Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout80A - TRANSIT CODE AND STATION DISTRICT - EXHIBIT O EXHIBIT O 80A-363 T ASS IT Z N I N D E D 4 EIR Findings of Fact/ Statement of Overriding Considerations Prepared for The City of Santa Ana Community Redevelopment Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza M20 PO Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 Prepared by PBS&J 625 The City Drive Saut1~, Suite 200 Orange, California 92868 June 7, 2010 80A-364 80A-365 ~ ~ t ~ ~~15__1_LL ~ ~#1~tD[~XXCf10f~i~.i~~•/i~+114/111/Illlf/~4i~/~~..~.~~.,~~.~~..~.~~.~~r~~~//+1++/11//11//141114i~1~,~1/~I~~fM~~~~~~~~i~i~~iF .L~.L kJ¦ r.~]~~JS4 ~.r 1 2i1~}111+7 ~t~~~iF~ai~~~ai~~a~i~F~~il~ill/114h1/IIf1~i1~i~~4~i~~~~~tiF~~ti~~a~~a~i~aF~~rf~rf~r/~+1//11114/1114111 i+~~ ~L~~~lJ ~LLlllll~ ~.••~~~~~~~~~~~~~~IF~Irrr~~r~i~~s•~~~~~~~~•r~rrr•+a••rr~~.•.••~~..rrr.rr..r......rr.......Illll~rrrr•~~~~~~s•r~~•a~~~1-I i 4J111LL iLI1LJ i 111~.+~1Iti7 ll~[i1~~~ ~LV~~k.~~ 111~4+111Gi~~Y4i7 ff~~i~rF~~~~~~~~~~~F~~~i~~tf~a~ii~/~f/14/1~/~+11/11/111f11~4M~fa+ All t 17 LLL • !!!Al1 VI ~F~~~`~ L-~~~\.f l~ •~~~ar~rarrrar~a•rrraa~~~~~~~~rl~llrr.~~~•~~~~~~~r•r~rrrrr r•~~r•rr~~~~~~~~~~rr~~~~~~~~~~~~r.~ar•~~~~I~I....rr~rrr~sl~V 1 ~~k~V~ ~J FJ~~VL-?i~1r lJ •s•rrr•rrr•rra~~~~~~~rrarrrr...•~~.i~~~~~~~rrr~~~~r~r~~~~~~~~~~sii~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r•rrr•r~~~~~~~a.rll~~~~~~1~~~~ 1.+ilrJ4~lll1 0~ 131 4tr~11CL~~~1..~71~~~~~~~~~~~~•rrr•rrr~~~~~~~rr•~~~~rrrrr~~~rar~~~~lllllllr~~~~~~r~~~~~rr~~~•~~s~~~~rirrr•~~~~~rri./ I'~o~eC~ ~~~~e~•I~~t~~~e ~~indins ~~~~~~I~rr...Irr~ri~~•,,.~,,.~~,,.~,......rr••ra~~s.••r.~..•a•a~~~~~~~~•a...~~.l~l.....ll~~~ 3.~-,~ I'~t~di~,s Oil l~tei`~~tl~re~ ~~7e Piopoed ~'~'~.~~i~ ~oni~g Code ~nal~=zed its t~~e Di~~ ~~....~,~.~,~..rrrll~~rrrr~~rr~~~~~~~~~~~~~~""~~~~~~r•••rr••~~~~~~~~•rr~~~~~~r.~~"Lr 3~~.~ ~indi~~ ors ~lterr~~Tes ~o tie ~'~•~posed Trat~si~ ~o~r~g Cede .t~~~~i~=red its ~i~e ~~~f~ ~Il~rr?.4.~~41~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~s•rrra~~~a•rr~~~~~~aa~~~~~~~~r•...•~~~~~I~...III~~RI ~.~-~3 ~'itadi~ o~~ ~efna~i~~es rh~~ ~~~ere Co~sidc~•ed ~li~nit~a~ed ~YO~Tl De~~i~~d ~~~al~=SIS fil the D~a~'~ EIR,,.,.,.rrr•••,,,•rr••ra•••r••sa~~~r.••r..~~~•.rr~.. ~'~-r ~d~~~oZ~~~ ~~~7d~i1,..rrrrrrr~a~~~~~~~~~l~rr...rrrrrrrrr~rrr~~~•rrrrrr••rrrrrr••rr••~~~~~~~••rr••~~~..a.~~ ~ 1of 1J-i~~k?. i ~i~L4111~114 111 1J~4+t114~~i1 #JJ.A1~-F~iCSL~lJtlti7/1+11/111111/4~If1~~*I~~~~~Fi~~i~~ti~~a~~ti~~i~a~~/i~i~tilll/11/ 1~~ 1~~ A~~L1L•4f Cllr lllJll ~~•r~~r~ar+~~~~~~~l~llr... r.rll~~~~~r~rrrrr~•rrr•r~~~~~~r~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~1~~~~.~lllllr..rr~~~~~~~~rrr•rrr•rrr~a+ 1 1 ~fJ..f ~El[{~r~l~(; y+~~' ~Ii,LAlL~L4 ~l. ~4J 1Te1~~ 11~.1~{{#r ~~31ll~~rrrr~~~~rri~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~rrrrrar•~~~~~~~~r~~~~~~~~ll 1R~ 1~~ ~J i~LL114+1~~ ~JSJl1~4f ~~~i-~~~~~~~rrrr•r~~~~~~~•~ar•rrr•rr••r~~~~..a~~~~•.a~•...+~~~I~~s~~~*~~~~~~~~~~rr~•rrs~~~~~~~~~~~~~•rr 1~~ Table ~1~rL"a4~ie ~~A~ ~i~-a~~~~ti~r o~T~a~s~~ TDn~~ Code ~~Otefl~l~ C~I~e~~s~~ir••~~~r"•F~~r~~~"~r~~"•~~"••~~r•~~•~~~r~~~.~~...~~~~.~~~. ~°ti/ J4 ~4J J.~ l~ LJl S ~1L 11-+~-~+~ r~~~rs~~~r~~~~~r~~~i ~•~~~rr Fi r•~r~s~ri~~r~~~•~~~r~~~r~~~r~~~..l~s. ~~ar~~~~•~~~~~~~~i ri~~rr~~•r~~~~r~~i ra~~r F~~•~~~~~~•~••~~r•~~+~•~~r•~~. 3 ~e~n~'~~e 2 end P~OpoSed ~'~"~~is~~ ~ar~ Code ~ f~ ~~~L~I.~LL+LL~ly7LitirLl ~~r•~i~•~~r~~~•~~rF~~i~•~~~~~t~r ~l~e~~aa~~e ~t~d P~Q~aSed ~"~.~~~i~ ~o~ng Cade ~J I~ 4J ~~CiLLEtir~k.7.~y713Ln7 •~~rF~~•~~~r~~•~~~r•~~~•~a~~r•~~ I j~ S Trans~~ Zaning ~a~e S4~ SIR Flndin~s of Fa~t~ta~ament of overriding Co~side~`a~fa~s ~ i ~ ~ ut~~r~ T'l~e Ci~~ of Santa Ana has p~•epa~ed ~n En~tiron~net~tal I~~pact Report ~EIR~ for the T~•ansit ~oi~in Code ~D S~-~ in compliance ~~rith the recluirexxrents of the Califarr~ia En~Tiron~e~~tal ua~~~ Act ~CE~~ ~PubZic Resources Cade section 2~.Oaa ser~,~, T`he Can~unit~~ Rede~Telap~nent Agenc~r of the Cit~t of Santa Ana ~Aenc~7} leas dlsct~etionar`~~ appra~ra~ po~~re~• o~rer a component of the p~•oject ar~al~T~ed in that EIR and ls, therefore, a Responsible Aenc~~ under CEA, A suc~~, prior to reaching a decision o~~ p~~o~cct, tine Aenc~r must canide~~ tl~e er~~~i~oi~ment~. ef~'ects of t~~e pro~ec~ as sllo~vn in the EIR, ~ '~°~~i docur~eixt presents the Findings of Fact and S~ateinent of ~~Tcri~~d~n Considerations that trust be adopted bar tie Aenc~? pursuant to the t~equiretnents of P~xb~.c Resout~ces Code Sectians Z1o0~,~.~ and ~d~, 2~D8~ and ~~5~,~ and Sec~ian ~~a~1, ~5~3, a.r~d ~5aG, respecti~~ei~~, of tine State guidelines far the It~pler~enta~an o~ CEA ~CEA uideiines~. TZus dacun.~ent is oi•atYi~ed as follo~v~ hap~er ~ Intraduction to the Findings of Fact a~~d ~tateinen~ of O~terridin Co~~sidciiatior~s. chap#er ~ P~~ecnts the CEA Fi~di#~gs of the Entritoni~en.tai ~rnpact Repo~:t ~E7R~, includlri the identifie~i ignificaf~t i~~pacts, chapter ~ Pr•ee~~ts the alternati~~es to the Pr~opased Project and e~raluates thetx~ in rel~tiori to the findings contained in Section. ~ ~~9~ ~a}~3} of the CEA ~u~delines, The Agenc~r rxiust consider and make ~indtns regarding alternatt~res ~~~~~er~ a project ~~ouid i~~~rol~~e en~~iranmentai i~.pacts tiiat cannot be iec~uced to a less-t~ian4 sir~~icax~t lc~zel, ar cannot b ubstai~tiall~~ reduced, b}? proposed m~tigatiori treasures, ~l~apter 4 Presents a State~~~er~t of ~~~erriding Conside~~ations tl~at is required in accoi•da~ice 4~ith ectian ~ 593 of the CEA uidclines for sini~'ieant impacts of t~~e Proposed Project t~~at cannot be mitigated to a less-than-sigr~ihcant ie~re~. 't'he Transit ~onirlg Code project area is located in the central urba~~ core of tl~e Ci~T of Santa Ana and comprises o~rer SOD blocks aril X50 acres 'File proposed pf~Qject is located in the area ~~Test of interstate 5, no~~t}~ of First Street, ar~d bet~~reen ~at~d A~Tenue and Fla~~rer Street acid souti~ of Ci~~ic ente~• I~i•i~~c in the Cit~F of Santa A~aa in grange Count~~, Cali~'o~•r~ia, 't'he Tt~a~~sit honing Code pro~Tides n~~4~ toning for all o~ the properties contained t~riti~in its boundat~r with the e:~ception of tiioe properties paned ~~igiit ~ndi~strFal or II~I~-~-~ca~~7 ~fYdustrial. ~'l~ese Il~i~ and ~~1~ properties ~~rauld retai~~ thcii• existing caning, but ~~Fouid be ca~Tered bit an a~Tetila~7 gone that allo4~rs far the option of future ini~edRuse development to be e~erc~sed at the disct~etior~ of the propert~t a~~rner. The Tt•ansit honing Cade pia~rides fot• t~~e integration of ne~~7 i~~£~il de~relopent into e~~isting nei~~borhoads, alla~~~s fog tic reuse of existing buildings, supports ini~ed,use de~~elopn~.ent, pr~a~~ides a transit-suppoi•ti~~e, pedestrian-oriented dc~~ciopt~ent fran~e~~ark to seduce ~relucle trips, reduce i•eer~liouse gas emtssios, ar~d support the addition oil` ne~~~ transit infrastructure, a~~d pi~o~Tides an economic de~Teloptr~ent stimulus. Trans~~ ~onin~ Code ~~D ~4} EiR Findln Fa~~~~~e~ent o€ Overriding ansiderations ~ ~ ~ l 4 I C1~apfer ~ ~ntraduct~on ~~~itl~in the bou~.da~•~T of the Transit ~ot~in Cade, the Aenc~r o~~~ns fo~:t~r-nine panels comprising approxirr~a.tel~r se~ren noncon~.uou acres, The Aenc~r~Cit~r is pursuing the potentiai ac~uisitian of t~~rent~~ additionai prope~•~ies ~~itl~in the imn~ediate ~~ic~nit~~ the fort~r-nine parcels r~entioned aho~re for the purposes carnpleting the asse~~.blae of properties on those blocks irr ~~rl~ieh the Aenc~~ a~riead~~ has rnajor;•it~F a~~nership, as i~Tell as to secure propeit~r to pro~ride for additional open space. The acgt~siaon of t~~ese add~t~on~l piaperties rTla~r lead to demolition and f or reloeatio~~ of e.~sting structures, as ~~ell as the potc~a~ial rielocation of arl~,t existing residents, Tl~e Aenc~~ and file ~eiated Co~~pan~es of California, LLC aid rif~~n Realt~~ Co~~poratior~, a California Corporation the De~teloper~ propose to rede~reiop these properttes, The ~e~~elape~• concept far these properties ~~~cludes the de~Telopment of ~ r~a~murn of ~5 rental ~~~.its and ma~ir~u~~ of ~ for-sale ~~~tsT--a total o ~ZD nc~~T ~~esiden~al ~~nits the Dc~~elope~ ~~~ajec~~, cotnpoz~ent o~ t~~is ~esi~entil de~~eioprnent ~~~ill tie a~~ordabfe pursuar~t to tl~e Count= of grange's criteria for lo~v-to-n~oder~.te ir~corx~e lousing. 7'he C~t~x f Ager~c~~ fs also pursuing the additiar~ of rYe~~ public open space that coup. include a public pa#.'~3, ~ public tot lot, and a x,000 squire foot con~mut~it~r burldi~i. Tl~e rede~reiopir~e~~t of these properties requires tl~e demolition of appra~~r~atel~T ~0,2~ square feet a~ building area, on fifteen Agenc~7-o4~~ned properties. Tl~e Cite ~vill amend the cuiier~t general Plan to peri~.it these near land ~~ses and ar~~end tl~e ~oi~ing Code to est.blish de~Tetopment sta~~dai~d that implement the p~io~ect. These amendments ~~~ll allau~ the Cit~r to pro~~ide ~ franme~~~ark fat the de~~eloprnent of carx~pact, transit4oriented de~relopment that contains a min o~ residential, comr~~ercial, and professional uses in order to address the Clt~r's and tine ~~eion's goals of pro~riding sites foi• llo~sing in alread~t urbar~i~ed locatiar~s that are adjacer~t to transit, thereb~t reducing ~rel~icle trips, stimulating ir7~restn~ent in underutilized lat~d, and impro~Ting the jabs~liousing balance ~~ithiz~ tl~e Cit~T. 7`1~is ~~ill Iead to potential de~~elopment of appiiaxit~atel~~ ~,~75 resider~tial ~~nits, 387,000 s~ of retail dc~Telopi~eiit, and an additional ~ 5,5 acres of open space ~~~tl~in the Cit~r, Adoption. of this project ~vou~d alfo~v the Cit~7 to consider subsequer~t ac~io~~s consistent 4th these updates i~~ tl~e general Plar~ and Land use designations, Table 3~~ ~8urr~mar~~ of T`~ansit honing Code ~DS~A a~~d DB~~~ e~~elopment Potentials lists tl~e o~~er~ll potential net cl~a~~e teat ~~~ould occur a a result of the proposed p~•oject area, f r~ tcir~~s of net de~~elopr~~ent, tl~e Transit honing Code would alloS~~ for tl~e poten~al de~relopr~efit of appro.~ii~.atel~r 351,000 square feet ~sf~ of retail de~~elapment and the additio~~ of ~ze~~r open space ~~rid~in fire cit~r, Creation of this Transit caning Code area ~~fa~~ld allo~~ fire Cite to conside~~ subse~uer~t actions consistent ~~~itl~ these updates. '~`abie ~urr~r~ar-~t of Transit ~oi~in Code Potential het Change lists the a~Terall potential net change teat could occur as a xes~~lt o~ an~~ ne~~~ construction built pursuant to the standards cot~tai~ied ~vithin file proposed Transit honing Code Transit Zan~ng bode ~p 84} EAR Findings of ~act~tatement of ~varrlding ~an~derat~ans 1 i i s Chapter ~ l~trod~c~lan ~~a~d tlse.~yp~ : ~~::~Po~e~~~a~ dross Devefa~mer~t: ~.:~~as~~~g ~ses,to_~e ~~nv~rfe~. : Pa~e~~~a~ Ne# DeYe~op~ie~if.::. Re~~e~~`~~ ~~ni~s~ ~,~72 4,07 Retail ~sf~ fi~3,00 3,~0 8~,~0~ ~mm~rc€al ~s~ ~ 1~4,~~ ~~~~,~0~} ~pe~ Space ~sf~ ~~0,~0~ 0 8~,0 Surrace Par~ir~~ l.vt ~sf} ~I,~~~ ~,~3~,~ ~~,7I~,~~O} ~'~~e ~c3r ~~~~ocedu~•a~ actions ie~a~ed to the p~~oces fir ~~~e T~ans~~ ~on~n bode and the ~e~re~o~e~~ Pro~ec~ ~nelude: ¦ ~~cu~a~e In~t~~~ tud3TJNo~ce Prep~rat~on ~3~ days} J~~~F 2~, ~0~6-u~t ~00~ ¦ Filed a~~d ~~•cu~a~ed I~t~a~t ~~R Feb~uar~T 2~1~ M ~ondue~ed e~pin ~4~~eeting at Februar~t 2~, ~'~a~xxait~ Co~n~~iss~or~ ~lrieetin a ~e-~i~~cu~ated ~lternatt~tes eeti~~~~ete~dcd DE~~ re~z~e~~T period, Fe~~ua~~? 2~, 2~~~- 12, ~~0 ¦ ~o~~ducted 5co~~n ~~ieeting a~ ~1~~a~~c~~ 2~, ~01~ ~'~ann~t~ amn~si~n ll~ieetin Transit Zoning Cade LSD 84~ iR F~ndin~s ~f FactJtatemsnt ~f Cverridin~ C~nside~atio~s f ~ r E ~ Ill ~I I f1 S . ~ ~ N~'R~IJ~`~~N Tl~s chapter presents tine potential impacts that ~~tere identified in tine and the hndings that ire required in accordance with Section 1509 of tl~e C~ guidelines. 't'he possible ft7dins for each si~~ificar~t and~or potend.all~7 significant ad~Terse impact ate as follo~~Ts: Ci7ai~es or altera~on h~~Te bec~~ required ill, or incorporated into, the p~•oject ~~~l~ich a~roid or substantiall~~ lessen the s~gn~ficant en~~~ronnae~~tal effect as identified ~n the ~I~ ~"~ir~din I ~2~ Such ch~.~~ges or aiteradons ate ~~~itl~in the ~'espot~sibilit~T and jurisdiction of another public aet~c~r and not the ae~~c~F making the finding, Such cha~~ges i7a~~e been adopted b~~ such other age~~c~• or~ can and should be adopted b~~ such other agenc~~ ~"~`zndi~~ ~3~ Specific econon~c, social, or other considera~on.s, including ~ro~~ision of emplo~rment opportunities foi• highl~~ trained ~~Torkers, r~.ake infeasible the xx~itigatio~~ measures or project alternati~~es in the ~II~ ~"~it~di~~g requires that a Responsibie .~~gc~~cy adopt tr~.tigation measures or alte~;~~ad~Tcs, ~~i~ere feasible, to a~~oid or substat~tiaiiy reduce s~gn~ficant etl~rirontnental ~~npacts tl~t ~uouid othei~v~se occur as a ~csult of a project, ~~esponsible ,~~ct7c~7 his respai~sibili~ for n~itigati.ng o~.• a~roidi~~g o~~l~r tine direct or indirect en~Fironn~ental effects of those pmts of the project ~~~hich it decides to cart~~ out, finance oi• app~o~~e State uideli~aes ~o~~ Project modification o~• alternati~Tes are not req~~ired, ho~~e~~ef•, ~~rhere their axe infeasible or ~~rhere the ~~esponsibilit~F for• ~~~odif~~ing the project lies ~~nth some other agenc~~ State guidelines ~~~~9~~a}~~~,~~}. Public Resou~•ccs bode section ~~OG~.~ defines "£easible" to ~~~ean {`capable of being acco~r~plished in a successful m~nnei+ ~t~fiithin a xeaso~~able period of tifne, taking into account economic, en~tironment~l, social, and tecl~nological factors.' State E~~ uideii~~es Section ~~C~~ adds a~~otl~er• factor: "legal" considerations. See also ~ti~~~.~ o~`~?~e~r~ ~~r~11~r .o~r~o~'rr~r~~~iso~:~ ~~le~r~~~] ~~0~ 5~ al,3d X53, G5 ~7~ ~al~ ptr, 4~0~.~ after fuli~~ comply?in ~~~.th tic ht~dings requirefr~ent can an age~~c~F adopt a taten~et~t of ~~~erriding Consideradons ~C'~~a~~~s ~o~irrali~~ r•~~v~~~ r~. ~`~~~o~~~~~ ~'l~c~.~~c~ ~~88~ X98 ~al.~pp.3d X33, ~-~5 ~ Cal. l~ptr. 7~~~}, x~eq~~ires the ~~esponsibie ~genc~T to state ~f~ ~~L'rlt~ng the speclf~c rationale to suppo~it its actions based on the final i~~R a~~d/or• ir~for~nation in the record, This ~~~ritten sta.te~nent is k~~o~~~~~ as the Statement of ~~Tc~~riding considerations. 'I'he Statenxent of ~~Te~~~•idit~ o~~siderations pro~rides the inforF~uation that demonstrates the decision ~r~aking bod~~ of the responsible ~genc~T leas ~veigl~ed the benefits of the proiect against its una~Tordable ad~Terse effects ~f~ deter~~~nin ~~Fhether to appro~re the project. ~f the benefits of the p~'oicct out~~~ell~ the una~~o~dable ad~rerse en~~~~ionzx~ental effects, tl~e ad~~erse effects ~na~~ be co~7sidered <`acceptable," Tile California Suprexr~e court has stated that, "the ~~~sdoxn of appro~~ing an~~ development project, a delicate task ~~~l~ich requites a balancit3g of interests, is necessaril~r left to the sound discretio~~ of the local officials and thei~• co~~sd.tuents ~~Tho are responsible for sucl~ decisio~~s, The la~v as eve interpret and appl~7 it si~~pi~~ requires that those decisions be infortneci, and therefore balanced" ~ol~~r~ ~ ~al,d 5a3, ~G [~~G dal, Rptr, ~01]~, { Transit zon~n~ Code 84} ~iR Findings of Fact~S~a~e~nen~ of overriding Considerations i l i Chap#er 2 C~QA F~na~~rr~s Table ~~1 ~E~ Findings surnn~ari~es the potentiall~F sfgnif~ca~~t i~~acts of the ~ that ~~ere seduced to less-than-s~r~i~'~car~t le~Fels ~~rith ii~itigation as 4~~ell as the sin~~icant and ~~na~roidahle irxr~acts of t~~e Transit honing Code LSD No. S~~ ar~d t~~e Jesrelope~ Project ~co~ec~.~rc~~r, t~7e P~•o~osed Pr~oject~, ~dc~itionai facts that support tine findings ale set forth in the ~'ixaa~ SIR, t~~e staff reports to the Planning Con~rr~ssio~~ and Ci~~ ~a~ncil, and the record of p~•oceedings. ear discussions that support the ~i~~dins from the ~'inai ~I~ ale pro~7ided in "~~ridence supporting Finding," ~o~~~c~~c~•, oti~er e~ridence ma~~ be contained in the o~rerali reco~id the ~~~•o~ect to further support the ~~xding, The docut~er~ts and other ~nateriais that consdtu~e t~~e record of proceedings on ~~~hi~h she P~•oject h~~dtr~gs are based are located at the Cit~r of Santa tuna 7'iann~ng and Pu~ldi~~g ~~,get~c~r, o Ci~ric Center Plaza, ~~~~~o, Santa .~~ns., Califorf~ia 9~~oZ, r~'he custodian fo~• ti~ese documents is L~xcyr Linr~aus. This info~Ft~atioi~ is pro~~ided in co~~~piiance P~~bhc resources Code ~~1~8~.~~a}~~~ and ~~A guidelines a Transit honing Cade {~D 8~~ EfR i=findings ~f ~act~taternent of ove~rid~ng Cvnside~afi~ns ~ l i ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~~C ~ ~ ~ a? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ yr ~ ~ a~ m . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ c c°~;o o ~'c°a~ o 3 ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c *C ~ ~ i~* ~ ~cro~cd~ ~~~~o ~~~~o~~~~ ~ can ~ ~ ~ a«~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o~ ~ ~ c ~ • ~ ~ ~ ro v ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ jai '~F.~ o ~ '7~ ~j ~ •Q-y± ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `C ~ of ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ to ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ Q7 ~ ~ Q3 ~ ~ i ~ ~~~C ~c~~4~ r ~'~~~d7~ ~ ~ G ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~ ~ c ~3 ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ c~ ~L ~ ~ . .D Cam] ~ C] ~y_ ' i ~ ~ tE~ ~ ~ ~ Ql D ~ d] ~ ~ # ~ ~ ~ ~ t3 ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ r ¦ ~ j I i 4t ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ _ it u~ ~ ~wr aJ~~ C ~ D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~l c c~~~ ~ ~ to ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~c~~W~G~ ~aa~ a~~ N c~a`~~a ~ _ W ~ ~ k- ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ 'o~n°~~~ ~v~`.bm~~ ,ins ~ ~ -a ~ ~ ~ as ~ N ~ ~ ~ ,o ~ o ~ ~ ~`~.~~a,c~ -ate o°- ~ ~ a' c~ m ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ L~ a ~'u~i~ ~ as ~ a ~ ~ t~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q~ e ~ ~ ~ . o 'o ~ c o ~ ~ ~ cam ~ w~ ~ ~ a a a ~ a,~~~o~~~,c~ c~ _ ~ N ~ ~ ~NoF~~,c~,~~~c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4! ~ ~~~o~a~~,~~ ma ~ ~~•~~7~ ~ ~ U 'Q~ Q d]Q s~•W ~ i - ~ ~ c ~ + ~ o ~ ~ c~ c a~ ~ a~~~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 43 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ N 4' ~ ~ C~.1 ~ ~ ~ d3 ~ ~ ~ a ~ .C ~ ~ l t I f ~ ~ i ~ ~ C ~r~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~s ~ C~ ~ ~ N cn ~ ~ ~ _ ' ~ a m m ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ V} 4} ~ O ~ L~~~ a c ~ C~~~~~rn~ ~ ~~~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~7 X37 ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ to ~ ~ ~a~ ~~,~~~C~~a~~~~~,~c per.