Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19C - EMPOWERMENT-FINANCIAL AUDIT FY 2009-2010REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 TITLE: SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION FINANCIAL AUDIT FOR FY 2009-2010 AND DISSOLUTION OF THE SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION a, fi, 02?? CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ? As Recommended ? As Amended ? Ordinance on 1st Reading ? Ordinance on 2"d Reading ? Implementing Resolution ? Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Approve the closing Financial Audit of the Santa Ana Empowerment Corporation for fiscal year 2009-2010 as prepared by Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP. 2. Authorize the City Attorney and City Manager to proceed with the dissolution of the Santa Ana Empowerment Corporation. DISCUSSION The City of Santa Ana received a Federal Empowerment Zone designation in 1999 from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This designation expired on December 31, 2009. As part of the Empowerment Zone requirements, an A-133 audit is necessary. The Santa Ana Empowerment Corporation (SAEC) contracted with Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP to conduct a final financial audit of the Corporation that was established to oversee and implement the grant on behalf of the City. The financial audit took place the week of August 9, 2010. The auditors found no material issues and determined that the SAEC was in compliance with the Nonprofit Integrity Act of 2004. A copy of the audit will be submitted to HUD for its records and the City Attorney will proceed with dissolving the Santa Ana Empowerment Corporation with the Secretary of State. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action /7 _ . ,-l_ '-f Cynthia"J. Nelson V Deputy City Manager for Development Services Community Development Agency CJN/LAS/DS/mlr Exhibit: 1. Financial Audit 19C-1 19C-2 Certified Pubt c Accountants. .. :5. .... ?f S;,: F?F. 4eF .? ?.:t '? mgocpa,corn To the Mayor and City Council of the City of Santa Ana We have audited the financial statements of the Santa Ana Empowerment Corporation (Organization) for the year ended June 30, 2010, and have issued our report thereon dated September 10, 2010. Professional standards require that we provide you with the following information related to our audit. Our Responsibilities under U.S. Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and OMB Circular A-133 As stated in our engagement letter dated May 8, 2009, our responsibility, as described by professional standards, is to express an opinion about whether the financial statements prepared by management with your oversight are fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our audit of the financial statements does not relieve you or management of your responsibilities. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Organization's internal control over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. We also considered internal control over compliance with requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on compliance and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Organization's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions is not an objective of our audit. Also in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, we examined, on a test basis, evidence about the Organization's compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the "U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement" applicable to its major federal program for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the Organization's compliance with those requirements. While our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion, it does not provide a legal determination on the Organization's compliance with those requirements. Planned Scope and Timing of the Audit An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements; therefore, our audit involved judgment about the number of transactions to be examined and the areas to be tested. EXHIBIT 1 ??i!'\?i .'(?2.?? ?? i l? t?, .:.:i f??. ;;: .lF,«. .?1 :?J.°ESf. k??, ? { ..??. it <S la..,i•t ?'' \ ? :.?Ir ? 1.`l i. ,?`! ?l ? ?,?/.? ice' b? Our audit included obtaining an understanding of the Organization and its environment, including internal control, sufficient to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and to design the nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures. Material misstatements may result from (1) errors, (2) fraudulent financial reporting, (3) misappropriation of assets, or (4) violations of laws or governmental regulations that are attributable to the entity or to acts by management or employees acting on behalf of the Organization. Significant Audit Findings Qualitative Aspects of Accounting Practices Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant accounting policies used by Organization are described in Note (1) to the financial statements. No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed during year. We noted no transactions entered into by the Organization during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements in the proper period. Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected We noted that the Organization's significant account balances are not dependent upon management's estimates. Certain financial statement disclosures are particularly sensitive because of their significance to financial statement users. The most sensitive disclosure affecting the financial statements was regarding the Organization's ability to continue as a going concern. This disclosure is included as Note (8) to the financial statements. Diculties Encountered in Performing the Audit We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our audit. Corrected and Uncorrected Misstatements Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. Management has corrected all such misstatements. In addition, none of the misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by management were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a whole. Disagreements with Management For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. 