The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem 30 - Police Oversight Commission Ordinance Work Study Session City Manager’s Office www.santa-ana.org/cm Item # 30 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report September 16, 2025 TOPIC: Police Oversight Commission Ordinance Work Study Session AGENDA TITLE Police Oversight Commission Ordinance Work Study Session RECOMMENDED ACTION Receive presentation on Police Oversight Commission Ordinance, discuss options for an updated ordinance, and provide direction to staff. GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No DISCUSSION On July 15, 2025 City Council heard proposed amendments to Article IV to Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Police Oversight Commission (Exhibit 1). During this meeting, the City Council voted to hold a joint special meeting with the Police Oversight Commission, the Police Oversight Director, and the City Council within 60 days. Before that meeting, all members were to meet with the City Manager, City Attorney, Police Oversight Director, and Police Chief. Staff has met with Councilmembers and Commissioners to review the proposed ordinance amendments, answer questions and receive input. In addition, the Police Oversight Commission will hold a work study session on September 11, 2025, and recommendations are to be provided to City Council during the City Council work study session. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss potential changes to the Police Oversight Commission Ordinance, discuss options for an updated ordinance, and provide direction to staff. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT Police Oversight Commission Ordinance Work Study Session September 16, 2025 Page 2 5 3 4 0 There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Draft Ordinance (redline presented at July 15, 2025 City Council Meeting) 2. Government Code 3300-3313, Penal Codes 832.5, 832.7, 832.8, and Evidence Code 1040-1047 Submitted By: Sylvia Vazquez, Deputy City Manager Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 1 of 14 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING SECTIONS 2-660-2-669 OF CHAPTER 2 (ADMINISTRATION), ARTICLE IV, DIVISION 16 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING A POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. On November 15, 2022, the City Council adopted an Ordinance establishing a Police Oversight Commission. The purpose of the Police Oversight Commission is to enhance transparency, increase accountability of and public confidence in the Santa Ana Police Department and provide for an Independent Oversight Director to provide the Chief of Police, City Manager, and City Council independent investigations of, analysis and recommendations on police practices, police misconduct, officer involved shootings, and other serious uses of force. B. On October 6, 2023, the six appointed members of the Police Oversight Commission held their first official meeting, marking the operational launch of the Commission. Since that time, the Commission has met regularly and its members have completed the training requirements as outlined in the Ordinance. C. The subsequent implementation of the existing ordinance revealed operational and procedural challenges prompting the need for a comprehensive review of the Ordinance. In response, the Police Oversight Ad Hoc Committee convened to evaluate the current Ordinance and consider amendments. D. The proposed amendments reflect collaboration from the Ad Hoc Committee, legal counsel, City staff, and personnel from the Santa Ana Police Department. E. The objective of these amendments to the existing Police Oversight Commission Ordinance is to enhance transparency and consistency of the Ordinance, strengthen the Commission’s operational effectiveness and ensure full compliance with applicable state laws. Section 2. The City Council finds and determines that this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to CEQA and Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, the adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from CEQA review because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, as there is no possibility it will Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 2 of 14 have a significant effect on the environment and it is not a "project", as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 3. The Santa Ana City Council hereby amends Sections 2-660-2-669 of Chapter2, Article IV, Division 16 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code as follows (new language is underlined and deleted language is stricken): Sec. 2-660. Establishment and purpose. There is hereby established a Police Oversight Commission (hereinafter referred to as the "Commission"). The purpose of the Commission shall be to improve transparency, increase the accountability of and public confidence in the Santa Ana Police Department and to provide for an Independenta Police Oversight Director. The purpose of the Commission is to act through the IndependentPolice Oversight Director, independent of the police department, to provide the Chief of Police,City Council, and City Manager, and City Council independent investigationsa review of, analysis, and recommendations on police practices, police misconduct, officer-involved shootings, and other serious uses of force. Sec. 2-661. Police oversight commission membership and term. The Commission shall consist of seven (7) members to be appointed by the city council from the residents of the city.City Council, who meet the qualifications set forth in Section 2-662 of this ordinance. The city councilCity Council shall strive to appoint members who are fair and impartial, and who represent diverse social, economic, and politicalcommunity interests. The city councilCity Council shall consider the career and life experiences of Commission applicants and appoint those who are representative of the diversity of the Santa Ana community and whose knowledge and experiences will most benefit the Commission's ability to carry out its duties and responsibilities and build trust with the community. The City Council will strive to appoint applicantsCommissioners with knowledge and/or experience in the fields of human resources practices, management, policy development, auditing, law, investigations, social services, civil rights, and civil liberties. The City Clerk of the Council shall prepare application forms requiring applicantsprospective members to provide information demonstrating that they meet qualification requirements set forth in Section 2-662. Sec. 2-662. Qualifications of commissioners. (a) All members of the Commission shall reside in the City of Santa Ana. (b) Elected or appointed officers and employees serving the City shall not be eligible for appointment to the Commission. (c) Retired peace officers or peace officers who have separated from public service shall not be eligible for appointment to the Commission unless at least five (5) years has passed from the date of their separation from the governmental entity with which they were previously employed. Only one former or retired peace officer, who is appointed first in time, may serve on the Commission at any given time. "Peace Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 3 of 14 officer" as used herein shall have the same meaning and definition as set forth in California Penal Code sectionSection 830 et seq. (d) Practicing attorneys who handle, or are members of firms or entities that currently handle, criminal or civil matters involving the Santa Ana Police Department are ineligible to serve on the Commission. ( e) The appointment, removal, vacancies and term of Commissioners shall comply with SAMC 2-326. Sec. 2-663. Commissioner confidentiality and training. (a) Prior to attending their first Commission meeting, each Commissioner shall take an oath and execute a confidentiality agreement stating that they will not divulge or disseminate confidential information, including identities of witnesses and contents of confidential testimony and documents, either during their term of office or thereafter to ensure that confidential personnel information and other information subject to state law protections is not released or shared. Failure to comply with the terms of the confidentiality agreement shall result in removal from the Commission and/or other legal consequences in a Commissioner’s individual capacity, including but not limited to criminal and/or civil penalties. Removal of a Commissioner shall comply with SAMC Section 2-326. (b) No later than ninety (90) days after appointment, each member shall: (1.) Receive training in relevant subject matters, including, but not limited to, the Police Department's operations, policies, practices, procedures related to the following: internal affairsInternal Affairs investigations; authorized uses of force, including the use of deadly force, control devices, and techniques; uses of conducted energy device; handcuffing and restraints; detention and arrest of persons; search and seizure of persons and property; the department's established focus of de-escalation tactics, vehicle pursuits, and the duties, responsibilities, procedures, and requirements associated with all ranks and assignments facilitated by the IndependentPolice Oversight Director. 2. All training shall Training should be predominantly obtained from independentSanta Ana Police Department personnel, third-party bodies or institutions that have experience with internal affairs ofInternal Affairs investigations within police departments and civilian review investigations and audits. 3.(2) Attend training sessions sponsored by the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement or similar entities, or through presentations provided on topics including, at a minimum, constitutional rights and civil liberties, fundamentals of procedure, evidence, and due process, procedural rights and confidentialities afforded to police officers by California law (including, but not limited to, Government Code Section 3300 et seq., Penal Code Sections 832.7 and 832.8, and Evidence Code Sections 1040-1043), state use of force standards, police union contracts, labor rights, in-person implicit bias training, and best practices for conducting investigations. Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 4 of 14 (c) Members of the Commission, may, but are not required to, participate in (3) Participate in a ride-along with the Santa Ana Police Department. The Chief of Police shall facilitate a ride-along consisting of a minimum of 8 hours of field- based patrol operations. Current Commissioners shall participate in this ride- along within 90-days from the effective date of this ordinance. ( (c) Members of the Commission are required to attend and complete at minimum the following Santa Ana Police Academy Program courses: Communications, Patrol Operations, Santa Ana Jail, Crime Scene Investigations, Investigations/Internal Affairs, Air Support/Traffic Stops/Motor Officers/Directed Patrol, Use of Force, Homicide/Gangs/SWAT, within 18 months of appointment and/or the first available offering of the Program. Current Commissioners shall participate in this Community Academy within 18 months from the effective date of this ordinance. These classes are subject to change at the discretion of the City Manager. (d) Failure to comply with subsections (b) and (c) shall result in the member’s removal from the Commission by the appointing Council Member. Sec. 2-664. Meetings. The Commission shall hold its first meeting when there are a sufficient numbermeet the second Thursday of appointed each month with a majority of Commissioners to constitute a quorum. At such meeting, the Commission shall fix starting at 5pm at a location designated by the time and place of regularly scheduled meetings which shall not meet less than once each monthCity Manager. The City Manager or their designee shall attend all regular and special meetings of the Commission and provide regular staff support to the Commission. The Police Chief or their designee shall also attend such meetings as requested by the Commission. ( If a Commissioner wishes to propose an item for placement on a future Meeting Agenda, the Commissioner shall prepare a written memorandum describing the proposed item and, after consulting with the Police Oversight Director and the City Manager, submit it to the City Manager. The memorandum shall be included for consideration at a regular meeting as a Commissioner requested item. The Commission may, by a majority vote of its members present, direct that the proposed item be added to the agenda for a future meeting. The City Manager or their designee also has the discretion for placing items on the Meeting Agenda. Sec. 2-665. Powers and duties of the police oversight commissionPolice Oversight Commission. To effectuate its purpose, the Commission shall: (a) Review, evaluate and make recommendations to the Chief of Police and City CouncilManager regarding the Police Department's policies, practices, and procedures, develop programs and strategies to promote positive police- community relations, and make appropriate recommendations to the City Manager and the City Council.. Within thirty (30) days after receiving such recommendations, the City Manager or designee shall submit a response to the Commission. If the Commission is dissatisfied with the response, the Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 5 of 14 Commission may submit its recommendations to the City Council. The City Manager may extend for an additional thirty (30) days the time periodsperiod in which they are required to submit their responses to the Commission by giving the Commission written notice of such extension. (b) Receive, hear, and review misconduct complaints, tort claims, or lawsuits: (1) Tort Claims; (2) Lawsuits; (3) Complaints made against on-duty Santa Ana Police Officers which allege Santa Ana Police Officers have engaged in the following conduct: (1) only when the Internal Affairs Investigation is completed and the complaint alleges: (i) officer-involved shootings-discharge of a firearm at a person by a Santa Ana peace officer that results in death; (2) in-custody deaths; (3) (ii) uses of force that result in great bodily injury of a person; (4) (4) Complaints made against Santa Ana Police Officers only when the Internal Affairs Investigation is completed with sustained findings for the following conduct: (i) prejudice or discrimination involving a protected class; (5) (ii) dishonesty; (6) (iii) sexual assault; (7) (iv) unlawful arrest or unlawful search; (8) (v) unreasonable or excessive force; (9) or (vi) failure to intervene against another officer using force that is clearly unreasonable/excessive; or. (10(c) Receive, hear, and review the following two categories: (1) In-custody deaths; (2) unlawful activities/conduct that interferes with First Amendment assemblies. (c) All complaints to(d) Allegations of misconduct not specifically enumerated in subparagraphs (b) and (c) shall not be heard or reviewed by the Commission must be, but shall be forwarded to the Chief of Police or designee within five (5) days of receipt by the Commission. (e) Review complaints submitted in writing on forms supplied by the Department or, the Commission, or submitted to the online portal. Anonymous complaints will be accepted. However, anonymity may limit the ability to thoroughly investigate and address the complaint. The Commission will not be authorized to retroactively conductCommission’s authority to review previously completed investigations of complaints.will comply with Penal Code Sections 832.5, 832.7 and 832.8. Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 6 of 14 (1) A copy of each complaint, tort claim, and/or lawsuit that alleges misconduct as set forth in sectionSection 2-665(b), regardless of where or how it is filed or) and (c) submitted to the Commission, shall immediately be forwarded to the members of the Commission, the IndependentPolice Oversight Director, the City Manager, and the Chief of Police. (2) No complaint shall be accepted, or reviewed, or investigated by the Commission or the IndependentPolice Oversight Director if it is not filed/submitted within one (1) year after the alleged misconduct by a Santa Ana Police Officer. (3) All Commission discussions with the IndependentPolice Oversight Director concerning alleged misconduct by any Santa Ana Police Officer shall be held in closed session. At least ten (10) days' advance written notice of the date of the meeting in which a specific officer will be discussed in closed session shall be provided to the complainant and the named police officer and their legal counsel, if known to the Commission and shall be deemed confidential. (df) Receive and discuss reports from the IndependentPolice Oversight Director on all incidents involving the following types of alleged misconduct by Santa Ana Police Officers: only when the complaint alleges: (1) officer Officer-involved shootings-discharge of a firearm at a person by a Santa Ana peace officer that results in death; (2) in-custody deaths; (3) uses Uses of force that result in great bodily injury of a person;. (4) (3) Complaints made against Santa Ana Police Officers only when the Internal Affairs Investigation is completed with sustained findings for the following conduct: (i) prejudice or discrimination involving a protected class; (5) (ii) dishonesty; (6) (iii) sexual assault; (7) (iv) unlawful arrest or unlawful search; (8) (v) unreasonable or excessive force; (9) or (vi) failure to intervene against another officer using force that is clearly unreasonable/excessive; or. (10) (4) In-custody deaths and unlawful activities/conduct that interferes with First Amendment assemblies. (eg) Direct the IndependentPolice Oversight Director to independently review and investigate, analyze and make recommendations regarding citizen complaints, tort claims, or lawsuits alleging the types of police misconduct as identified in sectionSection 2-665(b) or when the City Council provides authorizationand (c), unless there is pending Internal Affairs investigation at which time the Commission may, in Closed Session, review those misconduct complaints Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 7 of 14 when the Internal Affairs investigation is completed pursuant to Santa Ana City Charter Section 1100 subject to the restrictions set forth in Government Code Section 3300 et seq., California Penal Code Sections 832.5, 832.7 and 832.8, Evidence Code Sections 1043 through 1046, the Santa Ana Charter and Municipal Code, the MOU that applies to the impacted member, and Santa Ana Police Department's policies and procedures. (f) The Independent h) Authorize the Police Oversight Director shall review and investigate timely filed/submitted complaints as soon as possible. Pursuant to Santa Ana City Charter audit completed Internal Affairs files involving misconduct for the categories outlined in Section 1100, the City Council hereby authorizes the Independent Oversight Director to subpoena witnesses, administer oaths and compel the production of evidence for their independent investigation. At the conclusion of the investigation, the Independent 2-665(b) and (c). The Police Oversight Director shall submit aaudit findings to the City Manager within thirty (30) days who will then provide it to the Commission within thirty (30) days. (i) Advise the Mayor, City Council, City Manager and Police Chief on community relation issues involving the Police Department. (j) Prepare and submit an annual report with findings to the City Council concerning the Commission's activities, and recommendations, orally and in writing, to the Commission. (1) Upon receipt of the Independent Oversight Director's report, the Commission may: (i) Direct the Independent Oversight Director to investigate the complaint further; (ii) Forward the Commission's findings and recommendations concerning the complaint to the City Manager based upon the Independent Oversight Director's report; and (iii) Make disciplinary recommendations to the Police Chief and/or the City Manager, when a complaint of misconduct has been sustained against a Santa Ana Police Officer subject to the restrictions set forth in Government Code Section 3300 et seq., California . The annual report shall align with Penal Code Sections 832.5, 832.7 and 832.8, Evidence Code Sections 1043 through 1046, the Santa Ana Charter and Municipal Code, the MOU that applies to the impacted member, and the Police Department's policies and procedures. This subdivision does not, however, provide the Commission or the Independent Oversight Director the authority to impose any discipline on any member of the Police Department. All discipline ultimately imposed on any peace officer and must comply with all federal, state and local laws, including, but not limited to, Government Code Section 3303, et seq., Penal Code Sections 832.5, 832.7 and 832.8, Evidence Code Sections 1043 through 1046, Chapter 9, Article V of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the MOU that applies to the impacted member, Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 8 of 14 and theSanta Ana Police Department's policies and procedures. Unless extended by the Commission, within sixty (60) days after receiving such recommendations, the Police Chief or City Manager shall submit a response to the Commission. If the Commission is dissatisfied with the response, the commission may submit its recommendations to the City Council. The Police Chief and/or City Manager may extend for an additional thirty (30) days the time periods in which they are required to submit their responses to the Commission by giving the Commission written notice of such extension. (g) Authorize the Independent Oversight Director to audit complaint files and review policies to ensure best practices are implemented. (h) Advise the Mayor, City Council, City Manager and Police Chief on community relations issues involving the Police Department. (i) Review any Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Santa Ana Police Officers Association or the City and the Santa Ana Police Management Association, and provide suggestions and recommendations concerning negotiations to the City Manager and the City Council. (j) Conduct public meetings to educate the community on the purpose of the Police Oversight Commission and provide a forum for discussions about police policies, practices, and procedures. (k) Prepare and submit an annual report to the City Council concerning the Commission's activities, findings and recommendations. The annual report shall ; and include, at a minimum, the following: (1) The number of investigations initiatedInternal Affairs investigation reviews conducted during the annual reporting period and data summarizing the nature of the alleged or actual underlying conduct; (2) The number of investigations concludedInternal Affairs investigation reviews conducted during the reporting period, and, of those investigationsreviews, the number that took more than six (6) months to conclude and data summarizing the nature of the alleged or actual underlying conduct; (3) The number of Internal Affairs investigations pending as of the end of the reporting period and data summarizing the nature of the alleged or actual underlying conduct; (4) The number of complaints not sustained during the reporting period and data summarizing the nature of the alleged or actual underlying conduct; The number of complaints sustained during the reporting period and data summarizing the nature of the alleged or actual underlying conduct; The number of complaints filed against each police officer during the reporting and data summarizing the nature of the alleged or actual underlying conduct; Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 9 of 14 The number of disciplinary recommendations issued to the Police Chief and City Manager, as well as the number of recommendations accepted and rejected; The number of complaints referred to other agencies during the reporting period and the identity of such other agencies and data regarding summarizing the nature of the alleged or actual underlying conduct;; (5) The reports or recommendations submitted to the City Council, Police Chief, and City Manager concerning Commission regulations, legislation, or budgetary allocation and Police department policies, procedures, customs, orders, collective bargaining agreements, programs, and training, as well as the appropriate party's response to such reports or recommendations. (l) Perform such other duties as requested by the City Council. All staff work must comply with all federal, state and local laws, including, but not limited to, Government Code Section 3303, et seq., Penal Code Sections 832.5, 832.7 and 832.8, Evidence Code Sections 1043 through 1046, Chapter 9, Article V of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the MOU that applies to the impacted member and Santa Ana Police Department's policies and procedures. (m(k) References to Santa Ana Police Department's policies and procedures in this Division shall mean all current policies and procedures in place that apply to administrative/internal affairs investigations.Administrative/Internal Affairs Investigations. Those policies and procedures shall not be amended in any way that may conflict with this article, unless otherwise required by law. Sec. 2-666. Appointment and role of an independent oversight director. (a) The