Laserfiche WebLink
RCS: ar <br />4/29/77 <br /> <br />ORDINANCE NO. NS-1365 <br /> <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />APPROVING AMENDMENT APPLICATION N0.763 <br />TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN MAC- <br />ARTHUR BOULEVARD AND SUNFLOWER AVENUE, RAITT <br />AND BEAR STREETS FROM THE R1-PRD TO THE SD <br />(SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT, AMENDING <br />SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 35-5-10, AND ADOPTING <br />SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN 97 <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the real property located generally be- <br />tween MacArthur Boulevard and Sunflower Avenue, Raitt and <br />Bear Streets and more particularly described on exhibit <br />AA 763-A on file in the records of the Planning Director, <br />is located in the R1-PRD (Planned Residential Development) <br />District, and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, an application has been filed by C. H. <br />Segerstrom and Sons to amend Sectional District Map 35-5-10 <br />to rezone such property to the SD (Specific Development) <br />District, and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has given notice <br />of and on March 14, 1977 duly held a public hearing on Amend- <br />ment Application 763 to rezone such property from the R1- <br />PRD (Planned Residential Development) District to the SD <br />(Specific Development) District and has recommended approval <br />of such application, and it has considered Specific Develop- <br />ment Plan ~7 for the subject property, a copy of which is <br />on file with the Clerk of the Council, and has recommended <br />approval of such specific development plan, and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council regularly held a public <br />hearing on said reclassification and said specific develop- <br />ment plan and published the notice required by law and does <br />now find that the public necessity, convenience and general <br />welfare require that said property be reclassified from the <br />R1-PRD (Planned Residential Development) District to the <br />SD (Specific Development) District, and that the new classif- <br />ication will not be detrimental to the surrounding property, <br />and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council finds that Specific De- <br />velopment Plan 97, consisting of standards and regulations, <br />will be in keeping with the neighborhood and will not be <br />detrimental to the harmonious development of the city or <br />impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the <br />neighborhood, and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, prior to taking this action, the City <br />Council has reviewed and considered the information contained <br />in that Environmental Impact Report designated as "Environ- <br />mental Impact Report 76-4," has approved said document as <br />the final environmental impact report for the project on <br />the subject property, and finds that social and economic <br />conditions render infeasible the alternative of retaining <br />the property in the present land use designation, <br /> <br /> <br />