19C-4 Management Representations We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management representation letter dated September 10, 2010. Management Consultation with Other Independent Accountants In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the Organization's financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. Other Audit Findings or Issues We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the Organization's auditors. These discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship, and our responses were not a condition to our retention. This information is intended solely for the information and use of the Mayor, City Council and management of the Organization and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. ?? ?- a.." I D Certified Public Accountants Newport Beach, California September 10, 2010 19C-5 19C-6 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Financial Statements and Single Audit Report Years Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (With Independent Auditor's Report Thereon) 19C-7 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT REPORT Financial Statements and Single Audit Report June 30, 2010 and 2009 Table of Contents Page Independent Auditor's Report ....................................................................................................................... 1 Financial Statements: Statements of Financial Position ........................................................................................................... 3 Statements of Activities ........................................................................................................................ 4 Statements of Functional Expenses ....................................................................................................... 6 Statements of Cash Flows ..................................................................................................................... 8 Notes to the Financial Statements ......................................................................................................... 9 Single Audit Report: Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards ..................................................................................... 16 Note to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards ..................................................................17 Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with GovernmentAuditing Standards ..........................................................19 Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance with Requirements That Could Have a Direct and Material Effect on Each Major Program and On Internal Control Over Compliance in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133 ................................................................21 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs .................................................................................................23 Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings .................................................................................................26 19C-8 Certified PubUc Accountants. M ctigocpa.corn To the Mayor and City Council of the City of Santa Ana Independent Auditor's Report We have audited the accompanying statement of financial position of the Santa Ana Empowerment Corporation (Organization), a California nonprofit organization, as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of activities, functional expenses, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Organization's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Organization's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Organization as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the changes in its net assets and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Organization will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note (8) to the financial statements, the Department of Housing and Urban Development has determined that the grant period for all Empowerment Zone grants ended on August 30, 2010. The Organization will have until September 15, 2010 to request reimbursement for eligible Empowerment Zone expenses. At the conclusion of the grant period the Organization will discontinue operations. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated September 10, 2010, on our consideration of Organization's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. SS I . w.) .x51tz t, 1VC-9 . Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements of the Organization taken as a whole. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by U.S. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations, and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. %ia'c ?-? ae;? ? 0 4 &'nzd L-C'R Certified Public Accountants Newport Beach, California September 10, 2010 19G-10 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Statements of Financial Position June 30, 2010 and 2009 Assets: Current assets: Grant receivable Total current assets Loans receivable Total assets Liabilities and net assets: Current liabilities: Accounts payable Accrued program reimbursements to subrecipients Total current liabilities Payable to HUD Advances from the City of Santa Ana Total liabilities Net assets: Unrestricted Total liabilities and net assets See Accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. 2010 2009 $ 109,608 $ 436,029 109,608 436,029 1,799,033 133,304 $ 1,908,641 $ 569,333 $ 15,138 $ 1,187 41,714 41,438 56,852 42,625 1,799,033 133,304 52,756 393,404 1,908,641 569,333 $ 1,908,641 $ 569,333 3 19C-11 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Statements of Activities Years Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 2010 Unrestricted net assets: Revenue and support: Empowerment Zone grant $ 2,780,246 Program income - Total revenue and support Expenses: Program services Management and general Total expenses Change in net assets Net assets, beginning of year Net assets, end of yeas See Accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. 2009 $ 1,385,243 1,571 2,780,246 1,386,814 2,151,741 628,505 2,780,246 716,534 687,566 1,404,100 (17,286) 17,286 4 19C-12 This page intentionally left blank. 