HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-018 - Modifying Fees for Processings of Applications for Development Approval
bk: 3/9/09
RESOLUTION NO. 2009-018
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA MODIFYING FEES FOR PROCESSING OF
APPLICATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND
REPEALING IN PART RESOLUTION NO. 2008-041
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS
FOllOWS:
Section 1: The City Council hereby, finds, determines and declares as follows:
A. The FY 2008-09 Miscellaneous Fee Schedule was established by the City
Council by Resolution No. 2008-041. The Planning and Building Agency has continued
to analyze the cost to administer the various programs, activities and applications for
which the City charges application processing fee, and recommends certain
modifications of this Resolution to adjust for increased costs to provide the programs,
activities and services outlined herein.
B. On May 7, 2007, City Council approved an agreement with MGT of
America, Inc. ("MGT") for a study of the City's General Fund development processing
fees in order to analyze the cost of providing these City services. The study included an
analysis of staff time spent on the various development applications, as well as a
thorough analysis of all indirect costs of City agencies in the support of these services.
C. One of the major subjects of the MGT study are the fees charged for
building permits. Historically, the Uniform Building Code set building permit fees in
California cities and counties based on the valuation of the construction project. More
recently, however, numerous court decisions, including a judgment against the County
of Orange, indicate that valuation-based fees do not satisfy the state requirement to
show the connection, or nexus, between the fee amount and project value.
Consequently, cities throughout the state continue to move away from this methodology
in favor of one based on a comprehensive analysis of actual costs. The MGT analysis
follows this more rigorous methodology.
D. A true and correct copy of the full MGT study has been placed on file with
the Clerk of the Council for the statutory period required by Government Code S 66000,
et seq. The MGT study methodology analyzes the average volume of development and
permit applications during a year. A separate evaluation analyzed the time and motion
of processing the various project types. The third and final analysis calculated the
average overhead and indirect expenses required to provide these city services. To be
conservative, the consultants utilized FY 2006-07 general fund salary and operation
expenditures for the agencies, or portions thereof, involved in processing development
applications and permits. Budget allocations for other agencies, such as City Manager's
Office, Clerk of the Council, City Attorney's Office, and Personnel Services were
Resolution No. 2009-018
Page 1 of 38
provided to spread these support costs on a pro-rata basis over the various
departmental functions within the scope of the study.
E. The analysis found that the majority of the City's development processing
fees do not recover the costs of providing the service. This was expected for two
reasons: it had been a number of years since the fees were last updated; and, the new
methodology for building fees is a better gauge of actual costs. As a byproduct the fee
study found a number of instances where the current fees collect more than the cost of
providing the related service. In these situations, the fees will be lowered accordingly,
and to the extent that building fees are being lowered, the difference will be deposited in
the City's general plan fund to pay for long-range planning activities, including preparing
and implementing the general plan and covering overhead and other administrative
costs of the Planning and Building Agency's long-range planning division.
F. Section 200 of the City's Charter; state law, including but not limited to
Article XI, section 5 of the Constitution and Government Code ~~ 65943, 66014,
subdivisions (a) & (b), and 66451.2; and various provisions of the Santa Ana Municipal
Code authorize the imposition of the fees and charges set forth herein. The City
Council further finds, determines and declares that the fees and charges set forth herein
do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which such
fees and charges are charged.
G. The Request for Council Action for this resolution dated March 2, 2009
and duly signed by the City Manager shall, by this reference, be incorporated herein,
and together with this resolution and accompanying ordinance, any amendments or
supplements, the materials and study on file with the Office of the Clerk of the Council,
and oral and written testimony constitute the necessary findings for this action.
Section 2: The modified fees and charges set forth in Exhibit 1 to this
Resolution, which is incorporated herein by this reference, are hereby adopted. Each
charge, fee or service charge set forth shall be levied until further resolution of this
Council.
Section 3: Except as set forth in section 7 of this Resolution, to the extent that
any fee or charge established pursuant to City Resolution No. 2008-041 is inconsistent
with the fees or charges established pursuant to this Resolution, then said Resolution
No. 2008-041 is hereby repealed.
Section 4: That without further action of the City Council said charges, fees
and service charges shall be incorporated into the City's Miscellaneous Fee Schedule.
Section 5: If any charge, fee, service charge, section, subsection, sentence,
clause, phrase or word of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid by a court
of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this Resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed
Resolution No. 2009-018
Page 2 of 38
bk:3/9/09
and adopted this Resolution, and each and all provisions hereof, irrespective of the fact
that one or more provisions may be declared invalid.
Section 6: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by
the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting
this Resolution, except that, as required by Government Code ~ 66017(a), the fee
modifications set forth herein shall not take effect for sixty (60) days after adoption of
this Resolution.
Section 7:
A. The following "pipeline projects" (as defined in Section 7.C., below) shall
not pay the fees established by this Resolution, but rather shall be subject to the fees
set forth in Resolution No. 2008-041, unless the fee established by this Resolution is
lower than the fee set forth in Resolution No. 2008-041, in which case the lower fee
shall be paid by these "pipeline projects." :
1. development agreement,
2. tentative tract map,
3. tentative parcel map,
4. conditional use permit,
5. variance,
6. minor exception,
7. grading permit, or
8. building permit (including "foundation only" building permit).
B. The fees to be paid by a "pipeline project" shall increase annually,
commencing July 1, 2009, from those fees set forth in Resolution No. 2008-041 by the
increase in the Consumer Price Index-All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles-
Riverside-Orange County area, published by the United States Bureau of Labor
Statistics (or substitute index chosen by the Executive Director of Planning and Building
Agency should this index be discontinued), hereafter referred to as "CPI increase."
However, if a fee established for non-"pipeline projects" is less than the "pipeline
project's" CPI increased fee pursuant to this subsection, then only the lower fee shall be
assessed and collected. To the extent this subsection is contrary to the provisions of
state law or a valid development agreement adopted by this Council, this subsection
shall not apply.
Resolution No. 2009-018
Page 3 of 38
C.
follows:
For purposes of this Section 7, "pipeline project" shall be defined as
1. "Pipeline project" shall be any project for which the City has
received a "complete application," as that term is used in Government Code 9 65943,
within sixty (60) days of the date of Council adoption of this Resolution, and which
application is approved by the City.
2. A "pipeline project" shall not lose its status throughout its
processing by the City so long as (a) it is in "substantial compliance," as that term is
used in Government Code 9 66474.1, with the previously approved entitlement that
occasioned its pipeline status, and (b) the entitlement which occasioned its pipeline
status has not expired pursuant to applicable law, and the project has processed and
received no subsequent entitlement.
ADOPTED this 16th day of March, 2009.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney
By: /~.
Ba'nj
chi
I
AYES:
Councilmembers: Alvarez, Bustamante, Martinez, Pulido,
Sarmiento, Tinaiero (6)
NOES: Councilmembers: None (0)
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None (0)
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: Benavides (1)
Resolution No. 2009-018
Page 4 of 38
bk:3/9/09
CERTIFICATION OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached
Resolution No. 2009-018 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the
City of Santa Ana on March 16.2009.
Patricia E. Healy
Clerk of the Council
City of Santa Ana
Date:
3/L3/D 7
. I
Resolution No. 2009-018
Page 5 of 38
Resolution No. 2009-018
Page 6 of 38
This page intentionally
left blank
City of Santa Ana
Development User fee
Cost of Services Study Findings
March,2009
MGT
Of "MUICA. INC
;0
m
lJl
o
s:
o.
::J
-uZ
ll> lJ
<0",
mo
-..10
o'P
-0
"'~
00 00
4SSCapitoiMa11
Suite 600
~o'ICrarnento. CA ?5814
p' (916)443-3411
1: j~lbJ .;43-\766
\VW\\;.llllSlUr<llll~io..<l.\.U II
0-
,..
~
o
<0
"U;lJ
III '"
co(/)
'" 0
ex>E
o~
_0
",::J
ex>Z
o
'"
C)
C)
CO
b
~
ex>
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
IntroductiUIl
MGT of America (MGT) is pleased to present the City of Santa Ana (City) with this summary of findings for the cost of services.
The City has not undertaken a comprehensive COSt of services Study since the 1998-99 fiscal year. Since that time. the City has made annual CPI
adjustments to the fee levels, but has largely maintained the fee levels that had been previously adopted. The City is interested in accurately
reporting the true cost of providing various fcc-related services. and exploring the possibilities of modifying current fees to better reflect the
increasing cost: of providing services over time. The City contracted with MGT to perform this cost analysis using the adopted 2006-2007 fiscal year
budget. staffing and operational information. Fees should be reviewed on a regular basis and adjusted in accordance with established City policies on
user fee cost recovery.
This report is the culmination of the many months of diligent work between MGT and City staff. MGT would like to take this opportunity to
acknowledge all management and staff who participated on this project for their efforts and coordination. Their responsiveness and continued
interest in the outcome of this study contributed greatly to the success of this study.
Study Scope alld Objectives
This study included a review of fee.for service activities within me following departments/divisions:
..) PBA - Planning
{. PBA - Building Safety
.:. PWA - Development Engineering
The primary goals of the study were to:
.} Define what it costs the city to provide various fee-related services.
.:. Determine whether there are any opportunities to implement new fees, based on city COSt recovery policies.
.} Identify service areas where the City might adjust fees based on the full cost of services and other economic or policy considerations.
.:. Develop revenue projections based on recommended increases (or decreases) to fees.
MGT
Qf A,lUtICA. !HiC.
.:. Provide comp:lrativc data for recovery levels to cthe~ MGT clients
The i'lformadoll sumrrl2rizcd in this repol addresses each of these issues and provides the Ciry wth the tools ne:::essary to make infonned
decisions about any proposed fee adjustments ane :he rc,;ultil1g impact on general =l.nc revellues,
The rexr section is;: d scl.lssio'1 ::1l:ou economic and r:dicy consider-lricns whic,", rray help hcilit;lrc the dist:lJ!>sion on wh::>r cmt recovery levels a"'e
appropriate fo~ San:a Ana. To assis: In that discussion. MGT of;ers the following comments ~el3,tive to wnat we have seen in other agencies:
0." Dc\Ociopment-rclated fees (plannng and budding) gene~al;y should bve high cost recovery leve!s (at or close to 100%). Exceptions may be
mace for scrvices such as appC';!.1 fe-eos. cr those pro\Oided exc\isively to residential applic2nts.
. No fee ~houkJ I>c ~~~ hi~ller tlldll 100% Lu~ll eLuvel y. ~ilhoul J~:..IU~UI e aooullhc r~um wh)< (c.g. a nne UI pcnaLy e'<;lIIelll)
o"~ If the proposed fee inc'-ease is: significant. some 2.ger'lcies will opt to phase in the inc,e:ase over;l pericc 0; :hree to five yea.rs.
.:. Comp"'ehensivc reviews should be Jndcrtaken every th'"ec to five years. with minor COSt o~ iving adjustments made on an annual basis.
;u
'"
lJl
o
C
-
o.
:J
"Z
OJ ()
<C'"
"'0
<DO
o'P
-0
w~
())())
MGT
0-
"
(;,
<0
2;
<0
or A.IIl,[lIU. INC.
-U;U
llllll
IOu>
lllQ.
~<:
0=
00
-"
",Z
000
'"
o
o
CD
b
~
00
EWllomic & PoliCl! COllsideratiolls
Calculating the true coSt 0:- pro...cing city services is 1 critical step in :he process cf establishing user fees and corresponding COSt recovery levels.
Although it is an important factor, other -actors must also be given consideration. Ci:y decision-makers must also consider the effects that
esnbllshlng fees for services wil have on the ircividmls pu"'chasing those services. as well 25 the commLr.ity as a wrolc The fclbwilg economic
and policy issues help illustrate these considerations.
