Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING CENTER, THE 2• AGREEMENT TERMINATION Please complete this form when the attached agreement is no longer in effect �M_ Return form to the Sr. Deputy Clerk of the Council (M-30). Call 647-5238 ifl�e, any A rM VA questions. ------------ - - - - -- - ----------------- y The agreement with., L�\`���CVICx was completed on gzo %l O ,y , and final payment has been made. Revised 8-7-03 Department: Date: Z City of Santa Ana Clerk of the Council N, A-2006-317 [ �7 �AiE"2.ai 07 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT ?AGO THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 41h day of December, 2006 by and (T ZEi between The Planning Center, a California corporation (hereinafter "Consultant"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter "City"). RECITALS A. The City desires to retain a consultant having special skill and knowledge in the field of environmental studies. B. Consultant represents that Consultant is able and willing to provide such services to the City. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant shall prepare an Environmental Impact Report and related technical studies for the Village Green mixed -use residential development, as set forth in Consultant's Proposal dated November 14, 2006, attached as Exhibit A to this Agreement. 2. COMPENSATION a. City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services, the rates and charges identified in Exhibit B. The total sum to be expended under this Agreement shall not exceed $245,000.00 during the term of this Agreement. b. Payment by City shall be made within thirty (30) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals which may reasonably be expected by City. 3. DELIVERY OF WORK PRODUCT Consultant shall deliver to City all work product resulting from the services provided. Said work product shall be submitted in a hard copy and produced in a form compatible with City's computer system, as agreed between the Project Manager and Consultant. In regard to copyrightable material produced as a deliverable under this Agreement, including but not limited to books, reports, plans, photographs, drawings, Consultant agrees, for itself and all of it's affected officers, employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors and representatives that (a) other such material may not be copyrighted without prior review from the City, and (b) the authors of all such material, whether copyrighted or not, award to the City, and to its officers, agents and employees acting within the scope of their official duties, as a condition of payment to the Consultant, a royalty -free, nonexclusive, irrevocable license throughout the world for governmental purposes to disclose, publish, translate, reproduce, and use such materials. 4. TERM This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and terminate on City's acceptance of the final EIR, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 13, below. The term of this Agreement may be extended upon a writing executed by the Executive Director of Planning and Building and the City Attorney. 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 6. INSURANCE Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below: a. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance naming the City, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives as additional insured(s) and shall include, but not be limited to protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom and damage to property, resulting from any act or occurrence arising out of Consultant's operations in the performance of this Agreement, including, without limitation, acts involving vehicles. The amounts of insurance shall be not less than the following: single limit coverage applying to bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and property damage, in the total amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence. Consultant shall supply City with a fully executed additional insured endorsement in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit C upon execution of this Agreement and shall be approved in form by the City Counsel. b. Business automobile liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and non -owned automobiles. c. Worker's Compensation Insurance. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3300 of the Labor Code, Consultant, if Consultant has any employees, is required to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self-insurance. Prior to commencing the performance of the work under this Agreement, Consultant agrees to obtain and maintain any employer's liability insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000 per accident. d. Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per claim. e. The following requirements apply to the insurance to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this section: (i) Consultant shall maintain all insurance required above in full force and effect for the entire period covered by this Agreement. (ii) Certificates of insurance shall be furnished to the City upon execution of this Agreement and shall be approved in form by the City Counsel. (iii) Certificates and policies shall state that the policies shall not be canceled or reduced in coverage or changed in any other material aspect without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. f. If Consultant fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section or fails or refuses to furnish the City with required proof that insurance has been procured and is in force and paid for, the City shall have the right, at the City's election, to forthwith terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not effect Consultant's right to be paid for its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. Consultant waives the right to receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the City for any work performed prior to approval of insurance by the City. INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, consultants, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including health, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of the Consultant or its contractors, subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on their behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. 8. CONFIDENTIALITY If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City. 9. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement. 10. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by telefacsimile or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 telefacsimile (714) 647-6956 With courtesy copies to: Planning and Building Agency and City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-20) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 telefacsimile (714) 973-1461 City Attorney City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-29) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 telefacsimile (714) 647-6515 To Consultant: The Planning Center 1580 Metro Drive Costa Mesa, California 92626 telefacsimile (714) 966-9221 Attn: Rachel Struglia A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by telefacsimile, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 11. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant nor the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party which are not embodied herein. 12. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other consultants retained by City. 13. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. 14. DISCRIMINATION Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 15. JURISDICTION - VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 16. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 17. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature hereinbelow has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST' r r PATRICIA E. HEAL Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOSEPH W.FLETCHER City Attorney By: Lau heedy Assistant City Attorney CITY OF SANTA ANA DAVID N. REA City Manager THE PLANNING CENTER Tax ID # EXHIBIT C ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY Insurance Company This endorsement modifies such insurance as is afforded by the provisions of Policy # relating to the following: 1. The City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92701; its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives are named as additional insureds ("additional insureds") with regard to liability and defense of suits arising from the operations and uses performed by or on behalf of the named insured. 2. With respect to claims arising out of the operations and uses performed by or on behalf of the named insured, such insurance as is afforded by this policy is primary and is not additional to or contributing with any other insurance carried by or for the benefit of the additional insureds. 3. This insurance applies separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the company's limits of liability. The inclusion of any person or organization as an insured shall not affect any right which such person or organization would have as a claimant if not so included. 4. With respect to the additional insureds, this insurance shall not be cancelled, or materially reduced in coverage or limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been given to the City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92701. (Completion of the following, including countersignature, is required to make this endorsement effective.) Effective Policy # _ Issued to this endorsement form as a part of Named Insured Countersigned by Authorized Representative aconia CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE OP ID PLANN-1 DATE(MMIDDYYYY) 07/07/06 PRODUCER Austin Cooper 6 Price Ins Agency Inc (Lic-0546677) Box 3280 _, Bernardino CA 92413-3280 Phone: 909-886-9861 Fax:909-886-2013 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED Planning Center Inc 1580 Metro Drive Costa Mesa CA 92626 INSURER A: National Fire Ins Co (CNA) INSURERS: Praetoriam Ins Co (KRM) INSURER C: Valley Forge Ins CO (CNA) INSURER D: wastchester Surplus Lines (Len INSURER E. COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. LTR NSR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE(MMODPOUCVrFFECrM) MIFUVA DATE MM% DM LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 PREMISES(Ea occurence) $1,000,000 A X X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY 2090701722 07/01/06 07/01/07 MED EXP (Any one person) $ 10 , 000 CLAIMS MADE OCCUR PERSONAL &ADV INJURY $1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS - COMPIOP AGG $2,000,000 POLICY PRO JECT LOG C AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO BUA2088127377 07/01/06 07/01/07 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) $1,000,000 X BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS PROPERTYDAMAGE (Per accident) $ GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ OTHER THAN EA ACC AUTO ONLY: AGG $ ANY AUTO IS EXCESS MSRELLA LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $4,000,000 A X OCCUR �CLAIMSMADE 2088126939 07/01/06 07/01/07 AGGREGATE $4,000,000 $ DEDUCTIBLE $ X RETENTION $ 10 , 000 WORKERS COMPENSATION AND X TORY LIMITS ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000 B EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? 