HomeMy WebLinkAbout55D - BIKEWAYS STRATEGIC PLANCITY OF SANTA ANA
BIKEWAYS STRATEGIC PLAN
NOVEMBER 2ND 2009
EXHIBIT A
1
CITY OF SANTA ANA
BIKEWAYS STRATEGIC PLAN
Table of Contents
Bicycle Transportation Plan CKHFN/LVW«««««««««««««««««««
Addendum to OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan ..««««««««««« 3
([KLELW««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««
Exhibit A - City of Santa Ana Proposed and Existing Bicycle Routes Map
$SSHQGL[««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««
OCTA Commuter Bikeway Strategic Plan, May 2009
2
BT
P
T
I
T
L
E
:
_
C
i
t
y
o
f
S
a
n
t
a
A
n
a
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
P
l
a
n
_
_
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LO
C
A
L
A
G
E
N
C
Y
:
_
_
C
i
t
y
o
f
S
a
n
t
a
A
n
a
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
R
E
G
I
O
N
A
L
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
A
G
E
N
C
Y
:
_
_
O
r
a
n
g
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Y
e
s
N
o
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
P
a
g
e
N
o
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
9
(a
)
T
h
e
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
t
e
r
s
i
n
t
h
e
p
l
a
n
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
t
h
e
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
t
h
e
n
u
m
b
e
r
of
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
t
e
r
s
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
p
l
a
n
.
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x
,
p
p
.
1
6
7
9
(b
)
A
m
a
p
a
n
d d
es
c
r
ipt
i
on
o
f e
x
ist
ing
a
n
d p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
l
an
d
u
s
e
a
n
d s
e
t
t
lem
e
n
t
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
s
w
hi
ch s
hall
inc
lu
de,
b
ut
n
o
t
b
e
li
m
i
t
e
d
t
o
,
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
,
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
,
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
,
a
n
d
m
a
j
o
r
em
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
.
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x
,
p
p
.
1
6
8
9
(c
)
A
m
a
p
a
n
d
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
b
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
.
A
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
,
p
p
.
4
D
e
s
c
r
i
b
t
i
o
n
i
s
i
n
t
h
e
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x
,
p
p
.
1
6
9
-
1
7
1
9
(d
)
A
m
a
p
a
n
d
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
e
n
d
-
o
f
-
t
r
i
p
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
T
h
e
s
e
s
h
a
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
,
b
u
t
no
t
b
e
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
t
o
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
t
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
,
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
,
a
n
d
m
a
j
o
r
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
.
A
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
,
p
p
.
4
D
e
s
c
r
i
b
t
i
o
n
i
s
i
n
t
h
e
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x
,
p
p
.
1
6
9
-
1
7
1
9
(e
)
A
m
a
p
a
n
d
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
an
d
u
s
e
o
f
o
t
h
e
r
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
m
o
d
e
s
.
T
h
e
s
e
s
h
a
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
,
b
u
t
n
o
t
b
e
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
t
o
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
t
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
s
t
o
p
s
,
ra
i
l
a
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
l
s
,
f
e
r
r
y
d
o
c
k
s
a
n
d
l
a
n
d
i
n
g
s
,
p
a
r
k
a
n
d
r
i
d
e
l
o
t
s
,
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
a
n
d
bi
c
y
c
l
e
s
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
o
r
r
a
i
l
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
o
r
f
e
r
r
y
v
e
s
s
e
l
s
.
A
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
,
p
p
.
5
9
(f
)
A
m
a
p
a
n
d
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
c
h
a
n
g
i
n
g
a
n
d
s
t
o
r
i
n
g
c
l
o
t
h
e
s
a
n
d
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
.
Th
e
s
e
s
h
a
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
,
b
u
t
n
o
t
b
e
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
t
o
,
l
o
c
k
e
r
,
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
,
a
n
d
s
h
o
w
e
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
n
e
a
r
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
A
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
,
p
p
.
5
9
(g) A
des
c
r
ipt
ion
o
f bi
cy
c
le
s
a
f
et
y
a
n
d
e
duc
a
t
io
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
c
o
n
d
uc
t
e
d
in
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
inc
lud
ed w
ithi
n
t
he
p
lan
,
e
ff
or
t
s
by
t
h
e
l
a
w
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
a
g
e
n
c
y
h
a
v
i
n
g
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
l
a
w
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
i
n
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
t
o
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
pr
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
C
o
d
e
p
e
r
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
t
o
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
e
f
f
e
c
t
o
n
a
c
c
i
d
e
n
t
s
i
n
v
o
l
v
i
n
g
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
x
,
p
p
.
1
6
9
9
(h
)
A
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
e
x
t
e
n
t
o
f
c
i
t
i
z
e
n
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
n
v
o
l
v
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
p
l
a
n
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
,
b
u
t
n
o
t
li
m
i
t
e
d
t
o
,
l
e
t
t
e
r
s
o
f
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
.
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x
,
p
p
.
7
9
(i
)
A
d
es
c
r
i
pt
i
on
o
f
how
t
he
bi
cy
c
le
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
ion
p
lan
has
bee
n
c
o
o
r
di
na
t
e
d a
n
d
is
c
o
n
s
ist
e
n
t
w
ith
o
t
h
er
loc
a
l o
r
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
a
i
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
,
o
r
e
n
e
r
g
y
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
p
l
a
n
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
,
b
u
t
n
o
t
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
t
o
,
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
h
a
t
pr
o
v
i
d
e
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
f
o
r
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
t
i
n
g
.
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
x
,
p
p
.
7
-
1
0
9
(j
)
A
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
p
l
a
n
a
n
d
a
l
i
s
t
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
i
r
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x
,
p
p
.
17
0
,
1
7
1
9
(k
)
A
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
p
a
s
t
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
f
o
r
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
f
u
t
u
r
e
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
n
e
e
d
s
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
t
h
a
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
sa
f
e
t
y
a
n
d
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
f
o
r
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
t
e
r
s
i
n
t
h
e
p
l
a
n
a
r
e
a
.
A
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
,
p
p
.
3
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
C
h
e
c
k
l
i
s
t
AD
O
P
T
E
D
:
Y
e
s
_
9 N
o
_
D
A
T
E
1
1
/
0
2
/
0
9
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
:
Y
e
s
9 N
o
_
D
A
T
E
1
1
/
0
2
/
0
9
3
ADDENDUM TO OCTA
COMMUTER BIKEWAYS STRATEGIC PLAN
Introduction
In order to be eligible for Bicycle Transportation Account funding, the City of Santa Ana is
required to have an adopted bicycle transportation plan that meets with the criteria of the
California Bicycle Transportation Act (Sections 890-894.2 of the California Streets and
Highways Code). There is an option for the City to either prepare its own plan or to adopt a
countywide plan.
A countywide plan does exist in the OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan (CBSP) adopted
by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Board of Directors on May of 2009.
The 2009 CBSP, an update to the plan previously adopted by OCTA in 2001, represents the
culmination of a regionally supported effort that took a little over a year to complete. The result
is a comprehensive plan that was coordinated with city and county bike plans, general plans, land
use maps and existing and proposed bicycle systems. Public input was also sought through
surveys, public meetings, and by posting the draft document on the OCTA website.
The information submitted by the City of Santa Ana to OCTA for inclusion in the countywide
plan was intended to replicate the Bikeway Master Plan adopted by City Council in 1998.
However, after several iterations, the final CBSP document was found to include some minor
discrepancies. For the City to adopt the CBSP as its bicycle plan in accordance with the
California Streets and Highways Code, this addendum is being prepared to identify the areas
where it differs from the Council-approved plan. The CBSP, this addendum, its maps and
exhibits will together embody the City of Santa Ana Bikeways Strategic Plan.
Addendum
The city of Santa Ana accepts the findings and proposed plans identified in the 2009 OCTA
Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan with the following exceptions:
1. Add Class I bikeway on Bear Street from Segerstrom to MacArthur Blvd. to Map 1.1,
Map 1.2 and Exhibit: Orange County Bikeway Map / Section 3 and Section 4 in
Appendix 4.
2. Identify Raitt Street between McFadden Avenue and Edinger Avenue as a Proposed
Class I Bikeway in Map 1.1 and Exhibit: Orange County Bikeway Map / Section 3 in
Appendix 4.
4
3.Identify the Water Channel E/O Raitt Street between Occidental Street and Alton as a
Proposed Class I bikeway in Map 1.1and Exhibit: Orange County Bikeway Map / Section
3 in Appendix 4.
4.Add the Alton/Maple Union Pacific Class I bikeway to Map1.1, Map1.2, Exhibit Orange
County Bikeway Map / Section 3 and Section 4 in Appendix 4.
5.Add a Proposed Class II bikeway on Memory Ln between Bristol Street and Santa Ana
River to Exhibit: Orange County Bikeway Map / Section 4.
6.Identify Bristol Street as a Proposed Class II bikeway in Map1.1.
7.Identify Grand Avenue as a proposed Class II bikeway in Map1.1.
8.Past Expenditures for bicycle facilities include:
Flower Street Bike Trail Extension. The project consisted of the installation of a
¶ZLGHELNHWUDLOODQGVFDSLQJDQGVXSSRUWLQJLUULJDWLRQDORQJDòPLOHOHQJWKRI
a flood channel which runs parallel along Flower Street. The project total cost was
$1,112,000.
Santiago Creek Underpass. The project consisted of the installation of a bike trail
underpass to the 22-fwy and Main Street. The project total cost was $
Carl Thornton Park Re-pavement. The project rehabilitated the bike trail going
through Carl Thornton Park.
Alton Bike Trail. The project rehabilitated the pavement and enhanced the
landscape of the bike trail.
9.The City has no funding mechanism for improving or implementation new bicycle
facilities. The City relies on obtaining grant funding and providing matching fund to
leverage the limited available City funds. Overall, the City has a need for new bike
facilities in the corresponding financial need.
10.The following are ³W\SRJUDSKLFDO´HUURUVVKRXOGEHFRUUHFWHGRQWKHVSHFLILHGSDJHV
Appendix 3DJH ³%ULVWRO´St. / La Veta Ave.
Appendix Page 171:
17th St. Garden Grove City Limit
³ %XHQD6W ´
³(DVW´&LW\/LPLW
(Deodar St.)
Sunflower Ave. Costa Mesa City Limit
³ %HDU6W ´
Costa Mesa City Limit
³ (3DUN&HQWHU ´
Page 169:
Metrolink/Amtrak Santa Ana Station Bicycle racks
/RFNHUV´ ´
6
APPENDIX
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan
May 2009
Prepared for: Orange County Transportation Authority
Prepared by: Alta Transportation Consulting
2009 OCTACommuter Bikeways Strategic Plan
FINAL
For the:
OrangeCountyTransportationAuthority
Preparedby:
Alta Planning + Design
KOACorporation
May 2009
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1.INTRODUCTION.................................................................1
1.1.Purpose & Need ..............................................................................................................................................1
1.2.Setting................................................................................................................................................................1
1.3.Bikeway Fundamentals....................................................................................................................................2
1.3.1.Classes of Bikeways........................................................................................................................................2
1.3.2.Bicyclist Skill Levels........................................................................................................................................2
1.4.Orange County Bikeways...............................................................................................................................3
CHAPTER 2.REGIONAL STRATEGY.........................................................7
2.1.RegionalNeeds................................................................................................................................................7
2.1.1.Citizens Advisory Committee – Bicycle Ad Hoc Committee...................................................................7
2.1.2.CBSP Advisory Groups.................................................................................................................................7
2.1.3.General Public.................................................................................................................................................7
2.1.4.OCTA Committees........................................................................................................................................8
2.1.5.Outreach Results.............................................................................................................................................8
2.2.Modeling Analysis and Regional Improvement Opportunity Prioritization ...........................................9
2.3.Performance Criteria....................................................................................................................................14
2.4.OCTA Action Plan.......................................................................................................................................15
2.5.Funding Opportunities................................................................................................................................16
2.5.1.Federal Funding Sources.............................................................................................................................16
2.5.2.Statewide Funding Sources..........................................................................................................................18
2.5.3.Local and Regional Funding Sources.........................................................................................................19
2.5.4.Non-Traditional Funding Sources..............................................................................................................19
2.6.Design Guidelines.........................................................................................................................................20
2.6.1.Caltrans Guidelines.......................................................................................................................................20
2.6.2.CAMUTCD Guidelines...............................................................................................................................22
2.6.3.Guidelines for Innovative Treatments.......................................................................................................23
CHAPTER 3.BIKEWAY INFORMATION BY JURISDICTION..............................35
3.1.Aliso Viejo.....................................................................................................................................................36
3.2.Anaheim.........................................................................................................................................................39
3.3.Brea.................................................................................................................................................................45
3.4.Buena Park.....................................................................................................................................................50
3.5.Costa Mesa.....................................................................................................................................................53
3.6.Cypress...........................................................................................................................................................58
3.7.Dana Point.....................................................................................................................................................62
3.8.Fountain Valley.............................................................................................................................................67
3.9.Fullerton.........................................................................................................................................................71
3.10.Garden Grove...............................................................................................................................................79
3.11.Huntington Beach........................................................................................................................................84
3.12.Irvine..............................................................................................................................................................88
3.13.La Habra........................................................................................................................................................95
3.14.La Palma......................................................................................................................................................100
3.15.Laguna Beach..............................................................................................................................................104
3.16.Laguna Hills.................................................................................................................................................108
3.17.Laguna Niguel.............................................................................................................................................113
3.18.Laguna Woods............................................................................................................................................117
3.19.Lake Forest..................................................................................................................................................121
3.20.Los Alamitos...............................................................................................................................................126
3.21.Mission Viejo...............................................................................................................................................130
3.22.Newport Beach...........................................................................................................................................135
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan ii
3.23.Orange..........................................................................................................................................................142
3.24.Placentia.......................................................................................................................................................149
3.25.Rancho Santa Margarita.............................................................................................................................153
3.26.San Clemente...............................................................................................................................................157
3.27.San Juan Capistrano...................................................................................................................................162
3.28.Santa Ana.....................................................................................................................................................167
3.29.Seal Beach....................................................................................................................................................172
3.30.Stanton.........................................................................................................................................................176
3.31.Tustin...........................................................................................................................................................180
3.32.Villa Park......................................................................................................................................................185
3.33.Westminster.................................................................................................................................................189
3.34.Yorba Linda.................................................................................................................................................193
3.35.Unincorporated County.............................................................................................................................198
3.36.Caltrans........................................................................................................................................................203
APPENDICES.......................................................................................204
A-1: Survey..............................................................................................................................................................205
A-2: Survey Results.................................................................................................................................................208
A-3: User Estimation Method...............................................................................................................................213
A-4: Orange County Existing & Proposed Bikeway Maps d Pr.......................................................................215
A-5: Destination Demand Maps...........................................................................................................................224
A-6: Caltrans Deputy Directive 64.......................................................................................................................234
A-7: USDOT - Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel.....................................................................240
A-8: OCTA Congestion Management Program.................................................................................................243
A-9: Local Fair Share Program for Street Maintenance and Improvements..................................................245
List of Figures
Figure 2.1: Bicycle Facility Types...................................................................................................................................21
Figure 2.2: Examples of Regulatory and Warning Signs............................................................................................22
Figure 2.3: Bike Crossing of Freeway Ramps..............................................................................................................23
Figure 2.4: Signage and pavement markings encouraging bicyclists to cross ramp................................................24
Figure 2.5: Dashed bike lane through conflict zone (optional painted lane)...........................................................24
Figure 2.6: Lemon St. at Truslow Ave, Fullerton.........................................................................................................25
Figure 2.7: Push-button for Bicyclists...........................................................................................................................25
Figure 2.8: In-pavement Loop Detector.......................................................................................................................25
Figure 2.9: Bicycle Boulevard Signage in Berkeley, CA..............................................................................................26
Figure 2.10: Bicycle Boulevard Lane Configuration...................................................................................................27
Figure 2.11: Shared Lane Marking Placement and Shared Roadway Bicycle Marking...........................................28
Figure 2.12: Multi-Use Path Signs.................................................................................................................................29
Figure 2.13: Denver’s parallel path warning signage...................................................................................................29
Figure 2.14: Recommended bicycle parking spacing dimensions.............................................................................30
Figure 2.15: Recommended Short-Term Bicycle Parking Facilities..........................................................................31
Figure 2.16: Bicycle Lockers at a Transit Station.........................................................................................................32
Figure 2.17: Bike Corral..................................................................................................................................................33
Figure 2.18: Bike Oasis....................................................................................................................................................33
Figure 2.19: Bike Station.................................................................................................................................................33
Figure 2.20: Bike Sharing Programs..............................................................................................................................34
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan iii
List of Tables
Table 2-1: Priority Regional Projects.............................................................................................................................12
Table A-2: Survey Question 1.......................................................................................................................................209
Table A-3: Survey Question 2.......................................................................................................................................209
Table A-4: Survey Question 4.......................................................................................................................................210
Table A-5: Survey Question 6.......................................................................................................................................210
Table A-6: Survey Question 8.......................................................................................................................................211
Table A-7: Survey Question 9.......................................................................................................................................212
List of Maps
Map 1.1 Existing Bikeways and Proposed Bikeways.....................................................................................................4
Map 1.2 Existing Bikeways................................................................................................................................................5
Map 2.1 Regional Commuter Bikeway Priority Zones................................................................................................11
Map 3.1 Aliso Viejo Land Use.......................................................................................................................................37
Map 3.2 Anaheim Land Use............................................................................................................................................40
Map 3.3 Brea Land Use....................................................................................................................................................46
Map 3.4 Buena Park Land Use........................................................................................................................................51
Map 3.5 Costa Mesa Land Use........................................................................................................................................54
Map 3.6 Cypress Land Use..............................................................................................................................................59
Map 3.7 Dana Point Land Use........................................................................................................................................63
Map 3.8 Fountain Valley Land Use................................................................................................................................68
Map 3.9 Fullerton Land Use............................................................................................................................................72
Map 3.10 Garden Grove Land Use................................................................................................................................80
Map 3.11 Huntington Beach Land Use.........................................................................................................................85
Map 3.12 Irvine Land Use ...............................................................................................................................................89
Map 3.13 La Habra Land Use.........................................................................................................................................96
Map 3.14 La Palma Land Use.......................................................................................................................................101
Map 3.15 Laguna Beach Land Use...............................................................................................................................105
Map 3.16 Laguna Hills Land Use..................................................................................................................................109
Map 3.17 Laguna Niguel Land Use..............................................................................................................................114
Map 3.18 Laguna Woods Land Use.............................................................................................................................118
Map 3.19 Lake Forest Land Use...................................................................................................................................122
Map 3.20 Los Alamitos Land Use................................................................................................................................127
Map 3.21 City of Mission Viejo Land Use Policy Map..............................................................................................131
Map 3.22 Newport Beach Land Use............................................................................................................................136
Map 3.23 Orange Land Use...........................................................................................................................................143
Map 3.24 Placentia Land Use........................................................................................................................................150
Map 3.25 Rancho Santa Margarita Land Use..............................................................................................................154
Map 3.26 San Clemente Land Use................................................................................................................................158
Map 3.27 San Juan Capistrano Land Use....................................................................................................................163
Map 3.28 Santa Ana Land Use......................................................................................................................................168
Map 3.29 Seal Beach Land Use.....................................................................................................................................173
Map 3.30 Stanton Land Use..........................................................................................................................................177
Map 3.31 Tustin Land Use............................................................................................................................................181
Map 3.32 Villa Park Land Use.......................................................................................................................................186
Map 3.33 Westminster Land Use..................................................................................................................................190
Map 3.34 Yorba Linda Land Use..................................................................................................................................194
Map 3.35 Unincorporated County Land Use..............................................................................................................202
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan iv
This page intentionally left blank
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 1
CHAPTER 1.Introduction
1.1.Purpose & Need
This Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan (CBSP) has been developed by the Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCTA) to encourage the enhancement of Orange County’s regional
bikeways network, in order to make bicycle commuting a more viable and attractive travel option.
There are a number of challenges that must be overcome for Orange County to excel as a bicycling
region, including improving safety, access to key destinations, coordination of plans, and support
facilities. Furthermore, there are also opportunities, such as increasing congestion, climate change,
and oil dependency that bicycling can play a large role in mitigating. The goal of the CBSP is to help
address these many challenges by providing:
A strategy for improving the regional bikeway network;
Eligibility for state Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) funds;
Identification of roles and responsibilities for OCTA regarding bikeways; and
Documentation of existing and planned Orange County bikeways.
The projects described in this plan are a compilation of projects planned by Orange County Cities
and the County of Orange. The CBSP is a long range, financially unconstrained planning document.
Funding for these projects will not be limited to the OCTA Call for Projects. It will be the
responsibility of each implementing agency to identify funding sources for the projects within their
purview.
1.2.Setting
According to the 2005 American Community Survey (U.S. Census Bureau), less than 1 percent of
Orange County’s population commutes by bicycle. The vast majority of commuters (77.3%)
commute to work by driving alone. This shows how automobile dependent Orange County
currently is, and why many of the streets and freeways are at, or close to, maximum capacity. The
Orange County Projections, produced by the Center for Demographic Research (out of California
State University, Fullerton), estimates Orange County’s 2005 population of 3,059,950 to grow by
nearly 600,000, more than 19 percent, by 2035, which will only put more demand on transportation
infrastructure.
Much of the early suburban development took place in Northern Orange County, and infrastructure
facilities were geared towards commutes into Los Angeles. The Pacific Electric rail cars served much
of this area, until their service was stopped in the early 1960s. It was at that time that Orange County
residents began to be more dependent on automobiles for their commutes.
North Orange County was designed with grid-pattern road networks, much like Los Angeles. The
grid-pattern, along with the relatively level topography, is beneficial to bicycle commuters, as it allows
them to maneuver through short blocks, for more direct routes. Unfortunately, many of these streets
were not designed to support the demand that we see today. They are often narrow, and not
designed to safely accommodate automobiles together with bicycles. However, these roadways,
along with some of the watersheds and abandoned rail rights-of-way, retain opportunities to make
bicycling more viable.
Much of South Orange County was developed as planned communities over the last 30 years. The
roadway networks are generally wider and more circuitous than in North County. The advantage to
these roads is that many of them were designed with bike lanes along the shoulders. However, South
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 2
County has more elevation changes, and the planned communities tend to be relatively low density
with housing separated from work and shopping centers. This layout often results in longer trips,
and the lower densities consequently result in fewer job opportunities near the residential
communities. Nonetheless, many opportunities still exist, such as providing improved access and
facilities at transit stations.
Applying the strategies discussed in this plan, and implementing the local jurisdictions’ projects, will
help to create a regional bikeway network that will benefit Orange County communities, from the
bicycle dependent, to casual cyclists, and people of all income levels. Furthermore, the build-out of
the bikeway network, along with the favorable climate in the region, could make Orange County an
even more enjoyable place to live and work.
1.3.Bikeway Fundamentals
Bicycles share equal rights and responsibilities with other vehicles on the road, according to the
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). However, while bicyclists share all the same
rights and responsibilities of motorists, bicycle-specific facilities are often provided in an effort to
enhance safety for both bicyclists and motorists. Bicyclists also need to be conscious of their skill
and comfort levels when choosing their travel routes. The following sections provide a brief
overview of the various classes of bikeways, and some general characteristics of the different skill
levels of bicyclists.
1.3.1.Classes of Bikeways
There are three classes of commuter bikeways:
Class I – off-street paved bike paths
Class II – on-road striped and signed bicycle lanes
Class III – on-road shared-lane signed bicycle routes
Off-street paths are facilities on a separate right-of-way from roadways, and are usually shared by
bicyclists and pedestrians. Shared paths should not be used as high-speed bikeways, as the safety of
the other non-motorized users must be considered.
Bicycle lanes are on-street facilities that use painted stripes and stencils to delineate the right of way
assigned to bicyclists and motorists, and to provide for more predictable movements by each.
Bicycle routes are signed on-street facilities that accommodate vehicles and bicycles in the same
travel lane. Bicycles are permitted on most roadways; however, for safety purposes, signed bicycle
routes are often found on streets with lower speeds and traffic volumes.
1.3.2.Bicyclist Skill Levels
The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or AASHTO, published
the Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities in 1999. This guide provides descriptions for the three
general skill levels of bicyclists, as summarized by the A,B, and C typologies below:
Advanced or experienced riders are generally using their bicycles as they would a motor
vehicle. They are riding for convenience and speed and want direct access to
destinations with a minimum of detour or delay, and they are typically comfortable
riding with motor vehicle traffic.
Basic or more casual adult riders may also be using their bicycles for transportation
purposes, but prefer to avoid roads with fast and busy motor vehicle traffic unless there
is ample roadway width to allow easy overtaking by faster motor vehicles.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 3
Children, who still require access to key destinations in their community, such as
schools, convenience stores and recreational facilities. They prefer residential streets
with low motor vehicle speeds, linked with shared-use paths and busier streets with well-
defined pavement markings between bicycles and motor vehicles, so they can avoid
riding in the travel lane of major arterials.
The “commuter” bicyclists that this plan refers to are generally the type A riders, but the
implementation of the plan will benefit all types.
1.4.Orange County Bikeways
There are currently more than 1000 miles of bikeways in Orange County, with roughly another 700
miles that have been planned. It is the responsibility of the local jurisdictions to plan, implement,
and maintain the bikeways in Orange County. These local jurisdictions include all of the 34 Orange
County cities, the County of Orange, and Caltrans. All existing and planned bikeway data presented
in this plan was submitted by these local jurisdictions. The commuting habits within Orange County
region can be generally characterized with the following data:
Population:Approximately 3 million residents
Jurisdictions:34 cities, the County of Orange, and Caltrans
Commuting Characteristics:
Mode share (2000 U.S. Census):
o 77% drive alone
o 13% carpool
o 3% public transportation
o 2% walk
o 1% ride a bicycle
Average Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay (SCAG 2008 RTP)
o In 2003, the average daily VHD was 686,000 hours
o By 2035, VHD is projected to increase by 407,000 hours to 1,093,000
Average Vehicle Miles Traveled (SCAG 2008 RTP)
o In 2003, the average daily VMT was 70,458,000
o By 2035, VMT is projected to increase by 14,829,000 to 85,287,000
Bikeways:
1037.7 miles built
o 26% Class III bike routes
o 65% Class II bike lanes
o 9% Class I off-street paths
Overview of the bikeway planning roles for OCTA:
Suggest regional priorities for optimal use by local jurisdictions;
Assist in coordinating plans between jurisdictions;
Provide planning and design guidelines; and
Participate in outreach efforts to encourage bicycle commuting.
A»
?l
%&l(
A¥
A¾
?ê
?k
A»
!"^$
%&o(
%&l(
A¾
AÊ
!"^$
!"^$Aß
Map 1.1: Existing and Proposed Bikeways
Source: OCTA
April 23, 2009 Portions of this map copyrighted by Thomas Bros Maps and reproduced with permission.
W:
\
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
\
P
D
C
S
\
S
P
\
P
A
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
2
0
0
8
\
m
x
d
\
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
_
2
0
0
9
-
0
4
2
3
.
m
x
d
Class I :
Off Road Paved
Class II :
On Road Striped
Class III :
On Road Not Striped
Bikeways
042
MilesI
LOS ANGELES
SAN
BERNARDINO
RIVERSIDE
Class I Existing
Class I Proposed
Class II Proposed
Class II Existing
Class III Existing
Class III Proposed
A»
?l
%&l(
A¥
A¾
?ê
?k
A»
!"^$
%&o(
%&l(
A¾
AÊ
!"^$
!"^$Aß
IRVINE
ANAHEIM
ORANGE
SANTA ANA
BREA
FULLERTON
TUSTIN
YORBA LINDA
NEWPORT BEACH
HUNTINGTON
BEACH
COSTA MESA
LAKE
FOREST
MISSION
VIEJO
SAN
CLEMENTE
GARDEN GROVE
SEAL
BEACH
LAGUNA
NIGUEL
BUENA
PARK
LA HABRA
WESTMINSTER
CYPRESS
PLACENTIA
DANA POINT
SAN JUAN
CAPISTRANO
LAGUNA
BEACH
ALISO
VIEJO
FOUNTAIN
VALLEY
LAGUNA
HILLS
RANCHO
SANTA
MARGARITA
STANTONLOS
ALAMITOS
LAGUNA
WOODS
LA
PALMA
VILLA
PARK
Map 1.2: Existing Bikeways
Source: OCTA
April 23, 2009 Portions of this map copyrighted by Thomas Bros Maps and reproduced with permission.
W:
\
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
\
P
D
C
S
\
S
P
\
P
A
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
2
0
0
8
\
m
x
d
\
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
_
2
0
0
9
-
0
4
2
3
.
m
x
d
Class I :
Off Road Paved
Class II :
On Road Striped
Class III :
On Road Not Striped
Bikeways
042
MilesI
Class I Existing
Class II Existing
Class III Existing
LOS ANGELES
SAN
BERNARDINO
RIVERSIDE
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 6
This page intentionally left blank.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 7
CHAPTER 2.Regional Strategy
In the development of this Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan (CBSP), the Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCTA) collected input from committees, stakeholders, and the public, in
order to identify improvements that will provide the greatest benefit to commuters utilizing the
regional bikeways network. This includes identifying bikeway needs, performance criteria, and
general funding and design guidelines. Additionally, the CBSP examined OCTA’s role regarding
bikeways, and provides an action plan that outlines the responsibilities OCTA will assume in
implementing this plan.
2.1.Regional Needs
To identify the critical needs of the regional bikeway network, OCTA undertook a number of
outreach efforts. The input received was valuable, as it provided insights into the concerns of the
public, local jurisdictions, and the committees within OCTA. Below is a description of the various
outreach efforts, followed by more detailed discussions of critical issues that were identified.
2.1.1.Citizens Advisory Committee – Bicycle Ad Hoc Committee
The first committee approached by OCTA staff regarding the development of this plan was the
Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC). This committee took a large role in guiding the development
of the plan by creating a Bicycle Ad Hoc Committee. The ad hoc committee met about a dozen
times, and provided input and oversight that focused the goals of the plan.
2.1.2.CBSP Advisory Groups
Two advisory groups were formed to provide input on specific items that were produced during the
development of the CBSP. One group was referred to as the Technical Advisory Group (TAG),
made up of planning and public works staff from local jurisdictions. The other group was referred to
as the Public Stakeholders Group (PSG), which included members of the CAC, local bicycle
advocates, and representatives from local riding groups. OCTA staff met with these groups three to
four times each to discuss and receive input on data and strategies used in this plan.
2.1.3.General Public
Survey
A website was developed to help with the public outreach effort, which included the previous CBSP,
as well as an online survey, which received nearly 1,100 responses. The survey collected information
regarding the public’s bicycling habits and needs.
The following summarizes some of the survey results (the full results are located in the appendix):
The most popular reason people bicycle is for exercise and health reasons (92%). Other
popular reasons include bicycling for pleasure (84%) and commuting to work (54%).
The majority of survey respondents (53%) bicycle four or more times per week.
The City of Irvine had the most survey respondents (12%) out of Orange County’s local
jurisdictions. The next most responsive jurisdiction was the city of Orange (7%),
followed by Huntington Beach (6%).
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 8
The most common roundtrip distance traveled by respondents was 11-24 miles (34%).
The Santa Ana River Trail and Pacific Coast Highway are among the respondent’s
favorite places to bike.
The absence of bike paths, lanes or bike routes was the most reported reason why the
survey respondents are prevented from biking more often (58%).
Off-street paved bike paths were ranked as the most preferred bicycle facility (69%);
while unpaved trails or dirt paths were ranked as the least preferred facility.
More paved off-street bike paths and more bike lanes are the improvements most likely
to influence people to bike more often.
The CBSP website also provided information on the public workshop that was held at the OCTA
offices. The workshop time and location was posted; and all the information that was presented, as
well as the input received at the event, was posted on the website after the workshop was held. The
public was also notified of the workshop with an OCTA press release to major newspapers, flyers
that were mailed to over 500 Orange County residents, and through the OCTA website. Members of
the PSG also helped to notify the bicycling community; and thanks in large part to them, the
workshop was successful, drawing over 50 participants.
Public Workshop
The workshop was held on July 12, 2008, with the purpose of informing the public of the
development of the CBSP, clarifying the roles and responsibilities of the various entities involved in
bikeways, and gathering input from the attendees. The workshop had an open house format, with
various stations where the participants could gather information and provide input. Hardcopies of
the surveys were also available, as well as comment cards that allowed participants to address any
remaining concerns or issues.
2.1.4.OCTA Committees
Additional input and oversight was provided by several OCTA committees. OCTA and Alta
Planning staff presented data to the OCTA Board of Directors, Highways Committee, Transit
Committee, Technical Steering Committee, and Citizens Advisory Committee, throughout the
development of the CBSP. The guidance received from these committees was critical for addressing
many of the policy and technical issues regarding OCTA and its role in regional bikeway planning.
2.1.5.Outreach Results
The following subsections discuss some of the issues that were of the most concern throughout the
outreach effort. There may be other issues of equal importance; however, based on the input
received, the issues below were viewed as priorities for this plan. These issues, along with the other
input received, were used in the identification of priority improvement areas and project priorities,
which are discussed later in this chapter.
Safety & Education
The safety and education of both bicyclists and drivers is the most commonly raised issue. It is
important for everyone on the roadway to be familiar with the California Vehicle Code, as well as the
California Department of Motor Vehicles’ California Driver Handbook.
Bicyclists have all the rights, and are subject to all the provisions, applicable to drivers of vehicles. It
is important to respect the right-of-way of others, especially pedestrians and bicycle riders; and if an
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 9
automobile must pass a bicyclist, they should be patient when passing, only pass when it is safe, and
pass at a reduced speed. However, it should be noted that a 1996 FHWA study of bicycle and
pedestrian crashes found that about half of bicycle crashes with vehicles are the fault of the bicyclist,
which demonstrates the need to educate both bicyclists and drivers about safety.
Equally important is the quality and maintenance of the bicycle facilities. Bikeway facilities must be
planned, implemented, and maintained at a level that does not put the users at risk. In order to grow
the population of bicycle commuters, the facilities must be safe and inviting.
Ease of Implementation
Identification of projects that can be implemented relatively quickly and/or at a lower cost than most
projects should be given some priority. The difficulty in identifying large amounts of funding, and
obtaining necessary rights-of-way, often slows the development of the regional bikeways network.
By picking the “low-hanging fruit” improvements will be implemented at a more rapid pace, which
will contribute to a more complete and convenient bikeway system.
Multimodal Connections
In order for bicycle commuting to be an option for some Orange County residents, they would need
to utilize transit services for portions of their commutes. According to a study reported in the 2007
Transportation Research Board Journal1 - people are willing to bicycle about five miles each way of
their commute. Based on this assumption, the use of transit can greatly expand the distance a bicycle
commuter is willing to travel, making bicycle access to transit facilities a priority issue.
Transit facilities are designed to accommodate the flow of automobiles, but they do not always meet
the needs of bicyclists. Measures need to be taken to ensure that Orange County transit stations can
be easily accessed and utilized by bicycle commuters.
Parking & Amenities
Another issue for the regional bikeways network is the need for bicycle parking and amenities. This
is particularly important at regional destinations to encouraging bicycle commuting. Access to
showers and lockers at employment centers allows bicycle commuters to clean up and change for
work. Not having access to these kinds of facilities creates a difficult challenge for commuters who
would like to bicycle to work.
Bicycle parking at transit stations is necessary due to the limited capacity for bicycles on transit
vehicles. These parking facilities should be safe for long-term (all day) parking, and consist of bicycle
lockers and/or monitored parking areas, both of which are described in more detail later in this
chapter. Additionally, adequate bicycle parking is necessary at employment centers, and at colleges
and universities.
2.2.Modeling Analysis and Regional Improvement
Opportunity Prioritization
OCTA coordinated a modeling effort to identify regional commuter bikeway priorities. The analysis
identified the following key regional employment centers: Irvine Spectrum, The Irvine Business
Complex, Newport Center, South Coast Metro Area, Downtown Santa Ana, Main Street Area (Santa
Ana/Orange), The Anaheim Resort, Anaheim Canyon Business Center, and the Brea Mall.
These regional employment centers were analyzed for their trip generation characteristics. The trip
generation analysis was based on OCTA’s 2035 growth forecast model, OCTAM 3.3. Maps were
produced that show the areas with the highest concentration of demand for trips to each of the
1 Hagelin, Christopher. Integrating Bicycles and Transit Through Bike-to-Bus Strategy. Transportation Research Board
Annual Meeting Paper, 2007.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 10
employment centers (see Appendix B). In general, this data showed the highest concentrations of
trip origins to be within a few miles of the employment centers.
The intent of identifying the regional employment centers, as well as Orange County’s transit
stations, colleges and universities, which are also regional commuter destinations, is to improve
bicycle facilities at these locations in order to make bicycle commuting a more viable option.
Therefore, bicycle access and support facility projects within, or connecting to, the regional
destinations identified in Map 2-1 are viewed by OCTA as regional priorities.
Map 2-1 displays the regional commuter destinations. The radii around the employment centers
were determined based on the trip origin analysis, discussed above, as well as by National Personal
Transportation Survey data that shows the average bicycle trip is three miles or less. A study
conducted in 2007 by the Transportation Research Board estimates that the average commuter is
willing to bicycle about five miles to work, which is why projects that connect to the identified
priority zone will be considered priorities as well. The transit stations, colleges and universities do
not have radii since bicycle facilities should be at, or connect directly to, the specified location.
Note that the above prioritization methods are intended as guidelines, and that jurisdictions can use
them to help justify the regional significance of their projects.
h
h
h h
h
h ")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
¹º¹º
¹º
¹º¹º
¹º¹º
¹º
¹º¹º
¹º¹º¹º
¹º
¹º¹º
¹º
¹º¹º¹º¹º
¹º¹º¹º¹º¹º
¹º¹º¹º
¹º
¹º
¹º
¹º
Brea Mall
Anaheim Canyon
Business Center
The
Anaheim
Resort
Main
Street
Area
Downtown
Santa Ana
South
Coast
Metro
Irvine Business
Complex
Irvine
Spectrum
Newport Center
A¾
A»
?l
%&l(
A¥
A¾
?ê
?k
A»
!"^$
%&l(
A¾
AÊ
!"^$
!"^$Aß
Map 2.1: Regional Commuter Bikeway Priorities
April 23, 2009 Portions of this map copyrighted by Thomas Bros Maps and reproduced with permission.
W:
\
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
\
P
D
C
S
\
S
P
\
P
A
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
2
0
0
8
\
m
x
d
\
d
a
i
l
y
W
o
r
k
T
r
i
p
O
r
i
g
i
n
s
_
2
0
0
9
-
0
4
2
3
.
m
x
d
Source: OCTA
Class I Existing
Class II Proposed
Class II Existing
Class III Proposed
Class III Existing
Class I Proposed
Bikeways
Bikeway Priority Zones
Metrolink Rail
")Metrolink Station
¹ºCollege / University
Regional Employment Centers
042
MilesI
h Bus Station
Bikeway Priority Locations
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 12
The local jurisdictions of Orange County provided all of the information for proposed bikeways
presented in this plan. Map 2.1 was used to identify the following bikeways as regional priority
projects.
Table 2.1: Regional Priority Projects
City Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Anaheim Olive / UPRR Broadway Santa Ana River Trail Class I 4.00
Anaheim La Palma Ave. La Reina St. Jefferson St. Class II 8.34
Brea Birch St. Mercury Ln. State College Blvd Class II 1.18
Brea UP RR Palm St. Valencia Ave. Class I 4.50
Costa Mesa Santa Ana Ave. 23rd St. Mesa Dr. Class II 1.00
Cypress Katella Ave. Walker St. Stanton City Limit Class II 1.49
Dana Point Pacific Coast Hwy. Monarch Bay Dr. Street of the Blue
Lantern
Class II 1.97
Dana Point Pacific Coast Hwy. Street of the Copper
Lantern
Coast Hwy. Class II 0.53
Dana Point Stonehill Dr. San Juan Capistrano
City Limit
Niguel Rd. Class II 2.13
Fullerton BNSF RR Commonwealth Ave. Metrolink RR Class I 2.32
Fullerton UP RR BNSF RR La Habra City Limit Class I 4.83
Fullerton Rosecrans / Euclid Path Euclid St. Rosecrans Ave. Class II 2.31
Garden Grove Euclid St. Orangewood Ave. Westminster Ave. Class II 6.14
Garden Grove Westminster Ave. Bushard St. Brock Ln. Class II 3.22
Huntington
Beach
Pacific Coast Hwy
Segment 1
County Limit 8th St. Class II 4.61
Huntington
Beach
Pacific Coast Hwy
Segment 2
Huntington St. County Limit Class II 2.63
Irvine Jeffrey Rd. Path Trabuco Rd. North of Alton Pkwy. Class I 2.23
Irvine OCTA Metrolink Path Sand Canyon Ave. Great Park
Southeastern Path
Class I 1.96
La Habra UPRR Bikeway Western City Limit Palm St. Class I 3.00
La Habra La Habra Blvd. Valley Home Ave. Vallejo St. Class II 2.77
Laguna Beach Pacific Coast Hwy. City Limit ( S El Moro
Rdg.)
Broadway Class II 4.83
Laguna Hills Cabot Rd La Paz Rd. Oso Pkwy. Class II 1.19
Laguna Niguel Forbes Path Mission Viejo City Limit San Juan Capistrano
City Limit
Class I 2.03
Laguna
Woods
El Toro Rd. Moulton Pkwy. Laguna Hills City Limit Class II 0.74
Lake Forest OCTA Metrolink RR Irvine City Limit El Toro Rd. Class I 1.93
Mission Viejo Camino Capistrano Oso Pkwy. Laguna Niguel City
Limit
Class I 0.82
Orange Glassell St. Fletcher St. Katella Ave. Class II 1.39
Orange Glassell St. La Veta Ave. Santa Ana City Limit
(SR-22 E Exit 16)
Class II 0.40
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 13
City Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Orange Glassell St. Woodvale Ave. Fletcher St. Class II 0.12
Orange Glassell St. City Limit N Riverdale Ave. Class II 0.08
Orange Walnut Ave. Hewes St. Rancho Santiago Blvd. Class III 0.25
Orange Walnut Ave. Walnut Ave. _Tustin St.
Bikeway
Earlham St. Class III 0.77
Placentia Orangethorpe Ave. Chapman Ave. Anaheim City Limits (W
Lakeview Ave.)
Class II 2.92
San Clemente Avenida Vista Hermosa Avenida La Pata Avenida Pico Class I 1.01
San Juan
Capistrano
Las Ramblas / PCH San Clemente City
Limit
San Diego Fwy. Class II 2.00
Santa Ana Raitt St. Mc Fadden Ave. Sunflower Ave. Class I 2.72
Santa Ana Birstol St. / La Veta
Ave.
Orange City Limit
(Santa Ana Fwy.)
Sunflower Ave. Class II 5.88
Santa Ana Grand Ave. Orange City Limit
(S 22E exit 16)
Dyer Rd. Class II 4.64
Santa Ana Westminster Ave. Garden Grove City
Limit (W Newhope St)
Garden Grove City
Limit (W Clinton St)
Class II 1.36
Seal Beach Westminster Ave. Seal Beach Blvd. City Limit Westminster Class II 1.98
Stanton Magnolia Ave. Anaheim City Limit UP RR Class I 0.62
Stanton Katella Ave. Cypress City Limit Magnolia St. Class II 1.94
Tustin Red Hill Ave. Barranca Pkwy. Warner Ave. Class II 0.51
Tustin Red Hill Ave. Warner Ave. Parkway Loop Class II 0.78
Tustin Red Hill Ave. Edinger Ave. Nisson Rd. Class II 1.00
Tustin Red Hill Ave. El Camino Real First St. Class II 0.57
Tustin Red Hill Ave First St. Melvin Way Class II 0.78
Tustin Red Hill Ave. Melvin Way North of Irvine Blvd. Class II 0.18
Westminster Bolsa Chica Rd. /
Valley View St.
