|
501
<br />
<br /> Council Chamber
<br /> Santa Ana City Hall
<br /> August 1, 1960 7:30 P.M.
<br />
<br />City Council met in regular session.
<br />Meeting called to order by the Mayor.
<br />
<br />Present: Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Dale H. Heinly,
<br /> Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall
<br />Absent: Councilmen Stanley C. Gould, Jr.
<br />
<br />The Pledge of Allegiance was given.
<br />
<br />Invocation was given by Reverend F. W. Niedringhaus, Congregational Church.
<br />
<br />Each member of the City Council having received copies of the Minutes of
<br />July 18, 1960 and July 22, 1960, reading of the Minutes was dispensed with
<br />and ~pproved on motion of Councilm~u Hubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried.
<br />
<br />Reso.No.60-143
<br />No Parking Zones
<br />Delhi Road btn Harbor Blvd.
<br />Greenville St.; and north
<br />side btn Greenville St.
<br />~nd Raitt Street
<br />
<br />Hearing
<br />Amend.Appl.No.311
<br />Greschner-Rabec
<br />Ordinance
<br />
<br />Hearing
<br />Amend .Appl .No. 31R
<br />James A. Freeman
<br />
<br />This being the date set for hearing on the establishing of "No Parking' Zones on
<br />Delhi Road on both sides, between Harbor Boulevard and Greenville Street, and on the
<br />north side between Greenville Street and Raitt Street; no protests were received and
<br />the hearing was closed. The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the
<br />Resolution, on motion of Councilman Heinly~ seconded by Hubbard and carried, the
<br />following Resolution entitled:
<br />
<br /> "Resolution No. 60-143 prohibiting parking on both sides of Delhi
<br /> Road between Harbor Boulevard and Greenville Street and on the
<br /> north side between Greenville and Raitt Streets"
<br />
<br />was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Dale H.Heinly, Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall
<br />Noes, Councilmen None
<br />Absent, CounciLmen Stanley C. Gould, Jr.
<br />
<br />This being the date set for hearing on Amendment Application No. 311, filed by
<br />Greschner-Rabec and Rabec, Inc., amending Sectional District ~p ll-5-10, to reclas-
<br />sify fr~n M-1 to C-1 District, property on the north side of West First Street, begil
<br />ning at a point 90h feet east of the center line of Sullivan Street, thence easterly
<br />150 feet along the center line of West First Street, thence northerly 200 feet from
<br />the surMey center line of First Street, thence westerly 150 feet, thence southerly
<br />200 feet to the point of beginning; no protests were received and the hearing was
<br />closed. On motion of CounciLman Hubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried, the follow.
<br />lng 0r~inance entitled:
<br />
<br /> "Ordinance amending Article IX of the Santa Ana Municipal Code
<br /> to change district classification on Amendment Application
<br /> No. 311 and amending Sectional District Map ll-5-10"
<br />
<br />was lntroduced~ considered and placed on file for second reading.
<br />
<br />This being the date set for hearing on Amendment Application No. 312, filed by
<br />
<br />James A. Freeman, amending Sectional District Map 1-5-10, to reclassify from R-1 and
<br />R-2 Districts to C-1-PK District, property bounded on the north by the south line of
<br />Lots 22, 23, 22, and 25, of Tract 1572, on the west by Bristol Street, on the east
<br />by a line approximately 240 feet east of the center line of Bristol Street, and on ti
<br />south by a line approximately 215 feet north of the center line of 17th Street.
<br />~ag-~ss~e~-~ee®~me~e~-~a~. Cce~nunication was presented from Attorney
<br />Philip J. Reilly, representing a group of property owners opposing the Amendment
<br />Application filed by James A. Freeman, and requested continuance of the hearing until
<br />August 15, 1960. Attorney Theodore J. Beall).representing the applicant, objected
<br />to the continuance, and stated his client is being deprived of the use of the proper~
<br />Councilman Heinly stated that as a matter of courtesy continuances are generally
<br />granted in such matters, but a hearing would not be denied at this time if ~r. Beall
<br />desired to be heard. Attorney Beall withdrew his opposition and agreed to the con-
<br />
<br />tinuation until August 15, 1960. On motion of Councilman Heinly, seconded by Hubba~
<br />and carried, the hearing was continued to August 15, 1960.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|