City Council does hereby authorize the appointment of an Independent Police Oversight Director, pursuant to City Charter Section 1100 and in accordance with this Section 1100. (a) The City Manager shall appoint the IndependentPolice Oversight Director. subject to confirmation by the City Council. The IndependentPolice Oversight Director mayshall be engaged through a professional services agreement or may be hired as an exempt at-will City employee who willand shall serve at the will and pleasure of the City Council and will be subject to removal by majority vote of the City Council. Manager. (b) In addition to regular staff support provided to the Commission, the Independent(b) The Police Oversight Director shall assist the Commission in performing its duties and exercising its powers. (c) After receiving a complaint, tort claim, or lawsuit and when directed by the Commission, the Independent Oversight Director shall, in accordance with this division, conduct investigations of allegations of on-duty Santa Ana Police Officers who have engaged in the following conduct: (1) officer-involved shootings-discharge of a firearm at a person by a Santa Ana peace officer that results in death; Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 10 of 14 (2) in-custody deaths; (3) uses of force that resulted in great bodily injury of a person; (4) prejudice or discrimination involving a protected class; (5) dishonesty; (6) sexual assault; (7) unlawful arrest or unlawful search; (8) unreasonable or excessive force; (9) failure to intervene against another officer using force that is clearly unreasonable/excessive; or (10) unlawful activities/conduct that interferes with First Amendment assemblies. In addition to conducting investigations of complaints, tort claims, and/or lawsuits alleging the type of misconduct set forth in section 2-665(b), the Independent Oversight Director shall also have the independent authority to periodically request and review citizen complaints and "use of force" reports or other pertinent documents maintained by, or available to, the Chief of Police to determine whether death or great bodily injury was caused by direct police action. No investigations(c) The Police Oversight Director shall review and refer to the Chief of Police or its designee timely filed/submitted complaints for the Chief of Police to review and initiate an Internal Affairs investigation. In the event there is a pending Internal Affairs Investigation of police misconduct for the categories outlined in Section 2-665(b) and (c), the Internal Affairs investigation shall take priority pursuant to Government Code Section 3304(d)(1) [within one year of the public agency’s discovery by a person authorized to initiate an investigation of the allegation of an act, omission, or other misconduct.] Prior to the final determination by the Chief of Police, the Internal Affairs investigation shall be forwarded to the Police Oversight Director for review, analysis and recommendation to the Commission. Within 45 calendar days from the receipt and at the conclusion of the review by the Commission, the Police Oversight Director shall submit a report with the Commission’s recommendations to the Chief of Police. The Chief of Police shall make best efforts to wait for recommendation(s) from the Commission prior to rendering a final decision, unless doing so would compromise the statute of limitations as set forth in Government Code 3304(d). (d) No review of completed Internal Affairs Investigations shall be commenced on any incidents that occurred prior to the effective date of the Ordinance enacting this Division. Any review of historical data or incidents must comply with all federal, state and local laws, including, but not limited to, Government Code Section 3303, et seq., Penal Code Sections 832.5, 832.7 and 832.8, Evidence Code Sections 1043 through 1046, Chapter 9, Article V of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the MOU that applies to the impacted member and Santa Ana Police Department's policies and procedures. Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 11 of 14 (de) The IndependentPolice Oversight Director shall conduct all audits and investigationsreviews in a fair, objective, impartial, and ethical manner, and shall comply with the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights (Government Code Section 3300, et seq.) in interviewing police officers..). The IndependentPolice Oversight Director shall prepare a written report of each reviewed investigation that will constitute the public record and may discuss confidential or privileged information with the Commission in a properly notice closed session. The report shall comply with the provisions of Penal Code Sections 832.5, 832.7 and 832.8 and Evidence Code Sections 1043 through 1046. After review by the Commission, the public recordrecords of the investigationinvestigations for the categories of specified conduct outlined in Section 2-665(b) and (c) shall be posted on the publicCity’s website for the Commission within thirty (30) days. All disclosures. Disclosures of investigations conductedreviewed by the IndependentPolice Oversight Director shall comply with California Penal Code Sections 832.5, 832.7 and 832.8 and California Evidence Code Sections 1043 through 1046, as amended from time to time. The IndependentPolice Oversight Director may discuss findingsconclusions with the Commission and/or the public in strict compliance with California Penal Code Sections 832.5, 832.7 and 832.8 and California Government Code Sections 3300, et seq. (e) The City Manager or their designee shall assist with advertising the position of Independent Oversight Director and shall prepare the necessary documents to engage the Independent Oversight Director. The City Council shall review all qualifying applications and select no more than three (3) applicants to interview for the role of Oversight Director. The Commission shall be permitted the opportunity to review the top three (3) applicants and recommend a candidate to the City Council. The Independent Oversight Director shall be authorized by the City Council under Charter Section 1100 to report directly to the City Council. Sec. 2-667. Budget and support for commission and oversight director. The City Manager shall make a recommendation to the city councilCity Council, as part of the annual City budget, to fund the Commission and any additional labor, consulting, equipment, training, or materials necessary for the Commission and the IndependentPolice Oversight Director to carry out the duties and exercise the powers set forth in this Division. Sec. 2-668 Access to police department records, data and reports. To effectuate meaningful oversight and accountability, the Commission and the IndependentPolice Oversight Director shall have complete and prompt access to all relevant police department records, information, and data, including, but not limited to, audio and video recordings, photographs, police reports, dispatch logs, and other records related to the underlying incidentcategories of oversight as set forth in Section 2-665(b) and (c), to assist the Commission and the IndependentPolice Oversight Director in effectively discharging their respective duties, subject to all federal, state and local laws including any and all restrictions set forth in the Santa Ana Charter, Municipal Codebut not limited to, Government Code Section 3303, et seq., Penal Code Sections Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 12 of 14 832.5, 832.7 and 832.8, Evidence Code Sections 1043 through 1046, Chapter 9, Article V of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the MOU that applies to the impacted member, Santa Ana Police Department's policies and procedures, and the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights (Government Code Section 3300, et seq.). The Police Department shall designate staff who will timely receive and process requests for records made by the Commission and/or the IndependentPolice Oversight Director. To increase transparency, all data including, but not limited to, stop, detention, arrest, and use of force data, including Racial and Identity Profiling Act ("RIPA") data and reports, that are legally disclosed to the Department of Justice and/or any other federal or state law enforcement agency, shall, at the time of disclosure of that data, be concurrently provided to the Commission and the IndependentPolice Oversight Director. Any information that is confidential and prohibited from disclosure shall be redacted. Sec. 2-669. Rules and records. The for Conducting Commission shall, in consultationBusiness. The City Manager will consult with the IndependentPolice Oversight Director and the City Manager, to develop rules for the transaction of business of theconducting Commission, which rules shall, among other things, include the manner of calling and giving notice of special meetings and hearings, and the appointment and powers of ad hoc and standing subcommittees. Said subcommittees may be formed to work on various topics within the scope of police activities. business. The city councilCity Manager shall adopt the rules for the transaction of business of the Commission. The Commission shall also keep records ofmaintain its resolutions, rules, transactions, motions, orders, findings, and recommendations and determinations. Except , except for those items made confidential by California Penal Code Sections 832.5, 832.7 and 832.8, Evidence Code Sections 1043-1046 or by any other applicable privileges under the law, the records. The resolutions, rules, transactions, motions, and recommendations of the Commission shall be open to the public. Commission reports shall be posted on the City's website and open to public inspection, except that. Any information contained therein that is confidential and prohibited from disclosure under any other applicable law shall be redacted. Sec. 2-670. Severability. Should any provision of this division, or its application to any person or circumstance, be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unlawful, unenforceable or otherwise void, that determination shall have no effect on any other provision of this division or Chapter or the application of this Division or Chapter to any other person or circumstance and, to that end, the provisions hereof are severable. Secs. 2-671—2-699 Reserved. Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 13 of 14 it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 5. This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 6. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED this _______ day of ___________, 2025. _________________________ Valeria Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: _________________________ Jonathan T. Martinez Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers: _________________________________ NOES:Councilmembers: _________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: _________________________________ NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: _________________________________ Ordinance No. NS-XXX Page 14 of 14 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, ______________, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS-______ to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on _____________________, and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: ______________________ ________________________________ City Clerk City of Santa Ana State of California GOVERNMENT CODE Section 3300 3300. This chapter is known and may be cited as the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act. (Added by Stats. 1976, Ch. 465.) Government Code - GOV TITLE 1. GENERAL [100 - 7931.000] ( Title 1 enacted by Stats. 1943, Ch. 134. ) DIVISION 4. PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES [1000 - 3599.84] ( Division 4 enacted by Stats. 1943, Ch. 134. ) CHAPTER 9.7. Public Safety Officers [3300 - 3313] ( Chapter 9.7 added by Stats. 1976, Ch. 465. ) 3300. This chapter is known and may be cited as the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act. (Added by Stats. 1976, Ch. 465.) 3301. For purposes of this chapter, the term public safety officer means all peace officers specified in Sections 830.1, 830.2, 830.3, 830.31, 830.32, 830.33, except subdivision (e), 830.34, 830.35, except subdivision (c), 830.36, 830.37, 830.38, 830.4, and 830.5 of the Penal Code. The Legislature hereby finds and declares that the rights and protections provided to peace officers under this chapter constitute a matter of statewide concern. The Legislature further finds and declares that effective law enforcement depends upon the maintenance of stable employer-employee relations, between public safety employees and their employers. In order to assure that stable relations are continued throughout the state and to further assure that effective services are provided to all people of the state, it is necessary that this chapter be applicable to all public safety officers, as defined in this section, wherever situated within the State of California. (Amended by Stats. 