01KR0033085 07/01/06 07/01/07 E.L. DISEASE- EA EMPLOYEE $1,000,000 if yes, describeunder SPECAL PROVISIONS below E. L. DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT $1 000, 000 r OTHER A Property 2090701722 07/01/06 07/01/07 Prof $1,000,000 D Prof/Pollution IG22067291002 Pollution $1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES I EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT SPECIAL PROVISIONS Operations pertaining to named insured for certholder. Certholder its officers, agents, employees and volunteers are add'l insd as respects gen'l liab per SB146968A 01/06, as required by written contract. 30 day N O C except 10 day for nonpayment. CARRIER WILL NOT MODIFY CANCELLATION CLAUSE/NO XXX OUT. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20 Santa Ana CA 92701 CITYSAO I SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER ITS AGENTS OR PV 988 SB146968A 0106 Page 1 of 2 IMPORTANT: THIS ENDORSEMENT CONTAINS DUTIES THAT APPLY TO THE ADDITIONAL INSURED IN THE EVENT OF OCCURRENCE, OFFENSE, CLAIM OR SUIT. SEE PARAGRAPH C., OF THIS ENDORSEMENT FOR THESE DUTIES. THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT WITH PRODUCTS -COMPLETED OPERATIONS COVERAGE BLANKET WAIVER OF SUBROGATION Architects, Engineers and Surveyors This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: BUSINESSOWNERS LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM BUSINESSOWNERS COMMON POLICY CONDITIONS A. WHO IS AN INSURED (Section C.) of the Businessowners Liability Coverage Form is amended to include as an insured any person or organization whom you are required to add as an additional insured on this policy under a written contract or written agreement; but the written contract or written agreement must be: 1. Currently in effect or becoming effective during the term of this policy, and 2. Executed prior to the "bodily injury," "property damage," or "personal and advertising injury." B. The insurance provided to the additional insured is limited as follows: 1. That person or organization is an additional insured solely for liability due to your negligence specifically resulting from "your work" for the additional insured which is the subject of the written contract or written agreement. No coverage applies to liability resulting from the sole negligence of the additional insured. 2. The Limits of Insurance applicable to the additional insured are those specified in the written contract or written agreement or in the Declarations of this policy, whichever is less. These Limits of Insurance are inclusive of, and not in addition to, the Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations. 3. The coverage provided to the additional insured within this endorsement and section titled LIABILITY AND MEDICAL EXPENSE DEFINITIONS — "Insured Contract" (Section F.9.) within the Businessowners Liability Coverage Form, does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" arising out of the "products -completed operations hazard" unless required by the written contract or written agreement. 4. The insurance provided to the additional insured does not apply to "bodily injury," "property damage," "personal and advertising injury" arising out of an architect's, engineer's, or surveyor's rendering of or failure to render any professional services including: a. The preparing, approving, or failing to prepare or approve maps, shop drawings, opinions, reports, surveys, field orders, change orders or drawings and specifications by any architect, engineer or surveyor performing services on a project of which you serve as construction manager, or b. Inspection, supervision, quality control, engineering or architectural services done by you on a project of which you serve as construction manager. 5. This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury," "property damage," or "personal and advertising injury" arising out of: a. The construction or demolition work while you are acting as a construction or demolition contractor. This exclusion does not apply to work done for or by you at your premises. C. BUSINESSOWNERS GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS — Duties In The Event of Occurrence, Offense, Claim or Suit (Section E.2.) of the Businessowners Liability Coverage Form is amended to add the following: An additional insured under this endorsement will as soon as practicable: 1. Give written notice of an occurrence or an offense to us which may result in a claim or "suit" under this httiD://fominet-ci,cna.corfi/ni)ohtni/scna5359.htm 7/7/2006 SB146968A 0106 Page 2 of 2 insurance; 2. Tender the defense and indemnity of any claim or "suit" to us for a loss we cover under this Coverage Part; 3. Tender the defense and indemnity of any claim or "suit" to any other insurer which also has insurance for a toss we cover under this Coverage Part; and 4. Agree to make available any other insurance which the additional insured has for a loss we cover under this Coverage Part. We have no duty to defend or indemnify an additional insured under this endorsement until we receive written notice of a claim or "suit" from the additional insured. D. OTHER INSURANCE (Section H. 2. & 3.) of the Businessowners Common Policy Conditions are deleted and replaced with the following: 2. This insurance is excess over any other insurance naming the additional insured as an insured whether primary, excess, contingent or on any other basis unless a written contract or written agreement specifically requires that this insurance be either primary or primary and noncontributing to the additional insured's own coverage. This insurance is excess over any other insurance to which the additional insured has been added as an additional insured by endorsement. 3. When this insurance is excess, we will have no duty under Coverages A or B to defend the additional insured against any "suit" if any other insurer has a duty to defend the additional insured against that "suit" If no other insurer defends, we will undertake to do so, but we will be entitled to the additional insured's rights against all those other insurers. When this insurance is excess over other insurance, we will pay only our share of the amount of the loss, if any, that exceeds the sum of: (a) The total amount that all such other insurance would pay for the loss in the absence of this insurance; and (b) The total of all deductible and self -insured amounts under all that other insurance. We will share the remaining loss, if any, with any other insurance that is not described in this Excess Insurance provision and was not bought specifically to apply in excess of the Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations of this Coverage Part. E. TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US (Section K.2.) of the Businessowners Common Policy Conditions is deleted and replaced with the following: 2. We waive any right of recovery we may have against any person or organization against whom you have agreed to waive such right of recovery in a written contract or agreement because of payments we make for injury or damage arising out of your ongoing operations or "your work" done under a contract with that person or organization and included within the "products -completed operations hazard." http://fo=et-ci.cna.com/nDohtrn/scna5359.htm 7/7/2006 lf-JON THE N PLANNING November 14, 2006 Ms. Ann Ni CITY OF SANTA ANA Planning and Building Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza, Ross Annex M-20 P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Governmental Services Planning & Urban Design Environmental Studies School Facilities Planning 1580 Metro Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Phone: 714.966.9220 Fax: 714.966.9221 www.planningcenter.com Subject: Proposal to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Village Green Mixed Use Residential Community, City of Santa Ana, California We look forward to working with the City that constitutes "Orange County's downtown." Because you are the County's government and administrative center, one of the County's first cities, and are centrally located, you are faced with many exciting and challenging planning opportunities that we look forward to being a part of. The Planning Center staff has extensive experience with controversial residential developments having prepared numerous environmental documents, each with particular issues, physical constraints, and community concerns similar to those facing the development of the Village Green project. Key staff and resources are proposed for this project. Dwayne Mears, Principal -in -Charge, will act as a Senior Advisor on this project, providing input as needed. JoAnn Hadfield will serve as Co -Project Manager with Rachel Struglia. JoAnn's 25 years of experience in project management on many large controversial EIRs combined with Rachel's familiarity with issues of infill development, create a strong project management team for this project. This proposal shall remain valid for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of submittal. We look forward to working with the City of Santa Ana to bring about the successful completion of the Village Green EIR. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this proposal, please feel free to call me at (714) 966-9220 or e-mail me at rstrugli@planningcenter.com. Respectfully submitted, THE PLANNING CENTER Rachea, PhD, CP Associate Director, Environmental Services Enclosures EXHIE31T Proposal Environmental Impact Report for the Village Green Mixed Use Residential Community submitted by: r&nTHE CPLANNING OCENTER www.planningcenter.com COSTA MESA 1580 Metro Drive I Costa Mesa, CA 92626 1714.966.9220 Contact: JoAnn C. Hadfield Contact: Rachel Struglia, PhD, AICP Director, Environmental Services Associate Director, Environmental Services E-mail:jhadfeld@planningcenteccom E-mail:rtruglia@planningcenteccmm with: FUSCOE ENGINEERING, INC. DISCOVERY WORKS, INC. NOVEMBER 14, 2006 1. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING R 1. Project Understanding the reQuest of the City of Santa Ana, The Planning Center is pleased to respond with a scope of work and cost estimate for a At 380-unit mixed use residential development at 2833 North Bristol Street in Santa Ana. The project is already developed with multifamily and commercial entities and is surrounded by residential, commercial and park uses. The project applicant is Sun Cal -Heritage Village, LLC. The proposed project will reQuire a Tentative Tract Map, a zone change to create a new specific development district, a general plan amendment and a development agreement. Due to the size and scale of the project as well as the fact that demolition of existing buildings will be reQuired, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is needed to address potentially significant impacts associated with the "The, 5ukea a n+ EIK was wr,ll— project. conS+rociad, raSaar�hod, coordinaiu! We understand that the applicant has already conducted the following and reflc�fod We'll on the Gt� a5 studies that would be available for use in the EIR analysis: +he. 'Fmpamr' of -Mir, aloarmon+ " —Pam Davis, AICP • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment - Senior City of Irvine . Geotechnical Study • Hydrology Study The Planning Center is prepared to provide the following technical analyses in support of the EIR. These studies are included in this scope of work: • Air Quality Analysis • Cultural Resources Records Check • Noise Analysis • Shade and Shadow AnalysisNisual Simulations • Water Quality Analysis and Hydrology Report Peer Review Environmental Impact Report for the Village Green Mixed Use Residential Community THE PLANNING CENTER I Page 1-1 2. Methodology and Scope of Work he Environmental Impact Report'(EIR) will be prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act "The, walifrl of work iS ezc4rrf.. (CEQA), State CEQA Guidelines, and City of Santa Ana CEQA The, knowle r of en✓ironm"fal Guidelines. The proposed contents of the EIR and the methodology for law and Procedures IS rwidutt its preparation are described in the following pages: This knowlede� iS eSSe,nt al when de,alin$.wifh land esG Preparation of the EIR iSSve,S and The, Planning Gonfer Task 1: Initial Study/Notice of Preparation Sfaff iS wall vrwSe, in fha laws. If *hero was a gVe, 'ion re?rdinaa Brief written responses will be prepared for all items included on the law, Plannin5-6enfer staff did no* City's standard Initial Study checklist. Each response will explain the heSifafe io reSaarch issvaS in the basis for the No Impact, Less Than Significant Impact, Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation, or Potentially Significant sfafufe,S. That is a $nod thin " Impact response and will clearly indicate why a particular issue would not —Mr. Ken Miller result in a significant impact and does not require further evaluation, as Director of Facilities Planning Rialto Unified School District y well as those issues that require further anal sis in an EIR in order to fully determine the extent and significance of potential impacts and to identify mitigation measures that could avoid or reduce such impacts to a level of less than significant. Given the City's decision to prepare an EIR for the proposed project, it is assumed for the purpose of this proposal that checklist responses will consist mainly of short statements that lead to further analysis to be prepared within the EIR. A complete list of reference sources used to prepare the Initial Study will be provided. A Notice of Preparation (NOP) will be prepared, using the City's standard form. A copy of the Initial Study will be attached to provide an immediate explanation of the preliminary scope of issues to be included in the EIR. After City approval of the NOP, The Planning Center will copy and distribute the NOP via certified mail to state and local agencies, surrounding property owners and other special interest groups or individuals identified by the City. It is assumed that the City will Environmental Impact Report for the Village Green Mixed Use Residential Community THE PLANNING CENTER I Page 2-1 provide addresses of surrounding property owners and residents , selected to receive copies of the NOP. A brief cover letter will be prepared to explain the purpose and content of the NOP and to clearly identify the time period, contact person, and address established for submitting responses. Products: "f%Xoollcnt mport and follow-up. Draft IS/NOP (3 review copies plus digital copy) 'this is cXa�tlry how this Prow -SS • Final IS/NOP (So copies to and one reproducible original and digital Should work. and fha..fcam iS fo bt Copy) commemalrO &mat micro -focus wifh local conccrn. Thanks fa fhc Task 2: Public Scoping Meeting tnfirt 1-5 Tcam...Iou art th-- modcl The Planning Center will assist the City in organizing and conducting for how fo makc this all worm for one public scoping meeting (with Responsible Agencies and the general our commvnificS!" public) to present the main characteristics of the proposal and to solicit —Fred Latham, City Manager comments regarding the scope and content of the environmental issues City of Santa Fe Springs to be addressed in the EIR. Pre -meeting assistance will include scheduling the meeting, preparing public notices and agendas for City staff review, and mailing and publishing the final notices. At the meeting, we will be prepared to discuss the environmental review process and to answer specific Questions, as desired by the City. If reQuested, we will also prepare informational items to be distributed at the meeting, such as: • Flowchart defining the entire environmental review process, highlighting opportunities for public input; • Selected reduced -sized copies of applicant's master plan exhibits and textual summary of project characteristics; • Questionnaire designed to obtain focused responses to identify environmental concerns It is assumed that the scoping meeting will be held early in the 30-day public review period. Products: • Scoping meeting (1) attended by up to 2 Environmental Consultant members • Scoping meeting agendas and minutes Page 2-2 Proposal to the City of Santa Ana 3DOLDGY i scnpF nF wnp Task 3: SB 18 Consultation Senate Bill 18's implementation into law, effective March 1, 200S, places new rectuirements on cities to consult with Native American tribes when a General Plan Amendment is reQuired. The first task is to submit an "SB 18 tribal consultation list" reQuest to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento. This list can vary slightly from other lists provided by the NAHC. The NAHC has 30 days to respond with a list of tribes to contact for consultation. If the City has already reQuested this list, the City can then proceed with a reQuest for consultation with each tribe, which should be sent by formal letter via return receipt and with a follow-up call from a City Department Director/Head. (We have examples of this letter that we can provide to the City). Once the tribes receive the City's reQuest, each tribe has up to 90 days to respond. We envision the tasks for compliance with SB 18 as follows: Task 3.1: Tribal Consultation List Request Send tribal consultation list reQuest to the NAHC on behalf of the City The following Tasks are only necessary if meetings are reQuested by the tribes. Therefore, they are included in the scope and budget, but will be performed only at the reQuest of the City: Optional Task 3.2: Initial Face -to -Face Consultation (Meeting 1) • If NAHC response includes tribes responding to the reQuest for consultation, assist the City in setting up initial face-to-face consultation with City staff and tribal representatives (Meeting I ) - • Preparation for and attendance at Meeting I (assumes attendance by a Director of Environmental Services/Environmental Project Manager) Optional Task 3.3: Meeting 2 • Incorporate comments into map/plan document/EIR from Meeting I (Assumes 4 hours) • Assist in setting up second meeting with City staff and tribal representatives (Meeting 2 or Tribe 2) • Preparation for and attendance at Meeting 2 (assumes attendance by a Director of Environmental Services/Environmental Project Manager) Environmental Impact Report for the Village Green Mixed Use Residential Community THE PLANNING CENTER I Page 2-3 Optional Task 3.4 Continuing Consultation and Final Revisions In our experience with tribal consultation, the reQuirements of SB 18 can usually be met in one, and at most, two meetings per tribe. This scope of work and budget assumes a maximum of two meetings. Any additional meetings would be attended on a time -and -materials basis. Task 4: Screencheck Draft EIR Task 4.1: General Information Introduction This section is intended as a convenience to the reader who is not familiar with CEQA, EIRs or the environmental review process. The purpose and standards of adeQuacy for an EIR will be defined. A discussion the environmental review process for this project will be presented. Characteristics of an EIR and the reasons for preparing an EIR for this project will be described, and the intended use of this document as the master environmental clearance for the proposed project. Executive Summary "Thi6 is one, of fhe, ie4t draff This section will consist of a concise summary of the information presented in the main body of the EIR. This will include (a) a brief roPortS that I have, had the, I lug project description; (b) a tabular summary of findings regarding project Of rcvie,win�-over fhe, Past four and cumulative impacts, mitigation measures and any unavoidable, rlcarS—a mode,) mport in e-Vew l significant impacts; (c) a summary of discretionary approvals reQuired for scnse,. It is we,ll—wriitrrt and has the project: (d) a brief description of the alternatives considered, noting obvioudl alre,aell be,e,n vorrl wall which one was considered the environmentally superior alternative; and Proofu," (e) areas of controversy and issues to be resolved. —Paul Hughes Project Description Environmental Services, Inc The project applicant will be identified, along with a statement of project objectives. Specific