My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014 W Hemlock Way & Unit #2 - Plan
PBA
>
Building
>
ProjectDox
>
H
>
Hemlock Way
>
2014 W Hemlock Way Unit# 2
>
2014 W Hemlock Way & Unit #2 - Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2026 5:02:58 AM
Creation date
2/13/2026 5:01:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan
Permit Number
101121890
Full Address
2014 W Hemlock Way Unit# 2
Street Number
2014
Street Direction
W
Street Name
Hemlock
Street Suffix
Way
Unit Number
2
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 4 <br /> <br /> <br />SMs = FaSs = 1.551 (for the short period of 0.2 second) <br />SM1 = FvS1 = null* (for the 1-second period) <br /> <br />• Design Spectral Response Accelerations: <br /> <br />SDs = 2/3 SMs = 1.034 (for the short period of 0.2 second) <br />SD1 = 2/3 SM1 = null* (for the 1-second period) <br /> <br />• PGA = 0.553 <br /> <br />*Please see ASCE 7-16, Section 11.4.8. <br /> <br />Please see APPENDIX C for additional seismic parameters, as needed. <br /> <br />Note: In general, the structural consultant of record for this project should review the <br />seismic parameters provided in this report and the 2022 CBC to evaluate the seismic <br />design. Final selection of design coefficients should be made by the structural consultant <br />based on the local laws and ordinances, expected structure response, and the desired level <br />of conservatism. <br /> <br />The civil/structural design engineer should consult with the project geotechnical <br />consultant, if additional geotechnical information is needed for structural seismic design. <br /> <br />Faults <br /> <br />No active faults are known to exist within or near the site. The probability of primary <br />surface rupture or deformation at the site is, therefore, considered very low. <br /> <br />The site is not designated to be located within the Special Studies/Earthquake Zone under <br />the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Act. <br /> <br />Liquefaction Potential <br /> <br />As previously mentioned, for conservative purposes, the subject site is assumed to be <br />subject to the liquefaction. Therefore, the owner(s) of this property should be aware of <br />the risks associated with the potential liquefaction such as structural distress due to the <br />potential differential settlement caused by the potential liquefaction. <br /> <br />As previously mentioned, for conservative purposes, a strengthened / stiffened <br />foundation system (having thicker slabs with more reinforcements and deeper and <br />wider footings with more reinforcement as recommended in this report) should be <br />used for support of the proposed structure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.