HomeMy WebLinkAbout31A - 1261 HALLADAY STREET
../
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
~~~
ril.~} .\
~~~
~
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY:
JULY 5, 2005
TITLE:
MINOR EXCEPTION NO. 2005-05 TO
PERMIT A FENCE THAT EXCEEDS THE
FRONT YARD FENCE REQUIREMENT AT 1261
HALLADAY STREET - MARIA ZARATE,
APPLICANT
APPROVED
o As Recommended
o As Amended
o Ordinance on 151 Reading
o Ordinance on 2nd Reading
o Implementing Resolution
o Set Public Hearing For
/ -:~/ 22
I /1 /,. ./-,/ :",'
" ,// , ,
c;L.;/i [,./1:</ ~/' / < ,~'-'------
CITY MANAGER
CONTINUED TO
FILE NUMBER
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Receive and file the staff report denying Minor Exception No. 2005-05.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
On June 13, 2005, the Planning Commission denied Minor Exception No.
2005-05 by a vote of 4:2 (De La Torre and Nalle opposed, Leo absent) to
allow relief from the height requirement for a constructed front yard
wrought iron fence in the Single-Family Residential (R1) zoning district
at 1261 Halladay Street. The Planning Commission made no changes to the
recommended conditions of approval outlined in the attached staff report
(Exhibit A) .
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
( ~=l~ /
CfciyM. Trevino
~cutive Director
Planning & Building Agency
BSP:rb
bsp\staff reports\meOS-OS,cc
31A-1
REQUEST FOR
Planning Commission Action
~-~-~~"
/. ~\
i \
~~~~
,.,/ (\Uca110n 1 . --,
/;-.~-,"t; !>.(/\
..., -
, ;
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE:
JUNE 13, 2005
TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING - MINOR EXCEPTION
NO. 2005-05 TO PERMIT A FENCE THAT
EXCEEDS THE FRONT YARD FENCE
REQUIREMENT
Prepared by Bob St. Paul
~~:'2irector
RECOMMENDED ACTION
PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY
APPROVED
D As Recommended
D As Amended
D Set Public Hearing For
DENIED
D Applicant's Request
D Staff Recommendation
CONTINUED TO
~~p~~F
Adopt a resolution denying Minor Exception No. 2005-05.
Zoning Administrator Action
Referred to the Planning Commission pursuant to Santa Municipal Code
(SAMC) Section 41-641 at its May 4, 2005 meeting.
DISCUSSION
Request of Applicant
Maria Zarate is requesting approval of Minor Exception No. 2005-05 to
legalize wrought iron fencing exceeding the 36-inch maximum height for
front yard fences on non-arterial streets for the property at 1261
Halladay Street.
Property Description
The General Plan land use designation
Residential (LR-7), and is located within
zoning district. The property is located
Hickory and Cedar Streets. The proj ect
family house and an attached garage.
single-family residential homes to the
(Exhibits 1 and 2) .
EXHIBIT A
31A-2
for this site is Low Density
the Single-Family Residence (R1)
south of McFadden Street between
site is improved with a single-
The property is surrounded by
north, south, east and west
Minor Exception No. 2005-05
June 13, 2205
Page 2
Project Description
The project involves the unpermitted construction of a 48-inch high
wrought iron fence within the front yard setback. The wrought iron fence
construction includes four-inch spacing between the bars with circular
design features incorporated into the top of the fence (Exhibit 3). The
fence extends 77 feet along the north side property line, continues
approximately 47 feet along the front property line, and 25 feet along the
south property line, enclosing the front yard (Exhibit 4).
Analysis of the Issues
Section 41-610 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code requires a permit for the
construction or repair of any front yard wall or fence. The issue
pertaining to this proposal was the unpermitted construction of a 48-inch
high wrought iron fence in the front yard setback. On February 2, 2005,
the property was cited for the construction of the fence without the
benefit of a permit (Exhibit 5). The request for application RF-2005-15-
RF was denied by the Planning Division on February 15, 2005 (Exhibit 6).
Section 41-610 (a) (2) limits the maximum height to 36 inches. The
constructed fence exceeded the 36 - inch maximum height for front yard
fences on non-arterial streets. These restrictions were implemented based
on concerns related to community aesthetics and access for emergency
personnel.
