HomeMy WebLinkAbout31E - VARIANCE - 5105 W 1ST STREQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
APRIL 18, 2016
TITLE;
VARIANCE NO. 2016-02 TO ALLOW A
REDUCTION IN STREET FRONTAGE FOR
A NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT 5106
WEST FIRST STREET - GEORGE
BEHNAM, APPLICANT
(STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 3,2)
CITY M A R
RECOMMENDED ACTION
CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY:
,-,-e ;r
❑ As Recommended
❑ As Amended
❑ Ordinance on I" Readin
❑ Ordinance on 2tl0 Reading
❑ Implementing Resolution
❑ Set Public Hearing For
CONTINUED TO
FILE NUMBER
Receive and file the staff report approving Variance No. 2016 -02 as conditioned.
PLANNING C9MMISSiON ACTION
At its regular meeting on March 28, 2016 by a vote of 6:0 (Gartner absent), the Planning
Commission adopted a resolution approving Variance No, 2016 -02 as conditioned to allow the
reduction in street frontage for a new commercial building at 5105 West First Street located in the
General Commercial (C-2) zoning district, The Planning Commission made no changes to the
recommendation outlined in the attached staff report (Exhibit A).
The applicant Is proposing to demolish an existing 3,400- square -foot industrial building and
construct a two- story, 7,604-square-foot commercial center. The ground floor will consist of 4,695
square feet of floor area that will be divided Into two different uses, retail uses encompassing 3,200
square feet of floor area and medical offices encompassing 1,495 square feet of floor area, The
second level will consist of approximately 2,969 square feet that will be devoted to professional and
business office uses. The project will be in compliance with all applicable development standards
with the exception of the minimum street frontage standard, The architectural design of the
building is contemporary, with a combination of smooth stucco finishes, metal roofs, metal
louvers, decorative reveals and upgraded light fixtures used to convey a strong architectural
theme. Full -sized plans are available for public viewing in the Clerk of the Council Office,
Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to most Goal #3 - Economic [Development,
Objective #2 (create new opportunities for business /job growth and encourage private
development through new General Plan and Zoning Ordinance policies),
31 E -1
a April 6
Page
FISCA6 IMPAC T
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action,
Hassan Hdghani, AICP 7, -'
Executive Director
Planning & Building Agency
VF;rb
0 rapoiW VA 16.42 Huynh oommamW.aa
31 E -2
REQUEST FOR
Planning Commission Action
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE:
MARCH 28, 2016
TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING — FILED BY GEORGE BEHNAM
FOR VARIANCE NO. 2016 -02 TO ALLOW A
REDUCTION IN STREET FRONTAGE FOR A
NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT 5105 WEST
FIRST STREET {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 3,21
Prepared by Vince Fregoso
Execu e,kector
iILyawtr r s �rshl
PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY
APPROVED
13
As Recommended
•
As Amended
•
Set Public Hearing For
DENIED
•
Applicant's Request
•
Staff Recommendation
CONTINUED TO
Adopt a resolution approving Variance No. 2016 -02 as conditioned.
Request of Applicant
Planning Manager
Mr. George Behnam, on behalf of Henry and Nam Huynh, is requesting approval of a variance from
the required street frontage standard in order to allow the construction of a new two -story, 7,664 -
square -foot commercial building at 5105 West First Street. Specifically, the applicant Is requesting
relief from Section 41 -384 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), which requires all projects
within a commercial zoning district to have a minimum street frontage of 120 feet.
Project Location and Site Description
The Huynh commercial building is proposed to be constructed on a .49 acre, rectangular shaped
parcel of land located at 5105 West First Street, which is situated one parcel east of Euclid Street.
The parcel currently contains a 3,400- square foot structure occupied by a manufacturing use that will
be demolished to accommodate the new building. Land uses surrounding the project site include
multi - family residential to the north, south and east, and an AT &T data center and commercial uses to
the west and south (Exhibits 1, 2 and 3).
The General Plan land use designation for the site is General Commercial (GC). This land use
designation is developed with commercial uses that generate revenue for the City and support the
various land uses throughout the City. The parcel is located within the General Commercial (C2)
zoning district. The C2 zoning district allows commercial, retail and office uses such as the ones
proposed for this project, making the proposed use consistent with the zoning designation.