.:. It may ~ a desired policy (0 establish fees at 2. le'\lcl thu permits owe'" income groups :0 lse services that they might no: othe~ise be able
to aFore.
.) A cons cera::ion of community~wide benefit versus indivicual beneftt m gm be of concern for certain services.
The flow chart on :he following page helps il,ustrate tbe economic anc policy consideraticns fisted abo\'c.
MGT
!)f ....ElltA. II'le.
DECISION-MAKING FLOW CHART
Who
Benefits
Type of
Service
Tax VS. Fees
Policy
Example
Services
-
100% taxes
Po ICe patrol servlces i
MosIiytaxes
& some fee<
Code enfcrcenent
servi~s
,-------------
,
-
Mootly fces
& some taxes
Youth spcrts
f~
100% fees
r~~velopmenl ""'~!
t
--+
_____J
Stlltly Filltlillg,
::0
(1)
II>
o
s:
0'
::>
"Z
'" 0
<0 '
(1)N
~O
~O
O'P
-0
"'~
coco
Wflile the p!.rpose of this study is to icelit ff the cost of fee-rela.:ed a:::tiy"ties, one Ol the cutcomes or the analysis is to provide a complete picture of
ttlC full cOSt of ail services offered. It is necessa"Y to identify all costs. whether fee~re ared or not. so that there is ;a fai.- dis:ribJtion of al
departmental overt1ead costS (discussed 1'1 the following sect on of thiS report) across at act.vltics. thereby cnsunng a definitive relationship bet'Nccn
the cost of the son-ice and the fee :hu s charged. No SCN:CC should be burdened with costs that cannot be cirecdy or indirectly linked to that
se'"Vice
Therefore. the first task in this s:udy is to separate the (ee~for-service activities (rom the non.fee activitics. Some f1on~fee rel2ted activities are
approoriacely funded by general func monies (or other special revenue or impact fee sources). such J.S adva.'1ccd planning services performed by the
P1annin~ division. T~e costs of :hese o:her sel"'lices are identmed and set aside from the user fee se."ices.
<T
><
W
iD
25
'"
MGT
Of fl.lIUICA. l!'Ie.
-0;0
III CD
<Om
CD 0
~c
I\.):::!':
00
~::l
wZ
ex>!,>
'"
o
o
'"
,
o
~
ex>
Exhibit I below displays the spli: of the total costs of each department into either user ;ec-rclatcd or other serv;ce tests. 01 the $13..> minion in
total costs analyzed, $9.7 million (or n%i of Clat total is -elated to user fee services. It is this $9.7 m:liion tha: is the focus of :his swdy and
represents the :0:.11 potential for user fee-related rC'vcnues for the City.
Exhibit!
City of Santa Ana
Total Costs by User Fee Area
2008/2009
Total Cost<. U<er CostJ. Non.Fe~
Function/Activity Cost! Fee Service! Jervfces
Planning Division $4.439.944 $2.671.971 6C% $1.766.973 40%
Bu'lding Safety Divi!ion 56.%0.045 $6.424.192 92CYc $535.963 9%
Develo:>men: Enginee~ing Di'Jslo," $2.109.857 $639.776 3C% 51.470.CEl 700/0
Grand Total: $13.508.746 $9.735.929 72% $3.772.817 23%
"# C05tfigure5 j"dudes supportjrom the Cor;5tru~tiOfj .'mpectiOfl divi5iofl.
The- next elChibit (following page) identme-s. the SOl.;rce of funds for th~ user fee- <<:'I"\'ice-s. Exn:bit II breaks down the $9.7 million in u~er fe-~ seNices
between cos:s that re cU'Temly recovered through user fee charges and the remaining subsidy -' Overall, the City is experiencing a 40% COSt
reco\'ery ievel for its fee-rela.:ed se,.....ices.. VVithin elC'l department, current cost recovery le.....e1s range :rom 21% for Plannng to 4B?t~ for auilcin&
Safety and =ngineering. The Information a.bout indMdua .;'ees may be founc in sL.tJseqLem seaicns of this refXJrt.
MGT
OJ ,",IUIIU, l!'fe.
Exhibit II
City of Santa Ana
Source of Funds
- User Fee Activities -
2008/2009
COfts, U_ Fumkd by een'rW1i1d
Function/ktlvify FM${!fViCl'f u,'" F~ef SdiJi!!Y'
PI<tnning Divi~i:-::n $2,671.971 $558.059 21% ....S2.1t~,!Ilf 19'1ii
Pu:tdhg Safety Division $6.424.182 \3.055.352 48% .jSt'l;~6l!!~ 52%
Oe\lel~pme'1l: E"'lgi:-.eering Divis:o, $639,776 $304,852 480/CI 0'_",' "S~;~ 52%
Grand Total: $9.735.929 $3.91B.263 4O"k $~i'!l11#>6 60%
Exhibit I Indicates that user fees .-ecovc" 40% of full cost. leaVIng 60% or $5.8 mill on to be funded by other funding sources. This $5.8 million
represents a . wlneow of opportunity" for the City to Increase fees and gene,al fiJnd revenues, with a co""'espondlng c.ecrease In the subsldlza:lon of
servkelli by the g,efle'-.t fund.
The stud)"s prirr,ary objective is to p"ovido the City's decision.ma~ers with basi<: datil needed fer setting fees. This reJ=o,,-: details the fdl cos: of
ser'lices. ;md prf':'>t'nl.s proposed fees ~rd project?d reVf'l:ntJes brtsed on recommenried user fee cost ~ecovery :f':Vf~l~. R&ommanduiol'lS lNere bitsed
upon carefJI consideration of :he results of the cost analysis. h:stoncal COSt recovery levels. ant market comparisons.
;u
(ll
U>
o
s:
6'
'"
"Uz
&0
(llN
~o
",0
0'1'
~o
"'~
OJ OJ
MGT
0-
0<
W
"'
2;
<0
or "1II[lIel.. I~C.
1J::O
ID lD
COlf>
lD 0
~C
~e
00
-"
wZ
CD",
N
o
o
<D
,
o
~
CD
Exhibt II :x:lc;w summ2rizcs the financial analy~is of the Cit)"s usel- fee program. It is cstin~ated th3.t adoption d the n~comme,ded cost r"ccovery
polley WoulCllOcrease d-e specified rea r-e..,enue b)l $5.8 mi I'on, ThIS waule bring tile ovc--all cost "'ocovery level up to toe% .0'" these actlvloes:
Exhibit III
City of Santa Ana
User Fee Revenue Analysis
2008/2009
Com. Us., GeIHlf'8/Futid
Department/Dlvlrlon Fee SSnlicef $ubsklv'
Plann:ng Division $2.671.971 S2,l!~+$i~
BuilJillX Sdf~y Jivi>iulJ , $6.424.182 S~.~~;~30
D~~luV; lIer It EI~illt;1!rir~ D,vhiofl $639.776 $~~.924
.<<;0,"'"
Gr.nd T otel: $9.735.929 $5;817.666
Revenues @
CUn'ent COft RecolA!ry Increased
Fees Policy Revenue
5558.059 $2.663.786 100% $2.105.727
S3.055.352 $6.416.670 lOO:Jk S3.351.31E
S304.852 5628.285 98% 5323.433
$3.918.263 $9.700.741 100% $5.790.478
"'1) In addition to the $3.361,318 af new revenue, $166,676 is !yopO${:ci,fO,. an uodatc o-'t/;~ Gcr;~ra,' PIOfl.
Metlrodologtj
A CU!ll ur 3er"Yice ~udy allillyres tWO COll1pon~Il:~ or t:o:o>U. the direu ,om a~sucidled Wilh ~-c.:vidi.,1S cadl ree-io'..servke dl..l vily. dud lht: indil~u
COStS chilt support these :lctivitics. A brier discussion of each of :.hesc compcncnts to lows. (A complete. dcrnilcd rC:lOrt of CllcJlations is pro'{dcd
as :m a1Ll.c:hmem to this repon).
Dir-ect Costs. The direct costs: associatec with fee-for.serv ce acti""itcs were ...nalyzed in great detail in this stud)'. MGT worked wit' s::ai within
c,H.h departmerll ~o <.:evelop the aUd:Y~e. t;Jdl ~ :!lUlIIlIlarlcd '11 lhi:!llt::pon. The li~r..a ycar 2006-2007 adup:..ed budget was ~d to idclllify dircu
costs.
MGT
or A.ll-U,C"-. .toIC
~hc first step in tbe precess Yoi<.1S to identify stlff time spent dircctly on cach of :he user fce activities, :=a.ch staff pcrsonnvol'lcd n the uscr fee
services idcn:ificd :imc spent to completc each task a:sscc:iatcd wit, aH user :cc SCf'l:ces. Annual 'Iolume statistics wc..c also gzthered in order to
dcvelup ~o:.dl dllllUill 'lVolklodJ illformdLioll. S,dary dud benefit <.Iolldl ~ wel e d~~i;.rled to tile lime ~tiTldlC~ ~o lOIllt: up with the dire:.:: ~Laff (mt~.
Indirect Costs. A p~oport,onatc share of indirect cost was layered onto thc di"cct costs to calculate t1e fuly burdcncc COSt of each fee related
selVlc(> _ Th{'f(> are- two types of md lI'"C'Ct costs:
A:?:C1CY Indirect Costs: thcse are adm nistrat....e and supervisory costs buc,getcd wi:hin the particubr agency. General material and supplies costs
also fall in t!-is category. These costs are added to the direct cost calculations.
Cirvwide IndirE":r:r. emt!';: these costs stem from support received from orher C:ry departmenrs M;my of thE! r:mts th;lt suppor.: itIl city
program~ and se'Viccs arc bud,getcd in centT<!.l!zed ilctivities suen as Finznda Management. which p''''ov:dcs payrol budgeting and acr:ounting
support, ;J"d City Attorney. which provides legal services. The costs of these and Ocher cent'"illizcd services are ccnsidc"ed inarect ovemead
that support fec-for-service activities, as well as other programs and functions within the city.
As j:arc of this Study, MGT developed an indirect COSt allocaron plan that Identifies and distributes these indirect COStS to all ope:ra~jng programs
;md functions within tl1p. City's organiZil,jon::l1 ~""Jrfllre. The r:o~ ::IlloGltion phn T~k('s a det~:Ip.d ;approach to analyzing indirPC"t costs MGT
interviewed staff d.nd analyzed data w thin cact'1 central activity to de:ermine:
Wh:u Indirect support functions are provided (e.g. p;:ayroli, leg;ll services. building rm'nrenance. eoc)
2. How to ailocate centraily budgeted personnel and other operating expenses into these functions.
3. Wh,ch deparunenlS receive benefit from these services (e.g. payro;! services ",,"efit all deparcllencs mat have budgeted
staff. City Hall maintenante benefts all deparunents that are housed wid1in City Hall).
:lJ
CD
en
o
s:
5'
::>
"Uz
OJ 0
'" .
CD",
~O
eno
o'P
-0
w~
CX>CX>
.. How to identify the best method of a'locClong these costs to the users (e.g. information tcchno:ogy services are allocated
ba~d QlIlh~ numL~r of users .U1d applications in eadt department).
The end result of this ana'ysis is me allocCltion of all indirect costs to all operating dcparunents Clnd prograiT'ls. The indirect costs arc
tIlen added co tile direa COsts to determine the full cost of gJj ciI)' operations - whether fee-related or not. This accounting
exerc:se is important'" that it em result 'n an increase in general fund revenues for reimbursement of support for user fee services
and state or federally funded pro~rams.
MGT
CT
,..
W
<0
2;
'"
Of A,lUll~". I~C.