-~~-~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ m o~ ~ ~ r• ~ ca ~ m 4 ~ ~ °~t~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~a o~~c~corv'c~ ~ c ~ o`er ~~c~~' f~~ '~°c~°'~c b~ car ~ o~ o o o ~ ~ i 7 ~ ~ ~ F11 W ~ o ~ c„~ FW 1..1 W [/~J Y f,~ V! A 1~ .A ~ .fC? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,4 O O ~ ~ ~ O 43 N ~ ~ ~ ~ dj ~C ~ O L o~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ roc ~ ~ ~ ~ as c~ ~ a ~ ~ o a m~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cn rid cc~~c~:R~~ ~ y o ~ o 0 0 ~ ~~-~3u3 ~ ~ ~ ° r ° cw c~~._ ~c~c~c~~c~~..)~.n.~ ~c,3a~~~a.~~c..~o~~c.~ocn~ca{.~a..n.... ~ a w ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l C C ~ u c~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~c.o ~ ~ a. ro e~ c~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ a a ~ c~ a~.a ~•c~~ a~ac~ rn c ~ ° ~ ~ c c~ ~ -a ~ m r O ~1 ~ a C2 b} ~ i </l t ~ ~ ' ~ {a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 c C} ~ ~ O a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C? ~ ~ Q7 ~ ~ DUI ~ a a~ a c,a ~ ~ a a ro c rJ~ p~ ~ L V1 ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W . C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l i O C ~ ~ ~ ~ .c o R~ ~~i+- L 1-i . ~ m~ '1eY ==~.r~ T r~u~ 1r.~.f W ~ ~ ~ ~ ' {6 ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L' ~ L «y ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ emit ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ;c ~ a~ sip ~ ~ "~F cn v c~i c ~ .~Y a c o ~ u) ~~J ~ ~ o~-tea ~c~ acrao~ ~ ~a~ cam. ~ 'v a c O ro ~ ~ ~no~L~ ~ ~ ~y o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r 4i U r~ ~ L 'r r ~ # i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~FF ;r~ 4 M . . W #1 f~ ~J i W ~ ~ ~ ° ;a ° ~ Ica ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ a~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0~~3~~~~~~~~U~~c~+~~~°~~ O ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~~c~ ~ ~ aoo~~ °°°coc~i ° oar ~ • ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~p R ~ ~ ~ ~ O U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M . l C ~ ~ 0 ~ •p ~`o ~ c ~`~u,m c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ O O ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ C ~ a~ ~ a ~ ~a ~ ~-cvu~m~t~ ~ L s1' ~ ~ ~ ~ i"r ~ ~ ~ iii ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~ Q7 C ~ ~ ~ i ~ O'1 ~f ~ N 7 O ~ C QS p + ~ ii i-• ss. ~ ~ N a~ ~ l-w- cn ca ~ t~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ c~`a'~ a.~ can c ~ ~ ~ o U ,i7 ~ i- ~ ~ ~ ~ rte' ~ t~ ~ ~i~ ~ e~ ~ d7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • • ~ ~~rm~~~•~~,~~~~~ ~~~~c~c~ ~ t ~ .~om~ can ~ o 'v, y.., ~ -Q ~ ~o~c~~~~~ o c~ ~ ~ . 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ art o. ~ ~e o ~ ~ o .v ~ ° ~ ~ a~ ~U ~'ca ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ e~ ~ mC~~n ~ c~'S i l ~ '~~ro ~ ~ ~ ~ a a t,~ ~ ~ -a ~ o ~ G ~ F- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ . ,boa ~a . c`~a ~ m~c~~ -r~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ m~ ~ v~ rn {s Quo ~c~ ~ -a • ~3 G ~ a Qa ~ i~ ~ ~ 4.1 ~ . CIS Q} ~ . ~~~~~a~~o.~°~~~~i~~~~~~°~ Imo ~ ~ cat ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ m ~ ac ~ L? c~3 ,~n ~ ,~n ~ -o c ~n ~ ~ ~ ~ a • ~ ~ ~ ~ o i z.. ~ .c o c~ a ~ a ~ ~ ~ a. ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ca ca ~ a..-~ ~ ro ~ ~ : cr, ~ ~ ~ a 'C3 ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~~L-a ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ° ~ ~ b,~~ E~ ~ C`] ~ ~ ~i~i~~~ C ~ m ~ ~~~a.o ~ ° w~~c~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ . D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ C L L 4-• ~ ~j.. F~ C_ ~J.F E1J L C C U3 O Q iii ~ ' ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j LA ~ ~ ~ FS ~ Vic" ~ ~ ~~v;~~~ ~~~'~~~r~a'~ ~ • ~ ~ C7 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 l I i ~ ~ ~u ~ ~ . N . 4 ro .b . ~cn~`~~'~-- a~~a~~~ cn -ar-~ c~ oc~~ ~c~ . ~.~cocc~ ~~--•e ~ cu.~~ ac~L~J~#'o~~--~~~ c • m ~ ro c~~~ ~c ~ ~~m~~~ r~o~ ~ ~ ~ mr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~c~n?,.~ca ~~~Q~ ca'~~~ pia •c' a--~.~~~~c~~~~~yvx~ c~~v~!VIA~~~_.~~o tv~~aVl~.~ c~~~~ cyc~ c~;E~?~~~~.~~~ ~ ~ Itt , t.. V ~J + r~ ~ HMV F- ~ ~ rJl ~ ~ G) ~ ~ ~ ~7 ~ _ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ a C p ~ ~ N ~ w W ~Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f i ~ f a ~ ~ Q ~ i~ . ~ o ~ a _ _ _ _ w a..` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ear! ~ •e~ ~ ~ ~ ~ wV ~ 4 ~ D ~ ~-p SC ~ AFL 4f O ~ ~ ~ • 4 4~ fi ~ ~ ~ U ~ N ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ C] N i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ca ~ ~ ,o u i ~ ~i~ ~ . r~ ~ .s~~o~~ ~~~s~ ~~~~o o~z~~~ c ~ c ~ ;r~ ~ as ,n L ~ *3 ~ ~ ~ i-' ~ ~ ~ ,D • ~ D ~ ~ ~ ~O ~C U C C w W ~ ~ C ~ b~ ~ ~ E Q ~ k, r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Uri t ~ ~ 0 . ~ v~ a ~ G r~ ~~~~~~~~e~ . rj, • - 1~-~ ~ . ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W a~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m rn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L a ~ c~ 'cry ~ b o ~ 41 ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ •L VII w ii h ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ tf) ~ ~ h .,c ~ A~ ~ - r-+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~ t~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ V C~! d' ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ (U ~ ~ ~C ~ ~~~c~~ ~~°~i+m'~~ 'ill} CJ ~~oD,~;~ N4?~j~R.p~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C cam- = c~ ~ ~ ~ N -a~ ~ c m ~ ~ u, c ~ ~ ~ ay -mss ~ rn ~ ~ a.-~ a.r c ,n~ D ~ ~ ~ G ~ U ~ ~ J C ~ ~ f1J ~f ~ ~ C O ~ ~ ~ ~ s~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ,o ~ m a ro ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ c~.°~•~ ~ ~s~.~ ~ mac, ~ ca`~~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ c ,c~ ~ 4 c ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~rr V L V F~ i'~ ~ /1~;f V ~ [tr` L~ i C ~ ~..f ~ ~ Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~~k'~ ~ o ~ ~°-n_ o ~ • ~ C ~ c`o~W ~ ~ ~ ~~a~~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ p 4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ •O C ~l. ~ ~ 4) L~, I--' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~'v ~ cam ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h~ a~ ~ ~ cn ~~-,c ~ o ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ur ra .c m c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C i ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~l ~ ~ CAC C ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~U} L cam, ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~..Z f~ ~ ~ r ~ fJ tR ~ t6 ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C - Q ~ ~ C l.L ~ N U ~ r ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ Rte.. 41,0 ~ ~ ~ ~ i [3 U ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ C ~ ~a~c~.ccv' H i i s ~ l s ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ c • o~ ~~c~ o~'~n•~Li--ice ~~~~~s~. ~c°n~c~ ~L-ccr a~`~ro ~~~o~~~•c -v~~~ ~ ~c ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ca ar ~ ~ to ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tom,) Iwo ~ " Q} ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;p p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ N t-F ~ ~ L~ ~ ~ E ~L AGU ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v~ ~ ~ c art ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ f i s a, ,o ~ ~ ~ c° J ilk . C ~r to + tll ~ ~ ~ t4 L 1.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ° •-pro`. ~ ~ ~ ~ N c ~ ~ ~ ~,r~ ~ ~ C C l~ ~ c~~c ~ c ~~'o~, i.r= _ w ~ ~ o 0 0 ~ m ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ cca ~ • d7 O ~ ~ y,,, ill ~ ? ~ ~ F~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ U ~C ~C ~ C V~ ~ Vl ~ C~ 'Q ~ ~ C Q] ~ Q Q p~ ~ ~ i~., C ~ ~ ~ i?l ~.1 C O ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ mod! tr- ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D -C [S~ C ~ C t..~ ~ "Q ~ } ,i~~y~5 !~G_ .C ~J {}j Iilril Imo[ ~ 'C3 O 43 Q .C C J1 ? ~ ~ ~ ~i+ +F+ Vl L ~ V ~V •V ~ L ~ U L ~ N i--' ~ ~l S~. ~I} ~ o ~ G.1~(~ L ~ ~ N~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ '~I v,o ~ ~ c ~ c ~ ~ o ~ D ~ ~~d! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ Q7 ~ ~ i ~ ~ C ~D ~•y~~ N ~ ~ C ~ ~1 i~ C D ~ H ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ G~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~L ~ ~ 4} ~S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1,1,E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IeY i ~ ~ ~ ,o N ro L ~ !MAY .~~-y ~Qyj ~ O ~ ~ ~1 Q] ~ ~ ~ C ~1 ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~ C~+}~ N ~ ~ '}y~} ~ ~ a v ~ o o` a a~`~ ~ v c ~-rain.c~~oa~~°U~~~~~~v~.~~a~~.~r~~~~~~~ac • ~ ~ 4 G _ ~ o ~ ~ u~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ w o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C_ C Fr ~ ~ ~ u'° ~ ~ ~ ~ 'o c ~ ~ c) ~ ~ c ~ ~ o ~ m ~ .c " ° ~ ~ v ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c = ~ ~ ~ W {{;may} _ ,i ~ ~1 {6 f~ O ~ D L N ~ dam! ~ {{S ~ C7 ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ C ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~L~1, , Qom! ~ ~ ~ ~ C] Vy , . Ali ~ ~ C ..C ~ . ~ ~ 4(} VII ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r, f„ ~ Q ~ ~ L L ~ L+ ~ ~f1~Y Icy ~y /{!~~/~{J~ ~ A~? ~.~i~5 ~ ~ A~ r ~ ,~y'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CVJ ~1 N ~ <I} O ~ ~ ~~~,c~ Ua..~~ O ~.]~'c~~ coo ~ ~ ~ ~y • • ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ .a ~ ~ ~ ~°c~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ro ~ . ~ v, n~ ~ ~ o c~ ~ . c-~+c,~~ ~ c 'cn ~ ~ to ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •C ~ ~ C] c c ,~Y ~ ~ V ~ +y ~~.y VI ,~i~ w ~ ~ L ~ ~Y~y' ~~y~Y ,i~~ W .i~~ L ~i W VJ Q.~ ~J ~r+ -ice 4J VI iJ ~ « ~ ~ 4Li ~ .lk.i U.+ k,+ ~ +Y ~ YJ ~ ~ ~ QJ ~ ic-~ ~a ~c~~~ymmc'~.c ~`~+~~/~~~o~~cn~c_ v_~~ c.c/~~o mac, ~ v,~s~ ~~c ~o 0 c ~ ~ c C~ ~ c ~ t~ ~ ~ Q ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ c ~ ~ c~~ ~ can ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' s1 ~ I1(~ re! o ~o a _ ~ ~c~s~.~CA~~no~~roac~cv}~€]~~~'~n~~~~c~•~r~a~~~v]~~~.a~c--. ~~o~ ~~c~'- ~ cc ;nom ~ ~ rn ~ ~ ~ ~ n~ o c~ ~ ~ sn o v, ~ ~ ~c~ c ~ a ~ q'~ o ~ o ~ .cam ~ ~ ~ ~#''-cam- ~°vi o'~~ o~aa ~ a oc ~•~c~` L~ off.] C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Qa+~ (Vi'm' o ~W ~ ~ t6 ~ ~ ~ ~ o _ G~'~~cc~ ~ m~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ e +~+.,4 s~ ~J ~ ~ ~ ~ • G ~ ~ 43 F ~ t i ~ C p ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ f r ~ ~ r 1-/Lr(l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C . ~ G N ~ C ~ ~ off ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U a~,~~ ~ a~~ ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ o ~ 4a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~'j C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ Q ~7 ~ 31 Q7 ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ f-+ ? ~ ~p~ ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~C ~ ~ ~ U C ~ ~~~~~D ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ m ~ bA ~ ~ ~s~~~~c~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~c,a~z ~ C ~ G ~ ~ ~ id ~ N • ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ y ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e~ F~ ~ `h~vy • 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L6 ~ {~7 m ~ /c/am~ ~ //~w~ a ~ _ ~ ~ ~ _ ti! C c ~ ~ .a..+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ 4a C U3 ~ Ul ~ ~ ~ . vim c~ c~~"'~ cti~~~~ c~i~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ uJ 4f ~ _ ~ a ~~w~°°a~,w~n ~ Wog ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~vy~ ~ ~ ~ ca ~ cn c ~ C c c L ~a ~ ~ ~ mac.... ~ ~~~~a~~u~ ~ s ~ O ~ ~ ~~i~~°~-°~~oc~~~i~~ ~a~ ~ can ~ ~ o ~•~.`a fFM ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Uf ~J G ~L a. ;,f? Off'" Q~ _ t~ ~ ~ rw ~ l!. yr ~U'a o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ W c~~cv~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ III ~~~~~~~~~vi D t, ~ ~ p ~ ~ C [a ' N ~ G.1 ~ d) ~ U) ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ { E s C ~ ~ ~ ~ C } ~ L~ Lll~ C ~ O Q} p C C ~ t~ N ~ ~ ~ C~'1 ~ ~ O 't~ ~ G7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C (L3 O r~ ~ ~ V1~ Q)~ N'- ~ ~ C N • t~ ~ ~ • C r. ~ ~ t1T ~ C O D L1 ~ Q C ~4 ~ C ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [~3 X33 ~ O G3 ~ a ~ " 4y ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ o~~~~~ L~~~m-~ p ~ ~ ~ ~~•~~~~~~ro.+~~c°.yon.~c~a~.~.~~~..~i~~°a~~,;~c°.~r~n~clr~v~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ c~ a f Q,i I r t i I i h1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ 4: ~ ~ [y v, ~ o~,c~ ~ ~ U ~ ' a~ o~ ~ . ~ ro c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ _ ~ C ~ is -Q W ~ C c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~c~ ~ m ~~~'r~n~ ~a~i L ~ - 1... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~j G~ ~ ~ +l+~ ~w m~ ~ ~ ~L+ ~ ~ ITrUe W ~ ~ ~ ~ F- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C O ~ ~ C C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o a.~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~p N ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ti ci] ~ ~m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ cif ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L~ ~~~y- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ °~~oo~~o~co~~~~~~ °'o~ ~ c~._~~ ~ N ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ L ~ L ~ c~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~F D Ec~~N~~4 ~~,C~ ~ ~ t t i i I ~Q C Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,V~ c~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ ~ `a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . c ~ . o ~ ~ . ;a o . ~ ~ ~~=W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ax ~ ~ ~ W • ~ ~ ~ ~ cn a~ . ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~r~.~t,,.~~~Q~ p.,tn~~~~ ~eU~q~~~-~a•~ DID ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'gin ~ ~ ~ ~C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i N O L p r a to ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ m ~ ~ ~ ro~ L ~ W ~ c}u ~ ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~F~ rn ~ ~ ~x m e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cup W.-f, ~ ~ ~ c Woo c~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ a ' ~ io ~ r--, ~ tf3 ~ ~ c~3~ ~ cry L ~ .~~.e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° rn~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~~L~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~e~ ~ ~ ~ . u? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ .o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~,C~ Gw ~ c~ ~w a ~ ~ O U ~ ~ ~ t3 ~ c ~ ~ c ~ c a~~ ~ F~ ~~4~~c` ~~t~h~~~~~~'v, t~~ ice ~ ~ ~ °-~c~a~ ~ ~ ° ~ a~ v, o n.o ~ ~ ~ arm ° ~c ~ fir-. 'L c~ ~ c ~ ~ o~ s c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~~~'Q~v,~ d~co~v~~.~c?s,•~ coo ~ ~A ~ nn'' ~ Cf~ t~ p) ~ ydy~ Ott ~~i ^ ~l 4J spy, ~~jy//{]}• Lid ~ ~ {I~ ~C a aim ~ c ~ ~ ° c ~ ~ c c~ c ~ ~ ~ O ~ m~c~~ o o ~ ~ vii L ~ ~ ° ~ ~ t~, ~ ~cU c~lJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~ ~ ,C ~ ~ ~ D O A rh ' ~ - C? O ~ ~1 ~ ~7 ~ ~~~F_o~ ~ ~;r~o ~ ~ ~ ~ m~ cry ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c cam'' ~ ~ c c•~~ ~ _ ~ al ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L Q~ L ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 41.Y lV4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •~V ~ C hlcn~a ~.~a~~.~cn C Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J '#A ~ C ~ ~ VJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ L ~ C Q~Q~ p 4~ . 47 ~ C ~ Q ~ ~ p. ~ . ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ rr .c ~ p 4~.1 C) rig r ~ ~ ~ -v ~ ' ~ c a~ ~ ~ o of 'c~~aa roc) rnc~"'~~ ~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ m~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ cn a ~ * c~ c°~~ut v ~ v ~ c~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ?.~u~acr~ cam ~ • ~ ~ e c m L ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ tlf Ca ~ ~ ~ ~ U 41 ~r U ~ G 41 L ~3 Q] ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c G ~ ui ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oc~~~i~ ~ E s ~ t ~ `~~o ~ ~ ~ ~~r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~ « ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !I? ~ ~ ~ c.. ~ ~ ate., Q.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ F~ ~ 1~! ~ ~ L~~ ~ 4- r~+ C C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ r~ G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~s~~ h ~ ~ ~ f ro ~ ~ _ ~ 0~1 ro~ W O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f f s - Y U Q] ~ ~ ~ c , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v, ~ O a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ c C ~ C U~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,c~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ C 'C ~ ~ c C_ 8] c sro'~r~~ !.L L ~ti fi ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ca ~L v ~ ~ N ~ a cn ~ mo~~~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~D ~ F~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~~~L a ~ ~ ,e o ~ ui 'fin ~ .4 e ~ ~ ~ vii tl) C) ' C 7 IL ~ i' ? ~ ~ o ~ ~ .a ~ • ~ ~ i2 ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ iQ ~ ~ ~ 4.1 vi ~ ~ 4 ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~c ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ tJ ~ ~ r1S ~ i ~~fi0 ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ J fJ} ~ N Q1 + N G. o ~ ~ ~ L W .L ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ C '~'3 ~ ~ ~ O C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~~•~ ~ ~ m m~~,~c ~~~'o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ;t- ~ O ~ ~ dZ ~ ~ ~ ilk ~ p ~ ~ 'D G ~ 4[1 p- F- ~ • ~ ~ ~~~c~~~ ~ a~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ can ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u, v~ • 4~~ ~~~~~n,~`C`~ Lea ~co~~~~~ ~ ~ °c~ ~ ~ ~ can can ~.e o t~ ~ cri•~ ~ ~ ro ~~~ro~~°~~~ d r--. ~ w m~ ~q~c~~c~ ~ ~ ~cn~'o ~4]~~~"~4~~ ~ V ~ C ~ ~ ~ c., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ 4! ~~•a o ~ ~ ~ o c, c ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C i~ r~~•~u~i~ u. ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ i C ~ U ~7 ~ C G l3S ~ iQ i~ ~ o ,Lf1 p~ ~ ~ :A t1~ ~ ~ ~ O Qom,} ~ N p_ :p O ~ ~ ~ .C ~ ~ ~ ~ p a~~•- crsoc~ o ~c~ c~ acn ~ m~a~ ~o~~~ c~~~c~v~ a~ x'~ ° ~ ~i PTO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oi- ~ ~ ~ ar a cn ~ o~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~L ~ a~~ ~ pia ll~ r ~ A. C ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~~~~ai~ro ~ m ~ 0 ~~~.~m~r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `:~,a ~ . ~ m ~ . c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ,O? ,[A ~ ~ ~ A. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C] ~ ~ ~ ill Vl ~ A G ~ ~ ~ s ~ any c ~ oy~ ~ JCL cn ~ ~ ~c~U~,~~v`~icJ~roro~~c°.xc°~v~,c°+~~I~-~o-~c°.~{7~~~c`~.a~.~~~~o~ ~J ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ` L i ~ ~ ~ ~1 , ~ C ~ ~ rr ~ ~.r ~ ~ . C ~ ~ J ~N b4 C ~ ~rr W ~ 'V d7 Q C ~ c ~~o~ ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c -o ~ W , ~ ~ ~ac~~ ~ ~ 0 ~ r C = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ O ~ LL w RIi Q1 G i17 ~ O 4~ ~ '~3 N 'C~ Q ~ ~ ~ lV ~1 - ~ rr `C~i~ Q'~'~~ 4.10 ~ ~Op~~~. F~ O ~ ca c ~ v, ~ ~a ~ a_1 ~ ran a.~ ~ 43 ~ c ~ ~ c ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~Dy ~ c O~++ ,G Iy-r+ L ~ ±~W~+ ~ }py y~~ ~~y };{l{~1r {--F~y. ley d1 ~ ~ F ~ Li ~ ~ V ~ L ~ ~ ~ y~~.~. ~ ~1 ~ LL ,lhi ~ li /fh VI Vf ~ ~ 5 Q.'~4y~~'4 L ~ ~ RI ~ 1V cl-~ ~ c D tom. ~ ~~~~~`~~~~~~~~~~~o~ ~ ~~c~ O ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~v~ o~ a c 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ' ~'o ~ ~y, i_ ~ ~ ~ a ~ c~~ ~ L ti, d 4 C O ~C ~ ~ ~ Qom] ~ D. ~ ~ ~ ~ t3? ~ ~ ~ a Eli G~ Cf~ c N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ can ?J C ~ O 42 ~ ~1 r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • y d} t_. Vl to ~ c~ rc fir: o o ~s ~'a c c ~'c~~~m•~a~~~c~.~ ~~'i° ar acc,cn~ ~a~c~~ ~ oma~a~ac~~ a ~ c ~ ~ c ~ is ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a0. ~ ,~}1 ~ a ~ ~ ~a v, c o c ~ ~ ~ u R~ ~.c~~ ~ ~ di 4 a ~ i ~ •c~~~c~°~[~ ~ c~~s~ c~ ~ ~ --qq ~ o ~ c~~.c` ~~_Q~et~~~d~.~ can [~r~n~~~c C m ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ p;~aG~~c~q~''c CI) cU ~ ~ ,Q GD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~j C ~i ~ a~cc~c~.~o , ~~~~~~~07#~~~ ~ H f i I . . GJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~c ~ d} ~ 4~.1 ~ ~ C] ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~ tai ~ ~ ~ b] O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W a~ ~i • ~ ro p • ~ ~ ~ 'DQ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g g ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c$ ~ co ~ . ~ . + ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~~y55 ~ ~ ~ cb ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ c o cn cn 4 ~ ~ ~ o ~ .nom. ..U~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cry t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~ ~ ~ ~ i'~ ~ O` ~ ~ ~ 43 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'C1 ~ }~C ~ ~ i0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ri~ ~ L~ ~ ~ {3] ~ ~,~~o ~ ~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o as l ~ ~ ~ a, ;~yy ~ c ~ ~ f ~r N ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~°a~i~- c°3;~ a ~'°v;~ ~ ~ ~,e~ ~W i~~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ G ~ C C ~ ~ ,~j ~ N 7 ~ ~ ~ ] ~ ~ d~ L F ~ Na~~~-~~,~ W ~#,~irdi ~ ~ c ~ sue. ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ m Q r.,~ rn ~ cn ~ r~ o ~ ~ ~ ~U~~ • ~ ~ o~vi~o~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~?m~~o~~ ~ a- ~ ~3 v~ o.o ~~~~~-o~; ~ m~~ .nom ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L /ate~ ~yy~~~~~~~~_~,,c~ ~o/~ ~ ~ ~ +~~c~~~~ c~ ~ ~ o~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a ~ ~ ~ ##i k f 3 t i t I i i I I 4i ~ ~ ro c~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ 'c ~ c c O ~ . J fA J U1 ~ ~ try 4.k to ~ m ~ ~ 4~ ~ ;~3 ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ L O e ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~•M~c ~F ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ W ~r~~`~c cv~~ t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'L ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~.~c~~~ ~ro,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ `~+.,N°'~ .~mc~~o ran ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ p ~ ~ d2 cl3 ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ chi' a c~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ors ~.~U~.~o`~ o ~~~-c ~ ao ~ ~.o ~.avUQ ~ ca ¦ ¦ ~ U3 ~ ~ o ~ rya a, ~ ~~,y ~ ~ p ca o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ m ~C ~ o~ v~c°a ~ ~;a•o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.c goo C~ N s s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ a ~ ~y ~ 'v, fJ} ~ cn a~~~ ~ ~o~~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~~;~o ~c ° e ~ ~ ~ e ~ c~ ,m,c? ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ 'tl? O :R ~ O fly ~ ~ Q1 ~ ~ ~'f7 4~ O c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -p ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fly ~ ~ ~ ~ y~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O`er ~(4~ c Q1 Q~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ i~~ ~•c ~ C .G L ~ Q r d} T` 4.1 tli L ~ ~ L ~ ' f!^~ .C t.,. ~ ~ N ~ ~ r, ~ O ~ ~ ~ ] ~ ~ • ~~~~~c~~~~~~c ~ .#..r 3 c ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ " ~'~~~o~_~~~~~aa c~ Lam' ~ ~ ~ ~ Gi ~ ~°o~~ LL ~ ~ r-• D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ f}1 ~ C ~ ~ G D ~ LL ~ ~ ~.U v~y.~~'Q can w ~~~~c~,ct~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~pp ~ U ~ V C ~ ~ cmfn ~~~~c~n~F~ ~ a~ c ~ i~~~'~ ~ ~ € i a ~ ~a ~ > f-• 1~ s~ ~~yy V . C_ ~L ~l * 'v, ~ ~ acid ° ro~ ~'~`a~ c * U ~.o'-~ obi ~ ~ o ° ~ ~ ~ ~ o c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~«e'~ ~ a~~' ~ ~ c°.~ ~ ~ tea.} ~ yUy~~ '+7 ~ V f ~ .}`r ,~{~]~1 r 'ice ' (Y L ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~~ • r~ a" +SJ W W f ('1'} ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ ro ~a~ Ito ~ a~.~u~ ~ a~~ ~-~-o~ ~ ~ _ Off ~ t1y ~ ~ 3~] ~ C ~ ~ Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . • p ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~O ~ C_ ~ ~ W ~ 4s d! ~ ~ ~C O Fr t~ ~ o ~ ~ D a . b 0 ~C C ~L W ~ ~ ~ O h! 4S O 43 ~ O C~ 41 O O ~ ~ ~ ~ p Ql ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ 4? C ~ c ~ ~ ~~o ~ ~ ~ ~ D h _ t- ~ c r r ill r ~ r C ~ (1? C} r ~ ~ X111 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C • d3 C W ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ C C ~y ~ ~ c ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r1~ 4~ _ yr L `a ~ clx Q.1 to ~ to G.1 , 4~ ~ ~ ~ D ~ C ~ ~ G ~ ~ G 'U 43 ~ ~ Qx ~ .q L3 ~ ~ AEI ~ ~ r-+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~'1 ~ ~ c~ ~ ,off ~ ;'~o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d} r Q G`C~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ C r_ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ d ~ C l~] ~ 4.1 Q.1 ~ ' 'CS ~ ~ ~ ~ 'D Ql C1 U ~ 4~] ~3 ~ ~ O -p Qa ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ 'D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ Q1 ~ ~ i 4 ~ ~~s ~~~~a~ ~~~=°o ate. ~ ~~~~3c~ c w ~ ~..~~~~~~~.~~m ~L L~~~o.'..L~~cc,,~~ Leo W ~ a,~ ~ ° ~ omcar~m~ ~ c~ ~ ~ v~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ap 'c ~ r~yQ~~~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ # i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . rte! "ili J ~~1! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ C ~ p ~ C C U O C~ ;C~ D ~ ~ ~ ~ ir~4~3~c ul~~~~ LC C~ C C 3 C m ~ ~~vl~ ~ ~~'~~a~.~ _ W ~ ~ ~ cam' ~ v c~i ~ ~t ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ C] ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ C 4S ~ ~fij V1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ vii •o.c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~c~~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U o ~ ~ ~ tv ~ ~ c~ cn cv ~ ~ G ~ ~ nr • ~ fill ~ ~ L~1 ~~~1d~k C G ~ L ~1-Yt {f } C N Q~ ~ 'i~ ; `~1 (1~ .C o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~`a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o m ~ ~ ~ m a, ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~~o -vim- ~m ~c~+,o v7 ~ o L~a~~ CQ w t~Tc~~o~~~:,~ 2cnt~c~F~~.cva,~ ~~v~ie~,~c~°~~ ~ ~ ~ m cam-" "'c V ~ ~ t f E C ~ ro ~ N ~ ~ ~ ° C~ ~ ~ ~ r~ N : ~ U! ~ ~~~~'~c ~v~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o~sc~ ~ o ~ ul ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ L 0, ~ ~ cep ~ o ° ~ ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c Eta ~ ~ U7 ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 111 ~ ~ D~ L Q] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (4 ~7 cam,,]] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~3 ~ tl~ ~ ~ C i... U~ o _ o ~ _ .tea. ~ cvc~• ~ ~ ~~~a ~ • ~ c I~ `a o ~ ~ ~ ca ~ ~ t,c~c~lym.o~ m~ ~ ~ ~~~-~o c~ ~ Flo 2 ~i ~ ~ a~~~o~~ ~~v~~•-ate ~ ~ ~ as ~ ~~c~ ~~L ~rc°3u~•~~~~~ w... k~ W ~ ,w 5J L tifJ ~ L ~ stir ~ ~ ~ ~ Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~`~ca~~'~vrn ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ p ~ ~ ~ V> ~ ~ .E.e ~ 's i I ~ #i ~ ~ ~ 'cn C O ~ ~ G . Q) EL O C LEA ~ ~ G ~ Q C C i3l O ~ ~ i~ ` 4 ~ t6 ~ d)o~ ~~~=off..,..,.. c.~ ~ c ~ ~ cn ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ rn _ ~ C] ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ 'o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~a ~ ~ ~ u m ~ v ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ oq U ~ 3 f r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,o t,~ . . ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ran a.~ m~° ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m c~ c~~y~L~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .cis ~.~~'~~~•e ~ ~ ,~-a~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ '.cam ~ ~ Rcn~ U,~,~~ ~ ~ a ~ o 0 o i., o o a~ ~ ' L C ~ i C ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ Q 4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C_ b i u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ w as ~-o ~ ~ ~ c c ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ q~ a~ v o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cam`' fi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~.~c13 ark°c~c~ ~r~-orna,~ma..~a~ • w C b ,C ~ ~L ~ D" ~ ~ R ~ h] ~ ~ ~ 1 r~ ~ ~ b ~ . . a ro ,c /J~ F- _ ~SWf1 c ~ c~ ~n A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,i~ ~ ~ ~7-. ~~i. ~ a~ ~ ~ +T~ ~ L.L. A •,i~• ~ i~ ~ ~.~v~~uzc~c~c~r~.~~~c~cnv]v,U~?~C~~~~~a~a~~~~c~i° 4~ i • ~ ~ ~ ~ w W A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 41..F 4 C ~ i I I ~ i ~ ~ u ~d ~ c o c o ~ c c w ~ `vim, ~ ro•~ m•~~ ~ ~ ° ~ v,~•~;~~~~c ~ c L~~~~ m Asa. ~ ~cc.a ~ia~~_ ~~~~o ~ • 0 V ! w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C! ~ ~ i ~ ~ 4, ~ ~ ~ ~ ,d ~ 41 ~ ~ C ~..~C ~ ~ C ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ c o~'~ cam ~~~o ~ c . ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~O Q r ~ Q.1 ' - ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ v ~ a~~i cn ~ ~ ~ ~ saw o.~aao ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.0-.~'~~ q3O # ~ c~ ~ _ p '~~~~~o~~m ~Q ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ }1 fi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ r U ~ Q,1 ~ O ~ ~ ~ C .a N V7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m~c~a'~~Na~'a. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q o OD ~~~~c~~4~•c ~ ~ N O a N V) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q.~~c~O~~~ ~ €i f ~ ~ r `s ~ ~ ,C ~ ~ ~ m ~o c°~ a ~ ca cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u~~~~'o~ ~ ~ ~~a u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c°~'~ ~ 4 C ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fJ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ov Q ~ ~ e31 ~3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ 't!1 ~ ~ R C N C~~ O~~ A C T F~ C O O L ~ c ~ v~~,~ ~ ~ .tom ~~~~~~~~,~'cn ~ ~ a N O ~ C (4~ ~ F~ a! ~ N fA li7 _ CS ' R ~ ~~~y~~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~a¦ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~cYY ~ o SCI ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ 4f i ~ ' ~IJ ~ ~ ~ + ~ : A!J ~ ~.r ~ N.~~o ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ o ~ lid ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ,o ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~3 • a ~ ~ ~ w ' ~ C? ~ w • • ~ O C ~ ~ 0 ~f ~ ~ W N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R ~ N =u? ~ D O ~ ~ O`1.~ ~ ~ ~ C ~I ~ ~'~I ~f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~IIJ~ ~1 ~NT~~I~T~~f The E~ p~eparcd ~'or T'ran~t ~oz~in Cade considered sip ~b~ aite~~nati~res to the P~ioposed Praject. Purs~~ant to Section ~5~2~.~~a~ o~ the CEO uide~.nes, the px~i~~ai~~ intent of an alternati~tes ~~raluati.on is to "describe a range of reasonable alternati~Tes to the pra~ect, or to the location off' the p~~o~ect, ~vl~ich ~~Tauld feasibl~r attai~~ most of tl~e basic objecti~~cs of the project but ~vo~~ld a~~o~d ar• substantiall~t ~esse~~ atl~r of tl~e significant el`fects of the project, a.f~d eST~~uate tl~c ca~parati~Te ~x~c~~its of the altert~a~~Tes." This chapter describes the project objecti~res and design criteria used to de~reiap and c~raluate project alte~•~~ati~res pfesented i~Y the Draft EIS.. ~ descrip~ox~ of tl~e alternati~~e con~pared to the Pr~aposed Pr~aject and the ~ndi~~gs regarding tl7e feasibilit~~ of adapting the described alternati~~es are presented b elo~~r. PR~J~T ~BJ~T~~I~ ~'he project ob~ectittes of the prapased Transit caning Code a~•e to: ¦ P~Fa~ride caning for• the integration o~ x~c~~~ info de~relop~~~ent into e~usting neigl~borhaod ~ ¦ Pr•o~~~de far a range of hauling opt~o~~s, lncluci~n a~'~'or•dabie housing N ~lla~~r the reuse of e.~iting structures ¦ Alla~~~ the de~relopn~ent o~ tine ~genc~~ prope~~ties N P~o~z~de a transrt~supports~re, pedestrian-oz•~ented de~reiop~e~~t frame~~~ork to support the additia~~ of ne~~~ tt•ar~sit ini'rastructure ¦ P~eser~re and rein~'o~Fce tl~e e~i~n cl~ar•acter and pedestria~~ nature of t~~e Cite b}r strengt~~erring u~~ba~~ form through ii~praved de~~eiop~nent and design ta~~dards ¦ Encourage aiternad~T~ nodes o transpartation, includi~~g the rail s~Fstei~~ t€~at connects Sa~~ iea to ~~os t~~~geies The project objccti~~es of the propased De~reiopei• Pra~ect for the ~~genc~r~o~~~ned properties are to: ¦ ede~Telop ali of the ~e~~c~'-o4~Tned piopertle ¦ Pro~tide i1e~~~ affaidable ~~aus~n for fatr~.~es furtherance of the Cit~?'s a£~'ordable housi~~ goads established i~~ the ~~o~~sing Elei~cnt, the Ii~~plernentatio~~ Plan far the Santa tuna ~I~~e~•ged I~ede~reloptr~e~~t Project ~fea,and the Cis of Sa~~ta ~t~a Canso dated Plan ¦ Enhance tl~e stfeetscape and ui•ba~~ farm of the area, particularl~~ along Santa ~~i~a ~aule~Tard, ~~~tl~ the cansttucdon of ile~L~ bindings tl7at meet the standards contained. ire the 'T'ransit caning Code a~7d that s~~ppart future transit plat~ni~~ ~ ¦ Elhninate blight _ i Trar~si~ ~or~i~g Code ~p 84} EiR Fi€~din~s of F~c~l~a~o~ent of Overr~din~ ~on~iderations 3_~ i ~ap~er ~~~af~rts ~4~~ard~r~~ Project Arterrta~~ves ¦ P~~~~Tide ad~itionai pudic open space and acilita~e point a~•xa~~en~ent ~~iti~ ~~USD a~ a ne~~t cozx~tnunit~~ centef N P~o~Tide an econarr~ica~l~~ ~7iable ~ede~'e~DpiTlent scecla~ia f~~ the ~~e~~c~T-o~~ned p~opef~~ic ~~L~`Cl~N ~ ~L~'~IATlIIE The Dia~'t ~II~ and Reci~cuiated Drat ~~R e~~aiaated sip alte~nati~~es, inc~u~liig tl~e ~ Pio~ect~No ~e~~elopr~rent a1te~.~~Yati~~e, in Chapte~• 5.4, T~~is e~~aiuation c~t~pa~ed the en~~i~ianY~~et~tal ad~rantaes and disad~Tantaes a~ each alte~,~~ad~re to the Proposed ~•o~ect~ te~nati~re , and 3 aye p~~~~x~afil~r designed to address altcrnati.~Tes to tine 'I~~ansit ~onit~ Code as a ~~r~~ale. ternati~Te 4, 5, ar~d p~~ese~~t alte~nati~Tc to the p~oposeai ~Telope~ P~aject, undei each. off` t~~ese ~ltefnat~tres, ti7e p~~opaseci TI'atYSit ~oning Code ~~Tould remain the unc~~a.r~ed. 'I'he range oi' feasible alterr~ad~Tes ~~Tas selected and discussed in a ~r~a~~ne~• to foster ~nea~~it~g~ul public pa~~icipation and in~'o~~~ned decisio~~-xx~al~~n. iron tine £acto~s tila~ ~~re~e taken l~~ta account ~~~l~et~ conside~~in the feasibilit~T of aite~•nati~~es ~as clesc~ibed its CEO uideli~~es Section 1~1.~~~~~~ ~~e~c e~~~~i~•a~~~~ental impacts, econ4n~ic ~~iab~.it~~, a~~ailabi~it~F it~ftast~uctu~e, reguiato~~T li~~itation, ~u~~idictia~~al ba~~ndai{ies, and attain~ner~t of px•Q~ect abjecti~~es..t~s stated in ectio~~ ~ 5~ ~G.~~a~ of ~~.e uide~ines, a~~ need not coi~side~ an aiteit~atis~c ~~fi~ase e~'fects could Plot ~e ~eaonab~~7 identi~'ied, ~~~hos~ i~nplemet~tation is ~e~~ote speculati~Te, o~~c ti~at urould not acb~e~Te tl~e basic pt~o~ect ob~ecasTes. The anal~isis includes sufficient in~bi't17~tian about each a~tein~ti~~e to pio~ride zx~eani~~gful e~~a~tzation, a~~al~~sis, a~~d cot~~paf'ison ~~Titl~ tl~e P~opascd Project. It should be noted that the ~iteina~~~es section of tl~c ~i ~4tas re-c~iculated due to the addition of three ne~~r alterr~atl~~es ~t~lternati~~es 5 and ~~~hich ~~~ould lessen the i~npaets related to l~stoi*ic stfuct~~~es located ~~i~~~in the piopased De~relopei' Pi•o~ect area, Tl~e ie-circulation of the ~~lter~~ati~~es section concuiirezxtl~z c~tended the public cail~tnent period o~i the SIR, 'RAJ ~T ~LT~R I~~T111 N ~I ! .4.~ ~'fdi~ ~r~ ~trntiv~t~t r~~~d ~'rn~t~~nin od An~~r~~d ire the Drift ~R t~lteinati~Te acid 3 are pz~i~~aril~~ designed to address alterna~~Tes to the Transit ~oni~ig Cade as ~~rhole, Tile ~enc~7's ~ildings an each altert~at~~~e and tl~c xatia~iale behind eacli li~~din are set l'o~ith b ela~v. ~t~r~~t~v~ No ~ro~t~f~~ ~vr~pmr~t ~It~rnati~r Tliis alternatirre assu~x~es ~ cantin~aation of the Cis' existing e~~eral Plan and ~o~iln designations to guide ut~~~~c io~~~th and de~relop~x~ent ~~~tl~in the T`xa~isit caning Code p~~oject area. 