Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout25C - AGMT - ENGINEERING SRVSREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: DECEMBER 2, 2014 TITLE: APPROVED AGREEMENT WITH WKE, INC., FOR ❑ As Recommended ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES Cl Amended [] O Or rdinance on 1" Reading FOR FAIRVIEW STREET BRIDGE ❑ Ordinance on ed Reading REHABILITATION (PROJECT NO. 15 -6827) ❑ Implementing Resolution (STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 6, 1, G) ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO ( L FILE NUMBER CITY MANAGE RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with WKE, Inc., subject to nonsubstantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, to provide engineering services for a two -year period expiring December 2, 2016, with the provision for one one -year extension exercisable by the City Manager, for a total agreement amount not to exceed $600,000. DISCUSSION Fairview Avenue is classified as north -south Major Arterial per the City's General Plan Circulation Element with three lanes in each direction, except at the bridge crossing over Santa Ana River. Currently, Fairview Bridge is striped with two lanes in each direction with no curb or sidewalk on the bridge. Ultimately, staff will seek Federal and Measure M2 funds to widen the bridge and Fairview Street to accommodate three lanes in each direction. Improvements will include widening the bridge to add sidewalk, curb, and barrier rails. Staff issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitation Improvement through the Orange County Register on July 16, 2014. The RFP was also posted on the City website. Three proposals were received, evaluated, and ranked by a review committee comprised of personnel from various City agencies. Ranking criteria included firm and personnel experience, understanding of need, relevant project experience, schedule, and references. The top two firms were selected for interview for final ranking. Staff rated the proposals as follows: Firm Score Proposed Fee WKE, Inc. 92.7 $559,661 Mark Thomas and Company 88.1 TTG Engineers 79.7 25C -1 Agreement with WKE, Inc., for Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitation December 2, 2014 Page 2 Following evaluation and ranking of proposals, the fee rate schedule for the top ranked firm was opened and reviewed. Staff recommends awarding a contract to WKE, Inc., based on its experience with similar bridge rehabilitation projects and familiarly with Caltrans requirements and City of Santa Ana bridges. The proposal contained a clear path toward achieving City goals and objectives, as required by the RFP. The $600,000 total agreement compensation is comprised of the $559,661 project fee and $40,339 for contingency. The contract approved by this Council action will be effective December 2, 2014, through December 2, 2016, with a provision for one one -year extension exercisable by the City Manager. STRATEGIC PLAN Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #6 Community Facilities & Infrastructure, Objective #1 (establish and maintain a Community Investment Plan for all City assets), Strategy G (develop and implement the City's Capital Improvement Program in coordination with the Community Investment and Deferred Maintenance Plans). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Select Streets Construction accounts (05917660 -66220 and 05917663- 66220). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: d Mousa ipour Francisco Gutierrez E ecutive Director Executive Director Public Works Agency Finance & Management. Services Agency FM /EWG /ML Exhibit 1: Agreement 25C -2 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FAIRVIEW STREET BRIDGE REHABILITATION DESIGN SERVICES RFP NO. 14 -001 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this _ day of , 2014 by and between WKE Inc., a California corporation (hereinafter "Consultant'), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter "City "). RECITALS A. The City desires to retain a Consultant having special skill and knowledge in the field of civil and structural engineering. B. Consultant represents that Consultant is able and willing to provide such services to the City and is licensed by the State of California to provide professional engineering design services for the Fairview Street Bridge Improvement, which includes bridge deck rehabilitation, incidental widening, sidewalk, railing, environmental documents, and regulatory permits. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional engineering firm. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant shall provide civil and structural engineering services for the Fairview Street bridge rehabilitation in compliance with Consultant's Proposal dated August 6, 2014, attached hereto as Exhibit A, The Consultant will provide an experienced, educated and professional team, whose Project Manager and staff shall be responsive and maintain excellent working relations with City staff. The Consultant shall be committed to provide adequate staffing levels at all times in order to adhere to established schedules. 2. COMPENSATION a. City agrees to pay and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services, the rates and charges set forth in Consultant's Proposal, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. The amount to be expended for services shall not exceed $559,661 during the term of this Agreement. b. Invoices i. The Consultant shall submit a monthly invoice by the fifteenth of the month to the City for the services rendered in the prior month. ii. All invoices for work performed under this Agreement shall be submitted in a format approved by the City. Invoices shall include the following information at a minimum: 25C -3 I . Consultant's invoice number 2, Beginning and ending dates for services 3. City project number and/or name (Project 15 -6827) 4. Work site address /location (if applicable) 5. Tasks or deliverables completed, and percent of total services completed c. Payment by City shall be made within sixty (60) days following receipt of proper invoice, subject to City accounting procedures. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals which may reasonably be expected by the City. d. City shall retain ton percent (10 %) of the contract price for each project until the completed project has been accepted and deliverables received by the City. e. No additional work shall be authorized unless a separate estimate is given for said work and the estimates is approved by the City in writing before the work is commenced. The Consultant will be required to provide detailed information of such work. Work performed prior to obtaining written approval of the City shall not be included within the Scope of Work and may not be paid. 3. TERIM The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and continue for a period of two (2) years, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 10, below. 4. OWNERSHIP OF REPORTS AND DOCUMENTS Upon completion of all work under this Agreement, ownership and title to all reports, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, estimates and maps prepared or obtained under the terms of this Agreement shall be delivered to, and become the property of City. Basic survey notes and sketches, charts, computations, and other data prepared or obtained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available upon request of the City without restriction or limitation on their use, Contractor shall firrnish the City with all necessary copies of data needed to complete the review and approval process. 5. DELIVERY OF SERVICES Consultant agrees to provide schedule and deliverables as set forth in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). 6. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer - employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 7. INSURANCE Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below: 25C -4 a. Commercial General Liability Insurance: Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance naming the City, its officers, agents, volunteers, and employees as additional insured(s) and shall include, but not be limited to protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom and damage to property, resulting from any act or occurrence arising out of Consultant's operations in the performance of this Agreement, including, without limitation, acts involving vehicles. The amounts of insurance shall be not less than the following: single limit coverage applying to bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and property damage, in the total amount of $1,000,000 par occurrence. Consultant shall supply City with a fully executed additional insured endorsement in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B upon execution of this Agreement and shall be approved in form by the City Attorney. b. Business automobile liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and non - owned automobiles. c. Worker's Compensation Insurance: In accordance with the provisions of Section 3300 of the Labor Code, Consultant, if Consultant has any employees, is required to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self- insurance. Prior to commencing the performance of the work under this Agreement, Consultant agrees to obtain and maintain any employer's liability insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000 per accident. d. Professional Liability Insurance: If Consultant is or employs a licensed professional such as an architect or engineer, Consultant is required to carry professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim. e. The following requirements apply to the insurance to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this section: Consultant shall maintain all insurance required above in full force and effect for the entire period covered by this Agreement. ii. Certificates of insurance shall be furnished to the City upon execution of this Agreement and shall be approved in form by the City Attorney. iii. Certificates and policies shall state that the policies shall not be cancelled or reduced in coverage or changed in any other material aspect without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. f. If Consultant fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section or fails or refuses to furnish the City with required proof that insurance has been procured and is in force and paid for, the City shall have the right, at the City's election, to forthwith terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not affect Consultant's right to be paid for its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. Consultant waives the right to receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the City for any work performed prior to approval of insurance by the City. 8. INDE, MNITICATION Consultant agrees to and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, consultants, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including health, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the direct or indirect 25C -5 operations of the Consultant or its contractors, subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on their behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third, party asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. 