HomeMy WebLinkAboutURS CORPORATION 4 - 2005
A-2005-046
INSURANr, n" ",. f
WOllh.. ..~.,
UNTIL 1"0UKI. ,',' leXPiRES
if ~I ~()S
CkmK (JF Q(JlINqll'--
DAT~I #.:23/05
OR\G\NAl
"
,
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
C,/ Pt>
~.y~
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 21 day of J11 t1,(C Ii ,2005
by and between URS Corporation, a Nevada corporation, dba URS Corporation Americas
(hereinafter "Consultant"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation
organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter
"City").
RECITALS
A. The City desires to retain a consultant having special skill and knowledge in the field
homeland/urban area security for the purpose of preparing a Countywide Strategic Plan
for Terrorism Preparedness.
B. Consultant represents that Consultant is able and willing to provide such services to the
City.
C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is
knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this
Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be
expected from a professional consulting firm in the field.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the
terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall perform those services as set forth in Exhibit A, to this Agreement.
2. COMPENSATION
a. City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services,
the rates and charges identified in the fee schedule, Attachment 1 to Exhibit A. The total sum to
be expended under this Agreement shall not exceed $395,100 during the term of this Agreement.
b. Payment by City shall be made within thirty (30) days following receipt of proper
invoice evidencing satisfactory completion of each milestone listed in Attachment 1, subject to
City accounting procedures. Payment need not be made for work that fails to meet the standards
of performance set forth in the Recitals that may reasonably be expected by City.
3. TERM
This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and terminate on
satisfactory completion and delivery to City of the Countywide Strategic Plan for Terrorism
Preparedness, which the parties agree should be substantially complete on or before December
31,2005.
Page 1 of 51
4. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an
independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor
shall it be construed to create an employer-employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or
to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which
Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the
services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a marmer consistent with all
applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries
and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating
to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes.
5. INSURANCE
Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall
maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as
described below:
a. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial
general liability insurance naming the City, its officers, agents, volunteers, and employees as
additional insured(s) and shall include, but not be limited to protection against claims arising
from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting there from and damage to property,
resulting from any act or occurrence arising out of Consultant's operations in the performance of
this Agreement. The amounts of insurance shall be not less than the following: single limit
coverage applying to bodily and personal injury, including death resulting there from, and
property damage, in the total amount of $1 ,000,000 per occurrence. Consultant shall supply City
with a fully executed additional insured endorsement to be approved in form by the City
Attorney.
b. Worker's Compensation Insurance. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3300
ofthe Labor Code, Consultant, if Consultant has any employees, is required to be insured against
liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self-insurance. Prior to commencing the
performance of the work under this Agreement, Consultant agrees to obtain and maintain any
employer's liability insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000 per accident.
c. Professional Liability Insurance. If Consultant is or employs a licensed professional
such as an architect or engineer, Consultant shall provide professional liability (errors and
omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per claim.
d. The following requirements apply to the insurance to be provided by Consultant
pursuant to this section:
(i) Consultant shall maintain all insurance required above in full force and effect for
the entire period covered by this Agreement.
(ii) Certificates of insurance shall be furnished to the City upon execution of this
Agreement and shall be approved in form by the City Attorney.
Page 2 of 51
(iii) Certificates and policies shall state that the policies shall not be canceled or
reduced in coverage or changed in any other material aspect without thirty (30)
days prior written notice to the City.
e. If Consultant fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this
section or fails or refuses to furnish the City with required proof that insurance has been procured
and is in force and paid for, the City shall have the right, at the City's election, to forthwith
terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not affect Consultant's right to be paid for its
time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. Consultant waives the right to
receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the City for any work performed prior to approval
of insurance by the City.
6. INDEMNIFICATION
Consultant agrees to and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents,
employees, and special counsel from liability: (l) for personal injury, or just compensation,
arising out of claims for personal injury, including health, and claims for property damage, to the
extent which arise from the negligent or willful operations or errors or omissions of the
Consultant or its contractors, subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on their
behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any
claim that personal injury, property damage, or just compensation is due by reason of
Consultant's breach of the terms of this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless
agreement applies to all claims for restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to
have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of
this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all
reasonable costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be
selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party asserting personal injury or property
damage arising from Consultant's negligent or willful acts, error or omissions. City may make all
reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, Consultant's liability to City (including without limitation City's claims of
contribution and indemnification with respect to third party claims relating to services rendered
or obligations imposed under this Agreement) for injury or loss arising from its performance of
services hereunder shall not exceed $1,000,000 in the aggregate.
7. CONFIDENTIALITY
If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such
information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees
that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement,
and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of
like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall
include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written
information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means.
Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary andlor agent of the other
party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure
shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is,
through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful
Page 3 of 51
possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality (d) is required to be
disclosed by operation oflaw; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without
reference to information disclosed by the City.
8. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE
Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct
or indirect, which would conflict in any marmer with performance of services specified under
this Agreement.
9. NOTICE
Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this
Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or
mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by telefacsimile or other
telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons:
To City:
Clerk of the City Council
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988
Telefacsimile (714) 647-6956
With courtesy copies to:
George Saadeh
Captain of Police
Police DepartmentIM-18
60 Civic Center Plaza
P.O. Box 1981
Santa Ana, California 92702
Telefacsimile (714) 245-8745
and
Sergeant Brian Sheldon
Urban Area Security Initiative Coordinator
Police DepartmentIM-18
60 Civic Center Plaza
P.O. Box 1981
Santa Ana, California 92702
Telefacsimile (714) 245-8745
and
City Attorney
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-29)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702
Telefacsimile (714) 647-6515
Page 4 of 51
To Consultant: Tom Wall, Project Manager
URS Corporation
2020 East First Street
Suite 400
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Telefacsimile (714) 667-7147
With courtesy copy to:
David Marx, Vice President
URS Corporation
1615 Murray Canyon Road, Suite 1000
San Diego, CA 92108
Telefacsimile (619) 293-7920
A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter,
any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail,
communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been
deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and
addressed as set forth above. If sent by telefacsimile, communication shall be effective or
deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission
report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of
calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be
excluded.
10. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT
This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and
Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In
the event of a conflict between the terms ofthis Agreement and any attachments hereto, the
terms ofthis Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written
instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties
agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent
with, or in addition to, that terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant nor
the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements,
promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on
behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein.
11. ASSIGNMENT
Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant,
Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior
written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without
the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement
shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to
this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other consultants retained by City.
Page50f51
12. TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of
termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay
Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice
of termination, subject to the following conditions:
a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to
deliver to the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work
product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the
City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate.
b. Payment need not be made for work that fails to meet the standard of performance
specified in the Recitals of this Agreement.
13. DISCRIMINATION
Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital
status, sexual orientation, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited
by applicable law, in the recruitinent, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or
other employment related activities. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer
and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations.
14. JURISDICTION - VENUE
This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the
validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement
shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further
agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may
be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement.
15. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES
Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses,
permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services
hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California,
the City of Santa Ma and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City
immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals,
waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement.
16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the
power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement,
and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or
damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or
is withdrawn.
Page 6 of 51
b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as iffully set
forth in the body of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and
year first above written.
ATTEST:
- .
Patricia E. Healy
Clerk of the Council
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
. \ \j-\.-
,.."" ',\,. \ ."c
Paul M. Walters
Chief of Police
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JOSEPH W. FLETCHER
City Attorney
B:
Lau heedy
Assistant City Attorney
<J' t
',- i
)I', . "
~--'..Lc;.
,/-;
CITY OF SANTA ANA, a municipal
Corporation of the State of California
//. .', ~; /7
J' l:,' /
/\...../ , /'
I ",,-i{<i-:/), '/ie'
David N. Ream
City Manager
CONSULTANT
Employer ill: 30253
Page 7 of 51
.
EXHIBIT A
SOW Project Understanding
The Santa Ana Urban Area (UA). the Anaheim UA and the Orange County (County) Sheriff's department
have decided to approach terrorism prevention and preparedness as a regional program including the 34
Incorporated cities in the county as well as the unincorpotated areas. This strategic plan will provide the
road map for expenditure of not only UASI grants. but for other grant funds related to homeland security
and emergency response. The urban areas submitted the initial plan required by the Urban Area Security
Initiative (UASI) in April 2004. The plan includes a subjective analysis of potential targets, a discussion of
needs assessment and goals. objectives and implementation actions with a focus on the prevention of
terrorist attacks.
The strategy and assessments required in the scope of work will be broken down in two sections: one for
the Santa Ana UA (generally the southern portion of the County) and one for the Anaheim UA (northern
portion of the County). The strategy desired includes three components: a risk assessment, a capabilities
assessment and a spending strategy.
Based on our UASI project experience, we are aware that the strategy will include the public sectors of
fire services. law enforcement, emergency management, hazardous materials. public works, public
health, health care, emergency medical services, public safety communications and government
administrative. We expect that Caltrans, public utilities, private industry and possibly community-based
groups will also provide limited input as in the development of the strategy. We are aware that the
Regional Technology Integration Initiative (RTII) will be conducting threat and vulnerability assessments
for the operations area. If data is available and consistent with our collection requirements, any
information we receive from the RTII will be used to assist in the target ranking strategy.
In developing the strategy, URS will be responsibie for the following:
. Utilizing the existing data to the maximum extent possible
. Collecting data and validating from jurisdictions and agencies
. Evaluating the data. conducting analysis and providing recommendations
. Preparing project documents
. Attending meetings at least weekly
. Completing the strategy in 120 days
This scope of work includes as Attachment 1, the following documents: a project cost estimate, a billing
milestone schedule, and a URS fee schedule with teduced rates to be used for any additional services
that may be requested for this project. This scope of work includes as Attachment 2. the following
documents: a copy of the original RFP issued by the City of Santa Ana. RFP#04-146. and a copy of the
proposal submitted by URS in response to RFP#04-146. When clarification is required to determine the
scope of work to be performed by the Consultant, refer to the documents contained in attachment 2.
Page 8 of 51
,
SECTIONS
ANAHEIM URBAN AREA
The Anaheim Urban Area incorporates the cities in the northern portion of the county as indicated in RFP
# 04-146.
SANTA ANA URBAN AREA
The Santa Ana Urban Area incorporates the cities in the southern portion of the county as indicated in
RFP # 04-146.
FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS
The Terrorist Preparedness Plan wiil be divided into three components: Risk Assessment. Capabilities
Assessment and the Spendinq Strateqv.
RISK ASSESSMENT
The risk assessment wiil address the foilowing key objectives:
1. Promote interagency coliaboration/coordination of criminal, investigative and inteiligence
information reiating to terrorism in the Orange County Operational Area (OCOA).
2. Assess the threat to particular targets in order for agencies to focus on prevention and
preparedness, and enhance response capabilities.
3. Identify the types of WMD/CBRNE likely to be used in order to identify required response training
and equipment.
Threat Assessment (Part 1 of the Risk Assessment)
The first step in the risk assessment wiil be to identify and characterize the potential threat elements
(PTEs) and their ability to commit a weapon of mass destruction (WMD) attack using a chemical.
biological, radiological. nuclear, or explosive (CBRNE) device. Threat factors to be addressed include the
existence of the threat, the history. potential intentions. WMD capabilities and potentiai targeting.
Coilection of this information wili lead to the development of an UA threat profile. This information will
need to be provided by the law enforcement agencies. An issue that will likely arise is that this information
is normaily kept by the FBI and joint terrorism task force (JTTF), and these entities treat this information
as highly sensitive and confidential. In our experience. we should be able to coilect non-specific
information that would be adequate to convey a sense of the potential threat to the County.
We wiil also compile information from law enforcement (LE). fire services (FS) and hazardous materials
response teams (HM) regarding the responses to suspected-CBRNE incidents in the county. We will
breakdown these incidents by CBRNE type. It should be noted that based on our experience the
suspected biological agent incidents wiil dominate the data due to the rash of white powder (suspected
anthrax) incidents post 9/11.
URS will develop a draft report section for review and comment and we wili finalize this section
incorporating comments received.
Page90f51
Vulnerability Assessment (Part 2 of the Risk Assessment)
The vulnerability assessment will identify and rank potential targets in the UAs. URS will review the list of
over 65 high-risk targets identified in the 2004 plan and based on our familiarity with the County, we will
assess if any obvious targets are missing. If Caltrans, Southern California Edison and the Southern
California Gas Company were not included in the identification of the initial target list. we will work with
law enforcement representatives in the UA's to obtain target information from these entities.
When documenting the basic vulnerability assessment for each target, the following will be inciuded:
Levei of visibility, Criticality of the target site to the UA. Impact outside the UA. PTE access to the target,
Potentiai target threat of the hazard, Potential target site population capacity, and Potential collaterai
mass casualties. Additionally. when developing the site-specific vulnerability assessment. we will identity
specific vulnerabilities unique to the potential target and provide general recommendations for reducing
potential vulnerabilities.
URS will use a tiered approach to ranking the targets. As the complete list of potential targets is compiled,
all potential targets will be entered into an Access database that URS has specifically developed for UASI
target ranking. We will first conduct a screening-level ranking of all of the potential targets using the ODP
Assessment model. This will provide an inexpensive preliminary screening-Ievei ranking of the targets
and includes the elements of the basic vulnerability assessment specified in the RFP (i.e. level of
visibility. criticality of the target, impact outside the UA, etc.). The results of this screening level analysis
will be presented to the UA steering committee for consensus. The use of a simple Access database will
allow an "on-the-f1y" look at what-if scenarios related to changing scores for various elements for specific
sites during the steering committee meeting. This ability was instrumental in facilitating consensus to the
target ranking in the San Diego UASI vulnerability assessment. Interviews will also be conducted with the
stakeholders in the consensus-building process.
If the top ten infrastructure targets do not emerge in the preliminary screening-level. a secondary
screening-level analysis will be conducted for up to 15 targets in each UA using the Carver model. The
Carver model is similar to the ODP Assessment model, but it provides a higher level of specificity for a
number of the vulnerability elements. It should be noted that any facility in the County that has developed
a Buffer Zone Protection Plan (BZPP) will already have a Carver model analysis and the 15 sites selected
will supplement the BZPP sites. Results of this modeling will also be presented to the UA steering
committee for discussion and consensus. and the top 10 infrastructure sites in each UA will be identified.
Additionally for the top 10 targets. we propose to conduct a more detailed level analysis using the
Homeland Security Comprehensive Assessment Model (HLS-CAM). HLS-CAM was developed by the
National Domestic Preparedness Coalition Inc. (NDPCI). NDPCI is a non-profit. public I private
partnership, whose leadership includes the West Virginia National Guard, the West Virginia University
School of Medicine, and the Sheriff's Office. Orange County. Florida. The model was derived from a
collection of sources including U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Manual: The CIA
Fact-book; U.S. Army FM100-37; U.S Army TC19-16; U.S. Army FM34-130; Training Guidance to West
Virginia National Guard from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA);
Page 10 of 51
Orange County Sheriff's Office. Orlando. FL; Florida Regional Domestic Security Taskforce Risk
Assessment Model: ASIS International: and other open source documents. This model is becoming
commonly used for target vulnerability assessment.
Finally, if extensive and very specific vulnerability information is desired for each target. URS will develop
a cost estimate to include an analysis using the RiskWatch@ model. RiskWatch@ was developed as a
software tool based on the extensive site-specific vulnerability assessment guidance in FEMA Reference
Manual to Mitigate Potential Terrorist Attacks Against Buildings (FEMA 426, December 2003). As shown
in the brochure (included at the end of this section), RiskWatch@ includes over 350 questions for each
facility that would require data input. RiskWatch@ also allows the analysis of cost-benefit of preventative
measures and can estimate a return-on-investment (ROI) for security improvement options. It normally
takes between three and four weeks to compile the information to input into RiskWatch@for each facility
and we would typically use this model in conducting vulnerability assessments for facility owners and not
for area-wide planning analyses. However, if this level of information is desired for the top targets
identified in this project. we would be pleased to provide the cost and schedule to conduct this detailed
analysis.
URS will develop a draft report section for review and comment and we will finalize this section
incorporating comments received.
Legal Hazard Sites (Part 3 of the Risk Assessment)
URS will compile data for legal hazardous sites from HM and FS in each UA. In our experience,
information from these agencies is generally current and very accurate. The information will be compiled
for each UA and broken down by the CBRNE categories.
When consensus is reached for the vulnerability assessment, URS will develop a draft report section for
review and comment and we will finalize this section incorporating comments received.
CAPABILITIES ASSESSMENT
URS will conduct an accurate assessment of the current and desired capabilities of the Orange County
Operational Area (OCOA) to prevent. respond to and recover from a terrorism event. Following the
complete assessment of capabilities we will develop recommendations for strategic improvement of the
Operational Area's. The model created by URS to collect and analyze data follows the specifications
described in the RFP and complies with the guidelines of the US Department of Homeland Security.
Office for Domestic Preparedness' State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program, Urban
Area Jurisdiction Handbook.
Data Model
The model will be used to assess the emergency response capabilities. as well as the planning.
organization, equipment. training and exercise capabilities of each Urban Area. URS will 1 ) validate
existing and collect missing information: 2) project needed response capabilities: 3) analyze current and
desired response capabilities to identify gaps: and 4) make recommendations for cost effective
capabilities improvement to the OCOA. The following sections provide the methodology for data
collection.
Page 11 of 51
Solution Areas
URS will customize our UASI assessment Microsoft ACCESS database for the OCOA to enter. store and
manipulate the majority of information required by the OCOA. The data model used by URS uses current
or "on-hand" information as its input. The database system used by URS also allows information used in
different detail areas (such as number of emergency responders in a given discipline or special team) to
be entered only once. This prevents duplicate data. a problem that has been encountered by other Urban
Areas. This also significantly reduces the burden on, and opportunity for error by jurisdictions. special
districts, organizations and agencies.
URS will first review and validate information already collected by the Urban Area. This scope assumes
that the review of existing data will result in finding approximately 20% of the data required by the UASI
grant program to be accurate. Existing data will be entered into the URS database. Missing information
will be collected by URS staff familiar with the required information and the data collection process. URS
proposes to hold a data collection meeting. which will require a representative from each jurisdiction.
special district, organization or agency constituting the Urban Area(s). At this meeting a data specialist
will distribute customized data collection forms. We will provide administrative and technical assistance in
completing the forms. It is expected that the forms will be completed within three (3) weeks. It should be
noted that extensive cooperation from each of the jurisdictions will be necessary in order to collect the
jurisdiction-specific data required. During this time period URS will track and validate incoming data.
Verified data will be entered by URS into the assessment database. The details of the data entered will
include urban area, emergency response discipline, jurisdictionlspecial district as well as those details
set-out in by ODP or required by the OCOA. Our cost estimate assumes access to and receipt of
accurate information from the Urban Areas. A printout of the "on-hand" data will be provided to the
representatives for each jurisdiction for their review and verification.
The information will be collected are organized into five solution areas: Planning, Organization,
Equipment, Training and Exercises.
Determine Desired Response Capabilities
The standard of preparedness will be established by using the results of the risk assessment to determine
likely WMD/CBRNE scenarios for each Urban Area. The details of three scenarios (including location,
timing, number of persons at risk, CBRNE element and impact of the incident on victims and responders)
will create the basis for planning factor estimates to determine the level of preparedness required to
sustain a successful response. URS will also consider the steps necessary to achieve existing goals and
objectives of the relevant levels of government in establishing needed response capabilities. The needed
response capabilities will be presented to the Steering Committee for their input and review.
URS will collecUvalidate data to determine the number of existing emergency responders in each Urban
Area. The data will be collected and stored by discipline. jurisdiction/special district, and geographic
region. (Region will be used to determine potential response time within the Urban Area.) Additionally,
URS will provide technical assistance to jurisdictions to assist them in determining the number of
emergency responders at each WMD/CBRNE response level. Desired levels of training and equipment
will be determined using the model identified above. The same process will be used for Agricultural
Response. taking special districting into account.
Page 12 of 51
The standards for response will be entered into the assessment database by URS for comparison against
existing capabilities. URS will use the comparison to determine the gap between existing and required
capabilities for:
. Emergency Responders
. Planning
. Organization
. Equipment
. Training
. Exercises.
The above assessment model identifies the process for collection of information and analysis of that
information. Additional details of the proposed assessment are provided as follows. As noted above, URS
will either validate existing or collect new data to fulfill information requirements.
WMD Task By Discipline
URS will collect/validate data to determine the capability of each discipline in the Urban Area to complete
the tasks required to respond to a WMD terrorism incident. The completed information will be summarized
by Urban Area and analyzed using the model developed by URS for the San Diego UASI. The same
process will be used for Agricultural Response. taking biological incidents and special districting into
account.
NEEDS ASSESSMENT BY SOLUTION AREA
URS will develop a document that details what is needed to increase the capability to respond to a WMD
incident. The document will be organized by solution area as follows:
Planning
URS will collect/validate data to determine the current status of planning elements in the Urban Areas.
Recommendations for changes to existing plans and improvements in community response will be made.
We will use our extensive experience in general planning and hazard mitigation planning in developing
recommendations for the Urban Area..
Organization
URS will collect/validate emergency response team information and use that information to determine
capabilities and needs of the Urban Area. Response team equipment data will be collected as a portion of
the equipment data collection process.
Equipment
URS will collect/validate equipment data from the Urban Areas utilizing the data collection model
described above. The information on equipment will include equipment type (i.e. Personal Protective.
CBRNE Search & Rescue. etc.) subcategory. item name. jurisdictional source and discipline. This
assessment will include the amount of equipment needed at various operational penods during the
response to a WMD incident. Additional recommendations for technology. interoperable communications.
and specialized equipment will be provided.
Page 13 of 51
Training
URS will collect/validate information on personnel and current and needed levels of training according to
the data model identified above. The required level of training for each discipline will be based on
consensus with the UA and on URS subject matter expert suggestions. URS will also assess local
emergency response training location and local course capabilities and make recommendations for
improvement. Emphasis will be placed on training level analysis including awareness. performance
(defensive and offensive), and planning/management training.
Exercises
Exercising of equipment and training prior to a real incident is vital to a successful WMD emergency
response. We will survey the jurisdictions. special districts. agencies and organizations to determine what
exercises are currently planned for the OCOA. We will draw on the expertise our EG&G Technical
Services, Inc subsidiary., which holds the Western Region ODP Homeland Security Exercise and
Evaluation Program Technical Assistance Contract, to develop recommendations for a coordinated
exercise program. The exercise program will be targeted to address the most vital needs identified in the
risk assessment and to ensure that new training and equipment are accompanied by the opportunity for
first responders to use the equipment prior to a WMD incident.
URS understands that the UASI strategy is a dynamic process and will quickly evolve. This is especially
true as WMD capabilities in the UA's significantly improve during the first year or two of grant funding.
Considering this dynamic, URS will provide the UA's with the Microsoft ACCESS database developed for
this project protected upon completion of the scope of work. allowing the Urban Areas to update the data
on an on-going basis.
SPENDING STRATEGY
It has been apparent to UA's that have completed the UASI capabilities assessment that the cost to fill all
of the needs identified far exceeds any reasonable assumptions about funding that may be available.
Consequently. it is necessary for each UA to develop a methodology to prioritize spending to fill the most
important needs. URS will use a combination of statistical analysis and consensus building to develop the
priorities and spending strategy to be included in the Countywide Strategic Plan for Terrorism
Preparedness. This combination will provide a technically supported. reproducible list of spending
priorities. We propose establishing priorities at four levels: very high, high. medium and low. This will
result in numerous items at each level and will provide the UAs with some flexibility and discretion to
select desired items in the higher categories as needs arise.
Based on results of the capabilities assessment. the UASI needs prioritization model will be adjusted to
include strengthening regional preparedness and capabilities in the mutual aid regions of the OCOA.
As part of the needs prioritization modeling process. URS will develop a shopping list of various
prevention/response elements (e.g. collect PTE intelligence, prevent terrorist from accessing sites, detect
WMD's. rescue victims from site after attack. etc.) and a meeting will be organized with select agencies
members to rank and weight these prevention/response elements based on group consensus regarding
relative importance. Based on information provided during the pre-bid meeting. it is expected that
Page 14 of 51
preventions elements may be weighted higher than some response elements. The Delphi method of
assessing group consensus will be used. This method involves a discussion of assessment objectives.
anonymous voting by each participant regarding the relative importance of the different
preventionlresponse elements, statistical feedback on the distribution of individual responses. an open
discussion of the significant differences of opinion. and conducting additional rounds of assessment as
necessary.
The raw gap for each item listed in the capability assessment under planning. organization. equipment.
training. and exercises will be calculated as the difference between the target and current levels of the
resource. The gap will be expressed as a percentage of the desired level. For example, if the capability
assessment indicates that 4 urban search and rescue (US&R) vehicles are needed and only 1 is present.
the gap would be 75%. The impact of the gap for each item on the various prevention/response elements
will be assessed by the URS team and will be reviewed with the WG. Continuing with the example. a 75%
gap in US&R vehicles will have zero impact on the preventionlresponse elements of "collecting PTE
intelligence" because the lack of these vehicles is not expected to effect intelligence gathering. However.
but this gap would have a very high impact on the preventionlresponse elements of "rescue victims from
a site". The results for each item will be weighted on a scale of 0 to 100, with 100 indicating that the
preventionlresponse element will be completely impacted and 0 indicating no impact to the
preventionlresponse element.
The cost of closing each gap will be estimated based on a unit cost of adding the resource and the
quantity of the gap to be closed. In addition, the cost and benefit of closing each gap will be evaluated. A
plot of cost versus benefit will be prepared for all gaps. The graphical display of the cost versus benefit
matrix (see Figure 2.3.3) will be used to identify relative priority groups (high, medium, low etc.) of the
different needs. The relative plotting position of a given need in the cost versus benefit matrix provides an
effective visual tool to identify the relative priority of the need. If a given need plots in the portion of the
matrix with relatively high benefit (i.e., high gap impact score) and relatively low cost. the priority of
addressing that need would be high. Conversely, if a need plots in a portion of the matrix with low benefit
and high cost. the priority of addressing such a need would be low. Thus, the different portions of the cost
versus benefit matrix will be used to define different priority groups of needs.
The gaps will be listed in a descending order of the weighted gap impact score. The cumulative cost of
closing gaps in this priority order will also be shown. In addition. gaps will be sorted by priority groups and
the total cost of closing all gaps in each priority group will be estimated.
URS will utilize the results of the needs prioritization to develop a spending strategy for the OA that
achieves the goals and objective in the strategic plan. The updated data in the capabilities assessment
will inciude the items already purchased or slated for purchase with the current grant expenditures. The
needs prioritization process and the recommendations will be oriented to focus on strengthening regional
preparedness and capabilities in the mutual aid regions of the OA. URS will develop a draft report section
for review and comment and we will finalize this section incorporating comments received.
In our experience. many UA's desire the flexibility of a subjective approach to establishing the distribution
of funds among the various jurisdictions in an UA year to year. However. some jurisdictions prefer that a
Page 15 of 51
generally unbiased quantitative method be used. As an option, URS would develop a quantitative Funds
Allocation model to provide a systematic, rational basis for allocating available limited funds among
different jurisdictions. The model will be based on using multiple criteria that provide a defensible basis for
allocating funds. Potential criteria for funding allocation include the cost of meeting high-priority needs.
the number of targets weighted by their vulnerability. the number of mutual-aid obligations, and the
likelihood of a wide-spread. regional impact if an incident were to occur. In consultation with the steering
committee, URS will develop an appropriate list of criteria and assess their relative importance for funding
allocation. For each jurisdiction. URS will compile relevant factual data with regard to the defined criteria
and calculate a numerical weighted funding score. A preliminary allocation of available funds among the
jurisdictions will then be derived in proportion to the funding scores of the jurisdictions. This preliminary
allocation will be provided to the steering committee for review. The goal will be to provide a logical,
unbiased starting point for the allocation of funds among the jurisdictions. The steering committee may
revise this preliminary allocation based on non-tangible factors that may not have been addressed in the
numerical model. We will be happy to provide the City with a cost for these services at a later date if there
is interest in this approach.
Page 16 of 51
Attachment 1 To Exhibit A
Countywide Strategic Plan for Terrorism Preparedness
Billing Milestones
Deliverables/Billina Milestone Billina Amt
Kickoff Meeting $35,000
Draft Threat Assessment $25,000
Draft Vulnerability Assessment $40,000
Draft Legal Hazardous Sites $25,000
Target Modelling Results $55,000
Draft Capability Assessment $110,000
Needs Prioritization Model Results $15,000
Draft Report $10,000
Final Report $5,023
County Acceptance of Deliverables $75,000
Total $395,023
Page 17 of 51
Attachment 2 of Exhibit A
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Combined Areas Strategic Plan
(Santa Ana Urban Area - Anaheim Urban Area - Orange Operational Area)
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
FOR PREPARATION OF COUNTYWIDE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR TERRORISM
PREPAREDNESS
RFP # 04-146
Proiect Description
This project is being undertaken by the City of Santa Ana ("City") on behalf of the Santa
Ana Urban Area, the Anaheim Urban Area, and the Orange County Operational Area.
The project will provide the three areas with a strategic plan comprised of three
components. The components are a detailed risk assessment, a comprehensive
capabilities assessment, and a prioritized expenditure strategy for encumbering funds
from all State Homeland Security Grants, as well as Urban Areas Security Initiative
(UASI) Grants.
Scope of Services
The scope of services is provided in the specifications section of the RFP. The specifications are made
up of the Submission Requirements. Scope of Work (SOW), and the Requirements (REO).
Client Group
A working client group wiil consist of a committee of representatives from the City of Santa Ana Police
Department, the City of Anaheim Police Department. the Orange County Sheriff's Department. and other
Agencies as appropriate. The lead project team members will be those individuals in each agency that
manage either the Urban Areas Security Initiative Grant or the State Homeiand Security Grant.
Procedures
1. Bidder Inquires
The designated Police Department project manager is Captain George Saadeh.
Questions or comments concerning this RFP should be directed to:
Captain George Saadeh
Santa Ana Police Department
60 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA. 92702
Telephone number: 714-245-8304
E-mail: qsaadeh@ci.santa-ana.ca.us
Page 18 of 51
2. Submission Of Proposals
Interested firms shall submit an RFP responding to items 2.1 through 2.8 below.
Identify each response with the appropriate letter/numerical designation and
respond to all items in the order given. Do not provide company brochures or
other types of marketing materials in response to any item, except where
requested.
