HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-14
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-14
ROH - 08/23/10
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA MODIFYING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 2008-35 AS CONDITIONED TO ALLOW
AFTER HOURS OPERATION FOR THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 2773 NORTH MAIN STREET
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds,
determines and declares as follows: .
A. Applicant is requesting approval of modification to Conditional Use Permit
No. 2008-35 to operate a restaurant between the hours of 11:00 a.m. to
2:00 a.m., seven days a week, for the property located at 2773 North Main
Street.
B. On November 24, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa
Ana approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-35 as conditioned.
•
C. The Specific Development No. 59 (SD-59) zoning designation requires a
conditional use permit for restaurants open between the hours of 12:00
a.m. and 5:00 a.m.
D. The applicant is requesting the following modifications.to Conditional Use
Permit No. 2008-35 as conditioned to allow after hours operation for the
property located at 2773 North Main Street:
1. Allow dancing within the restaurant. The applicant is requesting a
minimum of 300 square feet of dance area.
E. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-196 and 41-638 authorizes the
Planning Commission to modify a conditional use permit upon making
certain findings.
1. Will the proposed use provide a service or facility.which will
contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or the
community?
•
The proposed amendment to the conditional use permit for
after hours operation will continue to provide an ancillary
service to the restaurant and thereby benefit the community
by providing an additional amenity at the eating
establishment. Conditions have been placed on the after
hours conditional use permit which will mitigate any potential
Resolution No. 2010-14
Page 1 of 9
impacts created by the use and ensure that.the use will not
• negatively affect the surrounding community.
2. Will the proposed use under the circumstances of the particular
case be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of
persons residing or working in the vicinity?
The proposed amendment to allow dancing at the location
will not be detrimental to persons residing or working in the
area because the use, as conditioned, will not create any
negative or adverse impacts. Dancing will occur within the
premises and is incidental to the restaurant use. The
extended hours will continue to be in conjunction with the
existing sit-down eating establishment. Conditions to
minimize potential noise impacts to the surrounding
residential and commercial uses are in place or
recommended.
3. Will the proposed use adversely affect the present economic
stability or future economic development of properties surrounding
the area?
The project site is located within the City Place development
and is suitable for the proposed use. The provision of
dancing at the Geisha House restaurant will increase the
• patronage to the restaurant and number of visitors to the
development, thereby enhancing the profitability of the
business and economic stability of the area. The project site
is located in a commercial area near the Westfield Mall and
helps to further emphasize North Main Street as a
commercial district.
4. Will the proposed use comply with the regulations and conditions
specified in Chapter 41 for such use?
As conditioned, the allowance of dancing will be in
compliance with all applicable regulations and conditions
imposed on a restaurant operating after hours pursuant to
Specific Development No. 59 and Chapters 11 and 41 of the
Santa Ana Municipal Code.
5. Will the proposed use adversely affect the General Plan or any
specific plan of the City?
The proposed use will not adversely affect the General Plan.
Policy 2.2 of the Land Use Element encourages land uses
that accommodate the City's needs for goods and services.
A restaurant with extended hours and ancillary dancing
provides an additional amenity to the existing dining service
and the residents of Santa Ana. Additionally, the property is
• located within the District Center (DC) general plan land use
Resolution No. 2010-14
Page 2 of 9
designation which emphasizes the area as a major
• commercial corridor for the City.
F. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act; the
recommended action is exempt from further review per Section 15301. This
Class 1 exemption allows the licensing of existing facilities with no
expansion of the existing use. Categorical Exemption Environmental
Review No. 2010-112 will be filed for this project.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana after conducting
the public hearing hereby approves the modifications to Conditional Use Permit No.
2008-35 as conditioned in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated as though fully
set forth herein. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid
hearing, which includes but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission
Action dated August 23, 2010 and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony,
all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.
ADOPTED this 23rd day of August, 2010 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Acosta, Alderete, Betancourt, Gartner, Turner,
Walters, Yrarrazaval (7)
NOES: Commissioners: None (0)
• ABSENT: Commissioners: None (0)
ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: None (0) ~ '-
% % /
~ ~ --- _ _ -
~ 1---__---_-
c Alderete' ~
Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Joseph W? Fletcher, City Attorney
By:
Rye
Deb
•
Resolution No. 2010-14
Page 3 of 9
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, MARTHA RAMIREZ, Secretary of the Planning Commission, do hereby attest to and
certify the attached Resolution No. 2010-14 to be the original resolution adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on August 23, 2010.
,,, ,"..
Date: - ~ ~ _ (~ ~~ `~'~'~
Secreta of the Planning Commissio
City of Santa Ana
•
•
Resolution No. 2010-14
Page 4 of 9
Modified Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit~No. 2008-35
•
Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-35 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with all applicable sections of the Santa Ana
Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the California Building Standards
Code and all other applicable regulations.
The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below rior to
exercising the rights conferred by this conditional use permit.
The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the
life of the conditional use permit. Failure to comply with each and every condition may
result in the revocation of the conditional use permit. (Added language highlighted,
deleted language in strikeout.)
A. Planning Division
1. The project shall remain in compliance with Site Plan Review (DP No. 08-
63).