EXHIBIT A
31 E -3
Variance No. 2016 -02
March 28, 2016
Page 2
Proiect Description
The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing 3,400- square -foot building in order to construct a
two -story, 7,664 - square foot commercial center. The ground floor will consist of 4,695 square feet of
floor area that will be divided into two different uses: retail uses encompassing 3,200 square feet of
floor area and medical offices encompassing 1,495 square feet of floor area. The second level will
consist of approximately 2,969 square feet that will be devoted to professional and business office
uses. A total of 34 parking spaces are required for the office, retail and medical uses, with 34 spaces
to be provided for the project. The architectural design of the building is considered to be
contemporary, with a combination of smooth stucco finishes, metal roofs, metal louvers, decorative
reveals and upgraded light fixtures assisting in conveying a strong architectural design concept
(Exhibits 4 and 5).
Prolect Anaivsis
Variance requests are governed by Section 41 -638 of the SAMC. Variance requests may be granted
when it can be shown that there exists a special circumstance related to the property, such as size,
shape, topography, location or surroundings; that a variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of substantial property rights; that a variance will not be detrimental to the public or
surrounding property; or that a variance will not adversely affect the General Plan. if these findings
can be made, then it is appropriate to grant the variance. Conversely, the inability to make these
findings would result in a denial. Using this information, staff has prepared the following analysis,
which forms the basis for the recommendation contained in this report.
The applicant is proposing to obtain a variance from Section 41 -384 of the SAMC and reduce the
minimum lot size from 120 feet to 90 feet and allow the development of the proposed project. After
analyzing the proposal, staff is supportive of the applicant's request. The minimum street frontage
requirement is intended to ensure that a commercial development has adequate street frontage to
be a viable development with the potential for long -term success. It was found that many older
developments that had a narrower street frontage were less successful, had extensive tenant
turnover and a high vacancy rate due to minimal street visibility. This resulted in development sites
that were not maintained and generated an excessive amount of code enforcement contacts. To
address this concern, the commercial development standards were amended to require a minimum
street frontage.
The project site faces unique challenges created by its locational circumstances. The site shares
its western property line with an AT &T data center and its eastern property line with a 35 -unit
condominium complex. Both of those developments are well- established and have expressed no
intent to relocate, making the acquisition of additional land to meet the minimum street frontage
standard infeasible. Therefore, a unique circumstance exists related to the shape and location of
the parcel that necessitates the granting of a variance, thereby allowing the redevelopment of an
underutilized parcel of land that is located on a major arterial corridor. Further, the project will be in
compliance with all other development standards for a commercial project in the General
Commercial zoning district.
31 E -4
Variance No. 2016 -02
March 28, 2016
Page 3
Finally, the project will be consistent
example, the project is consistent with
Goal 2 (enhance the City's economic
integrity of the neighborhood).
Public Notification
with several goals and policies of the General Plan, For
Land Use Element Goal 1 (promote a balance of land uses),
and fiscal viability), and Goal 3 (improve the character and
The project site is located within the Riverview West Neighborhood Association. Staff has
contacted the association representative to discuss the project and identify any issues related to
the request. The project site was posted with a notice advertising this public hearing, a notice was
published in the Orange County Reporter, and mailed notices were sent to all property owners and
tenants within 500 feet of the project site. At the time of this printing, no correspondence, by
phone, written, or electronic, has been received from any members of the public.
CEQA Compliance
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt for
further review per Section 15061(b)(3). The general rule exemption allows projects to be exempt
from CEQA if it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may
have a significant effect on the environment. As the project will be in compliance with all provision of
the Municipal Code with the exception of the street frontage standard, and no adverse environmental
impacts will result from the variance, it has been determined that the project will not have an effect
on the environment. Statutory Exemption Environmental Review No. 2014 -110 will be filed for this
project.
Strategic Plan Alignment
Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal No. 3 Economic Development, Objective
No. 2 (create new opportunities for business /job growth and encourage private development through
new General Plan and Zoning Ordinance policies).
Conclusion
Based on the analysis provided within this report, staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve Variance No. 2016 -02 as conditioned.
Vincent Fregoso I
Principal Planne
VF:jm
Orepa(W VA 16 -02 Huynh commercial.032816.pc
31 E -5
Variance No. 2016-02
March 28, 2016
Page 4
Attachments:
Exhibit 1 — Vicinity Map
Exhibit 2 — Location Map
Exhibit 3 — Site Photo
Exhibit 4 — Site and Floor Plan
Exhibit 5 — Building Elevations
31 E-6
—I
Ct1V of
G urde Grova
AVE. L
S: R7 R2
'a R7 -� "I: JER'l , - R3
R2 1
Ri R2-1 RI
kt! n�
Rl
Al R2 R2
1= R'h
RI ;RI
I yl
�? III _I RI
0
a
='I Al ilrnullt 1,___�I II ax
LRt }I„
1
CZj C2 T
rIF51 Inns) AVE; I. y R2 -PRD
( y PROJECrSn a'I _l' .11 11 � 6
y I 1 I J M
I Il. Ii~ MI
CITY 1 R CI 'IL R II I II RI RbPRI
rRi Rl II II II� , RI ' R2
RI it R JI
4 1 d a n I —•—�� it I1_RA R3
R RI R1 RI RI ., ill I'`- -F —� R4 () R2
Rl
ni az I Rl nI —
Weslnln >inr�
,.:Rl I li+l y RI Ai Al pz R2..