"U::lJ
W CD
"''''
CD 0
~c
m::
00
_::J
wZ
CPO
'"
C)
C)
<0
,
C)
CP
C(lst Recovery C(ll1lpariSOlls
The chart on the following page displays vario.Js city rccovc')' levels. These numbers were tHen From r~nt MGT clients. In o,..dcr to provite Santa
Ana with tre greateSt "app;es to apples" comparison, please note that these d cnts have undcrtclken the sarno Study as Sant:! Ana. using tbe same
processes rI'ld 'TIethodclogies.
City of Santa Ana
CC'st Recovery Comparison....,
PI.!\M\rNC FNDNFFR IN" RrfH DIN"
heccvery ,ates KecoY'ef)' rates HecC\/eri' rates
CI.JifHlI. feC'OfTlmenJt:d I;Uffeflt !eCumrT'efltktJ cummt leuJllr.r.endt!d
Co""""" 2640 SO% C:upbell 55% 53" R~:t)rxio Bead" SJ" n/a
Chino Hills '2"0 SO% Circ Hills ;% 55'10 Los "lam tos !J2'" 34%
Cupeltiro nla 1CC% C~rtln{; n/a .00":'0 HLJ'Uington Beach 91% 98%
Em8"yvi!1e 34'" 1CC% ErrerfVille 81'" '00% OLJblin 7D% 100%
Hun1ing1On Beach BL'" 1CC% HJI1tington Beach 860/" '00'<> Long Beac'l 77% "00%
La Halra 5'% nla lahatr31 29% n/. la Mesa 95" '00%
La Mesa 54% 89" la Mesa 76% 37% N3"ApOrt Beach 69% 97%
Long Beach 1t'.'o 99" Long 8eac.., 53% 72%
Loe Aanitos 7% 53% Los o\Iam tos 2.1% ~2l'.
In~ ('1Rtm 65"- 1CC% I o~~~trn!. Ql% '00"-
P1ac~r CCLrty nla 1CC% Place- Coc.rt'( n/a ,otJ'"'.()
VVhiUi;:l 4'''' 74" V'inuil.f 52% '00%
Pltt3.bJrg '9'<> <9% PittGb..rg 78% B2~
Santa Barl:ara 38'<> n/a $3fl1a Barbara 62% n/,
RedlardS 78'<> 9!l% R:t:lal1cs 56% ~5%
Newport Beach 62'10 99", NelvjX)f1 Beach 62% 93%
MGT
or AlIIfUt.A.. INC.
Planning and Building Agency-
Planning
;u
m
Ul
o
S
0"
:J
"Uz
III 0
co "
mrv
~o
...,0
o'P
~o
"'~
a> a>
MGT
tT
"
W
<0
2;
co
01 ....r IlCIl i Me
"1
,,~
H
~ "
!!
fl h
~ 1EI)~
) $
~
~z
H
~ .~
~
"
~
'"
Ii
.
"
~
';j
~
"
~
~
~-
~~
~
E 3 :t
.i~ .0
c:Jl~
~
~
~
H
,~
.
u
>
ill
~ '"
" c
- "
J!l Ie 8
c ~~
~
(f>
15 ~~
~
G G- .
~
~
"'
Resolution No. 2009-018
Page 18 of 38
~~~aaa~ ~a~~aaaaaa~a~~~~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8
:.4 ..... .... _. =. !!:. '"':. 'ei .... LX. ~. "'!, l!f:. ~ :l ::2 $ - ~ ~ ~ .... N N ?::! IX. ~
~~~~~~.i~A~~~ ~ ~ M~M~~l
I 11
" "
" "
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ U !l ~ ;,; !8
"'~"'~"':t
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
U~~~~ ~ ~
;l S ;; ~ ~ ~ ~
~~;;~;;~'
~ ~ ~ M ~ m 9 Mg. M N >> ~ M m ~ >>
~ ~ * ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ W ... ... ... ~ ~ ~ N ... ~ ~
... tit... ;; toot '" tit M '" ill-
pp~pp,,~
= 18 ;:::: 1ft: ;!: ~
~ , ~ ~ , , # , ~ , # , , , , p , ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ > > > > >
~
~
~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ !
~ u ~~ ~~ *
_ _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ N M ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ - W ~ ~ ~ -
~ ,~ ,~ ,~ J ,~ ,~ I ,~ ,~ ,~ j ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ I
'-'
! ~
~ ~ ~
B ~ . ~
~ _IW I €" ~
8 ~.~ . *z ~
~ ~ . ~ a j ~ 5 i
n HI ~ I i II h i il i Ii d j ~ p
d l ~ i~ d )1 H i~ a iJij a n 1 ~ I ~ j
~~~1i.i~~j.!1m~i ~~~~~>>>. ii~.
~ 6 ~ ~ c: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & & ~ F 6
L ~~_~,!l ~.,!lbi.n..,r,r~i~d~g
U f ~ j~1 ~ H ~ ~ E ~ n H H n ! ; u n j~
. j ~. I~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ . ~ . . . . . , ~ ~ ~ o. f
~ ~ 3 ~ u u I u u ~ 0 j ~ j j 3 ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n
~ N M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ re ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
c(.!: co
S E 8
15 is: ~
"' ~
0<8
i':'alN
o C.
bk: 3/9/09
""~ ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii
<d
H
.~ ~ $~~a~~~~p~~;~~~51~~~2!~~~
~ ~ . .. - ~ ~ . M ~ - :.. ~ ~ ~ a ~
~ "'l!" :;::i" " .. .. i Ii ~
. ""~
! ~
a: H ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ii~i~~i~~
B
ij .~
,,~
f ~_~~~e_~~~~~Si.~~a~s_~~a~.gBi
~ :;: ,,:;:.. ~ .. :;:~ 1 ~ "
'"
.
~
8 ~;;~a_~_~i~~s~;1;R~s_a~a~.~a~
'5 ~ ~a; ~ ;it ;$i m ~
~
>;
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
J N ~ . N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N W ~ _ ~ ~ M ~ _.
~~ ~ - .
~
.~ ~.~ *
j~~ >-
u
>
~
>
~
>
8 a ~ ~ 8 '" R ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ii ~ ii ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~~~a~~ -u -~s ~ ~~-~
!
8
H
~~
~
~
j
~ v ~ - ~ ~ ~ N ~ M W ~ ~ N ~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _
% t I I I tIt I I I ! I I I ~~ 1 .~ f I II oj (
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~I ~ ~
l l
.iI ~
~ ~ Ii
~ I = ~
3 ! . .
~Ilm
~ ! ~ i i ~
I ~~ j j n] .d~
.~ ~i ~ n-~ul ii-n
'" i ~ ~ ~ ~ j ; · )l i j i j ~ e jl i ~ .~
dHPn,dHP j Hn~n
n~qniniqlidHijH
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ! ! ~ ~ > ffi ffi 1 1 z ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~
;Q :Q 'i :Q " ..
Resolution No. 2009-018
Page 19 of 38
~ 01
4..!: 00
J!l E :;:
~ ~ ~
'" ~
'l5~~
?:-o.
o
"'] a a ~ " a ,,;] li a a " aa " " "
h ;j ..~
,f!1
.~ ti ~,! ~ & 3 a# ~~. 8 ~ ~. S~. f
~h a~ ~; ;alll;;:;;~;;la~
... 09.13 ..' It> <""'0 .... "" ~ ..... ... ~
t; ~ ," l:;j.~. ~ 18. "1 ~. i;;. <0'\0
e ~;a~::a~
~ ~1 <l: tt- f. #. ;j. ~'..t'.I'.i.~'..' ;I. ~ ,. # ;j. ;j. #- ;i. *-
0:._ ~~PlHH!,;, ~~~~~lH,~~
~] ..."
",~ ,I
rJ K j!'~'
r-. SOl ;t 00!!i!~;E M ;!; en 0'1 ('ol
1 ~.~.3.:t"'<';lli ~ii~f-;"",<I, ;a
" (') M:"'I .,... -~r . . '" ..... M g !'2
JJ ~_... ... ;( tl.~;;M~"""'!
~' ~ e m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
": 0 en ~ ~ ..... O'l ~ ~
~Iltr.l~~;dl&
R.!l~~~a~61 ~H1J.IH,~ ~
tiua .... ";!'I,;;(~~5!!~:::;:!'$l~
;t:~,,,,: ::~.
iJ~iil~s~~"d
,':::~~~r'~~::;
':J11 ................
" '" '" ~ " "'''. ~
~ ~ "' ~ ~ :! <""'0 n,....,J.,...' ~ ~ ; : : : : ~ ~
#::,1 g r- := "'" DO 'l) co
i!1 u ~ ~ a ,,'.'..'....'1... ~ ~ ~ ill!1J!1J ~ ~"
LL ;;x X ) ~..; ~ "!- " " ~ ~ ;;
I .~:.... .... .... .... ""
u .8<'
!~ ~ M" ~ ~ gril ~"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M_
~ ~~ -i(~!~~~~~~!
~ 0 ~ ~ ~ Ji ~~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
i .. n" ~ "II n n n n ~
:1
~ :~
~ I
II .,....' ~.d~L
.~ ~'i Sl!SlC'lCl~"
~ i ~~ r>>~~;hhL
~ I H 8,....,...1.. u i n 'I i i ~
I ~ ~ i. l5>:I" oib Ql 41 ! III III 110 .;.
~ 11 > ~l!d n Ld ~ ~ ~
.il .( ~ ;c:.,lll .~ 2l .f 11 .e .~ .~ j
T c( . N T (l':::~;i UI rI'I <Il t1l In In In In n
~~~!l$2~~,J~~~~~M;i"'~.-
6
5
o
~
U
~
~
..
"
~
"a -a 0 -a Q Q 0- -a
Resolution No, 2009-018
Page 20 of 38
!
t
"
i
11
'i
J!
~
i
~
~
j ~
-t III
.!! t' ~
. ~
g ~
.~ ~ ~ .
n: ~
t! ';: ~
~ "I! ,0
! ~ ~ "
~]if~
UI ~ ~ J ~
H I ~ 1
""if/; ~
~ L ~ ~
21 'io ~l~
1 d!
I ~~.
~ H ~ ~
ti;':i\';;';:;-
..
~
.5
.Q
-."
..
"
~
.
g
!
~
1
~
~
.~
~
~
~
~
..
~
a
. g ~ ... ... ::n ... ... '"
~!:1~_~F:l,\G;,>1~
-ti;t~~~;l~a~
"
,
.1;
~ " ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '" ~ :::! 11 l'rl . ''''
· i
~ .
~ k
~ : a ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~
K ~
~ ]
~ ; ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"" ~ . . M oi if ..... aQ ....
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- . . . - . I g ~
~!i!~U~-l
~ ... !'-i ~ ~ r!
~
~
I;
it
~
l
~
,~
i
.5
~
1
,
~
an~n,~,~
! ~ ~ ~ a ~ u a ~
..
f
;u
ro
II>
Q.
S.
o'
::>
"Uz
c210
roN
NO
~O
0'1'
-0
w~
OJ OJ
Planning and Building Agency-
Building
MGT
0'
,..
~
o
<D
or AIHlIC.... 1f'lC;.
"ll::O
W'"
10",
'" 0
",e-
Ne-
00
-::>
wZ
0>",
'"
o
o
(0
,
o
-
0>
USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET
~ PER UNIT INFORMATION-
City of Santa Ana
Building
FY 2007108
Recommendations
ServiceNImE! Service Annual CurrenlFee %ofFolCo;;t 10CI"l. c:fFull CtJlent MinillumFee Fee@P(jcy Subsidy @Pdicy
Type Volume eml Subsidy ",wi L~I
1 10,000 sfwio irterilri~lTI8nts - S1ruciJral Plan Chrd. Fee 11 S2,014 m Sg,244 $7,230 15'" SO 92 persJ.