Garden Grove City
Limit
Westminster Ave. Class II 1.09
Westminster Mc Fadden Ave. Van Buren St. Dalewood Ln. Class II 1.83
Westminster Westminster Ave. Seal Beach City Limit Atlantis Wy. Class II 4.59
Yorba Linda Bastanchury Rd. Placentia City Limit Village Center Dr. Class II 4.02
TOTAL 116.13
Table 2.2: Regional Priority Project Cost Estimates
Class Unit Cost (per mile) Total Miles Total Cost
Class I $1,500,000 31.97 $47,955,000
Class II $280,000 84.16 $23,564,800
Total 116.13 $71,519,800
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 14
2.3.Performance Criteria
The input received through the outreach process also served to identify project performance criteria
that can be used by local jurisdictions to prioritize their projects listed in this plan, as well as future
projects. The following criteria should be considered in the order of the Tiers in which they are
listed:
Tier 1:
Safety – Projects that reduce conflicts between motorists and cyclists, and address other safety
concerns.
Ease of implementation – Projects with an anticipated low difficulty for implementation, based on
available rights-of-way, existing traffic operations, and other similar factors.
Continuity – Projects that improve continuity within the route, or between routes.
Tier 2:
Regional significance – Projects that will benefit the overall region by addressing regional priorities
identified within this plan.
Accessibility – Projects that provide one or more points of access to regional destinations.
Support facilities and programs – Projects that include any of the following support facilities or programs:
bicycle parking (including lockers)
signage/street markings
signal detection (buttons and/or in-ground)
lighting
bicycle sharing programs
restrooms/drinking fountains
other similar facilities
Tier 3:
Directness – Projects that provide the most direct route between origins and destinations.
Route aesthetics – Projects that provide for visual aesthetics, increased comfort, a sense of personal
safety, and/or other similar factors along the facility.
Public Support – Projects that appear to be supported by the public input received in the development
of this plan, through letters of support, or other means of public input.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 15
2.4.OCTA Action Plan
Input received during the outreach process indicated that OCTA needed to clearly establish its roles
and responsibilities regarding bikeway planning in Orange County. The following Action Plan
identifies the tasks OCTA will undertake to ensure the implementation of the CBSP, as well as
OCTA’s support for bicycle commuting:
Improve the regional bikeways network
Provide funding, when feasible, for capital bikeway improvements through a
competitive call-for-projects
Support efforts by local jurisdictions to seek funding, such as state Bicycle
Transportation Account funds
Promote that local jurisdictions to emphasize their consideration of bicyclists within
environmental and planning documents
External coordination
Designate an OCTA bicycle coordinator
Maintain the countywide bicycle transportation plan, ensure it remains compliant with
the Bicycle Transportation Account requirements, and make it available for adoption by
local jurisdictions
Facilitate bikeway planning coordination efforts between jurisdictions and other
involved entities
Encourage local jurisdictions to coordinate local planning efforts with the CBSP
Encourage each local jurisdiction to designate a bicycle coordinator
Update and work with bicycle coordinators, Employee Transportation Coordinators,
and other stakeholders, on issues relating to bicycling, such as funding opportunities
Provide technical support to local jurisdictions
Internal coordination
Ensure that the needs for bicyclists and bikeways are considered in the development of
projects and programs within OCTA
Plan and participate in events that promote bicycling, such as
Bike-to-Work Week and Rideshare Week
Provide bikeway outreach and support through internet resources, including a
countywide commuter bikeways map
Communicate with OCTA committees as necessary
Address the regional priorities
Lead the implementation efforts of projects within OCTA owned
rights-of-way
Review development plans and environmental documents and provide comments, 1) to
ensure that developers and local jurisdictions are complying with the CBSP, and 2) to
encourage these entities to add local supplemental routes that may not be on the
regional bikeways plan, but would enhance the overall connectivity of the bikeway
system.
Advise local jurisdictions to submit projects that address the regional priorities when
state or federal funds become available
Provide incentives to local jurisdictions for submitting projects that address the regional
priorities during calls-for-projects for funds controlled by OCTA
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 16
2.5.Funding Opportunities
There are a variety of potential funding sources that can be used for bicycle projects, programs and
plans from all levels of government. This section covers traditional federal, state, regional and local
sources of funding, as well as some non-traditional funding sources that may be used for bicycle
projects. In addition, local jurisdictions are encouraged to have bicycle projects prioritized and ready
to move forward on short notice in the case that new funding sources become available.
2.5.1.Federal Funding Sources
The primary federal source of surface transportation funding—including bicycle and pedestrian
facilities—is the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient, Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA-LU). This Federal bill is the third iteration of the transportation vision established
by Congress in 1991 with the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act and renewed in 1998
and extended in 2003 through the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century and the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2003. Also known as the Federal
Transportation Bill, the $286.5 billion bill was passed in 2005 and authorizes federal surface
transportation programs for the five-year period between 2005 and 2009.
Federal funding is administered through the state (Caltrans and the State Resources Agency) and
regional planning agencies. Most, but not all, of these funding programs are oriented toward
transportation versus recreation, with an emphasis on reducing vehicle trips and providing inter-
modal connections. Many Federal programs require a local match of between 10-20%. Federal
funding is intended for capital improvements and safety and education programs and projects must
relate to the surface transportation system.
Specific funding programs under the federal transportation bill for bicycle facilities that might be
potential funding sources for the CBSP may include:
Federal Lands Highway Funds—Approximately $1 billion dollars are available nationally
through 2009 for planning and construction of bicycle projects built in conjunction
with roadways
Transportation, Community and System Preservation Program—$270 million nationally through
2009 for projects that improve the efficiency of the transportation system, reduce the
impact on the environment, and provide efficient access to jobs, services and trade
centers
Recreational Trails Program—$370 million nationally through 2009 for non-motorized trail
projects.
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program—About $1.7 billion available
nationwide per year. Estimated annual program level for California is $360 million.
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)—The annual program funding is approximately
$54 million for Federal Fiscal Year 2008/2009 at which time the HSIP program will
end, unless it is extended or reauthorized. The maximum funding amount for a project
is $1 million, and the federal reimbursement rate is 90%.
Regional Surface Transportation Program—Estimated annual program level is $330 million
which is eligible for State Match and Exchange Program funding.
Safe Routes to School—This is a 100% federal reimbursement program. California will
receive $68 million over the five year life of SAFETEA-LU. There is no local match
required.
Transportation Enhancements—California will receive approximately $75 million per year for
five years, starting in 2006.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 17
Federal Lands Highway Funds
Federal Lands Highway Funds may be used to build bicycle and pedestrian facilities in conjunction
with roads and parkways at the discretion of the department charged with administration of the
funds. The projects must be transportation-related and tied to a plan adopted by the State and
Metropolitan Planning Organization. Federal Lands Highway Funds may be used for planning and
construction and is managed by the United States Department of Transportation.
Transportation, Community and System Preservation Program
The Transportation, Community and System Preservation Program provides federal funding for
transit oriented development, traffic calming and other projects that improve the efficiency of the
transportation system, reduce the impact on the environment, and provide efficient access to jobs,
services and trade centers. The program is intended to provide communities with the resources to
explore the integration of their transportation system with community preservation and
environmental activities. The Program funds require a 20% match and can be applied to planning,
design and construction and is administered through the Federal Highway Administration.
Recreational Trails Program
The Recreational Trails Program (RTP) provides funds annually for recreational trails and trails-
related projects. The RTP is administered at the federal level by the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA). It is administered at the state level by the California Department of Parks and Recreation
(DPR). The maximum amount of RTP funds allowed for each project is 88% of the total project
cost. The applicant is responsible for obtaining a match amount that is at least 12% of the total
project cost. The application deadline is in October. Funds may be used for:
Maintenance and restoration of existing trails;
Purchase and lease of trail construction and maintenance equipment;
Construction of new trails; including unpaved trails
Acquisition of easements or property for trails;
State administrative costs related to this program (limited to seven percent of a State's
funds); and
Operation of educational programs to promote safety and environmental protection
related to trails (limited to five percent of a State's funds).
Land and Water Conservation Fund
The Land and Water Conservation Fund is a federally funded program that provides grants for
planning and acquiring outdoor recreation areas and facilities. The Fund is administered by the
National Parks Service and the California Department of Parks and Recreation and has been
reauthorized until 2015.
Cities, counties and districts authorized to acquire, develop, operate and maintain park and recreation
facilities are eligible to apply. The application deadline is in May, and applicants must fund the entire
project, and will be reimbursed for 50% of costs. Property acquired or developed under the program
must be retained in perpetuity for public recreational use.
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ)
CMAQ Funds are directed to transportation projects and programs which contribute to the
attainment or maintenance of National Ambient Air Quality Standards in non attainment or air
quality maintenance areas for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate matter under provisions in the
Federal Clean Air Act. Eligible projects include bicycle facilities.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 18
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
The Highway Safety Improvement Program is managed locally by Caltrans. For a project to be
eligible for HSIP funds, the project must be on any public road and/or publicly owned bicycle,
pedestrian pathway, or trail. Projects must identify a specific safety problem that can be corrected or
be improved substantially.
Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP)
Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) funding is distributed based on population, among
the urbanized and non-urbanized areas of the State through Metropolitan Planning Organizations
(MPOs) and Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPAs). Bicycle facilities are eligible for
funding through this federally administered program.
Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
Eligible projects fall under the category of infrastructure (capital improvements), or non-
infrastructure (education, encouragement, enforcement). Infrastructure projects must be located
within a two mile radius of a grade school or middle school. Local Caltrans representatives serve as
the administrative authority on SRTS projects.
Transportation Enhancements (TE)
Federal Transportation Enhancement funds are to be used for transportation-related capital
improvement projects that enhance quality-of-life, in or around transportation facilities. Facilities
that qualify for TE funds include bicycle safety, education and facility projects. Transportation
Enhancements projects are managed locally by Caltrans.
2.5.2.Statewide Funding Sources
The State of California uses both federal sources and its own budget to fund bicycle projects and
programs.
Bicycle Transportation Account
The Bicycle Transportation Account provides state funding for local projects that improve the safety
and convenience of bicycling for transportation. Because of its focus on transportation, Bicycle
Transportation Account projects must provide a demonstrable level of utility for transportation
purposes. For example, all in-town on-street and paved bikeways would be good candidates for
funding. Funds are available for both planning and construction. Bicycle Transportation Account
funding is administered by Caltrans and cities and counties must have an adopted Bicycle
Transportation Plan in order to be eligible. The maximum amount available through the Bicycle
Transportation Account is $1.2 million dollars, cities and counties are eligible to apply. All projects
must be designed to the standards outlined in Chapter 1000 of the Highway Design Manual. The
application deadline is in December.
Community Based Transportation Planning Demonstration Grant Program
This fund, administered by Caltrans, provides funding for projects that exemplify livable community
concepts including bicycle improvement projects. Eligible applicants include local governments,
metropolitan planning organizations and regional transportation planning agencies. A 20% local
match is required and projects must demonstrate a transportation component or objective. There is
$3 million available annually statewide. The application deadline is in October.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 19
Safe Routes to School (SR2S)
To be eligible for SR2S funds, the project must be located on any state highway or on any local road.
Projects must correct an identified safety hazard or problem on a route that students use for trips to
and from school. Up to 10 percent of the project’s cost can fund a non infrastructure component
that supports the infrastructure project. Only cities and counties are eligible to compete for funds.
State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
All STIP projects must be capital projects (including project development costs) needed to improve
transportation. Eligible projects include bicycle facility improvements and improved access to transit
and are administered by Caltrans.
2.5.3.Local and Regional Funding Sources
Developer Impact Fees
Fees placed on new development local government could be used as local matching funds to attract
other grant sources.
2.5.4.Non-Traditional Funding Sources
Community Development Block Grants
The Community Development Block Grant program provides money for streetscape revitalization,
which may be largely comprised of pedestrian improvements. Federal Community Development
Block Grant grantees may “use [these] funds for activities that include (but are not limited to):
acquiring real property; reconstructing or rehabilitating housing and other property; building public
facilities and improvements, such as streets, sidewalks, community and senior citizen centers and
recreational facilities, paying for planning and administrative expenses, such as costs related to
developing a consolidated plan and managing Community Development Block Grant funds; provide
public services for youths, seniors, or the disabled; and initiatives such as neighborhood watch
programs.”
American Greenways Program
Administered by The Conservation Fund, the American Greenways Program provides funding for
the planning and design of greenways. Applications for funds can be made by local regional or
statewide non-profit organizations and public agencies. The maximum award is $2,500, but most
range from $500 to $1,500. American Greenways Program monies may be used to fund unpaved
trail development. The application deadline is June 1.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 20
2.6.Design Guidelines
This section provides bikeway planning and design guidelines for use in developing the OCTA
bikeway system and support facilities. Guidelines are presented based on their regulatory agencies
and documents. One set of guidelines involve design elements required by the State of California for
compliance with Caltrans Highway Design Manual Chapter 1000 “Bikeway Planning and Design”
guidelines. Another set of guidelines follow the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (CAMUTCD). Finally, the last set of guidelines cover experimental or nonstandard best
practices with information about optional innovative bikeways and support facilities that have not
been adopted by Caltrans or the CAMUTCD.
Although this information meets Caltrans requirements it is not intended to state a minimum or
maximum accommodation or to replace any existing adopted roadway design guidelines. All facility
designs are subject to engineering design review.
2.6.1.Caltrans Guidelines
According to Caltrans, the term “bikeway” encompasses all facilities that provide primarily for
bicycle travel. Caltrans defines three major types of bikeways in Chapter 1000 of the Highway Design
Manual: Class I, Class II, and Class III. For each type of facility the document provides design
requirements and recommendations, including details for gradation, surfacing, intersection
considerations, lane-widths and lighting.
Figure 2-1: Bicycle Facility Types provides an illustration of these three types of bicycle facilities.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 21
Figure 2.1: Bicycle Facility Types
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 22
2.6.2.CAMUTCD Guidelines
In conjunction with the Caltrans guidelines for facility design, part 9 of the CAMUTCD provides
guidelines for signage, pavement markings, and highway traffic signals specifically related to bicycle
operation on both roadways and shared-use paths. These guidelines include details regarding traffic
control device placement, maintenance, and application. Figure 2-2 shows some of the signs
regulated by the CAMUTCD.
Figure 2.2: Examples of Regulatory and Warning Signs
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 23
2.6.3.Guidelines for Innovative Treatments
The following set of guidelines present treatments that go beyond the Caltrans and CAMUTCD
standards. These primarily consist of facilities that help bicyclists negotiate particularly challenging
roadways and improve the convenience of bicycle travel. Almost every city in Orange County
features locations where these innovative treatments can make conditions easier, more convenient,
and safer for bicycle commuters. These treatments may be key in determining a Level of
Service (LOS) standard for the region’s bikeways. If developed, this LOS can give bicyclists an at-a-
glance idea of the level of convenience that will be provided when choosing a route.
Freeway Ramps
Freeway on- and off-ramp crossings present a potential conflict zone for bicyclists and motorists, as
bicycle lanes are typically dropped and bicyclists must merge across travel lanes where vehicles are
accelerating or decelerating from freeway speeds. The appropriate bicyclist behavior is to merge left
away so as to be positioned in the through lane well before the mouth of the on-ramp, and to remain
out away from the curb until past the off-ramp. Implementation of interchange improvements
requires coordination with Caltrans District 12 regarding placement of signage and striping because
these areas are in Caltrans’ right-of-way. Two guidelines for these improvements are:
The bicycle merge should begin 250 feet in advance of the freeway on-ramp.
Appropriate signage and striping should be used to warn bicyclists and motorists of
the merge.
Bicycle improvements to freeway ramps are shown in .
Figure 2.3: Bike Crossing of Freeway Ramps
The City of Portland has addressed this issue with striping or physical elements that encourage
bicyclists to cross ramps at or close to a right angle. The treatment shortens the vehicle/bicycle
conflict zone while also improving sight distance for bicyclists. Some bicyclists may choose to ignore
this treatment however, as this creates a less-direct route through the interchange area and forces
them to relinquish right-of-way to exiting motorists.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 24
Figure 2.4: Signage and pavement markings encouraging bicyclists to cross ramp
Figure 2.5 shows a dashed bike lane through the conflict zone of a freeway interchange in
Jacksonville, Florida, clearly demarcating the cyclist’s route and lane positioning. Treating the
pavement with color enhances the visibility of the conflict area.
Figure 2.5: Dashed bike lane through conflict zone (optional painted lane)
Ideally, freeway ramps should approach surface streets at a right angle, and be signalized. This
provides both bicyclists and drivers with the greatest visibility, and it avoids conflicts between
bicyclists and merging automobiles.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 25
At-grade Undercrossings
At-grade undercrossing facilities for
pedestrians and bicyclists can be beneficial to
a region’s bikeway network. Because they
require less excavation than roads, they
provide time and financial savings.
At-grade undercrossings do not require the
same amount of elevation change as adjacent
roadways because they do not have the same
height clearance requirements. As Figure 2.6
demonstrates, the shorter the elevation
change (and closer to perfectly flat) the more
convenient the path will be.
Bicycle Signals & Detectors at Intersections
Many traffic signals are not programmed or sensitive enough to
detect a bicyclist waiting at an intersection. When this happens,
bicyclists can become frustrated and attempt to cross an
intersection before the light changes.
Two innovative methods for addressing this problem are
bicyclist-oriented push buttons or loop detectors. Push buttons
work in the same way a pedestrian actuated cross signal does, but
it is placed conveniently next to the curb where bicyclists can
activate it (without having to dismount their bike) and contains
signage that promotes its use (Figure 2.7).
Another facility designed to help bicyclists at intersections are
conductor loops. As Figure 2.8 demonstrates, pavement
markings can be used in conjunction with the detector loop to
instruct bicyclists where to wait while at an intersection.
These innovative treatments are effectively address the concerns
of bicyclists waiting at traffic signals, while also promoting safe
and courteous bicycle riding.
Figure 2.6: Lemon St. at Truslow Ave, Fullerton
Figure 2.7: Push-button for
Bicyclists
Figure 2.8: In-pavement Loop
Detector
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 26
Bicycle Boulevards
Bicycle Boulevards have been implemented in numerous
California locations including Berkeley, Davis, and
Pasadena. A Bicycle Boulevard, also known as bicycle
priority road, is a roadway that allows all types of vehicles,
but which has been modified to enhance bicycle safety
and security. Roadways are designed to be places where
cars and bicycles can equally share right-of-way. Bicycle
Boulevards tend to be residential streets with lower traffic
volumes, typically between 3000 to 5000 average daily
vehicles, but can include secondary commercial streets.
Figure 2.9 shows the typical design features of bicycle
boulevards, these include:
Traffic calming devices such as traffic circles
and curb bulb outs
Bicycle destination signage
Pavement stencils indicating status as a
Bicycle Boulevard
Crossing improvements at major arterials
such as traffic signals with bicycle-detection,
four-way stops and high-visibility crosswalks
Bicycle-friendly signal preemption at high-
volume signalized intersections.
Stop signs on streets crossing the Bicycle Boulevard
Bicycle Boulevards can be designed to accommodate the particular needs of the residents and
businesses along the routes, and may be as simple as pavement markings with wayfinding signs or as
complex as streets with traffic diverters and bicycle signals. Many good candidates for Bicycle
Boulevards may benefit most from signage and public education. Substantial capital improvements
may not be necessary.
To further identify a street as a preferred bicycle route, lower volume roadways may be modified to
function as a through street for bicycles, while maintaining only local access for automobiles. Traffic
calming devices can lower traffic speeds and through trips, limiting conflicts between motorists and
bicyclists and providing priority to through bicycle movement.
Figure 2.9: Bicycle Boulevard Signage
in Berkeley, CA
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 27
Figure 2.10: Bicycle Boulevard Lane Configuration
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 28
Shared Roadway Bicycle Marking
Recently, Shared Lane Marking stencils have been introduced for use in California as an additional
treatment for Class III facilities. The stencil can serve a number of purposes, such as making
motorists aware of bicycles potentially in their lane, showing bicyclists the direction of travel, and,
with proper placement, reminding bicyclists to bike further from parked cars to prevent “dooring”
collisions.
Figure 2.11 illustrates recommended placement of the stencil in the roadway and the “Chevron”
marking design recommended by Caltrans. Caltrans adopted the following pavement markings for
official use in 2005 as part of the California MUTCD.
Figure 2.11: Shared Lane Marking Placement and Shared Roadway Bicycle Marking
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 29
Inter-jurisdictional Wayfinding Signage
Local jurisdictions should work together to create a sign system for the class I/multi-use path
network. It is an expanding network that could link with many destinations countywide. Signs could
show destinations as well as proper traffic control.
These signs could be coordinated with other on-street bicycle route signage. This system should
encourage use of trails for recreational as well as functional bicycling trip-purposes. Helping bicyclists
of all ages reach destinations easily.
Figure 2.12: Multi-Use Path Signs
For many years Orange County has used brown and white “Trail Courtesy” sings along class I
bikeways. These are typically located at entrances to a class I bikeway, particularly at intersections
and other bikeway access points. The sign depicts the three main user groups as all users are allowed
on regional class I bikeways in Orange County. Optional signage can be included beneath the triangle
to provide wayfinding or the name of the path.
For aesthetic purposes, signage along class I bikeways should be kept to a minimum and should
include only those sings that are absolutely necessary to identify a route or provide safety direction.
Parallel Path Warning Signage
When paths are located parallel and adjacent to roadways, vehicles
turning into and out of streets and driveways must cross the path.
Conflicts between bicyclists and pedestrians and turning motorists
are common at these types of intersections. Turning motor vehicles
do not expect to see bicyclists or pedestrians coming in the opposite
direction of traffic.
Starting in the early 1990’s, the City of Denver, Colorado began using
experimental warning signage at its parallel paths. The signage is
modified from the standard MUTCD railroad warning signage.
Experimental signage, similar to the Denver parallel path warning
signs, could help alert motorists to the presence of bicyclists and
pedestrians on parallel paths.
Figure 2.13: Denver’s parallel
path warning signage
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 30
Bicycle Parking
As more bikeways are constructed and bicycle usage grows, the need for bike parking will increase.
Short-term parking at shopping centers and similar land uses can support bicycling as well as long-
term bicycle parking at transit stations and work sites. The Association for Bicycle and Pedestrian
Professionals published Bicycle Parking Guidelines to help with bicycle parking facility, design,
placement and installation.
Short Term Bicycle Parking
Short term bicycle parking facilities are best used to accommodate visitors, customers, messengers
and others expected to depart within two hours. Bicycle racks provide support for the bicycle but do
not have locking mechanisms. Racks are relatively low-cost devices that typically hold between two
and eight bicycles, allow bicyclists to securely lock their frames and wheels, are secured to the
ground, and are located in highly visible areas. They are usually located at schools, commercial
locations, and activity centers such as parks, libraries, retail locations, and civic centers. Bicycle racks
should be installed with the following guidelines in mind:
The rack element (part of the rack that supports the bike) should keep the bike upright,
supporting the frame in two places and allowing one or both wheels to be secured.
Install racks so there is enough room between adjacent parked bicycles. If it becomes
too difficult for a bicyclist to easily lock their bicycle, they may park elsewhere. A row of
inverted “U” racks should be installed with 15 inches minimum between racks.
Empty racks should not pose a tripping hazard for visually impaired pedestrians.
Position racks out of the walkway’s clear zone.
Install racks outside the 2-foot clearance area of a class I bikeway
Bicycle racks should be installed on concrete or asphalt to ensure security/stability
When possible, racks should be in a covered area protected from the elements. Long-term parking
should always be protected.
Generally, ‘U’ type racks bolted into the sidewalk are preferred and should be located intermittently
or in front of key destinations. Bicycle racks should be installed to meet ADA standards and not
block pedestrian through traffic. provides recommendations for placement of inverted U type racks.
Local jurisdictions may want to consider custom
racks that can serve not only as Bicycle racks, but
also public artwork, or as advertising for a specific
business. Figure 2.15: Recommended Short-
Term Bicycle Parking Facilities provides
examples of various racks. The “post and ring”
style rack is an attractive alternative to the standard
inverted-U, which requires only a single mounting
point and can be customized to have a city or
region name or emblem stamped into the rings.
These racks can also be easily retrofitted onto
existing street posts, such as parking meter posts.
While custom racks can add a decorative element
and relate to a neighborhood theme, the rack
function should not be overlooked: All racks
should adhere to the basic functional requirement
of supporting the bicycle by the frame (not only
the wheel) and accepting a U-lock.
Figure 2.14: Recommended bicycle parking spacing
dimensions
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 31
Figure 2.15: Recommended Short-Term Bicycle Parking Facilities
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 32
Long Term Bicycle Parking
For long-term parking, the local jurisdictions
may want to consider bicycle lockers.
Bicyclists are usually more comfortable
storing bicycles in lockers for long periods
because they offer increased security and
protection from natural elements. Although
they may be more expensive to install, they
can make the difference for commuters
deciding whether or not to bicycle.
Lockers can be controlled with traditional key
systems or through more elaborate
subscription systems. Subscription locker
programs, like e-lockers, or park-by-phone
systems allow even more flexibility within
locker use. Instead of restricting access for
each patron to a single locker, subscribers can
gain access to all lockers within a system,
controlled by magnetic access cards, or caller
ID. These programs typically have fewer
administrative costs because they simplify or
eliminate key management and locker
assignment.
Long-term bicycle parking facilities
accommodate employees, students, residents,
commuters, and others expected to park more
than two hours. These parking facilities
should be provided in a secure, weather-
protected manner and location.
Innovative High Volume Bicycle Parking
In many locations, individual U-racks located
on the sidewalk can be sufficient to meet
bicycle parking demand. Where bicycle
parking demand is higher, more formal
structures and larger facilities need to be
provided. Several options for high-volume
bicycle parking are outlined below.
Figure 2.16: Bicycle Lockers at a Transit Station
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 33
On-Street Bike Parking Corral
A relatively inexpensive solution to
providing high-volume bicycle parking
is to convert one or two on-street
motor vehicle parking spaces into on-
street bicycle parking. Bike racks are
installed in the street and protected
from motor vehicles with removable
curbs and bollards. These Bike Parking
Corrals move bicycles off the sidewalks,
and leave space for sidewalk café tables
or pedestrians. Bicycle parking does not
block sightlines like motor vehicles do,
so it may be possible to locate bicycle
parking in no-parking zones near
intersections and crosswalks.
Bike Oasis
In 2008, the City of Portland, Oregon began installation of several
“Bike Oases” in commercial districts. These signature bicycle
parking facilities are installed on curb extensions and consist of
attractive covered bike parking and an information panel.
Portland’s Bike Oases provide parking space for ten bikes. Bike
and walking maps are installed on the information panel.
Bicycle Commuter Centers
Bicycle Commuting Centers (BCC) are a type of mass storage
facility for bicycles. They are sometimes known as BikeStations.
BikeStation is a non profit organization that operates Bicycle
Commuting Centers. Bicycle Commuting Centers vary in size and
structure, but typically provide secure, monitored storage space for
bicycles and commuting equipment. Some facilities integrate
bicycle storage with repair and maintenance services operated by
hired staff.
Typically, BCCs provide free parking during
business hours on weekdays. Other centers
include enhanced services that come with
membership. In exchange for a monthly fee, BCC
members have unlimited access to the parking
facilities and may receive discounts on other
services provide at the facility. BCCs may also
feature showers/locker room space, equipment
for sale and refreshments. These facilities tend to
be located in a highly visible space so as to attract
patronage and also promote bicycle commuting in
general.
Photo: Bill Stiles
Figure 2.17: Bike Corral
Bike Oasis installed in Portland
Figure 2.18: Bike Oasis
Figure 2.19: Bike Station
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 34
Bike Sharing
Bike sharing is an innovative approach to urban mobility. Combining the convenience and flexibility
of a private vehicle with the accessibility and reliability of public mass transit public bicycles are
available on demand - fast and easy access for any trip, without the hassles presented by parking a
private car or waiting on a transit timetable. When used in combination with other transportation
systems, a shared bike program can reduce the travel time between transit stop and office and easily
overcome the distance between residence and shopping center.
Benefits of Bike Sharing Programs
Fast, flexible and convenient
personal transportation for the
urban environment.
A relatively safe and worry free
introduction to cycling for people
wishing to change their commute
mode.
Introduces a low cost, low
commitment transportation
alternative that enables and
encourages multi-modal commutes
when combined with mass transit.
Quiet, clean use of urban space when substituted for car parking.
Velib- Bike Sharing Program in France
Figure 2.20: Bike Sharing Programs
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 35
CHAPTER 3.Bikeway Information by
Jurisdiction
A summary of the existing bikeways, related facilities, and programs under the jurisdiction of Orange
County cities, the County, and the State of California are provided below. Bikeways information
provided by each city partially satisfies requirements for state Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA)
funding eligibility. As required in the Streets and Highways Code Section 891.2, this section provides
the following existing conditions and plans for each jurisdiction:
Land use and settlement patterns
Population
Estimated number of bicycle commuters
Collisions involving bicyclists
End-of-trip facilities
End-of-trip facilities are available to bicyclists at the end of their commutes. Important
end-of-trip facilities include storage such as bicycle parking and lockers, as well as
showers and places to change clothes.
Multi-modal facilities
Multi-modal facilities allow bicyclists to connect to other modes of travel. Multi-modal
facilities include park-and-ride locations and public transportation with facilities that
allow for bicycles on board.
Descriptions of bicycle safety and education programs
Descriptions of past expenditures for bicycle facilities
Existence of Bicycle Transportation Plan
Bikeways
Most individual city population figures come from the 2006/2007 totals reported by the US Census
Bureau. In some instances, more updated figures have been provided by individual city departments.
The estimated numbers of bicycle commuters for each city is extrapolated from a number of studies
and the U.S. Census 2000. Total estimated bicycle commuters include bike-to-work, transit, school,
college and utilitarian bicycle commuters; it does not include recreational trips. See appendices for
description of number extrapolation.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 36
3.1.Aliso Viejo
Aliso Viejo is well-known as a strong and lively community designed to meet the growing needs of
individuals, families, professionals and enterprising businesses. It is a balanced community with
opportunities for housing, jobs, future-planned multi-modal transportation and recreation. An
abundance of parks and trails, cultural and recreational activities and youth sports programs further
enhance the quality of life for a community with a vision to ensure long-term viability.
Population
40,166
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 273
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 0.9%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 546
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 351
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 1,100
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 171
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 444
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 888
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 648
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 2,981
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 789,984
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 2
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 16
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 1
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 84,029
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 37
Map 3.1 Aliso Viejo Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 38
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 22
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 4.4
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.11
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 0.32
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index less than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is lower than the statewide average.
End of Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Connectivity
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Safety & Education Programs
The City of Aliso Viejo does not currently provide bicycle-related safety and education programs.
Expenditures
Information on past bikeway facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
The city of Aliso Viejo does not have an adopted Bicycle Transportation Plan.
Bikeways
Aliso Viejo Existing Bikeways
Street / Path From To Class Mileage
Existing Bikeway Information Not Provided
Aliso Viejo Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Westwing Canyon Wren Aliso Creek Rd Class II 0.38
Aliso Creek Rd. Aliso Viejo Pkwy. Pacific Park Dr. Class II 1.26
Canyon Wren Ln. Westwing El Toro Rd. Class II 0.56
TOTAL 2.2 miles
Aliso Viejo Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class II 2.20 $280,000 $616,000
Total $616,000
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 39
3.2.Anaheim
With a population of 328,014 Anaheim is the second largest city in Orange County. It is also home
to several tourist destinations, most notably the two Anaheim resort theme parks. The area
surrounding the parks has been developed primarily with the tourist in mind. Anaheim is also home
to the Anaheim Stadium and Honda Center sporting and entertainment venues. The western portion
of the City is older and well established with a developed grid network of arterial streets. The eastern
portion of the City, called Anaheim Hills, is relatively newer and is largely comprised of suburban
subdivisions of single- and multi-family housing. Anaheim is also home to several industrial and
commercial centers, including those located along Orangethorpe and La Palma Avenues.
Population
328,014
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 4,138
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 2.0%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 8,276
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 5,551
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 20,203
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 834
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 4,972
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 9,944
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 7,259
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 33,391
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 8,848,636
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 24
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 179
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 12
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 941,212
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 40
Map 3.2 Anaheim Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 41
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 523
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 104.6
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.31
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 0.96
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index less than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is lower than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Location Type
200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Bicycle Lockers
201 Anaheim Blvd. Bicycle Lockers and Showers
235 E. Center St. Bicycle Lockers
Multimodal Connectivity
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Metrolink/Amtrak/Rideshare/Bus Anaheim Station
2150 E Katella Ave
Bicycle racks(6)/lockers(9)
Bicycle racks on trains and buses
Metrolink/Rideshare/Bus Anaheim Canyon Station
1039 N Pacific Center Dr
Bicycle racks(6)/lockers(15)
Bicycle racks on trains and buses
Rideshare Camelot Golf land
3200 Carpenter Ave
Rideshare State College Church of Christ
311 N State College Blvd
Safety and Education Programs
The City of Anaheim has existing bicycle safety and education programs.
Expenditures
Facility Improvement From To Cost
Loara St. Striped Class II Crescent Ave Wilshire Ave
Crescent Ave. Striped Class II Chippewa Ave Loara St
Wilshire Ave. Striped Class II Loara St Lincoln
$ 62,000
Frontera St. Striped Class II Park Vista St Glassell
Rio Vista St Striped Class II Mardi Gras Ave Lincoln $ 44,164
Miller St Striped Class II La Palma Orangethorpe $ 27,013
Orangewood Ave Striped Class II Euclid St Janette Ln $ 21,346
9th St Striped Class II Orangewood Ave Katella Ave $ 19,655
Miraloma Ave Striped Class II Tustin St Van Buren St $ 18,470
Broadway Striped Class II East St State College Blvd $ 8,470
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 42
Bicycle Transportation Plan
The city of Anaheim has an adopted Bicycle Master Plan as part of its General Plan.
Bikeways
Anaheim Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Carbon Creek Gilbert St. Crescent Ave Class I 0.50
Santa Ana River Orange city limit Yorba Linda city limit Class I 10.50
Anaheim Hills Rd. Santa Ana Canyon Rd. Nohl Ranch Rd. Class II 0.75
Brookhurst St. Lincoln Ave. Ball Rd. Class II 1.00
Broadway East St State College Blvd Class II 0.76
Cerritos Ave. Buena Park city limit Stanton city limit Class II 0.25
Crescent Ave. Chippewa Ave. Loara St. Class II 0.25
Euclid Ave. Lincoln Ave. Ball Rd. Class II 1.00
Frontera St. Park Vista St. Glassell St. Class II 0.70
Imperial Hwy Nohl Ranch Rd. Orange city limit Class II 0.75
Kellogg Dr. Yorba Linda city limit Orangethorpe Ave. Class II 0.75
Lakeview Ave. La Palma Ave. Santa Ana River Class II 0.25
Loara St. Crescent Ave. Wilshire Ave. Class II 0.25
Miller St. Orangethorpe Ave. La Palma Ave. Class II 1.00
Miraloma Ave Tustin St Van Buren St Class II 0.62
Ninth Street. Katella Ave Garden Grove city limit Class II 0.25
Oak Canyon Dr. Serrano Ave. Weir Canyon Rd. Class II 0.50
Orangewood Ave. Euclid St. Janette Ln. Class II 0.72
Orangewood Ave. Harbor Blvd. Mountain View Ave. Class II 0.75
Rio Vista St. Mardi Gras Ave. Wagner Ave. Class II 0.75
Riverdale Ave. Orange city limit Lakeview Ave. Class II 1.25
Santa Ana Canyon Rd Orange city limit Weir Canyon Rd. Class II 6.00
Sunkist St.. Wagner Ave. Cerritos Ave. Class II 1.00
Weir Canyon Rd. Santa Ana Canyon Rd. Blue Sky Ln. Class II 1.75
Wilshire Ave. Loara St. Lincoln Ave. Class II 0.50
Orangethorpe Ave. State College Blvd. Placentia Ave. Class III 0.50
Orangethorpe Ave. Miller St. Placentia city limit Class III 0.25
Western Ave. Buena Park city limit Del Monte Dr. Class III 0.50
TOTAL 34.05 miles
Proposed Regional Priority Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Olive / UPRR Spur Broadway Santa Ana River Trail Class I 4.00
La Palma Ave. La Reina St. Jefferson St. Class II 8.34
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 43
Anaheim Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path To From Class Mileage
Academy Av Path Dale Ave Beach Blvd. Class I 0.59
Dupont Path Orange Wood Ave Rampart St. Class I 0.44
Magnolia Pathway Lola Ave. Crescent Ave. Class I 1.64
OCTA Metrolink RR Orange City Limit West of the 57 Class I 0.3
Path 3 OCTA RR Western Ave. Class I 0.82
Sycamore / La Palma
Connector Sycamore La Palma Ave. Class I 0.12
UP RR Spur Path UPRR Path Walnut St. Class I 0.47
Vermont / Wagner
Connector Vermont Ave. Wagner Ave. Class I 0.18
9th St. Broadway Katella Ave Class II 1.77
Anaheim Blvd. La Palma Ave. Sycamore Ave. Class II 0.53
Ball Rd section 1 Buena Park City Limit Gilbert St. Class II 2.74
Ball Rd section 2 County/City Border Walnut St. Class II 2.02
Broadway Magnolia Path Gilbert St. Class II 1.93
Brookhurst St Section 1 Riverside Fwy. Lincoln Ave. Class II 1.51
Brookhurst St Section 2 Ball Rd. Katella Ave Class II 1.01
Camino Grande Hickamore Ln. Nohl Ranch Road Class II 1.05
Canyon Creek Rd. Serrano Ave. Sunset Ridge Rd. Class II 0.57
Canyon Rim Road Fairmount Blvd. Nohl Ranch Road Class II 1.16
Cerritos Ave. Magnolia Path Sylvan st. Class II 0.15
Citron St. Santa Ana St. Vermont Ave. Class II 0.57
Crescent Ave. Brookhurst St. Loara St. Class II 1.34
Crone Ave. UPRR Walnut St. Class II 0.24
Douglass Rd. UPRR Katella Ave. Class II 0.42
East St. La Palma Ave. Ball Rd. Class II 2.08
Fairmount Blvd. Santa Ana Canyon Rd. Canyon Rim Road Class II 1.07
Frontera St. La Palma Ave. Glassel St. Class II 1.21
Gilbert St. Tiger Woods Way Broadway Class II 0.57
Glassell St. Frontera St. Orange City Limit Class II 0.04
Greda Dr. Deana St. Pinney Dr. Class II 0.44
Grove St. Mira Loma Ave. La Palma Ave. Class II 0.67
Gypsum Canyon Riverside Fwy. Gypsum Spur Class II 0.38
Gypsum Spur Weir Canyon Rd. Gypsum Canyon Rd. Class II 1.05
Knott Ave. Lincoln Ave Ball Rd Class II 1.44
Lakeview Ave. Orchard Dr. Santa Ana Canyon Rd. Class II 1.43
Lincoln Ave Section 1 Knott Ave. La Reina St. Class II 1.78
Lincoln Ave Section 2 Rio Vista St. Orange City Limit Class II 0.51
Lincoln Ave. Manchester Ave. Wilshire Ave. Class II 0.15
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 44
Street/Path To From Class Mileage
Loara St. Crescent Ave. Wilshire Ave. Class II 0.29
Magnolia Ave. Kennely Ln. Cerritos Ave Class II 0.33
Manchester Ave. Lincoln Ave. Santa Ana St. Class II 0.43
Miller St. Orangethorpe Ave. La Plama Ave. Class II 0.99
Mira Loma Ave. La Palma Ave. Van Buren St. Class II 3.2
Nohl Ranch Rd. Anaheim Hills Rd. Serrano Ave. Class II 1.56
Oak Canyon Dr. Weir Canyon Rd. End of Oak Canyon Class II 0.41
Olive St. Santa Ana St. Vermont Ave. Class II 0.56
Orange Av. Buena Park City Limit Parkview St. Class II 0.98
Orangethorpe Ave. #1 Kraemer Blvd. Placentia City Limit Class II 0.78
Orangethorpe Ave. #2 Lakeview Ave. Imperial Hwy. Class II 1.66
Orangewood Ave.
Segment 1 Euclid St. Janette Ln. Class II 0.76
Orangewood Ave.
Segment 2 West St. Harbor Blvd. Class II 0.5
Orangewood Ave.
Segment 3 Mountain View Ave. Dupont Dr. Class II 1.02
Pinney Dr. Greda Nohl Ranch Road Class II 0.53
Rio Vista St. Wagner Ave. La Palma Ave. Class II 1.48
Royal Oak Rd. Santa Ana Canyon Rd. Nohl Ranch Road Class II 0.52
Santa Ana St. East St. Walnut St. Class II 1.63
Serrano Ave. Weir Canyon Rd. Orange City Limit Class II 2.98
South St. Peregrin St. Rio Vista St. Class II 0.65
Stage Coach Rd. Nohl Ranch Rd. Hickamore Ln. Class II 0.46
Sunkist St. La Palma Ave. Wagner Ave Class II 1.51
Sunset Ridge Rd. Canyon Creek Rd. Rossano Way Class II 0.91
Vermont Ave. Citron St. Wayside St. Class II 1.66
Wagner Ave. State College Blvd. Rio Vista St. Class II 1.02
Walnut St. Santa Ana St. Ball Rd. Class II 0.65
West St. Santa Ana St. La Palma Ave. Class II 1.37
Western Ave. Northern City Limit Southern City limit Class II 1.51
Westmont Dr. Loara St. West St. Class II 0.49
TOTAL 65.23
Anaheim Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 8.56 $1,500,000 $12,840,000
Class II 69.1 $280,000 $19,348,000
77.66 Total $32,188,000
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 45
3.3.Brea
Located in the foothills of North Orange County, Brea is a thriving city of over 40,000 residents.
Destination shopping and restaurants abound. An award winning school district and a diverse
business mix makes Brea the place to live, work and play.
Population
40,081
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 300
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.2%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 599
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 394
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 1,340
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 231
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 530
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,060
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 774
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 3,561
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 943,643
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 3
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 19
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 1
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 100,373
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 46
Map 3.3 Brea Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 47
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 68
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 13.6
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.35
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.08
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Location Type
Brea Mall Bicycle racks
The city’s Circulation Plan requires the provision of secure bicycle parking as part of all future non-
single family residential development.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Rideshare Brea Park-and-Ride
1000 E Lambert Ave Bicycle racks(7)
The Brea General Plan outlines a need to encourage daily bicycle use, specifically in providing
bicycle-to-transit links. Four main components are identified for bicycle-transit integration: allowing
bicycles on transit; offering bicycle parking at transit locations; improving bikeways to transit; and
encouraging use of bicycle and transit programs. Implementation of the city’s Circulation Plan
requires identifying bicycle and pedestrian projects within the Capital Improvement Projects and
through development fees that help to complete or enhance connections to bus stops.
Safety and Education Programs
Active Yes
# Of Years Conducted 6
# Of Times a Year Conducted All year long
Administered by Police Department
Location Schools
Program, Curriculum, and Activities
S.A.F.E. Program (Skills and Assets for Excellence)
with specific bicycle safety and education lesson
and workbook; bicycle rodeos; safety fairs
Other Bicycle Safety Support Programs Bicycle registration and free bicycle helmets,
special events
Total # of Children Reached Approximately 4,000 per year
Age of Children Reached Grades K-8
Other Program Notes Police Department has bike patrols
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 48
Expenditures
Facility Improvement From To Cost
City-wide Maintenance $19,407
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Bicycle planning is discussed in the City of Brea’s General Plan.