2.1 COVER SHEET.
Indicate the name of your firm and the project title.
2.2 ORGANIZATION INFORMATION.
Describe your firm's professional focus and the complete range of services
being offered for this project. Complete and submit the "GENERAL
INFORMATION SHEET" in Attachment "A."
It shall be the sole responsibility of bidder to ensure City has vendor's proper
address. City is not responsible for any misdirection, late delivery, or non-
delivery of mail to vendor.
2.3 PROJECT APPROACH
2.3.1 Describe your firm's management plan for this project. Include
information on key personnel including professional licenses,
assignment of tasks, project scheduling, budget control and production
capabilities. Discuss how the project's success will be tracked and
assured.
2.3.2 Provide the names and addresses of other firms and professional
licenses proposed for this project. Describe the work to be performed
by each firm and how responsibility will be divided (e.g., joint venture,
prime/subcontractor, etc.). Indicate if and when your firm has worked
with each company in the past.
2.3.3 Identify and discuss major milestones and implementation issues.
2.3.4 Provide a milestone project schedule for gathering and analyzing the
information, documenting the findings, and producing a written
strategy.
2.3.5 Provide a notarized letter of bonding capability. A bid bond or
cashier's check in the amount of 10% of the total value of the project is
due upon submission of the proposal. A performance bond equal to
the value of the contract may be required.
2.3.6 Describe the extent of City Staff involvement in the project, including
key decision points at each stage.
Page 19 of 51
2.4 PROJECT PERSONNEL
2.4.1 Identify the experienced principal or principals who will manage the
project through its various phases. Provide a plan for their
replacement in the event of a personal calamity. The Bidder shall
certify that principals and key personnel assigned to the project will not
be changed without the prior approval of the City of Santa Ana.
2.4.2 Provide resumes for the principals and key personnel assigned to the
project.
2.4.3 Provide resumes for personnel from other firms assigned to the
project.
2.4.4 Provide an organizational chart. Identify principals and key personnel
and indicate how much time each person will devote to the project.
2.4.5 Provide a list of office locations where work on this project will be
performed. Identify key personnel and the type of work to be
performed at each office. Indicate the percentage of total work to be
performed at each office.
2.5 EXPERIENCE
2.5.1 Provide a list of at least five (5) governmental entities (they may be
contacted as references) with whom you have contracted to provide
the services being proposed. Bidder will also need to submit at least
three (3) examples of work product which most closely resemble what
they will contract to produce in this project. The proposed services
must have been provided to the entities within the last three years.
Include the name of the person or organization, the contract period,
description of the project and a phone number of the reference. For
Bidders with multiple offices, list only those projects for the branch
office(s) that will be responsible for this project.
Please provide the following information for each project:
a. Project title, location and description
b. Nature of the firm's responsibility
c. Key personnel
d. Total contract amount
e. Name and address of ownerluser
f. Name and phone number of ownerluser contact person
g. Start and end dates
2.5.2 Your firm's experience in controlling costs and schedules. Provide a
table illustrating original and actual costs and original and actual
schedules for the projects identified above.
2.6 FINANCIAL INFORMATION
2.6.1 Submit a copy of your firm's most recently audited as well as current
(reviewed) financial statement.
2.6.2 Provide your firm's California and total revenue projections for 2004.
Page 20 of 51
2.6.3 Provide the following information relative to your firm's claims history
for the pastfive (5) years.
a. List all claims, demands for arbitration and/or lawsuits filed by this
company, predecessor companies or company officers against
project owners or their agents.
- Name of Project Owner
- Project Completion Date
- Basis for Claim
- Claim or Suit Amount
- Current Status
- Award or Settlement Amount
b. List all claims, demands for arbitration and/or law suits filed by
project owners, their agents or subcontractors against this
company, predecessor companies, its agents or bonding company
in connection with this company, its officers, its agents, or bonding
company.
- Name of Project Owner
- Project Completion Date
- Basis for Claim
- Claim or Suit Amount
- Current Status
- Award or Settlement Amount
2.7 STATEMENT
2.7.1 Submit a statement as to why your firm believes it should be selected
for this project.
2.8 COST
2.8.1 Bidders shall submit several fee structure and implementation options.
2.8.2 The City shall not be responsible for any costs incurred by the Bidder
in preparing, submitting or presenting its response to the RFP. This
Request for Proposal does not and shall not commit the City of Santa
Ana or their agents to enter into any agreement, to pay any costs
incurred in preparation of the submittals, or to procure or contract for
services or supplies.
2.8.3 Provide any additional information, including promotional material, that
highlights experience or expertise which is relevant and directly
applicable to this project. For statewide, national or international firms,
only the relevant experiences of the office(s) that will be responsible for
this project will be evaluated.
2.8.4 Payment for services shall be based upon satisfactory progress,
submission of requests for reimbursement, and percent of work
completed.
Page 21 of 51
3. Vendor Selection
3.1 Vendor Selection Schedule
At present, the City believes that the timing will be as follows:
Pre-Proposal Meeting
Return of Proposals
Evaluation of Proposals
Interviews (if necessary)
Contract Award by City Council
Contract Start Date
Jan. 4, 2005 at 10:00 AM
Jan. 11,2005
Jan 12, 2005 thru Jan. 17, 2005
To Be Determined
Early February 2005
To Be Determined
The pre-proposal meeting is not mandatory, but bidders are strongly
encouraged to attend. The pre-proposal meeting will be held at the Santa
Ana Police Department located at 60 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, on Jan
4,2005 at 10:00 AM.
3.2 Evaluation
The City of Santa Ana reserves the right to negotiate with any Bidder as
necessary to serve the best interests of the City of Santa Ana and negotiate
the final Contract with the most responsible and responsive Bidder.
The process for evaluating and rating of the proposals received in response
to this RFP will consist of three phases:
3.2.1 The first phase will be a preliminary review of all of the responses of
the bidder's proposal to determine basic responsiveness.
3.2.2 The second phase, for the bidders who have satisfactorily completed
and fulfilled the requirements of the first phase, will be a gating phase.
The proposals will be reviewed to determine the level of familiarly and
experience with developing and producing terrorism, WMD/CBRNE,
and preparedness strategic plans or related projects. Only bidders
with acceptable experience and expertise will be evaluated further.
3.2.3 The third phase, for the bidders who have satisfactorily completed and
fulfilled the requirements of the first two phases, will be a scored
review of their submission (including reference checks and pricing).
4. Other Terms and Conditions
4.1 The City regards the inclusion, in the project, of California-based firms and
services to be highly desirable, but not mandatory.
Page 22 of 51
4.2 The City reserves the right to modify any and all aspects of the selection
process, and waive any defects as to form or content of the Bidder's
proposals.
4.3 The City reserves the right to accept or reject any and all responses received
as a result of this request, and to cancel in part or in its entirety this Request
for Proposals. If all proposals are rejected, the City shall not be barred from
re-soliciting.
4.4 The City reserves the right to amend this Request for Proposals by
addendum prior to the final dates of submission. The response to this RFP
for the selected contractor will become part of the contract as an attachment
or exhibit.
4.5 All reports, proposals, or other data or materials, which are submitted, shall
become the sole property of the City of Santa Ana with the exception of the
Confidential Financial Capacity information.
4.6 All non-confidential products used or developed in the execution of any
contract resulting from this request will remain in the public domain at the
completion of this project. The final work product and any information,
materials or documents provided to contractor by any agency shall remain
strictly confidential and the property of the City of Santa Ana.
4.7 The attached "Certification of Non-Discrimination by Contractors" shall be
completed by each submitting firm and included in the proposal (Attachment
liB").
4.8 A "Sample Certificate of Insurance" is enclosed for your reference
(Attachment "C"). With respect to performance of work under this Contract,
the Vendor shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to
maintain insurance as described below:
4.9 Worker's Compensation insurance with statutory limits, any employer's
liability insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000 per accident.
4.10 Commercial general liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined
single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If such insurance
contains a general aggregate limit, such limit shall apply separately to each
project the Team performs for the City of Santa Ana. Such insurance shall (a)
name the City of Santa Ana, its officers, agents, representatives, volunteers
and employees as additional insureds; (b) be primary with respect to
insurance or self-insurance programs maintained by the City of Santa Ana;
and (c) contain standard separation of insureds provisions; and (d) give to the
Page 23 of 51
City of Santa Ana prompt and timely notice of claim made or suit instituted
arising out of Team's operations hereunder.
4.11 Business automobile liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined
single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall
include coverage for owned, hired and non-owned automobiles.
4.12 Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single
limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.
5. The Submittal Deadline
Please submit an original and (8) copies of the proposal as well as an electronic
copy of the proposal on CD. The City prefers to receive these materials in
vertically bound form, either loose-leaf or spiral, 8 y," x 11", with section
headings, tabbed and clearly marked by subject titles.
Proposals must be delivered no later than 5:00 p.m., PST on Jan 11, 2005.
Submittals received after 5:00 p.m., PST on Jan 11, 2005 will not be considered,
and will be returned unopened. In addition, for those submittals that are not
considered as finalists, only the financial information material will be returned.
Faxes will not be accepted.
Completed proposals should be sealed and marked "City of Santa Ana
Strategic Plan for Terrorism Preparedness" RFP # 04-146 and addressed to:
City of Santa Ana Purchasing
ATTN: Ms. Terri Okazaki
City of Santa Ana
Purchasing Division M16
20 Civic Center Plaza, RM. 429
Santa Ana, CA. 92701
714-647-5329
The submittal must be signed by an individual authorized by the Vendor to bind
the Vendor to all terms and conditions of the submittal. All submittals shall
provide the name, title, address and telephone number of the individual or
individuals with authority to contractually bind the Vendor and the person who
may be contacted by the City of Santa Ana during the proposal evaluation
process and contract award process.
ADDITIONAL PROJECT ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION
Page 24 of 51
1. Bidders are encouraged to be responsive to the objectives stated in this RFP. If, however. a Bidder
feels that it can offer substantial cost/benefit and/or performance advantages, the City of Santa Ana
will consider and may accept alternate proposals. Alternate proposals must specify how they deviate
from the requirements and describe cost reductions or other benefits to be achieved. The Scope of
Work contains what we believe is the minimum work product for the strategic plan.
2. Bidder will be working with a project team consisting of members from the Santa Ana Police
Department, the Anaheim Police Department, the Orange County Sheriff and members of other
agencies in the Operational Area. The lead project team members for the client will be those
individuals in each agency that manage the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) for the Urban Areas
(UA). Bidder must assign a project manager to this project that has significant experience in similar
work. and as many qualified employees as will be needed to complete the work on schedule.
3. Bidder will be responsible for obtaining relevant information and data from agencies throughout the
Orange County Operational Area (OCOA). which will include organizing stakeholder meetings and
using consensus-building techniques to prioritize critical infrastructure and grant spending now and in
the future. Bidder will also be responsible for meeting with the Urban Areas (UA) project team as
often as necessary, but at minimum once a week until project completion. Bidder will leverage
existing data and information to the fullest extent. but must validate the data and not be limited by it in
the pursuit of current data and information relative to all aspects of the project.
4. Bidder shall maintain a detailed schedule of activities for Bidder's team, and update the scheduie on a
weekly basis until project completion. The updated scheduie shall be transmitted to the lead
representatives of the Urban Areas (UA) on a weekly basis or more frequently if needed. Bidder shall
prepare progress reports on a monthly basis, with interim reports every two weeks outlining issues,
constrictions or other key information relative to project progress. Each progress report must identify
milestones and deliverables contrasted with original milestone completion dates. Bidder should use
generally accepted project management software.
5. The Urban Areas (UA) expect that the project will be completed in 120 days. Bidder shall consider
his/her resources. expertise and other variables when responding to the RFP and agreeing to the
timeline. An extension of the timellne is possible but should be based on unavoidable circumstances
that must be approved in advance by the Urban Areas (UA) lead project team. If Bidder is able to
show significant benefits to the final work product by granting additional time for the project. the
timeline may be extended as described above. but only after approval by the lead project team.
6. Bidder's work product will become the property of the Urban Areas (UA) and shall remain confidential
at all levels. The work product, including its derivatives and any materials upon which consultant
relied. shall be kept confidential and not released to anyone without the express approval of the
Chiefs of Police of each Urban Area (UA).
7. Bidder shall describe any areas in the Scope of Work (SOW) for which Bidder needs to partner with
others. Bidder will be the prime contractor and may partner with others to provide the necessary
Page 25 of 51
services. However. Bidder will be entirely responsibie for the delivery of services and meeting
schedules.
8. Bidder shall identify all team members that will be working on the project. and will provide curriculum
vitae for each of them, including specific experience each member has in working on similar projects.
Bidder will also identify the particular portion of the project for which each team member will be
responsible.
9. Bidder will be required to submit review documents and the final product in electronic form as well as
hard copy. Bidder shall ensure that all deliverables and documentation are free of spelling and
grammatical errors.
10. Bidders with significant experience in developing and producing terrorism, WMD/CBRNE and
preparedness strategic plans that included similar components as in this RFP will be given additional
points.
INTRODUCTION
For the past two years, the federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS), through
the Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP), provided funding to California for
terrorism and WMD preparedness, including preventing, responding to and recovering
from, threats and incidents of terrorism. In 2003 and 2004 the Orange County Sheriff's
Department was selected to receive and distribute funds under two grant programs, the
State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) and the Law Enforcement Terrorism
Prevention Program (LETPP). Under these two programs the County of Orange was
designate as the Orange Operational Area (OA). Building on the foundation established
under the State Homeland Security Program, the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), through the Office of Domestic Preparedness (ODP), designated the cities of
Santa Ana and Anaheim as Urban Areas (UAs) under the FY 2004 Urban Area Security
Initiative (UASI). Each city has been awarded a grant to create a sustainable model for
preparedness to prevent, respond to and recover from acts of terrorism. Although each
city is a designated Urban Area in its own right, the cities developed and submitted to
ODP a joint grant strategy. Continuing in this spirit of cooperation the Santa Ana and
Anaheim Urban Areas (UAs) are working with the Orange Operational Area and are
pooling resources to develop a countywide strategic plan. This plan will accurately
assess vulnerabilities and gaps, and help develop effective strategies to fill those gaps
on a countywide basis by using existing and future grant funds. We expect that
additional homeland security grant funds will become available to the Orange County
Operational Area (OA) through the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) and other
grant programs.
The City of Anaheim, as a representative of the Orange County Operational Area
(OCOA), is one of four cities selected by DHS to participate in the Regional Technology
Integration Initiative (RTII). As part of this program, DHS will be providing resources to
Page 26 of 51
conduct a threat and vulnerability assessment for the operational area. The Bidder will
work with DHS to avoid duplication of effort and to complete this project in the shortest
possible period of time, and should review and utilize, to the extent possible, the
information developed during the assessment conducted by the DHS resources. After a
review of the mission and goals of the Regional Technology Integration Initiative (RTII),
Bidder should determine to what extent it would be able to collaborate with DHS and
what information developed by the RTII team will be useful. Bidder should include in
their response an analysis of this potential relationship and how it affects Bidder's
proposal.
VISION
The vision for the Santa AnalAnaheim Urban Areas is to have a well-coordinated. regional emergency
management system built upon sound and effective response protocols. to prevent, respond to and
recover from terrorist threats or incidents, Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) events or any other
incident that threatens the wellness or safety of the community. This vision will be achieved through
cooperation and coordination between the 10 public sector disciplines: Fire Service, Law Enforcement,
Emergency Management. Hazardous Materials, Public Works, Public Health. Health Care, Emergency
Medical Services, Public Safety Communications. Government Administrative. as well as private industry
and community-based groups.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA
The Orange County Operational Area encompasses all of Orange County. which is located In the heart of
Southern California with Los Angeles County to the north. Riverside County to the east. San Diego
County to the south. and the Pacific Ocean to the west. It covers a land area of nearly 800 square miles
with 42 miles of coastline. The southernmost portion is only 70 miles from the international border with
Mexico. Orange County land use is 30% devoted to residential housing. the majority of which are single-
family detached units; 27% dedicated to open space and recreation: and 20% is vacant or devoted to
agricultural activities. It is a beautiful county with much to offer including 42 miles of pristine beaches. 2
major harbors. vast wilderness parks and open space. top-rated attractions, world-class shopping,
cultural arts, 5 universitieslcolleges, and an average of 143 clear. sunny days per year.
Orange County has a population of over 2.9 million people with an annual visitor population of
approximately 42 million people. It is ranked second in California in both population and population
density. It is the fifth largest county population in the nation and has more residents than 21 states.
Orange County's population by ethnicity is 50.5% Non-Hispanic white, 31.8% Hispanic. 13% Asian/Pacific
Islander and 6% black/other. The median age is 32 years.
Although only 13% of the county's land area is used for commercial. industrial. and public institutional
uses, Orange County is ranked as the 31st largest economy in the world and the 39th in gross product-
ahead of nations such as Turkey. Finland, Greece. and Thailand. The employed labor force at the end of
2000 was 1.49 million with the largest labor markets comprised of services (31 %). trade (24%) and
manufacturing (17%). In 2001. the median family income was estimated to be $71,200. During the
second quarter of 2003. the average price for a house was $423.468.
Page 27 of 51
Orange County is comprised of 34 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas throughout the county.
While many of the county's infrastructure systems are comparatively new and have more capacity relative
to demand than in other areas of the country. they will need substantial expansion or refurbishment to
handle anticipated future increases in demand and changing needs. Amusement parks. such as
Disneyland and Knott's Berry Farm, and the county's 42 miles of beaches continue to be among the most
popular tourist destinations in California. Public transportation has a ridership of over 50 million rides per
year. Driving is the most common means of transportation with the average commute time to work at
26.1 minutes.
There are 22 iaw enforcement agencies (21 municipal agencies and one county sheriff) and 13 fire
agencies (12 municipal agencies and one fire authority) serving the residents and visitors of Orange
County for their respective cities or through contractual agreement. Over 65 high-risk areas/facilities have
been identified in Orange County as possible terrorist targets. including amusement parks. the 12th
busiest airport in the nation. major shopping centers, industrial centers, and other critical infrastructure.
Orange County has over 12,000 public safety emergency responders in fire services, law enforcement
and health services. In addition, there are several agencies that provide helicopter services and a
regional program that services several cities. There are five hazardous materials teams, one hazardous
device squad. 13 SWAT Teams, and three cities have MMRS programs. The County is divided into five
Mutual Aid Regions (MARs), with primary agency responsibilities assigned to Santa Ana, Anaheim,
Huntington Beach, Irvine and the Orange County Sheriff.
Description of the Santa Ana and Anaheim Urban Areas
Santa Ana and Anaheim are the two largest cities in Orange County. In addition. each city has one of five
hazardous materials units in the county. as well as Class One fire departments. The Santa Ana and
Anaheim Urban Areas selected their respective jurisdictions primarily based on capabilities. geography,
proximity to each other and contiguity. The county was essentially divided in half. with Anaheim taking
the northern portion of the county and Santa Ana taking the southern portion. There were a number of
cities that were neither close nor contiguous to each core city. so they were divided between the two
Urban Areas based on each city's capability and their general location.
The Santa Ana Urban Area consists of the following cities; Santa Ana, Tustin. Laguna Beach. Alisa
Viejo, Laguna Hills, Lake Forest, Mission Viejo, San Clemente, Irvine. Costa Mesa, Huntington Beach,
Laguna Woods, Rancho Santa Margarita. Newport Beach. San Juan Capistrano, Dana Point. Laguna
Niguel, Fountain Valley, and the University Of California at Irvine Police.
The Anaheim Urban Area incorporates the cities in the northern portion of the county. These cities are;
Anaheim, Cypress. La Palma. Brea. Yorba Linda. Orange. Placentia. Westminster, Los Aiamitos, Seal
Beach, La Habra. Fullerton. Garden Grove, Villa Park. Stanton. and the University of California at
Fullerton Police.
Page 28 of 51
sow - SCOPE OF WORK
The assessment should be broken down into two sections: one addressing the Anaheim Urban Area
(UA), and another one addressing the Santa Ana Urban Area. Each of the sections should contain at
least three components, and must take into account regional capabilities and how those capabilities
overlap the Urban Areas.
SOW 1 - SECTIONS
SOW1.1 Anaheim Urban Area
SOW1.2 Santa Ana Urban Area
SOW 2 - FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS
The strategy should be divided in to three components.
1. A Risk Assessment, which is designed to assess the threat to particular
targets, enabling the Urban Areas (UA) to better focus their prevention and
preparedness efforts and to enhance their response capabilities. The risk
assessment will also identify the types of WMD likely to be produced and/or
developed by the existing potential threats to better identify equipment and
training needs necessary to respond to those particular types of hazards.
This assessment will be divided in to three components; a threat assessment,
a vulnerability assessment, and a list of the legal hazardous sites in the Urban
Area (UA).
2. A Capabilities Assessment, which is designed to document the desired and
current capabilities of the Urban Area's (UA) emergency responders. The
capabilities assessment will also assist the Urban Areas (UA) in identifying
the planning, organization, equipment, training, and exercises needed to
safely and effectively respond to WMD incidents.
3. A Spending Strategy, which is a summary of the risk assessment and
capabilities assessment coupled with comprehensive gap analysis that will
lead to a spending strategy. This strategy will assist the Urban Area's (UA) in
developing a prioritized list of critical infrastructure that are most in need of
protection. The strategy will also provide a prioritized list of capabilities,
equipment and training needed by the Urban Area's (UA) emergency
responders. The essence of the strategy will be to identify the gaps and the
most effective way to leverage grant funds to fill those gaps.
Page 29 of 51
SOW 2.1 Risk Assessment
The Bidder will produce a risk assessment for the top 10 critical
infrastructure (CI) in each of the two Urban Areas that is comprised of
three parts, a threat assessment (Part 1), a vulnerability assessment (Part
2) and a list of the legal hazardous materials sites ( Part 3) in the Urban
Area (UA). This risk assessment must prioritize each Urban Area's (UA)
critical infrastructure not only through OHS guidelines, but also through
interviews of stakeholders and use of consensus-building techniques.
When developing the risk assessment the Bidders should use a standard
risk/vulnerability model, preferably the OOP Assessment Model or the
CARVER Model. If the Bidder proposes to use an alternate
risk/vulnerability model other than the OPO Assessment Model or the
CARVER Model, the Bidder will provide a detailed description of the
proposed model and an explanation as towhy they desire to use the
alternate model.
The following is a list of objectives in the risk assessment process:
. Promote interagency collaboration/coordination of criminal,
investigative and intelligence information relating to
WMO/CBRNE/terrorism potential threat elements located within
the Orange County Operational Area (OCOA).
. Assess the threat to particular targets, enabling a jurisdiction to
better focus its prevention and preparedness efforts and to
enhance response capabilities.
. Identify the types of WMO/CBRNE likely to be produced and/or
developed by the existing potential threats to better identify
equipment and training needs necessary to respond to those
particular types of hazards.
For the purposes of this assessment, the following definitions apply:
Domestic Terrorism: The unlawful use, or threatened use, of force or
violence by a group or individual based and operating entirely within the
United States without foreign direction, and whose acts are directed at
elements of the U.S. Government or the general populace, in the furtherance of political
or social goals
International Terrorism: The unlawful use of force or violence committed
by a group or individual who has some connection to a foreign power or
whose activities transcend national boundaries against persons or property, to
intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment
thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.
Page 30 of 51
Potential Threat Element (PTE): Any group or individual in which there
are allegations or information indicating a possibility of the unlawful use of
force or violence, specifically the use of a WMD/CBRNE, against persons or property
to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment
thereof, in furtherance of a specific motivation or goal, possibly political or
social in nature. [Note: this definition provides sufficient cause for the FBI to
initiate an investigation.]
Weapons of Mass Destruction (Title 18 USC section 2332a): (1) Any
weapon or device that is intended, or has the capability, to cause death or
serious bodily injury to a significant number of people through the release,
dissemination, or impact of toxic or poisonous chemicals or their precursors; a
disease organism; or radiation or radioactivity; (2)(a) any explosive,
incendiary, or poison gas, bomb, grenade, or rocket having a propellant charge
of more than four ounces, or a missile having an explosive or incendiary
charge of more than one quarter ounce, or mine or device similar to the above;
(b) poison gas; (c) any weapon involving a disease organism; or (d) any
weapon that is designed to release radiation or radioactivity at a level
dangerous to human life.
SOW 2.1.1 Threat Assessment (Part 1 of the Risk Assessment)
The Bidder will produce (to the extent possible given resources and information
available to Bidder) a threat assessment that will document and measure the
existence of potential threat elements (PTE) located within the Urban Areas (UA) as
well as several factors (to the extent possible) regarding PTE existence, capabilities,
motivations, targeting, and history. The threat assessment will contain the following;
SOW 2.1.1.1 Identify and document known potential threat elements
(PTE) that exists or operate within the operational area.
SOW 2.1.1.2 Evaluate and document each treat factor attributable to each
potential threat element (PTE) identified in your jurisdiction.
Threat factors consists of:
. Existence
. Violent history
. Intentions
. WMD Capabilities
. Targeting
SOW 2.1.1.3Identify and document the motivation of each potential threat
element (PTE).
SOW 2.1.1.4 Identify and document the WMD/CBRNE capability of each
PTE.
Page 31 of 51
SOW 2.1.1.5 Develop and produce an Urban Area (UA) threat profile
which contains of the following information;
. WMD/CBRNE threat history for the Urban Area
(UA), a list of the responses to suspected
WMD threats and lor incidents that have
occurred within the Urban Area (UA). List
should be broken down by hazard: chemical,
biological, nuclear, explosive, and radiological.
. Total number of responses to suspected
WMD/CBRNE threats andlor incidents
occurring within the Urban Area (UA) that were
determined to be criminal. This list should also
be broken down by hazard.
SOW 2.1.2 Vulnerability Assessment (Part 2 of the Risk Assessment)
The basic vulnerability assessment provides the local jurisdiction with a current
vulnerability profile for all potential targets, as defined below, located within the Urban
Areas (UA) boundaries. The Bidder will produce (to the extent possible given resources
and information available to Bidder) a list of the Urban Areas (UA) potential targets
consisting of critical infrastructure facilities, sites, systems, or special events that are
present or take place within the Urban Area (UA). The list should then be prioritized
and the top 10 of the potential targets for each Urban Area should be further
documented in a Site-Specific Vulnerability Assessment.
Potential targets are defined as; a facility. site, system, or venue within the Urban Area (UA) that,
in the wake of a WMDICBRNE terrorism incident. would experience any or all of the following:
Large number of deaths and injuries extensive damage or destruction of facilities that provide or
sustain human needs (i.e. power sources. food distribution sites, and essential public services)
long-term catastrophic consequences to the general economic well being of the community,
including those targets associated with transportation systems, including bus, rail, air. etc..
SOW 2.1.2.1 Basic Vulnerability Assessment
When documenting the basic vulnerability assessment for
each potential target on the list the consultant will document
the following:
SOW 2.1.2.2.1 Level of visibility. This factor assesses the
visibility of the target and general public
awareness of its existence.
Page 32 of 51
SOW 2.1.2.2.2 Criticality of target site to Urban Area (UA).
This factor assesses the usefulness of the
asset to the local population, economy,
government, etc., and importance to the
continuity of the Urban Area (UA).
SOW 2.1.2.2.3 Impact outside of the Urban Area (UA).
Determine the impact of loss of this potential
target and the impact it would have outside of
the Urban Area (UA).
SOW 2.1.2.2.4 PTE access to target. This factor indicates
the accessibility of the target for ingress and
egress by a PTE.
SOW 2.1.2.2.5 Potential target threat of hazard. This factor
assesses the presence of legal WMD material
(CBRNE) in quantities that could be the target
of a terrorist attack or complicate the response
to an incident at that facility
SOW 2.1.2.2.6 Potential target site population capacity.
This factor assesses the maximum number of
individuals at a site at any given time.
SOW 2.1.2.2.7 Potential collateral mass casualties. This
factor assesses potential collateral mass
casualties within a five-mile radius of the target
site.
SOW 2.1.2.2 Site-specific Vulnerability Assessment
When developing the site-specific vulnerability assessment
the consultant will document the following;
SOW 2.1.2.2.1
SOW 2.1.2.2.2
SOW 2.1.2.2.3
level of visibility. This factor assesses the
visibility of the target and general public
awareness of its existence.
Criticality of target site to Urban Area (UA).
This factor assesses the usefulness of the
asset to the local population, economy,
government, etc., and importance to the
continuity of the Urban Area (UA).
Impact outside of the Urban Area (UA).
Determine the impact of loss of this potential
target and the impact it would have outside of
the Urban Area (UA).
Page 33 of 51
SOW 2.1.2.2.4
SOW 2.1.2.2.5
SOW 2.1.2.2.6
SOW 2.1.2.2.7
SOW 2.1.2.2.8
SOW 2.1.2.2.9
PTE access to target. This factor indicates
the accessibility of the target for ingress and
egress by a PTE.
Potential target threat of hazard. This factor
assesses the presence of legal WMD material
(CBRNE) in quantities that could be the target
of a terrorist attack or complicate the response
to an incident at that facility
Potential target site population capacity.
This factor assesses the minimum - maximum
number of individuals at a site at any given
time.
Potential collateral mass casualties. This
factor assesses potential collateral mass
casualties within a five-mile radius of the target
site. Describe the day-of the week and time-of-
day used in calculations.
Identify specific vulnerabilities unique to
the potential target.
Make recommendations on how to reduce
the identified vulnerabilities.
SOW 2.1.3 Document all legal hazardous sites located within the
Urban Area (UA). (Part 3 of the Risk Assessment)
Produce a list of sites within the Urban Area (UA) broken down by CBRNE
hazard; chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive. (Refer to
definitions below)
Chemical: Tier level II substances of 40 CFR Part 355 that
is present at a facility in an amount in excess of its threshold
planning quality, any "hazardous substance" listed in 40
C.F.R Section 302.4 that is present at a facility in an amount
in excess of its reportable quantity or in excess of its
threshold planning quantity if it is also an "extremely
hazardous substance," and any petroleum including crude oil
or any fraction thereof that is present at a facility in an
amount exceeding 100 pounds unless it is specifically listed
as a "hazardous substance" or an "extremely hazardous
substance."
Biological: Any individual or government agency, university,
corporation, company, partnership, society, association, firm,
Page 34 of 51
or other legal entity located at a single geographic site that
may transfer or receive through any means a select agent
Hazardous Sites.
