HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-07-23 SpecialMINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
JULY 23, 2013
CALLED TO ORDER SOUTHWEST SENIOR CENTER
2201 W. McFADDEN AVENUE
SANTA ANA, CA
4:37 P.M.
ATTENDANCE COUNCILMEMBERS Present:
MIGUEL A. PULIDO, Mayor (4:53 P.M.)
SAL TINAJERO, Mayor Pro Tern (5:16 P.M.)
ANGELICA AMEZCUA
P. DAVID BENAVIDES
MICHELE MARTINEZ
ROMAN A. REYNA
VINCENT F. SARMIENTO
COUNCILMEMBERS Absent:
None
STAFF Present:
KEVIN O'ROURKE, Interim City Manager
JOSE SANDOVAL, Chief Deputy City Attorney
MARIA D. HUIZAR, Clerk of the Council
Quorum was established thru presence of Councilmembers Amezcua, Benavides,
Martinez, Reyna, and Sarmiento.
MOTION: Elect Councilmember Amezcua as Chair (pursuant to SAMC 2-
101 due to unavailability of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tern).
MOTION: Martinez SECOND: Amezcua
VOTE: AYES: Amezcua, Benavides, Martinez, Reyna, and
Sarmiento (5)
NOES: None (0)
ABSTAIN: None (0)
ABSENT: Pulido, Tinajero (2)
MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING 1 JULY 23, 2013
PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
COUNCIL RECESSED to Conference Room for Closed Session discussion at 4:38 p.m.
PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
CLOSED SESSION ITEM
1 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT pursuant to Government Code Section
54957(b)(1)
Title: City Manager
Mayor Pulido left at 5:16 p.m. and did not return.
WORK STUDY SESSION
WS1 Santa Ana/Garden Grove Transit Vision Update - Cities of Santa Ana and
Garden Grove Transit Vsion and Go Local Project Concept
Presentation presented by Interim City Manager O'Rourke and Jason
Gabriel, Principal Civil Engineer
Why are we here?
Start a Conversation with the Mayor & City Council & Seek/Reaffirm
Policy Direction on:
1. City Adopted Transit Vision
2. Streetcar
3. Grade Separation
4. Expansion of the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center
SARTC)
5. Possible Relocation of OCTA Offices
6. 1-5 Freeway HOV Widening Project
Background
OCTA approved the "Go Local" program in 2006
City-initiated Transit Extensions to Metrolink
In 2008, Santa Ana/Garden Grove Submitted Fixed Guideway Project
Concept as Part of the Larger Transit Vision
Santa Ana's Transit Vision
A Streetcar
MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING 2 JULY 23, 2013
Expansion of the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center
SARTC)
Santa Ana Blvd. Grade Separation
City was awarded Funding to fully develop Project Concept
Whv Street Car?
Population density of 1.5 times L.A
5th most densely populated City in U.S.
17,380 residents per square mile
48,500 jobs per square mile
City, County, State & Federal offices and courthouses
SARTC average weekday visitor count is 2,995
Served by 18 OCTA bus routes
17.8% of households without a car
13.8% of residents use public transit
Historic Pacific Electric Railway route
A Streetcar is a destination in and of itself
Transit Leade r in Oranae Count
wmW 4.?u s
rr?p s
au ?tr
wi.wa s«.a ?u..-e..a.w.
Initial segment in Santa Ana
Potential future extension through Garden Grove
Would connect Anaheim & Garden Grove to Downtown Santa Ana and
the Civic Center
MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING 3 JULY 23, 2013
Alternatives Analyzed
Reduced Set of Alternatives Evaluated in Environmental Assessment
EA) / Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) (Nov 2012):
No Build
Transportation System Management (TSM)
o Changes to Existing OCTA Bus System
o Low Cost
Streetcar 1
Streetcar 2
Streetcar Alternatives
ToARC y:Metrollnk/
j""•Amtrak to
Los Angeles
Ga, en C-
NeqlonalTmnslt A Ana 3 7Conrsect- Station y,3 y?Galkge wnw.psw.ODISA
Future
Dow j
vN nrv 0Ci Ak11nric
GolrCourw
o.s c..w.o
r Civic
ommerc S RTC
v d i "?