Bikeways
Brea Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Carbon Creek Bike way Carbon Canyon Rd. Rose Dr. Class I 1.3
E. La Habra Blvd. Vallejo St. N. Palm St. Class II .2
W. Central Ave. N. Palm St. N. Brea Blvd. Class II 1.7
State College Blvd. N. Brea Blvd. Lark Ellen Dr. Class II 2.4
E. Birch St. S. State College Blvd Valencia Ave. Class II 2.1
Rose Dr. Valencia Ave. Vesuvius Dr. Class II .6
Associated Rd. E. Birch St. E. Imperial Hwy Class II .5
Elm St. Arovista Park S. State College Blvd Class III 1.0
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
UP RR Palm St. Valencia Ave. Class I 4.50
Birch St. Mercury Ln. State College Blvd Class II 1.18
Brea Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Tonner Canyon Rd. Valencia Path Valencia Ave. Tonner Canyon Rd. Class I 0.15
Wildcat Way to Valencia Ave. Path Wildcat Way Valencia Ave. Class I 1.42
Carbon Canyon Rd. Valencia Ave. Los Angeles County Limit Class I 4.35
Imperial Hwy. Saturn St. Placentia City Limit Class I 0.75
Path 1 Imperial Hwy Path 2 Class I 3.24
Path 2 Segment 1 Rose Dr. County/City Border Class I 0.15
Path 2 Segment 2 County/City Border Carbon Canyon Rd Class I 1.31
Path 3 Puente St City Limit Class I 2.43
Puente St. Path 3 Northwood Ave. Class I 2.47
Valencia Ave. Imperial Hwy County/City Border Class I 0.80
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 49
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Valencia Ave. Tonner Canyon Rd. Carbon Canyon Rd. Class I 1.38
Brea Creek Flood Control Channel UP RR Arovista Park Parking Lot Class I 1.50
Associated Rd -Wildcat Way Birch St. Wildcat Way to Valencia Ave. Path Class II 1.20
Berry St. Northwood Ave. Imperial Hwy Class II 1.75
Kraemer Blvd. Placentia City
Limit Wildcat Way-Valencia Ave. Path Class II 1.67
Lambert Rd. La Habra City Limit County/City Border Class II 3.79
Northwood Ave. Puente St. Berry St. Class II 0.57
Palm St. Fullerton City
Limit La Habra City Limit Class II 0.24
Rose Dr. Venus Dr. Blake Rd. Class II 0.09
Saturn St. Path 1 Imperial Hwy. Class II 0.24
Soquel Canyon Rd. Southern
County/City Border Eastern County/City Border Class II 0.93
Brea Blvd. Fullerton City
Limit City/County Border Class III 2.24
Whittier Ave. La Habra City Limit Puente St. Class III 0.25
TOTAL 32.92
miles
Brea Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 24.45 $1,500,000 $36,675,000
Class II 11.66 $280,000 $3,264,800
Class III 2.45 $21,000 $51,450
Total $39,991,250
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 50
3.4.Buena Park
The City of Buena Park is also a well-established community within Orange County. Buena Park is
host to many tourist destinations, including Knott’s Berry Farm and Medieval Times. The City
contains a developed network of older, grid arterial streets that typically do not provide enough space
to accommodate bicycle lanes. Some of the arterials that serve many of the City’s destinations include
Beach Boulevard and La Palma and Orangethorpe Avenues. A regional shopping center is located at
the intersection of Beach Boulevard and La Palma Avenue.
Population
82,452
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 1,033
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 2.1%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 2,066
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 1,390
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 5,105
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 241
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 1,274
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 2,547
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 1,859
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 8,553
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 2,266,542
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 6
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 46
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 3
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 241,088
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 51
Map 3.4 Buena Park Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 52
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 164
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 32.8
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.40
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.25
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Metrolink/Rideshare/Bus Buena Park Metrolink Station 8400
Lakeknoll Dr
Parking, Bicycle racks
Bicycle racks on trains
and buses
Safety and Education Programs
The City of Buena Park does not currently provide bicycle-related safety and education programs.
Expenditures
Information on past bikeway facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
The City of Buena Park does not have a Bicycle Transportation Plan.
Bikeways
No bikeways or bike lanes or trails have been approved by City Council or installed or posted in the
City at this time. The Council’s decision is based on the negative and unacceptable impacts to parking
and the need for unimpeded traffic flow.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 53
3.5.Costa Mesa
The City of Costa Mesa is one of Orange County's leading cultural and business centers. Located 37
miles southeast of Los Angeles, 88 miles north of San Diego and 475 miles south of San Francisco,
Costa Mesa encompasses a total of 16 square miles with its southernmost border only 1 mile from
the Pacific Ocean. The current population of approximately 113,440 has grown from 16,840 at the
time of incorporation in 1953. Since that time, it has evolved from a semi-rural farming community
to a city with its local economy primarily based upon retail commercial business and action sports
industries such as surfing, skateboarding, and snowboarding. A general law city, Costa Mesa has a
council-manager form of government and staff of approximately 580 full-time employees.
Population
113,440
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 1,971
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 2.6%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 3,943
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 2,754
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 11,313
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 173
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 2,144
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 4,289
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 3,131
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 14,401
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 3,816,353
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 23
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 77
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 5
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 405,938
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 54
Map 3.5 Costa Mesa Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 55
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 389
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 77.8
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.70
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 2.16
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Rideshare South Coast Plaza
Sunflower Ave/Bear St
Safety and Education Programs
Active Yes
# Of Years Conducted
# Of Times a Year Conducted
Administered by Police Department
Location
Program, Curriculum, and Activities Distributes Cycle Safety Bike Rider’s Guide
Other Bicycle Safety Support Programs Bicycle Rodeos and Bicycle Licensing Program
Total # of Children Reached
Age of Children Reached
Other Program Notes
Expenditures
Information on past bikeway facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Bicycle planning can be found in Costa Mesa’s General Plan.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 56
Bikeways
Costa Mesa Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Anton Ave. of the Arts Sunflower I 0.65
CM Golf & Country Club Placentia Merrimac I 1.45
Fair Arlington Fairview I 1.00
Fairiew Park Santa Ana River Fairview Park I 1.80
Fairview State Hospital Golf Course Harbor I 0.45
Gisler/SA River Path Santa Ana River Gisler I 0.30
Mesa Verde Adams Golf Course I 0.21
Sakioka Anton Sunflower I 0.25
Santa Ana River Path South City Limit MacArthur I 6.29
Sunflower/SA River Path Santa Ana River Sunflower I 0.23
Upper Newport Bay Path Del Mar Irvine I 1.19
Victoria Placentia Canyon I 0.53
Adams Santa Ana River Harbor II 1.49
Arlington Fairview Newport SB II 0.88
Baker Mesa Verde Royal Palm II 0.40
Baker Coolidge Bristol II 1.04
Bear I-405 Sunflower II 0.44
California Santa Ana River Gisler II 0.68
Fair Harbor Newport SB II 1.23
Fairview Sunflower Newport SB II 2.94
Gisler Washington Harbor II 0.84
Hamilton Placentia Harbor II 0.75
Hyland MacArthur South Coast II 0.69
Irvine 16th 20th II 1.00
MacArthur* Santa Ana River Harbor II 0.52
Mendoza Baker El Camino II 0.30
Merrimac Harbor Fairview II 0.68
Mesa Verde Adams Adams II 1.40
Paularino Bristol Red Hill II 0.73
Paularino Bear Platte II 0.13
Placentia Adams South City Limit II 3.02
Red Hill SR-73 I-405 II 1.62
Santa Ana Broadway 23rd II 1.13
South Coast Hyland Bear II 1.98
Sunflower Cadillac Fairview II 1.35
Sunflower Park Center East City Limit II 0.91
Susan Sunflower South Coast II 0.28
Victoria Santa Ana River Canyon II 0.47
Victoria Placentia Newport SB II 1.35
Wilson Placentia Harbor II 0.75
Total 43.34
* South side only.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 57
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Santa Ana Ave. 23rd St. Mesa Dr. Class II 1.00
Costa Mesa Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Canyon Victoria Nancy Lane I 0.44
Path1 Canyon Path2 I 0.09
Path2 Placentia Pacific I 0.58
18th Monrovia Orange II 1.18
22nd Newport Santa Ana II 0.50
Adams Harbor Fairview II 0.72
American Victoria Wilson II 0.30
Baker Royal Palm Harbor II 0.15
Baker Harbor Fairview II 0.69
Baker Bristol Red Hill II 0.61
Bear Baker Paularino II 0.25
Del Mar Newport Santa Ana II 0.57
Broadway Tustin Irvine II 0.26
Gisler Harbor End of Street II 0.52
19th West City Limits Monrovia II 0.31
Monrovia 18th 19th II 0.25
Newport Industrial Harbor II 0.82
Orange Rochester Broadway II 0.22
Path3 19th Southern City Limits II 0.42
Sunflower Fairview Park Center II 1.45
Wilson Harbor Fairview II 0.66
College Gisler Village III 0.65
Village College Pinecreek III 0.13
Pincecreek Village Adams III 0.18
El Camino Fairview Mendoza III 0.40
Mendoza Baker El Camino III 0.30
Total 12.65
Costa Mesa Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 1.11 $1,500,000 $1,665,000
Class II 10.88 $280,000 $3,046,400
Class III 1.66 $21,000 $34,860
Total $4,746,260
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 58
3.6.Cypress
Located in the northwest of Orange County, Cypress is host to the Los Alamitos Racetrack, Cypress
College, and many other local destinations. The major arterials through the City along which many
of these destinations are located include Valley View, Katella, and Lincoln Avenues, Moody Street,
and Ball Road. The City of Cypress has an established grid network of arterial streets, and a
developed network of bikeways.
Population
46,229
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 387
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.2%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 775
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 499
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 1,577
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 213
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 600
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,201
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 877
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 4,032
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 1,068,591
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 6
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 22
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 1
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 113,664
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 59
Map 3.6 Cypress Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 60
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 92
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 18.4
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.38
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.18
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Safety and Education Programs
The City of Cypress does not currently provide bicycle-related safety and education programs.
Expenditures
Information on past bikeway facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Bicycle planning can be found in the City of Cypress General Plan.
Bikeways
Cypress Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Crescent Ave. Acacia Dr. Denni St. * *
Crescent Ave. Denni St. Summer **
Crescent Ave. Summer Pl. Moody St. * *
Bloomfield Lincoln Ave. Cerritos **
Denni St. Lincoln Ave. Ball Rd. * *
Denni St. Ball Rd. Marion **
Denni St. Marion Ave. Cerritos **
Moody St. Crescent Ball Rd. * *
Moody St. Ball Rd. Marion **
Moody St. Marion Ave. Cerritos **
Walker St. Lincoln Ave. Cerritos **
Walker St. R.R. Katella **
Valley View Orange Ave. Cerritos **
Valley View Cerritos Border * *
Holder St. Lincoln Ave. Ball Rd. * *
Knott St. Cerritos Railroad * *
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 61
Orange Ave. Bloomfield Walker St. * *
Orange Ave. Valley View Holder St. * *
Ball Rd. Bloomfield Holder St. * *
Cerritos Ave. Bloomfield Walker St. * *
Cerritos Ave. Walker St. Camden **
Cerritos Ave. Camden Dr. Valley **
Cerritos Ave. Valley View Knott St. * *
Katella Ave. Walker St. Valley **
Orangewood Valley View Knott St. * *
*Bikeway class and mileage unspecified
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Katella Ave. Walker St. Stanton City Limit Class II 1.49
Cypress Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Bloomfield St. Lincoln Ave. Los Alamitos City Limit Class II 0.98
Cerritos Ave. Lexington Dr. Walker St. Class II 1.65
Denni St. Lincoln Ave. Orange Ave. Class II 0.97
Holder St. Cerritos Ave. Stanton City Limit Class II 1.05
Lincoln Ave. Bloomfield St. Buena Park City Limit Class II 1.84
Orangewood Ave. Valley View St. Knott Ave. Class II 1.00
Holder St. Orangewood Ave. Jaluit St. Class II 0.18
Valley View St. Lincoln Ave. Orange Ave. Class II 0.50
Walker St. Crescent Ave. Lincoln Ave. Class III 0.50
TOTAL 8.67miles
Cypress Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class II 9.66 $280,000 $2,704,800
Class III 0.50 $21,000 $10,500
Total $2,715,300
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 62
3.7.Dana Point
Dana Point is characterized by nearly seven miles of prominent coastal bluffs and rolling hills along
the Pacific Ocean. Most noteworthy of these bluffs is a unique promontory known as the
"Headlands" which overlooks Dana Point Harbor, one of the most significant manmade alterations
of the Orange County coastline.
Dana Point Harbor provides slips and mooring for over 2,500 boats along with over 50 specialty
shops and restaurants. The Harbor attracts thousands of visitors annually for shopping, sport fishing,
walking, bicycling, parasailing and a host of recreational activities. The Dana Point Harbor is also
considered the gateway to Doheny State Park, one of California’s most popular beach facilities. The
62-acre State Park offers camping, picnicking, swimming, surfing, bicycling, tide pool exploration and
more.
Population
35,945
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 268
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.2%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 536
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 358
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 1,288
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 188
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 456
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 913
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 666
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 3,065
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 812,295
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 5
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 16
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 1
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 86,402
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 63
Map 3.7 Dana Point Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 64
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 38
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 7.6
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.21
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 0.65
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index lower than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is lower than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Dana Point currently does not have any bicycle parking facilities that have been identified. However,
Section 9.35.080 in the City’s code allows development projects with a minimum parking
requirement of fifty or more parking stalls to install up to eight percent of the required stalls with
bicycle stalls in a properly secured and located rack. Also, Section 9.13.040 requires mixed-use
projects with residential units to provide each residential unit a minimum of 45 cubic feet of exterior
storage space and a bicycle locker capable of securing two bicycles.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Safety and Education Programs
Active Yes
# Of Years Conducted
# Of Times a Year Conducted
Administered by Police Department
Location Schools
Program, Curriculum, and Activities
Other Bicycle Safety Support Programs
Total # of Children Reached
Age of Children Reached
Other Program Notes
Bike safety education available upon school request
only; Police Department and volunteer program
have bike patrol
Expenditures
Information on past bikeway facility expenditures is not available.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 65
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Dana Point has a Bicycle and Pedestrian Trails Master Plan.
Bikeways
Dana Point Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Coast Hwy. Palisades Dr. Camino Capistrano Class I *
Street of Blue Lantern La Cresta Dr. Pacific Coast Hwy. Class II *
Del Obispo St. City Limit Stonehill Dr. Class II *
Doheny Park Rd. Quail Run Pacific Coast Highway Class I *
Niguel Rd. Camino Del Avion Pacific Coast Highway Class II *
Pacific Coast Hwy. Street of Copper Lantern Northerly City Limit Class II *
Selva Rd. Pacific Coast Hwy Southerly City Limit Class II *
Selva Rd. Pacific Coast Hwy. Stonehill Dr. Class II *
Dana Point Harbor Dr. Pacific Coast Hwy. Street of Golden Lantern Class II *
Del Prado Ave. Street of Blue Lantern Street of Golden Lantern Class II *
Street of Golden Dana Point Harbor Dr. Stonehill Dr. Class II *
Acapulco Dr. Street of Golden Lantern Elisa Dr. Class II *
Camino Capistrano Via Verde Easterly City Limit Class II *
Del Obispo St. Stonehill Dr. Quail Run Class II *
Elisa Dr. Acapulco Dr. Santiago Dr. Class *
Elisa Dr. Santiago Dr. Acapulco Dr. Class *
Street of Golden Stonehill Dr. Camino Del Avion Class *
La Cresta Dr. Chula Vista/Copper Calle La Primavera/Copper Class *
Old Golden Lantern Del Prado El Camino Capistrano Class *
Palisades Dr. Pacific Coast Hwy. Camino Capistrano Class *
Santiago Dr. Elisa Dr. Taxco Dr. Class *
Coast Highway Doheny Park Rd. Palisades Dr. N/A *
Crown Valley Pkwy. Pacific Coast Hwy. Camino Del Avion N/A *
Del Prado Ave. Street of Golden Lantern Street of Copper Lantern N/A *
Pacific Coast Hwy. San Juan Creek Bridge Street of Copper Lantern N/A *
Stonehill Dr. Niguel Rd. Easterly City Limit N/A *
*Mileage unspecified
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Pacific Coast Hwy. Monarch Bay Dr. Street of the Blue Lantern Class II 1.97
Pacific Coast Hwy. Street of the Copper Lantern Coast Hwy. Class II 0.53
Stonehill Dr. San Juan Capistrano City Limit Niguel Rd. Class II 2.13
Dana Point Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Margarita / Dana Strand Rd. Scenic Rd. Selva Rd. Class I 0.34
OCTA Metrolink Path PCH-Stonehill Connector Palisades Dr. Class I 0.81
PCH / Stone Connector San Juan Capistrano City
Limit Coast Hwy. Class I 1.04
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 66
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
PCH Path Pacific Coast Hwy. South of Via
Subida Class I 0.48
PCH Path SPUR PCH Path Stonehill Dr. Class I 0.21
Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano Via Verde Class II 0.56
Camino De Estrella Camino Capistrano San Clemente
City Limit Class II 0.13
Coast Hwy. Pacific Coast Hwy. Street of the
Park Lantern Class II 0.08
Del Prado Av. Street of the Golden Lantern Pacific Coast
Hwy.Class II 0.24
Niguel Rd. Pacific Coast Hwy. Laguna Niguel
City Limits Class II 1.05
Avenidas Las Palmas Camino Capistrano Camino De
Estrella Class III 0.71
Blue Lantern La Cresta Dr. Stonehill Dr. Class III 0.58
Calle Velez Via California San Clemente
City Limit Class III 0.87
Camino El Molino San Juan Capistrano City
Limit
San Clemente
City Limit Class III 0.87
Coast Hwy. Street of the Park Lantern Palisades Dr. Class III 1.09
Pacific Coast Hwy. Cabrillo Wy Monarch Bay Dr. Class III 0.42
Copper Lantern Selva Rd. Pacific Coast
Hwy.Class III 0.42
Dana Point Harbor Dr. Cove Rd. End of Road Class III 0.09
Doheny Park Rd. Coast Hwy. Camino
Capistrano Class III 0.61
La Cresta Dr. Selva Rd. End of Road Class III 0.22
Scenic Dr / Cove Rd. Marguerita Dr. Dana Point
Harbor Dr. Class III 0.26
Via California Camino Capistrano Camino El Molino Class III 0.60
Victoria Blvd. Doheny Park Rd. Pacific Coast
Hwy.Class III 0.31
Violet Lantern Selva Rd. Del Prado Ave. Class III 0.50
TOTAL 12.49 miles
Dana Point Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 2.88 $1,500,000 $4,320,000
Class II 6.69 $280,000 $1,873,200
Class III 7.55 $21,000 $158,550
Total $6,351,750
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 67
3.8.Fountain Valley
Located in the central portion of the County, Fountain Valley is a primarily a city of residential
neighborhoods. Fountain Valley is home to Coastline College, Orange Coast Memorial Medical
Center, and Mile Square Regional Park. The City’s destinations are located along the grid of arterial
streets, including Brookhurst and Euclid Streets, and Edinger, Warner, and Talbert Avenues.
Population
54,978
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 510
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.4%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,020
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 680
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 2,426
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 270
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 779
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,559
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 1,138
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 5,235
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 1,387,254
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 8
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 28
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 2
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 147,559
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 68
Map 3.8 Fountain Valley Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 69
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 103
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 20.6
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.36
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.13
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on
buses
Rideshare King of Glory Lutheran Church - 10280 Slater Ave
Rideshare Mile Square Park - Euclid/Heil Ave
Safety and Education Programs
The City of Fountain Valley does not have any bicycle safety and education programs.
Expenditures
Information on past bikeway facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Bicycle planning can be found in Fountain Valley’s General Plan.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 70
Bikeways
Fountain Valley Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Mile Square Park Interior Path Brookhurst St. Mile Square Park Interior Class I *
Mile Square Park Perimeter Ward St. Brookhurst Las Flores St. Class II *
Newland St. Garfield Ave. Warner Ave. Class II *
Magnolia St. Garfield Ave. Slater Ave. Class II *
Bushard St. Garfield Ave. Northern City Limit Class II *
Ward St. Garfield Ave. Warner Ave. Class II *
Ward St. Mile Square Park Northern City Limit Class II *
Newhope St. Slater Ave. Northern City Limit Class II *
Edinger Ave. Magnolia St. Brookhurst St. Class II *
Heil Ave. Magnolia St. Brookhurst St. Class II *
Heil Ave. Euclid St. Newhope St. Class II *
Slater Ave. Newland St. Santa Ana River Path Class II *
Talbert Ave. Newland St. Bushard St. Class II *
Ellis Ave. Newland St. Ward St. Class II *
Garfield Ave. Newland St. Santa Ana River Path Class II *
* Mileage unspecified
Fountain Valley Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Edinger Ave. Brookhurst St. Santa Ana City Limit Class II 1.05
Edinger Ave. Santa Ana City Limit City Limit Class II 0.72
Harbor Blvd. Verbena Ct. Edinger Ave. Class II 0.32
Harbor Blvd. Sylvan River City Limit Class II 0.35
Magnolia St. Slater Ave. Warner Ave. Class II 0.49
Ward St. Garden Grove City Limit Margarita Ave. Class III 0.02
TOTAL 2.95 miles
Fountain Valley Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class II 2.93 $280,000 $820,400
Class III 0.02 $21,000 $420
Total $820,820
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 71
3.9.Fullerton
Located 22 miles southeast of metropolitan Los Angeles and in the center of North Orange County,
Fullerton is a full-service city renowned for its unique mix of residential, commercial, industrial,
educational, and cultural amenities. The result is a high quality of life for both residents and
businesses alike. Fullerton is a community with a strong sense of tradition, one that treasures its
historic past as it prepares to meet the challenges of its future.
The bikeway map reflects locally-adopted plans and programs that are currently in place and as a part
of the current General Plan. The City of Fullerton is in the process of updating its General Plan and
developing a Bicycle Element, which may create a more comprehensive strategy for local bikeway
system by taking into consideration the regional connectivity with adjoining jurisdictions. In the near
future when the new General Plan is available, there may be new policies and programs within the
Bicycle Element that will influence future amendments to the maps and information contain in this
Section.
Population
137,4371
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 1,721
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 2.0%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 3,443
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 2,358
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 9,156
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 589
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 2,310
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 4,620
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 3,372
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 15,513
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 4,110,925
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 25
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 83
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 6
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 437,271
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
1 CA Department of Finance, January, 2008
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 72
Map 3.9 Fullerton Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 73
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 225
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 45
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.34
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.06
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using City of Fullerton Engineering Department – Traffic Division collision data and population
figures provided by the CA Deparment of Finance, 2008.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
The City of Fullerton Engineering Department is researching the possibility on adding bike racks to
various locations within the City at commercial centers, in front of businesses, and in front of
restaurants where ever feasible and permissible. Also, California State University at Fullerton (CSUF),
as of 2007, has bike racks at 30 locations with a capacity of approximately 650 bikes. In addition,
there is a directive message from the president of Cal State Fullerton’s to promote on-campus use of
personal forms of transportation. The directive encourages and supports the University use of
alternative forms of transportation such as bicycles by its faculty, staff, and students where ever
feasible. Per the Fullerton Municipal Code (FMC) Section 15.30.100, end of trip facilities are
required for private developments of100,000 gross square feet. Bicycle racks and lockers are
provided at the City of Fullerton’s City Hall and bike racks are provided at Richman Park.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Bus/Rideshare Fullerton Park-and-Ride
W Orangethorpe/Magnolia Ave
Bicycle racks on buses
Bicycle racks (8)
Metrolink/Amtrak/Bus/Rideshare Fullerton Station Bicycle racks (34)/lockers (24)
Bicycle racks on trains/buses
Safety and Education Programs
Safety and education programs are being developed as part of the Bicycle Element, which is a part of
the new General Plan that will be available in the near future.
Expenditures
Information on past bikeway facility expenditures is unavailable.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Currently, the City of Fullerton’s Bicycle Master Plan is part of the Circulation Element of its
General Plan. The City is in the process of updating its General Plan, which will be completed in the
near future. Under the new General Plan, the Bicycle Element offers Fullerton residents a plan
designed to meet commuter and recreational user needs and provide safe connectivity to activity
centers such as schools, open space/parks, residential neighborhoods, and commercial areas within
the City and adjoining jurisdictions.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 74
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 75
Fullerton Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
River Bike Path N. State College Blvd. Dorothy Ln. Class I *
Craig Regional Park bike way Rolling Hills Dr. Associated Rd. Class I *
N. Parks Rd. Castlewood Dr. Rosecrans Ave. Class I *
N. W. Campus Dr. Yorba Linda Blvd. N. State College Blvd. Class I *
S. W. Campus Dr. N. State College Blvd. Nutwood Ave. Class I *
W. Bastanchury Rd. Hughes Dr. W. Malvern Ave. Class I *
W. Malvern Ave. N. Gilbert St. W. Bastanchury Rd. Class I *
Associated Rd. E. Imperial Hwy. Yorba Linda Blvd. Class II *
Acacia Ave. Chapman Ave. Spring St. Class II *
Brea Blvd. Panorama Rd. E. Bastanchury Rd. Class II *
Castlewood Dr. N. Gilbert St. N. Parks Rd. Class II *
Commonwealth Ave. Nutwood Ave Chapman Ave Class II *
Dorothy Ln. Raymond Ave. Acacia Ave Class II *
E. Bastanchury Rd. Associated Rd. Cambridge Ave. Class II *
N. Berkeley Ave. W. Valley View Dr. E. Chapman Ave. Class II *
N. Harbor Blvd. W. Valencia Mesa Dr. W. Valley View Dr. Class II *
N. Harbor Blvd. Las Palmas Dr. Bastanchury Rd. Class II *
N. Parks Rd. Peacock Ln. W. Bastanchury Rd. Class II *
Rolling Hills Dr. Puente St. Hickory Pl. Class II *
Rolling Hills Dr. Associated Rd. Tri-City Park Class II *
Rosecrans Ave. Sunny Ridge Dr. N. Gilbert St. Class II *
Rosecrans Ave. W City Limit N. Gilbert St. Class II *
S. Highland Ave. W. Orangethorpe Ave. W. Hill Ave. Class II *
S. Highland Ave. W. Wilshire Ave. W. Rosslynn Ave. Class II *
W. Orangethorpe Ave. Jefferson Ave. Ray Ave. Class II *
W. Pioneer Ave. N. Gilbert St. N. Parks Rd. Class II *
Parks Rd N. Gilbertt St Bastanchury Rd Class II *
Valencia Dr Brookhurst Rd Highland Ave Class II *
W. Walnut Ave. S. Richman Ave. S. Highland Ave. Class II *
E. Orangethorpe Ave. Raymond Ave. S. Acacia Ave. Class II *
Orangethorpe Ave. Magnolia Ave. Basque Ave. Class II *
Orangethorpe Ave. Brookhurst Rd Highland Ave. Class II *
Brea Blvd. N. Harbor Blvd. Panorama Rd. Class III *
Brea Blvd. Evergreen Ave. E. Bastanchury Rd. Class III *
Brea Blvd. Rolling Hills Dr. Fir St. Class III *
Brookhurst Rd. W. Valencia Dr. W. Orangethorpe Ave. Class III *
Dorothy Ln. Hornet Wy. N. State College Blvd. Class III *
Chapman Ave Basque Ave. Woods Ave. Class III *
E. Commonwealth Ave. N. Acacia Ave. N. State College Blvd. Class III *
N Gilbert Valencia Dr Orangethorpe Ave Class III *
Hornet Wy. Dorothy Ln. N. Berkeley Ave. Class III *
Madison Ave. N. Placentia Ave. City Limit Class III *
Nutwood Ave Orange Fwy. N. Placentia Ave. Class III *
Rosecrans Ave. N. Gilbert St. N. Parks Rd. Class III *
S. Richman Ave. Valencia Dr. Houston Ave. Class III *
Sunny Ridge Dr. Rosecrans Ave. W. Malvern Ave. Class III *
Valencia Dr. Meade Ave. S. Richman Ave. Class III *
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 76
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Valencia Mesa Dr. Sunny Crest Dr. Youth Way Class III *
W. Chapman Ave. N. Basque Ave. N. Woods Ave. Class III *
W. Malvern Ave. W. Bastanchury Rd. Carhart Ave. Class III *
Walnut Ave. S. Highland Ave. S. Lemon St. Class III *
W. Valencia Mesa Dr. W. Bastanchury Rd. Harbor Blvd Class III *
W. Valley View Dr. N. Berkeley Ave. N. Harbor Blvd. Class III *
Wilshire Ave. N. Woods Ave. Harbor Blvd Class III *
* mileage unspecified
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
BNSF RR Commonwealth Ave. Metrolink RR Class I 2.32
UP RR BNSF RR La Habra City Limit Class I 4.83
Rosecrans / Euclid Path Euclid St. Rosecrans Ave. Class II 2.31
Fullerton Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Madison Ave. Placentia City Limit Placentia Ave. Class I 0.13
Bastancury Parkview Path Bastanchury Dr. Park View Dr. Class I 1.20
Drainage Path Raymond Ave. State College Blvd. Class I 0.97
Madison Continuation Path End of Madison Ave. CSUFullerton Class I 0.41
Malvern Ave. Gilbert St. Buena Park City Limit Class I 1.02
OCTA Metrolink RR BNSF RR Anaheim City Limit Class I 0.43
Bastanchury/Valencia Mesa Bastanchury Dr. Valencia Mesa Dr. Class I 0.71
Puente St. Rosarita Dr. Brea City Limit Class I 0.06
Rolling Hills Bastanchury Path Puente St. Bastanchury Rd. Class I 0.62
Rolling Hills Dr. Hickory Pl. Associated Rd. Class I 0.29
Yorba Ranchito Path. Rolling Hills Dr. Craig Regional Park Class I 0.28
Roberta Ave. / Page Ave. Gilbert St. Basque Ave. Class II 1.09
Artesia Ave. Dale Pl. Gilbert St. Class II 0.99
Basque Ave. Malvern Ave. Houston Ave. Class II 1.44
Bastanchury Rd Segment 1 Harbor Blvd. Associated Rd. Class II 2.74
Bastanchury Rd Segment 2 Malvern Ave. Parks Rd. Class II 0.82
Bradford Ave. Carlson Ln. Yorba Linda Blvd. Class II 0.37
Brea Blvd. Harbor Blvd. Panorama Rd. Class II 0.85
Brea Blvd. Bastanchury Dr. Brea City Limit Class II 0.59
Brookhurst Rd. Commonwealth Ave. Riverside Fwy. Class II 1.10
Campus Dr. Campus Dr. E. Campus Dr. Class II 0.19
Campus Path Associated Rd. E. Campus Dr. Class II 0.26
Chapman Ave. Basque Ave. Woods Ave. Class II 0.77
Chapman Ave. Drake Ave. Placentia Ave. Class II 3.24
Commonwealth Ave. Dale St. State College Blvd. Class II 5.50
CSUF Path E. Campus Dr. Campus Dr. Class II 0.45
Dorothy Ln. Long View Dr. State College Blvd. Class II 1.32
E Campus Dr. Campus Dr. Campus Path Class II 0.38
Euclid St. Riverside Fwy. Country Hills Dr. Class II 4.08
Gilbert St. Castlewood Dr. Commonwealth Ave. Class II 2.94
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 77
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Harbor Blvd. Bastanchury Dr. Valencia Mesa Dr. Class II 0.15
Highland Ave. Segment 1 Malvern Ave. Wilshire Ave. Class II 0.22
Highland Ave. Segment 2 Rosslynn Ave. Hill Ave. Class II 0.19
Highland Ave. Segment 3 Orangethorpe Ave. Baker Ave. Class II 0.17
Magnolia Ave. Commonwealth Ave. Anaheim City Limit Class II 1.09
Malvern Ave. Sunny Ridge Dr. Basque Ave. Class II 1.08
Orangethorpe Ave. Segment 1 Buena Park City Limit Magnolia Ave. Class II 0.51
Orangethorpe Ave. Segment 2 Basque Ave. Jefferson Ave. Class II 0.63
Orangethorpe Ave. Segment 3 Ray Ave. Lemon St. Class II 0.62
Orangethorpe Ave. Segment 4 Acacia Ave. Placentia Ave. Class II 0.84
Parks Rd. Castlewood Dr. UPRR Class II 1.09
Parks Rd. Path Castlewood Dr. La Habra City Limit Class II 0.47
Pioneer Ave. Sunny Ridge Dr. Sunny Ridge Dr. Class II 0.24
Placentia Ave. Palm Dr. Ruby Dr. Class II 0.89
Richman Ave. Walnut Ave. Valencia Dr. Class II 0.13
Rosecrans Segment 1 LA County Limit Sunny Ridge Dr. Class II 0.88
Rosecrans Segment 2 Euclid St. Gilbert St. Class II 1.30
Rosslynn Ave. Pomona Ave. Lemon St. Class II 0.12
State College Blvd. Orangethorpe Ave. Rolling Hills Dr. Class II 3.07
Sunny Ridge Dr. Pioneer Ave. Rosecrans Ave. Class II 0.55
Sunny Ridge Dr. Pioneer Ave. Malvern Ave. Class II 0.62
Valencia Dr. Highland Ave. Meade Ave. Class II 3.09
Valencia Mesa Dr. Sunny Crest Dr. Youth Way Class II 0.24
Yorba Linda Blvd. Campus Dr. Bradford Ave. Class II 1.15
Acacia Ave. Melody Ln. Dorothy Ln. Class III 0.10
Baker Ave. Pacific Dr. Highland Ave. Class III 1.62
Barbara Blvd. Brea Blvd. Melville Dr. Class III 0.19
Berkeley Ave. Commonwealth Ave. Chapman Ave. Class III 0.25
Cherry Ave. Pine Ave. Cedar Dr. Class III 0.25
Gilbert St. Castlewood Dr. La Habra City Limit Class III 0.36
Gilbert St. Riverside Fwy. Commonwealth Ave. Class III 1.08
Harbor Blvd. Berkeley Ave. Union Ave. Class III 0.12
Hermosa Dr. Lakeview Dr. Puente St. Class III 1.26
Hill Ave. Segment 1 Lee Ave. Euclid St. Class III 0.36
Hill Ave. Segment 2 Highland Ave. Harbor Blvd. Class III 0.25
Knepp Ave. Roosevelt Ave. Highland Ave. Class III 0.71
Laguna Rd. Euclid St. Valencia Mesa Dr. Class III 1.09
Lakeview Dr. Hermosa Dr. Codo St. Class III 1.10
Las Palmas Dr. Lakeview Dr. Puente St. Class III 1.17
Lee Ave. Southgate Ave. Hill Ave. Class III 0.06
Lemont St. Wilshire Ave. Riverside Fwy. Class III 1.24
Longview Dr. Dorothy Ln. Brea Blvd. Class III 0.82
Madison Ave. Placentia Ave. End of Madison Ave. Class III 0.14
Malden Ave. Union Ave. Malvern Ave. Class III 0.15
Malvern Ave. Malden Ave. Woods Ave. Class III 0.64
Marion Blvd. Barbara Blvd. Avalon Dr. Class III 0.20
Melody Ln. Acacia Ave. Melody Ln. Path Class III 0.12
Melville Dr. Marion Blvd. Avalon Dr. Class III 0.21
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 78
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Olive Ave. Magnolia Ave. Pine Dr. Class III 0.53
Pomona Ave. Segment 1 Walnut Ave. Rosslyn Ave. Class III 0.32
Park View Dr. Helen Dr. Marion Blvd. Class III 0.04
Pine Dr. Olive Ave. Cherry Ave. Class III 0.05
Pioneer Ave. Sunny Ridge Dr. Gilbert St. Class III 0.30
Puente St. Bastanchury Dr. Juniper St. Class III 0.60
Richman Ave. Sunny Crest Dr. Commonwealth Ave. Class III 1.29
Roosevelt Ave. Knepp Ave. Southgate Ave Class III 0.05
Santa Fe Ave. Pomona Ave. Lemon St. Class III 0.13
Southgate Ave. Cedar Ave. Lee Ave. Class III 0.93
Sunny Crest Dr. Valencia Mesa Dr. Valley View Dr. Class III 0.65
Valley View Blvd. Sunny Crest Dr. West of Brea Blvd. Class III 0.08
Union Ave. Harbor Blvd. Pomona Ave. Class III 0.27
Pomona Ave. Segment 2 Union Ave. Santa Fe Ave. Class III 0.58
Walnut Ave. Richman Ave. Highland Ave. Class III 0.25
Woods Ave. Malvern Ave. Chapman Ave. Class III 0.06
TOTAL 83.66
miles
Fullerton Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 13.27 $1,500,000 $19,905,000
Class II 50.77 $280,000 $14,215,600
Class III 19.62 $21,000 $412,020
Total $34,532,620
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 79
3.10.Garden Grove
Garden Grove is a vibrantly progressive and growing city located just south of Los Angeles in
Orange County, California. Garden Grove’s motto, "The City of Youth and Ambition," accurately
reflects this culturally diverse community of over 170,000 people. Garden Grove is home to four
annual cultural festivals that celebrate the Vietnamese, Korean, Arabic, and American heritage.
Garden Grove's Strawberry Festival, nearing 50 years old, is the largest community-based Memorial
Day event in the western United States.
Population
166,296
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 1,589
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.5%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 3,179
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 2,077
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 6,916
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 442
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 2,031
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 4,063
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 2,966
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 13,642
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 3,615,097
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 22
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 73
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 5
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 384,531
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 80
Map 3.10 Garden Grove Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 81
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 332
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 66.4
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.40
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.22
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Location Type
Garden Grove City Hall - 11222 Acacia Pkwy Bicycle racks (8)
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Rideshare Church of the Nazarene
13411 Euclid St
Safety and Education Programs
Active Yes
# Of Years Conducted
# Of Times a Year Conducted
Administered by Police Department
Location
Program, Curriculum, and Activities Bicycle Safety and Education workbooks, tips
handouts, bicycle rodeos
Other Bicycle Safety Support Programs
Total # of Children Reached
Age of Children Reached
Other Program Notes
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Garden Grove’s Bicycle Master Plan is part of its General Plan.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 82
Bikeways
Garden Grove Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Lampson Ave. Bolsa Chica Lewis St. Class II *
Ninth St. Orangewood Chapman Class II *
Ward St. Edinger Ave. Hazard Class II *
Brookhurst St. Katella Ave. Hazard Class III *
Chapman Ave. Valley View Lewis St. Class III *
Orangewood Dale St. Gilbert St. Class III *
* Location of bikeway and mileage unknown
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Euclid St. Orangewood Ave. Westminster Ave. Class II 6.14
Westminster Ave. Bushard St. Brock Ln. Class II 3.22
Garden Grove Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Path 1 Barclay Dr. Briarwood St. Class I 1.50
Trask/ Westminster Path Trask Ave. Westminster Ave. Class I 0.50
UP RR Chapman Ave. Garden Grove Blvd. Class I 1.01
9th St. Acacia Pkwy. Garden Grove Blvd. Class II 1.00
Bowen St. Westminster Ave. Morningside Dr. Class II 0.22
Morningside Dr. Bowen St. Ward St. Class II 0.06
17th St. Westminster Blvd. Santa Ana City Limit Class II 0.03
Brookhurst St. Segment 1 Katella Ave. Chapman Ave. Class II 0.99
Brookhurst St. Segment 2 Trask Ave. Hazard Ave. Class II 1.00
Chapman Ave. Segment 1 Magnolia St. Loraleen St. Class II 0.24
Chapman Ave. Segment 2 West St. 9th St. Class II 0.50
Garden Grove Blvd. 9th St. New Hope St. Class II 0.18
Harbor Blvd. Chapman Ave. Westminster Ave. Class II 2.17
Katella Ave. Dale Ave. Magnolia St. Class II 1.01
Knott Ave. Garden Grove Fwy. Stanton City Limit Class II 1.82
Lampson Ave. Merrill St. Haster St. Class II 0.96
Magnolia St. Katella Ave. Westminster City Limit Class II 3.08
Mc Fadden Ave. Ward St. End of McFadden Ave. Class II 0.12
Newland St. Garden Grove Blvd. Westminster Ave. Class II 1.00
Orangewood Ave. Segment 1 Knott Ave. Western Ave. Class II 0.54
Orangewood Ave. Segment 2 Stanton City Limit Mossler St. Class II 0.09
Orangewood Ave. Segment 3 Dale St. Euclid St. Class II 2.50
Orangewood Ave. Segment 4 Jacalene Ln. Anaheim City Limit Class II 0.63
Trask Ave. Wilson St. Brookhurst St. Class II 1.66
Valley View St. Santa Catalina Ave. Garden Grove Blvd. Class II 1.46
Western Ave. Simmons Pl. Garden Grove Blvd. Class II 1.25
Western Ave. Simmons Pl. Garden Grove Blvd. Class II 1.25
Bushard St. Westminster Ave. Westminster City Limit Class III 0.25
Century Blvd. Garden Grove Blvd. Taft St. Class III 0.23
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 83
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Dale St. Katella Ave. Garden Grove Blvd. Class III 2.02
Gilbert St. Katella Ave. Trask Ave. Class III 2.51
Hazard Ave. Ward St. Westminster City Limit Class III 0.88
Nelson St. Chapman Ave. Garden Grove Blvd. Class III 1.00
Springdale St. Santa Catalina Ave. Westminster City Limit Class III 1.23
Stanford Ave. Segment 1 Nelson St. Main St. Class III 0.25
Stanford Ave. Segment 2 Euclid St. 9th St. Class III 0.36
Main St. Stanford Ave. Euclid St. Class III 0.13
Taft St. Century Blvd. Westminster Ave. Class III 0.85
Ward St. Hazard Ave. Margarita Ave. Class III 1.38
West St. Orangewood Ave. Garden Grove Blvd. Class III 1.50
TOTAL 48.72 miles
Garden Grove Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 3.01 $1,500,000 $4,515,000
Class II 33.12 $280,000 $9,273,600
Class III 12.59 $21,000 $264,390
Total $14,052,990
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 84
3.11.Huntington Beach
The dynamic coastal City of Huntington Beach, with its sunny Mediterranean climate and idyllic
setting, is home to more than 202,250 residents. Internationally known as “Surf City,” Huntington
Beach boasts eight miles of scenic, accessible beachfront, the largest stretch of uninterrupted
beachfront on the West Coast. Tourism remains a vital part of the economy, as over 11 million
visitors flock to the city during the summer, on weekends and for special events.
Population
202,250
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 2,079
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.6%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 4,159
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 2,826
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 10,725
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 854
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 2,933
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 5,866
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 4,282
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 19,699
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 5,220,329
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 14
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 105
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 7
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 555,276
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 85
Map 3.11 Huntington Beach Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 86
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 573
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 114.6
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.58
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.80
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Bus/Rideshare Goldenwest Transportation Ctr
7301 Center St
Bicycle racks(5)
Bicycle racks on buses
Safety and Education Programs
The status of Huntington Beach’s bicycle safety and education programs is unknown.
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
The City of Huntington Beach does not have an adopted Bicycle Transportation Plan.
Bikeways
Huntington Beach Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Beach front * * Class I *
Edinger Ave. * * Class II *
Slater Ave. * * Class II *
Garfield Ave. * * Class II *
Lake Ave. * * Class II *
Hamilton * * Class II *
Edwards St. * * Class II *
Gothard St. * * Class II *
Newland St. * * Class II *
Bushard St. * * Class II *
*Boundaries and mileage unknown
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 87
Huntington Beach Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Pacific Coast Hwy Segment 1 County Limit 8th St. Class II 4.61
Pacific Coast Hwy Segment 2 Huntington St. County Limit Class II 2.63
Huntington Beach Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Hamilton Path Newland St. Beach Blvd. Class I 0.50
UPRR Path Macfadden Ave. Main St. Class I 3.47
3rd St. Walnut Ave. Pacific Cost Hwy. Class II 0.08
Adams Ave. Beach Blvd. Ranger Ln. Class II 2.27
Bolsa Chica St. Segment 1 Westminster City Limit Bolsa Ave. Class II 0.40
Bolsa Chica St. Segment 2 Warner Ave. Los Patos Ave. Class II 0.25
Edinger Ave. Segment 1 Graham St. Springdale St. Class II 0.50
Edinger Ave. Segment 2 Gothard St. Newland St. Class II 1.14
Goldenwest St. Warner Ave. Betty Dr. Class II 0.27
Magnolia St. Warner Ave. San Diego Fwy. Class II 0.29
Mc Fadden Ave. UPRR Westminster City Limit Class II 0.26
Talbert Ave. Segment 1 Springdale St. Ivory Crest Ln. Class II 0.20
Talbert Ave. Segment 2 Goldenwest St. Gothard St. Class II 0.40
Springdale St. Segment 1 Edinger Ave. Heil Ave. Class III 0.49
Springdale St. Segment 2 Talbert Ave. City Limit Class III 0.27
Varsity Dr. Talbert Ave. Edwards St. Class III 0.33
TOTAL 11.12 miles
Huntington Beach Proposed Facility Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 3.97 $1,500,000 $5,955,000
Class II 13.30 $280,000 $3,724,000
Class III 1.09 $21,000 $22,890
Total $9,701,890
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 88
3.12.Irvine
Irvine is one of the nation's largest planned urban communities and encompasses more than 55
square miles. Irvine has grown into a community boasting state-of-the-art transportation programs
and systems, an enterprising business environment, stellar educational institutions and a team-like
lifestyle.
