILIPSON FOR THE SALE AND
DEVELOPMENT OF THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
IN THE SANTA ANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Santa Ana has prepared an Initial Study of the
environmental impact of the proposed Disposition and
Development Agreement between the Agency and Stephen Lawrence
Philipson; and
WHEREAS, the Agency has reviewed and considered
the above said Initial Study and the final Environmental
Impact Report for the Santa Ana Redevelopment Plan; and
.
WHEREAS, said Initial Study conforms to the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et ~ the
"Guidelines for the Implementation of the Cãïi1OrñIa
Environmental Quality Act of 1970," as amended, adopted by
the Secretary for Resources of the State of California, and
the procedures for implementation of the Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 adopted by Resolution No. 75-4 of the
Agency.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, AS FOLLOWS:
The Agency hereby finds and determines that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study, the
environmental impact of the proposed agreement is '
essentially the same as found in the previous Environmental
Impact Report, and that there is no additional information
or data available requiring supplementation of the previous
Environmental Impact Report.
.
2. Neither the approval nor the implementation
of the proposed Agreement will cause substantial changes in
the Redevelopment Project, or with respect to the
circumstances under which the project is to be undertaken,
which will require major revisions in the Environmental
Impact Report previously adopted for the Project due to the
involvement of new environmental impacts not covered in said
previous Environmental Impact Report.
3. No new information of substantial importance
to the project has become available which shows that the
project will have one or more significant effects not
discussed previously in the Environmental Impact Report; or
that significant effects previously examined will be more
severe than shown in the Environmental Impact Report; or
that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found
not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would
substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the
project; or that mitigation measures or alternatives which
.
30
lC
RESOLUTION NO. 80-21
PAGE TWO
.
were not previously considered in the Environmental Impact
Report would substantially lessen one or more significant
effects on the environment.
§. The proposed action will have no significant
effect on the environment, except as identified and
considered in the previous Environmental Impact Report.
ADOPTED this 19th day of
the following vote: -----
February
, 1980, by
AYES:
MEMBERS: Bricken, Griset, Luxembourger,
Serrato, Yamamoto
MEMBERS: Markel
NOES:
ATTEST:
ABSENT: MEMBERS: None
ABSTAINED: MEMBERS: Ward
wJ
.
VICE CHAIRMAN
RICHARD E. GO IRSCH
Executive Di ector/
Recording Secretary
~A~'
KEITH L. GOW
Agency Legal Counsel
.
.
.31
\(}
J