HomeMy WebLinkAbout11B - ORD HOOKAH PARLORSbk:2/25/08
ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA ANA ADDING ARTICLE XIV TO
CHAPTER 18, AND ADDING SECTION 41-73.5 AND
AMENDING SECTION 41-144 OF THE SANTA ANA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT THE
ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF HOOKAH
PARLORS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and
declares as follows:
A. Provisions of the General Plan of the City and Chapter 41 of the
Santa Ana Municipal Code do not specifically identify hookah
parlors as a land use or designate zoning districts throughout the
City where hookah parlors may be permitted.
B. For this reason, on February 21, 2006, at a regularly scheduled
public meeting the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2707,
which established a moratorium on the construction or
establishment of a hookah parlor (hereafter "the moratorium
ordinance"). On April 3, 2006, following a noticed public hearing,
the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2709, which extended
this moratorium ordinance 10 months and 15 days, and on
February 5, 2007, following a noticed public hearing, the City
Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2709, which extended this
moratorium ordinance one year.
C. It has come to the City Council's attention that within the last two
plus years at least two individuals have made efforts in an attempt
to illegally establish a hookah parlor in Santa Ana.
D. Hookah parlors have been shown to create the following
deleterious effects on the public health, safety and general welfare:
1. In other cities, the operation of hookah parlors have led to
complaints of loud music, drinking in public and large crowds
milling outside of the site.
2. The Orange County Register reports (November 10, 2005)
that in two and one-half (2%2) years the Anaheim Police
Ordinance No. NS-XXX
11 B-1 Page 1 of
Department has responded to 413 incidents tied to hookah
parlors. The Anaheim Police Department reported to its City
Council that this number does not include an additional 86
police calls on hookah parlors that were made without a
request to a Police response (for a total of 499 police calls
on hookah parlors over 2 1 /2 years).
3. This same Police Department Report and news article
further states that illegal weapons and underage drinking
were found by an Anaheim Police Department vice operation
directed at hookah parlors.
4. This Police Department Report and news article further
stated that some hookah parlors in Anaheim had been the
target of fire bombs and arson.
5. While there is a widespread belief that smoking from a
hookah pipe is safer than other types of tobacco smoking,
the World Health Organization ("WHO") reported in 2005 that
"waterpipe smokers and second-hand smokers [are] at risk
for the same kinds of diseases as are caused by cigarette
smoking, including cancer, heart disease, respiratory
disease, and adverse effects during pregnancy."
6. The WHO investigatory panel also found that a "typical 1-
hour long waterpipe smoking session involves inhaling 100-
200 times the volume of smoke inhaled with a single
cigarette," and that the smoke, even after passing through
water, "contains high levels of toxic compounds, including
high levels of carbon monoxide, metals and cancer-causing
chemicals."
7. The WHO investigatory panel also found that sharing a
hookah's mouthpiece poses a serious risk of transmission of
communicable diseases.
8. The WHO investigatory panel found that the common
practice of sweetening and flavoring hookah tobacco, giving
it a sweet taste and smell, may account for the increase of
its use among young people who otherwise avoid smoking.
9. The smoking of tobacco in a hookah "is frightening because
it is a gateway toward a lifetime use of tobacco, including
cigarettes," according to Dr. Christopher Loffredo, Ph.D.,
Director of the Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology program
at Georgetown University Medical Center, who has studied
Ordinance No. NS-XXX
Page 2 of 4
11 B-2
hookah smoking since 1997. Dr. Loffredo further reports
that: "People think the water absorbs the toxins, and that is
true to some extent if the toxins are water soluble, but tar
isn't, and tar contains the carcinogens. We believe that,
compared to the typical cigarette smoker, waterpipe smokers
are exposed to larger total amounts of nicotine, carbon
monoxide and certain other toxins. And because the
tobacco is burning at a lower temperature, it is more
tolerable to inhale deeply, and in fact you need more force to
pull air through the high resistance of the water pathway.