9. COMPLIANCE WITIi APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS a. Consultant shall perform all requirements under this Agreement in strict observance of and in compliance with all applicable environmental, traffic, safety and any other laws, regulations, ordinances, codes and any other legislative or statutory requirements. b. Consultant certifies that it shall comply with the following regulations, as required by the Highway Bridge Rehabilitation and Rehabilitation (HBRR): Audit Records - With respect to all matters covered by this Agreement all records shall be made available for audit and inspection by the City, the grant agency and/or their duly authorized representatives for a period of four (4) years from the termination of this Agreement or for a period of three years after final delivery hereunder or until all claims related to this Agreement are finally settled, whichever is later, Consultant shall preserve and maintain all documents, papers and records relevant to the services provided in accordance with this Agreement, including the Attachments hereto. For the same time period, Consultant shall make said documents, papers and records available to City and the agency from which City received grant funds or their duly authorized representative(s), for examination, copying, or mechanical reproduction on or off the premises of Consultant, upon request during usual working hours. ii. Consultant shall provide to City all records and information requested by City for inclusion in quarterly reports and such other reports or records as City may be required to provide to the agency from which City received grant funds or other persons or agencies, iii, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Handicapped) - All recipients of federal funds must comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (The Act). Therefore, the federal funds recipient pursuant to the requirements of The Act hereby gives assurance that no otherwise qualified handicapped person shall, solely by reason of handicap be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of or be subject to discrimination, including discrimination in employment, in any program or activity that receives or benefits from federal financial assistance. The Consultant agrees it will ensure that requirements of The Act shall be included in the Agreements with and be binding on all of its contractors, subcontractors, assignees or successors. iv. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 - (ADA) Consultant must comply with all requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as applicable. v. Political Activity - None of the funds, materials, property, or services provided directly or 25C -6 indirectly under this Agreement shall be used for any partisan political activity, or to further the election or defeat of any candidate for public office, or otherwise in violation of the provisions of the "Hatch Act ". vi. Non - Discrimination Clause - During the performance of this Contract, Consultant and its subconsultant shall not unlawfully discriminate, harass, or allow harassment against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, race, color, ancestry, religious creed, national origin, physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), mental disability, medical condition (e.g., cancer), age (over 40), marital status, and denial of family care leave. Consultant and subconsultants shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of their employees and applicants for employment are free from such discrimination and harassment. Consultant and subconsultants shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code §12990 (a -0 et seq.) and the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder (California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 7285 et seq.). The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government Code Section 12990 (a -f), set forth in Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations, are incorporated into this Contract by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. Consultant and its subconsultants shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other Agreement. Consultant shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts to perform work under the Contract. vii. Consultant, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR chapter 60), as applicable. viii. Consultant, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Copeland "Anti - Kickback" Act (18 U.S.C. 874) as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3), as applicable. ix. Consultant, and all its contractors (or „ subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Davis -Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a to 276a -7) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5), as applicable. x. Consultant, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of Sections 103 and 107 of the Contract Work and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327- 330) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5), as applicable. xi. Consultant, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all applicable standards, orders or requirements issued under Section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857(h)), Section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and the Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 CFR part 15), as applicable. xii. Consultant, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (Pub. L. 94 -163, 89 Stat. 871), (53 FR 8078, 8087, Mar, 11, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 19639, 19645, Apr. 19, 1995), as applicable. xiii. Consultant agrees that the State of California shall have the authority to seek patent rights for any process, product, invention or discovery developed and paid for with funding 25C -7 through this Agreement xiv. Consultant may copyright any books, publications or other copyrightable materials developed in the course of or under this Agreement. However, the federal awarding agency, State Administrative Agency (SAA) and City reserve a royalty -free, non- exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, for federal government, SAA and/or City purpose: 1. the copyright in any work developed through this Agreement; and 2. any rights of copyright to which the subcontractor purchases ownership with support through this grant. The Federal government's, SAA's and City's rights identified above must be conveyed to the publisher and the language of the publisher's release form must ensure the preservation of these rights. xv. Covenant Against Contingent Fees: The Consultant warrants that he /she has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for the consultant; to solicit or secure this contract; and that he /she has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award, or formation of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the local agency shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or at its discretion; to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 10. ASSIGNMENT None of the duties of, or work to be performed by, Consultant under this Agreement shall be subcontracted or assigned to any agency, consultant or person with the prior written consent of City. Consultant must submit all subcontracts And other agreements that related to this Agreement to City. No subcontract or assigmnent shall terminate or alter the legal obligations of Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. 11. TERMINATION The City reserves the right to terminate the Agreement as follows: a. This Agreement may be terminated without cause by City upon thirty (30) days written notice delivered to the Consultant either personally or by mail. Upon termination, City shall pay to Consultant that portion of compensation specified in the Agreement that is earned and unpaid prior to the date of termination. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. In addition to, or in lieu of, remedies provided in this Agreement or pursuant to law, City shall have the right to withhold all or a portion of Consultant's compensation for Agreement services if in the judgment of the project's manager or designee, the level of service falls below appropriate standards and/or Consultant fails to satisfactorily perform Agreement services. City shall have the right to retain funds withheld until the project's manager or designee determines that Agreement services are performed as well and as frequently as required by this Agreement. 25C -8 12. JURISDICTION — VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties fwther agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 13. VALIDITY The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement. 14. FINES The Consultant shall be liable for all violation fines levied against the City by federal, state, or local agencies with regulatory authority related to Consultant provided services. 15. CONFIDENTIALITY If Consultant receives information from the City which, due to the nature of such information, is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise reasonable care to protect such information. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information in all forms: written, oral, visual, electronic, or any other means, Confidential information which is disclosed to either party by any subsidiary or agent is also covered by this Agreement. 16. PROFESSIONAL LICENSE Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 17. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by facsimile or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M -30) P.U. