HomeMy WebLinkAbout25G - AGMT - PAVEMENT MGT CONSULTANT SRVSREQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
FEBRUARY 4, 2014
TITLE:
AGREEMENT FOR PAVEMENT
MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT
SERVICES
-r
CITY MANAGER
RECOMMENDED ACTION
CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY:
9-Z*J."T*WWK
❑ As Recommended
❑ As Amended
❑ Ordinance on 1° Reading
❑ Ordinance on 2" Reading
❑ Implementing Resolution
❑ Set Public Hearing For
CONTINUED TO
FILE NUMBER
Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with Bucknam
Infrastructure Group, Inc., subject to nonsubstantive changes approved by the City Manager and
City Attorney, to provide pavement management consultant services, in an amount not to exceed
$95,000.
DISCUSSION
Approval of this recommended action will allow the City to retain professional services for
updating the City's Pavement Management Program (PMP). The PMP is an essential tool in
determining the pavement condition, expected life, recommended improvements, and associated
costs. The program also enables the City to prioritize pavement rehabilitation projects where
they are most cost effective. An updated PMP is required for the City to remain eligible for
Measure M2 funding programs and to continue to receive a reduction in the required local match
for Measure M2 funded projects.
In December 2013, the Public Works Agency posted a Request for Proposals on the City's
website. A total of eight firms submitted proposals and four were deemed responsive. These
proposals were evaluated by a review committee from the Public Works Agency and rated based
on qualifications, staffing and project organization, and project understanding and work plan. The
following is an average of the final scores:
FIRM
RATING
FEE
1. Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. 91 $82,189
2. Harris & Associates 82 $189,030
3. Omnis, Inc. 79 $85,400
4. Nichols Consulting Engineers, CHTD. 77 $185,050
Based on its rating and schedule, staff recommends that the firm of Bucknam Infrastructure
Group, Inc., be retained for the required consultant services in the not -to- exceed amount of
$95,000, which includes a 15 percent contingency.
25G -1
Agreement for Pavement Management Consultant Services
February 4, 2014
Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funds are available in the Measure M2 Program (Account 03217662 - 66220).
Edwin "William" Galvez, P.E.
Interim Executive Director
Public Works Agency
EWG /KN
APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS:
Francisco Gutierrez
Executive Director
Finance & Management Services Agency
Exhibit: 1. Agreement for Pavement Management Consultant Services
25G -2
AGREEMENT FOR PROVISION OF
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 4°i day of February, 2014 by and
between Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., a California corporation (hereinafter "Consultant ")
and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under
the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter "City ").
RECITALS
A. The City desires to retain a consultant having special skill and knowledge in the field of
pavement management practices.
B. Consultant represents that Consultant is able and willing to provide such services to the
City.
C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is
knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant tinder this
Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be
expected from a professional consulting firm in the field.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the
terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall provide all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services and incidental
customary work (hereinafter "Services ") required to fully and adequately update the City's
Pavement Management Program and develop best practices recommendations for efficiency and
cost effectiveness (hereinafter, the "Project "), as more fully set forth Consultant's Proposal dated
December 30, 2013, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference.
If during the term of this Agreement, the parties agree that additional services are
necessary to complete the Project, Consultant shall provide a separate written estimate for such
services. No additional services shall be authorized unless a separate estimate is given for said
work and the estimate is approved by the Executive Director in writing before the work is
commenced. Work performed prior to obtaining written approval of the City shall not be included
within the Scope of Work and may not be paid.
2. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS
This Agreement creates a non - exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use,
modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property
embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of
authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical
drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared
or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ( "Documents & Data "). Consultant
shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non- exclusive and
perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement.
Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the 'legal right to license any and all
Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to
Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in
any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within
the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk.
25G -3
3. COMPENSATION
a. City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services for
City a Project fee of $82,189.00, at the rates and charges identified in Exhibit B, attached hereto
and incorporated by reference. A contingency of fifteen percent (15 %) shall be available, at the
discretion of the Executive Director of Public Works, for services that are currently not
anticipated but may be required to complete the Project. The total sum to be expended by City
under this Agreement shall not exceed $95,000.00 during the term of this Agreement.
b. Invoices
i. The Consultant shall submit a monthly invoice by the fifteenth of the month to the
City for the services rendered in the prior month.
ii. All invoices for work performed under this Agreement shall be submitted in a format
approved by the City. Invoices shall include the following information at a
minimum:
a. Consultant's invoice number
b. 'Beginning and ending dates for services
d. Work site address /location (if applicable)
e. Tasks or deliverables completed and hours of service rendered during the
statement period
f Percent Project complete from Agreement commencement through invoice date.
g. Additional approved services provided outside Consultant's original Scope of
Work.
c. City shall, within sixty (60) days of receipt, review and make payment on the invoice.
City shall retain ten percent (10 %) of the invoice amount from each payment until the completed
Project has been accepted by the City. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet
the standards of performance as set forth in the Recitals, above.
4. TERM
This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and terminate on
December 31, 2014, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 14, below. The term of
this Agreement may be extended by a writing executed by the City Manager.
5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an
independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor
shall it be construed to create an employer - employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or
to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which
Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the
services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable
standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages,
employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees
and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes.
6. INSURANCE
Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall
maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described
below:
25G -4
a. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial
general liability insurance which shall include, but not be limited to protection against claims
arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom and damage to
property, resulting from any act or occurrence arising out of Consultant's operations in the
performance of this Agreement, including, without limitation, acts involving vehicles. The
amounts of insurance shall be not less than the following: single limit coverage applying to bodily
and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and property damage, in the total
amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence, and in the aggregate. Such insurance shall (a) name the
City, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives as additional insured(s); (b)
be primary and not contributory with respect to insurance or self - insurance programs maintained
by the City; and (c) contain standard separation of insureds provisions.
b. Business automobile liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined single
limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for
owned, hired and non -owned automobiles.
c. Worker's Compensation Insurance, hi accordance with the provisions of Section 3300
of the Labor Code, Contractor, if Contractor has any employees, is required to be insured against
liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self - insurance. Prior to commencing the
performance of the work under this Agreement, Contractor agrees to obtain and maintain any
employer's liability insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000 per accident.
d. Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of
not less than $1,000,000 per claim.
e. The following requirements apply to the insurance to be provided by Consultant
pursuant to this section:
i. Contractor shall maintain all insurance required above in full force and effect for
the entire period covered by this Agreement.
ii. Certificates of insurance shall be furnished to the City upon execution of this
Agreement and shall be approved in form by the City Attorney.
iii. Certificates and policies shall state that the policies shall not be cancelled or
reduced in coverage or changed in any other material aspect without thirty (30)
days prior written notice to the City.
f. If Contractor fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this
section or fails or refuses to furnish the City with required proof that insurance has been procured
and is in force and paid for, the City shall have the right, at the City's election, to forthwith
terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not affect Contractor's right to be paid for its
time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. Contractor waives the right to
receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the City for any work performed prior to approval
of insurance by the City.
INDEMNIFICATION
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold
harmless City, its officers, agents and employees (collectively, the "indemnified parties ") from
and against any and all claims (including, without limitation, claims for bodily injury, death or
damage to property), demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses,
judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including, without limitation,
attorney's fees, disbursements and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever (individually,
a claim; collectively, "claims "), which may arise from or in any manner related (directly or
indirectly) to any work performed or services provided under this Agreement (including, without
25G -5
limitation, defects in workmanship and /or materials) or Consultant's presence or activities
conducted performing the work (including the negligent and /or willful acts, errors and /or
omissions of Consultant, its principals, officers, agents, employees, vendors, suppliers,
contractors, subcontractors, anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them or for whose
acts they may be liable for any or all of them). Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein
shall be construed to require Consultant to indemnify the indemnified parties from any claim
arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the indemnified parties. This indemnity
shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable.
The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by
the Consultant.
8. LAWS AND REGULATIONS
Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and
federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the
services and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of
such laws and regulations in connection with services. If the Consultant performs any work
knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to
the City, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising wherefrom. Consultant shall
defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and
harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or
liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.
9. CONFIDENTIALITY
If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such
information is reasonably understood to be confidential and /or proprietary, Consultant agrees that
it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and
further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like
importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include
all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but
also inforimation transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential
information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and /or agent of the other party is covered
by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non -use and nondisclosure shall not apply to
any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault
of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the
Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of
law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information
disclosed by the City.
10. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE
Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct
or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this
Agreement.
11. NOTICE
Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this
Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or
mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by telefacsimile or other
telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons:
25G -6
To City: Clerk of the City Council
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M -30)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 92702 -1988
telefacsimile (714) 647 -6956
With courtesy copy to: Executive Director of Public Works
City of Santa Ana
Attn: Design Engineering
20 Civic Center Plaza (M -36)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702
telefacsimile (714) 647 -5635
To Consultant: Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc.