1990, Ch. 675, Sec. 1.) 3302. (a) Except as otherwise provided by law, or whenever on duty or in uniform, no public safety officer shall be prohibited from engaging, or be coerced or required to engage, in political activity. (b) No public safety officer shall be prohibited from seeking election to, or serving as a member of, the governing board of a school district. (Amended by Stats. 1978, Ch. 1173.) 3303. When any public safety officer is under investigation and subjected to interrogation by his or her commanding officer, or any other member of the employing public safety department, that could lead to punitive action, the interrogation shall be conducted under the following conditions. For the purpose of this chapter, punitive action means any action that may lead to dismissal, demotion, suspension, reduction in salary, written reprimand, or transfer for purposes of punishment. (a) The interrogation shall be conducted at a reasonable hour, preferably at a time when the public safety officer is on duty, or during the normal wa king hours for the public safety officer, unless the seriousness of the investigation requires otherwise. If the interrogation does occur during off-duty time of the public safety officer being interrogated, the public safety officer shall be compensated f or any off-duty time in accordance with regular department procedures, and the public safety officer shall not be released from employment for any work missed. (b) The public safety officer under investigation shall be informed prior to the interrogation o f the rank, EXHIBIT 2 name, and command of the officer in charge of the interrogation, the interrogating officers, and all other persons to be present during the interrogation. All questions directed to the public safety officer under interrogation shall be asked by and through no more than two interrogators at one time. (c) The public safety officer under investigation shall be informed of the nature of the investigation prior to any interrogation. (d) The interrogating session shall be for a reasonable period taking into consideration gravity and complexity of the issue being investigated. The person under interrogation shall be allowed to attend to his or her own personal physical necessities. (e) The public safety officer under interrogation shall not be subjected to offensive language or threatened with punitive action, except that an officer refusing to respond to questions or submit to interrogations shall be informed that failure to answer questions directly related to the investigation or interrogation may result in punitive action. No promise of reward shall be made as an inducement to answering any question. The employer shall not cause the public safety officer under interrogation to be subjected to visits by the press or news media without his or her express consent nor shall his or her home address or photograph be given to the press or news media without his or her express consent. (f) No statement made during interrogation by a public safety officer under duress, coercion, or threat of punitive action shall be admissible in any subsequent civil proceeding. This subdivision is subject to the following qualifications: (1) This subdivision shall not limit the use of statements made by a public safety officer when the employing public safety department is seeking civil sanctions against any public safety officer, including disciplinary action brought under Section 19572. (2) This subdivision shall not prevent the admissibility of statements made by the public safety officer under interrogation in any civil action, including administrative actions, brought by that public safety officer, or that officer’s exclusive representative, arising out of a disciplinary action. (3) This subdivision shall not prevent statements made by a public safety officer under interro gation from being used to impeach the testimony of that officer after an in camera review to determine whether the statements serve to impeach the testimony of the officer. (4) This subdivision shall not otherwise prevent the admissibility of statements made by a public safety officer under interrogation if that officer subsequently is deceased. (g) The complete interrogation of a public safety officer may be recorded. If a tape recording is made of the interrogation, the public safety officer shall have access to the tape if any further proceedings are contemplated or prior to any further interrogation at a subsequent time. The public safety officer shall be entitled to a transcribed copy of any notes made by a stenographer or to any reports or complaints made by investigators or other persons, except those which are deemed by the investigating agency to be confidential. No notes or reports that are deemed to be confidential may be entered in the officer’s personnel file. The public safety officer being in terrogated shall have the right to bring his or her own recording device and record any and all aspects of the interrogation. (h) If prior to or during the interrogation of a public safety officer it is deemed that he or she may be charged with a criminal offense, he or she shall be immediately informed of his or her constitutional rights. (i) Upon the filing of a formal written statement of charges, or whenever an interrogation focuses on matters that are likely to result in punitive action against any pub lic safety officer, that officer, at his or her request, shall have the right to be represented by a representative of his or her choice who may be present at all times during the interrogation. The representative shall not be a person subject to the same investigation. The representative shall not be required to disclose, nor be subject to any punitive action for refusing to disclose, any information received from the officer under investigation for noncriminal matters. This section shall not apply to any interrogation of a public safety officer in the normal course of duty, counseling, instruction, or informal verbal admonishment by, or other routine or unplanned contact with, a supervisor or any other public safety officer, nor shall this section apply to an investigation concerned solely and directly with alleged criminal activities. (j) No public safety officer shall be loaned or temporarily reassigned to a location or duty assignment if a sworn member of his or her department would not normally be sent to that location or would not normally be given that duty assignment under similar circumstances. (Amended by Stats. 1994, Ch. 1259, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 1995.) 3304. (a) No public safety officer shall be subjected to punitive action, or denied p romotion, or be threatened with any such treatment, because of the lawful exercise of the rights granted under this chapter, or the exercise of any rights under any existing administrative grievance procedure. Nothing in this section shall preclude a head of an agency from ordering a public safety officer to cooperate with other agencies involved in criminal investigations. If an officer fails to comply with such an order, the agency may officially charge him or her with insubordination. (b) No punitive action, nor denial of promotion on grounds other than merit, shall be undertaken by any public agency against any public safety officer who has successfully completed the probationary period that may be required by his or her employing agency without providin g the public safety officer with an opportunity for administrative appeal. (c) No chief of police may be removed by a public agency, or appointing authority, without providing the chief of police with written notice and the reason or reasons therefor and an opportunity for administrative appeal. For purposes of this subdivision, the removal of a chief of police by a public agency or appointing authority, for the purpose of implementing the goals or policies, or both, of the public agency or appointing authority, for reasons including, but not limited to, incompatibility of managem ent styles or as a result of a change in administration, shall be sufficient to constitute “reason or reasons.” Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to create a property interest, where one does not exist by rule or law, in the job of Chief of Police. (d) (1) Except as provided in this subdivision and subdivision (g), no punitive action, nor denial of promotion on grounds other than merit, shall be undertaken for any act, omission, or other allegation of misconduct if the investigation of the allegation is not completed within one year of the public agency’s discovery by a person authorized to initiate an investigation of the allegation of an act, omission, or other misconduct. This one-year limitation period shall apply only if the act, omission, or other misconduct occurred on or after January 1, 1998. In the event that the public agency determines that discipline may be taken, it shall complete its investigation and notify the public safety officer of its proposed discipline by a Letter of Intent or Notice of Adverse Action articulating the discipline that year, except as provided in paragraph (2). The public agency shall not be required to impose the discipline within that one-year period. (2) (A) If the act, omission, or other allegation of misconduct is also the subject of a criminal investigation or criminal prosecution, the time during which the criminal investigation or criminal prosecution is pending shall toll the one-year time period. (B) If the public safety officer waives the one-year time period in writing, the time period shall be tolled for the period of time specified in the written waiver. (C) If the investigation is a multijurisdictional investigation that requires a reasonable extension for coordination of the involved agencies. (D) If the investigation involves more than one employee and requires a reasonable extension. (E) If the investigation involves an employee who is incapacitated or otherwise unavailable. (F) If the investigation involves a matter in civil litigation where the public safety officer is named as a party defendant, the one-year time period shall be tolled while that civil action is pending. (G) If the investigation involves a matter in criminal litigation where the complainant is a criminal defendant, the one-year time period shall be tolled during the period of that defendant’s criminal investigation and prosecution. (H) If the investigation involves an allegation of workers’ compensation fraud on the part of the public safety officer. (e) Where a predisciplinary response or grievance procedure is required or utilized, the time for this response or procedure shall not be governed or limited by this chapter. (f) If, after investigation and any predisciplinary response or procedure, the public agency decides to impose discipline, the public agency shall notify the public safety officer in writing of its decision to impose discipline, including the date that the discipline will be imposed, within 30 days of its decision, except if the public safety officer is unavailable for discipline. (g) Notwithstanding the one-year time period specified in subdivision (d), an investigation may be reopened against a public safety officer if both of the following circumstances exist: (1) Significant new evidence has been discovered that is likely to affect the outcome of the investigation. (2) One of the following conditions exist: (A) The evidence could not reasonably have been discovered in the normal course of investigation without resorting to extraordinary measures by the agency. (B) The evidence resulted from the public safety officer’s predisciplinary response or procedure. (h) For those members listed in subdivision (a) of Section 830.2 of the Penal Code, the 30 -day time period provided for in subdivision (f) shall not commence with the service of a preliminary notice of adverse action, should the public agency elect to provide the public safety officer with such a notice. (Amended by Stats. 2009, Ch. 494, Sec. 1. (AB 955) Effective January 1, 2010.) 3304.5. An administrative appeal instituted by a public safety officer under this chapter shall be conducted in conformance with rules and procedures adopted by the local public agency. (Added by Stats. 1998, Ch. 263, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 1999.) 