That means the tobacco smoke can be penetrating deeper in
a person's respiratory tract than cigarette smoke does. The
damage could be even worse than seen in cigarette
smokers, but we haven't done studies long enough to
quantify the true cancer risk."
10. According to Dr. Loffredo, another concern is that hookah
use may represent a loophole around city and state laws
banning smoking in public places.
11. While California Labor Code section 6404.5 generally bans
indoor smoking at restaurants and bars, it exempts smoking
inside retail or wholesale tobacco shops and private
smokers' lounges. Many hookah bar owners claim they are
tobacco retailers and state law does not clearly repudiate
this claim. This allows tobacco smoking inside
establishments where people work, eat and drink. Hookah
smoking is not a safe alternative to smoking tobacco.
Smoking hookah pipes has been reported to cause oral,
esophageal and lung cancer, as well as heart disease,
chronic bronchitis and of course, nicotine addiction.
12. According to a report authored by Dr. Kamlesh Asotra,
Ph.D., for the University of California Tobacco Related
Disease Program, hookah parlors create unique problems of
second hand smoke, due to the increased presence of
carbon monoxide (CO), which is present both in the tobacco
smoke and the burning of charcoal indoors to ignite the
tobacco. Dr. Asotra reports that "It is becoming increasingly
clear that, like tobacco smoking, mainstream hookah smoke
and second-hand hookah smoke cause deleterious effects
on reproductive systems in men and women and produce
genotoxic, mutagenic, and teratogenic effects on babies of
smoking parents." Many commercial tenant spaces in Santa
Ana share a ventilation system with other spaces within the
Ordinance No. NS-XXX
11 B-3 Page 3 of
same building, thus allowing second hand smoke from
hookahs to propagate throughout an entire building.
13. The California Legislature approved a bill this year, AB 1467,
which would have expressly banned hookah parlors
throughout California. This bill, which would have
additionally banned cigar lounges, and smoking in hotel
lobbies and meeting rooms, was vetoed by the Governor on
October 14, 2007.
E. If hookah parlors are permitted in the City, they will pose a serious
threat to the public health, safety and general welfare for the
following reasons:
1. Hookah parlors established in other cities have been
associated with increases in noise, loitering, public drinking,
possession of illegal weapons, underage drinking, and
arson.
2. Hookah parlors could exacerbate the inherently dangerous
behavior of tobacco use around non-tobacco users; diminish
the protection of children from exposure to smoking and
tobacco while they increase the potential for minors to
associate smoking and tobacco with a healthy lifestyle; and
weaken the protection of the public from smoking and
tobacco-related pollution. Hookah parlors would additionally
create unique problems of second hand smoke, because of
the hot charcoal coals used to enhance the burning tobacco.
3. Hookah parlors if allowed in the City would have adverse
secondary effects on surrounding properties, including but
not limited to lowering property values and introducing
incompatible land uses to existing neighborhoods.
F. In response to the threat of unregulated hookah parlors several
cities, including but not limited to the Cities of Anaheim, Garden
Grove, and Dublin California, have adopted moratoriums or
development restrictions. Other cities, such as New York and
Calgary, Alberta, and the State of Washington, have simply banned
them. Other countries, including the United Kingdom, France,
Germany and Turkey, have banned hookah parlors.
G. The Request for Council Action for this ordinance dated February 4,
2008 and duly signed by the City Manager shall, by this reference,
be incorporated herein, and together with this ordinance, any
Ordinance No. NS-XXX
Page 4 of 4
11 B-4
amendments or supplements, and oral testimony constitute the
necessary findings for this ordinance.
H. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act a categorical
exemption has been approved for this project.
Section 2. Article XIV is added to Chapter 18 of the Santa Ana
Municipal Code to read as follows:
Article XIV
Hookah Parlors
Sec. 18-650. Purpose and Findings.