Mr. Peter Buckram
3548 Segate Way, Suite 230
Oceanside, California 92057
telefacsimile 760- 216 -6549
A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter,
any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail,
communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been
deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and
addressed as set forth above. If sent by telefacsimile, communication shall be effective or
deemed to have been given twenty -four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission
report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of
calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be
excluded.
12. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT
This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and
Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In
the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms
of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written
instrument signed by the authorized representatives of the parties. The parties agree that any
terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in
addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant nor the City.
Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or
agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any
party, which are not embodied herein.
13. ASSIGNMENT
Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant,
Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior
written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without
the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall
be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this
Agreement performed by City personnel or by other consultants retained by City.
25G -7
14. TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of
termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant
compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination,
subject to the following conditions:
a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver
to the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be
the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof
for such purposes as the City deems appropriate.
b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance
specified in the Recitals of this Agreement.
15. DISCRIMINATION
Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital
status, sexual orientation, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by
applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other
employment related activities. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and
shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations.
16. JURISDICTION - VENUE
This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the
validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement
shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. The parties further agree
that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be
brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement.
17. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES
Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses,
permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder
and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of
Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and
in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and
exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement.
18. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature hereinbelow has the power,
authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall
indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to
City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn.
b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set
forth in the body of this Agreement.
II/%
25G -8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year
first above written.
ATTEST:
MARIA D. HUIZAR
Clerk of the Council
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney
By:
Laura Sheedy
Assistant City Attorney
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
EDWIN "WILLIAM" GALVEZ, P.E.
Interim Executive Director — PWA
CITY OF SANTA ANA
DAVID CAVAZOS
City Manager
BUCKNAM & ASSOCIATES, INC.
PETER J.BUCKNAM
President
25G -9
EXHIBIT A
BUCKNAM INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP, INC.
PROPOSAL
Dated
December 30, 2014
25G -10
PROPOSAL FOR
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE
2014 (RFP #: 13 -078)
City of Santa Ana, CA
December 30, 2013
Submitted by:
BUCKRAM i�N�FOAASTRUCTU RE
up, itic
Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc.
i
r
i-
25G -11
Table of Contents
Statement of Qualifications
Section Pale
Cover Letter ......................... ............................1 -1
2 Firm and Personal Experience ..........................2 -1
Firm Qualifications ........................................... ............................... 2 -1
Key Project Team Members ............................. ............................... 2 -2
Project Team Org Chart ................................... ............................... 2 -4
Resumes........................................................... ............................... 2 -5
3 Project Understanding ......... ............................3 -1
Project Approach /Scope of Work .................... ............................... 3 -1
4 Schedule .............................. ............................4 -1
Project Schedule (Critical Path) ....................... ............................... 4 -1
�5 Relevant Project Experience ............................. 5 -1
Local Relevant PMP Project Experience .......... ............................... 5 -1
6 References ........................... ............................6 -1
PMPReferences ............................................... ............................... 6 -1
7 Fee Proposal ..................... ............................... 7 -1
Separate sealed envelope ................................... ............................7 -1
- Hourly Rate Schedule ................................ ............................... 7 -2
TOC
25G -12
December 30, 2013
Mr. Kenny Nguyen
Public Works Agency
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M -36); 3rd Floor, Ross Annex
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Subject: Proposal for Pavement Management Program Update -2014
Dear Mr. Nguyen:
It is our pleasure to submit our proposal to assist the City of Santa Ana in continuing the
proactive management of your Pavement Management Program (PMP). With the City seeking
to move toward stronger infrastructure management methodologies through advanced
pavement inspections, zone maintenance, MicroPAVER use, Capital Improvement reporting
(CIP), OCTA Measure M2 compliance and GIS development, Buckram Infrastructure Group, Inc.
has identified a proactive and cost efficient method to assist the City in implementing a
successful PMP. Our team will focus our long -term Orange County- Southern California
experience and GIS /GPS technologies to optimize the City's maintenance dollars by
implementing a manageable and reliable PMP methodology.
Our project staff can be relied upon to provide outstanding service to the City because we will
provide:
Relevant and accurate PMP services based on our ongoing work with the Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCTA), Measure M2 compliance (Bucknam has assisted
fourteen (14) OC agencies comply with M2 in the past year)
OCTA M2 compliant MicroPAVER surveying, reporting and pavement analysis by May,
2014 (prior to June 2014 deadline)
Local- Orange County knowledge and experience gained through our management of 60
local agency PMP's within Southern California; Mr. Peter Buckram is currently serving
as Project Manager for numerous Orange County PMP projects (i.e. Aliso Viejo, San
Juan Capistrano, Laguna Niguel, Brea, Irvine, Fountain Valley, Huntington Beach, Costa
Mesa, Tustin, RSM, Laguna Beach, Laguna Hills, Newport Beach and Westminsterl and
he has personally managed over 200 PMP projects over the past fifteen years
Project /engineering experience that brings the understanding that MicroPAVER results
are not set in stone; we proactively use the available data to enhance budget,
forecasting, project planning and maintenance zone development
SUCKNAMINFRASTRUCTURE GROUP, INC, -
3548 Seagate Way, Suite 230 Oceanside, CA 92056
T. 760.216.6529 F. 769.216.6549
wwwLUCkrcem- Inacom
25G -13
Cost effective management methodologies, from the project kickoff through final
reporting, gained through our Project Manager's experience and use of GIS tablet -based
/digital roadway imaging surveys
Professional Engineering experience through our Principal, Mr. Steve Bucknam, P.E. who
brings 40+ years of public /private local agency experience. Mr. Bucknam has served as
City Engineer, Deputy City Manager, Design Engineer and Utilities Director for numerous
public agencies and brings a tremendous amount of relative pavement management
knowledge to this project.
As Project Manager, my goal is not just to meet the requirements of this project but establish a
living document (Arterial & Local pavement CIP / Renewed Measure M2 submittal) that will be
used throughout the term of the CIP as well as implement achievable long -term infrastructure
management goals in coordination with City schedules.
By selecting Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., the City of Santa Ana will receive a strong,
knowledgeable, innovative, and communicative team with the experience to implement a cost -
effective pavement management program. Our handpicked pavement management
professionals are committed to delivering quality services to the City. We have already
scheduled time for your project and eagerly await our kick -off meeting with City staff and you.
Mr. Peter Bucknam will represent our firm for this project and can be contacted at 949 -363-
6461 (work) 714 -501 -1024 (cell) or email at peter @bucknam - inc.com.
Bucknam agrees with the Professional Services Agreement attached to this RFP (including the
insurance requirements). This proposal is valid for ninety (90) days.
Respectfully submitted,
Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc.
Peter J. Bucknam
Project Manager/ President
25G -14
b &I
Firm and Personal Experience _ T
Firm Profile and Qualifications
With more than fifteen years of managing change, Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. is
committed to building stronger relationships with government organizations through frequent
communication and team building. We build long -term partnerships with agencies that expect
and require accuracy, efficiency, and integrity in all aspects of community services. Our
experienced staff is committed to ensuring that immediate and long -term goals are met and are
a top priority in the development of pavement management, infrastructure management,
financial, geographic information systems (GIS), and facility management projects.
Our full- service Infrastructure Management - GIS Division provides comprehensive engineering
and infrastructure management services, as well as database management, pavement / ROW
field inspection services, and GIS automation and management. Our staff consists of registered
civil engineers; former Director of Public Works -City Engineers and maintenance specialists who
can help implement solutions based upon your specific facility /infrastructure needs and will
provide assistance through each step of your project.
Our extensive professional experience includes:
Public Works Management
Intranet GIS Implementation
ADA Self- Evaluation /Transition Planning
GIS Custom Applications
GASB 34 Compliance /Reporting
Water Resources Planning
Pavement -CIP Management (PMP)
City Engineering Services
Pavement Data Conversion
Federal & State Funding Assistance
Pavement Condition Surveys
Traffic Control Device/ Sign Inventory
PMS /GIS Coordination
Infrastructure Grant Assistance
Public Right -of -Way Inventories
Maintenance Management Programs
PIMP Compliance Reporting
Record Retention/ Scanning Services
Digital Roadway Imaging/ Survey
Regarding Pavement Management Programs, our firm is currently assisting 25+ local agencies
comply with the County pavement reporting requirements. In addition to the extensive
knowledge and experience of our infrastructure management professionals, Buckram provides
a broad scope of administrative, inspection, construction management, civil engineering, and
GIS services to public agencies. The extensive experience of Buckram's staff, coupled with its
service to more than 100 cities and other public agencies, assures our clients that the firm is a
broad based resource with an understanding of today's infrastructure issues and knows how to
provide the necessary solutions to public agencies in today's complex governmental
environment.