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 -1988 25C -9 Facsimile (714) 647 -6956 With courtesy copies to: Public Works Agency — Design Engineering City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M -36) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 City Attorney City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (ivI -29) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 Facsimile (714) 647 -6515 To Consultant: WKE, Inc. 400 N. Tustin Avenue, #275 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Attn: Dan Weddell, PE Phone: (714) 953 -1020 18. MISCELLANEOUS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature hereinbelow has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify Agency frilly, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to Agency in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement, Q. No delay or omission by either party hereto to exercise any right or power accruing upon any noncompliance or default by the other party with respect to any of the terms of this Agreement shall impair any such right or power or be construed to be a waiver thereof. A waiver by either of the parties hereto of any of the covenants, conditions, or agreements to be performed by the other shall not be construed to be a waiver of any succeeding breach thereof or of any other covenant, condition or agreement herein contained. 25C -10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: MARIA D. HUIZAR Cleric of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA CARVALHO City Attorney By Kyle . ellesen Deputy City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Fred Mousavipour Executive Director Public Works Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA DAVID CAVAZOS City Manager CONSULTANT Wei Koo, SE President WKE, Inc. 25C -11 I 0 25C -12 Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitation RFP No. 14 -001 August 20, 2014 Ms, Mindy Ly Public Works Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza; 3rd Floor, Ross Annex Santa Ana, CA 92701 RE: RFP 14.001, City of Santa Ana, Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitation Design Services Dear Ms. Ly: WKE, is a general engineering consultant based in the in the city of Santa Ana. WKE has assembled a team specifically tailored to successfully deliver the Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitation over the Santa Ana River. The team has demonstrated success on providing bridge engineering services for similar HBP funded projects for the city of Santa Ana and the County of Orange requiring river construction, developing feasible and fundable alternatives that maintain traffic while accommodating safe pedestrian and bicycle access during construction, and managing the design of over 50 bridges with Caftrans oversight. WKE has built its reputation on completing complex transportation projects efficiently. We bring in -depth knowledge of project requirements, both technical engineering and regulatory /oversight processes, a history of successful projects for the city of Santa Ana, and a strong company commitment to successfully execute the project to meet the client's requirements, and Project Manager personal commitment to be responsive to the city Project Manager. The team members assigned to the project have extensive experience managing HBP funded bridge widening, replacement and rehabilitation projects for local agencies. Our HBP experience includes developing project concept through environmental clearances, and preparing Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS &E) and providing engineering support during construction. Our extensive experience planning and designing HBP funded projects translates into efficiently run projects. WKE recently completed a similar HBP widening project, Foothill Boulevard over San Dimas Wash, incorporating bike lanes, shoulders and adding sidewalks on both sides of a busy two lane street. The team proposed for your project is substantially the same, and will transfer the knowledge and understanding directly to your project. Mr. Weddell, PE will serve as the Project Manager. Mr. Weddell has over 17 years of experience managing bridge and transportation projects for local agencies. He is personally responsible for successfully obtaining HBP funding of over 25 bridge projects and has managed the design of numerous HBP funded bridges, ranging from minor widening and rehabilitation to bridge replacement, with construction costs from $50,000 to $35 million. His in -depth knowledge of the Local Assistance Program Guide and Local Assistance Procedures Manual, and relationship with District 12 Local Assistance staff will ensure a trouble free project. iYr h L Dasign Sorvices for Fe Lviow Street Bridge Rebabikation Cover Letter I 1 25C -14 Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitation RFP No. 1¢001 D The WKE Team involves -five subconsultants with expertise fundamental to delivering this project for the City, They are: • LSA Associates provides experience processing NEPA and CEQA documents with District 12 oversight as well as detailed knowledge on coordinating with the resource agencies involved on this project; • Civil Works Engineers (DBE), to provide support on general civil, hydraulics and drainage engineering, bringing their knowledge of USACE, and Orange County Public Works Flood Division; • Earth Mechanics, Inc. (DBE), brings a very experienced group of geotechnical engineers with experience working on hundreds bridges, including several for Santa Ana within the Santa Ana River; • Tatsumi and Partners (DBE), will provide architectural renderings and landscape design; • Coast Survey (DBE), will provide survey services. All of these firms are recognized experts in their respective fields, and have current working relationships with WKE on similar projects. The team has demonstrative experience in completing federally funded projects and has worked closely with Caltrans Local Assistance on numerous projects. The attached proposal demonstrates our knowledge, skill and innovative approach to completing the project for the City. The enclosed -fee proposal is valid for 90 days. With this highly skilled team that has worked together on similar federally funded projects, we are confident we will deliver the project within the City's schedule and funding resources. WKE iscommittedto exceedingthe 12.01 %Disadvantage Business Enterprise (DBE) goal established for this proposal as exemplified by our selection of four DBE subconsultants. We have reviewed the draft contract contained in the RFP and concur with the provisions with no exceptions. I am authorized to bind WKE to the terms of the proposal. If you have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (714) 955 -1020, or at 400 North Tustin Ave, 4275, Santa Ana, CA 92705. We look forward to your favorable decision and the opportunity to continue participating in the selection process. Respectfully submitted, Dan Weddell, PE Project Manager Wei Koo, SE Principal -in- Charge 2 1 Cover Letter Design Services for ra rvlew Street arldge Rehabllltatien A07KE 25C -15 Fairview Street is a 6 -lane roadway, with a striped median and sidewalks that narrows over the Santa Ana River. Built in 1963, the bridge consists of an eight span cast in place T- Girder structure. Existing bridge width accommodates four 11' -0" lanes with 3' -6" side shoulders. The shoulder doubles as unprotected pedestrian walkways, causing many people to cross the river by walking down to the river bottom. As the deck geometry does not meet current AASHTO standards and is rated a 4 in the Bridge Inspection Report (BIR), the City plans on widening the bridge to bring it to minimum standard of 5' -0" sidewalks, new safety barrier rails, and T -0" shoulders. We understand the City also plans to widen the bridge with additional lanes to match the road sections on the approaches. WKE has successfully applied on behalf of our clients with Caltrans Local Assistance to add features such as sidewalks, turn lanes, through lanes, and bike lanes to HBP funded projects. In our extensive experience in developing HBP project scopes, we use traffic modeling, and Fairview Bridge over the Santa Ana River has a bridge deck condition rating of 3, indicating the decks in "poor condition ", triggering the bridge eligibility for funding. A visual inspection reveals a large network of cracks both on top of the deck as well as the soffit. The cracking below the deck shows signs of phosfluorescence, a telling sign that cracks extend through the entire deck depth allowing water to seep through. The extensive cracking and poor overall deck condition requires more than methacrylate overlay which essentially only seals existing cracks, and does not reduce new cracks from forming. It is recommended to place a layer of polyester concrete overlaid on the existing deck to protect the deck and prevent further damage due 'to water and traffic wear. Our engineers have developed plans for several bridge rehabilitations with polyester concrete overlay, including McFadden Street and Fifth Street both over the Santa Ana River. A key concern is to limit the depth of overlay to less than 2.5" to ensure adhesion, while also providing a smooth transition the approach asphalt concrete. We will evaluate the structure for the additional v,,idemnc, the bridge. �� b ©slgn Survicee for Fairvimw Stremt Brldge Rmhabirtation 25C -17 Understanding g andlncof Need I 11 Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitations RFP No. 14 -001 '"" Having completed several HBP bridge widening projects, such as the Foothill Boulevard Bridge for the city of San Dimas, and the Fifth and McFadden Bridge over Santa Ana River 'for the city of Santa Ana. We thoroughly understand the scope of work as well as the challenges associated with a bridge widening for sidewalk and bikeway Improvements for project over flood control facility, Areas of special consideration include developing a cost effective bridge widening that maintains local traffic, minimizes construction in the river in order to streamline the County /Army Corps approvals, provides continuous access to the Santa Ana River Bike Trails, maintenance and access roads, and can obtain NEPA approval. Utilizing our years of experience working on similar structures in the Santa Ana River, we will anticipate and plan for potential roadblocks, delivering a successful project for the City. Based on the most recent Bridge Inspection Report, as -built plans, and field review we have compiled a list of technical and institutional challenges expected on this project which will be investigated and resolved by the WKE team. A summary of these challenges is listed below, and our innovative approach to addressing them follows: • Bridge Alignment • Seismic Analysis Bridge Aesthetics Bike Trail • Environmental Documentation (NEPA /CEC!A) BRIDGE ALIGNIVIEINT"; An 18' -0" widening is required to accommodate four 11' -0" lanes, 4' -0" shoulders, and 8' -0" sidewalks with Type 26 barriers on the outside. WKE, studied the roadway geometry, right of way constraints and constructability of the bridge widening, and have developed three widening options with bridge and approach geometric alignments to accommodate left turn movement, in detail that provide geometric alignments that provide all current turn movements, ease bridge constructability, minimize river disturbance, provide continuous bike, pedestrian, and maintenance access, minimize traffic, impact and