HomeMy WebLinkAbout55E - RESO - STREETCAR ENVIR PLAN & DESIGNATE CM AS PROJ DIRECTORREQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
MAY 6, 2014
CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY:
TITLE: APPROVED
STREETCAR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW El
El
Recommended
PLAN AND COST PARTICIPATION BY
El Amended
OrOrdinance on 1" Reading
THE CITY FOR STREETCAR Ordinance on 2ntl Reading
OPERATIONS El Implementing Resolution
Set Public Hearing For
1; i
CITY MANAGER
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
CONTINUED TO
FILE NUMBER
Approve the Environmental Review and Public Outreach Plan.
2. Adopt a Resolution of Financial Support for Streetcar Operations in the amount of 10 percent
annually when operations begin in 2019 or thereafter.
3. Concur with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) that they become the lead
agency to advance the streetcar project to design, construction, and operations upon approval
of the environmental phase.
4. Designate the City Manager as the Project Director and City authority to interact and provide
direction to OCTA and to all related consultants.
DISCUSSION
Approval of the Environmental Review Plan and Public Outreach Plan as shown in Exhibit 1 would
provide staff with clear direction on how to best complete the project's environmental planning
phase, which is necessary to establish project readiness. The City has encouraged full
participation by the community, and the plan emphasizes an open and transparent public review
process to obtain local input and ensure City and community readiness for the streetcar.
Adoption of the attached Resolution shown as Exhibit 2 would help propel the project to the
design and delivery phase by providing Santa Ana's financial commitment for streetcar operations.
That commitment is important for the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to formalize
the project financial plan so that it can be advanced to design and construction.
Concurrence with the OCTA on becoming the lead agency for advancing the project will provide
the best option for successful delivery, since the OCTA is best suited and has the expertise to
serve as the project lead in the design, construction, federal grantee sponsor, lead contact, owner,
and operator of regional transportation projects including the streetcar. A letter to the OCTA
expressing such concurrence is shown in Exhibit 3.
55E -1
Streetcar Environmental Review Plan and
Cost Participation by the City for Streetcar Operations
May 6, 2014
Page 2
The OCTA Go Local Program was initiated in 2006 as a process to provide transportation options
which are conceived at the local level. That program is a partnership between OCTA and local
agencies, and the process was anticipated to foster local transit connectivity and extend the reach
of Metrolink. In addition, the process was a competitive one between local agencies to help
identify the best projects for funding consideration.
In 2007, the City of Santa Ana's streetcar project was one of two selected to proceed to a Step I
Feasibility Study which was completed in 2007. The streetcar was proposed as a partnership
between the Cities of Santa Ana and Garden Grove. While the project has been officially
identified as the Santa Ana - Garden Grove Fixed - Guideway, it is more easily recognized as simply
the "Streetcar." Although that partnership still exists today and is part of the project's planning and
environmental review, it is anticipated that the partnership will transform into a regional one as the
project moves through delivery and operations.
In fall 2009, OCTA and the City authorized development of an alternatives analysis and a draft
environmental impact report (DEIR). That effort received financial support by the City of Santa
Ana for approximately $1.1 million.
Today, the project's planning is nearly complete. The needs assessment was completed and
accepted by OCTA before the alternatives analysis and environmental documents were prepared
by the City's consultants. Those documents have been reviewed by City staff. The attached
memo from the project team to the City Manager, as shown in Exhibit 4, confirms completion of
alternatives analysis and DEIR. The City Manager will transmit the documents including a
statement of legal sufficiency to the OCTA via a letter shown in Exhibit 5.
Upon submittal, OCTA will also perform a final review and, thereafter, transmit the document to
the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). OCTA and the City anticipate that FTA will take two to
three weeks for its review, but there is no guarantee of that, and the FTA review could take even
several months. Nonetheless, the Environmental Review and Public Outreach Plan is ready, and
staff will immediately act upon it when the FTA releases the environmental documents for public
review.