We bring a wealth of experience to the City through our successful track record, pavement
management knowledge through application, and relationship building through trust and
adherence to schedule. We look forward to working with you on your project. Our handpicked
management professionals are committed to delivering quality services to the City. Our office is
located in Oceanside. CA.
2 -1
25G -15
Firm and Personal Experience 7 V,
Project Team — Key Staff
The Bucknam pavement management team's local agency expertise is demonstrated through:
Z• Our experience of managing pavement projects over the past fifteen years;
Assisting cities comply with OCTA Renewed Measure M2 through our experience
of working with 14 of the OC cities regarding PMPs;
o Implementing MicroPAVER through OCTA Project Management experience
Extensive Orange, Los Angeles, San Diego, Ventura, and Inland Empire PMP project
management experience;
Our understanding of public works projects from the "city" side through City
Engineer and Public Works Director experience;
Implementing a realistic, proactive and repeatable PMP methodology that matches
your agencies needs and goals.
Buckram will continue to bring our extensive experience to the City of Santa Ana by building
upon our knowledge and understanding of your PMP / GIS goals. Mr. Buckram's pavement
team includes six (6) dedicated, qualified managers and field technicians that have served under
his management for over fifteen years on PMP projects. His team of inspectors will update your
PMP through sound Army Corps of Engineers - MicroPAVER inspection methodologies. Mr.
Buckram's experience covers the management and implementation of infrastructure
management programs that exceeds 15,000 miles of pavement for more than 60 cities and 180+
PMP projects.
Based on the scope of work related to this project, our team brings a tremendous amount of
experience to the City of Santa Ana regarding field and in -house training for MicroPAVER and
innovative survey methodologies (i.e. Tablet -based windshield and /or automated digital
roadway imaging). We bring a wealth of experience through projects, pavement application
knowledge and relationship building through trust and adherence to schedule.
See Section 6 of our proposal for Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. staff compliance and pre -
qualification regarding OCTA's PMP guidelines and compliancy.
Bucicnom Team Experience
PETER BUCKNAM, Project Manager, has managed numerous pavement management
projects over the past 15 years in the Southern California region and will be the Project Manager
for Santa Ana's PMP project. Within this time he has served as project manager for sixty
agencies in the Southern California (including Santa Ana's 2008 -09 PMP update). Peter is
committed to the project from the receipt of the notice -to- proceed through completion and
furthermore he is a certified PMS software trainer on MicroPAVER and performed numerous
training sessions for local agencies. He has performed over 40 training workshops covering
software's such as MicroPAVER, MTC and CarteGraph.
2 -2
25G -16
Firm and Personal Experience
l
He brings his expertise to cities through converting, implementing, updating, and enhancing
pavement management programs.
Mr. Bucknam has spoken at numerous conferences pertaining to pavement practices, surveying,
management and GIS integration as well as conducted numerous City Council pavement studies.
As the City moves into the "program management" phase for its pavement program, Mr.
Bucknam brings his experience of working with individual cities for numerous years, where he
has assisted cities from the onset (turn -key, data conversion) to high -end pavement
management and GIS integration and County compliance. Our staff is proud of the numerous
long -term, on -call PIMP support contracts we continue to serve with local agencies (e.g.
Ontario, Fountain Valley, Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Rancho Santa Margarita,
Irvine, John Wayne Airport).
Mr. Bucknam will bring new, fresh and proactive recommendations to this project (i.e. zone
maintenance) and will identify realistic program management and fiscal goals to assist the City
in its upcoming CIP. Our team brings proven conversion and survey methodologies that
efficiently and accurately update all pavement data within the City's PMS. The City will receive
recommendations that are sound and achievable, rather than timid or unrealistic.
STEVE BUCKNAM, PE, Principal -in- Charge, will be responsible for the overall performance
of the project and provide quality assurance review. Mr. Steve Bucknam is a licensed Civil
Engineer (LIC #20903) and will oversee all tasks for this project. Mr. Bucknam is a former
Deputy City Manager for Public Works and City Engineer of Norwalk, and City Engineer in
Arcadia and Pacifica, California. He has over 40 years of professional experience and has
managed street maintenance, reconstruction and improvement programs. He has developed
and administered Street maintenance and improvement programs in those cities as well as the
City of Newport Beach where he served as Design Division head. He has extensive experience in
capital program planning, pavement construction and budgeting for street improvement
programs.
JAMES CRANDALL, Assistant Planner, will oversee all field surveyors for this project. His
responsibilities will include adherence to the survey schedule, survey quality control,
maintaining the MicroPAVER database through survey and GIS deliverables. Mr. Crandall has
been involved with over 47 pavement management projects within San Diego, LA and Orange
counties.
GREGORY BUCKNAM, Field Technician, will be a supportive field surveyor for this project.
His responsibilities will include surveying, quality control, and working with our management
staff ensuring the updated MicroPAVER database is complete. He has been involved with over
45 pavement management projects and brings his wealth of CarteGraph, MicroPAVER, GIS and
inspection experience to this project.
CHRIS VICTORIO, Field Technician, will be a supportive field surveyor for this project. His
responsibilities will include surveying, quality control, and working with our management staff
ensuring the updated MicroPAVER database is complete. Mr. Victorio has been involved with
over 75 pavement management projects and brings his wealth of MicroPAVER, GIS and
inspection experience to this project.
2-3
25G -17
Firm and Personal Experience
1.
DAN LIPINSKI, Field Technician, will be a supportive field surveyor for this project. His
responsibilities will include surveying, quality control, and working with our management staff
ensuring the updated MicroPAVER database is complete. He has been involved with over 20
pavement management projects and brings his wealth of CarteGraph, MicroPAVER, GIS and
inspection experience to this project.
With three technicians on this project that are trained in the Army Corps of Engineers survey
methodology and available to begin work immediately; our survey schedule will be expedited.
Our team will be able to survey the entire 105 miles of pavement within four (4) weeks' time
due to our experience, availability and man - power.
Availability of Staff:
• Project Manager
(65 %)
• Principal -In- Charge
(100 %)
• Assistant Planner
(75 %)
+ Field Technician(s)
(90 %)
2 -4
25G -18
Peter J. Bucknam / Project Manager
Director of Infrastructure Management— GIS
EDUCATION
B.A., Geography — Urban Planning, San Diego State University, 1997
PROFESSIONAL DATA
Member, American Public Works Association
Member, Maintenance Superintendents Association
Chair, Transportation Committee, Inland Empire Report Card (ASCE) — 2005/06 & 2008/09
Co- Chair, Member APWA Committee for Street and Technology 2003 -2013
Certificate of Professional Development — MicroPAVER
Certificate of Completion — OCTA MicroPAVER Distress Training (2011)
NASSCO — Certificate, National Pipeline Assessment Certification Program (PACP)
QUALIFICATIONS/ EXPERIENCE OVERVIEW
Peter Bucknam is an expert in infrastructure project management, training, planning, resource management,
implementation and program management. He has over fourteen years' experience in the area of Geographic
Information Systems and infrastructure asset management. Mr. Bucknam has managed a wide range of
infrastructure project tasks including the collection and input of infrastructure survey data, preparation of
Public Works capital improvement program projections and reports, infrastructure /software needs
assessments, GIS /GPS data collection, data conversion and quality control.
Mr. Bucknam has performed infrastructure management services to over 60 local agencies and is currently
serving as project manager for numerous pavement management programs throughout Southern California.
He has personally served as project manager for 200 PMP projects throughout Riverside, San Bernardino, San
Diego, Orange and Los Angeles counties. He has worked with over 20 Los Angeles cities and he is currently
working with fifteen (15) of the 34 Orange County agencies regarding Measure M2 MicroPAVER compliance.
His project level and management experience covers: pavement /sidewalk management, Traffic Control Device
Inventories (TCDI), GIS implementation, Traffic Signal surveys, Right -of -Way (ROW) surveys, and ADA
survey /compliance. In managing over 200 infrastructure projects in the past fifteen years, Mr. Bucknam has
used a diverse amount of software to assist local agencies implement infrastructure management programs
and GASB 34. These programs include MicroPAVER, MTC, LambdaTech's GPSVision, Cart6Graph, ESRI
products, Crossroads, Stantec, GBA Master Series, and Mapinfo.