simplify future widening to six lanes. Option 1 The RFP described a symmetric widening option by adding 9' -0" widening along both sides orF existing Fairview Bridge. Constructing symmetric widening Will require construction of new pier walls in Santa Ana River, including reconstructing existing debris walls. There are several site constraints on Fairview Street that will affect the widening option. The existing bridge has a narrow width, providing a 3'- 6" walking path on each side. By constructing the widening on both sides, it will essentially eliminate the walking path, and close pedestrian access over the bridge during construction. To avoid this, the bridge construction will have to proceed in two phases, constructing one side in each phase. The split phase construction will require the construction be spread over two summers with a winter shutdown period in between. This will lengthen the construction period by at least six months. Debris walls sit at the leading edge of all seven pier walls.The construction alongthe eastside of Fairview will require these debris wall be reconstructed. If the City proceeds with the six lane project on Fairview in the future, a symmetric widening will require the debris walls be reconstructed again. If the future widening is completed only on the west side of Fairview Bridge, the asymmetric widening will result in about a 13' -0 wide shift in the centerline, and additional right -of -ways will be required. Thus in either case, the future widening will carry additional cost. The WKE Team has examined other options to alleviate the aforementioned issues. Two additional options were examined and presented herein. 12 1 Understanding of Neod Design Services for Fairview Street Fridge Rehabilitation KE 25C -18 R/W Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitation RFPNo.14 RA I ............ ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii REHABILITATION WIDENING Option I - Symmetric Rehabilitation Widening; Maintain centerline & reconstruct debris wall. FUTUREIA Option I - Ultimate Symmetric 6 -bane Widening: Maintain centerline & reconstruct debris nose again. n. RyW ....... —! .................. . — ................... ---------------- Option I - Ultimate .isymmetric 6-Lane Widening: Shift centerline but maintain debris nose. ,Jfl<—E Dos 1 gn So rvl ce5 for Fi rview Stroet Bridge Re h a L 11 tatj on tjndersCqridinq of Need I 12 25C -19 Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitation Option 2 Option 2 is to widen the bridge deck 18' -0" to the west of the existing bridge to accommodate 8' -0" sidewalks, 4' -0" shoulder safety /bike lanes, and concrete barriers on both sides of the bridge (See Exhibit A). This option shifts the centerline 9' -0" west of the current bridge centerline. This alignment takes advantage of the approach curve south of the bridge to make a smooth lane shift in the northbound direction. In the southbound direction, the outside lane will be on a tangent alignment with a small shift to adjust for a wider shoulder on the bridge. The west side widening requires re- grading of two of the four OC Flood Control Department maintenance access roads and relocation of two gates. Within the river, the west widening does not impact the existing debris noses or the storm drain outlet at the northwest corner. Not needing to re- construct the debris noses represents a significant cost reduction to this project. Minimizing construction in the river has several benefits such. as ensuring nationwide permit is applicable for the streambed alteration which will speeds up environmental and permit processing tasks, and reducing the construction time which will result in lower construction bids. In order to build the widening, traffic will be shifted to the east side. This will maintain one 3' -6" walkway during construction, allowing pedestrian access across the River. Upon completion of the widening, a new sidewalk along the east side will be added. This option can be built in the shortest time possible without a winter shutdown. A key benefit of a single sided widening to the west is the reduced life cycle cost when factoring in i future &•lane widening. A future single sided 28' -0" widening of the bridge to the east will create a 6 -lane structure that matches the approaches. (See Exhibit B) This provides 8' -0" sidewalks, 5-0" shoulder /bike lanes, six 11' -0" lanes and a 4' -0" median. The overall centerline shift will be 5' -0 ",which can smoothly be shifted within the median transition on the approaches. Another benefit of this option is to be able to build ultimate sections within existing right of way. As shown in Exhibit B attached with this proposal, the existing extra wide sidewalk is narrowed from 20' -0" to about 10' -0 ", which results in less encroachment on the park across the street. The trade -off for this option is a slight encroachment into the recently improved Fairview Triangle Habitat Restoration area as opposed to a larger encroachment at a future date. REHABILITATION WIDENING Op #Bean 2 - West Rehabilitation Widening: Shift centerline 9' -0" west and do not touch debris wall. Future ultimate widening would require debris wall reconstruction. 14 1 Understanding of Need Design Services for Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitation AT K E 25C -20 I @ " kl Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitation RFP No. 14-001 Exist � 18 ' n'2' 12' 11' | 11' 11' I5.| 0.5' STAGE 1 {}oGvn2~M/estsideRohab//itat/onVMden/ngStage7/Mainta/n°ast3'^0'shnp/dorx/h//eweots/de superstructure isconstructed. Option 2~VMos$kda Rehabilitation Widening Stage 2: Open new west sidewalk and construct east sidewalk. Note the debris wall remains untouched. FUTURE Option 2 - Ultima te 6-Lane Wdening to the East: Shift centerline 5'-0" east and re-con5truct debris wall, go Rehabilitation Understanding of Need I E Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitation RFP No, 14-001 Option 3 Option 3 that we developed widens the bridge 18' -0" on the east side of the existing structure to provide four 11' -0" lanes, 4' -0" shoulders and 8' -0" sidewalks. Similar to option 2 above, the construction can be staged to maintain pedestrian access at all times. Option 3 maintains the curb line at the southeast corner and aligns northbound traffic with the 171h Street intersection. (See Exhibit C) An east side widening requires the existing debriswallsbe re- constructed underthe HBP funded safety project, which will result to a higher n �4 3 cost project and higher local match required for the safety project. The interim alignment for option 3 requires a longer transition towards 171h Street and creates an awkward shift in the southbound lanes to accommodate the northbound left turn to West 16 1h Street. The southbound approach transition to the bridge will require a longer approach sidewalk construction, or additional bridge barrier end treatments. In the ultimate 6 -lane condition, the westward centerline shift maintains the extra wide sidewalk on the southeast corner, and will further encroach into the park. (See Exhibit D) Exist- PROPOSED t C1 041 Z6' 9' 8' , 4,r 11' 11' ii REHABILITATION WIDENING —• Option 3 -- East Rehabilitation Widening: shift centerline 9' -0" east and reconstruct debris wall. Future ultimate widening would not touch debris wall, 35' Each of the three potential rehabilitation widenings have unique benefits as shown in the table below. Options 2 and 3 have shorter construction durations which minimizes traffic congestion and construction support costs. Where these options shine is when Life Cvcle Cost Analysis i Higher Bike Trail Detours Two Seasons viewing the rehabilitation as part of the larger ultimate six -lane bridge vision by the City; these two options have reduced life cycle costs and minimize impacts to the nearby park. Low low One Season One Season to ark None now,26'Take later * b' Take now, None later None now,12''rake later 1 b 1 Understanding of Need Design Services for Fairview Streot Bridge Rehabll'vtation A �, 25C -22 �w Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitation v.•. RFP No. 111 SEISMIC ANALYSIS WKE is one of the few firms that have widened and retrofit bridges in this stretch of the Santa Ana River. An understanding of the river history is important to understanding the potential seismic collapse mechanisms of these bridges. In the mid 90's, this reach of the Santa Ana River was concrete lined, lowering the riverbed about 9' -0" from the original design grade of many of the structures, leaving the bottom of footing 4' -0" above ground. The river was lowering reduces the pile vertical and lateral capacity, and exacerbating liquefaction instability. The bridge was seismically retrofitted in the mid 90's as part of the riverbed lowering completed by the County. The retrofit included casing the exposed piles and adding pipe restrainers at the hinges. Many of these early retrofits did not include liquefaction as a consideration in overall bridge stability, both vertical and lateral. In our experience on Fifth Street and the old First Street bridges over the Santa Ana River, the pile concrete casing did not adequately address the bridge stability during an earthquake. In both cases, a 'foundation retrofit was required in addition to hinge restrainers. In the case of Fifth Street, we used innovative solution of micropiles for the foundation retrofit since these can be installed under low overhead clearance situations. WKE's past experience on these bridges drives our alternatives development and ensures a cost effective design is chosen from the start. BRIDGE AESTHETICS One of the keys to a successful project is the acceptance by the local community using the structure on a daily basis. This includes school children attending the Spurgeon Intermediate School, users of the Santa Ana Bike Trail, and visitors to the nearby parks. Our team will work with the :200*• WKE's enhanced Aesthetic design incorporated colored river rock finish and custom hand rails on concrete barriers for Foothill Boulevard Bridge over San Dimas Wash. City and members of the general community in a process to arrive at a design that respects the recent surrounding park improvements, provides a level of aesthetic detail beyond a standard Caltrans solution, and provides a project that enhances the community beyond the basic functionality of crossing over the Santa Ana River. Solutions may include the use of the open railing Type 80 concrete barrier, with the additional of architectural finish included in the bridge. On Foothill Blvd in relatively rural San Dimas, the Type 80 barrier was chosen with a colored river rock finish to pay tribute to the many rock walls and foundations of the surrounding craftsman homes. BIKE TRAIL The existing Orange County Regional Bike Path crosses underneath