Laserfiche WebLink
November 18, 2025 <br />58.0 -ft Monoeucalyptus Structural Analysis Fairview Business Park (CLL01580) <br />TEP Project Number 353924.1184090 Page 4 <br /> <br />3) ANALYSIS PROCEDURE <br /> <br />Table 2 - Documents Provided <br />Document Remarks Source <br />Tower and Foundation <br />Design <br />Larson, dated July 17, 2019 <br />Job No. UR19272 M Squared <br />Previous Structural <br />Analysis <br />GPD, dated September 28, 2021 <br />Project No. 2021723.21.195375.01 M Squared <br />Construction Drawings M Square Wireless, dated November 4, 2025 <br />Project No. 12844670 M Squared <br />Mount Analysis TEP, dated November 8, 2025 <br />TEP No. 353924.1184084 TEP <br />RF Data Sheet AT&T RFDS-34994, dated September 26, 2025 M Squared <br />Correspondence Correspondence in reference to the existing, proposed, and reserved <br />loading. M Squared <br /> <br /> 3.1) Analysis Method <br /> <br />tnxTower (version 8.3.1.2), a commercially available analysis software package, was used to create a <br />three-dimensional model of the tower and calculate member stresses for various loading cases. <br />Selected output from the analysis is included in Appendix A. <br /> <br /> 3.2) Analysis Assumptions <br /> <br />1) The tower and foundation were built and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s <br />specification. <br />2) The configuration of existing antennas, transmission cables, mounts and other appurtenances <br />are as specified in the previous structural analysis. <br />3) Unless specified by the client or tower mapping, the location of the existing and proposed coax is <br />assumed by TEP and listed in Table 1. <br />4) All tower components are in sufficient condition to carry their full design capacity. <br />5) Serviceability with respect to antenna twist, tilt, roll, or lateral translation, is not checked and is <br />left to the carrier or tower owner to ensure conformance. <br />All antenna mounts and mounting hardware are structurally sufficient to carry the full design <br />capacity requirements of appurtenance wind area and weight as provided by the original <br />manufacturer specifications. It is the carrier’s responsibility to ensure compliance to the structural <br />limitations of the existing and/or proposed antenna mounts. TEP did not perform a site visit to <br />verify the size, condition or capacity of the antenna mounts and did not analyze antennas <br />supporting mounts as part of this structural analysis report. <br /> <br />This analysis may be affected if any assumptions are not valid or have been made in error. TEP should <br />be notified to determine the effect on the structural integrity of the tower. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />