HomeMy WebLinkAbout05A - JT CC-CRA Station District;vn
REQUEST FOR COUNCILI
AGENCY ACTION
mow`+ rvry4 w. T f 1t..v
T'l
MEETINGDATE:
JUNE 7, 2010
TITLE:
JOINT PUBLIC HEARING — FINAL EIR NO. 2006-02;
GENERAL L PLAN AMENDMENT DMENT 10-01; ZONING
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT No. 2010-01; AMENDMENT
APPLICATION No. 2005-9 (TRANSIT ZONING CODE);
DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
WITH SANTA AICA STATION DISTRICT, LLD AND
VARIOUS ACTIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
INTI rATj ISTWT
r/z-
CITY MANAGER EXECUTIV DIRECTOR
RECOMMENDED ACTION
CITY CONCIS ACTION
CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY:
APPROVED
El
As Recommended
El
As Amended
El
Ordinance on I st Reading
El
Ordinance on 2nd Reading
11
Implementing Resolution
El
Set Public Hearing For
CONTINUED T
FILE NUMBER
. Adopt a resolution certifying that the Final Environmental Impact Report ort (Final EI No. 200 6-
02 prepared for the proposed Transit Zoning Code SD 84A and 8413} and the proposed
redevelopment ent of properties owned by the Community Redevelopment r ent Agen r of the City of
Santa Ana (Agency) in the Station District has been completed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act C A (Public Resources Code § 2 000 et seg.), has
been presented to the City Council for review and consideration, and reflects the City of Santa
Ana's independent judgment and analysis; adopting the CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement
of Overriding Considerations; and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting orting Program
(Exhibit A
2. Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment ert No. 2010-0 (Exhibit .
3. Adopt an ordinance approving amendments to various zoning provisions of Santa Ana
Municipal Code Chapter 41 (ZOA No. 2010-0) (Exh ibit C).
4. Adopt an ordinance approving the creation of Specific Development No. 84, approving rezoning
of properties from various zones to Specific Development No. 84, repealing Specific
Development No. 30, 379 47 and 71, and amending the height exemption areas ma AA No.
2005-09 (Exhibit D).
5. Adopt a resolution approving Transit Zoning Code Architectural Style Guidelines and Transit
Zoning Code Street Network Concepts (Exhibit E).
5A- 1
T PH CC -CRA Station District Phase
June 7, 2010
Page
. Adopt a resolution making certain findings with respect to the consideration to be received by the
Community Redevelopment Agency pursuant to a Disposition and Development Agreement
between the Community Redevelopment Agency and Santa Ana Station District, LLC, for the sale
of certain real property in the City of Santa Ana and approving the sale of said real property upon
the terms and conditions contained in that Agreement (Exhibit F).
7. Direct staff to draft an inclusionary housing ordinance for City Council consideration within the
next 120 days, covering the industrial overlay areas identified in the proposed Transit Zoning
Code.
8. Direct staff to negotiate a Joint Use Agreement with the Santa Ana Unified School District for
Garfield Elementary, including a provision for the development and programming of a
community center.
. Authorize the City Attorney to prepare and City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute a
$25,000 reimbursement agreement with the Santa Ana Unified School District for purposes of
engaging an architect to develop conceptual plans in furtherance of developing the project
scope for a community center to be located at Garfield Elementary.
10. Direct staff to work with community members staff eholders to facilitate development of an
approximate 1.5 acre park/open space uses in the Station District.
11. Approve the expenditure of funds for a residential loan program In the Lacy Neighborhood with
cumulative not to exceed the amount of $100,000 (see Agency item .
12. Direct staff to prepare and file a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the County Clerk of the
County of orange in the manner required by lair.
. Adopt a resolution adopting CEQA Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding
Considerations, adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting ruing Program, and approving a
Disposition and Development Agreement with Santa Ana Station District, LLC (Exhibit G).
2. Authorize the Executive Director and Agency General Counsel to execute the attached
agreements for the acquisition of real property located at 609 E. 6t" Street APN No. 398-311 -
06
98-3 1-
06 from Frank J. Segura and Brendon McGuinness for $230,000; 613 E. 6th Street APN No.
