Laserfiche WebLink
ORDINANCE NO. NS- 2892 <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />SANTA ANA REZONING THE HERITAGE PROPERTY <br />LOCATED AT 2001 EAST DYER ROAD FROM LIGHT <br />INDUSTRIAL (M -1) TO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 88 <br />(SD -88) (AA NO. 2014 -04) AND ADOPTING SPECIFIC <br />DEVELOPMENT NO. 88 (SD -88) FOR SAID PROPERTY <br />THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS <br />FOLLOWS: <br />Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana does hereby find, determine <br />and declare as follows: <br />A. Amendment Application No. 2014 -04 has been filed with the City of Santa <br />Ana to change the zoning district designation of certain real property located <br />at 2001 East Dyer Road from Light Industrial (M -1) to Specific Development <br />No. 88 (SD -88). The Specific Development No. 88 zoning district (SD -88) <br />would allow the development of The Heritage mixed -use development <br />project, which would include 1,221 apartment homes, 12,675 square feet of <br />retail commercial space, and 5,415 square feet of restaurant space on an <br />18.84 acre parcel of land. <br />B. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed <br />public hearing on October 12, 2015, on Amendment Application No. 2014- <br />04 and decided to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance <br />approving Amendment Application No. 2014 -04, which is consistent with the <br />General Plan, as amended by General Plan Amendment No. 2015 -03. <br />C. This City Council, prior to taking action on this ordinance, held a duly noticed <br />public hearing on February 2, 2016. <br />D. The City Council also adopts as findings all facts presented in the Request <br />for Council Action dated February 2, 2016 accompanying this matter. <br />E. For these reasons, and each of them, Amendment Application No. 2014 -04 <br />is hereby found and determined to be consistent with the General Plan of <br />the City of Santa Ana and otherwise justified by the public necessity, <br />convenience, and general welfare. <br />Section 2. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information <br />contained in Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2015 -01 prepared with respect to this <br />project. The City Council has, as a result of its consideration of the record as a whole and <br />the evidence presented at the hearings on this matter, determined that, as required <br />Ordinance No. NS -2892 <br />Page 1 of 5 <br />