Population
209,806
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 2,317
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 2.2%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 4,635
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 3,216
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 12,972
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 638
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 2,956
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 5,911
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 4,315
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 19,850
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 5,260,274
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 31
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 106
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 7
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 559,525
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 89
Map 3.12 Irvine Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 90
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 197
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 39.4
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.21
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.30
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Bicycle parking can be found throughout Irvine as a result of zoning ordinance
Sec. 4-3-7, which requires many commercial, office, and community developments to provide bicycle
parking.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Metrolink/Amtrak/Rideshare/Bus Irvine Station Bicycle racks(12)/lockers(54)
Bicycle racks on trains and buses
Rideshare Jeffery Park-and-Ride
I-5/Jeffrey Rd
Rideshare Light of Christ Lutheran
18182 Culver Dr
Rideshare University Park-and-Ride
SR-73/University Dr
The i Shuttle Buses Irvine Business Complex
(IBC)Bicycle racks on shuttle buses
Safety and Education Programs
Active Yes
# Of Years Conducted 5
# Of Times a Year Conducted All year long
Administered by Police Department
Location Schools
Program, Curriculum, and Activities Assembly, D.A.R.E. program, bicycle rodeos
Other Bicycle Safety Support Programs Bicycle registration
Total # of Children Reached On average, 250 students at bicycle rodeos
Age of Children Reached Elementary and middle school students
Other Program Notes Programs provided as requested; City website has
bicycle education and safety tips
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 91
Expenditures
The City of Irvine estimates its annual cost for parking lot and off-street trail rehabilitation as
$193,000. Information about past bicycle facilities expenditures is unknown.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
The City of Irvine has a Bicycle Transportation Plan.
Bikeways
Irvine Existing Bikeways
Street From To Class Mileage
Barranca Trail (BT) Sand Canyon Trail / Sand
Canyon Avenue SR-133 Class I *
Bonita Canyon Trail (BC) Campus Drive Shady Canyon Trail / Shady
Canyon Drive Class I 1.1
Culver Dr. Path Campus Dr. Sand Canyon Dr. Class I 1.20
Freeway Trail (FT) San Diego Creek Trial / San
Diego Creek
Jeffrey Open Space Trail /
Jeffrey Road Class I *
Harvard Trail (HT) San Diego Creek Trail /
Barranca Parkway
Walnut Trail / Railroad
Tracks Class I *
Hicks Canyon Trail (HC) Peters Canyon Trail / SR-261 Portola Trail / Portola
Parkway Class I *
Jeffrey Open Space Trail
Northern Portion (JT) Trabuco Road Irvine Blvd Class I *
Jeffrey Open Space Trail
Southern Portion (JT) Quail Hill Trail / I-405 Barranca Parkway Class I *
Peters Canyon Trail (PC) Walnut Trail / Railroad Tracks Portola Trail / Portola
Parkway Class I *
Portola Trail (PT) Peters Canyon Trail / SR-261 SR-133 Class I *
Quail Hill Trail (QH) University Trail Shady Canyon Trail / Quail
Hill Trailhead Class I 1.0
San Diego Creek Trail (SD) Southern City Limits / SR-73 Pacifica Class I *
San Diego Frwy. Path S Shady Canyon Circle Existing San Diego Fwy.
Path South Class I 0.95
Sand Canyon Trail (SC) Alton Parkway Portola Trail / Portola
Parkway Class I 3.6
Shady Canyon Trail (SH) Bonita Canyon Trial Quail Hill Trail Class I 3.6
Turtle Rock Trail (TR) University Drive Shady Canyon Trail / Shady
Canyon Drive Class I 2.8
University Trail (UT) San Diego Creek Trail /
University Drive
Quail Hill Trial / Jeffrey
Open Space Trail Southern
Portion
Class I *
Venta Spur Trail (VS) Peters Canyon Trail / SR-261 SR-133 Class I *
Walnut Trail (WT) Peters Canyon Trail /
Jamboree Road
Sand Canyon Trail / Sand
Canyon Avenue Class I3.5
West Irvine Trail (WI) Western City Limits /
Jamboree Road Bryan Avenue / SR-261 Class I*
Woodbridge Trail (WB) Michelson Drive Yale Loop Class I*
Jamboree Rd. * Irvine Park Pl. Class II *
Portola Pkwy City boundary Jeffrey Rd. Class II *
Yale Ave. Portola Pkwy Yale Loop Class II *
Yale Ave. South end of Yale Loop Dead end Class II *
Yale Ave. Michelson Dr. University Dr. Class II *
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 92
Street From To Class Mileage
Culver Dr. Portola Pkwy Campus Dr. Class II *
Hicks Canyon Dr. Yale Ave. Park Pl. Class II *
Jeffrey Dr. Irvine Blvd. 405 Freeway Class II *
University Dr. 405 Freeway City boundary Class II *
Bryan Ave. City boundary Jeffrey Rd. Class II *
Northwood N/A N/A Class II *
Southwood N/A N/A Class II *
Eastwood N/A N/A Class II *
Westwood N/A N/A Class II *
Park Pl. Hicks Canyon Dr. Yale Ave. Class II *
Irvine Blvd. West city boundary East city boundary Class II *
El Camino Real * Dead end Class II *
El Camino Real N. Bryan Ave. El Camino Real Class II *
Trabuco Rd. Culver Dr. Jeffrey Rd. Class II *
Monroe Trabuco Rd. Roosevelt Class II *
Roosevelt Monroe Rd. Jeffrey Rd. Class II *
Walnut Ave. City boundary Dead end Class II *
Deerfield Ave. Harvard Ave. Yale Ave. Class II *
Irvine Center Dr. West city boundary East city boundary Class II *
Harvard Ave. Walnut Ave. Culver Dr. Class II *
Paseo Westpark Harvard Ave. Dead end Class II *
Jamboree Rd. Barranca Pkwy Main St. Class II *
Von Karman Ave. Barranca Pkwy Michelson Dr. Class II *
Red Hill Ave. North city boundary South city boundary Class II *
Barranca Pkwy West city boundary Alton Pkwy Class II *
Alton Pkwy West city boundary Muirlands Blvd. Class II *
Main St. West city boundary Jamboree Rd. Class II *
Main St. * Creek Culver Dr. Class II *
Warner Ave. * W. Yale Loop Class II *
Hearthstone Deerfield Ave. Paseo Westpark Class II *
Lake Rd. Barranca Pkwy Alton Pkwy Class II *
Creek Rd. Barranca Pkwy Alton Pkwy Class II *
Michelson Dr. Dupont Dr. Jeffrey Rd. Class II *
Carlson Ave. Michelson Dr. Campus Dr. Class II *
Campus Dr. Jamboree Rd. Turtle Rock Dr. Class II *
Mesa Rd. University Dr. Dead end Class II *
Peltason Dr. Mesa Rd. Campus Dr. Class II *
Peltason Dr. Campus Dr. Pereira Dr. Class II *
Berkeley Harvard Ave. Campus Dr. Class II *
Bridge Rd. Harvard Ave. Campus Dr. Class II *
Bison Ave. Peltason Dr. South city boundary Class II *
Academy Way Peltason Dr. Dead end Class II *
Los Trancos Dr. Peltason Dr. California Ave. Class II *
California Ave. Los Trancos Dr. Campus Dr. Class II *
Anteater Dr. Peltason Dr. Bonita Canyon Dr. Class II *
Bonita Canyon Dr. Shady Canyon Dr. South city boundary Class II *
Newport Coast Dr. Bonita Canyon Dr. East city boundary Class II *
Gabrielino Dr. Peltason Dr. California Ave. Class II *
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 93
Street From To Class Mileage
Vista Bonita Gabrielino Dr. Los Trancos Dr. Class II *
Turtle Ridge Bonita Canyon Dr. Newport Coast Dr. Class II *
Summit Park Dr. Turtle Ridge End of medians Class II *
Arroyo Dr. California Ave. Dead end Class II *
Shady Canyon Dr. Sunnyhill Bonita Canyon Dr. Class II *
Turtle Rock Dr. N/A N/A Class II *
Starcrest Turtle Rock Dr. Hillcrest Class II *
Ridgeline Dr. University Dr. Hillcrest Class II *
Bake Pkwy North city boundary Irvine Center Dr. Class II *
Lake Forest Dr. Lake Center Dr. Santa Vittoria Dr. Class II *
Research Dr. Irvine Center Dr. Lake Forest Dr. Class II *
Scientific Way Research Dr. Lake Forest Dr. Class II *
Rockfield Blvd. Dead end Lake Forest Dr. Class II *
Muirlands Blvd. Alton Pkwy East city boundary Class II *
Jeronimo Rd. Alton Pkwy East city boundary Class II *
Toledo Way Alton Pkwy East city boundary Class II *
Technology Dr. Dead end Alton Pkwy Class II *
Ada Barranca Pkwy Alton Pkwy Class II *
Valley Oak Dr. Irvine Center Dr. Alton Pkwy Class II *
Sand Canyon Ave. Laguna Canyon Rd. Alton Pkwy Class II *
Sand Canyon Ave. 405 Fwy Quail Hill Pkwy Class II *
Quail Hill Pkwy Sand Canyon Ave. Laguna Canyon Rd. Class II *
Knollcrest Quail Hill Pkwy Quail Hill Pkwy Class II *
Laguna Canyon Rd. Sand Canyon Ave. Laguna Fwy Class II *
Waterworks Wy Sand Canyon Ave. Discovery Class II *
Discovery Irvine Center Dr. Barranca Pkwy Class II *
Jenner Alton Pkwy Dead end Class II *
Pasteur Laguna Canyon Rd. Dead end Class II *
Banting Barranca Pkwy Alton Pkwy Class II *
Pacifica Barranca Pkwy Alton Pkwy Class II *
Gateway Blvd. Pacifica Irvine Center Dr. Class II *
Meridian Gateway Blvd. Alton Pkwy Class II *
*‡ California Ave. Culver Dr. Class I *
Around Aldrich Park ‡ N/A N/A Class I *
E. Pereira Dr. ‡ * * Class I *
Mesa Rd. ‡ W. Peltason Dr. Aldrich Park Class I *
Palo Verde Rd. ‡ California Ave. Aldrich Park Class I *
Physical Science Road ‡ Aldrich Park E. Peltason Dr. Class I *
Laguna Canyon Rd. North of Lake Forest Dr. Southern City Limit Class III 1.23
* Information not provided
‡ Maintained by The University of California, Irvine
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 94
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Jeffrey Rd. Path Trabuco Rd. North of Alton Pkwy. Class I 2.23
OCTA Metrolink Path‡ Sand Canyon Ave. Great Park Southeastern Path Class I 1.96
Irvine Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Eastern Mountain Path‡ Eastern City Limit Hicks Canyon Haul Rd. Class I 2.51
Great Park Northern Path‡ Irvine Blvd. OCTA Metrolink Path Class I 2.21
Jeffrey Rd. Path segment 1 Portola Pkwy Irvine Blvd. Class I 0.91
Modjeska / Portola Springs Irvine Blvd. Portola Pkwy. Class I 0.90
Great Park Southern Path‡ OCTA Metrolink Path Trabuco Rd. Class I 1.88
Portola Hwy. Hwy 241 Eastern Transportation
Corridor Class I 5.57
San Diego Frwy. Path N Alton Pkwy. Existing San Diego Fwy.
Path North Class I 0.96
Trabuco Rd. ‡ Sand Canyon Ave. Great Park Loop Class I 0.93
Un-named Trail Jeffery Trail/ I-5 NB Off-Ramp D Street Class I *
Bonita Canyon Trail Shady Canyon Trail Shady Canyon
Dr.Western City Limit Class I *
University Trail San Diego Creek Trail / Campus
Dr.Ridgeline Dr. Class I *
Peters Canyon Trail San Diego Creek Trail / Barranca
Parkway
Walnut Trail / Railroad
Tracks Class I *
C St. ‡ Irvine Blvd. Marine Wy. Class II 1.81
Campus Dr. Macarthur Blvd. Jamboree Rd. Class II 0.69
Great Park Southern Access
Road‡Perimeter Rd. Great Park Loop Class II 0.32
Great Park Loop‡ N/A N/A Class II 3.79
Jeffrey Rd. Hicks Canyon Haul Rd. Portola Pkwy. Class II 0.05
L St. ‡ Perimeter Blvd. Great Park Loop Class II 0.18
M St. ‡ Great Park Loop Irvine Blvd. Class II 0.49
Main St. Jamboree Rd. South of Union St. Class II 0.25
Marine Way‡ Sand Canyon Ave. Bake Pkwy Class II 3.71
Sand Canyon Ave. Segment 1 San Diego Fwy. Alton Pkwy. Class II 0.23
Sand Canyon Ave. Segment 2 I-5 NB On-Ramp Trabuco Rd. Class II 2.88
U St. ‡ Great Park Loop Irvine Blvd. Class II 0.35
Von Karman Ave. Campus Dr. Michelson Dr. Class II 0.57
* Information not provided ‡ Proposed bikeways related to the Great Park
Irvine Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 20.60 $1,500,000 $30,900,000
Class II 15.32 $280,000 $4,289,600
Total $35,189,600
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 95
3.13.La Habra
Located at Orange County's northernmost corner, La Habra is 7.3 square miles with a population of
61,789 and approximately 21,000 households. A quiet residential community, it is conveniently
located within an hour's drive of many beaches, mountain, and desert recreation areas.
La Habra also offers a distinctive and well-rounded program of civic, recreational, social and cultural
services to its residents, including 20 parks, a Children's Museum, Community Theater, Tennis
Center, and diverse Community Center. Community services include senior citizen programs,
recreation classes, youth and adult sports programs, facility rentals, and an active volunteer program.
Population
61,789
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 549
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.5%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,098
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 712
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 2,301
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 246
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 795
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,589
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 1,160
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 5,337
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 1,414,363
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 8
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 29
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 2
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 150,443
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 96
Map 3.13 La Habra Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 97
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 129
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 25.8
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.43
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.33
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Developments are subject to Facility Standards outlined in city ordinance §18.82.050, which require
one of two options for end-of-trip facilities. Option A requires bicycle parking and locker facilities in
a secure location for employee or tenant bicycle commuters, plus a minimum of two shower facilities.
Option B requires secure, adequate and convenient storage for bicycles, and a shower and locker
room facility for employees of each sex per building of 100,000 or more gross square feet.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Safety and Education Programs
The City of La Habra does not have bicycle safety and education programs.
Expenditures
Facility Improvement From To Cost
City-wide Maintenance $5,000
Bicycle Transportation Plan
The City of La Habra does not have a Bicycle Transportation Plan.
Bikeways
La Habra Existing Bikeways
Street From To Class Mileage
UPRR S. Idaho St. S. Walnut St. Class I *
Lambert St S. Beach Blvd w/b – Olive St.
e/b – Euclid St Class II *
E. Whittier Ave. N. Harbor Blvd. Palm St. Class II *
E. La Habra Blvd. Palm St. City Limit (City of Brea) Class II *
S. Idaho St. W. Sandalwood Ave. City Limit Class II *
S. Harbor Blvd. E. Las Riendas Dr. City Limit Class II *
W. Russell St. N. Valley Home Ave. N. Macy St. Class III *
E. Whittier Ave Palm St. City Limit (City of Brea) Class III *
N. Macy St. City Limit (City of Whittier) W. Wallace Ave. Class III *
W. Randall Ave. N. Koopmans Wy. N. Macy St. Class III *
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 98
Street From To Class Mileage
N. Koopmans Wy. W. Randall Ave. W. Whittier Blvd. Class III *
W. Whittier Blvd. N. Koopmans Wy. N. Rigsby St. Class III *
N. Rigsby St. W. Whittier Blvd. W. Gregory LN. Class III *
Gregory LN. N. Rigsby St. N. Beach Blvd. Class III *
N. Dexford Dr. W. Gregory LN. W. La Habra Blvd. Class III *
Berkley Ave. N. Dexford Dr Lime St. Class III *
Lime St. Worth Ave. Berkley Ave. Class III *
Morris Ave. N. Dexford Dr. Lime St. Class III *
Worth Ave. N. Dexford Dr. Lime St. Class III *
N. Palm St. E. Whittier Ave. E. La Habra Blvd. Class III *
N. Beach Blvd. Gregory LN. W. El Portal Dr. Class III *
El Portal Dr. N. Beach Blvd. W. La Habra Blvd. Class III *
Granada Dr. Granada Ct. El Portal Dr. Class III *
Lambert Rd. W City Limit S. Beach Blvd. Class III *
W. Lambert Rd. City Limit (Whittier) S. Beach Blvd. Class III *
W/B Lambert Rd Olive St. Cypress St. Class III *
E/B Lambert Rd. Cypress St. Euclid St. Class III *
Idaho St. W. Whittier Blvd. W. Sandelwood Ave. Class III *
W. Sandelwood Ave. S. Idaho St. S. Patwood Dr. Class III *
S. Patwood Dr. Gwynwood Ave. W. Sandelwood Ave. Class III *
Gwynwood Ave. S. Patwood Dr. E. Montwood Ave. Class III *
E. Montwood Ave. S. Euclid St. S. Lakeview Ave. Class III *
S. Lakeview Ave. E. Montwood Ave. City Limit Class III *
S. Euclid St. W. Parkwood Ave. E. Montwood Ave. Class III *
W. Parkwood Ave. S. Schoolwood Dr. S. Euclid St. Class III *
Schoolwood Dr. W. Parkwood Ave. W. Sandelwood Ave. Class III *
Las Lomas Dr. S. Idaho St. Encinitas St. Class III *
Encinitas St. Las Lomas Dr. Keene Dr. Class III *
Keene Dr. Encinitas St. S. Euclid St. Class III *
Lorella Ave. Colleen St. S. Idaho St. Class III *
Highlander Ave. N. Idaho St. N. Walnut St. Class III *
Greenwood Ave. N. Hazel St. N. Orange St. Class III *
N. Orange St. E. Greenwood Ave. E. Erna Ave. Class III *
N. Lois St. W. Greenwood Ave. W. Florence Ave. Class III *
Florence Ave. N. Lois St. Lemon St. Class III *
Lemon St. E. Florence Ave. E. Erna Ave. Class III *
E. Erna Ave. Lemon St. N. McPherson St. Class III *
N. McPherson St. E. Stearns Ave. E. La Habra Blvd Class III *
E. Stearns Ave. N. McPherson St. N. Palm St. Class III *
Palm St. E. Stearns Ave. E. Lambert Rd Class III *
E. Lambert Rd S. Cypress St. S. Palm St. Class III *
First Ave. Hillcrest St. S. McPherson St. Class III *
N. Fonda St. E. Whittier Ave. E. Stearns Ave. Class III *
E. Whittier Ave. N. Verona St. City Limit (City of Brea) Class III *
W. Loma Verde Ave. S. Walnut St. Portola Ave. Class III *
* Mileage not provided
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 99
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
UPRR Bikeway Western City Limit Palm St. Class I 3.00
La Habra Blvd. Valley Home Ave. Vallejo St. Class II 2.77
La Habra Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Coyote Creek Bikeway Imperial Hwy. Western City Limit Class I 0.71
Imperial Hwy. Path Beach Blvd. Harbor Blvd. Class I 2.02
Beach Blvd. Gregory Ln. Imperial Hwy Class II 1.33
Idaho St. Whittier Blvd. Imperial Hwy. Class II 1.53
Lambert Rd. Cypress St. Palm st. Class II 1.00
Palm St. Whittier Blvd. Lambert Rd. Class II 1.00
Whittier Blvd. Palm St. Eastern City Limit Class II 0.22
TOTAL 7.81
La Habra Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 5.73 $1,500,000 $8,595,000
Class II 10.85 $280,000 $3,038,000
Total $11,633,000
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 100
3.14.La Palma
La Palma is a well balanced city which prides itself on a responsive municipal government and a
strong sense of community. The City's small town character allows residents to live in quiet and
friendly neighborhoods. With one of the lowest crime rates in Orange County, La Palma is a place
where residents can rest easy and enjoy hometown living
Population
15,776
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 132
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.3%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 264
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 175
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 620
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 51
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 183
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 367
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 268
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 1,231
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 326,280
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 2
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 7
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 0
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 34,706
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 101
Map 3.14 La Palma Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 102
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 29
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 5.8
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.36
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.12
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
As part of La Palma’s Transportation Demand Management requirements, some development
projects may be required to provide bicycle parking and shower and locker facilities.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Safety and Education Programs
The City of La Palma does not have bicycle safety and education programs.
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Bicycle planning can be found in La Palma’s General Plan.
Bikeways
La Palma Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Coyote Creek Channel Moody St. Walker St. Class I 0.70 miles
La Palma Ave. Coyote Creek Valley View St. Class II 1.70 miles
Crescent Ave. West of Moody St. East of Walker St. Class II 0.80 miles
Moody St. Orangethorpe Ave Crescent Ave. Class II 1.28 miles
Walker St. Bransford Dr. Crescent Ave. Class II 1.20 miles
Valley View St. Thelma Ave. South of La Palma Ave. Class II 0.50 miles
TOTAL 5.93 miles
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 103
La Palma Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Orangethorpe Ave. Western City Limit Valley View St. Class II 0.76
TOTAL 0.76miles
La Palma Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class II 0.76 $280,000 $212,800
Total $212,800
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 104
3.15.Laguna Beach
The City of Laguna Beach is well known as a unique beach community and artist's colony with seven
miles of City beaches running along its nine square miles. The resident population enjoys the
ambiance provided by the sandy beaches, canyons and coastal hills. During the summer, several
million visitors are drawn to the resort environment for its picturesque beaches, art festivals and the
Pageant of the Masters. Laguna's village scale shopping district, bluff top walkways and tram system
create a pedestrian environment and scale which is unique in Southern California.
Population
24,161
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 203
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.3%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 405
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 278
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 1,086
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 142
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 345
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 689
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 503
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 2,315
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 613,548
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 4
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 12
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 1
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 65,262
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 105
Map 3.15 Laguna Beach Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 106
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 51
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 10.2
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.42
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.30
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Safety and Education Programs
The status of Laguna Beach’s bicycle safety and education programs is unknown.
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Whether or not Laguna Beach has a Bicycle Transportation Plan is unknown.
Bikeways
Laguna Beach Existing Bikeways
Street From To Class Mileage
El Toro Rd * * Class II *
Laguna Canyon Rd. * * Class III *
Coast Highway * * Class III *
* Information not provided
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Pacific Coast Hwy. City Limit ( S El Moro Rdg.) Broadway II 4.83
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 107
Laguna Beach Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Aliso Canyon Rd. Coast Line SE City Limit I 0.95
Broadway / Laguna Canyon Rd. City Limit ( E Laguna Canyon Rd.))Coast Hwy II 5.10
S SR-73 Exit 7 City Limit E Laguna Canyon Rd. I 0.01
TOTAL 6.06 miles
Laguna Beach Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 0.96 $1,500,000 $1,440,000
Class II 9.93 $280,000 $2,780,400
Total $4,220,400
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 108
3.16.Laguna Hills
Laguna Hills is primarily composed of residential neighborhoods. The City’s main destination is the
Laguna Hills regional shopping center. Many portions of the City are suitable for equestrian uses, and
these activities have been long established. Laguna Hills has several smaller shopping centers located
along some of the arterial streets, including Moulton and Alicia Parkways, El Toro and La Paz Roads,
Paseo de Valencia, and Lake Forest Drive.
Population
32,156
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 247
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.2%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 494
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 319
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 1,012
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 120
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 367
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 734
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 536
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 2,464
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 652,905
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 4
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 13
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 1
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 69,448
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 109
Map 3.16 Laguna Hills Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 110
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 40
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 8
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.25
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 0.76
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index less than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is lower than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Rideshare Laguna Hills Mall
24155 Laguna Hills Mall Bicycle racks
Rideshare/Bus Laguna Hills Transportation Ctr
Calle de Los Caballeros Bicycle racks (8)
Safety and Education Programs
The City of Laguna Hills does not have bicycle safety and education programs.
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
The City of Laguna Hills does not have an adopted Bicycle Transportation Plan.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 111
Bikeways
Laguna Hills Existing Bikeways
Street From To Class Mileage
Alicia Pkwy (w/b) Paseo De Valencia Moulton Pkwy I 0.76
Paseo De Valencia (sb) Laguna Hills Dr Alicia Pkwy I 0.28
San Diego Fwy Path s/s Alicia Pkwy. North of Georgia Sue Dr. I 0.33
J01 Bike trail (County
of Orange I-5 fwy w/o Moulton Pkwy I 1.8
Alicia Pkwy Moulton Pkwy Paseo De Valencia II 0.76
Paseo De Valencia (nb) Alicia Pkwy El Toro Rd II 1.50
Paseo De Valencia (sb) El Toro Road Alicia Pkwy II 1.50
Paseo De Valencia Alicia Pkwy La Paz Rd. II 0.91
Alicia Pkwy Paseo de Valencia Hon Ave II 0.83
Laguna Hills Dr w/b Paseo De Valencia Moulton Pkwy II 0.70
Laguna Hills Dr e/b Moulton Pkwy Paseo De Valencia II 0.70
Oso Pkwy (e/b) Moulton Pkwy Cabot Rd II 1.71
Oso Pkwy (w/b) Cabot Rd Moulton Pkwy II 1.71
Moulton Pkwy (n/b) City bdry near Glenwood Dr. La Paz Rd II 1.72
Moulton Pkwy (s/b) City bdry near Glenwood Dr. City bdry near Nellie Gail Rd II 2.18
Moulton Pkwy Lake Forest Dr. Ridge Route Dr. II 0.56
Los Alisos Blvd (e/b) Paseo De Valencia San Diego Fwy (City bdry) II 0.43
Los Alisos Blvd (w/b) San Diego Fwy (City bdry) Paseo De Valencia II 0.43
Lake Forest Dr (e/b) Del Lago Dr Santa Vittoria II 0.76
Lake Forest Dr (w/b) Santa Vittoria Dr Del Lago Dr. II 0.76
La Paz Rd e/b Cabot Rd I-73 II 2.37
La Paz Rd w/b I-73 Cabot Rd II 2.37
Cabot Rd. La Paz Rd. s/o Oso Pkwy III 1.18
TOTAL 26.3
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Cabot Rd La Paz Rd. Oso Pkwy. Class II 1.19
Laguna Hills Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Ridge Route Dr. Mill Creek Santa Vittoria Class II 0.46
Ridge Route Dr Mill Creek East of Sea Isle Rd. Class II 0.68
Aliso Hills Dr Alicia Pkwy La Paz Rd Class II 0.9
Alicia Pkwy Moulton Pkwy. Ramona St. Class II 0.22
Moulton Pkwy Ridge Route Dr. Santa Maria Ave. Class II 0.25
Moulton Pkwy (n/b) Nellie Gail Rd La Paz Rd Class II 0.56
Paseo De Valencia La Paz Rd. Cabot Rd. Class II 0.59
Avenida de La Carlota Ridge Route Dr. Los Alisos Blvd Class III 1.44
Avenida de la Carlota Ridge Route Dr. Lake Forest Dr. Class III 0.73
El Toro Rd (w/b) City bdry near Ave Carlota Paseo De Valencia Class III 0.34
El Toro Rd (e/b) Paseo De Valencia City bdry near Ave Carlota Class III 0.34
Santa Vittoria Dr Santa Maria Ave Lake Forest Dr Class III 1.27
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 112
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Lake Forest Dr (e/b) Del Lago Dr. City Bdry near I-5 fwy Class III 0.37
Lake Forest Dr (w/b) City Bdry near I-5 fwy Del Lago Dr. Class III 0.37
El Toro Road Avenida de la Carlota City Bdry near I-5 fwy Class III 0.06
Alicia Pkwy Hon Ave. City Bdry near I-5 fwy Class III 0.18
La Paz Rd. Cabot Rd. City Bdry near I-5 fwy Class III 0.08
Oso PkwyCabot Rd.City Bdry near I-5 fwyClass III 0.05
TOTAL 8.89
Laguna Hills Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class II 6.49 $280,000 $1,817,200
Class III 2.12 $21,000 $44,520
Total $1,861,720
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 113
3.17.Laguna Niguel
Over one-third of Laguna Niguel is designated as open space. This significant amount of open space
is one of the key features defining the character and urban form of the City. The City has two
community parks, 23 neighborhood parks, three mini-parks, one dog park, two county regional
parks, two small county parks and the new Laguna Niguel Skate & Soccer Park.
Population
64,177
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 440
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.1%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 880
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 558
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 1,649
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 243
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 683
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,366
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 997
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 4,588
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 1,215,743
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 7
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 25
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 2
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 129,316
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 114
Map 3.17 Laguna Niguel Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 115
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 25
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 5
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.08
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 0.24
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index less than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is lower than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Metrolink/Amtrak/Rideshare/Bus Laguna Niguel/Mission Viejo
Metrolink Station
Bicycle lockers (20)
Bicycle racks on trains
and buses
Safety and Education Programs
Active Yes
# Of Years Conducted 4
# Of Times a Year Conducted 5
Administered by Police Department
Location Schools and large parking lots
Program, Curriculum, and Activities Presentation/assemblies, bicycle rodeos, Bicycle
Handbook
Other Bicycle Safety Support Programs Bicycle registration, free bicycle helmets, special
events
Total # of Children Reached 300
Age of Children Reached Grades K-6
Other Program Notes
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Bicycle facilities are addressed in the General Plan Circulation Element.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 116
Bikeways
Laguna Niguel Existing Bikeways
Street From To Class Mileage
Sulfur Creek * * Class I *
Laguna Niguel Regional Park * * Class I *
Crown Valley Pkwy * * Class I *
Salt Creek Corridor Regional Park * * Class I *
Street of the Golden Lantern * * Class II *
Crown Valley Pkwy * * Class II *
Moulton Pkwy * * Class II *
Alicia Pkwy * * Class II *
La Paz Rd. * * Class II *
Niguel Rd. * * Class II *
Highlands Ave. * * Class II *
Pacific Island Dr. * * Class II *
Marina Hills Dr. * * Class II *
Camino del Avion * * Class II *
Niguel Rd * * Class III *
Camino del Avion * * Class III *
* Information not provided.
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Forbes Path Mission Viejo City Limit San Juan Capistrano City Limit Class I 2.03
Laguna Niguel Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Chapparosa Park Salt Creek Bikeway Chapparosa Park Rd. Class I .33
Forbes Path Mission Viejo City Limit San Juan Capistrano City Limit Class I 2.03
Niguel Rd. Crown Valley Pkwy S/O Marina Hills Tunnel Class I .65
Cabot Rd. Crown Valley Pkwy North of Crown Valley Pkwy Class II .18
Camino Del Avion Crown Valley Pkwy. Barkentine Blvd. Class II .35
Crown Valley Pkwy Cabot Rd. Mission Viejo City Limit (15) Class II .32
Niguel Rd. Crown Valley Pkwy. Los Arboles Dr. Class II .55
Camino Capistrano Mission Viejo City Limit San Juan Capistrano City Limit Class III 1.88
TOTAL 6.29 miles
Laguna Niguel Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 3.01 $1,500,000 $4,515,000
Class II 1.40 $280,000 $392,000
Class III 1.88 $21,000 $39,480
Total $4,946,480
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 117
3.18.Laguna Woods
The City of Laguna Woods is located in the Saddleback Valley area of South Orange County, ten
miles from the Pacific Ocean. Laguna Woods is both one of California's newest and oldest cities.
Incorporated in 1999 as Orange County's 32nd city, the average age of Laguna Woods residents is
78. Ninety percent of the City’s four square miles is contained within the senior citizen gated
community of Leisure World. The balance of the City contains three additional senior residential
communities and several thriving commercial centers.
Population
18,210
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 26
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.2%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 53
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 38
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 175
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 27
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 53
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 106
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 78
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 357
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 94,476
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 1
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 2
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 0
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 10,049
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 118
Map 3.18 Laguna Woods Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 119
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 4
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 0.8
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.04
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 0.14
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index less than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is lower than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Safety and Education Programs
The status of Laguna Woods’ bicycle safety and education programs is unknown.
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Bicycle facilities are addressed in the General Plan Circulation Element.
Bikeways
Laguna Woods Existing Bikeways
Street From To Class Mileage
El Toro Rd. * * Class I *
Laguna Hills Dr. * * Class I *
Paseo de Valencia * * Class I *
Ridge Route Dr. * * Class II *
El Toro Rd. * * Class II *
Moulton Pkwy * * Class II *
Paseo de Valencia * * Class II *
* Information not provided.
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
El Toro Rd. Moulton Pkwy. Laguna Hills City Limit Class II 0.74
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 120
Laguna Woods Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Valencia -Jasmine Creek Laguna Hills City Limit Laguna Hills City Limit
(W Valencia) Class I 0.73
Canyon Wren Ln. El Toro Rd. Aliso Viejo City Limit Class II 0.02
El Toro Rd. Moulton Pkwy. Laguna Hills City Limit Class II 0.74
Moulton Pkwy. Laguna Hills City Limit El Toro Rd. Class II 0.67
Santa Maria Ave. City Limit Avenida Sosiega Class III 0.28
TOTAL 2.4 miles
Laguna Woods Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 0.73 $1,500,000 $1,095,000
Class II 1.43 $280,000 $400,400
Class III 0.28 $21,000 $5,880
Total $1,501,280
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 121
3.19.Lake Forest
Lake Forest is primarily a city of residential neighborhoods. Adjacent to one of Irvine’s large
employment centers, Lake Forest is also developing an employment center of its own near the SR-
241 Foothill Toll Road. Foothill Ranch Towne Center is located there in the northern part of the
city, and other smaller shopping centers are located along some of the City’s arterial roadways,
including Lake Forest Drive, Bake and Portola Parkways, El Toro and Trabuco Roads, and
Muirlands Boulevard. Currently, Lake Forest has a developed network of bikeways
Population
76,323
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 621
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.5%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,242
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 826
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 2,918
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 270
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 891
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,783
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 1,301
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 5,986
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 1,586,368
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 9
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 32
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 2
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 168,739
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 122
Map 3.19 Lake Forest Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 123
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 94
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 18.8
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.24
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 0.75
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index less than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is lower than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on
buses
Rideshare Saddleback Valley Community Church
Saddleback Pkwy/Portola Pkwy
Rideshare Grace Community Church - 26052 Trabuco Rd
Safety and Education Programs
Active Yes
# Of Years Conducted 2
# Of Times a Year Conducted All year long
Administered by Police Department
Location Schools, neighborhood watch groups
Program, Curriculum, and Activities Assembly; DARE; bike rodeos; neighborhood watch
meetings
Other Bicycle Safety Support Programs
Total # of Children Reached
Age of Children Reached Grades K-8
Other Program Notes
Expenditures
Information on past bikeway facility expenditures is not available.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 124
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Bicycle facilities are discussed in the Lake Forest General Plan.
Bikeways
Lake Forest Existing Bikeways
Street From To Class Mileage
Aliso Creek * * Class I *
Borrego Canyon Wash * * Class I *
Bake Pkwy * * Class II *
Rockfield Blvd. * * Class II *
Muirlands Blvd. * * Class II *
Lake Forest Dr. * * Class II *
Ridge Route Dr. * * Class II *
Jeronimo Rd. * * Class II *
Trabuco Rd. * * Class II *
Toledo Way * * Class II *
Portola Pkwy * * Class III *
Lake Forest Dr. * * Class III *
* Information not provided.
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
OCTA Metrolink RR Irvine City Limit El Toro Rd. Class I 1.93
Lake Forest Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Borrego Tr. Continuation Path Towne Center Dr. Borrego Dr. Class I 0.46
Santiago Canyon Rd. City Limit City Limit Class I 0.87
Alton Pkwy. Portola Commercenter Dr. Class II 1.61
Bake Pkwy. Portola Hwy. Carillon Pl. Class II 0.71
Toledo Wy. Ridge Route Dr. El Toro Rd. Class II 0.46
Rancho Pkwy. Continuation Path Rancho Pkwy. Portola Pkwy. Class II 0.33
Glen Ranch Road Portola Pkwy. El Toro Rd Class II 1.63
Rancho Pkwy Bake Pkwy s/o Lake Forest Dr. Class II 0.71
Rockfield Blvd. Centre Dr. Ridge Route Dr. Class III 0.57
Rockfield Blvd. Cavanaugh Rd. Silverbay Dr. Class III 1.63
Lake Forest Dr. Muirland Blvd. San Diego Frwy. Class III 0.75
Live Oak Canyon Rd. El Toro Rd. City Limit Class III 0.02
El Toro Rd. I-5 N EXIT 91 San Diego Frwy. Class III 0.26
TOTAL 10.01 miles
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 125
Lake Forest Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 3.26 $1,500,000 $4,890,000
Class II 5.45 $280,000 $1,526,000
Class III 3.23 $21,000 $67,830
Total $5,699,600
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 126
3.20.Los Alamitos
Los Alamitos is a small city with a population of 12,150. The Armed Forces Reserve Air Station
occupies a large portion of the City but has advanced both as a residential and business community.
It is debt-free, with excellent recreational and park facilities, a top-notch police force and an
enthusiastic Chamber of Commerce.
Population
12,150
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 121
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.5%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 242
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 162
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 590
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 79
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 200
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 401
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 293
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 1,346
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 356,587
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 2
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 7
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 0
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 37,929
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 127
Map 3.20 Los Alamitos Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 128
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 36
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 7.2
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.61
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.89
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Rideshare Federal Regional Lab
4655 Lampson Ave
Safety and Education Programs
The status of Los Alamitos’ bicycle safety and education programs is unknown.
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
The City of Los Alamitos does not have an adopted Bicycle Transportation Plan.
Bikeways
Los Alamitos Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Catalina St. * * Class I *
Coyote Creek/San Gabriel River * * Class I *
Bloomfield Ave. * * Class II *
Lampson Ave. * * Class II *
Cerritos Ave. * * Class III *
Walnut Street * * Class III *
*Information not provided.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 129
Los Alamitos Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Path 1 Los Alamitos Blvd. Bloomfield St. Class I 0.51
Ball Rd. City Limit
( W Kaylor Ave.)
Cypress City Limit
( Bloomfield St.) Class II 0.24
Catalina St. Oak St. Los Alamitos Blvd. Class II 0.23
Cerritos Ave. Spring St. Lexington Dr. Class II 1.26
Los Alamitos Blvd. City Limit ( N Path 1) Seal Beach City Limit
( S Bradbury Rd.) Class II 1.93
TOTAL 4.17 miles
Los Alamitos Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 0.51 $1,500,000 $765,000
Class II 3.66 $280,000 $1,024,800
Total $1,789,800
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 130
3.21.Mission Viejo
One of the largest South County cities, Mission Viejo is home to Saddleback College, Mission Viejo
Regional Medical Center, and the Shops at Mission Viejo regional shopping center. Significant
recreational amenities include Lake Mission Viejo and the adjacent O’Neill Regional Park, which is
just outside the city limits to the east. Primarily a city comprised of residential neighborhoods,
Mission Viejo’s activity centers and key destinations are located along the City’s well developed
arterial network
Population
98,572
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 655
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.0%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,310
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 829
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 2,424
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 382
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 1,037
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 2,075
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 1,515
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 6,967
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 1,846,176
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 11
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 37
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 2
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 196,374
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 131
Map 3.21 City of Mission Viejo Land Use Policy Map
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 132
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 55
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 11
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.36
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.125
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using City collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index less than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is lower than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Metrolink/Amtrak/Rideshare/Bus Laguna Niguel/Mission Viejo
Metrolink Station
Parking lockers (20)
Bicycle racks on trains
and buses
Rideshare Alicia Park-and-Ride
23682 Via Linda
Rideshare Mission Viejo Church of Christ
26558 Marguerite Pkwy
Safety and Education Programs
Active Yes
# Of Years Conducted 6
# Of Times a Year Conducted 3
Administered by Orange County Sheriff’s Department
Location Schools, City Hall
Program, Curriculum, and Activities Bike rodeos, bike safety seminars, bicycle
handbook and safety exam
Other Bicycle Safety Support Programs
Total # of Children Reached Approximately 500 per year
Age of Children Reached 6 to 12 years old
Other Program Notes Childhood Watch/Traffic Smarts component are
active parts of the program
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 133
Expenditures
Information on past bikeway facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
The City of Mission Viejo is currently updating its Bikeway Plan to be incorporated into the city’s
General Plan.
Bikeways
Mission Viejo Existing Bikeways
Street From To Class Mileage
Aliso Creek I-5 Fwy. Los Alisos Blvd. Class I 0.58
Los Alisos Blvd. Vista Del Lago Mustang Run Class I 1.05
Entidad Entidad Mustang Run Class I 0.55
Jeronimo Open Space
/ Oso Viejo
Community Park Marguerite Pkwy. Olympiad Rd. Class I 2.38
Cordova Park Felipe Rd.
Crown Valley
Pkwy. Class I 0.70
Santa Margarita Pkwy. West city limit Melinda Rd. Class II 1.80
Crown Valley Pkwy. West city limit East city limit Class II 1.23
Marguerite Pkwy. El Toro Rd. Via Escolar Class II 9.00
Felipe Rd. / Olympiad
Rd.
Marguerite Pkwy.
south
Marguerite Pkwy.
north Class II 5.61
Trabuco Rd. North city limit Marguerite Pkwy. Class II 2.10
La Paz Rd. West city limit Olympiad Rd. Class II 2.71
Los Alisos Blvd.
North of Rockfield
Blvd. East city limit Class II 5.12
TOTAL 32.83
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Camino Capistrano Oso Pkwy. Laguna Niguel City Limit Class I 0.82
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 134
Mission Viejo Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Path 1 Laguna Hills City Limit Laguna Niguel City Limit Class I 0.65
Path 2 City Limit ( N Trabuco Canyon Rd.) San Juan Capistrano City Limit Class I 0.72
Alicia Pkwy. N I-5 N EXIT 90 Laguna Hills City Limit
( San Diego Frwy) Class II 0.16
Avery Pkwy. Laguna Niguel City Limit (I-5 S EXIT
85)Marguerite Prwy. Class II 0.16
Crown Valley Pkwy. Medical Center Rd. Laguna Niguel City Limit
( E Camino Capistrano) Class II 0.46
La Paz Rd. Muirlands Blvd. Laguna Hills City Limit
( San Diego Frwy.) Class II 0.11
Los Alisos Blvd. OCTA Metrolink RR Rockfield Blvd. Class II 0.75
Olympiad Rd. Marguerite Pkwy. Melinda Rd. Class II 0.40
Trabuco Rd. Nuez Los Alisos Blvd. Class II 0.36
Crown Valley Pkwy. Jardines City Limit Class III 0.03
TOTAL 3.8
miles
Mission Viejo Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 2.19 $1,500,000 $3,285,000
Class II 2.40 $280,000 $672,000
Class III 0.03 $21,000 $630
Total $3,957,630
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 135
3.22.Newport Beach
The City of Newport Beach is a popular upscale beach community. While popular for its miles of
beaches and two fishing piers, the City is also home to a large bay and the Upper Newport Bay
Ecological Reserve. The City has two large employment centers, the Fashion Island regional
shopping center, and several small shopping districts, such as Balboa Island. Because of its
geography, the City does not have an extensive arterial street network. The major arterials include
Coast Highway, Newport and MacArthur Boulevards, and Jamboree Road.
Population
84,218
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 689
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.5%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,377
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 949
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 3,751
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 378
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 1,067
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 2,133
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 1,557
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 7,163
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 1,898,146
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 11
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 38
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 3
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 201,902
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 136
Map 3.22 Newport Beach Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 137
The City’s Transportation Demand Management ordinance requires projects to reduce the number
of peak-period vehicle trips by promoting and encouraging the use of alternative transportation
modes, such as bicycling, by providing facilities that support alternate modes.
