Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout75A - PH - EIR AND AMEND GENERAL PLAN 555 E MEMORY LNREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MAY 6, 2014 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING - FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 2010 -01, AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2014-01 AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014-01 FOR PARK VIEW AT TOWN AND COUNTRY MANOR - STEVE LAZARIAN, APPLICANT CITY MANR RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: at ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 18' Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Adopt a resolution certifying Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2010 -01 and approve the Mitigation Monitoring Program. 1 Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2014 -01. 3. Adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2014 -01 for the Town and Country Manor Specific Development No. 87 (SD -87). PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION On April 14, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution certifying Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2010 -01 and approve the Mitigation Monitoring Program; adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2014 -01; and adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2014 -01 for the Town and Country Manor Specific Development No. 87 (SD -87) by a vote of 6:0 (Nalle absent) to allow the construction of Park View at Town and Country Manor senior residential tower at 555 East Memory Lane located in the Suburban Apartment (R4) zoning district. The Planning Commission made no changes to the recommended conditions of approval outlined in the attached staff report (Exhibit A). 1�76YyIr6�Cr7tl The Park View at Town and Country Manor tower will be an eight -story, 174 -unit independent living facility for active seniors. The tower will not contain any "for sale" units and will be a regulated residential care facility for the elderly. Fees will be charged for services such as common dining, cleaning, laundry, and recreational activities provided for each unit. The tower will consist of approximately 348,378 square feet of area, including 230,670 square feet of residential and ancillary /support uses and 117,708 square feet for the three level subterranean parking structure. The parking structure will contain parking for 260 vehicles and have a storage area for each unit. 75A -1 EIR No. 2010 -01, AA No. 2014 -01, GPA No. 2014 -01 May 6, 2014 Page 2 In addition to the tower, the applicant is proposing to construct a one -story, 6,413 square foot aquatics and wellness center that will serve as an additional amenity for the residents of the entire Town and Country Manor campus. Finally, the primary entrance of the existing Town and Country Manor building will be remodeled and expanded by an additional 914 square feet to provide an enhanced entry to the facility. Full sized site plans are available for public viewing in the Clerk of the Council Office. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Karen Haluza Interim Executive Director Planning & Building Agency VF:rb vATown and Country\ EIR2010- 01 &AA2014- 01 &GPA2014.0i.cc Exhibit: A. Planning Commission Staff Report 75A -2 REQUEST FORQ►� Planning Commission Action gilta\1W PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 14, 2014 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING — FILED BY STEVE LAZARIAN FOR FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 2010 -01, AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2014 -01 AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014 -01 FOR PARK VIEW AT TOWN AND COUNTRY MANOR Prepared by Vince Fregoso _ 1 -mil jtti\ � � Interim Executive Dir for RECOMMENDED ACTION Recommend that the City Council: PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Set Public Hearing For DENIED • Applicant's Request • Staff Recommendation CONTINUED TO Acting Plan . anager Adopt a resolution certifying Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2010 -01 and approve the Mitigation Monitoring Program. 2. Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2014 -01. 3. Adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2014 -01 for the Town and Country Manor Specific Development No. 87 (SD -87). Request of Applicant Steve Lazarian, on behalf of The Christian and Missionary Alliance, owners of Town and Country Manor, is requesting approval of various entitlements for the proposed Park View at Town and Country Manor senior residential tower. Specifically, the project entitlements include the certification of an environmental impact report, amendments to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and changing the current zoning of the site from Suburban Apartment (R -4) to the Specific Development No. 87 (SD -87) zoning designation. Proiect Location and Site Description The Town and Country Manor campus is located on an 8.29 -acre, irregular shaped parcel of land at the northeast corner of Memory Lane and Lawson Way, just east of the City Place development site and north of Santiago Park. The property contains two buildings that total approximately 219,556 square feet of area that were originally constructed in 1975. The primary building is a 213,107 square foot one to three -story structure that contains the residential care and skilled nursing units for the campus as well as various support and ancillary services. The other building is a 6,449 square foot, one -story chapel at the northwest corner of the site. EXHIBIT A 75A -3 EIR No. 2010 -01, AA No. 2014 -01, GPA No. 2014 -01 April 14, 2014 Page 2 The Park View at Town and Country Manor tower is proposed to be built on a 2.5 acre section of the site that is located at the southwest corner of the campus. This area of the campus is currently vacant and consists of both a parking lot and landscaped area. A total of 210 parking spaces are currently provided for the existing project. The site is surrounded by office development to the north, Santiago Park to the south, office development to the east and multi- family residential (City Place) and office development to the west (Exhibits 1, 2 and 3). Project Description The applicant, representing Town and Country Manor, is requesting approval of the Park View at Town and Country Manor tower, an independent living structure for seniors, on its existing campus. The proposed project will add 174 independent living units to the southwest corner of the campus and will be marketed solely to seniors 55 years of age and older The tower will not contain any "for sale" units and will be a regulated residential care facility for the elderly. Fees will be charged for services such as common dining, cleaning, laundry, and recreational activities provided for each unit. Park View will contain a total of 348,378 square feet of area, including 230,670 square feet of residential and ancillary/support uses and an additional 117,708 square feet for the three level subterranean parking lot. As proposed, the building will be eight stories and 97 feet in height at its highest point. Within the three -level subterranean parking structure, a total of 260 parking spaces will be provided. Additionally, one storage unit for each residential unit in the tower will be provided within the lowest (63) level of the parking structure. Park View at Town and Country Manor will serve as the cornerstone to the campus with its location at East Memory Lane and Lawson Way. The Park View tower has a contemporary design that has been guided by Renaissance and classical architectural influences. The main residential floors project vertically from the ground level common areas, highlighted by pilasters present at the main building facades. The use of glazing at balcony railings and in storefront windows at the ground floor and penthouse level is a key aspect that speaks to the building's contemporary nature. A prominent cornice, reminiscent of classical architecture, helps to define and characterize the roofline (Exhibits 4, 5 and 6). In addition to the high -rise tower, the applicant is proposing to construct a one -story, 6,413 square foot aquatics and wellness center that will serve as an additional amenity for the residents of the entire Town and Country Manor campus. Finally, the entry to the building will be remodeled and expanded by an additional 914 square feet to provide an enhanced entry to the facility. 75A -4 EIR No. 2010 -01, AA No. 2014 -01, GPA No. 2014 -01 April 14, 2014 Page 3 A comprehensive hardscape and landscape program has been developed for the project. This program will enhance the existing landscape theme of the campus and will further assist in unifying the structures through a consistent landscape program. A decorative plaza and motor court will be situated between the proposed tower and existing building that will provide an upscale entry to the campus as well as provide a public space for residents and visitors to gather and Interact. The plaza will include textured paving and a grove of deciduous and evergreen canopy trees. Preliminary designs also include a water element such as a fountain (Exhibit 7). Protect Background In 1972, the City Council approved Variance No. 1972 -38, which allowed The Christian and Missionary Alliance (Town and Country) the ability to construct a new residential care facility for the elderly with a 57 percent reduction in parking in the Single - Family Residence (R -1) zoning district. In June 1972, the City Council approved Amendment Application No. 698 to change the zoning of the property from R -1 to Suburban Apartments (R -4), which would be more compatible with the development proposed for Town and Country Manor. In 1989, Conditional Use Permit No. 1989 -04 and Variance No. 1989 -03 were approved to allow the construction of the one -story skilled nursing wing on the east end of the campus and to allow non - integrated parking on the site. Town and Country Manor is a non - profit organization whose mission is to provide a caring environment based on the Christian faith that is designed to meet the physical, social and spiritual needs of its residents. It is a continuing care retirement center licensed by the State of California's Department of Social Services. Town and Country is equipped to provide independent living, assisted living and skilled nursing care to meet the changing needs of its residents. General Plan and Zoning Analysis The General Plan land use designation for the site is Medium Density Residential (MR -15), which allows single and multi- family development at a maximum density of 15 units per acre. Development in Medium Density Residential areas of the City is characterized primarily by duplexes, apartments or a combination of both. The proposed project is not consistent with this General Plan land use designation. However, a General Plan Amendment is proposed for this project that would change the current MR -15 designation to District Center (DC), which will make the project consistent with the General Plan. The subject site is located in the Suburban Apartment (R -4) zoning district. The R -4 zoning designation allows uses such as bungalow courts, apartment houses and similar uses. The project site is not consistent with the zoning designation. An amendment application (zone change) to change the zoning designation to a Specific Development (SD) is proposed for this project, which will make the project consistent with the new SD zoning designation (Exhibit 8). 