HomeMy WebLinkAbout23B - BID REJECTION EL SALVADOR CENTER
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
~
~
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY:
NOVEMBER 7, 2005
TITLE:
APPROVED
REJECTION OF BIDS FOR EL
SALVADOR CENTER RENOVATON AND
PARK IMPROVEMENTS (PROJECTS
04-6375, 04-7709, AND 05-
7806)
D As Recommended
D As Amended
D Ordinance on 1" Reading
D Ordinance on 2'" Reading
D Implementing Resolution
D Set Public Hearing For
CONTINUED TO
.{..
CITY MANAGER
FILE NUMBER
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Reject all bids submitted for the El Salvador Center Renovation and Park
Improvement Projects.
DISCUSSION
These projects will renovate the existing recreation center building and
the courtyard at El Salvador Park (Exhibit 1). Improvements include re-
roofing, air-conditioning and electrical system upgrades, restroom
upgrades to meet Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements and
renovating the existing cultural arts room. This project will also
install a new wrought iron fence, replace the existing pavement with new
concrete and construct a new storage building/trash enclosure. Once
completed, the project will enhance recreational opportunities for
children in adjacent neighborhoods.
The Notice Inviting Bids was advertised on August 22 & 24, 2005 and bids
were opened on September 27, 2005. A summary of the bid invitations
mailed, received, and results follows.
Santa Ana Contractors receiving notices 11
Contractors requesting bidding documents: 10
Bids received: 4
Bids received from Santa Ana Contractors: 1
A total of four bids were received and were non-responsive. Sturgeon
General, Inc. (SGI) submitted an incomplete bid. SGI did not submit a
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goal as required by the bidding
documents. Faris Construction failed to notarize the bidder's signature
on the bid bond as required by the bidding document and failed to meet
the proj ect DBE goal. Hondo Company, Inc. submitted an incomplete bid
23B-1
Rejection of Bids for El Salvador Center Renovation
and Park Improvements.
November 7, 2005
Page 2
package. Lastly, Great West Contractors, Inc. also submitted an
incomplete bid that did not include the bid schedule and the total sum of
the bid. In addition to being non-responsive, these bids also exceeded
the engineer's estimate. Based on the above, staff recommends that all
bids be rejected. Following Council action, staff will review the scope
of the project and re-advertise for bids.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
~~
James G. ](oss
Executive Director
Public Works Agency
~7>~
Pwa_f_serv\Engineering\Construction\RFCA\04-6375 reject and re-adv 2005-11-07 120 WD
23B-2
PROJECT AREAS:
1JB=J
t=B EB
10TH BTIlEET
Iii
tjg i
=1 Bjmc~PI:~ rro
EXHIBIT 1
SANTA ANA
~ , CITY COUNCIL
P W A AGENDA DATE'
, , NOVEMBER 7, 2005
Title'
REJECTION OF BIDS FOR
EL SALVADOR CENTER
RENOVATION AND PARK IMPROVMENTS
P\B.(IIORI;SA&EN:T
23B-3
~
"TB
23B-4