Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCORRESPONDENCE - 65BApril 7, 2015 City Council Meeting Correspondence for Item 65B (Park Security Update) PARK SECURITY UPDATE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO ENSURE CONTINUED SECURITY Sender/Representative Letters in Support 1 Ann Salisbury hAgendmQ015 AgendnArrent Folder - WIPLExhibits Correspondence 65-B.doc Mitre -Ramirez, Norma From: Sent: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Categories: Mayor and City Council, Huizar, Maria Tuesday, April 07, 2015 1:57 PM Cavazos, David; Rojas, Carlos; Flores, Alma; Edward; Mouet, Gerardo Park Ranger Update (4/7/15, Item 65B) A change in the landscape_ L.A.pdf Correspondence Communication received on the Park Ranger program on tonight's agenda. From: Martinez, Michele Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 2:22 PM To: Huizar, Maria Subject: Fwd: Park Ranger Update (4/7/15, Item 65B) FYI Sent from my Whone Begin forwarded message: From: "Ann Salisbury" <sannsalisbury@a,anail.com> To: "Martinez, Michele" <MiMartinezi Santa-ana.org> Subject: Park Ranger Update (4/7/15, Item 65B) Dear Council Member Martinez, Lawrence, Mark; Garcia, Jorge (CMO); Raya, As you know, on Tuesday, April 7th, the City Council will be receiving a report on the status of the Park Ranger program. This would be Item 65-B, "Park Security Update and Staff Recommendation to Ensure Continued Security." The title of the item alone demonstrates that despite Council's clear and emphatic direction, Management refuses to set aside its preferred alternative. The City should reject the staff proposal and maintain the status quo to move forward with Council's plan to hire new park rangers and terminate the existing Ca1PERS annuitant rangers as their replacements are hired. The Saturday after Council made its decision to maintain the Park Ranger program, an op-ed appeared in the Los Angeles Times discussing the results and benefits municipalities have seen when they have provided a patrol and enforcement team dedicated to their parks. That op-ed may be found at hitp://www.latimes.com/o inn ion/op-ed/la-oe-0208-guuinones-parlcs-gangs- 20150208-story.htrnl a e=1. (I have attached a copy as a pdf, but the online version is easier to read.) The staff report makes much of the fact that Ca1PERS has not responded to the City's letter regarding the employment of the existing park rangers. I believe this is a red herring. I understand from Steve McGuigan that if CaIPERS does not respond to the City's request to keep the CalPERS annuitants within 60 days, the failure to respond is deemed approval to keep them. I have not yet independently verified this, but perhaps the City Attorney could provide us with accurate facts on this point. I found it interesting that Mr. Raya's letter to CalPERS failed to explain that the Ca1PERS annuitants were only being employed long enough to train new recruits and would be let go once their replacements were hired and trained. Perhaps it was inadvertent oversight rather than a deliberate attempt to mislead Ca1PERS into denying the City's request. That the City has issued termination notices to the existing Park Rangers is of no matter. Such termination notices have been rescinded before and may be rescinded again. Using police overtime to fill the gap is fiscally imprudent regardless of any budget surplus, and those funds would be better spent by expediting the park ranger hiring process. Speaking of expediting the process, I have spoken with family members who work in law enforcement for other agencies, and they related that no desired hiring process takes six to nine months. In their experience, open peace officer positions are filled much more quickly. It would be useful to know, with actual data, how long the Police Department takes in hiring lateral officers and new graduates for its open positions. Because Management has not presented any persuasive reason for Council to deviate from its existing policy, Council should reject the staff recommendation and proceed with its existing policy and direction. Thank you for your consideration of this important issue. Sincerely, Ann Salisbury A change r landscape: L parks n longer belong'streetgangs Sycamore Grove Park At Sycamore Grove Park, the city put in new jungle gyms and installed workout equipment, so, without the presence of gang members, locals now have what amounts to a health club with no membership fee. (Joseph Daniel Fiedler / For The Times) Sam Quinones At Sycamore Grove Park in Highland Park a few weeks ago, I met a 32 -year-old bank teller named Uscolia Flores. She's lived most her life within walking distance of this 15 - acre park, which winds along between the 110 and Figueroa Street. FOR THE RECORD: Parks: A Feb. 8 Op -Ed about gangs and parks stated that Smith Park is in Alhambra; it is in San Gabriel. Back when Flores was in her teens, local gang members tools it over as a hangout. They congregated toward the back of the park in ever -larger groups, drinking beer and ready to face off with any rival who happened by. You never really knew what was going to happen. Most families avoided Sycamore Grove. Flores said she didn't visit the park for years. Gangs have receded from streets and public areas they once dominated.... In the region that invented the phenomenon, it's probably no longer correct to talk about 'street' gangs. Two weeks ago, however, she was there, watching her 4 -year-old play on a jungle gym. She and her son are beneficiaries of what can properly be called a revolution across Southern California. In the last few years, gangs have receded from streets and public areas they once dominated. Indeed, in the region that invented the phenomenon, it's probably no longer correct to talk about "street" gangs. Gangs