2 1\.1000 sfwlo irieri(J"i~..emenls -Stl1Jcllralln5P Fee 21 $2.817 loa.. $2,004 .$213 $450 $016 persJ.
3 10000 ::;fwJu illteriu illllluvtlllltm!:; - EMP 11tit-' F.. 21 $1,508 .." $3,159 $U52 S_ir.:.Ji....ilJu~ll.tIlll::,(J~
4 10,000 sf wlo irterlcr-improvemems . EMP Plan Chock Fee 11 51,415 75.. $1,&91 5476 $019 persJ.
5 60,000 sfw10 irterlct"ilWfOVemenls -S1rucIJraf Plan Chock Fee 1 56,564 .... $13,57 $7.015 55'" $009 persJ
, CiO.ooo tof WIG irMuiCK"improvemen15 . 3t1'\l~ralln~ Fee 2 $10.099 142~ $7,091 ..SJ.OO8 $4'" SO" per'5J
7 60000sfwJo irtericrirJlll'DVf;!menls -EMP Irsp Fee 2 5MIt' .... 57.1~ $3,730 See in:Iividual item schlKliJe
8 60000 sfwJo iriericrinvovemenls -EMP Plan Chedl Fee I 52123 75.. 52,83 $714 S0.02 _,.I
9 100 000 sfw/o interior im~emert:5.. Gtructul1Il PLlIn CI'Ied<; ree I $10,070 ~9'l6 $10.9J $G.OO4 $550 $0.08 lH!lrsJ.
I. 100,000 sfw,'o interiormplD\'emerts. StructlJralll'&P Fee 1 $15492 128% $12,14 43,351 $450 $0.13 persJ.
11 100,000 sfwlo interiormJrOVemet1s - EMPhSD Fee 1 56.099 48" 512,780 $6,681 See rnividlJaI item &;hedtJe
12 100,000 ~Jyt!o intcriofim~. EMPPlan Chedl Fee I $2,717 ,,,. $3,631 1914 SOD2 per~f.
13 10000 sf will inErior ill'JlftWen81ts.StucklraI Ptm Cteck Fee " 52.367 19.. S12,5[J8 $10,231 5550 $126 persJ
" 10,000 sf will in~ ill"pfOYerT1ef1ts. SructJrallnsp Fee 24 53.310 91.. $3,623 1313 $450 $0.36 persJ
15 10000 " wilt irterior irrprovemenb - EMf" Imp Fee 24 $1,005 4... $4,180 $2.185 See irdMdI.ll:ll item !>ChedlJel
16 10,OOOsfwilhin~ill'proverret1ts-Et.lPPl<WIChedc. Fee 12 52.774 75"\ 53,1ll $933 SO" persJ.
17 60,000 sf will ilerior ill'provements - StuclJrn Pial Check Fee 1 $1,733 45% 517,261 59,52ll $550 10,,", persJ.
18 60000::fwi".,~riorirfl'rtWCIB:ln~ St'ucl.l~Irt'"..p Foo 2 $11,897 10'N $11.126 '771 "'50 SO.15 ~$.f
19 60000slwifli1erio1'i~nts.Et.lPlnsp Fee 2 $6,013 48% $12J~j1 56,587 See mividu;j ilern &;hedlJe
20 60000 sfwifl ileriol' imwements. Et.lP Plan Check Fee 1 56~2 75% $8,321 52094 $0.09 IJefsJ.
21 100000 dwith il'lt8rioflm .SlructurnIPlanCh.ck Fw I $12,Ot2 55.. $2U~23 $9,911 5550 $0.12 porsJ
22 100,000 sfwith interior improvements -SIructunIIIr6p Fee 2 518,489 105"10 $17.64 .$840 $4'" $016 persJ
Zl 100 OCO sfwith interiorimoroVEmeflts - EMP Insp Fw 2 5M58 48.. $18.142 $9.484 See in:iividu;j ~em schedlAe
24 l00,OCX) dwith inwriorim . Et.lP Pbn Check Fw I $Q,284 75.. 512.-407 $3,122 SOlO ....s.r
::xl
CD
en
a
~
5'
::>
-Uz
III a
co .
CD",
"'0
(.00
a'P
-0
(.O~
"''''
USER FEE STLDY SUMMARY SHEET
- PER UNI-INOORMATIOr-..
City of Santa Ana
Building
FY 2007108
Reccmme.1:JatlOns
Service Name Servce Anl1wl CLrrentF33 * ofFI.JIIC05t 10(l% dFull Cl.l"~: MFirlJ1f' Fee Fee~ ""ok)' Subsidy @: Polk)'
",... '.I"ulurlt! C~t 3.Julii~ "''''' le'otl
25 ~~ Ris9. 5 Stores or mof9 - Stn.<::lJral PIa, Chd F_ S9.42~ "" $.(',;12,( $32.'" $SSO SO. a~tITles50kscft
25 -i{:;~ Ri5=!. 5 90res or IOOf9 -Stn.c'rual hsp F"" $14.505 121% $11,35-4 -$2E", $4Sl S01 aS1::lJTlesSOkscll.
ZI -%rRi3e 5Sloresormore-EMPInst: r~ $7363 .." $15,428 $8e.. See indMduel Rem schedue
23 -itt'Rise 5SloresorrTlOO!-EMPFlanC..edt Foo $5004 75% $7,489 $a., SO.l assunes5m<sc It
29 29)()~FbiWl)'" 2':lo~:+' SF:I.$tn...tulal PlcsrrChtly. =:re eo $674 "" $5,481 ....oe $SSO $21 pel ~ f
15 rOe sto) $5Sl $1.() perS.1
:frepeat $500 SO-"< pen.1
3) 2,&IO<4~'1:3a1SFD. Str.lctlr.lllns~ "- --9 $1,344 "" S' ,,412 ,." $4'" SO! pc!'r'i.f
"' l,aJUsI t6dtnlal SrO - ~F If'IS:) -"" "9 $>OJ .." S",l35 It.. See mcllVtjual Oem sc:tJecl.lE
32 2,9)()sfReiIde..i:aISFD.EWPPanChflCk "- 35 $1.245 7'" S.,564 '41 soe perE.t
33 !\parmen. 10U'its4 SlJJcttralPlanOle:::t Fee $2,704 '3% $1',53-( $8!3t '5Sl $W as....~es.Okscll.
34 .6,pB~ent, 10urm- SWctrl.illllmD Fee $3,782 154% $2,310 -$1.471 $45 SOZ ll$.."U'OOs'Okscft
35 ,o\ootUneri, 10lhts-EMP Insp Fee $2,334 ,,% S4,!l91 S2ESC S~mivljualilem$ChockJe
35 .6,j.J&rll1lel'll, 10uriG- ENP Pfl:ll Chl:dl. F~ $1)l64 75" SZ,ZN ..."" S012 ilb..'UIIe:,.Oki>(,in
~ -io:elNoEl 20 Lrlls - S:ructu131 Plan C'ledI Fee $2555 ,,% $16,115 S13ffi1 $5Sl $Ui. assunes-Skscfl
3S "io:el.....ollel ZO U11ls - S:ruclU'<lllflsp ."" U~73 "" 56,232 'Rei," $4'" SO., aSSUTles'5k~n
~ -Io:l!lJv'o....I20U'lih-E\i\l=mp -- S6P11 ,,% S12,591 $E5" Sooin::lividual~sched.I"
4J ;o:el.....o~1 lIJ U11t$ . E:\'IP Plan t:hEdt r"" $4,1U4 "" ~,4lSl) ""'U $U.;; asstJ11es.okSGft
41 ~iK_ Resd. Strucu-.: ~tio CO'lwl GlITag9 _ 'Sln;dLir.ll P190 Chec F"" 2IJ '" 10% S5H S555 $]5 SO,. pen.l.
42 \'Iise. Resd. Strudlre: PtitbCc\'e!/Garage-Sln:ctJrallnsp ".. 'OC $91 '5% $363 $272 $19) $02 per!:.f.
43 ~i!;c:_ Rood. Struauro: POklCovcrlG3JOOO EMP Insp ="c ,OC $83 ,,% $187 '98 SDO indivi:tu~ item 5dloduc
45.6,dditbn: Jpto 500 sf Resid 1st Iocr- SlrtJck.ral PI." Ctect """ -n $335 ,,% S..493 $l1SC $:>00 $1151 per!:J
45.tWdki.." Jj)tv500:.IR~id1:.tloXi-::;lIlAJLliIIl'l:;p ;:=~ ,.. SO'S 97" $no S2S< '300 $,e<>l pt!1 ~_I
47.A.dditiln' Jpto 500 sf R3Sid 1st tocr-EMP In!:i: :::-!'e ,.. $25, 48" S541 $:iS: See iOOivl::lual tIem sctalJe
43.o\lXllU:ln' Jpto 1 :5OOsfResd IHrIoa' -Stru:::lUM PanChedl. -"" eo 165' "" 52,106 $,.... SUo! per:::.l.
~) 4r1rlithn' lptn 1~!'tRR!<;.ti1<:tflnn-_~lnrnllRl m;l ='*" ." SIOD '''' S.,:>.a:l S:::~1 $11,01 Jlftr"f
c-
'"
~
25
CO
"U;lJ
III CD
COCII
CD 0
I'V1:
~~
o 0
-='
wZ
000
I'V
o
o
CO
,
o
00
LSER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHE:oT
. PER UNIT Ir--FORMATICN'
City 01 Santa Ana
Buiding
FY 2007108
RecoJTI.m€ndariorJS
~r/K:e Nane S.,,"'" Annuel Current Fee % ofFu ICes: lCQ>4d=ul CU'1?'lt MrimJT Fee ::~e@FoIi="} SuI::l;;idy@Policy
-)J;e Voh.llre C"" SubOdy _evel L....
51 Ad:lition Lllbl,500'IRMidl~lfIocr-EMPlns~ .~ 12" $.<1E "... 5&:'1 <451 See hdivdJa item ~uk1
52 AdlltiorJ l4l t) 1,500 ~f R~id lstfloa- ENP F~n Ch=,,:;t. ".,~ 60 $5C' is% $081 S171 $0.45 persf-
:53 Adlltkln l.4J b 500 ~f Fi eslc 2nd IIoor - St'1..ClUra Plan Chedl ::;E ,. $:):!e ,.'" $~.436 $3,1OY $O'" SS."Z ~~r
::4 Aa:lJOOn l.4Ib:;,wstfoiesiC lndlloor-:itu::l\lra 1m::> -- "if 5:l1t """ $'" ,,,~l $rll $lJJ pent.
ffi Ad:fitbll4'b5((lsfResic 2nd floor-EMPlnsp =~ 27 Sl~~ 'S'" $324 $1" See hdivWa temsc1edule
S1 Ad:itioo l.4It:Jl,500s1Resid21dfb>r-Struc:1uraIPIan0led. =~ 28 S65~ "... SE,2~i S5.~r..c $2231 per;;f.
!";.8 Actitioo I4ltJl,SOOsfResid21dlDor-Struwalln:!::J: -- 55 $1 01~ 69% 51,,477 S46! $09SI periJ
~ Act1itim '''b1,SOOsfResid21dfbor.EMPIns:J -- 55 $.<" 48% $1,040 $I' Eee hdivdua item sc'ledule
ro Actlitim ~tJ1,SOOsfResid21dfbor-EMPPmChedl -- 28 $2!!3 i5% $378 S9! $015 pel'lt
., ~vrinTn,"'" PnlI, :\'iO!.t. %IK1lndPIan Ct-:k F~ 7 $;Ie;; ,,~~ ...,. !?O S~ $050 .....r
S2 Swirrmin... Pool, 350 if. Structtralll\lp F~ 66 5311 ,...... $lg{\ -$1" He $0.5.4 p9r ~ f.
ro $".;rrming Pool, 350;. :h1P Ir3p r~ GO $0" "... $000 ""'" ~ee rdioldua tem sc"mhk
64 SvrlllTTllngPool.350sf-:;h1P=>IanChe<:Il F.. ,. $2t!3 ,~% $3:'6 "'" $1.0& IB" ~ '-
ED F91:;.eCwoodl 20tf-St'\.cttra:PIanCheck F~ 1 $1:: t% $368 "" ,'S( 50.35 ~ErU.