'I'he ir~.pacts of this alternad~re ~~~ere anal~~~ed undci• a ~na~it~.urr~ buildout scenario ~~~itlxiri the Transit honing Code area ~~rith the current allo~~Ted land uses and de~~elopi~~ent tazidards designated in the existing encral Plan and ~on.ing desigt7atians. In addition, this alternati~Te assumes that th.e proposed e~~eloper Project ~~rauld not ~ go oi~~~ard on the genc~r-o~~~ned properties. II~Iaintaini~ig tl7e e~~sting erieral Plan and ~oniri ~ ---Transit honing Code ~Sa 84} Ei~ E=indi~~s of ~actater~ent overriding ansidera~io~s ~ i i 5 k desig~~a~ons th.~oughout tine 'T~•ar~sit o~~ir~ bode area ~~~au~d result in impacts that are similar, for the mast part, to those of the prapased 'Transit caning bode, although rnan~= of the sigr~if~cant impacts associated ~~ith aesthe~cs, air quafit~~, cli~n.atc ci~ar~ge, ar~d noise~~Tih~•ation ~~=auid be ~~educed a.s ca~~pared to tine ~~oposed ~•oject. ~ numhei• of llnpacts «rau~d be gre~.ter under the Na Pro~ect~Na De~relopment t~ternati~re than under the proposed project due to the ~rbsence of ~nidation measures that ~~zouid be adapted as pa~~t of the proposed praject, e.g., i~~pacts tram increased light and gia~~e. ~dditionauy, because the it~~'s e~istiz~g erae~•ai Plan and caning desinatians da oat emphasise alternative modes of transpartatian and do not contain the de~refapn~ex~t fra~x~c~~ra~.•k ~aecessa~~~ to suppo~•t tine t~•ansit-o~~iented de~reioptnent, fmpacts to traffie~transpo~~tatio~~ ~~rouid be ~•eate~• ur~de~• tine o P~•o~ectf Na ~eveioptr~er~t ternad.~Te ti~ar~ under the proposed Transit caning bode. ~~i=? ~11"~~ The ~genc~~ hereh~= finds that specific economic, leggy., social, technaiogical, ar other consideratian.s n~akc t~~e adap~.an of the o ~'x•aject~a ~]e~~eiapYr~ent te~ir~at%Te infeasible, ~~iti~augi~ .~~ite~•r~ati~Te ~vould ~~ade~•atei~z reduce same of tine prapased project's sir~if~cant impacts, it ~~Fouid ~~ot acia~c~rc mast of tine bask p~•o~ect ab~ectl~res. ~pecificall~~, ~Iternati~Te ~ ~~rould not pro~Fide zor~ir~ for the integ~•atior~ of €~e~v infill de~reiopment into e~~iting neighborhoods. ~t ~~rau~d not prop=lde fo>± a range of housing optio$~s, inciudfr~ afforidahie i~ousit~~ ~t ~~~ould oat pra~zide far the tease of e.~€stirlg structures, ailo~~r the deg=elopment of the t~ene~=-o~~rned properties, or• t~•t~thenii~ t~~~ba~. fo~tr~ ti~~•ouia i~~~p~'o~Ted dc~reiapr~er~t and des~gr~ standards. ~~farea~Ter, unlike the proposed praject, it ~~atild not pro~Tide a transit--support~~re, pedestrian-oriented de~relop~nent fra~rre~~ra~~k to suppa~it t~•~.nstt-orier~tcd de~reiop~~~er~t, or er~caurage alternati~~e modes of trailsportatian. ~s ~ result of its inabiiit~r to meet the basic project objecd.~~es, tine Na P~•oject~o ~e~relapment t~ternati~te ~vould eliminate the appart~~r~it~= to pra~tlde the nu~r~eraus benefits of the proposed project, as set Earth In the statement of ~~rerr~din ~onslderatton, including hand use de~reiap~xrent ti~at ptio~zides a better ir~arket far public transit, consistent ~~tith the goals of ~ 3~~, California's ustaitiabie ~ornn~ur~i~ties and liinate Protection ~~ct; pro~ridir~ strategic areas fo~~ infiil, pedestrian friendi~r eni=irantr~er~ts, ar~d focusing housing and. empia~?ment gra~~~th in transit~accessible iacation.s through transit-oriet~tcd de~relopzx~er~ts, co~~siste~~t ~~~iti~ tine auti~er~r~ ~alifarr~.a ~ssociatian of a~=erninents ~D~S ~io~~~1 ~'~r~~~s~otta~r'~~~ ~1r~~~~ ~~~.~a~i~a ~~~e '~~r~~~c~~~o~rs T~'}, and ~~~'s ~~D~ l~~i~~r~l ~'~~r~~~~1~~~asi~ae .~'Icrrr' ~~'e~r't~ o~t~~rr~ft~~fi~s ~c+l~i~rr~ r~ S~tstc~~~rcr~le F~r~rtr~ ~7'} land use goals; and praysiding opportunities to meet the ~it~= of Santa Ana's share of the Regional ~Iousiz~gNccd.s .~~llacation ~RE~'~~ far ~~-~0~~-, ~dditianall~=, ternati~~e 1 ~~touid not further the established foals aid Policies of the it~T's erxe~.iai ~'lar~ to tine sa~~c c~terat as tine pr~opased Transit ~onir~ odeF 7n particular, it ~~rauid not further ~~oi~sing Element Policies ~~E-2.~, 2.~, ~.4, ~vl~ich support the goal of pro~Tiding a di~Terisit~T of qualit~T housing, affordability= le~rels, and luring e~peiiences that accon~rnodate ar~ta ~t~~~a' residents ar~d urorkforcc of ail i~ousehaid t~rpes, ir~cai~e le~reis, fed age groups to foster an ~nciusive cain~nunit~= to the satr~e extent a the proposed `Transit caning ode Nor ~~~ould it fiirthe~• band use Eie~~ent pa~icies LE- ~~3, .G, ~.7, and ~,9, ~~~i~ici~ promote a balance of iar~d uses to address basic community= needs, LE-~.~, 2.8, 2.~, and ~.1~, ~~rhich promote farad uses ~~i~ich e~.hance tine i~z's econamic and fiscal Transit Zoning Cody ~D S~} EiR Findings o~ Fa~t/tatament of ~v~rt~ding vnsiderati~ns l C~apt~r 3 ~~na~~r~s Reardfn~ Pro~~ct A~terr~attves ~~iabilit~~, LE-~.~, and ~,5, ~vhich s€~pport the goad of protecting and enha~~cit~ de~re~opn~ents sites and dist~~cts ~~~i~ch are uillque co~~munit~r assets t~~a.t e~~~~ance the qual~t~~ of life, or L~-5.~, 5,~, 5,5, 5,~, ~.9, 5,~0, and 5.~~, ~~Ti~ic~~ e€~sure that the i~x~pacts of de~reop~~c~~t are mitigated to the same extent as the proposed T~a~asit ~ot~ing Code, ~ee Land Use Eleme~~t; ~]r•aft SIR Table imilar~~r, it ~~rou~d not ft~~•ti~e~• tine goals of the Urba~r Design ~let~ent Coals ~~7~ to the sat~~e extent as the proposed Transit ~onit~g Code. Sec Urban Design ~ie~ne~~t; Draft EII~ Table ~,7~,~ l1~Ioreo~Ter•, t~~e integrated a~~d cohesi~Te cie~reiop~e~~t standards that are proposed. for the Transit honing Code area ~~tou~d not be irpieented, Last~~~, ~.ternati~~e ~ ~~~ould increase if~~pacts o~ transportation as a result of hack of emphasis on a~ternatt~re modes of transportation. i~ the current Genera ~'~a~~ and coning des~g~~ations and the hack of a de~TelopYr~er~t fra~~~e~~~ork to support transit-orie~~ted de~reiopment. I~or• tiYese reasons, tic ~enc~~ rejects ~lternati~re 1 as i~~~`easibie, ~terntiv~ ~ ~r~r~i Rduc~d deity T~~e C~7ef~ah deduced ~er~sit5~ ternatt~re ~~rould reduce the inte~~sit~T of ah anticipated land uses ~~~~thi~. the Transit ~o~~ing Code LSD at~ea bar 2~ percct~t, In general, this a.itei~]a~;Fe ~~rou~d ~•educe the nurnher of residet~cc, it~ciuding affordable ~lousit~g, and reduce ernpio~~ment opportunities as a result of less coxx~~~ercial uses in the area, peci~€cali}r, this alter~~~.~~Te ~vouid result in appro1~i~nate~~~ ~,0~9 fever residentiai units, az~d G,75o fe~~rer square feet of retail ~~~t~in t~~e Transit ~ou~t~ Code ~D S~} a~iea. ~~eciftc de~~eiopment c~~a~•acteristics that ~~fiouid be allo~ved unde~i t~~is alter~~ati~~e relad.~re to tine proposed Transit honing Code ~ 8~~ are spec~tied in Table 3~1 ~,~~~ternati~~e 2 and Proposed Transit Zo~~ii~g Code Characteristics. : . t~r~d Else ~'y~~ a~~emp~~ve 2 ~rar~s~ ~or~ing bode (SD 8~ D~`e~er~ce Com~e~c~a~ ~S~ ~1 ~~,~04~ ~124x~0~ ~ Civ« ~s~ ~2~,~OD} ~2~,~~ ~ Gre~~ ~s 6~~,0 ~D}~0~ ~ SOU~~: ~~S&J ~~~0 T'~~e ~~ge~~c~r Z~ereb}r f Ends ti~at specific econorara~c, iegal, sociai, teci~~xoloicai, or other co~~siderations make file adop~o~ of tips alternat~~~e ~t~feas~b~e. although ~~lternati~~e ~ ~~Tou~d so~~e~~rhat reduce the sigt~if~cant impacts of the proposed T`z~a~~sit ~o~ng Code ~D one aest~~etics, climate ci~ane, and transportariot~, it ~~roul~ not reduce at~3r of those Impacts -4 ~'ransit ~onlr~g bode 84} ~iR Findings of ~ac~lt~tee~t of Dverr~ding Car~s~derations i i C~rapter ~ ~~r~a~~r~gs Rear~fr~~ Project A~terna~~ves to belo~~ tl~e le~rel of slgnlficance, lf~ addition, Alter~.ati~re 2 mould not meet tl~e hausi~g ar~d tr~.nsit ob jecti~Tes of the Project to the same extent as tl~e proposed project, Altertiati~re ~ ~~ould reduce housing b~F percent, from ~,0~5 to 3,~5G resieler~tial units, Tl~e potential number of affordable housing units ~~rould also be reduced b~~ 25 perce~.t. ~r`o~~iding x,05 ne~~t units ~~~ould teat meet an.ta A~~a's regional ~~ousing deeds Assessment for.` 2~Ob-20~~, ~~hich calls ~`or ~,~9 total units, ~,2~8 of ~~~lriCl~ must be af'f ordable far 101, ~''e~•~z lo~~~, ~.nd e~trer~~el~r lo~~r i~~cor~~e l~ausehalds. Tl~e Cit~r o~ Saz~ta Ai~a has a great z~eed for affordable hausi~ag; si~t~~ percent o~ the l~ouseholds in Santa lia~~e lo~~~, ~Tei•~F io~~~, at~d e~tren.~el~T lo~~~ i~~corne, ~~i~r of Santa Ai~a general Plan ~ra#`t pausing ~;lerr~ent ~aaC~-2D~ 4, Appendil4 p. a.~ Baal ~ of the HousiE~ ~;lement is to "pro~ride ~ di~rersit~~ of ciualit~~ l~o~~ing, affardabilit~z le~~els, and li~~ing e~pe~`icr~ces tl~at acco~~n~adate Santa Ana's residents and ~~Tarkforce of all l~ousehald types, income Ie~rels, and age g~•oups to Faster an 1nC~USI~Te corr~rr~unlt~~." Alternad~Te ~~rauld not meet tl~is goal, or the follo~~~.n Housing element policies, to the sar~~e e~tex~t as tl~e proposed p~•ojcct; H~~2. .e~~tal Housing ~ncoulage the construction of re~~tal housing f'or Santa Ana's ~•esidents and ~~~arkfarce, i~~cl~~ding a cor~~tr~trr~e~t to ~re~~t la~~r, lo~~~, and n~odel`ate income residents anti moderate itYCO~ne Santa Aria ~~~orkers. ~~-2,~ Dl~re~`sit~F of Housit~g'Y ~~pe, ~ac~~ttate and encouiac a di~Tefsit~~ and range in t~Tpes, prices, and sires of housing, i~7cluding single fan~il~r 1~a1~1es, apartments, to~~Fn homes, rx~i~ed f rr~ultiuse housiz~g, tians~t~orlented desreloplr~ents, and li~~e~~~~oa~.`~ hOUSing, Alternatf~~e ~~rould not meet the p~`o~ect's tratls~t oriented objectr~Tes to the sarr~e ehte~~t as the prapaserl project, deducing tl~e amount of lousing and retail space ~~~ould result in a failure to fly en~phasi~e t~~e use of tl~e Santa Ana Regio~~al T~•anspartation Centex` ~SAI~TC~ for its, ~`eider~ts, A mixedTuse urban a~~d tra.~~s~t~or~ented nelgi7~orhaad re~~ltes a cr.•itical mass and balar~ce bet~~~een residential and i~o~~- residcntial ~~ses its order to succeed, ~raf t ec~o~ 5.5,~ ~lternati~~e ~ ~vouid not pro~z~de that cii~c~~ rrras and balance, In addltior~, ~t ~~Fauld not lmplerr~ent established ~ RTP ar ~~P polrcres, or general elan Land Use element policies ~,2, ~,5, ~,C, ~,6, Z.B, ~,0, ~-.3, 4,5, ~.2, 5.5, 5.7, 5,9, and 5,~ or Urban Land Usc ~ler~ent foals 1 th.~oul~ 7 to the sar~~e e~te~~t ~s tl7e proposed p~`oject. See Land Use ~ler~~ent; Urban esigr~ ~lerr~et~t; Draft E~~. Table ~,7~~.} pecificall~T, tl~e Alternati~~e 2 ~~'ould i~at 1~1eet the follo~~~ng CA~ I~TP Land Usc awls to the same e~te~~t as the proposed ~roject~ ~ r.`eate reed-use districts of "campiete coxr~r~u~~ities" in strategic gray;~tll areas tl~~•o~rl~ a cotlcer~tr`at~an of ~c~~rl~.es ~~~t~~ l~aus~ng, em~lo~Trx~el~t, and a fl~l~ off' retail a~~d ser~Tices, lac~ted in close p~•oxixr~it~~ to each. other`, ~'acusing a min a£ la~~d uses In strategic grO~~TtI~ areas creates complete cornr~unities ~vherein most dail~r needs can. be rr~et ~vitlrtn a short dista~~ce of home, pro~~idin residents ~~itl~ the opportuniT to patrani~e thei~• local area and run dail~r rl`ands by walking ar c}?cling ratl~el` tra~relin b~~ automobile, a ~ntetisi? nodes alor~ corridors t~rith peo~~leYscaled, treed-use de~~elaplnents, ~riar~~~ existing corridors lack the feide~~tial and con~rneicial ca~~centratian to adequa.tel~T support non~auto tr.`a~~sit uses, ~~?ithout ~~rl~~cl~ tl~e exlst~t~ transit syster~ cannot full~~ realise its pater~tial for accar~~.adating additiar~al trips and relie~~ing the tfanportada~~ s~~stem, '~~l~ese nodes along the corridor also create ~~ansit zon~n~ Code ~D ~4~ EIR F~n~in~s of ~ac~/tatement of ove~~id~n~ ~ons~dera~~ons ~ ~hap~er ~ f~t~d~n~ ~eard~r~~ ~ro~e~t ~41~~rnat~ves ~Tibl•ant, ~~ralable comrxrunities t~itl~ i~cali~ed access to ar~cnities, fu~~tl~el• red~zci~. reliance an tl~e aUt~IT10b~1~ . ~Trlet~~ tfips. ¦ Pedest~•ian4friendl~r crl~~ironrner~ts and mare coln~act de~~ela~cr~t patterns in close pro~i~it~~ t~ transit set~Te to support and ~ti~~ro~Te transit use rtdershlp. ~ocusit~ hauling and errr~lo~tn~ent ro~~rth in transit-accessible locations thraul~ this tria.r~sit~oriented de~relaprr~er~t approach ser~Te to reduce auto ~~se ar~d suppo~•t more ulri~nodal tra~Tel beha~tri~r. Fu~~ther, the lade reduction in retail space ~~rould signif cantl~T red~~c~ poten~al ne~~ el~pio~~xnen~ opportur~iq.cs end the economic l~er~e~lts that accoln~an~~ such o~~port~rnide, as coln~ared to the proposed Transit ~orling bode, 7t ~vould also reduce tl~e an~ou~~t of poter~aal tax re~~enue that the Cit~T could arse to ~~eirY~~est and stilrru~ate economic de~reloprr7ent, ~n bala~~ce, reducing tl3e de~reloptrrent inte~~sit~~ b~~ 2~ percent under t~lternati~Tc ~~rould riot pro~~ide an~f sir~if~cant er~~ri~+anr~~ent~l b~t~e~'It t~~at aut~~el~~ file extent to ~~~l~icil it ~~~QUIc~ in~~ibit tl~e Cif' ~.~il€~r to n~eet ~~cional housing needs ar~d its goal o~ establishing a tl•~rls~t--su~pDrtive, pedestrian~orier~ted de~Telapl~~ent ~rat~le~~or~ to support tl~e ne~~ transit-ir~rast~,ucture. For these r~eason.s, tl~e tler~c~T rejects t~lter•nat~~re ~ as ~ra~`easlhie, Al~e~~?~~~V ~ ~.~IN~RI~ Tl~s a~te~nati~re is a lonT4 to mid-rise ~rersion o~ the ''rax~sit honing fade ~D ~~rhich ~~Tauld ~t7~t bu~ld~r~ heights ~n file Da~~~nto~vn ar~d Transit ~~iilage ~lstlicts to fou~i stories. L~nde~~ 1~lterna~~TC 3, the Do~~~nto~~~r~ and Transit ~L~illage districts ~~rould be rede~Teloped according to tl~e standa~ids of the Fist t~•eet ~orlidar District, Tl~e reri~air~ing districts o~ the ~I'~at~sit Boni#~ bode ~4~ area ~~~ould be de~relaped consistent ~~ith the prioposec~ project. This ~~?ould result in ~'eu~er• residet~dal units and 3G,0~~ fe~~~c~• s~ of retail uses. because this altcrnatl~Te ~~?ould allo~~r building heights that a~•e similar to existing buildings iz~ the area, tl~e alter~ad~Te r~tould cr]sure ~utul~e de~~elop~~~ent ~~~auld ha~~e less sl~ade~shada~~~ impacts, as ~~Fell a ge~~e~•ate ~e~~~er autol~labile trigs. r~'he anticipated n~i~ ol` land ~~ses ~~rould therefore be di~~erent tl~ar~ the p~ia~~osed project, ar~d a less residential based area ura~rld result. peci~c dejtelopn~ent characteristics tilt ~uo~uld be allo~~red uf~der this alte~•nat~4~e re~att~rc to the pr~aposed'~~ansit honing bode ~D 8~} are speci~'~ed ire Table ~ttcrna~~rc 3 and Proposed Transit ~or~ng ode ~5~ S~~ haracteritics~. f 3- Traneit ~on~ng Code ~5~ S4~ Eli Findings of Fa~t/~~atemen~ o~ ~verridin~ ~onside~a~ians t chapter ~ Ffr~dir~~s ~eardfn~ Pro~e~t ~~terna~~~es :~:~~~~:~~:~~::~..:~~~::tand.tls~ Type Afferna~ve 3. ~ ~ :i~ar~s~ ~o~ing Code {SD 8~~ :.:D~fl`erence.~ Res~~~atiai ~~~iis~ 2,~~6 4,015 ~~,0~9~ Retail ~s~} 5~,~~ 81,~~~ ind~s~~iai {s~ ~~~0,~00} ~~,~DO~ ~ Commercial ~sf~ ~~24,00~} ~~24,~~~ ~ Civic ~~~,4D4~ ~2~,~00~ ~ Green ~sf~ 5~~,0~~ SB~,~~~ 0 ~'ar~in~ t~,~,o~o~ ~~,~rz,o~~ ~~~~,~~o~ ~o~~~: ~ass~.~ ~fr?(~~1?3 t~enc~~ he~•eb~T finds that specific econo~~~ic, legal, social, teci~t~ological, or ot~~er considerati~o~~s make the adaption of~ternati~Te 3 it~feasible. ~lltl~ough ~lte~•~~a~~te ~ would ~•educe ~ stgntficar~t and una~~oidable ~tnpact of the p~•oposed project to aesthetics ~si~adi~~g and shado~~Fs} to ~ less than sigt~i~cant le~zei, ~t 4~ro~~ld restrict de~7eiop~nent ~~~itl~in the it~r to la~~~ to rr~d-~~ise de~reiopmt, ~~Tl~ich v~ould ~~ot t~eet project objecti~Tes to the satr~e extent as the proposed project. pecif~call~?, this ~'esti~iction ~~rould ~~e~uiie a leduc~oil in housing ~i~~cluding a~'~'ordable iiousing~ fro~~ ~,~75 units to ~,o~b uz~its, ~~T}~.ch ~~ould not meet Santa ~~na's ~~egiona~ dousing deeds assessment for 2o~G~~o~~, ~~Ti~icl~ call for 3,33 units, of ~~~hicl~ must be a~'fordabie for io~~~, ~Te~~~ lo~~, and ~xt~•exnel~~ lo~~~ income ho~~seholds, `i'l~e Cit~F of Santa Ana has a g~~eat need far affo~idable housing sixt~~ percent of the households ~n Santa ~i~a i~a~re la~~r, ~~`er~F lo~~~, and. e~trer~el~r lo~~~ incon~es, ~~i~T of Santa Ana erieral Flan Draft ~-~ousi~~g Element, ~ppet~dix p. foal ~ of tl~e dousing Element is to "pro~ride a di~~ersit~t of qualit~? housiz~, affordabi~it~~ le~~els, and li~zitlg experiences that ~.ccon~i~~odate Sai~ta Ana's ~~eidents and ~~~o~~k~arce of all housel~old t~r~?es, income ie~rels, at7d age groups to foster an iriclusi~Fe communit~T.>' ~~lternatirre 3 ~~~ould not meet tl~is goal to tl~e same extent as tine proposed p~•oject. Sin~ilarl~~, it ~~ould i~ot n~eet ~a~~sing Elen~ent polic~~ set fortis below, to the same extent a the proposed p~•oject; ~E-~.2 District renters. create l~igh intensit~r, tr~~xed~use urban ~rillages and ~~-lour pedestrian-oriented experiences that suppo~~t tl~e inid,to hil~-rise office cei~te~is~ commercial acti~~i~~, and cult~xral acti~Tities in the ~zaried District enteric. ~lternad.~Te ~ ~~~o~ild also fail to itnp~ernc~~t tl~e fallo~tnri dousing Element policies to the a~~e extent as the proposed project; ~~E-~,1 Do~~Tnto~~Tn. Strenthe~~ Santa tuna's code as a ~~i~arant mixed-use and tn~xed-i~~come en~fiiroi~ment h}? capitali~i~~ on the go~~er~~~~ent center, a~~ts district, and ixistoric do~vnto~~~n aid facilita~ii~ transit-oriei~ted de~relopmet~t and di~rerse i~eighborhoods, Transit Zoning bode ~~D 84~ EiR i=ir~dings of Fac~ltaterer~~ of ~v~rriding Considerat~ans 3_~7 { r I I I Cfrapter ~ Fir~a~ln~s Reardfn~ ~ro~e~t ~4~ternatives E4~.3 Rental dousing, ~ilcou~•ae the con~:uctian of rental housing for a~7ta Ana's residents and ~~Torkfarce, ~ncludtng a corr~~~tttnent to ~Te~•~~ lo~~F, la~~r, and Moderate incan~e residents and moderate income Santa .~~na ~~~arkers. HE~2,~ Di~Ter~sit~~ of ~o~~sing T~TpL.sr F`aCilitate and encourage ~ di~~ers;ter and ~'ange to ~rpes, prices, and sires of housing, including single fan~~~ ho~~.es, apartrrier~t, to~~ttn ha~nes, n~i.~ed~~nul~iuse housing, transit-a~"leted de~relo~~rzezats, end li~re~u~ot~~ housinr .~lternatl~te 3 ~~~ould ~~at r~eet t~~c project's transit ariented objecti~~es to the sane extent as the p~"abased project, .educing the a~~~ount of hauling and retail space ~~Tauld result in a failure to f~~il~~ emphasise the use a~ the ~~RTC far it~? residents, r~i~ed-use urban and t~~ansit~oriented neigllhorhaad requires critical ~r~ass and balance het~~reen residential and iron-presidential ut]4sr Draft E~ section ~.5.} ~lter~~ati~~e 3 4vould not pra~ride that c~riticai t~~ass and baiai~ce. Reducing lousing and retail apport~~nities ~~o~~ld result in . failure to full~~ benefit fiarri tl~e 1n~Testment ire the expansion of the t~•ansit s~~ste~~~ and 4~ould not adetluatel~~ target xo~~rth in housing, e~uplayment, a~~d commercial de~relopn~ent ~ti~~~~ ~~alk~ng d~stalace of the e~~~.ng a~ld planted t~"n~i~ t~tions. ~~x addition, ~~tcinatt~re 3 ~i~auld nat liplen~ent ~~TP and ~CI~ policies oir esta.biished c~leral Flan Land Use ~ien~ent pOl~cles ~ri.e, 1.1, ~r~, ~rV, i ~ ~a 13 L~I~kJ~ ~~V' L.rr/, F,rr~V~ i~ t} ~r~~ ~rL.r, wR~J, ./~J, J•~{J,~ and ~r, or Urban ~~ar~d Use Eie~cnt ails ~ thiaull7 to the extetzt that th.e proposed project u~DUld, ~~ee Land Use ~lernent; Urha~~ Desig~~ lei~ent; Draft T`ahie pecificall~~, lter~rati~re ~~Touid not nrieet tl~e folla~txin ~~TP sand Use oils to file same e4tei~t as the proposed project, ¦ create i~i~ed-use districts or• "complete coi~~~~~u.nities" iri strategic ~."o~~th areas thiougl~ a cancentratioz~ of actin?ities ~~~tli liousing, emplo~~met~t, and a t~~ of retail and ser~tices, located in close pra~.