19C-13 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Statements of Functional Expenses Years Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 2010 Salaries Fringe benefits Total salaries and benefits Occupancy Communications Training and transportation Advertising and promotion Office expense Equipment and software Indirect costs Payments to subrecipients Other contracted services Loan to subrecipient Totals Program Management Total Services and General Expenses $ - $ 398,133 $ 398,133 96,265 96,265 494,398 494,398 - 26,679 26,680 - 3,609 3,609 - 2,605 2,605 - 89 89 - 9,769 9,769 - 10,241 10,241 420,802 - 420,802 - 81,115 81,115 1,730,939 - 1,730,939 $ 2,151,741 $ 628,505 $ 2,780,246 See Accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. 6 19C-14 2009 Program Management Total Services and General Expenses $ - $ 444,727 $ 444,727 - 102,753 102,753 - 547,480 547,480 - 15,210 15,210 - 5,290 5,290 - 2,665 2,665 - 3,928 3,928 - 13,675 13,675 - 257 257 - 20,605 20,605 716,534 - 716,534 - 78,456 78,456 $ 716,534 $ 687,566 $ 1,404,100 7 19C-15 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Statements of Cash Flows Years Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 Cash flows from operating activities: Change in net assets Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: (Increase) decrease in grants receivable (Increase) decrease in interest receivable (Increase) decrease in loans receivable Increase (decrease) in accounts payable Increase (decrease) in accrued program reimbursements to subrecipients Increase (decrease) payable to HUD 2010 326,421 (1,665,729) 13,951 2009 $ (17,286) Net cash provided (used) by operating activities Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Advances from (reimbursements to) the City of Santa Ana Net increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents, end of year See Accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. (22,319) 17,286 405,373 (68,091) 276 15,630 1,665,729 (405,373) 340,648 (74,780) (340,648) 74,780 8 19C-16 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Notes to the Financial Statements June 30, 2010 and 2009 (1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (a) Organization and Nature of Activities Santa Ana Empowerment Corporation (Organization) is a California nonprofit corporation, which was incorporated on August 16, 1999. The City of Santa Ana (City), the State of California, and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) entered into an agreement in which HUD designated the City as an Urban Empowerment Zone effective January 1, 1999, which will remain in effect until July 2, 2010 or the effective date of HUD's revocation of this designation. In conjunction with this designation, the Organization was created under an approved strategic plan to undertake the responsibilities of the Empowerment Zone program which includes the administration of funds received consistent with community vision, goals, and objectives of the approved strategic plan. The Empowerment Zone program is funded by HUD. (b) Basis of Accounting The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, as well as contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management also determines the accounting principles to be used in the preparation of these financial statements. A description of significant accounting policies employed in the preparation of these financial statements follows. The financial statements of the Organization have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting and accordingly reflect all significant receivables, payables, and other liabilities. (c) Financial Statement Presentation The Organization follows the financial statement presentation recommended by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 958-205-45 (Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 117, Financial Statements ofNot for-Profit Organizations). Under this guidance, the Organization is required to report information regarding its financial position and activities according to three classes of net assets: unrestricted net assets, temporarily restricted net assets, and permanently restricted net assets. (d) Cash and Cash Equivalents For purposes of the Statements of Cash Flows, the Organization considers all unrestricted, highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist of various demand deposits. As of June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Organization did not have any cash or cash equivalents Refer to Note (3) for an explanation of the advances from the City of Santa Ana. 19C-17 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Notes to the Financial Statements (Continued) June 30, 2010 and 2009 (e) Property and Equipment Property and equipment is capitalized at cost. It is the Organization's policy to capitalize expenditures for property and equipment in excess of $5,000. Property and equipment are being depreciated over their estimated useful lives of three to five years using the straight-line method. All property and equipment has been fully depreciated. (f) Restricted and Unrestricted Revenue and Support The Organization follows FASB ASC 958-605-25 (SFAS No. 116, Accounting for Contributions Received and Contributions Made). In accordance with this guidance, contributions received are recorded as unrestricted, temporarily restricted or permanently restricted support, depending on the existence and/or nature of any donor restrictions. Support that is restricted by the donor is reported as an increase in unrestricted net assets if the restriction expires in the reporting period in which the support is recognized. All other donor-restricted support is reported as an increase in temporarily or permanently restricted net assets, depending on the nature of the restriction. When a restriction expires (that is, when stipulated time restriction ends or purpose restriction is accomplished), temporarily restricted net assets are reclassified to unrestricted net assets and reported in the Statements of Activities as net assets released from restrictions. As described in Note (1)(b), the Organization accounts for its revenues using the accrual basis of accounting. The Organization's most significant source of revenues is the Empowerment Zone Grant from HUD. Grant revenue is recognized when expenditures are incurred. (g) Concentration of Risk The Organization receives all of its funding from HUD. The Organization has a written memorandum of understanding with HUD, which will remain in effect until July 2, 2010 or the effective date of HUD's revocation of this agreement. (h) Income Taxes The Organization is exempt from federal and state income taxes under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 501(c)(3) and Section 23701d of the California Revenue and Taxation Code (CR & TC) and therefore has made no provision for income taxes in the accompanying financial statements. In addition, the Organization has been determined by the Internal Revenue Service not to be a "private foundation" within the meaning of the IRC Section 509(a). The Organization adopted the authoritative guidance for uncertainty in income taxes included in FASB ASC 740-10 Income Taxes (FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accountingfor Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109), as amended by Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-06, Implementation Guidance on Accounting for Uncertainty in Taxes and Disclosures Amendments for Nonpublic Entities. The adoption of ASC 740 (FIN 48) did not have an impact on the Organization's financial statements. 