En F91:eCwood) 201f-St'\.cttI'a'lnsp F~ 7 521 9... $24"- = $225 $025 J;ErU.
m Fielai'lilaWaI, 20 f- ~.J:::Iu'aIPlan::::he:k. =-!!!! 1 $::2 8% $654 "'" $-S( $0.37 J;ErU
JO f;cuhing WaI, 20 r. ~J:Iu1IllnSD =-ee . $ee :i6'f.. $222 114 $2<0 $0.35 ~erU.
7J TI,"-,OOO~f.s.tJctoolI;lJarCheck ;;-~ 99 $6" 52% 11,288 1621 $0.32 Mr"sf-
74 Tl.-".OOOsf-$)\JctIJ"a1 rsp -- 198 $934 '0,% $1169 -"" $022 J;D'"sf.
75 T1,4,OOO~_El.,pl'liD '.. 198 $S!:~ 4S% $1.172 161 See h.1;"dua itvm'iC''1IMltAe
7S T1. ",000';;1 EU::lpb'lCl1cck 'M 100 $,]E ~5% $U36 5261 $0,26 pcr:;,f.
77 TI. 8.000' ,.1- Sllu\.luI.. =>1"", C!lt~;k F.. 16 $l,07~ 53% S2,045 m< $026 WI "J
78 TI, 8,000 Sf - Structural TSP :;;~ 33 $1.5(4 49% 51,0-0 -5494 SO.I3 pe...'
79 TI, 8,000 sf. E~P l'Isn '.. 33 Si21 48% 51.649 <=I See h.1ivdua item SC'1edlAe
;0
'"
en
o
s:
5'
::>
-oz
., 0
U> .
"'IV
NO
010
o'P
-0
"'~
""""
USER FEE STU::lY SUMMARY SHEET
- fER UNIT :t--FD~MATION-
City of Santa Ane
Building
FY 7007108
RecommenaafTons
Se...ic:e'lane "'_ Annual CUmrt Fee %ofFUlCost 10)%:iFul Cwrenl rJlrifl"U'1\;;"a" Fee@Poli:( &JMid~@Pdi;1'
Type Vclurre :"" s..oocy "..I l.eo<el
.. ~ 8,000 sf- EW" par C'lett F.. I. $I'" 75~ $1,778 "" $OZZ persI.
81 -~ 12,OOCsf~StuctralPIanChedt Fee 7 $1"'" 54~ $2,740 S1255 $023 ::ersL
'" ~ 12.000 lOt ShlctJ"allnlOp F<< H $~07' 184% S1,130 .." $0.)3 pen;}.
83 ~ 12,OOOsf.EWInsp F.. ,. $1~ .,~ $2.283 $1,193 8m indiYidl.Ja item sdledtie
84 -ll2.000sf.ELf'P1mC1ed. F.. 7 $2434 75% $3.253 sal9 $027 ;:JersJ.
85 -l 20,00( sf. StuctJ-aI Plan ctEd<. F.. 4 $2ZlC 58% $3.845 $1.615 so.n ;JIllf'$J
86 -l20,OOO sf - Stuct.rallnsp F.. , $3,'" 1-12% $2,202 -$917 $0.11 pers.f.
Ifi -l20,OOOsf-EWInsp F.. , $1591 -18% $3,334 51,743 See indillldlialltem~.
88 -l20,OOO sf-ELf' P1mC'led F.. 4 $353> 75~ $4,128 51.190 $02. persJ.
89 Resi::I. Vise iwrn:rN, dxlr, etc.) - Strucllra PI., Dux F.. 12 $73 .", $532 $059 $532 ...
90 Rem, Vist; iwi'KbN, dxlr, etc.l-lnspectjoo Fee .20 $11 2~ $392 $281 $3a2 ...
93 COmm. rJlsc (S:0f3g9ract) -$lllcu"31 P1:Jn Check F.. 15 """ ,,~ $1,023 ..... $ :,OZ3 ""
9' Comm.M'5C(s:oI3;Jerad).$tllct.rallnsp Fee 29 $50!5 92~ $55' $46 $551 ...
QS Comtn.M<<(5:Orll;jiOracl:.).E'-'Fk'I$p F.. 29 $53, ,.. $1.1:4 15'2 S99 indMdlJaI ilIlIm $ct.dukJ
96 Comm.rJIs:(s:oraJarad).EWPPl81C'1ed Fe< 12 l7J< 75% '9113 >248 $933 ...
91 CoffTmec:a1 ~ign. Stl\,ct\f'8 PIa'1 Oe::;k F.. 9 l6! 1~ $532 $066 $532 flat
98 CorrmelC<l1 Sign - Stn..ctw Irsp Fe< .86 S101 44~ $230 $128 $2)) ...
99 COlT"mecEI ~tgn - EMP Insp F.. 186 $2;, '" $.(74 >248 See ildiYidual ifBm 5ChediE
10) CorrmelC21~tgn.EMPPlanCtE<:k Fe< 186 !11 75% 515' $38 $151 ...
101 Resda1:iaIRe-roof-ST.J:tnIPhnChed< F.. 52 $~ 1~ '654 151S S654 ...
102 ResOe1:iaIRe-roof-STJ:tnlh;p F.. 1041 $,Z 27~ "". 1338 5451 ...
105 CorrmelC.,1 Re-'llOf. S1ructnl Plan Ct'eck F.. '6 $9 1O~ '!Xl<) 3807 $9)) ...
100 CorrmelC.21 Re-'llOf. Struct..n:llnsp Fe< 3'" !14 20'-' $7-- $588 $711 ...
100 Derrdr..ion - Stn.ct\J"aI ~ ::tB::;k Fe< . l86i 1~ S450 $384 $45) ...
11J [komdi".ion-Sbt.cturallnsl= F.. 36 !1331 63~ S2-2 S79 $212 flat
")
-)
-)
CT
7<'
c;,
CiS
2;
<C
"tI::o
OJ m
1000
m 0
""'C
m!:!:.
00
_:J
wZ
0>0
""'
a
a
CD
,
a
~
0>
USER FEE STlJOY SUMMARY S'-lEFT
. P::::R UNIT INF~\.'ATION'
City of Sar1la An.
BUilding
FY 2001108
Recorrmendations
~...icet-.a1le - ....... ClJrrerltFee "'bofFulICJSt 10:>>. tt =.JI Cl.fTent Mirin.Jm Fee Fee@::!diCy SJ:J5i:1y@Policy
-,,,,, '1oUoo C"t <>b;dy "wi l"""
111 Demolti:n-EM::ll1sp Fee 36 $49 ..% SI.. $54 See incbldua item sd"eclJe
112 Demolib1-EM:'lP~Cherk Fee 18 5"70 75% $22' $57 $227 1Ia'
11::!.JWsff and~ISnlCKe"lOrc;:mert-stru::::lJr3P1<wll;hedt '"" 4 S.',O j" ~,IW SJ,OlSU 54'" ~L_:>O persJ_
114 400 sf r, and Eeisnc Renrorcemert - Stn.r:uf3 ns:> Fee 8 S'54 97% $158 $5 5149 K<lO I=Ers.1.
11C 400!Jrallu Sei:>l,i.;-RttitiJll,;:!III:'!(-ENPPlanQItlO. "'" 4 '" "'% 16' $15 ~C_15 ~I~.I,
SasmicReinfcroelrB1: On/) $82ll ~rreasT:rate5 l=ersJ
117 PriinQ l.D!.-20 or Jeyoerspex;e:J P,esbipi,~ - Structuf1Jl Pb,Che:d r~ 8 "'''' 155% $40. .-5225 $150 $2.00 perSJ)';e
112 Pa....jno llt..20 Of lewerspacas RestripilJ - h>Jedion -ee '5 $976 428% $229 -$748 $21-4 $2.00 persp3:e
"S Pai.ino Ln.. ~2:>spa::&$ ~-Str\JdlJr:;;II ~ ctv:k Fee $ $2,059 336% $614 -$\.145 $300 5:1.00 ,.......~
121: Pai.ing Lo'.' >2)spa:es sf Res.rlace -1nc:n Fee '0 53 .... 1015," $313 -$USS mo 52.00 ""'''''''''
1?1 ~inm,mFAP.-"Hf<<1inr ='P.P. 1 $7' ""'" $1AR m $IAS Ila'
12:<: Mini'ntJm Fee - Pbn Check (1/2 ho... winin.m. Fee 1 S'42 139% $102 -$40 $102 1Ia,
1~ Re-ir6nAdCI" 'ee 1 $;' ..% $1-48 In $lA8 1Ia,
124 Prelm Plan Ch:lc< Reo.iew -J;Elrtnr rlouti " $;4 36% $2ll5 $131 $2ll$ hoo"
125 Eoo"Olo PC 44))0 sf Fee 1 $89 22% $409 $32' $(.10 NlrsJ.
12€ Eoo-g) f'(:-8,)))sf Fee 1 S~32 16% $818 $686 KID rworsJ
127 Ao;essibiitv PC -4,ooos'. Slrucual PIa'l Checlo ::-88 1 SS9 5~ $1,1-45 $-,036 $!OO SC.15 ~Ers.f.
122 Ao:essibiitv PC -.(,OOOs'.lrspoction ::-89 1 59" 55~ $166 $75 $'56 SC,Q4 ~ers.l.
12: Ao:.essibiitvPC -8.000sf.StrucuaIPIm CI'ecIo- ;:00 1 595 '"' $1,841 $",746 $C.10 J:ers.l.
13C Ac:Jt5sibiitvPC-8.000sl.lrspa::lion =00 1 S-46 58~ $252 $11)6 SC.03 ~ers.l.
1j'1 CharqedLse o.po.' '2 $0 ()% $U9 $749 $749 deros ,
132 GodeModfi:a1ion -;irJ1)le ='ee 3 $233 28% $818 $595 $818 1Ia'
1~ GodeModfi:aliOf1. 'TCcerate Fee 4 $233 14% 51,636 $1,403 $1,636 1Ia'
1::.4 Code Modfi:ation . :::Dmpex Fee 3 $233 7'lb 53,272 $3,039 53,272 1Ia,
1~ Noli:erJvlOlation-S1r1..C.~P1alChed-. P\B'I':=~ 1 $0 ()% $40' $409 $409 1Ia'
0,
b,
t;J
l.J.J
I
(j)
>-
0::
<(
::;
::;
::J
(j)
>-
o
::J
I-
(j)
l.J.J
l.J.J
1.J...
0::
l.J.J
If!
:J
z
o
~
~
'"
o
"-
z
C
z
:::J
'"
w
D..
..
c
< '"
l!! ",0
c ;::;
:6:08
~3N
0"'>-
",. ll-
e:;
bk:3/9/09
.~
"
a.
<l>~
~~
11
J!
'" .ii .ii .ii
c
.\2
~
c
"
~ '" I<: ..
sL :li ;;; ;;;
" a. ~
C>: <l>~
~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ '" ~
l;!
a
.2 .2..2..2
_ C:! ~ ~ s
-~"~!~~.ii~~~ ~.ii-
.liLU.f.n I~f ! .Ii
~ ~ '" ~ '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
..:: .2
~ ~
.ii~~
~~
~ ~
~ '" '"
a ~ ~
,li
E
.~
:l;
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g g ~ m 2 8 2 ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
--~ c; ....... ~ $ ~ ;t ~ {;:C! f.IC ~ ~ ~ Ll 1;; tit ~ ~ ~... ... :;t ;;;;;;
h
uJ!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a i ~ ~
,,~
~u
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'"
15
..