~~~it~z to each otherr Focusing a mix of land uses iii strategic g~'o4~Fth areas c~."cates ~ cainplete con~~x~ur~ities ~~~herein. most dail~~ needs can be r~ct ~~ntl~in a short distance a~ home, pi"o~~iding residents ~~~ith the opportunit~~ to pat~•onlze their local area and ru~i dail~T errands b~~ ~~al~i~~g or c~~clin rather tra~~elin h~T autotnobiler ¦ l~itensify nodes along cor"r"#do~"s ~~Flth peo~~e-scaled, i~cd-use de~~eioptx~cntsr i4~fan~t existing r caul ors lack tie residential and catiercial co~acentratioil to adequatei~? uppai~t iron-auto tianslt uses, 4~~ithaut ~~~liicli the e.~isting t~."atisit s~~stem ca~~not full~~ reaii~e its potential fai• accat~adating additional trips and reliei~ing the txa~isportatior~ s}7stcin. These nodes along the coy"ridar also create ~~ibrant, ~~~al~able carr7r~~i~nities ~~~ith localized access to ainenit[es, further reduci~~g reliance o~i file autor~rohile fo~• a ~~ariet~~ of tr"ips, ¦ Pedestrian-friendl~r et~viranments a.~~d Mare CQITIp.Ct de~reiaprnent patterns in. close pro.~it~7 to tiratlslt sei~re to support and ItTlp~~o~~e transit use ar~d ridership, Focusing housi~ig acid ernplo~~ient g~"O~~Tth in transit-accessible locations thro~~h t~~is transit-oriented de~telopn~c~~t approach ~~~iil sei~Te to reduce auto use and support t~oie i~ltitr~odal ti~a~Tel beha~ziar, dditionall~~, tl~e reduction. i;~ ~~ctail space ~~nde~~ ~~lternati~~e 3 ~~~ould reduce potential ne~~r exi~plo3~ment appor"tunities, and the economic benefits that cco~n.pati~~ such oppart~~~ities, as compared to the proposed projectr It ~~Tauld asa induce the amount of potential tai re~renue tliat tl~e Cit~t could use to reir~~~est and s~i~~ulate econoxx~ic de~relopn~ent~ I 3~8 Transit xon~ng Code ~S~ ~4} SIR Findir~s of Fact~tater~ent of Ovetridin~ Conside~~t~ons C~ap~er 3 F~ndin~s ~e~ar~lr~ Pro~e~~ A~tarr~at~ves balance, file rednct~on impacts to shading end sh~do~vs provided bit t~~s alternative do ~xot out~vi~l~ the costs associated ~~~ith the loss o~ housing a~zd ~•etail oppoitu~.ities that ~~rould also occur ufld~~` tl~s alternative. l~'or these reaso~~s, the ~ge~~c~F rejects ~lternatt~Te 3 infeasible. ~~n~in ~n A~trntiv t~ the Prop~~ `~rn~it ~on~n o~~ An~~d in tie ~I t~lternati~tes and 6, desci+ibed '~eio~~, pieent a~tef~~a~.~~es to t~~e ~~~~opo~ed De~Teio~~cr ~'ro~eet, L~~de~• each o~ tl~ese ternadves, the proposed ~'r~nsit Boni#~g bode ~~~ould ~•e~r~ain the r~n.cha~~ed. The ~e~~c~?'s fi~.d~ns o~~ each alter~~a~.ve and the ra~onale bel~nd each ~ndi~~ are set f'o~~th below. Altrntiv~ 4: ~em~~~ti~n of~nc roprtie/~eha~ilit~t~ in P~ ~crfp~~or~ '~'l~is alte~•~~ative would eltrx~it~ate the den~olid,o~~ o structures on tl~e ~ourteet~ parcels «rithir~ the tatioi~ District currentl~~ owned bit the ~it~T o~ Santa ~~~~a ~edevelopz~.ent ~enc~t that were slated l'or dc~noli~on under the p~~opased Developer ~'ro~ect see figure 5-~ [Den~olitiot~s} and instead ~'cquire that those p~~aperties be xeta~iled and rehabilitated tht~~ cu~~rent locations, t~dditionall~~, the ~it~~~Agenc~t would riot acquire an~~ of the t~~reut~~ pafcels identi#~icd i~Y ~`iure 5-~ [potential ~e~~F Santa Ana ~edevelo~~~ent ~~enc~~ ~ccluisitia~~s~, Upon co~.~pletion of rehabilitation, the rehabilitateai ho~~ses would be of~e~.'ed or~sale as ~o~v or moderate it~corne housing. '~l~e proposed ~`~•a~~sit ~o~i~ bode would remain the sazx~e under t}~ ~lte~.'i~ative, ~n total, tl~s Alterna~.vc would pro~tide appro~ttnatel~t ~5 rental units and appro.~~atcl~t 2~- for• sale units ~~~itl~in the tatiot~ District, ~'or a total o~ appro~irnatel~~ units. ~ tl~ese, approxi~uatel~7 72 ~~ould be re~7ted to lo~v, v~.~~-lo~v and e~tre~~el~r-lo~v incorue housel~olds, appro~i~x~atel~t ~9 would be offered for sale a lo~~~ i~~come ~~nits, a~xd one ~~?oulCl be offered for sale to tl~ose meeting tl~e rare our~t~~ criteria for ~~ioderate ~cot~le. ~~ee EAR ~~ppet~di~ J pdated~ [~lternati~res'~csti~~g; ~'inancia~.t~.t~~.lysis~,'~able , ~lter~~a~ves t~nal~~sis.~ ~~T contrast, a.ppxo~i~natel~? 12~ utait ~~Tould be provided b}' the proposed Developer ~'~•oject, of ~~?hich ~1 ~vo~d be rented to lo~v, ver~r-lo~~~ and e~t~'cmel~tYlo~v it~corne ho~~seholds, and thirty= t~~~o units would be o£er•ed for sale, o~~vhicl~ sip wits ~~?ould be offered f'or sale to tl~ose meeting the ~ra~jge ~ount~r cr~ter~a foi ~lrioderate I~~co~r~e. ~d.~ ~~rlC~lr? ~l~e ~enc~t her~eb~7 finds that specific econot~~c, legal, social, tech.~7ological, or other consideratio~~s make the adoptton o~ this .iteri~ative ~nfeas~ble~ ~ot~struct~on of a~`i'ardable housing ut~its is critical to Yneeting the it~~'s Regional dousing deeds ~ssesstr~ent ~~A~ ~'or 200-~~1~. Tl~e i~~'s ~~H~ calls far 3,393 units of nety residet~ti~l CoflstrllCtloil, X94 of ~~xl~icl~ ale to be affordable to ~zer~t lo~v income households, 57~ of ~vllich a~'e to be ai`fordable to lo~v i~lcome households, and GCS to be affordable to zr~oderate income l~ousel~olds ~E~, ectiot~ ~.9~. t~lternat~ve ~ `vould pro~T~dc 37 fever ~~~ts that ~~~ollld be aff'o~•dable to vent-lo~~; lo~v and Transit honing Code ~D 84} SIR Findings of i=ac~/~a~ment o~ ov~~~~din Considerations ~g C~a~~er ~ Find~r~gs ~earaflr~~ P~o~ec~ A~~errra~fves inodera.te income households than the proposed De~reloper Project, Tlais (eduction ire the number of a.f~ordable hausi~~g units eli~~u~~ates an opportunit~T to pro~~ide affordable hawing in furtherance of mee~n the ~it~~'s ~t also elllr~inates the opportunit~~ to pra~~ide Special deeds housing through tl~e ~'iefC~' House p~,•alect, Sitl~il~rl~=, t~ltrna~j~e ~ does i~ot to meet the ~t~T's po~ic~~ of "r~rlahirni~[in~ affordahie hauling on ~genc~r-o~~ned properties tl~at is of high qual~t~, sustainable, and available to ~rarious inco~.~e le~~els," See Santa ~~.~~a Housing Element ~~OG-2o1~], Polic~T HE-~.$.~ for does it go far enough to meet tl~e it~~'s poiic~~ to "encourage the caz~struction of re~~tal housing fo~• Santa tuna's reside~~ts and ~~~D~,~l~force, inciuding a colnitment to ~Tcr~r ia~v, to~~ a~~d I~oderate inco~~e residents and moderate incoxx~e Santa ~~x~a ~~Torkers'~ ~l'olic~r H~--~,~~ or its polic~~ to "facilitate s.nd encou~•age a di~~ersit~t aid range in t}rpes, prices, and sues of housing, including single-faYr~i1~7 hones, apartments, to~~Tfx 17on~es, ~~i~ed/z~ultiuse housing, transit-oriented de~~elopments, and li~re~~~TDrk housing" ~.'olic~~ ~ ~E--~,~~. See Santa tuna. Hauling ~ler~lent [2a~GR~~~4,~ ~u~•tl~er, the it~~ of Santa tlna currer~tiy has a sl~ortage of ~~c~~tal units ~tppropriatel~~ sued to acco~n~nodate fat~~ies~ t~s stated in the ~it~F's 2D~b~2~~~ Housing Ele~~ef~t, ~~Tl~le tnultiple-fair~il~T l~ousi~ ca~~priscs ~I~ of all housing stock ~~thit~ tl~e Cite, anl~f ~ 3~1a of multiple fa.l~nil~~ and single- fatriil~? rental units ha~~e three ox• ITiore hedroo~s. ~t is estimated tl~at 4~°I~ of all fatiiies ~vha ~•e~xt l~a~re ~i~~e or more ~r~ct~bers, Ties translates into a shortage of ~~,~D~ large famil~t rental wits, The De~Teloper Project contains 78 t~~ro~bed~`oar~~ units ~t~~ro of~vl~ich are n~a~~ager ~~nits~ and ~7 three-heclroozx~ units, ~n addition, the ~1~~erc~r House project ~~~ould pra~ride one three--bed~•oarr~, ti~Te~one bedroom and fi~~e t~~~a- beclraan~ units ~e~clusi~~e of t~~anager's u~~it~ of special needs lousing. Tl~ese units are appr•opr•iatel~T sued to Ineet Santa ~~t~a's identifled de~~ograpl~ic needs. ~rnpie~nenta~.on of t~lterna~,~re ~~raE~ld not ~~~rtl~er the Cit~~'s policies relat~i~ to the need for recital housif~g suitabie fo~• fa.miiies, nor ~~tould it achieve the project abjecti~~es described abo~re. ~~~oreo~~er, the ~aliir'or~~ia ~eislat~~rc leas enacted ~o~~ernment Code section. G558.5, the "~~ousing ~ccountabilit~~ 1~ct," ~~hich restricts the Cit~r's abilit~? to disapprove, or ~,equire densit~r ~~ed~~ctions, in certain t~rpes of ~~csidentiai projects. Speciflcal~~, tl~e Ci~~ 1~~a~~ x~at disapprove a housing de~relopn~et~t project for ~re~~' ~.o~'V, lo~~T-, or moderate-Ii~cal~e households unless it makes certain findt~as set forth In ~o~Ternt~~ent Code secd.on ~5~59., subsection {d}, Tl3e it~~ i enable to tuake an~~ of these findings at this time. T'l~eiefare, disapp~•a~~al of the proposed 1~evelope~• Project is iegall~~ infeasibie~ ~~dditio~~all~~, t~.te~'nati~re ~ also affects tl~e ~i~ed ratio of construction costs but does not calnlnensurate~~7 reduce co~~tructian costs, Tl~erefare, although tl~e tatal cost of tlus alternati~rc to rile Cit~F~t~cncy ~~Tould be Tess than the proposed ~e~~eloper• Project, the cost unit ~~rould be appro~~Imatel~~ ~G,~00 higher than. the proposed eveiaper Project, This is attributable to the fact that smaller apartment projects «~ould be de~Teloped under this alternatrve, ~~rhicl7 generate a higher per unit fna~~cial gap, according to the f nancial anal~rsls p~.`epared bar e~tser ~~~arston ~ssaciates ~i~It~~ for tl~e Cit~i of Santa tuna ~as updated on i~r~a~F ~2, O~o~ and included in ~ppendi~ J of the ~~R, This i significal~tl~~ less efficient and effective ~~ra~r to spend the funds a~railable for rcde~Telopment of tl~e t~genc~~-aw~~ed parcels tl~a.i~ tl~e proposed I~e~Teloper Project. 3,x.0 Transit caning Cody 4~ SIR Findings of Fact~~tatemen~ of overriding ~on~id~ratians ~hapte~ ~~r~dlr~s Re~ardlr~~ Pr~~ect A~ternatfves Further, under ~ternati~~e 4, the p~0poscd park identified in the I~e~reiopei• Pia~ect ~v0uid i~o la~~er he includcd as ~ project component, The park ~~as one eler~~ent ~F se~reral in the ~~~er~~l ~T1s1on for de~telopn~e~~t of the ~gene~~-o~~Fned properties, The selection of ~lternati~r 4 eFfecti~rel~? eliminates the abi~it~T to construct a park on the bioc~ o~~ ~~~l~ich it is cui•rentl~~ en~risfon.ed gl~~en that the three structures curren~l~r located of~ the ~en.c~~-a~~FneCl properties ~v~ti~ir~ that block ~~Tould remain u~ider ~lternati~~e and tl~e Ci~r~~enc~r under ti~is scenaiio ~~ould he precluded fioin acquh~in a~~~7 .dditionat properties, ~'urthei, ~~~tei•~7ati~~e ~ ~t~ouid not meet the objecti~re the De~reloper Proposal to rede~telop all the t~genc~~-o~~ned properties, anal, as explained abo~re, it ~~~ould not meet the objecti~rc of pro~tiding ne~~r af~`ordable hous~~~g For ~atr~.ies i~~ furtherance aF the Cit~~'s affo~•dahle ho~~sin goals to the same exte~~t as the proposed pro~ect..~~lso, it is unlikel~7 that the City f ~~gc~~c~~ ~~ould be able to attract a qualit~r de~Teloper to undertake a st~~all scaie scattered site de~relop~~e~~t such as tl~at ~~l~ich ~~?ould be constructed ut~det• lternati~Te '~yhi seriousl~7 constrain the potential for pro~Tidit~g econonaicall~T S7iable rede~telop~.~c~xt. Iii light of these considerations, the t~e~lc~r rejects this altei•nati~Te as in~'casible, - It~rntiv~ : ~Va ~em~lit~~n of A~nc~r Pr~~rt~/~~catt~ enc - Y ~n~ ln~ill it~~R~h~b~litt~ in PIS ~~c~r'~tior~ '~°l~is alteii~a~.~Te ~~t0uld e~i~7ufi~te the de~olltton on the Fourteen parcels ~~~tl~in the Station district currentl~~ 0~~~~ed b~~ the Cit~t of Sa~~ta Ana Rede~Tclal~inent ~genc~~ tl~at ~~rere slated Fol~ demolition under the proposed De~~eloper l~roject see figure 5-~ ~Demolitions~~. Instead, those prope~ities ~~~ould be rehal~ihtated puce or tno~rcd to sTacant lots acid fehabiiitated, ~~rith the exceptio~l of the p~•opci•t~~ located at ~ Il~~inter Street, ~~rhich ~~Tould be demolished, ~f the propei{des identified fo~~ demolition on parcels cui•reiitl~? o~~~ned ~~7 the ~enc~~, and those that tna~~ potentiall~l be acquired in the Future, onl~r o~~e is currentl~? listed o~~ the Santa Ana Register of ~ Iistai~ical Propei~es---the ~~~l~itsonRPo~~Telsa~i pause located at ~~if ~h tr~ect~ ~`~le remaining ~~ouses ha~Te prin~arilST heer~ the s~~h~ect of "~~rinds~~ie~d" sur~Te~rs to detern~inc tlieir potential eii€bilit~~ for listing a a l~ist0ric resource, See EIR, Section anal 1~ppendi~ ~'alla4~~ti~g a cor~lprehensi~~e historic sur~~e~~ of tl~e properties, the Cit~r's Historic esoufces Coinir~ission ~~tould e~Taluate all of tine struct~~res to determine theiz• eliibilit~T for listiz~ on the Cit~T's Register of Historical P~•opertles and ~~rould nuke recoinn~et~datlons reardrn tine selec~0i~ of houses to be ma~~ed and o~~to ~~fl~ich sites the~~ shai~ld be zr~o~red. once moored ~nd~or rehabilitated the hawses ~~rould tl~e~~ he offered as For-sale affordable housing. The proposed 't`ransit honing Code ~~~ould remain tl~e sage under this ~~lter~lati~re. In total, this Alternati~re ~~~ould pro~ride appro.~i~natel~r 1~~ units ~approxirr~atel~~ ~~4 rental units and app~~axi~natel~r for sale u€~its~ 011 the .~~enc~~~o~~~ned parcels ~vithin the station District these, approl~irnatei~r i units ~~rould be rented to lo~~F, ~rei~r-lo~~F and exti•emel~FYlO~~r income households. See EIR ~~.ppendix J ~~iltei•natl~~es Testing; ~'ina.~~cial final}rsis~, Table 1, ~ltei•nati~res ~nal~~sis.~ T`l~is is the ~ sai~~e number of units that ~~~ould he rented to lo~~T, ~Tei~F-lo~v and extrerrlel~~~lo~~t inco~~.e households the proposed De~Telopcr Piaject, {Id.} ~ltei~r~ati~re 5 ~~ould also offer for sale 1 ~ lo~~~ incozrie units, ore ma erate incon~e ui11t and foul' marl~et rate units, I Transit 2onin~ Code {~D 84} EAR ~ind~n~s of Fa~t~~afe~nent of ~verr~din~ Cons~derat~or~s Chapter ~ Ftr~d~ns Re~ardlr~~ Pre~e~t A~~err~at~ve~ ~f~~Ff~ The t~enc~? hereb~~ finds that specific econan~ic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations ~~.ake the adop~on of this aitexnati~Te infeasible, peci~`ically, alternative 5 ~v~uld reduce t~~e number of resider~tia~ units ~ 1 gild ~vould increase costs to the ~enc~F bar appr'o~~imatel~? G,C2 ~~illion, according to the f nancial anal~Tsis prepared b~' I~e~ser I1~Iarston .~~.ssaci~tes ~I1~~-~~ for the it~r of Santa ~~~~a ~as updated on I1~Ia~~ ago} and incl€~d.ed in ~ppendi~ tl~e EIR. ~ddido~~all~~, thus aitern.a~.ve ~voulcl cost tl~e ~~e~~c~r appra~ir~atel~r ~C,S~a t~~o~•e per unit than. t~~e proposed Dev'eloper' I~roject, dr~e pri~r~aril~~ to the substa~~ti~l rehabilitati.or~ and reioc~tion costs that ~vould be involved in ties alt~n.ative. See ~ppe~~di~ updated},~ T'~~~s ~ep~esents a 39°/o ir~c~'ease i~~ per ~~~~it casts. T~~ is a in~~'ican~t~? ~e~ efficient ~ncl effecd~~e ~va~r to spend the funds avl~able faa~' r'edeveiopment of t~~e ~~enc~~~atvn.ed pa~.'cels than. the p~'oposed De~teloper I'~~oject. The situficant additional cost to tl~e ~genc~? of this alternative ~~e~~de~+s it ecana~Y~icali~7 ~r~~`es.si~~e. Further, under.' .~~lternative 5, the proposed park ~den~fled 1t1 file Developer 7~rolect ~vould ~o longer be tnci~~ded as a protect co~~~po~~ei~t. The park vas oc~e element of several in the overall visi~Il for de~relop~~~et~t of the t~enc~~-o~vf~ed properties. T'he selection of ~~lte~'native 5 effectively' eliY~~inate the abilit}' to cot~str~~ct a park o~~ tl~e Mock on ~vl~icl~ it is currentl~~ e~v~sla~~ecl ~~ren that tl~e three sttuctl~res currend~t located oi~ tl~e ~enc~r-o~vf~ed properties ~~~tl~if~ that block ~~rould retain under ~~ltex'native 5. Finall}', ~lternattve 5 ~vould not meet the objective of the Developer Proposal to redevelop all of tl~e ~genc~r-o~v~~ed properties. No~~ ~~Taulcl it meet tl~e objective of p~'oviding an eco~~ox~ically viable r'edeveiopmer~t scenario for t~genc~r-o~v~~ed properties, as explained aho~Te~ In light of these consideratio~~s, tl~e t~genc~~ rejects this alternative as i~ifeasible~ Ai~rr~aive Rhbii~at~ Ill~in~~r r~e~ in ~ia~~ ~~~ri~~i~n This alterr~ati~re ~vould be identical to the proposed Ie~'elaper Project, ~~~th the exception. teat the builgalo~~r cou~•t located at ~~,14~h.i~ter street would be retained ar~d ieliabilitated. once ~.•el7a~bilitate~, the wits at ~ I1~Iinter Street would be offei'cd for' rent to ~rer~F-lo~v aizd e~~ren~el~F-lo~v income ho~~se~~olds. ~~lter~~ati~Te ~ would provtcle S$ re~~tal u~~.ts, of ~~?hich S5 would be a4~aiiable to lo~v, ver~r~1D~~ acid e~treinel~~Rlo~v i~~co~rie households, a~cl ~vo~~lei pro~'ide 3 o~vner~~ip units, of ~vl~ich sip units would be available for sale to households meeting the ~ra~~e ~otln~r cater€a for n~Ioclerate Income. In total, tl~s ~lterna~~re would provide appro~~t~~atel~' 3C fe~~rer ~o~~; ver~~~la4v and e~tret~nel~~4lo~v inco~~~e ufii.ts than tlxe piopased De~~elopei' Project. ~ee EIS. t~ppendi.~ J ~updated~ ~Alternati~~es Testit~g: Financial ~nal~~sis~, rI'able 1, .~~ltert~ati~7es t~nal~ris.~ T'l~e t~e~YC~T l~ereb~t finds that specific econo~~ic, legal, social, technological, oi' other consideratio~~s make the ac~op~on of this alternative infeasible Speci#~~call~', as described above, cansiructiox~ of affordable housing antis is critical to reetln the lt~r' R~I~t~ for ZaaG-O14. The location of the ~ ~ ~~Ii~~ter Street prope~.'t~' ~.t the southeast corc~er of Transit ~on1n~ Cade ~p 84}EIR Findings of i=act/~~at~ment o~ Overriding Cons~dera~i~ns { f C~apt~r ~ F~r~d~n~s ~e~ara~~r~ Project Atternat~ves In light of these canside~~a~ions, the ~genc~~ rejects tl~is alterna~i~~e as infeasible. Fl~d~n ~ ~I~~~~~IV~ VII~~ ~~l~~~~ ~Ill'~''l~rld f~~r~ D~~~~o~ Air i~ the ~r~f~ E In addidon to the sip altc~i€~ad~Tes eS~aluat~d in the 1~~•aft ~rR, the dead ~ge~c~~ considered t~vo othe~~ alte~~a~~7es, both o~ ~vhich it eli~~.inated ~ro~ detailed anal~Tsis the either because it did not meet most o~ the basic project objecti~Tcs, ~~~auld not reduce ox~ a~~aid significant impacts of tl~e project as p~:aposed, and~or is z~ot feasible. These alteinad~res 21i'~ discussed beio~~~~ ~~rnativ Sits T`~~is alternat%~e ~~?o~~ld use a~a 2~ltei~~tati~~e site from tl~at prioposed for the T`ians~t ~a#~ng Cade and De~~eloper projects. ~f~1C~l~S The ~genc~~ he~ieb~z f~i~ds that specific econo~~~ic, legal, social, technological ar~ other consideratio~~s xx~ake tl~e adaptton of an ~ltertaa~vc Sate alternati4re infeasible. Tl~e Transit ~o~in Code is designed to guide de~teiopeut ~aear e:~isting and plan~~ed t~ia~~sit and i therefore dcper~da#~t an the location dcc~iibed for the p~•oposcd p~aject. ~n altc~•~~ad.