characteristics of the project will be defined, including the proposed tentative tract map, zone change, general plan amendment and development agreement. Rectuired discretionary approvals and anticipated uses of the EIR will be identified. Illustrations will include regional and site location maps, and the proposed land use plan. Environmental Setting A general description of the regional and local setting will be provided to establish the environmental and planning context within which this project occurs. In addition to physical characteristics that comprise the Page 2-4 Proposal to the City of Santa Ana 2. METHODOLOGY i SCOPE OF WORK environmental setting, relevant regional and local planning programs will be discussed to establish whether this project is consistent or inconsistent with applicable planning policies and programs. More detailed descriptions of existing conditions and pertinent policies will be provided, where appropriate, as part of the discussions under each of the specific impact topics in the main body of the EIR. Surrounding land uses will be identified on a vicinity map. Based on information readily available from the City of Santa Ana, development trends occurring in this general area will be described, and any other major development projects planned or proposed in the vicinity will be highlighted. Planned, pending and approved/not built projects throughout Santa Ana will be listed and total development by land use category will be Quantified. Other relevant projects such as infrastructure improvements or community facilities which could have a direct effect upon this project or local growth trends, and which are planned to occur during the time frame of the proposed project, will also be identified. Task 4.2: Discussion of Existing Conditions, Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Each topical section of the document will: (a) describe existing environmental conditions and pertinent regulatory policies and programs that apply to this project, (b) define the criteria by which impacts will be determined to be significant, (c) determine the environmental changes that would result from the project, (d) evaluate the significance of those changes with respect to the impact significance criteria, (e) define mitigation measures to reduce or avoid all potentially significant adverse impacts, and (0 provide a conclusion as to whether significant impacts would remain, even after successful implementation of recommended . mitigation measures. The EIR will be clearly written and will avoid the use of technical jargon so that the document is easily understood. If technical terms need to be introduced for accuracy, they will be clearly defined. The analysis of issues will be thorough,yet concise. Practical and feasible mitigation measures will be formulated which relate directly to the primary and secondary effects identified in the impact sections of the document. Analytical approaches to each of the EIR topics that we anticipate needing to analyze are described in the following pages. Aesthetics/Visual Impact/Shade and Shadow Analysis The proposed project increases the density of the residential uses allowed in the area and allows building heights up to 35 feet adjacent to existing residential uses. As a result, The Planning Center will perform Environmental Impact Report for the Village Green Mixed Use Residential Community THE PLANNING CENTER I Page 2-5 the following tasks to determine potential aesthetic and lighting impacts associated with the project: A -- X Conduct a shade/shadow analysis to define the portions of the area that could be impacted by adjacent land uses. Scaled information from the architectural drawings will be translated into a simplified three- dimensional computer model. This model will be placed on the precise site, per specific GPS coordinates, and the desired date and time of day will be input to generate an image that will show the expected shadow caused by the proposed structure. A series of 10 images will be created to show the shadows produced at various times and on various dates. The Planning Center reviewed the . Architectural visualizations, or view simulations, will be created for shadow analysis contained in the EIR further visual information about the proposed project. A maximum prepared for this Santa Monica project. of four visual simulations will be prepared. The elevation drawings Our analysis found that the EIR for the project will be incorporated into actual site photographs. overstated the impact of the shadows Additional "environment" will be added in terms of landscape, cast by this multistory project by ignoring shadows already cast by streetscape, and appropriate human activities. existing buildings and by not excluding . Document pertinent Santa Ana General Plan policies as they relate areas that are not sensitive to shade, to the proposed project zoning. such as parking lots, streets, and commercial areas. Our critique resulted . Review the allowable building heights in relation to existing and in a change in the EIR's conclusion proposed uses and adjacent roadways. regarding the significance of the buildings'shadows. . Discuss any potentially significant aesthetic impacts associated with project implementation. • Specify mitigation measures that will reduce significant impacts to the maximum extent feasible. Measures could include landscaping, setbacks, height limits, or shielding of proposed lighting to reduce the visual impact of the project. It is assumed that the City will provide the following materials reQ-uired for the shade/shadow analysis and visual simulations: • Scaled architectural renderings • Roof plan • Elevations (preferably in color) • Site plan • Landscape plan Page 2-6 Proposal to the City of Santa Ana 2. METHODOLOGY i SCOPE OF WORK CPS coordinates for the project Times and dates for which the City would like to see shadows generated Air Quality Tin Cheung, a Senior Environmental Scientist, is a specialist in the preparation of air Quality and noise studies for the firm. He will prepare an air Quality study for the proposed project. The results, findings and recommendations will be incorporated into the EIR, and the study will be included in its entirety as an appendix. The proposed project will have the potential to generate air pollution from the demolition, construction, and operational phases. Demolition could generate air Quality impacts if any of the buildings contain asbestos. If asbestos is present, hazardous materials procedures are reQuired in order to reduce potential impacts. The construction phase will generate air pollutants from construction vehicles, including fugitive dust and pollutants that contribute to smog. The operational phase will include emissions from project -related vehicles and from energy consumption by the proposed residences. The following information will be included in the EIR: • Describe the environmental setting, which will include local meteorology and air pollution monitoring data provided by the California Air Resources Board. • Use computer modeling to Quantify project -related construction emissions using procedures approved by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). • Conduct an inventory of regional emissions for the project using the SCAQMD's approved URBEMIS2002 computer model. This model will be used to calculate the mobile and stationary sources of emissions that occur during the operational phase of the project. • Evaluate the potential for any microscale air pollution "hot spot" formation at the four most congested project area intersections, using the CALINE4 line source dispersion model. • 'Discuss project consistency with the Air, Quality Management Plan in terms of land use planning consistency. • Identify any potentially applicable mitigation measures, including any relevant transportation control measures incorporated into the South Coast Air Basin portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). tnvironmental Impact Report for the Village Green Mixed Use Residential Community THE PLANNING CENTER I Page 2-7 I • Discuss the potential effects on air Quality of cumulative development in the area. • Compare air Quality impacts of alternatives to those of the proposed project. Cultural Resources Even though the site is developed, Discovery Works will conduct an archaeological and paleontological resources archival review, which will be used for the EIR and to assist in tribal consultation. The proposed project is subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, but not our understanding is that none of the buildings would reQuire review under the National Historic Preservation Act, Section 106. Discovery Works will provide the following services to comply with CEQA historical resources reQuirements and professional standards. M Discovery Works will conduct a records review at the archives of the state -designated, regional center for archaeological records, the South Central Coastal Information Center, located at the Anthropology Department, California State University, Fullerton. For this archival research, will: (1) determine if parts, or all, of the project area have been surveyed: (2) evaluate any previous archaeological surveys in relationship to current professional j standard reQuirements; (3) obtain copies of pertinent site records and survey reports of the immediate vicinity; and (4) determine what types of sites might be expected to occur within the proposed project, based on the existing data from archaeological sites located within two kilometers of the project. Discovery Works also will contact the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County to conduct a paleontological records review for fossil sensitivity of this project site. The Vertebrate Paleontology Department of the Natural History Museum maintains the records for fossil localities in Orange County. The purpose of this research is to obtain the background information necessary for an initial identification of issues: to develop Preservation and mitigation strategies; to provide an inventory of all recorded archaeological and paleontological resources: to identify areas that have not been surveyed for these resources; and to identify areas that may have a high potential for buried prehistoric archaeological remains and for paleontological resources. A brief letter report for the project will be prepared at the conclusion of the archival research. The letter report will include: ( I ) Page 2-8 