still exist here. They're involved in drug trafficking, identity theft, smash-and- grab jewelry heists, burglaries. But the daily degradation and intimidation of whole neighborhoods — the carjackings, graffiti, shootings and, of course, the constant hanging out — is no longer central to how they operate. Parks are among the best places to size up the scope of this change. Roosevelt Park in Florence -Firestone; Smith Park in Alhambra; Patterson Park in Riverside; Salvador Park in Orange County; Plaza Park in San Bernardino; and the mother ship, MacArthur Park, west of downtown — all these and many more were notorious gang hangouts. Today they have been returned to their rightful owners: neighborhood residents like Flores and her son. For years, gangs in parks inflicted a special kind of torture on working-class neighborhoods. Residents were often crammed into houses or apartments that were too small. Respite at a nearby park was out of the question when the picnic tables were dominated by gang members with their beer cans and pit bulls. Now families flock there, and nearby houses are appreciating in value. It's a barely noticed yet radical change, and its benefits redound mostly to working-class families. This shift is important beyond providing access to more outdoor space. Parks were part of the primordial soup from which gangs emerged here. Parks were open areas where members could be the occupying force that police could not. Several gangs took their names from nearby parks. Establishing a presence in them added to a gang's reputation. Because members were out in the open, some parks became crime magnets — places where shootings happened and long-running feuds could erupt. In the 1990s, when the Mexican Mafia prison gang imposed a truce between feuding Latino gangs and instituted a system in which gang members "taxed" local drug dealers, the meetings happened in parks in Chino, San Bernardino, Santa Ana, South El Monte, Pacoima and Echo Park, to name a few. 00017,"M • @teacherinLA > Stop blaming cops. They deserve a lot of credit for this& often work in conjunction with ex-gangstas: http://news.sky.corn/story/1416260/la-gangs-join- forces-in-fight-against-killings "Andre Christian, a former member of the Grape Street branch of the Crips, says the Gang... ZeroDarkThirty at 5:34 PM February 12, 2015 Add a comment See all comments 21 After that, Latino gangs undertook a kind of ethnic cleansing in many of the surrounding neighborhoods, attempting to rid their areas of black people, whether they were affiliated with a gang or not. That terror was often spread at parks. Pacoima's Humphrey Boyz gang made the Hubert Humphrey Memorial Recreation Center — Humphrey Park, as it's known — off-limits to blacks for several years, according to residents and members of that gang I have interviewed. In Montecito Park, just across the 110 from Sycamore Grove, Avenues gang members staged assaults against black Highland Park residents; federal prosecutors convicted four of them of violating hate crime laws in 2006. Those days are gone. What changed? The business imperatives in the gang and drug-trafficking underworld, for one thing. The focus is now on making money. Tit-for-tat shooting feuds that were so much a part of street gang life attract police attention and are now frowned upon. Why risk business over petty street beefs? New families, with no gang connections, are moving into traditional gang areas as old families depart. Kids spend far more time indoors on the Internet and less time on the street. Better policing strategies are a big part of the story. Federal racketeering indictments and CompStat, the data analysis of crimes and where they happen, have proved effective. Gang injunctions have sent many gangs indoors or at least elsewhere. The Los Angeles Police Department also underwent a profound change over 20 years, embracing community policing and becoming more racially diverse. Officers now cultivate alliances and partnerships with residents in a way impossible to imagine a generation ago — and that combats much of what had atomized neighborhoods and allowed gangs to flourish. Officers have fostered neighbors' confidence in reporting crimes. They'll call a city crew to remove a discarded sofa. Other law enfocement has followed suit. In 2010, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department brought this philosophy to parks. It formed a bureau to take over patrolling of 174 parks around the county from the Office of Public Safety. Deputies were assigned specific parks. With accountability and consistent deputy presence, problem parks — in Lennox, Lynwood, Lancaster — are now safe for families. At Sycamore Grove Park, the city put in new jungle gyms a few years back. It also installed workout equipment, so, without the presence of gang members, locals now have what amounts to a health club with no membership fee. Still, I guess nothing comes for free. Sycamore Grove is also where you can see another unexpected effect of the absence of gangs: a rise in the number of homeless people. You can usually see a few guys pushing shopping carts along the park and sleeping on the grass at midday. Omnipresent street gangs kept rents low more effectively than any ordinance. Who'd pay market rates to live in a gang neighborhood? What landlord wanted to invest in a property while thugs lurked down the street? Now rents are on the rise in Highland Park, and so is homelessness. Uscolia Flores said that in the last three years, her mother-in-law's rent went from $600 to $989. "You get rid of one thing," she told me, as I was leaving, "but then you struggle with another." Sam Quinones is a journalist based in Los Angeles. His third book, 'Dreamland: The True Tale ofAmerica's Opiate Epidemic," comes out in April. Links