both ends of the Fairview Street. The jurisdiction of this bike trail is under the County of Orange Harbor, Beaches and Parks Division of the Resources and Development Management Department. They require that the trail be open at all times with maximum closures for construction activity of 15 minutes. Longer closures require bike detours which must be approved by the agency. This requirement will be difficult to meet during foundation construction as bents 2 and 7 are embedded in the bike path slope requiring extensive excavation. Aviable alternative is to detour bike traffic to the bottom of the river. We have 40V K Design Services for Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitation Understanding of Noed 117 25C -23 Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitation RFP No '1$ -001 detoured the bike path into the river bottom during summer construction on other projects in the area. Identification of construction staging, bike detours or developing alternate routes is important to gain approvals from the County. WKE has experience in working with the Harbor, Beaches and Parks Division on Memory Lane Bridge widening project, the Classell Avenue Bridge Widening projects as well as the McFadden. construction as was done on Fifth Street Rehab Maintaining the existing 12' -0" of vertical clearance over the bike paths under spans 1 and 8 is critical to the bike path operation. A wider bridge has the potential of reducing the vertical clearance. We will develop solutions to address the clearance. One alternative is to lower the bike path under the new bridge. This could be costly and difficuitto stage while maintaining bike traffic. Another option is to design a shallower bridge section to compensate for the bike path vertical curve, and deck cross slope. Matching the existing span lengths of 5T -6 ", the bridge could be designed with a depth of as little as 2' -6 ", providing the potential for an extra 1'- 6" of space over the bike path. This option could be built at less cost than the previous alternative. (a DvF�1'11 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE The City will be utilizing federal funds for the project; therefore, compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) will be required, in addition to compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 12 Office of Local Assistance will act as the lead agency for NEPA compliance as delegated by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the City will be the lead agency for CEQA compliance. The key environmental issues are discussed below. The first step in the environmental approval process is to complete the Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) checklist which is crucial to determining the technical studies required, as well as identifies the type of environmental documents. In our experience accurate layouts and cross sections are critical to approval of the PES by Caltrans. Our environmental experts and engineers will work closely together to develop the potential alignments to create an accurate Area of Potential Effect map prior to submittal to Caltrans. The technical reportswill be prepared forthe project based on the Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference (SER). The anticipated technical reports for the projectirclude: a Natural Environment Study Minimal Impacts (NESMI) with attached Bat Habitat Suitability Assessment and Jurisdictional Delineation Report a Section 4(f) and 6(f) Documentation: memorandums of no use or "De Minimus" findings a Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR) with attached APE map, Archeological Survey Report, records search, and Native American Consultation results a Paleontological Identification Report/ Paleontological Evaluation Report (PER /PIR) a Water Quality Assessment Report a Summary of Floodplain Encroachment Report a Noise Technical Memorandum for construction impacts 18 1 Understanding of Need Dmsign Services for Falrviow Street Bridge Rehabilitation if/7- K L 25C -24 lc Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitation RFP No. 14 -001 The proposed widening does increase capacity on the bridge; therefore, a Noise Study Report and Air Quality Analysis/ Air Quality Conformity documentation will not be required. In addition, it is anticipated that the project footprint will be within City right of way; therefore, no potential historical resources will be within the Area of Potential Effects (APE) and a Historical Resources Evaluation Report will not be required, nor will a community impact or relocation impact document be required. Last, based on our review and preliminary completion of the Caltrans Questionnaire for Visual Impacts, no visual report or memo will be required. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND JURISDICTIONAL WATERS PERMITS. The project area is built out and the Santa Ana River is lined with concrete in this area; therefore, there is limited suitable habitat for special status species. However, bridge structures are often used by bats for roosting and nesting, so a bat habitat suitability assessment will be conducted by a qualified bat biologist. This assessment will be incorporated into the Natural Environment Study (Minimal Impacts) (NESMI) for the project. for mitigation banks and in lieu fee mitigation over permittee responsible mitigation, and the project area is within the Current service area for some of these options. Anyrequired mitigation will meetthe requirementsof the Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFW), the Section 401 Clean Water Act (CWA) Water Quality Certification from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the Section 404 CWA permit authorization from the USACE. Separate permit authorizations from USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW will be required to conduct gectechnical borings in the Santa Ana River. LSA will process these permits in coordination with the City. SECTION 4(%) AND CH. Caltrans /FHWA has previously determined that the Santa Ana River Trail (SARI) is subject to evaluation under Section 4(f) of the Transportation Act because it is a recreation area of regional significance, During construction, the portion of the SART that passes below the existing bridge may need to be if-E, Design Services for raiiVew Street Bridge Rehmblllt -ation Understanding of Need 119 25C -25 closed, restricted, or detoured. Similar impacts Fairview Street bridge passes over the Santa have been documented by LSA for several bridge Ana River, a tributary to projects, including the navigable waters of the U.S. recently completed First Therefore, a Jurisdictional Street Bridge project Delineation will be necessary in Santa Ana. LSA has to determine -the limits of the facilitated consultation waters of the United States between Caltrans, and State jurisdictional 1111 cities and county streambed within the project parks departments as limits. Because the Santa required under Section Ana River is completely 4(f). This process will concrete -lined in the project also be applicable to the area, it is expected that no proposed project, mitigationwill berequiredfor Newly constructed Fair,i;ew Triangle Habitat impacts to the river (bridge Restoration ,$ adjacent to so- uthwest ap,oroach The City received a abutments and pilings). However, if mitigation is Recreational Trails Program grant from FHWA and required, LSA will work with applicants and the the California Department of Parks and Recreation USACE to identify an appropriate mitigation ratio and improved Fairview Triangle into a trailside rest and mitigation bank or in lieu fee option, instead of a area with landscaping, seating, and interpretive comprehensive mitigation and monitoring plan. The signage. Through consultation with the City, it will 2008 USACE Mitigation Rule expresses a preference be confirmed whether or not this site is subject if-E, Design Services for raiiVew Street Bridge Rehmblllt -ation Understanding of Need 119 25C -25 Fairview Strut Bridge Rehabilitation S RPP No 14 -001 X3 to Section 6(f) of the Transportation Act, which is applicable to land improved with Land and Water Conservation Funds. During construction, a portion of the triangle may need to be closed. The project team will consult with Caltrans and the City to determine if impacts to this parcel need to be evaluated under Section 4(f) and /or 6(f). Compliance with Section 4(f) and 6(f), as applicable, will be demonstrated through letter correspondence between the City, Caltrans, and the County Parks Department. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT As described in the RFP, the project should qualify for a CEQA Categorical Exemption under Section 15302 of the CEQA Guidelines, which will be prepared by the City. Because the RWQCB and the CDFW are Responsible /Trustee Agencies under CEQA, they need to concur with the CEQA compliance for the project. Although we do not anticipate required mitigation for impacts to the Santa Ana River or other resources, our team is prepared to complete an Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/ ivIND) to clear the project. As envisioned, the project meets the criteria for a NEPA Categorical Exclusion (CE) under 23 CFR771.117 (d) (3), Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction or replacement or the construction of grade separation to replace existing at -grade railroad crossings, as long as the technical studies prepared for the project demonstrate that no substantial environmental impacts will occur. Based on our previous experience and knowledge of the area, substantial impacts will be avoided through implementation of appropriate avoidance, minimization, and /or mitigation measures. As required by Caltrans, a separate Categorical Exclusion will need to be prepared for the geotechnical borings within the Santa Ana River. A separate Categorical Exemption form may also be necessary, LSA will coordinate with the City and Caltrans for the Categorical Exclusion approval. 201 Understanding of Need Qoslyn Services for Fairview Street Bridge Reheblliwmn ifrK li 25C -26 C D Y.