75A -5 EIR No. 2010 -01, AA No. 2014 -01, GPA No. 2014 -01 April 14, 2014 Page 4 Project Analysis Town and Country Manor is proposing to expand upon the services the facility provides by constructing the Park View tower, an eight -story building that will provide independent living housing on its campus. This building will allow Town and Country the ability to provide an additional independent, active living component of senior living, giving residents the ability to age In place on the campus. Town and Country is proposing a project that is consistent with the development pattern In the area, which includes several tall buildings in the immediate area. The following subsections of this staff report provided analyses for each of the recommended action items. Environmental Impact Report The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation and approval of an environmental impact report (EIR) for this project. The environmental issues analyzed in the EIR include aesthetics, air quality, climate change (greenhouse gas emissions), hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise, transportation and traffic, and utilities and service systems. Preparation of the EIR was originally initiated about five years ago for a 12 -story tower on the Town and Country campus. As a result of the economic downturn, the project was placed on a temporary hold due to concerns with the ability to finance the project. During this time, the project was reduced in height to its current proposal of eight stories. Although there are no State mandates that identify how long a draft EIR is valid, staff directed the consultant to revise and update the document when the applicant elected to move forward with the development in 2012. The consultant reviewed all sections of the document, with only the Traffic Section being updated to reflect changes in traffic patterns that occurred after the original document was prepared. The update found that no significant changes had occurred in traffic, with no new mitigation measures added or modified for the project. In accordance with CEQA, a draft EIR was first circulated for review and comment to public, local, regional and state agencies, and interested parties on March 11, 2010 for a 45 -day review period. On April 10, 2010 a public hearing was held on the document to obtain input from interested members of the public. By the close of the 45 -day review period, a total 12 written comment letters on the document were received. The City has evaluated the comments received from persons or agencies that reviewed the EIR. In accordance with CEQA, each public agency and interested party that commented on the draft EIR was provided with a response to its comments at least 10 days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing. The Responses to Comments document, the Mitigation Monitoring Program and the Draft EIR constitute the Final EIR. In addition, the Findings of Fact for the project have been prepared. 75A -6 EIR No. 2010 -01, AA No. 2014 -01, GPA No. 2014 -01 April 14, 2014 Page 5 The EIR has found that, of the eight environmental issues analyzed in the draft EIR, all were determined to be less than significant or could be reduced to less than significant levels with mitigation measures. Further, it was determined that no significant and unavoidable adverse impacts associated with this project would occur after mitigation from proposed project implementation as all potential impacts that were identified for the project can be mitigated to a level of less than significant (Exhibit 9). General Plan Amendment To allow the development of this parcel, a General Plan amendment is required. Currently, the land use designation for this site is Medium Density Residential (MR -15), which allows residential development that does not exceed 15 dwelling units per acre. This project will require amendments to the Land Use Element, including amending the General Plan Land Use designation to DC with a General Plan floor area ratio of 1.27. The floor area ratio was derived from the size of the proposed buildings as well as the square footage of the existing structures on the site (Exhibit 10). The proposed project will be consistent with several goals and policies of the recently adopted Housing Element. First, the project is consistent with Goal 2, which encourages diversity of quality housing, affordability levels, and living experiences that accommodate Santa Ana's residents and workforce of all household types, income levels and age groups to foster an inclusive community. Second, the project supports Goal 4, to provide adequate rental and ownership housing opportunities and supportive services for seniors, people with disabilities and people needing sportive housing. Further, the project is consistent with Policy HE -2.2 to create District Centers with high intensity, mixed -use urban villages and pedestrian oriented experiences; Policy HE -2.4 to facilitate diverse types, prices and sizes of housing; Policy HE -4.1 to support development of affordable senior housing readily accessible to support services; Policy HE -4.4 to support service enriched housing for persons with special need such as seniors and people with medical conditions; and Policy HE -4.7 to exercise appropriate land use, planning and regulatory oversight over the operation, location and impact associated with social needs housing and facilities. As proposed and as shown on Map 1 on the following page, the project is similar in scale and intensity with the densities of residential, commercial and office developments found in the immediate vicinity, including those at Westfield Main Place and City Place to the west, as well as office developments to the west, and additional office developments in the City of Orange to the north and east. Amending the land use designation of the project site to DC from MR-15 would render the land use designation more consistent with the type of development in the proposed project, as well as with existing conditions nearby. Further, the DC land use designation would contribute to the overall area's transition to a segment of the city that increasingly offers a "live, work, play" lifestyle to its residents and visitors. The proposed residential tower and enhanced amenities at the project site are consistent with the residential developments at City Place, the recently - entitled "The 301" project at 301 East Jeanette Lane, and allows the future residents at the project to enjoy the commercial amenities nearby at City Place and the Main Place mall, as well as the ability to "age in place." 75A -7 EIR No. 2010 -01, AA No. 2014 -01, GPA No. 2014 -01 April 14, 2014 Page 6 Map Aerial View of Surrounding Area Amendment Application In 1972, the City Council adopted Amendment Application No. 698, which changed the zoning of the site from Single - Family Residence (R -1) to Suburban Apartments (R -4). At that time, it was determined that the proposed size and density of the project was most consistent with the higher intensity R -4 zone. In depth staff analysis has found that, although the intent of the facility is to provide retirement housing through the various life stages, the project's operational characteristics exceed those of a standard residential project. Various components of the Town and Country Manor facility also operate as a care facility, which is considered to be a commercial and service use. In order to apply a zoning designation that is most appropriate for the campus, a zone change to a specific development designation (SD -87) is proposed. 