Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-049 - Approving Site Plan Review No. 2012-06RESOLUTION NO. 2012-049 ROH - 11/19/12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 2012-06 AS CONDITIONED TO ALLOW THE RENOVATION AND EXPANSION OF THE DISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER AT 2500 NORTH MAIN STREET BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Discovery Science Center (DSC) is requesting an amendment to the development standards within Specific Development Plan No. 65 (SD-65) and site plan approval to allow the renovation and expansion of the existing science center as part of Phase II of its approved master plan at 2500 North Main Street. B. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed public hearing on October 22, 2012, and voted to recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Site Plan Review No. 2012-06 as conditioned. C. The DSC is requesting site plan approval for the project (Site Plan Review No. 2012-06). The zoning designation for the subject property is Specific Development Plan No. 65 (SD-65). 1. Section 41-593.4(b) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code requires review of all plans within a specific development plan area to ensure the project is in conformity with the Specific Plan. 2. Considering adoption of the amendments to SD-65 requested by the DSC, the project is in compliance with all applicable development standards outlined within the Specific Development Plan (SD-65). 3. Considering adoption of the amendments to SD-65 requested by the DSC, the project has been determined to be in compliance with applicable parking, landscape and architectural provisions governing the project. Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the recommended actions have been determined to be adequately evaluated in the previously certified FEIR 96-06 and subsequent Addendum FEIR 96-01 (ER00-04) as per Section 15162 of the CEQA guidelines. The originally certified Environmental Resolution No. 2012-049 Page 1 of 3 Impact Report and subsequent Addendum were analyzed in light of the revised site plan and it is determined that there are no new significant impacts resulting from the project, as proposed. All mitigation measures in FEIR96-1 and subsequent Addendum continue to apply to the proposed project. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves Site Plan Review No. 2012-06 as conditioned in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Council Action dated November 19, 2012, and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. This Resolution shall not be effective unless and until Ordinance No. NS-2840 becomes effective. If said ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or otherwise does not go into effect for any reason, then this resolution shall be null and void and have no further force and effect. Section 5. This decision rendered by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana is final and is subject to judicial review pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6. The Clerk of the Council shall give direct notice to the applicant of the Council's decision and these findings. ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 2012 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By: Assiktont ( Oy Attorney Resolution No. 2012-049 Page 2 of 3 AYES: Councilmembers: Alvarez, Benavides, Bustamante, Martinez Pulido (5) NOES: Councilmembers: None (0) ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None (0) NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: Sarmiento, Tinaiero (2) CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, MARIA D. HUIZAR, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2012-049 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on November 19, 2012. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2012-049 Page 3 of 3 Exhibit "A" Conditions for Approval for Site Plan Review No. 2012-06 Should the Planning Commission approve Site Plan Review No. 2012-06, the approval is subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with all applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the California Building Standards Code and all other applicable regulations. The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below prior to exercising the rights conferred by this Site Plan Review. The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the Site Plan Review. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the site plan review. A. Planning Division All proposed improvements must conform to the Site Plan Review approval of DP No. 2012-15 and staff report exhibits. 2. The project shall remain in compliance with Environmental Impact Report No. 96-01 and Addendum, including Mitigation Monitoring Plan. 3. The DSC shall maintain a Parking Management Plan (PMP) throughout construction of Phase II of the project. The PMP shall be reviewed and approved annually by the Planning and Building Agency and include an assessment of the peak parking periods. 4. The DSC shall maintain signed agreements for use of the required number of off-site parking spaces, as calculated by the PMP and confirmed by the Planning and Building Agency, during Phase IIA of construction and prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for Phase I I B of the project. 5. Phase IIB will require Site Plan Review and approval by the Planning Commission at which time the Parking Analysis and PMP will be submitted for review and revision, as necessary. 6. The DSC plan should remain in compliance with the Scope and Phases of the Development plan as per all applicable agreements, including the revised Implementation Agreement, between the DSC and the Successor Agency to the City's Redevelopment Agency. Exhibit "A" November 19, 2012 PAGE 2OF2 8. The DSC must comply previous entitlements, property. B. Police Department with any and all conditions and requirements of all permits, and discretionary actions pertaining to this The applicant shall submit a building and parking security plan to the Police Department for review and approval (added by the Planning Commission at its November 13th meeting).