^. N a m d E W W r z `z 0 W 4 O 0 C H RZ W g I a N \ I\ r 1,....._ gw Jo �kNk o W m � a a G c O O k O M 25C -27 0 cai as 25C-28 8 uj uj IA -J'a ti �j iv w w J E z 0 z o s o 0 o a aZ o CL v m 25C -29 Z w 52 0. ti d s m .c N EL a rn m N N W Z °zLJ w I_..., 25C -30 z 0 w� t�Q z D ti m 0 5 ? ° ° o °o a J a a q cgCZ� J 50} Z °zLJ w I_..., 25C -30 z 0 w� t�Q z D ti m Fairview Street Bridge Rehabilitation WKE Team is ready to serve the City of Santa Ana and work actively to implement the safety improvement project for Fairview Bridge over Santa Ana River. Presented below is an anticipated design and construction schedule for the bridge and roadway improvements. The schedule refectsthe schedule compression strategies that we have used effectively on other projects in order to accelerate the design development. WKE will complete preliminary engineering phase five months after NTP. We anticipate the project will clear with CE /CE for NEPA and CEQA. We propose to begin engineering work concurrently City of San. Dimas 245 East Bonita Avenue San Dimas, CA 91773 (909) 394 —6245 Foothill Boulevard over San Dimas Wash Los Angeles River Avenue 19 over Arroyo Seco before final approval of the Environmental Documents. To eliminate risk to change in scope, the main design work will not begin until the technical studies have been completed. This strategy will allow final PS &E be completed by February 2016, and contract bid and award by early December 2016. The 24 month schedule allows 3 months for Construction E -76, and 4 months for bid and award. The construction will begin in the beginning of 2017. This will provide ample cushion for the contractor to begin construction in the river by April 2017, and complete the bridge project by end of 2017. City of Los Angeles. ; Caltrans District 7 1149 South Broadway; #750 100 South Main Street Los Angeles, CA 90015 Los Angeles; CA 90012 (213)847 -- 5b25 (213) 897.- 6926 t„ kn Iennalnr•ity nrw iinwaniit nalaha@dot.ca.aov First Street over . SR- 57 /SR -60 Confluence ,A IZ E Design Services for Gnirvlew Street Bridge Rehabilitation Schedule & Referents 130 25C -32 LLF §k //] �) \ \ \ \ • !w HIV 4; /b \\ z) §)) } §) 25C-33 v a W G � Q U) X WQW m ° 4 W w LU y� W W Q LL 25C -34 v �a}gd Qgmp� ~�iiNQ �oyy xa3 �av 2 25C -35 v a N a F C C q 01WLL `vM 3 m o v BaN a � Z LL 25C -36 r a « ¢ m CLL U¢ x� 7m 6 W¢ a y z q W 25C -37 v a .W= c a a Q Z Fd- s �}i p jut U d u. 25C -40 Z 4C m W G �yq d i ro ro z H W LL N Q T# N H 'ad Q V a y 'S LL 25C -41 ryL �n W e H�4 m�aRQ F c c y Q �j lL a Q O W u�6 a y LL 25C -42 w � rn N Q a m N LL N Q �mo >� wu�a a m p LL 25C -43 4 �J W � fC Q N �p Td 3 S N Q ~N iLL Q H )S m W U W d N a y LL 25C -44 a LWm dy4 ❑I C LL' N Q v F. W � d Q N .0 LL 25C -46 mW N c�c�Q Ir Ldi Q h yzero °a W�p �yN '^WQ �av Z u� 25C -47 EXHIBIT A -8 PAED and Final PS &E Fairview Ave over Santa Ana River SANTA ANA OTHER DIRECT COST SCHEDULE TRAVE OSICOMERCIAL PRINTING Trips Average Miles/Trip Total Miles Cost/Mile Total Cost Santa Ana - Caltrans Santa Ana - Santa Ana 2 20 20 10 40 200 775-72-26o $0.565 $113.00 Santa Ana - Santa Ana 10 10 100 $0.565 $56.50 $2.5 $0.08 $300 $288 Subtotal 192.10 PLOTSIREPRODUCTIONIPHO OSICOMERCIAL PRINTING Check Prints Submittals Total Plots CostlSheet Total Cost Printings 11 x 17 500 1440 1,940 $0.8 $1,552 22x34 8 -1.2 x 11 0 0 120 3600 120 3,600 $2.5 $0.08 $300 $288 Subtotal 27140.00 OVER T MAIL Average Deliveries Cost /unit Ovem ht Mails 20 $25.0 $500 Same Day Delivery Services 5 $65.0 $325 Subtotal $500 25C -48 EXHIBIT 10 -H COST PROPOSAL Consultant: WKE, Inc, Contract No,: 14.011 Date: 1 0/712 01 4 DIRECT LABOR Classlficationrritle Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total Principal In Charge Weill 17 $93.64 $1,591.88 Project Manager Den Weddell 206 $742$ $15,295.50 QA /CC Engineer Adam Wang 89 $83.28 $7,411,92 Senlor Project Engineer Vlnh Trinh 163 $73.19 $11,929.97 Project Englnoor Casey Weber 364 $53.85 $19,301,40 Engineer/Designer Akshay Garnet 377 $33.37 $12,580.49 Techniclan /Drafter Trag Doung 468 $34.03 $15,912.00 Clerical Eric Koo 30 $20.00 $600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9.00 $0.00 $9.00 $0.00 $0.00 LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal of Direct Labor Costs b) Anticipated Salary Increases (3 %Nr, 5 yearduratlon) FRINGE BENEFITS d) Fringe Ber lta (Rate: 40.75%) INDIRECT COSTS f) Overhead (Rate: 96.85 %a) h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0 %) FIXED FEE (Profit) (Rate: 10 %) OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) 1) Travel /Mileage Costs m) Equipment Rental and Supplies (Including Melling and Reproductions) n) Permit Fees o)$ubconsullant Costs LPP 13 -01 $84,923.16 $2,561.84 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS $87,485.00 e) TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $35,650.14 g) Overhead $84,729 1) Gen and Admin $0 J) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $84,729 k) TOTAL PROFIT $20,786 $192 $2,640 $0 $0 p) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $2,832 TOTAL COST $231,483 25C -49 �r CD N N P Y O 0 O Z N G 0 A G r R N c a i O 0 T U 0 .c � O A 'aO a, � o � Y � S] y 7 Q A J o 2 CL �r d% y 3 0 — � L h R T N r \ � L +' O o � o L U � U M L O � R� a b uJ R vo 16 N N .Nu 7m L "C 'CL TT o O b 0 0 0 2 x 2 2 2 2 mmmmmm C Q Q Q Q Q Q O Nmvin nor N N U/ 0 N W is } } ? } } Y V N d O O Ii'i CD � �wnn4EA�� N T R � II II II II II II E T 7 O � L a C9 im R wo II M M M M M M Q O m o � a N d V C d w a� v Tslnolnrrd; y ovo- mo Q x � o fR�� s m Y Q R 7 U U fV r N M V l!) !0 rr > "r }y r N M d N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 zxxxxx EEEEE W W ui W W W N Y `w a w a 4 x t � II II 11 II II II II .Ci A m ,c o U o aRia o O `m l�rnti 1` ^_0 0 >. Q- o zi 7 L T L a a� L W E. a 0 0 0 0 Epriht°n lf?m 4o d R � fi 'A �w U M 25C -50 �-NMd'�lp N N N N t0 t� In I W W W W W 3 O t 4 M d � � r .L o Cq, o. (fir car ,h U 4 Y II II II 0 II II II A c O 7 > ro O s m In y W i m $ mm o � J E� a � m p O R W F R w U of v > 3 0 v "m c� +� m �NMIO V (O M h�Ff369 fR YY iH bi d� m= 0 7 T R7 m U M N rn � ro � er II II m N c o$_ o -I a d 0 `o M O 0 b JE N A W o x x 2 2 2 x to E E E E E E E E , .1 F- In I W W W W W 3 O t 4 M d � � r .L o Cq, o. (fir car ,h U 4 Y II II II 0 II II II A c O 7 > ro O s m In y W i m $ mm o � J E� a � m p O R W F R w U of v > 3 0 v "m c� +� m �NMIO V (O M h�Ff369 fR YY iH bi d� m= 0 7 T R7 m U M N rn � ro � er II II m N c o$_ o -I a d 0 `o M O 0 b JE N A W EXHIBIT 10 -H COST PROPOSAL Consultant: LSA Associates, Ino. Contract No.: 14 -011 Date: 1017/2014 DIRECT LABOR Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total Principal(OC) Rob McCann 25 $9844 $2,461.00 Principal (Biology) Art Homrighausen 22 $6931 $1,533.62 Prinolpal (Cultural) Deborah McLean 12 $56.25 $676.00 Associate (Env Load) Use Williams 204 $50.65 $10,373.40 Associate Ingri Cuon 70 $4040 $2,800.00 Senior Technical Specialist Terri Fallon 74 $38.62 $2,857,88 Senior Technical Speclallst Chrla Meloni 52 $32.69 $1,699.88 Senior Technical Specialist Jason Lul 40 $37.02 $1,480.80 Environmental Speclallst Erin Martinelli 60 $29.33 $1,759.80 Envvronmental Planner Carmen Lo 170 $27.76 $4,719.20 Assistant Environmental Planner Janet Cutler 34 $20,43 $694.62 GIs Justin Roos 109 $41,03 $4,47227 WP /Clerical Lauren Johnson 87 $25,34 $2,204.58 Office Assistant Litia Makakaufakl 12 $19.10 $229.20 LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal of Direct Labor Costa b) Anticipated Salary Increases (3 % /yr, 5 year dura0on) FRINGE BENEFITS d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 91.85 %) INDIRECT COSTS 0 Overhead (Rate: 42.35 %) h) General and Adminlstralive (Rate: 48,68%) FIXED FEE (Profit) (Rate: 16 %) OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) I) Travel /Mileage Casts M) Equipment Rantal and Supplies (Including Malling and Reproductions) n) Permit Fees o) Records Searches -PP 13 -01 $37,961.25 $1,14975 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS $39,111.00 e) TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $35,923A5 g) Overhead $16,564 1) Gen and Admin $19,039 )) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $35,603 IQ TOTAL PROFIT $11,064 $620 $1,395 $12,000 $1,200 p) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $15,115 TOTAL COST $136,816 25C -51 a N 0 ro P P 0 z 6 v C N c O i i E �5 0 � U 0 r > ^m N >1 a v v02 T ' ? ° '6 O � 2 m r � a , � 4 to L II II O J r d N L O O a F o r U Ua N � .0 O w _ o L F h L w {� Y � � a E �+ a � o = U m 1 � R � Uo m m m m a, m �aa ❑ 09 0 e o,� 9 of mm c Q 4 4 4 4 Q O NM -t tP I- ma10i ai°imvmm R rrrrrr V d a L h m NON N In N L II II II II II II w Y L T Of Z o O a r m IM o l M M M M m m 0 d 4a d w U G h L R O � m L ° n CO N O N } N V n O M V a¢ R a V U a ^ N M d N t0 Y Y Y Y Y A �•- •Nmvu7m N N > > a 7 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 m ° m a° v E E E E E E L U wwww a �y o_ � II II II II II II II d � a V Oa m a 0 R &rnrnrnrnrnm F, N0 N O a= CL o F 3 L (n x M x x x F d ld 7 L tJ GPE Q P E wo 0 e r � =E U •.� UW M ^ N M d (O N O 25C -52 r >r }rr 12 E N 2 2 2 0 7 > > > > 2 2 2 2 2 2 E E E E E E wW"wwww 0 0 CD ^ L e m � 7 W V M p 8 C p M a p co 2U r y II II II II II II II O a - 7 i EXHIBIT 10 -H COST PROPOSAL Consultant: Civil Works Engineers Contract No.: 14 -011 Date: 1017/2014 DIRECT LABOR ClessiflcatlonRitle Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total Principal In Charge Marla Marston 51 $72.00 $3,672.00 Drainage Engineer Francois Zugmeyer 178 $53.50 $9,523.00 Roadway Engineer David Grantham 66 $49.00 $3,332.00 Junior Engineer Lander Phan 148 $36,50 $5,402.00 Clerical Clark Pilcher 8 $2650 $212.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal of Direct Labor Costs b) Anticipated Salary Increases (3 % /yr, 5 year duration) FRINGE BENEFITS d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 20% INDIRECT COSTS 0 Overhead (Rate: 120 %) h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0 %) FIXED FEE (Profit) (Rate: to %) OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) 1) Travel /Mlleege Coate m) Equipment Rental and Supplies (Including Mailing and Reproductions) n) Permit Fees o) Subcansultant Costs LPP 13 -01 $22,141.00 $70300 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS $22,844.00 e) TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $4,568.80 g) Overhead $27,413 1) Gen and Admin $0 J) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $27,413 k) TOTAL PROFIT $5,483 $200 $350 $0 $0 p) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $550 TOTAL COST $60,858 25C -53 r 0 N G N N O V' r 0 Z L b U >5 U C N O 0 O L 7 i } i1f � w A ? y � '6 O x N SJ y Q O .IJ.a f 6 I yN O 0 ¢ 0 a {d O V L m O m T N T � � 4a — ¢ r a 3 E 00 „G y a� L17 roN m8 U o T N N N ,M1N, 41 N m''m mmmTn 7 7 J 0 J J C Q Q Q Q Q Q b N M V 10 Sp I-� � da10i a`0i�vd U d m O b. 9 O, m W d'O tDM T O I/MIf� Ui tDM A d II II II II II I L A 6 a Lb o t9 a °e e•a° d D M M M M M M N Q � a V C + + + + + + N b T ro b V- N � AzwCpi covocn Ox��ca va fR U3 t �Q m v U N N N ro N N N rrrr }r o o 0 0 0 0 0; 2 7 x x x 2 Oaac'u� N N N d W E EE E E E E E, E N h N 2 -v W W W Ili W v r a 0 r � 0 Y F- A II II II II II II II A m t O. u o d a a O 4J �%MMMMMM N y o ao Y_ F n� r R N N M N M N T d O. w Y 3 z W V� N aNi e U 'a R W U M 25C -54 0 D O O O d 6 'x4 x�x'pO=xx EEEEEE wwwwww 9 O L O d m Er�m�aoo � OI N c0 4 O �U y ` II it II II II II T 7 .s a Lm N >s T U V M N N O O C E° C m ,O y m W V YJ W �n a V � C +� m oio�ri ui �i m= a= U m 16 4 U V r N M 7 N O 0 W O 0 F' m a rQ .v v o II II m y C � O — v A o n N Q O � a � W M 1.2 � E N ,LU