3305. No public safety officer shall have any comment adverse to his interest entered in his personnel file, or any other file used for any personnel purposes by his employer, without the public safety officer having first read and signed the instrument containing the adverse comment indicating he is aware of such comment, except that such entry may be made if after reading such instrument the public safety officer refuses to sign it. Should a public safety officer refuse to sign, that fact shall be noted on that document, and signed or initialed by such officer. (Added by Stats. 1976, Ch. 465.) 3305.5. (a) A punitive action, or denial of promotion on grounds other than merit, shall not be undertaken by any public agency against any public safety officer solely because that officer’s name has been placed on a Brady list, or that the officer’s name may otherwise be subject to dis closure pursuant to Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83. (b) This section shall not prohibit a public agency from taking punitive action, denying promotion on grounds other than merit, or taking other personnel action against a public safety officer based on the underlying acts or omissions for which that officer’s name was placed on a Brady list, or may otherwise be subject to disclosure pursuant to Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83, if the actions taken by the public agency otherwise conform to this chapter and to the rules and procedures adopted by the local agency. (c) Evidence that a public safety officer’s name has been placed on a Brady list, or may otherwise be subject to disclosure pursuant to Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83, shall not be i ntroduced for any purpose in any administrative appeal of a punitive action, except as provided in subdivision (d). (d) Evidence that a public safety officer’s name was placed on a Brady list may only be introduced if, during the administrative appeal of a punitive action against an officer, the underlying act or omission for which that officer’s name was placed on a Brady list is proven and the officer is found to be subject to some form of punitive action. If the hearing officer or other administrative ap peal tribunal finds or determines that a public safety officer has committed the underlying acts or omissions that will result in a punitive action, denial of a promotion on grounds other than merit, or any other adverse personnel action, and evidence exists that a public safety officer’s name has been placed on a Brady list, or may otherwise be subject to disclosure pursuant to Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83, then the evidence shall be introduced for the sole purpose of determining the type or level of punitive action to be imposed. (e) For purposes of this section, “Brady list” means any system, index, list, or other record containing the names of peace officers whose personnel files are likely to contain evidence of dishonesty or bias, which is maintained by a prosecutorial agency or office in accordance with the holding in Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83. (Added by Stats. 2013, Ch. 779, Sec. 1. (SB 313) Effective January 1, 2014.) 3306. A public safety officer shall have 30 days within which to file a written response to any adverse comment entered in his personnel file. Such written response shall be attached to, and shall accompany, the adverse comment. (Added by Stats. 1976, Ch. 465.) 3306.5. (a) Every employer shall, at reasonable times and at reasonable intervals, upon the request of a public safety officer, during usual business hours, with no loss of compensation to the officer, permit that officer to inspect personnel files that are used or have been used to determine that officer’s qualifications for employment, promotion, additional compensation, or termination or other disciplinary action. (b) Each employer shall keep each public safety officer’s personnel file or a true and correct copy thereof , and shall make the file or copy thereof available within a reasonable period of time after a request therefor by the officer. (c) If, after examination of the officer’s personnel file, the officer believes that any portion of the material is mistakenly or unlawfully placed in the file, the officer may request, in writing, that the mistaken or unlawful portion be corrected or deleted. Any request made pursuant to this subdivision shall include a statement by the officer describing the corrections or deletions from the personnel file requested and the reasons supporting those corrections or deletions. A statement submitted pursuant to this subdivision shall become part of the personnel file of the officer. (d) Within 30 calendar days of receipt of a request made pursuant to subdivision (c), the employer shall either grant the officer’s request or notify the officer of the decision to refuse to grant the request. If the employer refuses to grant the request, in whole or in part, the employer shall state in writing the reasons for refusing the request, and that written statement shall become part of the personnel file of the officer. (Added by Stats. 2000, Ch. 209, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2001.) 3307. (a) No public safety officer shall be compelled to submit to a lie detector test against hi s or her will. No disciplinary action or other recrimination shall be taken against a public safety officer refusing to submit to a lie detector test, nor shall any comment be entered anywhere in the investigator’s notes or anywhere else that the public safety officer refused to take, or did not take, a lie detector test, nor shall any testimony or evidence be admissible at a subsequent hearing, trial, or proceeding, judicial or administrative, to the effect that the public safety officer refused to take, or was subjected to, a lie detector test. (b) For the purpose of this section, “lie detector” means a polygraph, deceptograph, voice stress analyzer, psychological stress evaluator, or any other similar device, whether mechanical or electrical, that is used, or the results of which are used, for the purpose of rendering a diagnostic opinion regarding the honesty or dishonesty of an individual. (Amended by Stats. 1998, Ch. 112, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 1999.) 3307.5. (a) No public safety officer shall be required as a condition of employment by his or her employing public safety department or other public agency to consent to the use of his or her photograph or identity as a public safety officer on the Intern et for any purpose if that officer reasonably believes that the disclosure may result in a threat, harassment, intimidation, or harm to that officer or his or her family. (b) Based upon his or her reasonable belief that the disclosure of his or her photogr aph or identity as a public safety officer on the Internet as described in subdivision (a) may result in a threat, harassment, intimidation, or harm, the officer may notify the department or other public agency to cease and desist from that disclosure. After the notification to cease and desist, the officer, a district attorney, or a United States Attorney may seek an injunction prohibiting any official or unofficial use by the department or other public agency on the Internet of his or her photograph or id entity as a public safety officer. The court may impose a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500) per day commencing two working days after the date of receipt of the notification to cease and desist. (Added by Stats. 1999, Ch. 338, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2000.) 3308. No public safety officer shall be required or requested for purposes of job assignment or other personnel action to disclose any item of his property, income, assets, source of income, debts or personal or domestic expenditures (including those of any member of his family or household) unless such information is obtained or required under state law or proper legal procedure, tends to indicate a conflict of interest with respect to the performance of his offi cial duties, or is necessary for the employing agency to ascertain the desirability of assigning the public safety officer to a specialized unit in which there is a strong possibility that bribes or other improper inducements may be offered. (Added by Stats. 1976, Ch. 465.) 3309. No public safety officer shall have his locker, or other space for storage that may be assigned to him searched except in his presence, or with his consent, or unless a valid search warrant has been obtained or where he has been notified that a search will be conducted. This section shall apply only to lockers or other space for storage that are owned or leased by the employing agency. (Added by Stats. 1976, Ch. 465.) 3309.5. (a) It shall be unlawful for any public safety depart ment to deny or refuse to any public safety officer the rights and protections guaranteed to him or her by this chapter. (b) Nothing in subdivision (h) of Section 11181 shall be construed to affect the rights and protections afforded to state public safety officers under this chapter or under Section 832.5 of the Penal Code. (c) The superior court shall have initial jurisdiction over any proceeding brought by any public safety officer against any public safety department for alleged violations of this chapt er. (d) (1) In any case where the superior court finds that a public safety department has violated any of the provisions of this chapter, the court shall render appropriate injunctive or other extraordinary relief to remedy the violation and to prevent future violations of a like or similar nature, including, but not limited to, the granting of a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, or permanent injunction prohibiting the public safety department from taking any punitive action against the public safety officer. (2) If the court finds that a bad faith or frivolous action or a filing for an improper purpose has been brought pursuant to this chapter, the court may order sanctions against the party filing the action, the party’s attorney, or both, pursuant to Sections 128.6 and 128.7 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Those sanctions may include, but not be limited to, reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred by a public safety department as the court deems appropriate. Nothing in t his paragraph is intended to subject actions or filings under this section to rules or standards that are different from those applicable to other civil actions or filings subject to Section 128.6 or 128.7 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (e) In addition to the extraordinary relief afforded by this chapter, upon a finding by a superior court that a public safety department, its employees, agents, or assigns, with respect to acts taken within the scope of employment, maliciously violated any provision of thi s chapter with the intent to injure the public safety officer, the public safety department shall, for each and every violation, be liable for a civil penalty not to exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) to be awarded to the public safety officer whose right or protection was denied and for reasonable attorney’s fees as may be determined by the court. If the court so finds, and there is sufficient evidence to establish actual damages suffered by the officer whose right or protection was denied, the public safety department shall also be liable for the amount of the actual damages. Notwithstanding these provisions, a public safety department may not be required to indemnify a contractor for the contractor’s liability pursuant to this subdivision if there is, within the contract between the public safety department and the contractor, a “hold harmless” or similar provision that protects the public safety department from liability for the actions of the contractor. An individual shall not be liable for any act for which a public safety department is liable under this section. (Amended by Stats. 2005, Ch. 22, Sec. 70. Effective January 1, 2006.) 3310. Any public agency which has adopted, through action of its governing body or its official designee, any procedure which at a minimum provides to peace officers the same rights or protections as provided pursuant to this chapter shall not be subject to this chapter with regard to such a procedure. (Added by Stats. 1976, Ch. 465.) 3311. Nothing in this chapter shall in any way be construed to limit the use of any public safety agency or any public safety officer in the fulfilling of mutual aid agreements with other jurisdictions or agencies, nor shall this chapter be construed in any way to limit any jurisdictional or interagency cooperation under any circumstances where such activity is deemed necessary or desirable by the jurisdictions or the agencies involved. (Amended by Stats. 