Radiological/Nuclear: (Irradiators), a facility that uses
radioactive sealed sources for the irradiation of objects or
materials and in which radiation dose rates exceeding 5
grays (500 rads) per hour exist at 1 meter from the sealed
radioactive sources in air or water, as applicable for the
irradiator type, but does not include irradiators in which both
the sealed source and the area subject to irradiation are
contained within a device and are not accessible to
personnel. (www.access.gpo.gov/ecfr/).
Production and utilization facilities - Any nuclear
reactor designed or used primarily for the formation of
plutonium or uranium-233; or (2) Any facility designed or
used for the separation of the isotopes of plutonium,
except laboratory scale facilities designed or used for
experimental or analytical purposes only; or (3) Any
facility designed or used for the processing of irradiated
materials containing special nuclear material, except
laboratory scale facilities designed or used for
experimental or analytical purpose or facilities in which
the only special nuclear materials contained in the
irradiated material to be processed are uranium enriched
in the isotope U-235 and plutonium produced by the
irradiation, if the material processed contains not more
than 106 grams of plutonium per gram of U-235 and has
fission product activity not in excess of 0.25 mill curies of
fission products per gram of U-235, and facilities in which
processing is conducted pursuant to a license issued
under parts 30 and 70 of this chapter, or equivalent
regulations of an Agreement State, for the receipt,
possession, use, and transfer of irradiated special
nuclear material, which authorizes the processing of the
irradiated material on a batch basis for the separation of
selected fission products and limits the process batch to
not more than 100 grams of uranium enriched in the
isotope 235 and not more than 15 grams of any other
special nuclear material.
Special nuclear material - Plutonium, uranium-233,
uranium enriched in the isotope-233 or in the isotope-
235, and any other material which the Commission,
pursuant to the provisions of section 51 of the act,
determines to be special nuclear material, but does not
Page 35 of 51
include source material; or (2) any material artificially
enriched by any of the foregoing, but does not include
source material.
Explosive: Sites that manufacture, produce, or store in
reportable quantities explosive materials as delineated in
Title 18, USC and 27 CFR 55
SOW 2.2 Capabilities Assessment
The purpose of conducting/reviewing the capabilities and needs assessment is to assist
the Urban Area (UA) in identifying the planning, organization, equipment, training, and
exercises needed to safely and effectively respond to WMD/CBRNE incidents.
The Bidder will identify each of the Urban Areas (UA) current capabilities to prevent,
respond to and recover from a terrorism event, as well as desired capabilities in
accordance with generally accepted principles for preparedness. In essence, this
component must identify gaps and ways to fill those gaps.
While conducting the capabilities assessment the bidder should always be aware of the directives
established by the Department of Homeland Security, the goals and objectives of the State of California
Office of Emergency Services, the goals and objectives of the Orange County Operational Area. and the
Santa Ana and Anaheim Urban Area Homeland Security Strategy. One of the primary mandates of the
Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) is that grant funds must be allocated to the prioritized needs
outlined in the Urban Areas (UA) strategy. In addition, the capabilities assessment and its attendant
recommendations must take into account all disciplines (i.e., law enforcement. fire service. healthcare,
EMS. hazardous materials, public works, public health. government administration, public safety
communications, and emergency management).
One of the prime benefits of doing a thorough capabilities assessment is the acquisition of valuable
information that can be used to drive the development of projects designed to address the Urban Areas
(UA) strategy's goals and objectives. The Bidder conducting the assessment should bear in mind the
methodology developed and documented by Texas A&M University. When conducting the assessment
and making recommendations, the information should be broken down into five solution areas: Planning,
Organization. Equipment, Training, and Exercises. These solution areas are described by ODP in the
following manner:
SOW 2.2.1 Solution Areas
SOW 2.2.1.1 Planning
Assesses planning that the jurisdiction has conducted to ensure
emergency responders have an updated emergency operation plan and
terrorism incident annex to provide clear direction and stakeholder
Page 36 of 51
responsibility in the event of a weapons of mass destruction (WMD)
incident. The WMD incidents may also be described in this and other
homeland security documents as relating to CBRNE incidents, which
stands for Chemical, Biological. Radiological, Nuclear and Explosive.
The assessment also documents the capabilities of stakeholders through
written mutual aid agreements and other documents that portend the
extent of each jurisdiction's capability in terms of WMDICBRNE.
SOW 2.2.1.2 Organization
Assesses organizational efforts and structures the OCOA
has developed through the construction of emergency
response teams and written mutual aid agreements with
jurisdictions to provide adequate responses and capabilities
to all cities in the OCOA.
SOW 2.2.1.3 Equipment
Makes a thorough assessment of the OCOA's equipment
inventory as it relates to its capabilities, and makes
recommendations to ensure an appropriate response to any
WMO/CBRNE incident in the OCOA. The assessment must
take into account the equipment capabilities of all disciplines
to avoid duplication and enhance the capabilities of the
OCOA Mutual Aid Regions (MARs).
SOW 2.2.1.4 Training
Assesses the skills and abilities of all first responders in the
OCOA as they relate to WMO/CBRNE incidents, and makes
prioritized recommendations with respect to all disciplines to
achieve a desirable state of readiness and proficiency. Any
recommendations must comply with guidelines and
requirements by OOP.
SOW 2.2.1.5 Exercises
Assesses the current slate of recently held and planned
exercises in the OCOA, and makes recommendations for an
exercise portfolio that will exercise local response plans,
mutual aid agreements and the OCOA's strategy to prevent,
respond to and recover from acts of terrorism.
The capabilities assessment should determine the WMD/CBRNE response level identified as necessary
Page 37 of 51
for the Urban Area (UA) emergency responders based on the Urban Area (UA) planning factor estimates.
The result will enable the Urban Area (UA) to properly equip. train, and exercise responder assets to
respond to a WMD/CBRNE incident in a safe and effective manner in accordance with Urban Areas (UA)
response plans.
Use the planning factors to establish CBRNE materials likely to be used during a
WMD/CBRNE terrorism incident in order to help determine desired and current
capabilities needed by each discipline to respond appropriately. The capabilities
assessment should use the same planning factors to establish a numerical estimate of
affected individuals who may become incapacitated during a WMD/CBRNE terrorism
incident. Apply the designated factors to planning, organization, equipment, training,
and exercises in order to identify gaps. In addition, Bidder will establish, in rank order,
the type of WMD/CBRNE incident that is likely to occur given the Urban Areas (UA)
threat and incident history, as well as potential threat elements (PTE).
The bidder will be responsible for contacting all agencies, jurisdictions, special districts,
and disciplines to obtain the following information:
SOW 2.2.2 Determine Desired Response Capabilities
2.2.2.1 Determine and document the response levels for each discipline in
the Urban Area's (UA).
2.2.2.2 Determine total number of emergency responders from each
discipline. Broken down in the following time elements, within 30
minutes, within 4 hours, within 8 hours.
2.2.2.3 Determine and document number of emergency responders from
each discipline desired at each WMD/CBRNE response level.
2.2.2.4 Response levels are defined as:
. RESPONSE LEVEL - 0 (NO WMD CAPABILITY LEVEL)
This level can be generally defined as having "no capability
to respond to or recognize a WMD incident." Emergency
responders at this level lack the training, and equipment to
react at any level to a WMD release.
. RESPONSE LEVEL -1 (WMD AWARENESS
CAPABILITY LEVEL)
This level can be generally defined as the Recognition level, having
"a capability to recognized a WMD incident." Emergency
responders at this level are those persons who, in the course of
their normal duties, could be required to respond to or support an
emergency involving a WMD incident. Emergency responders at
this level are expected to recognize the presence of a potential
WMD terrorism incident, take measures to protect themselves, call
for trained personnel, and secure the area. Competency at this
level is evidenced by compliance with Office for Domestic
Page 38 of 51
Preparedness Awareness Level training standards, National Fire
Protection Association training standards associated with
competencies for the emergency responder at the Awareness Level
(NFPA 472, Chapter 2) and applicable U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and other
appropriate state and local requirements.
. RESPONSE LEVEL - 2 (WMD PERFORMANCE
(DEFENSIVE) LEVEL)
This level can be generally defined as the Defensive level,
having "a modest increase in capability to respond to a WMD
incident." Emergency responders at this level are those
persons who respond to releases or potential releases of
WMD materials as part of the initial response to the incident
or support of this response for the purpose of protecting
nearby persons, the environment, or property from the
effects of the release. Emergency responders at this level
are expected to respond in a defensive fashion to control the
incident from a safe distance and keep it from spreading.
Competency at this level must be demonstrated by
performance of required skills and is evidenced by meeting
all requirements for Level One and possessing general
knowledge of biological, nuclear/radiological, and chemical
agents; personal protective equipment, emergency
decontamination, as well as compliance with Office for
Domestic Preparedness Performance (Level A) Level
training standards, National Fire Protection Association
training standards associated with competencies for the
emergency responder at the Operations Level (NFPA 472,
Chapter 3) and applicable U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA), and other appropriate state and local requirements.
. RESPONSE LEVEL - 3 (WMD PERFORMANCE
(OFFENSIVE) LEVEL)
This level can generally be defined as the Offensive level,
having "a moderate increase in capability to respond to a
WMD incident." Emergency responders at this level are
those persons who respond to releases or potential releases
of WMD materials as part of the initial response to the
incident or support this response for the purpose of reducing
or eliminating the source or effects of the WMD materials.
This level is normally required only for certified technicians
who are trained and equipped to operate in a fully
encapsulated environment in the hot zone to detect and
Page 39 of 51
neutralize a hazardous material. This level can only be
achieved if the jurisdiction has a technician-level certified
HazMat Team. Competency at this level must be
demonstrated by performanceof required skills and is
evidenced by meeting all requirements for Levels One and
Two and possessing advanced capabilities to work in the
affected area of a WMD material release, as well as
compliance with Office for Domestic Preparedness
Performance (Level B) Level training standards, National
Fire Protection Association training standards associated
with competencies for the emergency responder at the
Technician Level (NFPA 472, Chapter 4) and applicable U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), and other appropriate state and local
requirements.
. RESPONSE LEVEL. 4 (WMD ADVANCED
OPERATIONS AND TECHNICIAN CAPABILITY LEVEL)
This level can generally be defined as having an "advanced
WMD operations and equipment capability to respond to a
WMD incident." Emergency responders at this level have
met or surpassed the requirements associated with the
requirements for Response Levels One, Two, and Three,
and will meet or exceed all emergency response operational,
training, and equipment requirements for their jurisdiction to
respond to or support the response to a WMD incident. The
jurisdiction would have the capability to operate unhindered,
without planning, organizational, training, or equipment
shortfalls in any number of environments affected by WMD
material release.
2.2.2.5 Determine and document the number of emergency responders
from each discipline currently equipped and trained to desired
WMD/CBRNE response levels.
SOW 2.2.3 WMD Task By Discipline
Using planning factors and potential incidents the Bidder will produce a list, by
discipline, of required tasks needed to respond to a WMD terrorism incident. The
current capability of each task is determined through questions posed to the Urban
Areas (UA) members who represent the various disciplines. The list will contain the
following information:
Page 40 of 51
2.2.3.1 The specific tasks required of each discipline to respond
appropriately to likely incidents?
2.2.3.2 Are there appropriate plans and procedures in place to
accomplish the task?
2.2.3.3 If a specialized team will accomplish the task, is this
organizational component in place? (Le., task force, SWAT
team, HazMat, etc.)
2.2.3.4 Is the discipline equipped to perform the desired task for
potential incidents?
2.2.3.5 Has the discipline trained to perform these tasks?
2.2.3.6 Has the task associated with the response plan been
exercised using realistic CBRNE scenarios?
SOW 2.2.4 Determine Desired Response Capabilities-Agriculture
2.2.4.1 Determine Agricultural Response Levels For Responders
2.2.4.2 Determine the overall number of emergency responders
needed to respond to the incident.
2.2.4.3 Determine the overall number of personnel desired at the
agricultural WMD/CBRNE response level.
2.2.4.4 Determine the overall number of personnel currently
equipped and trained at the desired level.
2.2.4.5 Current capabilities using these agricultural tasks are
determined through questions posed to the jurisdiction:
SOW 2.2.5 WMD Task By Discipline - Agriculture
2.2.5.1 What are the specific agricultural tasks required by the
disciplines to respond appropriately to a biological incident?
2.2.5.2 Are there appropriate plans and procedures in place to
accomplish the task?
2.2.5.3 If a specialized agricultural team will accomplish the task,
are these organizational components in place? (Le., task
force, SWAT team, etc.)
2.2.5.4 Are responders equipped to perform the needed agricultural
task for a biological incident?
2.2.5.5 Have responders trained to perform these tasks?
2.2.5.6 Has the task associated with the response plan been
exercised using a realistic biological incident as the planning
scenario?
Page 41 of 51
SOW 2.3 Needs Assessment by Solution Area
The Bidder will develop a document, by solution area, that details what is needed to
increase emergency responders' capabilities to respond to a WMD terrorism incident
effectively. The Bidder will be responsible for contacting the agencies, jurisdictions,
special districts, and disciplines to obtain the information required for the document.
The document will contain the following information:
2.3.1 PLANNING
2.3.1.1 Terrorism incident annex
2.3.1.1.1 Determine if terrorism annex exists, if so, when was it
last updated.
Review and recommend changes to terrorism annex.
Review and recommend changes to
WMD/CBRNE/terrorism incident annex template.
2.3.1.2 Current Emergency Operation Plan (or similarly named plan)
2.3.1.2.1 Determine if Emergency Operation Plan exists, if so,
when was it last updated.
2.3.1.2.2 Review and recommend changes to Emergency
Operations Plan.
2.3.1.2.3 Review and recommend changes to response
protocols
2.3.1.2.4 Review and recommend changes to interoperable
communications strategy
2.3.1.3 Emergency response capability
2.3.1.3.1 Determine discipline capabilities of the Urban Area
(UA)
2.3.1.1.2
2.3.1.1.3
2.3.1.3.2 Determine strength (full-time/volunteer) of the
discipline, if capability exists; and Mutual aid
providedlreceived
Determine those disciplines that provide mutual aid.
Determine those disciplines that receive mutual aid
through written agreements or protocols from
neighboring jurisdictions.
2.3.1.4 Community Education and awareness
2.3.1.4.1 Determine the level of terrorism education and
awareness prevalent in the Urban Area's (UA)
population.
2.3.1.4.2 Determine the needed educationltraining information
required to bridge education/awareness gap
2.3.1.3.3
2.3.1.3.4
Page 42 of 51
2.3.1.4.3 Identify existing sources of educational materials and
programs.
2.3.1.4.4 Recommend appropriate educational multi-media
campaign.
2.3.1.5 Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT)
2.3.1.5.1 Determine the state and readiness of CERT teams in
the Urban Area (UA).
2.3.1.5.2
Recommend
enhancements to the program
2.3.1.6 Citizen Corp
2.3.1.6.1 Determine the state and readiness of Citizen Corp
teams in the Urban Area (UA).
2.3.1.6.2 Recommend enhancements to the program
2.3.1.7 Continuity of Government
2.3.1.7.1 Determine how many jurisdictions in each Urban Area
have current Continuity of Government Plans, and make
recommendations as to improvements.
2.3.2 ORGANIZATION
2.3.2.1 Identify Emergency Response Teams
2.3.2.1.1 Type of response teams - using general definitions
provided.
2.3.2.1.2 HazMat: Individuals, full-time, part-time, or on
voluntary basis, identify, characterize, provide risk
assessment, and mitigate/control the release of a
hazardous substance or potentially hazardous
substance.
2.3.2.1.3 Decontamination Teams: Decontamination teams
consist of individuals with responsibility for initiating
and conducting decontamination operations
necessary to maintain the health of contaminated
individuals as well as the safety of non-contaminated
individuals and physical facilities.
2.3.2.1.4 SWAT: Special Weapons and Tactics unit that will
search for any potential suspects, provide protection
for ongoing operations, and conduct high threat
searches or execute no-knock warrants.
2.3.2.1.5 Bomb Squad: Special unit that conducts an
immediate search and recognizes suspect package or
Page 43 of 51
secondary device in order to conduct render safe
procedures. Technical Rescue: Specialized
emergency response personnel who are trained to
apply special knowledge, skills and equipment to
safely resolve unique and/or complex rescue
situations.
2.3.2.1.6 Urban Search and Rescue: Specialized emergency
response personnel who are trained to apply special
knowledge, skills and equipment to safely resolve
unique and/or complex rescue situations involving
large concrete and/or steel structures.
2.3.2.1.7 Heavy Rescue: Specialized emergency response
personnel who are trained to use strategy, tactics and
operations for locating, extricating and treating victims
of structural collapse.
2.3.2.1.8 Metropolitan Medical Response System: Specialized
jurisdictional group with local, state and federal
involvement and representation. Core members
include public health, emergency services and
hospital representatives.
2.3.2.1.9 Public Health Team: City/County Public Health
officials including health inspectors, sanitarians and
physician Consultants who are trained to quickly
assess and investigate threats against public health.
2.3.2.1.1 ODisaster Medical Assistance Team: A regional group
of volunteer medical professionals and support
personnel with the ability to quickly move into a
disaster area and provide medical care. Under the
control of the U.S. Public Health Service, DMA 1's can
rapidly deploy for any type of disaster that requires an
immediate medial response.
2.3.2.2 Identify team capabilities within the Urban Area (UA)
2.3.2.2.1 Determine strength of teams.
2.3.2.2.2 Identify the number of emergency response teams
available
2.3.2.2.3 Identify the number of emergency response personnel
available per team.
2.3.2.3 Identify additional response team staffing needs
2.3.2.4 Mutual aid provided/received by teams.
Page 44 of 51
2.3.2.4.1 Indicate whether the emergency response team
receives mutual aid through protocols or written
agreements from other jurisdictions.
2.3.2.4.2 Indicate whether the emergency response team
provides mutual aid through protocols or written
agreements to other jurisdictions.
2.3.2.5 Develop additional response team protocols
2.3.2.6 Identify response team equipment
2.3.3 EQUIPMENT
2.3.3.1 Identify discipline(s) that need additional equipment
2.3.3.2 Identify needed equipment by type
2.3.3.1.1 The specific type of equipment desired by the Urban
Area (UA) in order to continue to properly equip
emergency responders to respond to WMD/CBRNE
terrorism incidents. When identifying equipment
steps should be taken to insure interoperability with
existing equipment and there should be consideration
for the shelf life of certain pieces of equipment.
2.3.3.3 Operational equipment
2.3.3.3.1 Personal protection equipment, detection,
decontamination, CBRNE search & rescue
equipment, interoperable communications equipment,
terrorism incident prevention equipment, explosive
device mitigation and remediation, WMD/CBRNE
technical rescue, physical security enhancement,
CBRNE logistical support equipment, medical
supplies and limited types of pharmaceuticals.
2.3.3.3.2 Determine total equipment that should be on-hand
initially and to meet the Urban Areas (UA) needs for
24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours.
2.3.3.3.3 Use the planning factors established as a focus for
the number of equipment pieces desired to meet the
Urban Areas (UA) response needs.
2.3.3.3.4 Determine current equipment on-hand or on order.
2.3.3.3.5 Make recommendations on how the Urban Area (UA)
can maintain an easily accessible database that
contains data on the types of equipment, location of
equipment, and quantities of equipment that are kept
within the Urban Area (UA).
Page 45 of 51
2.3.3.3.6 Estimate the number of equipment pieces currently
on-hand or on order by the Urban Area (UA). These
reported assets should supplement desired
equipment.
2.3.3.3.7 Determine a priority for procurement regarding a
specific discipline
2.3.3.4 Identify the gap desired to be filled for each discipline
2.3.3.5 Develop broad Urban Areas (UA) Technology Requirements
for enhanced data analysis, data fusion, and data and
information sharing.
2.3.3.6 Identify Urban Areas (UA) interoperable communication
equipment and software requirements.
2.3.3.7 Identify Urban Areas (UA) technology requirements for data
analysis, data fusion, and data and information sharing in light
of existing capabilities and on-going projects.
2.3.3.8 Identify Urban Areas (UA) interoperable communications
technology requirements for radio and data interoperability in
light of existing capabilities and on-going projects.
2.3.3.9 Bidder should consider, but not be limited by, the Urban Areas
(UA) list of potential targets developed during the Vulnerability
Assessment conducted in the recent past. From the
information collected, and that developed by Bidder, identify
the capability responders most urgently need. The following
are examples of capabilities that may be needed:
. The capability to quickly, and from a safe distance, detect
explosives contained within vehicles prior to entering a
tunnel or other passage way leading to a critical
infrastructure.
. The capability to perform real-time detection,
identification, and measurement of all biological agents.
2.3.4 TRAINING
2.3.4.1 Identify those emergency personnel who are currently trained
to appropriate levels in order to respond to a WMD/CBRNE
terrorism incident, recognize the use of a possible
WMD/CBRNE, and take appropriate action.
2.3.4.2 Identify those emergency personnel who need training at
appropriate WMD/CBRNE training levels in order to increase
capabilities to perform specific tasks required during a
WMD/CBRNE terrorism incident.
Page 46 of 51
2.3.4.3 Identify, by discipline, the number of emergency personnel
who need training, and the specific courses that are needed to
increase their ability to respond to a WMD/CBRNE terrorism
incident.
2.3.4.4 Assess the training needs for each discipline addressing the
three WMD/CBRNE training levels (Awareness, Performance,
and Planning/Management).
2.3.4.4.1 For each WMD/CBRNE training level there will be three
assessment inquiries:
2.3.4.4.1.1 The number of personnel within each discipline that
desires to be WMD/CBRNE trained.
2.3.4.4.1.2 The number of personnel who are currently
WMD/CBRNE trained.
2.3.4.4.1.3 Number of personnel who are not WMD/CBRNE
trained to the desired level.
2.3.4.5 New Training Levels
2.3.4.5.1 Awareness Training Level
Awareness Training Level: Addresses training needs
for emergency responders who are likely to witness or
discover an incident involving the terrorist/criminal use
of WMD/CBRNE or who may be sent out to initially
respond or support the response to the report of such
an incident. Generally, all actions to be taken by these
individuals should be conducted from within the cold
zone. Should personnel find themselves in the warm
or hot zones, they are to remove themselves and to
encourage others, if ambulatory, to move to a staging
area away from the immediate threat and attempt to
minimize further contamination. The requisite
competencies for this level of training are to recognize
(RECOGNITION) a WMD/CBRNE terrorism incident
and to notify (NOTIFICATION) appropriate authorities
of the incident.
2.3.4.5.2Performance training levels
Performance training level: Addresses training needs
for emergency responders who will be responding to
or supporting the response to the scene of a potential
WMD/CBRNE terrorism incident or hazardous
materials incident for the purpose of protecting nearby
persons, property, or the environment from the effects
of the incident. These responders are to provide the
personnel to conduct on-scene operations within at
Page 47 of 51
least the warm zone andlor hot zone (if properly
trained and equipped) that has been set up on the
scene of a potential WMD/CBRNE or hazardous
materials incident in order to control and mitigate the
incident.
This performance level is divided into two sub-levels
with a separate set of training guidelines for each.
Defensive
Performance-Defensive: (This training level replaces
the former Operations WMD/CBRNE Training LeveL)
The emergency responders trained to this sub-level
will be fully capable of working in the warm and cold
zones and support those responders working in the
hot zone. They are trained to respond in a defensive
fashion without actually trying to mitigate the effects of
the incident. Their function is to contain the incident
from a safe distance, keep effects from spreading,
and prevent exposures.
Offensive
Performance-Offensive: (This training level replaces
the former Technician WMD/CBRNE Training LeveL)
The emergency responders trained to this sub-level
will be fully capable of working in the hot zone, and at
times in the other zones at the incident scene, as
required. WMD/CBRNE emergency responders at this
level are individuals who respond to WMD/CBRNE
incidents and potential WMD/CBRNE incidents for the
purpose of mitigating the effects of the incident or
treating victims. They assume a more aggressive role
than emergency responders at Performance-
Defensive, in that they will approach the point of
release in order to mitigate the incident and treat
affected victims.
2.3.4.5.3Planning/Management Training Level.
Planning/Management Training Level: (This training
level replaces the former Incident Command
WMD/CBRNE Training LeveL) Addresses training
needs for emergency responders who are expected to
be part of the incident management
team, or support for the response to a potential
WMD/CBRNE terrorism incident or hazardous
materials incident (PLANNING/MANAGEMENT).
These response managersl leaders will be involved at
Page 48 of 51
a minimum in the planning for, mitigation against,
managing of, and recovery from scene operations and
support functions. They are expected to manage the
resources brought to the incident and to assist the
incident commander in bringing the incident to a
successful termination. Generally, all of the actions to
be taken by these emergency responder
manager/supervisors should be conducted from within
the cold zone. As access is required, there may be
times these duties and functions are accomplished
within the warm zone
2.3.4.6 Assess Emergency Response Training Locations Or Venues
2.3.4.7 Evaluate Locally Developed WMD/CBRNE Training Courses
and make recommendations on the types of training that may
need development.
2.3.5 EXERCISES
2.3.5.1 Determine type of exercise required by the Urban Area (UA)
to test and exercise the plans, equipment, and training
outlines in the planning guidelines
2.3.5.2 Type of Exercise
2.3.5.2.1 Jurisdiction scenarios defining specific CBRNE materials that
were likely to be used during an attack.
2.3.5.2.2Hazard (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear,
Explosive)
2.3.5.3 List frequency of exercises.
2.3.5.4 List scope of exercise participation.
2.3.5.5 Determine projected exercise cost.
2.3.5.6 Disciplines projected to participate in exercises.
2.3.5.3.1Indicate the number of responder participants who should
take part in this exercise.
2.3.5.3.2Specific tasks by discipline established for each emergency
responder.
SOW 2.2.6 Spending Strategy
The Bidder will develop a prioritized spending strategy that will take
into account what has already been accomplished, or is slated for
completion, with grant funds, both Urban Areas Strategic Initiative
(UASI) and homeland security grants, in the Orange County
Operational Area (OCOA). This strategy must clearly define
Page 49 of 51
priorities and make recommendations as to the most effective and
efficient manner in which to implement goals and objectives in the
strategy. Any recommendations made by the Bidder must be
primarily aimed at strengthening regional preparedness. and in
particular the capabilities of the mutual aid regions in the county.
Page 50 of 51
Attachment 2 to Exhibit A
Place a copy of the proposal submitted by URS here
Page 51 of 51
URS
January 11, 2005
Captain George Saadeh
Santa Ana Police Department
60 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Subject: Request for Proposal for Preparation of Countywide Strategic Plan for Terrorism
Preparedness
Dear Captain Saadeh:
In response to RFP # 04-146, URS Corporation (URS) is pleased to provide this proposal,
demonstrating the unique benefits offered by the URS team to develop a strategic plan for the Santa Ana and
Anaheim Urban Areas and the Orange County Operational Area. The Plan will include a comprehensive risk
assessment, capabilities assessment and a prioritized expenditure strategy.
Our goal, achieved through a process of consensus building, will be to create a sustainable model for
preparedness to prevent, respond to, and recover from threats to the operational area. The plan will identify
gaps and develop strategies to fill those gaps on a countywide basis using existing and future grant funds.
URS is one of the world's leading engineering services firms. More importantly, we have operated in
Orange County for more than 40 years. The Santa Ana office, with more than 260 employees, has worked
for virtually every governmental agency in the County on a variety of assignments, ranging from infrastructure
to environmental projects.
URS has undertaken hundreds of security, emergency preparedness and force protection/anti-
terrorism projects across the country. We served, for example, as program manager for FEMA's response and
recovery effort in New York City in the wake of the attacks on the World Trade Center. By choosing URS,
you will be selecting a team of experts unmatched in the development of threat assessments, emergency
response, and strategic plan development.
As a firm with broad international experience, we never lose sight of our local focus. This project is
important to us because we live and work in Orange County. We have a personal and professional
commitment to the success of this effort. Your Project Manager, a reserve police officer for the City of
Laguna Beach, walks a beat as a first responder on weekends and holidays. We know Orange County and
we understand your challenges.
Again, we appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal, and look forward to getting started on
the project as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
URS CORPORATION
(J~ t{ ~
David E. Marx
Vice President
URS Corporation
2020 East First Street. Suite 400
Santa Ana. California 92705
Tei: 714.835.6886
Fax: 714_667_7147
~
~ducat'on 1st'
~'1Iit.
~~
~
COMBINED AREAS STRA TEGIG PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
2.2 ORGANIZATION INFORMATION
URS Corporation is a publicly traded company providing environmental. homeland secunty, planning.
engineering, and construction management services worldwide. The depth and diversity of
our environmental science and engineering staff is unparalleled. For the fourth year in a row,
Engineering News-Record has ranked URS not only the number one design firm in IIIIB~-"':""~ ~..
the publication's annual list of 500 firms. but also in the top ten for transportation., :..._". " . ~ii:::.
power, water and telecommunications.. URS maintains those rankings . =:~~:- 5'10 ~..~
by delivenng value and results to our clients time after time. ~~="::;::.. ION ~~
Our success is a result of having talented professionals. the ENR 5.. ;::-:::: :::::: - - -".""
right tools and resources, and a commitment to continuous <--....-.-., =. ::::.. =..'" ~^ M S
improvement. 1 .~~:
"".'.~
U!IW"
URS Corporation is a $3.5B company with 26,000
employees, including our Santa Ana. CA office of 250. We
provide emergency preparedness and response services,
emergency operations center services, and infrastructure
protection services. Having worked with federal. state, and
local agencies, one particular area where URS is a
recognized national leader is homeland security. As part of that experience, the URS team has worked with a
broad range of federal, state, and local agencies, including the Office of Domestic Preparedness (ODP) and
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), to develop similar guidance materials. URS may be the only
company in the US that has a proven track record at providing services for both natural and man-made
disasters. This is made evident by the following experience:
URS developed the UASI Homeland Security Assessment and Strategic Plan for the City of San
Diego,
. URS developed the series of "How To" manuals that provide guidance for developing multi-
hazard mitigation plans to comply with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000).
URS' EG&G division is the Department of Homeland Security - Office of Domestic Preparedness
contractor for the western US.
URS is the largest FEMA contractor - we have activated nearly 200 people for Hurricanes Charley,
Frances, Ivan, and Jeanne.
.
URS has been involved in 400 of the last 500 Presidentially-declared disasters.