rFUPUsJi w UIC i Ity U1 11- 2. METHODOLOGY I SCOPE OF WORK the results of the record search; (2) the results of the background research and documentation; (3) an inventory of known resources; (4) an analysis of potential impacts to the prehistoric, historic, and paleontological resources within the project, and (5) recommendations for further study or a field survey, is needed. It is Discovery Works' understanding that the 17-acre property in Santa Ana contains several standing structures that are not SOyears and older. Therefore, this scope of work does not include an historical structure study for the project. If such a study is needed. Discovery Works would provide a separate scope and budget. Discovery Works anticipates that project coordination will be conducted by telephone, mail, or e-mail. Time for project meetings, if reQuested, is not included in our cost estimate; if client meetings are reQuested, then time will be charged at $95 per hour, in addition to this budget. Geology and Soils To assess the geotechnical impacts of the proposed project. The Planning Center will review available geotechnical information, including the geotechnical report to be provided by the applicant. We will review the geotechnical study to determine if any new significant impacts would be associated with the proposed project. After review, the results, findings, and recommendations will be incorporated into the EIR. This section will define the existing geologic, soils, and groundwater characteristics that occur on -site; identify regional seismic influences; and note and explain the characteristics of any areas containing constraints to site development. We assume that the geotechnical study will adeQuately address geotechnical issues upon which we can develop mitigation measures, if needed. Hazards and Hazardous Materials This section will evaluate existing and past uses and proposed construction and development activities to determine whether the area currently contains materials that are hazardous to human health or the environment, and whether the proposed uses could result in such hazards. Based on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment to be provided by the applicant, The Planning Center will identify businesses within the area that use and generate hazardous materials, as well as any users that emit hazardous air emissions. Based on the Phase I. The Planning Center will prepare a narrative discussion of the presence/absence and significance of hazardous waste risks and mitigation measures, if needed, that will be included in the EIR. We Environmental Impact Report for the Village Green Mixed Use Residential Community THE PLANNING CENTER I Page 2-9 assume that the Phase I provided will sufficiently address issues, and if it does not, that the project applicant will provide subseQuent information. Hydrology/Water Quality To assess potential hydrology/water Quality impacts of the proposed project, Fuscoe Engineering will prepare a water Quality study for the project area and will review the hydrology study prepared by the applicant for conformance with CEQA and stormwater reQuirements. Fuscoe's scope of work includes attendance up to five meetings with the City and/or project team. A technical water Quality report will be prepared to be included as an appendix to the EIR- ► Hydrology Report Peer Review. Review the applicant's hydrology report and verify existing and proposed runoff analysis in conformance with the Orange County Hydrology Manual guidelines. Prepare a Letter of Findings identifying any additional calculations, clarifications and/or modifications to the hydrology report for CEQA compliance. ► Water Quality Analysis. Review and summarize available water Quality data (surface and ground water) for the local area; identify local receiving water bodies, pollutants of concern based on land use potential and local water Quality data and local regulatory concerns. Evaluate the proposed project impacts on water Quality in conformance with CEQA guidelines and the local NPDES County- wide Storm Water Permit. Identify applicable site design, source control and treatment control BMPs to be implemented into the proposed project to satisfy water Quality reQuirements. Treatment control BMPs will be sized according to the OC Drainage Area Management Plan and City of Santa Ana sizing reQuirements. Land Use and Planning The proposed project increases the density from 7 dwelling units per acre allowed in the General Plan to approximately 22 dwelling units per acre. A general plan amendment to create a new mixed -use land use designation is reQuired. A commercial/live work component is also included as part of this project. Past and present land use conditions will be documented, and the local land use patterns will be described. Analysis of project impacts will focus on project consistency with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and the proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and -Development Agreement. Specifically, The Planning Center will: Page 2-10 Proposal to the City of Santa Ana 2. METHODOLOGY I SCOPE OF WORK Analyze recent development trends within the general area and assess the consistency of the proposed project with current development trends as well as relevant local and regional land use planning programs (i.e., City of Santa Ana General Plan, Zoning Code, etc.). Provide a nexus between the project's environmental impacts in aggregate and the environmental compatibility of the proposed project with surrounding uses. Propose mitigation measures to reduce potential conflicts between the residential uses and surrounding users to the maximum extent feasible. Noise Due to the increase in allowable units, the proposed activities associated with project implementation have the potential to substantially increase noise levels near existing sensitive receptors, and may expose future residents to adverse noise levels from adjacent major roadways. A noise section will be prepared by our in-house noise specialist, Tin Cheung. His scope of work will include the following: • Perform up to four on -site ambient noise monitoring as needed to develop a baseline noise characterization and to provide input data to prepare a site -specific calibration of the Federal highway Administration's (FHWA) Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA- 77-108). Develop a baseline noise exposure profile in terms of the CNEL noise metric, using the FHWA Traffic Noise Model. The computer modeling of existing conditions will be calibrated with the project site noise monitoring. Prepare a no -project versus with -project mobile noise impact comparison, including any viable project alternative development scenarios. Identify specific sensitive receiver locations where mobile source noise impacts may adversely affect City of Santa Ana residents. • Evaluate stationary noise impacts from temporary on -site construction noise sources. Relate project noise impacts to the noise/land use compatibility guidelines in the City of Santa Ana General Plan Noise Element and other applicable noise exposure regulations. Environmental Impact Report for the Village Green Mixed Use Residential Community THE PLANNING CENTER I Page 2-1 1 Develop a noise impact mitigation plan for any predicted noise impacts that exceed target noise exposure limits. Population and Housing Total residential population will be Quantified based on the proposed amount and mix of residential densities, and compared with the maximum allowable under the City's General Plan intensity tables to determine whether the potential population would exceed the level of growth included in adopted population projections used by the City and regional planning agencies. The proposed mix of housing densities and anticipated occupancies will be described and consistency with the City's Housing Element will be evaluated. Public Services Public service agencies serving the proposed project will be contacted to identify existing facilities that would be affected by the project, existing service levels and capacities available to serve the proposed land uses, and intensity of proposed development. The demand placed on these services and utilities will be identified on the basis of standard planning factors provided by each agency or from the City's General Plan, and the ability of the agencies to accommodate this growth will be assessed. The need for additional public facilities or personnel to serve the proposed project and maintain adeQuate levels of service will be determined in consultation with the agencies. Measures to avoid or reduce the significance of project -related public service impacts will be developed and included in the EIR. The public services to be addressed will include: • Fire Protection • Police Protection • Schools • Public Library Services Recreation Demand for parkland and recreation facilities associated with the potential population on -site will be estimated. Proposed parks, trails and any other private or public recreational uses included in the proposed project will be identified, and consistency with applicable parks, trails or other recreation plans or programs will be assessed. Satisfaction of parkland dedication reQuirements will also be discussed. Mitigation measures will be developed for any significant impacts. Proposal to the City of Santa Ana Transportation/Circulation A complete traffic impact analysis (TIA) will be prepared by a traffic firm to be selected by the City and is not included in this scope of work. We would be happy to provide input on the scope of work. Utilities and Service Systems Utility companies serving the proposed project will be contacted to identify existing facilities, service levels, and capacities available to serve the proposed land uses and intensity of proposed development. The demand placed on these utilities will be estimated and the ability of the agencies to accommodate this growth will be assessed. Because the project has fewer than 500 residential units, a Water Supply Assessment per SB 610 is not reouired. Based on the findings of these inQuiries, the need for possible extensions and upgrading of public facilities to service the project will be identified in the EIR. Measures to avoid or reduce the significance of project -related utility impacts will be developed and included in the EIR. The utilities to be addressed will include: • Water • Sewer • Solid Waste We assume we will be able to address the following utilities in