~Te site for the T~ar~sit ~onii~g Cade project ~~Tbuld #~ot locate de~TeloptTlCtlt of pro~~Ide the ~'ra~r~c~~ro~ik for de~~elopi~~ent ~xca~• existing or planned tra~~sit i~~f`~~astructure~ Tl~e~•efore, ~t ~~rould not be able to fulfill the basic p~~oject objecti~Tes of pro~r~d~r~g a trans~t~supp~iti~re, pedestriar~-o~{ie#~ted de~~elap~nent fra~~~c~~Tor~k to s~rppart the additio~7 of ne~v transit infrastructure, rao~ ~~rauld it encourage alter~~ati~~e modes of tianspo~~tatiotl, or increase access to the rail s}Fsten~ tl~at , co~~ects Sari Diego to dos ~ngelcs~ Failure to meet these 1~c3~ pra~ect objecti~res rende~~s a#~ alternatl~Te site infeasible. ~t ~~rould also he infeasible to de~relop the proposed I~e~reloper r~roject in an alter~~ati~~e location. C~zrrentl~f the .edc~~elop~nent ~ger~c~~ o~~Tns a cluster of parcels t~~e proposed project a~•ea at~d is considering the accluisitio~~ o~ other properties in tl~c ~~ici~i~~ of these ~geu.c~r-o~~ned parcels T'he proposed Dc~reloper l'rolect ~s designed and proposed to redc~relop~nent these specific pxoper~ties. Yt «rould not be practical o~• feasible to abandon plazas fo~• these parcels and begl#~ #~e~~r f~tuie acuisitio~~s else~~here, and doing so ~~auld fail to meet most o~ tl~e basic project objecd.~Tes of the De~reiope~~ ~'~~oject~ Spec€f~eall~~, a#~ alternati~re loca~o~~ ~~~ould not result in redc~relapir~e#~t of the t~e~~c~r-o4~~ned properties, ~vould riot enlace the streetscape arrd u~~ba~~ form of the area, particula~~l~f along Santa tuna Boule~raid, ~~~it~~ the canstr~~ction of ne~~~ buildings that rrieet the sta~xdards contained in the T~.•a~~sit ~oi~ing Code and that support future transit planting, and ~~Tauld not pro~~ide an econornicall~~ ~~iable rede~TelopY~.e#~t scei~ar~o for t~ger~c~r-o~~T~cd p~•operties. Further, co~r~pa~•able parcels 4vithin the et~ti~•e Transit honing Cade are li~~ited b3~ proposed. f~~ture uses a~~d i~~ca~npatil~le e.~isting u~•~~ou#~ding uses The~•e~a~~e, tl~e proposed site o the De~reloper Pz•oject is tl~e onl~~ feasible locatiot~ far this iede~relop~~.c~~t project. 3~1~ Tran~~ caning fade 84~ EAR F~nd~ngs of Fac~lt~tem~n~ of ~verr~~ing cnsiderations i ~hap~~r F~r~dlt~gs Rear~frt~ ~ro~act A~ternat~ves Re~~b~iitatien ~f ~~tent~ai Neva A~uiitiens Aite~ntive ~n this alterr~at~~re, the Rcdc~re~opmen t~genc~r ~~Toud acquire properties ~~~iti~in the De~~eioper ~'roject ire order to co~~piete blocks ~~rilere the .~~genc~~ altead~~ has ate o~~~nership interest, as it ~~rould u~~der~ t~~e proposed De~reloper Pra~ect, ~o~~~e~~er, instead o~ de~~o~is~~in these struct~rfes, the ~ede~~eloprnent ~~genc~~ ~vould re~~abiiitate tine in puce, 'I'he Aetxc~~ hereb~r finds that specific economic, legal, sociai, tec~~nologicai or other coi~sideratio~s ~rrake tine adoption of t~~is aitc~•rxati~~e infeasible, ~`~~is aiternati~~e ~~~ouid pre~rent rede~Te~opment of ~enc~~- o~~~ned p~•o~~~~+~.e~, ~e~r pio~e~t obiec~re of the e~Teiope~ Plo~c~t, It ~~~o~~l~ also s~bst~r~tiall~T limit t~~e oppor+tu~~it~~ to pro~~ide ~~e~~~ a~fordabie housing for farr~ilics furtherance of t~~e Cit~~'s a~fordab~c housing oafs established in the ~ousir~g ~len~ent, tixe lnlple~nentatio~. Plan for the Santa .~~r~a ~~ierged ede~7elopment project ~~,~.~ca, and the it3r of Santa Ana ~onsol~dated Flan. Ft~rti~er• it ~~ould nat enhance the streetscape and urban form of t~~e area, paracu~ar•~}z along Santa ~-~r~a ~ouie~Tard, t~rith t~~c construction o~ ~]e~~T buildings that ~r~eet file standards co~~tained in the ~'~Farrsit ~or~in bode ar~d that support future transit pia~~t~i~~, for ~~rould ~t secufe pro~r~to~~ of public ope~~ space or ~'ac~ta~.o~~ of a io~nt use arrangen~ent ~~~ith ~~.UD for a ne~~~ corr7r~ur~it}r cente~•. Finall3T, it ~~rou~d ~~ot pro~ride an eco~xot~~icali~~ ~~iabie rede~~eioprr~ent scenario for the ~enc~r-O~~~iled properties. ~dditionall~t, it ~~rouid result in the e~i~~ir~ation of an oppor~t~~r~it~r to pro~tide ~ualit~~ housing. ~~s a result, if den~olitior~ of the properties that ~r~a~T be acquired the ~~.gct~c~~ ~4~ere precluded, the Rede~relop~~~c~~t ~genc~r ~~~ou~d not pursue their acquisition, and the benefits of the Dc~~eloper r'roject, ir~cludir~ the creatio~i of ne~~r public opc~x space, the eli~i~7atior~ of blight, axed ate et~l~ancement of the streetseape, ~~rouid iYOt be realised, ~l~~~tl~n~ ~I~~IC~ ~~ndn Related to ~i~rifi~~~i~r~ and EJpdate~ to the ~rft I~ ~lapter 3 of the Final SIR includes the cox~i~ei~ts recei~Ted on the daft and responses to t~~ose cofn~ents. The focus o~ the respoxases to comments is on tie disposition of sigt~if~cant e~~~ri~•ontrrentai issues as raised in th.e con~z~ents, as specified b~~ C~;~ uideiines ~ 5~~8}, .t~.dditionall~T, a ~ res~~lt of refinerr~et~ts to file proposed De~~eloper l~ro~ect s~~~ce publication of tine Dral`t SIR, tine allocation of rer~tai of units and foi• sale u~lits that ~~tould be constructed u~~der the proposed De~~eloper Project a.~~d ~rnder t~ltelina~~Tes 4, ~ and ~ leas been slihd~i rx~odified. ~'he Febriuai~~ 23, 20~o flriar~cial ar~al~?is prepared bar e}rser ~~la~•stori t~ssociates that ~~Tas included as ~~.ppendix ~ to the FfIR leas been updated to reflect these inodiflcations. r~'he updated flnar~cial anai~7sis, dated ~I~~a~z 0~0, i included as ~ppendi~ j to the Final EAR. ~~1?C~ll?~5 Respoi~scs to consents n~ade ors the Draft 1R and re~rision.s to the Final SIR. i~erel~~ clarifp and ampiif~T the anal~~sis presented in the ~1R ai7d do not tugger the need to recirculate per guide- lines 15088.5~b~. in~l.arl~T, ti7e refined reallocatio~~ of rental and for sale residential u~iits that ~~rould be pro~Tided bar the De~~eloper Proleet and the updates to file e~~ser ~r~arston t~ssociates finazaciai anal3zsis Transit 2onin~ fade 5~4~ EII~ i=indins of Fa~t/~tat~ent of Overriding onside~a~lons 3w~~ r Y ~rapter ~ P~nd~r~s Re~ard~n~ Protect Alterrrat~ves merel~~ ciarif~~ al~d a.mplir file anal~xsi p~~cse~~ted in the EIR at~d do ~~ot trigger the need to reciicul~te per ~.t~. guidelines ~5~88.5~b}. Findin ~n I~ur ~~t~d ~n ~mn~ents on t~ Dry EIS e~~erai ~~.iaation measures aid alternatii~es ~~?ere p~~opoed in pubic co~r~~ne~7ts on the Draft I•~~~ Fi~~~ins far these rr~ita~ion measures and a~tc~~t~ad~res are pro~Tided beio~~F. ~~~?C~~1?~S Old ~~l~~~~1? ~~S~~~ {~1`~~ID~C~ t~ R~C~~~ ~~'I~~t;~ t4 ~CJI~#~~`~~ ~~5~~#~'C ~ ~'rvpaed ~ittatfo~ eas~~~e, l~~~a.ke the i=,~c}~ ~eii~bori~oad a s~e~ial dit~•ict b~sec~ on its i~istorical cha~~actei• and proposed a Historic eighbarhood istric~, Consel~ratio~ P~•eser~Tatian ~~~erla~? far the ~..ac~r I~e~hiaarhaad. ~ee I`i~~~.l SIR chapter ~ ~esponses to o~r~~~~c~~ts~, Letter fi•o~~ Jeff Dickmat1 comments JD-2~, -7, -35, and ~~-5.~ ~i~~dit~. 'The ~lgenc~~ finds ti~a~ speci~'~c eco~~at~~ic, legal, social, technoiagicai, or othcz• eo~~siderations made t~~is ~x~itiation i~~easure infeasibic. ~.ationa~e, 'I'he Lac~~ ne~~~barhood ~~as not beefs designated as h~sto~+ic, ~~~d ~t~ere is n.o e~Tidenee ti~at tine creatton of a i~~stor~c d€str~ct 44~~thfr~ the ~~ac~T neighborhood ~~o~~ld r~edl~ce the significant impacts of the proposed p~•oject. further} the c~•eatio~~ of a i~istoric dit~~ict ~~~it~lin the it~t is a epa~•ate p~•ocess reciuirin adoption of a local preser~Tatian ordinance and canz~ot be acco~~plished j throu~~ tine process fo~• tF~e proposed project, See Santa ulna ~~Iu~aicipai bode, Dart II, hapte~• 30.E Therefore, it is ~~ot feasible to adopt a~~d implement this rneasu~~e as part of the pro~ect~ ~ Proposed N~~t~~tion ~Vleax~Ye~ create a "~1rlaste~• ~'~an for the Prese~~Tatio~7 of ~uiturai Reso~~~ccs in t~ac'T~•ansit caning bode .~~~•ea" ti1a~ identifies pr•ope~~ties expected to be i~~pacted b~~ the project, the tape of impact expected, and mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a~xd a.~raid detnalition of i~istoric p~•ope~~ties. ~ee Final ~~R C~~apter ~ Responses to ~omtnents}, Lette~• ~~io~~ Jiff ~ickn~a~ ~D~, cazr~~ne~~t J~2~.~ ~r~di~~, Tire get~c~r f nds that specific economic, legal, social, technoiogica~, or other{ considera~ons t~~a~e this n~t~ga~or~ m.casure t~lfea~lbie. ~atio~ale. Identification of tl~e p~~operties that ~~rould be itr~pacted b}r the project, identification. of the t~rpe of i~r~pact expected, a~~d identil'icatian of mitigation ~~easures to reduce it~pacts and a~~oid den~olitio~~ of i~istaric properties leas ah•ead~~ been conducted in t}~e SIR. pecif~call~F, Table ~.~-R2 ~as modified in ~it~~l AYR hapte~,• fists all properties p~•opased far demolitio~~ ui7der the proposed Deveiope~• I~raject, a~.d the ai~al~Fsis under Impact explains that m~~ltiple studies bare been compicted that address man~F o~ tale l~~star~c~age propc~•ties ~~~iti~in the project a~eaF In ~aG, HRH conducted a rieconnaissance-st~Tle su~~re~~ end ~~istoric reea~•c~~ project in. support of the Sazata Ana renaissance pecitc Ilan prepared b~~ i1~Iaule I'ol~r~oides ~HI~ ~o~G~. 'Iy~~is project aimed to pra~Fide recornn~cndatians for i~istoi•ic preser~ratian pianni~~g ors about ~a~ acres, including ~~a~Y~w of file prope~~t~cs fauild 4~?~tiun the ~'~Fa~~sit ~o~~ing bode ~D 8~} pra~ect area, ubseciuer~t px•opert~~Yspecific studies ~~Tere conducted b~~ Jones at7d stokes ~20aG a~~d ~a~7}, ~~~llch resulted i~~ t~~e full recarda~tio a~~d e~Taluation of manor off` tine properties ~~~ithin t~~e ~'ransit ~onir~ bode LSD S~~ project area 'T'hese e~~al~~ations inclined detern~.if~ations of eligibilit~~ fo~~ t~~e NRHP, CIR, and the ~at~ta Ana Register of Historic Properties ~~RHI'}, t1n additio~~al i~istaric resources ~~~emora~adut~ for the record ~{gas the~~ piepare for se~Te~•ai praper~ies in a~ta ~~~~a bar ~appl~as Ens?ironrnet~tal, Inc, T1ll rne~~orandu~n pra~~ided reco~~.rr~e~datians about the eliibilit~~ of 30 properties for inclusio~~ in the S~I~I~I~. .el`e~~ to AYR, ~1ppedix I~.~ Tahie ~,~--I ~.st all ~ 3-~G Transit zoning Code ~4~ i~IR Findings of Fact/tatement of 4ver~idin considerations f Cl~ap~er F~r~~lr~~s Re~ard~r~~ ~raJec~ A~tornat~ves properties listed on the ARHI~ that could be impacted box the proposed Tra~~sit Zoning Cade, and Figure sl~o~~rs all of t~~ese propertier arY a reap of the ~"r~~.~~sit Zoning Code area and the surrounding areas, 'I'he ~R then iden~tifres ~~litigation ~1leasure ~~I~I~-.~-~ t~ reduce impacts to l~istorlc r~sou~ces throughout tl~e Tranrit Zoning Code Area '~l~is measure ~~~ould requite a ~uali~ed professionai to caf~duct site specific Distoricai xiesource lnttertia~o~~s for fut~~re de~~elopr~entr u~itl~ir~ the project area that ~vauld demolish or otiYei~~.se pl~~tsicali}~ affect buildings or st~.•uctures 5a ~?eats odd or alder or affect their historic setting. ~ Proposed Nl~t~g~tion Leasure, Prese~~Te historic properties in the Lac~~ ~eighbarhood, fee Final EIS. Chapter 3 ~Respanses to Comn~er~ts~, Letter fron.~ Jeff Dickman ~D}, car~nent ~D-~$.~ ~iriding;. The Agenc~~ finds that specific ecoi~ornic, legal, social, technological, ar other eo~~siderations make this r~itfgation measure infeasible ~atio~a~e, 'T'here are a ~~er~r iirr~ited number of designated historic resources in tl~e Lac~? Neil~borDaad ~ree draft SIR Figurc ~-,~-~Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties ~~~.tl~in tDe ~'ra~~sit Zoning Code Area~~, and tDe neighborhood itself bar not beery designated as l~istaric~ . i1~~itiation meas~xre II~~~~~~.~--3 ~~auid ~~educe impacts to 1~€staric resou~ices ~l~ro~~ghout tl~c Tianit Zo~~ir~g Cade Area to the extent feasible. Preser~ra~ion of all ~llstoric properties in tl~e Lac F I~eil~borhaad is not feasible because it r~~a~~ inhibit the Cit~~'s abilit~r to n~eet fts afford~€bie Dousing goais. Constructron of affordable housing units ~r criacal to rneettng the Ctt~r's ~~egionai Hourir~g deeds .t~ssessrr~ent ~RH~A} for ~a~G-~~4, and the Cit~T leas an adopted palic~~ to "tnaxin~i~e affordable housing on Agenc~TYa~~rned properties that is of l~il~ qualit~~, sustair~able, and a~railable to ~Tarious incor~e le~Telr," ~ee Santa Aria Housing Eletr~er~t ~~oQG-204], Police I~IE-~,8.} Additionall~7, preseri~atior~ of certain properties ~~ritlun the ~~ac~~ eighborhaod rrra~? in~ubit the Ci~i's abiii~z to "encourage tl~e canstrr~ctfon of rental housing far Sang. Aria's residents and ~~Farkforce, including a comitrrre~~t to ~Ter~~ lo~~~, lo4~F and r~~oderate ~ncaine rer~dents and moderate income Santa Ana ~~orkers" 'alic~r CIE-~,~ at~d to fulfill its police to "facilitate and encourage a di~terSft~r and range in t~~pes, prices, and sues of housir~, including sinle~fam~~? ho~.xes, apartments, to~~n Domes, r~~ixed/mf~lti~~re housi~~g, transit-a~•ie~~ted de~relop~r~e~~ts, and li~~e~~~~ork Dousing" ~'olic~7 HL~-~,~-~, See at~ta Ana Housiz~ ~ler~~ent BOO-~0~~~.~ Further, p~•eser~ration of all historic prope~•ties ~~itl~in the Lace ~eihbo~~l~oad ~~rauld be i~~consistent ~~~itl~ tine objecti~Fes of the proposed De~~eloper i'~~oject to "rede~Telap all of the Agenc~~~o~~rned p~.•operties" and "pro~~ide ne~~r affordable housing for families in furtheria~~ce of the Cit~~'s affordable Dousing goals established. in the Housing Elen~ef~t, tl~e ~rr~pler~~entad.on Ilan for the Sa~~ta Ana ~~~ered ~~ede~relopxx~er7t ~~roject urea, atld tl~e Ci~T of Santa Ana Consolidated Pian,y~ ~ ~~oposed II~rtiatlo~ Meas~~re. ~r~-place rehabilitatiof~, residential at~d business re-use, and~or felacation of historic properties to ~~acant land ~~~itl~in the Lac~z ~eigDborhood. See Final EIR Ci~apter responses to Comtnent~, Letter from Jeff ~ickn~an {~I~~, carrlmentr JD-34, Plt~di~g. The Agene~z f~ndr that specific econo~~ic, legal, racial, technological, oz~ other considerations make this Mitigation ~~~easu~•e infeasible. Rativnle, Funding for, de~relopn~ent of tl~e Agenc~t-o~~~ned properties ~~~itl~in the Lac~T Neighborhood is contingent upon these funds bei~~g spent on residential uses, ~'l~erefare, use of these funds for• no~~-residentiai adapt~~Te reRuse is prohibited. Accardingl~~, comn~er~cial reyuse of historic properties a~~ the Agenc~~-o~j~ned parcels ~~Fitl~in the L~ac~~ Neighborhood is legall~~ infeasible Transit honing bode ~~D 84} SIR ~~nd~~gs of Fac#Jt~te~e~t of ~v~~~id~~g Co~side~at~ons Chapter ~~r~~~r~~s Re~ard~n~ ~ro~ect Afternat~ves .~~.dditionall~r, inRplace re~~abilitation and f ar relocatia~x ar~d rehabilitation of pra~~erties proposed for de~x~olidon oti ~enc~~-o~~~ned parcels ~~ritl~in the Lac~t Neigl~barhoad are e~raluated ire Recirculated Deft EIR Chapter 5~~~. pecificall~F, ~~lternati~~e ~ ~~~ould eliminate the dernoliaan of the structures cui'rentl~7 existing an the ~genc~~-o~~rned properties and/ox~ ider~tihed for acc~uisi~ion, and ~~auld instead require that tl~ase prapert~es be retaf~~ed and rehab~htated its the~~• current locations, t~ltei'na~.~re ~~~auid reduce the dexr~al~t~on of propeities a~~~r~ed h~~ the Rede~Telopxr~et~t ~genc~F and~or idend,ed far ac~uisidon, at~d ~~~auld instead require that tl~ase properties be rehabilitated, either in~place or ofd=site, uFiti~ the e4ce~tian a~' tiYe ~~ape~~ at CSI I il~iir~~ef~ S~~eet, ~jti~ich ~~~ould be den~alished. ~1ter~~ati~Te ~~~auld retain and rehabilitate the bungalo~~T cau~~t located at bII N~ ~~linte~~ street; ho~ue;~er, the ~•exx~ainder of the struct~xx'es located an the t~enc~~-o~~Tned parcels ~~~ould be detr~alished, Please see Chapte~• 5,0 for additional details ahaut these ~lterna~~res. ~ ~'roposed Mitigation, Creation of a cai~~unit~~ park ~~~itl~in tl~e Lace ~e~ghborhood b~~ taking the follo~~~.n actions. Close a portion of Sixth street between Poxte~~ acid Lac~r~ Relocate of the ~ritltage horses on the south side of Sixth tieet to other ~~acant land ors Fifth ~treet~ Iuild a single rro~~ of ne~~? housing along the south side of Santa 1~na Bi~~d. Use the rexx~ainder of the larid south of this single ~,'o~~~ of ne~~~ housing to c~•eate ar~other segment of tlae park. ~~cquire G~~ Sixth foi~ park purposes. al~7ae the ~~Taad campone~.ts fi•ai~~ this str~ctuiie beforie demolition, Preser~re ire puce ~0~ and ~~3 E, fifth Street. See final EIR. Chapter 3 Responses to Co~~ntnents~, Letter fioxx~ ~eff Dickman ~D}, ca~x~~~.ent I~l~din, xl~e ~genc~~ finds that spec€1`ic economic, legal, racial, technological, ai• other consideratior~s ~~ake this mitigation. m.easu~'e irfeasible. Rtianale, Clasirig a portion of Sixth Street be~~~een Porter and Lac~f is not feasible because it ~~roulcl se~rerel~~ 1~~~~t future transit planning ~~~tlitn the Cit~? and ~~Tould be ~ncansistent ~~~.tl~ tl~e 'transit honing Cade ohjecti4te of "pro~Tidirig a transit-supparti~re, pedestrian-oficz~ted de~~elapi~ent fr~rr~c~;~o~'k to support the addition of ne~v transit inf~iastructure." F~~rthel, st~'eet closures are, in general, couriter to the policies and desic~ standards contained. ~vitl~tn the proposed 'I~rarisit honing Code, il~laintainit~ a dine-grained, gi'idded street net~~~oi•k allo~~Ts for increased pedestfla~~ and ~~el~cular accesslb~.t~~ ~~?hich ser~res to disperse traffic thraul~out the area. I~~ additio~i, maintaining the e~istiri street grid allo~~~s for greater opportunities for filture transpo~•tatian alignments. Si~~~ilarl~~, building a single x'a~~~ of r~e~v housing clang tlYe south side of Santa ~~r~a BI~Td. and using the i•eti~alnder of the land sa~~tlt of ti~is single ra4v of t~e~~T l~ousir~g to create at~otl~e~~ segment of the suggested parr is infeasible because it ~~auld be inconsistent ~~~itli the De~relope~i ~'r~o~ct objecti~~e of "enhancing the streetscape and urban farm of the area, paxacularl~T clang Santa ~~~a l3oule~rard, with the constiiuc~ari of ne~~? buildings that meet the standards contained in the 'T'ransit ~~o€~ing Cade and that support future transit plan~~in," It ~~~ould also result in the lass of units that ~~~ould otl~er~~~ise be Tented to lo~~F, ~7er~F-lo~~T and e~t~~e~el~~-lo~~~ income households. Construction of affo~~dable housing units is critical to meeting the Cit~~'s Regional dousing ~~eeds ~~.sess~nent fo~• 20Db-~OI~-, and the loss of such units ~~~ould be it~cor~sistent ~~~ith the Cit~t's adapted paiic~~ to "n~a~if~i~e affordable housing on ~~genc~T4 j awned prape~~~ies tliat is of high clualit~r, sutai~~able, and a~tailable to ~rarious income le~~els," ~~ee f Santa ~~na I~ausing Element ~ZaO-~~4~, l~olic~~ ~~E-2,8,~ .