As a member of the Santa Ana business community since 1973, URS whole-heartedly supports the City's
mission "to provide quality service to enhance the safety, livability, and prosperity of our community." Our
presence in Santa Ana since 1973 has demonstrated our commitment to the City and its continued prosperity.
URS
2
ATTACHMENT "A"
GENERAL INFORMATION SHEET
RFP 04-146
FOR PREPARATION OF COUNTYWIDE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR TERRORISM
PREPAREDNESS
January 11, 2005
Date:
Legal Name of Firm:
URS Corporation Americas
Type of Organization:
Publicly traded corporation
Sole Proprietorship, Partnership, Corporation, etc.
94-1381538
Federal Employer 1.0. Number:
Street Address: 2020 East First Street, #400
Santa Ana, CA 92705
714.835.6886
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
714.433.7701
Mailing Address:
(if applicable)
David Marx, Division Manager. Vice President
Name of Prlncipal-In-charge, Title, License Number
Tom Wall, Project Manager 714.973.40261 Cellular 949.874.6831
Primary Contact Person and Telephone Number
~'''t.
.~~
~
COMB/NED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
2.3 PROJECT ApPROACH
The project will be managed from the URS office in Santa Ana. Ca. under the direction of the project manager.
Tom Wall. Senior staff, including David Marx, from other southern California offices will be directly involved in
the process and available for face-to-face meetings with no more than 24-hour notice. The Santa Ana URS
office staff will provide administrative and accounting support.
URS has served our public-and private-sector clients for more than 20 years in all areas of security
preparedness projects and strategic plans. This experience ranges from urban area security initiative strategic
plans to full security system designs for large international airports. Over the past decade. URS has completed
tasks and projects ranging from threat/vulnerability assessments, emergency response. and preparedness
training to security systems engineering, biometrics technologies (facial recognition. chemical! bio sensors).
force protectionlthreat reduction. facility designlbuild construction. and business risk management.
2.3.1 Management Plan
Given the magnitude of the effort and the short time frame allocated for the project, URS has organized a
project team as outlined in the attached Organizational Chart. The two principal URS points of contact will be
Tom Wall, Project Manager, and David Marx. Principal-in-Charge and manager of the technical effort. The
team is further broken down into technical areas of responsibility as indicated on the chart. with administrative,
accounting and support staff assigned as necessary.
Biosketches for key personnel and resumes for all members of the team are included in Section 2.4. Team
members were chosen based upon their experience and competence with similar projects and/or technical
areas. All team members have worked together on other projects and have proven success working on multi.
jurisdictional assignments with tight schedules.
Key Personnel and Task Leaders
In addition to the project manager, technical manager. and support staff (as indicated on the organizational
chart), the URS team is organized into a series of functional areas each led by a Team Leader. The functional
areas include: data management, risk assessment. capabilities assessment. gap analysis/needs prioritization,
spending plan development, and meeting facilitationlconsensus building. Tom Wall will serve as the primary
client point of contact for all project tasks and supervise the efforts of the task leaders. David Marx will lead the
technical effort and ensure the quality and timeliness of all deliverables. Together, Tom and David will be
constantly available to support client activities.
Each team leader is responsible for that team's effort and will supervise the work in that area of responsibility.
The first task for Team Leaders is to prepare Project Management Plans (PMPs) for each task immediately upon
authorization to proceed. The PMPs describe the client's objectives, the scope of work and technical approach,
budget. project organization and contact list, interim milestones, deliverable schedule, technical review
requirements. and staff assignments to ensure complete, timely. and on-budget deliverables. PMPs are
distributed and reviewed by all project team members.
URS
"
4
~,f'j..
I',' r,
...~.~..
~~
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
Schedule and Cost Control
The proposed project schedule is included in section 2.3.4 of this document. Given the uncertainty of the
validity of some of the data required for completion of the assignment. the project schedule is designed to be a
guide that will be refined beginning at the kickoff meeting, and weekly thereafter to reflect changing
conditions. Since weekly project meetings with URS staff and client representatives are anticipated. the
schedule will be updated based upon discussions in those meetings.
Cost control is a very important component of our approach. A project accountant who works closely and
directly with the project manager in the Santa Ana office is assigned to the team. URS's accounting system,
EnterpriseOne, allows the project accounts and project managers on-line access to all prolect accounting
information. Expenditures are compared with the budget and project schedule and deviations are discussed
with team leaders to reconcile discrepancies. Our intent is to begin with a client-approved budget and track
expenditures weekly to ensure that we stay on track and on budget. Timesheets, invoices and all other budget-
related documents are internally audited and reviewed by the project manager. These audits are available to
the client for review as requested.
Document Production
Production of all documents related to the project. with the exception of any mass printing or mailing, will be
accomplished in the Santa Ana office. URS production capabilities are extensive and include graphic arts,
reproduction, collating and binding. As evidenced by the front cover for this proposal. URS personnel can
design and print custom logos and marketing materials for all deliverables or collaterals required for the project,
or requested by the client.
Project Quality Control
All significant deliverables undergo detailed checking to confirm that all facts and data presented are accurate,
and are reviewed thoroughly by an independent technical reviewer who has expertise in the subject area. This
review includes a critical evaluation of the basis and validity of significant conclusions, opinions. assumptions.
evaluations, recommendations, and other project requirements. In addition. compliance with all contractual
obligations is reviewed. After successful resolution of any discrepancies in the work product. the document is
submitted to the client.
Upon receipt of the comments on draft deliverables from the client, the project manager meets with the
project team to review the comments. The final deliverable is then prepared and submitted to the client.
URS project managers, task leaders, and technical staff are required to participate in the URS' corporate-wide,
68-course Project Management and Quality training program. This program includes a requirement of five
years project experience, and provides training in five subject areas: Client Relations, Contracts and
Procurement, Financial Management, Planning, and Project Administration. Project managers must then go
through a confirmation process, where a board of URS-certified project managers reviews their work.
URS
5
~'''t.
.~.~.
/~<
v y
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
Ultimately. the success of the project depends upon the organization, training and experience of the project
team. Effective project management is a fundamental strength of the URS. An example of our competence and
success is the Los Angeles Airport Master Plan and Environmental Impact Report program recently certified and
adopted by the City of Los Angeles. After approximately 10 years of work. and through the creation of more
than 12 thousand pages of documents, the URS-led project management team has completed the
environmental clearance for the largest and most complicated public works project in the history of the City of
Los Angeles.
2.3.2 Subconsultants/Subcontractors
URS will have one subconsultant. Jim McGeahy, Sole Proprietor, working out of the Santa Ana office. Jim will
be managing the following responsibilities:
Threat Assessment
Vulnerability Assessment
. Capabilities Assessment
2.3.3 Technical Approach and Milestones
This section presents our approach to completing the Countywide Strategic Plan for Terrorism Preparedness. In
this section we also identify major milestones and potential implementation issues.
2.3.3.1
Project Understanding
URS understands that the Santa Ana Urban Area (UAj, the Anaheim UA and the Orange County (County)
Sheriff's department have decided to approach terrorism prevention and preparedness as a regional program
including the 34 incorporated cities in the county as well as the unincorporated areas. Additionally. the
strategic plan desired will provide the roadmap for expenditure of not only UASI grants, but for other grant
funds related to homeland security and emergency response. The urban areas submitted the initial plan
required by the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) in April 2004. The plan includes a subjective analysis of
potential targets, a discussion of needs assessment and goals, objectives and implementation actions with a
focus on the prevention of terrorist attacks.
We understand that the strategy and assessments required in the scope of work should be broken down in two
sections: one for the Santa Ana UA (generally the southern portion of the County) and one for the Anaheim UA
(northern portion of the County). The strategy desired includes three components: a risk assessment, a
capabilities assessment and a spending strategy.
Based on our UASI project experience, we are aware that the strategy will include the public sectors of fire
services, Jaw enforcement, emergency management, hazardous materials, public works, public health, health
care, emergency medical services, public safety communications and government administrative. We expect
that Caltrans, public utilities, private industry and possibly community-based groups will also provide limited
input as in the development of the strategy. We are aware that the Regional Technology Integration Initiative
(RTII) will be conducting threat and vulnerability assessments for the operations area. If data is available and
URS
6
It'
~l't.
~~.
~:.
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
consistent with our collection requirements, any information we receive from the RTII will be used to assist in
the target ranking strategy.
In developing the strategy we understand that URS will be responsible for the following:
.
Utilizing the existing data to the maximum extent possible
Collecting data and validating from jurisdictions and agencies
Evaluating lhe data. conducting analysis and providing recommendations
Preparing project documents
Attending meetings at least weekly
Completing the strategy in 120 days
.
.
.
We propose the following work plan and milestones to complete the project. Please note that this work plan
reflects the lessons learned from our work on the San Diego UASI project.
2.3.3.2
Project Kickoff
URS will prepare for and attend a project kickoff meeting. At this meeting we will discuss the overall project
schedule, present our approach. lines of communication. review cycles and other expectations. We will also
establish a schedule for regular meetings for the duration of the project as outlined in the Request for Proposal,
identify a steering committee (or working group) that will be necessary to provide feedback at various
milestones, and identify the protocol for communicating decisions made by the steering committee that will
drive the progress of the project. It is anticipated that the meeting will last three hours.
2.3.3.3
Risk Assessment
Threat Assessment
The first step in the risk assessment will be to identify and characterize the pOlential threat elements (PTEs) and
their ability to commit a weapon of mass destruction (WMD) attack using a chemical, biological, radiological,
nuclear, or explosive (CBRNE) device. This information will need to be provided by the law enforcement
agencies. The RFP requests that PTE information contain specific details about their existence. history,
intentions. motivalion and their WMD/CBRNE capability. An issue that will likely arise is that this information in
normally kept by the FBI and joint terrorism task force UTTFl. and these entities treat this information as highly
sensitive and confidential. In our experience, we should be able to collect non-specific information that would
be adequate to convey a sense of the potential threat to the County.
We will also compile information from law enforcement (LEI, fire services (FSI and hazardous materials
response teams (HMI regarding the responses to suspected-CBRNE incidents in the county. We will breakdown
these incidents by CBRNE type. It should be noted that based on our experience the suspected biological agent
incidents will dominate the data due to the rash of white powder (suspected anthraxl incidents post 9/11.
URS will develop a draft report section for review and comment and we will finalize this section incorporating
comments received.
URS
7
~,'''t.
-~~
~'--Y,d"C~"Un,.,;)
, . ' .
- -
COMBINED AREAS STRA TEGle PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
Vulnerability Asses..ment
The vulnerability assessment will identify and rank potential targets in the UAs. URS will review the list of over
65 high-risk targets identified in the 2004 plan and based on our familiarity with the County, we will assess if
any obvious targets are missing. If Caltrans, Southern California Edison and the Southern California Gas
Company were not included in the identification of the initial target list. we will work with law enforcement
representatives in the UAs to obtain target information from these entities.
We propose a tiered approach to ranking the targets. As the complete list of potential targets is compiled. all
potential targets will be entered into an Access database lhat URS has specifically developed for UASI target
ranking. We will first conduct a screening-level ranking of all of the potential targets using the ODP Assessment
model. This will provide an inexpensive preliminary screening-level ranking of the targets and includes the
elements of the basic vulnerability assessment specified in the RFP (i.e. level of visibility, criticality of the target.
impact outside the UA, etc.). The results of this screening level analysis will be presented to the UA steering
committee for consensus. The use of a simple Access database will allow an "on-the-fly" look at what-if
scenarios related to changing scores for various elements for specific sites during the steering committee
meeting. This ability was instrumental in facilitating consensus to the target ranking in the San Diego UASI
vulnerability assessment. Interviews will also be conducted with the stakeholders in the consensus-building
process.
If the top ten infrastructure targets do not emerge in the preliminary screening-level, a secondary screening-
level analysis will be conducted for up to 15 targets in each UA using the Carver model. The Carver model is
similar to the ODP Assessment model, but it provides a higher level of specificity for a number of the
vulnerability elements. It should be noted that any facility in the County that has developed a Buffer Zone
Protection Plan (BZPP) will already have a Carver model analysis and the 15 sites selected will supplement the
BZPP sites. Results of this modeling will also be presented to the UA steering committee for discussion and
consensus. and the top 10 infraslructure sites in each UA will be identified.
If an additional level of characterization is desired for the top 10 targets, we propose an option to conduct a
more detailed level analysis using the Homeland Security Comprehensive Assessment Model (HLS-CAM). HLS-
CAM was developed by the National Domestic Preparedness Coalition Inc. (NDPCI). NDPCI is a non-profit,
public I private partnership, whose leadership includes the West Virginia National Guard, the West Virginia
University School of Medicine, and the Sheriffs Office, Orange County. Florida. The model was derived from a
collection of sources including U.s. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Manual; The CIA Fact-
book; u.s. Army FM100-37; U.s Army TC19-16; U.s. Army FM34-130; Training Guidance to West Virginia
National Guard from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA): Orange County Sheriffs Office, Orlando,
FL; Florida Regional Domestic Security Taskforce Risk Assessment Model; ASIS International; and other open
source documents. This model is becoming commonly used for target vulnerability assessment
Finally, if extensive and very specific vulnerability information is desired for each target, URS will develop a cost
estimate to include an analysis using the RiskWatch@ model. RiskWatch@ was developed as a software tool
based on the extensive site-specific vulnerability assessment guidance in FEMA Reference Manual to Mitigate
Potential Terrorist Attacks Against Buildings (FEMA 426. December 2003). As shown in the brochure (included
URS
8
.,,!,#~
, ",-,'
~H'-,~_
v~
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
at the end of this section), RiskWatch@ includes over 350 questions for each facility that would require data
input. RiskWatch@ also allows the analysis of cost-benefit of preventative measures and can estimate a return-
on-investment (ROI) for security improvement options. It normally takes between three and four weeks to
compile the information to input into RiskWatch@ for each facility and we would typically use this model in
conducting vulnerability assessments for facility owners and not for area-wide planning analyses. However. if
this level of information is desired for the top targets identified in this project, we would be pleased to provide
the cost and schedule to conduct this detailed analysis.
Legal HazardoU'; Sites
URS will compile data for legal hazardous sites from HM and FS in each UA. In our experience. information
from these agencies is generally current and very accurate. The information is will be compiled for each UA
and broken down by CBRNE categories.
When consensus is reached for the vulnerability assessment, URS will develop a draft report section for review
and comment and we will finalize this section incorporating comments received.
2.3.3.4 Capabilities Assessment
URS will conduct an accurate assessment of the current and desired capabilities of the Orange County
Operational Area (OCOA) to prevent, respond to and recover from a terrorism event. Following the complete
assessment of capabilities we will develop recommendations for strategic improvement of the Operational
Area's. The model created by URS to collect and analyze data for the San Diego County Urban Area follows
the specifications described in the RFP and complies with the guidelines of the US Department of Homeland
Security. Office for Domestic Preparedness' State Home/and Security Assessment and Strategy Program, Urban
Area Jurisdiction Handbook.
Data Model
The model will be used to assess the emergency response capabilities, as well as the planning, organization.
equipment, training and exercise capabilities of each Urban Area. URS will 1 ) validate existing and collect
missing information; 2) project needed response capabilities; 3) analyze current and desired response
capabilities to identify gaps; and 4) make recommendations for cost effective capabilities improvement to the
OCOA. The following sections provide the methodology for data collection. Additional assessment details for
each planning area can be found in Section 1.2, Assessment Details.
Data Validation and Collection
URS will cuslomize our UASI assessment Microsoft ACCESS database for the OCOA to enter, store and
manipulate the majority of information required by the OCOA. The data model used by URS uses current or
"on-hand" information as its input. The database system used by URS also allows information used in
different detail areas (such as number of emergency responders in a given discipline or special team) to be
entered only once. This prevents duplicate data, a problem that has been encountered by other Urban Areas.
URS
9
~'l't.
.~~.
-'~~'
"v y
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
This also significantly reduces the burden on, and opportunity for error by jurisdictions. special districts.
organizations and agencies.
URS will first review and validate information already collected by lhe Urban Area. This scope assumes that the
review of existing data will result in finding approximately 20% of the data required by the UASI grant program
to be accurate. Existing data will be entered into the URS database. Missing information will be collected by
URS staff familiar with the required information and the data collection process. URS proposes to hold a data
collection meeting, which will require a representative from each jurisdiction. special district. organization or
agency constituting the Urban Area(s). At this meeting a data specialist will distribute customized data collection
forms. We will provide administrative and technical assistance in completing the forms. It is expected that the
forms will be completed within three (3) weeks. It should be noted that extensive cooperation from each of the
jurisdictions will be necessary in order to collect the jurisdiction-specific data required. During this time period
URS will track and validate incoming data. Verified data will be entered by URS into the assessment database.
The details of the data entered will include urban area, emergency response discipline, jurisdiction/special
district as well as those details set-out in by ODP or required by the OCOA. Our cost estimate assumes access
to and receipt of accurate information from the Urban Areas. A print-out of the "on-hand" data will be
provided to the representatives for each jurisdiction for their review and verification.
Projection of Needed Response Capabilities
The standard of preparedness will be established by using the results of the risk assessment to determine likely
WMD/CBRNE scenarios for each Urban Area. The details of the scenario including location, timing, number of
persons at risk, CBRNE element(s) and impact of the incident on victims and responders create the basis for
planning factor estimates to determine the level of preparedness required to sustain a successful response. URS
will also consider the steps necessary to achieve existing goals and objectives of the relevant levels of
government in establishing needed response capabilities. The needed response capabilities will be presented to
the Steering Committee for their input and review.
Identifying the Gap Between Current and Desired Capabilities
The standards for response will be entered into the assessment database by URS for comparison against existing
capabilities. URS will use the comparison to determine the gap between existing and required capabilities for:
.
Emergency Responders
Planning
Organization
Equipment
Training
Exercises.
.
.
A.Hes.sment Details
The above assessment model identifies the process for collection of information and analysis of that
information. Additional details of the proposed assessment are provided as follows. As noted above, URS will
either validate existing or collect new data to fulfill information requirements.
URS
10
~"..
,
~~
~ " '-
/.C~\"d"'~~"''''I''''f
.../ ,...
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
Response Capabilities for Responders
URS will collect/validate data to determine the number of existing emergency resronders in each Urban Area.
The data will be collected and stored by discipline, jurisdiction/special district. and geographic region. (Region
will be used to determine potential response time within the Urban Area.) Additionally. URS will provide
technical assistance to jurisdictions to assist them in determining the number of emergency responders at each
WMD/CBRNE response level. Desired levels of training and equipment will be determined using the model
identified above. The same process will be used for Agricultural Response. taking special districting into
account.
WMD Task by Discipline
URS will collect/validate data to determine the capability of each Urban Area to complete the tasks required to
respond to a WMD terrorism incident. The completed information will be summarized by Urban Area and
analyzed using the model developed by URS for the San Diego UASI. The same process will be used for
Agricultural Response, taking biological incidents and special districting into account.
Planning
URS will collect/validate data to determine the current status of planning elements in the Urban Areas.
Recommendations for changes to existing plans and improvements in community response will be made. We
will use our extensive experience in general planning and hazard mitigation planning in developing
recommendations for the Urban Area.
Organization
URS will collect/validate emergency response team information and use that information to determine
capabilities and needs of the Urban Area. Response team equipment data will be collected as a portion of the
equipmenl data collection process.
Equipment
URS will collect/validate equipment data from the Urban Areas utilizing the data collection model described
above. The information on equipment will include equipment type Ii.e. Personal Protective, CBRNE Search &
Rescue, etc.) subcategory, item name. jurisdictional source and discipline. This assessment will include the
amount of equipment needed at various operational periods during the response to a WMD incident.
Additional recommendations for technology. interoperable communications, and specialized equipment will be
provided.
Training
URS will collect/validate information on personnel and current and needed levels of training according to the
data model identified above. The required level of training for each discipline will be based on consensus with
the UA and on URS subject matter expert suggestions. URS will also assess local emergency response training
location and local course capabilities and make recommendations for improvement.
Exercises
Exercising of equipment and training prior to a real incident is vital to a successful WMD emergency response.
We will survey the jurisdictions, special districts. agencies and organizations to determine what exercises are
URS
'.
11
1"
~Wt.
-~~
~
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
currently planned for the OCOA. We will draw on the expertise our EC&C Technical Services. Inc subsidiary"
which holds the Western Region ODP Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program Technical
Assistance Contract. to develop recommendations for a coordinated exercise program. The exercise program
will be targeted to address the most vital needs identified in the risk assessment and to ensure that new training
and equipment are accompanied by the opportunity for first responders to use the equipment prior to a WMD
incident.
URS understands that the UASI strategy is a dynamic process and will quickly evolve. This is especially true as
WMD capabilities in the UAs significantly improve during the first year or two of grant funding. Considering this
dynamic, URS will provide the UAs with the Microsoft ACCESS database developed for this project protected
upon completion of the scope of work. allowing the Urban Areas to update the data on an on-going basis.
Spending Strateg'
It has been apparent to UAs that have completed the UASI capabilities assessment that the cost to fill all of the
needs identified far exceeds any reasonable assumptions about funding that may be available. Consequently. it
is necessary for each UA to develop a methodology to prioritize spending to fill the most important needs. URS
will use a combination of statistical analysis and consensus building to develop the priorities and spending
strategy to be included in the Countywide Strategic Plan for Terrorism Preparedness. This combination will
provide a technically supported, reproducible list of spending priorities. We propose establishing priorities at
four levels: very high, high, medium and low. This will result in numerous items at each level and will provide
the UAs with some flexibility and discretion to select desired items in the higher categories as needs arise.
Based on results of the capabilities assessment we will customize the UASI needs prioritization model
developed for the San Diego UASI project to meet the needs of the OCOA. Specifically, the model will be
adjusted to emphasize strengthening regional preparedness and capabilities in the mutual aid regions of the
OCOA.
As part of the needs prioritization modeling process, URS will develop a shopping list of various
prevention/response elements (e.g. collect PTE intelligence, prevent terrorist from accessing sites, detect
WMDs, rescue victims from site after attack. etc.) and a meeting will be organized with select agencies
members to rank and weight these prevention-re_"polhP P/Pf7IPfl!S based on group consensus regarding relative
importance. Based on information provided during the pre-bid meeting. it is expected that preventions
elements may be weighted higher than some response elements. The Delphi method of assessing group
consensus will be used. This method involves a discussion of assessment objectives, anonymous voting by each
participant regarding the relative importance of the different prevention/response elements, statistical feedback
on the distribution of individual responses. an open discussion of the significant differences of opinion, and
conducting additional rounds of assessment as necessary.
The raw gap for each item listed in the capability assessment under planning, organization, equipment, training,
and exercises will be calculated as the difference between the target and current levels of the resource. The gap
will be expressed as a percentage of the desired level. For example. if the capability assessment indicates that 4
urban search and rescue (US&R) vehicles are needed and only 1 is present, the gap would be 75%. The impact
URS
12
~'l'i.
-~~
j~?
-v .....-
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
of the gap for each item on the various preventionre~pof1se elements will be assessed by the URS team and
will be reviewed with the WG. Continuing with the example. a 75% gap in US&R vehicles will have zero
impact on the preventiol1/response elements of "collecting PH intelligence" because the lack of these vehicles
is not expected to effect intelligence gathering. However, but this gap would have a very high impact on the
prevention/response elements of "rescue victims from a site". The results for each item will be weighted on a
scale of 0 to 100, with 100 indicating that the prevention/response element will be completely impacted and 0
indicating no impact to the prel'entio/71eSpOnse element.
The cost of closing each gap will be estimated based on a unit cost of adding the resource and the quantity of
the gap to be closed. In addition, the cost and benefit of closing each gap will be evaluated. A plot of cost
versus benefit will be prepared for all gaps. The graphical display of the cost versus benefit matrix (see Figure
2.3.3) will be used to identify relative priority groups (high, medium. low etc.) of the different needs. The
relative plotting position of a given need in the cost versus benefit matrix provides an effective visual tool to
identify the relative priority of the need. If a given need plots in the portion of the matrix with relatively high
benefit (i.e., high gap impact score) and relatively low cost, the priority of addressing that need would be high.
Conversely, if a need plots in a portion of the matrix with low benefit and high cost. the priority of addressing
such a need would be low. Thus, the different portions of the cost versus benefit matrix will be used to define
different priority groups of needs.
The gaps will be listed in a descending order of the weighted gap impact score. The cumulative cost of closing
gaps in this priority order will also be shown. In addition, gaps will be sorted by priority groups and the total
cost of closing all gaps in each priority group will be estimated.
URS will utilize the results of the needs prioritization to develop a spending strategy for the OA that achieves
the goals and objective in the strategic plan. The updated data in the capabilities assessment will include the
items already purchased or slated for purchase with the current grant expenditures. The needs prioritization
process and the recommendations will be oriented to focus on strengthening regional preparedness and
capabilities in the mutual aid regions of the OA. URS will develop a draft report section for review and
comment and we will finalize this section incorporating comments received.
In our experience, many UAs desire the flexibility of a subjective approach to establishing the distribution of
funds among the various jurisdictions in an UA year to year. However, some jurisdictions prefer that a generally
unbiased quantitative method be used. As an option, URS would develop a quantitative Funds Allocation
model to provide a syslemalic, ralional basis for allocating available limited funds among different jurisdictions.
The model will be based on using multiple criteria that provide a defensible basis for allocating funds. Potential
criteria for funding allocation include the cost of meeting high-priority needs, the number of targets weighted
by their vulnerability. the number of mutual-aid obligations, and the likelihood of a wide-spread, regional
impact if an incident were to occur. In consultation with the steering committee, URS will develop an
appropriate list of criteria and assess their relative importance for funding allocation. For each jurisdiction, URS
will compile relevant factual data with regard to the defined criteria and calculate a numerical weighted
funding score. A preliminary allocation of available funds among the jurisdictions will then be derived in
proportion to the funding scores of the jurisdictions. This preliminary allocation will be provided to the steering
URS
13
~,,.,.
.~~
~
COMBINED AREAS STRA TEGle PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
committee for review. The goal will be to provide a logical. unbiased starting point for the allocation of funds
among the jurisdictions. The steering committee may revise this preliminary allocation based on non-tangible
factors that may not have been addressed in the numerical model. We will be happy to provide the City with a
cost for these services at a later date if there is interest in this approach.
Figure 2.3.3
Personnel Protective
Equipment (PPE) / Law
Enforcement
1
Medical Supplies &
Pharmaceuticals / Public
Health
Decontamination
Equipment I HazMat
Training I Fire
Services
Planning
100.000.
.
.
.
..
...
...
-
e
.
. .
....
.
10,000.
.
.
If)
o
1.000
..
100.
.
.
.
.
-+-
.
.
.
..
....;
..
~:. ..
. :
,
-----..----+-----
. ' .
:+
+ :
,
,
,
~
~
~
'5
'It
<>
<>
.+
.. +.
10.
+
...
-*-- -----
o
10
20
30
60
Personnel Protective
Equipment (PPE) / Public
Works
CBRNE Incident Response
Vehicles / Emergency
Medical Services
Interoperable
Communications
Equipment I
Governmental
Administrative
2.3.4 Milestone Schedule
A milestone schedule has been included on the following page.
2.3.5 Bonding Capability
N/A per Addendum 1.
URS
'.
14
~,~.
-~~
~
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
2.3.6 City Staff Involvement
The assumption is made that, with the exception of management personnel or points of contact for each
jurisdiction or agency, city andlor county staff will not be available to participate in data collection. analysis or
evaluation for this project. URS assumes that all tasks associated with the preparation of required deliverables
will be the responsibility of URS or its subcontractor and have been included in the proposed budget. City staff
will need to be active participants in the steering committee that will be needed to provide on-going feedback
for the project. It is envisioned that one weekly two-hour steering committee meeting will be required and that
an additional six meetings will be required over the 17-week project duration. It should be noted that in order
for the steering committee to be maximally effective, it should include at least one representative from each of
the 10 disciplines (fire services, law enforcement. public works. EMS. etc) that is familiar with the capabilities
and policies in the OCOA. As funding agencies, it is expected that Santa Ana, Anaheim and the Sheriff's
Department would be represented on the steering committee. We might also suggest including at least one
representative from a smaller city. The final determination of the number of meetings and the amount of City
staff time that will be needed to complete this assignment is dependent in part upon the condition of the data
provided by the client agencies and their accessibility. It is expected that the final determination can be made
after the initial review of this data.
URS
15
TARGET, FOCUS AND JUSTIFY THE ENTIRE SECURITY BUDGET
WITH RISKWATCH@'S RETURN ON INVESTMENT (ROI) ANALYSIS
RiskWatch" foJlows thc GAO methodology in aJl
elements of its security risk assessment products.
"We huve previollsly reported 011 the )'a/lIe (~lll
flew approach l~rllsillg sound threat and ri.""h'
Wisessmcflts ... forfrn'lIsing programs ulld
investments to combat terrori.\'IIl. ..
According to a recent U.S. General Accounting
Office Report, " The approach to good securi(v is
fimdamentally similar regardless afthe assets
being protected ", As GA 0 has previously reported
for homeland security and information s.vstems
security. "applying risk management principles
can provide a sound foundation for effective
security whether the as!;ets are information,
operations, people. or facilities". These
principles, which have been followed by members
qfthe intelligence and defense community/or
many years. can be reduced tofive basic steps:
J. Jdent(fy Assets
2. Ident(f}' and characterize Threats
3. Ident(fy and characterize Vulnerabilities
4. Risk must be analyzed and assessed
5. Ident(f}' countermeasures to reduce risks
Risk W atchc< follows the GAO methodology and
ASIS best practices in all elements of its security
risk assessment products.
lurr'n~ "no Rc,'"",",~ .,~ cr'",
",,,",,,,"(",
]',,,,"'!' I.., (;"",,",,,
\,wlL,';"I."""
s.~,","\' """H' 140"
I"L,"""I1I1<<,',,,,,,,,,,,,,
1'10:",,,,,,11,<,,,,",,1011"
]';,,'k.,~, (,,,",,,,II~ '" ,
K""",""",
Mm
Ca,h
Llln
InliZ e a Ions IpS
Threat
Vulnerability
Direct Loss Accident , IConstruction 1
/'" I Fines !~, Earthquake / / Barriers
1- - I Dl5r\Jpbon 81 Oil Spills 1(" ;"'IRestricted Areas
-... 1 Indirect Los:s 'f\\ Power Loss Y' Personnel ID
Intang,bl.. \\ Theft I \ Key Control,
Lo5S of Ufe ~ AoodlnQ ~. \. No Security Plan
Terrorist Attac~ Pumas Damaaed
Incident Class -.J Homicide \ \~Dockside
Incident I ~Construction
'---Degree of Seriousness
Conditioned Incident
Carrier
I Chemicals
Ca",o
c~w
Security
Personnel
1 D_p .db\;j~R
The R;skWatch engine automatically links and analyzes the relationships
between each element of the assessment including threats and controls
EASY TO USE
RiskWaIch for Physical &
Homeland SecurityBl is shipped
overnight to your location and you
can start your assessment the very
next day!
