Laserfiche WebLink
would not be impacted with the high groundwater levels and they would readily provide <br />ample lateral capacity needed for seismic design. Pile driving impact is considered to be <br />a manageable risk and is probably the most cost effective solution. <br />Pertinent recommendations for design and construction of the proposed alternative i.e <br />driven pile foundation system are presented in the following sections: <br />Pile Recom mendations: <br />New proposed Sanctuary building may be supported by either l4-inch or 16-inch square <br />pre-cast pre-stressed concrete piles with grade bearns. <br />Axial capacities of the driven piles were calculated using the State of the Art and the <br />latest computer program APILE version 2015 .7 .8 (A program for the analysis of the axial <br />capacity ofdriven pile), developed by Ensoft, Inc. <br />The allowable axial capacity curves in compression and in tension as a function of pile tip <br />depths below the ground surface are presented on Figures E-l and E-3 in Appendix E for <br />static and live load conditions. These capacity curves include safery factors of 2.0 for <br />compression and 2.0 for tension. The allowable axial capacity in compression can be <br />increased by 33% for dead load, live load and transient loads such as seismic or wind <br />loads. The allowable uplift and lateral capacities, however, are not recommended to be <br />increased. Figure E-2 and E-4 presented on Appendix E are the axial load versus <br />settlement curves for compression and tension respectively. <br />It should be noted that the pile capacities shown are based on soil strengths alone. The <br />actual capacities may be limited to lesser values by the strength of pile materials and <br />connectlons <br />22 <br />ProJect No. D-3885-06 <br />Christ Our Savior Catholic Parish <br />Pile Axial Capacify <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />u <br />n <br />T <br />t <br />I <br />T <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />n <br />I <br />I