the Initial Study and close out the potential for any significant impacts with regard to: • Electricity • Natural Gas • Telephone • Cable Service Task 4.3: Alternatives to the Proposed Project In compliance with Section 15126(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the EIR will evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives. The Planning Center will consult with City staff for assistance in defining the alternatives to be analyzed in the EIR. Alternatives will be selected on the basis of their ability to (1) avoid or reduce one or more of the project's significant impacts and (2) feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project. The rationale for selecting each alternative will be explained, along with the principal features and environmental effects of each one. If any alternatives were considered during the project scoping process but rejected, reasons for rejecting those alternatives will be provided. Environmental Impact Report for the Village Green Mixed Use Residential Community THE PLANNING CENTER I Page 2-13 Analyses of up to three alternatives in addition to the "No Project" Alternative are included in the cost estimate for the EIR. Potential alternatives scenarios include ( I ) No-Project/Existing Conditions Alternative: (2) Reduced Intensity Alternative 1; and, (3) Reduced Intensity Alternative II and 4) an Alternative Land Use Plan Alternative. Impacts associated with each alternative will be compared to proposed project impacts, for each of the environmental impact categories included in the preceding sections of the EIR. The environmentally superior alternative will be identified; if it is the No-Project/Existing Conditions Alternative, then one of the development alternatives will be identified as environmentally superior to the others. Task 4A CEQA-Mandated Sections In addition to the topical issues discussed above, the following sections will be prepared as mandated by CEQA: Environmental effects found not to be significant during the Initial Study Scoping process. Adverse environmental impacts that cannot be avoided if the project is implemented. This section will summarize those adverse project impacts that cannot be mitigated to a level of less than significant. Cumulative Impacts. A discussion of cumulative impacts will be presented for each of the impact topics evaluated at length in the preceding sections of the EIR. These discussions will be concise, Quantified where appropriate, and will evaluate cumulative impacts within an appropriate context for each issue. Any irreversible environmental changes that will occur if the proposed project is implemented. • Growth -Inducing Impacts. This discussion will identify ways in which the project could foster population or employment growth in this area, either directly or indirectly. Products: Screencheck EIR plus technical appendices (5 review copies and digital copy) Page 2-14 Proposal to the City of Santa Ana Z, METHODOLOGY I SCOPE OF WORK Task 5: Draft EIR Task 5.1: Screencheck Review/Revision It is presumed that all City comments concerning the Screencheck EIR will be transmitted in writing to The Planning Center at the same time. The Planning Center will meet with City staff to discuss and resolve any major areas of concern or to clarify areas of misunderstanding, etc. Follow-up with City departments or other agencies will be conducted as necessary to respond to City staff comments. Fifty copies of the Draft EIR will be printed and distributed by The Planning Center to the local, state and federal agencies, as well as other special interest groups and individuals identified on a distribution list to be developed in consultation with the City. The documents will be transmitted via certified mail so there is a record that the documents were mailed and received by the recipients. The Planning Center will prepare the Notice of Completion (NOC) for City approval and signature and will transmit the NOC with all copies of the Draft EIR. Products: • DEIR (SO hard copies including digital appendices, 10 CD copies, and I reproducible original, including 15 copies of the Executive "The board approved both prjets Summary plus digital copy to the State Clearinghouse) with no problems. The No&,r/ of Task 6: Final EIR/Responses to Comments Determination were filed last- wee{., and both proje, t are out to A Final EIR will be prepared in accordance with CEQA and will contain bid. Thanks for all your work to help the City's reQuired elements, as follows. Ff these pnojects launched. We Task 6.1: Response to Comments couldnf have done it wifhovf The Plannl%. Gertte00 Following receipt of all comments on the Draft EIR, written responses —Paul Davis, Environmental al will be prepared for each comment. A Response to Comments section parnlist City of Los Angeles Recreation &Parks Departrnent Parks will be created for the Final EIR which will contain an introduction describing the public review process concerning the Draft EIR, copies of all comment letters received and minutes from public meetings where oral comments were taken, plus written responses to all comments. Responses will focus on comments that address the adeQuacy of the Draft EIR. Comments that do not address EIR adeQuacy will be noted as such and no further response will be provided, unless deemed necessary by the City. Responses will be prepared by The Planning Center, with input from our technical specialists, as needed. Environmental Impact Report for the Village Green Mixed Use Residential Community THE PLANNING CENTER I Page 2-15 A not -to -exceed budget for responses to comments has been established to cover efforts by any member of the consulting team needed. Up to 72 hours of professional time by The Planning Center has been included in our scope. _If an unexpectedly large volume of comments is received, or if certain comments result in the need for substantial additional responses, or new research or analysis, the initial budget may not be sufficient. Should this situation become apparent, we will discuss this concern with the City before the responses budget is consumed and determine an appropriate course of action. Responses to Comments by responsible agencies will be provided to those agencies, as well as to any other commenters identified by the City, a minimum of 10 days prior to consideration of the Final EIR by the City Council. Task 6.2: Mitigation Monitoring Program A Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) will be prepared, pursuant to Section 2 108 1.6 of the Public Resources Code. It will be presented in standard City format, and will identiy the significant impacts that would result from the project, proposed mitigation measures for each impact, the times at which the measures will need to be conducted, the entity responsible for implementing the mitigation measure, and the City department or other agency responsible for monitoring the mitigation effort and ensuring its success. A draft MMP can be prepared for consideration by the Planning Commission, if desired, so that any comments they may have can be incorporated into the MMP for approval by the City Council at the time they certify the Final EIR. Task 6.3: Statement of Overriding Considerations/ Facts & Findings Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines reQuires that no public agency approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been completed which identifies one or more significant effects unless the public agency prepares findings for each significant effect. As reQuested by the City, The Planning Center will prepare findings and facts in support of findings describing each of the significant impacts identified by the EIR and the determination as to whether those impacts would be reduced to below a level of significance by proposed mitigation measures. These facts and findings will be incorporated into the resolution to be prepared by City staff. Additionally, Section 15093 reQuires that when an agency approves a project which will have significant adverse environmental effects that are unavoidable, the agency must make a statement of its views on the ultimate balancing of the merits of approving the project despite the environmental damage. The Planning Center will prepare the Page 2-16 Proposal to the City of Santa Ana mm nry i srnrF of w[ Statement of Overriding Considerations for any unavoidable significant* impacts that may be identified by the Final EIR. Products: • Responses to comment letters (I original and digital copy of each) • Final EIR (30 hard copies, 30 CDs, one original and digital copy) • Mitigation Monitoring Program (20 copies) • Statement of Overriding Considerations/Facts & Findings (20 copies) Task 7: Public Hearings/Meetings "Thank% again for lour parfiuPafion The Planning Center will coordinate closely with City staff to ensure that in the Public, hcarin$.. All mporfS the EIR and associated documents delivered to the City are legally indiaafc +hat iovr con+ribvfion was defensible, accurate and will serve as useful tools for decision makers of vQYcat valve in movinff,+hiS matfar when considering the approval of the project. In an effort to achieve this fo a sati6fa&+orl cort&lvsion." level of communication, our estimated budget assumes that The Planning Center's Project Manager will attend two meetings with staff —Steven Den A.Preevelopmennon, AICPt Director Community D and four public hearings during the course of the environmental review City of Le Verne process. The City may select any combination of meetings/hearings for the six meetings. Additional meetings or attendance by other members of the Consultant team will be billed on a time -and -materials basis. Costs for meeting attendance would be billed in accordance with the hourly rates for the personnel involved. Products: • Staff meetings (up to 2) • Public Hearings (up to 4 in addition to the Public Scoping Meeting) Task 8: Project Management and Coordination As the lead consultant, The Planning Center will direct and manage all subconsultants included on the project team, and will act as the primary contact with the City of Santa Ana. Our responsibilities will include: (1) task scheduling and assignment, management of resources, monitoring of costs, and schedule adherence: (2) management and coordination of subconsultants, including contract administration and accounting; (3) consultation and coordination with local and state agencies relative to the environmental document and the environmental review