FREE TRAINING
A two-day class for one person at
Risk Watchj{; headquarters in
Annapolis, Maryland is included
at no cost with your software,
You can also purchase onMline or
on-site training.
WRITES THE REPORT FOR
YOU IN MOST WORD
PROCESSING PROGRAMS
RiskWatch for Physical &
Homeland Security ™ writes a
complete I OOMpage report that can
be fully customized by the analyst.
It includes a 3-page Executive
Summary, a 17-page Technical
Report, full definitions, a security
requirements library, and a
Project Plan/Data Collection kit.
INCLUDES AUDIT TRAILS
The report includes complete
audit trails to validate your results
and find out who answered every
question and what their answers
were.
ADD PICTURES OR
ORGANlZA TlONAL CHARTS
QUICKL Y & EASIL Y
; RISK
hWATCH
RiskWatch@develops the world's leading security risk assessment software. RiskWatch@ software
meels all federal and audit standards for risk assessment. RiskWatch@c1ients include the US Department
of Defense, the US Department of Justice, the National Research Council of Canada. the US Coast
Guard, the National Security Agency, the Pentagon Force Protection Agency, state governments in all fifty
states, as well as major private companies like AT&T, Pinkertons. PDVSA. Verizon and Vodafone.
2004 Product Sheet RiskWatch@ Is a registered trademark of RlskWatch,lnc.
I~'fit.
-~~
~;;.
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
2.4 PROJECT PERSONNEL
Figure 2.4.1 below illustrates the relationship between the Project Manager. Principal-In-Charge. task leaders
and other assigned staff members.
Figure 2.4.1
~''''''
_.~~..
~~
City of Santa Ana
l.::;:":'::_. ..~._~'_"',-C.L' ~~~._,._:..,,,.....,.....,;r........~:
,
f'
Project Manager
Principal-in-Chargel
Technical Advisor
Tom Wall
David Marx, REA, REHS
- ...'~---,"~,,-,"'.....~"--,"-,'_. -,
0....-,.r~C...'::,-.:,'''',V~~
Data Management
Risk Assessment
Capabilities Assessment
Jim Bognar
Jen Tucker
Jen Tucker
Diane Douglas, PhD
Jim Bailey
Jim McGeahy (sub)
David Marx, REA, REHS
Leslie Fischbein
Jim McGeahy (sub)
'-";'C:;;'~'-;:CC"-
~_=;;:~="', ..,..r.-.7'.~""""'T".=--
Gap Analysis!
Needs Prioritization
Ram Kulkarni, PhD
Chi-Wah Wong
David Marx, REA, REHS
Meeting FacilitationJ
Consensus Building
Tom Wall
Tim Whyte
Amanda Johnson
Spending Plan
il;.~._..__~ ~,_-,~'".'''
i.v.: "'_.......,,:,~.~:-:-:.t1i,.-;::"'~:'!:--
~---'-...,."'~~."'n..,..._
2.4.1 Principal Staff
The key team members proposed for this project and their roles are as follows:
Team Member Role
David Marx, REA, REHS
Principal-In-Charge/Technical Review
Tom Wall
Project Manager
In the event Tom Wall cannot complete the assignment, David Marx will take over for him as project manager.
URS assures that no key project personnel will be replaced without prior approval by the City of Santa Ana.
URS
.,
19
~"it.
~~
~
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
As the Principal-in-Charge (PiC!. David will be responsible for providing the Project Manager. Tom Wall.
with the resources necessary for the successful completion of the project. David will be able to assign additional
staff as necessary to meet timelines and milestones. Further, as a URS Vice President. David will work closely
with Tom to make sure the project remains on budget and that there are monthly reviews of the project's
finances to ensure budget compliance.
David has full authority to provide the corporate resources that are appropriate to the project requirements, He
also meets with client representatives to confirm that their expectations are achieved. For this proJect. David
will:
Ensure continuity of project terms
. Oversee our peer review and quality program
Ensure compliance with contract terms, conditions, and other requirements
Oversee conflict resolution and customer partnering
Since David has such extensive knowledge and experience with similar projects. he will also serve as Technical
Review. Working in conjunction with Tom, David will serve as our gatekeeper, releasing no document until it
has received appropriate Independent Technical Review. All significant deliverables undergo detail checking to
confirm that all facts and data presented are accurate, and are reviewed thoroughly by an Independent
Technical Reviewer who has expertise in the subject area. This review includes a critical evaluation of the basis
and validity of significant conclusions. opinions, assumptions, evaluations, recommendations. and other project
requirements. In addition. compliance with all contractual obligations is reviewed. After successful resolution of
any discrepancies in the work product. the document is submitted to the City.
As Project Manager, Tom will utilize his extensive background in both military planning and local law
enforcement to expedite this project. He will assume the following responsibilities:
1. Serve as principal point of contact for the Santa Ana Police Department, the Anaheim Police
Department. the Orange County Sheriff's Department and all client representatives in the operational
area.
2. Coordinate the efforts of the URS team to meet all scheduled and on-call meetings. and to provide all
deliverables on time and on budget.
3. Supervise project billing and accounting functions.
4. Facilitate (or provide representation) all scheduled and on-call stakeholder meetings required to meet
the project schedule.
5. Ensure the preparation of meeting agendas and minutes, as required.
6. Ensure the preparation and maintenance of the ongoing project schedule.
7. Provide any additional public outreach or agency coordination as may be required to facilitate
completion of the Assessment.
URS
~-." ~.. lll' ',.'.
. '''':~ .' '. "." .
1 "j' ." ~ _ {,. '.-
, 'r, ...'; ~'
1\ ".".,:", L
.- - .
20
~'I'r..
~~'
(-"'\U"~"'m ,"-,
~...,
, .
"
2.4.2 Resumes
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
The professional background and experience of the key team members are provided as abbreviated resumes
below. Complete resumes are included in Appendix A.
Years Experience:
24
Registration/Certificates:
. Environmental Assessot/CAlNo. 03298
. Environmental Health Specialist/CAlNo. 4569
. CertificatefToxicology and Hazardous Material
Management Program/CAl1981
. Certificate/Hazardous Materials Incident
Emergency Management/CA/1982
Education:
. Masters Public Health/1979
. BAl1977/ Biology
Office:
San Diego
~ ~~, f!i;; ~~ i f ~;'j i/ ;;~1'~'J;f~;'~~;;;~; ~~.. ~. ; ",.
~~~,~~r\~~~~~'
David Marx was the Project Manager for the San Diego
UASI Strategy project His other planning project
experience includes responsibility for facilitating a task
force consisting of industrial and environmental members
In order to implement the Community Right-to-Know
Ordinance in San Diego County, developing the
Biomedical/Infectious Waste Management Program for
the San Diego Department of Environmental Health and
technical advisor for the development of the San Diego
County Solid Waste Management Plan.
David was an original member of the Technical Advisory
Committee that assisted the California Office of Disaster
Preparedness (now OES) in developing the strategy for
implementing the Risk Management and Prevention Program (RMPPI throughout California. The Advisory
Committee subsequently assisted in the development of the RMPP Guidance Manual.
David worked with the OES to update the County of San Diego's Disaster Preparedness Plan to assure that it
adequately addressed planning and response issues related to hazardous materials for both accident and
natural disaster emergencies. He participated in planning and implementation of County disaster drills and
acted as On Scene Coordinator andlor Public Information Officer during numerous hazardous materials
emergencies. David was the County representative responsible for coordinating County resources with the US
EPA during several emergency hazardous waste removal episodes.
David has also managed environmental analysis and community participation programs for a variety of complex and
controversial projects including hazardous waste treatment facilities. landfills and power planK These projects
included community outreach. soliciting public input and facilitating public meetings. Many of these projects
included an analysis of a potential accidental release from the facility. including morbidity, mortality and damage
assessments. The preparation of mitigation measures was also a component of each of these projects.
Other specific projects on which David has served as Project Manager include:
San Diego County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan
El Sobrante Landfill Expansion Permitting
Kinder Morgan Carson Tank Farm Expansion Risk Assessment
Kinder Morgan Carson to Norwalk Pipeline Environmental Permitting and Construction
Monitoring.
.
.
.
URS
~'~. "flD' ..'
'-:. _ F," ~.~.
. "1' - ..'- .' . . '"'it
21
.,'lit.
~~.
~-
COMBINED AREAS STRA TEGle PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
I.,
-~
r.q,,~~;..;,
,~. ;" ~.;..'-
Years Experience:
37
Education:
. M BA/1986
. MS/1979/Systems Management
. MA/1977/Communication Theory and
Management
. BA/1966/ Arts & Science
. Graduate of the US Marine Corps Command
and Staff College
Office:
Santa Ana
Tom Wall, a senior project manager with URS
Corporation, possesses a detailed understanding of
installation and facility security. force protection. and
individual security requirements based on 30 years of
military experience. education. and training in the field.
and eight years experience as a reserve police patrol
officer with the City of Laguna Beach. CA. He presently
serves as the URS southern California team leader for
homeland security and public outreach.
Pre-qualified by the California Department of Personnel
as a facilitator and public speaker. Tom has conducted
over 500 public agency and private company consensus-building and public outreach meetings in southern
California during the past ten years. He is a recognized expert in the fields of leadership and management
training, and public outreach plan development and implementation.
As a senior project manager, Tom has 35 years of experience leading people. managing schedules and
controlling costs related to high profile public infrastructure and consulting assignments. Please feel free to call
Tom's personal references:
Chief Jim Spreine
Laguna Beach Police Department
949 497-0385
Mayor Curt Pringle
City of Anahei m
Contact: Mishal Montgomery, Special Assistant to the Mayor
714.765.5098
Years Experience:
10
Education:
. BS/1998/Micro-Molecular Biology
Office:
Santa Ana
James is trained and experienced as an ISO 14000 Internal
Environmental Auditor, a computer programmer and has
developed a number of applications, online courseware and
databases for specific client needs as well as made use of
commercially available data management programs and CIS
systems. His programming experience includes the use of MS
Access. visual basic, SQL, .HTML, .ASP and .PHP.
Additionally. he has participated in numerous environmental studies. His involvement in these projects has
included field sampling, laboratory monitoring. data management and data management plan implementation,
3D geologic and environmental modeling, health and safety plan development and chemical data validation, as
URS
.,
22
(",~.
k'\.:
~
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
well as the management of the data validation group. His data validation experience over the last six years has
included thousands of soil and water samples under all aspects of SW-846 and EPA methodology.
.....""'~.-..,.
II ~ ~. ~""."""~."',J~'-f~""': ',~~ '-"',j
- .~~.:_..~~ '.r.).C"'M-~.'~~ ': "'.
".':'~,ri'-/:;f~-~'~~"~~~~, '
~~:tl:'.\ti;,,l.;:.':-"";~ ,
Years Experience:
7
Education:
. BA/1997/Government
Office:
San Diego
Jen Tucker has seven years of experience working as a
project coordinator and analyst for prolects funded by
the Federal Government. jen has also managed the flow
of project resources. data and reporting requirements for
these projects. Her specific areas of expertise include
data analysis and management. homeland security
exercise planning, project coordination and technical
writing. Specific qualifications include:
. Extensive homeland security planning experience in Southern California.
. Expertise in data management and analysis, including designing self-directing tools for collection
and reporting.
. Experience in designing, implementing and evaluating terrorism preparedness exercises to assist
jurisdictions with multiple levels of capabilities in achieving preparedness.
~,_~r~~,!",.~,",_:.
"'. -"',$i;"';,jP.<......\i.~_ ...."...'.,'._..,.~
L:.~j.,~.l r ~ ~ ~',;' ,,~~
".<e,.,. ~~
... ,~-",-,.~...."".~.,~,""l~'" ,'" "'=".,-.".... -"...., ..,. "~."" ',..
. :.r;i:E~;Jt~~;t~~~g;0.~ii;::~;~;i;.iA:iii.~.~',fA}- ~.~ I .
Dr. Kulkarni specializes in applying statistical and
probabilistic modeling and decision theory to
engineering and environmental projects. He has worked
on assessing and evaluating potential risks of natural as
well as man-made hazards in which techniques of fault
tree analysis, event tree analysis, and simulation were
used. He has analyzed the risk associated with such
facilities as dams, reservoirs, marine terminals, buildings,
transportation facilities, and pipelines. He has also
analyzed security risks in urban areas and evaluated priorities for addressing gaps in current resources.
Years Experience:
35
Education:
. PhD/1974/Civil Engineering
. MS/1970/S1ructural Engineering
. BE/1967/Civil Engineering
Office:
Oakland/Santa Ana
For investigation of hazardous waste sites, Dr. Kulkarni has applied statistical, geostatistical, and risk analysis
procedures to develop sampling plans and to assess the extent of contamination. He has participated in siting
studies that involved evaluation of candidate sites based on considerations of safety, economics, environmental
impacts and community concerns. He has been responsible for the development of pavement management
systems for highways, and received the 1982 Management Science Award from the Institute of Management
Science for the development of the pavement management system in Arizona. Dr. Kulkarni has also been involved
in the analysis of uncertainties associated with physical processes. He has used techniques of geostatistics. analysis
of variance, multiple regression analysis, time series analysis, probability distributions, Bayesian analysis, and
stochastic modeling. Dr. Kulkarni also has extensive teaching experience in courses on risk analysis. statistics, and
URS
23
"'!If.
~~
-- '. ---
)~^.
y v
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
geostatistics. He teaches a course on statistics and geostatistics for environmental professionals for the National
Groundwater Association and for the Environmental Education Enterprise.
[ ." '1::" &1;....;.::. .~.-~, '.' ~ ' . ., .;::.c __-~,n l'i\.!i,,,'>-i;;';.'" ;(",,~"1JjJ:"'~;,1"!..e-:~ .~". ,< 'if"", . ,~
es Ie .rJSC ut:In' .' . ,t .,' -- ,', .' C""'>~,.., .f'.'ll"'"
" f' {~",,~ ,1' - ~~. '"
",",,' _..;q. ,~~_'<^-.+' ._" ;J, (". 'lI'~loR>~ -Ji'l"!IIO~,~,~~"",",..~.-n, . ....1j;U;"... ",A'"
.",_ , ., , \< ~ ..' ~ - <;;;';;''',iJ\.',.'t>.'i!W' ....... ... ~ ..;!'!..-
Years Experience:
4
Education:
. BS/1997/Engineering
. Air Quality Dispersion Modeling Coursework
Office:
leslie Fischbein began working in the air quality consulting
field after working in the Environmental Health and Safety
Department of a semiconductor manufacturer. Her
technical skills air quality emissions estimations and air
quality impact analyses. greenhouse gas related projects.
on-site compliance assistance, and analyses of hazardous
materials handling and accidental releases.
Dr. Douglas has worked as a research scientist, technical editor and
environmental planner since 1983. and has worked as a senior project
manager for ten years. During this period she has contributed her
technical expertise to environmental studies nationally and
internationally. presented papers at conferences and given national
radio interviews on a range of environmental topics. In the U.S., she has
developed a comprehensive understanding of federal laws that protect
cultural and natural resources. Dr. Douglas has worked on nearly 200
NEPA projects for BIA. BOR. BlM, FEMA. FERC, FHWA, FS and
Milllary undertakings. Dr. Douglas has participated in all aspects of project management including budgeting, client interaction, field
investigations and research, regulatory permllting assistance. agency liaison. report preparation and review and public presentations.
Years Experience:
22
Education:
. PhD/1998/Geography
. MS/1991/Quaternary Sciences
. BAl19901 Anthropology
Office:
San Diego
t,~ -'\-..-",,"i...:'l..""'i
Years Experience:
24
Education:
. BS/1989/Business Administration
. MAlin Progress/Homeland Security/
Weapons of Mass Destruction
Office:
Santa Ana
'~!)'!"..~r:m;r:-'l)!.~
:,',Y:/ (>." . '" ,'', .... . ~,~ ~
",' '-,",~"cr"""""__'"
"r:.,tfi.~"';ti5'~~;f,!~
James Bailey is a Senior Exercise Project Manager for the Western Region
of the United States with 20+ years of proven experience in designing,
developing, and conducting exercises in both the military and the U. S.
Department of Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program
(HSEEP). He is currently leading and managing several exercise programs
in California and Arizona.
James has extensive experience in exercise design, development, conduct,
and evaluation of terrorist attacks involving weapons of mass destruction
(WMD). He was the Exercise Manager for the State of Arizona Bioterrorism
Exercise in 2002, a six-month effort completed in six weeks by a team of eight exercise professionals. James was also the Team leader for
the Arizona Statewide Binatkmal Exercise in 2003. which involved over 1.000 participants from both the U.S. and Mexico. He currently leads
the exercise programs in Los Angeles and San Diego Counties. James has designed, developed, and executed over 50 exercises under
the HSEEP.
URS
24
.
~'li#.
~~
~~
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
; "~;.."-t",, f~.:.,;.\...'~ I fi~I".I"".'& ~)
;~'"t1<~E',' 'i.' .' - '~,'
Years Experience:
10
Education:
. MS/1996/Geological and Environmental
Sciences
. BA/1995/Environmental Sciences
. BA/1995/Economics
Office:
Oakland/Santa Ana
Chi-Wah Wong joined URS in 1997 and has assisted on the
many projects with the primary role of collecting! analyzing
data and developing appropriate models for various
objectives. His areas of expertise include Data and Statistical
Analysis and Geostatistical Modeling, Risk and Failure
Analysis.
i""'h~"""~~~'~
;I-;.t;,::~;;..",;,y ... I II,. .r" ,t".' ..." ',' ','I' ". ,!.., -Y"'.;,,' ", ,I ;'j
Years Experience:
10
Education:
. BA/1993/English
Office:
Santa Ana
Tim Whyte has over 10 years of experience conducting public
involvement activities for Federal, state, municipal, and private clients
during environmental restoration activities at sites nationwide. These
activities are designed to educate the public, provide for two-way
communication, and meet public participation requirements under
CERCLA, NEPA, CEQA, and other regulations.
He has prepared over 50 Community Profiles and/or Public Participation
Plans. He has prepared and distributed over 175 fact sheets. letters, andlor newsletters. He has coordinated more
than 90 public meetings andlor hearings. Other responsibilities include conducting community interviews.
conducting demographic research, developing PowerPoint presentations, establishing information repositories. and
preparing public notices and press releases. He has extensive experience in the coordination of Restoration
Advisory Boards lRABs). He has developed close working relationships with Public Participation Specialists at the
California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). He conducts stormwater-related public education
activities. He has also acted as a fact witness for the u.s. Department of Justice regarding a public involvement
program.
, ~J~E~5'.
. h"'" ~ ~~,:i l ;....~~ ;
.~ -..tl' ~,.X,t~'S1:}i~~'~'<.i'.,
Years Experience:
4
Education:
. BA/2001/Geography
Office:
Santa Ana
Amanda Johnson has 4 years of experience as an environmental
plannerlscientist writing NEPA and CEQA compliant documents
including Applications for Certifications IAFCsl, environmental impact
statements lEIS). environmental impact reports IEIR), environmental
assessments, and various biological reports. Ms. Johnson is also
experienced in public outreach activities including meeting facilitation
planning, writing public involvement plans, fact sheets, and newsletters.
URS
25
~'!'t.
~.~
~
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
2.4.3 Resumes for Subconsultants
;~,.~ 'i!;'
....'. '<;
....'-...
'"
Jim McGeahy has 35 years experience as a security professional- over twenty years in direct support of
national security programs. He is a recognized expert in planning, developing, and managing comprehensive
security activities for highly sensitive national defense facilities, projects and operations. He has speCialized in
the integration of diverse physical. technical. operational. and administrative controls to secure and protect
important national resources. He has performed threat and vulnerability assessments, developed
comprehensive security plans, advised on security policy. designed security systems. and developed security
specifications for new construction projects and facility upgrades for high-security facilities. Through the years.
he has been involved in the planning, design, integration and commissioning of classified security
projects at some of the nations most secure sites. He has also acted as a subject matter expert and key
advisor to 000 and other Government officials on the security of special programs and homeland security
initiatives. He has participated in national level security working groups and possesses extensive expertise in
the technical aspects of computer and communications security. In this capacity. he participated in
technology/application surprise groups under DoD's "Disruptive Technology Innovations Partnership" (DTIP)
program to assess potential terrorist threats. and served as a working group chairman to develop accreditation
standards under the National Industrial Security Program. While in government service, he directed classified
project activities, interfaced directly with the DCI and senior White House officials. and managed protection
operations for high-ranking U.s. government officials/dignitaries.
2.4.4 Organization Chart
See above.
URS
26
~,~.
~~
~~
2.4.5 Office Locations
0......................<-
. ...-..-......-
"
. _lIIS_,<-
( ,_..
" ..-.
Olkl",JI.:;;:'
., ......~-_.
1(;-
.',,'
URS
COMBINED AREAS STRA TEGle PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
This project will be managed out of URS' Santa Ana office. The San
Diego and Oakland offices will playa supporting role. as illustrated in
the table below.
Percentage of Work
Santa Ana
San Diego
Oakland
70
20
10
27
/~,Tit.
-~~-
~
2.5 EXPERIENCE
COMBINED AREAS STRA TEGle PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
The proposed work for this UA County requires a team committed to excellence in all aspects of homeland
security. URS is a recognized national leader in homeland security. The URS team has worked with a broad
range of federal, state. and local agencies, including the ODP and FEMA, to develop similar guidance materials.
2.5.1 Relevant Projects and References
Compiling capabilities and needs data and developing a
database to manage and query the data
Evaluating the urban areas capabilities and needs in the areas
of planning, organization, equipment, training and exercises
Developing a cost-benefit model to assist in needs prioritization
Preparing Goals, Objectives. Implementation Steps and an Evaluation Plan
CLIENT
City of San Diego
Office of Homeland Security
NATURE OF FIRM'S
RESPONSIBILITY
. Risk Assessment
Capabilities Assessment
. Expenditure Strategy
KEY PERSONNEL
. David Marx
. Diane Douglas
. Tom Wall
. Jim McGeahy
. Jim Bailey
. Jen Tucker
TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
$250,000
CLIENT CONTACT
Donna Faller
City of San Diego, Office of
Homeland Security
1010 Second Ave
Suite 1060, MS 610
San Diego, CA 92101
619-533-4803
619-533-4815
dfallerlaJsa nd iego.gov
CONTRACT START/END
Sept 15, 2003 - April 30, 2004
.
.
URS developed the San Diego Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI)
Strategy for the San Diego urban area. The strategy was developed in
accordance with Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Program
guidelines. Assessment data was collected from 10 disciplines (law
enforcement, emergency medical services, emergency management,
fire services, hazardous materials, public works, governmental
administration. public safety communications. health care. and public
health) in 36 jurisdictions throughout San Diego County (18 cities, 17
fire districts, and the County itself representing unincorporated areas).
These data were consolidated, analyzed. and supplemented with
additional data to develop a clear understanding of current Urban Area
capabilities, and to characterize goals for specific capabilities required
to reduce risks and achieve an effective response to potential acts of
terrorism involving weapons of mass destruction (WMD). The
assessment results provide the analytical bridge for cross-jurisdictional
goals, objectives. implementation steps. and metrics that are the
foundation of the SDUA Strategy. Project work completed by URS
included:
.
Facilitating a steering committee with stakeholder
representatives in the region
Developing a risk profile for the San Diego urban area
including an evaluation of San Diego Area potential targets,
CBRNE sites, critical infrastructure and other potential targets
Developing and ranking WMD scenarios and a vulnerability
assessment
'URS
28
i-W.
.~.~..
,:~~(
~ ~
COMBINED AREAS STRA TEGle PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
-~~-
U RS assisted the
County to lead a multi-
Jurisdictional hazard
mitigation planning
effort that involved the
CLIENT
San Diego County
Office of Emergency Services
NATURE OF FIRM'S
RESPONSIBILITY
. Risk Assessment
Capabilities Assessment
KEY PERSONNEL
. David Marx
. Diane Douglas
. Jen Tucker
TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
$228,000
CLIENT CONTACT
Herman Reddick
5555 Overland Ave. Bldg 19
San Diego, CA 92123
(858) 565-3490
Fax (858) 565-3499
herman. reddick@sdcounty.ca.gov
CONTRACT START/END
June 1, 2003 - Dec 1, 2004
County itself and San
Diego County's 18
incorporated cities.
The Multi-Jurisdiction
Hazard Mitigation Plan
was developed by URS
to bring all 19 participating entities into compliance with DMA 2000.
The process includes:
Coordinating involvement of relevant federal, state. and local
representatives.
Identifying hazards most important to the region (e.g.,
wildfires, earthquakes. flooding. and human-caused hazards).
Developing a vulnerability and risk assessment that focuses on
the exposure of people and property to hazardous conditions.
Compiling data and assessing capabilities.
Establishing goals, objectives. and performance metrics.
Developing feasible and prioritized mitigation measures, as
well as action items.
.
.
Conducting a series of public workshops
Developing and delivering presentations of the plan to electedlappointed officials
The planning process included coordinating and facilitating a working group that consists of representatives of
al119 jurisdictions involved in the project, as well as other stakeholders (e.g., utility districts, the Red Cross, and
universities).
URS
29
~'Ti".
-~~
~
CLIENT
Los Angeles World Airports
NATURE OF FIRM'S
RESPONSIBILITY
. Planning
. Environmental
Documentation
KEY PERSONNEL
. Tom Wall
TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
$6,000,000
CLIENT CONTACT
Jim Ritchie
Deputy Executive Director
1 World Way, Los Angeles, CA
90045
310.417.2342
CONTRACT START/END
2000 - Present
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
The Los Angeles
Airport Master
Plan and
associated
environmental
documents
describe the
most expensive,
complicated and
comprehensive
public works project in the history of Los Angles. Under the guidance
of the Mayor. the Los Angeles City Council contracted URS
Corporation to oversee this massive effort.
Tom Wall serves as deputy project manager for relocation and real
estate entitlement for the $9 billion LAX security, safety and
modernization program. In this capacity he is responsible for all
commercial and residential relocation planning, and for the processing
of all real estate entitlement and permit processing for the lO-year LAX
Airport Master Plan. In addition. Tom is the senior facilitator for all
public hearings and conducts a variety of public meetings and
presentations with business. residential and community groups.
Coordinating the efforts of three consulting firms with the Los Angeles City Planning Department, Tom and his
team are undertaking the task of processing entitlements requiring concurrence from federal, state and local
agencies. In his capacity as team leader, Tom and his team were successful in receiving Los Angeles City
Council approval and certification of the ll.000-page Environment Impact Report, the Airport Master Plan,
and 15 other documents associated with implementation of the Safety and Security Plan.
URS has assisted Kinder Morgan Energy Partners' (KMEP's) California public utility subsidiary (formerly known
as Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines) with a full range of environmental, geotechnical and permitting services for
projects in California for the past 10 years. Risk assessments, capabilities assessments and strategic planning are
integral components of the services provided.
Applicable Work Provided 10 Client/Organization. The services provided for Kinder Morgan projects
applicable to the services to be provided are assisting with project strategic planslfeasibility studies, consensus
building with multiple agencies, coordinating with permitting agencies, conducting risk assessments, developing
mitigation strategies and preparing mitigation plans. The following projects highlight this experience.
URS
30
"",
lit
~'I'f.
~.~".
'<6."'''''''<>0] j:-""
~
CLIENT
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners
NATURE OF FIRM'S
RESPONSIBILITY
. Environmental
Assessment
. Planning
. Hazard Risk Analysis
KEY PERSONNEL
. David Marx
TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
$1,000,000+
CLIENT CONTACT
David Cornman,
Director, Project Permitting
1100 Town and Country Road
Orange, CA 92868
714.560.4914
CONTRACT START/END
Nov 1993 - Present
COMBINED AREAS STRA TEGlC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
The Carson to Norwalk Pipeline Project is a 13-mile petroleum
products pipeline project through an urbanized portion of Los
Angeles. URS assisted in developing the strategic plan to route and
permit this project. We also prepared a Proponent's Environmental
Assessment (PEA) for submittal to the California Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC) and coordinated permitting activities through the
CPuc. The project included a hazard risk analysis. evaluating the
potential for pipeline failure. This analysis included a hazards and
operability study. identification of potential causes for failure.
evaluating the damage and impacts from a release and developing
cost-effective mitigation measures to minimize the probability of a
release and the damages that would result from a release.
The Watson Tank Farm Expansion Project added three aO.OOO-barrel
petroleum products tanks to the KMEP tank farm in Carson. The tank
farm is near an active fault. URS conducted a fire and explosion
hazard risk analysis for this project that identified the area where
property damage. morbidity and mortality would occur in case of a
catastrophic tank failure, including a fire and explosion. The initial
analysis indicated that a nearby residential area would be affected by
this catastrophic failure. In coordination with KMEP engineers, URS
developed cost-effective mitigation as part of the project strategic plan
and design that reduced the potential impacts to the residential area.
URS prepared and implemented a strategic plan to assist KMEP in routing and permitting their Camp Pendleton
Pipeline Project. We also prepared an Environmental Assessment and coordinated multi-agency permitting for
the 26-mile replacement pipeline through the Camp Pendleton. URS developed mitigation plans, conducted
contractor training and provided general oversight for the
implementation of the mitigation measures.
URS prepared a feasibility study, risk assessment and strategic
plan for the 70-mile Concord to Sacramento pipeline project.
We also conducted a geologic hazards analysis for a proposed
pipeline. The analysis evaluated the potential seismic
displacements at several fault crossings and the potential for
seismically induced liquefaction to damage the pipeline and
this data was used in a finite element analysis to determine
stress and the potential for a pipeline rupture. URS identified
a variety of potential mitigation measures and assisted in
developing a cost-effective mitigation strategy for this project.