At the May 4, 2005 Zoning Administrator hearing, the applicant requested
approval of the minor exception to legalize the fence at the present
height of 48 inches. The Zoning Administrator considered a height
relief of 42 inches similar to other considerations granted through
preVlOUS minor exceptions i however, the appl icant indicated that she
wanted the fence at the current height. Pursuant to SAMC 41-461, the
Zoning Administrator may continue the hearing to a scheduled meeting of
the Planning Commission if the request for a minor exception is of
magnitude as to be of special interest to the people of the City of
Santa Ana and the Planning Commission.
Although the code specifically limits maximum fence height, the minor
exception process provides an opportunity for relief from this requirement
based on demonstration of hardship. In this case, no special
circumstances exist to allow relief from the code for an increase in fence
height. In an attempt to reduce the new construction of fences that are
intrusive and detract from the character of the neighborhood, it is
recommended that the strict application of the code be applied in this
instance. Therefore, it is recommended that the Planning Commission deny
Minor Exception No. 2005-05 (Exhibit 7).
31A-3
Minor Exception No. 2005-05
June 13, 2205
Page 3
CEQA Compliance
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed
project is Statutorily Exempt. No further environmental review is needed.
Environmental Review No. 2005-31 will be filed for this project.
BSP:JM
~~
Bob St. Paul
Associate Planner I
bsp\staff reports\meOS-OS,pc
31A-4
M1
M1
iD1~. "
i
MCFADDEN
M1
~
o
z
<(
a:
(!J
M1
il M1
M1
B EDINGER AV,
C1
M1
M1
POMONA ST
R3 ~ C2 ;D 50-69
~
~
ST ANDREW PI.
50-69
M1
Al
-B
C-SM
Cl
Cl-MD
C2
C3
C3-A
C4
C5
GENERAL AGRICULTURAL
PARKING MODIFICATION
COMMERCIAL SOUTH MAIN
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
COMM, COMMERCIAUMUSEUM DISTRICT
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
CENTRAL BUSINESS
CENTRAL BUSINESS-ARTIST VILLAGE
PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER
ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL
CR
GC
Ml
M2
MO
o
P
PCD
PRD
COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL
GOVERNMENT CENTER
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
MILITARY OPERATIONS
OPEN SPACE
PROFESSIONAL
PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
1m
~...,~
ME 05-5
MS. MARIA ZARATE
1261 SOUTH HALLADAY STREET
1" = 1000 FEET
P LAN N
N G
AND BU LD
EXHIBIT 1
31A-5
N G
Rl
R2
R3
R4
RE
SD
SP
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE
MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
SUBURBAN APARTMENTS
RESIDENTIAL ESTATE
SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT
SPECIFIC PLAN
A
6V'
- = 500 FEET
AGE N C Y
....
w
w
a:
....
en
-.J
\ "l:
-
-.J
"l: \ f--
\ - ~
f-- ..
~
Cl
Lu
-
I..J
C/J
-
C/J Lu
Lu CI:
CI:
>-
>-
-.J
-.J
-
-
~ ~
"-
lJ... lJ...
Lu
Lu
-.J
-.J
~
~ ~
- '>
C/J -
C/J
>
a:
o
::.::
2
::J:
-.J -.J
"l:
f-- "l:
~ -.J
Cl
C/J ....
W
.... Lu ~ W
W a: f--
w ....
a: >- en
....
en -.J Cl Lu
Cl
"l:
lJ... C/J
Lu C/J
Lu
-.J
~ CI:
~ CI:
C/J
>- >-
-.J -.J
-.J
"l:
- ~
f-- ~
"l:
Lu "l:
Cl lJ...
lJ...
C/J
CI:
Lu
>-
-.J Lu -.J
~ ~ a: ~
c "l: <C
<C lJ... ~ C ~
..J
..J W
<C ~ 0
::J: -.J
~
~
C/J
C/J
~
~~
ME 05-5
MS. MARIA ZARATE
1261 SOUTH HALLADAY STREET
PLANNING
AND
BUILDING
AGE N C Y
EXHIBIT 2
31A-6
A
,g('
Maria Zarate
1261 Halladay St.
Santa Ana CA 97202
Tel. (714) 972-2232
Cell (714) 417-0089
Single Family Residence
Lot size 6018 square feet
Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 014-201-13
..j:::o.
00
4"
Wrougt iron
ME 05-5
~~IA!1
EXHIBIT 4
31A-8
anoSANTA
ANA PIJ. ~~l'.'U.
I; KUtDl\G
. . AGESn
PLANNING AILDING AGENCY
COMMUNITY PRESERVATION
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA {M19!
p.o. eox '1988
~!';~:!'; !,;~f\l 'if"l JiTii
(714) 667-27&0
.