398-311-07) from Franc Segura and Dolores Segura for $400,000; and 617 E. 6th Street (APIN
No. 398-311-08) from the Estate of Alice McCallum, Estate of Phyllis Robinson, Estate of
Manuel Becerra, Steven Campbell, Franc Segura, Brendon McGuinness, Richard hard Becerra
and Rita Barron for $115,000, for a total amount not to exceed $745,000, plus normal escrow
and closing costs, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the Agency Counsel and
5A- 2
JT PN CC -CFA Station District Phase l
June 7, 2010
Page 3
Executive Director. Authorize the Executive Director to pay read estate brokerage fees to Veit
Commercial Brokerage in an amount not to exceed 3% of the purchase price (Exhibit H).
I Authorize the expenditure of up to $60,000 for cultural/historical markers to he installed in the
public right of way within the Station District in collaboration with SAC eD.
. Direct staff to prepare, within 90 days, a Relocation Plan for residents that may be displaced
resulting from any applicable Agency acquisitions as it relates to the Station District.
5. Authorize the expenditure of up to $180,000 for down payment assistance to six affordable
homebuyers.
6. Direct the Executive Director to establish a targeted residential loan program for the Lac
Neighborhood and authorize the expenditure of up to $100,000, cumulatively from various
funding sources.
. Direct staff to prepare and file a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the County Clerk of the
County of Orange, in the manner required by law.
DISCUSSION
Summar of.-Planning.Commission Action
On May 27, 2010, the Planning Commission, during a duly noticed public hearing, voted to make
the following recommendations to the City Council;
Adopt a resolution certifying the Environmental Impact Report No. 2006-02 prepared for the
proposes Transit Zoning Code S and the proposed redevelopment of properties
owned by the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana; adopting the
Mitigation Monitoring and Deporting Program, adopting the CEA Facts, Findings and a
Statement of Overriding Considerations,
Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2010-01.
Adopt an ordinance approving amendments to various zoning provisions of Santa Ana
Municipal Code Chapter 41 oA No. 2010-01).
Adopt an ordinance approving the creation of Specific Development No. 84, approving the
rezoning of properties from various zones to Specific Development No. 84, repealing
Specific Development Not 30, 3$ 47, and 71, and amending the height exemption areas
Map AA No. 2005-09).
5A- 3
JT PIS CC -CFA Station District Phase I
June 7, 2010
Page
Adopt a resolution approving Transit Zoning Code Architectural Style Guidelines and Transit
Zoning Code Street Network Concepts.
Those members of the Planning Commission voting in favor were Acosta, Alderete, Gartner,
Turner and Walker. Commissioner Betancourt abstained and Commissioner Yrarrazaval was
absent. The entirety of the items included in the Request for Planning Commission Action are
included as an attachment to this report and are incorporated herein by reference.
As further described in the attached Request for Planning Commission Action, the proposed
Transit Zoning Code is designed to provide the zoning necessary to support the long-term
development o a successful transit program, as well as to provide the framework rork for the
redevelopment of properties owned by the Agency In the Station District (the Developer Project),
further described below. The attached action item (Exhibit P) also describes the environmental
analysis conducted for the Transit Zoning Code and the Developer Project, in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act CPA* Additionally, it describes the proposed
amendments to the Land Use Element of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Amendment.
Following the Planning Commission bearing, staff made modifications to the Transit Zoning Code
intended to refine standards. These include reducing the minimum floor height on certain buildings
to g feet, requiring that units have access to on-site laundry facilities and establishing additional
standards for on-site trash service. The referenced changes can be found on page 4:3 of the
Transit Zoning Code. In addition, In response to a comment from the Orange County Public Works
s
Agency, the General Plan Land Use Element will be amended to reflect requested updates to its
Flood Control provisions.
Summary of Developer Project
The Community Redevelopment Agency currently owns 49 parcels within the Station District area.
These parcels have been acquired on a voluntary basis over a period of years, with the intent of
ultimately developing new residential units of varying types and ranges of affordability, In a manner
that enhances the Lacy Neighborhood and supports the transit vision for the area. The Agency Is
also considering the potential acquisition of additional properties within the immediate vicinity of
the 49 parcels for the purposes of completing the assemblage of properties, as well as to secure
property to provide for additional open space. In April 2009, the Agency issued a Request for
Qualifications to solicit development proposals for these parcels (the Developer Project). On
August 17, 2009, the Redevelopment Agency selected the team of the belated Companies of
California, LLC and Griffin Realty Corporation, a California Corporation (the Developer). The two
firms combined have considerable experience in all aspects of real estate development, ranging
from market rate and affordable rental and for sale residential development, to high end
commercial, retail and office development. Both firms have a proven track record in delivering
quality projects on schedule and on budget. In addition, both have had years of experience
dealing with complex projects that required considerable public outreach.