1977, Ch. 579.) 3312. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the employer of a public safety officer may not take any punitive action against an officer for wearing a pin or displaying any other item containing the American flag, unless the employer gives the officer written notice that includes all of the following: (a) A statement that the officer’s pin or other item violates an existing rule, regulation, policy, or local agency agreement or contract regarding the wearing of a pin, or the displaying of any other item, containing the American flag. (b) A citation to the specific rule, regulation, policy, or local agency agreement or contract that the pin or other item violates. (c) A statement that the officer may file an appeal against the employer challenging the alleged violation pursuant to applicable grievance or appeal procedures adopted by the department or public agency that otherwise comply with existing law. (Added by Stats. 2002, Ch. 170, Sec. 2. Effective January 1, 2003.) 3313. In the 2005–06 fiscal year, the Commission on State Mandates shall review its statement of decision regarding the Peace Officer Procedural Bill of Rights test claim and make any modifications necessary to this decision to clarify whether the subject legislation imposed a mandate consistent with the California Supreme Court Decision in San Diego Unified School Dist. v. Commission on State Mandates (2004) 33 Cal.4th 859 and other applicable court decisions. If the Commission on State Mandates revises its statement of decision regarding the Peace Officer Procedural Bi ll of Rights test claim, the revised decision shall apply to local government Peace Officer Procedural Bill of Rights activities occurring after the date the revised decision is adopted. (Added by Stats. 2005, Ch. 72, Sec. 6. Effective July 19, 2005.) State of California PENAL CODE Section 832.5 832.5. (a) (1) Each department or agency in this state that employs peace ofﬁcers shall establish a procedure to investigate complaints by members of the public against the personnel of these departments or agencies, and shall make a written description of the procedure available to the public. (2) Each department or agency that employs custodial ofﬁcers, as deﬁned in Section 831.5, may establish a procedure to investigate complaints by members of the public against those custodial ofﬁcers employed by these departments or agencies, provided, however, that any procedure so established shall comply with the provisions of this section and with the provisions of Section 832.7. (b) Complaints and any reports or ﬁndings relating to these complaints, including all complaints and any reports currently in the possession of the department or agency, shall be retained for a period of no less than 5 years for records where there was not a sustained ﬁnding of misconduct and for not less than 15 years where there was a sustained ﬁnding of misconduct. A record shall not be destroyed while a request related to that record is being processed or any process or litigation to determine whether the record is subject to release is ongoing. All complaints retained pursuant to this subdivision may be maintained either in the peace or custodial ofﬁcer’s general personnel ﬁle or in a separate ﬁle designated by the department or agency as provided by department or agency policy, in accordance with all applicable requirements of law. However, prior to any ofﬁcial determination regarding promotion, transfer, or disciplinary action by an ofﬁcer’s employing department or agency, the complaints described by subdivision (c) shall be removed from the ofﬁcer’s general personnel ﬁle and placed in a separate ﬁle designated by the department or agency, in accordance with all applicable requirements of law. (c) Complaints by members of the public that are determined by the peace or custodial ofﬁcer’s employing agency to be frivolous, as deﬁned in Section 128.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or unfounded or exonerated, or any portion of a complaint that is determined to be frivolous, unfounded, or exonerated, shall not be maintained in that ofﬁcer’s general personnel ﬁle. However, these complaints shall be retained in other, separate ﬁles that shall be deemed personnel records for purposes of the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code) and Section 1043 of the Evidence Code. (1) Management of the peace or custodial ofﬁcer’s employing agency shall have access to the ﬁles described in this subdivision. (2) Management of the peace or custodial ofﬁcer’s employing agency shall not use the complaints contained in these separate ﬁles for punitive or promotional purposes except as permitted by subdivision (f) of Section 3304 of the Government Code. (3) Management of the peace or custodial ofﬁcer’s employing agency may identify any ofﬁcer who is subject to the complaints maintained in these ﬁles which require counseling or additional training. However, if a complaint is removed from the ofﬁcer’s personnel ﬁle, any reference in the personnel ﬁle to the complaint or to a separate ﬁle shall be deleted. (d) As used in this section, the following deﬁnitions apply: (1) “General personnel ﬁle” means the ﬁle maintained by the agency containing the primary records speciﬁc to each peace or custodial ofﬁcer’s employment, including evaluations, assignments, status changes, and imposed discipline. (2) “Unfounded” means that the investigation clearly established that the allegation is not true. (3) “Exonerated” means that the investigation clearly established that the actions of the peace or custodial ofﬁcer that formed the basis for the complaint are not violations of law or department policy. (Amended by Stats. 2022, Ch. 28, Sec. 125. (SB 1380) Effective January 1, 2023.) State of California PENAL CODE Section 832.7 832.7. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), the personnel records of peace ofﬁcers and custodial ofﬁcers and records maintained by a state or local agency pursuant to Section 832.5, or information obtained from these records, are conﬁdential and shall not be disclosed in any criminal or civil proceeding except by discovery pursuant to Sections 1043 and 1046 of the Evidence Code. This section does not apply to investigations or proceedings concerning the conduct of peace ofﬁcers or custodial ofﬁcers, or an agency or department that employs those ofﬁcers, conducted by a grand jury, a district attorney’s ofﬁce, the Attorney General’s ofﬁce, or the Commission on Peace Ofﬁcer Standards and Training. (b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), Section 7923.600 of the Government Code, or any other law, the following peace ofﬁcer or custodial ofﬁcer personnel records and records maintained by a state or local agency shall not be conﬁdential and shall be made available for public inspection pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code): (A) A record relating to the report, investigation, or ﬁndings of any of the following: (i) An incident involving the discharge of a ﬁrearm at a person by a peace ofﬁcer or custodial ofﬁcer. (ii) An incident involving the use of force against a person by a peace ofﬁcer or custodial ofﬁcer that resulted in death or in great bodily injury. (iii) A sustained ﬁnding involving a complaint that alleges unreasonable or excessive force. (iv) A sustained ﬁnding that an ofﬁcer failed to intervene against another ofﬁcer using force that is clearly unreasonable or excessive. (B) (i) Any record relating to an incident in which a sustained ﬁnding was made by any law enforcement agency or oversight agency that a peace ofﬁcer or custodial ofﬁcer engaged in sexual assault involving a member of the public. (ii) As used in this subparagraph, “sexual assault” means the commission or attempted initiation of a sexual act with a member of the public by means of force, threat, coercion, extortion, offer of leniency or other ofﬁcial favor, or under the color of authority. For purposes of this deﬁnition, the propositioning for or commission of any sexual act while on duty is considered a sexual assault. (iii) As used in this subparagraph, “member of the public” means any person not employed by the ofﬁcer’s employing agency and includes any participant in a cadet, explorer, or other youth program afﬁliated with the agency. (C) Any record relating to an incident in which a sustained ﬁnding was made by any law enforcement agency or oversight agency involving dishonesty by a peace ofﬁcer or custodial ofﬁcer directly relating to the reporting, investigation, or prosecution of a crime, or directly relating to the reporting of, or investigation of misconduct by, another peace ofﬁcer or custodial ofﬁcer, including, but not limited to, any false statements, ﬁling false reports, destruction, falsifying, or concealing of evidence, or perjury. (D) Any record relating to an incident in which a sustained ﬁnding was made by any law enforcement agency or oversight agency that a peace ofﬁcer or custodial ofﬁcer engaged in conduct including, but not limited to, verbal statements, writings, online posts, recordings, and gestures, involving prejudice or discrimination against a person on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status. (E) Any record relating to an incident in which a sustained ﬁnding was made by any law enforcement agency or oversight agency that the peace ofﬁcer made an unlawful arrest or conducted an unlawful search. (2) Records that are subject to disclosure under clause (iii) or (iv) of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), or under subparagraph (D) or (E) of paragraph (1), relating to an incident that occurs before January 1, 2022, shall not be subject to the time limitations in paragraph (11) until January 1, 2023. (3) Records that shall be released pursuant to this subdivision include all investigative reports; photographic, audio, and video evidence; transcripts or recordings of interviews; autopsy reports; all materials compiled and presented for review to the district attorney or to any person or body charged with determining whether to ﬁle criminal charges against an ofﬁcer in connection with an incident, whether the ofﬁcer’s action was consistent with law and agency policy for purposes of discipline or administrative action, or what discipline to impose or corrective action to take; documents setting forth ﬁndings or recommended ﬁndings; and copies of disciplinary records relating to the incident, including any letters of intent to impose discipline, any documents reﬂecting modiﬁcations of discipline due to the Skelly or grievance process, and letters indicating ﬁnal imposition of discipline or other documentation reﬂecting implementation of corrective action. Records that shall be released pursuant to this subdivision also include records relating to an incident speciﬁed in paragraph (1) in which the peace ofﬁcer or custodial ofﬁcer resigned before the law enforcement agency or oversight agency concluded its investigation into the alleged incident. (4) A record from a separate and prior investigation or assessment of a separate incident shall not be released unless it is independently subject to disclosure pursuant to this subdivision. (5) If an investigation or incident involves multiple ofﬁcers, information about allegations of misconduct by, or the analysis or disposition of an investigation of, an ofﬁcer shall not be released pursuant to subparagraph (B), (C), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1), unless it relates to a sustained ﬁnding regarding that ofﬁcer that is itself subject to disclosure pursuant to this section. However, factual information about that action of an ofﬁcer during an incident, or the statements of an ofﬁcer about an incident, shall be released if they are relevant to a ﬁnding against another ofﬁcer that is subject to release pursuant to subparagraph (B), (C), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1). (6) An agency shall redact a record disclosed pursuant to this section only for any of the following purposes: (A) To remove personal data or information, such as a home address, telephone number, or identities of family members, other than the names and work-related information of peace and custodial ofﬁcers. (B) To preserve the anonymity of whistleblowers, complainants, victims, and witnesses. (C) To protect conﬁdential medical, ﬁnancial, or other information of which disclosure is speciﬁcally prohibited by federal law or would cause an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy that clearly outweighs the strong public interest in records about possible misconduct and use of force by peace ofﬁcers and custodial ofﬁcers. (D) Where there is a speciﬁc, articulable, and particularized reason to