NOTICE OF VIOLATION &
NOTICE T2 ~!!~'t!2 ~~~~!~ N),mU~~~
""' , ~ . _ C>z::J x______
DATE:
; ,
; !
Address!
Location 0
Da/e
Observed'
Violator Name
l2..lel
zooS-
Assessor'sPorceINumber: 014 - 2.<5 I - I:;'
tJ D.)'ublic Property
F Zone: I'- i [B Privole Pro r
o Male 0 Female
Telephone Number
Viololor Nome
Residence/Mailing
Address:
Ci:
Slate:
Zi:
YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE FOLLOWING SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS:
Use ootpennitted in zone,SAMC 41-190(01
o
A satellite dish antenna has been installed without the required Land Use
Certificate (LUC) or required Building Pennit. Satellite dish antenna must
not be visible from public view, SAMC 414B. 41-624: UBC 106.1: 10B,l
UHC 301,303 Obtain the required LLJC and Building Perinit or remove
antenna, CII11 the Planning and BuUdlng Agency ill (714) 647.5BfU for
LUC lnfornulJlon or (714) 647-5BOO for Bu/lJling Permit /nfornulJlon.
o
D
o
D
Pennitting grass/weeds to exist in excess of 6" above grade, SAMC 164B
Any accumulation of rubbish is prohibited, SAMC 164B
Landscaping not maintained (requires ground cover and water maintenance).
SAMe 41-609
D
o
o
ff
o
o
o
Trash cans remaining in public view is prohibited, SAMC 16-34
Lack of address on residence (must be 4" high, in contrasting color),
SAMC B-210(kl
Dilapidated or unsightly wall, fence or hedge. SAMC B-1951(c1
Prohibited fence height, No-Fee Pennit required. SAMC 41-610(a),{bl
Improper occupancy of mobile bomeltrailer, SAMC 10-B9
Habitation of garage/shed, dc" is prohibited, ".is 17920.3{nl
Garage must be available and accessible for the parking ofvehicle(s),
SAMC 41-1303(dl
o
o
Christmas lights or other decorative lighting must be removed, Maximum
of 90 days is pennitted for temporary lighting. NEC 305-3(61: H.iS{dl
Weather protection is required for rafter ends, facia boards, or wood trim,
Apply exterior type paint or approved coating, H.iS 17920.3{a13), {IlJ
o
Windows have been installed or changed out without Building permit and
must comply with code requirements, Building Pennit and inspection
Required, UBC 106.1: 108.1: UHC 301: 303.
o
Work without pennits, The work described below requires pennits, Obtain
penn its within _ days, Cover no work until inspected and
approved, SAMC 106.1: SAMC 8-94 CII11 the P1Imllbtg and BuildIng
Agency at (714) 647-5BOO for permlt ;nfornulJlon.
Other
o
.
(see below)
REMARKS:
fA Y\d
(1+
C .' I :, :H -r
. ) u1J ~ +\Ae ('lfi ~ J ~r 1\ tx ct..1\, +CK {.Q t'A/\ f',Q
\~ P \ o..~NU !M, ()JI? (\{ +MP.lAf l'I'itlJvd,e-.-
\
Notice is hereby given that all violations must be corrected within t, n ~121'S from the date of receipt of this notice. It is the responsibility of the
property owner and/or occupant to notifY this office when the above~~e'been completed, You have the right to request an administrative hearing
to determine the vali4ity of the violations listed and/or to show cause why you are not liable, If the violations are upheld, you will be ordered '0 abate the
nuisance and all costs of enforcement and/or abatement will be assessed and will continue to accrue untir all the violations are abated, Failure 10 abate the
violation(s) will result in the matter being referred to the City Attorney's Office for a court order to abate the nuisance and/or criminal prosecution, These
violations are a misdemeanor offense and each day that they continue constitutes a new and separate offense. In addition to this Notice of Violation, an
Administrative Citation may be issued and additional fines may be imposed, Be advised that aU interested parties and/or lien holders will be notified of this
Notice of Violation,
TAX WARNING: Anyone who derives rental income from housing determined to be substandard cannot deduct from State personal income. tax and bank
corporate income tax interest, depreciation, amortization or taxes attributable to such substandard housing, If the violation(s) specified in this notice regarding
substandard building(s) have not been brought to a condition of compliance within six (6) months from the date of this notice, notification will be sent to the
Franchise Tax Board as provided in Sections 17274 and 24436.5 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code.