5A-4
T PH CC -CRA Station District Phase I
,dune 7, 2010
Page
After an extensive public outreach process (detailed further below) which garnered a great deal of
input on community needs and issues, a determination was rade to set aside six of the 49 parcels
for the possibility of open space uses. The proposed concept for the 43 remaining Agent -owned
parcels in the Station District (see Exhibit 1) calls for the construction of approximately 112 rental
units and 32 for sale units. Of the 112 rental units, all but two (manager units) will be available to
persons at or below 0% of the adjusted median income (AMI); and of those, 20% of the units will
be offered to residents at 30% AMI. It should be noted that this amount of affordability exceeds that
required by State lave, as well as the requirements imposed for state tax credit financing. For
comparison purposes, the initial rent for a two bedroom unit at 0 IMI is $918 per month and
$576 for 30 AMI; market et rate for the Lacy Neighborhood is approximately $1,272 per month.
The term of affordability will be for 55 years. Additionally, six of the for sale units will be offered at
20% AMI. The estimated market price for a 3 bedroom home in the Lacy Neighborhood today i
approximately $290,000. The 26 market rate homes will be sold between $250,000 and $300,000.
The affordable homebuyers. (120° AMI) will be provided a $30,000 silent second loan, thus
reducing the sales price to the range of $220,000 and $270,000.
The first component of the Developer Project would be 74 podium apartment units to be rented to
extremely -low and very -low income households. If is anticipated that the 74 unit project R- will
be submitted for State tax credit financing in Jul} 2010. If successful in securing the credits,
construction will commence in March 2011 and take approximately 24 months to complete. The
for sale project is slated to commence construction in early 2011 and be completed within 12
months.
Acquisition of Additional Properties
As part of this action, the Agency is considering purchase agreements to acquire three properties
on the R-1 parcel in order to accomplish the 74 units planned for the site. The owners of the three
panels have agreed to the terns of purchase in the amount of $230,000 (bog E. 6th Street),
$4001000 (613 E. 6th Street) and $115,000 for (617 E. 6th Street). Once the Agency/City Council
approve the various actions for the project, staff will prepare a relocation plan to address the needs
of the tenants residing in the Additional Properties acquisitions as specified in the Agreement,
including these properties, as well as applicable panels under consideration for a proposed part
site and present the plan to the Agency at a subsequent meeting. Tenants will be encouraged to
remain in the homes until such time as the Agency closes escrow and relocation benefits can be
provided. All tenants displaced by this and previous acquisitions in the Station District will be
notified upon completion of the new units. Further, at thecommunity's request, the developer is
required to give first preference to interested and qualified tenants wishing to return to the new
r
development.
The Developer Project, including the acquisition of additional panels, is addressed and analyzed
in the Transit Zoning Code EIR (leo. 2006-0. Certification of the EI, adoption of the CEA
5A-5
T PH CC -CRA Station District Phase
June 7, 2010
Page 6
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adoption of the Litigation
Monitoring Report provides the CEA clearance needed for the Developer Project.
Project ir an ial Overview
In accordance with redevelopment lair, a Summary of Sale has been prepared by Keyser Marston
Associates (Exhibit K), which outlines in detail the financial terms of the proposed transaction. A
summary of the terms and conditions contained in the proposed Disposition and Development
Agreement (DDA) (Exhibit are as follows:
The Agency will convey the fee title to all properties to the Developer for $1.00.
Closings for each component of the Developer Project may occur separately.
There will be three 3 Agency loans to the Developer for - ($'10.8 million), -2 ($4.7
million) and FS ($1.5 million), respectively, in the total amount of $17.07 million. For the
rental project, the loan will be repaid from 50% of the residual receipts from the applicable
phase. For the for sale project, the loan will be repaid from profit participation based on
25% of sales proceeds generated In excess of development profit.