process; (4) coordination and communications with the City's project team to ensure compliance with City policies, procedures and any applicable codes and, where applicable, that such policies and procedures are incorporated into the EIR; (5) ensuring that the environmental review process and the EIR satisfy the statutes and guidelines of CEQA, and the City of Santa Ana CEQA Procedures: (6) representing the Consultant Environmental Impact Report for the Village Green Mixed Use Residential Community THE PLANNING CENTER I Page 2-17 Learn in public meetings and project progress meetings as reQuested by 1 the City. The Planning Center will be responsible for all mailings including the notice of preparation, scoping meeting notice, the notice of availability, Draft EIR, and Final EIR. This proposal assumes that the City will provide address lists for the property owners/interested parties. Task 9: Notice of Determination I Within five days of EIR certification, The Planning Center will file an NOD with the State Clearinghouse and County Clerk. Products: • Notice of Determination Page 2-I8 Proposal to the City of Santa Ana 3. Statement of Offer The Environmental Impact Report for the Village Green —including the Screencheck Draft EIR, Draft EIR, and Final EIR—will be prepared in accordance with the scope of work, schedule, and terms and conditions presented in this proposal. The scope of work and budget are subject to the following terms and conditions: ► Preparation of the EIR in accordance with the work program outlined in this proposal. ► The screencheck Draft EIR fee and Final EIR budget will be subject to review and modification if additional work is reQuired and/or costs are incurred as a result of any of the following: • Completion of the Draft EIR is extended more than 60 days beyond the schedule presented in the proposal (or alternative schedule agreed upon with the City at contract execution) for reasons beyond the control of The Planning Center; • Information developed during the refinement of the Initial Study and scoping process reQuires the scope of work to be modified; or o Modifications are made to the project by the City or the Client, subsectuent to the approval of the contract, which necessitate making substantial and material changes in the EIR analysis, text, tables, maps, or figures. ► The proposed budget includes up to two iterative revisions of the screencheck Draft EIR; these revisions are assumed to be primarily editorial and do not include revisions due to changes to the project description, modeling, or technical analyses. The budget for the Final EIR is an estimate only, based on approximately 72 hours for preparation of Response to Comments. The estimated ' Environmental Impact Report for the Village Green Mixed Use Residential Community THE PLANNING CENTER I Page 3-1 budget assumes that no additional'basic research will be reQuired to respond to comments, that the comments will be directed at the substance and technical adeQuacy of the EIR, and that the comments will be compiled by the City and transmitted in writing to the consultant. Modification to the scope of work, budget, and time frame may be necessary if comments received from agencies or the general public reQuire substantially increasing the scope of impacts and issues that the EIR has addressed. In addition, the budget for reimbursable expenses for document binding and printing is an estimate only and will be billed at cost plus 12.5 percent. Page 3-2 Proposal to the City of Santa Ana n 4. Project Schedule Preparation of the Village Green EIR will be accomplished through a "Tho yualifrl of work pywidod bi team effort between The Planning Center and its subconsultants. The, 1lannin5. Cantor mot our The full -service capabilities of these firms will be available to cxpfafionS, eSP allj as it was complete the project successfully and on time. The Planning Center and dolivorod on fima...on a vorrl fish+ its subconsultants are fully capable of complying with the 9-month T molino." schedule, which follows. —George Buell City of San Clemente Environmental Impact Report for the Village Green Mixed Use Residential Community THE PLANNING CENTER I Page 4-1 NMI ' c m f f L.' a y LL � C O � O N m U O y N � E m w y s m ry n m m a o m v o� a w ry K 3 W N O N � � o! o m m a u a0 n W E> v z> a L o > v E m o n o o y K o o U O O o v u o m z ?-\ m m o a m rn c O C � Y N Q N N C � N O fn O U N U w E K LL W V N C MC t0 N Q T (j d >_ C O O A m - U W U N Q a.3 N O O O E 3 m LL C NN n -C6 O m 1] v m c= v N6-OQ>�m-o v m NW OI�WN d �Ti mK to '= v E m �O mQ'w `0 5 c vLL = > _ ¢OuooU❑ a � N N YV1 N Y N N N *,I w w 7 ou S. Cost Estimate "Thc Planning Gcnfer iS tho onli aonSvlf n� firm I've, hired that �omPlcfcd the PnoIcC.i- w thin budr, and on f mc.» — Phil Testa Community Development Director City of Modesto n hourly rates schedule follows. In addition, we have provided an overall summary of our cost proposal by task and firm to be involved in the project, as well as a detailed breakdown of The Planning Center's budget for our proposed scope of services by task and staff member. THE PLANNING CENTER 2006 STANDARD FEE SCHEDULE Staff Level Hourly Rate Principal $165—$250 Director/Team Leader $1504200 Sr. Planner/ScientisUDesigner II $125—$200 Sr. Planner/ScientisUDesigner 1 $100—$150 Associate Planner/Scientist/Designer II $85—$115 Associate Planner/Scientist/Designer 1 $80—$85 Assistant Planner/ScientisUDesigner II $70—$85 Assistant Planner/ScientisUDesigner 1 $60—$70 GIS/CAD Operator II $804110 GIS/CAD Operator 1 $65—$80 Graphic Artist II $75—$125 Graphic Artist 1 $55—$75 Planning Technician/Intern $45460 Technical Editor $75 Word Processing $60 Clerical $55 Third -Party CEOA Review $200 Expert Witness 2 x Normal Hourly Rate umer direct costs are puled at cost plus 12.5%. Mileage reimbursement rate is the standard IRS -approved rate of $0.485 per mile. EXH!RI { B 1 Environmental Impact Report for the Village Green Mixed Use Residential Community THE PLANNING CENTER I Page 5-1 Budget City of Santa Ana Village Green THE PLANNING CENTER Task Description SA Cc -PM Cc -PM AO/N Via Sims AQ/N Assoc Planner Assist Planner GR Editing WP TOTAL HOURS IVIAL BUDGET TASK l' If .. ,.. , a:.. , r ..�.., LI Task 1- Subtotal 0 4 B 0 0 32 24 4 4 2 78 $B,420 ASK'-PU8'IDSCOBiN M "s. rh: • , T=+ „ 'a.+ r ,"q;fi;! •, r + ,1±t.'t. +ra , ! 1. t vu .. _ ..I:.,u + �c: 21 Pre am for Scopin Meetin 8 4 4 4 2 22 $2680 AII tot TASKS'=8B 8C0 UETA 1nro+• .: .,. "WINIfitinifimp,, i,. 31 Tribal Consultation List Request 1 2 2 $230 3.2 Initial lace-lo-lace consultation 8 0 1 9 $1420 33 Meeting2 8 0 8 1360 34 ConVnuln consultation/revisions 8 0 2 2 12 $1,680 Task 3-Subtotal 0 24 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 3 37 4690 TASK A'- 41 9CRFENONEOKORAAT A Evacutive Suri ' 4 n , n .Ai, ii ,H +1„ Rl 1 2 h 131I 1 nt ? 1 S 24 S" v m 1 't ,8 fi%: (r"" 1 + 28 " " ' 42 Protein Descri tioMnVoduciicn 4 40 4 1 1 50 43 Environmental SelHn 4 24 1 1 32 E235 4,4 Aesthetics 8 24 2 1 1 3fi 4.5 Shade Shash�Niew Sims B 40 1 49 4.6 AliQualit 4 16 16 1 1 38 4575 4.7 Resources 4 8 2 1 I 16 1.695 4.8 .8.1olottical Culheal Resources 4 16 I I 22 2175 4.9 Grue B Soils 4 32 1 1 38 3.535 4.10 hydrology and Water Quality 0 24 2 2 1 37 3810 4.11 Land Use A Relsranl Returning 24 6 1 1 34 $5A35 4 12 11 trarlsion and hrru5urn 4 16 1 I 1 1 22 2.655 413 INDIse 4 16 16 2 I 39 4650 4.14 Public Health and Safet Rlsk of Upset 2 16 1 1 20 1.835 4.15 Public Service 4 32 1 1 38 3.535 4.16 Recreation 2 16 1 1 20 2.315 4.17 Trial and Circulation 40 0 2 1 43 $7,010 4.18 Utilities 4 24 1 1 30 2.855 419 Impacts Found Not to be SI0nl8cant 2 8 1 1 12 1 SIG95 4 20 Growth aducing Impacts of the Prdecl 4 2 1 1 8 $1,045 4.21 Cumulative Impacts 2 2 2 1 7 $780 4.22 Alternatives 4 32 16 1 1 50 1 $7.415 423 UnavoirstrIOAdverse Impacts 8 232 24 2 1 35 $4330 4.24 Misholanenus/Olher Betlhtrs 16 8 0 2 1 35 $5,690 Task4-Subtotal 1fi 190 0 32 212 152 12 30 23 739 09150 TASKS=DRAFTEIR A` '+111i1 ,,,, ,w.;g , , in=d�¢u r,.'#'XS (Gr,S.-ttt lN9( Ir 11, U, I 11: .RI, tit II 'N ci, .. p. ..( 11 .,. ' 51 Screencheck Review nd Revision 32 24 4 8 70 $9,320 T5- o TASK -FINAL EI 3ti . . �: 6.1 Pre ore Res Dose m Comments 16 16 40 0 4 84 110,56 6.2 Miu anon Monitorin Pm ram 4 4 8 4 0 2 run 63 Fmdinos FacuSlale of venidin Con Ideraepni 16 0 0 4 2 22 3.140 TA ,_ .;1 nai f!i, Ili a .,, f, hi +. a ..., : • : 1 1. : 1 77 Pubhc Hearin c 4 8 8 25 57 6300 7.2 Meetn s1214 8 20 1 Ilin �a� T ?P-MWFi' Y{ .nV • �:, • vtgn f ..,'r �.a ., .t ..+, t.l .. 1. 1. �., ..0 .Lr 1`fs, f. a..rc ✓d l., r" ,nl.� 8.1 Prdecl Manaement 20 20 1 40 6400 Task 8 - Subtotal e1 i e+ q r J' 1 - . . 9.1 e 21 2 1 4 $570 Task 9- Subtotal 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 1 $570 TOTATBN•;-a jeW'PrQl W114i,J ,. tl, ti.4;{.y{.L, f i. .. ,. t.1 .. 1, . r. , Whylefloi r.. +v1w. it .. v, n TOTAL HOURS 28 336 48 32 0 32 348 180 26 58 63 1.191 N/A BILLING RATES $200 $170 $150 $150 $100 $85 $115 $85 $100 $75 $60 A A PERCENTAGE OF PARTICIPATION 2% 28% 4% 3% 0% 3% 29% 15% 2% 5% 5% 1 100% 1 WA 1ABOA TOTAL 5 600 57120 $7,200 $4 800 0 $2,720 1140,020 $15,300 E2 Ann $4 350 $3 780 A 143 490 REIMBURSABLES E15767 TOTAL $159257 , UBCONBIIL ANTS {.:•:Hl t ++'P+ ., S171117 '.d },.., t „rrelptai -_ . Discovery Works Inc. $3994 - FUSCOE Engineering Water Quality Studyl $40950 Subconsultants Subtotal 1 1 44 944 iI metuuyetmr mennucu. isan esv re" only testa orlapymxnnarety rnmutsmt prcpatatmt m nerpun lilt entilludleuUUUyttdtildtlIU4UUUwinamyunuvuayouu.'unwell., nmr um woune�na wni ue mm.au ai 21 The rombursables budget is an natural only and will be billed at cast plus 12 5%. If additional copies are requested by the Citythey will be billed at cost plus 12.5%and are War to contract. SA = Senior Advisor PM = Project Manager PMA = Pmjecl Manager Assistant PP = Project Planner GIS = GIS/CADD Technician GEO = Geologist GR = Graphics Technician AO/N = Air Quality / Noise Specialist BID = Biologist PAM = Environmental Project Manager EPII = Environmental Planner ll EPI = Environmental Planer) WP = Word Processing/Technical Editing PWN➢N60FFNNA OWENTA' Kti{BNt +ttt,: Draft NOP/Initial Stutl - 3 co ies at 55 each + I digital copy Final NOP/IS- 50 copes at$5 each+ 1 unbound Gr icat i 1digital SCEIR-5copies at $200 each +l digital OEIR - 50 hard copies at $200 each + 1 original + 1 digital 7$2.. Dri 10com actdiskm issat$l0each Res Doses to Comment Letters -1 o..final + 1 tli Ilal FEIR - 30 bard co ies at $25 each + 1 on final + 1 di ited FEIA-30 compact disk copies at$1D MMP 20 copies at $10 Facts and Findings 20 copies at 10 Subtotal IS 12015 Mile. a $0.485 permlle1 '• ""•' " *$40 f00 Postage for documema/miscellaneous postage f1000 Subtotal $1400 aTa eimbursa a Expenses I November 2006 From: Kenai) Goad At Austin, Cooper & Price FaAD. 909-886-2013 To: Tonia Zerba Date: 02/072007 01:50 PM Page: 2 of ACORD CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE OP ID X DATE IMME)D/VYYY) eLANN-1 02 07 07 PRODUCEfl Alliant Insurance Services, Inc THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE (Lie-OC36861) HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR P 0 Box 3280 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. San Bernardino CA 92413-3280 Phone: 909-886-9861 Fax:909-886-2013 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURED NAIC# I. 9at1 er,o ma co oY ea,r (CNA, FFr'NSURERA-. NSURER& clarenaon Nac ina co (XRN) 20532 P arming Center Inc 1 SURER-C_Valley FOr(le Ins Co (CNA) - ----- 80 Metro Drive Costa Mesa CA 92626 INSURER D. wastchalters MMus Lanes (>En -------- INSURER E. THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTARI, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ____._.._.