srn N.Center un =
nntrHt t
Metrolink/
Amtrak to
San Diego
LEGEND
Streetcar 1
su-tcar 7
O Proposed Step
5wdy A.i,
W Ridership
TSM/Bus Streetcar Streetcar
1 2
1. Ridership projections for streetcar alternatives based on average of
high and low forecasts
Streetcar Economic Development Potential
MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING 4 JULY 23, 2013
In Portland, $3.5 billion was invested within 2 blocks of the initial
streetcar alignment
In Seattle, $2.4 billion in investment occurred within 3 blocks of the
streetcar line
Tampa gained $1 billion in investment within 3 blocks of its streetcar
line
Little Rock attracted $816 million in capital investment along its 3-mile
River Rail streetcar corridor within 10 years
Santa Ana/Garden Grove investment potential being evaluated as part
of the next phase of the project.
Preliminary analysis anticipates a similar level of investment as Little
Rock.
Streetcar Economic Development Potential
Cost Estimates
TSM/Best Bus' $16.4 $13.2 $1.5 $13.2 $14.7
Streetcar 1 $238.0 $4.9 $16.9 $4.9 $21.8
Streetcar 2 $257.0 $6.1 $18.4 $6.1 $24.5
1. All costs in millions
2. Annualized Costs are based on a 12-year bus and a 25-year streetcar
useful life per FTA depreciation schedule
3. Full cost, including previously funded phases, year of expenditure,
Cordoba Corporation, July 2013
4. Includes O&M costs for travel time improvements outside the study
area
Cost Comparison to Other Systems
With a pre-construction capital cost estimate of $47.5 million per mile, the
cost of the Santa Ana-Garden Grove system is on par with other streetcar
and BRT systems being planned and/or built:
Tucson's nearly completed streetcar cost $50.5 million/mile
Seattle's First Hill streetcar will cost $53.6 million/mile
MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING 5 JULY 23, 2013
Kansas City's streetcar is estimated to cost $50 million/mile
Portland's Lake Oswego extension will cost $59.3 million/mile
Anaheim's streetcar may cost $99.7 million/mile
The Hartford New Britain Busway is estimated to cost $60.9
million/mile*
San Francisco's Van Ness Avenue BRT system will cost $62.8
million/mile*
despite their relatively high costs, both of the BRT systems received
federal New Starts funding
Community Outreach Efforts
General community awareness campaign
Initiated Oct 2012
One-on-one & small group discussions with more than 30 groups:
Schools
Churches
Businesses
Service organizations
Neighborhood associations
More meetings planned
Focused Downtown Santa Ana business outreach
Initiated Nov 2011
Fixed Guide-Way tours
Property owners
Merchants
Arts Council
Door-to-door meetings with more than 234 business
representatives
Information provided in English & Spanish
MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING 6 JULY 23, 2013
Steps take & Immediate Actions Remaining:
To Date:
a) Go Local request by OCTA (2006)
b) City Proposal (2007)
c) OCTA funding to City for conceptual development (2008)
Moving Forward:
1) City Council - Information (7-16-2013)
2) City Council - SS / LPA & Environmental Status 7-23-2013 (first
time public interacts w/ full CC)
3) OCTA - Project Status to (August 2013)
4) Release Environmental (August 2013)
5) OCTA - Completion of Draft Environmental (September/October
2013)
6) City Council - Select LPA & Certify Environmental (November
2013)
7) OCTA - Confirm adoption of LPA & Environmental by City Council
December 2013)
Council Police Direction Needed
As Leaders in the County for the Regional Transit Vision, the City Council
needs to Advise Staff:
1. Do you Support the Proposed Project & Next Steps?
2. Owner/Operator goes to OCTA
Design & Construction
Operations & Maintenance ($5 - 6 million annually)
City Council made several general comments on proposed Streetcar
project, including: overwhelming support of proposed project; need to
have balanced distribution of transit funds i.e. highways, streets, etc.;
proposed Streetcar project would alleviate street traffic congestion;
OCTA's M-2 funds set aside for alternative modes of transportation;
evaluate alternative route drop off; staff to analyze tangible benefits to
City's economic development; study walkability component; City Council
supports OCTA as owner and operator of Streetcar; Council to promote
and encourage Countywide support of project.
MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING 7 JULY 23, 2013