75A -8 EIR No. 2010 -01, AA No. 2014 -01, GPA No. 2014 -01 April 14, 2014 Page 7 A series of site - specific objectives, policies and development standards will be used to guide the development of the tower and associated aquatic and wellness center. Specifically, the SD -87 would involve the creation of development standards such as setbacks, parking and signage and allow the exclusive entitlement of the eight -story residential tower and affiliated parking garage per the approved plan. The SD has been framed to allow the construction of the project as proposed and prohibits future modifications to enlarge or reduce the size of the project. The SD is also intended to be consistent with the scale and character of the surrounding area (Exhibit 11). Approval of the proposal would allow for the construction of a senior residential tower on a campus that provides a variety of services to the senior population. Further, the proposed tower will provide living facilities for active, independent seniors and will allow residents to age in place. Finally, the proposed project would be consistent with applicable zoning requirements. Public Notification The project site is not located within the boundaries of an established Neighborhood Association but is adjacent to the Park Santiago Neighborhood Association. The president of this Neighborhood Association was both contacted by staff and notified by mail a minimum of 10 days prior to the public hearing to ensure the association was notified of the meeting and to see if there were any areas of concern from the neighborhood. At their request, staff and the applicant attended a quarterly neighborhood meeting on April 2, 2014 to review the scope of the project and receive input. A total of 10 members from the neighborhood were in attendance, with the membership generally favorable to the new project. However, a few members were concerned with the size and massing of the tower and how it related to the campus and surrounding area. And, concerns were expressed regarding the potential for constructing additional towers on the Town and Country site. Staff also spoke with the representative from the adjacent City Place Homeowners Association to inform them of the project. Staff did not receive any calls from the HOA board or residents of City Place regarding the proposed project. The project site itself was posted with a notice advertising this public hearing, a notice was published in the Orange County Reporter and mailed notices were sent to all property owners and occupants within 500 feet of the project site. At the time of this printing, no correspondence, either written or electronic, had been received from any members of the public. CEQA Analysis As part of the City's permitting process, the proposed project is required to undergo an environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with CEQA, the recommended actions have been reviewed through an environmental impact report, EIR No. 2010 -01. Sections 15080 through 15097 of the State CEQA Guidelines (Article 7) guide the process for the preparation of an environmental impact report. 75A -9 EIR No. 2010 -01, AA No. 2014 -01, GPA No. 2014 -01 April 14, 2014 Page 8 The EIR, as required by CEQA, contains 1) an initial study; 2) a project description; 3) a description of the environmental setting, potential environmental impacts, mitigation measures for any significant effects, and consistency with plans and policies; and 4) names of preparers. The mitigation measures included in this EIR are designed to reduce or eliminate the potentially significant environmental impacts described herein. The scope of the EIR evaluates the proposed project's effects on the following resource topics: aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation and traffic, and utilities and service systems. The City prepared a draft EIR and published the Notice of Availability (NOA) in the Orange County Register as well as posted the NOA at the Orange County Clerk's office on March 11, 201 Q. The City circulated the draft 'EIR for a 45 -day public review between March 1, 2010 and April 15, 2010. The draft EIR was available for public review at the Santa Ana City Hall, the City of Santa Ana Main Library, and on the City's website. This EIR is intended to provide a forum to air and address comments pertaining to the analysis contained in the draft EIR and to provide an opportunity for clarification, corrections, or minor revisions to the EIR as needed. Comments were received during the public review period. Pursuant to Section 15088 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City, as the lead agency for the project, has reviewed all comments received on the document. As a result of the environmental analysis, no significant impacts were found from the construction of the proposed project. Mitigation measures have been provided to address potential environmental impacts, with a list of these mitigation measures found within the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Mitigation measures have been outlined to address potential impacts on air quality, noise, transportation and traffic, utilities and service systems, and climate change (Exhibit 12). Conclusion Based on the provided analysis, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution certifying Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2010 -01 and approve the mitigation monitoring program for the Park View and Town and Country Manor; adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2014 -01; and adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2014 -01 for Specific Development No. 87 (SD -87). Vince Fregoso, AIq _. Acting Planning Manager vflrapods\Town and CountryUR2010 -01 &AA2014 -01 &GPA2014- 01.041414.pc 75A -10 EIR No. 2010 -01, AA No. 2014 -01, GPA No. 2014 -01 April 14, 2014 Page 9 Attachments: Exhibit 1 — Vicinity Map Exhibit 2 — Land Use Map Exhibit 3 — Site Photo Exhibit 4 — Site Plan Exhibit 5 — Floor Plan Exhibit 8 — Building Elevations Exhibit 7 — Landscape Plan Exhibit 8 — Zoning Map Exhibit 9 — Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 10 — General Plan Amendment Exhibit 11 — Specific Development No. 87 Exhibit 12 — Mitigation Monitoring Program 75A -11 pi I! Al GENERAL AGRICULTURAL -B PARKING MOOIEICATION CI COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL C1610 COMNNNITY COMMERCIAL- MUSEUM DISTRICT C2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL. C3 CENTRAL BUSINESS CIA CENTRAL BUSINESS- ARTISTS'VILLAGE C4 PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER Cs WERIALCOMMERCIAL CR COMMERCIAL RENUSNTIAL C I 1 Y .1 1 0, n n g e I C -SM SOUTH MAIN STREET COMMERCIAL DISTRICT I'D PLANNED DEVELOPMENT -F FLOORAREARATIO PRO PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CC GOVERNMENT CENTER RI SINCL&FAMILY RESIDENCE MI LIGHTIND03TRIAL R2 TWO - FAMILY RES DENCE M2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL R3 MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE MO MILI-ARYOPHWRONE A4 SUBURBAN APARTMENT D OPEM1I SPACE RE RESIDENIIAL ES TATE -02 OVERLAY LONE SO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT P PROFESSIONAL SP SPECIFIC PLAN PCD PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EIR 2010 -1 /GPA 2014 -1 /AA 2014 -1 PARK VIEW ATTOWN & COUNTRY MANOR S i" = ID00 FEET 555 EAST MEMORY LANE - - = 50OFcEr P L_ AN NI_N G _. A N...q. 0. U I L 6 I N G A G E N C Y VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT T 75A -12 i f _ C O M M E R C I A L OFFICE G AND z vaRUINC O COiOME RCIM1L STT.UCTURE g �5AN U II AN GE EIT Y -- LIMt5 - - --- '�- -.^ TA AN A CITVY .IMIT 5 LNE -WORK ❑Nft5 !i COND05 VACANT —111ANIT ..ROkC r SITE LANE �s CUMMERCIAI. CENTER CONDOS s Ll I 1 PAR K .MEMORY `- SANTIAGO REEK. OFFICE APGO PARK AND SPAT SANTIAGO PARKING --� STRUCTURE REEIUENTNI RESIUENTNL EIR 2010 -1 /GPA 2014 -1 /AA 2014 -1 PARKVIEW ATTOWN & COUNTRY MANOR cVrl 555 EAST MEMORY LANE P L A N N I N G A N D B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y LAND USE MAP EXHIBIT 2 75A -13 !-J'A C S if � p ��: r v� • {•� EIR NO. 2010 -01, GPA NO. 2014 -01 AND AA NO. 2014 -01 PARK VIEW AT TOWN AND COUNTRY MANOR 555 EAST MEMORY LANE EXHIBIT 3 75A -14 5 s3 } B - 11 ° � a SS9i — E €I 11 311 § i3'l11li3Bs61 €iii A Ph Y@ fP Y ®13 d5 e.t• t� � 1L ili tfd fl$p ' ; fil F slift I.a $1 a $td fill, .1si313. 1 =:•t {,€ 1'ii 1 €E311 li8I 111111,11'a M11111 €4��a� 50 0� m ®® � ale s "d E8 I ;1 s _`i5\�`S.t, � �7f iSv �i3ii�S151 ziY i, $ Hi Y� € I g 1iI�1E11'1 nawirz .erw�n,n i °aa muxree e e Y " -L,= pose i i s i1,1.. -1 g_g 1;111111111!, 5F -i30W �1 � IIiQ1 � 111@ EXHIBIT 4 75A 1f5 Id d�d 1 1t 11 �i Ii 21 I: is 9 e SiE "a I r 8= Q a 6 E I: 9iP4P4!Bep I ! YffY5YIIfY �.i3i334:1 dn3aid3`3 1�i�IPi1 111111 €ll[ 1111 i Ii t z i'- 31d1 ! 'tI !11! a115 I 5 p j js '1f °18Ese 111 1j fd¢Yzf35 i1f1, i18Flil`t14 e��st9� ? x..,iEYUE @:•III© d I 5 9111 1_ 1 149 1d °3aa �' lfdf It € ee$Ixv EelFd!••I• ®� I zI. U u� o�E o= 5F s9 V�d d.y 4 3 B N f y q 4 e U yV 5i e3.59§ A. AZA!'� e F N_af 4• e 6 � a£ u O 1':•a BSE IS' W ➢NINTW NVIJNLiNE•J IIWM/t Y Mrld'�+tliytl { /YyMOEUptl M1VYI�KR ��5 P : S i EI E£F 33Ri42 LF"9 4 f ®ryry Y � Li r¢ ia6x 3 d 5Q 9I.= WLi HHM M }552 - ." - E Page 2 of 2 75A -16 E $zRun 9 3 kR2 '�Sk1�ii$ HH HEN 4g�1 Hi e i 2 ,M Wa:� °Ij {©M�, asWild"4➢ 3�3E 3 i is OD��8c5 sp���se�v fm 00 i a Y o g!lfs iif Asga�Ri{3 •�is �ki a a4 ids 49sa1 Fb €,�ltx �ai.En Z a P, Q pia Ai Rpa p wn'Iwrsmema'mwn 11!# /YI2 PMM �dMIi /B'•NfINi3^bi IVWVAN S±Sai aYY§ Yiui) E9M 90's -F- iiA 03?� k 5pt.3 k3 §� i ai¢9 R;36�E 3 PiL _.q33 13AY kA% C ?.2 >k3 tf4gc9 f.3 5dkk�'n9i .2 }i 'ai Rb 15 i � :a�AF %nf lY: of.a Y. nni neY °iu FFRN quxi ::u5::x4F %reij^ s ^.:'ve44 xfix.:�l S � 77I F ➢IIF Si Sl7!]YY� �7I S787 i]77ISf�� 794P1I I34I1 ;�� IS di II7F I13fE�€ � 6l+2�3112� �z13 1111215 5333113/ iiS.23 s3.ii192a11 Z! 51333211 A71�1 EXHIBIT 5 Page 1 of 8 75A -17 w K td E6 €{ F itii i L:i O LY�1'S31 ®� L3Gm al W �x 111t2IRIEi.:Sii�kE SE�E.�EaEa` @E O O €55 €i89�1E�z8�� oB i�l EEd �iwZ3�slx7�{� CSJ ¢© Em � xpl vi t €i w U 6 N W O O z% o� 0 at h ppt x a s i t i i" �EI�AleIb i tl N+1H U Ila b� V � a }ark m 8 O M3�NiM NVylYY2'Y3p YIWNI2 9MMp&81S /dpMl]iNGS 'IYIII: YVIiS � 1a4;izAd III hsz Ef tglI =aYi g gs 9,rfl p 2 a s ?e'egiu�ll as xx ;aBN3�Sl: 6 :tl5 rec:i a6 2dz ;via e`E:i §a. $�y a. €5 _4pafyfiA '4 i }�'dptla'SE Y rt _ ?� }M1kn� _u_5. �14+Iny ells S� 'n l'.nwrf _tlx YRR'd >.'rt�i tYa xYnr3'eaJg AAF 1 ••n fk Y 1tl � }E ?!]a7b� 3715 ;aF7�l�i val BIIFa S3 i3'3 ?� 3!7359779!] ?d� I7�ai 7E �l IY ?S� j a'paaL'9 aaiaa a f ;; aaSSia3a2i9 a5 75777 aa7➢ as Iar. Yaa ?a n w 0 z 2 0 0 LL R N 0 r� Page 2 of 8 75A -18 W7, z w a 0 b 0 0 x N Da (C 2� 0 m . I[ ; 11 a zla�f��i 1 k lilt f E yg�b�t;. �4iz {F[ FaF�i SEl4 a ?4 en i� lec;rmm m. m ®o a� ra�a�lsac -gym mm RTIPI �m o 4 t i8 F. ¢ Cog #0_ �3Bga�5g�a ��s5 %� �Qdi6}s3a� �l kzs\ a 4�yy a i a I i I rc -i 3a��a�a ps {{[ {t�{tyiy((pp atB SPki]i ;� $ q Q 9 .l B f e 1s1 411 !`� U w. .a� n ;_ s P a .r 5 YaS An E3 haAd :[.M Y i n E 1 i 11�917k�� 173779Tkl SE ��7 kl7i llY'IWN3Ftl NNA itlYln3'> YI6'91R iHNd ]IilY�IIMXYII>RAI NIV/1005 .,EY Zen qxj xa z >ka zg c3 a� s n arag47 ^ey s 3Bk0Fi Ped +Mq t P.t kiF 4i5 tEpFAjaS0. 3$AnNna:� .a xanoN•.