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 439
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 87.8
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 1.09
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 3.35
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Ferry
Balboa Island Ferry
Agate Ave/Bayfront
Edgewater Ave/Palm St
Bikes permitted on
ferries
Rideshare/Bus Newport Transportation Ctr
1550 Avocado Ave Bicycle racks (6)
Safety and Education Programs
Active Yes
# Of Years Conducted
# Of Times a Year Conducted 4
Administered by Police Department
Location Schools
Program, Curriculum, and Activities Bicycle Rodeos
Other Bicycle Safety Support Programs Bicycle Registration
Total # of Children Reached
Age of Children Reached
Other Program Notes Bike safety education available upon school request
only
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 138
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Bicycle planning can be found in Newport Beach’s General Plan.
Bikeways
Newport Beach Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Miles
Balboa Beach Bike Path Section 1 36th St. 24th St. Class I *
Balboa Beach Bike Path Section 2 20th St. F St. Class I *
Via Lido Bridgeway Lafayette Ave. Via Lido Soud Class I *
Newport Blvd Short St. Pacific Coast Hwy. Class I *
Central Ave-Pacific Coast Hwy Via Lido Riverside Ave Class I *
Superior Ave. 15th St. Industrial Wy. Class I *
Lower Back Bay Cliff Paths Dover Dr. Castaways Park Class I *
Bayside Dr. Pacific Coast Hwy. Marine Ave Class I *
Newport Dunes Bike Route Bayside Dr. Back Bay Dr. Class I *
Avocado Ave. Second Ave. Kewamee Dr. Class I *
Bayside Dr. Carnation Ave. Marguerite Ave. Class I *
Fifth Ave. Iris Ave. Marguerite Ave. Class I *
Newport Center Dr. Pacific Coast Hwy. Newport Center Dr. E-W Class I *
Jamboree Rd. Pacific Coast Hwy. University Dr. Bike Path Class I *
Upper Back Bay Path Santiago Dr. Jamboree Rd. Class I *
West of 73 bike Path Jamboree Rd. Bison Ave. Class I *
MacArthur Blvd. University Dr. Bonita Canyon Rd. Class I *
Bison Ave. MacArthur Blvd. Camelback St. Class I *
Buffalo Hills Park Path San Miguel Dr. Ford Rd. Class I *
Spyglass Hill Rd. San Miguel Dr. San Joaquin Hills Rd. Class I *
San Joaquin Hills Rd. Jamboree Rd. Spyglass Hill Rd. Class I *
Santa Barbara Dr. Jamboree Rd. Newport Center Dr. W Class I *
Santa Cruz Dr. San Joaquin Hills Rd. Newport Center Dr. E-W Class I *
Santa Rosa Dr. San Joaquin Hills Rd. Newport Center Dr. E Class I *
Bristol St. North Campus Dr. Jamboree Rd. Class I *
MacArthur Blvd. Campus Dr. Jamboree Rd. Class I *
Jamboree Rd. Bristol St. Campus Dr. Class I *
Von Karman Ave. Macarthur Blvd. Campus Dr. Class I *
Campus Dr. Von Karman Ave. Jamboree Rd. Class I *
Seashore Dr. Orange St. 32nd St. Class II *
Pacific Coast Hwy. (north side) Highland St. Superior Ave. Class II *
Balboa Blvd. 45th St. 26th St. Class II *
Newport Blvd. NB Pacific Coast Hwy Newport Blvd. Class II *
Newport Blvd. SB Ramps Pacific Coast Hwy Newport Blvd. Class II *
Superior Ave. Pacific Coast Hwy. Placentia Ave. Class II *
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 139
Street/Path From To Class Miles
Placentia Ave. Superior Ave. 16th St. Class II *
Riverside Ave. Pacific Coast Hwy. Cliff Dr. Class II *
Cliff Dr. Riverside Ave. Dover Dr. Class II *
Dover Dr. Pacific Coast Hwy. Irvine Ave. Class II *
16th St. Irvine Ave. Dover Dr. Class II *
Irvine Ave. Cliff Dr. Bristol St. Class II *
Campus Dr. Bristol St. Jamboree Rd. Class II *
Back Bay Dr. Jamboree Rd. Eastbluff Dr. Class II *
Eastbluff Dr. Ford Rd. University Dr. Class II *
Vista Del Sol Eastbluff Dr. Vista Del Oro Class II *
Mesa Dr. Irvine Ave. Birch St. Class II *
University Dr. Jamboree Rd. MacArthur Blvd. Class II *
La Vida St. University Dr. La Salud Class II *
La Salud Marsala Dr. Milano DR. Class II *
La Felicidad Camelback St. La Salud Class II *
Camelback St. Bison Ave. La Felicidad Class II *
Bison Ave. MacArthur Blvd. 73 Freeway Class II *
MacArthur Ave. Bison Ave. Bonita Canyon Dr. Class II *
San Miguel Dr. Ford Rd. SpyGlass Hill Rd. Class II *
San Miguel Dr. Newport Center Dr. E Pacific View Dr. Class II *
Avocado Ave. Pacific Coast Hwy. Salt Air Dr. Class II *
Pacific Coast Hwy. Newport Center Dr. Avocado Ave. Class II *
Newport Center Dr. East Newport Center Dr. Newport Center Dr. W Class II *
Newport Center Dr. West Newport Center Dr. Newport Center Dr. Class II *
Pacific View Dr. San Miguel Dr. West of Marguerite Ave. Class II *
Marguerite Ave. Fifth Ave. San Joaquin Hills Rd. Class II *
Fifth Ave. Marguerite Ave. Poppy Ave. Class II *
Bonita Canyon Dr. MacArthur Blvd. 73 Freeway Class II *
San Joaquin Hills Rd. Spyglass Hill Rd. Newport Coast Dr. Class II *
Newport Coast Dr. 73 Freeway Pacific Coast Hwy Class II *
Pacific Coast Hwy. Seaward Rd. Southern City Limit Class II *
Ocean Front Dr. 24th St. 20th St. Class III *
Newport Blvd Pacific Coast Hwy North of Hospital Rd. Class III *
Pacific Coast Hwy. Riverside Ave. Dover Dr. Class III *
El Paseo Dr. Bayside Dr. Malabar Dr. Class III *
Seadrift Dr. Malabar Dr. Evita Dr. Class III *
Kewamee Dr. Seadrift Dr. Avocado Ave. Class III *
Second Ave. Avocado Ave. Goldenrod Ave. Class III *
Goldenrod Ave. Second Ave. South of Harbor View Class III *
Ford Rd. Western End Prairie Rd. Class III *
Prairie Rd. Ford Rd. Bonita Canyon Dr. Class III *
Mesa View Dr. Ford Rd. Bonita Canyon Dr. Class III *
Pacific Coast Hwy. (south side) Western City Limit Superior Ave. Class I, II *
Pacific Coast Hwy. Superior Ave. Newport Blvd. Class I, II *
Pacific Coast Hwy. Dover Dr. Bayside Dr. Class I, II *
Pacific Coast Hwy (south side) Bayside Dr. Avocado Ave. Class I, II *
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 140
Street/Path From To Class Miles
MacArthur Blvd. Pacific Coast Hwy. Ford Rd. Class I, II *
San Miguel Dr. Pacific View Dr. SpyGlass Hill Rd. Class I, II *
* Information not provided.
Newport Beach Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Bayside Dr. Carnation Ave. Marguerite Ave. Class I 0.47
Bison Ave. Belcourt Dr. Macarthur Blvd. Class I 0.15
Bonita Canyon Dr./ MacArthur
Blvd.Macarthur Blvd. Baonita Canyon Dr. Class I 0.05
Jamboree Rd. University Dr. Eastbluff Dr. Class I 1.19
Jamboree Rd. Coast Hwy. Bayside Dr. Class I 0.17
Jamboree Rd. Campus Dr. Bristol St. Class I 0.85
Jamboree Rd. / University Dr. Jamboree Rd. University Dr. Class I 0.40
Jamboree Rd. / San Joaquin
Hills Rd. Jamboree Rd. San Joaquin Hills Rd. Class I 0.17
Kings Rd/ Dover Dr. Kings Rd. W Dover Dr. Class I 0.69
MacArthur Blvd. Campus Dr. Jamboree Rd. Class I 0.98
Newport Center Dr. Newport Center Dr. Coast Hwy. Class I 0.41
22nd St. / Santiago Dr. City Limit Costa Mesa Irvine Ave. Class II 0.38
2nd Ave. Avocado Ave. Heliotrope Ave. Class II 0.40
Avocado Ave. Kewamee Dr. 2nd Ave. Class II 0.08
Balboa Blvd. Coast Hwy. Channel Pl. Class II 0.63
Bay Ave. 221st St. Buena Vista Blvd. Class II 1.14
Bayside Dr. Coast Hwy. E Bayside Wy. Class II 0.27
Bison Ave. Jamboree Rd. Belcourt Dr. Class II 0.32
Bonita Canyon Dr. San Joaquin
Transportation Corridor E Chambord Class II 0.11
Bristol St. Irvine Ave. Jamboree Rd. Class II 0.75
Coast Hwy. Carnation Ave. Poppy Ave. Class II 1.26
El Paseo Dr. Bayside Dr. Malabar Dr. Class II 0.11
Ford Rd. Prairie Rd. Hillside Dr. Class II 0.06
Heliotrope Ave. 2nd Ave. Coast Hwy. Class II 0.05
Jamboree Rd. Bristol St. University Dr. Class II 0.64
Kewamee Dr. Seadrift Dr. Avocado Ave. Class II 0.23
Newport Blvd. Lido Mc Fadden Pl. Class II 0.68
Newport Coast Dr. San Joaquin Hills
Transportation Corridor Newport Coast Dr. Class II 0.34
Newport Coast Dr. / Tesoro Newport Coast Dr. Tesoro Class II 0.07
Coast Hwy. Riverside Ave. Dover Dr. Class III 1.06
Newport Coast Dr. / Moon Shell Tesoro S Reef Point Dr. Class III 2.67
TOTAL 16.78 miles
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 141
Newport Beach Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 5.53 $1,500,000 $8,295,000
Class II 7.52 $280,000 $2,105,600
Class III 3.73 $21,000 $78,330
Total $10,478,930
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 142
3.23.Orange
The City of Orange is situated in Central Orange County, approximately 32 miles southeast of Los
Angeles. The City's land area is 27 square miles. The City's planning area is 38 square miles, with a
"Sphere of Influence" area of 55 square miles. Included in the City's Sphere of Influence is 18,500
acres of undeveloped land owned by The Irvine Company.
Population
138,640
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 1,563
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.9%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 3,126
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 2,110
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 7,834
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 539
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 2,102
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 4,204
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 3,069
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 14,118
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 3,741,387
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 22
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 76
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 5
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 397,964
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 143
Map 3.23 Orange Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 144
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 300
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 60
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.44
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.37
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Location Type
Eisenhower Park Bicycle racks (x1)
El Camino Real Park Bicycle racks (x5)
Fred Barrera Park Bicycle racks (x1)
Grijalva Park Bicycle racks (x1)
Hart Park Bicycle racks (x4)
Killefer Park Bicycle racks (x1)
McPherson Park Bicycle racks (x6)
Olive Park Bicycle racks (x1)
Pitcher Park Bicycle racks (x1)
Santiago Hills Park Bicycle racks (x3)
Serrano Park Bicycle racks (x1)
Shaffer Park Bicycle racks (x1)
The Depot Park Bicycle racks
Veterans Memorial Bicycle racks
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Metrolink/Amtrak/Rideshare/Bus Orange Station
194 N Atchison St
Bicycle racks(6)/lockers(12)
Bicycle racks on trains and buses
Rideshare Lincoln Park-and-Ride
Lincoln Ave/SR-55
Safety and Education Programs
The City of Orange Traffic Department organizes a bicycle safety education program. However, the
traffic department does not have the resources to regularly support the program.
For City employees, through the Trip Reduction Program, there is a $35 Bi-annual bike helmet
reimbursement as well as an opportunity to win a bike through the annual Bike Loan-to-Own
program.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 145
Expenditures
Facility Improvement From To Cost
City-wide Development/maintenance $750,000
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Bicycle planning can be found in the City of Orange’s General Plan.
Bikeways
Orange Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Santa Ana River Path Garden Grove Blvd. Tustin Ave. Class I 6.4
Jamboree Blvd. Santiago Canyon Canyon View Ave. Class I *
Santiago Creek Path Section 1 UPRR Tustin St. Class I *
Santiago Creek Path Section 2 Walnut Ave. Collins Ave. Class I *
Rancho Santiago Blvd. Bond Ave. Hewes St. Class I .53
Cannon St. Park Path Cerritos Dr. Avenida Palmar Class I *
Santiago Blvd. Wanda Rd. Collins Ave. Class I *
Wanda Rd. Santiago Blvd. Katella Ave. Class .19
Batavia St. Nohl Ranch Rd. Taft Ave. Class *
Glassell St. Fletcher Ave. Santa Ana River Path Class *
Cambridge St. Meats Ave. Santiago Creek Path Class 3.22
Walnut Ave. Shaffer St. Handy St. Class *
Handy St. UPRR Walnut St. Class *
Meats Ave. Tustin St. Santiago Blvd Class *
Santiago Blvd. Nohl Ranch Rd. Villa Park Rd. Class 3.74
Taft Ave. Santiago Blvd. Nichols Ave. Class *
Hewes St. Villa Park Rd. Rancho Santiago Class *
Cannon St. Northern City Limit Villa Park Rd. Class *
Collins Ave. Handy St. Bond Ave. Class *
Prospect Ave Spring St. Collins Ave. Class .66
Cannon St. Chapman Ave Cannon St. Park Path Class *
Canyon View Ave. Newport Blvd. Outrider St. Class .38
Santiago Canyon Rd. Wanda Rd. Jamboree Rd. Class 1.80
Orange Park Blvd Chapman Ave. Santiago Canyon Rd. Class 1.33
Chapman Ave./Santiago Canyon Cannon St. Eastern City Limit Class *
Jamboree Rd. Irvine Regional Park Southern City Limit Class 1.89
Newport Blvd. Santiago Canyon Chapman Ave. Class .38
* Information not provided.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 146
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Glassell St. Fletcher St. Katella Ave. Class II 1.39
Glassell St. La Veta Ave. Santa Ana City Limit (SR-22
E Exit 16) Class II 0.40
Glassell St. Woodvale Ave. Fletcher St. Class II 0.12
Glassell St. City Limit N Riverdale Ave. Class II 0.08
Walnut Ave. Hewes St. Rancho Santiago Blvd. Class III 0.25
Walnut Ave. Walnut Ave. _Tustin St. Earlham St. Class III 0.77
Orange Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Collins Ave. / Walnut Ave. Collins Ave. Walnuts Ave. Class I 0.49
Glassell St. / Main St. Glassell St. W Main St. Class I 1.87
Hewes St. City Limit (Prospect Ave.) City Limit (Julie Ave.) Class I 1.24
Jamboree Rd. Santiago Canyon Rd. Canyon View Ave. Class I 0.79
Main St. / Chapman Ave. Main St. Chapman Ave. Class I 1.36
OCTA Metrolink RR / Batavia
St.OCTA Metrolink RR W Batavia St. Class I 1.49
Palmyra Ave. / Fairhaven
Ave.Palmyra Ave. Fairhaven Ave. Class I 1.24
Palmyra Ave. / James St. Palmyra Ave. James St. Class I 0.23
Path 1 City Limit (S Santiago Blvd.) City Limit ( S Villa Park
Access)Class I 2.39
Path 2 Hewes St. City Limit (W Orange Park
Blvd.)Class I 1.31
Shaffer St. / Nordig Pl. Shaffer St. N Nordgi Pl. Class I 0.66
Tustin St. Taft Ave. Taft Ave. Class I 0.11
UP RR / Arden Villa Dr. W Main St. Villa Park City Limit ( W
Sunkist Cir.) Class I 2.53
Walnut Ave. / Tustin St. W Walnut Ave. W Tustin St. Class I 1.43
Batavia St. Chapman Ave. La Veta Ave. Class II 0.51
Cambridge St. Lake Dr. Santa Ana City Limit ( S
Fairway Dr.) Class II 0.09
Cannon St. Santiago Canyon Rd. Patria Ct. Class II 0.47
Canyon View Ave. Chapman Ave. Out rider St. Class II 0.83
Canyon View Ave. Newport Blvd. Jamboree Rd. Class II 0.78
Chapman Ave. Hewes St. Cannon St. Class II 0.57
Collins Ave. Handy St. Wanda Rd. Class II 0.29
Crawford Canyon Rd. Chapman Ave. City Limits Class II 0.01
Escola Meats Ave. Cannon St. Class II 1.11
Esplanade St. La Veta Ave. Fairhaven Ave. Class II 1.37
Fairhaven Ave. Costa Mesa Fwy. Yorba St. Class II 0.23
Fletcher St. Batavia St. Glassell St. Class II 0.51
Garden Grove Blvd. Lewis St. Santa Ana City Limit Class II 0.54
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 147
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Hewes St. City Limit (Pearl Ave.) Fowler Ave. Class II 0.75
Hewes St. Walnut Ave. City Limit (S Drew Wy.) Class II 0.16
Katella Ave. Handy St. Wanda Rd. Class II 0.29
La Veta Ave. Batavia St. Parker St. Class II 0.12
La Veta Ave. City Limit Santa Ana (Santa Bedford Rd. Class II 0.51
La Veta Ave. / Rock Creek
Dr.E Sedona Dr. Esplanade St. Class II 1.61
Lewis St. Anaheim City Limit (N Tiller
Ave.)Garden Grove Blvd. Class II 1.24
Lincoln Av / Nohl Ranch Rd. City Limit (E Berkeley St.) Anaheim City Limit (E
Wyngate Rd.)Class II 1.64
Main St. Taft Ave. Palm Ave. Class II 1.67
Meats Ave. Anaheim City Limit (W
Westfield Ct.)
Villa Park City Limit
( W Stone Pine Rd.) Class II 1.04
Meats Ave. Glassell St. Villa Park City Limit
( Santiago Blvd.) Class II 1.57
Newport Blvd. Chapman Ave. City Limit
(S Skylark Pl.) Class II 0.91
Orangewood Ave. / Walnut
Ave.W Orange Frwy. Shaffer St. Class II 1.81
Parker St. La Veta Ave. Santa Ana City Limit ( S
Town And County Rd.) Class II 0.38
Prospect St. Spring St. City Limit ( Fairhaven Ave.) Class II 1.23
Rancho Santiago Blvd. Bond Ave. City Limit (S Sycamore Ave.) Class II 0.45
Rancho Santiago Blvd. City Limit ( Pearl Ave.) Chapman Ave. Class II 0.06
Santiago Blvd. Anaheim City Limit (E Costa
Mesa Frwy) Lincoln Ave. Class II 0.25
Serrano Ave. Cannon St. Anaheim City Limit Anaheim
(E Kendra Dr.) Class II 2.14
Spring St. Walnut Ave. City Limit (E Esplanade St.) Class II 1.00
Spring St. City Limit ( Earlham St.) City Limit ( Hewes St.) Class II 0.12
Taft Ave. Main St. Hart St. Class II 2.64
Tustin Ave. Santa Ana Canyon Rd. Lincoln Ave. Class II 0.58
Tustin Ave. Fairhaven Ave. City Limits Santa Ana Class II 0.01
Walnut Ave. Handy St. Spring St. Bikeway Class II 0.28
Almond Ave. Feldner Rd. Cambridge St. Class III 1.50
Batavia St. Palm Ave. Chapman Ave. Class III 0.25
Bedford Rd. Palmyra Ave. La Veta Ave. Class III 0.25
Feldner Rd. Almond Ave. Palmyra Ave. Class III 0.14
Glassell St. Katella Ave. Palm Ave. Class III 1.21
Glassell St. Almond Ave. La Veta Ave. Class III 0.38
Grand St. Palm Ave. Almond Ave. Class III 0.37
Lemon St. Palm Ave. Almond Ave. Class III 0.38
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 148
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Lincoln St. Walnut Ave. Palm Ave. Class III 0.25
Palm Ave. Main St. Lincoln St. Class III 1.65
Palmyra Ave. Feldner Rd. Bedford Rd. Class III 0.06
Palmyra Ave. Costa Mesa Fwy. Palmyra Ave. / Fairhaven
Ave. Bikeway Class III 0.47
TOTAL 53.82
Orange Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 17.14 $1,500,000 $25,710,000
Class II 31.76 $280,000 $8,892,800
Class III 7.93 $21,000 $166,530
Total $34,769,330
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 149
3.24.Placentia
Placentia is a fast-growing community with beautiful suburban homes, good schools, stately
churches, and wholesome recreation. The climate and rich land attracted an ever-growing number of
new residents.
Population
52,450 (Source: City of Placentia, 2008)
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 512
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.6%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,024
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 684
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 2,454
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 220
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 732
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,464
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 1,068
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 4,915
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 1,302,392
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 8
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 26
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 2
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 138,533
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 150
Map 3.24 Placentia Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 151
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 82
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 16.4
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.33
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.02
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Safety and Education Programs
The City of Placentia does not have bicycle safety and education programs.
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Bicycle facility planning is documented in the Placentia Bike Path map.
Bikeways
Placentia Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Tri-City Park Path N/A N/A Class I .86 miles
Golden Ave. Kraemer Blvd. Placentia City Limit Class II 1.00 miles
Bastanchury Rd. Western City Limit Eastern City Limit Class II 1.80 miles
Kraemer Blvd. Northern City Limit Yorba Linda Blvd. Class II 1.10 miles
Valencia Ave. Northern City Limit Palm Dr Class II 1.30 miles
Palm Ave. Yorba Linda Blvd. Rose Dr Class II 1.10 miles
Primrose Ave. Placentia Ave. Twilight St. Class III .20 miles
Angelina Dr. Palm Dr. Kraemer Blvd. Class III .40 miles
Twilight St. Primrose Ave. Ruby Dr. Class III .30 miles
Ruby Dr. Twilight St. Bradford Ave Class III .50 miles
Bradford Ave. Ruby Dr. Madison Ave. Class III .20 miles
Chapman Ave. Placentia Ave. Kraemer Blvd. Class III 1.00 miles
Bradford Ave. Chapman Ave. Crowther Ave. Class III .30 miles
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 152
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Melrose St. Crowther Ave. La Jolla St. Class III .60 miles
TOTAL 10.66 miles
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Orangethorpe
Ave.Chapman Ave. Anaheim City Limits (W Lakeview
Ave.)Class II 2.92
Placentia Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Placentia Ave. /
Kraemer Blvd.
Anaheim City Limit
(W Placentia Ave.)
Anaheim City Limit (Kraemer
Blvd.)Class I 1.09
Bradford Ave. Carlson Ln. Center St. Class II 0.87
Chapman Ave. Fullerton City Limit (W Placentia
Ave.)Orangethorpe Ave. Class II 1.87
Kraemer Blvd. La Brea City Limit Golden Ave. Class II 1.43
Melrose St. Crowther Ave. Orangethorpe Ave. Class II 0.38
Richfield Rd. Orangethorpe Ave. Las Brisas Pl. Class II 0.39
Rose Dr. Yorba Linda City Limit (S Yorba Linda
Blvd)Palm Dr. Class II 0.44
Rose Dr. Alta Vista Dr. Oranthorpe Ave. Class II 0.53
Rose Dr. Imperial Hwy. Yorba Linda City Limit Class II 0.07
Yorba Linda Blvd. Fullerton City Limit (Bradford Av) City Limit ( E Kilts Ave.) Class II 0.82
Yorba Linda Blvd. City Limit (W Mac Cormack Ln.) Yorba Linda City Limit (W Linda
Vista Wy.) Class II 0.27
Yorba Linda Blvd. Yorba Linda City Limit (E Rose Dr) Yorba Linda City Limit (W
Prospect Av) Class II 0.20
Buena Vista Ave. Petry Dr. Jefferson St. Class III 0.11
Jefferson St. Yorba Linda City Limit (N Zion Av) Yorba Linda City Limit (N
Carlsbad Av)Class III 0.19
Madison Ave. Bradford Ave. Kraemer Blvd. Class III 0.26
Richfield Rd. Yorba Linda City Limit (S Mariposa
Av)Orchard Dr. Class III 0.09
TOTAL 9.01 miles
Placentia Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 1.09 $1,500,000 $1,635,000
Class II 10.19 $280,000 $2,853,200
Class III 0.65 $21,000 $13,650
Total $4,501,850
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 153
3.25.Rancho Santa Margarita
Rancho Santa Margarita has one employment center and many newer housing developments.
Rancho Santa Margarita has experienced rapid development over the past fifteen years, primarily in
the residential market. The City contains portions of O’Neill Regional Park, which runs along
Trabuco Canyon through the City.
Population
50,618
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 356
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.0%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 712
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 438
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 1,124
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 179
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 535
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,069
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 781
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 3,591
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 951,555
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 3
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 19
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 1
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 101,215
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 154
Map 3.25 Rancho Santa Margarita Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 155
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 19
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 3.8
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.08
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 0.23
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index less than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is lower than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Safety and Education Programs
The City of Rancho Santa Margarita does not have bicycle safety and education programs.
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Bicycle facilities are addressed in the General Plan Circulation Element.
Bikeways
Rancho Santa Margarita Existing Bikeways
Street From To Class Mileage
Santa Margarita Pkwy * * Class I *
Trabuco Canyon * * Class I *
Santa Margarita Pkwy * * Class II *
Alicia Pkwy * * Class II *
Antonio Pkwy * * Class II *
Oso Pkwy * * Class II *
Avenida Empresa * * Class II *
* Information not provided.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 156
Rancho Santa Margarita Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Trabuco Canyon Bike Trail
Extension (North) Antonio Pkwy. Robinson Ridge Class I 1.00
Trabuco Canyon / Santa
Margarita Pkwy Bridge
N/o Santa Margarita
Pkwy S/o Santa Margarita Pkwy Class I .10
Trabuco Canyon Bike Trail
Extension (South) Tijeras Canyon Rd. Oso Pkwy. Class I .70
Antonio Pkwy. / Rose Canyon Rd. City Limit ( S
Trabuco Canyon Rd.) Santa Margarita Pkwy. Class II .67
TOTAL 2.47 miles
Rancho Santa Margarita Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 1.80 $1,500,000 $2,700,000
Class II 0.67 $21,000 $14,070
Total $5,459,070
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 157
3.26.San Clemente
San Clemente is the southernmost city in Orange County. The City is home to miles of beaches,
which are popular in the summer months. Many of the City’s coastal neighborhoods are older, and
many of the inland areas are newer, with recent new housing construction and construction planned
in the future. Some of San Clemente’s destinations are located along the arterial streets, including El
Camino Real, Avenida Pico, and Camino de Los Mares.
Population
61,050
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 377
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.2%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 755
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 487
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 1,552
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 307
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 684
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,368
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 999
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 4,595
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 1,217,680
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 7
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 25
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 2
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 129,522
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 158
Map 3.26 San Clemente Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 159
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 63
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 12.6
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.20
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 0.63
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index less than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is lower than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Location Type
Ole Hanson Beach Club Bicycle racks
Showers
La Pata/Vista Hermosa Park
Bicycle racks
Showers
Lockers
Municipal Parks Bicycle racks
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Metrolink/Rideshare/Bus San Clemente Station
1850 Avenida Estacion
Bicycle racks on trains
and buses
Metrolink/Amtrak San Clemente Pier Station
615 Avenida Victoria Bicycle racks on trains
Safety and Education Programs
Active Yes
# Of Years Conducted
# Of Times a Year Conducted Varies based on funding and time.
Administered by Sheriff’s Department
Location Schools
Program, Curriculum, and Activities
Assemblies; bicycle rodeos; free helmets;
Curriculum: proper hand signals, equipment, lane
and traffic sign obedience, proper bike condition,
information packets
Other Bicycle Safety Support Programs
Total # of Children Reached Varies from year to year
Age of Children Reached Elementary school students
Other Program Notes
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 160
Expenditures
Information on past bikeway expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Bicycle planning can be found in San Clemente’s General Plan.
Bikeways
San Clemente Existing Bikeways
Street From To Class Mileage
Camino de Los Mares Portico del Norte Calle Nuevo Class I *
Camino del Rio Camino de Los Mares Avenida La Pata Class I *
Avenida Talega City border Avenida Vista
Hermosa Class I *
Avenida Vista Hermosa Camino Vera Cruz* Avenida Pico Class I *
Avenida La Pata City border Avenida Pico Class I *
Avenida Pico Calle del Cerro City border Class I *
Camino de los Mares Camino del Rio Avenida Vaquero Class II *
Avenida Pico Avenida La Pata Calle del Cerro Class II *
Avenida Vaquero Camino de Los Mares Camino Capistrano Class II *
Avenida Vista Hermosa * * Class II *
Pacific Coast Highway/El Camino
Real
Northwest of Camino
Capistrano Avenida Pico Class II *
Avenida del Presidente Avenida Valencia Avenida de Las
Palmeras Class II *
Avenida La Pata Avenida Pico Calle Extremo Class II *
Camino Vera Cruz Camino de Los Mares Avenida Vista
Hermosa Class II *
Avenida Pico Calle de Los Molinos El Camino Real Class III *
Calle Puente/Ola Vista * * * Class III *
* Information not provided.
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Avenida Vista Hermosa Avenida La Pata Avenida Pico Class I 1.01
San Clemente Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Avenida La Pata Camino Del Rio Calle Saluda Class I 0.15
Avenida Pico E Camino La pedriza W Foothill Transportation Corr Class I 0.14
Avenida La Pata / Camino Del
Rio Avenida La Pata Camino Del Rio Class I 0.71
Avenida Capistrano Avenida Vaquero Coast Hwy. Class II 0.12
Camino Del Rio E Camino Forestal Avenida La Pata Class II 0.27
El Camino Real Avenida Pico Avenida del Presidente Class II 2.70
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 161
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Camino de Estrella / Camino de
los Mares
Avenida Vista
Hermosa Avenida Vaquero Class II 1.22
Avenida del Mar / Avenida
Victoria / Avenida Madrid Calle Seville S Ola Vista Class II 0.71
Camino de los Mares / Las
Ramblas Las Ramblas Camino de los Mares Class II 0.36
Ola Vista Avenida Madrid Avenida Gaviota Class II 0.45
Avenida Palizada Avenida Miramar Calle Seville Class II 0.13
Path 1 City Limit S Talega Rd Class II 0.14
Path 2 City Limit Talega Rd Class II 0.27
Avenida Pico Avenida Navarro El Camino Real Class II 0.62
Calle Puente Avenida Pelayo Avenida Palizada Class II 0.48
Calle Sarmentoso Camino Del Rio Camino Vera Cruz Class II 0.84
Calle Seville Avenida Palizada Avenida del Mar Class II 0.10
Talega Rd. N Calle Portofino Avenida Vista Hermosa Class II 0.34
Avenida Valencia El Camino Real Avenida del Presidente Class II 0.06
Camino Vera Cruz Calle Aquamarina Avenida Pico Class II 0.58
Camino Vera Cruz / Vista Carretera Vista Hermosa Class II 0.65
Avenida Acapulco Avenida San Pablo Avenida Adobe Class III 0.10
Avenida Adobe Avenida Acapulco Calle Bahia Class III 0.22
Calle Amanecer Avenida Pico Calle Cordillera Class III 0.38
Calle Bahia Avenida Adobe Avenida Santa Margarita Class III 0.36
Calle Cordillera Calle Amanecer N Calle Sol Class III 0.41
Camino El Molino San Juan Capistrano
CityLimit Dana Point City Limit Class III 0.01
Camino El Molino Dana Point City Limit N Camino de Estrella Class III 0.02
Calle Frontera Corte Calamar Avenida Pico Class III 1.03
Ola Vista Avenida Magdalena Avenida Calafia Class III 0.32
Avenida Pico Avenida Presidio Avenida Navarro Class III 0.53
Avenida San Pablo Avenida Acapulco El Camino Real Class III 1.11
Avenida Santa Margarita Calle Bahia Avenida San Luis Rey Class III 0.42
Avenida Vista Hermosa Calle Frontera Camino Verra Cruz / Avenida
VistaHermosaBikeway Class III 0.21
Avenida Vista Hermosa I-5 S Exit 77 Avenida Pico Class III 0.67
Avenida Vista Hermosa / El
Camino Real
Avenida Vista
Hermosa El Camino Real Class III 0.90
TOTAL 17.73 miles
San Clemente Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 2.01 $1,500,000 $3,015,000
Class II 10.04 $280,000 $2,811,200
Class III 6.69 $21,000 $140,490
Total $5,966,690
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 162
3.27.San Juan Capistrano
San Juan Capistrano is an older established community in South County. The City is most famous
for its Mission located in the downtown area of the City. The downtown area is popular with
residents and visitors alike featuring a quaint restaurant and shopping district. Development in San
Juan Capistrano has occurred less rapidly over the past two decades as in the rest of the South
County region. Most of its development has been residential with some commercial located in the
downtown area.
Population
34,839
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 288
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.4%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 577
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 372
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 1,178
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 158
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 446
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 892
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 651
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 2,995
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 793,682
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 5
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 16
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 1
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 84,422
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 163
Map 3.27 San Juan Capistrano Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 164
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 39
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 7.8
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.22
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 0.69
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index lower than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is lower than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Location Type
San Juan Capistrano Community
Center and Sports Park Not provided by City
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Rideshare Junipero Serra North Lot
Junipero Serra Rd/I-5
Rideshare Junipero Serra South Lot
Junipero Serra Rd/I-5
Metrolink/Amtrak/Rideshare/Bus San Juan Capistrano Station
26701 Verdugo St
Bicycle racks on trains
and buses
Safety and Education Programs
Active Yes
# Of Years Conducted
# Of Times a Year Conducted
Administered by Police Department
Location Schools
Program, Curriculum, and Activities Bicycle rodeos
Other Bicycle Safety Support Programs Free bicycle helmets
Total # of Children Reached
Age of Children Reached
Other Program Notes Not a regular program
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 165
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
San Juan Capistrano has bicycle plans that are not part of a Master or General Plan.
Bikeways
San Juan Capistrano Existing Bikeways
Street From To Class Mileage
Rancho Viejo Rd. * * Class I *
San Juan Creek Rd. * * Class I *
Camino del Avion * * Class I *
Camino Capistrano * * Class I *
San Juan Creek * * Class I *
Trabuco Creek * * Class I *
San Juan Creek Rd. * * Class II *
Del Obispo St. * * Class II *
Alipaz St. * * Class II *
Camino Capistrano * * Class II *
La Zanja St. * * Class III *
Avenida de La Vista * * Class III *
* Information not provided.
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Las Ramblas / PCH San Clemente City Limit San Diego Frwy. Class II 2.00
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 166
San Juan Capistrano Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Forster Canyon Rd. / Via
California San Juan Creek Rd. Camino Las Ramblas Class I 2.58
La Novia Rd. Forster Canyon Rd. La Novia Ave. Class I 0.13
Path 1 N San Juan Creek Rd. City Limit ( S Ortega Hwy) Class I 0.29
Path 2 Mission Viejo City Limit Path 4 Class I 1.46
Path 3 Laguna Niguel City Limit Path 4 Class I 1.74
Path 4 N Oso Rd. N Ramos St. Class I 1.22
Vivente de Marlita / Camino
Capistrano Vivente de Marlita Camino Capistrano Class I 0.32
Camino del Avion Parkside Wy. E Alipaz St. Class II 0.65
Camino Capistrano Calle Lorenzo San juan Creek Rd. Class II 1.57
Del Obispo St. Ortega Hwy. Ramos St. Class II 0.53
La Pata Ave. / Mares La Pata Ave. Mares Class II 1.48
Ortega Hwy. Capistrano City Limit ( W Horno Rd.) Class II 2.16
Rancho Viejo Rd. S Path 2 Calle Arroyo Class II 2.07
San Juan Creek Rd. La Novia Ave. Paseo Christina Class II 0.72
Stonehill Dr. Dana Point City Limit OCTA Metro Link RR Class II 0.10
Camino Capistrano Dana Point City Limit Via Serra Class III 0.10
Mares San Clemente City Limit San Clemente City Limit ( N
Portico Del Norte) Class III 0.60
TOTAL 17.72
San Juan Capistrano Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 7.74 $1,500,000 $11,610,000
Class II 11.28 $280,000 $3,158,400
Class III 0.70 $21,000 $14,700
Total $14,783,100
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 167
3.28.Santa Ana
Santa Ana is the seat of County government and the largest city in Orange County. County
government offices are located in the City’s Civic Center downtown. The City is also home to Santa
Ana College, the Santa Ana Zoo, and the Main Place and Bristol Marketplace shopping centers. The
City is one of the oldest and established cities in Orange County. Most of the City’s destinations and
services are located along the arterial street network
Population
337,977
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 4,317
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 2.2%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 8,634
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 5,734
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 20,204
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 641
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 4,958
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 9,917
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 7,239
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 33,300
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 8,824,570
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 53
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 178
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 12
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 938,652
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 168
Map 3.28 Santa Ana Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 169
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 646
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 129.2
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.38
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.16
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Location Type
Civic Center Bicycle racks
The Downtown Public Urban Design Guidelines suggest that Bicycle racks be provided at key
activity locations, attractions, and other points of interest.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Metrolink/Amtrak/Rideshare/Bus Santa Ana Station
1000 E Santa Ana Blvd
Bicycle
racks(18)/lockers(5)
Bicycle racks on trains
and buses
Safety and Education Programs
Active Yes
# Of Years Conducted
# Of Times a Year Conducted All year long
Administered by Police Department
Location Schools
Program, Curriculum, and Activities Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Automobile Safety
Program
Other Bicycle Safety Support Programs
Total # of Children Reached Approximately 34,000 per year
Age of Children Reached
Other Program Notes Not a regular program
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 170
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Santa Ana has a Bicycle Master Plan as part of the Circulation Element in its General Plan.
Bikeways
Santa Ana Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Santa Ana River Pathway Edinger Ave. Northern City Limit Class I 3.58
Santiago Creek Path Memory Ln. Northern City Limit Class I 1
Alton-Maple Pathway Susan St. Chestnut Ave. Class I 5.01
Flower St. Warner Ave. N/O Alton St. Class I 0.67
Mac Arthur Blvd (WB) Santa Ana River Path Susan St. Class I 1.00
Greenville St. Warner Ave. Pomona St. Class II 0.85
Santa Ana River Pathway Edinger Ave. Mac Arthur Blvd. Class I 1.97
Susan Street Mac Arthur Blvd. Alton St. Class II 0.16
Bear St. Mac Arthur Blvd. Segerstrom Ave Class II 0.54
Raitt St. Occidental St. Edinger Ave. Class I 0.22
Total 15.0
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Raitt St. Mc Fadden Ave. Sunflower Ave. Class I 2.72
Birstol St. / La Veta Ave. Orange City Limit (Santa
Ana Fwy.) Sunflower Ave. Class II 5.88
Grand Ave. Orange City Limit
(S 22E exit 16) Dyer Rd. Class II 4.64
Westminster Ave. Garden Grove City Limit (W
Newhope St)
Garden Grove City Limit (W
Clinton St) Class II 1.36
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 171
Santa Ana Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Channel W/O Fairview Edinger Sunflower Ave. Class I 2.72
Flower St Alton Ave. Sunflower Ave. Class I 0.77
OCTA Metrolink RR 6th St. S 4th St. Class I 0.37
Raitt St. Mc Fadden Ave. Edinger Ave. Class I 0.50
Union Pacific RR Westminster Ave. Raitt St. Class I 1.69
UP RR S 4th St. Chestnut Ave. Class I 0.38
17th St. Garden Grove City Limit City Limit (Deodar St.) Class II 3.93
1st St. Newhope St. E Quiet Village St. Class II 1.08
4th St. OCTA Metrolink RR Grand Ave. Class II 0.21
Central Ave. Orange Ave. Maple St. Class II 0.05
Chestnut Ave. Maple St. Elk Ln. Class II 1.14
Civic Center Dr. Fairview St. Santiago St. Class II 2.77
Dyer Rd. Grand Ave. Red Hill Ave. Class II 0.59
Flower St. Santa Ana Blvd. Warner Ave. Class II 2.20
MacArthur Blvd.(EB) Costa Mesa City Limit Susan St. Class II 0.38
Main St. Macarthur Blvd. Costa Mesa Fwy. Class II 0.49
Mc Fadden Ave. Garden Grove City Limit (W Maple St. Class II 4.75
Memory Ln. Orange City Limit Bristol St. Class II 0.20
Newhope St. Westminster Ave. Edinger Ave Class II 1.48
Orange Ave. Central Ave. UP RR Class II 0.12
Penn Wy. 17th St. Washington Ave. Class II 0.37
Raitt St. Santa Ana Blvd. McFadden Ave Class II 1.44
Santa Ana Blvd. Raitt St. Grand Ave. Class II 2.48
Santiago St. Washington Ave. 6th St. Class II 0.52
Sunflower Ave Harbor St Susan St Class II 0.34
Sunflower Ave. Costa Mesa City LimitCosta Mesa City Limit Class II 0.49
Tustin Ave. Orange City Limit N/O 1st St. Class II 1.70
Warner Ave. Flower St. Maple St. Class II 1.93
Warner Ave. Anne St. Forest Ave Class II 1.13
Edinger Ave. SA River 55 FWY Class III 4.65
Total 40.77 miles
Santa Ana Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 9.15 $1,500,000 $13,725,000
Class II 41.67 $280,000 $11,667,600
Class III 4.65 $21,000 $97,650
Total $25,490,250
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 172
3.29.Seal Beach
The City of Seal Beach is a Charter City located in Orange County, California. Seal Beach sits on the
coast as the gateway to Orange County between the cities of Long Beach and Huntington Beach.
Seal Beach has retained its quaint, small-town atmosphere. The 5,256-acre Seal Beach Naval
Weapons Station, and the 920-acre Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge, comprises 2/3 of the land
within the 13.23 square-mile City.
Population
24,098
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 207
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.7%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 415
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 286
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 1,134
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 71
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 279
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 557
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 407
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 1,871
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 495,907
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 3
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 10
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 1
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 52,749
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 173
Map 3.29 Seal Beach Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 174
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 47
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 9.4
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.38
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.17
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Safety and Education Programs
The status of Seal Beach’s bicycle safety and education programs is unknown.
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
The City of Seal Beach does not currently have an adopted Bicycle Transportation Plan.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 175
Bikeways
Seal Beach Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
San Gabriel River Path Seal Beach Coastline Pacific Coast Hwy. Class I 0.80
San Gabriel River Path College Park Dr. North City Limit Class I 0.73
Beverly Manor-SR22 Path San Gabriel River Path Foxburg Rd. Class I 0.48
Seal Beach Blvd. Ocean Ave. Pacific Coast Hwy Class I 0.22
Marina Dr. Western City Limit 7th St. Class II 0.53
Electric Ave. Marina Dr. Seal Beach Blvd. Class II 0.68
Seal Beach Blvd Pacific Coast Hwy. St. Cloud Dr. Class II 3.23
Bolsa Ave. Pacific Coast Hwy. Seal Beach Blvd. Class II 0.58
Westminster Blvd. Western City Limit Eastern City Limit Class II 0.83
Beverly Manor Dr. Foxburg Rd. Seal Beach Blvd. Class II 0.68
Lampson Ave. Basswood St. Eastern City Limit Class II 1.35
Edinger Ave. Sunset Aquatic Park Bolsa Chica St. Class II 1.76
Bolsa Chica St. Edinger Ave. Bolsa Ave. Class II 1.00
Pacific Coast Hwy. Western City Limit Seal Beach Blvd Class III 1.00
Westminster Blvd. Seal Beach Blvd. Easter City Limit Class III 1.98
* Information not provided.
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Westminster Ave. Seal Beach Blvd. City Limit Class II 1.98
Seal Beach Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Path 1 LA County Limit Orange County Limit Class I 1.04
Seal Beach Blvd. Bradbury Rd. Lampson Ave. Class I 0.66
1st St. Marina Dr. Ocean Ave. Class II 0.17
Lampson Ave. Seal Beach Blvd. Basswood St. Class II 0.64
Pacific Coast Hwy. City Limit Seal Beach Blvd. Class II 1.00
Sunset Wy. E Park Circle Dr. Huntington Beach
City Limit Class II 0.10
TOTAL 3.62 miles
Seal Beach Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 1.70 $1,500,000 $2,550,000
Class II 3.89 $280,000 $1,089,200
Total $3,639,200
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 176
3.30.Stanton
The City of Stanton is located in northwestern Orange County. Stanton is 3.1 square miles and
residents enjoy a small town community feeling. The City's motto - Community Pride and Forward
Vision identifies Stanton as a place where innovation and pride in the community are an important
aspect of life in Stanton. Community excitement comes from revitalization of commercial and
residential areas, and the attraction of major new developments created through an active
redevelopment program. Stanton residents enjoy major retail opportunities, active civic volunteers
and business-friendly City organizations. Residents benefit from a wide variety of programs provided
by the City which include great parks, a family resource center, annual holiday events and programs
which support taking pride in ownership.