Included in these loan amounts are required off-site improvements for each respective
component totaling $2.5 million.
At the time of building permit issuance, both the city permit fees and the confirmed cost of
the required off-site improvements will be determined and the loan amounts will be
adjusted accordingly.
$30,000 in assistance will be provided to each qualified homebuyer of the sic 6 total
affordable for sale units, secured by a deed of trust in favor of the Agency.
The Developer must solicit at least two 2 competitive bids from tax credit investors for
each component -1 and R-2).
o The Developer covenants and agrees to rent the affordable units in -'l and R-2 to
extremely lour and very love income households for a period of 55 years.
The Developer covenants and agrees to sale six 6 of the 32 homes at an affordable
housing cost.
In addition to the above, the Agency is responsible for delivering the sites free and clear of
all structures and to relocate all remaining tenants of its expense.
5A- 6
JT PIS CC -CRA station District Phase I
June, 2010
Page
Project Alternatives Considered In the EIl
The EIR evaluated six alternatives to the Transit Zoning Code and the Developer Project in EIC
Chapter 5 — Alternatives. These alternatives are briefly summarized below. Alternatives 1 � 2, and
3 are primarily designed to address alternatives to the Transit Zoning Code as a whole.
Alternatives 4, 5, and 6 present alternatives specific to the proposed Developer Project.
1l ema ive (No f o ecllNo Development Altemative): Under this Alternative, the Transit Zoning
Code would net be adopted and the City's existing General Plan and zoning designations would
continue to guide future growth and development ent within the Transit Zoning Code project area.
Additionally, the proposed Developer Project would not go forward on the Agency -owned
properties.
Altemative 2(Overall Reduced Density): This Alternative would reduce the intensity of all
anticipated land uses within the Transit Zoning Code area by 25 percent. In general, this
alternative would reduce the number of residences, including affordable housing, and reduce
employment ment opportunities as a result of less commercial uses in the area.
Af e ria l e 3 (Lour -Rise Alternative): This alternative is a low- to mid -rise version of the Transit
Zoning Code SD 84A and SD 8413), which would limit building heights in the Downtown and
Transit Village Districts to four stories.
l ema ive No Demolition of Agencyro er ies el a ili e in Place): This alternative would
eliminate the demolition of structures on the fourteen Agency -owned parcels within the Station
District that are slated for demolition under the proposed Developer Project and instead require
that these properties be retained and rehabilitated in their current locations. Additionally, the
City/Agency would net acquire any of additional parcels within the Station District. Upon
completion of rehabilitation, the rehabilitated houses would be offered for -sale as low or moderate
income housing. The proposed Transit Zoning Code would remain the same under this Alternative.
Alternative 5 (No Demolition of AgencyProp er ieslRelo a te to Agency -Owned infill
Si es Re 7a lli a e in Place): This alternative would eliminate the demolition on the fourteen
Agency -owned panels within the Station District that are slated for demolition under the proposed
Developer Project, with the exception of the property located at 611 N. (linter street, which would
he demolished. The remaining properties would be rehabilitated In place or roared to vacant lots
and rehabilitated.
l ernati e 6 eha iii a te 611 N. Min ter Street in Place): This alternative would be identical to the
proposed Developer Project, with the exception that the bungalow court located at 611 N. (hinter
5A- 7
JT FIS CC -CRA Station District Phase 1
June 7, 2010
Page
Street would be retained and rehabilitated. once rehabilitated, the units at 611 N. Minter Street
mull be offered for rent to very -low and extremely -lour income households.
As set forth in Section 3.4 of the attached
Considerations (Exhibit , specific economic,
adoption of these alternatives infeasible.