COORDINATION WITH OCTA
In parallel to the project planning and environmental review described above, preparations by the
City and OCTA are taking place which will help advance the project to design and construction.
The plan involves 1) confirmation of policy decision by the local agency and OCTA that the project
can be best developed and delivered by OCTA; and 2) development and approval of a financial
plan to commit design, construction, and operation /maintenance funds for the project.
On May 5, 2014, the OCTA Executive Committee is expected to receive staff recommendations
to:
55E -2
Streetcar Environmental Review Plan and
Cost Participation by the City for Streetcar Operations
May 6, 2014
Page 3
1. Direct staff to develop a proposed project implementation plan for the Santa Ana - Garden
Grove Fixed - Guideway Project with OCTA serving as the lead agency.
2. Direct staff to develop a proposed financial plan to fund capital, operations, and maintenance
of the Santa Ana - Garden Grove Fixed - Guideway Project that is consistent with the
implementation plan, and maximizes the use of state and federal funding sources by
leveraging Measure M2 revenues.
The May 5, 2014 draft OCTA staff report to the Executive Committee is shown in Exhibit 6.
Thereafter, the OCTA Board is anticipated to support the same at the May 23, 2014 meeting.
CITY IMPLEMENTATION & FINANCIAL PLAN
The City of Santa Ana's plan is in alignment with OCTA's plan. The City staff recommendation
includes a request by the City that OCTA: 1) is best suited and has the expertise to serve as the
project lead in the design, construction, federal grantee sponsor, lead contact, owner, and
operator of the streetcar, and that the City, 2) Commit 10 percent funding (net of farebox) to the
streetcar operations.
A presentation with the above information was made to the Development and Transportation
Council Committee on April 28, 2014. The meeting was attended by the City's environmental
consultant and OCTA staff. The same presentation is being made to the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact at this time related to the staff recommendations. The fiscal impact
estimated to be $500,000 to $600,000 per year represents the City's share in the streetcar's
operations when operations are estimated to begin in 2019. It is anticipated that the Measure M
revenues would be reduced by this amount to cover the City's share. The economic activities
associated with business and development growth resulting from this project will be significant,
and the revenue generated from those activities will exceed the City's annual cost of participating
in the streetcar's ow-ations.
Edwin "William" Gall z, P.E.
Interim Executive Director
Public Works Agency
WG:Io
Exhibits: 1. Environmental Review & Public Outreach Plan
2. Resolution of Financial Support
3. City Request to OCTA on Streetcar Lead and Financial Commitment
4. City staff memo confirming Environmental Document Completion
5. Transmittal Letter by City to
6. OCTA staff report to the ExeotC3nmittee
55E -4
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PLAN & PUBLIC HEARINGS
TIMELINE PLAN
Days after
Release
0--5 Notifications
o File Notice of Availability with State Clearinghouse, send notices to interested agencies,
notify residents, property owners, and businesses within 500 feet of the project, note the
location where documents can be obtained /reviewed, and the date, time, and location of
public meetings.
5-50 45 -Day Public Review Period
Conduct three (3) Public Meetings which will be held at three different locations (east end
of the study area, center of the study area and west end of the study area) and at three
different times (one weekday evening, one weekday morning and one weekend
afternoon) for the convenience of the community and to provide multiple opportunities
for their participation.
Public Hearing #1 @ Goodwill Industries
Midweek evening approximately 10 days after release.
Public Hearing #2 @ Garfield CC or SARTC
Weekend afternoon approximately 15 days after release.
Public Hearing #3 @ PD Community Room
Midweek morning approximately 20 days after release.
50 -150 OCTA Board Milestone
o Presentation by City of Santa Ana and OCTA staff to seek OCTA Board approval of the
completion of the project's Draft Environmental document.
Final EA(EIR Document Preparation
Following the close of the 45 -day public review, collect and compile all comments that
have been received.
Prepare a documented response to each of these comments, modifying the EA /EIR where
appropriate.