O W EXHIBIT 10 -H COST PROPOSAL Consultant: Earth Mechanics, Inc. Contract No.: 14 -011 Date: 10/7)201 4 DIRECT LABOR Class lticallonri'lle Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total Project Manager 110 $76.50 $8,415.00 QArQC Engineer 20 $76,50 $1,530.00 Senior Project Engineer 216 $43.50 $9,396.00 Senior Staff Geologist 70 $32.50 $2,275.00 Staff Engineer 52 $26.60 $1,383,20 Soil Tech. 78 $32,00 $2,496.00 Cledoai 2 $16.15 $32.30 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal of Direct Labor Costs b) Anticipated Salary Increases (3 %/yr, 5 year duration) FRINGE BENEFITS d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 24%) INDIRECT COSTS f) Overhead (Rate: 148,42 %) h) General and Adminlatrative (Rate: 0 %) FIXED FEE (profit) (Rate: 10 %) OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) 1) Travel /Mileage Coats rn) Equipment Rental and Supplies (Including Malting and Reproductions) n) Penult Fees 0) Subconsullant Costs LPP 13 -01 $25,527.50 $709.50 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS $26,297.00 a) TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $6,311.28 g) Overhead $39,030 1) Gen and Admin $0 I) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $39,030 k) TOTAL PROFIT $7,164 $150 $17,695 $0 $0 P) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $17,845 TOTAL COST $96,647 25C -55 N_ O N m r Y' O r z° w ro 0 f C mCm N O AM b O U 0 V L r O w+ T T 7 3 N O , 2 N , m i U Q U) II II Q tti J � N L 0 A O a i 0 m O O O 9l 5 +L+ 2 Q m i N `n m N 0 9 _Ta i N 7 O U t N N i � N �m d 3� m Uo r y}r Sr T T T T a 0 x °x ° 0 x °x°x 2° 4 m> i WX l . • 'C011ewwew Consultant: Coast Survey Contract No.: 14 -011 Date: 10/7/2014 DIRECT LABOR ClassifloatlonfTltle Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total Survey Manager 4 $66.00 $28470 Projerl Surveyor 16 $00.76 $812.18 Survey Analyst 31 $40.20 $1,246.20 Party Chief 44 V1,5.76 $2,013.44 Chairman 44 $40.51 $1,782.44 $0.00 $0.00 KOO $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 K00 LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal of Direct Labor Costs b) Anticipated Salary Increases (3 % /yr, 5 year duration) FRINGE BENEFITS d) Fringe Benefits (Rats: 27% INDIRECT COSTS f) Overhead (Rate: 160.23 %) h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0 %) FIXED FEE (Profit) (Rate: 10 %) OTHER DIRECT COSTS (DOC) 1) Travel /Mileage Costs m) Equipment Rental and Suppilas (Including Mailing and Reproductions) n) Permit Fees a) Subconsultant Costs LPP 13 -01 $6,11824 $36.76 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS $6,155.00 e) TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $1,681.85 9) Overhead $9,247 1) Gen and Admin $0 J) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $9,247 k) TOTAL PROFIT $1,706 $o $3,495 $0 $0 p) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $3,495 TOTAL COST $22,265 25C -57 a N_ Gl N 09 d T O r O z m C O u c :d 7 C O V' O O r 4 U .00 } {0 � w >. L � m r o O =° v � Q @ � y 7 N Q If 11 g N L Q Q d 100 0 C U M L) c 0) 3 S O L F°- 01 a w r � \ O o- w o � o i N 7 @ 00 `w � O � > j 07 d d 7 J 0 A v UQ r N N N N N FN, TT TTT_T 2 2 L 2 2 2 a mm mmol m C Q d Q d Q 4 O N M C M D r N� N a 0 •' d' O 01 � M fp T V� 3 dam' } 64 N N � FPr bT E9 H >1 N II II II II II II L i 0 t ,o m i W o a e o 0 0 y.°mmmmm M Q @ 0 d Q � a 0) OS 0 c + + + + ++ N N A N w N O l' TN eI' OCS C'M I- MR t j 0> Q a 0 R U N M d' M W rrr " }rr J J 7 4 J J S T 2 2 2 2 w ai Bi r d (D EEEEEE 'u N � N t W W W W W W } =a�rN OOtlCS M T 0 m II II II II II II It >h N i L a 0 O d ly o p 0>Urnrnmmmrn N J m ° a ° 3 >1 d CL r O ro L W y� U O1 00 r � la � 0 V W ri rrrrrr� 25C -58 Y Y Y T Y N N 4 V ✓" E E E E E E EisEEE U E UI N N N i W W W W W W 0 O L O � d E a rn N Er 'dcy?pp 1@@ I P 4 b 0 M 4 f9 63 �U Il II II II II II II II C V A 0 N b o � L LOU y O L N U N O J L U N N =E .O - m N W s v IIi Im G V �o J V �Ct °u�o 0 4 v(6 m 6 1 � T � J O � 2 V � R R u d' N ttl N R @ @ m °S 0. O w W @ N U y O d O a m �6 p 4 0 B a io U o � a J @ E N aw EXHIBIT 10 -H COST PROPOSAL Consultant: Tatsumi & Partners Contract ND: 14 -011 Date: 10/7(201 DIRECT LABOR Classificatio0?itle Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total Principal in Charge 4 $103.00 $412.00 Associate 10 $47,25 $472.50 Tech Skiff III 39 $41.90 $1,618.50 Tech staff II 76 $39.00 $2,964.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $0.00 LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal of Direct Labor Costs h) Anticipated Salary Increases (S % /yr, 5 year duration) FRINGE BENEFITS d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 18 -A) INDIRECT COSTS f) Overhead (Rats: 108°/x) h) General and Administrative (Rata: 0%) FIXED FEE (Profit) (Rate: 10 %) OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) 1) TravellMileage Costs m) Equipment Rental and Supplies (Including Mailing and Reproductions) U) Permit Fees a) Subconsultant Casts LPP 13 -01 $5,467.00 $162.00 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS $5,629.00 e) TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $1,013,22 g) Overhead $6,079 1) Gen and Admin $0 1) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $6,070 k) TOTAL PROFIT $1,272 $750 $250 $0 $0 p) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $1,000 TOTAL COST $14,994 25C -59 I N h O (U w f6 N r CD 0 v Z O U 70 c %n c U O a c 0 � U C } a dm V� ? M b O N S a � HY O =4 N � II it a J G N L O d � Q R O C U N � Qr h d 3 o 2 Q N L �° d A w r \ � O w O � Q �+ a` u O = U W Qm Ln v N o >a A0) 3 J U � wo r T T T T S S m m m m �T OI = Q 4 G 4 d 4 O NM srN (Dh R N N N N N N v ar FL 0 L {OM 6M0 >, my oro 0 N O If It II II II II d L T 7 �O o U to M LL o 0 0 o n o gS M M M M M M NO N Y o a Q1 ro c + + + + + + N M w {{pp 7YL MtNO 0� MbY OSuer lam& s ; CD d as u iC U c-NM 4' {O fo } } } } o J J 0 o 0 2 2 2 2 2 5 E E E E E E E E E E m E .N .N 11 . _9 V, wwwwww d a rn b E2 O A n u u 11 n n 11 tip QI — yy {6 t°o U L Q Q. o p 16 � MMMORM+O+ O H E2 N 0 d ° T L C6 x a x x x a A L Q � v r 7 L W d �a w� � m V 'L U ri 25C -60 ID- � N 0 N M V M b td N N t�J N f6 YYYY >?� > > a > > 2 2 2 T 2 2 N N N N m m m m m m E E E E E E I�L1 W W W W U1 r O O L � EY°o° °moo �, m•��uNr�bv O Y L II II II II II II II A c L � 7 @ O ° u W 0 � N C L N i y U N m O _AU N Qhi f0 tpOOU .Y O c L J v W � N p O N �w v x x x x x x C rJ .00 N m O U O O M w M ro m M h h M M f0 [V dl 0 T � O �x V Ol N U d4 •-NM d'4� cp irYrri m a 0 m h c2 ° ) v (1 N C N � — J p N R O � O J W O N o w EXHIBIT 10 -H COST PROPOSAL Consultant: LSA Associates Inc. Contract No.: 14.011 Data: 10 /7/2014 DIRECT LABOR Class Ificatloarrltle Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total Principal (CC) Rob MoCann 26 $98.44 $2,461.00 Principal(Biology) Art HOmnghausen 22 $69,71 $1,533.62 Principal (Cultural) Deborah McLean 12 $5625 $675.00 Associate (Env Lead) Lisa Williams 204 $50.89 $10,373,40 Associate Ingri Coon 70 $40.00 $2,800.00 Senior Technical Specialist Tarr! Fulton 74 538.62 $2,857.88 Senior Technical Specialist Chris Melon[ 52 $32.69 $1,699.88 Senior Technical Specialist Josiah Lui 40 $37,02 $1,480,80 Environmental Specialist Erin Martinelll 60 $29.33 $1,759.80 Enivronmental Planner Carman to 170 $27,76 $4,719.20 Assistant Environmental Planner Janet Cutler 34 $20.43 $694.62 GIS Justin Rocs 109 $41,03 $4,472.27 WP /Clerical Lauren Johnson 67 $26,34 $2,204,58 Office Assistant Litia Makakauf9kl 12 $19.10 $229.20 LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal of Direct Labor Costs b) Anticipated Salary Increases (3 0lolyr, 5 year duration) FRINGE BENEFITS d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 91.85% INDIRECT COSTS f) Overhead (Rate: 42.35 %) h) General and Administrative (Rate: 46.68 %) FIXED FEE (Profit) (Rota: 10 %) OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) 1) Travel /Mlleage Caste m) Equipment Rental and Supplies (Including Mailing and Reproductions) n) Permit Fees o) Records Searches LPP 13 -01 $37,961.25 $1,149.75 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS $39,111.00 e) TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $35,923.45 g) Overhead $16,564 1) Gen and Admin $19,039 J) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $35,603 k) TOTAL PROFIT $11,064 $520 $'1,395 $12,900 $1,200 p) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $16,115 TOTAL COST $136,816 25C -61 0 N_ O e- N f6 C] Q d- p Z O A J C M C O 0' ym T} T T T T 0 0 0 9 0 3 m 2 i S S 2 T .. o y a m�rnm mm m ¢ ¢ 4 ¢ 4 d L V C N M lt* M (p h r� � w m v v a4Qi a1°i w N N T O .S N N N K T p D. N V iqq�vOyy f�SO O T 4 t6 II II O II II II II II J L N � 7 O e � p p v0 0 d� ar C U n U W o .° o 0 o a 000 Q) pM MMmMM E2 N N a 46 2.o O `ry h A d T V N es C + Z o d id a — �e Ta L 7 w 0 U y m d%p,�cn i�,OhWNON f9 S m N t rn R a � m v� v U� U a'� N NMd 47O 0 z° 0 0 0 s° E E E E E E N N '7� N WWwWWw } UI N O = O~ r II II II N - T a v o aria c E Q m m rn r N o O O p F- c� v T >r 7 L U G w E om�" y U d o w $j A m 7 U .N Uw M m rn3 . e 0 m o o d Ip 000 25C -62 O N N W (0 N N >rYN }N-YY 0 0 ] > > 3 z r x °z °M EEEMEMEOE � wwwwww 7 O t O V d C G C N w C M p 0.(p 00o 0 Y � II II II II II II T 0 Y P 7 5 O � a y W � N 3 S � c 7 L V C m O L ea w LU C 7 r O �+ 4i m 9 VOi0 N gg 0 h � �c O o �x V m U 4 �-NMd Ip ro i6 t6 IO N N N ' YY >YY? N d 0 m 0 l0 N II II N N N M c y o m m a Qo N Q U d N Q W EXHIBIT 10 -H COST PROPOSAL Consultant: Civil Works Engineers Contract No.: 14-011 Date: 10/7/201 DIRECT LABOR Classlflcatlonn'Itle Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total Principal In Charge Marla Marston 37 $72-00 $2,664.00 Drainage Engineer Francois Xugmeyer 150 $53.50 $8,025.00 Roadway Engineer David Grantham 99 $49.00 $4,651.00 Junior Engineer Lander Pham 148 $3U0 $5,402,00 Clerical Clark Pitcher 8 $26.50 $212.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal of Direct Labor Costs b) Anticipated Salary Increases (3 % /yr, 5 year duratlon) FRINGE BENEFITS d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 20%) INDIRECT COSTS I) Overhead (Rate: 120 %) h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0%) FIXED FEE (Profit) (Rate: 10%) OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) 1) Travel /Mileage Costs m) Equipment Rental and Supplies (Including Mailing and Reproductions) n) Permit Fees o) Subconsultant Casts LPP 13 -01 $21,154.00 $672.00 C) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS $21,826.00 a) TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $4,365,20 g) Overhead $26,191 1) Can and Admin $0 )) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $26,191 k) TOTAL PROFIT $5,236 $200 $350 $0 $0 p) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $550 TOTAL COST $58,171 25C -63 0 N C O r N W d l'^ O z c 0 U C y 0 U _ c y UL 7 `- L } N 0 W T A N � m 'S = o� xI � m A � 7 L II II O A J W N L O d O` yd a M o U N d m Q R L F d 7n UI r L F1 O i o as O o L U O a� R m t6 � N d b a 7 J +J ,J f5 W Uo t- N N N N Ali N J 3 0 J 7 a x 2 x x x x .,� wwrnaww Q'a'¢ N M u. R m N W N N W rr } }rr U1 m d O o. 0 L O W O h o N Q M h M M V �- � OI o N hi u'i r L yr vp «n en av v� d 9. b Q II II II II 11 11 d A L 7 0 0 Q _ N M W a o 0 0 0 0 >' p M M M M M M N O � o U) m L V C L d) A ro w d b' T4}O W OhU y,� WMI+MSO� L of IU Q m :1 U N �NMd'�n c0 a:=== 2 E E E E N E E E E E E E W W W WI W W N } N yy- O x s� +� F Y II II If (I II II II B R Va 0 a�i a o Q y y 3 � D T F L L CL y } � t L w C�C ao e o 0 o d o C O M N O U O y U d o � v � N aE O bw U Ni r N M V If) M�p N N EN N N N D 25C -64 } } Y Y r Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 xsxsxx E E E N N N E E E E_ E E �1 w wwww Wua O t o d OR 7 9 o 0 � w °n.