�5 _3 +JxaAx xk� SE379 ➢17�� 91i71F17191 «� 373,k IS771lI�7� :ja iiila Elid1 ii 38397�� kiiAS:531191a. 8 Page 3 of 8 75A -19 =a 9E E_qp a:gg ZA E E gk R { ° J ei2H a4asadin w� 0 ro on -O�k a Q e =a I Q. qq�Y i i a I g q �E�iEt�6 s):as i3 amaa a e 3s6 V 41 u. U° c. w„s O `z: kH E g��EsEeE�4€ 2 g pp ,8 § @$�4 &fIAESk §t €E �t�Fki uEE tl N L'-"D C�'W Q��itril U. O @l O mil. �9F 8 5 g q pSR7f � 9 ¢ 31 =a 9E E_qp a:gg ZA E E gk R { ° J ei2H a4asadin w� 0 ro on -O�k a Q e =a I Q. qq�Y i i a I g q �E�iEt�6 s):as i3 amaa a e 3s6 V 41 u. U° c. w„s O `z: R Ing ON g! \ \S Page of 75A-20 , j+ \+ { `! ! !! . . ., !® (9 !Q9®m | ¢( ¢| ¢! u ! ! / !, ,! � { + � .y � \� \ 11 q ]�� ! m § | |! |! HIP 1A �\ \ � \ U� u S)p :t \ |6 oil & g, m %! mullm �INIIIPM INN oil 50A, Page 5 of 8 75A-21 0 m 0 HIM Ili kit tJ 0 WP ma F. ■ Nil Nil ' doss A Cl F. j❑ ®a A Cl Rp� CN N a k ci§ s m �by Cy Y� 5 a 8 �y4y 58 Wa vOMmNYIe NbBISI IIN'tll2 YM'W'.AA>3d1 /3 ^v M'1 ]3 W[ TrI1M411C Page 6 of 8 75A -22 r C Qy `3 0 LO x B x f 5 � H .a kgY�E�[i! aMaa �Z€ 6 ]gi U s 0 0 I a 0 4V.TW W Wp NVW Nua,N3'J �iWN12 Vrvn ]IA3e[ /3�:+VNJ3W! lvwvetl[ � e - - - ■IIIIA■ r s 0 0 I a 0 4V.TW W Wp NVW Nua,N3'J �iWN12 Vrvn ]IA3e[ /3�:+VNJ3W! lvwvetl[ Page 7 of 8 75A -23 x v s° k� r a co 0 p� a p¢ g[ yy t 3g q4 ®B fP {E }i 3d 0� a ¢:S v � e Page 7 of 8 75A -23 x v s° k� r a co 0 p� a p¢ g[ yy t 3g q4 ®B fP {E }i 3d 0� a ¢:S v wvrmrawvrvvslmwn YIMMI2 9H�lA9iC9dd /d'MYIg3HW NllfrypM Page 8 of 8 75A -24 L G G N_ a C n k c( Nxx O �awl rte. �I!= m= a- - _ MIME ME ME 0 aJ��� i��llll +•;I�� 111 �•••�• .. .. a .. ■i .. .n Jam[ 111 X1111 ry 4n■n on ■■ ■■ u ■ .. ■ ■_ II A�7 newirz ...w aa�rsrrxnroi+or .ru-ns N Y L G E Page 2 of 5 75A -26 0-8- �gggEE �gY a s [ A A AA4�A [p �9 E41if �e sa 3�1 1� i� u o u u u u u u u .■ u u o ■■ u u .. a .. o d u u u . o u 40'NtiLW M'q M3AJ nawirz •...u�nrrxmmN ruw�. .......... Page 3 of 5 75A -27 1 .�, $� o ■■ u u MR ■ :: I N 5 yZ�d W e, G: x� w a �Q 5 ® 4 C E n >_l TE° �3 ai U m° Y. V� C.§ O d_3 ,u.ic' Sam nu•• II » _p .........:.... ICI 1� i� u o u u u u u u u .■ u u o ■■ u u .. a .. o d u u u . o u 40'NtiLW M'q M3AJ nawirz •...u�nrrxmmN ruw�. .......... Page 3 of 5 75A -27 1 .�, $� o ■■ u u MR ■ :: I N 5 yZ�d W e, G: x� w a �Q 5 ® 4 C E n >_l TE° �3 ai U m° Y. V� C.§ O d_3 CIE. ill Page 5 of 5 75A -29 sa fig= a a i �[aF HIM] HIM ®aa� j s U �3 xF �� R R 1 . It♦ 1Ei IT � IT 1 zor 1 o'. 1 �Na %ZV Wm �1 l�i�. to .'_; ► � og AVM NOSMV-1 EXHIBIT 7 Pa 7i4f 30 Z i Ya z Q J a w CO a Q U O z Q �.j O L f 1 s J 30 3� \w U /6V �Z F Q g� F Y. 0� O d`3 r i lei RAN 3 u'mu ez �Nm ZU Kim os WOm y 1 i u° N me � �m n 'All 1 zor 1 o'. 1 �Na %ZV Wm �1 l�i�. to .'_; ► � og AVM NOSMV-1 EXHIBIT 7 Pa 7i4f 30 Z i Ya z Q J a w CO a Q U O z Q �.j O L f 1 s J 30 3� \w U /6V �Z F Q g� F Y. 0� O d`3 r i lei RAN 3 Eby _ _ Fi 55 E u i� o, u mLL r oz C 0 z� NN M� rionirz •mv �ovsraa.NOwr mwwrc@ 6 22 gl3 t3aS �!l;3333fdSS �3�t3 _.. 1 TT 6W�F V 6S m�y6 r pPp�° Cite {�P9 {{? gin Fi; N NO j XIj = VOO Page 2 of 3 75A -31 T Z g w a Q U 0 g J' Q L w w U Z U U N f { J s � s 3 ism -W cr l o k ifkz6� Y- o�FE 1, [ait ZKO_ bWOO4V � 4 Y1133e5 33S -3eIlHD1VYt Page 2 of 3 75A -31 T Z g w a Q U 0 g J' Q L w w U Z U U N f { J s � s 3 ism -W cr l o k ifkz6� Y- o�FE 1, [ait � � g=aaaas `v 'lit r: g.pyg4i���i • m_• ® 01 ® ®d�1E• . i '104 * nvnirt +mv xrn.,av�owm :naxQu N s I •. 9 , H Jill I1 Ilia `I' ��� $��i gtpt`•t p �E 8 t'� i`It €djs€ (( tf OL 1 1 Z AVM NOSMVI Page 3 of 3 75A -32 z J r1 w F- w Q U W O Z R v f � J — Gg 0 awm w I &� X066 � af< d` 9 I jMfl !td et remN" O� o a m �t� p r[ me) 22 GARDEN GROVE FREEWAY < r~n � 22 GARDEN GROG FREEWAY . CITY OF ORANGE RI AI O 0 a� OH Ra CE 9 sy 29 o„E .Pxwrt.o .E3IN c 3, FkIRHAVEN PV \17, ul V.w (A JON z ' +av a.EN3rE Cx 1. < € 8 onaPE - EccE.,mo.e Exeneaolo 2 s NORESOLUTIONx00RDINANCEN00ROATE OFADOPTIONS SHOWN FOR THIS MAP sc.v- E:eiceer ♦ SINC'c IT IS >N ORIGYIAL RE0CROOF rdE SANTAANA G.rt DISTRICTCOSSIFICATON FOR ALL PROPERTIES RICLUDED HEREON : WO 60. 4000 "^�� ^w>afor apEe AT GENERALAGRICULTURAL CSM SOUTH MAIN STREET COMMERCIAL DISTRICT PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT -5 CI PARKING MODIFICATION COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL .F GC FLOORAREARATO GOVERNMENT CENTER PRD RI PLANNED PESIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENCE xmE.Y"aeul EECr.exal rmepRYa @aPNMIIH aL<s+N3roa'rL9 CIWD COMMUNITY COMMERCIALALUSEUM DISTRICT MT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL n nV0FAMILY RESIDENCE av n,r cwarcn PFSMwlxn ra.: &1, Oa1fO x -14,>: CZ GENERAL COMMERCIAL NI2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL R6 MULTIPLE- FAMILY RESIDENCE uFafarnrtF;r -eur 3W9nuasa rauE C3 CENTRAL BUSINESS MO MILITARY OPERATIONS R4 SUBURBAN APARTMENT ap N�3uF 3CR'.GOCISESnm:uwswc, v . CYA CENTRAL BUSINESS-ARTISTS VILLAGE O OPEN SPACE RE RESICENTAL ESTATE C4 PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER -OZ OVERLAY ZONE SO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT 05 ARTERIALCOMMEROIAL P PROFESSIONAL SP SPECIFIC PLAN 17 FIRK- CA GWIAERCIALRESIDENTWL PCD PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT us.aA rAlu ao OPO AE. ND W TI.lE PES:aA r ".X N 5569 3333 EM8 MO rtF9 :19 _ >OOP,EPDaIE 11 .1AE .5 1 XIiS • ♦ DISTRICT • I PREPARED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA REI'Ye E. ..S^R53 T8 7`5A 33 - - W v E i� tp The complete Environmental Impact Report is a separate document of the staff report. The EIR can also be found at the Planning Division public counter and on the City's webpage at http://www.santa- ana.org /pba/ planning /ParkViewatTownandCountryManor .asp C�'i'TQ%- . 75A -34 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element 1998 City of Santa Ana Planning Division Adopted February 2, 1998 (Reformatted January 2010) The following is a chronology, of the approved general plan amendments that have been incorporated into this document since the motprchensive update of the General Plan Land Use Element adopted by the Santa Ma City Council February 2, 1998 (GPA 1997 -05): GPA 2014 01 foeudion) GPA 2007 02 (June 18, 2007) GPA 2004 -06 (July 6, 2004) GPA 2000-08 (February 5, 2001) GPA 2011 -03 (March 19, 2012) GPA 200F01 (March 19, 2007) GPA 2003 -02 (June 16, 2003) GPA 2000 -03 (December 4, 2000) GPA 201142 (June 6.2011) GPA 200601 (October 2, 2006) GPA 200301 (Febmary 18, 2003) GPA 2000 -02 (November 20, 2000) GPA 201001(June 7, 2010) GPA 2005 -01 (December 5, 2005) GPA 2002 -01 (September 3, 2002) GPA 1999 -02 (October 18, 1999) GPA 2008 -02 (July 20, 2009) GPA 2005 -02 (October 17, 2005) GPA 200203 (August 19, 2002) GPA 1999-01 (August 16 1999) GPA 2007 -03 (May 18, 2009) GPA 2004 -01 (April 5. 2005, as passed by GPA 2001 -03 (February 19. 2002) GPA 1998 -04 (October 5, 1998) GPA 200403 (February 2. 2009) the voters of Santa Ana) GPA 2001 -02 (January 7, 2002) GPA 1998 -05 (September 21. 1998) GPA 200M1 (May 5.. 2008) GPA 200404 (July 19, 2004) GPA 200009 (May 7 2001) GPA 1998 -01 (May 4, 1998) 835 FMM & _,! ;l ; : :: :!! /`. 75A-36 LAND USE ELEMENT The City established development intensity standards in 1988, for nonresidential land use designations. The standards measure intensity through the use of Floor area ratios. The floor area ratios proposed for the City's major commercial corridors are expected to remain in place over the life of the Land Use Element. The basic character of these corridors is not expected to change significantly during that time. Those areas of the City proposed for the most intensive levels of development include district centers, professional and administrative office districts, and several other commercial centers with a unique character, or special development concerns. Some of these areas correspond to those for which Specific Plans have been prepared. The proposed floor area ratio(s) for most of the City's commercial corridors allows structures of two to three stories with surface parking. The major development areas -the District Centers and Professional/Administrative Office Districts along Tustin Avenue and East First Street -allow mid -rise and high -rise buildings with structured parking. These areas are expected to generate the highest level of development activity in the City as centers of commerce. These areas are listed in Table A -2 and are shown in Exhibit A -4. The floor area ratios indicated in Table A -2 are the maximum building intensity allowed for development. Table A -2 Key Area- Floor Area Ratios Area ProjectlArea 1 MainPlace — 2 — City Place _ 3, North Main Street 4 North Broadway 5 _ _ _ .Museum District 6 Hutton Development FAR 2.1 — 2.54 - 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 7 Civic Center Specific Development Plan 1.0 8 Midtown Specific Plan _ Civic Center Downtown _ _ Orange County Register Xerox Center Development First StreetlTustin Avenue _ Bentall Center Development 2720 Hotel Terrace Drive 1951 East Carnegie Avenue 1 4040 West Carriage Avenue Lake Center Development 0.5 -1.0 9 10 12 13 14 15 1.0 3.0 1.15 3.29 1.0 1.5 1.0 0.55 0.47 �— _ 0.72 _ 16 _ 17 18 19 20 _ 21 — 22 South Coast Metro 1.0 - _ 2.0 1.0 - - -- - -- MacArthur Place North MacArthur Place South -- - -- — — Pac Tel Office 1.5 A -12 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 75A -37 ..... 06 — /G UL a-D < {} § sm cl) > U) LL § \!