Compile the Final EA /EIR incorporating all modifications, comments, and responses into
the administrative record of the EA /DEIR. This is necessary to ensure a legally defensible
EA /DEIR. As the federal lead agency, PTA will need to review and approve all response to
comments and modifications to the Final EA /EIR.
City Council Adoption of Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA)
City.Council Review /Certification of Final EIR
OCTA Board Milestone
o Presentation by OCTA / Santa Ana staff to OCTA Board seeking acknowledgement of EIR
completion and direction for advancing the project into Project Development.
Exhibit 1
55E -5
55E -6
RESOLUTION NO, 2014-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA COMMITTING TO FINANCIALLY SUPPORT
THE SANTA ANA - GARDEN GROVE STREETCAR
PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF 10 PERCENT NET OF
FAREBOX FOR THE COST OF STREETCAR
OPERATIONS
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana (City) is the fourth most densely populated city
in the United States with a large transit- dependent population; and
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana partnered with the City of Garden Grove to
participate in the OCTA Go Local Program initiated in 2006 as a process to provide
transportation options which are conceived at the local level; and
WHEREAS, that partnership between the City of Santa Ana and the City of
Garden Grove led to promoting the Santa Ana - Garden Grove Fixed Guideway, a
transportation system referred to as the "Streetcar' project; and
WHEREAS, in the fall of 2009, OCTA authorized development of alternatives
analysis and a draft environmental impact report (DEIR); and
WHEREAS, the Streetcar Project would provide "last mile" transportation for
individuals traveling from the transportation hubs to employment and activity centers in
the heart of Orange County, directly connecting Santa Ana travelers with many OCTA
bus routes and the Garden Grove International West tourist corridor: and
WHEREAS, the City supports the development of a cohesive and connected
regional network between the City Santa Ana and the City of Garden Grove, and with
the entire Orange County region; and
WHEREAS, the Streetcar Project will serve Santa Ana's historic downtown area,
including government offices; federal, state, and local courthouses; unique restaurants
and shops; the artists' village, several colleges, and a variety of community enrichment
organizations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Garden Grove resolved on January
28, 2014 to be a supporting partner of the Streetcar with Santa Ana and OCTA, and
underlines its interest to participate in the Project as approval and funding is secured;
and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared an Alternatives Analysis which investigates
possible transit options and identified three feasible alternatives that include a modern
streetcar transit route from Santa Ana to Garden Grove; and
Exhibit 2 Resolution No. 2014 -
Page 1 of 3
55E -7
WHEREAS, the City has prepared a draft environmental impact report to
investigate all impacts that could be attributed to the streetcar construction and
operations; and
WHEREAS, OCTA staff is recommending to their Executive Committee and to
their Board to develop a proposed financial plan to fund capital, operations, and
maintenance of the Streetcar Project that is consistent with maximizing the use of state
and federal funding sources by leveraging Measure M2 revenues; and
WHEREAS, adopting this Resolution would help propel the project to the design
and delivery phase by extending Santa Ana's financial commitment for streetcar
operations which is important for OCTA to formalize the project financial plan.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
The City Council of the City of Santa Ana commits to a ten percent (10 %)
annual net of farebox financial participation in the Streetcar operations,
estimated at $500,000 to $600,000 annually.
2. The City Council designates the City Manager as the Project Director and City
authority to interact and provide direction to OCTA and to all related City
consultants.