Population
39,276
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 598
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 2.7%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,196
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 817
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 3,151
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 76
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 674
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,349
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 985
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 4,529
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 1,200,242
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 7
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 24
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 2
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 127,667
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 177
Map 3.30 Stanton Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 178
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 84
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 16.8
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.44
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.36
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
The city ordinance for new development requires that bicycle parking and locker facilities be
provided for employees or tenants who commute to the site by bicycle as part of the Transportation
Demand Management Facility Standards. At least five bicycle parking locations are required for every
one hundred employees, or fraction thereof, and a minimum of two shower facilities is required, one
each for men and women.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Safety and Education Programs
Active Yes
# Of Years Conducted 1
# Of Times a Year Conducted 1
Administered by Police Department
Location Community Services Center
Program, Curriculum, and Activities Bicycle rodeo
Other Bicycle Safety Support Programs Free bicycle helmets
Total # of Children Reached Approximately 200 per year
Age of Children Reached
Other Program Notes Not a regular program
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 179
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Bicycle facilities are addressed in Stanton’s General Plan.
Bikeways
Stanton Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Knott Ave Cerritos Ave Jonathon Ave Class II *
Western Ave. Seaboard Cir. Cerritos Ave. Class II *
Chapman Ave. UPRR Santa Rosalia Class II *
Lampson Ave. Beach Blvd. Monroe Ave. Class II *
* Information not provided by City.
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Magnolia Ave. Anaheim City Limit UP RR Class I 0.62
Katella Ave. Cypress City Limit Magnolia St. Class II 1.94
Stanton Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
OCTA RR Anaheim City Limit Dale St. Class I 1.31
UP RR / Chapman Av UP RR Chapman Ave. Class I 0.92
Cerritos Ave. Knott Ave. Anaheim City Limit Class II 2.08
Dale Ave. Lola Ave. Katella Ave. Class II 0.91
Knott Ave. Anaheim City Limit Garden Grove City Limit Class II 0.80
Lampson Ave. UP RR San Marcos Dr. Class II 0.49
Magnolia Ave. Cerritos Ave. Syracuse Ave. Class II 0.42
Orangewood Ave. Western Ave. Jane Wy. Class II 0.74
Dale Ave. Chapman Ave. Garden Grove City Limit Class III 0.06
TOTAL 7.73 miles
Stanton Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 2.85 $1,500,000 $4,275,000
Class II 7.38 $280,000 $2,066,400
Class III 0.06 $21,000 $1,260
Total $6,342,660
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 180
3.31.Tustin
Tustin is primarily an urban area. Historic old buildings, some dating back to the 1880s, are
maintained in "Old Town" on Main Street and El Camino Real. The downtown area of the City is
well established, but the eastern Tustin Ranch area has been developed primarily over the past
decade. Tustin Marketplace in Tustin Ranch is a major regional shopping and entertainment
destination in the County.
The former Tustin Marine Corps Air Station was closed in 1999. In 2003, the City adopted the
Specific Plan establishing the zoning designation, development standards, and entitlement framework
for future development of the facility, now named Tustin Legacy. The site is currently being
developed and will ultimately include 4,600 homes, over 10 million square feet of non-residential
space including major office, retail, entertainment, business park, educational, and support facilities.
Over 275 acres are dedicated to park land and recreational open space and will feature a two-mile
linear park with walking spaces, playgrounds, natural areas, and sports facilities.
Population
74,218
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 667
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.4%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,335
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 884
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 3,077
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 285
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 952
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,904
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 1,390
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 6,393
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 1,694,273
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 10
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 34
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 2
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 180,216
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 181
Map 3.31 Tustin Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 182
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 103
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 20.6
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.30
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 0.91
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index less than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is lower than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Metrolink/Rideshare/Bus Tustin Metrolink Station
2975 Edinger Ave
Parking: rack (11
bicycles) lockers (20
bicycles). Bicycle racks
on trains and buses
Safety and Education Programs
Active Yes
# Of Years Conducted 25
# Of Times a Year Conducted 1
Administered by Police Department
Location Schools
Program, Curriculum, and Activities Presentation/assembly at schools, bicycle safety
coloring book
Other Bicycle Safety Support Programs Bicycle registration and bicycle helmet
replacements
Total # of Children Reached Approximately 1,750 per year
Age of Children Reached 4th grade classes in all schools
Other Program Notes The Police Department also funds adult crossing
guards at a cost of over $400,000 per year
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 183
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Tustin has a Master Bikeway Plan as part of the Circulation Element of its General Plan.
Bikeways
Tustin Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileag
Barranca Pkwy.1 Tustin Ranch Rd. Jamboree Rd. Class I 0.49
Como Channel Bikeway Peters Canyon Channel Harvard Ave. Class I 0.22
El Camino Real Tustin Ranch Rd. Myford Ave. Class I 0.32
Irvine Blvd.2 Browning Ave. East of Ranchwood Rd. Class I 0.13
Myford Rd. El Camino Real Bryan Ave. Class I 0.15
Newport Ave. El Camino Real Irvine Blvd. Class I 0.90
Orange County Regional
Trail
Jamboree Rd. (s/o Champion
Way)
Peters Canyon Regional Park Class I 1.93
Park Ave. Tustin Ranch Rd. Warner Ave. Class I 0.63
Armstrong Ave. Valencia Ave. Warner Ave. Class II 0.58
Barranca Pkwy.3 Red Hill Ave. Jamboree Rd. Class II 0.75
Browning Ave. Bryan Ave. Red Mill Cir. Class II 0.07
Browning Ave.2 Red Mill Cir. Irvine Blvd. Class II 0.43
Bryan Ave. Red Hill Ave. Jamboree Rd. Class II 1.50
Del Amo Ave. Newport Ave. Edinger Ave. Class II 0.27
Edinger Ave. Newport Ave. Harvard Ave. Class II 2.50
Harvard Ave.3 OCTA/SCRRA Railway North of Columbus Grove Dr. Class II 0.76
Irvine Blvd. East of Ranchwood Rd. Jamboree Rd. Class II 0.77
Jamboree Rd. El Camino Real Northern City Limit Class II 4.13
Kensington Park Dr. Valencia Ave. Edinger Ave. Class II 0.28
Moffett Ave. Peters Canyon Channel Harvard Ave. Class II 0.27
Newport Ave. Irvine Blvd. Wass Street Class II 0.22
Newport Ave. Valencia Ave. Edinger Ave. Class II 0.45
Newport Ave.2 Wass Street South of La Colina Drive Class II 0.34
Parkcenter Ln. Bryan Ave. Tustin Ranch Rd. Class II 0.31
Patriot Way Pioneer Rd. Jamboree Rd. Class II 0.15
Pioneer Rd. Pioneer Way Jamboree Rd. Class II 1.55
Pioneer Way Tustin Ranch Rd. Pioneer Rd. Class II 0.13
Portola Pkwy. Tustin Ranch Rd. Jamboree Rd. Class II 0.29
Red Hill Ave. Nisson Rd. El Camino Real Class II 0.14
Red Hill Ave.4 Parkway Loop Edinger Ave. Class II 0.15
Robinson Dr. Irvine Blvd. Jamboree Rd. Class II 0.56
Tustin Ranch Rd. Walnut Ave. Jamboree Rd. Class II 3.36
Tustin Ranch Rd. Barranca Pkwy. Warner Ave. Class II 0.71
Valencia Ave. Red Hill Ave. Kensington Park Dr. Class II 0.88
Walnut Ave. Browning Ave. Myford Ave. Class II 0.95
Warner Ave. Tustin Ranch Rd. Park Ave. Class II 0.11
TOTAL 27.38
1 Northside of Barranca Pkwy.
2 Shared Jurisdiction - City of Tustin & County of Orange
3 Shared Jurisdiction - City of Tustin & City of Irvine
4 Eastside of Red Hill Ave only
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 184
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Red Hill Ave.2 Barranca Pkwy. Warner Ave. Class II 0.51
Red Hill Ave. Warner Ave. Parkway Loop Class II 0.78
Red Hill Ave.4 Edinger Ave. Nisson Rd. Class II 1.00
Red Hill Ave. El Camino Real First St. Class II 0.57
Red Hill Ave.4 First St. Melvin Way Class II 0.78
Red Hill Ave.1,4 Melvin Way North of Irvine Blvd. Class II 0.18
Tustin Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
South Loop Rd.4 Armstrong Ave. Tustin Ranch Rd. Class I 0.48
Armstrong Ave. Warner Ave. Barranca Pkwy. Class II 0.53
17th St. Prospect Ave. N. Prospect Ave. Class II 0.11
Prospect Ave. 17th St. North of Arbolada Way Class II 0.11
Prospect Ave.1 North of Arbolada Way Sherbrook Dr. Class II 0.40
Prospect Ave. Sherbrook Dr. First St. Class II 0.45
First St. Prospect Ave. Red Hill Ave. Class II 0.95
Barranca Pkwy.3 Red Hill Ave. Tustin Ranch Rd. Class I 0.75
Valencia Ave. Newport Ave. Red Hill Ave. Class II 0.33
Newport Ave.4 Edinger Ave. El Camino Real Class II 1.09
Walnut Ave.4 Red Hill Ave. Browning Ave. Class II 0.50
Tustin Ranch Rd. Warner Ave. Walnut Ave. Class II 1.41
Heritage Way Tustin Ranch Rd. Bryan Ave. Class II 0.67
Parkcenter Ln. El Camino Real Bryan Ave. Class II 0.38
Warner Ave. Red Hill Ave. Armstrong Ave. Class II 0.35
Warner Ave.4 Armstrong Ave. Tustin Ranch Rd. Class II 0.55
East Connector4 North Loop Rd. Edinger Ave. Class II 0.27
Moffett Ave.4 North Loop Rd. Peters Canyon Channel Class II 0.37
North Loop Rd.4 Tustin Ranch Rd. Warner Ave. Class II 0.89
Valencia Ave. Kensington Park Dr. Tustin Ranch Rd. Class II 0.16
Orange County Regional
Trail OCTA/SCRRA Railway Warner Ave. Class I 1.02
TOTAL 1177
1 Shared Jurisdiction - City of Tustin & County of Orange
2 Shared Jurisdiction - City of Tustin & City of Santa Ana
3 North side of Barranca Pkwy. only
4 Potential Route
Tustin Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 2.25 $1,500,000 $3,735,200
Class II 13.34 $280,000 $3,735,200
Total $7,470,400
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 185
3.32. Villa Park
The City of Villa Park is in the center of Orange County. It has an area of 2.1 square miles,
approximately 1,900 homes, and is almost 99% built out. With the exception of one shopping center,
the City is zoned for single-family residences, most of which are on half-acre lots. The shopping
center includes a grocery store, banks, a pharmacy with a postal substation, a variety of specialty
shops and offices, the City Hall and community room, and a branch of the Orange County Public
Library.
Population
6,500
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 53
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.3%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 106
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 68
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 217
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 21
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 74
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 148
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 108
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 497
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 131,716
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 1
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 3
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 0
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 14,010
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 186
Map 3.32 Villa Park Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 187
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 8
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 1.6
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.26
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 0.81
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index less than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is lower than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Safety and Education Programs
Active Yes
# Of Years Conducted
# Of Times a Year Conducted
Administered by Orange County Sheriff’s Department
Location Villa Park Elementary School
Program, Curriculum, and Activities Bicycle Rodeo
Other Bicycle Safety Support Programs
Total # of Children Reached
Age of Children Reached
Other Program Notes Not a regular program
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
The City does have a Bikeway Master Plan which is currently being updated within the City's
comprehensive General Plan Update.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 188
Bikeways
Villa Park Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Villa Park Rd. * * Class II *
Taft Ave. * * Class II *
Lemon St. * * Class II *
*Information not provided.
Villa Park Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Arden Villa Dr. Orange City Limit Santiago Blvd. Class I 0.30
Santiago Creek Path
Segment 1 City Limit (N Villa Park Rd.) City Limit Class I 0.26
Santiago Creek Path City Limit City Limit Class I 0.07
Katella Ave. Orange City Limit Wanda Rd. Class II 0.00
Meats Ave. Stone Pine Rd. Santiago Blvd. Class II 0.34
Taft Ave. Sycamore St. Cannon St. Class II 0.31
TOTAL 1.28miles
Villa Park Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 0.63 $1,500,000 $945,000
Class II 0.65 $280,000 $182,000
Total $1,127,000
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 189
3.33.Westminster
The early years of 2000 found continued growth and improvement in Westminster. Design and
completion of two 8 million gallon state of the art water tanks at Hoover and Hazard Avenues
assures an adequate water supply. In the Civic Center area, Sid Goldstein Memorial Park was
dedicated. An important part of the park is the Vietnam War Memorial which is a tribute to all who
served in that arena.
Population
89,520
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 925
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.7%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,850
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 1,239
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 4,481
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 243
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 1,168
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 2,337
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 1,706
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 7,848
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 2,079,591
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 12
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 42
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 3
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 221,202
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 190
Map 3.33 Westminster Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 191
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 240
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 48
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.53
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 1.65
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
Information on existing and proposed end-of-trip facilities is not available.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Rideshare United Methodist Church
8152 McFadden
Safety and Education Programs
The City of Westminster does not have a bicycle safety and education program.
Expenditures
Facility Improvement From To Cost
Hoover Path Implemented $5,000-
$10,000
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Westminster only has a map of existing bikeways.
Bikeways
Westminster Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Rancho Rd. Bolsa Chica St. Westminster Ave. Class I *
Hoover Ave. Wyoming St. Bolsa Ave. Class I *
Edwards St. Homer St. Bolsa Ave. Class II *
Hoover Ave. Garden Grove Blvd. Wyoming St. Class II *
Bushard St. Westminster Ave. Edinger Ave. Class II *
McFadden Ave. Goldenwest St. Vermont St. Class II *
McFadden Ave. Dalewood St. Ward St. Class II *
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 192
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Eddinger Ave. Newland St. Bushard St. Class II *
* Information not provided.
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Bolsa Chica Rd. / Valley View
St.
Garden Grove City
Limit Westminster Ave. Class II 1.09
Mc Fadden Ave. Van Buren St. Dalewood Ln. Class II 1.83
Westminster Ave. Seal Beach City Limit Atlantis Wy. Class II 4.59
Westminster Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Hoover St. Garden Grove Blvd. Wyoming St. Class I 0.88
Magnolia St. San Diego Frwy. Huntington Beach City Limit Class I 0.04
UP RR Garden Grove City Limit Garden Grove Blvd. Class I 0.00
Bolsa Chica Rd. Rancho Rd. Huntington Beach City Limit Class II 0.01
Edinger Ave. City Limit Huntington Newland St. Class II 0.00
Edwards St. Garden Grove Blvd. Homer St. Class II 1.24
Hazar Ave. Goldenwest St. Garden Grove City Limit Class II 2.62
Heil Ave. Galaxy Dr. Magnolia St. Class II 0.37
Newland St. Westminster Blvd. Hazard Ave. Class II 1.85
Path 1 Bolsa Ave. Huntington Beach City Limit Class II 0.50
Path 2 Venus Dr. Galaxy Dr. Class II 0.01
Springdale St. Garden Grove City Limit Garden Grove Blvd. Class II 0.01
Trask Ave. Edward St. Wilson St. Class II 1.85
Ward St. Halifax Ave. Torrington Cir. Class II 0.01
Western Ave. Garden Grove City Limit Garden Grove Blvd. Class II 0.004
Bushard St. Garden Grove City Limit Jennrich Ave. Class III 0.03
Ward St. Bolsa Ave. Halifax Ave. Class III 0.10
Ward St. Torrington Cir. Garden Grove City Limit Class III 0.04
TOTAL 9.52 miles
Westminster Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 0.92 $1,500,000 $1,380,000
Class II 15.98 $280,000 $4,475,520
Class III 0.17 $21,000 $3,570
Total $5,859,090
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 193
3.34.Yorba Linda
The City of Yorba Linda has many newer neighborhoods and streets, especially in the eastern portion
of the City. The downtown area is older and includes the Richard Nixon Presidential Library on
Yorba Linda Boulevard. Some of the major arterial streets include Imperial Highway, Yorba Linda
Boulevard, Esperanza Road, and Lakeview Avenue.
Population
58,918
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
Estimated Bicycle Commuters Number
Estimated Total Number of Bicycle
Commuters and Utilitarian Riders 490
Estimated Adjusted Mode Share 1.2%
Estimated Current Bicycle Trips
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 979
Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 622
Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 1,860
Future Potential Bicycle Commuters
Future number of new bicycle commuters 245
Total Future Daily Bicycle Commuters 735
Future Total Daily Bicycle Trips 1,470
Future Reduced Vehicle Trips per Weekday 1,073
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Weekday 4,936
Future Reduced Vehicle Miles per Year 1,308,084
Future Air Quality Benefits
Reduced HC (metric tons/year) 8
Reduced CO (metric tons/year) 26
Reduced NOX (metric tons/year) 2
Reduced CO2 (metric tons/year) 139,138
Emissions rates from EPA report 420-F-00-013 "Emission Facts: Average Annual Emissions and
Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." 2000.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 194
Map 3.34 Yorba Linda Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 195
Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 52
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 10.4
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.16
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 0.49
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index greater than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is higher than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
The Bikeway Trails Component identifies provision of comprehensive bicycle parking at destinations
and inter-modal locations as a key security recommendation.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses City-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Safety and Education Programs
The City of Yorba Linda does not have bicycle safety and education programs.
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
Bicycle Transportation Plan
Yorba Linda has a Riding, Hiking, and Bikeway Trails component that is part of its General Plan.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 196
Bikeways
Yorba Linda Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Bastanchury-Kellog Path Section 1 Bastanchury Rd Imperial Hwy Class I *
Bastanchury-Kellog Path Section 2 Valley View Ave East of Casa Loma Ave. Class I *
Bastanchury-Kellog Path Section 3 Imperial Hwy Eureka Ave Class I *
Bastanchury-Kellog Path Section 4 Eureka Ave Yorba Linda Blvd Class I *
Bastanchury-Kellog Path Section 5 Yorba Linda Blvd Lakeview Ave Class I *
Bastanchury-Kellog Path Section 6 Lakeview Ave Kellog Dr Class I *
Arroyo Cajon-Glenknoll Path Arroyo Cajon Dr Glenknoll Elementary Class I *
Kingsbriar Park-Imperial Hwy Path Kingsbriar Park Arroyo Cajon-Glenknoll Class I *
Fairmount Blvd-OC Bicycle Path Esperanza Rd OC Bicycle Path Class I *
Prado-Yorba Linda Blvd Path Paseo Del Prado Yorba Linda Blvd Class I *
Montana-Village Center Path Vista Montana Village Center Dr Class I *
Kingsbriar Path Fairmount Blvd Yorba Linda Blvd Class I *
Village Center-San Antonio Path Village Center Dr San Antonio Rd Class I *
Fairmount Blvd Yorba Linda Blvd Esperanza Dr Class *
Yorba Linda Blvd Fairmount Blvd Esperanza Dr Class *
Esperanza Dr Fairmount Blvd Yorba Linda Blvd Class *
* Mileage unknown
Regional Priority Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Bastanchury Rd. Placentia City Limit Village Center Dr. Class II 4.02
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 197
Yorba Linda Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Fairmont Blvd. / Fairmont Blvd. Brookmont Dr. Class I 0.66
PATH 1 ( Esperanza Rd.
to La Palma Ave.
connector)
Esperanza Rd. La Palma Ave. Class I 0.07
PATH 2 Still Pond Wy. City Limit Class I 0.82
PATH 3 City Limit N Fairmont Blvd. Class I 0.17
Avenida Rio Del Oro Bastanchury Rd. Yorba Linda Blvd. Class I 0.58
Buena Vista Ave. Jefferson St. Van Buren St. Class II 0.33
Gypsum Canyon Rd. 91 Ramp Anaheim City Limit Class II 0.09
Hidden Hills Rd. Star Light Dr. Path 1 Class II 0.52
Kellogg Dr. City Limit Imperial Hwy. Class II 0.72
La Palma Ave. Anaheim City Limit Camino De Bryant Class II 2.61
Lakeview Ave. Valley View Ave. Anaheim City Limit Class II 3.43
Paseo de las Palomas Yorba Linda Blvd. Fairmont Blvd Class II 1.44
Rose Dr. N Placentia City Limit S Placentia City Limit Class II 1.04
Village Center Dr. Fairmont Blvd. Fairmont Blvd Class II 2.62
Yorba Linda Blvd. Placentia City Limit Jefferson St Class II 0.21
Yorba Ranch Rd. Yorba Linda Blvd. Esperanza Rd Class II 1.19
Casa Loma Ave. Bastanchury Rd. S Imperial Hwy Class III 0.27
Fairmont Blvd. / San
Antonio Rd. Trentino Ln. Yorba Linda Blvd Class III 3.16
Jefferson St. Placentia City Limit Buena Vista Ave Class III 0.39
Via Lomas De Yorba La Palma Ave. La Palma Ave Class III 1.75
Mariposa Ave. E Richfield Dr. Candlelight Ln Class III 0.45
Mountain View Ave. W Kellogg Dr. City Limit Class III 0.01
Paseo Del Prado N Calle Bella Esperanza Rd. Class III 0.09
Sunmist Dr. Mountain View Ave. Arroyo Cajon Dr. Class III 0.55
Paseo de Toronto Avenida Del Tren Camino De Bryant Class III 0.99
Valley View Cir. N/A N/A Class III 1.41
Valley View / Richfield Valley View Cir. City Limit placentia S Class III 2.57
TOTAL 28.14 miles
Yorba Linda Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 2.3 $1,500,000 $3,450,000
Class II 18.22 $280,000 $5,101,600
Class III 11.64 $21,000 $244,440
Total $8,796,040
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 198
3.35.Unincorporated County
Population
Not available.
Estimated Number of Bicycle Commuters
In 1988, The County of Orange published results to a survey of bicyclists on the Santa Ana River
Bikeway. The survey indicated that about 500,000 bicyclists and pedestrians annually use the Santa
Ana River Bikeway (a regional, Class I bikeway that traverses central Orange County). Along with
the growing population of Orange County, this number has likely significantly increased. Also, the
number of bicycle commuters has increased in County unincorporated areas, as new communities
such as Las Flores and Ladera Ranch have been developed.
Bicycle Accidents
Parameter Collision Rate
Total # of Bicycle Collisions for 5 Years 104
Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 20.8
Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year1 0.18
Index (relative to statewide average of 0.32 /1000)2 0.54
Notes:
1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
2. The Index is based on a ratio of the local collision rate and the statewide collision rate. An index less than one
(1.0) indicates that the local accident rate is lower than the statewide average.
End-of-Trip Facilities
In its development reviews, the County typically conditions developers to provide bicycling amenities
and end-of-trip facilities, as appropriate. Also, the County’s regional and wilderness parks typically
provide bicycle parking.
Multimodal Facilities
Mode Location Facility Type
OCTA Buses County-wide Bicycle racks on buses
Safety and Education Programs
The County of Orange does not conduct bicycle-related safety and education programs.
Expenditures
Information on past bicycle facility expenditures is not available.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 199
Bikeways
Unincorporated Orange County Existing Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Wintersburg Slater Ave Coastal Bikeway Class I *
Coastal Sunset Beach Seapoint Ave. Class I *
Bolsa Chica Ellis Ave. Coastal Bikeway Class I *
Mile Square Perimeter of Mile Square Regional Park Class I *
Santa Ana Along the entire Orange County Segment of River Class I *
Santiago SR-22 Black Star Canyon Rd. Class I *
Peters Irvine Regional Park Peters Canyon Regional Class I *
San Diego Santa Ana Ave/University Dr. San Diego Creek Class I *
Upper San Diego Creek Bikeway Irvine Avenue Class I *
University Harvard Ave Ridgeline Dr. Class I *
San Joaquin Newport Beach City Limit Laguna Canyon Rd. Class I *
Aliso Creek Moulton Pkwy. Aliso Canyon Wilderness Class I *
Laguna Alicia Parkway South end of Park Class I *
Trabuco Cleveland National Forest Mission Viejo City Limit Class I *
San Juan San Juan Capistrano City Limits Lucas Canyon Rd. Class I *
Quail Hill Jeffrey Sand Canyon Bike bridge over the Sand Canyon Ave. Class I *
PCH Along PCH, through Sunset Beach Community Class II *
Warner Pacific Coast Hwy Brightwater Ave. Class II *
Valencia North of Lambert Road Birch St./Rose Dr. Class II *
Carbon Valencia Ave. Carbon Canyon Regional Class II *
Portola Irvine City Limit Lake Forest City Limit Class II *
North Newport Blvd. Browning Ave. Class II *
Santiago Orange City Limit Live Oak Canyon Rd. Class II *
Live Oak Santiago Canyon Bikeway Trabuco Canyon Rd. Class II *
Oso Pkwy. Mission Viejo City Limit Coto De Caza Dr. Class II *
Antonio Rancho Santa Margarita City Limit Ortega Hwy. Class II *
* Information not provided.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 200
Unincorporated Orange County Proposed Bikeways
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Aliso Woods Canyon Path Laguna Beach City Limit Laguna Niguel City Limit Class I 3.59
Black Star Canyon End of Black Star Canyon
Rd.Silverado Canyon Rd. Class I 3.12
BNSF RR Yorba Linda City Limit Riverside County Limit Class I 0.56
Brea Blvd. and Brea Canyon
Rd.Brea City Limit Los Angeles County Limit Class I 1.52
Eastern Transportation
Corridor Path 2 Santiago Canyon Rd. Peters Canyon Rd. Class I 4.49
Eastern Transportation
Corridor Path 1 Irvine Park Rd. Hwy. 241 Class I 3.27
Esplanade Ave. Fairhaven Ave. Tustin City Limit Class I 1.57
Foothill Corridor Path Ortega Hwy. Nieblas Rd. Class I 5.63
Northwood Ave. Berry St. Path Canyon Country Rd. Class I 1.14
Ortega / La Pata Spur San Juan Capistrano Ortega Ave. Class I 0.85
Path 2 Brea City Limit Brea City Limit Class I 0.23
Portola Pkwy. Hwy 241 Lake Forest city Limit Class I 1.22
San Joaquin Corridor Path Irvine City Limit Laguna Beach City Limit Class I 2.44
San Joaquin Hills Path Irvine City Limit Laguna Beach City Limit Class I 1.20
Santiago Canyon Rd. Orange City Limit Live Oak Canyon Rd. Class I 10.73
Santiago Creek Path
(segments between Orange
and Villa Park)
Orange City Limit Villa Park City Limit Class I 0.93
Silverado Canyon Rd. Santiago Canyon Rd. Black Star Canyon Class I 0.18
Tonner Canyon Rd. Brea Blvd. Los Angeles County Limit Class I 2.58
Tonner Canyon Rd. Spur Tonner Canyon Rd. Brea City Limit Class I 0.92
Trabuco Canyon Rd. Path Rancho Santa Margarita City
Limit Main Divide Rd. Class I 8.91
Trabuco Canyon Rd. Path 2 Mission Viejo City Limit Rancho Santa Margarita City
Limit Class I 4.19
UP RR Brookhurst St. Gilbert St. Class I 0.50
Valencia Ave. Lambert Rd. Brea City Limit Class I 0.24
Windy Ridge Path Orange City Limit East of Windy Ridge Rd. Class I 1.59
Coast Hwy. El Moro Canyon Laguna Beach City Limit Class II 0.74
Crawford Rd. Chapman Ave. Newport Ave. Class II 1.12
Cristianitos Rd. Ortega Hwy. Wilson Camp Rd. Class II 1.13
Edinger Ave. Fountain Valley City Limit Santa Ana City Limit Class II 0.07
Esperanza Rd. Richard Nixon Pkwy. Yorba Linda City Limit Class II 0.52
Fairhaven Ave. Yorba St. Hewes St. Class II 1.25
Fairlynn Blvd. Oakvale Dr. Esperanza Rd. Class II 0.25
Foothill Corridor Road San Clemente City Limit Cristianitos Rd. Class II 0.62
Glassell St. Anaheim City Limit Orange City Limit Class II 0.11
Hewes Segment 1 Bond Ave. El Carmen Ave. Class II 0.13
Hewes Segment 2 Spring St. Pearl Ave. Class II 0.19
Kellogg Dr. Yorba Linda City Limit Shadowhill Dr. Class II 0.35
Avenida La Pata Ortega Hwy. San Celemente City Limit Class II 3.19
Laguna Canyon Path 1 Irvine City Limit Laguna Beach City Limit Class II 1.32
Lambert Rd. Brea City Limit Valencia Ave. Class II 0.44
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 201
Street/Path From To Class Mileage
Live Oak Canyon El Toro Rd. Trabuco Canyon Rd. Class II 3.25
Newport Blvd. Marcy Dr. Orange City Limit Class II 1.55
Oda Nursery Ortega Hwy. Foothill Corridor Path Class II 0.23
Ortega Hwy. San Clemente City Limit Riverside County Limit Class II 14.54
Pacific Coast Hwy. Warner Ave. Huntington Beach City Limit Class II 0.31
Prospect Ave. Fairhaven Ave. El Camino Ln. Class II 0.93
Rancho Santiago Blvd. Avenida Palmar Pearl Ave. Class II 0.25
Red Hill Ave. Melvin Way Irvine Blvd. Class II 0.16
Richard M Nixon Pkwy. Esperanza Rd. Yorba Linda City Limit Class II 0.25
Santa Ana Ave. Mesa Dr. Costa Mesa City Limit Class II 0.39
Soquel Canyon Rd. Segment
1 Brea City Limit Brea City Limit Class II 1.04
Soquel Canyon Rd. Segment
2 Brea City Limit Riverside County Limit Class II 0.98
Spring St. Orange City Limit Earlham St. Class II 0.00
Trabuco Canyon Rd. Live Oak Canyon Rd. Antonio Pkwy. Class II 1.41
Tustin Ave. Santa Ana City Limit Santa Ana City Limit Class II 0.12
University Dr. Santa Ana Ave. Irvine Ave. Class II 0.24
Wilson Camp Rd. San Clemente City Limit Cristianitos Rd. Class II 1.30
Yorba Linda Blvd. Kilt Ave. Placentia City Limit Class II 0.18
Crown Valley Pkwy. Mission Viejo City Limit Antonio Pkwy. Class III 1.49
Dodge Ave. Esplanade Ave. Hewes St. Class III 0.32
La Colina Dr. Newport Ave. Ranchwood Rd. Class III 1.13
Laguna Canyon Path 2 Laguna Canyon Path 1 Laguna Woods City Limit Class III 0.45
Mountain View Ave. Kello Dr. Sunmist Dr. Class III 0.15
Newport Inlet Path Coast Hwy. Newport Beach City Limit Class III 0.78
Santa Clara Ave. Prospect Ave. Esplanade Ave. Class III 0.52
TOTAL 105 miles
Unincorporated Orange County Proposed Bikeway Cost Estimates
Facility Miles Unit Cost (per mile) Total
Class I 61.6 $1,500,000 $92,400,000
Class II 38.56 $280,000 $10,796,800
Class III 4.84 $21,000 $101,640
Total $103,298,440
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 202
Map 3.35 Unincorporated County Land Use
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 203
3.36.Caltrans
Caltrans has completed draft plans for the following state routes: 1, 39, 72, 74, 90, and 142. State
Route (SR) 1, locally known as Pacific Coast Highway, is an official state bicycle route with Class II
and Class III bicycle facilities and is well used* by cyclists for commuter and recreational trips.
State Routes 39, 72, 74, and 142 have no designated bicycle facilities but are sometimes used by
cyclists on weekends. These routes are opportune areas for bicycle facilities because they are located
in close proximity to other bicycle facilities, recreational areas, neighborhoods, and job centers.
State Route 90 has a Class I bike path adjacent to it that exists between Yorba Linda Boulevard and
Orangethorpe Avenue.
Existing bikeways on the state routes are reported in this section as well as in the existing conditions
sections of jurisdictions that contain the state routes.
State Existing Bicycle Routes (Caltrans)
Street From To Class Mileage
SR 90 (adjacent
to)Orangethorpe Ave. Yorba Linda Blvd. Class I 2.31
SR 1 Copper Lantern Blue Lantern Class II 0.90
SR 1 Reef Point Dr. Seward Rd. Class II 0.18
SR 1 Avocado Ave. Dover Dr. Class II 2.02
SR 1 SR-55 Off Ramp 61st St. Class II 1.12
SR 1 Mid-block between Huntington
St. and 1st St. 7th Street Class II 0.50
SR 1 Superior Ave. Orange St. Class II 0.90
SR 1 Anderson St. Seal Beach Blvd. Class II 1.63
SR 1 Main St. LA/OC boundary Class II 0.53
SR 1 Nordina St. Beach Blvd. Class III 2.19
SR 1 Orange St. Newland St. Class III 2.00
TOTAL 14.28
Miles
* Mileage not provided by Caltrans
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 204
Appendices
A-1 Surveys
A-2 Survey Results
A-3 User Estimation Method
A-4 Orange County Existing & Proposed Bikeways
A-5 Destination Demand Maps
A-6 Caltrans Deputy Directive 64
A-7 USDOT: Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel
A-8: OCTA Congestion Management Program
A-9: Local Fair Share Program for Street Maintenance and Improvements
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 205
A-1: Survey
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 206
Orange County Transportation Authority
Bicycle Survey
1. Why do you bike? (check all that apply)
ɷ For exercise/ health reasons
ɷ For pleasure
ɷ For shopping/errands
ɷ To get to work
ɷ To get to school
ɷ To get to transit
ɷ I don’t bike
ɷ Other please specify) ______________________________________
2. How many days per week do you ride?
ɷ 0 ɷ 1 ɷ 2 ɷ 3 ɷ 4 ɷ 5 ɷ 6 ɷ 7
3. What is your zip code? ___________________
4. What is the average distance of your rides (one-way)?
ɷ Under 2 miles
ɷ 3-5 miles
ɷ 6-10 miles
ɷ 11-24 miles
ɷ 25 miles and above
5. Where are your favorite places or routes to bike? Please be specific.
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
6. What prevents you from biking more often? (Check all that apply)
ɷ Destinations are too far away
ɷ Too many cars / cars drive too fast
ɷ Drivers don’t share the road
ɷ I travel with small children
ɷ No bike paths, lanes or bike routes
ɷ I have to carry things
ɷ Not enough time
ɷ Insufficient lighting
ɷ Bikeways/roads in poor condition
ɷ Weather
ɷ Other (please specify)
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
* Please mail surveys to
453 S Spring St, Suite 804
Los Angeles CA 9003
Contact Jennifer Allen or Greg Nord at:
jenniferallen@altaplanning.com
gnord@octa.net
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 207
7. Where are the most difficult places for you to bike and why? Where would
you ride if you could and what prevents you from riding there?
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
8. Please rank your preference for bicycle facilities, on a scale of 1 to 4 (1 being
most preferred and 4 being least preferred)
1 Most
preferred
2 3 4 Least
Preferred
Off-street paved bike paths ƑƑƑƑ
On-street bike lanes ƑƑƑƑ
Bike routes ƑƑƑƑ
Unpaved trails or dirt paths ƑƑƑƑ
9. Would the following improvements influence you to bike more often? (Please rate each
improvement by likelihood of influencing you to bike more often)
Very
Likel
y
Likely Somewhat
Likely
Not
Very
Likely
Unlike
ly
No Not Sure
More Bike Lanes (Separate Lanes
for bikes) on Major Streets ɷɷɷɷɷɷɷ
More Bike Routes ɷɷɷɷɷɷɷ
More Paved (off-street) Bike
Paths ɷɷɷɷɷɷɷ
Increased Maintenance
(sweeping/repairs to bike lanes,
routes, paths, and landscape
trimming, etc.)
ɷɷɷɷɷɷɷ
Widen Outside/Curb Lanes on
Major Streets (easier to share lanes
with cars)
ɷɷɷɷɷɷɷ
More On-Road Bike Signage ɷɷɷɷɷɷɷ
More Bicycle Parking ɷɷɷɷɷɷɷ
Education or Promotional
Programs for Drivers ɷɷɷɷɷɷɷ
Education or Promotional
Programs for Cyclists ɷɷɷɷɷɷɷ
Other (please specify)
___________________________________________________________________
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 208
A-2: Survey Results
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 209
Table A-1: Survey Question 1
Why do you bike? (check all that apply)
Answer Options Response Percent Response Count
For exercise/ health reasons 92% 1007
For pleasure 84% 918
For shopping/errands 38% 421
To get to work 54% 587
To get to school 11% 115
To get to transit 15% 165
I don’t bike 1% 9
Other (please specify) 6% 66
answered question 1094
skipped question 3
Table A-2: Survey Question 2
How many days per week do you ride?
Answer Options Response Percent Response Count
0 days per week 1%14
1 day per week 8%88
2 days per week 14%153
3 days per week 24%261
4 days per week 20%214
5 days per week 18%196
6 days per week 7%74
7 days per week 8%88
answered question 1088
skipped question 9
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 210
Table A-3: Survey Question 4
What is the average distance of your rides? (one-way)
Answer Options Response Percent Response Count
Under 2 miles 6% 67
3-5 miles 15% 165
6-10 miles 27% 294
11-24 miles 34% 366
25 miles and above 18% 195
answered question 1087
skipped question 10
Table A-4: Survey Question 6
What prevents you from biking more often? (check all that apply)
Answer Options Response Percent Response
Count
Destinations are too far away 20% 216
Too many cars / cars drive too fast 53% 577
Drivers don’t share the road 53% 571
I travel with small children 5% 58
No bike paths, lanes or bike routes 58% 623
I have to carry things 16% 170
Not enough time 26% 283
Insufficient lighting 11% 115
Bikeways/roads in poor condition 30% 320
Weather 10% 109
Other (please specify) 20% 221
answered question 1081
skipped question 16
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 211
Table A-5: Survey Question 8
Please rank your preference for bicycle facilities, on a scale of 1 to 4 (1 being most preferred and 4
being least preferred)
Answer Options
1 Most
Preferred 2 3
4 Least
Preferred
Response
Count
Off-street paved bike
paths 69%20%8%3%1077
On-street bike lanes 32%41%16%10%1074
Bike routes 20%27%33%20%1066
Unpaved trails or dirt
paths 21%19%17%43%1058
answered question 1084
skipped question 13
21
2
O
C
T
A
C
o
mm
u
t
e
r
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
P
l
a
n
Ta
b
l
e
A
-
6
:
S
u
r
v
e
y
Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
9
Wo
u
l
d
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
i
n
f
l
u
e
n
c
e
y
o
u
to
b
i
k
e
m
o
r
e
o
f
t
e
n
?
(
P
l
e
a
s
e
r
a
t
e
e
a
c
h
i
m
p
r
ov
e
m
e
n
t
b
y
l
i
k
e
l
i
h
o
o
d
o
f
i
n
f
l
u
e
n
c
i
n
g
y
ou
t
o
b
i
k
e
m
o
r
e
of
t
e
n
)
An
s
w
e
r
O
p
t
i
o
n
s
Ve
r
y
L
i
k
e
l
y
Li
k
e
l
y
So
m
e
w
h
a
t
Li
k
e
l
y
No
t
V
e
r
y
Li
k
e
l
y
Un
l
i
k
e
l
y
No
No
t
S
u
r
e
Re
s
p
o
n
s
e
Co
u
n
t
Mo
r
e
B
i
k
e
L
a
n
e
s
(
S
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
L
a
n
e
s
f
o
r
bi
k
e
s
)
o
n
M
a
j
o
r
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
67
%
19
%
8%
3%
1%
2%
0%
10
7
1
Mo
r
e
B
i
k
e
R
o
u
t
e
s
46
%
22
%
18
%
8%
3%
3%
1%
10
5
8
Mo
r
e
P
a
v
e
d
(
o
f
f
-
s
t
r
e
e
t
)
B
i
k
e
P
a
t
h
s
70
%
13
%
10
%
3%
2%
1%
0%
10
6
2
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
(s
w
e
e
p
i
n
g
/
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
t
o
b
i
k
e
l
a
n
e
s
,
ro
u
t
e
s
,
p
a
t
h
s
,
a
n
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
t
r
i
m
m
i
n
g
,
et
c
.
)
41
%
25
%
22
%
8%
2%
2%
1%
10
5
5
Wi
d
e
n
O
u
t
s
i
d
e
/
C
u
r
b
L
a
n
e
s
o
n
M
a
j
o
r
St
r
e
e
t
s
(
e
a
s
i
e
r
t
o
s
h
a
r
e
l
a
n
e
s
w
i
t
h
ca
r
s
)
51
%
25
%
16
%
4%
2%
2%
0%
10
5
6
Mo
r
e
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
B
i
k
e
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
29
%
18
%
23
%
17
%
8%
4%
1%
10
4
0
Mo
r
e
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
28
%
17
%
22
%
17
%
9%
6%
2%
10
2
3
Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
P
r
o
m
o
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
f
o
r
Dr
i
v
e
r
s
36
%
18
%
18
%
13
%
8%
5%
2%
10
4
4
Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
P
r
o
m
o
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
f
o
r
Cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
27
%
19
%
19
%
18
%
10
%
6%
2%
10
3
5
Ot
h
e
r
(
p
l
e
a
s
e
s
p
e
c
i
f
y
)
19
1
an
s
w
e
r
e
d
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
10
8
0
sk
i
p
p
e
d
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
17
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 213
A-3: User Estimation Method
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 214
This section explains the method for estimating the current and potential number of bicycle
commuters in Orange County municipalities. Census data, in combination with national commuting
statistics from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) and EPA estimates of standard
emissions rates for cars, give a rough projection of future bicycle ridership within Orange County,
along with trip reduction and air quality benefits.
Calculations for each city in Orange County are included in this Plan to meet Caltrans Bicycle
Transportation Account requirements (a) to provide “the estimated number of existing bicycle
commuters in the Plan area and the estimated increase in the number of bicycle commuters resulting
from implementation of the Plan.”
According to the National Household Travel Survey (NHTS), the average work commute time has
remained close to 20 minutes since 1983. In 2001, averaging all modes, the commute time was 23
minutes. Assuming an average speed of 10 miles per hour, a cyclist traveling for 23 minutes covers
approximately four miles, which would be equivalent to a 9-minute motor vehicle trip (traveling at
about 30 mph).
Using this data as a baseline allows assumptions to be made about prospective and current bicycle
ridership in Orange County. Estimates are provided in each municipality’s respective section in
chapter 3 of this document.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 215
A-4: Orange County Existing & Proposed Bikeway Maps d Pr
The proposed bikeways map reflects current, locally-adopted plans and programs and does not
consider concurrent and future planning efforts. The City of Fullerton is currently in the process of
updating General Plans and other policy programs that will influence future amendments in this
Section.
An
a
h
e
i
m
Am
t
r
a
k
/
Am
t
r
a
k
/
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Sa
n
t
a
A
Sa
n
t
a
A
n
a
Tr
a
n
s
i
s
t
T
e
r
Tr
a
n
s
i
s
t
T
e
r
m
i
n
a
l
Or
a
Or
a
n
g
e
Me
t
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Go
l
d
e
n
w
e
s
t
Go
l
d
e
n
w
e
s
t
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
Se
a
l
B
e
a
c
h
Se
a
l
B
e
a
c
h
Na
t
i
o
n
a
l
W
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
R
e
f
u
g
e
Na
t
i
o
n
a
l
W
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
R
e
f
u
g
e
We
s
t
m
i
n
s
t
e
r
We
s
t
m
i
n
s
t
e
r
Ma
l
l
Ma
l
l
Be
l
l
a
T
e
r
r
a
Be
l
l
a
T
e
r
r
a
Ha
r
r
i
e
t
t
M
.
W
i
e
d
e
r
Ha
r
r
i
e
t
t
M
.