Prior to joining Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., Mr. Bucknam served as Director of Infrastructure
Management -GIS with an Engineering consulting firm where he managed numerous public works
infrastructure /ROW projects ranging from surveying, maintenance life- cycles, cost & benefit analysis,
financing and construction cost estimating. This included researching, surveying, converting and
implementing multiple phase pavement management projects which provided better management practices,
data efficiencies and GIS functionality within local governments and maintenance facilities. In addition, he
provided technical (software) support for the on -going citywide PMS projects as well as developing capital
improvement plans /budgets for integrating Tablet -GIS data management functionality into future
maintenance efforts.
25G -19
MR. PETER BUCKNAM'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE (1997 -2013)
• 2013 -16
Pavement Management Program, City of Aliso Viejo (MicroPAVER)
• 2013 -16
Pavement Management Program, City of Huntington Beach (MicroPAVER)
• 2013 -16
Pavement Management Program, City of Lake Elsinore (MicroPAVER)- Digital Roadway
Imaging
• 2013
Pavement Management Program, City of Indian Wells HOA— Digital Roadway Imaging
• 2013
Pavement Management Program, City of San Juan Capistrano (MicroPAVER)
• 2013
Pavement Management Program, City of Pomona (MicroPAVER)
• 2013
GIS Annual Contract Services, City of Fountain Valley
• 2013
Pavement Management Program, City of Fountain Valley (MicroPAVER)
• 2013
Pavement Management Program, City of Huntington Beach (MicroPAVER)
• 2012 -16
Pavement Management Services, City of Irvine (MicroPAVER)
• 2012
Pavement Management Services, City of Costa Mesa (MicroPAVER)
• 2012
Pavement Management Program, City of Vista (MicroPAVER)
• 2012
Pavement Management Program, City of Hermosa Beach (MicroPAVER)
• 2011 -12
Pavement Management Program, City of Pico Rivera (MicroPAVER)
• 2011 -15
Pavement Management Program, City of Palmdale (MicroPAVER) - Digital Roadway Imaging
• 2011 -12
Pavement Management Program, Ontario Municipal Utilities (MicroPAVER)
• 2011
Annual Infrastructure Management -GIS, City of Fountain Valley
• 2011
Record Retention Management, City of Tustin (MicroPAVER)
• 2011
Pavement Management Program, City of Lomita (MicroPAVER)
• 2011
Pavement Management Program, City of Culver City (MicroPAVER)
• 2011 -16
Pavement Management Program, City of Laguna Hills (MicroPAVER)
• 2011
Pavement Management Program, City of National City (MicroPAVER) - Digital Roadway Imaging
• 2011
Pavement Management Program, City of Diamond Bar (MicroPAVER)
• 2011
Pavement Management Program, City of Ontario (MicroPAVER)
• 2011
Pavement Management Program, City of Tustin (MicroPAVER)
• 2011 -14
Pavement Management Program, John Wayne Airport (MicroPAVER)
• 2011
Pavement Management Program, City of Laguna Niguel (MicroPAVER)
• 2010 -13
Pavement Management Update, City of Newport Beach (MicroPAVER)
• 2010
Pavement Management Update, City of La Habra (MicroPAVER)
• 2010
Pavement Management Update, City of Brea (MicroPAVER)
• 2010
Pavement Management Update, City of Lake Elsinore (MicroPAVER)
• 2010 -13
Pavement Management Update, City of Irvine (MicroPAVER)
• 2010
Park / Facility Sidewalk Inventory, City of Irvine
• 2010
Pavement Management Update, City of Huntington Beach (MicroPAVER)
• 2010
Pavement Management Update, City of Costa Mesa (MicroPAVER)
• 2010
Pavement Management Update, City of Culver City (MicroPAVER)
• 2010 -13
Pavement Management Update, City of RSM (MicroPAVER)
• 2009
Bike Trail / Parking Lot PMP, City of Irvine
• 2009
Pavement Management Update, City of Westminster (MicroPAVER)
• 2008 -09
Sign Inventory / PMP Update, City of Palmdale
• 2008
Sign / TCDI Inventory — ADA Compliance Inventory, City of Palm Desert
• 2007
Public Right -of -Way Inventory, City of Santa Barbara
• 2007 -08
Digital Roadway Imaging Program / ROW Inventory, City of Cypress
• 2009
Pavement Management Update, City of Brea (MicroPAVER)
25G -20
• 2009
Record Retention Scanning— GIS Link, City of Brea
• 2009
Pavement Management Update, City of Rosemead (MicroPAVER)
• 2009
Pavement Management Update, City of Alhambra (MicroPAVER)
• 2008 -09
Pavement Management Update, City of Newport Beach (MicroPAVER)
• 2008 -09
Pavement Management Update, City of Culver City (MicroPAVER)
• 2008 -09
Pavement Management Update, City of Santa Ana (MicroPAVER)
25G -21
C. Stephen Bucknam, Jr., P.E., Principal -in- Charge
EDUCATION
B.S., Civil Engineering, Loyola University of Los Angeles, 1967
M.S., Environmental Engineering, Loyola University of Los Angeles,
1972
PROFESSIONAL DATA
Registered Professional Engineer, States of California (No.20903) and Washington (No.17310)
California State Community College Teaching Credential
Fellow, American Society of Civil Engineers
Member, Board of Directors — Urban Water Institute
Life Member, American Public Works Association
Member, Water Environment Foundation
Member, University of California Irvine, Civil & Environmental Engineering Affiliates
Honorary Member, Chi Epsilon
EXPERIENCE OVERVIEW
Over forty years' experience in the administration, management, planning, design and construction
management of public works and development programs and projects including: water and wastewater
projects, transportation, drainage, including: program management, master planning, infrastructure planning
and maintenance programming, environmental studies, street, highway, alley, storm drain, water and sewer
system design, rate studies, emergency planning, facilities design, groundwater studies, wells, reservoirs, site
studies, pump stations, lift stations, intergovernmental negotiations and agreements, hydrology, treatment
facilities, building design, grants, regulatory permitting, system appraisals, R/W negotiations, acquisitions and
documentation, project management, production control, operations studies, capital improvement
programming and budgeting, hydroelectric projects, underground utilities, assessment districts, surveying,
mapping, legal testimony to public boards, commissions and councils, and direction of technical advisory
committees to joint powers agencies and water districts.
Transportation / Streets— Highways -Traffic
Served as Contract City Engineer for the City of Arcadia responsible for long range advanced planning of the
City's transportation engineering program. Directed the preparation of the City's Transportation Master Plan
which identified, consistent with the City's General Plan the transportation related needs under these
requirements so of AB 1600 nexus constraints.
Acted as Principal in charge over a Pacific Coast Highway (SR -I) /Newport Boulevard (SR -55) interchange, City
of Newport Beach. Project involves a study of various alternatives, conventional and unconventional, for
improvements to the existing interchange.
Restraints include limited right -of -way, environmental challenges (e.g., Newport channel bridge widening,
"Arches" liquor store and restaurant property acquisition, and existing bridge aesthetics), and potential
hazardous waste issues. Alternatives were evaluated and selected to include in the PSR. Included project
coordination with various agencies and sub consultants, and oversight of concept geometries, cost estimating,
25G -22
and report preparation.
Conceptual study, Project Study Report, and Project Report for 1- 710 /Firestone Boulevard interchange
modification and Firestone Boulevard improvements for City of South Gate. Also involved a feasibility study
which included preparation of a traffic study, conceptual plans for several types of interchanges, construction
cost estimates, and preliminary Caltrans Project Study Report. Prepared ISTEA National Highway System
funding application for authorization and appropriation. Coordination with Caltrans District 7.