Client Satisfaction:
"lJRS has ,1 pnlVl'fl track f('(-(ml (If suu:essfully
:--uppmting us \\'ith thl'sl-' tVfJl'S (l( pruj{'cts... URS has
dl'moI1Slr,l1l'd thl' ,lbilitv to pl"OdUCl' hjgh~quality
\\'(ll"k while ,l(hil'ving aggressin' pnljcc! sdwdules.
t'v\osl importantl\', URS he\':. provid('d Kinder Morgan
with slgniiic,lllt addc'eJ value by ,bsisting in
,;f1l'pll('rdin~ projects through llll' CPLJC ,lIlcl MCBCP
on f,l~l-tr,lC~ scl1l'dule; \vilh thorough strategic
planning and crcati\'l' l'osl-s,wings ideas."
David Cornman, 5/1/00
URS
'i"
31
i~w,...
~~
'-;:-.1u~~"O" /---,
~
COMBINED AREAS STRA TEGle PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
~~m~~,!~tf~\~~it{tr~tt;~t~~~~f.t~~
" ,,~ . ..' , -', --.- "-''''''''~~~u;..&C;.. "'.J'';' ..-::....'::;",,' .:;;;.;..:i..i,.;;,',O...:;;.....'"..;.c"';,,::~.'~;ii;L;~:;~,~._.,..;;,<.,.'1.,'; "'-- .'..~.t',"'.U.J-".,._'_'~~.4.~:O'.;:.;.",.~.",.;,
CLIENT
U. S. Department of Homeland
Security, Office for Domestic
Preparedness
NATURE OF FIRM'S
RESPONSIBILITY
. Planning
. Homeland Security
. Training
KEY PERSONNEL
. Jim McGeahy
Jim Bailey
TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
$3,000,000
CLIENT CONTACT
Michael Forgy
Regional Exercise Manager
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
(202) 514-1546
srnithg(O)oi D. usdoi.gov
CONTRACT STARTIEND
FY 2003
time lines for implementation.
As part of the Department of Justice's IDO)I anti-terrorism
preparedness initiative in 2002. the Office for Domestic Preparedness
lOOP) designated URS' EG&G Division to assist in developing
homeland security exercise and evaluation programs in thirteen
western states and three u.s. possessions in the Pacific. This contract
recently transitioned to the DHS, and its purpose is to help states and
local jurisdictions build or enhance their capacity to design, develop,
conduct. and evaluate WMD exercises.
Under this contract, (funded at $3,000.000 for FY03) ODP requested
URS' support for the planning. implementation, and facilitation of
fifteen Exercise Plan Workshops for the Western Region of the United
States to support the Fiscal Year 2003 State Homeland Security Grant
Program ISHSGP). We also supported the development of the
corresponding Three.Year Exercise Plans. The purpose of the
workshops was to assist the states in developing a state and local
exercise program that enhances the level of preparedness. These
meetings, conducted in partnership with ODP, brought together a
group of high level officials, representing multiple disciplines from the
state, regional and local levels to: 1) establish expectations for exercise
activities; 21 discuss implementation of the Homeland Security Exercise
and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) doctrine; 31 estlblish priorities for
exercises; and, 4) define how corrective actions flowing from exercises
will be addressed and tracked. Using the input from the meeting. we
developed draft Three-Year Exercise Plans. which included an exercise
program description for the state, goals and objectives, and a plan with
Comprehensive draft Three-Year Exercise Plans were developed In fifteen working days after each Exercise Plan
Workshop.
CLIENT SATISFACTION
ODP has selected the Colorado Three-Year Exercise Plan prepared by URS' EG&G Division as the plan that
best meets their vision, format and content required for such plans. This plan will serve as the template for all
future plans developed for all 58 federal jurisdictions (States, the District of Columbia, and Territories).
Note: Sample work products for San Diego Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, the LAX Master Plan
and the San Diego Urban Area Security Initiative have been included with this submittal on CD because of
lheir length. For the latter, this project and the results are confidential, so we have provided summary
information available wilhin the constraints of our agreement.
URS
32
~'Ti#.
k~
,--:""<~"..,, I ---,
~
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
Project Original Actual Cost Original Actual Comment
Cost Schedule Schedule
2.5.2 Experience with Cost and Schedules
San Diego Urban Area
Security Initiative Strategy
$250,000
$250,000
October 03 March 04
San Diego Multi-
Jurisdictional Hazard
Mitigation Plan
$208,000
$228.000
December 03 March 04
LAX Master Plan EIR/EIS
$500.000
$21 M
6 months
5 years
URS
ft.
Problems with the ODP
toolkit delayed the project
submittal.
The plan was in final draft
in Oct 03. The firestorms
at the end of the month
caused many of the
jurisdictions to re-think
their goals and
implementation strategy
and our client extended
the due date and added
funds to accommodate the
jurisdiction's request.
URS has had nine contract
extensions over the past
five years, assuming the
role of contract manager.
33
,,~l't.
I,. .. , .~
-~~
~
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
2.6 FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Fiscal year 2004 figures will not be released until January 14, 2005.
2003 Sales (in millions) . ,!S.186.7
Below, we have provided some financial highlights for 2003. We
1-Year Sales Growth 31.3%
will be happy to provide you with financial statements for 2004
when they are released. 2003 Net Income (in millions) $58.1
h f b 1.Year Net Income Growth 5.3%
For t e iscal year ending Octo er 31,2003, URS revenues
increased 31% to $3.187 billion from $2.428 billion for the fiscal Backlog (in billions) $3.662
year ended October 31,2002. Net income was $58.1 million, or Backlog increase 29%
$1.76 per share, fully diluted, compared to $55.2 million or $2.03 per share, fully diluted, in fiscal 2002. As of
October 31,2003, lhe Company's backlog was $3.662 billion, compared to $2.828 billion as of October 31,
2002, an increase of 29%. There are no financial conditions that would impede URS' ability to complete this
project.
2.6.1 Financial Statement
URS' audited financial statement for 2003 can be found on the following page.
2.6.2 Revenue Projections
As a publicly traded entity, URS is prohibited from publishing revenue projections.
2.6.3 Claims History
As with any national professional service organization the size of URS Corporation, from time to time it is
involved in litigation. URS has substantial liability insurance to protect itself from litigation. Additionally. the
company has substantial assets, including liquid assets of several million dollars. Various legal proceedings are
pending against the Company or its subsidiaries alleging breaches of contract or negligence in connection with
the performance of professional services. The Company's management does not believe that any of such
proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position and operations of the
Company.
URS
34
iii-,lii.
~.~.
~
COMBINED AREAS STRA TEGle PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
(3310:..;',
- ----
___~~60~___--340.216
:3_3b 17.895
22,?41 ?0.248
939.665 988,33:
:58.55::: 156.524
: CXJ4,E8J 1.001.529
'I 391 14.500
51.323 68.108
$2.167.612 $2.229.892
URS Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
:-'< '.~, . -'. ':~ -,,"';
Assets
CurrerI! asset:,
Casll and :astl equivalents
Accounts recelvabl~, IrJcludlng retalIlage amounts of S42.617 and S50,55'=
Costs an(j accrued p.<'Irnings in excess of tJI!'lllgS (111 contracts f1 pr~ce<:'~
_ess re'~elvable a'lowances
Net accounts receivable
------~_. ..----..
Deferred Lncome taxes
Prepdid expel'58':; and o'lle~ assets
Total curren! aS5e:'~
Pruperty a~)d eqU'prnt.'nt at :05:, Ilet
GooeJl.vl::. net
Fllwrla"pci Intimptllp asspts net
Gme! assets
s
15..5ot:
52S.C37
r,,;SDe:llv~IV
39367C
Liabilities. Mandatorily Redeemable Securities. and Stockholders' Equity
':lJrre'lt lat)ll;ties
::urent portlun of IOlig-term debt
A~'ccunt3 Gaya:::,]e an:: 5ubcon:raC!o' payatJ!;: ii' -!Ivilng '(';;,'J;llrijo\' ()I S7~C):<
(jrcJ $~. 19C r25Jf'Clively
A::C:.'lled S~Ii'lrIi~S Gnd wag2s
A:~~'I'ed exrJense..:. ann othel
Billings ',," t,x,-:ess c:t costs awl accr~Ji:'d (:am, Igs
~ok: '-:LJITP.C'\; I,ab lilies
L..',w~,t"lrn debt
Dcierrecl In:ome laxe::=;
DeterreeJ compcnsat;on and other
TotCilllrlbilitles
Commitments and ccntlngencles
Mandatoniy redeemable Series 0 serllO' cOl'vertllJlf pdrllcIDat!~lg prpf,-'rrp.1 :>~i ;U\
par value S.Ol; 3uth,1rIzed 100 sflares: ;ssuecJ ;:Jnj outsti1wjln~ C! ann ,,-'~;
respectivelY: liqlJldatlon preff'renc~_.?gJ3.0_':!_;'O. resofC't'v,:olv
Stockr.olde's. equity
Common stoe"" par value $.OL authorlled 50,UOJ shar~:). ;c,c,ut:.J ':l:U ::-:,ten; 'I'c
33.664 anc1 3J.084 sr.ares. resoectlvel,
Treasury Sr',)I~K. 52 ,,'lares at cost
Addit:onal ~Ja~d-irl capita'
Accumulated other comprehensive 'U':iS
Retalred earnings
Tctal stockholaers equity
,
23.88=
; 72.50::'
12:',774
_~dlt',L'> ,'I Li';_".~.~':'
8687.;..
83_CD~
,FL\.l='3~
788"lOE
55.U
6S.]8~,
~_':;':J:2.53q
-------,-.-.
336
'2871
.187.82.1
':906:
278,106
1':;:'.1..'.' ~,
3~.167,612
".",
.r:.:' ':":;-II~' ~, ,. fI,'! 'J.': ,'. ,". ..., 1,
" '." ~ ,.,
. ! I/.!., i ,,' ~/.>:. "" . '
URS
,
9.972
57:,833
399,093
(30.710'
30.298
199.728
1D1.287
91.634
92235
515.182
925.265
40.629
67.431
1.548.507
45.733
301
(237)
418.705
15.1321
220.255
633.852
5.2.229.092
.-".'.-,~..
35
i~'l'f.
-~~
~,.d"""'O(m /--"
~
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
2.7 STATEMENT
URS is the ideal team for this project for the following reasons:
Direct Recent Relevant Experience - The URS team members are the same individuals that recently
completed an identical UASI project for the San Diego UA. Nearly identical to your approach. the San Diego
UA includes all of the incorporated cities in the county and developed the strategy to address numerous
homeland security related grants. Consequently, the UA strategy was developed as a collaborative strategy and
is designed to provide guidance for UASI, Homeland Security and other grant program funding. Due to this
experience, we are very familiar with the issues associated with developing a UA strategic plan. We have
developed first-hand working relationships with Donna Anderson, the UASI coordinator for the California
Office of Emergency Services and John Carnegis, the UASI Program Manager for the US Department of
Homeland Security. Office of Domestic Preparedness. Additionally, we offer proven capabilities as we have
developed and successfully implemented a both a Needs Prioritization Model tailored specifically to UASI and
a spending plan.
Local history and experience - URS has a more than 40-year history of providing consulting services in Santa
Ana. We have working relationships with virtually every city in the County and have an extensive working
history in the area. We are very familiar with the local jurisdictions, districts and politics. Our projects range
from the current designlexpansion of the Garden Grove Freeway, the designlwidening of the 1-5 North,
extensive water quality sampling and analysis in the wake of beach contamination issues, on-call contracts with
the County, Santa Ana and Anaheim. to construction management for the Santa Ana Unified School District.
Our staff lives in Orange County and has a strong commitment to the success of this plan.
Disaster Preparedness/Response and Homeland Security - URS has extensive disaster-related planning,
preparedness, response. and recovery experience. We have assisted the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) with responses to hundreds of disasters nationwide. URS has been assisting the nation in
dealing with the impact of emergencies for more than 20 years-one of the longest continuous records of
service to professional first responders and emergency managers in the u.s. Our approach to providing services
has been developed through lessons learned and experience on training and exercises, disaster response,
recovery, and mitigation projects performed throughout the u.s. and internationally. As a result, our work has
been tested in real-world disaster recovery situations, and represents solutions that are 'cutting edge' and
results-oriented.
In California, response efforts have included the Laguna post firestorm risk assessment, evaluation and design of
restoration; flooding during the winters of 1995.1997. and 1998; and the 2003 southern California wildfires.
Through these operations, URS has gained extensive practical understanding of Federal, state, and local
emergency management operations. Additionally, these operations have given URS the opportunity to work
frequently with OES.
URS is at the forefront of the changing conditions and requirements faced by the emergency management
community. Working for the Office of Domestic Preparedness, URS has worked with states and territories
throughout the weslern United States. including California, to develop strategic plans and exercises for
URS
36
""lit.
.~.~.
c",w<a'''>n,"-..,
~
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
Weapons of Mass Destruction incidents. In the wake of the anthrax incident in 2001, URS assisted the US
Postal Service with the development of a nationwide emergency response plan and is currently assisting them
with coordination of response planning with local governments for the installation of Biological Detection
Systems in postal processing facilities.
Risk Assessmenl, Capability Assessment and Strategic Planning - URS has a long history of providing risk
assessment. capability assessment and strategic planning services to a wide variety of public. and private-sector
clients.
Significant Local Resources - Our Project Team is supported by 400+ local staff Given the extensive
coordination and data gathering that will be part of this project, our breadth of local staff gives us the resources
that will be needed to complete the project on an aggressive schedule.
Extensive Experience in multi-jurisdictional/discipline consensus building - As demonstrated by the San
Diego UASI project we have proven expertise in consensus building and collaboration. Recently. this expertise
was also fundamentally important in the development of multi-jurisdiction hazard mitigation plans for
numerous jurisdictions in California.
Strategic Planning - URS has been developing strategic plans for a large range of clients for over 30 years.
Many of these plans include cost impacts, cost-benefit analysis andlor spending strategies. The table following
the text in this section presents a sample of the more recent and relevant plans prepared by URS.
In summary, URS has extensive breadth and experience to complete this project, meeting the desired
aggressive schedule. Out specific UASI experience for the San Diego UA has enabled us to understand and
solve issues, eliminating a learning curve for our team. Our familiarity and intimate understanding of the local
community will facilitate consensus-building and allow us to assist the City in developing a highly successful
Countywide Strategic Plan for Terrorism Preparedness.
URS
37
ft'
, ~,..,.
~.~
~
COMBINED AREAS STRATEGIC PLAN
FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
2.8 COST
The costs for each task identified in the RFP are shown on the following table. As requested implementation
options are provided. The costs are based on our 2005 schedule of charges that have been discounted to be
compatible with the rates we are currently charging the City of Anaheim for on-call work.
Please note that the costs were developed assuming number of hours and level of effort based on the limited
information provided in the RFP and at the pre-proposal meeting. The scope and cost we have proposed
assumes extensive data validation, collection and analysis. If our initial review of the data already collected
indicates that it is in better shape than we envision, we will revise our cost estimate accordingly. Similarly, if the
scope and options we propose are not entirely consistent with your desires. we would gratefully appreciate the
opportunity to revise them with additional input and clarification.
URS
~.-
. .'.' "., - ..'_ :'. _',~ _t.. .'It'
38
Q.
OJ
~
0-
E
.!!l
~
~
OJ
I-
~
.g
"
IV
ii:
o
'c,
cum.!!
c::.c:!! "--
<(<(-.:;'
cv cu en c::
__4):::1
cc:."o
n:l m.~ (.)
..~~~~
c: 0 0 c: c:
~~~5l!
~UUUO
~
.g
"
=.. ..c:ozo..~
o~"u >-.l<
CI>> C1l 1: CIJ:O::O . mo"
O'!cp'-.rJD. .cv.!!:
... =Eoe:1i).s:::.m
D. UO-....oO-WUC
..
"
o
;I'
Q.
o
~
..,.
III
r;:j
, ..,. ,
...
." to..,.
.. ~.....
_.!ICON
cu III <<f.......-
EO"'1ll
1:u ..,.
w
'"
'"
..
c
~
e
IV
Cl.
..
...
=-
=
'"
"C
e
... ..
.. -
Eo< IV
... .5
cE-;;;
cr.il
IV _
s: ~
...u
'Q,
..
-
IV
...
-
~
..
~
'i
....
-
c
"
=>
U
~
5
..,
8-
~ OJ
1 ~
.,,_Qm ~ _ 5
I1l = ".::
i! <i 8
:0 _ ::::< ::: ~::;
- ,,< .. - ""
'= Go! [l :: " l't.I
Jiia~<J::"'O
~ 5...1 ~'" !i
~ .:I: _ Qljt..
- -"I = I:
..< -"'8
.. .. ""
'C'. Q.u
.l:i ~~
,;,:
~
...~N
o
II ....
Q..l< .l<
o III III
o IV ..
CIlI-I-
'"
N
to
N
'N '
...
~o
0>'"
.....'"
-.::iN
........
~
...
NCO"'=tO
q-q-aa
............(00:>
r--:...t ,,- 0-
q- tR- N .,-
... ......
c-
o
.'"
8-
~
"
I.l :!
-; "
." "
J~
,)j 8
~u
,,:::.
." "
c..1.l'::
t2 e c
M .. U
1: " _
Q " ..
'" " f
"",,1.l:E_
"11:_=
.e . ~ "'"
~ ..! "S' J
u " .. _
:0;;::;"'0
'" ..,.
U')CO,.....cx;:l
~.:Jt:.
III III
.. ..
1-1-
.:.::.ii~~
CD III u) (/)
ca ftI m m
1-1-1-1-
III
o
,
"
IV
..,
:::;~o
w ~
C
>.
m
0>
to
~
ri
to
...
III
III
"'.
~
'"
'"
...
M
N
o
",
'"
M
..
~
..,
8-
-5
.~
'3
,::
s
o
I-
8
s
.
~
!
u
.
!
~
~
u
I
.
l
~
i
ii
.~
~
1
.=
~
,;
~
."
III
"
o
:a
E
"
III
..
c(
-
..
o
()
.]
~ ~
~ ,5
~ ~
.5 "
R i'
.~ ~
~ ..
I i
~ s
- ~
i ;
,s "
, ~
i i
,5 ~ii
c .5..
o ~ g
) !q
~ i!'"
~ . ~ .. t
~i~i~
o '0 ~ -= .El
~ t"n
J~11f
." ~ "; '8
j~~gj'
,5 j IH
~ll]j
If ~d ."
.!l E ~ ~ -a
'i 1] ~ ~
.~ ~ ~ ~ I
J! ~ ~~ ~
1 j ~~ ~
j~l~l
g....cE€
lI.l
Dl
~
;
R
i
f
:s
~
!
."
l
!
-a
1l
[
. .
.'.: '::;':":"M";' '.':':~:R:'" ':'S;"'~t.:.::
::;..~~.~ ~ ~ :-:::-:~:~ .: : ::~ ..:....: ,';' ~~.~,:_:::::,~.
PFlOOlJCeR
MARSH RISK,&INSURANCE SERVICES
P.0.OOX'931llJO
SAN FRANCISCO CA 9<11'9-3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
...... ".
. I'll" ........:....~.~.'.
:;':::':::.:~_:.:~~; ~ ~ r:, ..",",
: .. ',. .:'.... :'::';':'. ".:-,. ',.~:' :'1:1":"...... .,.".....;.;:;1 ;',:..:.:.:,:, __
C.EAtlf.lCAte:O'FAH$P"'~~E::: ~~A.=~~=
".:~. '.. '.. ',.:. ":"; n; ""n,;"" '.: '.:~:'::; :;'," .... '. 'n:.:.: . ..:' ,- no"'; . ... ~
'~:.:.~~ :; ;'~.';;
...:......,...
. ; ~ ; : . . .
i.! :
lHIl c~n'leAn. IS 1..sJ ",AIU.TTlR Of INl'atYATlCIIOHLY ANOCON~
NO ~l>>tTS UPON lltE CERTlPlCAil HDL.~R g~R 'tHAN ltIDK PROYIJfD IN m~
poua. 1l1~CUTlFlCAlEDQ!INOT A.MEHg, iXTUCO"...I.TIR TI-E CCVENlGIE
AffCIIWElJ BY THE. IIOUCI.. L1IKfUIED HI!fWN.
COMPANIESAFFOROING COVIiRA.GE
A _.;}.(}()J- rID G
A-~oo3- J9!
COMP"""
A. NATIONAL UNION A~ INS. CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA
COMP"'Y
II
URSCA.,f,ll-WPRO-lI4-<l5 SFOUf\SA
It.I!lL.REO
U RS CORPORATION
Illlo. URS COFlPORATION 1>1I. ERICAS
600 MONTGOMERV STFlEET
:l$TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94\' I
AMERICAN INfERNATIONALBPECIAl.1YLItES INS. CO.
COMPANY
C
COMPANY
o
!VA
INSURANCE CO OF THE STATE Of' PA
TI-IS IS10 CEI{J1FY THo\.T POUCIEaOF INSURANCE OESCFUliIW HEFIElN liwesEENI89UEDTO THE INBURE:D NAMED HEREIIII FCFt THE POUCVPB=lIOOINDIOATEO.
NOTWITHS1"ANCXP<<Ji ANY RBJUlFlilMEN'T. TIIIII OF! coNOO'ION OF Nl'f CClNTPACT OROT'HEROOCI.IJIENT WITH RESI'ECT TO WHICH THE CEFfTIFtCATE MAYBE ISSUED QR
MAY fiE RT'....N. nlf INel.lVHCE AfFORDED BY TI-E POLICIES CESCRBED tERBN II! I!lBIB:IT TO AU. TH: TEfW3, OONOIT10NB AND EXCLUSIONS OF &UCH f"OLICIEfJo.
AGCRWATE UUl18 SHOWN MAY JitlVE BEEN REDJCED Ill' PAl [) CLAIr.! S.
CO TY". Q flN&lRANCI fIOUCY NUYlI'" POLlcy..,.cn" ,()uev UIllRA'TKlN
l.", o.t.ft lUM.ODml llAftl\lllJ1llllYVl
" GEHRM. UAlILln QL033-311e O4All-'l4 0401105
:x ('.OIJlU!N:UJ. GENEF\ULlAelllT'f
ClA..aMACE ~ OCCUFl
OWNER'I!lr.cOt.lTP.ACT'on'SPACT
A AlITDIllOBlLE Lill-lllTY 826-1 87D-'OS 04ID1.m Cl4.O,106
:x /tNyAUTO
IU OWNED AUrOS
SCHEOll.ED AUTOS
X HREOAUT09
X NalICNNEDAUT08
GARAGI W.ILU1Y
~y AUTO
IIXCI:_ UAIIIUlY
LLIIPJ!LLA 1i0lW
OTHIA THAN UM8RElJ...A FOFW
A WOAIC2N COIIPBI..nONAND ......,.. leAl 01 ~1104 01,(111tl5
C EUP1.aY'1fW UUlUT't' ._ lAOS) 010111104
01,0'105
A 'T'H!"~NETOFII ,"a. 643GQDS EXCWD.CA.AOS,GA O1.o1~ 01Ja1105
PARTNERSQECUTIVE
E OFfICERS ARE: El<<L M:WlllCl (GA 01 ,\)1104 0111J11OS
OTHII!!"
B PROF. LIASIUTY (BO) 818-41G8 """,- 04.IJ1.....
a..AI.u MADE FOI'N
LIMIT'
B ENEP.Al. AOOREOPATE
PROOlJCTs..<:oMPJOP .-aG
PEf:I9OIlAL 6 AC>>IINJI.RY
1!Ac:H OCCURRENCE
FiRe au.IIAGE!: (AnVal. &-11)
MEOEXPt,Mrl_.....,)
QCt,II"EC~U~IT
800lL Y lK.lUfW
(P. "-'lII'l)
&COl.Y If'IJUR.Y
p.lIOdanO
PftOPERTYo-MAQE
AlITO en. y. fA. MOl DENT
(lTIoI&RTHAN AUTO ONLY:
EACH A(KjIDENT
AOOFBlATE!:
EADI OCCIJFFENCE
AllGRB3ATE
B. D1SEASE.POL.ICY UMJT
a. C1sWf-EACH EMPlO'YEE
EACH CLAN
AGGREGATE
J 1.000000
S 2.000.000
. 1,000,000
$ , .000.000
. , .000.000
. 5.000
J 1,000,000
$
$
$
$
'. t ''''d'''c,,'."~r
i.!~,_,,-~
'.000.000
1,000,000
'lOOllOO
$1.000,000
51,000,000
DElCAIPnON OF OP&AAllCNlllCC4l1GNIlNEl-lCL.UllPlcw.ITEUa
RE: PROJECT NO. 67-l>>ll6'005.01: CENTEPLJNE PRWECT NOiSE REVIEW. THE crrv OF SANTA ANA. ITS OFRCER9. AGENTS. EUPWYEES. & Va.UtfTEERS ARE
AllllI1lONAI.1NSUREDS Wlfft RESPECT OI'ERATlOlS PEFlFOFlMED BY OR RJR THE NANEO INSUREO AS RESPECTS GEI'lERAL lIABUTY. THIS INSURANCE IS
PRIMARY PER I'a.lCV FORM. &EVERABUTY OF INTEREST.cROSS UABIUTY APPUE9.
1 '.~ _", + -. ~ - -, ' . I. f N I' ".. . !' . , " I' " . .., -
,,~:r,1"~'./1 \ 'I ---. .',' ,r ' ._ < l' r."" ",II,,~,,+fr!"""_~_'_f4-..+._.J'.j..... . W4j1J"j_\'''',':t~t.T'l
. ", ,E. 'I ,. . ~;"
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
P.O. BOX 1!188
~AANA.CA G27C2
~~ 1/'1
SHOlLO iii., or' TH!!! POliCies DI!:SOPllet:O HEFlEN BE CANceLLED BEFORE" THE EXPlMTIOOl
DIl.TSTHEREOF, THE I!ULREflAFFCROINQ COYIifWJIiiWIL.L. ....XIIIICJa MAlLSQ Q\Y8
W~TTENNo1'ICeTOTM!CEJmFlCATE I<<lL.OiFlNIt."EC~IN;e:~.~. ...:10.. ---
,.,.-........Q~ .- __If]Jl-.---IUW.-'"dI.~
Jm' rT1 ..~..-_ -..~---.-_~
......._..f'.~.._.-aCC~CrJ~:JQC~(Jr_...._.."lJOO(1X
WA.R8H LBA INO
BY: MchID Nekotl
':j1 ':,_. ; -}.',.::; .,"~ . ~:"__ ,..L._-l~~_>.l:'~"c~:~;_':'._/'I,' ~.'..;, '(-4~:;r. .' ,,}I.. I.r.._.'}:.'
'1".tJ .'(..17 .L..
VALI5AroF,""-"
/Hi4.-.
~ c.\TeIMMIDO('fVl ii-
. oeI2II6t ~,o;;-
,.
PROtu::ER
MAASH RISK&INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119->1880
OAUFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0<131155
OOMMNY
E AMERICAN INlERNATIOOALSOlJIH INSURANOE GO.
URSCA _AlL.WIPRo.o4-05 SFO UF\SA
COMPANY
F
INSUAmJ
URS CORPORATION
dba URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
. 600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FlOOR
SAN FRANC1SCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
G
COINANY
H
POLICY NUIJlBER: Gl. 933->1116 COMMERCIAl. GENERAl. LIABILITY
CG20101001
THIS EN OORSEMENT CHANGES THE F'OLICY. Pl.EASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
IIDDITIONAL INSU flED. OWNERS, LESSE E3 OFl CONTRACTORS - SCHEDULED PEFlSON OR ORaANIZATlON
THIS ENDORSEMENT MODIFIES INSURANCE PROVIDED UNDER THE FOLLOWING:
COMMEFlCIAL GENERAL LIABIUTY COVERAGE PART
SC!1!;OULE
NAME OF PERSON OR ORGANIZATION:
WHERE REQUIRED BY 'INSURED CONTRACT' AND AS EVIDENCED BY CEI'lTlFlcAtE OF INSURANCE ON FI LEO WITH COMPANY
(IF NO ENTRY APPEARS ABOVE. INFORMATION REQUIRED TO COMPLE1E THIS ENDORSEMENT WILL BE SHOWN IN THE DEClARATIONS AS
APPUCABLETOTHIS ENDORSEMENT.)
A. SECTION II . WHO IS AN INSURED IS AMENDED TO INCLUDE All AN INSURED THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION SHOWN IN THE SCHEDULE, BUT
ONLY WITH RESPECT TO UABILITY AflISINCl. OliT OF YOUR ONGOING OPERATIONS PERFORMI;O FOR THAT INSURED.
B. WITH RESPECT TO THE INSURANCE AFFORDED TO THESE ADDITIONAL INSUREDS, THE FOLLOWING EXClUSION IS ADDED:
2. EXCLUSIONS:
THE INSURANCE DOES NOT APPI. Y TO 'BODIL V INJURY' DR 'PROPERTY DAMAGE" OCCURRING AFTER:
(1) ALL WORK. INCLUDING MATERIALS, PARTS OR EQUIPMENT FURNISHED IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH WORK. ON THE PROJECT rOTHERTHAN
SER\IICEb, MAINTENANCE OR REP.lJRS) TO BE PERFORMED BY OROH BEHALF OF THE ADDITlOIlAlINSURE"O(S) AT 'fIiE am: OF THE
COVERE OPEFi" TIONS HAll BEEN COMPlETED: OR
(2) ntAT PORTION OF 'VOUAWORK' OUTOF WHICH THE INJURY OR DAMAGE ARISES HAS se;EN PUT TO ITS IN1ENDED USE SV"NYPERSON
OR ORGANIZATION OntER THAN ANOTHER CONTRACTOR OR SUIlCONTI'lACTOFi ENGAGED IN PERFORMIIoIG OPERATIONS FOR A PRINCIPAL
AS A PART OF THE SAME PROJECT.
OG2010 1001
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 CMC CENTEA PLAZA
P.O. BOX 1888
SANTA ANA, CA 112702
~ ~/y
DATE(M~ !,~
-'(G'M4
PRO"""""
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
COMPANY
E AUERlCAN M'EANATIONAlSClUTH INSURANCE CO.
URSCA -ALL.WIPRO-04-D5 SFO URSA
COMPANY
f
IN8LHD
URS CORPORATION
dIla URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
eoo MONTGOMERY STREET
2CTH fLOOR
SAN F RANCtSCO, CA 94111
COMf'ANY'
G
COMPANY
H
~
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
0C320371001
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGeS THE POUCY. pL.EASe R~ IT CAR5FULL Y.