~~ddid.onall~F, the loss of affordable ~ 3-~S Transit Z~nir~~ Cody ~~D 84} ~I~ i=findings of Fac~ltatement Overrid~n~ Considerations E 4 r f f I i i Chapter ~1r~dlt~~s Re~ardlr~~ Project A~ternat~ves housing ur~rts ~~?ouid fr~cons#stent ~llth the ~t~~'s poiic~t to "encourage the construction of rentai housing for• Santa Ana's r~csidents and ~~~ork~'o~~ce, including a cor~.r~xittr~ent to ~rer~t lo~~~, io~~~ and ~roderate i~acotue residents arad moderate income Santa Ana ~~orkers'> ~Polic~ 1~E~2.~~ and its polic~~ to "f~.crhtate and encourage ~ dt~rers~t~~ and range ~=pes, prices, and sires of housing, i~acludi~g sir~g~eRf~n~il~z homes, apartments, to~~t~ hor~res, n~i~ed~r~ultiuse housing, txa~asit-oriented de~reiopnae~~ts, and li~re~~~To~ik lousing" ~!'olic~~ ~~-~.4~~ ~ee Santa ,t~taa dousing Eiernerat ~oDY ~0~~.} Further, file it~T of Santa ulna currentl~~ leas ~ shortage o~ ~~er~tal units appropriatel~~ sired to acco~n~~rodate fatni~es. stated in the it~~'s oo~~ZO1~ lousira Eleme~rt, ~~rhile ~aaul~pie-famil~T housi~a co~uprises ~1~/0 of all lousing stock ~~~tl~in the Cit~r, or~i~r ~ 3°l0 of multiple famil~r and sinle~famil~7 rental units ha~~e tl~~•ee or more bedroo~~as. ~t is estimated tiaat 45°/a of ail families ~~~lao rent ha~re ~~Te o~• ~~rore n~en~ber. This translates into a shortage of I2,oo0 lane far~ilp rentai units. The De~~eloper l~ro~ect conta~~as 7S t«'o~~ecroom ufa~ts ~t~~ro of ~~?hich a~,•e Y~ar~ager units grad G7 three~bedraotxr units. ~n additio~a, tine ~~lerc~~ I-louse project ~~ro~~ld pro~Tide one threeRbedroo~x~, ~'~ve~one hedroo~rr ar~d f~~re t~~ro-hed~•oo~n units ~e~clus~~re of irranaer's un~t~ of speciai needs housing, rI'hese units are appropf~iatei~r sired to greet 5a~ata ~~rla's identified detnograpl~ic needs, Reducing the nurxaber of units that could he pro~rided b~T the proposedl De~reiope~• Project tivouid ~aot Further the it~T's polices relat€ng to the need for rentai housi~a surtahle for families ~rloxeo~~er, under l ~ealtla grad 5afet~~ bode cc~ion ~~334.~, In rede~relop~rrent project a~~eas, r7ot less than 0 percent of the ~•oss tai increment generated from a project must be used bit the rede~Telap~nent agenc~r to ~Iae~•ease and irr~pro~Tc tl~e communit~~'s uppl~~ of affordable housing. rI'herefo~~e, tlYe use of finds £o~• co~nn~unit~F ser~~i~ag i~afra.str~rcture on. tlae ~genc~t~o~~rned properties r~r~rst be ~~elated and propo~iaon~l to de~~elopr~rerat of a~`fordahle housi~ag~ There is no e~ridence ti~at fu~ads reed to constrict the eol~tnunlt~r park suggested b~? the coraat~ef~ter ~~~ouid be proportionai to tine pro~~ision of affa~dable laousing~ ~~~lthout sucl~ proportlor~alit~~, it ~~ould be lega~~F infeasible to use tlae genc~~'s set-aside funds to construct tine park suggested biz tine commenter. Finall~T, the ElR anal~~~ed tauraaerous alternati~re to the proposed project tl~at ~~rould reduce i~aapacts to histaric resources See ReGircu.lated EIR Chapter 5.0~~ pecificall~r, ~ternati~re ~ ~~~ould el~lninate tlae det~olition of e~isti~~ structures on .~~enc~T~o~~rned proper~es and ~~ouid eliminate an~~ of the ne~~~ potenti~.l acquisitio~as identified in Figure 5-, Therefore, the suggestion to prese~~~e in puce 7oI a~ad 7~~ E. Fifth Street is ~~ntl~in the range of altern~.ti~~es alread~7 a~~ai~~ed in chapter 5~~~ ~n addition, CEt~ does not ~~eq~rire aiternatl~Tes to i~adi~~id~zal project co~~panents. Tl~c suggestions pro~~ided in the comment arc not considerabl~~ di~feretit frorfr t~~hat is .lread~r anai~F~ecl i~x tlae E7R and ~~rould not ciearl~? lessen the sigr~if~cant en~~if~o~a~aae€at~.i effects of tine project. ~'r~ rasp Or~tror~/1'raffl ¦ ~'roposed itiatinn Il~easure. ~~dal language to tlae proposed project ~oraing code that includes measu~~cs for planned afet~~ near rail crossings arad suggested mitigation measures that include grade separations for major tlaorouhfares, imp~•o~re~nents to e~isti~ag at-grade high~~Fa~z-rail crossings, and car~tinuous ~randai resistant fencing or other appropriate ba~•riers to ]in~it access of trespassers onto tine railroad right-off ~~ra~T. See Final EIR ~l~apter ~Resporases to omt~ents, I,ette~• from Caiifornia Public utilities onamissior~ ~CPI~~~, co~aar~aerat PIJC--~~~ Findi The ~lenc~r ~'r~ads that specific economic, legal, social, technologicai, or other consider+a~or~s make tips r~i~.atlon rneasuie in~'eas~ble. t 'r ~"ransitZoning Coda 84~ ~!R Findings of Fac'~eter~ent of overriding ons~derations 3-~.9 - i I C~apfer 3 F~na~ln~ ~e~ard~r~~ Pro~ea~ A~terr~ativee R~~~o~a~e, The p~~oject ~~rould not ha~~e an~r s~n~ficant ~r~pacts on safet~r at ~•aih•oad crossings. T~~e~•efo~~e, mitigation Measures that ~vo~~d ~~equi~~e Made sepa~~ador~s an project aie~ ~•oad~~7a~~s to reduce potenttai auto~trafn conflicts are clot required. grange Count~~ Trar~spartation ~uti~ot~it~ ~~Cri'~~ is p~•o~~iding crossing safet~T er~hat~cements at ~D ~•ailtaad projects i~~ t~~e Cit~F of Santa Ana, These planned txp~~ades ~vi~ incl~~de nas~~ir7 lights, pedest~~ia~~ sinals~gates, quad gates and raised medians, ~~nplementatior~ of the Transit ~o~~in Code €5D S~~ project ~~rill enhance safet~~ for n~otoi•ists and pedestrians. Cur~•ent techt~olog~t ~~li also be used to upg~•ade tra~'fic and signal controllers ~~~ti~ i~~plementation of tae p~•oposed project, ~n addition to these p~•oject ca~nponents, t~~e Transit Zoning Code swill be amended to include police Ianguage in the St~~cet a~~d N~et~~rork Concepts section that states "~r~~r future o~• planned de~relop~~e~~t adjacent or near tine rat'lroad right-~~ ~~7~~r be piannecl ~~~itl7 tale safer}~ of the ~•ail corridoi in. ~~~d, Tl~ts includes consideri~~g pedestri~~~ circulation~destit~ati.ons ~ETith respect to ~aii~•aad right~of ~~~a~~,3> ~ I'ropose~ itig~ation Measure. ~dentif~r itr~pfo~re~~ents and f funding ~nechar~sn~s to zx~itigate the project's t~af fic impacts. ~~ee final ~R ~hate~• 3 ~esponse to at~r~ents}, Lette~• fio~r~ ~it~r af'~'ustin comment TES-5.~ ~fnClfl~ T`lYe 1~genc}~ finds teat specific economic, legal, social, technological, o~• othe~• cansideia~ons n~a~e t~~s i~~i~ga~on treasure ~nfeas~bie. ~ationa~e. Tl~e ~J~?YR identi.fics z~itiatian measures needed ~.s a ~•esult of expected pro~ect- generatecl t~•affic i~~ Section ~,~~,3, Specific ii~pro~Te~~c~~ts are identified ire mitigation i~easu~es i1r~Il~~~t.~ ~ th~•ough ~+i11~~~.11 ~1, Fu~•ti~ei•, tz~.tiation n~easui•e ~~~il~t~. ~ requires t~~e Cit~F of Santa Ana to "instit~~te a program for s~~stez~natic initiation of i~~p.cts as de~~eloprr~ent proceeds ~~ritl~in the Transit ~oni~~ Code to ensure n~tigatian of the indi~~iduai impro~~er~ex~ts," Tire pragrai~. is required to include, at~ong other things, "a funding and i~~~p~•o~Tement prog~a~~~ to identify financial resources adequate to canst~~~~ct all iden~il'ied ini~tigatiot~ measures its a tit~~e1~F basis," ~•af't Section 1.3, ~+~il~~~,~~~~-.~ The ~~.itiatian n~easu~~e suggested ~}r the it~r of Tustin a~.•e aread~~ included i~~ the project and ~~l not p~•a~~ide meaningful addition.a~ tr~itig~.tiia~~ be~~ond the irreasures ti~at a~•e ~.dopted ~~1"~1f~ 1~1~~~~1'~ P~"D~03C~ F~BC~I~C ~1??f~~C~ ~0 ~~#~~~C ~~VIC~ ~ ~'~roposed Mitigation Measure, require tl~e a~~plication of pa~~kl~.r~d in~lieu fees iii cor~jur~ction ~~rith de~Teloptr~ent of the projeet~ See ~i~~al Chapter 3 ~esponses to oYr~~ncf~ts}, Le~tei from Cite of Tustin ~5~, comment TLS-2.} ~i~dl~rg, 't'he ~ge~~c~~ finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations n~.al~e this iriitigation measure infeasible, Rat~o~ale. De~~eiopt7~ent under the Transit ~o~~i~~g Code project ar~d De~teloper ~'~.•ojec~ is required to con~pl~? ~~~ith t~itigatiar7 treasure ~1~~~I~i~.~ 0-~, ~~T~~ich requires pa~~rnent into the Park ~cquisitioi~ ar~d ~]e~~elopnlent fund pursuant to Santa t~.r~a ~~~unicipal Code Chapter 35, t~rticle fiver and abo~re the req~~irement fo~• ne~~r development to pa~T into the ~'ai~k acquisition a~ad ~e~~elopi7~ent Fund, tl~e ~~ede~~elopment ~~enc~T is pursuing tt~e acquisition and construction of a ~•a~~e of potential open space amenities ~~~itl~ii~ tl~e Transit ~ox~ii~g Cade area, ~~~i~ich could include a public park, net~r cornn~u~~it~r center anal a tot lot, Fir~all~t, the standards far pri~~atc ope~~ space conta~t~ed ~~Tithin the T~.•ansit honing Code a~.•e designed to ensure that ne~r~ de~Telopier~t pra~tide open space and o~~tdoor a~~enities anisite as pa~•t of the project design. Consecluentl~~, tl~e impact of the p~.•oject on park facilities i Tess than significant and no further mitigation is needed 3-~0 Trensit ~onin~ Code ~4} EAR F~nd~ngs o~ ~act~ta~er~ent o~ overr~dir~g Conside~a~io~s f ~~T~ ~ ¦ , ~ ~ ~I~I~1 ~I"'ll~f~~~l~11 I NT~~DTI~N If a pxo~ect tl~~t . ~~espansibie ~genc~7 decides to c~rr~~ out, finance or appr~o~~e ~~~i11 h~~Te significant effects ~~Jl~ch are identified i~~ the tin~l but are not a~Toided or substai~tiall~r lessened, ft shall rna~e the findings described in Section 15493 of the C~~ guidelines, ~~~iuch states: {a~ requires the decision-rr~aki~~g ~genc~~ to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, tecll~~ological, or other benefits of a prapased project against its uira~roidable en~ritonmental risks ~~Jir~n determining ~~~hether to s.p~~ro~Te the project. If the specific eco~lomic, legal, sociai, tecl~nalaical, or other benefits of a prapased project out~~reigh tl~e u~~a~~oidable ad~~erse en~Tir•ont~er~tal effects, the ad~fierse en~~iro~~~nental effects mar be considered "accept~bie." ~ ~~~lrerr tl~e lead aenc~~ appro~Tes a project ~~~l~cl~ will result in the occuri•e~ice of significant effects ~vl~icl~ are identified in the final but are nat a~~oi~ed or substantiall~r lessened, the agenc~? shall state its ~~riting the specific reason to support its actions based on the final Eli andJor other information i~~ the record. 'I'he statetx~ent of o~rerriding considerations shall be supported b~~ substantial c~~tdence in the record. {c} If ~n agenc~~ makes a statement of o~rerridiza considerations, the staten.~ent should be included ~n file record of tl~e praject appro~~al and should be ~x~entiarred in the notice of dctert~.ination. This statement does not substitute far, and shall be in additio~r to, findings required pursuant to Section 15~9~. This Statel~ent of ~~~ei•rid.it~ ansiderations describes the a~~ticipatcd ecanorntc, social, and otlrcr benefits o~• other considerations of the ~'r•oposed project to support the decisio~~ to proceed with the praject e~ren though i~ot all of tl~e ~dent~fied impacts are rn~~.gated to a Iess~than~significant le~~el, 4, L1N~11~1~~BLEIN~'IAfT~11E~E IIPT ~~Terr ~~ritl~ mitigation ~r~easures idetrtified i~~ tl~e SIR far the project, tl~e follo~~Fin significant i~.pacts are Ezna~~oidablc because no feasible mitigation is a~Tailable to further reduce the impacts to ~ less~tl~an~ sigi~if~cant lei?el. Refer to l~apter Findings for fui~the~.• clariftcatian regarcl~ng the i~x~pacts listed belov~~~ Aes~h~~l Impact LongRter~n cumulati~re de~Telopr~ent occurring purs~~ant to tl~e Transit ~on~n fade ~D S~~ would result in substantial increase i~~ sl~ade~shado~~rs o~~er sensiti~~e uses. ~utnulati~~e .~~s noted i~~ tl~e discussion for Impact ~~~-5, i~e~~~ sources of increased shade ~~tould likel~T result from ne~i~ de;~elopn~ent u~~der the proposed 't'ransit ~oni~~ bode ~D S4}. Since there is t~rpicall~r na feasible z~.itigatian a~~ailable to reduce to less than significant or elirnir~ate shading impacts, si~~ific~nt and una~~oidable Transit ~~n~ng ~od~ LSD 84~ ~i~ F~n~ins ~f F~cltat~r~enf of overriding ons~der~tions q._~ t Chapter 4 statement o~~ve~r~ding Cor~slderat~ons ~~adin impacts ~~~D~d iesult f~•oxr~ t~~e proposed Tiansit ~ot~ir~ Code ~D 8~~. Cu~~~uiati~Te dc~reloptrrent of additional tr~ediu4 ar~d high-sic buiidif~s ~~Tau~d lead to additional shade i~r~pacts to ~rar~ous shade-sens~t~~re ~zses th.rougixout the Cit~r. Therefore, curn.ulative si~adin impacts fro~xr future projects ire the Transit ~Tiilae ~ ar~d ~ot~rnto~~rn ~ hones canstr~~cted pursuant to tine 'Iiansit honing Code ~~rould made a co~~siderabie contribution to this sinil`icar~t curnuiati~~e i~~pact. Air uaii~y Impact ~,2-~ Construction acti~zities associated ~~~iti~ tine constructiail of iradi~=ideal projects ~viti~r~ the Transit ~~or~.r~ Code area, inci~~dit~ the De~~elaper project, ~~Fould contribute substantiall~T to are e~.sttr~ of proiectcd air qualtt~~ ~?iolation for criteria p~~~ltantS. It~~pact 4.~~ ~peratior~ of the proposed project ~~ouid e:~ceed au.ti~ Coast Air uali~,~ ~~Ia~~ae~x~ent District st~ndarci far ~~OC, ~0~, , and ~~+~f~ ar~d ~~~ouid result In proiectcd f~.' qual~t~r ~rla~at~or~.. Impact Canstructiat~ and operation of the proposed project ~~~ouid result ire a cumuiad~rel~~ carls~deiab}e net increase of criteria poilutar~ts for ~~?hich the proposed project region i in no~~attainr~~ent ~Inder an applicable federal or state ambient ai~~ qua~it~~ standard. CL~mulati~Te ~s the I3asiza is c~~rrer~ti~~ in nonattai~.ment far ozone, N~, P~~~~~, atYd 7'~~I~~, ctrrnulati~re de~7ciopt~erlt ~~tauld ~rfalate a~] air qualit~r standard a~.• contribute to a~ Busting or projected air quait~? ~rlala~o~~. T'i~erefore, this is con.s~de~•cd to be a significant cun~.u~atisre it~npact within the Basi~~, Construction ur7der tine p~•oposed project ~~?ould ir~akc a cumulatf~Te~}~ cansider•abie cantrtb~rtran to this s~gi~ificar~t impact. In addition, as discussed in Ympact ~,2-G, operation at full buildout of tine pf~aposed project ~~o~~ld result in quan~tie off` air emissions that exceed tine ~CA~~ID tl~r•esholds for ~~DC, C~, acrd P~1rI~~, and ~~To~~id cfeate a cut~~~Iati~rel~~ considerable cor~tributioil to ti~is sigt~ifrcat~t impact, u~~~r~l ~n~pact 'I'he adoptior~ of the Transit ~oi~i~g Cade ~D ~~rouid result in substar~ti~l ad~rerse chaz~e in tine sinificar7ce of a i~istaricl resource ~.s defir~ed in Section 15~~~,~ of the CI~ ~uic~elit~es, Cuinuiati~~e 'I'h.e cuuiati~re anal~~sis far impacts on cultural and paleontological resources considers ~ broad regional s}rstem of ~~zi~ich the resources ar•e . part. The cu~nulatit~e con.te~t for tl~e cultural al~d paleontological reso~~rc anal~Tsis is range Cout~t~~ as a ~~~ilole, ~~~hile the pr•aject impact anal~rsis far cultural r•csources necessaril~r irrcludcs separate anal~rses fo~• l~~stor~c~periad resources a~xd archaeological resources, the cuirrulati~re anal~~sis combines these resources into sin~ie, iron-rei]eu~a~]le resource base and cans~ders the add~~.~re el`fect of pro~ect~ specific impacts to sYgnf~car~t regional ~txrpacts on c~~ltural resources. Because a~ cultural reso~~rce ale ur~que ar~d non-rene~~~able members of fi~~ite classes, all ad~~erse effects or• negati~~e impacts erode a d~~rindling resource base, Federal, i f q...~ Transit honing Code ~p 84} EiR Flndinga of i=act~taternent o~ Overriding Car~siderations E ~~a~#er 4 #atam~n# of ~verrr'd~n~ C~r~s~derafJor~s state, and ~aca~ lar~xs protect cuitu~•al r~esaurces in ~r~ast instances. E~Te~~ o, it is foot ai~~a3~s feasible to protect cu~t~~~a~ resources, par~.cuiari~~ ~vhen preser~cratia~~ its pace ~~Tould f~~strate implementation of p~•o~cct. t~~is reason, the cu~r~ulatf~te effects of de~~eiop~nent in the Orange ~aunt~r region a~~e considered sinilicar~t~ I~a~~r~~~er, because ~t is cur~•ef~tl~f infeasih~e to determine urhethe~• future de~~eloprnent under the proposed Transit Tonif7 bode ~~ou~d res~~lt in den~olition r•cma~Tsl of i~istarical iesaurce t~ithin the p~'o~ect boundaries, the project's incrcinenta~ co~~tribt~~on to these cut~~u~ati~re effects ~~~ouid be cu~ulati~~el~~ considerable {i.e~s the project ~~Fouid contrihE~te to the lass of ~~itor~icaZ ~'esou~•ces ifs Oraf~ge Count~~} ~t~pact 4~~~ peradon. o~ the outi~ertl California I~egiana~ Rai ,~~,ut~~orit~~'s ~5~~ rail line ~~au~d paten~all~~ expose ~~olse-senslt~~Te hand uses located ~~~iti~in tine Transit Toning bode ~D S~~ area to ~~aise le~Tels that exceed the standards estabiisi~ed i~3~ tine Cite of Santa Ana ene~ai ~'ian, I~~~pact ~.S- Cof~struc~on act€~Tftles associated ~~Flt~l tine prroposed project r~aul~~ generate o~~ e~pase persons Stiu~tll~'CS to excessl~re groan borne ~~Fbratia~~, umuati~Te Construction of ~ndi~ridua~ projects pursuant to the rI'ranit Toning Code ~~~ould produce teir~porar~~ ~ribra~on impacts. ~s discussed in Impact ~.8-9, tine construction ~tii~ration .pact ~uo~~id be sigf~iflcant and una~Taidabte, ~ indi~ridua~i de~relopn~ec~t projects under the xrai~sit Tor~ifig Cade ~D S~~ area mar be c~ilstiucted concurrentl}T u~ith each othe~• oi' oti~er related projects, it is possible ti~at i~~te~7se cot~structian Pram. t~~ro ar xxio~.•e p~•ojects ~~~ould simu~taneaus~~ acc~ir at distances of 5D feet or less from e~ud.f~g nca~'b~T receptors, Ti~erefare, ~~ibratian fiozx~ futut•e de~~elopent ~~ouid paten.tiall~r coix~blf~e ~~~tii construction ~Tibratian of other p~•ojects to result in a potentia~l~r s~gnificaf~t curnuiati~~e impact. ur~ulati~~e ~'iie proposed project is located ~~t~t~un close pro~iinit~r to the southern a~farn.ia ~egloflai ~~ll ~uthailt~?'s ~I~1~ tali iinc. er~siti~Te receptors, including ~•esidetitiai uses ~;nth exterior ~~ses such as cozx~t~7unal a~'eas consisting o~ packet parks ox pedestrian ~~~alk~~ra~Ts and pri~~ate 1~alconies, ina~T ar mar not he si~ie~ded from noise generated bar raiir~~d operations. ~s a ret~it, noise le~Tels ~~~itl~in these areas ir~a~r exceed tine G5 dB~ I~~f, "Desitab~e II~Ia~i~un.~" sta~idar~d. Trar~~or~~~or~ Impact Loi~g~terir~ cun~uiati~~e de~relopxnent under i~pleinentatian of the Transit Toning Code «~auld result in impacts related to £ree~~a~r ramps in the ~~~cinit~~ of the 'I~ransit Toning Code area. Cutr~uiati~re ~s identified ifs ~n.~pact 4.~ ~-8, because implen~enta~on of the pi•opased project ~vouid contribute to sig~~f~cant impacts t the d~~ area ifitersections, and because iinp~einentatio~~ of the potential in~prai~einent measures canfiot be gua.ranteed~ the iong~term cu~n~iiati~Te de~relapi~ent pursuant to the t`r'ansit Tonlf~g Code ~~~ould hate a considerable cof~tribution to cuir~~~lati~~e impacts. f I Transit 2anin bode D 84 ~I~ F~ndin s o~ Fay St~tarnan~ a~ Dvarridin ~onsideratians l Chapter ~ Stat~met~t o~Cvarrldlr~~ ~or~s~deratlorts impact-,13-~ Long-term cumulative de~~ei~pmcnt pursu~~t to t~~e T'r:~r~~i~ ~ar~n ode Full buiidYout ~~ould ~iesult i~ significant localised air cluaiit~t i~~pacts for operational le~Tel ernissians. ~s ~ uTh~le, this impact i sir~i~`icant for operad.or~al en~issia~s due to tl~e size of the Transit ~ar~~ng Code LSD S4~ a~~ea, ~rnpact 4~~3~~ Lang~term cum.uiari~~e de~Teiopment pursuant to the Transit ~or~in Code at foil build~out has the pater~tial to cor~~lict ~~~.th The ~'~•a~ect as ~ ~~hole i sig~i~'icant for ope~ador~al ernissior~s duc to tl~e size of the Tra~~sit Caning Code ~S area, h~r~-T~rm mp~~t ~f the si~?tcer~ significant ~~r7a~Toidabie impacts d~~iectl~T attributable to the 1'ropose~ P~•o~ect arrd associated curnu~ati~7e impacts, as ide~.afied aba~Te, fo€.