Mr. Bucknam has served as the working Principal for all pavement management related projects that
Bucknam has performed. This includes projects listed below:
• 2013 -16 Pavement Management Program, City of Aliso Viejo (MicroPAVER)
• 2013 -16 Pavement Management Program, City of Huntington Beach (MicroPAVER)
• 2010 -16 Pavement Management, City of Lake Elsinore (MicroPAVER) - Digital Roadway Imaging
• 2013
Pavement Management Program, City of Indian Wells HOA— Digital Roadway Imaging
• 2013
Pavement. Management Program, City of San Juan Capistrano (MicroPAVER)
• 2013
Pavement Management Program, City of Pomona (MicroPAVER)
• 2013
GIS Annual Contract Services, City of Fountain Valley
• 2013
Pavement Management Program, City of Fountain Valley (MicroPAVER)
• 2013 -15
Pavement Management Program, City of Huntington Beach (MicroPAVER
• 2012
Pavement Management Services, City of Costa Mesa (MicroPAVER)
• 2012
Pavement Management Program, City of Vista (MicroPAVER)
• 2012
Pavement Management Program, City of Hermosa Beach (MicroPAVER)
• 2011 -12
Pavement Management Program, City of Pico Rivera (MicroPAVER)
• 2011 -15
Pavement Management Program, City of Palmdale (MicroPAVER) - Digital Roadway
Imaging
• 2011 -12
Pavement Management Program, Ontario Municipal Utilities (MicroPAVER)
• 2012
Sign Inventory Program, City of National City
• 2012
Pavement Management Program, City of Brea
• 2012
Pavement Management Program, City of Ontario
• 2012
Pavement Management Program, City of Lake Elsinore
• 2012
Pavement Management Program, City of Alhambra
• 2012
Pavement Management Program, City of Rosemead
2012
Pavement Management Program, City of Newport Beach
• 2012
Pavement Management Program, City of El Segundo
• 2012
Pavement Management Program, City of Irvine
• 2012
Pavement Management Program, City of Hermosa Beach
• 2011
Pavement Management Program, City of Pico Rivera
• 2011
Pavement Management Program, City of Palmdale
• 2011
Pavement Management Program, Ontario Municipal Utilities
• 2011
Annual Infrastructure Management -GIS, City of Fountain Valley
• 2011
Record Retention Management, City of Tustin
• 2011
Pavement Management Program, City of Lomita
2011
Pavement Management Program, City of Culver City
• 2011 -16
Pavement Management Program, City of Laguna Hills
2011
Pavement Management Program, City of National City
• 2011
Pavement Management Program, City of Diamond Bar
• 2011
Pavement Management Program, City of Ontario
• 2011
Pavement Management Program, City of Tustin
2
25G -23
2011 -14 Pavement Management Program, John Wayne Airport
2011 Pavement Management Program, City of Laguna Niguel
2010 -13 Pavement Management Update, City of Newport Beach
25G -24
Project Understanding / Scope of Work 'f
Project Understanding / Approach
We have defined detailed phases to the scope of work in accordance to the City's RFP;
1. Management and Administration
a. Project Status Meetings — Quality Control Program
b. Client Satisfaction / Project Deliverables
2. Update Maintenance & Rehabilitation History
3. Pavement Condition Surveys
4. Budget Analysis
5. Final Report (Internal City CIP / OCTA Compliance Reporting)
1) Project Implementation (MPAH Network)
TASK 1.1: Management and Administration
The first step in implementing a successful pavement management program truly resides in
frequent communication and timely scheduled data updates. For the City of Santa Ana it will be
essential to establish, up front, the Public Works /Maintenance pavement management
priorities. Our team will set a Project Kickoff meeting to further discuss and review in detail the
expectations of the project, technical approach, section ID management & surveys, Orange
County Transportation Authority (OCTA) compliance, finalization of the scope of work and the
review of schedule.
This effort will build consensus between the Street Maintenance and Engineering departments
as well as build stronger ARTERIAL and LOCAL maintenance programs. The first key topics to be
discussed will include the review and assessment of the existing MicroPAVER pavement
plan /data, OCTA compliance, and survey areas based on recent maintenance work and
schedules, new construction, data quality and condition, current pavement procedures,
historical expenditure levels, and desired service levels.
Project Status Meetings - Quality Control Program
Status Meetings and Progress Reports
• Minimum of three meetings during the project (kickoff, field, and status
meetings)
• Field review meetings
Monthly progress status reports will be delivered to City project manager
Quality Control (QC)
We will use a statistical sampling approach for measuring the quality of our field
technician's work. In this manner, 10 percent (7.5 miles) of the original surveys will be
re- surveyed by an independent survey crew, supervised by a field supervisor, and the
results will be compared to the original surveys.
3 -1
25G -25
Project Understanding / Scope of Work 1'
Our QC process involves checking the field crews' work in a "blind study" fashion.
Quality control checks will be performed at the end of each survey week. This will
ensure that all field personnel are properly collecting distresses and pavement
quantities for all street segments. Since we are collecting distress information on our
field Tablets with the Santa Ana MicroPAVER database live, our staff will perform
several quality control tests within the pavement management software using a
sample set of the City of Santa Ana's street distress data. This will ensure that all
system and analysis settings as well as City recommendations and standards are being
followed.
As shown within the OCTA "Countywide Pavement Management Program, Guidelines
Manual (December 2012) ", our staff will follow and deliver on the requirements stated
on Section 2.4, page 9 which require specific QA /QC data (Items A through G).
Additionally, Chapter 3 requires numerous data /deliverables from local agencies for
Measure M2 eligibility. All general draft and final reporting will follow the Chapter 3
guidelines.
Over the past year, Bucknam has already submitted fourteen (14) OCTA Measure M2
compliant reports for OC municipalities, they include Brea, Costa Mesa, Huntington
Beach Laguna Hills, Fountain Valley, Irvine, Aliso Viejo Laguna Niguel, San Juan,
Newport Beach, Laguna Beach, RSM, Tustin and Westminster.
Our surveys follow the accepted OCTA walking requirements. A copy of the QA /QC plan
utilized by our staff during the project will be submitted along with the PMP certification
documents.
Our staff has already attended the OCTA
MicroPAVER Distress Training Class held in
November, 2011, 2012, 2013. In February,
2013 our staff was considered prequalified
to prepare Pavement Management Plans
fully compliant with the OCTA Countywide
Pavement Management Guidelines
(contact Mr. Harry Thomas / OCTA for
details).
' Certificate of CompCetion
This Certification Is presented upon wmpietion of attendance and
panicipplion In the pCTA MlcroPAVEt2 Biatraas "Crstlning Class.
Hold November 14&15,2011 at Iha GaNen Greve Bus Facility.
7'eter.'Utuknum
Orange County Transportation Authority
1 1 r'pn1 Val(! t � iuu
Deliverable: Monthly Project Status reports, field review and project status meetings,
OCTA QA /QC Plan
Client Satisfaction /Project Deliverables
Shown throughout our Scope of Work, each Task is summarized with project
deliverables. Client satisfaction will derive from frequent communication with the
Project Manager and key staff members from the Engineering and Street Maintenance
departments. Project success is created by delivering on three main factors;
3 -2
25G -26
S..
Project Understanding / Scope of Work
1) Adherence to scope tasks and deliverables
2) Performing to the standard set by the Project Schedule; and
3) Controlling costs. Our Project Manager will follow each of these factors throughout
the duration of the project
Deliverable: Project Status Updates, as stated in Task 1.2
TASK 1.2: Update Maintenance and Rehabilitation History
Bucknam will review all city provided maintenance projects that have been completed since the
last major PIMP update (i.e. 2011). These records will be assessed and entered into MicroPAVER.
Our staff will generate an updated work history report for City review and compliance. The City
will provide Bucknam with the most recent PAVER 6.5 database (.e65 file).
Deliverable: Citywide Work History Report
TASK 1.3: Conduct Pavement Condition Survey
Once the pavement segmentation has been assessed and
verified, the inspection of approximately 105 MPAH centerline
miles will be performed per ASTM D6433 -11 and OCTA
guidelines.
City of Santa Ana Street System Network:
• MPAH —105 centerline miles (2014 survey)
o Survey will exclude private streets, Orange
County unincorporated areas and State
Highways
o Recently slurry seal and overlay maintenance will reduce the amount of
necessary survey, Bucknam will coordinate mileage and cost reduction with City
prior to survey
• It is also noted that the City may elect to survey on Local and Alley sections. We have
shown the additional optional costs within our proposed fee to demonstrate these
efforts.
o Locals -317 centerline miles (optional survey)
o Alleys — 28 centerline miles (optional survey)
Our survey methodologies will include the following approach based on the City's cost and
benefit analysis:
3 -3
25G -27
Project Understanding / Scope of Work `�'
1. Walking (Recommended) based MicroPAVER survey (performed on Tablets live in the
field); this survey methodology is required by OCTA. Our staff will establish all
inspection sample locations for survey based on MicroPAVER / OCTA December 2012
guidelines.
2. Automated Digital Roadway Imaging (Optional Task 4.1) survey; Bucknam has recently
performed this service for the cities of Fountain Valley, Cypress, RSM, Santa Ana, La
Habra Heights, Tustin, National City and Palm Desert for PMP and ROW inspections.
MicroPAVER sampling method used.
Distress types will be collected based upon actual surface conditions and physical characteristics
of the segment. Surveying methods will be conducted by remaining consistent with MicroPAVER
& the Army Corp of Engineers sampling guidelines while being flexible to current City practices.
We will use the City's GIS centerline live in the field to reduce survey times and project
schedules. If the City has a recent high - resolution aerial (approx. 3 ") we will use this file during
ourfield survey efforts to verify street measurements and other segment attributes.
Our use of MicroPAVER- Tablet units allows our staff to collect pavement data with the City of
Santa Ana's MicroPAVER database live in the field. At the end of the day all electronic data is
transferred to our office for quality control and management. Our Tablet methodology sets us
apart from the competition since we are using a paper -less inventory process to enter data;
this in turn generates cost savings to enhance other portions of the project such as CIP
reporting, MicroPAVER training, and on -call services.