19C_18 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Notes to the Financial Statements (Continued) June 30, 2010 and 2009 (i) Functional Allocation of Expenses The costs of providing various programs and activities have been summarized on a functional basis in the Statements of Activities. 6) Recent Accounting Pronouncements The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") implemented the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the "Codification") effective July 1, 2009. The Codification has become the source of authoritative Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") recognized by FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities. On the effective date of the Codification, the Codification superseded all then existing accounting and reporting standards. All accounting literature not included in the Codification has become non-authoritative. References to GAAP included in the FASB Codification are noted as Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC"). Following the effective date of the Codification, FASB will not release new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force abstracts, but instead will issue Accounting Standards Updates ("ASU"). ASUs will not be considered authoritative in their own right, but will serve only to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance in the Codification, and provide the basis for the conclusions on the changes in the Codification. 19C-19 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Notes to the Financial Statements (Continued) June 30, 2010 and 2009 (2) EMPOWERMENT ZONE GRANT The total amounts granted and allocated are as follows: Approved Grants: Second round grant - Year One $ 3,000,000 Second round grant - Year Two 3,666,000 Second round grant - Year Three 12,306,200 Second round grant - Year Four 3,000,000 Second round grant - Year Five 1,987,000 Second round grant - Year Six 994,100 Second round grant - Year Seven 661,333 Second round grant - Year Eleven 667 Total Approved Grants 25,615,300 Allocated Grant Amounts: Expensed during the period ended June 30, 2000 (1,199,953) Expensed during the period ended June 30, 2001 (2,856,500) Expensed during the period ended June 30, 2002 (3,847,624) Expensed during the period ended June 30, 2003 (2,337,630) Expensed during the period ended June 30, 2004 (3,190,000) Expensed during the period ended June 30, 2005 (2,471,670) Expensed during the period ended June 30, 2006 (2,243,119) Expensed during the period ended June 30, 2007 (1,687,564) Expensed during the period ended June 30, 2008 (1,566,386) Expensed during the period ended June 30, 2009 (1,404,100) Expensed during the period ended June 30, 2010 (2,780,246) Total Allocated Grant Amounts (25,584,792) Total Unexpended as of June 30, 2010 $ 30,508 (3) OPERATING AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF SANTA ANA On December 6, 1999, the Organization entered into an operating agreement with the City to administer the goals and objectives of the approved strategic plan of the Empowerment Zone. These duties include the monitoring of programs, staffing, administration, and payment of program funds. Through the Memorandum of Understanding with HUD, the City requests payment from HUD for program costs incurred by subrecipients which are administered through the Organization in accordance with the operating agreement. The City advances the funds for these program costs and is reimbursed by HUD. 19G-20 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Notes to the Financial Statements (Continued) June 30, 2010 and 2009 All funds for the Empowerment Zone program are received directly by the City then passed through to the Organization who in turn reimburses subrecipients. The subrecipients' programs have been selected by the Organization to fulfill the goals stipulated in the approved strategic plan. The City is reimbursed for its administration costs associated with this agreement. The initial term of the agreement was through December 31, 2000; thereafter unless cancelled by the Organization through an action of its Board of Directors, which action shall take place no later than November 30 or any calendar year, the agreement shall be extended for the succeeding calendar year or until the termination date of the program. The outstanding advances from the City of Santa Ana were $52,756 and $393,404 at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. (4) PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT The Organization's property and equipment consist of the following at June 30: 2010 2009 Equipment $ 22,884 $ 22,884 Furniture 30,816 30,816 Subtotal 53,700 53,700 Less: accumulated depreciation (53,700) (53,700) Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation $ - $ - (5) GRANT RECEIVABLE The Organization receives all of its grant revenue from HUD through the City. Grant revenue is recognized when expenditures are incurred since all monies received are on a reimbursement basis. The amount due from HUD was $109,608 at June 20, 2010 and $436,029 at June 30, 2009. (6) LOANS RECEIVABLE On May 3, 2002, the Organization entered into an agreement with Taller San Jose, a subrecipient organization, whereby the Organization lent Taller San Jose $200,000 for the purchase of property that will be used for a vocational training program for young at-risk adults. The interest free loan is payable on July 1, 2009. The principal amount is deemed repaid by $2,353 on the first day of each calendar month. Taller San Jose is not obligated to make any payments to the Organization as long as the property is used for the Empowerment Zone program. In the event that the property is put to any other use than the designated Empowerment Zone program, the remaining principal balance would be payable in full to the Organization who would then return the funds to HUD. The outstanding balance was $0 and $2,353 at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. 