- _ ......._..._. — LTR N TYPE OF INSINANCE POLICY NUMBER .. _.._ tiICVEFPEC"fl GCRP EXP'IRAriDN GATE MUM DATE MMDOIYI' LIMITS GENERAL LABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE E 1, GOO, OOO IIREMW ESO RENIunnno PREMISESIE accurerKe -- $1,000,000 A X X COAYAERCALGENERALUA&urv' H2O90701722 07/Ol/06 07/Ol/07 CLAIMSMAOE OCCUR U ME. DEXPNnyone Person) Is 10 DOO PERSONAL &ADV IWURY $1,000 000 rGENT GENERAL AGGREGATE $2,000,OOD AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER. `I PRODUCTS-COMP'OPAGG $2,000,000 POLICY PRO- JECTJECT LOC --_-- _-- AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY C ANY AUTO 7 07/Ol/06 07/01/07 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (E.aodde,I) $ 1 DO r O,D00 1 ALL OWNED AUTOS -' $ 1 SCHEOULEDAUTOS BODILY INJURY IP. Person) -. HIREOAUTOS - -_-.— NON-OWNEDAUTOS BODILY IWURY IPeramiberU S $ _-- _-- --- PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per awtlent) GARAGE LIABILITY ACGIOENT $ ANY AUTO EA ACC =UTO $ DOG $ A EXCESSIUMSRELLA LABILITY X OCCUR CLAIMS EACH OCCURRENCE $4,000,000 MADE 2088126939 O7/O1/O6 O7 O1 Q7 AGGREGATE E DEDUCTIBLE I__ �'$ RETENTION 810 OOO $ $ WORKERS WORKERS COMPENSATION AND -- X_ TORY LIMITS B ANY PROPRIETORPARTNEWEXECUTIVE 01KR0033085 O7 /OS / O 6 07/01/07 EL. EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000 OFPICEMMEMSER EXCLUDED? -- -- -- - Myes,aee0nbe,.nCer E.L.DISEASE EA EMPLOYE $1,oO0,000 SPECIAL PROVISIONS bebw OTHER EL DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 1 OOO OOO A Property 2090701722 07/01/06 07/O1/07 Prof $1,000,000 D Prof/Pollution W2067291002-CLAIW mD, DESCRIPTION 07/01/06 07/O1/07 Pollution $1 000,000 OF OPERATIONS I LOCATDNIS I VEHICLES 1 EXCLUSION8 ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT I SPECIAL PROVISIONS Operations pertaining to named insured for certholder; professional Liab includes E S O Coverage.Certholder its officers, agents, employees and volunteers are addrl insd as respects gen'1 liab per SE146968A 01/06, as required by written contract. *Except 10 day for nonpayment. CARRIER WILL NOT MODIFY CANCELLATION CLAUSE/NO XXX OUT, Replaces prior cert 07/07/06 CERTIFICATE MTw nPR .....__.. __._.. L`ITY!!'SSHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATIO _ " I 1 DATE THEREOF, ME ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL *30 DAYS WRITTEN City of Santa Ana TjE/itQ,QD / /� NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL 20 Civic Center Plaza, M,rLL UV / IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIM UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR Santa Ana CA-92701 REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHOR EP z;n E (2001108) From: Kennail Goad At: Austn. Cooper 8 Price FaAD. 909-886-2013 To: Tonia Zerba Date: 02/072007 01:50 PM Page: 3 of 4 SB 146968A 0106 Page i of 2 PoldeyLHolder: Planning Center Inc Policy Humber: 2090701722 w�A Policy Effective Date: 07/01/06 IMPORTANT: THIS ENDORSEMENT CONTAINS DUTIES THAT APPLY TO THE ADDITIONAL INSURED IN THE EVENT OF OCCURRENCE, OFFENSE, CLAIM OR SUIT. SEE PARAGRAPH C., OF THIS ENDORSEMENT FOR THESE DUTIES. THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT WITH PRODUCTS -COMPLETED OPERATIONS COVERAGE 8� BLANKET WAIVER OF SUBROGATION Architects, Engineers and Surveyors This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: BUSINESSOWNERS LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM BUSINESSOWNERS COMMON POLICY CONDITIONS A. WHO IS AN INSURED (Section C.) of the Businessowners Liability Coverage Form is amended to include as an insured any person or organization whom you are required to add as an additional insured on this policy under a written contract or written agreement; but the written contract or written agreement must be: 1. Currently in effect or becoming effective during the term of this policy; and 2. Executed prior to the "bodily injury," "property damage," or "personal and advertising injury-" B. The insurance provided to the additional insured is limited as follows: 1. That person or organization is an additional insured solely for liability due to your negligence specifically resulting from "your work" for the additional insured which is the subject of the written contract or written agreement. No coverage applies to liability resulting from the sole negligence of the additional insured. 2. The Limits of Insurance applicable to the additional insured are those specified in the written contract or written agreement or in the Declarations of this policy, whichever is less. These Limits of Insurance are inclusive of, and not in addition to, the Limits of insurance shown in the Declarations. 3. The coverage provided to the additional insured within this endorsement and section titled LIABILITY AND MEDICAL EXPENSE DEFINITIONS — "Insured Contract" (Section F.9.) within the Businessowners Liability Coverage Form, does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" arising out of the "products -completed operations hazard" unless required by the written contract or written agreement. 4. The insurance provided to the additional insured does not apply to "bodily injury," "property damage," "personal and advertising injury" arising out of an architect's, engineer's, or surveyor's rendering of or failure to render any professional services including: a. The preparing, approving, or failing to prepare or approve maps, shop drawings, opinions, reports, surveys, field orders, change orders or drawings and specifications by any architect, engineer or surveyor performing services on a project of which you serve as construction manager, or b. Inspection, supervision, quality control, engineering or architectural services done by you on a project of which you serve as construction manager. 5. This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury," "property damage," or "personal and advertising injury" arising out of. a. The construction or demolition work while you are acting as a construction or demolition contractor. This exclusion does not apply to work done for or by you at your premises, C. BUSINESSOWNERS GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS— Duties In The Event of Occurrence, Offense, Claim or Suit(Section E.2.) of the Businessowners Liability Coverage Form is amended to add the following, An additional insured under this endorsement will as soon as practicable 1. Qjvq written ,n3otice of an occurrence or an offense to us which may result in a claim or "suit" under this From: Kennad Goad At: Austin, Cooper & Price FaAD'. 909-886-2013 To: Tonia Zerba Date: 02/072007 01:50 PM Page: 4 of SB146968A 0106 Page 2 of 2 insurance; 2. Tender the defense and indemnity of any claim or "suit" to us for a loss we cover under this Coverage Part; 3. Tender the defense and indemnity of any claim or "suit" to any other insurer which also has insurance for a loss we cover under this Coverage Part; and 4. Agree to make available any other insurance which the additional insured has for a loss we cover under this Coverage Part We have no duty to defend or indemnity an additional insured under this endorsement until we receive written notice of a claim or "suit" from the additional insured. D. OTHER INSURANCE (Section H. 2. & 3.) of the Businessowners Common Policy Conditions are deleted and replaced with the following: 2. This insurance is excess over any other insurance naming the additional insured as an insured whether primary, excess, contingent or on any other basis unless a written contract or written agreement specifically requires that this insurance be either primary or primary and noncontributing to the additional insured's own coverage. This insurance is excess over any other insurance to which the additional insured has been added as an additional insured by endorsement. 3. When this insurance is excess, we will have no duty under Coverages A or B to defend the additional insured against any "suit" if any other insurer has a duty to defend the additional insured against that "suit" If no other insurer defends, we will undertake to do so, but we will be entitled to the additional insured's rights against all those other insurers. When this insurance is excess over other insurance, we will pay only our share of the amount of the loss, if any, that exceeds the sum of (a) The total amount that all such other insurance would pay for the loss in the absence of this insurance; and (b) The total of all deductible and self -insured amounts under all that other insurance. We will share the remaining loss, if any, with any other insurance that is not described in this Excess Insurance provision and was not bought specifically to apply in excess of the Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations of this Coverage Part E. TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US (Section K.2.) of the Businessowners Common Policy Conditions is deleted and replaced with the following: 2. We waive any right of recovery we may have against any person or organization against whom you have agreed to waive such right of recovery in a written contract or agreement because of payments we make for injury or damage arising out of your ongoing operations or "your work" done under a contract with that person or organization and included within the "products -completed operations hazard"