Roadway Verification Survey - A listing of the field attribute data that is updated /verified during
the survey for the pavement management database is listed below. Bucknam will obtain
measurements of each streets width, length and surface classification and compare it to existing
PAVER data. Discrepancies in the data will be tabulated and reviewed by Bucknam and the City
prior to any update within PAVER.
1. Field Attribute Data (updated and /or verified)
• From /to, indicating the assigned limits of the section, sample test areas, street
name, a street codification (arranged west to east and south to north)
• Street ranking indicating local, alley, arterial, collector, # of lanes, surface type
• Historical PCI tracking from previous inspections and 2014 PCI inspections
• Segment quantities, indicating the length, width, and total true area of the section
• Pavement distresses compliant with MicroPAVER — OCTA guidelines (i.e. alligator
cracking, block cracking, rutting, long /trans cracking, weathering, etc.
2. Conditional data will be evaluated for all street segments and will include:
• MicroPAVER 20 AC & 19 PCC distresses by type, severity and sample area
• PCI ratings (0 -100); per segment, per grid zone, per maintenance zone and citywide
• Other known or found environmental issues (standing water, site condition, etc.)
3 -4
25G -28
x`
Project Understanding / Scope of Work r
We welcome staff members from the City of Santa Ana to join our surveys. All pavement data
will be entered into the City's most current licensed software (version 6.5.4). All items listed
above will be maintained by our staff for the duration of this project.
Data management will be performed in -house at our Laguna Niguel office. At the completion of
the project, the MicroPAVER database will be placed within your information
services /communication network.
3. Section Distress and PCI Reporting
Once inspections are completed, we will generate a draft Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
Report for City staff to review.
PCI reports will include the necessary data listed within the Countywide Pavement Management
Program, Guidelines Manual; Chapter 3 (Agency Submittals).
At a minimum, the Santa Ana Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report will include
• Present condition index per segment, per rank, per maintenance zone and citywide
• Present condition of segments and future performance for the next seven years based
on performance prediction modeling and local conditions
• Identify the form, condition and causes of pavement failure (if possible)
• Integrate surface distress, functional classification, ride quality and traffic volume into
maintenance analysis (See Task 4.3/4.4)
Deliverable: Citywide draft PCI report, Pavement segment data required within Chapter 3
MicroPAVER Guideline Manual (OCTA)
TASK 1.4: Budgetary Analysis
We will assist the City in developing the most cost - effective preventative maintenance, repair and
rehabilitation strategies possible. This will be accomplished by meeting with the City to discuss
and strategize maintenance activities that are currently being used by the City. Based on the
City's current AC & PCC applications and other maintenance practices used we will conduct an
historical and prospective analysis on the conditional and financial impact these current practices
have on the pavement network. Based on our fiscal and deterioration analysis, we will present
our results and recommendations to City staff. This analysis will become an essential building
block for the 2014 -2021 fiscal year maintenance programs.
We will establish a maintenance "decision tree' that will be used to generate pavement
recommendations that match current 2014 maintenance approaches. This will be accomplished
by assessing /updating the unique and individual deterioration curves within MicroPAVER based on
functional class (i.e. arterial, collector, local), ride quality, traffic volumes and age.
Our staff will review the Santa Ana's deterioration curves that have been developed based on
historical pavement condition, inspection, surface type, MicroPAVER deterioration, and road
class.
3 -5
25G -29
Project Understanding / Scope of Work
The curves will be modified based on 2014 pavement conditions. The strategies that are typically
reviewed are rehabilitation and reconstruction (R &R), localized maintenance, slurry seals, and
various overlay types, the expected improvement in pavement condition, the life -cycle extension
that would result and the unit costs for maintenance.
All maintenance practices /unit costs will be integrated into MicroPAVER and will be derived from
the most recent construction bids for pavement rehabilitation. We will account for inflation rates
when long -term revenues projections are made.
Our staff will also update the City's residential maintenance zone approach. We will focus on
projecting budgets and maintenance recommendations for all streets within maintenance
zones; this will allow us to proactively schedule maintenance efforts throughout the multi - year''
CIP as well as achieve the desired level of PCI across the City.
Our Project Manager and Principal will work closely with City in defining repair and
rehabilitation strategies during each fiscal year and within each tract /area defined by the City
(i.e. Maintenance zones 1 thru 4 have been completed, zone 5 is under construction and zone 6
is currently being bid out). Once the repair /rehabilitation strategies have been defined, the
identification of a seven year Forecasted Maintenance schedule will be generated.
The recommended budget scenarios will be identified on the basis of several criteria:
• Present pavement conditions; Desired levels of service and available resources
• Achieving Local Match Reduction guidelines identified by OCTA
• Scheduling with the City's maintenance zones and other capital projects (water,
sewer)
• Accrued backlog levels and stabilization of maintenance backlog
• Future routine maintenance needs based on projected deterioration rates
The primary emphasis of this task is to maximize the programming of street maintenance
projects using the most cost - effective strategies available and taking into account a life -cycle
cost analysis. A working "draft" Final Report will be generated for City staff to review. The Draft
and Final PMP reports will include:
• Executive Summary/ Findings and Recommendations
• Pavement Condition Index (PCI) reports;
• 7 -Year CIP identifying arterial and residential zone maintenance (per section)
recommendations (slurry, overlay, recon, etc.) associated with a construction cost
• GIS mapping
Deliverable: Three copies of the Draft Pavement Management Program Report
TASK 1.5: Final Report - OCTA Compliance Reports/ Citywide CIP Report
We will deliver the Final Report to the City which will be essential for staff reference and use as
well as presented in a way that is beneficial for elected officials /upper management.
3 -6
25G -30
Project Understanding / Scope of Work t
- MITI -
This report will assist the City in complying with OCTA and its most recent Countywide PMP
Guideline requirements. The report will be prepared in a format that uses the information
delivered by MicroPAVER in conjunction with the information and analysis performed by our
team. The report will also provide the City with information on:
• Current inventory and pavement conditions indices (PCI) for all road classes
• Projected annual rehabilitation programs for street maintenance for a 7 -yr period
(ARTERIAL and LOCAL Forecast Maintenance Reports) that show the largest return on
investment and acceptable levels of service
• Modeling and comparison of budget scenarios typically include:
• Maintenance required to complete all streets within 7 -years
• Current/ Actual budget projection (citywide approach)
• 7 -year CIP projection budget for OCTA submittal requirements
• Final Local Match Reduction budgetary models / results
• Strategies and recommendations for the City's AHRP, Prop. 113 and maintenance
programs and procedures, including a preventative maintenance schedule
• Supporting documentation required by OCTA
• A detailed breakdown of deferred maintenance (backlog)
Our OCTA PMP submittals have been well received by OCTA and are formatted in such a way for
easy review and acceptance. Our staff will include within the draft /final report the following
minimum data:
A) Average PCI for:
a) Entire pavement network
b) MPAH Roadways
c) Local streets
B) Projected PCI under existing funding levels over the next seven years for:
a) Entire pavement network
b) MPAH Roadways
c) Local streets
C) Seven -yr plan for road maintenance and rehabilitation, identifying street sections
selected for treatment, based on the existing budget.
a) Street name, limits of work, length, widths and pavement areas
b) Functional classification
c) PCI and most recent date of inspection
d) Type and cost of treatment
D) Alternative funding levels required to:
3 -7
25G -31
Project Understanding / Scope of Work
a) Maintain existing weighted average network PCI
b) Improve weighted average network PCI
E) Backlog by FY of unfunded pavement rehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction. Total
amount of backlog will be included in summary tables
F) Pavement Management Program Certification form
We will make a presentation of the results from the 2014 PMP update to City personal and /or
City Council if necessary (pro - bono).
Registered Engineer
Mr. Steve Bucknam, P.E. will supervise all operations, review all completed data and prepare
and sign a final report incorporating the results of our pavement evaluation and conditions. We
will provide engineered recommendations for pavement rehabilitation and replacement design
based upon field data and analysis.
Deliverable: Digital file on CD, one (1) hardcopy of the Final Pavement PMP, in binder and
electronic form (.pdf), will be sent to the City. Bucknam will provide one (1) copy of
Micro PAVER .e65 file on CD as well as all M &R, survey and budget analysis data.
Optional Tasks
TASK 2.1 through 2.3 (Local Network):
If needed and per the City's request, Local streets (317 centerline miles) will be surveyed. Our
methodology for project administration, data assessment, pavement survey and reporting will
be identical to the scope of work shown above for the MPAH network.