ADDIT10NAL.INSURED . OWNERS. LESSEES OR CONTRAOTORS - OOMPLETED OPERATIONS
THIS ENDORSEMENT MODIFIES INSURANCE PROVIDED UNDER THE FOLLOWlNC3:
CONMERCIAL GENERAL. LIABIUTY COVEiFlAGE PART
SCHEDULE
NAME OF PERSON OR ORGANIZATION,
Wl'ERE REQUIRED BV 'INSURED CONTRACT' AND AS EVIDENCED SV CERTIFICATE OF' INSURANCE ON FILE WITH COMPANY.
(IF f'lO ENTRY APPEARSABOI!~ INFORMATION REQUIRED TO COMPLETE 11115 ef'lDORSEUENT WILL. BE SflOWN IN TflE DECLARATIONS AS
APPliCABLE TO THIS Ef'lDOR....MENT.)
SECTIOf'lll. WHO IS AN If'lSURED IS AMENDED TO INCLUDE AS AN If'lSUREDTHE PERSON OR ORQANIZATION SflOWN IN TflE SCHEDUL.E, BUT
ONLY WITH RESPECT TO LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF 'YOUR WORK' AT THE LOCATlON DESIClNATEDAND DESCRIBED IN THE SCflEDUl.E OF THIS
ENDORSEMENT PERFORMED FOR THAT I NSURED AND INCLUDED IN THE .PRODUCTS-COMPLETED OPERATIONS HAZARD',
.. . '''''I "",.. ',.,-- -..,".. .. "' -, I I
";, 'Ir _ I, ,.:1, 1___ _ . 1:] ... f I i -_ t ...-!~,~!~l"_j_ "r:" ,.",' -i -. I ~ 1'.",' " 'L_''''''';;'~
. " f.' ' - ,.' "1' - I' o~: -~ --. "1
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 CIVIC CENTER PI..AZI\
P_O. BOX 1911B
SANTA ANA. CA 9270Z
~ ...J IS/
"-=-,!-~', :tl_l., 1 - ." "~ j '"' ~ " . ,. ,l" 'I I r . 1- T 1-;'. , ,.l ._Q,-
"" _ , __." I I . . , . . .. , r,' , , ,,, ~-,- --.--~ , ". . ',' - - J . ' } I
. -, ,. -.- " _ -, .'
P-,tARSH I..I8A INO,
BV: YchIo NekDta
'1t.~ ~'t.tJ L
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
... . .
... ~E (....MJOCi'f'Y)
f.:OI A.,l.I':'f.I:'':I{~'t 06 :., l"04
COMPANlESAFFOIICItlG COVERAGE
"ROOUCIiR
MARSH RISK & INSuRANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX '83880
SAN FRANCISCO eA 94119-3880
CAUFORNIA UCENse NO. 0437153
COMPNJ,Y
E
AI.1EA1CAN INTEFlNATIONALSOlITH INSlJF1ANCE CO.
URSCA -AU.-WIPRC>-04-iI5 STA URSA CGZ010
COMPNolY
F
_0
URS CORPORATION
dbaURSCORPOAATION AMERICAS
600 1ll0NTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 841\1
CQMPNlY
G
COMPANY
H
NBltle of Porson or OrganiZation: CITY OF SANTA ANA
If no .nby eppoar. fI.bov., information roquind 10 compltte lhla .nllolM,""nl w11 ba lI10wn illlle Declaration. al
aa applicabl. to Ihl. endorsamomL
WHO IS AN INSURED(Section III 1_"""",<lAId to indudea..n .,..,,.d the p....." oro'llaniution .ho","., lIle 9c:hedule
but only..,;!h nlp'otto MablUly ailolngoutol "your work'lotthat .,..nd by or lor you.
PRI MARY INSURANCe: It \_ fur1hor ag_ that euch In"''''''''e .. ifanord.1I by thl_ pollc'f lor the _elil 0' lit. aboVe Addl1io nllln...nd(a)
&hau be prilT1lllY in>>UIll/lCO _ 'Wlpeota any otalm,lc" or llal>illy arialng out olllle Hama<1lnlllnd'o operallono, and MY o1h.rlnlUrance
mlinlarned by Ill. Additionallnauied(s) sholl be axcel_ Md non-conlllbuID'Y..,;th "'a Insurance proltfded helll\lndor.
ca 2010 11/85 Copyrigh~ IneurUlCtl Service. OH1ce, Inc. leM
No~: ThI_MRnethe legal requl_nlo' F<lnn CG2010 1115.
,,'F',',';,y..'.,,.:J'1 ., "~1 '1'1 "I ' " 1-' "-e ,o"~" ,'" I' ,.." 'r'" "1"""'1
~ I ' ..' . " . . ~:!. f l r I .. , j' " I I _ - -,," - .
CITY OF SANTA ANA
ATTN: CLERK OF THE cnv eoUNClL
20 C1V IC CENTER PlAZA (M-30)
PO IlOX 111I1
v.NTA ANA. CA G2702
;;€D ?It:/
_:_~I._:=l...:~j.":'.:...' .1,' . ::.L::." "J'!"---;-'",c"""","HC:-'['I';' I ., I.'""'
. .~~...__".r,&<.# J...........____. ......,..1.:. ". ~_........,~ ~1,.".....-,...~ .~._._ 1~ ......1)
LU.RSHUlAlNC:.
BY: t.AJcI'WQ N_kota
',k, -oil; It.d L.
ii ,- Ab~...I4..ii\...}\....'...\....\\.". ......................11.... ............... ..\.....\.... ..................\ .~;;J.i '"" ... CERTIFICATE NUMBER...
i ,..~.....:...C....~...7C.......,.. ........ .......................... ...i............ .............. .................... :~!~'f.;..S....... ....................... SEA-0006140BS-09 ,;::
PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONfERS
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER OTHER THAN THOSE PROVIDED IN THE
P. O. BOX 193880 POLICY. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OA ALTER THE COVERAGE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3880 AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN.
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY
URSCA -ALL-W/PRO-04-05 SFa URSA A NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA
INSURED COMPANY
URS CORPORATION B LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
dba URS CORPORATION AMERICAS A -,;l,{X)':} - C"N~
600 MONTGOMERY STREET COMPANY
25TH FLOOR C INSURANCE CO OFTHE STATE OF PA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
0 NIA
.., ...........................}.......
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE DESCRIBED HEREIN HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED HEREIN FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THE CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.
AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS
LTR DATE (MMiODNY) DATE (MM/DDNY)
A GENERAL LIABILITY 706-1033 04/01105 04/01/06 GENERALAGGREGRATE $ 2,000,000
~ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTs-caMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,UOO
~ 0 CLAIMS MADE 0 OCCUR PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000
- OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000
FIRE DAMAGE (Any orle lire) S 1,000,000
- $ 5,000
MED EXP (Anyone person)
A _AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 826-2024 (AOS) 04/01105 04/01106
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1.000,000
~ ANY AUTO
- ALL OWNED AUTOS BODIL Y INJ URY
(Per persorl) $
SCHEDULED AUTOS
X HIRED AUTOS RM BODll Y INJURY
APPROVEl AS TO F $
X NON.OWNED AUTOS (per accident)
, f;/ ' II PROPERTY DAMAGE $
I.' )
~, /, I' .
GARAGE LIABILITY . Laur( siArt Sheedy AUTO ONL y. EA ACCIDENT $
I-
ANY AUTO Assistan (t>ity Altornc\ OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY; :...........,...............
I- EACH ACCIDENT 5
AGGREGATE $
EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $
~ UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE $
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM .
A WORKERS COMPENSATION AND 7155121 (CA) 01/01/05 01/01/06 . I we STATU-,1 I OTH-
EMPLOYERS' LIABIliTY X TORY LIMITS ER
C 7155122 (AOS) 01/01/05 01101106 EL EACH ACCIDENT 5 1,000,000
C THE PROPRIETORI ~I 7155118 EXCLUD. CA,AOS, GA 01101/05 01/01/06 EL DISEASE.POLlCY LIMIT $ 1,000,000
PARTNER.SIEXECUTIVE X INCL
F nlOlO"lC:lO"q<l. ARIC:' EXCL 71SS119 (GA\ 01/01/05 01/01106 EL DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE $ 1.000.000
OTHER
B PROF. LIABILITY (E&O) 1155287 04101105 04/01/06 EACH CLAIM $1.000,000
CLAIMS MADE FORM AGGREGATE $1,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSfLOCATIONStVEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS
RE: PROJECT NO, 57-09961035.01; CENTERLINE PROJECT NOISE REVIEW. THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS. EMPLOYEES, & VOLUNTEERS ARE
ADDITIONAL INSUREDS WITH RESPECT OPERATIONS PERFORMED BY OR FOR THE NAMED INSURED AS RESPECTS GENERAL LIABILITY. THIS INSURANCE IS
PRIMARY PER POLICY FORM. SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST/CROSS LIABILITY APPLIES.
....y~?r>r'Yt".flj ...... ." ...........
SHOULD ANY OF THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION
CITY OF SANTA ANA DATE THEREOF, THE INSURER AFFORDING COVERAGE WILL KN~ MAIL 30 DAYS
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED HEREIN,~>U'AcllC~
P.O. BOX 19B8 ~Dllte()OO(NlO((!II8~J0mIlil~~XXXX
SANTA ANA, CA 92702 .lUI:KI8l~~~KSX~XJeaIJ(~XXXX
EKJlIl[>OOl:UKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
MARSH USA INC
BY; Mlchlo Nekota 7.wd.Jt..L.L
1<............. <.......i....:...... ......))................ ... ......\'''[,0 As 6{ ........ ,
PRODUCER
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
DATE (MM/bD/YY)
03/31105
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY
E AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SOUTH INSURANCE Co.
URSCA .ALL-WIPRO-04-05 SFO URSA
COMPANY
F
INSURED
URS CORPORATION
db. URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
G
COMPANY
H
Note: This is the usual form we use and it fulfills the legal requirement of Form CG201 0 11 85.
POLICY NUMBER: 706-1033
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS
- SCHEDULED PERSON OR
ORGA.N1ZATION
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART.
SCHEDULE
_n_n_nnnnhn_n_n.nu.uunnn__nnnnn_nn__n_u___n_n_____nnn__nnnn_n_n_..n_n_n__U.._n_n_nnnn__nn_n_n_nnhun_n_______nnu___nnnn__n
Name of Additional Insured Person(s)
or Organization:
Location(s) of Covered Operations
WHERE REQUIRED BY INSURED CONTRACT
u-n-___n__hnnn____n__hnnn___n_n__hn_n_n_nnuh_n_n_n_n_n__-n-n--___U.._hn_n_n_nu__n_n_n_nuu_hn_n_____UU_nn_nnun_n_u_h_n_n_n__nn_
AS DESCRIBED ON CERTIFICATE
nnn_n_n__Uh_nnnnun_h_n_n____n_nnnn_n__nn____n_n____n_n___h_n_n__nn____n_n__nnn_h_nn.___U.._hn_n_n_n_n_..n_n____n_nnnn__un_nn.u_
A. Section II - Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect
to liability for "bodily injUlY', property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" caused, in whole or in part, by:
1. Your acts or omissions; or
2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf;
in the performance of your ongoing operations for the additional insured(s) at the location(s)
designated above.
B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the folloWing additional exclusions apply:
This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurring after:
1. All work, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work, on the project (other than service, maintenance or
repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of the additional insured(s) at the location of the covered operations has been completed; or
2. That portion of "your work" out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its intended use by any person or organization other than
another contractor or subcontractor engaged in performing operations for a pnncipal as a part of the same project.
PRIMARY INSURANCE
Such insurance as is afforded by this endorsement for the additional insureds shall apply as primary insurance. Any other insurance maintained by the
additional insureds or its officers and employees shall be excess only and not contributing negligence on part of the additional insureds.
CG 20 100704
APPROVED AS TO FORfd
,-/-";/5 ~) / :3,
I Laura Stilt Sheedy
Assistant Cily'i\tt()Tn:.::v
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
P.O. BOX 1986
SANTA ANA, CA 92702
PRODUCER
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
DATE (MMIDDlYY)
03131/05
COMPANY
E AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SOUTH INSURANCE CO.
URSCA -ALL.W/PRO-04-05 SFO URSA
COMPANY
F
INSURED
URS CORPORATION
dba URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
G
COMPANY
H
Note: This is the usual form we use and it fulfills the legal requirement of Form CG201 0 11 85.
POLICY NUMBER: 706-1033
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR
CONTRACTORS - COMPLETED OPERATIONS
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART.
SCHEDULE
-n____U_hnnn_nuhnn_n_n____nn_nn_.n____n_n_n_un_n_n____nnunn_nn._nu.n_nn._______u_n_n_n__u_un_n_n_nu___hnnn___nn__nnn___n_________
Name of Additional Insured Person(s)
or Organization(s):
Location And Description of Completed
Operations
WHERE REQUIRED BY INSURED CONTRACT
--_____h___________..__________.___..___________.___n____________n____n________.__________.._.._____________._._________.__.._______________U_n_n_________.._.___________.._..._____
AS DESCRIBED ON CERTIFICATE
.hn-nnn____hnn_n____h_nn_______uhnn_n____uh_nn.._____hhnn_n_______nn_nnn__..._n_n________Unnn_n____nn_n___________n_n__n_____..__nnn________
Section II . Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additonal insured the person~s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to
liability for "bodily injury" or "property damage" caused, in whole or in part, by "your work' at the location designated and described in the schedule of this
endorsement performed for that additional insured and included in the "products-completed operations hazard".
PRIMARY INSURANCE
Such insurance as is afforded by this endorsement for the additional insureds shall apply as primary insurance. Any olher insurance maintained by the
additional insureds or its officers and employees shall be excess only and not contributing negligence on part of the additional insureds.
CG 20 37 07 04
APPROVED AS TO FORM
;t~b :;!~
Laura Stilt Sheedy
A~SlsWnt City' Attorney
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
P.O. BOX 1966
SANTA ANA, CA 92702
MARSH USA INC.
BY: Mlchlo Nekota
~~L
PRODUCER
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
CERTIFICATE NUMBER
SEA-000614183-09
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTI FICA TE HOLDER OTHER THAN THOSE PROVIDED IN THE
POLICY. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE
AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN.
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
URSCA -ALL-WIPRO-04-05 SFO URSA
INSURED
URS CORPORATION
dba URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
A NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO. OF PlnSBURGH, PA
COMPANY
B LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
COMPANY
C INSURANCE COOF THE STATE OF PA
COMPANY
o N/A
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE DESCRIBED HEREIN HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED HEREIN FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED,
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THE CERTIFICATE MAYBE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF SUCH POLICIES,
AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS
LTR DATE (MMIODIYY) DATE (MMIODlYY)
A GENERAL LIABILITY 706-1033 04/01105 04101106 GENERAL AGGREGRATE $ 2,000,000
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS-COM PlOP AGG $ 2,000,000
CLAIMS MADE 0 OCCUR PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000
OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000
FIRE DAMAGE (Anyone fire) $ 1,000,000
MED EXP (Anyone person) $ 5,000
A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 826-2024 (AOS) 04/01105 04/01/06
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000
X ANY AUTO
ALL OWNED AUTOS BODIL Y INJURY
(Per person) $
SCHEDULED AUTOS
X HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY
$
X NON-OWNED AUTOS (pe'accidel1t)
PROPERTY DAMAGE $
GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY. EA ACCIDENT $
ANY AUTO OTHER THAN AUTO ONL Y:
EACH ACCIDENT
AGGREGATE
EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE
UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
A WORKERS COMPENSATION AND 7155121 (CA) 01/01/05 01/01106
C EMPLOYERS' LIABIUTY 7155122 (AOS) 01/01/05 01/01/06
$ 1,000,000
C THE PROPRIETORI X INCL 7155118 EXCLUD. CA,AOS, GA 01/01/05 01/01106 EL DISEASE. POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000
PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE
< C!=(:iCERS ~'\RE: EXCL 7155119 (Gf'..) C1/01/0S C1/01/CS R :J!8E!'S[-[ACI: EMPl..CYEc- $ 1,000 000
OTHER
8 PROF, LIABILITY (E&O) 1155287 04/01105 04/01/06 EACH CLAIM $1,000,000
CLAIMS MADE FORM AGGREGATE $1,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSlLOCATIONSNEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS
RE: PROJECT NO. 57-09961035.01; CENTERLINE PROJECT NOISE REVIEW, THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, & VOLUNTEERS ARE
ADDITIONAL INSUREDS WITH RESPECT OPERATIONS PERFORMED BY OR FOR THE NAMED INSURED AS RESPECTS GENERAL LIABILITY. THIS INSURANCE IS
PRIMARY PER POLICY FORM, SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST/CROSS LIABILITY APPLIES.
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
PO BOX 1988
SANTA ANA. CA 92702
APPROVED AS TO FORM
'-;/0((, ,t I //~
I )' ~~~-_..
kaura Stitt Sh1cdy
Assistant Cit')-! Allorm'\
SHOULD ANY OF THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION
DATE THEREOF, THE INSURER AFFORDING COVERAGE WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS
WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED HEREIN, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH
NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER
AFFORDING COVERAGE, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES, OR THE ISSUER OF THIS
CERTIFICATE.
MARSH USA INC
BY: Mlchlo Nekota
~UL
PRODUCER
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
DATE (MMIDD/Y'rj
03/31105
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY
E AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SOUTH INSURANCE CO.
URSCA .ALL-WIPRO.04-05 SFO URSA
COMPANY
F
INSURED
URS CORPORATION
db. URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
G
COMPANY
H
Note: This is the usual form we use and it fulfills the legal requirement of Form CG201 0 11 85.
POLICY NUMBER: 706-1033
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CARE FULL Y.
ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS
- SCHEDULED PERSON OR
ORGANIZATION
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART.
SCHEDULE
____________.n_n__________..._____________._.______________._..________________._____________....___________________..____________________________.._____.______________________________
Name of Additional Insured Person(s)
or Organization:
Location(s) of Covered Operations
n--.nhn_n_n_____.hhnn_nnnnn_n_n_n_..nnnn_n_n____n_nn_n___.n___n_n_n__n_nnnnn_n__.._n_hn_n_n_nn__nnn_n_n.n_n_n_nnn.___n_n_n_nn
WHERE REQUIRED BY INSURED CONTRACT
AS DESCRIBED ON CERTIFICATE
-n-n_nn._n_n_n_n_nh_n_n.____Uhn_n_nnnn_n_n_nnnnhn_n_n_n_n_hn_n_n_n__U_Un_n_n.nnuhnnnn.nn____n_nn.__n_U.n_nnn.n_nn.hnnn_
A. Section II - Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect
to liability for "bodily injury", property damage" or "personal and advertising injury' caused, in whole or in part, by:
1. Your acts or omissions; or
2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf;
in the performance of your ongoing operations for the additional insured(s) at the location(s)
designated above.
B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following additional exclusions apply:
This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurring after:
1. All work, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work, on the project (other than service, maintenance or
repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of the additional insured(s) at the location of the covered operations has been completed; or
2. That portion of "your work" out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its intended use by any person or organization other than
another contractor or subcontractor engaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project.
PRIMARY INSURANCE
Such insurance as is afforded by this endorsement for the additional insureds shall apply as primary insurance. Any other insurance maintained by the
additional insureds or its officers and employees shall be excess only and not contributing negligence on part of the additional insureds.
eG 20 100704
APPROVED AS TO FORM
'j/::5S ~,);;
Lauta Stilt Sheedy
Assistant City All.orn~y
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
PO BOX 1988
SANTA ANA, CA 92702
MARSH USA INC.
BY: Michio Nekota
PRODUCER
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
DATE (MM/DDIY'f)
03/31/05
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY
E AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SOUTH INSURANCE CO.
URSCA -ALL-WIPRO-04-05 SFO URSA
COMPANY
F
INSURED
URS CORPORATION
dba URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
G
COMPANY
H
Note: This is the usual form we use and it fulfills the legal requirement of Form CG2010 11 85.
POLICY NUMBER: 706-1033
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR
CONTRACTORS - COMPLETED OPERATIONS
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART.
SCHEDULE
---n---~--n-_n__h___n_nnhn_n__"__h__nnn_Un_nnn_nn_n_n_n_u_n_n-----h--n-n_n_~__n_n_nunnnnnn_n_n____n_~__n_n___nun_n_n__n_hn_nn_nu
Name of Additional Insured Person(s)
or Organization(s):
Location And Description of Completed
Operations
WHERE REQUIRED BY INSURED CONTRACT
-n-----u~--n--n_u~n_nn_nhn_nnn__h__n___nh_nn__u_n___n_n_u___n-n-n-n-n-n-_n___n_n__n___n_n__nun_nn__u____n__n_uu__n_nn_unhn_n___n_h
AS DESCRIBED ON CERTIFICATE
---n____u____nn_nn~n_n_u__hn_n____u~n_n_u_____hn____u____nn_uuhn-n_u__hn_n_u_un_n_u_nhnn_nnhn_n__n_hn____nnhn_nnn_n___n_n__nu_u
Section II - Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additonal insured the person~s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to
liability for 'bodily injury' or 'property damage" caused, in whole or in part, by "your work' at the location designated and described in the schedule of this
endorsement performed for that additional insured and included in the "products-completed operations hazard",
PRIMARY INSURANCE
Such insurance as is afforded by this endorsement for the additional insureds shall apply as primary insurance. Any other insurance maintained by the
additional insureds or its officers and employees shall be excess only and not contributing negligence on part of the additional insureds.
CG 20 37 07 04
APPROVED AS TO FORM
1~~') 3/3
Laura Still Sheedy
i\,>sistant City Attorney
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
PO BOX 1988
SANTA ANA, CA 92702
MARSH USA INC.
BY; Michio Nekota
. " 'M- A R -'-:'RTIF .. -rtA" ~CERTIF'CATENUMBER
rVI hl ~ t-I . . \.OF 1 IE; ( 'F II I~Uf SEA-00053B?BB-09
'''' --.- _ _ _ _ _ _
PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER OTHER THAN THOSE PROVIDED IN THE
P. O. BOX 193880 POLICY, THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3880 AfFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN.
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
URSCA -ALL-WIPAO-04-05 STA URSA CG2010
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY
A NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA
INSURED
URS CORPORATION
dba URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
B LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
COMPANY
o N/A
COMPANY
C INSURANCE CO OF THE STATE OF PA
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE DESCRIBED HEREIN HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED HEREIN FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THE CERrlFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.
AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
CO
lTA
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION
DATE (MMIDDNY) DATE (MMIDDNY)
TYPE OF INSURANCE
A GENERAL LIABILITY 706-1033
Ix CC'MMEFiCi,;L GEi',::RAL ,-,ASIL1,Y
~ D CLAIMS MADE 0 OCCUR
_ OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT
-
04/01105
04101/06
A _AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
2: ANY ALn"O
ALL OWNED ALn"OS
- SCHEDULED ALn"OS
X HIRED AUTOS
2: NON-OWNED ALn"OS
-
826-2024 (AOS)
04/01105
04/01106
APPROV D AS TO ORM
-;!:~ IG'p du / AI'
v Lau a Slittj~hcedy
Assistart. Ci(y Attorn y
GARAGE LIABILITY
-
ANY AUTO
-
A
C
C
EXCESS LIABILITY
I UMBRELLA FORM
1 OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
01/01/06
01/01/06
01/01/06
7155121 (CA)
7155122 (AOS)
7155118 EXCLUD. CA,AOS, GA
01/01/05
01101105
01/01/05
01/1)1/(1.'>
fXllNCL
HEXr:t
THE PROPRIETOR/
PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE
nFf'"!CERS ,ARE:
c
715')119 {G.A.}
01 ffll1n6
B
OTHER
PROF. LIABILITY (E&O)
CLAIMS MADE FORM
04/01/06
1155287
04/01105
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS
RE: PROJECT #HT00000368.01 MINNIE/STANDARD STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT MANAGER: JEFF CHAPMAN
SEE ATTACHED ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT.
--'.-
iFI
, .
LIMITS
GENERAL AGGREGRATE $ 2,000,000
rRODUC;8-CC~~r/op AGO $ 2,OOC,aoc
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000
EACH OCCURRENCE S 1,000,000
FIRE DAMAGE (Anyone fire) S 1,000,000
MED EXP (Anyone person) $ 5,000
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000
BODIL Y INJURY
(Per person) $
BODILY INJURY $
(per acddenQ
PROPERTY DAMAGE $
ALn"O ONl Y- EA ACCIDENT $
OTHER THAN AUTO ONL Y: ~
EACH ACCIDENT $
AGGREGATE
EACH OCCURRENCE
AGGREGATE
s
$
$
$
$
$
1,000,000
1,000,000
Xl ~gR~T ~~YTS I I ~~H-
EL EACH ACCIDENT
EL DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT
EL DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE
,
10flt1.0f1f)
EACH CLAIM
AGGREGATE
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
~..
CITY OF SANTA ANA
ATTN: CLERK OF THE CITY COUNCIL
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA (M-30)
PO BOX 1988
SANTA ANA, CA 92702
,,"C""", ......"..."...,.::,:,::'""., ,'.:.
SHOULD ANY OF THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION
DATE THEREOF, THE INSURER AFFORDING COVERAGE WILL ~ MAIL 30 DAYS
WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED HERE1N,~
~~C<QIl~XD<m~~~XXXX
~RI8i~~JlllG{A~~~~XXl<XH~XXXX
l!l:1OO[Je(EMKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
I
MARSH USA INC
BY: Michlo Nekota
_ MMj($I"'I.
~U-.L
;'?::,:'W~(ip"~~"qF:':':Q~31'/05j'.
PRODUCER
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
DATE (MMIDQIYY)
03/31105
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY
E AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SOUTH INSURANCE CO.
UASCA -ALL-WIPAO-04-05 STA URSA CG2010
COMPANY
F
INSURED
URS CORPORATION
dba URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
G
COMPANY
H
Note: This is the usual form we use and it fulfills the legal requirement of Form CG2010 11 85.
POLICY NUMBER: 706-1033
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CARE FULL Y.
ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS
- SCHEDULED PERSON OR
ORGANIZATION
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART.
SCHEDULE
n._u_hn.n_nnu_n_n_n___n_nnn_nun_nn_n_n___nu__nnnn_nunn_n_.-____U_n_nn___.__Unn_..___nUn_n_n__UU_n_n_n____Un_n_n_nu_nnnnnn___
Name of Additional Insured Person(s)
or Organization:
Location(s) of Covered Operations
-n-___nu__nn.nn__Un_n_n___U_Unnnu_n_Un_nnnnnnn_n__n_uh_nnnn_n___U_nn_nu_____n_n_.n_U_nn_n__U_Un_nUn__hO_hn_n__n_____Un_n_n_.
WHERE REQUIRED BY INSURED CONTRACT
AS DESCRIBED ON CERTIFICATE
-nn-_nn_n____nnn___h_nnn_n_____nnn___UUOn_nn__n_n_nn_nnun_oun-nn_n_n_n_n_n______nnnnuu___n__n___n_n_nnn..._un_n_n_.____nUn_nnn
A. Section II - Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect
to liability for "bodily injury", property damage' or 'personal and advertising injury" caused, in whole or in part, by:
1. Your acts or omissions; or
2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf;
in the performance of your ongoing operations for the additional insured(s) at the location(s)
designated above.
B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following additional exclusions apply:
This insurance does not apply to 'bodily injury" or 'property damage" occurring after:
1. All work, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work, on the project (other than service, maintenance or
repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of the additional insured(s) at the location of the covered operations has been completed; or
2. That portion of "your work" out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its intended Use by any person or organization other than
another contractor or subcontractor engaged in performing operations for a pnncipal as a part of the same project.
PRIMARY INSURANCE
Such insurance as is afforded by this endorsement for the additional insureds shall apply as primary insurance. Any other insurance maintained by the
additional insureds or its officers and employees shall be excess only and not contributing negligence on part of the additional insureds.
CG20100704
APPROVED AS TO FORM
2~ ;:-/t;
. ~a~ra Sliu Sheedy
'\:;:-.l\tanl City Attorney
CITY OF SANTA ANA
ATTN: CLERK OF THE CITY COUNCIL
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA (M-30)
PO BOX 1988
SANTA ANA, CA 92702
MARSH USA lNC.
BY: Michlo Nekota
~~L
DATE (MMIDDIYY)
03/31105
PRODUCER
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY
E AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SOUTH INSURANCE Co.
URSCA -ALL-WIPRQ-04-05 STA URSA CG2010
COMPANY
F
INSURED
URS CORPORATION
dba URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
G
COMPANY
H
Note: This is the usual form we use and it fulfills the legal requirement of Form CG2010 11 85.
POLICY NUMBER: 706-1033
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR
CONTRACTORS - COMPLETED OPERATIONS
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under ihe following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART.
SCHEDULE
uhn-nu___h__nunuhunn_uh__n_n_u___h_nu_uuhnu______hnn______uun-n-nu_n_n_n_____nnu_____uun_n___uh___nuu___n_n_nu__u__n_nu____U_U
Name of Additional Insured Person(s)
or Organization(s):
Location And Description of Completed
Operations
WHERE REQUIRED BY INSURED CONTRACT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------________________n_____________n__--U____h___________________________________n_______u____n______________
AS DESCRIBED ON CERTIFICATE
n--n--h--n-nnu___n_n_n_hn_n_______nnunnhunnn_____n_n_nu_n_n__--u.nn---_uh__nun_u.hnu_nn..h____nn__un____n__hn_n__nuu_u_u_nnn___
Section II - Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additonal insured the person~s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to
liability for "bodily injury" or "property damage" caused, in whole or in part, by 'your work' at the location designated and described in the schedule of this
endorsement performed for that additional insured and included in the "products-completed operations hazard'.
PRIMARY INSURANCE
Such insurance as is afforded by this endorsement for the additional insureds shall apply as primary insurance. Any other insurance maintained by the
additional insureds or its officers and employees shall be excess only and not contributing negligence on part of the additional insureds.
CG 20 37 07 04
POlley NUMBER: GL 933-1972
COMMERcrAL GENERAL LIABILITY
APPROV ED AS TO FORiVJ
~e -, )//
./ 7.../ ~/ 'T
~aura Still Sh';::cdy
As:::.isUHH Ci!,y A!!nrnc\'
CITY OF SANTA ANA
ATTN: CLERK OF THE CITY COUNCIL
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA (M-30)
PO BOX 1988
SANTA ANA, CA 92702
MARSH USA INC.