��oM a w II II II II II II II ` o C � m t A � d E W N 5 L E j g v v p O N IN O O V r = L J EN h E � W � ,IIJP « M M M M rc W C 3 Rm� (D O N C] h (h U �co M,hMmvi; R � 0 V m V Q a �Nm�r'�nco N m a 0 ,d c Y3 II II Iv m � m a U N C � O J 1 E O J E I] O �O d 7 T M AOF a � E N y p W EXHIBIT 10 -H COST PROPOSAL Consultant: Earth Mechanics, Inc. Contract No.: 14011 Date: 10/7/2014 DIRECT LABOR ClasslFlcatlonlTltle Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total Project Manager 7 $76.50 $535.50 WOO Engineer 20 $76.50 $1,530.00 Senior Project Engineer 255 $43.60 $11,136.00 Senior Staff Geologist 70 $32.50 $2,275.00 Staff Engineer 52 $26.60 $1,383.20 Soil Tech. 78 $32100 $2,496.00 Clerical 2 $1615 $32,30 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $6.00 $0.00 LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal of Direct Labor Coats b) Anticipated Salary Increases (3 %(yr, 5 year duration) FRINGE BENEFITS d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 24 %) INDIRECT COSTS I) Overhead (Rate: 148,42 %) h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0 %) FIXED FEE (Profit) (Rate: 10 %) OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) 1) Travei/Mlleage Costs m) Equipment Rental and Supplies (Including Malting and Reproductions) r) Permit Fees c) Subconaultant Costs -PP 13 -D1 $19,388,00 $685.00 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS $19,973.00 e) TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $4,793.52 g) Overhead $29,844 1) Gen and Admin $0 J) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $29,644 k) TOTAL PROFIT $5,441 $150 $17,595 $0 $0 p) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $17,845 TOTAL COST $77,696 25C -65 Q N C 4 r— Z 2 C C U c N c O U c a Q' 0 � U o A b =m « ro 7 ¢ N LO II II R J G y (] O *' a }Gq 6 yr U y C 0 a° O x O L F M T r � � Q u- ` m O a L N 7 0 00 L M m ro M yAfH R N d R .oa V itl � Uo r^ mm•N @m@ 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S S x 2 T S . O NM�I'hMti u }r } }rr a d C L r mm crM Q <Y to m M r A 7+ R L Q II II II 11 II II d R A L C d IM N R W 3:0 0�0 0 0 y O M M M M m M 4 N Q a d G e + + + + + + Lo R .T1 R w Y N � UMMW+ -nl M cti X al N d N 9 G U s �-N M•�W 10 t0 �' NM d'tn 10 rrrir "i 0 0 0 0 0 0 T TS'2p 2�Tt � N N Ui N Ui m@midmm E E- E E E N N Y0 N N wwwwww a O = t � O ~ � II II II II II II II R T N G � aRi a o O d U u� In �n In In In +' m mco roco M � � 3 G O T�a F 7 g L Q � } L W R% 6o a pN 00 in004 � U tll o Y V 3 @ U N R w U ME r N M V 0 0 25C -66 N tU N N N (0 d w W w w w w r Q M d � rn E i I°q�orN OOw C7 r- W 'o d�mN �Uu�y3,�ia .d1 > O 7 N sS � y w 3 n 0 O V E am a o� w r v w i > � o u @ yC n O @ o 7 2 G rn R U Ti W M � isr O C N u @ c „m `o G_ @ O J a @ Q O O M O O a � E o w r >0>0 o E2 @ �o 0 @ a 2TT-SOS 2 'Q' E E E E E E c d w W w w w w r Q M d � rn E i I°q�orN OOw C7 r- W 'o d�mN �Uu�y3,�ia .d1 > O 7 N sS � y w 3 n 0 O V E am a o� w r v w i > � o u @ yC n O @ o 7 2 G rn R U Ti W M � isr O C N u @ c „m `o G_ @ O J a @ Q O O M O O a � E o w EXHIBIT 10 -H COST PROPOSAL Consultant: Coast Survey Contract No.: 14.011 Date: 10/7/2014 DIRECT LABOR ClasslflcatlonITltle Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Tote] Survey Manager 4 $66.00 $264.00 Project Surveyor 16 $50.76 $812.16 Survey Analyst 31 $40.20 $1,248.20 Party Chief 44 $45.76 $2,013.44 Chainman 44 $40.51 $1,782.44 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.66 $0.66 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal of Direct Labor Costs b) Anticipated Salary Increases (3 % /yr, 5 year duration) FRINGE BENEFITS d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 27 %) INDIRECT COSTS 0 Overhead (Rate: 150.23 %) h) General and Adminlstrative (Rate: 0 %) FIXED FEE (Profit) (Rate: 10 %) OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) 1) Travel /Mileage Costs m) Equipment Rental and Supplies (Including Melling and ReproductlonB) n) Permit Fees o) Subconsultant Costs LPP 13 -01 $6,118.24 $30.70 0) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS $6,155.00 e) TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $1,661.86 g) Overhead $9,247 I) Gen and Admin $0 J) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $9,247 Ic) TOTAL PROFIT $1,796 $0 $3,495 $0 $0 p) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $3,495 TOTAL COST $22,265 25C -67 0 N Q 0 O C1 Z O U C m c 0 7 Q N U 0 R � Y O Y v d R ,9 a T ao 2 O N L II II m J Y W N L Q p o f0 P � U M N 4 0 2 O R L F d N O w Y O o 7+ a L N 7 O 4 U .c R � to 0 J M w U Y U R d R R T T T T?n T 0 0 O > > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 xxzzxx m m m m �rn �rn ❑ aa O NM V to Ol`• ro N N N N N W m r }rrrr W Vi d d O a 0 T C V V O N N = rs+ ran ea � vi• w m O!� ro p II II II II II II o N A Ti 7 c S 'o(� 47 U 0 Q1 R m W G T A w i N d O O 12 O a2ei �so�s��� s � a4+ a W U cV N M V �0 rp N M V N (O T 12 L) E xxxx00 E E E E E E W W W W W W v _ o a= O t m �+ Ip � II II (1 II II II II s R T N W o4 aroia e 0 d UOn Opwrnmrn � E a H 0 a) D T ? Q R 3 L ryl . x x x x a L Q O m sW EQ�Q O O O b 0 y U d c ro � 3 R W �w U ai 25C -68 0 �-N Md t0 W N N t6 N R N W W W W W W 7 4 r 4 n v E7°'Oi�O000 CI++ m O O oOo oO t o�� % II II 11 II II II II 0 � o Oy R N W 07 gj s � m � O „1y U '0000 V 4_ no YC � E = R O 4 Y W O ro � R N W O1 7 � .00 V R G � N � N ?` m 0 3 x W rn ro 4 U d• .- N M V 0 0 r Er�i; 0 a N 0 a UJ O J I m m 0 m � c O Q 0 E W o a 'o 'o 'R 0 0 x 3:3: R m W W W W W W 7 4 r 4 n v E7°'Oi�O000 CI++ m O O oOo oO t o�� % II II 11 II II II II 0 � o Oy R N W 07 gj s � m � O „1y U '0000 V 4_ no YC � E = R O 4 Y W O ro � R N W O1 7 � .00 V R G � N � N ?` m 0 3 x W rn ro 4 U d• .- N M V 0 0 r Er�i; 0 a N 0 a UJ O J I m m 0 m � c O Q 0 E W EXHIBIT 10 -H COST PROPOSAL Consultant: Tatsumi & Partners Contract No.: 14 -011 Date: 10/7/201 DIRECT LABOR Classlflcatlonfritle Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total Principal In Charge 4 $103.00 $412.00 Associate $162.00 10 $47.25 $472.50 Tech Staff 111 FRINGE BENEFITS 39 $41.50 $1,018,60 Tech Staff ll e) TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS 76 $39.00 $2,964.00 f) Overhead (Rate: 108 %) $0.00 $6,079 h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0%) 1) Gon and Admin $0.00 j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $0.00 FIXED FEE (Profit) $0.00 k) TOTAL PROFIT $1,272 OTHER DIRECT COSTS (DOC) $0.00 1) Travel /Mlleage Costs $0.00 m) Equipment Rental and Supplies (Including Melling and Reproductions) $250 $0.00 n) Permit Foes $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $1,000 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal of Direct Labor Costs $5,467.00 b) Anticipated Salary Increases (30/dyr, 5 year duration) $162.00 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS $5,629.00 FRINGE BENEFITS d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 18 %) e) TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $1,013.22 INDIRECT COSTS f) Overhead (Rate: 108 %) g) Overhead $6,079 h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0%) 1) Gon and Admin $0 j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $6,079 FIXED FEE (Profit) (Rate: 10M) k) TOTAL PROFIT $1,272 OTHER DIRECT COSTS (DOC) 1) Travel /Mlleage Costs $750 m) Equipment Rental and Supplies (Including Melling and Reproductions) $250 n) Permit Foes $0 a) Subconsultant Costs $0 p) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $1,000 LPP 13 -01 TOTAL COST $14,994 25C -69 T C) N N O T O N O V' O 2 N C 0 U C O i C D a' 0 �U E >- r � Y A � D M 0 � 2 N ON N q If II s R U N L Q Q O a N O ,fJ U m C N tlf � 2 O m L A N L N N M °- Aa O ° r U a V � N lV � d A In U .p r y +N+ N 61 N N N (tl N R N N aaaaaa 2 Z Z S= T �? m rn rn m m rn n > > > > > > C Nava¢¢ p Nm vnmr L N d d p Q Q fD 4. MN: ci6 fo In T R L p II II II II II II A oL_ C Z 01 .D m m m M m m a� 0 d Q r a N d U C L A w w m R OZ 64 4Pr � Hi U} 6g O V^ V d N ro v i0 U a } } } } }} "NM d a(O 2 2 2 2 0 2 E E E E E E W W w W W W W v N y_ a IL j N nl (fl O O O c oS O s � 0 O ~ �' II II II II II 11 II a d — 'O a U O wa 1 N o O Ql U m rn m rn m rn- .W N N 0 fY A � Q P V F- L A (V � Q N } � s L W R a 0 0 o n o Q U�? hv�u> oc7o a r U. c7 R U 0 ° Y Y Y Y Y Y~ 25C -70 rNM V'NfD N 0 0 0 0 0 0 2'2'pp a o �, ''SppS22 N W N� N EgEE,E2 - - N r �q W W W W W W 3 O Off L ° }coo D'�m o0 ^0 0 c dV N°OR .O ap+ ILO II II II II II II II }' o T. - tl y m W N m ra 7 O O y,�Nmm<000U a� O � L d O E m N N tm C °3 �I U top M t°O C? IOC, r � T lQ � a= v o, U V 4 } } } } } } m cN° �"fPr 0 Q: d 0 td 0 a N d J 0 L, 0 m a In 0 N O 0 0 N E W EXHIBIT B ADDITIONAL INSURED .ENDORSEMENT Insurance Company This endorsement modifies such insurance as is afforded by the provisions of Policy # relating to the following: 1, The City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92702; its officers, employees, agents and volunteers are named as additional insureds ( "additional insureds ") with regard to liability and defense of suits arising from the operations and uses performed by or on behalf of the named insured. 2. With respect to claims arising out of the operations and uses performed by or on behalf of the named insured, such insurance as is afforded by this policy is primary and Is not additional to or contributing with any other insurance carried by or for the benefit of the additional insureds. 3. This insurance applies separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the company's limits of liability. The inclusion of any person or organization as an insured shall not affect any right which such person or organization would have as a claimant if not so included, 4. With respect to the additional insureds, this insurance shall not be canceled, or materially reduced in coverage or limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been given to the City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92702. (Completion of the following, including countersignature, is required to make this endorsement effective.) Effective , this endorsement form as a part of Policy # Issued to Named Insured Date: Countersigned by Authorized Representative of Insurer Or Insurance Agent 25C -71 25C -72