TASK 3.1 through 3.3 (Alley Network):
If needed and per the City's request, Alley streets (28 centerline miles) will be surveyed. Our
methodology for project administration, data assessment, pavement survey and reporting will
be identical to the scope of work shown above for the MPAH network. It is noted that work
histories will be excluded from this effort.
Additionally, the City has requested that the alley network /sections that are currently within the
Santa Ana PAVER 6.5 database be cross - checked and verified against the City's GIS pavement
layer. This effort will include the verification of alley segments, naming conventions, dimension
accuracy and the organization of Branch / Section ID's in logical sequences (i.e. alphabetical,
geographical, etc.).
TASK 4.1: Automated Digital Roadway Imaging
Bucknam has performed numerous digital roadway imaging survey throughout Southern
Califnornia over the past fifteen years. Based on the City's infrastructure / GIS data collection
priorities we have performed digital imaging surveys for local agencies that complament our
3 -8
25G -32
Project Understanding / Scope of Work Aa
pavement inspections. Our services are a proactive and cost efficient GPS survey methodology
that will allow for the collection of numerous GPS locations using "one" set of digital imagery
(e.g. five citywide infrastructure surveys for the cost of one). We always tell our clients,
regarding this task service, "It has to be the right fit at the right time'. If the City is looking to
proactively collect numerous assets under one survey effort within the next 12 to 18 months,
this is the solution.
Beyond the pavement survey capabilities, the City will be able to collect other infrastructure
assets in the future such as signs, driveways, catch basins and
other ROW features; a tremendous costs savings that could
reach $400,000 over the next 3 years. M
With verification of street segmentation, the inspection of
approximately 105 centerline miles will be surveyed (or
citywide). MicroPAVER - Army Corp of Engineers AC and PCC
distress types will be collected based upon actual surface
conditions and physical characteristics of the segment while
being flexible to current City practices.
Our automated digital imaging allows technician to collect the following:
• Continuous pavement imaging (images taken every 5 meters, competition typically
surveys at every 8 meters /25 feet intervals)
• Surface roughness ratings (IRI); Rutting depth (full width of lane or street)
• Imaging captures 100% of each pavement segment (not just one lane)
• Data transfers seamlessly to MicroPAVER
• 2mm pixel images allows for centimeter horizontal and vertical accuracy
The first survey process will involve the mobile GPS vehicle taking approximately two - week's
time to survey the Santa Ana's street network; additionally, the vehicles drive the posted speed
limits. The images that are collected are taken by using Sony digital stereographic cameras (6
cameras) positioned on the vehicle. The images have a resolution of 1600x1200 and are geo-
referenced by means of inertial GPS equipment contained within the van; images are taken
every 4 to 6 meters, 15 ft. intervals.
The quality of the imagery and its GIS / record collecting capabilities within the software
provided allows the technician to accurately identify the required pavement distresses defined
by the pavement software and the project (distresses are collected in- house).
Survey vehicles are equipped with digital measuring instrumentation (DMI) that will be used to
verify all pavement section lengths and widths. Our vehicles can be equipped with road
roughness rating equipment, strip mapping cameras and are set to record 360 degree street
imaging.
The survey will be performed by the Bucknam team that is experienced and trained in
infrastructure condition assessment using LambdaTech's "Feature Extraction" software.
3 -9
25G -33
Schedule
kvA�
Our Critical Path Method (CPM) project schedule shows each major task identified in our scope
of work, as well as quality control milestones and meetings.
See key milestone dates from the project schedule below:
• Project Kickoff — January, 2014
• Survey Completion —April, 2014
• Delivery of draft PMP — May, 2014
• City comments returned to Consultant — May, 2014
• Delivery of City CIP Final Report— May, 2014
o Santa Ana CIP data /Final Report, reporting and revenue projections will be
submitted by May, 2014
• Implementation of MicroPAVER PMP software /database — Any time after acceptance of
Final PMP
• All pavement and GIS data pertinent to the project deliverables will be submitted with
the Final PMP report, May, 2014
4 -1
25G -34
Relevant Project Experience ='
Relevant Project Experience
The following project experience presents our description of work, its relevance in completing
similar projects for numerous other agencies, OCTA Measure M & M2, Prop. A, and METRO
compliance, PMP experience, PMP software training expertise, and the broad knowledge of our
pavement project team. Our project team brings over 75 years of public /private engineering
and data management experience to the City of Santa Ana. This includes over 60 PMP projects
covering turn -key projects, simply training of City staff with pavement management methods,
County Measure /Proposition compliancy, financial strategies and Capital Improvement
Programs.
Mr. Peter Bucknam, our Project Manager, has worked with over seven (7) San Diego County
local agencies, over half the cities within Orange County and 20+ Los Angeles county cities
regarding pavement management projects. He served as the Project Manager for the OCTA
Pavement Management Software project in 2008 -09 where he interviewed all 35 Orange County
agencies regarding their unique PMP needs and successfully approved MicroPAVER for County
wide use.
Currently, Mr. Peter Bucknam is assisting numerous other Orange County agencies with PMP
services (Laguna Niguel, Laguna Hills, Laguna Beach, Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley, Irvine, RSM,
Aliso Viejo, Westminster, Brea, Tustin, Huntington Beach, Newport Beach and San Juan).
Over the past fifteen years, Mr. Bucknam has worked on numerous projects similar to Santa
Ana's current PMP project. We have listed five (5) similar pavement management projects that
cover the same task descriptions as listed in your RFP (all use MicroPAVER):
1. 2008 /16 —City of Irvine, "Citywide Pavement Management Program — GIS
2. 2008/14 —John Wayne Airport (County of Orange) Pavement Management Program
3. 1998/16 —City of Fountain Valley, "Citywide PMP Update, GIS Intranet Implementation
4. 2012/14 —City of Vista, "Citywide Pavement Management Program"
5. 2011/13 —City of National City, "Citywide Pavement Management Program"
Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc.
Citywide Pavement Management Program Update
City of Irvine (2008 -2016)
Mr. Joe Dillman, Public Works Street Supervisor— (949) 724 -7696
6427 Oak Canyon, Irvine, CA 92618 (Idiliman @ci.irvine.ca.us)
In 2013, Bucknam was selected again to assist the City of Irvine for another three -years in the
management of their PMP. Historically, in 2008, Bucknam was selected by the City to perform a
citywide conversion of their previous CHEC pavement software to MicroPAVER as well as
perform 400 miles of pavement survey.
5-1
25G -35
Relevant Project Experience (a-
Our staff developed a citywide capital improvement plan that proactively developed an OCTA
Measure M2 compliant MPAH network and a local maintenance zone program that will garner
the greatest return -on- investment for the City.
All MicroPAVER data was be
linked to the City's GIS system
through the GBA Master Series
software.
Based on our assessment,
conversion and
implementation efforts, the
City contracted with our firm
through fiscal year 2014 for
pavement management
services.
City al I(Vin a, CA
Pavement Conditioa Index (PCQ Map
BpeeC un Bummar iY081n,paelinnn
Additionally, our staff is
currently performing
pavement management and
inspection services on all designated "off- street" bike and trail pathways, park sidewalk and
facility hardscapes.
John Wayne Airport (JWA), Orange County
Pavement Management Program Update — 2008 thru 2014)
Mr. Leo Tang, A/E Project Manager— (949) 252 -6068
3160 Airway Avenue, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Itane @ocair.com
Bucknam was selected by the John Wayne Airport in 2008 to perform a facility -wide pavement
survey which includes all PCC aprons, taxiways and AC runways. Our staff will be assessing
previous MicroPAVER inspection and survey efforts that have been performed over the past six
plus years as well as assist JWA staff develop a new FAA required capital improvement program
through the use of MicroPAVER. Our work efforts have covered a three -year term and assisted
JWA staff in implementing a MicroPAVER -GIS based system to enhance the PMP. Based on the
success of our initial project, Bucknam was recently awarded a three -year extension to 2014 for
PMP services.
5 -2
25G -36
Relevant Project Experience
Citywide Pavement Management Program
City of Fountain Valley (1998 -2016)
Mr. Mark Lewis, Director of Public Works/ City Engineer— (714) 593 -4435
10200 Slater Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (mark.lewis @fountainvalley.ore)
Mr. Peter Bucknam has managed the City of
Fountain Valley's pavement management
program for over fifteen (15) years and is
current beginning the 2013 -14 annual update
for MPAH for Measure M2 compliance. Over
the fifteen years Mr. Bucknam has overseen
eight phases of pavement survey, built the
City's Pavement -GIS layer and assisted the City
in accomplishing the overlay of more than 90%
of the City's arterial network. Our team
assisted the City in implementing an Intranet
ArcServer Intranet GIS to assist the City in
managing all it GIS assets.
Our firm converted all pavement data from
CarteGraph to MicroPAVER (2005) based on
the use of the program from surrounding
agencies and its integration into the City's GIS
Intranet program.