((§] /�] \ {)� /) \� \/� ) |�{ cts � | § | § | \ | |� /j�) \� j� / |� \ [ §| `�' 75A-38 LAND USE ELEMENT Residential The Land Use Plan provides for three distinct residential land use designations. Residential development is also permitted in two other designations: District Center and Urban Neighborhood. The Santa Ana Land Use Plan includes the following residential land use designations: • The Low Density Residential (LR -7) designation applies to those areas of the City which are developed with lower density residential land uses. The allowable maximum development intensity is 7 units per acre. Development in this category is characterized primarily by single- family homes. This designation applies to a large proportion of the City (6,466.0 acres) representing 47 percent of the City's total land area. • The Low- Medium Density Residential (LMR -11) designation applies to those sections of the City which are developed with residential uses at permitted densities ofup to 11 units peracre. The land area included in this designation is approximately 433.7 acres. The great majority of the land designated as Low- Medium Density Residential is located in the westerly portion of the City, north and south of First Street. Properties with this designation are typically characterized by mobile home parks, a mixture of duplexes and single family residences, or small lot subdivisions. The Medium Density Residential (MR -15) designation applies to those sections of the City which are developed with residential uses at densities of up to 15 units per acre. Development in this designation is characterized by duplexes, apartments, or a combination of both. A total of 377.0385.3 acres is designated as Medium Density Residential. The designation applies to areas located in the vicinity of downtown, areas north and south of MacArthur Boulevard, and in other areas where there are established multiple - family development projects. CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 75A -39 LAND USE ELEMENT Mixed Use The Land Use Plan provides for two distinct mixed use land use designations. "These designations allow for both vertical and horizontal mixed use developments, with an emphasis on linkages to a range of transportation options: The District Center (DC) land use designation includes the major activity areas in the City. Seven areas of the City, totaling 521.7 513 - 4--acres, are designated as District Center. The intensity standard for the District Center designation ranges from a floor ratio of 1.0 to 5.0. District Centers are designed to serve as anchors to the City's commercial corridors, and to accommodate major development activity. District Centers are to be developed with an urban character that includes a mixture of high - rise office, commercial, and residential uses which provide shopping, business, cultural, education, recreation, entertainment, and housing opportunities. Residential developments within some District Centers are allowed at a density of up to 90 units per acre when developed as an integral component of a master planned mixed use project. In Metro East, Downtown, and Transit Village District Centers residential development intensity is based on a combination of floor area ratio and zoning overlay and /or development standards. Some District Centers serve as major retail and employment centers locally and regionally, and should include development which promotes the City as a regional activity center while creating an environment conducive to business on a regional scale. District Centers in Santa Ana include the following: • The Main Place /City Place District Center includes a regional shopping center and office complex as well is.. Additiona high intensity housing and mixed -use development is�ntieipated fee this discriet. • The Museum District located between the Downtown and MainPlace /City Place District Centers is proposed as a major office/cultural center which will be developed over the next 15 to 20 years. The area will focus upon the expanded Bowers Museum, the Discovery Science Center and the construction of additional museums and cultural centers. • The Downtown District serves as one of the County's major employment and governmental operations centers complemented with a mix of residential, commercial, and services uses to enhance its urban vibrancy. Emphasis on streets that accommodate all modes of transportation, including mass transit, pedestrian and bicyclist is key in this urban setting. 21 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 75A -40 Exhibit A -5 Major Development Areas LAND USE ELEMENT IAYFIA GAR'JEN OM[ME BL r— �. 1 I !RASE AY I ` SAWACV A AY. mH 5,- r] L iNJ 4 s 7 WAWiWSEO A. wm 5i i [MC 4NlE0. BR ' y 9nl 51 $ANIAANA BI' / 8 I51 51. i of nlESmm Al 1. 9 � L N N[fAOEEN AV. I l.L. ^y� EmNBER AV. 3 i : yy e 9 g wARNeR nv. SERER$ �1 5, 6 5 P N,EN AV. ALl. Al %o .1 AlnuoeHBRBL J 1 - MainPlace /City Place 2 - Museum District 3 - Downtown 4 - One Broadway Plaza 5 - SoutIncoosl Metro b - MacArthur Place kR' L 7- Tustin Avenue Corridor �.�.� ary Lirn7ts 8 - Metro East 9 - Transit Village 0 0.6 1.2 Miles CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 75A -41 LAND USE ELEMENT interagency Development Review Committee (DRC) to ensure consistent and comprehensive application of City regulations and policies for all projects. • Redevelopment Plans. The City will apply redevelopment tools associated with the implementation of the adopted redevelopment plans, as appropriate. The City will encourage the further development of industrial, commercial, and residential projects in suitable locations to strengthen the City's tax and employment base. • Special Studies. In certain instances, a special study may be required to address a particular issue. In these cases, a specific effort to identify staff resources needed to conduct the appropriate investigation and analysis will be identified. • Zoning Code Review. The zoning code serves as a primary tool used by the City to regulate development. The City will develop a program to revise the Zoning Ordinance to ensure that development regulations and standards are consistent with community needs and high quality development. The City will initiate appropriate changes to the ordinance to ensure, where appropriate, conformity between the Land Use Element and Zoning Map. LAND USE PLAN BUILDOUT As indicated previously, the City of Santa Ana has been almost completely developed for many years. As a result, any new development will necessarily consist of redevelopment and infill development on the remaining vacant and underutilized parcels. Many parcels with nonresidential land use designations will never be developed to the maximum intensity permitted under the General Plan. Table A -4 indicates the development possible under the build -out of the Land Use Plan. The build -out for residential land uses considered two scenarios. Effective build -out for residential development is calculated by adding the 15,168 ++,8,60-units possible in the areas designated as District Center to the existing 74,588 units presently fount{ in the City per Census 2000. Theoretical build -out for residential development considered the development possible ifall ofthe areas designated as residential were developed according to the permitted Land Use Plan intensities. Since the Land Use Element does not contemplate the elimination of existing housing in the City, the effective build -out figure represents a more realistic estimate of future residential development. As indicated in TableA -4, three of the non - residential land use designations have a range in FAR intensities. For the non - residential land use designations, effective build -out considered the development possible under the lower range of FAR intensities while theoretical build- outconsidered the upper FAR range. Typically, parking and landscaping requirements will result in significantly less floor area for commercial and industrial developments than that which is permitted under the General Plan. CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN A -3; 75A -42 LAND USE ELEMENT As indicated in Table A -4, between 7(I$567H,66t-to 89.755 99748-housing units are allowed by the Land Use Plan. The additional units which presently exist in the City beyond the maximum number permitted under the theoretical buildout scenario are a reflection of the higher density multiple - family developments constructed in the 1970's and 1980's. However, the purpose ofthe Land Use Plan as it applies to the residential areas is to preserve and maintain the stability of existing neighborhoods, regardless ofthe character ofdevelopment. The intent of the Plan is not to create any displacement, nor decrease existing development densities. Rather, it is to ensure a safe, healthy, and livable environment for City residents. Existing residential development entitlements are protected through this Land Use Element, applicable Zoning regulations, and sections of the City code pertaining to legal nonconforming uses. The Land Use Element's implementation may result in an increase in the amount of commercial, office, and industrial development in the City. As indicated in Table A -4 up to 37,678,572 square feet of commercial and office development, and 42,892,704 square feet of industrial development are possible under the effective capacity parameters of Land Use Plan. a -34 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 75A -43 LAND USE ELEMENT Industrial IND 2,188.2 FAR 0.45 42,892,704 sf 42,892,704 sf Institutional' INS 796.3 FAR 0.2.0.5 6,937,758 sf Table A -4 Open Space OS 1,017.8 FAR 02 8,867,509 sf 8,867,503 sf Subtotal 1,814.2 Land Use Plan Build -out Capacities Intensity/ Effective Buildout' Theoretical a Land Use Acres Density Buildout Low Density Residential LR -7 6,466.0 7 du/ac 45,262 du Low Medium Density Residential Uvi 1 433.7 11 du /ac 4,771 du Medium Density Residential MR -15 377.0 15 du /ac I 5 655 _ 316 ++9 du Subtotal 7 276.7 89.755 55.688 .,2815 , .. du' S., &F ?du District Center Downtown Oc 62.5 FAR 3.0 2,057,824 sf 1,661 du 2,057,824 sf 1,661 du Metro East DC 98.3 FAR 3.0 3,245,185 sf 5,551 tlu 3,245,185 at 5,551 out Transit village DC 51.4 FAR 5.0 402,864 sf 2,761 du 402,864 sf 2,761 du Othef DC 309.5 90 du /ac 11,955.583 3017 23.764.534 3017 _ 301+2 FAR 1.0 -2.0 44,908,95 n at ___2q49du 2 3:617,901 sf ". du Urban Neighborhood UN 148.1 FAR 0.5 -1.5 4 724,249 sf 2,177 du 724,249 if 2,177 du Subtotal _ 665.7 i — 18.385.705 15168 —. 30.194.656 1515 1fi8 65&4 .0 14,2- 23�","" at 44-960 du 30,048.2,11 -sf 14,;860 du Professional & Admin. Office PAO 633.0 FAR 0.5 -1.0 13,787,219 sf 27,574,438 sf General Commercial GC 1,071.6 FAR 0.5 -1.0 23,338,795 sf 46,677,589 sf One Broadway Plaza District Ch" OBPDC 4.3. FAR 2,9 543,193 st 543,193 at Subtotal 1,709.9 37,669,207 sf 74,795,221 at Industrial IND 2,188.2 FAR 0.45 42,892,704 sf 42,892,704 sf Institutional' INS 796.3 FAR 0.2.0.5 6,937,758 sf 17,344,394 sf Open Space OS 1,017.8 FAR 02 8,867,509 sf 8,867,503 sf Subtotal 1,814.2 15,805,267 sf 26,211,903 at FAR =floor area ratio; d.u.= dwelling unit; s.t.