2. Any amendment to this conditional use permit must be submitted to the
Planning Division and Police Department for review. At that time, staff will
determine if administrative relief is available or the conditional use permit
• must be amended.
3. The hours of operation for the facility shall not exceed past 2:00 a.m.,
seven days a week.
4. All special events hosted by the restaurant must be catered by the on-site
Geisha House kitchen and staff.
B. Police Department
1. There shall be no fixed bar on the premises maintained for the sole
purpose of sales, service or consumption of alcoholic beverages directly to
patrons.
2. Full menus and food service shall be available in the lounge area and at
the counter/bars during all operational hours.
3. At all times when the premises is open for business the sale of alcoholic
beverages shall be made only in conjunction with the sale of food to the
person ordering the beverage.
• AUGUST 23, 2010
Resolution No. 2010-14
Page 5 of 9
PAGE2OF4
•
4. The quarterly gross sales of alcoholic beverages shall not exceed the
gross sales of food during the same period. These records are to be kept
no less frequently than on a quarterly basis and shall be made available to
the City if requested.
5. The premises shall be maintained as a bona fide eating establishment and
shall provide a menu containing an assortment of foods normally offered
in restaurants.
6. The establishment shall not be operated as a public premises.
7. The sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off the premises is strictly
prohibited.
8. There shall be a server assigned to the patio area at all times that the
service and consumption of alcoholic beverages is available.
9. There shall be no exterior advertising of any kind' or type, including
advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the
availability of alcoholic beverages.
• 10. It shall be a licant s res onsibilit to ensure that no alcoholic bevera es
pp () p Y 9
are consumed on any property adjacent to the licensed premises under
the control of the applicant(s), with the exception of the enclosed patio
area.
11. The applicant(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the area
adjacent to the premises under the control of the licensee.
12. There shall be no public telephones located on the exterior of the
premises. All interior pay phones must be designed to allow outgoing
calls only.
13. The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining the premises free of
graffiti. All graffiti must be removed within 24 hours of occurrence.
14. There shall be no pool tables, coin-operated games, or video machines
maintained upon the premises at any time. r
15. Live entertainment and amplified music are prohibited on the premises at
any time, with the exception of the proposed DJ.
• AUGUST 23, 2010
Resolution No. 2010-14
Page 6 of 9
•
PAGE3OF4
rnr ch~+ll ho nn n~~hlin rl~nninn nn +ho nrorr+i~+ec• f~r~~c;:,
•
•
17. Noise/music shall not be audible beyond 20 feet from the exterior of the
premises in any direction.
18. The sales, service, and consumption of alcoholic beverages shall be
permitted only between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m.
19. This land use authorization is only for a Type 47 on-sale general, public
eating-place, any other license use at this location will require a new land
use clearance.
20. Existing restaurant and required parking within 60 feet must conform to
the provisions of Chapter 8, Article II, Division 3 of the Santa Ana
Municipal Code (Building Security Ordinance). These code conditions will
require that the existing project's lighting, door/window locking devices and
addressing be upgraded to current code standards. Lighting standards
cannot be located in required landscape planters.
21. Prior to issuance of Letter of Approval to the Alcohol Beverage Control
Board condition 20 must be complied with.
22. Applicant is required to provide Police Department approved armed
robbery prevention training annually to all of their restaurant employees.
23. Window displays and racks must be kept to a maximum height of three
feet including merchandise.
24. Atimed-access cash controller or drop safe must be installed.
25. Install a silent armed robbery alarm.
26. The applicant shall not share any profits, or pay any percentage or
commission to a promoter or any other person, based upon monies
collected as a door charge, cover charge, donation, or any other. form of
admission charge, including minimum drink orders, or the sale of drinks.
The dressing room indicated on the plans shall only be used by food
service personnel employed by the establishment.
AUGUST 23, 2010
Resolution No. 2010-14
Page 7 of 9
PAGE 4 OF 4
•
$,: ~ ~ ~ i~r~cas a~er~clc~sir~, r~ene
e ~estacxar~: ci b~. Pk ~~ovrr~ssi~t ~;
~~~~
•
r~
Resolution No. 2010-14
Page 8 of 9
PROOF OF SERVICE
. (C.C.P. SECTION 1013(a), 2015.5)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF ORANGE
I am employed in the aforesaid county; I am over the age of eighteen and not a
party to the within action; my business address is 20 Civic Center Plaza, Ross Annex
2"d Floor, Santa Ana, California 92701.
I served the foregoing document described as: Resolution No. 2010-14
(Amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-35) in this action y placing a true
copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as follows:
Bill Hammerstein Lonnie Moore Adam Palmer
441 North Beverly Drive, The Dolce Group The Dolce Group
Suite 209 6633 Hollywood Blvd. 2773 North Main Street
Beverl Hills, CA 90210 Holl ood, CA 90028 Santa Ana, CA 92705
[ ] I caused to be delivered by courier, such envelope by hand to the office of the
addressee(s).
[X] BY MAIL I am readily familiar with my employer's practice of collection and
• processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with
U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Santa Ana,
California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party
served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is
more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
[ ]The document was transmitted by facsimile transmission and was reported as
complete and without error.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on September 14, 2010 at Santa Ana, California.
1
A THA RAMIRE
•
Resolution No. 2010-14
Page 9 of 9