G In+ AI Rt Rl RI E,
mrrvm r m
Al
CEEALACRRCULTURALI
CR
C%MAMEMALFiHDEMIAL
R1
SNCSEFAMILYRR"IHRTIAL
.B
FARQNGMODIECATION
CL;
GOVUHMENTCDM
FQ
TVOFAMILYff DERCE
GSM
ODMMEPJALSOUTH MAIN
Ml
UG{TINDUSMAL
m
MU01PEDMOTYMULiRE
Cl
COMMUNITYCOMM90AL
M2
NFAWINDUSRRAL.
FAMILYFESDEdCE
CI-MD
COMM, CCMMEMAUMU831M DISRRCT
MO
M10TARYOPERATIONS
RR
SJEREA.NAFARINIMTS
C2
GENIPALCOMMMAL
0
ORNGACE
FE
RESDDMALLWE
m
CWRALR1SNM
P
RZN"S"L
R)
S�mRCDevao MHVT
Ct•A
CSq TAL EJ9NE3EWMSTMUACi
FCD
PLANNE) COMMUNITYUBaOPMSRT
S'
S- IMFICRAN
CA
RANNE7 SiCFR R
NGCSm
FR
PLANNED PODERTIAL DEMS.CFMMT
CS
ARCERALCOMMffCAL
VA 2016 -2
l�r HUYNH COMMERCIAL BUILDING y
a 5105 WEST FIRST STREET — __ =500 FEET
P' =1000 FEET
P L_ ANN_ I_ N G A N D B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y
EXHIBIT 1
VIC?dtl�flQ71
IN L -F MILY :E R 51 E C
3RD STREET
2ND STREET
V
IN L w
A IIL
RE 3 I C E N C E :E
0
1 5 T
ER
MULTI
FAMILY
RESIDENCE
IRE�SID N ELY
F--
w
w
h
w
J
v
u�
MOBILE
COMM. HOME
PARK
I wi
MOBILE
HOME
PARK
'W w MULTI
CO MERCIAL COL' FAMILY
tA
RESIDENCE
STREET
VA 2016 -2
HUYNH COMMERCIAL BUILDING P
(p 5105 WEST FIRST STREET y�
P L A N N I N G A N D B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y
EXISTING LAND USE MAP
EXHIBIT 2
31 E -8
SI
G
E
u
FA
I
Y
w
2i
RI
SI
E
CE
2
0
2ND STREET
V
IN L w
A IIL
RE 3 I C E N C E :E
0
1 5 T
ER
MULTI
FAMILY
RESIDENCE
IRE�SID N ELY
F--
w
w
h
w
J
v
u�
MOBILE
COMM. HOME
PARK
I wi
MOBILE
HOME
PARK
'W w MULTI
CO MERCIAL COL' FAMILY
tA
RESIDENCE
STREET
VA 2016 -2
HUYNH COMMERCIAL BUILDING P
(p 5105 WEST FIRST STREET y�
P L A N N I N G A N D B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y
EXISTING LAND USE MAP
EXHIBIT 2
31 E -8
VA 2016 -2
HUYNH COMMERCIAL BUILDING
5105 WEST FIRST STREET
EXHIBIT 3
31 E -9
IiunnH naNaw aw V4
Jaia aoIdjo v lIViaa
I]3fOVJ
t..
a�3' 33 'J tl 1 Wy q A N
WVNH3 3
9a03�J
I u
wl
�I
i
I
<. ,.� ...,.o,. RUN �� 1
15 � N
K qr
U FFN
u
Z
N
15 /ally 'N
f1�71 r1
a
a
a
c
t-
a
LL
131 A. VIJ M5a14 Mkr r°M1 cm cr
a »ANNn lary eAvy °JNIOlU1B H01d30 g e i '. h F yy 4 0
a k• IdNhliH AaN3H'NW '8'71V13i!
dS a�aroue WVNH38 AS809 E, s3
Oil n
I;
� I
I �4
Z 7
LL
e
i
m-
i Q
7
F 6
W J '. Y
It o
'4 0,
m. EXHIBIT 5
1 E -11
Ls 03.28.16
RESOLUTION NO.2016 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING VARIANCE NO.