ADOPTED this day of May 2014.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
Jose Sandoval
Chief Assistant City Attorney
Miguel A. Pulido
Mayor
55E -8
Resolution No. 2014 -
Page 2 of 3
AYES:' Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, MARIA D. HUIZAR, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached
Resolution No. 2014 -XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the
City of Santa Ana on
Date:
Clerk of the Council
City of Santa Ana
55E -9
Resolution No. 2014 -
Page 3 of 3
55E -10
MAYORMigual A. Pulido
MAYOR PRO TEM
sal Tinalero
COUNCILMEMSERS
Angelica Amezcw
P. David Benavides
Michele Martinez
Roman Rama
Vincent F. Sarmienta
May XX, 2014
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 Civic Center Plaza • P.O. Box 1985 M -21
Santa Ana, California 92702
vmw santa-ana om
Darrell Johnson
Chief Executive Officer
Orange County Transportation Authority
600 South Main Street
Orange CA, 92863
Dear Mr. Johnson,
CITY MANAGER
David Cavazos
CITY ATTORNEY
Sonia R. Cmvalho
CLERK OF THE COUNCIL
Mane D. Huizar
As you are aware, the Cities of Santa Ana and Garden Grove, in coordination with the
Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), have been working on the
development of the Santa Ana - Garden Grove Fixed- Guideway Project (Project). The
Project is nearing completion of two major milestones as Identified In the cooperative
agreement: the Alternatives Analysis and State and Federal environmental clearance. In
anticipation of these significant milestones and the desire to continue to advance the
project for further engineering, the Santa Ana City Council recently approved the
following in regard to future implementation and funding of the Project:
Request that OCTA serve as the lead agency for design, construction, federal
grantee sponsor, lead contact with FTA, owner and operator; and
Commit a 10 percent (net of farebox) local match to fund operations
It is my understanding that the City's position on implementation and funding is
consistent with OCTA's ongoing policy development work. As OCTA develops the
project implementation and funding plans, the City of Santa Ana looks forward to
continued partnership and collaboration in this effort,
Please contact me at XX if you have questions or would like additional Information.
Sincerely,
David Cavazos
City Manager
Exhibit 3
55E -11
55E -12
i /is i`77:iITi
To: David Cavazos, City Manager
From: Edwin "William" Galvez, P.E.
Interim Executive Director
Date: May 1, 2014
Subject: COMPLETION OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL FOR THE STREETCAR
The undersigned team is pleased to submit to you the Environmental Assessment /Draft Environmental
Impact Report (EA/DEIR) for the Santa Ana - Garden Grove Fixed Guideway Project (Streetcar) for your
approval and subsequent transmittal to Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). OCTA, as
the project's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) lead agency, is responsible to transmit the
EA/DEIR to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA).
Included as appendices to the EA/DEIR are several technical reports which both the City of Santa Ana
and OCTA's Project Management Oversight consultant team have thoroughly reviewed. Based on our
reviews, the documents are complete and accurate.
The EA/DEIR also underwent legal sufficiency review by our City's legal counsel. Therefore, it is our
recommendation that the documents are ready to be forwarded to OCTA, and subsequently to FTA, for
an expeditious review. We will release the EA/DEIR for public review when FTA clears the document
for release, tentatively in May 2014.
Edwin "William" Galvez
Interim Executive Director
Public Works Agency
Catherine Higley
Consultant Project Manager
Cordoba Corporation
Jason Gabriel
Principal Engineer
Public Works Agency
Ryan Hodge
Assistant City Attorney
City of Santa Ana
Exhibit 4
55E -13
55E -14
MAYOR
Miguel A. Pulido
MAYOR PRO TEM
Sal Tirejero
COUNCILMEMBERS
Angelica Amezcua
P. David Benavides
Michele Martinez
Roman Rayne
Vincent F. Sarmlento
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 Civic Center Plaza + P.O. Box 1988 M -21
Santa Ana, California 92702
Sincerely,
David Cavazos
City Manager
c: Mayor and Council
City Manager
SANTA ANA CITY COUNCIL
CITY MANAGER
David Cavazos
CITY ATTORNEY
Sonia R. Carvalho
CLERK OF THE COUNCIL
Marla D. Huizar
mpact Report
insmittal to the
ilestone in the
en Grove, and
the past four
ighly reviewed
tant team. The
legal counsel.
