HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-13RESOLUTION NO. 2006-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO RENAME THE
STREETS IMPERIAL PROMENADE AND HUTTON
CENTRE DRIVE TO MACARTHUR PLACE
KO - 6/13/06
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds,
determines and declares as follows:
A. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed
public hearing on June 12, 2006, on Street Naming No. 2006-01.
B. The Planning Commission took into consideration the policy guidelines
contained in Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 33-6.
C. The streets to be renamed are as follows:
1. Imperial Promenade will become MacArthur Place
2. Hutton Centre Drive south of MacArthur Boulevard and north of
Sandpointe Avenue will become MacArthur Place
D. The Planning Commission continued the renaming of Hutton Centre Drive
(not including Hutton Centre Drive south of MacArthur Boulevard and
north of Sandpointe Avenue) to allow additional public outreach.
E. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the
recommended action is exempt from further review pursuant to Section
15301. This Class 1 exemption allows minor alterations to the operation
and licensing of public streets. Categorical Exemption No. 2006-89 will be
filed for this project.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby,
approves Street Naming No. 2006-01 as identified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein. The renaming of the street shall become effective 90 days after top
off of 9 Hutton Centre.
Section 3. The Planning Manager shall provide 60 days written notice to each of
the affected businesses and tenants prior to the effective date of the renaming of the
above referenced streets.
Resolution No. 2006-013
Page 1 of 2
Section 4. Should the top off of 9 Hutton Centre fail to occur within 5 years from the
date of adoption of this resolution, this resolution shall become null and void and be of no
further force and effect.
ADOPTED this 12th day of June, 2006 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Betancourt, Cribb, De La Torre, Gartner, Leo, Lutz
(6)
NOES: Commissioners: None (0)
ABSENT: Commissioners: Rodriguez (1)
ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: None (0)
li
Christopy er Leo
Chairm n
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney
Kylee O. Otto
Assistant City%Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, MARTHA RAMIREZ, Clerk of the Planning Commission, do hereby attest to and
certify the attached Resolution No 2006-013 to be the original resolution adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on June 12, 2006.
Date: /'Of! '-'Q~
. Cle of the Plannin mmissi
City of Santa Ana
Resolution No. 2006-013
Page 2 of 2
z
'~
.. i
•
F
w
w
y
~-, ~~
III --- "' JJJ !~~
!~ ~~.
I '' "1
EAST COLUMBINE AVENUE
O
MAC ARTHUR PLACE
,~
` fa
k ~ ~
~~.. ..... t _~J
f~~ ~' ;.
{~
f ~ ~ N ! ~ t
~~'.
_... .,. t. ~.._.,...°.
MAC ARTHUR BOULEVARD
o~ y,
o~_
{ ~, c~o~
F ~
~ e~o 111ILLLL
%~/~j LAKE
SgHO ~~ ~^ ~'lf/1~fC~
A°~~r ~
F
AVENUE
.\
z
Mac Arthur Place Master Plan
® New Buildings
Imperial Promenade
to MacArthur Place
""'~' Existing Buildings
r t-...
Hutton Centre Drive
to MacArthur Place
EXHIBIT A
PROOF OF SERVICE
(C.C.P. SECTION 1013(a), 2015.5)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE
I am employed in the aforesaid county; I am over the age of eighteen and
not a party to the within action; my business address is 20 Civic Center Plaza,
Ross Annex 2"d ,Santa Ana, California 92702.
On July 21, 2006 I served the fore oing document described as: Resolution
No. 2006-013 (Street Name No. 2006-0 in this action by placing a true copy
t ereo enc ose m sea a enve opes a ressed as follows:
Cynthia J. Nelson
Vice President of Government Relations
Nexus Companies
1 MacArthur Place, Suite 300
Santa Ana, CA 92707
[ ] I caused to be delivered by courier, such envelope by hand to the office of the
addressee(s).
[X] BY MAIL I am readily familiar with my employer's practice of collection and
processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited
with U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at
Santa Ana, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on
motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date
or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in
affidavit.
[ ]The document was transmitted by facsimile transmission and was reported as
complete and without error.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California
that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on July 21, 2006 at Santa Ana, California.
MARTHA RAMIREZ
•