= square feet (of Boor area). Acreage shown in table does not include roads m right -of -way. i Effective capacity for non- residential development assumes development possible under the lower range of FAR intensity standards with Be exception of the Metro East District Center, Transit Village District Center, Downtown District Center, and Urban Neighborhood areas. The Metro East District Center, Transit Village District Center, Downtown District Center, and Urban Neighborhood areas allow a range of intensity for mature of residential and non - residential development based on the zodng development standards. Residential effective capacity was calculated by adding the 15168 4al-lunits possib ll in the District Center and Urban Neighborhood with the existing 74,588 (Census 2000) housing units. Y Land use designation permits both residential and non - residential development. Build -out assumes 90% of land area will be developed as commercial and 10% will be developed as residentiaL with the exception of Town and Country Manor protect intended for continuum of care and houi;ind seniors. ' Land use designation permits high intensity office development with ancillary retail use. This table ,has been revised to correspond with the GIS Land Use Map illustrated in Exhibit 2. CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 75A -44 SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 87 Town and Country Manor SECTION I — APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE The Specific Development zoning district No. 87 for the Town and Country Manor project site is authorized by Chapter 41, Division 26 Section 41 -593 et seq. of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. SD No. 87 contains the specific standards and regulations contained in the residential and commercial districts, as herein amended, for the purpose of establishing land use regulations and standards. All other applicable chapters, articles, and sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code are in effect unless superseded by regulations contained in this ordinance. SECTION 2 — PURPOSE The Specific Development Plan No. 87 for the Town and Country Manor campus consists of standards and regulations established for the purpose of protecting the health, safety, and general welfare of the people of the City of Santa Ana by promoting and enhancing the value of property and encouraging the orderly development of the property. SECTION 3 — Uses permitted in Specific Development No. 87 The following uses are permitted in the SD -87 district: (a) Continuing care residential facilities for seniors including: ('1) Independent living facilities (2) Congregate care facilities (3) Assisted living quarters (4) Skilled nursing facilities (b) Churches and chapels (c) Child care facilities SECTION 4 —Uses subiect to a conditional use permit in Specific Development No. 87 (a) Continuing care residential 'facilities for persons other than senior citizen (b) Wireless communication facilities EXHIBIT 1.1 Page 1 of 4 75A -45 SECTION 5 — Mhrhnurn lot area in Snecific Development No. 87 Lots shall have a minimum lot area of 8 acres. SECTION 6 — Minimum street frontage in Specific Development No. 87 Lots shall have a minimum street fi-ontage of at least 250 feet. SECTION 7 — Building height in Specific Development No. 87 No structure shall exceed 125 feet in height, as measured from the lowest adjacent grade of the structure to the top of the structure. SECTION 8 Lot coverage in Specific Development No. 87 No more than 60 percent of the lot shall be covered by structures. SECTION 9 — Front vards (Lawson Way) in Specific Development No. 87 There shall be a front yard of not Less than 17 feet from the street. SECTION 10 — Side yards (Memory Lane) in Specific Development No. 87 There are no side yard requirements, except that on corner lots the side yard adjacent to the street shall have a side yard of not less than 20 feet. SECTION 11 — Rear vards in Specific Development No. 87 There are no rear yard requirements, except that rear yards adjacent to a residential use shall . have a Landscaped setback of at least 5 feet. SECTION 12 — Development standards in Specific Development No. 87 Lots in the SD No. 87 zoning district shall comply with the following standards: (a) Front and street oriented side yards shall be landscaped with the exception of approved driveways and sidewalks. (b) A landscaped planter not less than 10 feet in width is required along any property line that abuts any property which is neither zoned or has a general plan land use designation. (c) All storage shrill be conducted within a completely enclosed building. Page 2 of 4 75A -46 SECTION 13 — Parking standards in Specific Development No. 87 Off - street parking in the SD -87 zoning district shall comply with the standards set forth in Article XV (Off - Street Parking) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code except for the following: (a) The minimum off-street parking requirement for senior citizen establishments, pertaining to spaces reserved for residents who are 55 years of age or older, are as follows: (1) One space for each one bedroom unit and one and a half (1.5) spaces for each two bedroom unit, (2) Of the spaces required by subsection (a), at least one space shall be in a garage or under a carport. (3) In addition to subsection (a), Brest parking spaces shall be provided in an amount not less than 15 percent of the required parking under subsection (a). SECTION 14 — menage standards in Specific Development No. 87 Lots in the SD No. 87 zoning district shall comply with the following standards: (a) Signage shall comply with the standards set forth in sections 41 -850 through 41 -1000 of the SAMC, with the exception of the standards identified below. (b) One freestanding sign identifying the facility can be located on Lawson Way and may be a maximum of 18 linear feet (height plus length of sign). SECTION 15 — Landscape standards for Specific Developrent No. 87 In the SD No. 87 zoning district, all yards shall be landscaped. The site shall comply with the following minimum requirements: (a) Front /side yard facing a street: (1) Two 24 -inch box canopy trees. (2) All trees shall be double- staked. (3) Six five -gallon size shrubs and 10 one - gallon size herbaceous perennials /shrubs as afoundation planting. Page 3 of 4 75A -47 (4) Turf or acceptable dry climate ground cover: i, Turf shall be drought tolerant variety and planted as sod or hydroseed. ii. Ground cover shall be well - rooted cuttings from flats and planted at appropriate spacing for that particular plant material. (b) Irrigation systems: (1) A pop -tip sprinkler type irrigation system shall be provided for all yards (2) The use of "xcriphytic" or dry climate type plant materials is encouraged. hrigation systems may require special fittings to properly water dry climate plantings. (c) Screening: (1) All meters shall be appropriately screened from public view with trellis work and vines or a hedge type shrub or they shall be incorporated into the stricture. (2) Any enclosed structure for utilities must not encroach into any required setback. (d) Maintenance: (1) All plant material shall be maintained per section 41 -609 of the Santa Ana Mmiicipal Code. Page 4 of 4 75A -48 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Environmental Impact Report Park View at Town and Country Manor Project Santa Ana, California Prepared for: a,s of '�. o ; .0r'paa City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza /M -20 Santa Ana, CA 92702 714.744.7220 Contact: Vince C. Fregoso, AICP, Principal Planner Prepared by: Michael Brandman Associates 220 Commerce, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 714.508.4100 Contact: Tom Holm, AICP, Director April 8, 2014 EXHIBIT 12 75A -49 r� of �N o i dC aIL N 00 N = N dp) m Q C O O `£ E E 7 A d O m K G C aR .5 tV b G N •p C u ^p •O. bn O O( u b9 O Ua C U 'U F,; UU Uad U w C M � N roIt c �v CO O •� �J O p 'GC N d UU a; Uwe o b O o U U U I a nn C bn C m C o p N on C do 75A -50 do C U � ^' 00 � N Q vl cr-r °J t G'Gro en ^' U •� itl O .G v O C U b v N N r C ^G O C N u N S 4. o o c r .V .S Y� a cb o 5 L O o c n °'0 o P_ O a U N .O O' to U '� 6 O L 9 'S O LO O to. u C F N C O C 4ry -• C o M C w C .d p Pn N ,'dJ �' N ,.0 O � .O �i� ; ¢`Ji 0J ICJ d a'v 75A -50 g I c '3 � en � o �'a •„ 3 N i N m o > E � .. .. v 1U c oU 0TbCj� — o aTL' O��� y j �•c �.a ._. CO 3� CY N d D � ❑ O •C o 7 9 N T N C C b4 .0 i N N ro �C N N 6b i m N •O +� �p � I •H N .0 � N K-2 I O 'L' O C P. I N U ;� }� vt 0 a �i U O. vN .3 'o I,., v sN•. ', O �I a � o J nn yO o ❑ bum v „' �.. v .o '. .°. o c A a G T C d G G a I p y FQ U d W tai i 'd R7 i d fA eC C1l ,. d d w G d t/J bC0 N v V1 by T T Z 4.. C Ei D� °U °U !b b0 O 4 Uad U a clad w u Uwd ua,d u I quad I S .y 2 �NN O1. C I Yn N y Yn E ,E b e A d g C O E 75A -51 '3 � en � o �'a •„ 3 N i N m o > E � .. .. v •o d" c oU 0TbCj� — o aTL' O��� y j �•c �.a ._. CO 3� CY N d D � ❑ O •C G O b w 7 9 N T N C C b4 .0 i N N ro �C N N 6b N •O +� �p � I •H N .0 � N K-2 O 'L' O C P. I N U ;� }� vt 0 a �i U O. vN .3 'o I,., v sN•. ', O �I a � o J nn yO o ❑ bum v „' �.. v .o '. .°. o c a T d ° a �3 d 75A -51 d 0 as j N y _C 0 bb G N Oq Uw6 u G G p O u V1 b0 u ° T G N G G ti W p O uF, UU Cq V1 to U p C_ ° G a T N C G .:': !tl bq O O Ua t UV C o b0 ° G N bq a IF U C C O O G fNnN to W G T p ° G C G N G �,� tl9 O O!d Uwd UU C W C T p C C y C GJ C bq O VPd V •E d O U O U C N C b9.t A Vl III y to f rO i �N OW �� N u L N L S O "O O:D N J] 0 w O 6 y y 7 0 w hd o u d' � nl PLr E 0 ❑ F' ° K v° 'd y w y o' !2 4 [J N y y N U cl p'U N d .NL ro ^LJ Yn N O N� �.• U N p N N � _ In m ro i In 0 ,G '.. .n E ,c'@ > y 0 .� to o O O .Q I� G C d to bo C" c o o U p d 3 I, 3 o' A .c Rc 75A -52 C i m; _w E U U p, i,� d 3 C O IL? Nom. m. a D:U d OI N U Nq� W .Cn VadUUw G I Nc,b I m to O O O 3adUUw cNc 'C E 06 O O �aduu CC to U U 3 2 0 0 0 Nom" w 4? O bA v O N '� U C 0'p C N N b N O••v�i itl C by �• N RI N ty U> > DO N tC0 G 0 6 W .E :C R rA G r bn •G ti VN G 0 Ory O ro p C N O nn.EV Nom' N v. p ro ro Y y° C E v �� N O Gr '� `✓r t W : 6� l O N � K b9 5.2-2 .Y rE' v 0 7 0 , N-d' ro � bb= bad N O. N U � G G� d G rn •O bn J 'IO N o.o :E'�NNw-.: Cum .nwO yP1NC� c._.. r> G F° w O y LN C E� N .yO pp `anFdOp�NaQ'GU iO A•i. G.Nu -i yO bq b C i.� E ❑ c m 'n > E.w —s.p .Q,: Q,m° uE� G " E °��e'.uc..SOa�i�va.._ 0%n °"�� CL c' O ✓ a A C �m G j 5 C c1 �ri u. vyr _ o v a ;o .L., G .v':.CE N 'd O O: eV C CCJ L c 75A -53 'r. a V 75A -54 d p m E o: ;v `o I - - c c b dA yaj�w = ¢Emq c a a CL N❑ ni ua a, w C Ua C c a uwa vu r- _._Uw 0 O N .