accurate and
EIR for public
A for all of the
ok forward to
ighout Orange
nation Center
Miguel A- Puiid. Sal 7inaforo j Vinoonl R Sormienal MirW.MaNnez I AngelicaAmezcua P. David Benavides Roman Rayne
Mayor Mayer Pro Tem, Ward6 Ward Wam2 Ward3 Wam4 Womb
Mpylgtr senteana Qg IpgJaga t VSarm's Santa- a.a.rg MMarlrae ®aenta- o6e.ra AAmezr alrII La PByp pJdepaypa g g Ll RRe rN 1
55E -16
May 5, 2014 OCTA STAFF REPORT TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
May 5, 2014
TO; Executive Committee
From: Darrell Johnson, Chief Executive Officer
subject: Fixed-Guideway Policy Decisions Overview
Overview
On April 22, 2013, staff presented an overview of the anticipated Orange County
Transportation Authority Board of Directors' actions required to advance the
Measure M2 Project S fixed - guideway projects, consistent with federal funding
guidelines. Given the Santa AnatGarden Grove Fixed-Guirleway Project's
upcoming milestone completion and advancement Into engineering, staff Is
seeking Board of Directors' direction to develop an implementation and funding
plan for the project.
Recommendations
A. Direct staff to develop a proposed project implementation plan for the
Santa Ana/Gailden Grove Fixed Guideway Project with the Orange County
Transportation Authority serving as the lead agency.
6, Direct staff to develop a proposed financial plan to fund capital,
operations, and maintenance of the Santa AnalGarden Grove
Fixed - Guideway Project that is consistent with the Implementation plan
and maximizes the use of state and federal funding sources by
leveraging Measure M2 revenues.
Background
In April 2013, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Board of
Directors (Board) was presented with an outline of policy and technical
decisions necessary to advance the two fixed-guideway projects currently
under development as part of the Measure M2 (M2) Project S, Transit
Extensions to Metrolink Program: the Anaheim Rapid Connection (ARC) and
the Santa AnatGarden Grove (SA/GG) Fixed-Guideway projects. As discussed
with the Board, further development of the Project S program requires
Orange Cm ty Truperfahm Amdwfly92863-15841(714)560-=TAi6283)
Exhibit 6
55E -17
Fixed-Guideway Policy Decisions Overview Page 2
consideration of two significant policy decisions: project Implementation and
funding.
Both the ARC and SA/GG Fixed-Guideway projects are progressing towards
environmental clearance. The cities of Santa Ana and Garden Grove anticipate
Completing the environmental phase In fall 2014, while the City of Anaheim is
expected to complete environmental work In late 2015. Updated decision
diagrams for each project are provided to depict progress in the project
development process and the decisions necessary to advance (Attachment A).
The varied progression of each of the fixed-guideway projects will require
policy decisions to be made initially for the SAIGG Fixed-Guideway Project.
Staff anticipates that these policy decisions will set the framework for future
discussions on policy decisions for the ARC project. When the ARC project
approaches environmental clearance in late 2015, staff will evaluate in a similar
fashion the policy decisions in context of the ARC project
In anticipation of the cities of Santa Ana and Garden Grove's completion of the
alternatives analysis and environmental milestones and request to advance the
project into engineering, OCTA Is prepared to Identify roles and responsibilities
and develop a financial plan to implement the WGG Fixed-Guideway Project.
Discussion
Advancement of the SA/GG Fixed-Guideway Project into the engineering
phase requires OCTA to develop a project management plan (PMP)
conforming with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) guidance, clearly
delineating roles and responsibilities for the delivery and operations of a transit
project, Should OCTA pursue FTA New Starts funds, FTA will approve the
PMP; therefore, it is prudent planning to ensure consistency with FTA
guidance.
