Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout23C - REJECTION OF BIDS PROJECT NO. 106730REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: AUGUST 16, 2010 TITLE: REJECTION OF BIDS FOR RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PHASE 14 (PROJECT NO.106730) j? CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ? As Recommended ? As Amended ? Ordinance on 1s` Reading ? Ordinance on 2"d Reading ? Implementing Resolution ? Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Reject all bids for the Residential Street Repair Phase 14 project. DISCUSSION Phase 14 is the final phase of the City's $100 million investment to rebuild neighborhood streets throughout the City. The majority of the work done in this phase will take place in the area north of McFadden Avenue and east of Bristol Street. Segments of local streets located in these neighborhoods have been identified as a high priority for rehabilitation in the City's pavement management system. The pavement is deteriorating due to weather, age and heavy usage. Additionally, some of the adjacent curbs, gutters, sidewalks, cross gutters and curb ramps are in various states of disrepair and require replacement. The Notice Inviting Bids was advertised on July 7 and 9, 2010, and bids were opened on July 28, 2010. A summary of the bid invitations mailed, the bids received, and the bid results follows. Santa Ana Contractors receiving notices: Contractors requesting bidding documents: Bids received: Bids received from Santa Ana Contractors: 12 12 4 NAME OF RESPONSIVE BIDDER 1. R.J. Noble Company 2. All American Asphalt 3. Excel Paving Company 4. Hardy & Harper, Inc. CITY Orange Corona Long Beach Santa Ana BID AMOUNT $5,047,312 $5,069,069 $5,179,402 $5,333,000 23C-1 Contract Award For Residential Street Repair Phase 14 August 16, 2010 Page 2 A total of four bids were received and all were responsive. Since this is the last phase of the Residential Street Repair Program, it became apparent during the bidding period that based on available funding, additional streets can be included in this project. This will significantly increase the scope of the project and the time required to finish it. For this reason, staff recommends a division of the project, including the additional work, into two projects to expedite completion of work. This will also ensure the added work will be done using competitive bid prices (instead of the negotiated prices should the work require a change order). Therefore, staff recommends that all bids be rejected. Following Council action, staff will revise the plans and rebid the work as separate projects. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action Raul Godinez II Executive Director Public Works Agency RG/ET 23C-2