� 0 C _ w0 .0 U F U > Ol I I � C Cd.I N C G b C b •c > E.y c a i N > a N CO () b S V L •v 'v J] i ro U L rn C O C C O N 'O O M .f� .. O C' 'D E w ( c. G "C a C C a �� y y `w -a F. v t o c &•o m L° y o 5 ,5 .E rE C'> o N N "N 'n s v._ Uu.� v o,o •��:9 O'G',vNi yWNj aN„4a Oy'd .a�� °> 2 N G U u o -R o > E p i. C bn m °- i N U G N N L 'V o rcr�� =' i O `P-i •C •O O b0 ❑ C. O C .0 N 3 'O U N r_ bn > bn C •2 W 3 ^ % 60 ° E �• .d . c v 'E `= ° 8 p .G 'b o v. �o a U t 0.- •� ,' E o 3 7ab�A y ^o ICJ °o 7'E qro °'dC >�;co o. F'V •y = e N a 01 G vi T� d N Gn C d bO U N rR q e > m w° ni U N F4 4 is v O C y W1 C ] y > C 4. .d y b ro m'° :° o a'U �' o w.E❑ ° 3 a N 04 1> l N t9J raj tit vai U •N a O p itl 4: N .'° C O P- G a Y .Y v .a � W Ca N� M O Y, ro m O U C 'O i•G z o •v p 7 G1 WO Fl+ O C O 9 M W e e Va i• O wN" .b Vy' F O. z O '� Ti k q > W t� 2 Z� N 'd j .>+ 75A -54 iC R E E 0, 0 to CL CL Cad dd¢ u P. a P. P, 0 o o i 0 CD a 46 0 uCo P, U 0 aU0 IaU0 .5 C GO 0.2 75 E C4 > 0 pu °WO 0Y' CbG m E C—m n m rz 2 r 0 45 E o Q a R O'l �v u g > 0 6 u > �E dd E 0 •m 0 = U y 0 2 o �mu — 0 0 Y -: v b = u 0 4 `i'u L) 21 0 > 80 rz E o 04 U 75A-55 c O m y g c E 0 U O _... C O � m A o :. Q £ i O U N •C � v P +u o 4 V tii.� C v t� P,u a o 4 U N O V tGd �� o � _ � o � � P..u0 PC,UO N Y v y T U I N b0 I N pNq N N N N y p '' c � .a G � .n• � � •a N � .n. c � ,n• w° U w w° wN^. ro ° o o n° N I N N i y y •o p, .-• .Q ,a o Z,s .o •o P. r� U P,, a = U u '' e. n o :. Q £ O V N •C 'w e� P.UO O U N •C � v P +u o 4 V tii.� C v t� P,u a o 4 U N O V tGd �� o � _ � o � � P..u0 PC,UO N Y v U w O b b0 . 1 0-0 D v o a w° U w w° wN^. ro ° o o n° N I N N i 'G C� 3 y p, .-• T Y p� ti m O b N N I aG �omAy~. ago coo � 2P:o mho"❑ p ° 0 U `r• '3 :.% b N V id •fl. N U b ro G G L NT 3 � U D ';n G V O O O C m N .0 W i v' G vi � b➢ � Sm p 0 bll 'C 'C N O i ❑ O N N _Y N O n) G RGt v �v.cM rJ- C Q7 u" FL � cbtl � � aCj' ?• Fri Si, fG o C 'Nd I � N n � � u � 75A -56 C O:� m a 0 U( O. C' O V m O d mY a� C i CL N C N W za O O A C'm E_0 ra E N d N m 2 E U, U UY C �NN Q� 7 n C a v G C ro N� 7 C C C U G U °° •� u v I V�i b0 �i N bn j � O G G N C'o •o^ L'" m to ' v N 7 O — O ^ p n R 'U O PG L O C Yl O •C C N O �F F � O O^ G v Y' c�u •o � nu .o �'` m nvn N '� �' m on 'o •� U w d w C,1 w •�- G C ro N� 7 C F U U °° •� u v I V�i b0 �i N bn j � O G G N C'o •o^ L'" m to ' v N 7 O 75A -57 v G !' C V. .C+ dtl c o b w a ro � O O N ! G v ! N � bUhl I U � O U 9 U U N T d L O c — ro N �v U d N, C y U T ro � T to U G b0 ;� C O ! � O c_ w ! N L U U °° •� u v v � v j � G G I (} O U v N 7 O — O ^ p n R 'U O PG L Q v O � m •�- LL U O 0. V O 0. U N U U O v y.. 0. O 75A -57 v G !' C V. .C+ dtl c o b w a ro � O O N ! G v ! N � bUhl I U � O U 9 U U N T d L O c — ro N �v U d N, C y U T ro � T to U G b0 ;� C O ! � O c_ w ! N L U N O C U j � G G O v N — O ^ O PG L O � c w ro O N U O N I 6 ❑� I iC G U C 4. ro y c `^ i � U N 6Y N titi�j H ! U V u 75A -57 v G !' C V. .C+ dtl c o b w a ro � O O N ! G v ! N � bUhl I U � O U 9 U U N T d L O c — ro N �v U d N, C y U T ro � T to U G b0 ;� C O ! � O c_ w ! N d O i1• 2 F- m d r� u C C a L ll a W d N 'C N ro 3 � a� b m N N O C N A. y d N N C C bA C R 0 0 R U N O N V G ,v. p F d9 I OttlO U F G O c` 0 v v n m N b w cN U N `U Vi d �G a u F 0 0 V U � o G V O � U G 'd G Q L v d I c I b 0 ,G n1 h C i N C � :b .O C v d w L � o � V U L C h C � Q a 75A -58 T Oi d C W G N y � C � U ' c a N W d i W F T O'C G y b CN N v C R `o q r: r b N N N yj C .0 qry I N �•' i P-i d � o ti I I A i O I U O .•C„ R R O V Ni C m 6 ro m I m N bA dU N bA � N bA cl Ca d A N bA qR eeeG� N bA '�G •U � � bA � d v h0 C L u M 0 O ` E b0 O N bNA O ;�L' N bVA O W b l ad d O i1• 2 F- m d r� u C C a L ll a W d N 'C N ro 3 � a� b m N N O C N A. y d N N C C bA C R 0 0 R U N O N V G ,v. p F d9 I OttlO U F G O c` 0 v v n m N b w cN U N `U Vi d �G a u F 0 0 V U � o G V O � U G 'd G Q L v d I c I b 0 ,G n1 h C i N C � :b .O C v d w L � o � V U L C h C � Q a 75A -58 T Oi d C W G N y � C � U ' c a N W d i W F T O'C G y b CN N v C R `o q r: r b N N N yj C .0 qry O bll C P-i d bA o ti �.E I A v u G O O _ ¢. O .•C„ R R O V Ni C m 6 ro m d 'C N bA dU N bA du N bA cl Ca d A N bA qR eeeG� N bA '�G •U � � bA � d v h0 C L u M 0 O ` E b0 O N bNA O ;�L' N bVA O W b l ad a Vw¢Pw bwd a" 0—) w a. d O i1• 2 F- m d r� u C C a L ll a W d N 'C N ro 3 � a� b m N N O C N A. y d N N C C bA C R 0 0 R U N O N V G ,v. p F d9 I OttlO U F G O c` 0 v v n m N b w cN U N `U Vi d �G a u F 0 0 V U � o G V O � U G 'd G Q L v d I c I b 0 ,G n1 h C i N C � :b .O C v d w L � o � V U L C h C � Q a 75A -58 T Oi d C W G N y � C � U ' c a N W d i W F T O'C G y b CN N v C R `o q r: r b N N N yj C .0 qry O bll C P-i d bA o ti �.E I A v u G O O _ ¢. O .•C„ R R U N y C W O a T d O i1• 2 F- m d r� u C C a L ll a W d N 'C N ro 3 � a� b m N N O C N A. y d N N C C bA C R 0 0 R U N O N V G ,v. p F d9 I OttlO U F G O c` 0 v v n m N b w cN U N `U Vi d �G a u F 0 0 V U � o G V O � U G 'd G Q L v d I c I b 0 ,G n1 h C i N C � :b .O C v d w L � o � V U L C h C � Q a 75A -58 T Oi d C W G N y � C � U ' c a N W d i W F T O'C G y b CN N v C R `o q r: r b N N N yj C .0 qry O bll C P-i d bA o U w v O 9 R R U N y C W O a T v 4 d v « .b.A u v � o CCZ N 0O I U •U � � bA � d v � CY � O C•.^_ Y O D W b 4 C : A m ' C C E I O' U. O_ O C N mY, d m D T ' D. m N y Q ' o `Dm me c E d ra E bCA bA b C C G to C y C qq 7 G �Fp C G G Cj C G Q GA 6 0.1 v ¢ P7 U Q 4x1 v 4 Pa u I Q Qj 0.l u G C G C G. t 4 nn�n dw nb�n Qw nw QII n °nom d ° •G F N °'E G N° J F N °� C N °� C L° E r y° G G y :�' N bNA 'o m b0 O 'i..` n0 O .�' m b0 Q L'' d bU o i'• 0 'o L'' 'o^ Uad w Uad a. iUF a` OF a. Uad a Ua4 w UaQ w 75A -59 m m V- v 0 'O i �l C U to O a s I N N r i 0 m O N N (1 U D O 0. C I I i� to G m o L I a U c o ro i s E � pEj N N I � a E 7 F �C � NC E ro w to 0 a m i c to O to �° bA O 9 O b O O ;d O ,ti O ,d O N v ro c i I v i 75A -59 m m V- v 0 'O i �l C U to O a s I N N r i 0 m O N N (1 U D O 0. C I I i� to G m o L I a U c o ro i s E � pEj N N I � v cN �C '6 m � NC E ro w to 0 a m i c b U . Vi � b0 N v o � v N v ro c i m I v i N i N y m W I 75A -59 m m V- v 0 'O i �l C U to O a s I N N r i 0 m O N N (1 U D O 0. C I I i� m I T o ro i s N � y i pEj N N n cN ° O N � NC E � F to 0 a � to G U . Vi � b0 N v � N v ro ;a a E u uN 75A -59 m m V- v 0 'O i �l C U to O a s I N N r i 0 m O N N (1 U D O 0. C c o',� m'« E,— V, o C: 0 u. m a m m Y m w IL D T Ix N y Q m N d O A Ol O O. c m 'EEIn � ❑ yna a ya C y C m T U m s.a yc O, yo c w W C 7 td TJ U `^ b U N •CY U U rob cn ¢ ¢ �n bD ¢ vi nn ¢ ra nn ¢ rn no 5 •CG ( pC O G a' N O �C C N a Ua,¢ P: m N d O A Ol O O. c m 'EEIn � ❑ yna a ya U 3 m T U m s.a yc O, yo c w W os 0 O � a C N f• b Qi N ": Q U m N d O A Ol 75A -60 Y L `S U 4 R �aa5 G C 0 n O O. U 3 m U m v U w o ❑ o wo a m yo c w W > U 0 O � a C N f• b Qi N ": Q U ( pC y Cq A ❑ 'G U W ��: es" ht H o c i C I N � d: � •D H oC � N` rl N� w •2 W C m n U '_ r N y u i 75A -60 Y L `S U 4 R �aa5 G C 0 n I I I I � I l o A I o I I IV O' I O I q I i L � q?J ro� qqb roq 9 ro 9 b0 d to b4 ¢ VI OD b9 U W C ti O G C U O E c V ICI 'maD o 'u'mbn Q roan P, o p 2.'ronp w , U a �mn� a o U 9`2 n4O U . 6 d, C, a _m F Q E .4 'C e'> °''C u .O 'C v .o .' u . ❑ °❑'C s�i O't� cai O u 'G y U ti v u Pr o 0 (1-r U O Q.I U O W U O A a 0 of 75A -61 y I m — ❑ U � G i W U I 7 bf w 3 O 0 bn e4 ,S ! W O j 0 G y' •� j � � i 3 E ro b ro I `� p I, v in ro 0 = Ei G CIAO N b v7yi °..'yq o.S fib,-, � w r o o:o D bll ti O t y c m b= b N bD 75A -61 C' C' m r d �O C'. O m L� O I> d Y d A IL O a CL c d� � Q c o� rn c _E E 't=a E N 7 A rL C O OI C b W � U C T 4, UU 0 3 0 U Q u m o � � u W V O U 4. O G v q .ro E Y O 6J O O_ q ,c C M k p. U T U A E v k O � C � a '7 a 9 7v c A U U L 4 a P q O 04 rn 75A -62 3 Z• ROH - 05/06/14 RESOLUTION NO. 2014- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0, 2014 -01 AND CERTIFYING FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 2010 -01 AND APPROVING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 555 EAST MEMORY LANE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Applicant is requesting General Plan Amendment No. 2014 -01 to amend the General Plan to change the land use designation from Medium Density Residential (MR -15) to District Center (DC) to allow construction of the Park View at Town and Country Manor tower to be built on a 2.5 acre section of the site that is located at the southwest corner of the campus located at 555 East Memory Lane. B. On April 14, 2014, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and voted to recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2014 -01 and Certifying Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2010 -01 and approving the Mitigation Monitoring Program. C. On May 6, 2014, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed public hearing and at that time considered all testimony, written and oral, related to General Plan Amendment No. 2014 -01 and Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2010 -01. D. Currently, the land use designation for this site is Medium Density Residential (MR -15), which allows residential development that does not exceed 15 dwelling units per acre. This project will require amendments to the Land Use Element, including amending the General Plan Land Use designation to District Center (DC) with a General Plan floor area ratio of 1.27. The floor area ratio was derived from the size of the proposed buildings as well as the square footage of the existing structures on the site. E. The proposed project will be consistent with several goals and policies of the recently adopted Housing Element. First, the project is consistent with Resolution No. 2014 -XXX 75A-63 Page 1 of 5 Goal 2, which encourages diversity of quality housing, affordability levels, and living experiences that accommodate Santa Ana's residents and workforce of all household types, income levels and age groups to foster an inclusive community. Second, the project supports Goal 4, to provide adequate rental and ownership housing opportunities and supportive services for seniors, people with disabilities and people needing sportive housing. Further, the project is consistent with Policy HE -2.2 to create District Centers with high