believe that disclosure of the record would pose a signiﬁcant danger to the physical safety of the peace ofﬁcer, custodial ofﬁcer, or another person. (7) Notwithstanding paragraph (6), an agency may redact a record disclosed pursuant to this section, including personal identifying information, where, on the facts of the particular case, the public interest served by not disclosing the information clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosure of the information. (8) An agency may withhold a record of an incident described in paragraph (1) that is the subject of an active criminal or administrative investigation, in accordance with any of the following: (A) (i) During an active criminal investigation, disclosure may be delayed for up to 60 days from the date the misconduct or use of force occurred or until the district attorney determines whether to ﬁle criminal charges related to the misconduct or use of force, whichever occurs sooner. If an agency delays disclosure pursuant to this clause, the agency shall provide, in writing, the speciﬁc basis for the agency’s determination that the interest in delaying disclosure clearly outweighs the public interest in disclosure. This writing shall include the estimated date for disclosure of the withheld information. (ii) After 60 days from the misconduct or use of force, the agency may continue to delay the disclosure of records or information if the disclosure could reasonably be expected to interfere with a criminal enforcement proceeding against an ofﬁcer who engaged in misconduct or used the force. If an agency delays disclosure pursuant to this clause, the agency shall, at 180-day intervals as necessary, provide, in writing, the speciﬁc basis for the agency’s determination that disclosure could reasonably be expected to interfere with a criminal enforcement proceeding. The writing shall include the estimated date for the disclosure of the withheld information. Information withheld by the agency shall be disclosed when the speciﬁc basis for withholding is resolved, when the investigation or proceeding is no longer active, or by no later than 18 months after the date of the incident, whichever occurs sooner. (iii) After 60 days from the misconduct or use of force, the agency may continue to delay the disclosure of records or information if the disclosure could reasonably be expected to interfere with a criminal enforcement proceeding against someone other than the ofﬁcer who engaged in the misconduct or used the force. If an agency delays disclosure under this clause, the agency shall, at 180-day intervals, provide, in writing, the speciﬁc basis why disclosure could reasonably be expected to interfere with a criminal enforcement proceeding, and shall provide an estimated date for the disclosure of the withheld information. Information withheld by the agency shall be disclosed when the speciﬁc basis for withholding is resolved, when the investigation or proceeding is no longer active, or by no later than 18 months after the date of the incident, whichever occurs sooner, unless extraordinary circumstances warrant continued delay due to the ongoing criminal investigation or proceeding. In that case, the agency must show by clear and convincing evidence that the interest in preventing prejudice to the active and ongoing criminal investigation or proceeding outweighs the public interest in prompt disclosure of records about misconduct or use of force by peace ofﬁcers and custodial ofﬁcers. The agency shall release all information subject to disclosure that does not cause substantial prejudice, including any documents that have otherwise become available. (iv) In an action to compel disclosure brought pursuant to Section 7923.000 of the Government Code, an agency may justify delay by ﬁling an application to seal the basis for withholding, in accordance with Rule 2.550 of the California Rules of Court, or any successor rule, if disclosure of the written basis itself would impact a privilege or compromise a pending investigation. (B) If criminal charges are ﬁled related to the incident in which misconduct occurred or force was used, the agency may delay the disclosure of records or information until a verdict on those charges is returned at trial or, if a plea of guilty or no contest is entered, the time to withdraw the plea pursuant to Section 1018. (C) During an administrative investigation into an incident described in paragraph (1), the agency may delay the disclosure of records or information until the investigating agency determines whether the misconduct or use of force violated a law or agency policy, but no longer than 180 days after the date of the employing agency’s discovery of the misconduct or use of force, or allegation of misconduct or use of force, by a person authorized to initiate an investigation. (9) A record of a complaint, or the investigations, ﬁndings, or dispositions of that complaint, shall not be released pursuant to this section if the complaint is frivolous, as deﬁned in Section 128.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or if the complaint is unfounded. (10) The cost of copies of records subject to disclosure pursuant to this subdivision that are made available upon the payment of fees covering direct costs of duplication pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 7922.530 of the Government Code shall not include the costs of searching for, editing, or redacting the records. (11) Except to the extent temporary withholding for a longer period is permitted pursuant to paragraph (8), records subject to disclosure under this subdivision shall be provided at the earliest possible time and no later than 45 days from the date of a request for their disclosure. (12) (A) For purposes of releasing records pursuant to this subdivision, the lawyer-client privilege does not prohibit the disclosure of either of the following: (i) Factual information provided by the public entity to its attorney or factual information discovered in any investigation conducted by, or on behalf of, the public entity’s attorney. (ii) Billing records related to the work done by the attorney so long as the records do not relate to active and ongoing litigation and do not disclose information for the purpose of legal consultation between the public entity and its attorney. (B) This paragraph does not prohibit the public entity from asserting that a record or information within the record is exempted or prohibited from disclosure pursuant to any other federal or state law. (13) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, an agency that formerly employed a peace ofﬁcer or custodial ofﬁcer may, without receiving a request for disclosure, disclose to the public the termination for cause of that ofﬁcer by that agency for any disclosable incident, including those described in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, of paragraph (1). Any such disclosure shall be at the discretion of the agency and shall not include any information otherwise prohibited from disclosure. This paragraph is declaratory of existing law. (c) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), a department or agency shall release to the complaining party a copy of the complaining party’s own statements at the time the complaint is ﬁled. (d) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), a department or agency that employs peace or custodial ofﬁcers may disseminate data regarding the number, type, or disposition of complaints (sustained, not sustained, exonerated, or unfounded) made against its ofﬁcers if that information is in a form which does not identify the individuals involved. (e) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), a department or agency that employs peace or custodial ofﬁcers may release factual information concerning a disciplinary investigation if the ofﬁcer who is the subject of the disciplinary investigation, or the ofﬁcer’s agent or representative, publicly makes a statement they know to be false concerning the investigation or the imposition of disciplinary action. Information may not be disclosed by the peace or custodial ofﬁcer’s employer unless the false statement was published by an established medium of communication, such as television, radio, or a newspaper. Disclosure of factual information by the employing agency pursuant to this subdivision is limited to facts contained in the ofﬁcer’s personnel ﬁle concerning the disciplinary investigation or imposition of disciplinary action that speciﬁcally refute the false statements made public by the peace or custodial ofﬁcer or their agent or representative. (f) (1) The department or agency shall provide written notiﬁcation to the complaining party of the disposition of the complaint within 30 days of the disposition. (2) The notiﬁcation described in this subdivision is not conclusive or binding or admissible as evidence in any separate or subsequent action or proceeding brought before an arbitrator, court, or judge of this state or the United States. (g) This section does not affect the discovery or disclosure of information contained in a peace or custodial ofﬁcer’s personnel ﬁle pursuant to Section 1043 of the Evidence Code. (h) This section does not supersede or affect the criminal discovery process outlined in Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 1054) of Title 6 of Part 2, or the admissibility of personnel records pursuant to subdivision (a), which codiﬁes the court decision in Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531. (i) Nothing in this chapter is intended to limit the public’s right of access as provided for in Long Beach Police Ofﬁcers Association v. City of Long Beach (2014) 59 Cal.4th 59. (Amended by Stats. 2024, Ch. 3, Sec. 1. (SB 400) Effective January 1, 2025.) State of California PENAL CODE Section 832.8 832.8. As used in Section 832.7, the following words or phrases have the following meanings: (a) “Personnel records” means any ﬁle maintained under that individual’s name by his or her employing agency and containing records relating to any of the following: (1) Personal data, including marital status, family members, educational and employment history, home addresses, or similar information. (2) Medical history. (3) Election of employee beneﬁts. (4) Employee advancement, appraisal, or discipline. (5) Complaints, or investigations of complaints, concerning an event or transaction in which he or she participated, or which he or she perceived, and pertaining to the manner in which he or she performed his or her duties. (6) Any other information the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. (b) “Sustained” means a ﬁnal determination by an investigating agency, commission, board, hearing ofﬁcer, or arbitrator, as applicable, following an investigation and opportunity for an administrative appeal pursuant to Sections 3304 and 3304.5 of the Government Code, that the actions of the peace ofﬁcer or custodial ofﬁcer were found to violate law or department policy. (c) “Unfounded” means that an investigation clearly establishes that the allegation is not true. (Amended by Stats. 2018, Ch. 988, Sec. 3. (SB 1421) Effective January 1, 2019.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL State of California EVIDENCE CODE Section 1040-1047 Evidence Code - EVID DIVISION 8. PRIVILEGES [900 - 1070] ( Division 8 enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299. ) CHAPTER 4. Particular Privileges [930 - 1063] ( Chapter 4 enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299. ) ARTICLE 9. Official Information and Identity of Informer [1040 - 1047] ( Article 9 enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299. ) 1040. (a) As used in this section, “official information” means information acquired in confidence by a public employee in the course of his or her duty and not open, or officially disclosed, to the public prior to the time the claim of privilege is made. (b) A public entity has a privilege to refuse to disclose official information, and to prevent another from disclosing official information, if the privilege is claimed by a person authorized by the public entity to do so and either of the following apply: (1) Disclosure is forbidden by an act of the Congress of the United States or a statute of this state. (2) Disclosure of the information is against the public interest because there is a necessity for preserving the confidentiality of the information that outweighs the necessity for disclosure in the interest of justice; but no privilege may be claimed under this paragraph if any person authorized to do so has consented that the information be disclosed in the proceeding. In determining whether disclosure of the information is against the public interest, the interest of the public entity as a party in the outcome of the proceeding may not be considered. (c) Notwithstanding any other law, the Employment Development Department shall disclose to law enforcement agencies, in accordance with subdivision (i) of Section 1095 of the Unemployment Insurance Code, inf ormation in its possession relating to any person if an arrest warrant has been issued for the person for commission of a felony. (Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 20, Sec. 1. (SB 79) Effective June 24, 2015.) 