~ :1: 8 a ~ ~
,li I;; i'i oj
i .... on
,
U
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
000000
...,........... ....
.. _ ..
'" ~ ~
l::i ~
:li
H lil lil .. '" ;l; III III
.~ !<l N '" " .. '" - III .. '" '" 1'3 N '" N g '" ~ ill - M
~> .. .. .;
h ,li ,li I .l! .l! .l! Il Il ~ ! Il ,li Il 8 ,li Il Il ! ,li ,li ! ! ! Il
~ 15 15 15 ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Jl"" z z z :z:
i ~ ~
j]~ ~ 11 ~
"H · ~~. ] ~~ ~
:ig ~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~j.~
t ii~~li~~~~I~~~~ ~niil
~ ~])~8&j~~~~.~i~i~!~~r~l~
i i i J I J i J i ~ j ! j ~ i i j I j ! I I l ~
jL~]]]~ ~r~l~ij~~d~l~ [~~
liilll~;~I.~AI'III~~~~tl
a. c. a.. tn '" en u. <3 c cr w c < .- _ :.:J Q. 0. rJ) U. ~ I- a: a::
~ ~ ! ~ ! ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !
'"
..
Resolution No. 2009-018
Page 27 of 38
-U;U
D> CD
COli>
CD 0
",C-
OO:=':
00
~::>
wZ
009
'"
o
o
<0
,
o
~
00
LSER FEE STUDY SU\1MARY SHEET
.?b UI\IT ,NFORMA1l0N.
City of Santa Ana
Building
FY 2007/\)8
.'1ecommern1atlCns
Servi::e ~al1l: Se-..ice AnnLSI Q.rn!nt Fee %ofFulCost 1000d::'ul Cooert ..., mum Fee Fee@ P~t::y StJ::JSidy iJP:llicy
Type Vclune Coot "'b9'" Li!'yel ...".1
159 Sp:l':ia Inspectbn Fee '''' $C )% SSE $55 SlotS "'"ry
170 HP-N:lrk St3nd rsDMlJon Fee 75 $e )" S" S2~ 525 'la'
171 Nisc. "on Resid. SIruc\Jres: 200 sf Palic Cove'"' Struclulll PlEne Fee '0 $'S~ 25% $747 $562 S200 $(.40 pers.f
172 Ni5C.l\on ReSd. StrucVr'e$; 200 sf pa,tic COV'l:r" GtTJcbJ"1!llnp F.. 1) $2S~ "''' "'" $-::;, S200 $C.35 per5..f
173 Misc. "'on Resid. Strucllres: 200 sf Patic COVE!" - EWP nsp Fee 10 SSS "" $m $-35 See m;..idu31 item sct'Eldje
I\((e: TheV01Sne b" P8'\ Chel::ka:th'ily t"as!:Ban recuced:c RJfJect the fact h:ll ccrtrad servic&s arc o~a1ime 3I"8UsOO to-:::onpleB a portbno;activity.
a) Net riff re-tr:.ofhg actMtes.rel1-'Ks pIa,,~ Ma!erla.' ard CVf91~ sttdL'lfHksj.;Jn v.if. be iheie:::dir.g fact>r.
b) Ttis s€:fVice W:ht6charrJooer; /fl.mde{.OSland~t.uJchatgedbyhotsty .tite.
c) Tfese SllfVaS Me'e (e9:Jocsted BCrJ5S fB9 <nti!5 es e" OHThead
d) Ur- b IOmds. =ach add'ior.al.71ckwi1 iJechar]8d at $1Oesch
e) HcWf11Jtes.wibt:ctageaat06rthetrirtlhlJtt1/$/nIZ,ifrFJQuired
f) 1hs re;enue/$ 9a/T'luried fu !foe ~neral Pfen Up:Jai? Endls ~ indud6d1n 'l&wrever.ue fglles
"tl N fJar c/'e<* sa;vices rellec! an iritsl "U> two .'1!dJeds. A::Jdllionel re~iews Mil be dergoo C(J a (f()(.'rY tasfs.
/.r:ytnitfuepar; ctec!cO;fflpectlOnthatlXX!S rvl1'labl 8se'\o"icecategay ""'l.'ec/'aved (JI' an ooury bass
;0
(Il
'"
o
s:
o'
:0
""Dz
Q) 0
lO .
(Ill\.)
1\.)0
<DO
o'f'
-0
"'~
OJ OJ
USER FEE s-:-UDY SUM YlARY sCiEET
- PE~ U!"J- INFCRt>..MTCN.
City 01 san1a Ana
Buikling - EMP Fees
FY 2007108
Hecomtneo1a2lrons
SerJireName Cment Fee '% ofF'" Cos.t lCO%ofl:"u11 Currert. CostR3:o\'ery Fee@Poley St.tsldy@PJlIcy
Cost Stbsijy PoIi-:y .".. LUllel
E I9Ctrica Fees
17~ Pvnit Issuanai FfKI ~6.75 m. ,,"00 $11.25 l00.)()*i ,....OC
175 Minrnum FM iNool'Q;;idardal) S60.)() lCO" SOC.OO SO.OO lOO.,)J~ 'SO.OC
176 EIecbiCIIIPlanChedFt'oE' :when"ecu~) 55% 01 Subtotal lCO'lt. e5'bdSulu:~ $0.00 llXl-)J'" 69% :J!S..hlctal
1'77 1?fiVot~~f:l0I11* '"'" ~1'lk $1tQ $f17.\ 10011% St 1.
17K I i{tIl SwtmlFl!>, l1lT_I'Rl~ ~q'l'Ul'" '"'" 74" $119 $O~:l. HIIl-l1% ,,"
1791IMtF"frllm<!l '"'" """ 5C Afi ~O 10 1(0)'}% $O~
lRO Air ("..m1~~1'!';. ....PR Pump!' SA110 ''''' S~'O $;lR 10 100 ))% ,"'"
181 FadoN'-\"AP-d Urils :501(' HJOI;,-L~s) $10.15 """ $21:.30 510.15 100.))% '2U
182 Oedcate:JCru.lts 115or20Ar.p RealI:tades) $10.15 """ 521:.30 $10:5 100.))% '20.3
183 11100 Ckx:k. Photo-Cel. Time Swtdl SK)) ,,,. $S.90 S1.90 100.))% $9.g
Tf'5cH.igtt,C5IbTP.lf,$pcWl Raceway,Pl.Jgmdd, Under-FloorD.J:l P1ug~n [).J_~~,
184 WmrokL Et:. (Ead1lOC lee: =r any 'ra::fion ttelWf) $10.15 ~o.. $2(.30 $10.15 IOCt)}% $20.3
$croltcc Mew, R_tMee-, Subp<<'el, Swtd1bo~, Mob:Y::::ootrol Ce-l:er, Tr~
Switt, Bt.6du:t. orather Diilrilution EqUpnent charCES crmodificaticns
135 Under400a~ $30.70 '0.. ~.56 512.86 100.))% $-13.51
186 400 anJell!S b 119'9 amoere; sn.)} "" $118.80 $41.80 100.1)% $118.8C
1871:dlOanoeleSB"1do\'eI" $'5.:.50 ,.. $19l3.oo $43.50 lOO.)}% iT98.OC
Motor, ~r:ns.fcrtne', Woec;r h'kr.;ri3I =QJ~rnont CNcn, Roctificr Gcn::l"tltlr, Surgo
ArnlEtor, WfiIl!Kl-eaEr, ~c PooelcrotherPowe:r EqJ~rt
188 Ck>1-F,kIi)....VA $U5 ~'" 5:2_90 $1..(5 lOO.)}% $29<:
189 Over 1 to'O -P, kit (Y tV.A, $10_55 ~'" $19.01 $8.36 100.))% $19-01
190 Over 1C 105O!-F, (W,)rkVA $21.50 rn, $37.75 $16.15 lOCUO% '3'."
191 Over 5C to '(I( H~,"'W or kVA "630 54% $BE.SO ~9.50 llXLXI% '8511(
192 Over 1CO to 5Ci: HP '<<WorkVA $61.55 ~'" $12:.30 SEt65 100.))% $123.3C
193 Over5COHP, t'l'I.or tVA $77.)) ~'" $154.00 S77.00 100.))% $l51.OC
I ~ 'ht::ll)ll' rl;r.n:t. ;'IIIl'l fllIlpt ~PA"kP.r. h"!lmo,,;t:'l', rhT h'''f'r.drmn'lll. piill'itlllm.
SI1d.e deb:tor, a1arn devoo,:::ald Ie<)(ig',etc
0-
""
c;,
<0
25
'"
"'0;:0
"'II>
lOCIl
II> 0
we
o=:
00
-='
wZ
0>0
'"
o
o
CD
,
o
~
0>
U~c.R Fc.c. S JUDY SUMMARY SHc.c.l
- PER UNIT INFORMATlON-
City of Santa Ana
Building. EMP Fees
FY 2007108
Recommendations
~Ff'Vif'-p.N:uw ClrK'fltFiI!IeI % of FtM Cost l00%ofFIAI c,_ Cost Recovery ""@"'''' Subsidy@PiJicy
C.~ Stbsidy Poky La'" L...,
194 CorrvnIl"CiclI:
195 FIRST 10 devices or ou1lets 521.00 78% S2772 56.12 1(('-0:)% $27.n
196 Additb1a1 Qeyjces $1.75 6S% 12" 50.89 1CXlJX)% 52"
197 Each cortroIpeool, powersumlllll'V1tlociator, switch or al.lJl:ihary l!qtJipn-ent 510.15 77% $13.20 53.05 1oo.c0% $13"
Residential:
198 Single Owelno Unit 522.10 7'% $)100 $7.00 11)100% $:JOOI
199 Each Additiooal dwelm \SlilI2- 20) $13.25 50% $26.40 $13.15 1 ()100% $264<
200 Each adrlilDnal Ur1lIOt/er 20' 18.05 !'l)% $16.10 1805 l00.cO% $16.1
Mis.ceIlaneous:
IDlligltStmal1l(PoIe}withonelirnn 510.15 50% $20.'" S10.15 100.00% $20.3(
202 Additla1al FIXUes - Same Pole 5295 1000 .$295 1(1),00% 50.00
200 """,,polerram""""l 15335 63% 58427 S30.92 1Il100% $34.27
204 Additialal Distibukln Pdes $10.15 50% $"'''' $10.15 1lXLOO% 520.30
205 SMrTI1Irn Pod, Spa, Fwntain $6700 69% $99.00 $31,10 100.ClO'*. 59900
206 AOOve GrourKl Spa S21.85 51% 542.77 $20.92 HllOO% S42.n
1!J70er001iti0n 52992 76% SC<l.60 $9.68 1 ()loo% 53960
208 ~ns& Neootl.EO [)e(;Q"a~ve Ujjltilg $:JO.lIl 50% $6140 531 100.00% $61.4
(retmdable bond I
NeworTcmlR!M'ireforSinnle Family Dwellings Per square foot PBrS(llJ<nfoot
209 SFD (p8'" <:nlJarefnnl'l 5006 50% $0.12 5006 100.00% 501'
ZlO Glnlge lPBr<:nJal8 bot) 5006 50% $0.12 50.06 U)lOO% $0.12
Medlanical Fees
211 PttnnitlssuarnoFee $36.75 77% $48.00 51125 1(X1OO% $4800
212 Minimum Fee (Nr<<esidertial) S60.oo 100% S60.00 5000 HXlOO% \6000
213 Stand Alooe MechaAical Plan Check Fee 6~ofSubtota 100% 65% d S,"'" $000 lOCI.OO% 65% of Sutmtal
Furnace Wldudng ducts & vents (each)
214 Unto l00,OOOBTU $26.80 50% 553.60 I2SBO 1(XlOO% $53'"
tu
w
I
(f)
>-
ct
<{
~
~
:J
(f)
>-
o
:J
f-
(f)
W
w
I.J...
ct
w
(j)
:J
z
o
f=
<(
::;:
0:
o
~
z
t:
z
:J
0:
OJ
0.