The City Council finds that hookah parlors have been
associated with increases in noise, loitering, public drinking,
possession of illegal weapons, underage drinking, and arson;
that hookah parlors exacerbate the inherently dangerous
behavior of tobacco use around non-tobacco users; diminish
the protection of children from exposure to smoking and
tobacco while they increase the potential for minors to
associate smoking and tobacco with a healthy lifestyle; and
weaken the protection of the public from smoking and
tobacco-related pollution; and that hookah parlors if allowed in
the City would have adverse secondary effects on surrounding
properties, including but not limited to lowering property values
and introducing incompatible land uses to existing
neighborhoods; and that in order to serve public health, safety,
and welfare of the residents and businesses within the City,
the declared purpose of this article is to prohibit hookah
parlors as defined in this article.
Sec. 18-651. Hookah Parlor Defined.
(a) "Hookah parlor" shall mean any facility or location
whose business operation, whether as its primary use or as
an ancillary use, is denoted by the smoking of tobacco or
other substances through one or more pipes (commonly
known as a hookah, waterpipe, shisha or narghile) designed
with a tube passing through an urn of water that cools the
smoke as it is drawn through it, including but not limited to
establishments known variously as hookah bars, hookah
lounges or hookah cafes.
11 B-5
Ordinance No. NS-XXX
Page 5 of
(b) "Ancillary use" shall be defined as that term is defined
in section 41-13.5 of the Code.
(c) "Primary use" shall mean a use that is not an ancillary
use.
Sec. 18-652. Hookah Parlors Prohibited.
It shall be unlawful for any person or entity to own, manage,
conduct, or operate any hookah parlor or to participate as an
employee, contractor, agent or volunteer, or in any other
manner or capacity, in any hookah parlor in the City.
Section 3. Section 41-73.5 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby
added to define hookah parlors as follows:
Sec. 41-73.5. Hookah Parlors.
(a) "Hookah parlor" shall mean any facility or location
whose business operation, whether as its primary use or as
an ancillary use, is denoted by the smoking of tobacco or
other substances through one or more pipes (commonly
known as a hookah, waterpipe, shisha or narghile) designed
with a tube passing through an urn of water that cools the
smoke as it is drawn through it, including but not limited to
establishments known variously as hookah bars, hookah
lounges or hookah cafes.
(b) "Primary use" shall mean a use that is not an ancillary
use.
Section 4. Section 41-144 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby
amended to prohibit hookah parlors as a retail or service use in the City such that it
reads as follows:
Sec. 41-144. Retail and service uses.
Retail and service uses include any use of property for the
purpose of offering merchandise or services to the public for
compensation, and include banks, savings and loan
associations, and similar financial institutions, but do not
include the following:
(a) Sheet metal shops, body-fender works, automobile
paint shops, repair garages, and any activity which includes
Ordinance No. NS-XXX
Page 6 of 4
11 B-6
the processing, treatment,
compounding of any product,
and traditionally incidental an
activity.
manufacturing, assembling or
other than that which is clearly
d essential to a particular retail
(b) A medical marijuana dispensary as defined in section
41-121 of this Code.
(c) A hookah parlor as defined in section 41-73.5 of this
Code.
(d) Any use which is more specifically identified as a
permitted use or as a use which may be permitted subject to
the issuance of a conditional use permit in one or more use
districts pursuant to Article III of this chapter.
Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of
this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana
hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that
any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be
declared invalid or unconstitutional.
ADOPTED this day of
2008.
Miguel A. Pulido
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney
By:
Benjamin Kaufman
Chief Assistant City Attorney
11 B-7
Ordinance No. NS-XXX
Page 7 of
AYES: Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify that
the attached Ordinance No. NS-XXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the
City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ,and that said
ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana.
Date:
Clerk of the Council
City of Santa Ana
Ordinance No. NS-XXX
Page 8 of 4
11 B-8