SEE ATTACHED FEE SCHEDULE AND ANY OTHER DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
This notice has been mailed/posted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section] 7,] 00) of Chapter 17 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code,
NOTE: A copy of this notice will be sent to the owner(s) of record for violations occurring on private property.
Further information may be obtained by contacting the undersigned inspector(s) between the hours of ~ ' ~~W1~w3wed-satJMOn-Fri
I acknowledge receipt of a copy of this Notice: Date:
Owner{sl of Record:
~
~
r(\ C\{\ c\ 20-1" olt-.
Name(s)
12.{o I S ~C~(cUQA ~L((
Street Address I P.Q, Box
~'j (it' -hI An () (1\ cfl7 aT I q {J &>
City, State, Zip
~ [/31'1 J (})lQ3
Inspector
2_1
ID
Inspector
ME ~i~~:9~
EXHIBIT 5
ID
or (714) (010-]- .;:2.180
..
Planning and Building Agency
Planning Division
20 Civic Center Plaza
P.O. Box 1988 (M-20)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
(714) 647-5804
www.santa-ana.org
APPLICATION FOR
RESIDENTIAL FRONT
YARD FENCE PERMIT
amm~~m BmBB9a~BmBmBBEm
mmmSBB 1m mmm B\B8BSBB mmm BB Be
mmn
Property Owner: M () .-1 fA _ ?t'1. r-a-t e
Property Address: l::l C; / 1+ all o..A all sT
J
Applicant Name (Print): M (1 r I CI. -;: Q t-o-b p
Mailing Address: I) IP I ~~ 5 T ~G ~+"-
Applicant's Signature: ~ ~
PROPOSED FENCElPL.~'NTERlHEDGE IN RMATION:
f~l
Phone No.: 7/4-) Cf7 2-223Z.
AVlGL ('A 9 ?-707
Date: 0 Z-.- 17 - 6 5
Zone:
1.
2.
Height:
Material:
4 ~ - I IV C 1-,-
\AJ r ('i (), ~ h- +-
1'-01-"\
Arbor Information:
1. Height:
3. Width:
2. Depth:
Note: A Building Permit may be required in addition to the Planning Division Residential Front Yard Fence Permit.
Please contact the Building Safety Division at (714) 647-5800 for information regarding building permit requirements.
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
One (1) set of plans with the following information:
Site Plan: Fully dimensioned site plan with all property lines, all structures, dimension of
building to front property line, accurate dimensioning of the proposed front yard fence,
street names, owner's name, and address of property.
Drawing or photo of proposed front yard fence or arbor, including height, width, and
material.
STAFF USE ONLY
Arterial Street: ~ D
Non Arterial Street: [g-'
Corner Lot:
DYes IlJ..+t6
.;y) n/05: Planner:
! ~ ~ J-liA-kJ.
2nd Review: Planner.
5.h (I yYtcuy;,~ ~/1.I.
1 st Review Date:
Comments:
Inspector.
Inspector's Comments:
cm\cntr-frm\fence permit
8/0tt
EXHIBIT 6
31A-10
f-F-os--tR
OS~fc,o(P(R
o APPROVE ~DENY
FENCE PERMIT NO.
Minor Exception No. 2005-05
June 13, 2005
Page 1 of 2
Findings of Fact
A. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject
property, including size, shape, topography, location or
surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found
to deprive the subject property of privileges not otherwise at
variance with the intent and purpose of the provisions of this
chapter.
There are no special circumstances applicable to the subj ect
property where the strict interpretation of the zoning ordinance
is found to deprive the subj ect property of privileges not
otherwise at variance with the intent and purpose of the
provisions of the zoning code. This is a standard residential
lot that can construct a wrought iron fence within code
requirements.
B. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights.
The denial of this minor exception will not significantly impact
the rights of the property owner to enj oy the use of the
property. The construction of a 48-inch high wrought iron, in
and of itself, will not guarantee any greater enj oyment than
which is permitted by code.
C. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property.
The granting of a minor exception may be detrimental or
injurious to the surrounding properties due to an appearance
that is incompatible with the existing fences of the surrounding
area. Goal 2.7 of the Urban Design Element states that projects
must exhibit a functional, comfortable scale in relation to the
neighborhood. Although the fence material is compatible with
the existing residence, the proposed fence will detract from the
character of the neighborhood.
EXHIBIT 7
31A-11
Minor Exception No. 2005-05
June 13, 2005
Page 2 of 2
D. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General
Plan of the City.