~d
<("-.,
SD.e
r::::::E ;::::
.,we
VJ , ~
'0 g >-
biiilL
03
ell
~
"
"-
@l
j~
~ ,jl
.~
~~
~ .l']
~ @~
P
0::
5l ~
I'! 8
~ ;;;
"
~f
~.l'
.3
'" '"
8 8
!! 8
;! ~I).J i ~ ~;; $
8 oi'", !Ii:ll t;l:ll t;l
....-... .... tit ~ toOt .,.
~ ~
#- tl *- lfl "Ii ill ill .,
888 8 8 8 8 8
~ !! ~ H ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ 2 ~ 2
Haa aiai~~~~
,~
u'"
o ~
-:I "1 r-:
... ~ a
~~ M ;;;
!!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'!l
...
"
'"
;! ~ gJ ~ ~ $ ~ g
r; ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 2 ~ 2
~ a ~ * * ~ & ; ~ ~ ~
!
u
I
.
~
.
1
~ ~
j 1
.~ '" ~ rf
~ QI 0 u
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
u! u o:p
=>~. ~~~6
~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
q';l~~~dHq
!! ~ 8 '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I
~ ~ ] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 _ N M ~
N N N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
.
z
.~
.
'"
bk:3/9/09
$ S 8 ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ g s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ i sa! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ !! ~ ~ !! ~ 8 ~ !! ~ !! !! !! 8 ~ ~
~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
S S 8 ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ g g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ t;l ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ re ~ ~ ~
tit ~ tit ~ .,. .,. ~ M .,. .,. ... tit .,. tit tit tit
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 2 2 2 2 2 g ~ g ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 2
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 w ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tit ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;; M ~ ~
f
I~
l
.
f
. If.
il !i ~
! ~ l
! ~ ~
5
E
.
~
!
!
j f
! ;; ~
. ~ ! '
~ 6 <<( :jj
~ '!!!! > ai 'M
~ -i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ] ~
~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - Q1~ i j
'; ~.. t:: tl ts.: LL. c::
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 ~ w I I ~
"I ~ a: i:! a: " E E ",lj ~ Ii
! ~ ~ ~ j {I ~ j j I ] (E j j~
~jj~~iIJ!jfjJ
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~
~ '"
l:j l:j
Resolution No. 2009-018
Page 31 of 38
ti
w
I
(j)
>-
0: Z
<l: 0
::;: ~
::;: :;:
::J IX
(j) ~
>- ~
o t::
::J Z
f- ::J
(j) IX
W W
W tL
l.L
0:
W
UJ
::>
~
~ $
",LL",
l'lo..o
c:::::E t:::::
"wg
(I) , N
'0 ~ >-
l;>'- "-
_ 31
b .3
CD
.~
."
..-
@~
~~
"
.l!I
~ bl
.~
~i/
" l'l!
~ @j
~ ~
Cl:
Resolution No. 2009-018
Page 32 of 38
"
h
8
~I ii!1~. 5l ii!1:'; 5l 8 8 5l ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M
~ ~ ~
# ~ * * * # * # * # *
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~
~ $ S $ $ 8 $ 8 8 $ 8
1:!"" Ltl u:i a tt:i lD r:.: tt:i ,..: ,..: w t'
~ ~ ;;; 1)1 1)1 1)1 .. 1)1 j;; j;; 1)1 ..
,-9
u",
~ ~ g g g 8 g g 8 g 8
;r ~ ci " ci :;j ;:i :;j ;:i ;:i :;j ;:i
'5!j <It M .,. <It ;; .,. u; ;t "" ;;
"u
~
8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'!I
~
'5
"
g $ ~ $ $ 8 $ 8 8 $ 8
~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ Ei Ei ~ Ei
i
u
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
<It ~ ~ ~ .,. ~
* * ~ * * * # * ~ * # * * ~ # #
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 888 8 8
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 8 ~ $ ~ $ ~ R s ~ s i ~ ~ 8
~ ~ Ei ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ Ei
~ ~ g; ~ ~ fi; li; ~ ~ 3; :i; ~ g :7; ~ g
~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ M ~ Ltl ~ ~
~ <It _ ~ <It .,. <It .,. ~ .,. ~ .,. <It - <It -
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 8 8 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8 ~ 8
. j ~ ~ w ~ w ~ w ~ w w '" ~ ~ ~
~ u j;; ~ 1)1 ~ 1)1 ~ 1)1 ~ 1)1 1)1 1)1 .. ;;; ~
jj
I
~
~
I ~ ~
~ 1 I
~ (J ~:g
d ~ · ~I
> ~ ~ g ~I ~
q i~ I I h
~ 0 15. j r: ~.3 ~ ~
II) LL ~ ~ E.2 cr -F. Jiii.
~ ~! ~ <;; S 1 J" ;:' ~ ~ ~ &l
!Il~ -H { i h J Ii ~ n n i ~ ~
~ !!.".!lOilZO!" .jjS .~,
"T' !i~.'I:&'u~~z ~88. ~il..~il
o lrOtn,:::<:!U(),iJi --ElIl~Ii:E~
. . . . . j S 'il ~ '" ~ ~ ~ [;l E "S . ~ 'B .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 6 < ~ ~ - ~ 8 8 ~ ~ u ~
_ N ~ ~ w '" ~ w '" ~ _ N ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ '" ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ N ~ N ~ ~
~
.
Z
.~
~
j
I
!;
it Iii
.~ ~ _ 'I E
~ c::. !9 ~ 0
u i ... j l!,1 hl
n~i~n
~n~~j~
iij ~ ~ ~ ~ ;fj ~
bk:3/9/09
~
"
~
ill]
t~
~ ~
fi 8 g N :;; 0 0 0 M :il ;: 0 l<: N " 0 " " " N :;: 111 "
" N N ~ ~ N M ~ ~ N N ., N ~
~.tr :; ~ s III .. oi l2 III Ii ci ,; .. :u Ii .. ;;; ~ ;i ~ ij ~
< ;l'l ~ ~ ~ ;; M ~ ;; M ;; ~ ;; ~ ;; M ~
~ I6Jj
" t "
o ~ "
~ "
"
" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i!) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ u
R R R ~ R R R R R R ~ !3 R R R :0: R R R ~ :0: R ill
OL~
~~
,
v
"1 8 8 ~ ~ S! S! 5 l:l R III S! S! Fe 1lI :0: " " i<l ~ :il ill "
"' OJ
" ~ 0 0 oi '1 ~ .; N Q ci ;i .,; ;; 0 ci '" .; "' ill " .,; "'
M M M ~ M ~ M M M ~ '1 M ~ ;; '1 ;;
~~
t;J v"
W :;: 8 " N :;; 0 0 " M " ;: 0 " N " 0 " " ~ !'I :;: ~ "
" ~ N ~ ~ "' N N M ~ " N N ~
T , ~ ~ ~ ~ .. !2 l2 III Ii ,; ,; G :u Ii w oJ l2 ~ ,-' ~
" ~ "'
(f) ,,~ M ;; ;; M M ;; ;; ;; M ;;; ;; M ~ M M ~
f3 "
>- ~
u: z
~ 0 .0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I 0 ;;;
~: v
::E " ~
~
:-J 0: "6
(f) 0 "
~
>- ~ I'? :;: 11 ,- ,- ,- " ,- " 'P ,- ,- " ,- ill ill ,- " l'l "' ill 8 "l'l
~ ill ..
0 t: ~ ljj ~ Ili Ili Ili Ili 11l Ili Ili Ii Ili ill ~ ~ ill Iii '" !il ~ t 0;
~ ;; ;;
=> z " ~ S
I- :J 5 "
U) 0: v ~
.11 "
W a..
w
l.L.
a::
w
(f)
=>
" a:
"
<<: ~gg j
!lI ~
" ::!i~
., "'8 .
<n z
'N a
(; ~(;:
~ ~
JO <n
" 'S
'"
~
~
'S Ei
i .i
~ ~
t .~ r
u- ~ i
~ ~ ~
III V ~ 1Il ...
J.q~~1l J
:i l ~ !i ~ 11
::> ~ II ;: :; ...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E
t E
c ~.; B
o~" q ~
,Ii _! s "
..... 8 1.1.. &.
~ 1 ~ i~~I~ i
~ ~~n~_~; HI~Li ~
~ ~ 11 ~ ;l\ ~ ::' LJ: " " . -< " " ~ JI c!I
~ ~ 8 ~II ~ ~ ~ ~ I J I I J' R ~ I J
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Resolution No. 2009-018
Page 33 of 38
"U;lJ
III <1>
10(1)
<1>Q.
We:
~~
00
-"
wZ
0>0
'"
o
o
<0
6
~
0>
USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET
- PER UNIT INFCRMA-ION-
City of Santa Ana
Buildng. EMP Fees
FY 2007/08
RecomtnerJ33rionS
Stfvk:eNa'Tl! ClITenlFee % of Ful ::lst l00%l.r=u1 :::.JUtllt Ctr.:.lR"'-l.Ntll~ R:t:I~PuIk.)' SulbiUy@PUil..y
~t S1A:!J.dy Policy LN" L='
2')' .~<Ilt1a1aIUasCWet(eeC'l) S:i.!:ll "'" $1>." $2'" lOJ_UU~ $1>.'
292 ~;rtftndAle' Gas S\,&em $26.0: 50% '53." $26'" 103.00% $53."
293 ~anllirGasPi"i""'" $18.2C 50% '364' 518:<1\ 10).())% $36."
294 8ap G35 Dulle: 54.BE - S6.S $2IB 10:HX>% 16.9
Swirnmins; Pods
29:5 :>OOlTrap 59 Ie 50% $18.2 59.10 100.t)O~ $'8.20
296 :JooIHe83 S46.3C 78% $59.4 51310 lOCI.I))% S59"
297 :IooIPpiry $18.2C "'" $36.4 $1820 103-())% $36....
\IIiscellanews
79R ","'MAr -1i'JAtAr (RAAiriR1;alun 'o!"O OR Jon::) ri91r "'" !ilR?1 S!lln 101m"- S~R'
299^8tEr ;,*tet" (Corrvn~lI:iIlI un b 50 18l1on,) S!l.1C "''' $18.2( $9.10 10),00"(, $18.2
300 Water -toorer (ReslCOOlm Oie( 5) aalons} S46.JC 62" $i4.fl l2ll31 10),00% $74.61
3O.,^at.er rleeter(T.-Tkess\ S26.8C 50% S53.€ $26'" 10nW)% $53.61
302 ^"ater $e1VCe umch lCOfeet) $IS.2C "'''' '36.41 $1820 10).1))% $36.':
303 "hater OCm (each lOC feet) $18.2C 50% 536.4 $18,41) 10).00% $36.-'
304 ~;;opipl! (Fb?m<<JliaI-Eid l00FHtl $IS_:2C 50% '3<<4 $182) 10HO"4 $36.-'
::105 "'rirnar,ISe<:on:l.-y ,;>ofCrain 'pee" set) SHl.2C "''' 5:.0.4 $1820 10).(10% $Xi.':'
::AAi LJecl<jP.tea Otan Sti..4t ""'" 'I.~ $l,;tJ 10J.lJJ'!b $/.l:i4
307 ~:Inwal8r $vsteTl $18.2C 50% SJ6.4 S18:D 10).00% $36.4.