W
i
e
d
e
r
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
P
a
r
k
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
P
a
r
k
Mi
l
e
S
q
u
a
r
e
Mi
l
e
S
q
u
a
r
e
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Co
a
s
t
l
i
n
e
Co
a
s
t
l
i
n
e
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Ce
n
t
e
n
i
a
l
Ce
n
t
e
n
i
a
l
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Bo
l
s
a
C
h
i
c
a
Bo
l
s
a
C
h
i
c
a
Ec
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Ec
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Go
l
d
e
n
W
e
s
t
Go
l
d
e
n
W
e
s
t
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Se
a
l
Se
a
l
Beach
Pi
e
r
Pi
e
r
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
Be
a
c
h
P
i
e
r
Be
a
c
h
P
i
e
r
Up
p
e
r
N
e
w
p
o
r
t
B
a
y
Up
p
e
r
N
e
w
p
o
r
t
B
a
y
Ec
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Ec
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Fa
i
r
v
i
e
w
P
a
r
k
Fa
i
r
v
i
e
w
P
a
r
k
Ta
l
b
e
r
t
Ta
l
b
e
r
t
Na
t
u
r
e
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Na
t
u
r
e
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Ta
l
b
e
r
t
Ta
l
b
e
r
t
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Ar
m
e
d
F
o
r
c
e
s
Ar
m
e
d
F
o
r
c
e
s
Re
s
e
r
v
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
Re
s
e
r
v
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
Los
Lo
s
Al
a
m
i
t
o
s
Al
a
m
i
t
o
s
Ra
c
e
Ra
c
e
Tr
a
c
k
Tr
a
c
k
Ho
n
d
a
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
We
s
t
w
o
o
d
We
s
t
w
o
o
d
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Co
l
l
e
g
e
So
u
t
h
So
u
t
h
Coast
College
An
g
e
l
An
g
e
l
St
a
d
i
u
m
St
a
d
i
u
m
Di
s
n
e
y
l
a
n
d
Anaheim
Co
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
Co
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
Cr
y
s
t
a
l
Cr
y
s
t
a
l
Ca
t
h
e
d
r
a
l
Ca
t
h
e
d
r
a
l
Th
e
B
l
o
c
k
Th
e
B
l
o
c
k
At
O
r
a
n
g
e
At
O
r
a
n
g
e
Argosy
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Ma
i
n
p
l
a
c
e
Ma
i
n
p
l
a
c
e
Br
i
s
t
o
l
Br
i
s
t
o
l
Ma
r
k
e
t
p
l
a
c
e
Ma
r
k
e
t
p
l
a
c
e
Sa
n
t
a
A
n
a
Sa
n
t
a
A
n
a
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Bowers
Mu
s
e
u
m
Mu
s
e
u
m
Sa
n
t
a
A
n
a
Sa
n
t
a
A
n
a
Ci
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
Ci
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
So
u
t
h
So
u
t
h
Co
a
s
t
P
l
a
z
a
Co
a
s
t
P
l
a
z
a
Ar
g
o
s
y
Ar
g
o
s
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Jo
h
n
W
Jo
h
n
W
a
y
n
e
Ai
r
Ai
r
p
o
r
t
Un
i
v
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
Re
d
Re
d
l
a
n
d
s
Pa
c
i
f
i
c
Pa
c
i
f
i
c
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Co
l
l
e
g
e
The
La
b
La
b
So
u
t
h
e
So
u
t
h
e
r
n
St
a
t
e
s
St
a
t
e
s
Un
i
v
e
r
s
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Orange
Co
u
n
t
y
Co
u
n
t
y
Fa
i
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
s
Fa
i
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
s
Or
a
n
g
e
Or
a
n
g
e
Co
a
s
t
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
Co
a
s
t
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
Va
n
g
u
a
r
d
Va
n
g
u
a
r
d
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Tr
i
a
n
g
l
e
Tr
i
a
n
g
l
e
Sq
u
a
r
e
Sq
u
a
r
e
Seal
Be
a
c
h
Be
a
c
h
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
Be
a
c
h
Be
a
c
h
Fo
u
n
t
a
i
n
Fo
u
n
t
a
i
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Va
l
l
e
y
Costa
Me
s
a
Me
s
a
Sa
n
t
a
Sa
n
t
a
An
a
An
a
St
a
n
t
o
n
St
a
n
t
o
n
Lo
s
A
l
a
m
i
t
o
s
Lo
s
A
l
a
m
i
t
o
s
Ga
r
d
e
n
G
r
o
v
e
Ga
r
d
e
n
G
r
o
v
e
We
s
t
m
i
n
s
t
e
r
We
s
t
m
i
n
s
t
e
r
BEACH BLVD
HARBOR BLVD
1S
T
S
T
KA
T
E
L
L
A
A
V
E
ED
I
N
G
E
R
A
V
E
MAGNOLIA ST
WA
R
N
E
R
A
V
E
17
T
H
BROOKHURST ST
DALE ST
LA
M
P
S
O
N
A
V
E
LA
M
P
S
O
N
A
V
E
HE
I
L
A
V
E
BRISTOL ST
TR
A
S
K
A
V
E
NEWLAND ST
FAIRVIEW RD
BO
L
S
A
A
V
E
BUSHARD ST
SL
A
T
E
R
A
V
E
PAC
I
F
I
C
C
O
A
S
T
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
AD
A
M
S
A
V
E
WE
S
T
M
I
N
S
T
E
R
A
V
E
FLOWER ST
HA
Z
A
R
D
A
V
E
EDWARDS ST
MA
C
A
R
T
H
U
R
B
L
V
D
EL
L
I
S
A
V
E
9TH ST
GA
R
D
E
N
G
R
O
V
E
B
L
V
D
GOLDENWEST ST
19
T
H
S
T
SPRINGDALE ST
OR
A
N
G
E
W
O
O
D
A
V
E
NEWHOPE ST
RAITT ST
TA
L
B
E
R
T
A
V
E
GA
R
F
I
E
L
D
A
V
E
BA
K
E
R
S
T
WARD ST
GOTHARD ST
DY
BEAR ST
WEST ST
GRAHAM ST
SE
A
L
B
E
A
C
H
B
L
V
D
YO
R
K
T
O
W
N
A
V
E
CENTIA AVE
BOLSA CHICA ST
AT
L
A
N
T
A
A
V
E
PAL
M
A
V
E
FA
I
R
D
R
VI
C
T
O
R
I
A
S
T
LAKE ST
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
A
V
E
HASTER ST
DELAWARE ST
HOOVER ST
SE
G
E
R
S
T
R
O
M
A
V
E
CI
V
I
C
C
E
N
T
E
R
D
R
IN
D
I
A
N
A
P
O
L
I
S
A
V
E
WI
L
S
O
N
S
T
LEWIS ST
HA
M
I
L
T
O
N
A
V
E
BLOOM
THE CITY
D
R
GI
S
L
E
R
A
V
E
CH
E
S
T
LOS ALAMITOS BLVD
BI
S
O
AN
T
O
N
B
L
V
D
R
A
N
C
H
O
R
D
E
A
S
T
B
L
U
F
F
D
R
BA
N
N
I
N
G
A
V
E
S
E
A
P
O
I
N
T
A
V
E
HYLAND
MA
R
I
N
A
D
R
DI
S
N
E
Y
W
A
Y
DEL
M
A
R
A
V
E
PA
U
L
A
R
I
N
O
A
V
E
AR
G
O
S
Y
D
R
MES
A
D
R
ALGONQUIN ST
SAYBROOK LN
ME
M
O
R
Y
L
N
PA
C
I
F
I
C
V
I
E
W
A
V
E
LEXING
1
S
T
S
T
SAN
T
I
A
G
O
D
R
GILBERT ST
CH
A
P
M
A
N
A
V
E
HOLDER ST
ORA
N
G
E
A
V
E
LA
V
E
T
A
A
V
E
4T
H
S
T
OR
A
N
G
E
W
O
O
D
A
V
E
N
E
W
P
O
R
T
B
L
V
D
MAIN ST
HE
I
L
A
V
E
BROADWAY ST
M
A
I
N
S
T
WARD ST
AL
T
1
7
T
H
S
T
IR
V
I
N
E
A
V
E
Or
a
n
g
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
M
a
p
/
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
3
LE
G
E
N
D
Cl
a
s
s
I
O
f
f
-
R
o
a
d
(
P
a
v
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
(
S
t
r
i
p
e
d
L
a
n
e
s
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
I
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
(
S
i
g
n
e
d
O
n
l
y
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
s
Pa
r
k
-
a
n
d
-
R
i
d
e
s
Tr
a
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
Pa
r
k
s
Po
i
n
t
s
o
f
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
Am
t
r
a
k
/
M
e
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
(to section 4)
(t
o
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
1
)
(t
o
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
6
)
An
a
h
e
i
m
An
a
h
e
i
m
Ca
n
y
o
n
Ca
n
y
o
n
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
An
a
h
e
i
m
Am
t
r
a
k
/
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Or
a
n
g
e
Or
a
n
g
e
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
Or
a
n
g
e
Or
a
n
g
e
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
U
CS
U
ton
Fu
l
l
e
r
t
o
n
g
Cr
a
i
g
nal
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
k
Pa
r
k
Ri
c
h
a
r
d
Ri
c
h
a
r
d
M.
N
i
x
o
n
M.
N
i
x
o
n
Li
b
r
a
r
y
Li
b
r
a
r
y
Th
e
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
Th
e
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
At
O
r
a
n
g
e
At
O
r
a
n
g
e
Ch
a
p
m
a
n
Ch
a
p
m
a
n
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Fi
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
o
y
Fi
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
o
y
Sc
o
u
t
R
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Sc
o
u
t
R
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Ch
i
n
o
Ch
i
n
o
Hi
l
l
s
Hi
l
l
s
St
a
t
e
St
a
t
e
Pa
r
k
Pa
r
k
Ca
r
b
o
n
C
a
n
y
o
n
Ca
r
b
o
n
C
a
n
y
o
n
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Fe
a
t
h
e
r
l
y
Fe
a
t
h
e
r
l
y
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Yo
r
b
a
Yo
r
b
a
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Or
a
n
g
e
Or
a
n
g
e
Co
u
n
t
y
Co
u
n
t
y
Zoo
We
i
r
C
a
n
y
o
n
We
i
r
C
a
n
y
o
n
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Sa
n
t
i
a
g
o
O
a
k
s
Sa
n
t
i
a
g
o
O
a
k
s
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Ir
v
i
n
e
Ir
v
i
n
e
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Sa
n
t
i
a
g
o
C
a
n
y
o
n
Sa
n
t
i
a
g
o
C
a
n
y
o
n
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Hon
d
a
Ho
n
d
a
Cen
t
e
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
stw
o
o
d
We
s
t
w
o
o
d
oll
e
g
e
Co
l
l
e
g
e
uth
So
u
t
h
ast
Co
a
s
t
ege
Co
l
l
e
g
e
In
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Orange
Villa
Park
Yorba Linda
Pl
a
c
e
n
t
i
a
Pl
a
c
e
n
t
i
a
Br
e
a
TUSTIN ST
BA
S
T
A
N
C
H
U
R
Y
R
D
ROSE DR
YO
R
B
A
L
I
N
D
A
B
L
V
D
KRAEMER BLVD
TA
F
T
A
V
E
S
E
R
R
A
N
O
A
V
E
ME
A
T
S
A
V
E
GLASSELL ST
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
CANNO
N
S
T
LAKEVIEW AVE
SA
N
T
A
A
N
A
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
N
O
H
L
R
A
N
C
H
R
D
M
I
R
A
L
O
M
A
A
V
E
CAMBRIDGE ST
C
A
R
B
O
N
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
R
I
V
E
R
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
E
S
P
E
R
A
N
Z
A
R
D
SANT
I
A
G
O
B
L
V
D
RICHFIELD RD
KELLOGG
D
R
PROSPECT ST
WEIR
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
RIO VISTA ST
GO
L
D
E
N
A
V
E
CR
O
W
T
H
E
R
A
V
E
MILLER
S
T
ORA
N
G
E
O
L
I
V
E
R
D
VILLAGE CE
N
T
E
R
D
R
AL
T
A
V
I
S
T
A
S
T
FAIR
M
O
N
T
B
L
V
D
CA
N
Y
O
N
V
I
E
W
A
V
E
VI
L
L
A
P
A
R
K
R
D
BU
E
N
A
V
I
S
T
A
A
V
E
WANDA RD
FR
O
N
T
E
R
A
S
T
SP
R
I
N
G
S
T
BO
N
D
A
V
E
VI
A
E
S
C
O
L
A
A
V
E
ADE ST
MELROS
E
S
T
AVE
ANAHEIM HILLS
R
D
GR
O
V
E
A
V
E
MI
R
A
L
O
M
A
A
V
E
OA
K
C
A
N
Y
O
N
D
R
TA
F
T
A
V
E
SA
N
T
I
A
G
O
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
FAIRMONT BL
V
D
ELLVALENCIA AVE
PA
L
M
D
R
WA
L
N
U
T
A
V
E
CH
A
P
M
A
N
A
V
E
Or
a
n
g
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
M
a
p
/
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
2
LE
G
E
N
D
Cl
a
s
s
I
O
f
f
-
R
o
a
d
(
P
a
v
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
(
S
t
r
i
p
e
d
L
a
n
e
s
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
I
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
(
S
i
g
n
e
d
O
n
l
y
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
s
Pa
r
k
-
a
n
d
-
R
i
d
e
s
Tr
a
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
Pa
r
k
s
Po
i
n
t
s
o
f
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
Am
t
r
a
k
/
M
e
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
(to section 1)
(t
o
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
4
&
5
)
Bu
e
n
a
P
a
r
k
Bu
e
n
a
P
a
r
k
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Fu
l
l
e
r
t
o
n
Fu
l
l
e
r
t
o
n
Am
t
r
a
k
/
Am
t
r
a
k
/
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Anaheim MMetrolink
An
a
h
e
i
m
An
a
h
e
i
m
Am
t
r
a
k
/
Am
t
r
a
k
/
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Or
a
n
g
e
Or
a
n
g
e
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
Or
a
n
g
e
Or
a
n
g
e
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Fu
l
l
e
r
t
o
n
Fu
l
l
e
r
t
o
n
Pa
r
k
&
R
i
d
e
Pa
r
k
&
R
i
d
e
Ar
m
e
d
F
o
r
c
e
s
Ar
m
e
d
F
o
r
c
e
s
Re
s
e
r
v
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
Re
s
e
r
v
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
Lo
s
Lo
s
Al
a
m
i
t
o
s
Al
a
m
i
t
o
s
Ra
c
e
Ra
c
e
Tr
a
c
k
Tr
a
c
k
Cy
p
r
e
s
s
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
Cy
p
r
e
s
s
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
Kn
o
t
t
'
s
Kn
o
t
t
'
s
Be
r
r
y
F
a
r
m
Be
r
r
y
F
a
r
m
Bu
e
n
a
P
a
r
k
Bu
e
n
a
P
a
r
k
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
Fu
l
l
e
r
t
o
n
Fu
l
l
e
r
t
o
n
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
A
i
r
p
o
r
t
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
A
i
r
p
o
r
t
Fu
l
l
e
r
t
o
n
Fu
l
l
e
r
t
o
n
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Fu
l
l
e
r
t
o
n
Fu
l
l
e
r
t
o
n
Me
t
r
o
C
e
n
t
e
r
Me
t
r
o
C
e
n
t
e
r
CSU
Fu
l
l
e
r
t
o
n
Fu
l
l
e
r
t
o
n
Brea
Ma
l
l
Ma
l
l
Cr
a
i
g
Cr
a
i
g
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
Pa
r
k
Pa
r
k
Th
e
V
Th
e
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
At
O
At
O
r
a
n
g
e
Ch
a
p
m
a
n
Ch
a
p
m
a
n
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Fi
r
e
s
Fi
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
o
y
Sc
o
u
t
Sc
o
u
t
R
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
CCarbon Canyon RRegional Park
Ho
n
d
a
Ho
n
d
a
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
We
s
t
w
o
o
d
We
s
t
w
o
o
d
College
So
u
t
h
So
u
t
h
Coast
College
An
g
e
l
An
g
e
l
St
a
d
i
u
m
St
a
d
i
u
m
Di
s
n
e
y
l
a
n
d
Di
s
n
e
y
l
a
n
d
Anaheim
Co
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
Co
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
Center
Cl
a
r
k
Cl
a
r
k
Regional
Pa
r
k
Pa
r
k
Anaheim
Pl
a
z
a
Pl
a
z
a
Cr
y
s
t
a
l
Cr
y
s
t
a
l
Th
e
B
l
o
c
k
Th
e
B
l
o
c
k
At
O
r
a
n
g
e
At
O
r
a
n
g
e
Argosy
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Ar
g
o
s
y
Ar
g
o
s
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Ho
p
e
Ho
p
e
In
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
In
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Orange
Pl
a
c
e
n
t
i
a
Pl
a
c
e
n
t
i
a
Br
e
a
Br
e
a
La Habra
Fullerton An
a
h
e
i
m
An
a
h
e
i
m
Bu
e
n
a
Bu
e
n
a
Park
La Palma
Cy
p
r
e
s
s
Cy
p
r
e
s
s
St
a
n
t
o
n
St
a
n
t
o
n
Lo
s
A
l
a
m
i
t
o
s
Lo
s
A
l
a
m
i
t
o
s
Gd
G
Ga
r
d
e
n
G
r
o
v
e
BEACH BLVD
EUCLID ST
BA
L
L
R
D
LA
P
A
L
M
A
A
V
E
LA
P
A
L
M
A
A
V
E
KA
T
E
L
L
A
A
V
E
LI
N
C
O
L
N
A
V
E
TUSTIN ST
E ST
IM
P
E
R
I
A
L
H
W
Y
LA
M
P
S
O
N
A
V
E
LA
M
P
S
O
N
A
V
E
KNOTT AVE
BR
E
A
B
L
V
D
OR
A
N
G
E
T
H
O
R
P
E
A
V
E
CE
R
R
I
T
O
S
A
V
E
OR
A
N
G
E
A
V
E
LA
M
B
E
R
T
R
D
WESTERN AVE
B
ROSE DR
STATE COLLEGE BLVD
VALLEY VIEW ST
9TH ST
KRAEMER BLVD
CR
E
S
C
E
N
T
A
V
E
CH
A
P
M
A
N
A
V
E
OR
A
N
G
E
W
O
O
D
A
V
E
WALKER ST
EAST ST
B
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
S
T
ME
A
T
S
A
V
E
GLASSELL ST
VA
L
E
N
C
I
A
D
R
MOODY ST
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
CO
M
M
O
N
W
E
A
L
T
H
A
V
E
WH
I
T
T
I
E
R
B
L
V
D
MA
L
V
E
R
N
A
V
E
IDAHO ST
WEST ST
SUNKIST ST
LA
H
A
B
R
A
B
L
V
D
ANAHEI
M
B
L
V
D
GILBERT ST
M
I
R
A
L
O
M
A
A
V
E
AR
T
E
S
I
A
B
L
V
D
STANTON AVE
CAMBRIDGE ST
HOLDER ST
BERRY ST
ACACIA AVE
HASTER ST
DENNI ST
R
I
V
E
R
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
RO
S
E
C
R
A
N
S
A
V
E
PUENTE ST
LEWIS ST
CE
N
T
R
A
L
A
V
E
BLOOMFIELD AVE
THE CITY
D
R
RIO VISTA ST
GO
L
D
E
N
A
V
E
CR
O
W
T
H
E
R
A
V
E
MILLER
S
T
RAYMOND AVE
ORA
N
G
E
O
L
I
V
E
R
D
AL
T
A
V
I
S
T
A
S
T
LOS ALAMITOS BLVD
BU
E
N
A
V
WA
G
N
E
R
A
V
E
FR
O
N
T
E
R
A
S
T
PARK
S
R
D
PI
O
N
E
E
R
A
V
E
MELROS
E
S
T
HIGHLAND AVE
DI
S
N
E
Y
W
A
Y
NU
T
W
O
O
D
A
V
E
GR
O
V
E
A
V
E
RO
M
N
E
Y
A
D
R
LEXINGTON DR
WALNUT ST
GILBERT ST
CH
A
P
M
A
N
A
V
E
TA
F
T
A
V
E
HOLDER ST
GILBERT ST
ELL
OR
A
N
G
E
W
O
O
D
A
V
E
VALENCIA AVE
PLACE
N
T
I
A
A
V
E
BEACH BLVD
PA
L
M
D
R
WA
L
N
U
BI
R
C
H
S
T
PALM ST
DALE ST
Or
a
n
g
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
M
a
p
/
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
1
LE
G
E
N
D
Cl
a
s
s
I
O
f
f
-
R
o
a
d
(
P
a
v
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
(
S
t
r
i
p
e
d
L
a
n
e
s
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
I
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
(
S
i
g
n
e
d
O
n
l
y
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
s
Pa
r
k
-
a
n
d
-
R
i
d
e
s
Tr
a
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
Pa
r
k
s
Po
i
n
t
s
o
f
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
Am
t
r
a
k
/
M
e
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
(to section 2)
(t
o
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
3
&
4
)
Sa
n
J
u
a
n
Sa
n
J
u
a
n
Ca
p
i
s
t
r
a
n
o
Ca
p
i
s
t
r
a
n
o
Am
t
r
a
k
/
Am
t
r
a
k
/
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Sa
n
C
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
Sa
n
C
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Da
n
a
Da
n
a
Po
i
n
t
Po
i
n
t
Ha
r
b
o
r
Ha
r
b
o
r
San
Cl
e
m
e
n
t
e
Cl
e
m
e
n
t
e
Pi
e
r
Pi
e
r
Ra
n
c
h
o
M
i
s
s
i
o
n
V
i
e
j
o
Ra
n
c
h
o
M
i
s
s
i
o
n
V
i
e
j
o
Ec
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Ec
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Sa
l
t
C
r
e
e
k
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
Sa
l
t
C
r
e
e
k
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Al
i
s
o
&
W
o
o
d
C
a
n
y
o
n
s
Al
i
s
o
&
W
o
o
d
C
a
n
y
o
n
s
Wi
l
d
e
r
n
e
s
s
P
a
r
k
Wi
l
d
e
r
n
e
s
s
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
Par
k
Pa
r
k
La
g
u
n
a
eac
h
Be
a
c
h
Da
n
a
Da
n
a
Po
i
n
t
Po
i
n
t
Laguna
Niguel
Sa
n
J
u
a
n
Sa
n
J
u
a
n
Ca
p
i
s
t
r
a
n
o
Ca
p
i
s
t
r
a
n
o
Sa
n
C
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
Sa
n
C
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
O NIO PK
W
Y
NI
G
U
E
L
R
D
C
R
O
W
N
V
A
L
L
E
Y
P
K
W
Y
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
P
I
C
O
EL CA
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
CAMIN
O
C
A
P
I
S
T
R
A
N
O
DE
L
O
B
I
S
P
O
S
T
LA PA
T
A
A
V
E
SE
L
V
A
R
D
ST
O
N
E
H
I
L
L
D
R
RAN
C
H
O
V
I
E
J
O
R
D
A
L
I
P
A
Z
S
T
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
T
A
L
E
G
A
S
A
N
J
U
A
N
C
R
E
E
K
R
D
PACIFIC ISLAND DR
AVE
N
I
D
A
L
A
P
A
T
A
CA
M
I
N
O
D
E
L
R
I
O
HIGHLA
N
D
S
A
VE
M
A
R
I
N
A
H
I
L
L
S
R
D
DE
L
P
R
A
D
O
C
A
M
I
N
O
L
A
S
R
A
M
B
L
A
S
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
V
I
S
T
A
H
E
R
M
O
S
A
CL
U
B
H
O
U
S
E
D
R
PAS
E
O
D
DA
N
A
P
O
I
N
T
H
A
R
B
O
R
D
R
T
R
A
B
U
C
O
C
R
E
E
K
CA
M
I
N
O
V
E
R
A
C
R
U
Z
PAC
I
F
I
C
C
O
A
S
T
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
CA
M
I
N
O
C
A
P
I
S
T
R
A
N
O
Or
a
n
g
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
M
a
p
/
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
8
LE
G
E
N
D
Cl
a
s
s
I
O
f
f
-
R
o
a
d
(
P
a
v
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
(
S
t
r
i
p
e
d
L
a
n
e
s
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
I
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
(
S
i
g
n
e
d
O
n
l
y
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
s
Pa
r
k
-
a
n
d
-
R
i
d
e
s
Tr
a
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
Pa
r
k
s
Po
i
n
t
s
o
f
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
Am
t
r
a
k
/
M
e
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
(t
o
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
7
)
Ir
v
i
n
e
Ir
v
i
n
e
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
La
g
u
n
a
La
g
u
n
a
Ni
g
u
e
l
Ni
g
u
e
l
Me
t
r
o
l
l
i
n
k
Me
t
r
o
l
l
i
n
k
Sa
n
J
u
a
n
Sa
n
J
u
a
n
Ca
p
i
s
t
r
a
n
o
Ca
p
i
s
t
r
a
n
o
Am
t
r
a
k
/
Am
t
r
a
k
/
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Sa
l
t
C
r
e
e
k
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
Sa
l
t
C
r
e
e
k
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
ood
C
a
n
y
o
n
s
Al
i
s
o
&
W
o
o
d
C
a
n
y
o
n
s
nes
s
P
a
r
k
Wi
l
d
e
r
n
e
s
s
P
a
r
k
La
g
u
n
a
La
g
u
n
a
Ni
g
u
e
l
Ni
g
u
e
l
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
Park
Pl
a
z
a
Pl
a
z
a
De
L
a
P
a
z
De
L
a
P
a
z
O'
N
e
i
l
l
O'
N
e
i
l
l
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Ar
r
o
y
o
T
r
a
b
u
c
o
Ar
r
o
y
o
T
r
a
b
u
c
o
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
T
h
o
m
a
s
F
.
R
i
l
e
y
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
T
h
o
m
a
s
F
.
R
i
l
e
y
Wi
l
d
e
r
n
e
s
s
P
a
r
k
Wi
l
d
e
r
n
e
s
s
P
a
r
k
ne
S
p
e
c
t
r
u
m
Ir
v
i
n
e
S
p
e
c
t
r
u
m
La
g
u
n
a
H
i
l
l
s
La
g
u
n
a
H
i
l
l
s
Ma
l
l
Ma
l
l
Th
e
S
h
o
p
s
A
t
Th
e
S
h
o
p
s
A
t
Mi
s
s
i
o
n
V
i
e
j
o
Mi
s
s
i
o
n
V
i
e
j
o
Sa
d
d
l
e
b
a
c
k
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
Sa
d
d
l
e
b
a
c
k
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
So
k
a
So
k
a
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
La
g
u
n
a
Be
a
c
h
Da
n
a
Laguna
Ni
g
u
e
l
Ni
g
u
e
l
Sa
n
J
u
a
n
Ali
s
o
Al
i
s
o
Vie
j
o
Vi
e
j
o
Laguna
Hills
La
g
u
n
a
La
g
u
n
a
Wo
o
d
s
Wo
o
d
s
Mission
Viejo
Lake
Fo
r
e
s
t
Fo
r
e
s
t
Ran
c
ho
Ra
n
c
h
o
Sa
n
t
a
Sa
n
t
a
Ma
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
Ma
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
ORT
E
G
A
ALICI
A
P
K
W
Y
OS
O
P
K
W
Y
E
L
T
O
R
O
R
D
ANTO
N
I
O
P
K
W
Y
B
A
K
E
P
K
W
Y
LA P
A
Z
R
D
MOULTO
N
P
K
W
Y
MAR
G
U
E
R
I
T
E
P
K
W
Y
RD
JER
O
N
I
M
O
R
D
LO
S
A
L
I
S
O
S
B
L
V
D
C
R
O
W
N
V
A
L
L
E
Y
P
K
W
Y
CABOT RD
LA
K
E
F
O
R
E
S
T
D
R
MUI
R
L
A
N
D
S
B
L
V
D
FEL
I
P
E
R
D
ALISO CREEK RD
TOL
E
D
O
W
A
Y
OLYMPIA RD
CAMIN
O
C
A
P
I
S
T
R
A
N
O
O S
T
SA
N
T
A
M
A
R
G
A
R
I
T
A
P
K
W
Y
ROC
K
F
I
E
L
D
B
L
V
D
LA PAT
A
A
V
E
M
E
L
I
N
D
A
R
D
RAN
C
H
O
V
I
E
J
O
R
D
LAGUNA HILLS DR
LI
P
A
Z
S
T
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
P
A
R
K
D
R
S
A
N
J
U
A
N
C
R
E
E
K
R
D
PACIFIC ISLAND DR
PA
S
E
O
D
E
V
A
L
E
N
C
I
A
RI
D
G
E
R
O
U
T
E
D
R
HIGHLA
N
D
S
A
V
E
G
L
E
N
W
O
O
D
D
R
M
A
R
I
N
A
H
I
L
L
S
R
D
WOOD
C
A
N
Y
O
N
D
R
AVE
N
I
D
A
D
E
L
A
C
A
R
L
O
T
A
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
D
E
L
A
S
F
L
O
R
E
S
PLANO TRA
B
U
C
O
CL
U
B
H
O
U
S
E
D
R
PAS
E
O
D
E
C
O
L
I
N
A
S
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
D
E
L
A
S
B
A
N
D
E
R
A
S
T
R
A
B
U
C
O
C
R
E
E
K
R
D
TR
A
B
U
C
O
R
D
O PK
WY
R
I
D
G
E
R
O
U
T
E
D
R
PAC
I
F
I
C
Or
a
n
g
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
M
a
p
/
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
7
LE
G
E
N
D
Cl
a
s
s
I
O
f
f
-
R
o
a
d
(
P
a
v
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
(
S
t
r
i
p
e
d
L
a
n
e
s
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
I
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
(
S
i
g
n
e
d
O
n
l
y
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
s
Pa
r
k
-
a
n
d
-
R
i
d
e
s
Tr
a
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
Pa
r
k
s
Po
i
n
t
s
o
f
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
Am
t
r
a
k
/
M
e
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
(to section 6)
(t
o
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
5
)
(t
o
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
8
)
Ir
v
i
n
e
Ir
v
i
n
e
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
La
g
u
n
a
B
e
a
c
h
La
g
u
n
a
B
e
a
c
h
Bu
s
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
Bu
s
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
Ne
w
p
o
r
t
Ne
w
p
o
r
t
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ba
l
b
o
a
Ba
l
b
o
a
Fu
n
Z
o
n
e
Fu
n
Z
o
n
e
La
g
u
n
a
La
g
u
n
a
Ma
i
n
B
e
a
c
h
Ma
i
n
B
e
a
c
h
Al
i
s
o
&
W
o
o
d
C
a
n
y
o
n
s
Al
i
s
o
&
W
o
o
d
C
a
n
y
o
n
s
Wi
l
d
e
r
n
e
s
s
P
a
r
k
Wi
l
d
e
r
n
e
s
s
P
a
r
k
La
g
u
n
La
g
u
n
a
Ni
g
u
Ni
g
u
e
l
Re
g
i
o
n
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
Pa
r
k
Pa
r
k
Pl
a
z
a
Pl
a
z
a
De
L
a
P
De
L
a
P
a
z
La
g
u
n
a
C
o
a
s
t
La
g
u
n
a
C
o
a
s
t
Wi
l
d
e
r
n
e
s
s
P
a
r
k
Wi
l
d
e
r
n
e
s
s
P
a
r
k
Cr
y
s
t
a
l
C
o
v
e
Cr
y
s
t
a
l
C
o
v
e
St
a
t
e
P
a
r
k
St
a
t
e
P
a
r
k
Up
p
e
r
N
e
w
p
o
r
t
B
a
y
Up
p
e
r
N
e
w
p
o
r
t
B
a
y
Ec
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Ec
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Ta
l
b
e
r
t
Ta
l
b
e
r
t
Na
t
u
r
e
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Na
t
u
r
e
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Ta
l
b
e
r
t
Ta
l
b
e
r
t
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
St
a
t
e
s
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Va
n
g
u
a
r
d
Va
n
g
u
a
r
d
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Tr
i
a
n
g
l
e
Tr
i
a
n
g
l
e
Sq
u
a
r
e
Sq
u
a
r
e
Fa
s
h
i
o
n
Fa
s
h
i
o
n
Is
l
a
n
d
Is
l
a
n
d
UC
I
r
v
i
n
e
UC
I
r
v
i
n
e
Co
n
c
o
r
d
i
a
Co
n
c
o
r
d
i
a
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Ma
s
o
n
Ma
s
o
n
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
Pa
r
k
Pa
r
k
Ir
v
i
n
e
S
p
e
c
t
r
u
m
Ir
v
i
n
e
S
p
e
c
t
r
u
m
La
g
u
n
a
H
La
g
u
n
a
H
i
l
l
s
Ma
l
l
Ma
l
l
So
k
a
So
k
a
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
La
g
u
n
a
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
La
g
u
n
a
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
of
A
r
t
s
&
D
e
s
i
g
n
of
A
r
t
s
&
D
e
s
i
g
n
Ne
w
p
o
r
t
Ne
w
p
o
r
t
Be
a
c
h
Be
a
c
h
Laguna
Be
a
c
h
Be
a
c
h
DDana Point
Al
i
s
o
Al
i
s
o
V
i
e
j
o
V
i
e
j
o
Laguna
Wo
o
d
s
Wo
o
d
s
Ir
v
i
n
e
Ir
v
i
n
e
PAC
I
F
I
C
C
O
A
S
T
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
LA P
A
Z
R
D
J
A
M
MOULTON
P
K
W
Y
LRD
19
T
H
S
T
C
R
O
W
N
V
A
L
L
E
Y
P
K
W
LA
K
E
F
O
R
E
S
T
D
R
LAGUNA
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
BAL
B
O
A
B
L
V
D
C
A
M
P
U
S
D
R
MUI
R
L
A
N
D
S
B
L
VD
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
D
R
S
A
N
D
C
ALISO CREEK RD
PLACENTIA AVE
AT
L
A
N
T
A
A
V
E
FA
I
R
DR
VI
C
T
O
R
I
A
S
T
ROC
K
F
I
E
L
D
B
LVD
N
E
W
P
O
R
T
C
O
A
S
T
D
R
LAGUNA HILLS DR
WI
L
S
O
N
S
T
D
O
V
E
R
D
R
HA
M
I
L
T
O
N
A
V
E
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
P
A
R
K
D
R
PACIFIC ISLAND DR
S
A
N
M
I
G
U
E
L
D
R
B
O
N
I
T
A
C
A
N
Y
O
N
D
R
BI
S
O
N
A
V
E
FO
R
D
R
D
S
U
P
E
R
I
O
R
A
V
E
RIDG
E
L
I
N
E
D
R
RI
D
G
E
R
O
U
T
E
D
R
EA
S
T
B
L
U
F
F
D
R
HIGHLA
N
D
S
A
V
E
G
L
E
N
W
O
O
D
D
R
BA
N
N
I
N
G
A
V
E
T
U
R
T
L
E
R
O
C
K
D
R
BA
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
M
WOOD
C
A
N
Y
O
N
D
R
GLEN
N
E
Y
R
E
AVE
NID
DEL
M
A
R
A
V
E
C
A
R
L
ME
S
A
D
R
CL
U
B
H
O
U
S
E
A
V
O
C
A
D
O
A
V
E
E
Y
A
L
E
A
V
E
SAN
T
I
A
G
O
D
R
LAGUNA
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
M
A
R
G
U
E
R
I
T
E
N
E
W
P
O
R
T
B
L
V
D
IR
V
I
N
E
A
V
E
PAC
I
F
I
C
C
Or
a
n
g
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
M
a
p
/
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
6
LE
G
E
N
D
Cl
a
s
s
I
O
f
f
-
R
o
a
d
(
P
a
v
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
(
S
t
r
i
p
e
d
L
a
n
e
s
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
I
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
(
S
i
g
n
e
d
O
n
l
y
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
s
Pa
r
k
-
a
n
d
-
R
i
d
e
s
Tr
a
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
Pa
r
k
s
Po
i
n
t
s
o
f
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
Am
t
r
a
k
/
M
e
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
(to section 7)
(t
o
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
3
&
4
)
Ir
v
i
n
e
Ir
v
i
n
e
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
e
Or
a
n
g
e
y
Co
u
n
t
y
Zo
o
Ir
v
i
n
e
ark
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Pe
t
e
r
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Li
m
e
s
t
o
n
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
Li
m
e
s
t
o
n
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
To
w
n
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
To
w
n
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
Ar
r
o
y
o
T
r
a
b
u
c
o
Ar
r
o
y
o
T
r
a
b
u
c
o
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
ne
S
p
e
c
t
r
u
m
Ir
v
i
n
e
S
p
e
c
t
r
u
m
Lake
Forest
Rancho
Sa
n
t
a
Sa
n
t
a
Ma
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
Ma
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
O
R
D
B
A
K
E
P
K
W
Y
PO
R
T
O
L
A
P
K
W
Y
SANTIA
G
O
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
JE
F
F
R
E
Y
R
D
ALIS
O
S
B
L
V
D
MUI
R
L
A
N
D
S
B
L
VD
TOL
E
D
O
W
A
Y
SA
N
T
A
M
A
R
G
A
R
I
T
A
P
K
W
Y
M
E
L
I
N
D
A
R
D
GL
E
N
N
R
A
N
C
H
R
D
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
D
E
L
A
S
F
L
O
R
E
S
PLANO TRAB
U
C
O
O OD
R
A
S
OD
A
L
T
O
N
P
K
W
Y
TR
A
B
U
C
O
R
D
RA
N
C
H
O
P
K
W
Y
G
E
R
O
U
T
E
D
R
Or
a
n
g
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
M
a
p
/
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
5
LE
G
E
N
D
Cl
a
s
s
I
O
f
f
-
R
o
a
d
(
P
a
v
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
(
S
t
r
i
p
e
d
L
a
n
e
s
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
I
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
(
S
i
g
n
e
d
O
n
l
y
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
s
Pa
r
k
-
a
n
d
-
R
i
d
e
s
Tr
a
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
Pa
r
k
s
Po
i
n
t
s
o
f
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
Am
t
r
a
k
/
M
e
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
(to section 4)
(t
o
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
2
)
(t
o
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
7
)
An
a
h
e
i
m
Amt
r
a
k/
Am
t
r
a
k
/
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Or
a
n
g
e
Or
a
n
g
e
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
Sa
n
t
a
A
n
a
Sa
n
t
a
A
n
a
Tr
a
n
s
i
s
t
T
e
r
m
i
n
a
l
Tr
a
n
s
i
s
t
T
e
r
m
i
n
a
l
Th
e
D
e
p
o
t
a
t
Th
e
D
e
p
o
t
a
t
Sa
n
t
a
A
n
a
Sa
n
t
a
A
n
a
Tu
s
t
i
n
Tu
s
t
i
n
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Ir
v
i
n
e
Ir
v
i
n
e
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
Orange
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
Me
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
e S
q
u
a
r
e
Mi
l
e
S
q
u
a
r
e
ion
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Coastline
College
Ce
n
t
e
n
i
a
l
Ce
n
t
e
n
i
a
l
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Up
p
e
r
N
e
w
p
o
r
t
B
a
y
Up
p
e
r
N
e
w
p
o
r
t
B
a
y
Ec
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Ec
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Fa
i
r
v
i
e
w
P
a
r
k
Fa
i
r
v
i
e
w
P
a
r
k
Ta
l
b
e
r
t
Ta
l
b
e
r
t
ure
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Na
t
u
r
e
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Tal
b
e
r
t
Ta
l
b
e
r
t
ion
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Ch
a
p
m
a
n
Ch
a
p
m
a
n
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Or
a
n
g
e
Or
a
n
g
e
Co
u
n
t
y
Co
u
n
t
y
Zo
o
Zo
o
Ir
v
i
n
e
Ir
v
i
n
e
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Sa
n
t
i
a
g
o
C
a
n
y
o
n
Sa
n
t
i
a
g
o
C
a
n
y
o
n
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Pe
t
e
r
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
Pe
t
e
r
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
Li
m
e
s
t
o
n
e
C
a
n
y
Li
m
e
s
t
o
n
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
ToTo
w
n
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
Ho
n
d
a
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
We
s
t
w
o
o
d
We
s
t
w
o
o
d
College
So
u
t
h
So
u
t
h
Co
a
s
t
Co
a
s
t
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Co
l
l
e
g
e
An
g
e
l
An
g
e
l
St
a
d
i
u
m
St
a
d
i
u
m
An
a
h
e
i
m
An
a
h
e
i
m
Co
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
Co
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
Cr
y
s
t
a
l
Cr
y
s
t
a
l
Ca
t
h
e
d
r
a
l
Ca
t
h
e
d
r
a
l
Th
e
B
l
o
c
k
Th
e
B
l
o
c
k
At
O
r
a
n
g
e
At
O
r
a
n
g
e
Ar
g
o
s
y
Ar
g
o
s
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Ma
i
n
p
l
a
c
e
Ma
i
n
p
l
a
c
e
Br
i
s
t
o
l
Br
i
s
t
o
l
Ma
r
k
e
t
p
l
a
c
e
Ma
r
k
e
t
p
l
a
c
e
Sa
n
t
a
A
n
a
Sa
n
t
a
A
n
a
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Bo
w
e
r
s
Bo
w
e
r
s
Mu
s
e
u
m
Mu
s
e
u
m
Sa
n
t
a
A
n
a
Sa
n
t
a
A
n
a
Ci
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
Ci
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
Sa
n
t
a
A
n
a
Sa
n
t
a
A
n
a
Zoo
En
d
e
r
l
e
En
d
e
r
l
e
Center
So
u
t
h
So
u
t
h
Co
a
s
t
P
l
a
z
a
Co
a
s
t
P
l
a
z
a
Ar
g
o
s
y
Ar
g
o
s
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Jo
h
n
W
a
y
n
e
Jo
h
n
W
a
y
n
e
Ai
r
p
o
r
t
Ai
r
p
o
r
t
The
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
Re
d
l
a
n
d
s
Re
d
l
a
n
d
s
Pa
c
i
f
i
c
Pa
c
i
f
i
c
College
Th
e
Th
e
La
b
La
b
So
u
t
h
e
r
n
So
u
t
h
e
r
n
St
a
t
e
s
St
a
t
e
s
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Or
a
n
g
e
Or
a
n
g
e
Co
u
n
t
y
Co
u
n
t
y
Fa
i
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
s
Fa
i
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
s
Or
a
n
g
e
Or
a
n
g
e
Co
a
s
t
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
Co
a
s
t
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
Va
n
g
u
a
r
d
Va
n
g
u
a
r
d
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Tr
i
a
n
g
l
e
Tr
i
a
n
g
l
e
Sq
u
a
r
e
Sq
u
a
r
e
UC
I
r
v
i
n
e
UC
I
r
v
i
n
e
Co
n
c
o
r
d
i
a
Co
n
c
o
r
d
i
a
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Ma
s
o
n
Ma
s
o
n
Regional
Pa
r
k
Pa
r
k
Th
e
M
a
r
k
e
t
Th
e
M
a
r
k
e
t
Pl
a
c
e
Pl
a
c
e
De
V
r
y
De
V
r
y
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
He
r
i
t
a
g
e
He
r
i
t
a
g
e
Pl
a
z
a
Pl
a
z
a
Ir
v
i
n
e
Ir
v
i
n
e
Va
l
l
e
y
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
Va
l
l
e
y
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
Ir
v
i
n
e
S
p
e
c
t
r
u
m
Ir
v
i
n
e
S
p
e
c
t
r
u
m
n
Fo
u
n
t
a
i
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Costa
Me
s
a
Me
s
a
Irvine
Tustin
Sa
n
t
a
Sa
n
t
a
An
a
An
a
Or
a
n
g
e
Or
a
n
g
e
Gro
v
e
Ga
r
d
e
n
G
r
o
v
e
La
k
e
La
k
e
Fo
r
e
s
Fo
r
e
s
t
HARBOR BLVD
1S
T
S
T
ALT
O
N
P
K
W
Y
IRV
I
N
E
B
L
V
D
17
T
H
R
O
R
D
TUSTIN
MC
F
A
D
D
E
N
A
V
E
B
A
K
E
P
K
W
Y
LA
M
P
S
O
N
A
V
E
BRISTOL ST
C
U
L
V
E
R
D
R
FAIRVIEW RD
R
E
D
H
I
L
L
A
V
E
J
A
M
B
O
R
E
E
R
D
BA
R
R
A
N
C
A
P
K
W
Y
BRY
A
N
A
V
E
FLOWER ST
GRAND AVE
PO
R
T
O
L
A
P
K
W
Y
N
E
W
P
O
R
T
B
L
V
D
E
MA
C
A
R
T
H
U
R
B
L
V
D
WAL
N
U
T
A
V
E
JE
F
F
R
E
Y
R
D
9TH ST 19
T
H
S
T
OR
A
N
G
E
W
O
O
D
A
V
E
NEWHOPE ST
RAITT ST
TA
L
B
E
R
T
A
V
E
BA
K
E
R
S
T
IRV
I
N
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
D
R
WARD ST
GLASSELL ST
C
A
M
P
U
S
D
R
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
C ANNON
S
T
MUI
R
L
A
N
D
S
B
L
V
D
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
D
R
DY
E
R
R
D
BEAR ST
WEST ST
MA
I
N
S
T
MIC
H
E
L
S
O
N
D
R
S
A
N
D
C
A
N
Y
O
N
A
V
E
CENTIA AVE
CAMBRIDGE ST
YORBA ST
FA
I
R
D
R
TOL
E
D
O
W
A
Y
VI
C
T
O
R
I
A
S
T
TRA
B
U
C
O
R
D
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
A
V
E
HASTER ST
FA
I
R
H
A
V
E
N
A
V
E
V
O
N
K
A
R
M
A
N
A
V
E
T
U
S
T
I
N
R
A
N
C
H
R
D
SE
G
E
R
S
T
R
O
M
A
V
E
STANDARD AVE
CI
V
I
C
C
E
N
T
E
R
D
R
HOLT AVE
PROSPECT ST
WI
L
S
O
N
S
T
LEWIS ST
SA
N
T
A
C
L
A
R
A
A
V
E
THE CITY
D
R
GI
S
L
E
R
A
V
E
CH
E
S
T
N
U
T
A
V
E
CA
N
Y
O
N
V
I
E
W
A
V
E
N
D
R
BI
S
O
N
A
V
E
VI
L
L
A
PA
R
K
RD
AN
T
O
N
B
L
V
D
RIDG
E
L
I
N
E
D
R
WANDA R
EA
S
T
B
L
U
F
F
D
R
SP
R
I
N
G
S
T
BO
N
D
A
V
E
E
R
O
C
K
D
R
HYLAND
ESPLANADE ST
DI
S
N
E
Y
W
A
Y
DEL
M
A
R
A
V
E
FO
O
T
H
I
L
L
B
L
V
D
C
A
R
L
S
O
N
A
V
E
PA
U
L
A
R
I
N
O
A
V
E
PENN
W
A
Y
ME
S
A
D
R
AR
B
O
R
W
O
O
D
ME
A
D
O
W
O
O
D
SO
U
T
H
W
O
O
D
C
R
E
E
K
R
D
SYC
A
M
O
R
E
A
V
E
NO
R
T
H
W
O
O
D
ME
M
O
R
Y
L
N
Y
A
L
E
A
V
E
SA
N
T
I
A
G
O
D
R
LAGUNA
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
IR
V
I
N
E
B
L
V
D
A
DO
D
G
E
A
V
E
TR
A
B
U
C
O
R
D
LA
V
E
T
A
A
V
E
GLASSELL
4T
H
S
T
WAR
N
E
R
A
V
E
N
E
W
P
O
R
T
B
L
V
D
MAIN ST
VAL
E
N
C
I
A
A
V
E
YORBA ST
D
G
E
R
O
U
T
E
D
R
HE
I
L
A
V
E
B
R
O
W
N
I
N
G
A
V
E
BROADWAY ST
WA
L
N
U
T
A
V
E
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
WARD ST
AL
T
O
N
A
V
E
L
A
K
E
R
D
IR
V
I
N
E
A
V
E
CH
A
P
M
A
N
A
V
E
Or
a
n
g
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
M
a
p
/
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
4
LE
G
E
N
D
Cl
a
s
s
I
O
f
f
-
R
o
a
d
(
P
a
v
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
(
S
t
r
i
p
e
d
L
a
n
e
s
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
I
O
n
-
R
o
a
d
(
S
i
g
n
e
d
O
n
l
y
)
Cl
a
s
s
I
I
I
(
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
)
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
s
Pa
r
k
-
a
n
d
-
R
i
d
e
s
Tr
a
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
Pa
r
k
s
Po
i
n
t
s
o
f
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
Am
t
r
a
k
/
M
e
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
(to section 3)
(to section 5)
(t
o
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
1
&
2
)
(t
o
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
6
)
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 224
A-5: Destination Demand Maps
A¾
!"^$
A¥
%&l(
AÊ
!"^$
Aß
IR
VIN
E
A L T O N
A LICIA
B A K E
E L T O R O
C U L V E R
OSO
LA
PAZ
B
A
R
R
A
N
C
A
MOULTON
P
O
R
T
O
L
A
MA
RGUERITE
W
A
L
N
U
T
J E F F R EY
B
R
Y
A
N
J E R O N I M O
CABOT
C
O
A
S
T
LOSALISOS
IR
VIN
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
H A R V A R D
LA K E F O R E S T
LA
GUNA
CANYON
M
U
I
R
L
A
N
D
S
1ST
R E D HIL L
FE
LIPE
YALE
S A N D C A N Y O N
ALISOCREEK
E
DIN
G
E
R
MAIN
T
O
L
E
D
O
T
R
A
B
U
C
O
J A M B O R E E
R
O
C
K
F
I
E
L
D
C R O W N V A L L E Y
T U S T I N R A N C H
UNIVERSITY
N E W P O R T
MIC
H
E
L
S
O
N
L A G U N A HI L L S
EL
C
A
MIN
O
REAL
P A C I FI C P A R K
W
A
R
N
E
R
NEWPORT
COAST
PA S E ODE VA L E N C I A
C A M P U S
RIDGE ROUTE
G L E N W O O D
TURTLEROCK
Q
U
AIL
HILL
SHADYCANYON
W
O
O
D
C
A
N
Y
O
N
S A N T A M A R I A
AVERY
L A K E
S
A
N
T
A
M
A
R
G
A
R
I
T
A
G L EN N R AN C H
ARBORWOOD
MEADOWOOD
S
O
U
T
H
W
O
O
D
C R E E K
R
A
N
C
H
O
B R O W NIN G
T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y
W E S T W O O D
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
E
N
T
R
E
T
R
A
B
U
C
O
RANCHO
L A G U N A C A N Y O N
M
AIN
P
O
RTOLA
H A R V A R D
Y A L E
A L T O N
B
R
Y
A
N
R I D G E R O U T E
Irvine Spectrum Area
2035 Daily Work Trip Origins
November 12, 2008 Portions of this map copyrighted by Thomas Bros Maps and reproduced with permission.