19C.-21 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Notes to the Financial Statements (Continued) June 30, 2010 and 2009 On June 14, 2005, the Organization entered into an agreement with Kidworks, whereby the Organization awarded Kidworks a conditional grant of $314,282. The funds were used to fund the renovation costs for a community center site located in the Zone 1 area of the Santa Ana Empowerment Zone. As long as Kidworks complies with the terms of the agreement and uses the property for the Empowerment Zone program, an amount equal to $62,856 will be forgiven annually. In the event the property is put to any other use than for the designated Empowerment Zone program before July 31, 2010, the remaining balance would be payable in full to the Organization who would then return the funds to HUD. The outstanding balance was $68,094 and $130,951 at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. On August 20, 2009, the Organization entered into an agreement with The Cambodian Family, a subrecipient, whereby the Organization loaned the Cambodian Family $1,730,939 for the purchase of property that will be used for its headquarters where it will undertake programs for education, job placement and health. The interest free loan is payable on August 20, 2014. The Cambodian Family is not obligated to make payments to the Organization as long as the property is used for the Empowerment Zone program. In the event that the property is put to any other use than the designated Empowerment Zone program, the balance would be payable in full to the Organization who would then return the funds to HUD. The outstanding balance is $1,730,939 as June 30, 2010. (7) ACCRUED PROGRAM REIMBURSEMENTS TO SUBRECIPIENTS Accrued program reimbursements to subrecipients, including retentions payable, consisted of the following at June 30: 2010 2009 The Cambodian Family Mexican American Oppurtunity Foundation Templo Calvario CDC Total (8) GOING CONCERN $ 40,081 $ 13,262 - 10,630 1,633 17,546 $ 41,714 $ 41,438 The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has determined that the grant period for all Empowerment Zone grants will end on July 2, 2010. HUD has granted the Organization an extension until August 30, 2010 to incur expenses. The total unexpended grant funds of $30,509 at June 30, 2010 must be expended by that date. The Organization will have until September 15, 2010 to request reimbursement for eligible Empowerment Zone expenses. At the conclusion of the grant period the Santa Ana Empowerment Corporation will discontinue operations. All assets will be reverted to the City of Santa Ana. The salaries and benefits of the staff under the Santa Ana Empowerment Corporation will be transferred to other projects within the Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency. 19C-22 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Notes to the Financial Statements (Continued) June 30, 2010 and 2009 (9) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS The Organization has evaluated subsequent events through September 10, 2010 the date the financial statements were available to be issued. 19C-23 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Year Ended June 30, 2010 Federal CFDA Federal Grantor/Pass-through Grantor Number U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: Passed through the City of Santa Ana: Empowerment Zones Program 14.244 Grant Term Amount Federal Provided to Expenditures Subrecipients $ 2,780,246 $ 420,802 Total 5/4/00-07/02/10 See Accompanying Note to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. $ 2,780,246 $ 420,802 19C,6--24 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Note to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Year Ended June 30, 2010 (1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (a) Scope of Presentation The accompanying schedule presents only the expenditures incurred by the Santa Ana Empowerment Corporation (Organization) that are reimbursable under federal programs for federal financial assistance. For purposes of this schedule, federal awards include federal financial assistance received from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) through the City of Santa Ana. Only the portion of program expenditures reimbursable with such federal funds is reported in the accompanying schedule. (b) Basis of Accounting The expenses included in the accompanying schedule were reported on the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note (1) to the Organization's financial statements. Expenses reported include any property or equipment acquisitions incurred under the federal program. (c) Subrecipients During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, the Organization made the following payments to subrecipients: The Cambodian Family $ 304,146 El Puente CDC (Kidwojks) 116,136 Santa Ana WORK Center - Daisy Wheel 520 Total $ 420,802 19G-25 This page intentionally left blank. 190-26 Certified Public Accountants. rngocpa.cc?m To the Mayor and City Council of the City of Santa Ana Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance With Governmental Auditing Standards We have audited the financial statements of the Santa Ana Empowerment Corporation (Organization), California, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2010, and have issued our report thereon dated September 10, 2010. Our report included an explanatory paragraph highlighting that the Organization will discontinue operations after June 30, 2010. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Organization's internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Organization's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Organization's internal control over financial reporting. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that might be deficiencies, significant deficiencies, or material weaknesses. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Organization's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. 