HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-32•
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-32
bk: 8/23/07
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING
NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT REVIEW NO. 2007-14
TO PERMIT THE REHABILITATION OF THE FRONT
PORCH AT 810 NORTH FRENCH STREET.
LOCATED IN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT 19 ZONE
(SD-19) (FRENCH PARK)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby
finds, determines and declares as follows:
A. The property owner is requesting approval of Neighborhood Project
Review No. 2007-14 to permit the rehabilitation of the front porch at
810 North French Street. located in Specific Development 19 Zone
(SD-19) (French Park)
• B. The applicant is proposing the repair of one-inch by four-inch
clapboard siding for the porch railings, which has been damaged by
termite and moisture, and rehabilitation of the front porch. The
ornate porch trim associated with the porch railing and columns are
proposed to be repaired and remain in place.
C. The French Park Architectural Review Committee reviewed and
commented on the project and has found that the repairs are
consistent with the historic character of the neighborhood.
D. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-593.5(c) requires the
Planning Commission to review all plans within a Specific
Development Plan area to ensure that the project is in conformity
with the approved Specific Development.
E. On August 27, 2007, the Planning Commission conducted the
necessary review pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Section
41-593.5(c).
F. After considering all of the evidence submitted, the Planning
Commission finds and determines that Neighborhood Project
Review No. 2007-14 is consistent with both the French Park Design
Guidelines and the Citywide Design Guidelines in regards to
• architectural style and method of operation.
Resolution No. 2007-32
Page 1 of 3
G. This project was reviewed in accordance with the Guidelines for the
California Environmental Quality Act. The recommendation is
exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15270. This
exemption applies to projects which a public agency disapproves.
Statutory Exemption Environmental Review No. 2007-127 will be
filed for this project.
Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby approves Neighborhood
Project Review No. 2007-14. This decision is based upon, but is not limited to:
the Request for Planning Commission Action dated August 27, 2007 and exhibits
attached thereto, and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein
by this reference.
ADOPTED this 27th day of August, 2007.
VOTE: AYES: Alderete, De La Torre, Gartner, Leo, Mill, Munoz (6)
NOES: None (0)
ABSTAIN: None (0)
ABSENT: Betancourt (1)
~~
Christo er Leo
Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney
By:.
Ber
Chi
nt City Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, MARTHA RAMIREZ, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and
certify the attached Resolution No. 2007-32 to be the original resolution adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on August 27, 2007.
Date: J ~v
nning Commission S retary
City of Santa Ana
Resolution No. 2007-32
Page 2 of 3
• PROOF OF SERVICE
(C.C.P. SECTION 1013(a), 2015.5)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE
I am employed in the aforesaid county; I am over the age of eighteen and
not a party to the within action; my business address is 20 Civic Center Plaza,
Ross Annex 2"d ,Santa Ana, California 92702.
I served the foregoing document described as: Resolution No. 2007-32
(Neighborhood Project Review No. 2007-14) in this action y p acing a true
copy t ereo enc ose in sea a enve opes a ressed as follows:
Victoria Betancourt
810 North French Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
[ ] I caused to be delivered by courier, such envelope by hand to the office of the
addressee(s).
[X] BY MAIL I am readily familiar with my employer's practice of collection and
processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be
deposited with U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully
• prepaid at Santa Ana, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware
that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal
cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of
deposit for mailing in affidavit.
[ ]The document was transmitted by facsimile transmission and was reported as
complete and without error.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California
that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on October 9, 2007 at Santa Ana, California.
MARTHA IREZ
Resolution No. 2007-32
Page 3 of 3