W:
\
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
\
P
D
C
S
\
S
P
\
P
A
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
2
0
0
8
\
m
x
d
\
S
p
e
c
t
r
u
m
_
W
o
r
k
O
r
i
g
i
n
s
_
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
_
2
0
0
8
-
1
1
1
2
.
m
x
d
Source: OCTAM 3.3
Class I Existing
Class II Proposed
Class II Existing
Class III Proposed
Class III Existing
Class I Proposed
Bikeways
010.5
MilesI
[Irvine Spectrum
Trip Origins*
Trip Destinations
* Darker colors represent
greater number of trip origins
A¥
?ê
%&l(
AÊ!"^$
Ak
?ê
%&l(
1ST
C
O
A
S
T
EDINGER
BEACH
17TH
HARBOR
WARNER
BRISTOL
C U L V E R
A
LT
O
N
TRASK
MCFADDEN
MAGNOLIA
NEWLAND
FAIRVIEW
BUSHARD
Y A L E
EUCLID
J A M B O R E E
R E D HIL L
ADAMS
BROOKHURST
LAMPSON
FLOWER
SLATER
GRAND
BOLSA
HAZARD
MACARTHUR
W
A
L
N
U
T
ELLIS
N E W P O R T
B
A
R
R
A
N
C
A
19TH
NEWHOPE
4TH
IR VIN E
GOLDENWEST
B
R
Y
A
N
RAITT
TALBERT
H A R V A R D
BAKER
GARDEN GROVE
WARD
GARFIELD
WESTMINSTER
BALBOA
C
A
M
P
U
S
TUSTIN
GOTHARD
UNIVERSITY
J E F F R EY
DYER
BEAR
MAIN
BROADWAY
MICHELS
ON
LAGUNA
CANYON
YORKTOWN
PLACENTIA
ATLANTA
FAIR
VICTORIAPA
CIFIC
C
O
A
ST
LAKE
SUNFLOWER
FAIRHAVEN
DELAWARE
HOOVER
IR
VIN
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
V O N K A R M A N
HEIL
SANTA ANA
T U S T I N R AN C H
SEGERSTROM
STANDARD
LA VETA
9TH
CIVIC CENTER
HOLT
INDIANAPOLIS
WILSON
EL
C
A
MIN
O
R
E
A
L
DOVER
T
R
A
B
U
C
O
SANTA CLARA
HEWES
HAMILTON
GISLER
22
N
D
O
R
A
N
G
E
YORBA
CHESTNUT
SOUTH COAST
DALE
SA N MIG U EL
B O N I TA C A N Y O N
BISON
FORD
5TH
S A N D C A N Y O N
WEST
ANTON
L
E
W
I
S
K
N
O
T
T
EASTBLUFF
6 T H
BANNING
Q
U
AIL
HILL
HASTER
BAYSIDE
S H A D Y C A N Y O N
G
L
E
N
N
E
Y
R
E
HY
L
A
N
D
PROSPECT
ESPLANADE
P
A
L
M
ARLINGTON
M A R G U E RIT E
M E S A V E R D E
WESTERN
32ND
FOOTHILL
MERRIMAC
SPYGLASSHILL
MESA
AV O C AD O
S
O
U
T
H
W
O
O
D
C R E E K
DODGE
B R O W NIN G
MEMORY
FOREST
S
A
N
TIA
G
O
BERKELEY
DODGE
M E M O R Y
S A N T A A N A
N E W P O R T
ELLIS
4TH
F O R D
ALTON
W
A
R
N
E
R
IR
VIN
E
HEIL
1 S T Y A L E
M AIN
LAGUNA
CANYON
1 7 T H L A K E
IRVINE
B
R
Y
A
N
HEIL
WA
RD
MAIN
17TH
LA VETA
Newport Center
2035 Daily Work Trip Origins
November 21, 2008 Portions of this map copyrighted by Thomas Bros Maps and reproduced with permission.
W:
\
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
\
P
D
C
S
\
S
P
\
P
A
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
2
0
0
8
\
m
x
d
\
F
a
s
h
i
o
n
I
s
l
a
n
d
_
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
_
W
o
r
k
O
r
i
g
i
n
s
_
2
0
0
8
-
1
1
2
1
.
m
x
d
Source: OCTAM 3.3
Class I Existing
Class II Proposed
Class II Existing
Class III Proposed
Class III Existing
Class I Proposed
Bikeways
010.5
MilesI
Trip Origins*
Trip Destinations
* Darker colors represent
greater number of trip origins
[
Newport
Center
Ak
A¥
%&l(
AÊ
!"^$
Aß
1ST
C
O
A
S
T
A
LT
O
N
J A M B O R E E
C U L V E R
HARBOR
EDINGER
BRISTOL
R E D HIL L
FAIRVIEW
WARNER
BA
R
R
A
N
C
A
MACARTHUR
MCFADDEN
W
A
L
N
U
T
J E F F R EY
B
R
Y
A
N
4TH
IR VIN E
RAITT
FLOWER
H A R V A R D
BAKER
LA
GUNA
CANYON
GRAND
C A M P U S
19TH
IR
VIN
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
UNIVERSITY
DYER
BEAR
MAIN
BALBOA
NEWHOPE
17
T
H
YALE
FAIR
ELTORO
S A N D C A N Y O N
T
R
A
B
U
C
OSUNFLOWER
N E W PO R T
BIR
C
H
V O N K A R M A N
ADAMS
P
L
A
C
E
N
T
I
A
T U S T I N R A N C H
BROADWAY
HEIL
N E W P O R T C O A S T
SEGERSTROM
STANDARD
WILSON
EL
CA
MIN
O
REAL
D O VER
SANTA ANA
VICTORIA
22
N
D
CHESTNUT
SOUTH COAST
S A N MIGU EL
B O N I TA C A N Y O N
BISON
F OR D
5TH
GISLER
ANTON
EASTBLUFF
B A K E
TURTLEROCK
Q
U
AIL
HILL
BAYSIDE
SHADYC
A
NYON
HYLAND
ARLINGTON
M A R G U E RIT E
HOLT
SLATER
32ND
L A K E
D
E
L
M
A
R
C A R L S O N
PACIFIC PARK
MERRIMAC
PAULARINO
SPYGLASSHILL
S A N T A M A R I A
MESA
TUSTIN
AV O C AD O
ARBORWOOD
V
A
L
E
N
CIA
MEADOWOOD
S
O
U
T
H
W
O
O
D
C R E E K
B R O W NIN G
TE
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y
W E S T W O O D
WO
O
D
C
A
N
Y
O
N
S
A
N
TIA
G
O
SANTACRUZ
IRVINE
Y A L E
L A G U N A C A N Y O N
F O R D
B
R
Y
A
N
ALTON
IR
VIN
E
N E W P O R T
MAIN
W
A
R
N
E
R
4TH
S A N T A A N A
Irvine Business Complex
2035 Daily Work Trip Origins
November 12, 2008 Portions of this map copyrighted by Thomas Bros Maps and reproduced with permission.
W:
\
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
\
P
D
C
S
\
S
P
\
P
A
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
2
0
0
8
\
m
x
d
\
I
B
C
_
W
o
r
k
O
r
i
g
i
n
s
_
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
_
2
0
0
8
-
1
1
1
2
.
m
x
d
[Irvine
Business
Complex
Source: OCTAM 3.3
Class I Existing
Class II Proposed
Class II Existing
Class III Proposed
Class III Existing
Class I Proposed
Bikeways
010.5
MilesI
Trip Origins*
Trip Destinations
* Darker colors represent
greater number of trip origins
Ak
!"^$
A¥
?ê
%&l(
1ST
17TH
C
O
A
S
T
EDINGER
HARBOR
BRISTOL
WARNER
FAIRVIEW
MAGNOLIA
BUSHARD
J A M B O R E E
MCFADDEN
R E D HILL
A
LT
O
N
C U L V E R
EUCLID
BROOKHURST
TRASK
FLOWER
GRAND
MACARTHUR
ADAMS
19TH
4TH
IR VIN E
NEWHOPE
RAITT
H A R V A R D
BAKER
ELLIS
W
A
L
N
U
T
WARD
HAZARD
N E W P O R T
BALBOA
C A M P U S
SLATER
BARRANCA
UNIVERSITY
DYER
BEAR
MAIN
BROADWAY
BOLSA
TALBERT
Y A L E
PLACENTIA
WESTMINSTER
FAIR
TUSTIN
VICTORIA
SUNFLOWER
B
R
Y
A
N
BIR
C
H
V O N K A R M A N
HEIL
SANTA ANA
GARFIELD
N E W P O R T C O A S T
SEGERSTROM
STANDARD
CIVIC CENTER
HOLT
WILSON
EL
CA
MIN
O
R
EAL
D OVER
SANTA CLARA
YORKTOWN
T U S TIN R A N C H
ATLANTA
HAMILTON
GISLER
22
N
D
J E F F R E Y
YORBACHESTNUT
SOUTH COAST
S A N MIGU EL
B O N I T A C A N Y O N
BISON
F OR D
5TH
S U P E RIO R
IR
VIN
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
ANTON
EASTBLUFF
INDIANAPOLIS
BANNING
TURTLEROCK
PACIFIC
COAST
BAYSIDE
SHADYCANYON
HYLAN
D
PROSPECT
ESPLANADE
ARLINGTON
M A R G U E RIT E
M E S A V E R D E
32ND
L A K E
D
E
L
M
A
R
FOOTHILL
C A R L S O NMERRIMAC
PAULARINO
SPYGLASSHILL
MESA
AV O C A D O
V
A
L
E
N
CIA
C R E E K
DODGE
B R O W NIN G
S
A
N
TIA
G
O
SANTACRUZ
O
L
D
IR
VIN
E
S
A
N
T
I
A
G
O
17TH
Y A L E
HEIL
ALTON
WARD
4TH
YORBA
PROSPECT
N EW
PO R T
IRVINE
S A N T A A N A
MAIN
B
R
Y
A
N
W
A
R
N
E
R
IR
VIN
E
F O R D
South Coast Metro Area
2035 Daily Work Trip Origins
November 12, 2008 Portions of this map copyrighted by Thomas Bros Maps and reproduced with permission.
W:
\
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
\
P
D
C
S
\
S
P
\
P
A
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
2
0
0
8
\
m
x
d
\
S
o
u
t
h
C
o
a
s
t
_
W
o
r
k
O
r
i
g
i
n
s
_
d
e
s
n
i
t
y
_
2
0
0
8
-
1
1
1
2
.
m
x
d
Source: OCTAM 3.3
Class I Existing
Class II Proposed
Class II Existing
Class III Proposed
Class III Existing
Class I Proposed
Bikeways
010.5
MilesI
[
South
Coast
Metro
Trip Origins*
Trip Destinations
* Darker colors represent
greater number of trip origins
?ê
?k
%&l(
AÊ
!"^$
!"^$
1ST
HARBOR
EUCLID
17TH
BALL
EDINGER
BRISTOL
BROOKHURST
TUSTIN
A
LT
O
N
KATELLA
FAIRVIEW
C U L V E R
LINCOLN
Y A L E
WARNER
R E D HILL
MCFADDEN
FLOWER
GRAND
N E W P O R T
9TH
CHAPMAN
B
A
R
R
A
N
C
A
NEWHOPE
TRASK
4TH
RAITT
TAFT
BATAVIA
B
R
Y
A
N
MACARTHUR
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
H A R V A R D
BAKER
WARD
MEATS
ADAMS
E
A
S
T
GLASSELL
C A M P U S
J A M B OR E E
HEWES
COLLINS
CANNON
LAMPSON
B R O A D W A Y
ORANGEWOOD
UNIVERSITY
19TH
DYER
BEAR
WEST
MAIN
J E F F R E Y
SUNKIST
MICHELSON
N O H L R A N CH
CAMBRIDGE
HAZARD
YORBA
FAIR
IR VIN E
VICTORIA
SUNFLOWER
SLATER
GARDEN GROVE
HASTER
FAIRHAVEN
BIR
C
H
ELLIS
STATE
COLLEGE
V O N K A R M A N
HEIL
SANTA ANA
T U S T I N R AN C H
WESTMINSTER
WALNUT
SEGERSTROM
STANDARD
TALBERT
SE RRAN O
PLACENTIA
S
A
N
T
I
A
G
O
LA VETA
CERRITOS
CIVIC CENTER
HOLT
PROSPECT
WILSON
EL
CA
MIN
O
REAL
LEWIS
SANTA CLARA
BOLSA
T
R
A
B
U
C
O
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
RIO
VISTA
GISLER
22
N
D
SOUTH
R I V E R D A L E
CHESTNUT
ORANGEOLIVE
ORANGE
SOUTH COAST
VILLA PARK
5TH
ANTON
P
O
R
T
O
L
A
SA NTIAGO C ANYON
WAGNER
DISNEYLAND
WANDA
S A N DC A N YON
IMPERIAL
GARFIELD
R
I
D
G
E
L
I
N
E
SPRING
BOND
Q
U
AIL
HILL
HYLAND
VIA ESCOLA
ESPLANADE
ARLINGTON
M E S A V E R D E
DISNEY
YORKTOWN
L A K E
D
E
L
M
A
R
FOOTHILL
C A R L S O NMERRIMAC
PAULARINO
MESA
RAMPART
TURTLEROCK
C
R
A
W
F
O
R
D
C
A
N
Y
O
N
V
A
L
E
N
CIA
FLETCHER
ECKHOF
F
S
O
U
T
H
W
O
O
D
C R E E K
DODGE
B R O W NIN G
GROVE
E A S T B L U F F
HOWELL
W E S T W O O D
MEMORY
LAWSON
DODGE
B
R
Y
A
N
LA VETA
WARD
C E R R I TO S
N E W P O R T
TAFT
IRVINE
S A N T A A N A
PROSPECT
GLASSELL
ALTON
CHAPMAN
MAIN
IR
VIN
E
HEIL
W
A
R
N
E
R
W
A
L
N
U
T
PROSPECT
BROADWAY
WALNUT
Y A L E
4TH
S
A
N
T
I
A
G
O
LEWIS
Downtown Santa Ana
2035 Daily Work Trip Origins
November 12, 2008 Portions of this map copyrighted by Thomas Bros Maps and reproduced with permission.
W:
\
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
\
P
D
C
S
\
S
P
\
P
A
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
2
0
0
8
\
m
x
d
\
S
a
n
t
a
A
n
a
_
W
o
r
k
O
r
i
g
i
n
s
_
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
_
2
0
0
8
-
1
1
1
2
.
m
x
d
Source: OCTAM 3.3
Class I Existing
Class II Proposed
Class II Existing
Class III Proposed
Class III Existing
Class I Proposed
Bikeways
010.5
MilesI
[Santa Ana
Trip Origins*
Trip Destinations
* Darker colors represent
greater number of trip origins
A»
?l
?ê
?k
A»
AÊ
!"^$
!"^$
1ST
EUCLID
HARBOR
17TH
LA PALMA
TUSTIN
BALL
EDINGER
KATELLA
BROOKHURST
LINCOLN
WARNER
BRISTOL
MCFADDEN
FLOWER
FA
I
R
V
I
E
W
GRAND
R E D HILL
N E W P O R T
ORANGETHORPE
TRASK
9TH
J A M B O R EE
CHAPMAN
YORBA LINDA
NEWHOPE
4TH
E
A
S
T
RAITT
TAFT
BATAVIA
IR
VIN
E
C U L V E R
Y ALE
MEATS
STATE
COLLEGE
LAMPSON
GLASSELL
B
R
Y
A
N
B R O A D W A Y
HEWES
COLLINS
ORANGEWOOD
WARD
DYER
MACARTHUR
WEST
MAIN
SUNKIST
HAZARD
VALENCIA
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
K
R
A
E
M
E
R
M I R A L O M A
A
LT
O
N
SLATER
BEAR
ELLIS
CAMBRIDGE
LAKEVIEW
N O H L RA N C H
ROSE
COMMONWEALTH
YORBA
GARDEN GROVE
PLACENTIA
SUNFLOWER
H A R V A R D
ACACIA
HASTER
FAIRHAVEN
LEMON
TALBERT
WESTMINSTER
HEIL
SANTA ANA
CERRITOS
B
A
R
R
A
N
C
A
T U S T I N R A N C H
PALM
F
A
I
R
M
O
N
T
C
A
N
N
O
N
WALNUT
IMPERIAL
BOLSA
SEGERSTROM
STANDARD
R I V E R D A L E
S
A
N
T
I
A
G
O
RI
C
H
F
I
E
L
D
LA VETA
MALVERN
CIVIC CENTER
KE
LLOGG
HOLT
PROSPECT
S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N
EL
C
A
MIN
O
R
EAL
LEWIS
ORANGE
SANTA CLARA
S E R R A N O
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
RIO
VISTA
GISLER
CROWTHER
SOUTH
M
I
L
L
E
R
RAYMOND
CHESTNUT
ORANGEOLIVE
GARFIELD
ALTA VISTA
SOUTH COAST
BRADFORD
VILLA PARK
5TH
BUENA VISTA
ANTON
B R E A
T
R
A
B
U
C
O
WAGNER
E S P E R A N Z A
DISNEYLAND
WANDA
FRONTERA
SPRING
JEFFERSON
BOND
V O N K A R M A N
SANT I AGO C ANY ON
B A S TAN
C H U R Y
I
R
V
I
N
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
HY
LA
ND
VIA ES COLA
ESPLANADE
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
HIGHLAND
DISNEY
BE
RK
E
LE
Y
PA
R
K
S
NUTWOOD
FOOTHILL
RAMPART
C
R
A
W
F
O
R
D
C
A
N
Y
O
N
FLETCHER
ECKHOF
F
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
H
I
L
L
S
DODGE
B R O W NIN G
R
O
YA
L
O
A
K
GROVE
HOWELL
W E S T W O O D
MEMORY
ROMNEYA
LAWSON
W
A
R
N
E
R
LA VETA
B
R
Y
A
N
GLASSELL
ANAHEIM
S
A
N
T
I
A
G
O
C E R RI T O S
DODGE
WARD
CHAPMAN
YORBA
BROADWAY
WALNUT
PROSPECT
W
A
L
N
U
T
PROSPECT
Y A L E
TAFT
4TH
HEIL
CHAPMAN
KELLOGG
MAIN
VALENCIA
CANNON
V
A
L
E
N
CIA
ALTON
IRVINE
LEWIS
Main Street Area (Santa Ana / Orange)
2035 Daily Work Trip Origins
November 12, 2008 Portions of this map copyrighted by Thomas Bros Maps and reproduced with permission.
W:
\
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
\
P
D
C
S
\
S
P
\
P
A
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
2
0
0
8
\
m
x
d
\
M
a
i
n
S
t
_
W
o
r
k
O
r
i
g
i
n
s
_
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
_
2
0
0
8
-
1
1
1
2
.
m
x
d
Source: OCTAM 3.3
Class I Existing
Class II Proposed
Class II Existing
Class III Proposed
Class III Existing
Class I Proposed
Bikeways
010.5
MilesI
[
Main
Street
Area
Trip Origins*
Trip Destinations
* Darker colors represent
greater number of trip origins
%&l(
A»
?l
?ê
?k
!"^$
BEACH
1ST
EUCLID
HARBOR
BALL
EDINGER
KATELLA
LA PALMA
17TH
LINCOLNMAGNOLIA
TUSTIN
WARNER
DALE
K
N
O
T
T
MCFADDEN
TRASK
BROOKHURST
BRISTOL
ORANGETHORPE
WESTERN
LAMPSON
FLOWER
GRAND
SLATER
FAIRVIEW
HAZARD
BOLSA
BASTA NCHURY
NEWLAND
R E D HIL L
ELLIS
9TH
CHAPMAN
ORANGEWOOD
NEWHOPE
BUSHARD
4TH
E
A
S
T
RAITT
B R O A D W A Y
STATE
COLLEGE
ORANGE
BATAVIA
CERRITOS
ROSE
TALBERT
GARDEN GROVE
MEATS
GOLDENWEST
KR
A
E
M
E
R
GLASSELL
WESTMINSTER
VALENCIA
COLLINS
COMMONWEALTH
YORBA LINDA
MALVERN
TAFT
LA
K
E
V
I
E
W
DYER
PLACENTIA
MACARTHUR
WE
S
T
B R E A
MAIN
GOT
H
AR
D
SUNKIST
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
WARD
M I R A L O M A
GILBERT
STANTON
CAMBRIDGE
CRESCENT
YORBA
SUNFLOWER
ACACIA
N E W P O R T
HASTER
FAIRHAVEN
LEMON
IMPERIAL
HOO
VE
R
HEIL
SANTA ANA
BEAR
PALM
IRVINE
A
LT
O
N
WALNUT
SEGERSTROM
STANDARD
R I V E R D A L E
S
A
N
T
I
A
G
O
RI
C
H
F
I
E
L
D
LA VETA
ROSECRANS
CIVIC CENTER
ARTESIA
HOLT
PROSPECT
LEWIS
SANTA CLARA
J A M B O R E E
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
RIO
VISTA
CROWTHER
SOUTH
B
A
R
R
A
N
C
A
M
I
L
L
E
R
RA
Y
M
ON
D
CHESTNUT
ORANGEOLIVE
ALTA VISTA
B
R
Y
A
N
NOHL RANCH
BRADFORD
5TH
BUENA VISTA
WAGNER
DISNEYLAND
WA
ND
A
FRONTERA
SPRING
EL
CA
MIN
O
REAL
H AR V AR D
JE
FF
E
RS
ON
P
A
R
K
S
BOND
HEWES
ASSOCIATED
VALLEY
VIEW
PIONEER
HY
L
A
N
D
VILLA PARK
ESPLANADE
SOUTH COAST
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
HIGHLAND
BER
KEL
EY
WHITAKER
RAMPART
V O N K A R M A N
FLETCHER
ECKHOF
F
ANTON
STA
G
E
DODGE
GROVE
HOWELL
MIRA LOMA
MEMORY
ROMNEYA
LAWSON
GILBERT
HEWES
PROSPECT
TAFT
4TH
MAIN
HEIL
ELLIS
ALTON
W
A
L
N
U
T
VALENCIA
GLASSELL
WALNUT
LE
W
I
S
BROADWAY
C E R R I T O S
DALE
M AIN
GIL
BE
RT
CHAPMAN
HEIL
PROSPECT
V
A
L
E
N
CIA
VA
LE
N
CI
A
WAR
D
S
A
N
T
I
A
G
O
CHAPMAN
LA VETA
Anaheim Resort Area
2035 Daily Work Trip Origins
Source: OCTAM 3.3
November 12, 2008 Portions of this map copyrighted by Thomas Bros Maps and reproduced with permission.
W:
\
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
\
P
D
C
S
\
S
P
\
P
A
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
2
0
0
8
\
m
x
d
\
D
i
s
n
e
y
l
a
n
d
_
W
o
r
k
O
r
i
g
i
n
s
_
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
_
2
0
0
8
-
1
1
1
2
.
m
x
d
010.5
MilesI
[Anaheim
Resort
Area
Trip Origins*
Class I Existing
Class II Proposed
Class II Existing
Class III Proposed
Class III Existing
Class I Proposed
Bikeways
Trip Destinations
* Darker colors represent
greater number of trip origins
A»
?l
?ê
?k
A»
AÊ
!"^$
EUCLID
1ST
HARBOR
LA PALMA
17TH
TUSTIN
BALL
IMPERIAL
KATELLA
LINCOLN
EDINGER
BREA
MCFADDEN
BROOKHURST
BASTANCHURY
ROSE
N E W P O R T
ORANGETHORPE
STATE
COLLEGE
LAMBERT
TRASK
YORBA LINDA
9TH
KR
A
E
M
E
R
CHAPMAN
4TH
E
A
S
T
GRAND
BIRCH
TAFT
BATAVIA
BRISTOL
LAMPSON
FLOWER
MEATS
B R O A D W A Y
GLASSELL
ORANGEWOOD
HEWES
COLLINS
CANNON
PLACENTIA
FAIRVIEW
LA
K
E
V
I
E
W
IDAHO
WE
S
T
MAIN
IR
VIN
E
HAZARD
SUNKIST
NE
W
HO
PE
VALENCIA
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
N O H L R A N C H
GILBERT
LA HABRA
M I R A L O M A
COMMONWEALTH
CAMBRIDGE
PALM
GARDEN GROVE
YORBA
RAITT
F
A
I
R
M
O
N
T
J A M B O R E E
BEACH
BUSHARD
ACACIA
WARD
HASTER
FAIRHAVEN
LEMON
WESTMINSTER
BERRY
CERRITOS
BOLSA
SANTA ANA
C A R B O N C A N Y O N
SANTA ANA CANYON
WALNUT
S E R R A N O
MALVERN
R I V E R D A L E
S
A
N
T
I
A
G
O
RICHFIELD
LA VETA
R E D HIL L
ORANGE
PUENTE
CIVIC CENTER
KE
LLOGG
HOLT
PROSPECT
LEWIS
T U S T I N R A N C H
SANTA CLARA
ASSOCIATED
CENTRAL
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
RIO
VISTA
GOLDEN
CROWTHER
SOUTH
E S P E R A N Z A
M
I
L
L
E
R
STANDARD
RAYMOND
CHESTNUT
ORANGEOLIVE
VILLAGE
CENTER
ALTA VISTA
OHIO
B
R
Y
A
N
BRADFORD
E
L
C
A
M
IN
O
R
E
A
L
VILLA PARK
5TH
BUENA VISTA
SANTIAGO CAN YON
WAGNER
C A N Y O N V I E W
DISNEYLAND
WANDA
FRONTERA
SPRING
JEFFERSON
P
A
R
K
S
BOND
VALLEY
VIEW
PIONEER
B R O W NIN G
VIA ESCOLA
ESPLANADE
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
HIGHLAND
BE
R
KEL
EY
FOOTHILL
CRESCENT
RAMPART
C U L V E R
C
R
A
W
F
O
R
D
C
A
N
Y
O
N
FLETCHER
ECKHOF
F
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
H
I
L
L
S
DODGE
GROVE
HOWELL
MIRA LOMA
MEMORY
ROMNEYA
LAWSON
IMPERIAL
PROSPECT
GLASSELL
PROSPECT
F
A
I
R
M
O
N
T
DODGE
IRVINE
CHAPMAN
PALM
LAKEVIEW
C E R R I T O S
LA VETA
ASSOCIATED
MAIN B
R
Y
A
N
BROADWAY
TAFT
4TH
CHAPMAN
W
A
L
N
U
T
LEWIS
VALENCIA
VALENCIA
WALNUT
LAMBERT
KELLOGG
Anaheim Canyon Business Center
2035 Daily Work Trip Origins
Source: OCTAM 3.3
November 24, 2008 Portions of this map copyrighted by Thomas Bros Maps and reproduced with permission.
W:
\
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
\
P
D
C
S
\
S
P
\
P
A
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
2
0
0
8
\
m
x
d
\
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
_
W
o
r
k
O
r
i
g
i
n
s
_
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
_
2
0
0
8
-
1
1
2
4
.
m
x
d
010.5
MilesI
[
Anaheim Canyon
Business Center
Class I Existing
Class II Proposed
Class II Existing
Class III Proposed
Class III Existing
Class I Proposed
Bikeways
Trip Origins*
Trip Destinations
* Darker colors represent
greater number of trip origins
A»
?l
?k
!"^$
EUCLID
BALL
HARBOR
LA PALMA
KATELLA
DALE
LINCOLN
IMPERIAL
BREA
TUSTIN
LAMBERT
ORANGETHORPE
MAIN
MAGNOLIA
BASTANCHURY
ROSE
STATE
COLLEGE
LAMPSON
9TH
KR
A
E
M
E
R
CHAPMAN
BROOKHURST
E
A
S
T
ORANGEWOOD
B R O A D W A Y
BIRCH
TAFT
BATAVIA
YORBA LINDA
MEATS
GLASSELL
VALENCIA
COLLINS
CANNON
PLACENTIA
HEWES
CERRITOS
COMMONWEALTH
GARDEN GROVE
WHITTIER
MALVERN
ORANGE
LA
KE
V
I
E
W
IDAHO
WE
S
T
SUNKIST
LA HABRA
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
GILBERT
M I R ALO M A
CAMBRIDGE
PALM
BERRY
ACACIA
HASTER
FAIRHAVEN
LEMON
N O H L R A N C H
WALNUT
R I V E R D A L E
C A R B O N C A N Y O N
S
A
N
T
I
A
G
O
RI
C
H
F
I
E
L
D
LA VETA
CRESCENT
ROSECRANS
PUENTE
KELLOGG
PROSPECT
LEWIS
YORBA
ASSOCIATED
CENTRAL
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
RIO
VISTA
GOLDEN
CROWTHER
SOUTH
M
I
L
L
E
R
RA
YM
O
N
D
ORANGEOLIVE
BEACH
ALTA VISTA
OHIO
BRADFORD
VILLA PARK
BUENA VISTA
SANTA ANA CANYON
WAGNER
DISNEYLAND
WA
N
D
A
FRONTERA
SPRING
JEF
F
ER
SO
N
P
A
R
K
S
BOND
VALLEY
VIEW
PIONEER
VIA ESCOLA
ESPLANADE
FA
I
R
M
O
N
T
BRISTOL
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
HIGHLAND
B
ERK
E
LE
Y
FLOWER
WHITAKER
ARTESIA
RAMPART
MAC
Y
FLETCHER
ECKHOFF
S E R R A N O
GROVE
MIRA LOMA
ROMNEYA
LAWSON
GI
LB
E
RT
CHAPMAN
ASSOCIATED
VAL
E
NC
IA
C E R R I TO S
DALE
LAKEVIEW
LE
WI
S
BEACH
PALM
WALNUT
KELLOGG
GLASSELL
BEA
C
H
VALENCIA
CHAPMAN
LA VETA
GILBERT IMPERIAL
TAFT
Brea Mall
2035 Daily Work Trip Origins
Source: OCTAM 3.3
November 21, 2008 Portions of this map copyrighted by Thomas Bros Maps and reproduced with permission.
W:
\
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
\
P
D
C
S
\
S
P
\
P
A
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
\
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
2
0
0
8
\
m
x
d
\
B
r
e
a
M
a
l
l
_
W
o
r
k
O
r
i
g
i
n
s
_
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
_
2
0
0
8
-
1
1
2
1
.
m
x
d
010.5
MilesI
[
Brea Mall
Class I Existing
Class II Proposed
Class II Existing
Class III Proposed
Class III Existing
Class I Proposed
Bikeways
?ê
Trip Origins*
Trip Destinations
* Darker colors represent
greater number of trip origins
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 234
A-6: Caltrans Deputy Directive 64
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 240
A-7: USDOT - Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel
Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel: A Recommended Approach, Policy
of the US DOT;full document at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bikeped/design.htm
Excerpts:
Purpose:
Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel: A Recommended Approach is a policy
statement adopted by the United States Department of Transportation. USDOT hopes that public
agencies, professional associations, advocacy groups, and others adopt this approach as a way
of committing themselves to integrating bicycling and walking into the transportation mainstream.
The Design Guidance incorporates three key principles:
a. a policy statement that bicycling and walking facilities will be incorporated into all
transportation projects unless exceptional circumstances exist;
b. an approach to achieving this policy that has already worked in State and local agencies;
and
c. a series of action items that a public agency, professional association, or advocacy group
can take to achieve the overriding goal of improving conditions for bicycling and walking.
The Policy Statement was drafted by the U.S. Department of Transportation in response to
Section 1202 (b) of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) with the input and
assistance of public agencies, professional associations and advocacy groups.
Policy Statement
1. Bicycle and pedestrian ways shall be established in new construction and reconstruction
projects in all urbanized areas unless one or more of three conditions are met:
bicyclists and pedestrians are prohibited by law from using the roadway. In this instance,
a greater effort may be necessary to accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians elsewhere
within the right of way or within the same transportation corridor.
the cost of establishing bikeways or walkways would be excessively disproportionate to
the need or probable use. Excessively disproportionate is defined as exceeding twenty
percent of the cost of the larger transportation project.
where sparsity of population or other factors indicate an absence of need. For example,
the Portland Pedestrian Guide requires "all construction of new public streets" to include
sidewalk improvements on both sides, unless the street is a cul-de-sac with four or fewer
dwellings or the street has severe topographic or natural resource constraints.
2. In rural areas, paved shoulders should be included in all new construction and reconstruction
projects on roadways used by more than 1,000 vehicles per day, as in States such as Wisconsin.
Paved shoulders have safety and operational advantages for all road users in addition to
providing a place for bicyclists and pedestrians to operate.
Rumble strips are not recommended where shoulders are used by bicyclists unless there is a
minimum clear path of four feet in which a bicycle may safely operate.
3. Sidewalks, shared use paths, street crossings (including over- and undercrossings), pedestrian
signals, signs, street furniture, transit stops and facilities, and all connecting pathways shall be
designed, constructed, operated and maintained so that all pedestrians, including people with
disabilities, can travel safely and independently.
4. The design and development of the transportation infrastructure shall improve conditions for
bicycling and walking through the following additional steps:
planning projects for the long-term. Transportation facilities are long-term investments
that remain in place for many years. The design and construction of new facilities that
meet the criteria in item 1) above should anticipate likely future demand for bicycling and
walking facilities and not preclude the provision of future improvements. For example, a
bridge that is likely to remain in place for 50 years, might be built with sufficient width for
safe bicycle and pedestrian use in anticipation that facilities will be available at either end
of the bridge even if that is not currently the case
addressing the need for bicyclists and pedestrians to cross corridors as well as travel
along them. Even where bicyclists and pedestrians may not commonly use a particular
travel corridor that is being improved or constructed, they will likely need to be able to
cross that corridor safely and conveniently. Therefore, the design of intersections and
interchanges shall accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians in a manner that is safe,
accessible and convenient.
getting exceptions approved at a senior level. Exceptions for the non-inclusion of
bikeways and walkways shall be approved by a senior manager and be documented with
supporting data that indicates the basis for the decision.
designing facilities to the best currently available standards and guidelines. The design of
facilities for bicyclists and pedestrians should follow design guidelines and standards that
are commonly used, such as the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle
Facilities, AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, and the
ITE Recommended Practice "Design and Safety of Pedestrian Facilities".
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 243
A-8: OCTA Congestion Management Program
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 244
OCTA Congestion Management Program:
Transportation Demand Management Requirements
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies are geared toward increasing vehicle occupancy,
promoting the use of alternative modes, reducing the number of automobile trips, and decreasing overall
trip lengths. The adoption of a TDM ordinance was required of every local jurisdiction for Orange
County's 1991 Congestion Management Program (CMP). The ordinances were based on a worksite
standards approach contained in a model TDM ordinance prepared by the Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCTA).
TDM Ordinances
The model TDM ordinance, prepared by OCTA, aims to promote carpools, vanpools, alternate work
hours, park and ride facilities, telecommuting, and other traffic reduction strategies. OCTA updated the
model ordinance in 2001 to reflect the adoption of Rule 2202 by the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD), which requires employers with 250 or more employees at a worksite
to develop an emission reduction program projected to meet an emission reduction target set by the
SCAQMD. In 2002, OCTA reviewed jurisdictions’ ordinances to ensure conformance with the Rule
2202.
Principal provisions of the TDM model ordinance are as follows:
x applies to non-residential public and private development proposals expected to generate more
than 250 employees;
x contains a methodology for determining projected employment for specified land use proposals;
x includes mandatory facility-based development standards (conditions of approval) that apply to
proposals that exceed the established employment threshold;
x presents optional provisions for implementing operational TDM programs and strategies that
target the property owner or employer, and requires annual reporting on the effectiveness of
programs and strategies proposed for facilities;
x contains implementation and monitoring provisions;
x includes enforcement and penalties provisions.
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 245
A-9: Local Fair Share Program for Street Maintenance and
Improvements
OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan 246
Streets Programs
Local Fair Share Program for Street Maintenance and Improvements
The Local Fair Share Program will provide flexible funding to help cities and the county of Orange pay for the escalating
cost of restoring the aging street system. In addition, cities can use these funds for other local transportation needs such as
residential street projects, traffic and pedestrian safety near schools, signal priority for emergency vehicles, etc.
City Requirements to Receive Funds
This program is intended to augment, rather than replace, existing transportation expenditures and therefore cities must
meet the following requirements to receive the funds:
1.Continue to invest general fund funds (or other local discretionary funds) for transportation and annually increase
this commitment to keep pace with inflation
2.Agree to use M2 funds for transportation purposes only, subject to full repayment and a loss of funding eligibility
for five years for any misuse
3.Agree to separate accounting for M2 funds and annual reporting on actual expenditures
4.Develop and maintain a pavement management program to ensure timely street maintenance and submit regular
public reports on the condition of streets
5.Annually submit a six-year capital improvement program and commit to spend M2 funds within three years of
receipt
6.Agree to assess traffic impacts of new development and require that new development pay a fair share of any
necessary transportation improvements
7.Agree to plan, build and operate major streets consistent with the countywide Master Plan of Arterial Highways
to ensure efficient traffic flow across city boundaries
8.Participate in traffic forums with neighboring jurisdictions to facilitate the implementation and maintenance of
traffic signal synchronization programs and projects. This requires cities to balance local traffic policies with
neighboring cities — for selected streets — to promote more efficient traffic circulation overall
9.Agree to consider land use planning strategies that are transit-friendly, including bike and pedestrian access and
reduce reliance on the automobile
Distribution of Funds Based on Formula
The funds under this program are distributed to cities and the County of Orange by formula once the agencies have
fulfilled the above requirements. The formula will account for population, street mileage and amount of sales tax collected
in each jurisdiction.
Cost:
The estimated cost for this thirty-year program is $2 billion.