24 S N zl „f;+,i? [swtf S;?I? 10? "t,. t SS ???:,, V. 1 9C727 ?, We noted certain matters that we reported to management of the Organization in a separate letter dated September 10, 2010.This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Mayor, City Council, management and others within the Santa Ana Empowerment Corporation and federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. )ha,.,c ?'? a?? ? o Certified Public Accountants Newport Beach, California September 10, 2010 19C-28 Certified Pudic Accountants. mgQCj)a.COIn To the Mayor and City Council of the City of Santa Ana Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance with Requirements That Could Have a Direct and Material Effect on Each Major Program and on Internal Control over Compliance in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133 Compliance We have audited the Santa Ana Empowerment Corporation's (Organization) compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on the Organization's major federal program for the year ended June 30, 2010. The Organization's major federal program is identified in the summary of auditor's results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. Compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to its major federal program is the responsibility of the Organization's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Organization's compliance based on our audit. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Organization's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our audit does not provide a legal determination of the Organization's compliance with those requirements. In our opinion, the Santa Ana Empowerment Corporation complied, in all material respects, with the compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on its major federal program for the year ended June 30, 2010. However, the results of our auditing procedures disclosed an instance of noncompliance with those requirements, which is required to be reported in accordance with OMB Circular A-133 and which is described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs as item 2010-01. Internal Control Over Compliance Management of the Organization is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to federal programs. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Organization's internal control over compliance with the requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program to determine the auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on compliance and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Organization's internal control over compliance. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be deficiencies, significant deficiencies, or material weaknesses. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. However, we identified a certain deficiency in internal control over compliance that we consider to be a significant deficiency as described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs as item 2010-01. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. The Organization's response to the finding identified in our audit is described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. We did not audit the Organization's response and, accordingly, we express no opinion on the response. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Mayor, City Council, management and others within the Organization and federal awarding agencies, and passthrough entities and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. a;,uz, ? 0 16nned zcP Certified Public Accountants Newport Beach, California September 10, 2010 19CA0 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2010 Section I - Summary of Auditor's Results Financial statements: Type of auditor's report issued: Unqualified Internal control over financial reporting: • Material weakness(es) identified? No • Significant deficiency(ies) identified not considered to be material weaknesses? None noted Noncompliance material to financial statements noted? No Federal Awards: Internal control over major programs: • Material weakness(es) identified? No • Significant deficiency(ies) identified not considered to be material weaknesses? Yes Type of auditor's report issued on compliance for major programs: Unqualified Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with Section 510(a) of OMB Circular A-133? No Identification of major programs: CFDA No. 14.244 Empowerment Zones Program Dollar threshold used to distinguish between Type A and Type B programs: $300,000 Auditee qualified as a low-risk auditee? Yes 19G3 31 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2010 Section II - Financial Statement Findings None. Section III - Federal Award Findings and Ouestioned Costs Finding 2010-01 Federal Grantor: Department of Housing and Urban Development Program: Empowerment Zones Program CFDA No. 14.244 Criteria or Specific Requirement When Empowerment Zone funds are expended the grantee must minimize the time elapsing between the disbursement and drawdown. Condition During our testwork of cash management in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, we noted that the Organization's administrative expenses that occurred and were disbursed during FY 08/09 were not drawn down until January 15, 2010; which is not on a timely basis. Cause The deficiency appears to be due to inconsistent implementation of policies and procedures in place by the Organization. Effect Noncompliance with the aforementioned requirement results in the Organization not submitting drawdowns in a timely manner or the receipt of those funds. Questioned Cost Noncompliance with the aforementioned requirement results in untimely drawdown of $35,574. Recommendation We recommend the Organization adhere to policies and procedures that are in place by the Organization to ensure drawdowns are made in a timely manner. 19C .32 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2010 Management's Response We concur with this one untimely draw-down of $35,574. We have reminded Finance staff of the importance of drawing down funds in a timely manner. The Finance staff is aware of the Organization's policy and procedures and will apply them consistently. 19G--33 SANTA ANA EMPOWERMENT CORPORATION Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings Year Ended June 30, 2010 There were no findings reported for fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. 1966 34