intensity, mixed -use urban villages and pedestrian oriented experiences; Policy HE -2.4 to facilitate diverse types, prices and sizes of housing; Policy HE -4.1 to support development of affordable senior housing readily accessible to support services; Policy HE -4.4 to support service enriched housing for persons with special need such as seniors and people with medical conditions; and Policy HE -4.7 to exercise appropriate land use, planning and regulatory oversight over the operation, location and impact associated with social needs housing and facilities. F. The City Council has weighed and balanced the general plan's policies, both new and old, and has determined that based upon this balancing that General Plan Amendment No. 2014 -01 is consistent with the purpose of the general plan. G. As part of the City's permitting process, the proposed project is required to undergo an environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with CEQA, the recommended actions have been reviewed through an environmental impact report, EIR No. 2010 -01. Sections 15080 through 15097 of the State CEQA Guidelines (Article 7) guide the process for the preparation of an environmental impact report. H. The EIR, as required by CEQA, contains 1) an initial study; 2) a project description; 3) a description of the environmental setting, potential environmental impacts, mitigation measures for any significant effects, and consistency with plans and policies; and 4) names of preparers. The mitigation measures included in this EIR are designed to reduce or eliminate the potentially significant environmental impacts described herein. The scope of the EIR evaluates the proposed project's effects on the following resource topics: aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation and traffic, and utilities and service systems. The City prepared a draft EIR and published the Notice of Availability (NOA) in the Orange County Register as well as posted the NOA at the Orange County Clerk's office on March 11, 2010. The City circulated the draft EIR for a 45 -day public review between March 1, 2010 and April 15, Resolution f 5No. 2014 -XXX Page 2t 75A -64 2010. The draft EIR was available for public review at the Santa Ana City Hall, the City of Santa Ana Main Library, and on the City's website. J. Comments were received during the public review period. Pursuant to Section 15088 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City, as the lead agency for the project, has reviewed all comments received on the document. K. As a result of the environmental analysis, no significant impacts were found from the construction of the proposed project. Mitigation measures have been provided to address potential environmental impacts, with a list of these mitigation measures found within the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Mitigation measures have been outlined to address potential impacts on air quality, noise, transportation and traffic, utilities and service systems, and climate change. L. The applicant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City of Santa Ana, its officials, officers, agents, and employees, from any and all liability, claims, actions or proceedings that may be brought arising out of its approval of this project, and any approvals associated with the project, including, without limitation, any CEQA review or approval, except to the extent caused by the negligence of the City of Santa Ana. Section 2. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2010 -01 prepared with respect to this project. The City Council has, as a result of its consideration of the record as a whole and the evidence presented at the hearings on this matter, determined that, as required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines, Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2010 -01 meets all requirements of CEQA. The City Council hereby certifies and approves Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2010 -01 and the Mitigation Monitoring Program attached herewith and incorporated herein by this reference, and directs that a Notice of Determination be prepared and filed with the County Clerk of the County of Orange in the manner required by law. Section 3. Pursuant to Title XIV, California Code of Regulations ( "CCR ") §735.5(c)(1), the City Council has determined that, after considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have the potential for any adverse effect on wildlife resources or the ecological habitat upon which wildlife resources depend. The proposed project exists in an urban environment characterized by paved concrete, roadways, surrounding buildings and human activity. Therefore, pursuant to Fish and Game Code §711.2 and Title XIV, CCR §735.5(a)(3), the payment of Fish and Game Department filing fees is not required in conjunction with this project. Section 4. The City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 2014 -01 and certifies Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2010 -01 and approves the Mitigation Monitoring Program. The amendments to the General Plan are attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. Resolution No. 2014 -XXX 75A -65 Page 3 of 5 Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2010 -01 is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. The Mitigation Monitoring Program is attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. These decisions are based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Council Action dated May 6, 2014, and exhibits attached thereto, and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. These decisions rendered by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana are final and are subject to judicial review pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6. The Planning and Building Agency shall give direct notice to the applicant of the Council's decisions and these findings. ADOPTED this _ day of 2014. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: Ryan O. Hodge Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers Councilmembers Miguel A. Pulido Mayor Resolution No. 2014 -XXX Page 4 of 5 75A-66 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, MARIA D. HUIZAR, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2014 -XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2014 -XXX 75A-67 Page 5 of 5 75A -68 ORDINANCE NO. NS- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA REZONING THE TOWN AND COUNTRY MANOR PROPERTY LOCTED AT 555 EAST MEMORY LANE FROM SUBURBAN APARTMENT (R -4) TO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 87 (SD -87) (AA NO. 2014 -01) AND ADOPTING SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 87 (SD -87) FOR SAID PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: A. Amendment Application No. 2014 -01 has been filed with the City of Santa Ana to change the zoning district designation of certain real property located at 555 East Memory Lane from Suburban Apartment (R -4) to Specific Development No. 87 (SD -87). The Specific Development No. 87 zoning district (SD -87) would allow the Park View at Town and Country Manor tower to be built on a 2.5 acre section of the site that is located at the southwest corner of the campus. B. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed public hearing on April 14, 2014, on Amendment Application No. 2014 -01 and decided to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2014 -01, which is consistent with the General Plan. C. This Council, prior to taking action on this ordinance, held a duly noticed public hearing on May 6, 2014. D. The City Council also adopts as findings all facts presented in the Request for Council Action dated May 6, 2014 accompanying this matter. E. For these reasons, and each of them, Amendment Application No. 2014 -01 is hereby found and determined to be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana and otherwise justified by the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare. 75A -69 Section 2. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2010 -01 prepared with respect to this project. The City Council has, as a result of its consideration of the record as a whole and the evidence presented at the hearings on this matter, determined that, as required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines, Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2010 -01 meets all requirements of CEQA. Pursuant to Title XIV, California Code of Regulations ( "CCR ") §735.5(c)(1), the City Council has determined that, after considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have the potential for any adverse effect on wildlife resources or the ecological habitat upon which wildlife resources depend. The proposed project exists in an urban environment characterized by paved concrete, roadways, surrounding buildings and human activity. Therefore, pursuant to Fish and Game Code §711.2 and Title XIV, CCR §735.5(a)(3), the payment of Fish and Game Department filing fees is not required in conjunction with this project. Section 3. The real property located at 555 East Memory Lane in Santa Ana is hereby reclassified from Suburban Apartment (R -4) to Specific Development No. 87 (SD -87). An amended Sectional District Map, showing the above described change in use district designation, is hereby approved and attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. Section 4. Specific Development No. 87 (SD -87), attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein, is approved and adopted in its entirety. Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. ADOPTED this _ day of , 2014. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor 75A -70 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney 0 Ryan O. Hodge Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, MARIA D. HUIZAR, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS- to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 75A -71 75A -72 Item 75A A blueprint is on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Council and is available for public inspection during regular business hours, 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. 75A -73 75A -74