HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-25RESOLUTION NO. 2006-025
i
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING THE ART
PROGRAM FOR THE PROPERTY AT 2775 NORTH MAIN
STREET WHICH IS WITHIN SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT
NO. 59 (SD-59)
KO x/30/06
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds,
determines and declares as follows:
A. The Applicant is requesting approval of the proposed art plan located at
2775 North Main Street which is within Specific Development No. 59 (SD-
59).
B. The art plan came before the Planning Commission of the City of Santa
Ana on August 14, 2006.
C. The art plan proposed provides an art piece within a fountain at the
northeast corner of Main Street and Memory Lane. The design submitted
provides a 30-foot high by 25-foot wide bronze freestanding sculpture that
consists of a juxtaposition of flat and curved planes of metal that interact
with the gravity flow of water.
D. Specific Development No. 59 requires Planning Commission review and
approval and that the art piece be completely installed prior to issuance of
any certificate of occupancy. Additionally, Specific Development No. 59
identifies minimum requirements such as:
Public art valued at one half of one percent of the overall project
construction valuation.
2. Location of at least one art piece at the northeast corner of Main
Street and Memory Lane.
3. The public art should invite participation and interaction, inspire,
add local meaning, interpret the community by revealing its culture
or history, and/or capture or reinforce the unique character of the
new place.
4. Location to complement features such as plaza or architectural
• components so that the art piece is an integral part of the
development site.
Resolution No. 2006-025
Page 1 of 4
5. The use of durable materials and finishes including, but not limited
to, stone or metal.
6. No advertising of any type including, but not limited to, products,
services or businesses.
E. The art plan is in compliance with the provisions of Specific Development
No. 59 (SD-59) zoning district
F. In accordance with the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality
Act, the proposed art and plaza plans has been determined to have no
significant impact to Environmental Impact Report 2004-01 that was
certified.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby
approves the art plan. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the
abovesaid hearing, which includes but is not limited to: the Request for Planning
Commission Action dated August 14, 2006 and exhibits attached thereto; and the public
testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.
ADOPTED this 14th day of A
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners:
ugust, 2006 by the following vote:
Benavides, Betancourt, Cribb, De La Torre,
Gartner, Leo, Lutz (7)
None (0)
None (0)
None (0)
~ ~~~
Christop r Leo
Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney
By:
. Kylee O. tto
~- Assistan City Attorney
Resolution No. 2006-025
Page 2 of 4
•
~J
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, MARTHA RAMIREZ, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify
the attached Resolution No. 2006-025 to be the original resolution adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on August 14, 2006.
Date: 0 ` ~~- ~ (o
Planning Commission Secretary
City of Santa Ana
Resolution No. 2006-025
Page 3 of 4
PROOF OF SERVICE
(C.C.P. SECTION 1013(a), 2015.5)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF_ORANGE
I am employed in the aforesaid county; I am over the age of eighteen and
not a party to the within action; my business address is 20 Civic Center Plaza,
Ross Annex 2"d ,Santa Ana, California 92702.
On August 31, 2006 I served the foreggoing document described as:
Resolution No. 2006-025 (City Plan Art P1anZm this action by placing a true
copyTo~ en roseam sea e enve opes a ressed as follows:
William Hammerstein, President
Hammerstein Investments, Inc.
441 North Beverly Drive, Suite 209
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
[ ] I caused to be delivered by courier, such envelope by hand to the office of the
addressee(s).
[X] BY MAIL I am readily familiar with my employer's practice of collection and
processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited
- with U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at
Santa Ana, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on
motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date
or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in
affidavit.
[ ]The document was transmitted by facsimile transmission and was reported as
complete and without error.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California
that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on August 31, 2006 at Santa Ana, California.
MARTH MI Z