„11 4I:t,I,"V 1111 -,
eapinmhn u, am,v
%eapimMa C.Ilenh. r lnlmslrvGUm Mnne"eliet fee"" t
,lle eia ft No Ob[hnam & All.11e, Wn all ha, pat 1.. In ite.1.1,nb and- laulai
the Clly o is aapahOHlae have IDneb a re,,red el ba,eHl tbmn lil., Il,e Olt, at
reltelale Volta, All U.,aaet ale, IotNJlnp the flty Menage, ale WWI, the t,l
narompml It prnMlx ".,R, corny ncnnnn m Imonellen laid le & el, ypmlty mnrnloe
Injual a lmv ehnrt hay..., el Hat computer.
ale Clly Ilmh 1prcnud to eamtoving ear inlehalPAllp wait suakeien B Awacedas ni w,,
e pond end ranee wu GIS anpahllHWa
6lncerely,
Milk I.a
y �11
lid. Nbllo 4.1alU, G,l.,ew
MLgr
Residential maintenance zone management is now the focus of the program where our project
team is performing survey, coring and the reorganization of the City's slurry /cape seal zones to
create a more attainable, proactive residential maintenance program.
Additionally, our staff has performed a citywide arterial and collector pavement management
study, sign, catch basin, and curb marking inventory for the City using the Digital Roadway
Imaging shown in our scope of work.
Bucknam serves as the City's on -site GIS Program Manager where we support all GIS services
within all departments; this contract runs through FY 2016
Citywide Pavement Management Program Update
City of vista (2012 -14)
Mr. Tim Shell, Principal Engineer— (760) 726 -1340 ext. 1328
200 Civic Center Drive, Vista, CA 92084 (tshell @ci.vista.ca.us)
Over the past year, and recently completed, Bucknam worked with the City of Vista, CA
regarding the 2012 -13 PMP update. This project included a citywide survey update and a
comprehensive pavement CIP report.
5 -3
25G -37
• �RJ
Relevant Project Experience
Our efforts generated a proactive return on the City's pavement CIP capital in that a practical,
common -sense management plan was accepted and put in place. This plan included alternative
pavement maintenance materials (i.e. Cape Seal) and logistical residential zone maintenance.
Additionally, our staff linked the MicroPAVER database to the City's "CityWorks" GIS system
using ArcView 10.1.
Bucknam also presented the PMP to upper management within Vista and the report was well -
received; the City has asked Bucknam to continue providing PIMP services through 2013/14 and
beyond.
Citywide Pavement Management Program Update
City of National City (2011 -2013)
Ms. Barby Tipton, Project Officer— (619) 336 -4583
1243 National City Boulevard, National City, CA 91950 (btipton @nationalcityca .gov)
Bucknam was selected by the City of National City to perform a citywide conversion of their
previous pavement software to MicroPAVER as well as perform 107 miles of pavement survey.
Our staff developed a citywide capital improvement plan that proactively developed TransNet
compliant reporting that will garner the greatest return -on- investment for the City. All
MicroPAVER data was be linked to the City's GIS system through the ESRI software.
Residential maintenance zone management is now the focus of the program where our project
team is performing survey, coring and the reorganization of the City's slurry /cape seal zones to
create a more attainable, proactive residential maintenance program. Additionally, this fiscal
year, our staff is performing a citywide arterial and collector pavement management study, sign,
catch basin, and curb marking inventory for the City.
Additional local agencies our project manager and staff have worked with over the past
fourteen years regarding Pavement Management Programs:
City of Santa Ana
City of El Segundo
City of Cathedral City
City of Temecula
City of Sierra Madre
City of Westminster
City of Burbank
City of Alhambra
City of San Clemente
City of Pico Rivera
City of Yorba Linda
City of Beverly Hills
City of Los Alamitos
City of Tustin
City of Santa Barbara
City of Stanton
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
City of Palmdale
City of Culver City
City of Moreno Valley
City of Arcadia
City of Carlsbad
City of Cypress
City of Huntington Park
City of Costa Mesa
City of Diamond Bar
City of La Habra
City of La Habra Heights
City of Lake Elsinore
City of Lomita
City of National City
OCSD
OCTA
City of Norwalk
City of Orange
City of Palm Desert
City of Santee
City of Rosemead
John Wayne Airport
S -4
25G -38
References
References
Per the City's RFP, Bucknam has provided our relevant projects and references for three (3)
public entities where we have performed similar work within the past five years. We have
shown further project details within Section 5 of our submittal regarding these references:
Citywide Pavement Management Program Update
City of Irvine (2008 -2016)
Mr. Joe Dillman, Public Works Street Supervisor— (949) 724 -7696
6427 Oak Canyon, Irvine, CA 92618 (idillman (@ci.irvine.ca.us)
Citywide Pavement Management Program
City of Fountain Valley (1998 -2016)
Mr. Mark Lewis, Director of Public Works /City Engineer— (714) 593 -4435
10200 Slater Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (mark.lewis @fountainvalley.org)
Citywide Pavement Management Program Update
City of Vista (2012 -14)
Mr. Tim Shell, Principal Engineer— (760) 726 -1340 ext. 1328
200 Civic Center Drive, Vista, CA 92084 (tshell @ci.vista.ca.us)
6 -1
25G -39
Proposed Fee
Proposed Fee
Buckram Infrastructure Group, Inc. has included a time and materials, not -to- exceed fee for the
City's consideration (separate envelope). Our fee follows the described tasks shown within the
Scope of Work.
Additionally, we have created specific line item fee summaries to show the projected costs for
including the Local and Alley network scope of works within the project.
As indicated within our fee, all tasks are negotiable.
7 -1
25G -40
EXHIBIT B
FEESCHEDULE
25G -41
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Pavement Management Program Update
Fee Proposal - December 30, 2013
25GA2
Project
Description Principal '
Assistant Field
Admin I Total by
Manager
Planner Technician(s)
j Task
2014 Base Fee $265/hri $175/hr(
i
$130/hr $84/hr
$75/hr.
Task 1.1
Management and Administration 11 6j
3 8
V 1 $2,452
Task 1.2
Update Maintenance and Rehabilitation History 1
2 12
$1,443
Task 1.3
Pavement Condition Survey (105 miles MPAH-citywide) 5
10 162
$15,783
Task 43
Budgetary Analysis 1j 10
2 2
$2,443
Task 4.4
Final Report - OCTA Compliance Reports 24
4 2
$5,228
Reimbursables (mileage, printing, materials)
$840
All deliverables will become property of the City of Santa Ana
All Tasks are negotiable
Total Hours per Staff 46
21 186
2014 Total Base Fee S $ 8,050
$ 2,730 $ 15,624
_2
$ 150 $28,189
Optional Tasks
Task 2.1 to 23
Local Street Network (recommend surveying 1/3 of network every two years) - fee
shows 317 miles citywide - -
- - -> $46,500
Task 3.1 to 3.3
Alley Street Network
$7,500
Task 5.4
Automated Digital Roadway Imaging (Citywide)
TBD
Additional services outside of this contract will be negotiated with the City where we will use the Standard Hourly Rate Schedule shown here.
Assumptions:
r-::'
Work History data entry will be provided by the City + Micro PAVER database
k 12
Micro PAVER v6.5 has been obtained by City, no MicroPAVER purchase will be necessary
Task 1.3
City's recent slurry seal and overlay maintenance will reduce total mileage to survey - TBD
Task 1.5
Presentation to City Council / Upper Management available at no additional cost to City
Optionals
Optional Tasks to be considered as additional work efforts and fees to base fee I
25GA2
Standard Hourly Rate Schedule
Categon
Principal
Senior Project Manager
Senior Engineer/ Planner
Construction Manager
Pavement Management Project Manager
Management Analyst
Project Engineer / Planner
Engineer /Senior Technician /Planner /Senior Inspector
Assistant Engineer / Technician /GIS Planner / Inspector
CADD Operator
Administrative Assistant
Field Technician
Clerical / Word Processing
Forensic Services
Reimbursables
Mileage
Subconsultant Services
Reproduction
Travel & Subsistence
Fees & Permits
Computer Services (External)
Standard Hourly Rates
shown will not be
changed and /or
increased during the
contract period
BUCKNAM INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP, INC.
3510 S.ZgV.Way, 5Wde230 u�eamane,fr 32056
T 760.216.5529 F. 7EP.216.6519 vmn,.CUCknan..net
25G -43
Rate
$ 265
215
185
177
175
165
160
135
130
110
100
84
75
Quote
$ 0.65 1mile
Cost + 15%
Cost + 15%
Cost + 15%
Cost + 15%
Cost + 15%
7 -1
25G -44