The PMP needs to demonstrate the capability and capacity of the
implementing agency to put in place the resources to manage and undertake
design and construction, and secure any needed funding. Two significant
policy decisions need to be considered for the PMP:
Implementation
o Lead agency for design and construction
o Owner of the system and Its assets
o Federal granteelsponsor and lead contact with FTA
o Owner, operator, and maintainer of the system
Funding
o A sustainable and viable financial plan for capital, and
operations and maintenance
55E -18
Fixed - Guideway Policy Decisions Overview Page 3
Project Implementation
Consistent with the intent of M2 Project S, the cities of Santa Ana and
Garden Grove have served as the lead in the planning efforts for the
fixed- guideway project to foster a locally driven project that expands the reach
of the backbone rail service. This allowed for maximum local input on planning
and alternatives to develop a project that best met the transit needs of the
communities.
The next phase of project development, engineering, and design, requires the
Implementing agency to have the necessary experience and technical
expertise to deliver FTA grant-funded projects. This criterion has long been
communicated by FTA and was evident in its support of OCTA serving as
grantee even at the Inception of the program. OCTA has a well- respected,
long- standing reputation within the united States Department of Transportation
as having demonstrated the capacity to successfully manage and deliver
capital projects on schedule and under budget. For be cities of Santa Ana and
Garden Grove to achieve a level of technical capacity acceptable to FTA would
take a significant amount of resources and time, resulting in schedule impacts.
Prior discussion with FTA and input from industry experts indicates that the
highest likelihood of success for project Implementation and federal funding
would be for OCTA to serve as the lead agency. Staff is requesting Board
direction to develop an Implementation plan for the SAIGG Fixed- Gukieway
Project with OCTA serving in lifts role. Preliminary discussions with cities of
Santa Ana and Garden Grove staff also indicate a desire for OCTA to serve as
lead agency. This decision will be fully vetted through the Santa Ana City
Council in the next month.
Staff Will model the implementation plan on FTXs PMP guidelines and
structure for consistency in addressing organizational, technical, and financial
capacity to deliver the project, and will return to the Board to seek input and
approval of the plan.
A recommendation on the implementing lead agency for the ARC project will
be brought to the Board for consideration when the project moves closer to
environmental approval.
Funding Plan
Consistent with OCTA's standard financial planning practices, a
comprehensive business plan that demonstrates the SAtGG Fixed - Guideway
Project cash flow for both capital and ongoing operations and maintenance is
required to make project decisions. Staff is seeking Board direction to develop
a viable and sustainable financial plan for the SA/GG Fixed - Guideway Project.
55E -19
Fixed-Guideway Policy Decisions Overview Page 4
The following factors would form the parameters in the development of this
plan:
The Local sales tax revenue from M2 Project S is anticipated to provide
1.3 billion in funding over the life of M2 and would need to take into
account funding needs for other Project S-eligible projects, Including, but
not limited to, ARC and the rubber-tire projects (Attachment B).
The M2 ordinance states that "The Authorlty shall make every effort to
maximize state and federal funding for Transit Projects," (Attachment C).
Prior Board direction that the SAIGG Fixed - Guideway Project remain
eligible for the FTNs New/Small Starts Program.
Additionally, when evaluating the potential funding strategies, staff will consider
the desire to deliver the benefits of the projects In the most expeditious manner
possible while ensuring the most prudent use of M2 funds and leveraging its
use to maximize state and federal funding sources. To support this effort, the
New and Small Starts development processes (Attachment D) and funding
requirements will be consulted and the timetrames refined as the funding plan
Is developed.
summary
Staff will return to the Board within the next quarter with a proposed
implementation plan for the SAIGG Fixed - Guideway Project with OCTA as the
Implementing lead agency, as well as with a proposed financial plan that
addresses the funding needs for both capital and ongoing operations and
maintenance of the SAJGG Flied- Guideway Project.
Attachments
A. Fixed - Guideway Program: Decision Flow Diagrams
B. Measure M2 Project S Description
C, Measure M2 Ordinance Transit Projects Funding Language
D. Draft Timeline: Santa Ana/Garden Grove Fixed-Guideway Project
Prepared by: Approved by:
Kelly Hart Jim Bell, P.E.
Project Manager Executive Director, Capital Programs
714) 560-5725 (714) 560-5646
55E-20