308 ~:Inwater Piping (buriEd) $1 PC 66% S17.E! 5519 10).00% n.6!
309 3torm D:ains SI1."7C 50% '23.4' S11~ 10l_00% $23."
310 'A'otcr Sof.ooCil'{lb$idr:nliaI; $tl.1C 50% $18.:1 $910 10).(lO<{, $"8.20
31" ^,C:IltI30r.~'dI{~,.,It2l..',t:d) SI8.ZC "''' 536.4 518,21) 10)J))<.f, $36-"
312 _1Mf' SJ:rhtler(Eachl S1PC 141% 58.3 -$331 100.00% $8.:>2
313 3acld\owl P~uent:er(lessthan 2irdles) 59.lC "'''' Sl&l 1910 10).00% $"8.2
314 3acI<fkNr Prelerter(2 i"d'esand bigger) $18-2( "''' 5:i6.4 $1820 1O-l.00% $36."
:\1fi 'lfarUIIT'IRI'P.Fk::r.;;;(' 105) ~Q If !=i.Il% !i1fi,FCl S7ffi 10lm~ S:66.
316 VaCUlMll8rockcr-;(Ovcr5 eoch. S2.9C 61" .." SU6 10J.OO<{' $4.75
::0
m
en
o
~
o'
'"
-Cz
III 0
'" .
mN
WO
",0
o'f'
-0
w~
00 00
USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET
- PER UNIT INFORMATION-
City of Santa Ana
Building. EMP Fees
FY 2007108
Recommendations
ServiceNalTl:! CumntFee % afFIA Cost 100% ofFul Currert Cost Recovery Fee@ Pol., Sutsidy @Pdq
Cost SWold, Poicy Level Lwei
317 Hose Bib wilhVaaJl.m Breaker $9.10 72% $12.67 $3.57 1Ol00% $12.67
318 GreaseWaste lo~tor $15.35 50% $ll70 $15.35 100.00% $:mo
319 Dertal Unit $18.20 69% $264( $820 10:1.00% 526.40
320 Medical Gas Piping (Fire Oepartmoot) $18.20 50% $364( $18.20 10JOO% $3640
321 Aientiooto Orain or Vert Piping $18.20 50% $364( $18.20 100 00% $36.40
322 Appiance rot bled 526", 50% $53.6C 526.'" 100.00% $53.60
323 $26.'" 50% $536C 526", 100.00% $53.60
324 SurnpPul'l1J 526.'" 50% $5360 526", 100.00% $53.60
325 HotWalerStora~Tank 526.'" 107% $24_95 -$1.85 HMlOO% $24.95
326 Hem Excha1ger 126", 57% $47.12 $20.32 100.00% $047.12
'5l.7 CooIin'J Towo- 526", 50% $53.60 526.'" 10100% $5360
328 Boosi!r Punps 526.'" 92% $2904 52.24 10100% $2904
329 Rreine'Hydra1t(Each 100 Feet) $18.20 50% 536.40 $18.20 100.00% $3640
330 Tem~Gas(30days) $193.00 89% $217.80 $24_80 100.00% $217.80
C"
,..
W
<i3
o
'"
-0::0
Q) l1>
<O(J>
l1> 0
wi':
O)!:!:
00
_::J
wZ
o:>()
'"
o
o
CD
,
o
~
0:>
Public Works Agency-
Development Engineering
MGT
M ..IHUr.A. lI'lle
b
b
b
::u b
<I> b
'"
0
~ b
0 b
::J
"Z b
c210 b
<1>1\)
wo b
.....0
o'f' b
-0
w~
0>0>
USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET
- PER UNIT INFORMATION-
City of Santa Ana
Engineering - Development
FY 2007/08
Recommendations
S8lVice Name Service Annual Cunent Fee % of FIJI Cost l00%ofFtJl Currem Cost Recovery Fee@ Poley Subsidy @ Policy
Type Volume Cost Subsidy Poicy level (%) level Level
1 T ralSoortabon Permit - Annual State 215 $90.00 1'3.85% $79.05 -$10.95 100.00% $90.00 -$10.95
2 Tnrlsportation Permit. Sinale Trip State 215 $16.00 20.24% $79.05 $63.05 100.00% $16.00 $63.05
3 Transportation Permit - Fax Processing State 6 $31.00 39.21% $79.05 $48.05 100.00% $31.00 $48.05
4 Building MCNing Pennit Each 0 $91.46 nla nla nla delete delete delete
5 Bu~ding Moving - U1der 1,000 SQ ft Each 0 $99.07 nla nla nla delete delete delete
6 BuUdinnMOYM 1.000saft+ Eactl 0 $121.94 nla nla nla delete delete delete
9 Accelerated Plan Check Hourtv 10 $14724 69.85% $210.81 $63.57 100.00% $211.00 $0
10 Improvement Plan Check Hourty 91 $133.85 84.66% $158.10 $24.25 100.00% $158.00 $0
" Surface Drainage Plan Check Hourty 91 $129.56 81.95% $158.10 $28.54 100.00% $158.00 $0
12 Tract Map - Final Hourty 32 $133.86 84.67% $158.10 $24.24 100.00% $158.00 $0
13 Parcel Ma:I - Final Hourlv 32 $133.86 84.67% $158.10 $24.24 100.00% $158.00 $0
14 llA I Lot Meroer I Cert of Comoliaoce Hourlv 32 $13386 8467% $158.10 $24.24 100.00% $158.00 $0
15 Si~le Family Resd. Repair Insp. Each 46 $73.61 31.40% $234.40 $160.79 100.00% $234.00 $0
16 Street WorK Permit/Inspection Each 46 $135.65 5t.19% $264.98 $129.33 100.00% $265.00 $0
17 Trench Insp: Paving (600 sq ft) Sq Fool 46 $564.00 54.91% $1.027.09 $463.09 100.00% $1,027.00 $0
18 StOrmlSewerlWater lnsos Pavinq (200 so ftl So Foot 46 $868.00 52.49% $1.653.69 $785.69 100.00% $1.654.00 $0
19 Sewer Laterals/Water Svcs InsD Each 46 $264.71 30.49% $868.32 $603.61 100.00% $868.00 $0
20 Manhole, Vauls, CatchbaSIls etc. Insp Each 46 $199.00 19.38% $1.027.09 $828.09 100.00% $1.027.00 $0
21 Curb, Gutter, inclde earthWOr1\ (200 sq ft) Sq Foot 46 $322.00 82.16% $391.91 $69.91 100.00% $392.00 $0
22 Curb Return, inclde eartl'w.tork Each 46 $63.95 24.21% $264.17 $200.22 100.00% $264.00 $0
23 Sidewalk. irx:ludina earthwork (4' x 30') Sq Foot 46 $69.60 44.80% $155.34 $85.74 100.00% $155.00 $0
24 Drive Amroach, incld earthwork (25' x 8') So Foot 46 $148.00 84.22% $175.73 $27.73 10000% $176.00 $0
25 Pavina: 2.000 5<l ft So Foot 46 $460.00 63.72% $721.92 $261.92 100.00% $722.00 $0
#
a
a
a
<:r
,..
~
~
'"
lJ::O
DllT>
lOCI>
IT> 0
we
oo!::!':
00
-='
wZ
0>0
'"
C)
C)
<0
,
C)
0>
USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET
- PER UNIT I NFORMA TION-
City of Santa Ana
Engineering - Development
FY 2OO7!08
t
Recommendations
Sef'oice Narre Servce Annual Current Fee % of hH:OSl 1))% 01 FtJl Ctnert Cost Reco'/ery Fee@hicy 5utsidy @Polcy
T~,e Vdume Ccst Subs~ P::ricy Lev:l (%) Leva! Leotel
26 Pavino: 4,000 s~ ft Sq Foot 46 $640, )) 62.31% Sf.C27,09 $~e7,09 '00,00% SI,027,oo SO
27 Street Trees. Inso on,v Eact- 46 $30,50 17.77% 1171.61 $141.11 'OO.~ $172.00 SO
28 Permanent Street Patch GUClrantee :' 00 s~ ft) Sq ~::xJt 10 nla nl. ". rl. Deposit - added to tond process
29 Proj"s 9l(ceedirg $50,COO & <$~OO,OOO Per::ent 20 325'<> 33,90% $4.793,68 $4.793.64 '00,00% 9,59%
Pr~'s ell::ceeClng $lUO,LUl I-'er..ent 'OO.1.lJ% :.t.JI.NIo
30 Cel1nicate otC::>'TeCtbn HJJ1'" 19 $'33,36 84.61% $15&,10 $24.24 -00,00% $168,00 SO
31 8cverarts, Ccn:UiQ1S & MIS<: C'~<.ina HJJrlf 19 $033,36 84.67% $158.10 $24.24 '00,00% $158,00 SO
32 Slney Monument Check: 1st Eaen 10 $766.:X> 95.39% $e02,9& $2€.9& '00,00% $803,00 SO
33 ~.l'VR'f Monllrt1P.nl ChP.c:k: Fflch ~,r:'1 F;:;c" 9 $9' 75 59:;!4% $lfil?? $Ef:.41 .0000% $lfiloo SO
J.4 o\ban!:icrment P"ocessing- SlInITlEf)' Eact 3 $;" .83 4,54% $1,581.05 $l,:CS.22 '00.00% SI,581,00 SO
35 4.bandcrrnent p.ocessino- Non SUlln:;r'\' Eact: 5 11,6'9.74 34.15% $4.743,15 $3,123.41 '00.00% S4.743,OO SO
36 Outdom DininQ Aoolication Eacl1 2 $",'2.32 36,83% $1,121.00 pe&,18 'OO.l:Xl% SI,121,00 SO
31 Traffi: Ana~si5 HJJrI( 10 $'34,:JO 68.64% $195,21 $€t21 . 00,00% $195,00 SO
38 Clirecticnal Bering Fee (200 sc ft! So Foo: 100 $ Hl",:JO 24.95% $416,75 5312.75 '00,00% $417.00 SO
39 Asst Crrgineer 111 Hourly RlIte Ho..lrty' 1 $158,10 $lE8.10 ~OO.{)()% $158,00
40 PlanniM De'" Support SllJl)OI1 1 $346,223.29 $346,322.29
41 Pedestrian PrJtecticn ~ge Each 20 $~16,21 $~1€,21 'OO.CO% $316,00 SO
t
e
o
c
Nota: Unnit'ated Steel Walk WIll be assessed a .Cct...'ble fees. penaly.
Mhimum 'f'lSpediDn O,9rge: for ad if'l${:ectx:r1 servicilS c"ars;~ 0.1 sr. ,'JOJjly tt.sis, a ::)'}~ /lour mini:'T:l'I~ (irIc1udhg drive ri.re) c/l2rJ9 w:JI C'pp~I
Ef: fiJe to iW'equency lone buikl;ng mcve n rheas: SIX yeal5) tnsse fees 3~e recolffllended for cIe:eoon. FUII..TebL'iding mo\'es 5,'JaJl ~recovered 011 an houI1y rate t:esis.
b: If tl1e esti71ate'1 cast cf cor.stlLcten exceeds $Sa 000, a ;J'3'l;enta'Je-oased fee s~ be cna~f;{! as p3f" ilemh29 abOve.
c: deposit aikJed to bof>d
d: CJtT81t fee is $383 per hoor for survey team. Pio{XJsed fee .(5 a fer amoum
11 tlrs tee r.1iJy exceee Sate Imts on r rar.sponatcn tJernJt ~ AItOlT.ey opl1KJf''S needed.