2016 -02 AS CONDITIONED TO ALLOW A REDUCTION IN
STREET FRONTAGE FOR THE HUYNH COMMERCIAL
BUILDING TO BE LOCATED AT 5105 WEST FIRST
STREET
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds,
determines and declares as follows:
A, The Applicant is requesting approval of Variance No. 2016 -02 to allow a
reduction in the minimum street frontage required for a commercial
development proposed at 5105 West First Street.
B. Pursuant to Section 41 -373 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), a
commercial property in the General Commercial (C2) zoning district is
required to have a minimum street frontage of 120 feet.
C. Variance No. 2016 -02 came before the Planning Commission of the City
of Santa Ana on March 28, 2016 for a duly noticed public hearing to
reduce the required street frontage to ninety (90) feet for the building to be
located at 5105 West First Street.
D. The Planning Commission determines that for Variance No. 2016 -02 the
following findings, which must be established pursuant to Santa Ana
Municipal Code (SAMC) Section 41 -638 in order to grant a variance from
the provision of the Santa Ana Municipal Code have been established:
1. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject
property, including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings,
the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the
subject property of privileges not otherwise at variance with the intent
and purpose of the provisions of this chapter.
The project site contains a special circumstance related to its
size, shape and location. Due to the unique location of the site
along a primary arterial street and its placement between two
established land uses, the built out conditions adjacent to the
parcel makes it infeasible for the applicant to obtain additional
land to meet the minimum street frontage standard.
Resolution No. 2016 -xx
31 E -12 Page 1 of 4
Therefore, denial of the variance would deprive the property
owner the privilege of utilizing the site to its maximum
potential.
2. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights.
The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of substantial property rights. The granting of
the variance would allow the property owner the opportunity to
demolish an outdated building and replace it with a new
commercial building with less than required street frontage.
3. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to surrounding property.
The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the
public or surrounding properties as the building and site have
been designed to comply with all applicable development
standards except for the minimum street frontage standard.
Further, off-site improvements will be provided to address
disabled accessibility issues from the public right -of -way to the
site. The proposed building will blend with the surrounding
buildings and will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to surrounding property.
4. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General
Plan of the City.
Finally, the project will not adversely affect the general plan in
any way as the land use designation of General Commercial
(GC) allows commercial uses such as medical office, retail
and professional office uses. Further, the project will be
consistent with Goals 1, 2 and 3 of the Land Use Element as
the project will promote a balance of land uses, will enhance
the City's economic and fiscal viability and will improve the
character and integrity of the neighborhood.
F. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the
recommended action has been reviewed through per Environmental
Review No. 2014 -110. It has been found that the project will not result in
any impact on the environment and is therefore exempt by the General
Rule provision of CEQA.
Section 2. The applicant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the
City of Santa Ana, its officials, officers, agents, and employees, from any and all liability,
claims, actions or proceedings that may be brought arising out of its approval of this
Resolution No, 2016 -xx
31 E -13 Page 2 of 4
project, and any approvals associated with the project, including, without limitation, any
environmental review or approval, except to the extent caused by the negligence of the
City of Santa Ana.
Section 3. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby
approves the variance for the project subject to conditions outlined in Exhibit A. This
decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which
includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission Action dated March
28, 2016, and exhibits attached thereto, and the public testimony, all of which are
incorporated herein by this reference.
ADOPTED this 28th day of March, 2016 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
By:
Lisa Storck
Assistant City Attorney
James Gartner
Chairperson
Resolution No. 2016 -xx
31E-14 Page 3of4
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, ROSA BARELA, Acting Recording Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the
attached Resolution No. 2016 -xx to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Santa Ana on March 28, 2016.
Date:
Acting Recording Secretary
City of Santa Ana
Resolution No, 2016 -xx
31 E -15 Page 4of4
EXHIBIT A
Conditions of Approval for Variance No. 2016 -02
Should the Planning Commission approve Variance No. 2016 -02 the approval is subject
to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with all
applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative
Code, the California Building Standards Code and all other applicable regulations.
The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below prior to
exercising the rights conferred by this variance.
The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the
life of the variance. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the
revocation of the variance.
A. Planning Division
1. All proposed improvements must conform to the Site Plan Review
approval of DP No. 2014 -35 and the staff report exhibits.
2. Any amendment to this variance must be submitted to the Planning
Division for review. At that time, staff will determine if administrative relief
is available or the variance must be amended.
3. There shall be no more than 3,200 square fleet of retail space and 1,495
square feet of medical office space at any time.
4. Landscaping, once installed, shall be maintained per the approved
landscape plan.
5. The site occupant shall be responsible for maintaining the premises free
from graffiti, including the side of the buildings adjacent to the railroad
tracks. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours.
Resolution No. 2016 -xx
31 E -1 6 Page 5 of 5