The requested minor exception will adversely affect the General
Plan, as it has a negative impact on the goals and policies
expressed in that document. Goal 3.5 of the Urban Design
Element Policy Plan is to encourage residential alterations that
are consistent with the adj acent uses and responsive to the
street classification of the neighborhood. A 48-inch high
wrought iron fence is inconsistent with the non-arterial street
classification and no special circumstances exist to allow
relief from the code for an increase in fence height. A similar
fence could be constructed with the required 36-inch height and
still incorporate the proposed style of the fence.
31A-12
KO - 6/20/05
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-15
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DENYING MINOR EXCEPTION
NO. 2005-05 TO CONSTRUCT A FRONT YARD FENCE
THAT EXCEEDS THE 36-INCH MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR
THE PROPERTY AT 1261 HALLADAY STREET
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds,
determines and declares as follows:
A. Applicant is requesting approval of Minor Exception No. 2005-05 to
construct a front yard wrought iron fencing which exceeds the 36-inch
maximum height for front yard fences on non-arterial streets for the property
located at 1261 Halladay Street.
1. The project involves the construction of 48-inch high wrought iron
fence within the front yard setback.
2. The wrought iron fence construction includes four inch spacing
between the bars with circular design features incorporated into the
top of the fence.
S. Minor Exception No. 2005-05 came before the Zoning Administrator of the
City of Santa Ana for a public hearing on April 20, 2005. After conducting
the public hearing, the Zoning Administrator referred the item to the
Planning Commission pursuant to Santa Municipal Code Section 41-641.
C. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on Minor Exception No.
2005-05 on June 13, 2005.
D. Section 41-610 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code contains the wall and
fence requirements, including limiting the front yard fence height to 36
inches.
E. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-638 authorizes the Planning
Commission to grant a Minor Exception upon making certain findings
which have not been established.
1. Will the proposed use provide a service or facility which will
contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or the
community?
31A-13
Resolution No. 2005-15
Page 1 of 3
There are no special circumstances applicable to the subject
property where the strict interpretation of the zoning
ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of
privileges not otherwise at variance with the intent and
purpose of the provisions of the zoning code. This is a
standard residential lot that can construct a wrought iron
fence within code requirements.
2. That the granting of a minor exception is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property
rights.
The denial of this minor exception will not significantly impact
the rights of the property owner to enjoy the use of the
property. The construction of a 48-inch high wrought iron, in
and of itself, will not guarantee any greater enjoyment than
which is permitted by code.
3. That the granting of a minor exception will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding
property.
The granting of a minor exception may be detrimental or
injurious to the surrounding properties due to an appearance
that is incompatible with the existing fences of the
surrounding area. Goal 2.7 of the Urban Design Element
states that projects must exhibit a functional, comfortable
scale in relation to the neighborhood. Although the fence
material is compatible with the existing residence, the
proposed fence will detract from the character of the
neighborhood.
4. That the granting of a minor exception will not adversely affect the
General Plan of the City.
The requested minor exception will adversely affect the
General Plan, as it has a negative impact on the goals and
policies expressed in that document. Goal 3.5 of the Urban
Design Element Policy Plan is to encourage residential
alterations that are consistent with the adjacent uses and
responsive to the street classification of the neighborhood.
A 48-inch high wrought iron fence is inconsistent with the
non-arterial street classification and no special
circumstances exist to allow relief from the code for an
increase in fence height. A similar fence could be
constructed with the required 36-inch height and still
incorporate the proposed style of the fence.
31A-14
Resolution No. 2005-15
Page 2 of 3
F. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed
project is Statutorily Exempt. No further environmental review is needed.
Environmental Review No. 2005-31 will be filed for this project.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana after conducting
the public hearing hereby denies Minor Exception No. 2005-05. This decision is based
upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid hearing, which includes but not is not
limited to: the Request for Planning Commission Action dated June 13, 2005, and
exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein
by this reference.
ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Cribb, Gartner, Lutz, Mondo (4)
NOES: Commissioners: De La Torre, Nalle (2)
ABSENT: Commissioners: Leo (1)
ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: None (0)
Glenn Mondo
Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney
By:
Kylee O. Otto
Assistant City Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, MARTHA RAMIREZ, Clerk of the Planning Commission, do hereby attest to and
certify the attached Resolution No. 2005-15 to be the original resolution adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on June 13, 2005.
Date:
Clerk of the Planning Commission
City of Santa Ana
31A-15
Resolution No. 2005-15
Page 3 of3
31A-16