1041. (a) Except as provided in this section, a p ublic entity has a privilege to refuse to disclose the identity of a person who has furnished information as provided in subdivision (b) purporting to disclose a violation of a law of the United States or of this state or of a public entity in this state, and to prevent another from disclosing the person’s identity, if the privilege is claimed by a person authorized by the public entity to do so and either of the following apply: STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL (1) Disclosure is forbidden by an act of the Congress of the United States or a statute of this state. (2) Disclosure of the identity of the informer is against the public interest because the necessity for preserving the confidentiality of his or her identity outweighs the necessity for disclosure in the interest of justice. The p rivilege shall not be claimed under this paragraph if a person authorized to do so has consented that the identity of the informer be disclosed in the proceeding. In determining whether disclosure of the identity of the informer is against the public inter est, the interest of the public entity as a party in the outcome of the proceeding shall not be considered. (b) The privilege described in this section applies only if the information is furnished in confidence by the informer to any of the following: (1) A law enforcement officer. (2) A representative of an administrative agency charged with the administration or enforcement of the law alleged to be violated. (3) Any person for the purpose of transmittal to a person listed in paragraph (1) or (2). As used in this paragraph, “person” includes a volunteer or employee of a crime stopper organization. (c) The privilege described in this section shall not be construed to prevent the informer from disclosing his or her identity. (d) As used in this section, “crime stopper organization” means a private, nonprofit organization that accepts and expends donations used to reward persons who report to the organization information concerning alleged criminal activity, and forwards the information to the appropriate law enforcement agency. (Amended by Stats. 2013, Ch. 19, Sec. 1. (AB 1250) Effective January 1, 2014.) 1042. (a) Except where disclosure is forbidden by an act of the Congress of the United States, if a claim of privilege under this article by the state o r a public entity in this state is sustained in a criminal proceeding, the presiding officer shall make such order or finding of fact adverse to the public entity bringing the proceeding as is required by law upon any issue in the proceeding to which the p rivileged information is material. (b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), where a search is made pursuant to a warrant valid on its face, the public entity bringing a criminal proceeding is not required to reveal to the defendant official information or the identity of an informer in order to establish the legality of the search or the admissibility of any evidence obtained as a result of it. (c) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), in any preliminary hearing, criminal trial, or other criminal proceeding, any otherwise admissible evidence of information communicated to a peace officer by a confidential informant, who is not a material witness to the guilt or innocence of the accused of the offense charged, is admissible on the issue of reasonable cause to make an arrest or search without requiring that the name or identity of the informant be disclosed if the judge or STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL magistrate is satisfied, based upon evidence produced in open court, out of the presence of the jury, that such information was received from a relia ble informant and in his discretion does not require such disclosure. (d) When, in any such criminal proceeding, a party demands disclosure of the identity of the informant on the ground the informant is a material witness on the issue of guilt, the court shall conduct a hearing at which all parties may present evidence on the issue of disclosure. Such hearing shall be conducted outside the presence of the jury, if any. During the hearing, if the privilege provided for in Section 1041 is claimed by a person authorized to do so or if a person who is authorized to claim such privilege refuses to answer any question on the ground that the answer would tend to disclose the identity of the informant, the prosecuting attorney may request that the court hold an in camera hearing. If such a request is made, the court shall hold such a hearing outside the presence of the defendant and his counsel. At the in camera hearing, the prosecution may offer evidence which would tend to disclose or which discloses the identity of the informant to aid the court in its determination whether there is a reasonable possibility that nondisclosure might deprive the defendant of a fair trial. A reporter shall be present at the in camera hearing. Any transcription of the proceedings at t he in camera hearing, as well as any physical evidence presented at the hearing, shall be ordered sealed by the court, and only a court may have access to its contents. The court shall not order disclosure, nor strike the testimony of the witness who invok es the privilege, nor dismiss the criminal proceeding, if the party offering the witness refuses to disclose the identity of the informant, unless, based upon the evidence presented at the hearing held in the presence of the defendant and his counsel and the evidence presented at the in camera hearing, the court concludes that there is a reasonable possibility that nondisclosure might deprive the defendant of a fair trial. (Amended by Stats. 1969, Ch. 1412.) 1043. (a) In any case in which discovery or disclosure is sought of peace or custodial officer personnel records or records maintained pursuant to Section 832.5 of the Penal Code or information from those records, the party seeking the discovery or disclosure shall file a written motion with the approp riate court or administrative body upon written notice to the governmental agency that has custody and control of the records, as follows: (1) In a civil action, the written notice shall be given at the times prescribed by subdivision (b) of Section 1005 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (2) In a criminal action, the written notice shall be served and filed at least 10 court days before the hearing. All papers opposing a motion so noticed shall be filed with the court at least five court days, and all reply papers at least two court days, before the hearing. Proof of service of the notice shall be filed no later than five court days before the hearing. (b) The motion shall include all of the following: (1) Identification of the proceeding in which discovery or disclosure is sought, the party seeking discovery or disclosure, the peace or custodial officer whose records are sought, the governmental agency that has custody and control of the records, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL and the time and place at which the motion for discovery or disclosure shall be heard. (2) A description of the type of records or information sought. (3) Affidavits showing good cause for the discov ery or disclosure sought, setting forth the materiality thereof to the subject matter involved in the pending litigation and stating upon reasonable belief that the governmental agency identified has the records or information from the records. (c) Upon receipt of a notice served pursuant to subdivision (a), the governmental agency shall immediately notify the individual whose records are sought. (d) No hearing upon a motion for discovery or disclosure shall be held without full compliance with the notice provisions of this section except upon a showing by the moving party of good cause for noncompliance, or upon a waiver of the hearing by the governmental agency identified as having the records. (Amended by Stats. 2019, Ch. 585, Sec. 2. (AB 1600) Effective January 1, 2020.) 1044. Nothing in this article shall be construed to affect the right of access to records of medical or psychological history where such access would otherwise be available under Section 996 or 1016. (Added by Stats. 1978, Ch. 630.) 1045. (a) This article does not affect the right of access to records of complaints, or investigations of complaints, or discipline imposed as a result of those investigations, concerning an event or transaction in which the peace officer or custodial officer, as defined in Section 831.5 of the Penal Code, participated, or which the officer perceived, and pertaining to the manner in which the officer performed the officer’s duties, provided that information is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending litigation. (b) In determining relevance, the court shall examine the information in chambers in conformity with Section 915, and shall exclude from disclosure both of the following: (1) In any criminal proceeding the conclusions of any officer in vestigating a complaint filed pursuant to Section 832.5 of the Penal Code. (2) Facts sought to be disclosed that are so remote as to make disclosure of little or no practical benefit. (c) In determining relevance where the issue in litigation concerns th e policies or pattern of conduct of the employing agency, the court shall consider whether the information sought may be obtained from other records maintained by the employing agency in the regular course of agency business which would not necessitate the disclosure of individual personnel records. (d) Upon motion seasonably made by the governmental agency which has custody or control of the records to be examined or by the officer whose records are sought, and upon good cause showing the necessity thereof, the court may make any order STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL which justice requires to protect the officer or agency from unnecessary annoyance, embarrassment or oppression. (e) The court shall, in any case or proceeding permitting the disclosure or discovery of any peace or custodial officer records requested pursuant to Section 1043, order that the records disclosed or discovered may not be used for any purpose other than a court proceeding pursuant to applicable law. (Amended by Stats. 2021, Ch. 402, Sec. 1. (SB 16) Effective January 1, 2022.) 1046. In any case, otherwise authorized by law, in which the party seeking disclosure is alleging excessive force by a peace officer or custodial officer, as defined in Section 831.5 of the Penal Code, in connection with the arrest of that party, or for conduct alleged to have occurred within a jail facility, the motion shall include a copy of the police report setting forth the circumstances under which the party was stopped and arrested, or a copy of the crime report setting forth the circumstances under which the conduct is alleged to have occurred within a jail facility. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 391, Sec. 3. Effective January 1, 2003.) 1047. (a) Records of peace officers or custodial officers, as defined in Section 831.5 of the Penal Code, including supervisorial officers, who either were not present during the arrest or had no contact with the party seeking disclosure from the time of the arrest until the time of booking, or who were not present at the time the conduct at issue is alleged to have occurred within a jail facility, shall not be subject to disclosure. (b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), if a supervisorial officer whose records are being sought had direct oversight of a peace officer or a custodial officer, as defined in Section 831.5 of the Penal Code and issued command directives or had command influence over the circumstances at issue, the supervisorial officer’s records shall be subject to disclosure pursuant to Section 1045 if the peace officer or custodial officer under supervisio n was present during the arrest, had contact with the party seeking disclosure from the time of the arrest until the time of booking, or was present at the time the conduct at issue is alleged to have occurred within a jail facility. (Amended by Stats. 2019, Ch. 585, Sec. 3. (AB 1600) Effective January 1, 2020.)