BY: Mlchio Nekola
~UL
DATE (MMIDD/Y'rj
03/31/05
PRODUCER
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
COMPANY
E AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SOUTH INSURANCE CO.
URSCA -ALL-WIPRO-04-05 STA URSA CG2010
COMPANY
F
INSURED
URS CORPORATION
db. URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
G
COMPANY
H
EFFECTIVE: 04/01/02 TO 04/01/03
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ iT CAREFULLY.
ADDITiONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEE, OR
CONTRACTORS - FORM B
INSURED: URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
SCHEDULE
Name of Person or Organization: CITY OF SANTA ANA
If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as
as applicable to this endorsement.
WHO IS AN INSURED(Section II) is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the Schedule
but only with respect to liability arising out of "your work" for that insured by or for you.
PRIMARY INSURANCE: It is further agreed that such insurance as if afforded by this policy for the benefit of the above Additionallnsured(s)
shall be primary insurance as respects any claim, loss or liability arising out of the Named Insured's operations, and any other insurance
maintained by the Additionallnsured(s) shall be excess and non-contributory with the insurance provided hereunder.
CG 20 10 11/85 Copyright, Insurance SelVices Office, Inc. 1984
Note: This fulfills the legal requirement of Form CG2010 11 85.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
~ 51'/7"
Laura Stitt Sheedy
Assistant City Attorney
CITY OF SANTA ANA
A TTN: CLERK OF THE CITY COUNCIL
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA (M-30)
PO BOX 1988
SANTA ANA, CA 92702
MARSH USA INC.
BY: Michlo Nekota
ERTIFICA TE OF INSURANCE
CERTIFICATE NUMBER
SEA-00061419B-09
PRODUCER
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER Of INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER OTHER THAN THOSE PROVIDED IN THE
POLICY, THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE
AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN.
''''';lr ,-
. <.......)
'~: n"j
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURED
URS CORPORATION
dba URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
A NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. Co. OF PITTSBURGH, PA
CoMPMY',
B LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
URSCA _ALL_W/PRO_04_05 SFO URSA
COMPANY
C INSURANCE COOFTHE STATE OF PA
COMPANY
o N/A
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE DESCRIBED HEREIN HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED HEREIN FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THE CERTIFICATE MAYBE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BYTHE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.
AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
eo TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS
LTR DATE (MM/DDfYY) DATE (MM/DDNY)
A GENERAL LIABILITY 706-1033 04101105 04/01106 GENERAL AGGREGRATE $ 2,000,000
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PROD'JCTS.CC~.~P/CP ASS . 2,:::OG,C::;::;
.
CLAIMS MADE 0 OCCUR PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000
OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000
FIRE DAMAGE (Anyone fire) $ , ,000,000
MED EXP (Anyone person) $ 5,000
A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 826-2024 (AOS) 04/01105 04101/06
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000
X ANY AUTO
ALL OWNED AUTOS BOQIL Y INJURY
SCHEDULED AUTOS {Per persoo} $
X HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY
$
X NON-OWNED AUTOS APPR (pel'i:lccidenQ
PROPERTY DAMAGE $
GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY. EA ACCIDENT $
ANY AUTO OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY:
EACH ACClDENT
AGGREGATE
EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE
UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
A WORKERS COMPENSATION AND 7155121 (CA) 01/01105 01/01/06
C EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY 7155122 (AOS)
01101/05 01101106 $ 1,000,000
C THE PROPRIETOR/ X INCL 7155118 EXClUD. CA,AOS, GA 01/01/05 01/01/06 EL DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000
PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE
E OFFICERS ARE: EXeL 7155119 (GA) 01/01/05 01/01106 EL DISEASE-EACH EMPlOYEE. ~ 11)00(100
OTHER
B PROF. LIABILITY (E&O) 1155287 04/01105 04/01/06 EACH CLAIM $1,000,000
CLAIMS MADE FORM AGGREGATE $1,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLESfSPECIAL ITEMS
PROJECT #H1 00000368.01 MINNIE/STANDARD STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT MANAGER: JEFF CHAPMAN
SEE ATTACHED FOR ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT.
CITY OF SANTA ANA
ATTN: CLERK OF THE CITY COUNCIL
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA (M-30)
P.O. BOX 1988
SANTA ANA. CA 92702
SHOUlD ANY OF THE POLlCfES DESCRIBED HEREIN BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION
DATE THEREOF, THE INSURER AFFORDING COVERAGE WILL ~ MAIL 30 DAYS
WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOlDER NAMED HEREIN,~
~~Em:~J<W!~~~XXXX
.M~xmnm:~~~;oeQ(WlOO(XXXX
EDll(Je(E;Q.:HXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
MARSH USA lNC
BY: Mlchlo Nekola
'1wLJ~L
DATE (MMfDDIYY)
12/27/04
PRODUCER
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119.3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY
E AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SOUTH INSURANCE Co.
URSCA -ALL-WIPRQ-04.05 SFO URSA
COMPANY
F
INSURED
URS CORPORATION
dba URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
G
COMPANY
H
Note: This is the usual form we use and it fulfills the legal requirement of Form CG2010 11 85.
POLICY NUMBER: GL 933.3116
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
ADDITIONAL INSURED. OWNERS, LESSEES OR
CONTRACTORS. COMPLETED OPERATIONS
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART.
SCHEDULE
Name of Person or Organization:
WHERE REOUIRED BY WRITTEN CONTRACT
...........--...--.--.----...-.---.------...--.------..-.--.-----....--.--.--.......------.-....-----.-....--.--.--.....---------...-------.-.....--------......--.-----.....-.--.--.......
-----.--....--.--.---....--.--.----...--.--.--....--.------....--.----......--.--.............................................................................-.....--.............--......
Location And Description of Completed Operations:
Additional Premium:
o
......-.........................-.....--.................-...........-...........-....................................................................................--...................
..............................................................-.................................................-.............................................................-.....--.....
(If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declara.
tions as applJcable to this endorsement.)
Section II . Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the
Schedule, but only with respect to liability arising out of "your work" at the location designated and described in
the schedule of this endorsement performed for that insured and included in the "products.completed
operations hazard".
PRIMARY INSURANCE
Such insurance as is afforded by this endorsement for the additional insureds shall apply as primary insurance. Any other insurance maintained by the
additional insureds or its officers and employees shall be excess only and not contributing negligence on part of the additional insureds.
CG20371001
APPROVED AS TO FORM
~~. ( ."1' cl / i3.---
J l.ad'" "y. --".
AssiSl<la~ ell)' i\l.lU.:k\
JAN04'05 Mil 9:41 PUI~
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
P.O. BOX 1988
SANTA ANA, CA 92702
MARSH USA INC.
BY; Michlo Nekota
DATE (MM/DD/YY)
12/27104
PRODUCER
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMF.'l.tJY
E AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SOUTH INSURANCE Co.
URSCA -ALL.WIPRQ-04.05 SFO URSA
COMPJ~NY
F
INSURED
URS CORPORATION
dba URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
G
COMPANY
H
Note: This is the usual form we use and it fulfills the legal requirement of Form CG201 0 11 85.
POLICY NUMBER: GL 933-3116 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS
- SCHEDULED PERSON OR
ORGANIZATION
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the foilowing:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART.
SCHEDULE
Name of Person or Organization:
WHERE REQUIRED BY INSURED CONTRACT
___.._..n_.__.___..______.__.._...__n_____...._________......_______._...________._.....________.....__________..."_..______.__...._________.....__________....___________......_________.
___...._________....__n_____...________.__...__________...._____n__._...________......_________....._______........_________....._______......_________......_______.......________.......
(If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement wili be shown in the Declarations
as applicable to this endorsement.)
A. Section II . Who Is An Insured is amended to
include as an insured the person or organization
shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to
liability arising out of your ongoing operations
performed for that insured.
(1) All work, including materials, parts or
equipment furnished in connection with
such work, on the project (other than
service, maintenance or repairs) to be
performed by or on behalf of the additional
insured(s) at the site of the covered
operations has been completed; or
B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these
additional insureds, the following exclusion is added:
2. Exclusion
This insurance does not apply to "bodily in.
jury" or "property damage' occurring after:
(2) That portion of "your work" out of which
the injury or damage arises has been put
to its intended use by any person or
organization other than another contractor
or subcontractor engaged in performing
operations for a principal as a part of the
same project.
PRIMARY INSURANCE
Such insurance as is afforded by this endorsement for the additional insureds shall apply as primary insurance. Any other insurance maintained by the
additional insureds or ~ts officers and employees shall be excess only and not contributing negligence on part of the additional insureds.
CG20 iO 1001
APPROVED AS TO FORM
~~---~':'L~~~lJ__
1,",1 '..Il " h (, ; _ .,:)'
.JAN04'05 "11 9:41 PUR
Assi~tauL ell} /\llOfllC)
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
P.O. BOX 1988
SANTA ANA, CA 92702
MARSH USA INC.
BY: Michlo Nekota
'2uALJu-'L
PRODUCER
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119.3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
CERTIFICATE NUMBER
SEA-0006140B5-0B
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER OTHER THAN THOSE PROVIDED IN THE
POLICY. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE
AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN.
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
URSCA -ALL-WIPRO-04-05 SFO URSA
INSURED
URS CORPORATION
db. URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
A NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA
COMPANY
B AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES INS, CO.
COMPANY
C INSURANCE COOFTHE STATE OFPA
COMPANY
o NIA
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE DESCRIBED HEREIN HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED HEREIN FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THE CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.
AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS
LTR DATE (MMfDDfYY) DATE (MMfDDfYY)
A GENERAL LIABiliTY GL933-3116 04/01104 04101105 GENERALAGGREGAATE $ 2,000,000
^ COMMCRCIAL GG~EnAL L:A8IUTY PRCDUCTS-CGMPIOP AGG $ 2,OOa,Coo
CLAIMS MADE 0 OCCUR PERSONAL & ACN INJURY S 1,000,000
OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000
FIRE DAMAGE (Anyone fire) $ 1,000,000
MED EXP (Anyone person) $ 5,000
A AUTOMOBilE LIABILITY 826-1679 AOS 04/01104 04101105
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000
X ANY AUTO
ALL OWNED AUTOS BODIL Y INJURY
(pef person) $
SCHEDULED AUTOS
X HIRED AUTOS BODIL Y INJURY
NON.OWNED AUTOS FORM (per accident) $
X ,['PROVED AS TO
PROPERTY DAMAGE $
GARAGE LIABILITY .....:o::_Lo:o"-"-.---..-.-- AUTO ONL y. EA ACCIDENT $
ANY AUTO :;.: ~ ~:j OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY:
Assistanl CtlY Att"~)fl1i.':Y EACH ACCIDENT
AGGREGATE
EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE
UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
A WORKERS COMPENSATION AND 7155121 (CAl 01/01/05 01101/06
C EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY 7155122 (AOS) 01/01/05 01101/06
C THE PROPRIETOR/ X INCL 7155118 EXCLUD. CA,AOS, GA 01/01/05 01/01/06 EL VISEASE-POUCY LIMIT
PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE
E OFFICERS ARE: EXCL 7155119 (GAl 01/01/05 01/01/06 EL DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE
OTHEQ
8 PROF, LIABILITY (E&O) 819-4168 04/01104 04101105 EACH CLAIM $1,000,000
CLAIMS MADE FORM AGGREGATE $1,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/lOCATlONSNEHICLES/SPECIAllTEMS
RE: PROJECT NO. 57-09961035.01; CENTERLINE PROJECT NOISE REVIEW. THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, & VOLUNTEERS ARE
ADDITIONAL INSUREDS WITH RESPECT OPERATIONS PERFORMED BY OR FOR THE NAMED INSURED AS RESPECTS GENERAL LIABILITY. THIS INSURANCE IS
PRIMARY PER POLICY FORM. SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST/CROSS LIABILITY APPLIES.
JAN04'05,4t1 9:41 PIJI!
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
P.O. BOX 1988
SANTA ANA. CA 92702
SHOULD ANY OF THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION
DATE THEREOF, THE INSURER AFFORDING COVERAGE WILL ~ MAIL 30 DAYS
WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED HEREIN.~
MVDmK.GQC\UXNt:eOOO<MJO<QlI~XX!~xxm;ueQf!(J~XXXX
JO{Jl:QtiMKllOOSJOOO(El(X31El<~~~;oea)(~XXXX
EJOOlOe{EJO::HXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
MARSH USA INC
BY: Michio Nekota
PRODUCER
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
DATE (MM/DD/YY)
12127/04
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY
E AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SOUTH INSURANCE CO.
URSCA .ALL-W/PRO-04-05 SFO URSA
COMPANY
F
INSURED
URS CORPORATION
db. URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
G
COMPANY
H
Note: This is the usual form we use and it fulfills the legal requirement of Form CG201 0 11 85.
POLICY NUMBER: GL 933-3116
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR
CONTRACTORS - COMPLETED OPERATIONS
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART.
SCHEDULE
..--------...--------...-------...-------.....-----....------.....--------..--------.....-----.....------..-.-------...-------.-...------.-----------...--------....-------...--------.--.-
Name of Person or Organization:
WHERE REQUIRED BY WRITTEN CONTRACT
-...-------.--..-------..-.--------..--------.-.-------.-..-------...---------..--------.-.--------..-------..-.-------..-------.....-------..---------..-----------.--------.-..-------..-
Location And Description of Completed Operations:
Additional Premium:
o
------..-------..-..--------..-------...-------..-.------.-..--------....--------...-----.--.--------.----------..--------.-.------.-.--------.--.--------.--------.--..-------.-----------
---.-..-.------..-----------.--------..--------------------..-------..-.--------..-------.--..------..----------..-------.--------...--------...------..-.--------...------..-..-------....
(If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declara.
tions as applicable to this endorsement.)
Section II - Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the
Schedule, but only with respect to liability arising out of "your work" at the location designated and described in
the schedule of this endorsement performed for that insured and included in the "products.completed
operations hazard".
PRIMARY INSURANCE
Such insurance as is afforded by this endorsement for the additional insureds shall apply as primary insurance. Any other insurance maintained by the
additional insureds or its officers and employees shall be excess only and not contributing negligence on part of the additional insureds.
CG 20 371001
APPROVED AS TO FORM
__..__.v_-_____
--...-"'".-~;_\.Wi,. -".1.' :):i:':
A~Sl~\.all,- \~,l} I\ll'_ l!;~ I,
JfiN04'05 Atl 9:42 PUR
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
PO BOX 1988
SANTA ANA, CA 92702
DATE (MMiDDIYY)
12127/04
PRODUCER
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPClJ,iY
E AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SOUTH INSURANCE Co.
URSCA -ALL-WiPRO-04-05 SFO URSA
COMPANY
F
INSURED
URS CORPORATION
dba URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
G
COMPANY
H
Note: This is the usual form we use and it fulfills the legal requirement of Form CG201 0 11 85.
POLICY NUMBER: GL 933-3116 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS
- SCHEDULED PERSON OR
ORGANIZATION
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART.
SCHEDULE
Name of Person or Organization:
WHERE REQUIRED BY INSURED CONTRACT
_____.....u__________.....___________......__________.......__________.......____________.......___________......__..________.......___._..._.__.......u.._.._..._..........._..._._..._..
--.--......-...-...........-..-..-.--.......-..-..-..........-..--.-.......-..-..-.............--.--.--.......--..-.--...........-..-............-..-.--..-........--.--..-...........-...-
(If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations
as applicable to this endorsement.)
A. Section II . Who Is An Insured is amended to (1) All work, including materials, parts or
include as an Insured the person or organization equipment furnished in connection with
shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to such work, on the project (other than
liability arising out of your ongoing operations service, maintenance or repairs) to be
performed for that insured. performed by or on behalf of the additional
insured(s) at the site of the covered
operations has been completed; or
8. With respect to the insurance afforded to these
additional insureds, the follOWing exclusion is added:
2. Exclusion
This insurance does not apply to "bodily in.
jury" or "property damage' occurring after:
(2) That portion of "your work" out of which
the injury or damage arises has been put
to its intended use by any person or
organization other than another contractor
or subcontractor engaged in performing
operations for a principal as a part of the
same project.
PRIMARY INSURANCE
Such insurance as is afforded by this endorsement for the additional insureds shall apply as primary insurance. Any other insurance maintained by the
additional insureds or its officers and employees shall be excess only and not contributing negligence on part of the additional insureds.
CG2010~001
.\j j'ROV cU AS TO FORM
;1:!1, "it SiH:--:l::'
,::,(,;11. l >l),AttlJrll,-'~
JAN04'05 (jr; 9:42 PUR
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
PO BOX 1988
SANTA ANA, CA 92702
MARSH USA INC.
BY: Mh.:hfo Nekota
~~L
". ....-..-
I Ir ~H
I ,._,
PRODUCER
MARSH RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES
P. O. BOX 193880
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3880
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 0437153
'T~' F INS>URA-N U( ~EeERTIFleATE NUMBER
ct ':':~ SEA-000614183-0a
.- .
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER OTHER THAN THOSE PROVIDED IN THE
POLICY. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE
AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN.
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY
A NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO, OF PITTSBURGH, PA
URSCA -ALL-WiPRO-04-05 SFO URSA
INSURED
URS CORPORATION
dba URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
600 MONTGOMERY STREET
25TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
COMPANY
B AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES INS. CO.
~-
COMPANY
o NIA
COMPANY
C INSURANCECOQFTHESTATEOFPA
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE DESCRIBED HEREIN HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED HEREIN FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THE CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.
AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
CO
LTA
POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION
DATE (MM/DDIYY) DATE (MMfDOIYY)
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
A _GENERAL LIABILITY GL933-3116
;. jCOMME::RCIAL GENEHAL LIABiliTY
ill CLAIMS MADE 0 OCCUR
_ OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT
-
04/01104
04/01/05
A _AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
..2 ANY AUTO
_ ALL OWNED AUTOS
f.- SCHEDULED AUTOS
~ HIRED AUTOS
0. NON-OWNED AUTOS
I-
826-1679 AOS
04/01/04
04/01/05
APPROV Ei
AS TO Fe RM
GARAGE LIABILITY
I-
ANY AUTO
l-
I-
l..~LII <.i
jIlt! :');'iCCUY
^;,:,""tililC '<.....-HY AllofilCY
A
C
C
E
EXCESS LIABILITY
n- UMBRELLA FORM
H OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
THE PROPRIETORI ~
PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE X INCl
OFFICERS ARE: EXCL
7155121 (CA) 01/01/05 01/01106
7155122 (AOS) 01/01/05 01101/06
7155118 EXCLUD. CA,AOS, GA 01/01/05 01/01/06
7155119 (GA) 01/01/05 01101106
819-4168 04/01 104 04/01/05
Oil-:!;:!
B PROF. LIABILITY (E&O)
CLAIMS MADE FORM
LIMITS
GENERAL AGGREGRATE $ 2,000,000
PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000
EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000
FIRE DAMAGE (Anyone fire) $ 1,000,000
MED EXP (Anyone person) $ 5,000
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000
BODilY INJURY
(Pet person) $
BODilY INJURY $
(peraccidellt)
PROPERTY DAMAGE $
AlITO ONl Y- EA ACCIDENT $
OTHER THAN AlITO ONLY:
EACH ACCIDENT $
AGGREGATE $
EACH OCCURRENCE $
AGGREGATE $
X I we STATU- ,I I OTH- ~
TORY liMITS ER
El EACH ACCI DENT $ 1,000,000
El DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000
EL DISEASE.EACH EMPLOYEE $ 1 000 000
EACH CLAIM $1,000,000
AGGREGATE $1,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLESlSPECIAL ITEMS
RE: PROJECT NO. 57-09961035.01; CENTERliNE PROJECT NOISE REVIEW. THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, & VOLUNTEERS ARE
ADDITIONAL INSUREDS WITH RESPECT OPERATIONS PERFORMED BY OR FOR THE NAMED INSURED AS RESPECTS GENERAL LIABILITY. THIS INSURANCE IS
PRIMARY PEA POLICY FORM. SEVERABIUTYOF INTEREST/CROSS liABILITY APPLIES.
.",.",..,...".,...,...,.., ",.,
........,.".",..,...
SHOULD ANY OF THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN BE CANCEllED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION
DATE THEREOF, THE INSURER AFFORDING COVERAGE Will ENDEAVOR TO MAil 30 DAYS
WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED HEREIN, BUT FAilURE TO MAil SUCH
NOT!CE SHAll IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABiliTY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER
AFFORDING COVERAGE, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATlVES, OR THE ISSUER OF THIS
CERTIFICATE.
IcERT
- .
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
PO BOX 1988
SANTA ANA, CA 92702
JAN04'05 Arl 9:42 PU!~
. ,
.
MARSH USA INC
BY; Michio Nekota ~~L
.
12127104
~ ... .. -"\
. AI DI 0 SUR-EO ENDORS ENT
fQJU~aRmAL GJ$tmRAI. bIY!Y.IY PO~IC'{
Insurarlll8 Company. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH. PA.
ThIs endOl'llemen,t modlfles such insurance aa Is afforded by the provIsions of Policy
~ 706 -10 3 3 . relating to. the. following:.
. 1. Thel ~ of Santa Ana, 20 Civic. Center Plaza. Santa Ana. Califomla
92701; /fe offloem, employees,,811&n1s. w1unfetla and representatives are named as.
lCkIitlonallnsurecla raddltlonallntunld.") with. regald to. liability. and defense. of auits
artelno from tha clp8f'4tlonQ and UllOa porflllftlOCl by, or on behalf g( 1I1e. named Insured..
2. With. respect tel Claims. arisinG out of tha operations and usee performecl by
Dr. on. behalf: of ttl. namecllnsured, 8ucI1lnaurance. as. Is afforded by. this policy. Is
PrImary. and.1a. nelt e.ddltklnal to or c:ontllbUtlng with any other Insurance calTled by. or for
Ihla beneftt of lhei additional Insureds.
. 3. This InllUranco.llpplles. 8EIparately. to each Insured. against Whom claim Is
made. or. suit Is bl'tiUQflt except WIU\ respect to. the. company's. limits. of Ilsbnlt)'. . The
Inc:lualon of any, IPElrson or: organization as. an Insured. ahall not affect any. right ,which
BUch. pel'BOn or. cllgln1iatlon would. ha~ 8ll Ii Glalmant If. not 60. Included. .
4. W11h. /'e$pect to. the additional Insureds. thls.lnsuranca shall not be
canceUed. or rnailerlally. reduced. In covera9~ or Umlts. except after. thirty. (SO} daye written
notIca haa been' gtien tel the OIly. of Santa Ana,20. CMQ Center. Plaza, Santa Ana,
Callfomla 92701. ,
(Completion of the. fonowlng,lnclud1ng counteralgnab.lI'$.la required to make. thla
endorsement eflreotlve.) .
.
E~ April 1, 2005
PoI1cy.., 706-1033
.1It1a endorsement fonn as a part, of
"
lsauacl to.
URS CORPORATION AMERICAS. 600 MONTGOMERY ST., 25TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO
.
Named Insured.
CA 94111
Countel'&lgned. b~
ACORD", CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE Page 1 of 3 I DATE
01/04/2008
PRODUCER 877-945-7378 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
A;).001-1 (pI( ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
Willis North America. Inc. HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
26 Century Blvd. N-?DO\ - 0:2-3 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
P. o. Box 305191
Nashville, TN 372305191 ~ -;:)OD~~ INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC#
1/ 'I .- 1
INSURED ORB corporation d.b.a. URB Corporation Americas \NSUAERA: National Union Fire Ins Co of Pittsburgh 19445-100
600 Montgomery Street, 25th Floor INSURER B: American Home Assurance Company 19380-100
San Francisco, CA 94111 /\ ),-'r:-~ - :;lt~,~,-
INSURER C: Insurance Company of the State of PA 19429-100
INSUAER 0: Llovd's of London/A.P. Beazley Syndicate 15792-200
, INSURER E: Lexinnton Insurance Comnanv 19437-000
A.XJd1-0,5
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
ll~~~~! TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLlCY EFFECTlVE POLICY EXPIRATION L.lM1TS
A GENERAL l.IABIL.lTY GL197-9807 5/1/2007 5/1/2008 EACH OCCURRENCE , 1 000 000
I ~ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ~~~~~~I9E~~6~~nce\ , 1 000 000
~ CLAIMS MADE [i] OCCUR MED EXP (Anyone person) , 10 000
I ~xcu. BFPD PERSONAL & ADV INJURY , 1 000 000
I X Contractual Liabilitv GENERAL AGGREGATE , 2 000 000
I GEN'L AGG:E~ ILlMIT APnS PER: PRODUCTS - COMPIOP AGG , 2 000 000
r 'I POLICY X I ~~9; LaC
A r;lOMOBILE LlABIL.lTY CA826-2672 5/1/2007 5/1/2008 COMBINED SINGLE l.\MIT
5/1/2007 5/1/2008 (Eaacck:lent) , 2,000,000
A ~ ANY AUTO CA826-2675
B I- Al.L OWNED AUTOS CA826-2674 5/1/2007 5/1/2008 BODILY INJURY
(Per person) ,
I- SCHEDULEOAUTOS
~ HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY
,
H NON-OWNED AUTOS (Peracciclenl)
I PROPERTY DAMAGE ,
(Per accident)
I RAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONl. Y - EA ACCIDENT ,
~Y AUTO OTHER THAN EAACC ,
AUTO ONLY: AGG ,
t=JESSlUMBRELLA LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE ,
OCCUR 0 CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE ,
f-- ,
H DEDUCTIBLE ,
I RETENTION , ,
A I WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WC1593661 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 X I T'((~3n;,~', I 10J)!'
EMPl.OYERS' LIABIL.lTY
C I ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE WC1593662 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 E.L. EACH ACCIDENT , 1 000 000
A I OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? WC1593663 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 EL DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE , 1 000 000
tlyes, describe under WC1593665/WC1593666 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 000 000
C SPECIAL PROVISIONS below EL DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT , 1
D OTHER MMP 0005 5/1/2007 5/1/2008
E professional Liability 1156494 E&O 5/1/2007 5/1/2008 $1,000,000. Each Claim
w/Limited contractual - $1,000,000. Aggregate
Claims Made Polic..
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATlONSlLOCATlONSlVEHICLESlEXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/5PECIAL PROVISIONS
Re: Project# H100000368.01 Minnie/Standard Street Improvement Project Manager: Jeff Chapman
It is agreed that City of Santa Ana ie included as an Additional Insured as respects to General
Liabili ty.
COVERAGES
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
CANCELLATION
City of Santa Ana
Attn: Clerk of The City Council
20 Civic Center Plaza(M-30)
P.D.Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 92702
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXF'tRA110N
DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILLXQfft!'1!\IM[)fllMAlL ~ DAYS WRITTEN
NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LE~I!III..-,e1a'l1ll2t"YNMWIl\~'1UlL
~:II1lXa1lWllDt_~DKJaiXBMl'\llI"'Vl!l'.lI.M~'1R''Vl!I\!I~
ACORD 25 (2001108)
Co11:2216592 Tp1:728088
Willis CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE Page 2 of 3 I DATE
01/04/2008
PRODUCER 877-945-7378 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
willis North America. Inc. HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
26 century Blvd. ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
P. o. Box 305191
Nashville, TN 372305191 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC#
INSURED ORB Corporation d.h.a. ORB Corporation Americas INSURER A: National Union Pire Ins Co of Pittsburgh 19445-100
600 Montgomery Street, 25th Floor INSURER B: American Home Assurance Company 19380-100
San Francisco, CA 94111
INSURER C: Insurance Company of the State of PA 19429-100
INSURER D: Llovd's of London/A.F. Beazley Syndicate 15792-200
INSURER E: Lexinaton Insurance Company 19437-000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATtONSlLOCATlONSlVEHtcLESlEXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENTISPECIAL PROVISIONS
Co11:2216592 Tp1:728088 Cert:10157258
Page 3 of 3
IMPORT ANT
If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. A statement
on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate hoider in lieu of such endorsement(s).
If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may
require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate
holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
DISCLAIMER
The Certificate of Insurance on the reverse side of this form does not constitute a contract between
the issuing insurer(s), authorized representative or producer, and the certificate holder, nor does it
affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon.
ACORD 25 (2001108)
Coll:2216592 Tpl:728088 Cert:10157258
POLICY NUMBER: GL 197-9807
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CG20 3710 01
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR
CONTRACTORS - COMPLETED OPERATIONS
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
SCHEDULE
Name of Person or Organization:
WHERE REQUIRED BY "INSURED CONTRACT" AND AS EVIDENCED BY CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE
ON FILE WITH COMPANY
Location And Description of Completed Operations:
AS EVIDENCED BY CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE ON FILE WITH COMPANY
Additional Premium:
(If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations
as applicable to this endorsement.)
Section II _ Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the
Schedule, but only with respect to liability arising out of "your work" at the location designated and described in
the schedule of this endorsement performed for that insured and included in the "products-completed operations
hazard",
CG20371001
@ ISO Properties, Inc., 2000
Page 1 of 1
o
POLICY NUMBER: GL197-9S07
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CG 20 10 10 01
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR
CONTRACTORS - SCHEDULED PERSON OR
ORGANIZATION
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
SCHEDULE
Name of Person or Organization:
WHERE REQUIRED BY "INSURED CONTRACT" AND AS EVIDENCED BY CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE ON
FILE WITH COMPANY
(If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as
applicable to this endorsement.)
A. Section II - Who Is An Insured is
amended to include as an insured the
person or organization shown in the
Schedule, but oniy with respect to liability
arising out of your ongoing operations per-
formed for that insured.
B. With respect to the insurance afforded to
these additional insureds, the following
exclusion is added:
2. Exclusions
This insurance does not apply to "bod-
ily injury" or "property damage" occur-
ring after:
(1) All work, including materials, parts
or equipment furnished in connec-
tion with such work, on the project
(other than service, maintenance
or repairs) to be performed by or
on behalf of the additionai in-
sured(s) at the site of the covered
operations has been completed;
or
(2) That portion of "your work" out of
which the injury or damage arises
has been put to its intended use
by any person or organization
other than another contractor or
subcontractor engaged in per-
forming operations for a principal
as a part of the same project.
CG20101001
@ ISO properties, Inc., 2000
Page 1 of 1