~r ~~ro~~ld be classified as sho~.it-terrn. These short- tern~ in~pacts are rebated to construction ac~.~~ities ~r~d their ternpora.r~z effect on air ~~~alit~T and gr•oui~dborne ~ribratior~. ~t~ce the ~rarious cor~sttuctian projects a~.•e cornplete~ these irnpacts ~~rouid no lot~ge~• e~.st, L~r~~Terr ~mp~ct ~f the sixteet~ s~gr~ificant ur~a~ro~dahie impacts directl~z attributable to tine proposed Project and associated curn~~lati~re irnpacts, as identified abo~~e, t4~rel~Te of the a£ar~en~er~tianed irnpacts a~•e considered long-ter~rn. 4~ 11ER~~~1 NI~~RT~~N 't'he t~e~~c~T hereb~~ finds that cco~~arnic, legal, social, technological ox otl~cr• benefits of the Dc~~eloper i~r~oject out~veigl~ the sicu~'icant and una~roidable impacts idc~tihed in the EIR. rnakir~ this finding, the ~enc~T has balanced the benefits of tl~e De~reloper ~'~•nject against its una~7oidable signifrcant impacts a~~d has indicated its ~~~llingness to accept those ad~~erse impacts, T`he ~genc~r finds that the fo~o~~rln benefits off' tl~e De~reloper ~'x•ojcct ~varrant app~•o~ral of the De~reloper• ~'r~a~ect not~~4~ithsta~~dit]g its sigt~if~car~t, una~Toidable er~~Firanrr7enta.l impacts. '~~l~e oblcc~~Tes of the De~Teloper~ i~roposal cornponc~~t of the ~'roposed project for the ~guc~t-o~~rned properties are toy ¦ ~ede~Teiop all of tl~e ~genc~?-o~~rn.ed properties ¦ Pro~ride ne~~F ai'ford~.hle housing fo~• i'arntli.es in furthe~a~~ce of the Cit~r~s af£or•dable housing goals estal~ished in the Housing Eierne~~t, tl~e ~tnpiementatio~~ flan for the Santa. Ana ~~ierged Rede~~elaprnent P~•ojcct area, ar~d the Cit~f of Santa Ana Consolidated 'ian ¦ ~,r~hance the strectscape and urban fog+~n of the area, particular+l~~ along Santa. ~n.a Poule~~~.rd, ~~rith tl7e construction of ne~~T buildings that rneet tl~e standards co~zta~€~ed iri the r~iansit ~o~~i~~g Code a~~d that support future t~.•a~~sit planning i ¦ ~litninate blight 4-~ Transit honing Code 84~ irfR Findings of ~ac~lta~ernent of ~verrl~ling Considerations t Chapter ~ Statement of Cverr~af~r~~ Cor~sfa~erat~ons ¦ Pro~~lde a.dditiatial public open space af~d facilitate point use arranerr7ent ~~itl~ S~~SD for ~ ne~~F cammunit~~ centel• ¦ ~~ia~tlde an ecanor~~call~~ ~~iable rede~~elopent scenario fo~• the ~enc~T~o~~rned p~~operties ~~a~ring ~i~ adapted a~ feasible ~~.itigation measures, ~ii} ~•e~ected as lf~feas~bie ~~t~~natl~res to the P~•aject discussed abo~re, ~iii~ ~~ecof~i~ed all significant, uf~a~~oidable impacts, and {iv~ balanced the benefits of the proposed Project against the proposed ~~~oject's signif ca~~t af~d una;?oidable itx~pacts, the ~lgenc~f he~~eb~T flt~ds tl~at its heneflt out4~~ei~~ and. a~~erride lts sif~i~cant una~~oldable impacts fol• the ~'eaa~~s stated belo~~F. each bene~~t set forth helo~~~ cons~.tutes an o~~erridiz~ consideration ~~ar~a~xti~~g appra~ral of tl~e project, it~depe~dent of the othcz• bene#`~ts, despite each a.f~d e~~er~i u~.a~roidable impact. ~~r~l~per Pr~jC~ B~r~~fits a, The 'I°1•anlt ~oil~n Cade CQ1TipOn~flt of the ~roposcd ~~ia~ect pro~rldes a fia~~~eu~oik foi' the de~~elap~nent of co~~pact, transit-oricn,ted de~~elapl~~e~~t, sucl~ as the De~~eloper f~ro~ect, that caf~tains a ~ni~ of x'esidential, camn~ercfal a~~d prafesloi~~€l uses in oiler to add~'es tlYe Cit~~'s and i t~~e region's goals o~ p~'o~r~d~tig slte for lxouslf~ In alread~t u~ibani~ed locations that a~•e adjacent to transit, thereb~r ~•educing ~Tehicle trips and related greenhouse gas en~lsslons, as ~~iell as stil~ruladn ii~~~estment in u~lderutili~ed land, and i~~pro~~ing the jobs f housing balance ~~~itl~.n the Cite, ~ccarding to a st~~d~r published b~~ the Southerf~ California .~~.ssociatian of ~o~7e~•ntr~ents entid.ed "T'l~e ~e~~~ Econo~x~~~ afl.d the ~obs~~~ousi~~ alaf~ce in outhcl'f~ California," the ~os Angeles aril ~~~a~~ge Counties ~icioixs l~a~~e a lugher p~~opo~•tiof~ of jibs to l~ausin than do those areas in the ~n~af~d ~~npire, Due to a lack of readily a~railable lafld for ne~~~ l~ous~flg canstructla~~ ~i~ t~les~ iab- ~'ic~~ areas, ~~~arkers a~'e r•equilied to dri~re falithcz• at~d farther distances in older to flr~d a~`fardable housing. ~ situation that e~a.ce~ibates this lack of a~~ailable land fog f~e~~r housing is the o~~c~•-~ai~ing of land far canur~ercial uses, ~~Flrich cities ha~Tc historically done ifs order to increase sales tai: res~ez~ucs fallo~~~ing the adoption of 7'ropoltion in X975. ~I'he T'~:ans~t ~aning Code ~~Tould ~~e~ gone p~~opert~T, either through sta~~dard coning tools or through o~Te~~la~T panes, that ~~Tas foot l~istoricall~~ coned foci ~'esidential use, the~~eb~r lncreasing t~~c land a~~ailable ~o~.~ 1esidential de~reloplnent and prD~rldlf]g ~~ore liauSing In an al~'ead3~ urbanised, ~obs4rlch en~rlron~.Cf~t ~T'l~e Derv ~cotrorr~~ cr~~r~ ~~~e ~~~~s~.`~rr~rir~ ~r~lr~~rre ~t~ ~'arrt~~errr 'rrlr'~orrf~cr, outhc~'n Califorf~.a ~socia.tian of o~rc~'~~~~~ents, April ~aa1. ~,os ~~f~eles, CA.~ '~~'he T'~a~~sit ~ai~ing Code area is ideall~T located fo~~ if~creased gro~~~th b~7 its pro~~il~~it~t to n~a~ar transit s~~ste~~s and its adjacenc~r to existing residential colr~n~unities and a~7 established gadded street net~~~o~ik, Tl~e proposed Tl'a~~sit caning Code supports the e~~isting t~~a~~spartatian net~~To~'k, and creates a~~~cf~it~r-enriched connec~.at~s be~~~een the ~o~rel•~zinent Cente~i a~~d fail Station, af~d il~pra~re oleo-~~~ide ~~~alkabilit~T. C. T'l~e Transit ~o~.n Code alla~~7s land uses and la~ld densities ti~at ~~Till pro~~lde t~'anslt-supportl~re de~~elapment, such as tl~e e~~elaper Project, faecessar~~ to gexxe~'ate adequate ridc~'s~aip an the pf~apased Santa ~~~~a Irixed uide~z?ay transit s~'steln ~uhlch ~~~ll sel~re Santa ~1na .cgiar~al '~"ranslt d. The T~Fansit caning Code p~~o~7ides caning ~~thich ~~~ould alla~~~ fo~• the integration of ~~e~~T if~flll de~relaprncf~t, such as the De~relope~• ~l~a~ect, into e~isti~ neighborhoods. ~ e. The '~'ranslt Tofll~~g Cade and the De~Teloper ~'ra~ect a~'c consistent ~~ith a~xd further the goals, ~ policies and ob'ec~~Tes of the Southe~f~ Callforn~a t~ssoc~attof~ of o~ternn3e~~ts "SCE" ~~DS ~eio~rrrl ~'r~rtrs~or~rr~io~~ ~'~c~tr: 1~~airt~ '~rrrr~c~~~otr~ ~xT~}, and SCt~C's ,~i~rrr~l ~t~~~r1~et~,~i~~~ ~'l~r~r. ~e1i~g C'a~r~yrrrtrrti~s ~~~l~i~~~~ a ~'rr~~~itaa~le ~'rrfarr~ ~RCP~ land use goals The RT~'s goals inch~de t ~'~ansi~ honing bode LSD ~4~ ~~R ~in~~ngs of Facfatement o~ ~ve~~idlr~g Cor~s~de~at~o~s ~hapt~r ~ tatem~nt of ~verrid~r~g or~s~afera~~ons fdentif~ting strategic areas for i~~f~ll, pedestrian friendl}r en~~i~on~~nc~~ts, and focusing housing and et~plo~rment gro~~rth ~n transit-acccss~ble locations through trans~t~oriented de~relopmei~t ~E~R, ec~.on and use], and RrI~, pp, 90-9~~, The includes simi.laf' strategics, suclY as establishment of mixed-use clusters and other transit oriented de~~elopment around. transit stations and along transit corridors MCP, pp. ~ 5417}. f. ~e~Teiopment of the 'I~ansit ~oi~in Code result in fe~~~er traffic impacts t~~a~~ the I'roject~l~.eaonabl~~ foreseeable De~relopment ~T'able 5-3~. This result is consistent ~~~.tl~ a~~d furthers the implcnxc~~tatio~~ strategies detailed in the Califo~,'~~ia ~csaurees hoard Climate Change coping Pian ~~coping I~lan~. 3 directed the California fir Resources ~aard ~t1l~B} to de~~elop a ~copln ~~lan ~~?~th actions to reacia tine target, The S'co~it ~'1cr1~'s proposed strategies for local o~Ter~~~ents include ~ greenhouse gas reduction measure of ~`inf~., affordable and t~•ansit~ oriented lousing de~Telopir~ent and the land use changes ~~ecessar~r increase such de~~elopi~e~~t." ~.~'c•~~i~~ ~'1~~~, ~~ol~ C~7~~~ Tl~c Transit ~ot~ing Code play's a critical role i~~ acllie~~itig targets under ~ 375, California's ustainablc Cotr~~r~unities and Climate Protection ~~.ct, T"lYe ~~I~B Sc'~~i~~~ Pla~i cites the ke~r role of SIB 375 in it~~plcinet~tir~g ~B 32, noting ~3 375 "~e~ccts tiae it~partance of achie~rii~ significant additional reductio~~s of greet~i~ouse gas etl~ssions froir~ changed laf~d use patterns and ~mpro~~ed tiansportatiai~ to help acliie~~e tl~e goals of ~ ~S~~ita .~1~~}~, p, ~7,~ The role of local ga~~ernmerrts is also recogt~i~ed in rcacl~ing ~B 375 targets. "Local o~~cr~~~nents ha~Te the abihr to clirectl~T in~uence bath tl~c siting and desig~~ of ne~~ residential at~ci coiix~eicial de~Telapments in a `~Ta~~ tlYat reduces greenhouse gases associated ~~Fith ~~ehicle tra~~el, as ~~Tell as e~ierg~r, ~~rater, and ~~raste, , Enhanced public tianit sci-~~ice combined ~~~ith incenti~res for lard use de~Teloprnent that pro~~ides a better market for p~xblic tiFansit pla~~ an important role in helpi~~ to reacli regional targets." ~S~~~ia ~'Ic~~~, p. ~S.} T'l~e ~~B 32 ir~~plementatioiY strateg~T for' 375 includes tl~e follo~~ing measure: "Enhanced public transit ser~~ice combined ~t~ith incenti~~es fox• Iand use de~relopi~ent that pra~Tides a better market for public trar~sit ~~rill pla~F an important role iia l~clping to reach regional targ~ts~" ~S~O~113 ~1~t1, p. ~S.} T`i~e Cit~r of a~7ta ~1na curren.tl~r bas a si~ortae of rental units appropriatel~t si~cd to acca~~t7~odate fa~7~ilics. ~s stated in the Cit~~'s 2ooG-2~1~- ~Ioustng ~,lement, ~~?hile t~~ultiple-faxx~il~f housing con~priscs 4~°I~ of all housing stock ~~~ithin. the Cit~r, onl~~ 3°I~ of multiple fa~nil~T and single-fatrlll~T ~'ental ux~~ts l7a~re three or more bedrooms, ~t is esti~~~ated that ~-5°l~ of all families ~~~l~o rct~t i~a4re fi~~e or zr~ore ~~ci~~~ers. This translates into a shortage of ~~,~00 large family, rental u~~its, T'i~e De~~eloper ~'~.•ajcct contains 77 t~vo-bedroom units a~~d S ti~ree~bedroor~l units. In additio~~, the I1~Ierc~~ I~ouse pra~ect ~~~ll pra~~ide one three~bedroom a~~d f~~~e t~vo-bedroom units 't`hese units arc appropriatel~~ sued to meet Santa tuna's identified detr~ograpl~ic needs. i~ The City curi'cntl~~ suffers frail a shortage of affordable l~ous~n,l~s set forth in the Cit~t' certified Ioi~sing Eleinetxt ~~oo6-D14}, fire Cite of Santa ~~na's sl~aie of the Regional I ~oi~sing deeds allocation ~INt~~ fo~,• 3,33 units of ne~~r residen~al coi~structioi~, of ~~~l~ich are to be affordable to ~~er~~ lo~~~ i~~coxc liousel~olds, 57~ of ~~hich are to be af~'oxdable to lo~~r income l~ousel~alds, and GG5 to be affordable to moderate incoir~e households HEIR, section ~.9}. State la~~~ xx~az~datcs that in order to satisf~fi its R~l~~~ ~•equiretnent the Cite create oppo~'t~~~aitics far ne~~ housing, particulail~T affordable housing, through tl~c a~~plicatian of coning ~~l~ich allo~~Ts for increased densi~~. T`l~c existing ma~x~n~~m densit~~ allo~~Ted under tl~c current coning ~~~ithin. the area co~rered b~? the Transit To~~itig Cade is 5 d~~relling units per acre, tl~oul~ there are projects ~~ntl~in the area that ~~rere constructed prior to the establishment of the cur~•e~~t ~o~~i~~g that exceed the ~5 d~~rellin units pci' acre, Tl~e Mate department of I lousing a#~d Cormuni~~ ~e~~elopment ICD~ rewires that cities pra~Fidc ~o~ring that allo~~rs for residential construction at a iTlinimi~m densit~t of 113 4~~ Tr~ns~t ~~ning Coln {n 4} findings o~ Fact~tatetne~t of ~verr~di~g o~side~at~ons t i C~ra~ter ~ St~ternent o~~verrfa~lr~~ Cor~sfderat~ons 3~ dwelling units per acre in order to r]~eet the densit~~ criteria tl]at HCD has establ€shed as being suppard.~~e of affordable housing production. The Cit~r's Hausir] ~;lemer~t ider~tif~ed tl~e Renaissaf~c Specific Plan area, ~~rl~ich sl~a~•cs tl~e same geographic boundar~~ as tl~c T'~•ansit Zoning Code area, as ane that has the patenti.al to pra~ride a ne~~r source of residential in-f~l de~Telopment and, as such, eras used to partill~~ satfsf~? the Cit~r's RHO requrter]~ent. During the planning period ca~~ered b~F the Housing ~,lement ~2aaG-2~~~ it is esti#]~ated tl~at the Cit~r could anticipate up to 23S ur7its o£ ne~~T ~.~csider~tial de~relapzx~ent, T'l~~'ougl~out the lifc of tl~e Transit Zoning Code {a planning hari~on of 20 to 3D ~rears~ it is estimated that there could be as mar]~r as ~,~7 ne~v residential units, a pardon of 4vhicl] could be expected to meet affardabilit~~ requirements Tl]e Proposed Project in~ple~nents the ~Iausing dement and pro~~ides tl]e ~o~ir] r]ecessar~r to stimulate neuT affo~•dable housing production, The De~relape~• Project corx~porxent of tlxc Pr:aposcd I'raject ar~d tl~e ll~ler~c~z douse project ~~~ll pra~ride up to 220 ne~~r residential units. ~s currer~tl~r desfr~ed tl~cse projects ~~~ill pr•o~Tide ICI rental units affordable to tl~ose meeting tl~c ~r'ange Count~~ crite~'ia fo~• fao~~~, ~~c~~F-I~o~~T and Ii~~tx•en~el~T ~,ouF Inco~x~c, th~•ec ~x~a~•l~ct ~•ate ~,~c~]tal units, sip fo~•-sale units af~'ordable to those meeting the ~~•ange Caunt~~ criteria for 11r1oderate Incax~~e, and 25 xriar~ket-rate for-safe units rI'his creates a combined total of 1~G near residential units. f these, 127 be deedRrestricted affordable housing and ~~rill be co~~nted to4~~arcls the City?'s RI~~ re~uiren~er]t. ~I'hese I27 affordable units represent 5~°/a of all ne~~r units estit~]ated to be constructed ~~ritl]in the 2~~C-2~~4 planning hori~ar] of the Housing Hlement for the Transit Zoning Cabe area and represent ~~°l~ of the Cit~~'s total RHO requirement for ~~ef~t ~,aw and Lo~v Yncome hauling {~,2GS units ~ Cit~z of Santa tuna Housing ~len-~ent 2D~6Y20~~ Table This ~s a s~gn~#`icant cai]trib~~tioi] to ~]~eeting bath the State mandated requiretents for affordable housing production, as well as f~eetir]g a real need far the resider]ts of Santa t~na~ ~n addition, the ~4rierc~~ ~~ouse project X12 of the X27 pre~riouSl~~ described units meets the City?'s cr~ter~a for peclal Deeds hous~r], also identified as a creed. in the dousing Hle~nent. Failure to appro~Te the De~relaper Project ar]d the 11~1erc~? House project ~~~iil elhninate an itl~portant ne~~T source of a.ffardahle housi~] and special needs housing. k. The ~e~7eloper I~raject furthers the Cit~~'s palic~r of ~`ma~tt]~i~[ir]g affordable Housing an ~genc~~4 a~~t]ed properties that is of 1]ih qualit~r, sustair~ablc, and a~railable to ~rarfous ~r]cot]~e le~~els." See Santa Ana ~Iausin ~lemer~t [~~~-20~~, Palic~z HE-.~.~ It greets the Cit~~'s polic~r to "er~courag~ tl~e car~struction of rental housing fa~• Santa ~~r~a's residents ar~d 4~'ar~force, including a eotrrY~.itt~~ent to ~re~~f lo~~T, lo~T aid ~~.ode~iatc incon~e residents a~~d ~~oderate inca~r~c Santa ~~na ~~~or•~er's" ~I'olic~r HH-~~~~ and its palic~r to "facilitate and e~~co~~~+ac a dl~re~'sit~~ a.rxd xar~gc i~~ t~~pcs, pr~ccs, and sizes of housing, including single-fa~nil~T hones, apartments, to~~~r~ hoes, zr~i~ed~multi- use housing, transit-oriented. de~Telaprner~ts, and li~re~~~~ork l~ousir~g" ~l'alic~7 HE-,4~. See Sa~~ta ~r~a Housi~~g Hletxrent [200G-2~I~~~~ T'l~e Transit ;oni~xg Code co~rrponent of tl~c P~•oposed Project acco~nplislaes this bar creating ~onir]g anal a~`fordablc housing incer~ti~~cs that supports the de~Teloprnent of Ile~~r affordable housing bar allo~ng far der]sl~es ~~~l~ich pro~~ide the ecan.amie of scale necesar~~ to allo~~? for belo~~r-market construction. '1'he'r'rans~t ~orung Code also pro~rrdes for a wide ~?ariet~F of hauling t~?pes ~~rl]ich includes e~~er~ttlung from sir~gle~fa~~.il~? detached houses to l]ih~rise ~ni~edYu.se de~~elapn-~er]t, B~~ alla~~in far a mixture of uses both 17or1~antalllr an single properties, and ~~eY+ticall~T ~~~tl~it7 single ~buildit~s, tl~e T~'ar~sit ~or~in Code pra~~ides oppor't~~r~ities for' a di~~ersc xx~i~ of housing in fu~itl~crance of the Cit~F's Houirag I ~le~~~c~~t. ~'l~c I~c~~elo~~e~• ~'~~ojcct component of the Proposed Project accomplishes this b~T pra~rld~ng 12~- ile~~~ rental units and 32 ne~~~ farRsale units. ~f these units, 127 ~~rill be deed restricted to ensure their lorrg~tern~ affordabilit~r, This ne~~F housing is ca~np~•ised of a ~ra~,'iet~r of product t~Tpes i~~cludin caurt~Tard Transit honing Code LSD 84~ FIB Findings of ~ac'~tetemer~~ of ~verr~ding Considerat~ans 4_~ Chapter 4 ~tatemer~t o~ ~verrld~n Cons~afera~~ons hausi~~g, ta~~n~~oes and ~a~~~ hauses in fu~theranee of the pra~T~sians of the ~aus~ng leent and t~~e T~•ans~t ~a~~~n fade. 't'he Transit honing bode pro~Tide fo~• ~ plan~~in and z~~~ing frarr~e~~~ox• to alla~T for the rede~re~opt~ent of the Aenc~T-a~~nec~ prapeities, thereby= elitr~natin b~i~ht and pro~~iding for ner~ propet~t~r tax ger~e~•atian, The 1~enc~-pt~aperties a~'e, far the mast past, ~Taeant hand ~n the o~~r~xe~ship of a pub~.c agct~c~~ arid, as suc~~, do txat cu~•~•eilt~~r ene~•ate p~~ape~t~r tai ~~e~~e~~ue. T~~e Proposed ~~~11 allo~~~ for the rede~Telopm.ent of these p~Fapeides and the~~• ~Fet~~z•~ to eco~xon~ic use, 'I'he adop~an of the Tians~t ~an~n fade also alio~~Ts for the future de~Teioprnent of other ~racant and underut~~ed p€aperties eu~rentl~~ in pri~~ate a~ public a~~rnership ~n ather parts of the pra~ect a.~•ea. ~~~e suc~~ e~aple ~s t~~~ cu~i~~e~~t OUilt~r of grange ~pe~atfar~s Ward. The ~perat~at~s ~'a~~d cozx~~~~~~ses a~~~ro~in.~ate~~7 ,5 ac~•es of u~de~iud.~~~ed laid as t~~e ~aunt~r of ~~•ane cant~~~ucs to consolidate their fleet and ~~~a~~~tenance ope~a~ons ire othe~• facilities. ~~.do~~io~~ of t~~e Tratasit Ta~~in fade ~~~~a~rides fa~~ tic ~a~~ing f~•atx~c~~Tork at~d e~~~r~~ol]tr~ei~tal af~a~~Tsis ~ecessa~~z to a~la~~~ these p~~operties to tiansitian i~~to ~r~are ccoo~~ieal~~z p~•oduc~~Te uses and to patc~~t~a.l~~r e~~e~•ate Ile~~~ propert~~ and saes tai re~Tenues.llrlan~~ areas ~~~.thii7 the T~iansit ~a~~i~ ~odc s~~ffc~~ f~•o~~. a lacy of t71adern inf~a.sti~~ctu~e and are In ~~eed of ne~~~ st~ieet and side~~Talk in~pro~Te~nents. The additional tai re~Ten~~es generated b}~ ne~v de~~elopment ~~~ithin the Transit honing bode area. ~~~ill allo~v for rein~Te5tn7ent 1n p~~bl~c ~nfrast~~rcture and ne~'~T ~n~~estent that r~rill st~€nt~late the econom~r of thus area. gyn. The 7~rapased l~ra~ect furthers the l~ra~ect Ob~ect~~re set faith above, inearpoiated ~n f~~~ b~= this reference 4-$ Transit ~anin~ Code ~4~ EIR Findings of Fact/statement of overriding Considerations