HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-20RESOLUTION NO.O1-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING
VARIANCE NO. 01-02 IN PART TO ALLOW A
FREESTANDING SIGN AND WALL SIGNS AND
DENYING A FREEWAY PYLON SIGN FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2901 TECH CENTER
DRIVE
WHEREAS, Variance No. 01-02 came before the Planning Commission for a public
hearing seeking approval for a freestanding sign not within the four foot landscaping requirement
and exceeding the maximum length and area allowed; for wall signs to be located above the first
story; and for a freeway pylon sign over 100 square feet and locate more than 300 feet from a
freeway exit;
WHEREAS, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program,
Environmental Review No. 00-171 has been prepared for this Project;
WHEREAS, Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-638 authorizes the Planning
Commission to grant a variance upon making certain findings;
• NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
1. Based upon the evidence submitted at the above-said hearing, the Planning Commission
finds and determines as follows:
A. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size,
shape, topography, location or surroundings, that the strict application of the zoning
ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges not otherwise at variance
with the intent and purpose of the provisions of this Chapter.
The project site is irregular in shape and has limited frontage along Tech Center
Drive, which prohibit the flexibility of building placement and circulation. The
variance for setback and landscape buffer reduction is necessary in order to allow
this property to be utilized in a manner that is consistent with similar surrounding
industrial use.
B. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or
more substantial property rights.
The granting of the variance for freestanding sign is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights since the proposed
• freestanding sign will allow proper identification of the development to visitors
without further interrupting the 10-foot setback with another sign structure. The
• sign is designed in a way to be non-intrusive and consistent with other industrial
business park in the vicinity.
The granting of the variance for wall sign is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights since the proposed wall signs
will allow the tenant the ability to identify the name of the business to visitors
without removing the entry canopies.
The variance for the freeway pylon sign is not necessary to preserve property rights,
as the tenant will maintain the ability to install wall signs, therefore allowing the
ability to identify the business.
C. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to surrounding property.
The granting of variances for a freestanding sign and wall signs will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property as
proposed since conditions of approval has been added that will limit the size of wall
signs allowed on the site which will assist in minimizing the visual clutter found on
structures with multiple wall signs.
The granting of a variance for the freeway pylon sign may be detrimental to the
• area by allowing excessively large signage on the site that may contribute to
adverse aesthetic impacts along the State Route 55. In an effort to improve the
overall aesthetics and reduce sign blight along one of the Freeways, it is critical to
only permit freeway pylon signs that fully comply with code.
D. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City.
The granting of Variance No. 01-02 will not adversely affect the General Plan of the
City since the proposed industrial park was designed in conformance with City
Zoning, Development, and General Plan requirements. Signage is ancillary to the
project and a necessary component of an industrial development.
2. Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, Environmental
Review No. 00-171, is hereby approved and adopted.
Pursuant to Title XIV, California Code of Regulations ("CCR") § 735.5(c)(1), the Planning
Commission has determined that, after considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that
the proposed project will have the potential for any adverse effect on wildlife resources or the
ecological habitat upon which wildlife resources depend. The proposed project exists in an urban
environment characterized by paved concrete, roadways, surrounding buildings and human activity.
Therefore, pursuant to Fish and Game Code § 711.2 and Title XIV, CCR § 735.5(a)(3), the
payment of Fish and Game Department filing fees is not required in conjunction with this project.
•
• 3. Variance No. 01-02 is hereby approved in part as to the freestanding sign and wall signs,
subject to conditions, as set forth in Attachment A, attached hereto and incorporated herein.
4. Variance No. 01-02 is hereby disapproved in part as to the request for a freeway pylon
sign.
ADOPTED this ~ day of ~Y 2001 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Cribb, Doughty, Leo, Mondo, Nalle, Verino (6)
NOES: Commissioners: None (0)
ABSENT: Commissioners: Richardson (I)
ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: None (0)
ATTEST:
Rosa Barela
Recording Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
i -~
Christopher G. Norman
Assistant City Attorney
•
3
~~SOLUTION NO.Ol-20
AY 29, 2001
PAGE 1 OF 1
Conditions for Approval
Variance No. 2001-02 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with all applicable sections of the
Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the Uniform
Fire Code, the Uniform Building Code and all other applicable regulations.
The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed
below prior to exercising the rights conferred by this variance.
The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below
throughout the life of the variance. Failure to comply with each and
every condition may result in the revocation of the variance.
A. Planning Division
1. Any modifications to this variance must be submitted to the
Planning Division for review.
• 2. The letter height for the wall signage shall be reduced to 30
inches.
3. No signs shall be placed on the first floor.
Mitigation Measures
4. The applicant shall coordinate with the Orange County Airport
Land Use Commission prior to approval of the final subdivision
map.
•
ATTACHMENT A