Community outreach
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding
legal, social, or other considerations make the
There has been extensive community outreach for this project, beginning with the earlier meetings
relating to the renaissance Flan. Specific to the Developer Project, staff began soliciting input
from area residents, businesses and other stakeholders in October 2009, following developer
selection. The key issues raised by those participating focused on affordable housing, park and
open space, and impacts to Garfield Elementary. The Developer and staff then worked together to
create a concept plan for further community input. The plan, shown on inhibit L, called for rental
and for sale housing on the scattered sites owned by the Agency, along with a new community
center at Garfield Elementary associated with proposed school renovation project) and an
approximate 1.2 acre park unrest of Lacy, south of 5th Street. It is important to point out that the
Santa Ana Unified School District hoard graciously agreed to reallocate funding for the proposed
school expansion and renovation project as a direct result of being approached by the City
regarding the community input received and the City's overall vision for the area. In addition,
members of the community participated in a bus tour to vier similar projects that the Related
Companies of California, LLC has undertaken In an effort to help the area residents visualize the
potential for the Agency -owned properties. The community input then was continued via
S C D—Santa Ana Collaborative for Responsible Development. ` h key representatives
include OCCORD, Kennedy Commission, OCCC , Latino health Access, and several area
residents as lead, along with Friends of Lacy, in relation to preservation of vintage homes in the
neighborhood. Staff has continued to keep other residents, businesses and stakeholders apprised
of these efforts.
SAC eD is requesting that the City, Agency and the Developer enter into a legally -binding contract
which SACT eD refers to as a Community Benefit Agreement (CBA). For reference purposes, the
most recut formal list of requests from SACI eD is attached (Exhibit M). S C eD has identified
five key areas of concern/interest, with specific requests to be ret by the Agency and the
Developer under the headings of safety, housing, open space, small business assistance and
cultural and historic preservation. In response to SACReD's request for a CBA, City staff proposed
a Memorandum of Understanding MO with SAC eD (Exhibit N) to address their concerns.
While agreement was not reached on every single point, the MOU demonstrates that all of
SACReD's requests were considered and analyzed for feasibility given the project scope and
funding sources.
5A-8
JT PSI CC -CRA Station District Phase I
June , 2010
Page
As of the writing of this report: agreement with SACReD with regard to a CBA has not been
reached. It is, therefore, recommended that the City/Agency take the actions/directives set forth
for various programs and improvements in the Lacy Neighborhood. Specifically, staff recommends
that the Cit Agency take the following actions to fulfill the requests made by the community:
- Direct staff to draft an inclusionary housing ordinance for City Council consideration
within the next 120 dans, covering the industrial overlay areas identified in the proposed
Transit Zoning Code;
Direct staff to negotiate a Tint Use Agreement with the Santa Ana Unified School
District SA SD for Garfield Elementary, including the provision of a community center;
- Authorize the expenditure of up to $25,000 as reimbursement to SAUSD for purposes of
engaging an architect to develop conceptual plans in furtherance of developing the
project scope for a community center to be located at Garfield Elementary; -
Direct staff to work with community members/stakeholders to facilitate development of
an approximate 1.5 arae park/open space uses in the Station District;
- Authorize the expenditure of up to $60,000 for cultural/historical markers to be installed
in the public right of way within the Station District in collaboration with SAC eD;
-- Direct the Executive Director to establish a targeted residential loan program for the Lacy
Neighborhood, and authorizing the expenditure of up to $109,000 for such purposes;
and
Direct staff to prepare a Relocation Plan for residents that may be displaced resulting
from any additional Agency acquisitions as it relates to the Station District.
The Developer has agreed to certain additional requests that will be reflected in the DDA between
the Agency and Station District, LLC. These include the provision of space in the -1 community
room for a childcare provider rent-free; public art equal in value t .5% of the rental building permit
valuation; and reduced rent for the business operator of the 1,500 square feet of retail space
planned for the R-1 parcel.
These actions taken as a whole will result in both tangible and social improvements for the Lacer
Neighborhood.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funds for the loan agreements, down payment assistance, historical markers, acquisitions and
residential rehabilitation program will be available in various Tax Increment accounts (los.
507188330-662203 50718830-691511 50718830-661003 57018830-66220). Funds for the
5A- 9
HJT PIS CC -CRA Station District Phase
June 7, 2010
Pae 1
reimbursement agreement and residential rehabilitation program will be in the Community
Development Block Grant Accounts (Nos. 13518780-62300 and 13518780-69152).
Jy . Trevi n
E tie Director
Planning & Building Agency
Shelly ry-Bayle
Housing Division Manager
Community Development Agency
APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCENTS:
Francisco Gutierrez
Executive Director
Finance & Management Services Agency
5A- 10
For Item #5A Exhibits,
please refer to the June 7, 2010
City Council Agenda
Joint City Council /Community
Redevelopment Agency Agenda Ite
m #80A